20180231 Ver 1_401 Application_20180218

O�O� W A7FR9
a o180)33
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
❑Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit
Corps:
umber:1
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 (non -reporting) or General Permit (GP) number.-
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Oak Hollow Lake Shoreline Repair
2b.
County:
Guilford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
City of High Point
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
City of High Point
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
D.B. 1750, pg 137
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
211 S Hamilton St, P.O. Box 230, ATTN Derrick Boone
3e.
City, state, zip:
High Point, NC 27260
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
3h.
Email address:
derrick.boone0highgointnc.gov
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
S.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Jonathan Smith
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Tetra Tech
5c.
Street address:
1 Park Drive, Suite 200
5d.
City, state, zip:
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
jonathan.smithO-tetratech.com
Page 2 of 12

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel No. 0200173
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.03515 Longitude: - 79.99775
1 c.
Property size:
0.31 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Oak Hollow Lake
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV CA
2c.
River basin: map is available at
Cape Fear
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of an eroding section of shoreline of Oak Hollow Lake that is leading to slope instability, mass wasting,
and loss of riparian trees. Boating, fishing and swimming are common uses of the lake in addition to water supply. The
rolling watershed is characterized by urban and residential development.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 ac
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
0 If
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Stabilize approximately 285 If of an eroding shoreline bank.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Project includes installation of temporary 10' wide access road and vehicle turnaround extended from a nearby cul-de-
sac. Approximately 40 trees will be removed for construction purposes, then approximately 285 linear feet of shoreline will
be regraded and stabilized with either rip rap armoring or installation of a cellular confinement grid. Typical equipment to
be used to complete the project includes pickup trucks, dump trucks, and light to medium duty earthwork equipment.
Ground cover will be established promptly on all disturbed areas and all work will conform to the latest edition of
NCDENR's Erosion and Sediment Control Manual. Permanent vegetation consisting of native trees and shrubs are
proposed to further stabilize the disturbed upland areas where trees were removed for construction.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments: We are confident that there are no jurisdictional
waters within the project boundary.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or
State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 DP[ -1T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
01 ❑ P ®T
Oak Hollow Lake
Shoreline grading for
Lake
0.04 (1,805 sq. ft.)
stabilization purposes
02 ❑P
03 ❑P
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: 0.31 impacted acres refers to total project area. Approximately 285 linear feet of shoreline will be impacted
with zero net fill.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com fete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ® Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
131 ®P ❑ T
Shoreline
West Fork Deep River (Oak
❑ Yes
6,710
1,735
Stabilization
Hollow Reservoir)
® No
B2 ❑PFIT
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑PFIT
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 12

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project owner (City of High Point) was provided an engineering assessment that evaluated multiple options including
a "do nothing" and a strictly regulatory option. The current design option was selected because it was determined to most
effectively accomplish the City's goals while also minimizing current and future impacts to Oak Hollow Lake.
b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction activities will be limited to minor bank grading and bank stabilization, and will eventually reduce overall
impacts to the lake ecosystem. Short-lived, less stable softwood trees will be replaced with replaced for select native
hardwood species.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Given the nature of the project, diffuse flow plan is not required or
❑ Yes ® No
practical since we are not impacting stormwater on the site.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project is less than 24% impervious.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of High Point
® Phase li
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated as a result of this project.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USACE map of NC Significant Natural Heritage Areas; USFWS Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern, and Candidate Species list for Guilford County, NC
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
f ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service; NC listings in the National Register of Historic Places for
Guilford County
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Floodplain management will not be altered in any way and flood
heights will not be increase by the project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? DFIRM Map Number 3710780300J
-D�am'c x a 300h,-
,
s1�8
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applican gent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12

0
January 26, 2018
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: PCN Notification
To Whom it May Concern:
Io r-
@
�
_ar
FEB 1 1018
The City of High Point has contracted with Tetra Tech Engineering, P.C. to prepare construction
documents for the repair of an eroding shoreline on Oak Hollow Lake in Guilford County. This letter
provides a summary of the project site existing conditions, repair design, and supporting documentation
for the enclosed PCN notification form.
Oak Hollow Lake was constructed in the 1970's and is used for water supply and recreation. The project
area is located on a semicircular shaped projecting point along the east side of the northwestern aligned
arm (West Fork Arm) of the lake. A residential street, Jeffrey Lane Point, terminates within the projecting
point and serves two single family residences located on the point. The City of High Point owns an area of
land between the lakeshore and the private parcels exhibiting a variable width but generally 20+ ft.
Ownership of this area allows the City to provide long term preservation of lakeshore line which enhances
the protection of water quality for the water supply to City of High Point.
The shoreline in this area has exhibited
accelerating erosion, relative to other
areas of the lake, along a length of
approximately 200+ ft. for several years.
The eroding profile exhibits significant
undercutting at and just below the water
level extending horizontally a distance of
2-5 feet underneath the overhanging
shore. The profile of shore above the
undercut transitions from near vertical at
the water's edge to a gentle slope of 10-20
percent within 3-5 feet onshore. The
water depth at the shoreline is
approximately 12-18 inches. The
overhanging shoreline is in the process of
failing structurally due to bank rotation
and mass wasting (see figure 1). This 9 a s ruc ura s ore a► ure a
process is reducing the shoreline buffer Project site
managed by the City and introduces sediment into the lake.
F ure 1 Treefa 11 nd t t I h f 7 t
Oak Hollow Lake Shoreline Restoration PCN Notification Letter
Poge I

0
The proposed -design .project, -which is intended to repair the eroding shoreline and provide Yong term
protection, includes installation of temporary 10' wide access road and vehicle turnaround extended from
a nearby cul-de-sac. Approximately 40 trees will be removed for construction purposes, then
approximately 285 linear feet of shoreline will be regraded and stabilized with either rip rap armoring or
installation of a cellular confinement grid. The repaired shoreline will exhibit the same planform as
currently exhibited. Ground cover will be established promptly on all disturbed areas and all work will
conform to the latest edition of NCDENR's Erosion and Sediment Control Manual. Permanent vegetation
consisting of native- trees and shrubs are proposed to, further stabilize the disturbed upland areas where
trees were removed for construction.
The enclosed PCN notification form and supporting documents are submitted on behalf of the City of High
Point. Based on a phone discussion between Jesse Phillips, a Staff Engineer with Tetra Tech and David
Bailey, the USACE manager for Guilford County on Tuesday January 9 we understand that the project as
described will be covered under NWP 13, non -reporting. Thus, the project will be covered under NWP 13
but the project's environmental impacts are considered minor and therefore the city is not required to
submit a pre=construction notification to the district engineer prior to implemerrtatton
Please feel free to contact me if I can answer any questions or provide additional information.
Sincerely,
Tetra Tet ngi eering,. R.C.
nathan Smith
roject Manager
cc:
Enclosures:
PCN Notification Form
Design Plans (provided at %z scale for efficiency) including:
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Application fee in the amount of $240
Oak Hollow Lake Shoreline Restoration PCN Notification Letter
Page 2

Oak Hollow Shoreline Repair I�
City of High Point, NC
Final Plan Submittal
GENERAL NOTES
1. THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS IS THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT AND
TRANSPORTATION NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
AND ALL INCIDENTAL WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT IN AN ACCEPTABLE MANNER, READY FOR USE, OCCUPANCY,
OR OPERATION BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
2. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INCORPORATE ALL APPLICABLE DRAWINGS AND THE APPROPRIATE
SPECIFICATIONS AS A UNIT. ANY OMISSIONS, DELETIONS, OR CONFLICTS ARISING AS A RESULT OF FAILURE TO INCORPORATE ALL
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH APPLY SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE
OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER.
3. EFFORTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO INDICATE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHY. HOWEVER,
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING ITEMS BEFORE INITIATINGANY
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. ANY EXISTING STRUCTURE, PIPING, OR UTILITY DISTURBED OR DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR
DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER AND/OR
ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COORDINATION ACTIVITIES WITH THE OWNER OF ANY FACILITY
DISTURBED OR PLANNED TO BE DISTURBED.
4. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITIONSAT THE SITE. ANY
DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE DOCUMENTED BY
THE CONTRACTOR IN WRITING AND SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR CONSIDERATION AND DECISION BEFORE
THE WORK PROCEEDS.
5. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY NORTH CAROLINA 811. FOR LOCAL UTILITIES, TWO (2) FULL WORKING
DAYS (NOT INCLUDING WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE A MINIMUM OF 14 DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING.
6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING ALL APPLICABLE OSHA REGULATIONS.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A COMPLETE SET OF RED -LINED DRAWINGS UPON COMPLETION OF THE
CONSTRUCTION. THE RECORD RED -LINED DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW FINAL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF ALL BURIED
UTILITIES ADDED OR MOVED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION. THEY SHALL INCLUDE ALL LINES, ACTUAL FIELD ANGLES BETWEEN
LINES, SERVICE LINES AND TEE LOCATIONS, VALVE VAULTS AND VALVE BOXES, AND STUB -OUTS. THEY SHALL REFLECTALL
ALIGNMENT AND GRADE CHANGES FROM THE DESIGN DRAWINGS MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION. RECORD DRAWINGS MUST BE
COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.
8. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PRESERVED, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PLACE OR
ADJUST MONUMENT BOXES, AS REQUIRED.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL BENCHMARKS SHOWN. THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE
NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY CONFLICTS.
10. CONTRACTOR STAGING AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED TO LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, UNLESS APPROVED
BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. NO EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING SAFE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM EACH PROJECT SITE FOR ALL
VEHICLES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TRAFFIC ON ADJACENT PUBLIC ROADS, PRIVATE PARKING LOTS AFFECTED BY
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE, ERECT AND MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR EACH SITE
LOCATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH NC DOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TEMPORARY FENCING AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. RESTORE SITE TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR
BETTER THAN THE EXISTING CONDITIONS.
13. SPECIFIED AND/OR PROPRIETARY PRODUCTS SHOWN HEREIN MAY BE SUBJECT TO SUBSTITUTION WITH OTHER PRODUCTS OF
EQUAL OR SUPERIOR FUNCTION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CONTRACTOR SUBJECT TO WRITTEN REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. WHEN THE CONTRACTOR USES PROPRIETARY PRODUCTS, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY
TO VERIFY WITH THE SUPPLIER/MANUFACTURER THAT THEIR PRODUCT WILL FUNCTION PER THE DESIGN OR THE GIVEN FIELD
CONDITIONS.THE ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DEVIATIONS FROM EXISTING FIELD
CONDITIONS EXIST WHICH MAY AFFECT PRODUCT FUNCTION.
14. NO WELLS OR SEPTIC SYSTEMS ARE PROPOSED OR ARE KNOWN TO EXIST ON THE SITE.
SURVEY NOTES
1. IRON PIPES AT ALL CORNERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. METHOD OF COMPUTATION IS BY COORDINATE CALCULATION.
3. THE RATIO OF PRECISION IS 1:10,000+,
4. NO NCGS MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN 2000'.
5. THIS SURVEY IS OF AN EXISTING PARCEL(s) OF LAND AND IS BASED ON EXISTING
CORNERS FOUND ON SITE.
6. FLOOD CERTIFICATION: A PORTION OF THE SURVEYED AREA IS LOCATED IN A
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (AS SHOWN) AS SCALED FROM MAPS FURNISHED
BY NORTH CAROLINA FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM DATED JUNE 18, 2007.
SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY DETAILED FLOOD MAP STUDY. SEE COMMUNITY
PANEL No. 3 71 07 8030 0J.
7. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
8. THIS SURVEY SHOWS EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AS PER AUGUST21, 2017.
9. COORDINATES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTH CAROLINA GRID SYSTEM
(NC3200), NAD 83 (2011), AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 88.
COORDINATES WERE OBTAINED USING THE NCVRS SYSTEM.
10.SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONED R-3 (RESIDENTIAL) 8 PNR (PARKS AND NATURAL
RESOURCES).
11.THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, AGREEMENTS, OR
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THIS MAP WHICH WERE NOTAPPARENT
AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION AND MIGHT OTHERWISE BE DISCLOSED BY AN
ATTORNEY'S TITLE OPINION WHICH AS OF DATE SHOWN HEREON HAS NOT BEEN
SUPPLIED TO DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL ENGINEERS 8 SURVEYORS. THERE MAY BE
EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PROPERTY NOT
SHOWN HEREON
12.THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO SHOW PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
OF OAK HOLLOW LAKE SHORELINE AND BOUNDARY OF ADJOINING PROPERTY
FOR PROPOSED SHORELINE REPAIR AND POTENTIAL EASEMENTS FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
AeBREVIA 770/VS
/P = EXIS7/1VG IRON PIPE
N/P = NEW IRON PIPE-
ECU
IPEECM = EXIS77NO CONCRETE MONUMENT
NPK = NEW PK NAIL SET
" = RIGHr OF WAY
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CMP = CORRUGA IED METAL PIPE
CPP = CORRUGATED PCASUC PIPE
NOPE = HIGH DENSITY POL YE7HYLENE
CONC. = CONCRE7E
RIC = HANDICAP
POB - PO/NT OF BEGINNING
MBL a MINIMUM BUILDING UNE
CM = GAS METER
AG = ABOVE GROUND
BC BELOW GROUND
R - RUSH WITH GROUND
G = GROUND SHOT
70 = TOP OF BANK
TOE = TOE OF BANKlID17CH
CL CR = CENTER LINE OF CREEK
FEE. = FINISHED FL OCR ELEVA77ON
INV. = INVERT
D.B. = DEED BOOK
P.B. = PLAT BOOK
PG = PACE
LEGEND
DRAWING INDEX
DRAWING NO.
DRAWING TITLE
C-01
Cover Sheet and Notes
C-02
Existing Conditions
C-03
Demolition and Erosion Control Plan
C-04
Site Improvement Plan
C-05
Bank Cross Sections
C-06
Typical Section Details
C-07
Misc. Details
SURVEY NOTES
1. IRON PIPES AT ALL CORNERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. METHOD OF COMPUTATION IS BY COORDINATE CALCULATION.
3. THE RATIO OF PRECISION IS 1:10,000+,
4. NO NCGS MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN 2000'.
5. THIS SURVEY IS OF AN EXISTING PARCEL(s) OF LAND AND IS BASED ON EXISTING
CORNERS FOUND ON SITE.
6. FLOOD CERTIFICATION: A PORTION OF THE SURVEYED AREA IS LOCATED IN A
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (AS SHOWN) AS SCALED FROM MAPS FURNISHED
BY NORTH CAROLINA FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM DATED JUNE 18, 2007.
SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY DETAILED FLOOD MAP STUDY. SEE COMMUNITY
PANEL No. 3 71 07 8030 0J.
7. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
8. THIS SURVEY SHOWS EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AS PER AUGUST21, 2017.
9. COORDINATES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTH CAROLINA GRID SYSTEM
(NC3200), NAD 83 (2011), AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 88.
COORDINATES WERE OBTAINED USING THE NCVRS SYSTEM.
10.SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONED R-3 (RESIDENTIAL) 8 PNR (PARKS AND NATURAL
RESOURCES).
11.THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, AGREEMENTS, OR
RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THIS MAP WHICH WERE NOTAPPARENT
AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION AND MIGHT OTHERWISE BE DISCLOSED BY AN
ATTORNEY'S TITLE OPINION WHICH AS OF DATE SHOWN HEREON HAS NOT BEEN
SUPPLIED TO DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL ENGINEERS 8 SURVEYORS. THERE MAY BE
EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PROPERTY NOT
SHOWN HEREON
12.THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO SHOW PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
OF OAK HOLLOW LAKE SHORELINE AND BOUNDARY OF ADJOINING PROPERTY
FOR PROPOSED SHORELINE REPAIR AND POTENTIAL EASEMENTS FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
AeBREVIA 770/VS
/P = EXIS7/1VG IRON PIPE
N/P = NEW IRON PIPE-
ECU
IPEECM = EXIS77NO CONCRETE MONUMENT
NPK = NEW PK NAIL SET
" = RIGHr OF WAY
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CMP = CORRUGA IED METAL PIPE
CPP = CORRUGATED PCASUC PIPE
NOPE = HIGH DENSITY POL YE7HYLENE
CONC. = CONCRE7E
RIC = HANDICAP
POB - PO/NT OF BEGINNING
MBL a MINIMUM BUILDING UNE
CM = GAS METER
AG = ABOVE GROUND
BC BELOW GROUND
R - RUSH WITH GROUND
G = GROUND SHOT
70 = TOP OF BANK
TOE = TOE OF BANKlID17CH
CL CR = CENTER LINE OF CREEK
FEE. = FINISHED FL OCR ELEVA77ON
INV. = INVERT
D.B. = DEED BOOK
P.B. = PLAT BOOK
PG = PACE
LEGEND
BENCHMARK
®
CATCH BASIN
®
CLEAN OUT
DI
DROP INLET
®
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
©
GAS MANHOLE
pd
GAS VALVE
0
GAS METER
V
HYDRANT
0
EXIS771VC IRON PIPE
❑
✓UNC770N BOX
LAMP
OMB
MAILBOX
MONUMENT
0
NEW IRON PIPE (SET)
ID
POWER PEDESTAL
POLE
©
SANITARY MANHOLE
SHRUB
SIGN
STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
11
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
CD
TREE
O
WATER METER
®
WA 7ER MANHOLE
®
WA 7ER VALVE
COMPUTED POINT
AD✓OINER LINE
UTILITY EASEMENT
FENCE LINE
LINE SURVEYED
OVERHEAD POWER
SOIL PATH
RIGHT OF WAY
SANITARY SEWER-r-
S70RM SEWER
TREE LINE . ............ .
WATER LINE - -
CURB h GUT7ER
1 Park Drive, Suite 200
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Phone: [phone]
NC License: C-2644
www.tetratech.com
PROJECT LOCATION:
Oak Hollow Lake
4101 Jeffrey Lane Point
High Point, NC 27265
Tt PROJECT No.:
100-IWM-T37512.01
PROJECT DESCRIPTION / NOTES
Shoreline Stabilization Design
CLIENT INFORMATION
Derrick Boone
City of High Point - Public Services
211 S. Hamilton Street
High Point, NC 27261
CLIENT PROJECT No.:
THE CITY OF HIGH POINT IS PLANNING TO REPAIR APPROXIMATELY 285 OF ERODING SHORELINE ALONG OAK HOLLOW LAKE
THAT IS LEADING TO SLOPE INSTABILITY AND LOSS OF TREES. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE TWO OPTIONAL
STABILIZATION TECHNIQUES: THE USE OF RIP RAP ARMORING OR INSTALLATION OF A CELLULAR CONFINEMENT GRID WITH
NATIVE PLANTINGS. AN EXISTING ACCESS ROAD WILL ALSO BE MODIFIED TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS.
ISSUED:
100% SUBMITTAL
JANUARY 16, 2018
RELEASED FOR BIDDING
TOTAL SITE DISTURBED ACRES: 0.31 AC (APPROX.).
% NEW IMPERVIOUS IN DISTURBED AREA: O.OAC (APPROX.).
SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED AUGUST 2017 BY DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL, INC.
1 VICINITY MAP: 1
NOT TO SCALE

Y
F
PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS FOOTPRINT
CITY OF HIGH POINT
PARCEL NO. 0200173
D.B. 1750, PG. 137
P. B. 25, PG 75
P.B. 71, PG. 54
I%
_9
20' OAN
PROJECT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
21'
1/2" IP FL
NAD 63 (2011)
N.' 833, 481.83
N. 151 / E' 1, 705,190.67
T{• OAK
21. OAK 1 Vl_`1 l
�• 12" NNE � \, G l21�,•
21'OAK�,,�y
le• aar °y" ° hoAK \ / (QV�Q' \/2" lP FL
`n� \
1\
3 r 12c�
1'NN /
h`Y X11•
oAK I r / 06 3r5\ \\
12_ �
p/��/:::OOYYYtl�VVf 0^J � � � `
IP 4" BG \ \
�°�a�/ .810 NAD 83 (201 f) \\
j N.• 833, 358.06 \ \
E' 1, 705, 087.10 \
G ` ✓ULIUS A. & DEBORAH \
W. DYKES \ \
J ` ELEV.' 814.25 (NA VD 88) 1 PARCEL NO. 0205753 \�
OL T OF
'01 1 .[5e. +r
, - PAA
B• NNE—�/
B"PINE— /
e" /
11" PINE)
12' NNE—�
B' NN£�
LAKE MONUMENT
NAD 83 (2071) NSRS
N = 833, 086.60
E = 1, 704, 946.59
ELEV = 805.94
GARY L. & RICHELLE
G077CO STACY
PARCEL NO. 0205755
D.B. 7119, PG 983
P.B. 82, PG. 45
LOT f21
0.43± ac.
18586± sq.ft
I" /P FL
ELEV.- 810.80 (NA VD 88)
—TOP OF REBAR
s IN TREE TRUNK
�0\
°q T S
�,2• PINE N65'03'09' 09
6
�, 1" IP LEAN/NG
.A6'0 4 N S PNE
8" OAK 8• PINE
B' NNE x a
B' RNE—
D.B. 5492, PG. 839 /
n
801.80
WA7ER CLEVA7701V
�N�E
e NNE
Cl
!1' NNE
LOT #19
B' NNE—
�/
B' PINE—
B NNE
12• PINE -_
12"I
lP FL
12'
12" NN
8- NNE—
B' NNE
21'
1/2" IP FL
NAD 63 (2011)
N.' 833, 481.83
N. 151 / E' 1, 705,190.67
T{• OAK
21. OAK 1 Vl_`1 l
�• 12" NNE � \, G l21�,•
21'OAK�,,�y
le• aar °y" ° hoAK \ / (QV�Q' \/2" lP FL
`n� \
1\
3 r 12c�
1'NN /
h`Y X11•
oAK I r / 06 3r5\ \\
12_ �
p/��/:::OOYYYtl�VVf 0^J � � � `
IP 4" BG \ \
�°�a�/ .810 NAD 83 (201 f) \\
j N.• 833, 358.06 \ \
E' 1, 705, 087.10 \
G ` ✓ULIUS A. & DEBORAH \
W. DYKES \ \
J ` ELEV.' 814.25 (NA VD 88) 1 PARCEL NO. 0205753 \�
OL T OF
'01 1 .[5e. +r
, - PAA
B• NNE—�/
B"PINE— /
e" /
11" PINE)
12' NNE—�
B' NN£�
LAKE MONUMENT
NAD 83 (2071) NSRS
N = 833, 086.60
E = 1, 704, 946.59
ELEV = 805.94
GARY L. & RICHELLE
G077CO STACY
PARCEL NO. 0205755
D.B. 7119, PG 983
P.B. 82, PG. 45
LOT f21
0.43± ac.
18586± sq.ft
I" /P FL
ELEV.- 810.80 (NA VD 88)
—TOP OF REBAR
s IN TREE TRUNK
�0\
°q T S
�,2• PINE N65'03'09' 09
6
�, 1" IP LEAN/NG
.A6'0 4 N S PNE
8" OAK 8• PINE
B' NNE x a
J-
O
0
508 100 YEAR & 500 YEAR
FLOOD LINE AS SCALED
FROM DF/RM MAP
f2' OAK NUMBER 3710780300%
78Q5+E �.e°
—e" mer
Q-
387
BBoo— — 799.89
B•PINE 99 WD
Curve Toble
TOP OPERA 77NG B
D.B. 5492, PG. 839 /
n
FIRE HYDRA NT
P.B. 82, PG. 45
Cl
8507
LOT #19
5147654E
�/
lP FL
\
JEAN -BAP IISTE
/
\\
ARCHINARD
,
\ ,
PARCEL NO. 0205754
\
D. B. 4132, PG 2080
P.B. 82, PG. 45
\
�ry
LOT J20
CITY OF HIGH POINT
PARCEL NO. 0200173
D.B. 1750, PG. 137
P.B. 25, PG 75
P. B. 71, PG 54
1/2" IP FL
Jo- OAK
J-
O
0
508 100 YEAR & 500 YEAR
FLOOD LINE AS SCALED
FROM DF/RM MAP
f2' OAK NUMBER 3710780300%
78Q5+E �.e°
—e" mer
Q-
387
BBoo— — 799.89
B•PINE 99 WD
Curve Toble
Curve ,¢
Length
Rodius
Chord Bearing
Chord DI'stonce
Cl
8507
45.00
5147654E
72.96
0 15 30 60
SCALE: 1"= 30'
PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC &
BOUNDARY SURVEY
FOR THE CITY OF HIGH POINT
PROPERTY OF
GARY L. & RICHELLE
GOTICO STACY & CITY
OF OF HIGH POINT
PARCEL NO. 0205755 & 0200173
D.B. 7119, PG. 983
D.B. 1750, PG. 137
P.B. 82, PG. 45
P.B. 25, PG. 75
P.B. 71, PG. 54
4101 Jeffrey Lane Point
High Point, North Carolina
High Point Township, Guilford County
RELEASED FOR BIDDING
U
0
e
F
z
z
0
U
x
e
zz
Z
(D
C/)
U)
o Z
O
z a I—
a_
W z
Z 0
C7 J
_ Q5 C)
LL
O x Ur
3 Z
U O f�n
J vJ
O X
Y W
0
P;oj No.: 1004WM-T37512.01
Designed By: B. Tucker
Dream By: B. Tucker
Checked By.. B. NeIsm
Sheet
C2
of 6 Sheets

m
m
K
s
N
moor\
PROPOSED 10' -WIDE
TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD
/ a \
TEMPORARY STAGING
AND STOCKPILE AREA
N
N -
N
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES
AND ACCOMPANYING STAGING AREAS AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY FENCING AS
APPLICABLE.
2. DISTURBED AREAS, LOCATED WITHIN 15' FROM EDGE OF WATER AND NOT
INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED RIP RAP EXTENTS, SHALL BE SEEDED &
MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION/DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES NECESSARY FOR BANK STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
PLAN AND THE NC SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL (UPDATED 2013).
4. GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE 7 OR 14 -DAY GROUND STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS
PER SECTION II.B.2 OF NPDES CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER GENERAL
PERMIT NCG010000.
5. INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT GROUND COVER MAY COMMENCE
IMMEDIATELY ASSUMING PROPER WEATHER CONDITIONS AND GROWING
SEASON. IF NATIVE GRASSES FAIL TO GERMINATE PROPERLY, AREAS SHALL
BE STABILIZED WITH ANOTHER GRASS MIX WITH APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.
6. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO NCDENR'S EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MANUAL, LATEST EDITION.
7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING SOIL TYPE AND ENGINEERING
PROPERTIES WHERE NECESSARY.
�9
G� z
B. ALL BRANCHES AND VEGETATION UNDER 5" IN DIAMETER FROM TREES
MARKED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE CHIPPED ON SITE AND USED AS COVER FOR
THE ACCESS ROAD. LARGER TRUNKS AND STUMPS SHALL BE REMOVED
OFFSITE.
TEMPORARY SEEDING REQUIREMENTS FOR MISC. DISTURBED AREAS:
1. EXPOSED SOIL OUTSIDE OF THE BANK STABILIZATION AND ACCESS ROAD
AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING AT RATES SPECIFIED IN
THE TABLE BELOW. ONE OR TWO SPECIES MAY BE INCLUDED IN THE MIX. THE
WARM SEASON GRASS SEEDING RATE SHOULD BE DOUBLED IF
HYDROSEEDING IS USED. SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL FOLLOW
RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS, OF APPLY 2,000 LB'AC GROUND
AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/AC 10-10-10 FERTILIZER. APPLY 4,000
LB/AC STRAW MULCH AS NECESSARY. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE
APPLIED IN THE FALL ACCORDING TO PRACTICE 6.11 IN THE NC SEDIMENTAND
EROSION CONTROL MANUAL.
o;
C
9
ill
2 2 4+ W 4 W 4
2
N
TEMPORARY SEEDING CHART
MATERIAL SEED TYPE
MINIMUM SEED
PURITY (X)
APPLICATION
RATE'
PROTECT -IN-PLACE EXISTING C&G.
OTHERWISE, REMOVE AND REPLACE
Lime
IF DAMAGED
1
Y
.
O \
Jan 1 — Dec 31
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXR .
W/ 2'J' COARSE AGGREGATE
,...
z
a
r
qj 2�0
Seed
2 2
�
N
\ \4
Y
O
\S :
00 .�
O
94 1120lbs/acreAu
O
co� k
Wheat
94
3016,/acre
Apr 1
�
R e GraiN
WA
120 Ibs/acre
s
N
moor\
PROPOSED 10' -WIDE
TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD
/ a \
TEMPORARY STAGING
AND STOCKPILE AREA
N
N -
N
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES
AND ACCOMPANYING STAGING AREAS AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY FENCING AS
APPLICABLE.
2. DISTURBED AREAS, LOCATED WITHIN 15' FROM EDGE OF WATER AND NOT
INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED RIP RAP EXTENTS, SHALL BE SEEDED &
MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION/DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES NECESSARY FOR BANK STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
PLAN AND THE NC SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL (UPDATED 2013).
4. GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE 7 OR 14 -DAY GROUND STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS
PER SECTION II.B.2 OF NPDES CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER GENERAL
PERMIT NCG010000.
5. INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT GROUND COVER MAY COMMENCE
IMMEDIATELY ASSUMING PROPER WEATHER CONDITIONS AND GROWING
SEASON. IF NATIVE GRASSES FAIL TO GERMINATE PROPERLY, AREAS SHALL
BE STABILIZED WITH ANOTHER GRASS MIX WITH APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.
6. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO NCDENR'S EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MANUAL, LATEST EDITION.
7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING SOIL TYPE AND ENGINEERING
PROPERTIES WHERE NECESSARY.
�9
G� z
B. ALL BRANCHES AND VEGETATION UNDER 5" IN DIAMETER FROM TREES
MARKED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE CHIPPED ON SITE AND USED AS COVER FOR
THE ACCESS ROAD. LARGER TRUNKS AND STUMPS SHALL BE REMOVED
OFFSITE.
TEMPORARY SEEDING REQUIREMENTS FOR MISC. DISTURBED AREAS:
1. EXPOSED SOIL OUTSIDE OF THE BANK STABILIZATION AND ACCESS ROAD
AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING AT RATES SPECIFIED IN
THE TABLE BELOW. ONE OR TWO SPECIES MAY BE INCLUDED IN THE MIX. THE
WARM SEASON GRASS SEEDING RATE SHOULD BE DOUBLED IF
HYDROSEEDING IS USED. SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL FOLLOW
RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS, OF APPLY 2,000 LB'AC GROUND
AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/AC 10-10-10 FERTILIZER. APPLY 4,000
LB/AC STRAW MULCH AS NECESSARY. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE
APPLIED IN THE FALL ACCORDING TO PRACTICE 6.11 IN THE NC SEDIMENTAND
EROSION CONTROL MANUAL.
o;
C
9
ill
2 2 4+ W 4 W 4
2
N
TEMPORARY SEEDING CHART
MATERIAL SEED TYPE
MINIMUM SEED
PURITY (X)
APPLICATION
RATE'
PLANTING
DATES
Lime
WA
WA I
by Sail Test
Jan 1 — Dec 31
Compost
WA
WA I
by Soil Test
Jan 1 — Dec 31
Seed
German Millet
97
40lbs/acre
May i —Aug15
Annual Rye
94 1120lbs/acreAu
15—Dec 30
Wheat
94
3016,/acre
Apr 1
�
R e GraiN
WA
120 Ibs/acre
Jan 1 — May 1
Kobe Lespedezia
50lbs/acre
Jan 1 — May 1
1 —Application rates anNor chemical
analysis shall be established by
a soil test
0 10 20
SCALE: V = 20'
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
(13,750 SF t)
LIMITS OF BANK
STABILIZATION (TYP)
U
8 NrN
W Z dz
z�
�H is
LU
�j W a" Ep t
�LLLL Z _ a
1�' v
Wm
Z
F— LL.i
LEGEND
X TREE TO BE REMOVED
RELEASED FOR BIDDING
z
0
a
z
U
F
zz
Z
(D
N
w
Z
Q
ZILJ
a m
LLI
C7 J Z
_ O
LU
_x
LLJ
O =
3 O
U O
W
O 0
2
Y
Q
O
Pro)ect No.: I D04WM-T37512.01
Designed By: B. Tucker
Drawn By: S. Tucker
Checked By. B. Nelson
Sheet
C-3
of 6 Sheets
Z
W Z Z a 6z
W Quj�6 4�
j�0��
o 0
R N A co
Q
Q Z II W
a
J
p
�
Q
of
ofQ
Q
LEGEND
X TREE TO BE REMOVED
RELEASED FOR BIDDING
z
0
a
z
U
F
zz
Z
(D
N
w
Z
Q
ZILJ
a m
LLI
C7 J Z
_ O
LU
_x
LLJ
O =
3 O
U O
W
O 0
2
Y
Q
O
Pro)ect No.: I D04WM-T37512.01
Designed By: B. Tucker
Drawn By: S. Tucker
Checked By. B. Nelson
Sheet
C-3
of 6 Sheets

� PROTECT -IN-PLACE EXISTING C3G.
OTHERWISE, REMOVE AND REPLACE
IF DAMAGED
°o
zm \
O � �
���0 Waw
/ \\
-500
\\
O
ze
PROPOSED 10 WIDE
II TEMPORARYACCESS
ROAD
25.n
TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING NOTES.\
1. REPLACEMENT TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED ON ALL
DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE BANK STABILIZATION FACE
SLOPE, INCLUDING TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD AND `L-✓
STAGING/STOCKPILE AREA.
2. TREES AND AND SHRUBS SHALL ONLY BE PLANTED DURING THE
FALLAMNTER DORMANT SEASON FROM OCTOBER THROUGH
MARCH. `^f'� / APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WATER\
ELEV. =801.80' (8-21\�17)
PERMANENT SEEDING NOTES:
1. DISTURBED SOIL WITHIN THE STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREA
SHALL BE SEEDED WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION. IF THE
\(
ALTERNATE SLOPE STABILIZATION IS UTILIZED, A PERMANENT ,mil - \ \ \ \ �\ O Y
SEED MIX SHALL ALSO BE APPLIED TO UPPER SLOPE SECTION AS q
SHOWN ON DETAIL B, SHEET C6.
2. PERMANENT SEED MIX SHALL BE SOWN AT25 LBS/AC.
3. SOIL TESTING AND SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN
ACCORDING WITH PRACTICE 6.11 IN NC EROSION CONTROL - .2
MANUAL. --00,9
4. FOR SEED MIX, REFER TO THE NATIVE SEED MIX TABLE, THIS 8
SHEET, WITH MINIMUM MIX PERCENTAGES BY WEIGHT.b
ALTERNATIVE NATIVE SEED MIXES CAN BE UTILIZED WITH
APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.
PERMANENT SEED MIX:
5%
temanas
TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS:
Common Name
Botanical Name
Cl-Ification
Maln or Alternate
Speciesun
Spadng (feet
center)
Min.
Container
Class
#of Plank
:ed Maple
Acer Rubrum
Tree
Main
20
1 gal.
25
trip Poplar
uriodendron tulipfere
Tree
Main
20
1 aI.
25
mericen Beech
Fag. grendlf.M
Tree
Alternate
20
1 gaL
25
Vax N9 rtie
Mydca..."".
Shrub
Main
8
1 gal.
40
eauty Berry
Ca/! erps americana
Shrub
Main
8
1 gal.
40
sn
00
r-0-)
00 T 6)
\
L&'00t� I
00s- \
PROPOSEDTEMPORARY VEHICLE
TURN -AROUND
�w
-� i +I
CO
V' cc
0 L
Co
,-I
M
� gyp►
BANK TOE POINT TABLE
Point#
Elevation
Northing
Easting
49
800.000
833126.8363 1704902.5587
57
8DD.000
833084.7060
1704928.2281
55
800.000
833058.5111
1704969.7315
54
800.000
833249.6436
1704909.7522
53
800.000
833225.1991
1704904.5115
52
800.000
833200.7546
1704899.2707
51
800.000
833176.2204
1704895.6132
50
800.000
833151.4891
1704898.7707
48
800.000
833104.7296
1704913.4545
45
800.000
833068.4673
1704947.0956
42
800.000
833052.8600
17D4993.8556
41
800.000
833052.0953 1705009.4172
� gyp►
0 10 20 40
SCALE: 1"= 20'
CONTRACTOR NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SEPARATE BASE BIDS FOR BOTH
ALTERNATE SLOPE SECTIONS AS SHOWN ON SHEET C6.
EXISTING LAKE MONUMENT TO
BE PRESERVED IN PLACE
PROPOSEDBANK
STABILIZATION EXTENTS
AREA OF PROPOSED FACE SLOPE = 352 SY t
t�ae� a
� k
�� IZO
BANK TOP POINT TABLE
Point#
Elevation
Northing Easting
71
806.000
833064.3988 1705003.2880
70
806.000
833241.1466 1704920.2D32
62
806.000
833093.0844 1704936.8189
69
800.000
833256.6940 1704923.5365
68
806.000
833222.6835 1 1704916.2448
67
806.000
833198.2390 1704911.0041
66
806.00D
833176.5507 1704907.6087
65
806.000
833153.1793 1704910.6511
64
806.000
833129.7080 1704914.2101
fit
806.000
833078.2776 1704954.0063
50
806.000
833069.9175 1704973.4587
59
806.000
833064.8403 1704994.5424
56
800.000
833064.1676 1705019.7375
0 10 20 40
SCALE: 1"= 20'
CONTRACTOR NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SEPARATE BASE BIDS FOR BOTH
ALTERNATE SLOPE SECTIONS AS SHOWN ON SHEET C6.
EXISTING LAKE MONUMENT TO
BE PRESERVED IN PLACE
PROPOSEDBANK
STABILIZATION EXTENTS
AREA OF PROPOSED FACE SLOPE = 352 SY t
t�ae� a
� k
�� IZO
Projact No.: 1004WM-737512.01
Designed By: B. Tucker
Drawn By: B. Tucker
Checked By. B. Nelson
Sheet
RELEASED FOR BIDDING C-4
of 6 Sheets
z
O
m
w
0
F-
a
Z
a
a
Q
2
z
nJ
J n
=
w
w W
U-
O
X: f-
3 (1)
U
O
O
2
Y
Q
O
Projact No.: 1004WM-737512.01
Designed By: B. Tucker
Drawn By: B. Tucker
Checked By. B. Nelson
Sheet
RELEASED FOR BIDDING C-4
of 6 Sheets

u`4
FILL AS REQUIRED WITH AGGREGATE OR
COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL
810
810
_ _
TOP OF SLOPE
(EL. 806.0')
--_-______ _
PROPOSED GRADE W/
(EL. 806.0)
RIP RAP STABILIZATION
2.0% MIN
%
--
__________
___
2.0%MIN
-----
z
W.S. ELEV. = 801.80'
PROPOSED GRADE W/
_
(8-21-2017)
- _
EXISTING GRADE
RIP RAP STABILIZATION
7RIP
'
Z1
EXISTING
GRADE
W.S. ELEV. = 801.80'
����
L'
(8-21-2017)
_
(TYP)
(8-21-2017)
__-
(NP)
800
600
SEE SHEET C6 FOR BASE BID
SLOPE
FILL
AS REQUIRED WITH AGGREGATE
OR
AND ALTERNATE SLOPE TREATMENT
COMPACTED
NATIVE SOIL
SECTION
795
795
- 0
1 zo
SL -1 STA. 1+07
C4 SCALE:
1"=5'-HORIZ SCALE: 1"=5'
810 810
TOP OF SLOPE
(EL. 808.0) --------
PROPOSED GRADE W/
RIP RAP STABILIZATION
EXISTING GRADE
W.S. ELEV. =801.80'(NP)
(a-zl-zo17) �`-
B _ _ _ _ _ �ti�, - 800
00
.'
795 -_ 795
SL -3
STA. 2+80
C-0 SCALE: V=F-HORIZ SCALE: V=5'
810
800-
795-
0
00795 0 0 0
SL -4 STA. 3+40
C-0 SCALE: 1"=5'-HORIZ SCALE: 1'=5'
Bic
80[
79:
sL-z
TOP OF SLOPE
TOP OF SLOPE
_ _
(EL. 806.0')
--_-______ _
PROPOSED GRADE W/
-
RIP RAP STABILIZATION
2.0% MIN
%
--
__________
___
795
PROPOSED GRADE W/
z
W.S. ELEV. = 801.80'
— - ---
(8-21-2017)
- _
EXISTING GRADE
7RIP
STA. 2+00
C-0 SCALE: 1'=5'- HORIZ SCALE' 1"=5'
310
300
'95
810
U
Vfn N
uj Z � z'
Lw ado
Z- E H a
LL1�'
I uj
800
TOP OF SLOPE
(EL. 806.0')
2.0% MIN
%
--
__________
___
795
PROPOSED GRADE W/
z
Z
— - ---
RAP STABILIZATION
T.
7RIP
'
W.S.
ELEV. = 801.80'
L'
EXISTING GRADE
(8-21-2017)
__-
(NP)
FILL
AS REQUIRED WITH AGGREGATE
OR
COMPACTED
NATIVE SOIL
810
U
Vfn N
uj Z � z'
Lw ado
Z- E H a
LL1�'
I uj
800
a
795
z
Z
0 0
a w
� o
U z
W ?
O LL
a
O �
Y
D;
Q
z
U
rn
W
� Q z
Z a O_
Lu
a w
x z Y U
C_9 z W
x of Q (n
O o m Cf)
N U
U O U
J
o U
x
Y
Q
O
Project No.: 1004WM-T3751ZO1
Designed Br: B. Tucker
Dre W. B. Tucker
Checked By. B. Nelson
Sheet
RELEASED FOR BIDDING C-5
016 Sheets

U
� 8N1,�
RELEASED FOR BIDDING u -a
TOP OF SLOPE = 806.0' g" W Z
�- dz—
EXISTING GRADE yl _I,Ii� u�'WWr.uvu�r Biu �r rlrl �tLilbr�iG d�n�� lnlhi iilLi.tru�hl�' � o a
1:+�muahr W d
'•
10' MINIMUM TEMPORARY J 8',`. (� t
J u2± #4 NCDOT ACCESS,CLEARED AND SEEDED a �y W Z
n- 1 W/ NATIVE SEED MIX, SHRUBS, = 0 4 W
��- AND TREES PER SHEET C-4. 0,1 ��
��••
2'± X 2'± TOE - PROVIDE 12" THICK 2 —41""
LAYER OF CLASS B""'•
1
W/ #2 NCDOT RIP RAP
NCDOT RIP RAP
W.S.E. (8-21-2017) = 801.8'
(VARIES)
+t ' +l
zo 0 t
EXISTING GRADE i\1 �i 1
2' MIN
12" MIN
BACKFILL CELLULAR CONFINEMENT
GRID W/ 6" MIN LIFT OF POMONA
QUARRY "MOD3" AGGREGATE (TYP)
CELLULAR CONFINEMENT GRID,
6" THICKNESS,
"GEOWEB" OR "ENVIROGRID" OR
APPROVED EQUAL
2' MIN
W.S.E. (8-21-2017) = 801.8'
(VARIES) I
Z
EXISTING GRADE N;
6" LIFT #4 NCDOT
BEDDING STONE
(TYP)
PROPOSED GRADE
(CUT AND FILL AS REQUIRED)
NOTE:
1. REMOVE ALL STUMPS AND ROOTS WITHIN THE
PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS FOOTPRINT.
2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF BANK SLOPE
IMPROVEMENT THAT EXCEED 3:1 SLOPES SHALL
BE RE -SEEDED AND STABLIZIED WITH A MULCH
BLANKET.
TYP RIP RAP
A SECTION DETAIL
C 4 SCALE: N.T.S.
TOP OF SLOPE = 806.0'
EXISTING GRADE
2
#4 STEEL REBAR @
24" LENGTHS (TYP),
3' O.C. EACH WAY
6" LIFT OF POMONA QUARRY
"MOD3" AGGREGATE OR
NCDOT #4 BEDDING STONE
"TOE" OF SLOPE LOCATION
I�.fl111i IJnp /.�t_illil�l t ii�Tn}n,LVlc.hLU0.k1.LL1il�.P,�LJJhUo iltl �rkA;_�
Ute'
10' MINIMUM TEMPORARY
ACCESS,CLEARED AND SEEDED
W/ NATIVE SEED MIX, SHRUBS,
AND TREES PER SHEET C-4.
18" MIN BURY
PROPOSED GRADE
(CUT AND FILL AS REQUIRED)
TOP OF SLOPE 6" MIN TOPSOIL,
SEEDED W/ NATIVE SEED MIX 8k
MULCH BLANKET
ALT CELLULAR CONFINEMENT
B SECTION DETAIL
C 4 SCALE: N.T.S.
TYPICAL HDPE EROSION CELL
(TO BE INFILLED WITH AGGREGATE)
TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL MATERIAL
PACING
0
w
0
Y
Za Q U/
O o Z
D- w m
_ ? O
w J
LL o Q U
O m W
U
Cn
U O >
O
x
Y
Q
0
Project No.: 1004WT37512.01
Dedgned By: B. Tucker
Drawn By. B. Tucker
Checked By. B. Nelson
Sheet
C-6
of 6 Sheets

TOE OF SLOPE 800.0'
TOE STABILITY ANCHORING, SEE
TYPICAL SECTION SHEET C6
HDPE 64NCH THICK EXPANDED GEOSYNTHETIC WEB SLOPE PROTECTION SYSTEM
MATERIAL WITH INFILL PER PLAN PLACED ON PREPARED 2H:1V SLOPE
2
SLOPE TO BE VEGETATED FOLLOWING
MATT INSTALLATION '
4 I S
TRUNK CALIPER SHALL MEET ANSI Z60
CURRENT EDITION FOR ROOT BALL SIZE
ROOT BALL MODIFIED AS REQUIRED
ROUND -TOPPED
SOIL BERM 4" HIGH X B" WIDE
ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE
SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND
THE ROOT BALL. BERM SHALL
BEGIN AT ROOT BALL PERIPHERY.
a
TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH W/ FINISHED GRADE
PRIOR TO MULCHING, LIGHTLY TAMP SOIL
AROUND THE ROT BALL IN 6" LIFTS TO
BRACE TREE. DO NOT OVER COMPACT.
WHEN THE PLANTING HOLE HAS BEEN
BACKFILLED, POUR WATER AROUND THE
ROOT BALL TO SETTLE THE SOIL.
LOOSENED SOIL. DIG AND TURN IN TO
REDUCE COMPACTION TO THE AREA AND
DEPTH SHOWN.
4" LAYER OF MULCH. NO MORE THAN 1" OF
MULCH ON ROOT BALL.
FINAL STAKE LENGTH AND CLIP SPACING PER FINISHED GRADE
MANUCTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. SEE DETAILED EXISTING SOIL
SPECIFIFACATION FOR MATERIAL AND ANCHORAGE
REQUIREMENTS.
TYPICAL SLOPE SECTION
a CELLULAR CONFINEMENT DETAIL
C-4 SCALE: N.T.S.
BLANKET AND MATTING CROSS-SECTIONS
UPSTREAM TERMINAL
TRANSVERSE CHECK SLOT
DOWNSTREAM TERMINAL
-
:
0 1
III—ISI
SECTION VIEW
STEP 1: CUT i
� =
STEP 1: CUT TERMINAL ADT.
CHECK SLOT. -
STEP 1: CUT • I IIT ,
TMwwAar A rtxsox.
I� 15"_
TERMINAL. AOT. —
.,,_... _IT=
a� II-,,,
7T�ITMECHECK
S1EP Z SNUG MAT INTO SLOT.
STEP 2: WtlRK UPSTREAM ACROSS
SLOT AND LAP BACK 15".
AOT.
Li" �1'
Iy III- K
IZZALL
A STAKE MAT INTO SLOT. B. UA 1" X 3" PRESSURE TREATED
STEP 3: TUCK MAT LAP INTO AOTTERMINAL
BOARD TO SPACE MAT AGAINST
AM STAKE.
SLOT
VERTICAL CUT.
C. BACKFlLL AND COMPACT.
1�
.L
S1EP ♦ •— II—III
STEP 4: -III -
STEP t. — T1T
A REVERSE MAT ROLL DIRECTION TO
A. BACKFlLL ANO PROGRESS UPSTREAM
A ROLL MAT UP- IIIc
OVERLAY CHECK LOT.
B. PULL WT TEMPORARY STAKES WHEN
STREAM OVER REFILLED TERMINAL.
B. STAKE MAT TO ANCHOR TERMINAL.
NO LONGER NEEDED FOR TENSIONING.
B STAKE MAT DOM TO ANCHOR
TERMINAL
C. PROGRESS UPSTREAM WITH ROLL.
SEOUEN7IAL ROLL RUN OUT IN
CHANNELS
PICTORAL
VIEW OF TRANSVERSE SLOT
�Eq�\
I6"I�
BO]E5
1. START AT DRETERMINAL AND PROGRESS UPSTREAM.
2. FIRST ROLL IS IS CENTERED
D STAKES
IN MID -CHANNEL AND
PINNED WITH TEMPORARY STAKES TO MAINTAIN ALIGNMENT.
3. SUBSEQUENT ROLLS FOLLOW IN STAGGERED SEQUENCE BEHIND
THE MRS T ROLL. USE THE CENTERERROLLROLL FOR ALIGNMENT TO THE
T" CHANNEL CENTER.
4. WORKOUTWARDSOVERLAP FROM AND THE CHANNEL CENTER i0 ME EDGE.
5. USE J" OVERLAPS AND STAKE AT 5' INTERVALS ALONG THE
SEAMS.
6. USE JOVERLAPS AND SHINGLE DOWNSTREAM TO CONNECT THE
LINING AT THE ROLL ENDS.
B MULCH BLANKET RECP DETAIL
C-4 SCALE: N.T.S.
SLOPE SIDES OF LOOSENED SOIL
BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL FIRMLY ON
EXISTING OR RECOMPACTED SOIL
WIDEST DIMENSION OF ROOT BALL.
c TREE PLANTING DETAIL (EXISTING SOIL)
C-4 SCALE: N.T.S.
4" LAYER OF MULCH. NO MORE THAN 1" OF
MULCH ON ROOT BALL.
FINISHED GRADE
SLOPE SIDES OF LOOSENED SOIL
LOOSENED SOIL. DIG AND TURN IN TO
REDUCE COMPACTION TO THE AREA AND
DEPTH SHOWN.
BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL FIRMLY ON
EXISTING OR RECOMPACTED SOIL
N
vv ROOTBALL a
O O
F w
ROUND -TOPPED SOIL BERM SHALL HIGH X B" WIDE O
ABOVE
T BALL SURFACE
(T LL Z
BERM SHALL BEGIN CONSTRUCTED O ATBALLD THE LROOT
-
PRIOR TO MULCHING, LIGHTLY TAMP SOIL
AROUND THE ROOT BALL IN 6" LIFTS TO
BRACE TREE. DO NOT OVER COMPACT.
WHEN THE PLANTING HOLE HAS BEEN
•, �.
BACKFILLED, POUR WATER AROUND THE
ROOT BALL TO SETTLE THE SOIL.
:
EXISTING SOIL
�X'S WIDEST DIMENSION OF ROOT BALL
1
SECTION VIEW
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL (EXISTING SOIL)
C� SCALE: N.T.S.
RELEASED FOR BIDDING
Z
0
tY U)
F- c- -�
O f Q
o w
S Z W
W
Y
tl
O 7x U
U 0
0
2
Y
0
O
woJ. No.: 1004WM-T37512A'
Designod By: B.Tucker
Dn By. B. Tucker
Checked By: B. Nelson
Sheet
C-7
of 6 Sheets