Homestead Chapel Hill High School (2).pdf

r.
��n K�mley Hom
� � and Assayates, Inc
May 17 2012
Ms Lauren W�therspoon
North Carolma Drv�ston of Water Qual�ty
3800 Barrett Dr�ve
Raleigh NC 27609
Ms Jean Gibby
US Army Corps of Engmeers
3331 Her�tage Trade Drive Sutte ] OS
Wake Forest North Carolma 27587
2(� 1 2�49 7
Sub�ect Ripar�an Buffer Author�zat�on Request and Prel�mmary Jur�sd�ctional
Deterrnmation Request for the Homestead Chapel H�ll High School
Mult� use Path (TIP Pro�ect U 4726DE)
Orange County North Carolma
Dear Ms W�therspoon
■
P 0 Box 33068
Raleigh North Carolina
27636 3068
On behalf of our client the Town of Carrboro Kimley Horn and Associates Inc is
applymg for a R�parian Buffer Authorization and Prel�mmary Jurisdictional Determmation
for the Homestead Chapel H�II H�gh School Multi use Path Pro�ect m Orange County
North Carolina The followmg mformatton is mcluded as part of the applicat�on
submittal
■ Preconstruct�on Notification Form
■ Figures
➢ F�gure 1 Vicmity Map
➢ F�gure 2 USGS Topographic
➢ F�gure 3 NRCS Soil Survey (Orange County)
➢ F�gure 4 Jurisdictional Features Map
Design Drawings
Appendix A Agent Authorization Forms J
Appendix B Prel�mmary Jurisdict�onal Determmahon Request
Appendix C USACE and NCDWQ Stream Data Forms
��
�����
��
��qv����� ,
%
The Pro�ect consists of design of a multi use (bicycle and pedestrian) path begmnmg at the
Claremont ne�ghborhood north of Homestead Road extendmg east under Homestead
Road and through land owned by the Univers�ty of North Carolma at Chapel Hill to
Chapel Hill High School at the Town of Carrboro/Town of Chapel H�ll boundary The
length of the facility will be approximately 2 100 lmear feet and mcludes a bridge crossmg
■
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]

.
��� K�mley Hom
� artd Ass�ates, Inc
over Bohn Creek approx�mately 200 feet south of Homestead Road The mulri use path
w�ll be a 10 foot wide tra�l des�gned to AASHTO NCDOT and Town standards
The proposed pro�ect is located m the Cape Fear Rrver Basm and streams m the vicmity of
the pro�ect are sub�ect to the Jordan Lake R�parian Buffer Rules The proposed pedestrian
bridge at Bolm Creek and the stormwater outfall pipe (northwest of Homestead Rd) will
result m unavoidable �mpacts to Zone 1(6 985 sq ft) and Zone 2(6 710 sq ft) of the
r�parian buffers The proposed pro�ect �s allowable under the Jordan Lake R�partan Buffer
Rules and no mrtigat�on is ant�cipated No permanent or temporary impacts to streams
w�ll result from the proposed pro�ect No impacts to wetlands w�ll result from the pro�ect
If you have any questions or comments please contact me at [phone] or
Anna Reusche@k�mley horn com
Smcerely yours
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
� (� �e�.�v.c��n.�
Anna Reusche PWS
Enclosures
CC Sharon Myers LJNC Chapel Hill
Jeff Brubaker Town of Canboro

2�120497
�F W ATF9
o� v� Office Use Only
� r Corps action ID no
ti
o '� DWQ pro�ect no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Not��cation (PCN) Form
_ __ A Applicant Informahon
1 Processing
1a Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number or General Permit (GP) number
1 c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps� ❑ Yes � No
1d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non�04 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — E�ress � Ripanan Buffer Authonzation
1 e Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit
because written approval is not required� Certification
❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No
1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or m lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts� If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
1 g Is the pro�ect located m any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below
1 h Is the pro�ect located within a NC DCM Area of Enwronmental Concern (AEC)� I❑ Yes � No
2 Pro�ect Information
2a Name of pro�ect Homestead Chapel Hdl High School Multi use Path Pro�ect
2b County Orange
2c Nearest municipality / town Carrboro
2d Subdivision name N/A
2e NCDOT only T I P or state U-4726DE
pro�ect no
3 Owner Information
3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed State of North Carolina Parker Louis LLC Claremont Homeowners Association
3b Deed Book and Page No 1750/470 4433/17 5030/353
3c Responsible Party (for LLC if Town of Carrboro ATTN Jeff Brubaker Transp�eu,Planner
ann6rahlal
3d Street address 301 W Main Street ����
�
3e City state zip Carrboro NC 27510 ''~—
3f Telephone no [phone] V� �
�
3g Fax no [phone] p��
3h Emad address JBrubaker@ci carrboro nc us d$�a,,_k
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Appl�cant Information (if different from owner)
4a Applicant is � Agent ❑ Other specify
4b Name
4c Business name
(if applicable)
4d Street address
4e City state zip
4f Telephone no
4g Fax no
4h Ematl address
5 AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a Name Anna Reusche PWS
5b Business name Kimley Horn and Associates Inc (KHA)
(if applicable)
5c Street address 3001 Weston Parkway
5d City state zip
5e Telephone no
5f Fax no
5g Email address
Cary NC 27513
[phone]
[phone]
anna reusche@kimley horn com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B Pro�ect Information and Prior Pro�ect History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 9779573920 9779476533 9779481225
1b Site coordinates (m decimal degrees) Latitude 36 027201 Longitude 78 86556
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1c Prope�ty size 30 69 33 34 8 08 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to golin Creek
proposed pro�ect
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water C NSW
2c River basin Cape Fear
3 Pro�ect Description
3a Describe the existmg conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the pro�ect at the time of this
application
The proposed greenway is located m a mix of developed lands (mcluding recreational fields a cross country trad
ad�acent to a high school and a sewer easement) and early successional mid successional and mature forested land
The proposed multi use trad begms at the Claremont neigborhood north of Homestead Road extends east under
Homestead Road and then through land owned by the Urnversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hdl (UNC CH) to Chapel
Hdl High School at the Town of Carrboro/Town of Chapel Hdl boundary Whde the pro�ect corridor is mostly on public
land some recently developed and soon to be developed residentral property is also located ad�acent to the pro�ect
corridor
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
No wetlands were identified withm the Pro�ect Area
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (mtermittent and perennial) on the property
2 200 LF perenrnal
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed pro�ect
The Town of Carrboro is proposing to provide a multi use path beginning at the Claremont neigborhood north of
Homestead Road extendmg east under Homestead Road and through land owned by UNC CH to Chapel Hdl High
School at the Town of Carrboro/Town of Chapel Hdl boundary
3e Descnbe the overall pro�ect in detad including the type of equipment to be used
The proposed improvements will include the construction of the multi use path and one single span bndge Typical
roadway construction equipment wdl be utdized
4 Jur�sdict�onal Determinations
4a Have �unsdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
pro�ect (including all pnor phases) in the past� � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments A preliminary�urisidictional determination
request is included as part of this application
4b If the Corps made the �urisdictional determmation what type
of determmation was made� ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c If yes who delineated the�urisdictional areas� A9ency/Consultant Company Kimley Horn and
Associates Inc on January 17 2012
Name (if known} Anna Reusche KHA Other
4d if yes list the dates of the Corps �urisdictional determmations or State determinations and attach documentation
Lauren Witherspoon NCDWQ perFormed a stream ver�fication on Aprd 17th 2012 One stream currently shown north of
the pro�ect corndor on the NRCS sod survey (Figure 3) was determined to no longer be present Bolm Creek Jolly
Branch and an unnamed tributary crossing the pro�ect corridor were determined perenrnal and sub�ect to the Jordan
Lake Ripanan buffer rules
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your pro�ect (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams tributaries � Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
Wetland impact Type of �unsdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps 404 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404 other) (acres
Tem ora T �
W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland �mpacts
2h Comments No wetiand impacts wdl result from the pro�ect
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perenrnal or intermittent stream impacts (mcluding temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of �unsdiction Average Impact
number (PER) or (Corps 404 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent
DWQ — non-404 width (linear
Temporary (T) (�NT)� other) (feet) feet)
S1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tr�butary �mpacts
3i Comments No stream impacts wdl result from the pro�ect
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuanes tnbutanes sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a 4b 4c 4d 4e
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P�T
4f Total open water �mpacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construct�on
If ond or lake construction ro osed then com lete the chart below
5a 5b 5c 5d 5e
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Fdled Excavated Flooded Fdled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required�
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
5i E�ected pond surface area (acres)
5� Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If pro�ect wdl impact a protected npanan buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If an im acts re uire miti ation then ou MUST fdl out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico � Other Jordan
Pro�ect is in which protected basin� ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re uired�
Multi ❑ Yes
B1 � P❑ T use Bolin Creek � No 6 985 6 710
path
B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer �mpacts 6 985 6 710
6i Comments Proposed impacts to the buffers wdl result from fdl associated with the proposed path and a stormwater pipe
with an in stream outlet comprised of rip rap
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minim¢e the proposed impacts in designmg pro�ect
Direct impacts to streams m the pro�ect corndor were avoided by creating an alignment that minimizes buffer wetland and
stream impacts crossing the creek at 90 degrees minimizmg grading and clearmg to the minimum necessary and
maintammg diffuse flow
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techrnques
Erosion and sedimentation control measures appropriate for the site wdl be implemented
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the pro�ect reqwre Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State�
2b Ifyes mrtigat�on is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes which mitigation option wdl be used for this
pro�ect� ❑ Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Us�ng a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached ❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigatron requested linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet
4e Ripanan wetland mitigation requested �res
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested �res
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the pro�ect result in an impact withm a protected riparian buffer that requires I❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation�
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the nparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of m�tigation required
6c 6d 6e
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1 5
6f Total buffer m�t�gation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to pnvate mitigation bank
permittee responsible nparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1 Diffuse Flow Plan
1a Does the pro�ect include or is it ad�acent to protected nparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No
withm one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules�
1 b If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included� If no explam why
Comments � Yes ❑ No
2 Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this pro�ect� 50 g�/a
2b Does this pro�ect require a Stormwater Management Plan� ❑ Yes � No
2c If this pro�ect DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why Linear public transportation pro�ects wdl
be required to treat stormwater runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable in accordance with the practices described in
the NCDOT Best Management Practicies (BMP) Manual
Zd if this pro�ect DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative descnption of the plan
No runoff from the path wdl be allowed to concentrate Any concentrated runoff from off site wdl be bypassed in a
nonerosive manner
� Certified Local Government
2e Who wdl be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan� ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3 Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government s �urisdiction is this pro�ect� Town of Carboro
� Phase II
3b Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs � NSW
apply (check all that appiy) ❑ USMP
� Water Suppiy Watershed
� Other Jordan Buffer Rules
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes � No
attached�
4 DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a Wh�ch of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply � H�W
(check all that apply) ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached� ❑ Yes � No
5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements� � Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met� � Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

F Supplementary Informat�on
1 Environmental 4ocumentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a Does the pro�ect mvolve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federaUstate) land�
1b If you answered yes to the above does the pro�ect require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA}�
1 c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House� (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes � No
Comments The evironmental document �s a Categorical Exclusion which is
required by the FHWA which the State Clearing House �s not required to review
The pro�ect does not trigger any other NEPA/SEPA requirements
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the s�te in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)�
2b Is this an after the fact permit application� ❑ Yes � No
2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Wdl this pro�ect (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result m � Yes � No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality�
3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Cleariy detad the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed pro�ect or avadable capacity of the sub�ect facdity
The proposed multi use path will not be generating any wastewater
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requ�rement)
5a Wdl this pro�ect occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
hab itat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerrnng Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
impacts�
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Ashevdle
5d What data sources did you use to determme whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat�
Critical habitat was not observed durmg site reconnaissance (01/27/2012 and 04/13/2012) m the pro�ect study area for
any of the categorized species on the U S Fish and Wddlife Service (USFWS) list of threatened and endangered species
for Orange County
A review of the Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Element Occurrence Database was conducted on 01/27/2012 for the
pro�ect site This review did not identify any documented occurrences of the federally threatened or endangered species
listed for Orange County within the vicinity of the pro�ect study area (approximately 1 mde radius)
6 Essential F�sh Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Wdl this proJect occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat� ❑ Yes � No
6b What data sources did you use to determme whether your s�te would impact Essential Fish Habitat�
Pro�ect does not occur in coastal plain
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this proJect occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as havmg histonc or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties signdicant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)�
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources�
A review of the State Histonc Preservation Office (SHPO) online database was conducted on 04/11/2012 to identify any
properties eligible for listing on the National Register of Histonc Places within the pro�ect study area This review did not
identify any National Register properties within the pro�ect study area
Additionally a rev�ew was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on 04/30/2012 This review by the OSA
did not identify any signdicant archaeological sites within the pro�ect study area or withm the vicmity
No histoncal structures or indicators were found or observed dunng the field reconnaissance conducted on 01/27/2012
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Wdl this pro�ect occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplam� � Yes ❑ No
8b If yes e�lam how pro�ect meets FEMA requirements A floodplam development permit is being submitted through the
Town of Carrboro s Floodplain Manager This application wdl require a flood impact study and either a No Rise
Certification or CLOMR for the proposed multi use path
8c What source(s) did you use to make the fioodplam determination� The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps were reviewed
for the pro�ect location Accordmg to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps Number 3710977900J the pro�ect site is
located in a FEMA regulated floodway
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

Anna Reusche I �,K � I 0 5/ 11 / 2 012
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Applicant/Agent s Signature I Date
(Agent s signature is valid only if an authonzation letter from the applicant
is orovided )
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

�_`..
:��� �� ^ •'1. t i . r '
°r t
,�, h '. , � �'f'., y'�"" � ` , .
� *.
��
� � ��,:�
�-.�—+'�+'" _ � r -: �.
� ' ' r -• �, � %'i� v
� -� —
- � �;� �" � .�, ,; i h SchoqyiRro'ad
- ��`.i �'t� �� I �� �, .�..
-,'` „� r•,- �}' ��4 ► ,�.
�t, ~ � ` , . �. ,.; : � �ks � `,�iw, �, .' k• �` � .
l
�� Yl �` 1 ��'. 9 � .� 4 r � ,
:�.�r� �'r. � i .ti� 3�" �+� �- -,,�7���'�� �. . �1
vr � � n , 1 .
r � t � � t
, � � . 'i��i,K �l � , r .
� . . : �k .} .� . �' _ , ���1� � F,�S , ^ �
�' �M. ��'� ' S� . � �y q e
'�"+r�� _ - ; � . . � �+�� _ ��i� ��
'' `�" *f -� ,
"' `# � �;;� � w_
�. - r� �
�!`� �. � � ,
� � .—�_h -�- i
� e F�.,
►'� - . +s, q . ,.
�r� '!�. �
t 1 i
� . .. � �
� �� �'
�.
•��i �e�in Project
�;.,
__ ` ' :�
� �����
� ,�;,,..,;;,�. � �.
��! -� },
� '��i � ���� �
� � � ���
� ��� �
.r ,.. I t � F� ��. ���
I M 'i `) � ,s/� _
j ��., ��� 1L!. �` '<T . ( �
' � �l .. .� ' ►a . L
� , : .��, �
#, � ,� ,. � .r- , _ . _..F .
� �l: � � * �� _���
� � .i{ �A ��y ��
';i � 1 � � �
_ _ j �" _'..__- -: - � . �
, I— 1
=• ; , Tie to existing paved trai! �
';►, , `. �'
�. � . i _ ..-_.f�.����... .
Tie to existing - � i �
Clarem�nt traif 1� � ��' i _
� �',: J . � � '' ` _��� End �'roject . �
�� y
� �� � , ��y � . _
s � � _ �=�� � �'
' �ridge to span floodway � ;j��. _
� �_ .. _ ___._._ ____.._ . .
i ,�', .�-��� ��rai) underpass
�� � i at Homestead Ro�d � �� -
� .. ���� 4'�
�� { , 1+Y,l��� ■ � � � y � V �� � •
i.►1�..ci`Y .3:...,. I � ����:>y„�y��� �+1 ' i_1�., �. �! ' ��
�W�� ti ����j�� � �� ��� � 4'y�y }y-J � �'. ` L
�7:��: � �,��� . �u��, tF, . �'�j ��ti �
�..'_ 1� S. _ � , „y � . . � { Y ,' :=� . ♦ . . �. � .
0 200 400 800 ' ' �� �
Feet ,l �" � •�r` � _ �
a .
� . �.�. ' ;.s
'�(°,�
. ��
,,�
.

�L�
_ fi�
� ����� � -.,[
• � r � � W F.
� F,�
� _ ?� . - . �A_ �' . � %
- '�O �
� •. ; _ - - ` • . �2 _ � y''��.
_ � � �- � � �' '�"�• ,,r,,,,,�
- .� �
�
� I �'�' ' � ' HIGH SCHaOL �� �S
,Y, - e p �
i � �. Z s
�
,
�
r
• � � °�, ��i ,�
� '� � * . �, *�
" � � � ,�►j�� �1��
,�'� '� No stream � -
,�'` �,. - present at
� i�� ��
this location
� ,- — UTto
� � Bolin Creek
.r- � �gg� -
._. � M T
�,-'�� " ° �i. ,
,,.- � , � � ■
i,�_ '� •
�.,�.���� � C'� , �
r./� �
��� � 1
1
� « ' _
� � � Jolly Branch
, �
' � -��.
� ' '�
, � -� '
� � �� �
, � � �
� '
- 'f ' �-,.� - � -� - � . - . � {, � � i r"
� � a � �
.. _ ' � ` � i `
� � _ , '' _ � '. ° �►�►'e��� �."��
. � - , �.
� ��� �.
, - ; . �n - � f
,, . �;.,,� , . �,, ,
,
�' � •
r r
'` l r � 500 1,00
a� ' � ' l I I
� ' �� Feet
� , �� i�Y ' � I Legend
� , ' � �,`� � . ',, � Proposed Greenway
�
� '�.,,�,�,r�� � ' f, � � i i • � �• # Proposed Greenway Connection
+ ' ;� k Streams -
'i� � .' ;
;��'����,
�. .:�
�,
;,
i' �, � KimleyHorn
� � — and Associates, Inc.
d' +
Figure 2: Project Study Area Map (Chapel Hill)
TIP Project U-4726DE
Homestead-Chapel Hill High School
Multi-use Path
Orange County, NC

��
S]� ' � , '��
.-'d'r,re� ''�-q+.="� f.�,..
.�
/) � � Ifimley-Horn
\�� _ andAssociates. Inc.
No skream
present ai
this location
�r
�.'I���`tiklk,�
�
�
,�
.���`
::�
,, � -� �,�
� ��
�
UT to
Joily Branch
��. ■. � (SB)
�
.
�
.
�
�
/
�
�
Jolly Branch
,. „r.. �.. -...
_,� �
?`
�_.�
,,�,r�`�.a:^�, ,, � 240 48
. 4 . .,•`��!: � � � �
2 - Feet
'�:
>�.
. Legend
� � �`�� '�'' � Proposed Greenway
�"`"� r,�ti� ' ■•�■■Proposed Greenway Connection
� � � Streams
_: _,;
;4
Figure 3: NRCS Soil Survey (Orange County)
TIP Project U-4726DE
Homestead-Chapel Hill High School
Multi-use Path
Orange County, NC

a t' t�
. �
u jft= !
a� , ._, �.� � �,' .. r, , "�:,
i
t y•.� g ... :;� -. .f.;.
�'t' �,L- i�'�, �
�, �i�
.�� _ k,-. � .1�7 � :4�:.'�Y[c,
�
�
\'oF'p' � � + :
, 1
r
i
a� ��,� :
� �jf.
;Y,�'1'a. ,,�..
3.
4.Y..
,
C
7�� �+' "'•1t��� ` �' .� `'-Z.
.,Y � �
�. i. � ' `� �(' }„ , �i f
.+''' , �; ` ` )
� ti. ��
� - '�:i, ,t
��..�i i „� . , , a'��,"r •y , ;.r
.+�' � �' I r �Af ' y 4 . �
�l f' � (Y't . . � e
� 1 ,� ,�. .���"st�, ��?ti„�� �.i"` � 1 `` 3 �,
.. - • + .• .
'� "y2._ F �KY1�f'' `,1�R �•`'d/ 1Ts vYa�"•��r 6 •�
'R� .,, ..4 N� � ����� Y.�
�1.� l
.���,�.. . � ' ���� '�'� ! ��. L! �t ' - <
� _ r ' _ . - , .,r;o � � r ,-
. .�'� +1
r'ti '(� �
y � 'L t ' � �`� F =
� ;'�w � ",
, � "� �• {
?f,� ; .' . . , y � , I
.,r ,�'.��►, �r �%�'�* �. '� � �'��� � . �
��'�a{� _ ) . :�j�,�����lll�� �� �a� � , �. ti.�� ��� �!
-�a� : ' � ' � �
M �
�'�le -� ��� wr !��'" . '�' • „� ��' �+; ;���,�f
!" F ,�'. -� . J � �' � . �, �; -v, � - .:{
. 1� � .. � �
- ��i .�}� eF' +G,. � k , � . 4': •t + � P, 4
1 ��" �,►�; �e '.'�` �' n ' X�,y4� " "` �`I � : � �y• ;d'�t.* ! a -
- � ��_�>� � � � k � � ' � �: i �}•1 f ' � •,.) rf • R . ' •
.. '.��• 'i. I r.:� 9� ��T M, .7yr� ��.. � 3, J�, .
�' �4 '�
' • �; � ` _ ��: �' `r t � �. ���� �` }� �., � fi� '� • � �r; � • �
y ' 1 .r . .' . 1• 5 ,���. � . . n. . � _; r .. -
. � ; ;��
.1 i . . K �1� l�ar , . • � `; � � .�� �. , ''� �. p .
'.d/ , �.. .ti . : ' �'� . F� l.
,tir; . • -It.'. r�` ,� a ;,:� '> .. ,, � �
� �.
Ri `• `'`- s�t:, � �M � -�� X�
i� . ��. �.;�c�
_ , � .��c..�'w�; ���.�
w�
� � ' �
�y �` �`'<
y�.�X, j.., - ��i�'+� T+t-4� i., x�. �.a�,. '� ,;���ikf� \ +;,3`i }��ti,.
` � �F , � I . `. �'fi'� ' � }. ,�, � l,� !�� �� �.,�
;^ ' ,� 7. �: � : �r' `' ' �' , �.� �' � ,� , .' � '` �+, '� r� � �i ' .�
'+ ti � . ' y � � � `�- _ �' _�
� M� '� � `,i � � 'n� , � . ��k �
k 4 � y`: , ti {^ , , `4� � ' �
� 14 • , c � + �� � , � S
. J` !
� JI _ � t �a^ 1 .7'. ! � ; �j -
t
.,�� . .�, �.r_ ^ r y � ' � , ����` ►� � , t '
� .`J . . , � 4 ` � �.—.1 I t3� . . . � ' �i � a �.1 � Vr �t.�y�� . , .
Ij4 , � ��,: „ .� [ 1
+ t . � A" \.
�1 � � ;i� la �� d��� �h'�, ` �I' 1.l �� i�� r�,�r 'i �
r ^ A 1 %���,�� 1 �' '�,�� �.�'t�. j i ,��' �� . �,s� .�� , d � i��
yrS� � 4A��"f e,_� A i b , k � � i � n
� "�, ��� ,�, �, � �,� �,� , �Y :�i�► 1 r�,.
.I 0��� . ':�'� �' � 1 �t_ � <. �
� �q ti \ ��jj �', � �L � '� � . �] � i� �.
�3-J . , _�1 ''f�,�tiqlt,�t4� ,y ��.�� lFa�µ.�+.i�� ,;~ �r L : � �+ �� n,t'F'"h 1.
7 ; . ��� [b � � � L�� L � f } , V.. r' � �� � �� ,
i� �
�'s � :"� V .� i � ��' . ' 1.�t T� � �. + r ` • �'�'� . Q � �; � 4 . • � � . i
.� �tyl • `�' '^��� ����ah� ��� � • ' �, ��yi ,+* M ' I �s �" ; r "� �' � ip�'fi�„` �
s',4 ` I � - SJ .. :.. �t T � `�J 1 , � � f � J '' � ' �L ��.� i I . . 5' �� 1 �'4
1 � �� � r- f �- ' F .� 1� i ,ts . ������ ��„'��•�+�, ''�'� ' .�,. '�� � � `1i�!lYiw , - .Gi;�.,:< �
-'' .��'y � � ti•:�� S.� J 7F.r't� ���`�� . � ' e-'1'�1 � . � �l i�� . ,� rt..��v V a y ,� ...{�� �: . ♦ _ � � f � F � 1

GRAPHIC SCALE
75 0 75 /50
�.
(/N FEET 1
l INCH = l50 FT
m
� Kimley-Horn
� and Associates, Inc.
� zo�z
a.� OHk� Bc. 13068
Ra1wpF.Nar1M Carollna ])63E
-- -_ �_u
�•�" _ -- - —"�
�F F_\ �
�
�� \
`-�� \
� '. �
eJ1
4
m \� S�TE �
� Om
1 \ � c\
m
BOLW CREEK GREENWAY
Li
�
a
BOLW CREEK GREENWAY

❑� Kimley-Horn
� ❑ and Associates, Inc.
0 zo��
vaox,�. m.3aaea
0.abpM,NonF Cmol��w ]]636
TEMF�ORARY PERMANENT �UFF(-R QUf= FER
IMPACIS STREAM STREAM ZONE I ZONE 2
IMPACTS IMPACTS IMPACTS IMPACTS
(FT) �FT) (�T � ) (FT � )
�IT� I 0 0 6�985 6�710
BOLIN CREEK GREENWAY
IMPACT SUMMARY

��
� \ ��
\ \ � �
\ \
�-�9� �
�— BZ� � — — — � B1 1 � \ \ , ^
� /
� � � � � � �'..,
INSTALL �-H86K � eZ � gi �`°-� � �j�P — CLASS �l
RE/NFORCED SILT � P/PE OUTLET L(1CATE0 \ ,� i� Q��/
FENCE 0U'iLETS fTYP1 /N STREAM BANK. B
� �
— � � _ _
� � �
— � �
� ��r
— BZ 1 �_y � �
1—
\ �� � ���
R/P RAP SHALL BE � `�< /
� a PLACED /N BANKS ONLY � / `
� � � � �
� � �� � i �
r � � � / � \
a E '' B � F/
3i`" ` � ' _ii --,ti -�,_�-t��" 4;,,,��.�' ` ` \ \ � ,/ /°J �. \ � \
�' t A `
� __—__' __, _ _ �,. _�� \ __ � o� �
�i� ?1+' �if�� ` � `�s_� �y �� ;� � . \ \ � � ' � � � �\ \ \ �
� 7�r -� E �. , \ _ F - �. I�!'�^ , - � � \ dl ^
,, —j-,,�,� ' �
� PROI�OSED � \ ' F% � � -�
�i�p�/_ � � ;9. MUX��TI–USE \ � PATH–� � �� • ` � `\ .,• eZ �
— �PATH� ` � � ✓ / . � �� ' \ � �
� , � � \m?A , 1. , �_ ��` � \ �j
� � \ �� '�, '' �� \ .
CONSTRUCT TIMBER HEADER OfY S/TE RUNOFF /N � � � �' �., � `�. �
�DArER�ION OUTS/DE OF EX/STiNG SWALE W/LL � � i"
� BUFFER ZONE�2 TO BE BYPASSED TO �� � `�' T� � `
D/RECT RUNOFF AWAY gp�/N CREEK W/TH ' � ��� i ,
FROM RETA/N/NG WALL STABILIZED Oi/TLET ��� INSTq� 5 C/AL
TO EX/STING SWALE PROTECTION �� � , 'C SED)AI£NT TROL �
OUTSIDE OF ZONE 2 .i �= FENCE (`�YPI 'ez
� o „\\ j� _ •� � BR/qGE IR/ER
INSTALL TEA/PORAf�1' /V � � `� � � :rs ez � � P� .�
CONSTRUCi/ON F ^ \ '�� � °� `� � •�
ENTRAf�CE fTYPJ � � � � �^ ' ��
,–�,; ,� � � � � ��� �,�
�
/ � � e � � �
� �
\
, ., � \ ��
/ � ;b "_ �
�
/
�
� �, \� F '
INSTALL TREE PROTECTION
FEnrcE r FRo� '6� � � _� _
CONSTRUCT/ON UAI/T,� (TYPI
� �� ��
� �
� F �F�: �
rF �_�
INSTA/l SILT FENCE�
2' FROAI CONSTRUCT/ON�
UAUTS fTYPI �
_ � ^
I
�
-�-_-_-= PROPOSEO SILT FENCE —TPF— TREE PROTECTION FENCE
—E EASEMENT —"'— APPROX. EDGE OF WATER
--- PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE —BZ'— BUFFER ZONE 2 LIMITS
—POE— PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT —� 2— BUFFER ZONE 2 LIMITS
❑�❑ Kimley-Horn
� and Associates, Inc.
� �o�z
o�lOfl��� Bo.3306!
0.a�evti.�`lonn Co.dino l]b3e
BOLIN CREEK GREENWAY
��—'��� _.
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
—f° — TOP OF BANKS
0 BUFFER ZONE IIMPACTS
[� BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
6,985 SF BUFFER ZONE IIMPACTS
6,710 SF BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
�`
i /
i � '~A /
�
i
� ,�
�
"`� �e��`, ;,� � �"�"
���`�`--� ,�- � «3 J� �
�
�-
� PROPOSED
AIULT!–USE
�T E ABUTA/ENT PATH
� � �
SED BR/Df�E` �
19+12e�3 — _ .
� 40' � \\
�
,
��,.,;— �
i �
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 15 0 30 60
ii�i
SITE I BUFFER ZONE IMPACT
I OF 4

�
rl�❑ Kimley-Horn
�I� andAssociates, Inc.
� zo,�
e,� �«K. �
No1NpF. Ne�M Co�oli�a 316�6
�
� � � �
�
���� � � � � �
�SEo —
� �
�
�� �
uw +537!' I�� p��r�
'C�/��E�
BOLIN CREEK GREENWAY
-
t,rw � � � — -- — —
�
ZONE I
SECTION A-A
� ,
GRAPHIC SCALE

���e�cin�c �.
A�ent Aut�o�°n��tion �orm�

Letter of Authorization
Mr Jeff Brubaker w�th the Town of Carrboro authonzes Kimley Horn and
Assoc�ates Inc to act as nur lirnrte�l age�t ta coardinate w�th the U S Army
Corps of Engineers and the North Carobna Division of Water Qualrty for the
preparat�on and submittat of the�urtsdechonal ddermuiarion application
associated w�th Mult� Use Path betwcen Homestead Road and Chapel Hill H�gh
School (TIP # U-4726DE) tocated m Orange Couuty North CaroUna
Authorization will texm�nate on e�iher final agency act�on or upon wrttten
not�fication from erther part�es invofved
Company Naene Kimlev-Horn and Avaeciates. Inc.
Contact Name Jeft 1Vloorc, P�.
Client Address 'H'own of Carrborn
301 W Main S�
Carrb 271
Client Phone # [phone]
Cllent P'ag # 919 9l8 4454
Cl�ent Email JBrubakea�ci.carrboro nc.us
, �
, �� �.
..s�_i�.., , ��
�a, .�!!� !�� . �
.�
�f-�z-lZ
Date

�' t� � �r �r� ��,
Pre����a���-y ,�ua-�scl��t�o��l Req�est

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIOId FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD)
B NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
Attn Anna Reusche PWS on behalf of the Town of Carboro
P O Box 33068
Raleigh NC 27636-3068
C DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER
D PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION The
path begins at the Claremont neighborhood north of Homestead Road extending
east under Homestead Road and through the land owned by the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill to Chapel Hill H�gh School at the Town of
Carrboro/Town of Chapel Hill boundary
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUWBENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State NC County/parish/borough Orange City Carrboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat
35 942297° N Long 79 085062° W
E
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Bolin Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
Non wetland waters 2 200 linear feet 30 width (ft) and/or
Cowardin Class R�verme
Stream Flow Perenrual
Wetlands N/A acres
Cowardm Class N/A
acres
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters
Tidal N/A
Non Tidal N/A
REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY)
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date

❑ Field Determination Date(s)
1 The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be �urisdictional waters of the
United States on the sub�ect site and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved �urisdictionai determination (JD) for that site
Nevertheless the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time
2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
pre-construction notification (PCN) or requests venfication for a non reporting
NWP or other general permit and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD which does not make an official determination of
�urisdictional waters (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization and
that basing a permit authonzation on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authonzation and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the sub�ect permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant s acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity m reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the s�te affected in any way by that activity
are �urisdictional waters of the United States and precludes any challenge to
such �urisdiction in any administrative or �udicial compliance or enforcement
action or in any administrative appeal or m any Federal court and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable Further an approved JD a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein) or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R Part 331
and that in any administrative appeal �ur�sdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C F R 331 5(a)(2)) If during that administrative appeal it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA �urisdiction exists over a site or
to provide an official delineation of �urisdictional waters on the site the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result as soon as is practicable
2

This preliminary JD finds that there may be waters of the United States on the
sub�ect pro�ect site and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity based on the following information
SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for prel�minary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and where checked and
requested appropriately reference sources below)
� Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
� U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 1 24 000 Chapel
Hill Quad
� USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey
Crtat�on Orange County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
� Photographs � Aerial (Name & Date) 2010 Statewide Imagery
or � Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Other information (please specify)
IMPORTANT NOTE The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been verified bv the Coras and should not be relied upon for
later iur�sdictional determinations
Signature and date of
Regulatory Pro�ect Manager
(REQUIRED)
�" � �-��.t.Lu_ o5/li/2oi2
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED unless obtairnng
the signature is impracticable)

Estimated
Site Cowarden amount of Class of
number Latitude Longitude Class aquatic aquatic
resource in resource
rev'ew area
Bolin 35 9425 79 0850 Riverine 800 linear feet non-section
Creek 10 — non tidal
UT to 35 9424 79 0815 Riverme 700 linear feet non section
Jolly 10 — non-tidal
Branch
Jolly 35 9434 79 0811 Riverrne 700 linear feet non section
Branch 10 — non tidal

" il� il+; !I; �1; i `. `�
�J�ACE and I�CIl�WQ �ireara �at� �'or�s

Plorth Carolina Division of VUater Quality Stream Identification Form Version 411
Date 1/17/2012 Pro�ecUSite Bolin Creek Latitude 35 9425
Evaluator A Reusche KHA County Orange Long�tude 79 085
Total Polnts 43 Stream Determmation Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitte Perenrnal e g cluad Name Chapei Hdl
lf t 19 or rennist it Z 30
B Hydrology Subtotal =
12 Presence of Baseflrn
13 iron oxidizmg bacten
14 Leaf litter
90
15 Sed�ment on plants or ciebns
16 Or�arnc debns Imes or pdes
17 Sod based evidence of h�qh water tabl
19
Subtotal = 9 5
oots in streambed
pland plants in streambed
�nthos (note divers�tv and aba�
�00��
�a��o��
�����o�
�����
��0����
• ' �
0
0
0
�
25 A ae p
26 Wetland fants m streambed FACW =
perennial streams may also be fdenhfied us�ng other meihods See p 3b of manual
Notes Bohn Creek is a lar e perenrnal channei Stoneflies
and mayflies were observed dunng site reconaissance
� 0 2
1 0 2
1 3 2
1 3 2
�5 1 15 0
i5 1 15 0
15 1 1 5 0
i5 1 1!
5, OBL = 4 5. Other � 0 n

PJorth Carolina Drvtsion of Water Quality Stream Identiflcation Form Version 411
Date 1/17/2012 Pro�ect/Site Jolly Branch �atitude 35 9425
Evaluator A Reusche KHA County Orange Longitude 79 085
Total Points 45 Stream Determination Other
Stream is at least Intermittent Chepel HIII
Ephemeral fntermitte Perennial e g Quad Name
if a 19 or erennlal ft Z 30
A
1E
2
4 Pafticle sfze
ogy Subtotal = 25 5
channel bed and bank
hannel along thalweg
�ucture ex riffle pooi step pa
n
8 Headcuts
9 Grade controi
10 Naturai valley
11 Second or greater order
a arliflcial ditches are not rated see
n manual
3
K3
Score
�
3
3
3
7
C Biology Subtotal =
18 F�brous roots m streamk
19 Rooted upiand plants in
20 Macrobenthos (note di�
5
�
�
�
0
�5 Ai ae p
26 Wetland lants m streambed FACW =
perennlat sUeams may also be identlfted using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes Jolly Branch flows southwest to Botin Creek Jolly is
located outs�de of the pro�ect area Stonefliesand mayflies were
observed durmg s�te reconaissance +
1 0 2
2 1 0 2
1 2 3 2
1 2 3 2
05 1 15 0
05 1 15 0
05 1 15 0
05 1 1 1!
75 OBL=15 h ra0 0

North CaroNna Division of Water Quality Stream Identificat�on Form Version 411
Date 1l17l2012 Pro�ectlSite UT to JoAy eranch Latitude 35 9425
Evaluator A Reusche KHA County Orange Longdude 79 085
Tota) Points 33 5 Stream Determ�nafion Other
Stream is at feast interm(ttent Ephemeral IMermitte Perenn�al e g Quad Name Chapel H�il
if 2 19 or erennlal ff a 30
A Geomorphology Subtotal =
18 Cantinurty of channel bed and bank
Z Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3 In�hannel structure ex nffle pool ste
poolsequence
4 Particle s�ze of stream substrate
5 Ac.�velrelic floodplain
6 Depasitwnai bars or benches
7 Recent alluv�al deposits
8 Headcuts
9 Grade control
10 Natural valley
11 Second or greater order channel
e artifldal ditches ere not reted see discussions m R
B Hydrology Subtotal= 10
12 Presence of Baseflow
13 Iron oxidizmg bactena
14 Leaf I�ter
15 Sediment on plants or debns
16 Orgarnc debns lines or pdes
17 Sod based ev�dence of high water tabl
C &ology Subtotal = 4
18 Fibrous roots m streambed
19 Rooted upland plants m streambed
20 Macrobenthos (note dnrersitv and abu�
Mollusks
�00�
�001
�0�1
�����
���0�
► . � �l:!'�
3
Q 1
D 1
05
0 05
05
05
�n v�rei�ana iants in streamDeci FACW = 0 75
perenn�al streams may also be idenhtied using other methods See p 35 of manual
Idotes This channei has been �mpacted by the existing walkway
The channe! is currentty 6ned wdh np rap at the crossing vv�th the
ex�stmg walkway �� �
3
�
3
3
3
�
3
5
.�
Score
�
a
3
2
1
0
0

� USACE AID# � � � DWQ #_
_ Site # � (mdicate on attached map) �
� STl�A1VI QLTALI'TY ASSESSIVIENT WORKSI�EET �,.
Prov�de the followmg mformat�on for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name Town of Carboro 2 Evaluator s name A Reusche KHA
3 Date of evaluation 01/17/2012
5 Name of stream Bolin Creek
7 Approximate dramage area 10 000 aCr2S
9 Length of reach evaluated 250 fe2t
11 Srte coordmates (if known) prefer m dec�mal degrees
Lat�tude (ex 34 872312) 35 9425
4 T�me of evaluarion 9 00 am
6 River basm Cape Fear
8 Stream order Th11'd OI'der
lo Counry Orange
12 Subdivision name (if any) _
Long�tude (ex —77 556611)
79 0850
Method location determmed (c�rcle) �PSQI'opo Sheei�rtho (Aenai) Photo/GIS�ther GIS�ther
13 Locat�on of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map ident�fymg stream(s) location)
Bolin Creek crosses Homestead Road
14 Proposed channel work (if any) Ped2St►'lan bi'Idge
15 Recent weather conditions Approx�mately 50 degrees
16 S�te conditions at time of visit Cloudy and cool
17 Identify any special waterway classificahons known �Section 10 �Tidal Waters �Essential F�sheries Habitat
II,Trout Waters �Outstandmg Resource Waters � Nutnent Sensihve Waters aWater Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluat�on pomt� If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map� 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey�
21 Estimated watershed land use 25 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 15 0�o Agncultural
55 0�o Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22 Bankfull width
24 Channel slope down center of stream �Flat (0 to 2%)
25 Channel smuosity �Straight �Occasional bends
23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
�Gentle (2 to 4%) �,Moderate (4 to 10%) ,QSteep (> 10%)
�✓ Frequent meander �Very smuous ,�Braided channel
Instructions for complet�on of worksheet (located on page 2) Begm by deternumng the most appropnate ecoregion based on
location terram vegetation stream classification etc Every character�stic must be scored usmg the same ecoregion Assign pomts
to each charactertstic withm the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 prov�des a brief descript�on of how to review the
charactensrics identified m the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characterisric cannot be evaluated due to site or weather condrtions enter 0 m the sconng box and provide an explanahon m the
comment section Where there are obvious changes m the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
mto a forest) the stream may be divided �nto smaller reaches that display more contmuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representmg a stream of the
highest quality
Total Score (from reverse) 68 Comments
Bolm Creek is a larqe, perennial channel Stoneflies and mayflies were observed durinq site reconnaissance
Evaluator s S�gnature ����'�"�'�- Date 01 /17/2012
This channel evaluat�on form is intended to be used only as a guide to ass�st landowners and env�ronmental professionals m
gathering the data required by the Un�ted States Army Corps of Engineers to make a prel�mmary assessment of stream
quaLty The total score resulhng from the complet�on of this form �s sub�ect to USACE approval and does not imply a
part�cular mit�gat�on ratio or requ�rement Form sub�ect to change — version 06/03 To Comment please ca11 919 876 8441 x 26

Bolin Creek
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORI�SI�EET
� �' ' � ��- � '� � > F �' "�`� µ w { � � � ECORF:GION +POINT�RANGE �'� '� `� tt �"
� #X � � R� CHARACI'ERI5TICS � ,Y� � -� � Coastal -� Plecimont � � Mounta�n � SCORE
1 ' Presence of flow /�persistent pools m stream �
3
no flow or sahuation = 0 stron flow = max omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 4
;` 2 Evidence of past human alterahon 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 5
�„ extensive alteration = 0 no alterahon = max omts
3 Riparian zone
no buffer = 0 conri ous wide buffer = ma�c omts 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 3
�Y Evidence of nutrient or chem�cal cLscharges
� 4 extensive dischar es = 0 no dischaz es = max oints 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 2
�
,a 5 Groundwater d�scharge -- 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 4
Vno dzschar e= 0 s rm s see s wetlands etc = max omts
� j 6 Presence of ad�acent floodplam 0— 4 0— 4 � 0— 2 2
�y no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max omts
� Entrenchment / floodpla�n access 3
a de 1 entrenched = 0 fre uent floodui = malc omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2
,
�� g Presence of ad�acent wetlands �, 2
no wetlands = 0 lar e ad acent wetlands = tnax oints 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2
�, Channel smuosity
�" 9 extensive channehzation = 0 natural meander = max oints 0— 5 � 0— 4 0— 3 3
�� 10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 4
extensive d osit�on= 0 httle or no sedunent = max omts
� 11 Size & d►versity of channel bed substrate ,�NA*,v �� 0— 4 0— 5 4
�- � fine homo enous = 0 lar e diverse stzes = max oints �
�, 12 Evidence of channel mc�swn or widenmg 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 4
de 1 mcised = 0 stable bed & banks = malc, omts
�� 13 Presence of ma�or bank fadures
� a severe erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max omts 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 5
� 14 Root depth and density on banks 4
H
no visible roots = 0 dense roots throu out = max oints 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5
` Impact by agriculture, l�vestock, or hmber produchon
� 15 �bstantial un act =0 no evidence = max omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 �
�'� � 16 Presence of nffle pooUr�pple pool complexes p_ 3 0— S 0— 6 5
�� ., no rifflesln les or ools = 0 well develo ed = max�` omts
�� Hab�tat comple�ty
,�,�� 1� little or no habitat = 0 fre uent vaned habitats = max oints 0— 6 0— 6; 0— 6 5
�a Canopy coverage over streambed s
18 no shadui ve etarion = 0 contmuous cano = max omts 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 2
Substrate embeddedness � - �
�� 19 -� de 1 embedded = 0 loose structure = malc ,�,�,� �NA* � 0— 4 0— 4 3
5�' Presence of stream mvertebrates (see page 4)
�„�� 20 no evidence = 0 commo numerous es = max omts �— 4 f 0— 5 0— 5 3
(}'' j 21 Presence of amph�bians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 0
O.� no evidence = 0 commo nutnerous es = max omts
��� 22 � Presence of fish
�� no evidence = 0 commo numerous es = max oints 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
�� 23 Ev�dence of wddLfe use 4
� `" no evidence = 0 aburidant evidence = max oints , 0— 6 � 0— 5 0— 5 s 0
! � � � � � r �. � �w � � �- � � �. � � �- , � �. � � ,,.�
� � � � �, � �� `�T�otal PointsfPos�ble ,� �'�"" � �' � 100 � 100 "� ��5 100�"�"� i '�� , � s��,�
z � .� ~� � ��, f � � .� � � # � � y� � �, � � �;
u� �. ,. .f °� f.� .�.3'� �z-� � .x 'r � L� r.�.a �' '-� r �` � sr � _'" �� " � i °' �
z -� � �� � ,��+,. � TOTAL,SCORE;�(also enter;on first,page) r � � � �` � � � � � ` 6$
�- � -� -
s t� x �-fi x
* These characterishcs are not assessed m coastal streams

��USACE AID# � ��_� DWQ #�_^_ Site # �(md�cate on attached map�
�_� ___._ � � _
� S'T1��11VI QLTALITY ASSESSMENT VVORKS�IEE'T �„r
� .�, "
Prov�de the following information for the stream reach under assessment "'
1 Applicant s name TOWn Of C8�b01'O 2 Evaluator s name A Reusche KHA
3 Dateofevaluation 01/17/2012
5 Name of stream J011y BranCh
7 Approx�mate dramage area 4 000 aCl'eS
9 Length of reach evaluated 200 feet
11 Srte coordmates (if known) prefer m decimal degrees
Latttude (ex 34 872312) 35 9425
4 Tune of evaluation 10 00 am
6 River basm Cape Fear
8 Stream order Second Order
lo County Orange
12 Subdiv�sion name (if any)
Longitude (ex —77 556611)
79 0850
Method locat�on determmed (ctrcle) �'iPSQI'opo Sheet�rtho (Aenal) Photo/GIS�ther GIS�ther
13 Locarion of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map �dentifymg stream(s) location)
Joliy Branch is located southeast of the pro�ect corridor
14 Proposed channel work (�f any) N011e
15 Recent weather conditions Approx�mately 50 degrees
16 Site conditions at time of visit Cloudy and Cool
17 Identify any special waterway classificarions known �Section 10 �Tidal Waters �Essential F�shenes Hab�tat
aTrout Waters �Outstandmg Resource Waters �✓ Nutnent Sens�t�ve Waters nWater Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluahon pou►t� If yes esrimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map� ZO Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey�
21 Estimated watershed land use 25 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industnal _% Agr�cultural
25 0�o Forested _% Cleared / Logged 50 % Other ( SChool YardS �
22 Bankfull width
24 Channel slope down center of stream �Flat (0 to 2%)
25 Channel smuosity �Straight �Occasional bends
23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
�Gentle (2 to 4%) �Moderate (4 to 10%) �Steep (> 10%)
�Frequent meander �Very su►uous �,Braided channel
Instructions for complehon of worksheet (located on page 2) Begm by deternvmng the most appropnate ecoregion based on
location tenam vegetation stream class�fication etc Every charactenst�c must be scored usmg the same ecoregion Assign pomts
to each charactenstic withm the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a br�ef description of how to review the
charactenshcs identified m the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
character�stic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 m the scormg box and provide an explanation m the
comment secrion Where there are obvious changes m the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
mto a forest) the stream may be divided mto smaller reaches that display more contmuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representmg a stream of the
highest quahty
Total Score (from reverse) 68 Comments
Jolly branch flows southwest to Bolin
Evaluator s Signature ������ Date 01/17/2012
Th�s channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to ass�st landowners and environmental profess�onals m
gathermg the data requ�red by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a prehmmary assessment of stream
qualrty The total score resultmg from the completion of th�s form is sub�ect to USACE approval and does not �mply a
particular mrtigation ratio or reqwrement Form sub�ect to change — version 06/03 To Comment please ca11 919 876 8441 x 26

Jolly Branch
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
� � � ECOREGION POIN� RA�TGE �°`
#� , �t � � CHARA'CT�ERISTICS `� � SCORE
, } � T � Coastal �Piedmont 'Mountam � �- �
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools m stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 4
� no flow or saturahon = 0 stron flow = m� omts
2 Evidence of past human alterahon 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 5
�
" extensive alteratton = 0 no alterahon = maac omts
"� R�parian zone `
�t 3 no buffer = 0 conU ous wide buffer = max omts i 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 4
� Ev�dence of nutrient or chemical cLscharges
.� �
4 extensrve dischaz es = 0 no dischar es = max oints 0— 5 0— 4 - 0— 4 3
gi„a 5 Groundwater d�scharge 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4' 4
�V no dischar e= 0 s nn s see s wetlands etc = max omts
,� �Presence of ad�acent floodplain 2
��,,' _ 6 no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = xnax omts 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
�` Entrenchment / floodplam access
� � de I entrenched = 0 fre uent floodui = max omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 3
"� g Presence of ad�acent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 0
�, � no wetlands = 0 lar e ad acent wetlands = max omts ,
�� 9 Channel sinuos�ty 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 3
� extensive channehzation = 0 natural meander = max omts
�� 10 Sediment mput f 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 4
�.� extensive d osihon= 0 httle or no sedunent = m� omts
�� 11 S�ze & diversity of channel bed substrate �.� NA � 0— 4 0— 5 4
� fine homo enous = 0 lar e�diverse sizes = max oints �- * s �
Evidence of channel incision or widenmg
�� 12 de 1 mcised = 0 stable bed & banks = ma�c omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 4
13 Presence of ma�or bank fa►lures 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 5
j� severe erosion = 0 no eroston stable banks = max omts
R�1 Root depth and density on banks
�� 14 no vis�ble roots = 0 dense iroots throu out = max omts 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 4
�� Impact 6y agr�culture, Lvestock, or hmber production
15 substantial un act =0 no evidence = max oints 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 1
�� 16 Presence of nffle pooUr►pple pool compleges 0— 3 0— S 0— 6 5
�E no riffles/n les or ools = 0 well develo ed = max oints
� i � Habitat complexity 0— 6 � 0— 6 0— 6 5
�'' little or no habitat = 0 fre uent vaned habrtats = max omts
�, Canopy coverage over streambed
� 1 g no shadm ve etarion = 0 contmuous cano = max omts 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 2
� Substrate embeddedness * 0— 4 0— 4 3
� 19 de 1 embedded = 0 loose structure = max NA ,�
20 Presence of stream mvertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 3
no evidence = 0 commo numerous es = max omts
'(��}� Presence of amph�bians
O? 21 no evidence = 0 commo numerous es = max omts 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 0
-t� 22 Presence of fish � �
�� no evidence = 0 commo numerous es = max omts 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 0
Evidence of wildHfe use 0— 6 0— 5 , 0— 5 0
��,� 23 no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max omts � �
� �� Y, F� - Total�Pofnts Possible� � � , ,� ~ 7 3100 ,� � � ` ' 1�00{ a-.� � 100 -� � � ��� a�
t .� �- � -� � �, � x � £ r � � x ,�, �~ �
, `- �, .� � u � � r � �- � y " .� � ��. � �
� � � ' � ���� �f � � �TOTAL SCORE '(also enter on first:page) �' `� �- ., � �, �-3 � � 6$
� s� �
� i nese cnaracteristics are not assessed m coastal streams

•
�USACE AID# �` ' �_ DWQ # ` __� �� _ _ Site #__ (mdicate on attached map) �
� ST1tEA1VI QUALIT'�' A.SSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the followmg ►nformat�on for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name TOWn Of Cal'bOro 2 Evaluator s name A Reusche KHA
3 Date of evaluation 01 /17l2012 4 Time of evaluat�on 10 00 am
5 Name of stream UT to Jolly Branch _ 6 River basu► Cape Fear
7 Approximate dramage area 400 aCreS
9 Length of reach evaluated 100 feet
11 Slte Cooidu►ates (if known) prefer m decimal degrees
Latitude (ex 34 872312) 35 9434
8 Stream order First Order
10 County Orange
12 Subd�v�sion name (if any)
Longitude (ex —77 556611)
790811
s:-�i�ri - �
�:: � _
Method locatton determmed (c►rcle) �'iPSQI'opo Sheet�rtho (Aenal) Photo/GIS�ther GIS�ther
13 Location of reach under evaluat�on (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map ident�fymg stream(s) location)
The UT to Jolly Branch is located southeast of the pro�ect corridor at the existing walkway
14 Proposed channel work (if any) None
15 Recent weather conditions Approx�mately 50 degrees
16 Srte conditions at tune of visit Cloudy and Cool
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known �Sect�on 10 �Tidal Waters �Essential Fisheries Habitat
❑.Trout Waters �Outstandmg Resource Waters � Nutnent Sensit�ve Waters aWater Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluarion pomt� If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map� 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey�
21 Esrimated watershed land use 25 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial `% Agricultural
25 % Forested _% Cleared! Logged �Q°lo Other ( School yard �
22 Bankfull width
24 Channel slope down center of stream �Flat (0 to 2%)
25 Channel smuosity �Straight �Occas�onal bends
23 Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
�Gentle (2 to 4%) �Moderate (4 to 10%) �Steep (> 10%)
�Frequent meander �Very smuous �Braided channel
Instruchons for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begm by determmmg the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location tenam vegetat�on stream classificahon etc Every character�st�c must be scored using the same ecoregion Ass�gn pomts
to each charactenshc withm the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 prov�des a brief description of how to review the
charactenstics identified m the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a
characterisric cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 m the sconng box and provide an explanation m the
comment sect�on Where there are obvious changes m the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture
mto a forest) the stream may be divided mto smaller reaches that display more contmuity and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 w�th a score of 100 representing a stream of the
h�ghest quahty
Total Score (from reverse) 62 Comments
This channel has been impacted by the existinq walkway The
existinq walkwav
Imed with np rap at the crossinq with the
EvaluatorsS�gnature � � �1���- Date01/17/2012
This channel evaluat�on form is �ntended to be used only as a gwde to ass�st landowners and environmental professionals m
gathermg the data reqwred by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a prelimmary assessment of stream
qual�ty The total score resultmg from the complet�on of th�s form �s sub�ect to USACE approval and does not �mply a
part�cular mrtigahon rat�o or requ�rement Form sub�ect to change — vers�on 06/03 To Comment please ca11 919 876 8441 x 26

UT to Jofly Branch
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
� 1 � �-� �a ~ � t � } � ECOREGION POINT �RANGE � � �
� # h ` � � CHA€RACTERISTICS � ' SCORE
� � �. � � � { Coastal � �Pledmont � Mountam � �,
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools m stream
no flow or saturahon = 0 stron flow = max omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 4
,� 2 Evidence of past human alterahon
extensive alteration = 0 no alterahon = max omts 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 2
T 3 '� Riparian zone
�'
no buffer = 0 conti ous wide buffer = max oints 0— 6 0— 4 0— 5 4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical cLscharges
'�, 4 extensive dischaz es = 0 no dischar es = max omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 3
a Groundwater discharge 4
V5 no dischar e= 0 s rm s see s wetlands etc = max omts 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4
�A 6 � Presence of ad�acent floodplain 0— 4 0— 4 0— 2
� no flood lam = 0 extensive flood lam = max omts 2
`� Entrenchment /'floodplam access 3
a� � de 1 entrenched = 0 fre uent floodm = max omts 0— 5 0— 4� 0— 2
� g , Presence of ad� acent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 Q
+ � no wetlands = 0 lar e ad acent wetlands = max oints
9 Channel smuosity 0— 5 0— 4 ' 70 — 3 3
,
� extens�ve channehzation = 0 natural meander = max omts
4 10 SecLment mput ` 4
' extensive d osition= 0 httle or no sedunent = max omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4
' S�ze & diversity of channel bed substrate �
�, 11 fine homo enous = 0 lar e diverse sizes = max oints � N`�*r '' e 0— 4 0— 5 4
� 12 Evidence of channel �nc�sion or widenmg '
t�de 1 mc�sed = 0 stable bed & banks = max omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 4
13 Presence of ma,or bank fadures
a� severe`erosion = 0 no erosion stable banks = max omts 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 5
� Root depth and dens�ty on banks 4
�� 14 no v�sible roots = 0 dense roots throu � out = max oints 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5
�2 Impact by agriculture, hvestock, or hmber produchon '
,� � 15 substantial un act =0 no evidence = max omts 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 �
{�� 16 Presence of nftle pooUripple pool complezes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 5
� E no nffles/n les or ools = 0 well develo ed = max omts
£� 1 � Habitat complezity 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 5
��, httle or no habitat = 0 fre uent vaned habrtats = max omts
� 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 2
�� no shadm ve etat�on = 0 conhnuous cano = max omts 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5
�`�� 19 Substrate embeddedness Npr* '� ,� 0— 4 0— 4 3
de 1 embedded = 0 loose structure = max �
20 Presence of stream mvertebrates (see page 4)
no evidence = 0 common numerous es = max omts 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 �
L�'}� 21 � Presence of amphibians
Od� no evidence = 0 commo numerous es = max omts 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
Presence of fish
� 22 no evidence = 0 commo numerous es = max omts 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �
23 Ev�dence of wddLfe use
no evidence = 0 abundant evidence = max oints 0— 6 0— 5 $ 0— 5 0
�- � �
# �, �.� � � ,� ;� Total �Pofnts+Possible �,� `� � z Y , � ' 100 �'' "� ti100 m ��' ` � 100.� j �� .� � x �
� "� � �' �' a " r " ''s � f � � � �
� � � �. � � � �
� � � f ��`TOTAL�SCORE (also enter�on first�page) � � � � � � � "� -� - � �" 62
'S 4 A � -''� " ,a � k � � k
* These characterisrics are not assessed m coastal streams