20180215 Ver 1_B-5377 NWP 3 and 13 application_20171208

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following information:
1. Project Name: Brid e Re lacement No. 890157 on SR 2170 over Polecat Creek
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NCDOT Di�ision I0. Scoit Cole, P.E.
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: STV En ineers Inc.
*Agent Authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
5. Site Address: SR 2170 Irb Road o�er Polecat Creek Monroe NC
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City: Manroe, NC,
8. County: Unian
9. Lat: 34.859797° N Long: -80.603641° W
10. Quadrangle Name:_Tradesville, 5C-NC _
11. Waterway: Polecat Creek (Class C�_
12. Watershed: Yadkin Pee-Dee �HUC 03040202), �
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 3 and 13
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign Number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/Nature of Activity/Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:

� � �Ti�r - ���
� �f�.r.�
December 7, 2017
Ms. Crystal Amschler
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
SUBJECT: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permits #3 and #13
NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement No. 890157
SR 2170 (Irby Road) over Polecat Creek, Union County, NC
State TIP Number B-5377
STV Engineers, Inc. Project No. 4018646
Dear Ms. Amschler:
On behalf of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) — Division 10, STV
Engineers, Inc. (STV) is submitting a Pre-Construction Notification Form (See Attachment A)
pursuant to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) #3 —
Maintenance and NWP #13 — Bank Sfabilization. The NCDOT has retained STV to assist in
matters related to wetland permitting services for this project. Materials supporting our
Jurisdictional Determination regarding the approximate location and extent of jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. within the approximate 3.9-acre project study area (PSA) including North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Stream Identification Forms, a Wetland
Determination Data Form, an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (Rapanos) Form,
Approximate Potential Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary Map, and photographs, are
found in Attachment B. Accompanying figures, permit drawings, list of property owners, and an
impact summary are included in Attachment C. A"No National Register of Historic Places
Eligible or Listed Archaeological Sites Present or Affected Form" and "Historic Architecture and
Landscapes No Survey Required Form" are included as Attachment D.
Based on NC OneMap aerial photography for Union County and verified by field review, the
approximate 3.9-acre PSA consists primarily of undeveloped forest, agricultural property,
disturbed (maintained) right-of-way (R/W), and the improved paved roadway.
Pro;eet Des�rip�ticr�tl�Pur�pose �n€i Need
STV was retained by the NCDOT to provide engineering and environmental services for the
bridge replacement project on SR 2170 (Irby Road). The SR 2170 bridge over Polecat Creek
PSA is located southwest of Monroe in the southwestern portion of Union County, east of NC
522; see Attachment C— Figures 1 and 2.

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
The existing bridge consists of a single span structure approximately 31 feet in length and 20
feet in width. The proposed structure consists of a single span cored-slab bridge approximately
55 feet in length and 30 feet in width. The new bridge will be constructed on the same horizontal
alignment as the existing bridge. The existing R/W is 60' wide.
This project is part of the NCDOT's Division Managed Bridge Replacement Program. This
program is intended to replace the State's aging, deficient bridges in an efficient and cost
effective manner. Many of the State's bridges were built in the 1950's and are now deteriorating
faster than funds are available to replace them. It is estimated that for every bridge replaced,
two additional ones become deficient. It is the goal of this program that all bridge replacements
meet state and federal environmental regulations while providing the maximum benefit to the
public.
The existing bridge conditions were most recently evaluated on August 30, 2012 by the
NCDOT. Subsequently, the NCDOT prepared an updated Structural Inventory and Appraisal
report for the SR 2170 bridge over Polecat Creek (identified as Bridge No. 890157). This
Structural Inventory and Appraisal report gives the bridge a sufficiency rating of 21.25 out of
100, with a status considered "structurally deficient." The NCDOT is planning to replace the
existing SR 2170 Bridge No. 890157 over Polecat Creek, while funding is available, with an
improved modern structure. During construction, the SR 2170 roadway will be closed to traffic,
and traffic will be detoured off-site.
It is anticipated that this bridge replacement project qualifies for a NWP #3 and a NWP #13.
NWP #3 authorizes the replacement of currently serviceable structures and allows minor
deviations in the structure's configuration due to current construction code or safety standards.
NWP #13 authorizes bank stabilization activities necessary for erosion control and prevention.
Backqround and Methodology
The scoping meeting for this bridge replacement project, SR 2170 over Polecat Creek Bridge
Replacement, was held on March 7, 2017 at the proposed SR 2170 over Polecat Creek project
site; see Attachment B- Photograph 1. Representatives from the NCDOT, NCDWR, USFWS,
Vaughn & Melton and STV attended. It was agreed by the NCDOT and other representatives in
attendance that a NWP #3 would be appropriate for this bridge replacement project. The 2017
reauthorization of the Nationwide Permits included a change in NWP #3 so that bank
stabilization typically associated with bridge replacement is no longer authorized by NWP #3.
Therefore, the use of a NWP #13 will also now be required.
Field surveys were conducted within the proposed SR 2170 over Polecat Creek Bridge
Replacement project study area (PSA) by STV environmental scientists on July 20, 2017, and
September 28, 2017. A PSA that was approximately 150 feet wide and 1,000 feet in length,
centered along the existing bridge, and that extended downstream for approximately 200 feet
and upstream for approximately 100 feet was field reviewed. Streams and wetlands within the
PSA were assessed and plant communities and their associated wildlife were identified and
recorded.
Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are defined by 33 CFR 328.3(b) and protected by Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), which is administered and enforced in North Carolina
Page 2

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District. Potential wetland areas
were defined using the USACE Routine On-Site Determination method as described in the 1987
"Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."' This technique uses a multi-parameter
approach, which requires positive evidence of hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and
hydric soils. In addition, the USACE "Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0)"2 was utilized for
further procedural and technical guidance. Potential jurisdictional stream channels were
classified according to the most recent NCDWR3 methodology. The stream limits and
breakpoints (transition from intermittent flow to perennial flow) were approximated with a
Trimble Geo7X hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS) unit capable of subfoot accuracy
and mapped using ArcGIS 10.3 software.
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms are included in Attachment B. The Approved Jurisdictional
Determination (Rapanos) Form and representative photographs of the jurisdictional features
located in the PSA are also included in Attachment B.
Prior to fieldwork, the following references were reviewed to identify possible waters of the U.S.,
including wetland areas:
• U.S. Geological Service (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle map [Tradesville, SC-NC (2017)]
• U.S. Geological Service (USGS) The National Map Topo Base Map
• U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map (Tradesville,
SC-NC)
• U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS), now known as
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Soils Series Data Map for Union County,
NC (2014)
• USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey
The USGS map and Soil Survey each depict two streams within the PSA. The USFWS NWI
map depicts one stream (R5UBH) and a palustrine forested wetland (PF01A) as potential
jurisdictional features within the PSA. Jurisdictional stream boundaries were delineated and
flagged in the field by STV Senior Environmental Scientist Brandon Phillips, CHMM, with blue
and white striped tape at the ordinary high water mark near the top of the stream bank. The
boundaries were approximated and mapped using ArcGIS 10.3 software for preliminary
planning purposes.
The proposed SR 2170 over Polecat Creek Bridge Replacement project is located entirely
within the Carolina Slate Belt Physiographic Province of North Carolina, which is characterized
by trellised drainage patterns. Based on topographic mapping, elevations in the PSA range from
approximately 625 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) to 655 feet NGVD
(Attachment C- Figure 2). The highest elevation in the PSA is located in the western portion of
� Environmental Laboratory, 1987, "Corps of Engineers Wellands Delineation Manual, " Technica[ Reporl Y-87-1, US Army
�'ngineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Z U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern
Mounlains and Piedmont Region. Vicksburg MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
3 North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2010. Methodology for ldentification of Inlermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins. Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh,
NC.
Page 3

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
the PSA. The lowest elevation in the PSA is located within Polecat Creek where it exits the
southern portion of the PSA.
According to the NRCS SCS, the project study area contains four soil types: Chewacla silt loam,
0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded (ChA); Cid channery silt loam, 1 to 5% slopes (CmB); Tarrus
gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15% slopes (TaC); Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam, 2 to 8% slopes,
moderately eroded (Tb62); see Attachment C- Figure 3. The Chewacla soil series is included
on the NRCS List of Hydric Soils due to inclusions of the Wehadkee, undrained, soil type.
The proposed PSA is located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee drainage basin, Lynches River Watershed
subbasin 03-04-02-02. The major stream in the project vicinity is Polecat Creek. Polecat Creek
is a Class C water that generally flows in a southeastern direction to Lynches River, which flows
to the Great Pee Dee River.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
The results of the on-site field reviews conducted by STV environmental scientists indicate that
two jurisdictional relatively permanent waters (RPWs), RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) and
seasonal RPW Stream B(Unnamed Tributary {U.T.} to Polecat Creek) are located within the
PSA. The figure entitled Approximate Potential Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary Map
Exhibit (Attachment B) depicts the approximate locations of these jurisdictional features.
Representative photographs of these jurisdictional feature that are located within the PSA are
included in Attachment B. The PSA is located in Union County which is not one of the 25
designated trout counties of NC.
Streams or Relafively Permanent Wafers
RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) was concluded to be an RPW with perennial hydrology. Polecat
Creek, also concluded to be providing important aquatic function, begins off-site to the north and
flows south across the PSA (Attachment B- Photographs 2 and 3). Approximately 360 linear
feet of Polecat Creek is located within the PSA (Attachment C- Figure 4). Polecat Creek is
depicted as a blue line stream on the USGS topographic quadrangle and is depicted as a
stream on the NRCS Soils Series Data Map of Union County (Attachment C- Figures 2 and 3,
respectively). RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) flows to the Lynches River, which flows to the
Great Pee Dee River, a traditional navigable water.
Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) was concluded to be an RPW with intermittent
hydrology. Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek), also concluded to be providing
unimportant aquatic function, begins on-site north of SR 2170 and west of RPW Stream A
(Polecat Creek) and flows east into Polecat Creek (Attachment B- Photograph 4).
Approximately 111 linear feet of seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) is located
within the PSA (Attachment C- Figure 4). Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) is
depicted on the USGS topographic quadrangle and on the NRCS Soils Series Data Map of
Union County (Attachment C- Figures 2 and 3, respectively). Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to
Polecat Creek) flows to Polecat Creek. Polecat Creek flows to the Lynches River, which flows to
the Great Pee Dee River, a traditional navigable water.
Page 4

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
No potential jurisdictional wetlands were identified in the PSA during the field reviews.
More information on the individual stream characteristics of RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) and
seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) can be found on the NCDWR Stream
Identification Forms included in Attachment B. More information on the surrounding upland
characteristics can be found on the Wetland Determination Data Form included in Attachment
B.
lmpacts to Waters of the U.S.
The project involves the replacement of the existing SR 2170 Bridge over Polecat Creek (RPW
Stream A) with a cored slab bridge. Permanent impacts to waters of the U.S. would result from
the project. Approximately 60 linear feet (<0.01 acre) of RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) would
be permanently impacted (designated by the symbol "S" on Attachment C- Sheets 2 through
4). Permanent impacts would result from the riprap lining of the stream banks under the new
bridge. Minor temporary impacts (designated by the symbol "TS" on Attachment C- Sheets 2
through 4) may occur to a maximum of 85 linear feet (approximately 0.02 acre) of RPW Stream
A(Polecat Creek) due to the removal of the existing bridge, the removal of the existing
abutments, and the construction of the new bridge abutments that may potentially cause
incidental debris to fall into the channel (See Attachment C- Sheets 2 through 4). Roadway
approach work has been minimized to that which is absolutely necessary within the scope of
replacing the bridge and will result in no additional impacts to waters of the U.S. No major utility
relocations would be required as part of the bridge replacement; no additional impacts would
occur as a result of utility relocations.
Hydraulic calculations have been prepared based on the placement of the new bridge. No
increase in the upstream flood elevations is anticipated based on these calculations. Based on
the results of the HEC-RAS model for SR 2170 over Polecat Creek, the existing bridge can be
replaced with a longer bridge without causing a rise to the established 100-year flood elevations
and meets the requirements of Federal Highway Administration, Federal-Aid Policy Guide, 23
CFR 650A, "Location and Hydraulic Design of Encroachments on Floodplains," and the
Memorandum of Agreement between the NCDOT and the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program.
Project activities will be done in compliance with Water Quality Certification No. 4085 and No.
4087. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted so that the flowing stream
does not come into contact with the disturbed area. No untreated runoff shall be discharged into
the stream. All necessary measures shall be taken to prevent direct contact between uncured or
curing concrete and waters of the state. Matting that incorporates plastic mesh and/or plastic
twine shall not be used in the stream or floodplains. No temporary fills or access roads will be
used.
Avoidance and Minimization
Due to the nature of the project, avoiding the minor permanent and potential temporary impacts
to Polecat Creek while achieving project goals is not possible. There is not a practicable
alternative that would achieve the project purpose of replacing the bridge, stabilizing the
Page 5

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acemenf Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Polecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
streambank, and improving the roadway approaches without causing minor permanent impacts
as well as potential minor temporary debris impacts to Polecat Creek. Best management
practices (BMPs) and appropriate erosion and sedimentation controls will be installed and
maintained during construction activities to allow for the least adverse effect on the stream
channel and associated water quality.
Potential minor permanent and temporary impacts to Polecat Creek are unavoidable due to the
requirement to replace the bridge with a longer cored slab bridge, and the removal of the
existing abutments. Efforts to minimize impacts to this stream included:
• The crossing of Polecat Creek will essentially remain in the same location within the
existing SR 2170 R/W in order to reduce the need for additional roadway fill and to avoid
additional impacts to Polecat Creek.
• The construction of the new cored slab bridge from either of the stream embankments
will eliminate the need for heavy equipment to enter jurisdictional waters of the U.S. and
will allow demolition of the existing structure and construction of the new bridge with
minimal temporary impacts to the stream channel. The road will be closed during
construction and work will be performed from the existing roadway approaches.
Activities on the project site involving impacts to waters of the U.S. will be required to follow the
General Conditions of the USACE Nationwide Permits (Federal Register Vol. 82, No. 4; updated
January 6, 2017), applicable USACE Wilmington District Regional Conditions (March 17, 2017),
and applicable NCDWR consistency conditions (March 19, 2017).
Compensaiorx MitiAation
As described above, efforts have been made to avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the
U.S. to the maximum extent practicable. The replacement of the existing bridge with a longer
cored slab bridge will cause permanent impacts to 60 linear feet (0.01 acre) of RPW Stream A
(Polecat Creek) for bank stabilization. Overlapping potential temporary impacts are anticipated
to 85 linear feet (approximately 0.02 acre) of RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek); see Attachment C
- Sheets 2 through 4. Given the magnitude of permanent impacts, compensatory mitigation is
not anticipated. In the event the USACE requires mitigation then the NCDENR Division of
Mitigation Services, formerly known as the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
will be utilized.
5tormwater Mana�ement Plan
A bridge replacement project is considered to be a're-development' procedure and
redevelopment procedures do not require a state stormwater permit although the project is
covered by NCDOT Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS000250. A Stormwater Management
Plan has been prepared and Best Management Practices (BMPs) and runoff controls will be
implemented during construction to reduce the stormwater impacts to the receiving stream due
to erosion and unfiltered runoff; see Attachment C- Stormwater Management Plan. Temporary
construction runoff will be controlled by using silt fence, special sediment control fence,
Page 6

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
impervious dikes, coir fiber wattle breaks, coir fiber wattles with polyacrylamide, rock silt checks
and temporary matting and grassing.
The proposed roadway will have a 3.4% superelevation with 10-foot travel lanes. Overall
drainage patterns will be maintained. A traffic bearing drainage inlet will be placed on the low
side of the superelevation to pick up runoff from the bridge. Water will be conveyed from this
inlet and discharged to a riprap apron in uplands through a 15-inch reinforced concrete pipe.
Class II riprap abutment protection is proposed to prevent future erosion and stream migration.
Permanent soil reinforcement mat (PSRM) will be used as toe protection for the bridge. Class II
riprap was used as bank stabilization on the stream through the bridge. Impervious dikes will be
used to prevent the mixing of sediment laden water with the stream during construction activities
close to the water. The existing bridge will be removed.
Cultural Resources
In a document dated March 25, 2015, the NCDOT Archaeologist made a determination that
"There are no National Register Eligible or Listed Archaeological Sites present or affected by
this project" for the Area of Potential Effects (APE); see Attachment D- No National Register of
Historic Places Eligible or Listed Archaeological Sites Present or Affected Form. In a document
dated October 4, 2017, the NCDOT Architectural Historian made a determination of "No Survey
Required" for Historic Architecture and Landscapes for the APE (Attachment D- Historic
Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Required Form).
Protected Species
STV conducted a protected species habitat assessment and review of the PSA on July 20,
2017, and September 28, 2017. Prior to the field reviews, STV reviewed the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) databases,
which provided existing data concerning the potential occurrence of federally and state
protected (threatened or endangered) species in Union County. These databases indicate that
there are three federal and state endangered species that may occur in Union County. These
protected species and their physical descriptions and habitat requirements are described below.
5chweinitz's sunflower �Helianfhus schweinrtzrr} - FederallState Endana�ered
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herbaceous plant limited to the Piedmont counties of North
and South Carolina. The plant grows from one to two meters tall from a cluster of tuberous
roots. The sunflower consists of a flower with a yellow disk and ray flowers formed on small
heads. The disc is less than 1.5 centimeter (cm) across and the petals are two to three cm long.
The lanceolate leaves are opposite on the lower stem and alternate near the flowers. The
typical habitat for this plant includes roadsides, old pastures, transmission line rights-of-way
(R/Ws), open areas, and edges of upland woods. Periodically maintained R/Ws are typically
considered good potential habitat for the Schweinitz's sunflower. Major characteristics of soils
associated with suitable Schweinitz's sunflower habitat include thin soils, soils on upland
interstream flats or gentle slopes, those which are clayey in texture (and often with substantial
rock fragments), those which have a high shrink-swell capacity, and those which vary over the
course of the year from very wet to very dry. Flowering occurs from August to the first frost of
the year.
Page 7

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed within the project study area and the
area was reviewed in the flowering season. There are no records of Schweinitz's sunflower
being located in the Tradesville, SC-NC USGS quadrangle. The NC Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) website was reviewed to determine the locations of the nearest populations of
Schweinitz's sunflower. The NCNHP determined that no populations of Schweinitz's sunflower
were present within one mile of the project study area. The project study area has some of the
proper habitat requirements preferred by this species but it is unlikely that Schweinitz's
sunflower would be found within the project study area. Based on the field review conducted
during the flowering season, the available databases, and the limited area of proposed roadside
disturbance, it is determined that this project will have `no effect' on Schweinitz's sunflower.
Biological Conclusion: Nv Effect
Carolina heelsplitter {Lasmigona decoraia) - FederallState Endanqered
The Carolina heelsplitter has an ovate, trapezoid shaped shell. The outer surFace of this mussel
species' shell is yellowish, greenish, or brownish with greenish, blackish rays. The inner shell
ranges from iridescent to mottled pale orange. The average size of the Carolina heelsplitter is
78 millimeters (mm). The Carolina heelsplitter is found in small to large streams and rivers as
well as ponds over a variety of substrates usually near stable, well-shaded stream banks. Most
individuals are found in undercuts and along shaded banks stabilized with extensive tree roots,
a buried log, or rocks. The Carolina heelsplitter requires waterways with well oxygenated clean
water. Pursuant to the USFWS Carolina Heelsplitter 5-Year Review: Summarv and Evaluatian
2012, eleven populations of this mussel are presently known to exist, three of which occur within
North Carolina. Two small remnant populations occur in the Catawba River system; one
population occurs in Waxhaw Creek in Union County, and one population occurs in Sixmile
Creek in Union County. Another small population occurs in a short stretch of Goose Creek, a
tributary to the Rocky River in the Pee Dee River system, also in Union County.
Potential habitat does not exist within the reach of perennial RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek), or
seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) located within the project study area. Potential
habitat characteristics such as undercut shaded banks with extensive root systems and buried
logs and rocks within the channel were not observed in the streams. There are no records of
Carolina heelsplitter being located in the Tradesville, SC-NC USGS quadrangle. The NC Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) website was reviewed to determine the locations of the nearest
populations of Carolina heelsplitter. The NCNHP determined that no populations of Carolina
heelsplitter were present within one mile of the project study area. Although an aquatic survey
was not performed, based on the field review, and the available databases, as well as the
proposed construction methods, it is determined that this project will have `no effect' on the
Carolina heelsplitter.
Bioloqical Conclusion: No Effect
Michaux's surr�ac fRhus michauxir� - Federal Endanqered
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous, densely hairy shrub, with erect stems from one to three feet
in height. The compound leaves contain evenly serrated, oblong to lanceolate, acuminate
leaflets. Most plants are unisexual; however, more recent observations have revealed plants
with both male and female flowers on one plant. The flowers are small, borne in a terminal,
erect, dense cluster, and colored greenish yellow to white. Flowering usually occurs from June
to July; while the fruit, a red drupe, is produced through the months of August to October.
Michaux's sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic soils.
Page 8

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Polecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
Apparently, this plant survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has provided an
open area. This plant is restricted to eleven counties in North Carolina, and is listed as current in
Union County.
No individuals of Michaux's sumac were observed within the PSA during the July and
September field reviews, and the September review was conducted inside the fruiting season.
The PSA exhibits some habitat requirements preferred by this species but there are no known
populations within one mile of the PSA. Michaux's sumac is not listed as present within the
Tradesville, SC-NC USGS quadrangle. The NCNHP determined that no populations of
Michaux's sumac were present within one mile of the project study area. Based on the field
review inside the fruiting season, the available databases, and the limited area of proposed
wooded disturbance, it is determined that this project will have `no effect' on Michaux's sumac.
Bioloqical Conclusion: No Effect
Closin�
Please feel free to contact the undersigned at [phone] should you have any questions or
concerns regarding this submittal in support of the NCDOT's use of Nationwide Permit #3 and
#13.
Sincerely,
STV gineers, Inc.
Brandon J. hillips, CHMM
Environmental Science Senior Manager
cc:
r/1 1� ��L'/ I� ,1 i1>+��, �, �
- � .. .y ,� 1
Attachment A- Pre-Construction Notification Form
Attachment B- Jurisdictional Determination Materials
Attachment C - Figures
Attachment D- No National Register of Historic Places Eligible or Listed Archaeological
Sites Present Form and Historic Architecture and Landscapes No
Survey Required Form
Garland Haywood - NCDOT
Larry Thompson - NCDOT
Donna Hood - NCDWR
Page 9

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program December 7, 2017
6ridge 157 on SR 2170 over Polecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
Attachment A
Pre-Construction Notification Form

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: OX Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 and 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank � Yes ❑X No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes �X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bridge No. 890157 on SR 2170 over Polecat Creek
2b. County: Union
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Monroe
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: T.I.P. B-5377
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Div 10
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Scott Cole, P.E.
applicable):
3d. Street address: 716 West Main Street
3e. City, state, zip: Albemarle, NC 28001
3f. Telephone no.: 704 983-4400
3g. Fax no.: 704 982-3146
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name;
5b. Business name
if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): State Project No.: B-5377
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.859797 Longitude: -80.603641
1 c. Property size: 3.9 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Polecat Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Yadkin - Pee Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing conditions include SR 2170 (Irby Road) and the deteriorated Bridge No. 890157, undeveloped forest, agricultural properties and
disturbed/maintained right-of-way.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: p,
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 471
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace Bridge No. 890157, rated as structurally deficient, with an improved, modern bridge structure.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Erosion and sedimentation measures will be installed. Bridge replacement using heavy construction equipment such as track hoes, N
cranes, dump trucks, bulldozers, paving equipment and various hand tools.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the � Yes x❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro'ect includin all rior hases in the ast? Comments;
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes ❑ No ❑x Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
W1 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W2 Yes/No -
W3 Yes/No -
W4 Yes/No -
W5 Yes/Na -
W6 Yes/No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
No wetlands were identified within the project study area.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 P Stabilization Polecat Creek PER Corps 15 60
S2 T Demolition Polecat Creek PER Corps 15 85
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts so
3i. Comments:
Stream Impacts are depicted on Attachment C- Sheets 2 through 4.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Tem ora T
01 Choose one Choose
02
03
04
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: No pond or lake construction impacts are proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? � Yes � No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surFace area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico � Catawba � Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number — mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square (square
Tem ora T feet feet
B1
B2
B3
64
B5
B6
6h. Total Buffer Impacts: o 0
61. COf11f1'lefltS: PSA is not located on the main stem of the Catawba River and has no buffer impacts.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Best management practices (BMPs) and appropriate erosion and sedimentation controls will be installed and maintained during construction activities
to allow for the least adverse effect on the stream channel and associated water quality. Impacts to Polecat Creek are unavoidable due to the
requirement to remove the existing structure as well as stabilization of the stream banks; see cover letter for additional details on avoidance and
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction of the new cored slab bridge will take place from roadway approaches which will minimize stream impact; off-site detour to be utilized.
2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes x� No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Quantity:
Type: Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Com lete if Makin a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Pro ram
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires � Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: o
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
� Yes � No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. Wfiat is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? � o�o
2b. Does this ro'ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? ❑x Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project is covered by NCDOT Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS000250. BMP's and runoff controls will be implemented during construdion to
reduce the stormwater impacts to the receiving stream due to erosion and runoff, Sediment and erosion control wifl adhere to "Design for Sensitive
Watershed" standards; see Attachment C- Stormwater Management Plan.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan;
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? DWR 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local overnmenYs �urisdiction is this ro'ect? N!A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): � USMP
Water Supply Watershed
� Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
�Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply �ORW
(check all that apply): Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? OX Yes � No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ SurFace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) .
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in �Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project involves the replacement of an existing structure. The bridge is being replaced to standard load limits and width to improve safety to the
traveling public. The crossing upgrade is not anticipated to have any significant impact on future development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑x No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Endangered species and Designated Critical Habitat information was obtained from the NCNHP and USFWS IpaC website (September 2017). Site specific surveys were
conducted during the scoping and stream delineation process; survey for endangered plant species conducted on September 28, 2017 during flowering and fruiting season.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Webpage
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑x No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Please see NCDOT "No National Register of Historic Places Eligible or Listed Archaeological Sites Present or Affected Form" and "Historic
Architecture and Landsca es No Surve Re uired Form", Attachment D.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? x� Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Hydraulic calculations have been prepared based on the placement of the bridge. No increase in the upstream flood elevations is anticipated based
on these calculations. Based on the results of the HEC-RAS model for SR 2170 over Polecat Creek, the existing bridge can be replaced without
causing a rise to the established 100-year flood elevations and meets the requirements of Federal Hlghway Administration, Federal-Aid Policy Guide
f r m n FI in n h T M A.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM maps on-line
J. Scott Cole, PE. 12-07-2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the a licant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP �? and #13
Attachment B
Jurisdictional Determination Materials
-NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
- Wetland Determination Data Form
-Approved Jurisdictional Determination (Rapanos) Form
-Approximate Potential Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary Map Exhibit
-Photographs

RPW Stream A (Polecat Creek)
NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7/20/2017 Project/Site:B�d�� 157 on SR 2170
over Poiecat Creek B-53i
Evaluator: Brandon Phillips County: Union County
Total Points: I Stream Determination
Stream is at least intermittent 41.%5 Ephemeral Intel'mittel
if > 19 or oerennial if >_ 30"
Latitude: 34.859801
Longitude: -80.603640
Other Tradesville, NC/SC Quad
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = 23 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalwe 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 � 3
ri le- ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 Z 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 es =
B. Hydrolagy (Subtotal = 10 }
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
2
2
0.5
1
1
3
3
0
1.5
C. Biolo Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 .5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland pfants in streambed CW = 0. �BL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perenn?�! e4ro?me mov �Icn he irlen4ifiori iicinn n4hor mafhnrie. Coo n'�F nf m?niiol
'-a - -
Notes: RPW �m A P I Cr ek w de rmined to be erennial within ro'ect limits.
Sketch.

Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek)
NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7/20/2017 Project/Si ��dge 157 on SR 2170 Latitude: 34.859900
�i]er Polecat Creek B-5377
Evaluator: Brandon Phillips County: Union County Longitude: -80.603850
Total Points: S#ream De#e n�circle one) Other Tradesville, NC/SC Quad
Stream is at least intermittent 25.75 E hemera ntermitte Perennial e. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30" � g'
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = 13.5 Absent Weak Maderate Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. rifFle-pool, step-pool, 0 �1 2 3
ri le- ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel o= Yes = 3
GI1111V101 UILliI1GJ OIG IIVI IOIGU� JGG UIJV4JJIVIIJ 111 IIIQIIUQI
B. Hydrology (Subtotal � 6 }
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
2
2
�
�
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
C. Biolo Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed CW = 0. �BL = 1.5 Other = 0
" erenn��! e4ro�mc mov �Ien ho i�ian4ifiari iiainn n4hor mo}hnrie CPP �1 'tF nf m�ni iol
p ' � ^"' �- .��......�< <�...a ....�. ...�...'--• r• �' '. ...�..��..
Notes: easonal RPW rea B U.T. P 1 cat Creek as ermine be intermittent within ro'ect limits.
S ketch.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mauntains and Piedmont Region
PCO)BCtIS.I[Bunion Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Polecat Creek (B-5377) CIlylCoullty: MonroelUnion Sampllllg Date: 07-20-17
Applicantl0wner: NCDOT Division 10 StatO: NC Sampling POlnt: DP#I
Investigator{s): Brandon Phiuips, CHMM Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.}: tercace Local relief {concave, convex, none}: Convex Slope (°/o): �2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA}: LRR-P Lat: 34.859838 N Long: -80.603803 W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam NWI classification: NA
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks,}
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed7 Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.}
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X NQ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
DP#] is representative of upland areas (See Approximate Potential Wa[ers of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary Map Exhibit for approximate location of DP#1).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicatars: Seccx►der�r lndleators imirlirnurl1 oftyVo Y@OuiPedl
Primarv Indicators Iminimum of one is re�uired: check all that a��J,v� _ Surtace Soil Cracks (86}
_ Surface Water (A1j _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Veget�ted Concave Surface (g8j
_ High Water Table (A2} _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor {C1} _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation {A3} _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Raots (C3} _ Moss Trim Lines (816}
_ Water Marks (g1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) T Dry-Season Water Table (C2}
_ Sediment Deposits (82} _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6} _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (g3} _ Thin Muck Surtace (C7} _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (&I} _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (g5} _ Geomorphic Position (D2}
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) � Shallow Aquitard (D3J
o Water-Stained Leaves {g9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13} _ FAC-Neutral Test {D5}
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches}:
Saturation Present7 Yes No �_ Depth (inches}: Wetland Hydrology Preserrt? Yes No x
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspectionsj, if available:
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 20

VEGETATION (Four Strataj — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Domfnant Indieator
Tr�e S'�ratum (Plot size: 30' radius j °/o Cover 9Cies7 Status
1. F+•ariu��s7�emisylvarr[ru 60 Yes FACW
2. Linuidambar slvraciflua 20 Yec FAC
3. Celli.s nccidentulis 20 Yes FACU
4.
6.
7.
50°/0 of total cover: 5�
SBD�IffQl�ftl'i113 �if�[Ll171 (PIOt SIZO: l0' radius }
1. Ulmus ameria��a
2._ Li,e+r.crrirm .rrnense
3. Rubus allegha�iie�2sis
Q.
5.
7.
8.
9_
l00 - Total Cover
20°/0 of total cover: 2�
20 Yes FACW
20 Yes FACU
5 No FACU
45 = Total Cover
50°Io of total cover: ZZ•5 20°/0 of total cover: 9
Het'b Streturrt (Plot si�e: 1 meter �
1. Microsleeium i�iminenm 40 Yes FAC
2, Loliuna perenne 30 Yes FACU
3, Persicaria maculosa � 5 No FACU
4 VrILs ues�ii�uli,s ]p No FACU
�j, Lo��icerajapaaica 5 No FACU
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50°/0 of total cover: 50
WOOc�! Vi�@ SfTetum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
50°/0 of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
Hydrophytic vegetation is presenL
too = Total Co�ver
20°/0 of total cover: 20
= Total Cover
20°/0 of total cover:
eet.}
Sampling Point: DP#1
uominance i est worKsneet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Spacies Across All Strata: 7 {B}
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, ar FAC: 57 (AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total °/a Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (R} (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2- Dominance Test is >50°/0
� 3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
,_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' {Pro�ide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' {Explain}
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation 5trata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. {7.6 cm) or
more in d�ameter at breast height {DBFIj, regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greaterthan or equal to 3,28ft(1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody} plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
I-ydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: �P#�
Ptofile Descrt�lon: .(Qescrlbe to the depHt needed to documer�tti'te indtcator or conflrm the absence of Indicators.j
Dapth M2L'ix Redox Features
(inChes Color fmoistl °/o Color (moist) °/o Tyr�e Loc Texture Remarks
D-5 ]0 YR 3/2 ]00 $ilt loam
3-20 10 YR 5/8 I 00 Sil[ loam
'T : C=Concentration �t]e letian
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
� Black Histic {A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (AA)
_ Stratified Layers (A5J
_ 2 cm Muck {A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
s Thick Dark Surface (Al2}
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1j (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4}
_ Sandy Redox (S5}
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches}�
Rem arks:
RM=Reduced M�trix MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Linin M=Matrix_
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
_ Dark Surtace {S7} _ 2 cm Muck (A10J (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface {S8j (MLRA 747, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
� Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 748) (MLRA 147, 148j
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2j _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils {F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ Redox Dark Surtace {F6} _ Very Shallovr Dark Surface (TF12)
J _ Depleted Dark Surface {F7) _ Other {Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron-Manganese Masses {F12} (LRR N,
MLRA '136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) {MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19} (MLRA 148) wedand hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21} (MLRA 127, 147a unless disturbed or problematic,
Hydric Soil lndicators were not present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 20

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: NCDOT Div 10 Bridge Replacement - SR 2170 over Polecat
Creek
State:NC County/parish/borough: Union City: Monroe
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.859797° N, Long. -80.603641 ° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: N 3857566.9 E 536230.1
Name of nearest waterbody: Polecat Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) lnto which the aquatic resource flows: Pee Dee River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03040202
� Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
� Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 07/19/17.
� Field Determination. Date(s): 07/20/17 and 9/28/17
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of lhe U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [RequiredJ
� Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: .
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [ReguiredJ
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): �
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to T'NWs
� Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into T'NWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) = 360 linear feet: 15 width (ft) and or 013 acre; Seasonal RPW Stream B
(U.T. to Polecat Creek) = 111 linear feet: 2 width (ft) and/or 0.005 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): .
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: .
' Boxes checked below shall be suppoRed by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RP W is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.I and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.l and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacenY':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial tlow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a signiticant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 7,213 square miles
Drainage area: 1,413 square miles
Average annual rainfall: 46.67 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4.5 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Rclalionship wi[h '{'FV W:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
� Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 30 (Or more) river miles from T'NW.
Project waters are 1(or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1(or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .
"Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regazding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.

Identify flow route to T'NWS: Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) drains into RPW Stream A(Polecat
Creek). RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) drains into the Lynches River (RPW) which drains to the Yadkin-Pee Dee River
(TNW)•
Tributary stream order, if known: first.
(b) Gencral7'ribut�r_y Characteristics (check a!1 that ap�lvl:
Tributary is: � Natural
❑ Artiiicial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 2 feet
Average depth: 0.2 feet
Average side slopes: Vertical (1:1 or less).
PrimBry tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts � Sands ❑ Concrete
� Cobbles � Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain: .
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: steep, eroding banks.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: moderate run/riffles with poorly developed pools.
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 3%
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: intermittent.
Other information on duration and volume: .
Surface flow is: Diserete 8nd con�ined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknowo. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed: .
Tributary has (check all that apply):
� Bed and banks
� OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
� clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑
� changes in the character of soil ❑
❑ shelving ❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent �
� leaf litter disturbed or washed away �
❑ sediment deposition ❑
❑ water staining ❑
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.� Explain: .
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
� High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review azea, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporazily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). W here there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

Characterize tributaty (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.),.
'Explain: turbid water.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: suspended sediments.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
� Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): forested corridor greater than 50 feet wide.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: .
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
❑ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wedand Charactcristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain: .
Wetland quality. Explain: .
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) Gencr�al Fiow R;el�tianshsB with 1�lvn-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain: .
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics: .
Subsurface flow: Plck List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed: .
(c) Wetland rldjacency �etcrmination with Non-'TNW:
[� Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: non jurisdictional stormwater conveyance.
❑ Ecological connection. Explain: .
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: .
(d) Praximity fRelatianship� taTNW
Project wetlands are Piek List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Piek List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Piek List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): .
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: .
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
❑ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: ,
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Uirectiv abuts? (Y/Nl 5ize (in acres} Directly ahuts? [YM3 Size fin acresl
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: .
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine signifcant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
+ Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawniog, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D: .
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: .
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section II1.D: .
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY): �
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to 1'NWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
� Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perenniaL• RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek), has an OHWM, well-defined bed and banks, fish and moderate flow
and is depicted as a blue line on the USGS topographic quadrangle and as a stream on the NRCS Soil Series Map. RPW
Stream A(Polecat Creek) drains to the Lynches River (RPW), which drains to the Yadkin-Pee Dee River (TNW).
� Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) has an OHWM, well-defined bed and banks, and moderate flow
and is depicted as a blue line on the USGS topographic quadrangle and on the NRCS Soil Series Map. Seasonal RPW Stream

B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) drains into RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek). RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) drains to the Lynches
River (RPW), which drains to the Yadkin-Pee Dee River (TNW).
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
� Tributary waters: RPW Stream A 360 linear feet 15 width (ft); seasonal RPW Stream B lll linear feet 2 width (ft�
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
3. Non-RPWsB that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: .
0 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: .
Provide acreage estimates forjurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TN W are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data suppor[ing this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of ajurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
eSee Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IfI.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook,
to Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiclion Fo/loweng Rapanos.

❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain: .
❑ Other factors. Explain: .
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solelv on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: .
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above): .
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required forjurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicandconsultant: Approximate Potential Waters of the U.S. and
Wetlands Boundary Map Exhibit.
� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
❑ Corps navigable waters' study: .
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1:24000, Tradesville, SGNC (2017).
� USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Series Data for Union County (2014).
� National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Tradesville, SGNC.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
[] FEMA/FIRM maps: .
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929}
� Photographs: � Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap.
or � Other (Name & Date): Photos (07/20/17).
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
❑ Applicable/supporting case law:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature: .
❑ Other information (please specify): .

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: The limits of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) and
seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) were delineated by STV and the locations were approximated using a Trimble Geo7X hand-
held GPS unit capable of subfoot accuracy (See Exhibit - Approximate Potential Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary Map). RPW
Stream A(Polecat Creek), was determined to be a relatively permanent water (RPW) with perennial flow based on an OHWM, well-defined
bed and banks, fish and moderate flow and is depicted on the USGS and Soils maps as a stream. Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat
Creek) was determined to be a relatively permanent water (RPW) with seasonal flow based on an OHWM, well-defined bed and banks, and
moderate flow and is depicted on the USGS and Soils maps as a stream. Seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Potecat Creek) drains into RPW
Stream A(Polecat Creek). RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) drains into the Lynches River (RPW) which drains to the Yadkin-Pee Dee River
(TNW).

� . ' � Er 5 �y � ; - l� u� F; �� ��t �� �� �•� � -I� ��;; �, ,I� - `�
'I �
�, :�'�;� ;�� • � �/Vr. ����, e��I�'i���{`Y'y' � ��� �. \� :� 'Z�`_� � �.. �tii�'�, � `1
o ,� ��`�� ..'t � R � �_,A`f,� � , r'� ��, �� s ��' , f A, y `��_ } � t �'� - ' � r i p I �� F ,
' �j� �y ,,�, n
�•L'l��,��'R: � �}�` k '�` �+p,'H ,,;�(�,��l(��4ti � i j.A1y\! rR,.� 1>� c �t S1it/[.:.,�"� . i.•- fi4�� 11 �'y O � �'; C�s'.� � ��/r L����� mT.-,I� �.
�,� '.�' �y `�.� �` -j'F�; a.. f,y y � �T,� �... fJr_ . � �Y� ,.'i' � �. �,1 '�� 1 �'�,
�,. $ N_ ', � �+ ` �..� �` g�"✓�,' `�f•' Yar �1,� ��.�� �;C•.5 ��'�'.e .�;�y� ,. ,fr7; 1�: ' yr � lA�
�.� ;'�!1� J ti y'a r��y,l�` ,� �'��� \ 1� �,�;� ru �' '�y1� ��.�'�. , r i��� r�y �
_ ,��� � _.ry, � �, � �- lxl�i. � . tk � 1 ��,�+� �� � -���y,� r `y` J � fl' '� ° , f � ° ` ,i 4�ti � � � Jf�O �6 .g
�� 1 � ,� s,� ��� 'i7 +N^� � f�1"(� \d �ry,, 4 � � � .'7 -Fi � ��� ���ti ;� �.�' I�� � � i i-�
"Q 7}K . ti' Y � 1 � � f r
° tz .� r �. f^; �,_,! � � + � ; `,� � ,�` f` � �
�:�'i��r"�""t �' '� 1�ti'l+K�,,,{:� Q�('� ,r1 , � b'��� 4`�'�I�. � 4 �� �h�� i� ; i+�.r� fi�i� iIr' \ • � � ��� �y� y� '�� �.
� � 'q„� r � � � � i �. '� r �y � �f�,
�` Q "�� ��b 5 '�T'� . t f v . -� '' 9 �j S ti y �. i '4'" �" � 1��/, r�?� 44k �'�f '�y� �' i �^ �� � �' f +�� 1 � . � `�
•4 1 � °� ,! ,. 1y(��,,, ( 1� t . y� Y�1 (u+.� � ..� �' A ( � �' � llj� . T / i�:��., . ^�
�u \ � �� -�"L.. - � ' ✓�� �'��' -I . '�f ."`�:. � - � ��?�i, . � i � �� �i � , �}��P �: . � 1 � ����. ��� '�Y:
e ♦. �'.'.. � ��\�1Q'�i' 1:, � ., �
1 , .�. a ,,r}�n. \ p �,E. � y , � r n y 17 , h, , � : � �1 �r ° '� �� F- ,�,��� '.'�� � a � .S r�
r ` �i_'y�,lry y s �a` -�,' i�.. �( : `,r 1�.5 n�;d �,i� � ' � � ��� i.�" ��, �•�„ ,�y ;.�� 7 -.�1 a�.
�p, �,§� ,��-U � ` �Ir � ,`,w�,� ,,. ,� s * yti'�' f �� �v �'+ ,� 1 � ,� � � .; �°'..
�ry��1��L � � �"� ..�C. �-{- .� ..,ti� �tl \�1yL � � �' ��ry iJ� . j �` _ `, � � � - � �a'L��� 4�� � �d , .
�IL I�I� 4 k !� •'1 ��i 7 A r"' �� 1 Y i�
L y.� l r''� �.�-' �i .� �'�k s.'�i � r � ; �': i�YV�� 1) 1 �g,� K .l��ti._ n .1 ' t� � . .� � Y ,� �r.r,y � r�- �
\: ��' �r ` �� �i''�T��� `y� � r�j�J �i '�'Y �� �r@*� x "l � y r '^k � "�Y��X����L��!S�
�` ' .
a\ ? � n V y�
��, s `'�'�: �` � ���C �` � + �� 91tiw? � r i^ � y �' f � F � + 1 " , � �'�.
' i . �}' 1 � W' i "S. �
� �� � h �'��� . � �ti� ��; d�a����'��,?�l ���ul�{T�l�'._ � � � 1� r��i�A �r� .-� .��� a ��t, �-�x�"r �
'��r� 1� � + . �.�. : � ' � � � i S q� �' =4 y e . t � � �`, ef� ;jR.,, �..� �� .. .
, � 1 i c v �' w �h ' :h � �� �j � �� � 4� � v� �. d F' 1 � � ,1�.- �y t . 7� . • �I• -q�r� � h i .
i \�� ' r�i� � V 'y �� -7��.' Z� ���j�..� �Wf'�S_� ^m,� �;, 1���� [� ti ,�pGy. I � �".� ��.(i... .I 4� �� �.: , �y �a , i
� ' 1 ��, .��' .~4-� `_��" �, ."a'k" P�y�,i. :^{ � I.i� •�;f� 4. � �j"1 � �`r�'-"� � > 3�,!�j •�.�� �'� �` ' >,1 ����
�>��°�. ���. t..�`�; �� a� � �'•� i "� �i�,�'P�t �C� i tY ��F��� y' rl l {+ �^'.� ` i� ' fF�� ' �j� �� S�r,, v'"��( -*, ��`.:����'k" ` r
,`' �� • ,ti� '+L� �"' Y � ti��.r.,��r � t �, S� J,� +. � C' 1 � r� � i�' � yy, r rtl
}` � ���'�l,""''+ r '��'�,n �4�` :� y����� � �'� f� 4fi'�1'�����1 cl�� �k4. � ��w�� l�k �.�!` d±�?✓ �s(y� a �'Y�i� �.., � � } -F9�\ ".�' ru e , ` �
l ti , F � -'n4 �l i, ., , ,/N 1
.Q , k �- ��� v �, y a � �. � � � i �'u , 1�; *r. �1r �; � �� q �. ,�� � ,�`' � �A �.. � � '� J'r, . � 1 .
�", ti}���,. �G�,.��;".,.� . :rt . ; 11.:,-`Y,�`r�i�� �'�y�,���� �'t�\'9�t a,�, ���a � a , ` �k���� J��� �� ��� :'L"�'�j' �� ��� � � ��',�� �,' y�,"�}� }�!i � i'�
,e �y � ,�p�
qP��� � 1.� t� 8^ i �C'�� V��'_ �A� �: � t ` � L �
' "k�dr� � aeasonal RPW Stream B (� 111 If� � ,� � � ,1 . � xi `�[ � .: �,,,y�� '�iLf.��yu, �p vl�� ':ii\�� ��� �y' �Y ' i - � 2 r�� �tFy' \ ^
y� � § � } C"� ''�Q`, ., ��i � � i ����' s� II4 � ti' w ' � . .�k � .+1„S°'� s '°'`'' • � �R � � a� d \���
�`i -�'q � a l:34 $59900 °N� -80.643850 °W) ' ��'y.� „ � i f � �S"� ,y u�b7�"=� � � , ��o �ti� " ,�.,�,, y!°�F '. � 1 w � i� � � , �
�i� { �.s ������,, n � , ,f�� ��,.�\ +� �'V� �i�+n�� ' � �J� _ J ' �. •i/ I!� �+5 Xty ��sa
t'�ly t' '�k h �4 , =� e�7v , ti���.t ' � ,' ` �>�' rr�, ! ;i�� i, ;4 'gry,�. 4 � y
��..�:,; M �� ,u� , � '��K, ��K �,` .;'� �� � �� )r►* : ��.��' �i .��n �,j, �' .�4,�. . � �j�„"+' ;.�. ���'�
ti `: 7L, �� . `� r ih•.r .,i � � A � .� �c k �� ��ic f !i� ±. {� ".,., ' F a� ti
q �'�
`�, h � t y..�. < �, � � 1� � .AE, J � • i �� . � '�,�� � S� � r o�r .. d��lf � s ` A� �'1 �'��.'' - �
.�y �3t ,�\, �y J\" M��g�' u7 "r^,'.,r q qtil I�.r w.'�",Y'e- '� r c•"� t �e � r,�
���'�`T �� �.`s�}A'���'fi�. � \ 5��� �4)�\ � '�*�'_ +r � y� Js`' . ( a � �,'L��; 1J:��h iIT� ti �;�I 4 � � r� � .�!• , .
ty� H 6 �� � t ,,.y� r '., � � ` � ' �.r � . t 1��.� � i
�'r L�iy Z? �r���� �,. i��K��"� ?" � � ���t.`�� ����Yrl "`�.4 !r ,�'r���1.:Sy,�1 � �i� � '`� aLH.,. � .r '� 4 � �� �' �N.` yn�� � � 1� �j,, , qr � ��' i�
+� c �? .. �'� t �. ' i � r� } � S . �� d � � . '4 �, ti"a. ...� t„'1 �4� �� �I�� � -.
4 i 'bi `}`�''1,�l � `�'� .�� rA: � �1 � � n � } �. �(� �, � "'�
�`.i � . � ��� �' `�/'�' �. � 0 "p� �� � � t �. . . Lr. ti �'� I l t. 7 ..1 � � �,IE� 1,{y:
� � . ,'`Y����y 'S l� � +j� '�y�� �} �'M 1{� � y, f� s� y,� �� c `.�.. � J,6.',� `�{�� �1 4 1 .
ti. �� r�! � iY. a � �� �r'� t� II a
� �,����,� _�� +n�� w���i ��g.��''+p���.,�, � �i''�+;�� � �'� ::�e . ° 1� . �,:'a � 1.tS�'v���` � a��'�i� 'i ..,�'����Y,..TV� ��. `� ;�W�''.
� r r � �� �5,�.� � \ :- �� i4 i�� ,. rl . n '... r V � � � `R"iS�'+�. \'t - �, �b.�'' � 1��� �� �
W ' � a � . r ay - � t{r . � y � .
, n ; y� ' � � � � '' x �� Y� V'�-�"4��♦h �^ 1� l w ,� � '�� > y,f�� �� � ��ri`.
.�, /� ti .+ �j� �: �:�a�� � v, ��,�x, � �
i i i �� ,, � ��� i �� � �r� z+► .1� ]�,�N� d ' � '� �' � �i�.A11�^.��11 I.�bi� � . uti �!:'�1�'�d. � rl ��'�. �'W ^`i� � � i��, f�. �,
�� . „t 4 ii �Vtiii� 1 � �e �r �� ��'., , �'� "4 ,r,��'1�'d � �'sY:'_��'d�r� 1 R� � -. '� _�� F�?�/1� Stf@2I11 A - P01@C8� C!@@k ('., 36� I� �� � '��, X�rh ���1rp+�' ��
�1 ` � ��1;t����' 't"P;r'�lt�k�, � '�`��'���` t��'� ��. c t (34.859801 °N, -80 603640 °W) �� } �} �',� .
�' `".` ati,.
11�'l�tl�tlll'1 � � ��, � � ,�is � � � ° ,
,p� _.�s�. �(y� � ' � I '�Y �'�. {: O } `y'� � . j � t � (\, C.
�{�!, �" 1N' �Y, �� /��" ± t, + i � , .��� ����� � .�` y H`ky�} �'1� Y'; �r '
i . .. a _ �41�t. F�r'-� �}�y a, •�' ,'��}� ..��1 ��.` �V Y`�ff ���` 1. �I�� 5��. �4� � `���ti;..����h���� ����3..
� �.. _ �!��:.�� iw^.I � ��' ��, 5,`A� �. �'�A. -.I M P
. f _ '-.��� �,Ifi� ry.� f �.', � • �� .
� - ���` ��,�yj�' �' � �?{i. „�f� �'�� ��h� �;'�!�� '�'Y�' �f"�.>>. ; i�1 a
J�-. '�.�r� �• „ '� ' �� j� i rc`1 4: a yr � r� ����
� �.,� .,�
_�' ��~~ °'i.� �•°+ 5f � ���. � �: ��J�I: ++Vaw. �<<�,I , "r�, ,r:l�*� r.+l,��, �' ��'I�[l � �:" i
�. - .*�1� • � '. � AS ��n�.,yt. ;�'' ' ' ���,: • �tii� j� �il� � :if �j� �l �9.�i•�
"''rJ'- �-' �.�. �y � „ �r,l',�, �� ' �, � � fii�N'�pi� y;� � �r� ��,��'y�'t
�t . ,' _ � ��� 4�t. � �"i�, �� . �,;;
�Y �"�i � , s. �f ��� , ,x •
�,� � � ��. ����
I�Y � - . ; ' %i .. . �.:� �,;ri, ... r:w.l:W°�0 V. ., __ .,� '.,.".
.v i 1 � � � c'b �G �`�y',r� : ,��. a�
� , � �� �. �.�, � •'�I 1( +�p4 Lr � ' . .
"�. �r. Y . ._ ...' :h � '.;�,�'A�, 1y y'.Y. rd, 'i'� '.?,�' �
�� � 1��" �l� . "� `� _ r , l. _ y� �y � � 'f ��,r �_" ' �' „'a,
'i4 � : ' -r . �.�- ,<s�y;'I,"' . d"��� �'� . ;rt II .�,�,� K�;- 1 '��
�r � � � �� ��� �� �� �' �' � �� . . ..; ppr " . f_ ���ii��' , � �� a.: �. -
' 4 � _ �� �� 'cf� �, �. ' �/�` `�k 1:. ' � � ;,����� ��; � r ��
_ � _ .� ' _ .'li;�. �"�1� ., 1� �,�'ry�����'i�lf ��� ��� . u -
.. ,���M. ' . _. ( 1�;' }� � ����, ��1",aN �.��� �'f�l� q��� . 1- � f . /��. � '
, ., I � 4 r '. . ' M1 ' ��e � I' .. . . �r f r �r .�. I I� .�t ,�41�`�\ tJ� i r.i!ti��� � .1 N fr/ a� ,
, s
_�yy��1g` � �yt, _ �{ c
�' � '{: "��y� Yr.e�7F45'.� �. 7 . -t'T ' �, '�\ ,j���"�,�N+4.� '. ��, , �(i � � "aw
_ � � :. iilif � � :'�r�' i;' � 2 ���.-' ��'`�1� ��++� ��' a 1� �, t - ^- ' '
� G , � �1� � `,.,'�y'' ��f� ti`�`:4� '�� l tif�`� ` ��'� �`��� VA � �' ''� : �� .'�
� �a �u
c $. „ �_ �
{ �'� 1 •. : n�x� ' .' . � �:11�t� ��� � �,� T " i i � r �` . ' .:�.
•�'_ - �.+� �'^ J� 4 � � � , � E�� \.Fi �<� _. ���.,..
� � . y.�-,.��,�,.,�..._, . �,, �� ''�y�k�1' '�.K�� ��'�����°�� � + � � r� # � � �� �� � r� �.�
� . ��&!� � ,;r`"�� 4.._ �i � t��� e �S .. �, i � x r!r �
' 0 75 150 300 � � � -�
��'��?l �,'�iA�, �"� . t� �i`� k:�;,���c,,,�� ��. � ���, .
� � � F,� . a, ° � '�= � - °l E;i%
_ -- ''�`"��`' ��'�-:'`i ��t��_ �� '� ;:��`�``'�p;,:�x'�v, �� i,� ;�,�.�
�
r����5 Division 10
� 1+�H'��+e I Polenfal walers oF ihe U S were
�k �2 Legend delineated by STV Engineers, Inc during Bridge Replacement
I�,,+� Yr. field reviews conducled on July 20, 2017
f�+ ► Potentiel boundanes have been marked SR 2170 Over Polecat Creek
f in Ihe field with blue end while striped lape
qc n � Project Study Area (� 3.9 Acres) and mapped �sin9 a Trimn�e ceo�x hand- STIP ProjeCt B-5377
1'i ,E held GPS unit capable of subloot accuracy
�,�q v�+ This map is inlended for planning puryoses Bridge No. IrJi
�'��,, �� � RPW Stream �^�Y
. toF,�h�'� Union County, NC
-�- 2 Boundpries oY Ipn polential walors of the
U$ hg+ad not heBn vnnlied by [No U.S.
Seasonal RPW Stream inmy Carps of Enqinoors dnd are SnCwcl lo Thursday, December 07, 2017
Sr7�vp ,r . � 00 change lollowing verificalion
1+�' fr�t.} � Data Point Location P
3 N� o�aA,�Q� W6u�n�9 �n ��$�n��r�� �n EXHIBIT
the Prafacl 5ludy Area
STVEngineers,lnc.ProjeclNu. PhOLO ra h Loeation APPROX7MATE
4p18646 9 p Source: NC OneMaµ NC Cenler for P�TENTIAL WATERS
OI' THE U.S.
Geographic Informatian and Analysis,
Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By: NC 911 Board AiYD WETLA�DS
JLK BJP MAI BOUNDARY MAP

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek — PCN for NWP #3 and #13
,;;:
. r
,�,r�:�t�h
!'°��`1'�1°V�b.#
<
ti• .
� "'\ �-.�
��
� .
� ''+ :
� ;. _�
�h ' �' - :- �I
4 �:T ' ' �
��� 4.
Photograph l— A view of the SR 2170 (Irby Road) bridge over RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek)
looking to the west.
Photograph 2— A view of RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) at the SR 2170 (Irby Road) bridge,
looking upstream to the north.

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek — PCN for NWP #3 and #13
� ` `� t Q� '�t
, � �, �l ti ` � ; .
�j L s`-� � ' f `^ �
4' '� , _ i, �.
:l .�i;v \ ��..�5` `_ ,r
q� °�`r � �'�k. t.:' �
� �,
I'1�. f ` . ..k Y. � '
y .'.1
�
� �`� � -=' `'''� ' .
� y
� `•�; . rA
�� '' .
�-� i
�d�� �� --- -
�'' ' '� �'.� � : '� > `k', ,i
.t� . � `�.R �I
�� � �
�� ' • Z r� � ¢-
7 ,� �,, �'' ,+ , � + l r�!
J1 . p
�,���Wl .. a�.� � LiP�.'�.-3 .-e4
�
Photograph 3— A view of RPW Stream A(Polecat Creek) at the SR 2170 (Irby Road) bridge,
looking downstream to the south.
'�'�' '�u '���J�'"f S +. - s ��' f Y.. .-Y . 1 1.�• ° ��.:�,',�.,a�`�F�iJ
.`? i �� ���1.�.?��. ..���r..1 .:S<.;�', ,?;� c•aY.. � . ro�:tr� �. .. , �;,z..h� + .,a . � °e � ,�'al�l
i `s
� �� �: s ��;�v�..� ; N .�ac-.,�w �,pt .b^1�;�,R+`11;f'. e � �: �. �c -.t�W.r,\ � ��.: ..�
, ,+f �. 9 �4- ,?r.�w. . f . ..7 A a7�fu �a, .. �-� . _ �., .'`t� � � __vei� o� t--?. . �� �:t , y,
Photograph 4— A view of seasonal RPW Stream B(U.T. to Polecat Creek) at the confluence with
RPW Stream A (Polecat Creek).

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Rep/acement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
Attachment C
Figures

t , tr* � � � ��> > � ' . � ��, _ `�` i �' ti � h ' ary�' '—� : a ��-. ., r� � �,
�j^Ti � a� ��r� N
`� ,�� � � i,. � � t � �'j ,��„� y. "� P�'��J�[ Yl � I �i : � �' t .. ��q� '11 C
; ^ � � ti;. '' � �[�, ,Ni��' �J� � � �'�1'1yr�' I !r j f .p I� . � , � . � J� Y` . 7 � �I I� , Ve F
��..� '.�"�'.�+ �..':i. �,t'�1 e.��t �" ri.� .�� r ��,\, 1��.�� ry � p��`t.� .�•� vi r:[.��r :3'.�' i �V' �.� ��(y , „M�.,.� �.�i�fJ � I�
"''��"���� ��'j'� A¢ •:a1 �. �'.�,� �,"�. ��7.Pl,�r '�`, �... �.� �i. ,�' y�",�,K ,� �kC ,,�!.�,,.n�
"�, i. . ;�''` . , � . - .,. � ' ��
� .1 �.. � � .. �( � v ��S? i Jt�.' '
� �a��'>vl��T � . �,' V'�y���1'� �{�r �'��1�.,� ' 1�4i ;�!' °������ar �'.� ���+,J{,,�,�. � �,' ''�' _ u ��'�'' ipr`%
I �j(�
�'� ��h,Y��iY ��. -.'''j�. '`i�j. � g�A��J"'� r �rti�� a-, +;� TYv-.i4'��,��,/ y: � �."�\f'�` `s� .+'�� �;w{ .1��� ' c� �'
"� d � � t � � i ,�, � �,�� ti ����!'t� ,kF,l�r,r r �{ tlr'
yy. �r#� i� t .,,� �'�'� �,y�'. t ,�,�.,,�� \ � ' �,�tl ,j�'', �,11, ��� `4!'.. r x y:7 � , �� . , � '�'{� 7,�� �rt';�,' 4 y' � � ^� � �y
��� J� f���� .�' c'1�4A�.�� � ��r�K�k� -. ,. . �y .. �`�j�L,' �f .�� � 1 � � i ,�.�� ��.r' II
e� ��` � ,,�� � "a. � r.�.�x�,, "�`��'�fr �r. �� ti �, �, i'� ti+' �� �� ��{{{A` �!r �,,. ,( 1 �l,
T ..i'i\��',� �� . al ��..i�. `R ���\��i:\j, �t��,� I l 1�.1� ..�J~� J � �_-�4�� !�.` � { .� +1I . �+�. i,f ,�1,, k�7.'1�
"' Si � .��i'� � � t � � t ' I �, � � �` � .� ( �� �i+'' �.�itj�M1 G �.,'r .ii 1��� �1•NA
���. � .A'�.. � Y Y�1� �'�T ( �i� (�,�7. \ � � '1 4 7P .� � 1'
^ •� •� f, �t,x, ,'1�,��; Y �V << ��:(' I �i � : i � ,� . 'b � � v� � ,� �1'. � "� ���, �" ° , , ;,�� `�'^� ��w y61,� ., r
�� �: + � �,� �
bYy � h ! '�<��" �� � S t�' �� �w"}��;:�I. ��, �,{.�.��i`r� - ,���r� f� �'�� �,� ,<.y�"��,��1 ,
. �,
;: �1 �' � �.�(7r , ���l; v� �i', 6 }; tI w ,� K„ '� �j f�� }� � '��
.14. �� l�f� , .,k �Jft `.'. :T�7j� �.�� T', �iy�4 � ^I, �'�,) �;y �;� � °..^ `, 1I'.� '' � � .
� i .� � :� � �{�j�� . � .� ��` 4 ��' qN �F �. � rf 1��� i «�y�
'i� ' �� s\� , N a � ' �[�, S rr'ti /�; .�+ � s > .
� ' x�� "`� �r \ . `� >�t ,, ,�Y r �I.�i �� ��" ,d� ��i` � !�!f t- �l ° r! � ` } • U'`'`' �
�\ �'" �; r _ ��� y,ta � Ar+ l
� .: , , . ;k� �.� � . � �,� -
; ��'i , `� � w� �'4 � 1y `r r �� ��� t 4 1 ` '` � � ! � �� Z f� �t" � �' t
�,�. ��y��t`�,�, +1� n.�. �rL 'c � <�`i6►� �4 �{F �e".I ��N �•�� � . �r t.. f�, r;,R � � , � '�`?�» ����.'� \e� � '::
� G � y�, ti 1 �t 1 1
\, ; \�'���` � �•res��c!� 31.�i� .u����� a,t �c�u� q�; ,�, r� � ; { N Krd�+�t, \�,1� �','"", �•� � , �
� "• S � ��,h� � �''�" � �+'� ,��y, � I�� "� ` � �
� 'V: 1 -. �r Yl � � � �4� � � 1 / ��� ' I 1 �'�b n ���. y � � � � � Iti J . �.
"..� ,t' � . �i �`;.5�' :< � �,� 1,v'_�7s' �' q I'��_ti � jk`�,� �1:�) ��i'� ki�.j'J�i�.-. � �.i ' �y�-�' '��' �.�� ,•,�Y �il`i. I��'�
'k..\ ,i. i ' � a g. � T V � �� A �'�I �I'� � ., ��u L i� ! �4 r . r
' ..��� �., .. ; . ' � �, i�.:. � _� I� �� '^•'i� .� ����. I• �M� ��i`�. M�-�� B�! �il� y �r���'Q, � . ��.`v� ��� -rR ' ".t{'�,.i�Y `° ��''`l� r .� { .�- ��.-\k.
�, v �� ! � r �� p � � '��� + � J,r` � �i ���t
� C,�,� v� P11; t����r,� },t�w`75�+� 6� 1��i�G� 4, ��I',i� ���r. � � Y�uyc�1� �l,,�,.� Q.• `�� �'d p�y�,
�'�:'� �.��`��'9 . .\ �'-1 `� `�- O �li,-:��'�� .. y � ��\ o�"��!1 \9s,` L . _:1^ �� r', � � ��'��� I'71; ��1� . ����� c��� �; `�', •e-�.���y,�`l �t ,"� b. �+ :',
�i e,� 1? .�'J1lt 1 �+ �S'' { . � �y , ��' � � �y 1 � Y a�;��` -fy '�' '�$'�� i� ���'',
! � SR�.,.���I RFW 5fream B(� 111 If} a ,, r 3�• �� �y r y�r�� i,'�1/�lti v'?• > > a���, ' :�,�' ?�f- ��f y�
�>> ��� �34.$5J900 °fV, -80.603850 °W) ^ �1�'� � ��� �� �c�`�ti.� �.'�+�1�'rt��:� � �.;.�N� � 1 ; �l �l;l �a �•, ` �a�s "��y � � �� ��i,
f I �I .�i �y . �y �� b }'� �`�-�� yti>r�,w�'�1���� 1 �� � til�,{J�:� �f:. .{`' j`; ��'1:�,.j�'�, i
s��� `�yTr it_"x',.� �h���,�a` `�����`�� �������� M��� �W T�i'tv`'1�r��9�,. �'+( N J�1'�y:. �Al2 r i16 '
' . 'l t �. +� \ � (�i ��. � �t J il� � � �Y i f,�{\, .� � �i � . " E�t �'1 . 3 . ��
" 4���� � `` ��f>L �\ � 1. �. ,jr.� ;d�� k�^,�'"�,°�'4�' �.f"' t' i�C ro� �C�7+, � �. '� � �, luit(,� .i -�
�'�- �r 4,r '�'1r ���w . �" �: , � r u � r �, .,�. � �t � , � i.. x4, � � . rc �`
.�`+C , v� �., r � Y � � � �"` �.
� t �� � � •.. /�i, 4 1 l� �a, rl� 4 �'�.i�
`�` 2•'�. ��'��-_ile�� A�` .. .�v. r� ' �.t �� � InM��{F �'n . rnll Q . 7�� ��. � 'Y( � �.M 9 _`�,I � r.i:�, �' - �:
���� '��ti•f�•��•��; �l �`� � '',"��y'����A�� .�� riY�t`��ni���.,�?�r,°��..,�� ��'�� + �',"� �r �t� r�' �r I :,�° �� ,� .
��, � � �' � � E� � \�� ; F ��, f La i
I � T r. - y, i � �� �
�� ��� �.`ti`� i'��:�� J��rISF�•,� �,��'.����,, ��'� � d��.��+';�.� � � ��,. 1�`�w {��,�,. � ,��.� PP�,.r�1�
� ���v ` �� }�' , ,r.�� �' `` `�, .?'t0 ��';h,''"-g t,, fi�}t1 �,�� y1, 4�� �i} ''t�s �,��' ���,� M11� 4�1ti�?rr � ����.� � � 1 ta�,�
p r�Y �r ,,'y 4� y
� `t_:.� t ��1M� �1,.�\��y' .� . it � �i,_ .Q�° . r � Sr,� `���-� i Y.1° `i�� � ,i1 r � F� .
�'.,..�,; �e't1l�L,� ,�,,��..�a-� < �.-`�''� .i, : � �`,�� -�'�+ •. 1`��' -��#1,�' ��}.��� < ��y�114x'i7,•ti. �l�µ' �4l �'�',.:�;�I�� ���,�! ���
"'� rn � t�., ',;t �. ���' 2,r ``�:�:1L �R � .t�. "''' .;1 �I �./,_. �� � ��i�3NN� �'.j!4?_"�kk�s.:��t��.l-t���.;� '�_. �'+-�`Y, �a�'` � t����� ��,�i
�,"ti� i�1� . , ,- � ��,�'y • �:+'�� ,, � ' ',�,, , �RPW Stream A - Polecat Creek 360 If� . �� y� ��' ,��'
i. f'�',� M1��l`-`1��1i. �'��., ;A�4, : ,.'{v�}ti. +c +�i.� � 4 �"' I ��:^� t ly.;
` , �. � .tilt��,�l �y, �u a�.x���.� �4i'�� .\�;�j�. � �n .� (34.859801 °N, -80.603640 W) �� ` "�`�'� Z � `' .
11���1��i11�`4�11�� . .. �y �, Y �t11:� ��r .� � : ��
,� �= r ti�'�
�ie� q � \� u
��� �` �U �ae�'-ekk.,. . � .u�c: � ti 'I `�NV� 4 ��P'� l �� �� tii � i � ♦5�'fi j tiS
�'� � ��1f� � �� � ti�'� � 1 'M �
� 1• Yr`����fi},� �j� �� 'i .��� -`*y+���`�+��':. �� '� �'���'0:. �,�f �V,( � .'' ���,�, in�� �,�,
�i ��'�._ �`l' �f'°a P- � ,S�r��� ..1 �-'dP,= "'�4� ��V �t' fi..���1 Vr��° �..y' ,1� ���f�y��l ,��•7: �.�� +�i(�liT
, �
..-' .• - � . -.' � �C1 . I '� . . � . � � �1;(. '�� � i� Y, ��L � I�K,1 � �li 4+�y
�:�, IW ;� f�.' � j,� M ; � 'i�^ ;�'i. ��'�,�4Ar.� .�'JT y� �7,r�✓ ��.' �p ?1.��+" � �• P �F
~ � �" �� 17l' - . s�� ,t:i�. �.f ,y ?�. :1�1 ��
4� . � P
_- . _� �„�'r Lr�;N ,..., ' � c.r .. '�,; �1�g'S4�`� !,A,��rti�;, a .� i�, � }tiN+�,�.�'.
p,� s• �y �
�,� !� /� ` y�i � Y
4
w �„��1t' ' � r- r.'9T ;;p.f�ilAt4`�, ,Qxp�;�r C�:' � ti�;� � . l�I� ylrv" ����K i � � � u��'-�!.� � �1";� ��� ���
� �� ��,r � ��� ��f,�'';" �L: ��, �1" �'���.���,��� � ' �� �i
� � f ' � � �. i 'iM ' +� �±'�: � ����!
� tJ f ,
. . �... {f . f i ., " �: �Y� . 4y��`'�4�1,�!,.�; ��j �. ` 1
. � /� J?'ii4' , .r.. � , ,. . ,e`- � �o .. . , - ,t��v .
- . . .. ���r, . �.�` �� �t �� �
� ' t .�• ���,. ' ,. . ,�� 1 �y�l . � �'�I`'.,�V1��'�Y• •.,fl _ � _�.
..`ti"�\ � N� _ •, • , f i: ' , .. _ ' . . - �u ` . i �I.� �� 3 -. ' y . �. , V � �. . . .
,� }t ./ ' ,- , 1Y ' '1 �.
. k ,.�., r{ ' . . . 1� . r��' i ` . . •u�� �. 1 ty� �lq` �'��� . � '���,'
' ' � � 1 . � - :�t�+' ' . . . ��;� •,.'i .� . 7,7u., ��b �-i� r � '��`� ' .,� � l��� � �
I . . � . �� ' j �iry
�' . . x j �' ft�w � ��" . , � , . � � q I� y ) � ��,J � �' � ' � . .
�_ � '. : !� . 1 F l�!��'� i�. ��iS .ti � � \3Y � , � { f�,rp� ��'Plr �f �'4 u r � .
. .. , '�++"�'�� � �� `�' � � ryof�r �;�t.�� � � :�, � �K�p � Jr �`��� . �'1,� +.. u' ..
. • _ ' - . �', ! ' '(.urJ ' �t(. :'� F , ��w � �I y� F r 1'��. M �. � �' � '
. . d � �. �at � � F iVti r .,�� � �
_ ^ . ' . . .s�..•: .' . 'v.r.• ' . . .. . ��' ,�,,+ � ,,'�l yl��(+'t�` +;�ro Fj�111..�;�,_� � . tv � �,
, � � � '`� ��Z �. ' �``''y5�a '\ . /
� L � �Iti r� ��a �.! � .t
. . 1 �- � � . 1�1�I ,�� i"I���n �y� �'1 �{ . • .r ,�
' f y�y' Y. il,} . 1 f 1 �.• 11r 4i���1; .`F� 41' ` 1.� a I �r^i I/
1 ���i' '^ 9 � � � .. � J { � �� t . , � �:', �,\,Y1` 1J'� � :`�,�tY �� ' .' � �' - Yy .
�''��� ���'� . � ��� 1� �ti�� ��3�,''1
�,. .i, �-���� � � �'- .. �f±', �� ^.{�f c e��(' ����;w4' �";� ��• ��� �.� ' �s �' 'a�P
. 'd p ' � V�.� . �`-
�' . . � �, ^v 1 �S' •
. . .. M, . . ,\� ��.r
ir t
� �l �
4`�,' \ . .
. "1 '
♦ . � �' .
!� �'4 - ( �� z
v'�.'� .'�'". �}����� u�w""y�.�.. "`l` � �3� �� � ar.� �j�. �C+�' ��A`t"�'�,�' ��;.. �'ii �.� pI ��A'� .,� �,��
' �.:: (,�
� . �iu�a..�_ �,'���'� �1i., ;✓�1 ,�n �,�' ,.: `n � . ,".r '�
� . , } i + '
r� h. �,�.�,,
o �s isa 300 .�'�� �4 ���.� �irPq ° rd'��� �t�3*�� w ,l � ;�'v � ' , �: %,��a-��;°�'
S i
,� � � � M "• I �
'Fee� i�.�_;:.A t'r,y��. �:y � � � ��,� 1`��. .,� 4� t �.
� — ' �;.T-y. ,r .. {• Y�t � y ' y _;'f. 1 )'.�.
f p i+an��y --0, Noles: DIV�SIOiI IQ
- f C 1 Potenlial waters of the U 5 were
�►� �4�� Legend delineated by STV Engineers, Inc during Bridge Replacement
/� `�1, feld reviews cuntlucYed on July 20, 2017.
! Polenlial bountlnnea have been marked SR 2170 Over Polecat Creek
� •� in Ihe fia=d� wim� biun �nd wh�ts sfnpau lape
:y '� Project Study Area (� 3.9 Acres) and mup�pfla usin� a ir�mblo Gsu1X hand- STIP FCOJCCt B-S3%%
o � held GW unil EnpeGlo a! vuplqgl accuracy
Y This map is intended for pianning purposes Bridge No. IrJ7
� � RPW Stream �^�Y
�-Lnx,,,n._! Union Count,y, NC
-- � 2 Boundaries of the potenlial waters oi Ihe
U S have nol been verifiea by the U S
Seasonal RPW Stream Army Corps of Engineers ana ere subject to Thursday, December 07, Z�li
S�j� ] 1�� change following verificalion
w �T+��-' � Data Point Loeation 3 No pofenfialweflands were �de����ed �� ' FIGURE 4
Ihe Projacl5ludyArea
APPROX[MATE
STVEngineers,���.P�o;���No. Photograph Location POTENTIALWATERS
4018646 Source: NC OneMep, NC Center for OP TH E U.S.
� Drawn By: Checked By: Appraved By: Geagraphic lnfarmelion endAnalysis, AND WETLANDS
KC vu eaard gQUNDARY MAP
JLK BJP MAl

Se� St�e/ 7A For InOex o( 9�ers
See S'.w.er ;P .-�r Slondarr 5ymbol�a�y SM.er
�5377
-4 STA.14+30.00
y �n n
�
4
�
3
0
�
�
�
0
0
r
E
E
_ ]Nf5 PROJF.CT f5 N07 WfTHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUN!)ARlES.
- C• CLFARfNG ON THfS PROJECT SI7Afl BE PERFORMF.D
�� TO 7NE LlMfTS ESTABLfSHED BY METHOD ff.
�/
_ �I GR.4PHIC SCAL6S DESIGN DATA
7Q itf 0 2p <0 ADT 2011 = 410
� I ����� ADT 2025 = 9B0
- �y PLANS DHV = N/A
_ / YO 10 0 PO a0 D= N/A
- O ��
T 6%
_ PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) y = 55 MPH
- V + s o � a
` -� Fl1NG CLASSIFICATION:
"` �i�rP�OFl� ERdICAi7 LOCAL
_c i
�'1["A7["]E �1F N�ll$'J["]H[ CA]f$�1L�Nt�
�� V��`��1V Uy� �ll�� YY 17� ll�
+6J" 1<�V i� V� V" i i
LOCATTOIK: BRIDGE #157 OVER POLE CAT CREEK
ox sR zr�a �rxaY nn�
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, f� STRUCTURE
STREAM fr WETLAND IMPACTS I
SEE
FIGURE
SITE �
7 � , '
ac� wx� , x r +-
PROJECT LENGTH
IavGTN OF ROADWAY T1P PROJECI' �5777 = O.OB4 MfLES
f�NG7F7 OF STRUCTUR£ TTP PROJECT 8-5377 = 0.01J MILES
7107AL LENGTH OF Tfp PROJECi a5377 = 0.095 M(IES
NCDOT CONTAC7: GARIAND HAVWO00, PE
Division Bridge Monager
� SITE 1
�
PfANS PREPARED FOR ]HE NCD07 BY:
ST'�JF.�.qottK'°P„�'� ;.'�,�,
'� vn
�.�`. RB-5377� i
� NORTH GAOfINA II
'�,� �
!�
�
�
�
�
END TTP PRQJFC7 R-S3J7
-U STA 19+30.00
':,�f"i11I U'�OW�"'� OOCUMENTNOTCON�IYEqEYFIMIIL
� i � cC i 1 U� o ux�u �u sisNwTune� eaxr��u
HYDRAULCS
ENGINFF'R
IX-4:1ri _u'
R1GHT OF WAY DATE�� NIKKI T. HONEYCUTf. PE Jt�ALOtviFY
DECEMBER 11 21 017 °"��`'''�`""E" DESlGN
ENGINEER
LETTING DATE: ETHAN R. WASHAM. EIT
__ JUNE 20,2018 ^amur nrs�c�

r �rCEND I. - _
s'va �:x sin nuac �ce»a+a x�r�.o
�� oEucr�s r�Mvaania, . . _ .�.. . _ �� IOd�c ,�, - � Y +,Yrrva 2
_ %'�Gl IMPAI.TS IN 5'JFFdCF 'NA1'_H O . �� ��f� � T� � �
��� i]ENOi�S PEAMpNtNi . � ���� tl4�� � �
V1�/'/1 iM�Gfi� PLNOT CCFLiSLE STGpNES . � ��u
!N S�JRFALE WPiER ._ _ �
�i'r�EAM PFRMIT IMPACT -.:` - . 4yy'
I nsec �ao I�erv;-H a�r� � �� SEE - � .�, n�
a+ncn�rvT e�ctiv FrrlcE g FIGURE $_ - 8 �` �,
� v. M ac �s I °•°' 'o - . � SITE 1 � � _- � p
5,'A; �i+5s..ro
;��. o�� <N•. , . •Fa-,,� . tar � � 5 :, � =YI
, �u�,�;s �`�.�� I 95 �� -. _ -t- x; F< SITE 1 � YOCWtlfMFI]TC6NiJO41�EOF1�4
I Wl�11\ iLL uGl4RNI[E�� cOMPLETEO
4 {i . � .,' i�` . __
�..C[: ' -W.' � y � - 'v� Sa - .. JR4E5 iRBx S1aRNE5.�P.
` I
.. .
�. .
. � _._ -_ :.�_ . _ _� __ _ .����"�� j ,, _ _ _`�.� /�` i.-- -��: _ _ . - ,� r.___f- . . -. _ .
s � � ^� � - -- - --- _ , ,
. , - i . �
_��_
---s----- °
_ __,-----� ;:, - - �
g. � . .�...... � 1�..-... _________-__ ___y .-
4 & F� " — _' _ . � _ . , f � ,r, _ . . _ - ._ _ �� �� I� a �,"
_ n � l L � � i� � y �y � !. \ ._ -L' r.. '� �Q �� d� m � . I
-_ ..I _ �� � � �,�y� � 11. � . \ a '.e SR ?.J7Q _�� -.-r.. -
� : �--_«__ ,1.�$r-�-'' u - . _ ___ _-�»__--_ � t
' . - F. , ___' _ �. `� -'____ __ _ _�_ ' _ � /�I- �,;� ,_ .:i :� ' . ,-.. .-- .-_ -'�, /-'' • - � ' .
. . - -. _ . . . -,. � � � � i` , . 1 ' .. . - � trrr -ir+ �a _ �r.r�\ '
�'' . _ � � _ _ �_ �—� � _=.�,i ri•�c`
rGrh' TfA PA01i'CT 6�SSTT � k� R7-.^ ..
E ,. 3 !GE
' $iA :da_4�j^�y_: - . .
-L �7A ilt�y[�(j - . J.
. - - . . .. .. � ' NI9 .+?RN�Ab <Uyo . [
Q t-=sra n+�o.sa �
yU� (� a(�� BEiiY SiAqNES LRIFFIN ' _�
�EfrTllt I�fljWi�Q - � S4aa S�aRnF.S SFENCER
JII��. . C( � _ _ _ _ " �
CFAi',al� �CA��_L '-
6Sa 'n�Ge: -
CK..�C•.v s�cEr7 zM7p'a:�rW.':E'%'r:�Y:;�wi� �_,.� IG�� . . �54
;� WFrr LS7 (N.kW �lfkti+'.:�ES'GN sr�s.�, pf�� ' _ _ _ . _
c�t,��v^uvN,Y :1rq _^r5�:.'tl �iCL�,YLS. � ;. .� .... ._ '_. - :. - : . __. .'... ..: .'..:. . .. . .. ..
h50 . � . . .�.� ... � • ���� � . _. :-�,_ . ., . : .:.:� �. i� - . . � 65U
-• . _ . — . ._ �.w• - -
J`]L�N 71P F�IECT 8�3{� . . . . .'. _ . . -. . . - " ., ' .. ��; � .. ;. _ :.
i,i� 31AA913v^� . . .� �� - . : .. . .
Gk6 .�t • sssrr . . . - c :. = � _ x rrr��.��.
i ' ' "::' _� � : _.__�� .—...._—�.'.' . '.' :.' .:� -�' z_'�" - '�"'_ _�'.._ �._ '-• ': .. . . 'L- STA+5�3�i.Cr7 &$6
` � .. . . .t .. . . . . . _'_.
.T, . : . . . •., FL � 63E6Y
642 .�:._� .- .
r ' .�._ _ ��n'ti G%rIL�iC' . .. �6�2
:fGrN wr7r{€.� - . . . . ---" I
4� I �r �; .. .. `t_ S•A�T'; JE� .
4.i.0J -r - � A+o-'7..H j
di3� �A'�$7 f.� . YC '�.l � � f^Yr :JIh; Fl, �.��� ��$
y�d,�� K r; . . . . ,� � �t-�ST�iri=11T' � ci � 532.7P : �_� "
.. DS , uF?ir. ; i VC 2PL
- YF:a^�. :,r„` � . x ts si5� � �SFFi'L�'z
' 634 es ss yrr,= E
r-„ � b3A
� 'r, __ __-- . _� .Y.. -
n i`#.i82tx. � --�� r-xtsBx'r.µ J�`:39��' �. BF..IRG.� FiY�J'RAUth.: u;,T ti I
� 6aa y'4 ____ _�---- "- ecs�, c•5�,•a� - •rrv cFsb aao
_ rx+sre�; cr�r��c �` 4 r `l - - - - - �€sxav F�r�a,�eKc'e _ 2s r.es �
Y
.' I. ... ��� NN FftVd7'AN �27L• T �d
� ' $0.4� Gi[nTfiY•t - 5_N CFS�',a
-..�' {..�-� .. _ . ISFS., �r�'f�fLAYY - � Y�� 6.2�
� b26 5 „ -- - - t3..SE rra ritv.sr.:a+ s2az
r �• Y . .. ..:: .... ... .. AICR7��"NG i� r!M'�'x = J •,
_ . . '_ I
.. ' ..
_ sc - ��c(' c� s
_, �S W �_Y:VJT`LrSS�m'rFii ___/ �.�,,� � _ .. . - I �7lEftT�PF7NG FftELlE1�i`= `..Q7� YHS j
62� s�Y �� FXC:JbTcSN �S� � Ir✓ffRTQPF�Ni t`i£VdTqN = E33@ FT I fa22
� �� IL..'.1'E ('F Sf1AlE'.' - "J3JC3'/20ff I
� . . .. .. . CC ':'! R+P'�!F Eh:f± .:AQE �—.� ... _ WS_ctf✓Ri �V! ]
�g�; G]$ I�� r�'+7E OF SW7vEr ' b225 F� I
b18
- 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 19+00 19+00

� �F;i ND � r .a,»�
����l� V)[� S�TYt �x
�0"N�IES cMPORCRY . - -,� •. � „a'��'�, ���� �f`..$,T! I.
y FaC � N �R�6UL N'41EH . � ' _. �� .. � X-� .2lln�� .,y
IGfrri�✓'+1�i '%� rr
�OENOTES PERMaNEWi R,w6t �; yt�y � I � �JJJ _r+cw[w
IMP4L7S IN SIJRFPCE WAT�R _ _ � i
. :�`' 1
5?RFGM PERMIT INIP4CT �- � ' . 1
I naEn � r I �_EmcrH u.-n �-- _�- SEE' . i 4 �� �
$ FIGI�RE
_ � ' �
PERMaMENi I ,�,ul 60 �tiiM1� F�NLE - - �� - - � _ I
sw iMPaCi_ 5rn.r�.i� ' � _-�-- $ITE 1 L,'- a i7 � ,
r�MWOFa�v II $E"WN. ka°1'r �H �:t� . _- ' _. c TC $S' � i,
SW iMPACTS � C.OJ 65 . �� i _�` �+RI.`x'.�''- . _. �7I 1 L � � c` i 64CV�E#TkpTCCN9iFffkOlVe4
� :� WIL[)S 11Li 6LC#t11TYwi5 Col�'v_[iED
� /� 1`, 9E 14 t3�:.LCf �' . , .
} _ . .. _ , _ ./ -.. ' �y � � . ib�.s� jt _ � . +e+4 i^S il�Ar{S.F. - ..
� ' �_ . , . -� ` . 1,���';�`l , _ �'� - �' ___ _ - � . _ . ��- _ -- . - - �
. _. . __ --�-� y� .
� - , ;� ---- '� �, � , , : _ _____ -`"`—
. � � ,
..�_
__- � . .
- $ -----V---'--__�_ � , _ . -� - ---- _ _ �
. __- . � ..... � _ � --�--s-------� --- -
,- e
' � �i iG - �ti _ _ _ ryF_ \ , ;, � - — - r �
" ; __ R
- �� $ ia 6 � � - � , r ,� � � � � � �.y 3$ � __
� '
,, i _,
. _ .. - - � �f: ; 4 a sa zno_
s -~r_---'____ -- - - - - __!� __"--.-- � .
- - ,� _ - . - �9 -..� � ��4 r 1�' Y _ ' -
, - . .-� .. _ '.. � �f � ? — , -- — �N-- � - -•'jA-,r..��-,�.. ' :tio rrF rr,ccr B _,zz� '
. ~.. _. - 'L- 371..9 ?C
/CFr,lN TIP PRCJECr B-S;77 � � � �.pr� p,yy�r. � \` � _ ,
S�4 idt3ao0 ' "C id !'�.ns�� f�� '
" .' -. �. NG A.�"+�Ml�'H SL'�L ' f.'��
� -± _s�u�r•roso
,1� - - l': 4G. �r�,. s+a�.as :ars�r . . � sanr a��b.Fs �E�4a
Fermit Drcm�nq � j
Shee! � ef � �
��vFHic sca�E �-
• nprF. _
45A �S:�ti SPE�O S!+�f'n fC�+ vEaeq:.�' C�w.!f ,s �v rr7_ � .
?'' uPn.t:SS lndb' Q�=Ft+1��,' LE]K.v :P£E!i sE.i . . 654
SU8-s::Gh77+L t�rEN GLS.",tY �,-LY'rrr;l._<.
GSq 454
6£SNM �.M'.?+3SfEc7 8-5� � - ... - - � - -- -- � - - --
''L" 57At4�3� ' . .��� .. _ �:. . :
64b EL = 6.iSXr �.. . � � - : . .= . . . . . . � � . � - . �. .: r:. _. - - - _ . . - - �� �ar5�'Y!m 3-9srr . 646
_'_' _._—. -.-_r . __._' "_._'__' � __. _ —_ -_:_ " t_. _. .
. � .. , _ "
._.. . . .. .. . "..._'.
. ., ' _,___' . . . . . _ _ ' '. ft ' S3fi69
ba2 - crc �+.�a� - bd2
_' 8EG',Y Et71CGE �,,���,�� �
�- Pa. r5�«04G' - t- STA/s=52Jd
tt ` h?3C`
638 E'�s'r r_� vC 2�sT � � � e�r+ �+irr Pr • r8+.2a�t 638
,•�B�7y x j . .. . .:�arr���t�' Et = 5.i2Jc --
� � _" �` �Pf•,r��m�oiSFlt GH1� � . '� X � �� "• ;.135:�� ._
G34 j t7S = :5 ,vPx. �%"ys
`';, 63A
- ' -- � +�q.48e'fX __ �-- •_�Q.fB3X' 'tti3�F �I [�t'd�[ H"r'Iy7„rIl-rfi 17ATA �
d3U ______----- pr,�s�+ e+seNaace - �o cfs� G3U
. �l''�4 - _� '�cESr.� tRfekiEhfr - � rFSi
�
3 �X.'wthi,GfaG:''.tiQ-� :.', j:._ ^,ES.�"+%Ma'%LEV:tiPYiM = 5t7�r iT .
_ �::. :1, �. 7?�r r,y.C'7+�a^.,f - o'•-1 �"f5
b23 f_,-r j�zSE �rtFtY�th^� = rm ras
� .: i w r.:Cn :c���. ^ f � �. . . ' ' . ...'.- � LN R7GPFu.rr rAAl£HL7Y `�" � 62G
f ., .
_ ' - � T!L ril7l c xC�✓cT n,,f`W -- -- �
- 822 _ _ . -.. -- - ..GCIf .Y[.: �. -' �� - RFEF77f?P!pG �tt'✓AXAi�+ - f3]J rT
- .. -- - - � .� _ -_ 622
�.:rr c: suPr� � o.�ia��r�o
• CL-HPJP.RRP �rCte �f�f �----r� r4'.`,.LLGJA7fl:N
c`„ 878 �.�� 17�%E S�F Sl.+avt3' ' 6725 �a
_ 5l8
_ 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19 r 00

�
R�MDT C�RLISLE S7PRNE5
'1. ' _ '
�
V' � P�
1 ,- . ' eC) G�y4,4`�_
t ,
., . ,� �
� �.�.��� ���,,�. � ���.� �. _
I� ;'URtf Ai.i 4Wh I CR ' S~
� {.
i
, �
�I BETTY STARNES GRIFFIN
r—
Q
U l�iJ �
W �
J U
O
�
1 1J
LLGEND
{/ f CENOTES TEMPORAHY
.�41L _. iMPACTS IN SURFACE WAiER
{��� ,� G�E�OTES PERMANENT
I t'!/�}� IN�PACTS IN SLJRFACE WATER
STREAM PERMIT IMPACT
AREA (ACI LENCiH (FTI
�f'ERMANENT p,01 f:0
SW IMP,�CTS
TEMPOR/�RY 0.02 ��
SW IMFF�CTS
� �(�l' �)� L�]'
t':RAi�� i�r..: �i:Al_-
�`1����
�IIVISII�N �� IHII�]HW.��'S
�JNI�N C�YJN'Il`�
1�1E8�J]EC°�°: l���s�ii
�lplllll"1J1L'. �i Aa➢% � V Ilill4
���.�'. �f�� ���.' �+�
�N �II� �lli�
(dff81��Y ff8�.�l�D
Il�% �% ��li
S1�IlE1C°l[[' 4 �1C �n

�������� ������
NAM[�S AN� .���ll81ES���
1�A�8�IEII� N�. N.�N][]GS
b ,YBA:�III�� CA1E81L�S1LlE 5"��1E8N1E5
� 1�]E°1[°'IC� �"II°.�1E8N]E5 �lf�d�'1F�N
t���ff81GSS
�5�� �ff81�� ff81�
M[�NIE��IE, NC �8llb�
dff8�� ff8�
l�l[�1\TlEB��, NC 28Illl2

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS URF CE WATFR IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) ac) (ac (ac) (ac) (ac) ft (ft) (ft)
1 -L- 16+52 TO 17+10 55' Cored Slab 0.01 0.02 60 85
TOTALS: 0.01 0.02 60.00 85.00

t-�j���,�y'ay North Carollna Department of Trensportation �
�� Highway Stormwater Program i;�F,
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN � ����''
�i IVcrsion 2�3; Released Oc[ober:'�ri5� FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
'WBS Elerneni: 4�092.1.FD1 T1P No.: B-5377 Eaun iesJ: Un�nr� Pa e 1 of 1
General P� eci Rniormatidn
WBS Element: 46092.1 FD1 TIP Number: B-5377 Pro'ect T e: Brid e Replacement Date: 10/27/2017
NCDOT Contact: Paul Fisher, PE Contractor / Desi ner: SN, Inc Shirshant Sharma
Address: � 020 Birch Ridge Drive Address: g00 West Trade Street, Ste. 715
Raleigh, NC 27610 Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone: {919) 707-6720 Phone: [phone]
Email: Pfisher NCDOT. ov Email: Shirlian[_Sh�rma e�stvine_com
Ci ITown: Monroe Coun (ies : Union
River Basin s: Yadkin-Pee Dee CAMA Coun ? No I
Wetlartds within �Pro"ect Limits? No
PTu'ect i)�es�ri tioc� —
�'ro"ect Len tM Vit�, miles or feet : a.10 Surroundin Land Use: Rural and agncuEturaE land
Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Built-U on Area (ac.) 0.3 ac. 0.2 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Two 10' lanes with 3'-11" paved shoulders 7wo 9' lanes, grass shoulders
Annual Avg Daily Treffic (veh/hr/day): Desi nlFuture: 980 Year: 2025 Existin : 410 Year: 2011
Generel Project NaFrat�ve: I The existing one span 30'-6" bridge over Polecat Creek on Sft 2170 j9rby Rd) is being replaced with a single span (1 @55') 21" cored sVab ondge. The bridge will be
(Description of Minimization of Water superelevated at 3.4% with 10' travel lanes and 3'-11" shoulders, 27'-10" clear width and 30'-0'" OTO width. The existing bridge structure will be removed. Overall drainage
Quality Impacts) pattems will be maintained. At the end of the bridge, a traffic bearing 2GI drainage inlet was placed on the low side of the superelevation to pick up runoff from the bridge. Class-
I II Rip Rap abutment protection is proposed to prevent future erosion and stream migration. PSRM was used as toe protection on the begin and end bridge side of the roadway.
' C9ass II Rip Rap was used as bank stabilization on the stream through the bridge.
W lrAortnatinn
SurFace Water �od � �: Polecat Creek NCDWR Strearn fndex Na.: 13-49-1
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Prima Classification: Class C
Su lemental Classification:
dther Stream Classification: None
Im airments:
A uatic T�E S ecies? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID; Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Pra'ect Includes Bri� e S annin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? N/A Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justifcation in the General Project Narrative) Qf yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If es, rovide justification in the General Project Narretive) General Project Narrative)

NCDOT Division 10 Bridge Replacement Program December 7, 2017
Bridge 157 on SR 2170 over Po/ecat Creek - PCN for NWP #3 and #13
Attachment D
No National Register of Historic Places Eligible or Listed
Archaeological Sites Present or Affected Form and Historic
Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Required Form

Pmjec! Trpcking No,_14-i2-0020
14-12-0020
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
od���, ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ,,�: .� 1�
�� � '� �4 � PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM ?`�' � �
f�� �.' � C��- . _ti o
';��:�,�i°�,� This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not '; ',, �J
'''•� �`�.' valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the ���3/
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No:
F.A. No:
B-5377
460921.FD1
BRZ-2170(6)
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document.'
Union
PCE or CE
Funding.• ❑ State
� Yes ❑ No Permit Type: ?
� Federal
Project Description:
This project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 157 on SR 2170 (Irby Road) over Polecat Creek in
Union County. According to the Request for Cultural Resources Review form, the proposed project
length is approximately 1, 450 feet (441.96 m). Existing right-of-way (ROW) is 60 feet (18.29 m) wide,
but no proposed ROW for the project has been determined. A 200 foot (60.96-m) wide study corridor has
been proposed to cover any potential new ROW. Thus, the area of potential effects (APE), for the
purposes of the current archaeological review, is estimated to encompass an area of nearly 6.66 acres
(2.69 hectares).
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed
the subject project and determined:
� There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the
project's area of potential effects.
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
� Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological
resources.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
❑ All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
� There are no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needec�
"NO NATIONA(. R!'C/STI:R EI,/GIB/.F. OR !.lS7 LD A2CHAE0/.OG/CAI, S/7 L'S YIU:SEN7' O2 AFFF.C7F,D
form for Minor Transporlalion Projecls as Qualified in !he 2007 Programmalic Agreemenl.
1 of 13

N�eclTraok�No.: l4-12-0020
14-12-0020
RECOMMENDATION
An archaeological survey and evaluation of the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 157 in Union County
was conducted on March 3, 2015, by New South Associates. During the course of the survey, no
previously unidentified sites were located within the project APE. No further archaeological
investigations are needed for this project. I concur with this recommendation, as the proposed bridge
replacement project will not impact significant archaeological resources. If the project expands and
impacts subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further archaeological consultations will be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info � Photos
Signed:
�Other: Shovel Test Results Table
CMarch 25, 2015
Uatc
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
"NO NATIONA/. RFC/S7ER EL/GB[,E OR /.IS7'h.'D ARCHAEOL.OG/CAL SL7ES PRGSENT OX Al�FEC�GD
form for Minor Transporlalion /'rojecls as Qualified in Ihe 2007Yrogrammalic Agreemenl.
2of13

P �ecr Trac�ing, Na,; _14-1 Z,OQ20
14-12-0020
Brief description of review activilies, results of review, and conclusions:
The project's Area of Potential Effects (APE) along Bridge No. 157 on SR 2170 (Irby Road) over Polecat
Creek in Union County was subjected to an intensive archaeological survey (Figure 1). In March 2015,
New South Associates, Inc. completed shovel testing at 15-meter intervals to survey for potential
archaeological resources within the project APE. The purpose of the fieldwork was to investigate the
possibility of unknown archaeological resources that might be impacted by the proposed undertaking.
The APE far this study measured approximately 1,450 feet (441.96 m) long by 200 feet (60.96 m) wide
and 290,000 square feet (6.66 ac.) in size.
The APE is characterized by gently sloping forested areas in the central portions and moderately sloping
agricultural and pastureland in the eastern and western portions. Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the general
landscape and slope within the project area. An examination of the USDA soil survey map showed that
the APE consisted of three different soil types. The stream bench and terrace in the central portion of the
APE consists of Chewacla (ChA) loam and Cid (CmB) channery silt loam. Chewacla series soils are
somewhat poorly drained and are found in areas with slopes ranging from 0-2 percent. Cid series soils
are moderately well drained or somewhat well drained and are found in areas with slopes ranging from 0-
15 percent. The eastern and western portions of the APE consist of three variations of the Tarrus series
(TbB2, TaC, and TaB). Tarrus series soils are well drained and are found in areas with slopes ranging
from 0 to 50 percent (USDA Soil Survey 2000; 2003; 2010).
The examination of National Register of Historic Places-listed (NRHP-listed), State Study Listed (SL),
Locally Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing
resources available on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) website
determined that no historic structural resources with potential archaeological deposits were situated within
the boundaries of the APE or proximal to the APE. Additionally, historic maps of Union County were
reviewed for former structure locations, land use patterns, or other confirmation of historic occupation
within the Bridge 157 vicinity. No structures or historic features were found to be in the APE.
Archaeological and historical reference materials were inspected' as well. Overall, the historical review
established that no NRHP-listed properties, archaeological sites, ar cemeteries were contained within the
APE.
On March 3, 2015, an archaeological survey and evaluation of the proposed replacement of Bridge No.
157 in Union County was conducted by New South Associates. The intensive archaeological survey
consisted of 55 shovel tests placed at 15-meter (49.2-ft.) intervals along four transects, each located on
either side of the existing road working northeast and southwest from the bridge within the APE (Table
1). Nine shovel tests were not excavated due to the presence of standing water in the area or exposed
subsoil (Figure 3). One shovel test was not excavated on Transect 1 due to the presence of exposed
subsoil and 100 percent surface visibility. Five shovel tests were not excavated on Transect 3, and four
shovel tests were not excavated on Transect 4, all due to the presence of standing water in the area. The
first shovel test of each transect was placed approximately five meters from the edge of the bridge
structure. Transects ran approximately 15 meters from the road centerline. All shovel tests measured at
least 30 centimeters (12 in.) in diameter and were excavated to at least 10 centimeters (4 in.) into sterile
subsoil. All excavated soils and sediments were screened through mesh screen (0.64-cm, 0.25-in.) and all
shovel tests were backfilled. A visual inspection of the surface was also done in conjunction with
subsurface testing. A typical soil profile consisted of 0-10 centimeters of brown (7.SYR 4/3) silty loamy
(Stratum I), 10-20 centimeters of yellowish-brown (lOYR 5/6) silt (Stratum II), and 20-30 centimeters of
yellow (lOYR 7/8) clay subsoil.
"NO NA770NA/, XISGIS�LR l;'L/G/B/.h.' OK L/SY � D ARCHAEOl,OG/CAI, S/�L'S P13I.ti!{N7' OR AI�ThY'7ED
form jor Minor �ransporlalion Projecls as Qualified in ihe 2007 Programmalic Agreemenl.
3of13

Pro'ec1 Trackrng Na: /4-12-OO10
14-12-0020
Table 1. Shovel Test Table
Quadrant Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soil Artifacts Notes
Test Pit (top) (base) Texture
7.SYR 4/3 -
Northwest 1-1 I 0 20+ Z•SYR 5/8 - Brown, Red, Clay No Mottled
lOYR 7/8 - Yellow, Gray
SYR 5/1
7.SYR 4/3 -
Northwest 1-2 I 0 20+ Z•SYR 5/8 - Brown, Red, Clay No Mottled
lOYR 7/8 - Yellow, Gray
SYR 5/1
7.SYR 4/3 -
Northwest 1-3 I 0 20+ Z•SYR 5/8 - Brown, Red, Clay No Mottled
lOYR 7/8 - Yellow, Gray
SYR 5/1
7.SYR 4/3 -
Northwest 1-4 I 0 20+ Z•SYR 5/8 - Brown, Red, Clay No Mottled
lOYR 7/8 - Yellow, Gray
SYR 5/1
7.SYR 4/3 -
Northwest 1-5 I 0 20+ Z•SYR 5/8 - Brown, Red, Clay No Mottled
lOYR 7/8 - Yellow, Gray
5YR 5/1
7.SYR 4/3 -
Northwest 1-6 I 0 20+ Z•SYR 5/8 - Brown, Red, Clay No Mottled
lOYR 7/8 - Yellow, Gray
SYR 5/1
7.SYR 4/3 -
Northwest 1-7 I 0 20+ 2•SYR 5/8 - Brown, Red, Clay No Motded
lOYR 7/8 - Yellow, Gray
SYR 5/1
Not Dug -
Northwest 1-8 Exposed
Subsoil
7.SYR 4/3 -
Northwest 1-9 I 0 20+ 2•SYR 5/8 - Brown, Red, Clay No Mottled
lOYR 7/8 - Yellow, Gray
SYR 5/1
Northwest 1-10 I 0 5 7.5YR 4/3 Brown CIaY y No
II 5 15+ lOYR 5/6 1'ellowish Clay No
Brown
Northwest 1-11 I 0 10+ lOYR 5/6 �'ellowish Cfay No
Brown
Northwest 1-12 I 0 ]0+ 10YR5/6 I'ellowish Clay No -
Brown
Northwest 1-13 I 0 5 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Clay No
II 5 15+ lOYR 5/6 I'ellowish Clay No
Brown
Northwest 1-14 I 0 5 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Clay No
"NO NA%%ONAI. ItliG/S7ER ELIG/HI.F. OR L/S7ED ARCHA/:OI.OGlCAf, S/TES PRF^�EN7' OR AH'I�GC'!'[iD
jorm jor Minor �ransporlalion Projecls as Qualified in �he 2007 Programmalic Agreemenl,
4of13

Prq�ecl7Yricki No.: /4-12-0020
14-12-0020
Table 1. Shovel Test Table
Quadrant Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soil Artifacts Notes
Test Pit (top) (base) Texture
II 5 15+ lOYR 5/6 Yellowish Clay No
Brown
Northwest 1-15 I 0 10+ 2.SYR 5/4 Reddish Brown Clay y No
Northwest 1-16 I 0 10+ 2.5YR 5/4 Reddish Brown Cl �y No
Y
Southwest 2-1 I 0 $ 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Loam No
II 8 12+ 2,SYR 5/8 Red Clay No -
Southwest 2-2 I 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silt No -
II 10 22+ 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Clay No
Southwest 2-3 I 0 15 7.SYR 4/3 Brown �am No -
II 15 35+ lOYR 7/8 Yellow C,ayY No
Southwest 2-4 I 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown �t� No
II 10 20 lOYR 5/8 I'ellowish Silt No
Brown
III 20 30+ lOYR 7/8 Yellow C��aY No
Y
Southwest 2-5 I 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silty No
Loam
II 10 20 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No -
III 20 25+ 7.SYR 5/4 Brown Clay No
Southwest 2-6 I 0 8 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Lot� No
II 8 16 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No -
III 16 20+ 7.SYR 5/4 Brown Clay No -
Southwest 2-7 I 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Lat� No
II 10 25+ Z•SYR 5/8 - Red and Gray Clay No Mottled
SYR 7/2
"NO NA� IONAI. WiGISTh.'R EL/GIBLE OR [./S7 ED ARCHAGOLOG/CAL SI7 ES NRESGN7' 02 AP/%GC7CD
jorm for Minor Transporlalion ProjeGs as Qualified in Ihe 2007 Programmalic Agreemen4
Sofl3

P� cr ria�k�� Na: �a-iz-oozo
14-12-0020
Table 1. Shovel Test Table
Quadrant Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soil ArtifaMs Notes
Test Pit (top) (base) Texture
Southwest 2-8 1 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silty No
Loam
II 10 18 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No
III 18 28+ 7.SYR 5/4 Brown Clay No -
Southwest 2-9 I 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silty No -
Loam
II l0 15 7.5YR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No
III 15 20+ SYR 7/2 Gray C1ady No
Y
Southwest 2-10 I 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silty No -
Loam
[I ] 0 20+ lOYR 5/2 Grayish Brown C1ady No
Y
Southwest 2-1 l I 0 l0 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silty No
Loam
II 10 15+ 2.5YR 5/8 Red Clay No
Southwest 2-12 I 0 5 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silty No
Loam
II 5 8 7.SYR 5/4 Brown Clady No Bmbsock at 8
Y
Southwest 2-13 I 0 ] 0 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silty No
Loam
II 10 15 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Sandy No Bedrock at
Clay 15 cmbs
Southwest 2-14 [ 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silty No
Loam
II ] 0 15 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Sandy No Bedrock at
Clay 15 cmbs
Southwest 2-15 I 0 10 7.5YR 4/3 Brown Lot� No
I[ ]0 15+ SYRS/1 Gray C��aY No
Y
"NO NATIONA/, IU'GlSTLR El./GIHLE OR /JS%'F,D ARCHAI:'OI,OGICAI, S/%'8S PRh,�SF.NT OR A/•7%fiC:77iD
form for Minor 7'ransporla�ion Projec�s as Qualified in �he 2007 Programma�ic Agreemen�.
6of13

ProjE�r Tracklrqr�Nrz: 14-l2•0010
14-12-0020
Table 1. Shovel Test Table
Quadrant Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soil Artifacts Notes
Test Pit (top) (base) Texture
Southwest 2-16 I 0 10 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Lot� No
II 10 20+ 2.SYR 5/8 Red Clay No
Northeast 3-1 I 0 l0 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No Quartz
Cobbles
II 10 20+ 5YR 5/1 Gray Clay NO C�obbles
Northeast 3-2 I 0 10 lOYR 2/I Black Loam No Quartz
Cobbles
Il 10 20+ SYR 5/1 Gray Clay NO C�o bles
Y
Northeast 3-3 I 0 5 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Clay Y NO C�obbles
Light Qu�
II 5 15+ lOYR 6/4 Yellowish Clay No Cobbles
Brown
Not Dug -
Northeast 3-4 - Standing
Water
Northeast 3-5 I 0 5 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Clay�y NO C�o bles
Light QU�
II 5 15+ lOYR 6/4 Yellowish Clay No Cobbles
Brown
Northeast 3-6 I 0 5 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Clay Y NO C�o bles
Light QuartZ
II 5 15+ lOYR 6/4 Yellowish Clay No Cobbles
Brown
Northeast 3-7 I 0 5 7SYR 6/3 Light Brown Cla1y y NO C�o bles
Light Quartz
II 5 15+ lOYR 6/4 Yellowish Clay No Cobbles
Brown
Not Dug -
Northeast 3-8 - Standing
Water
"NO NATIONAI, RL•'CISTFR Gl./C1BI.L' OR !./STED ARCHAL•'0/.OG/CAL S/7GS PRIiSGN7' OR AH7�'F.'CTIiD
form far Minor Transporlalion Projecls as Qualifred in !he 2007 Programmalic Agreemenl.
7of13

Prolect 7kacldn� Na.: 14-11-0020
14-12-0020
Table 1. Shovel Test Table
Quadrant Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soi{ Artifacts Notes
Test Pit (top) (base) Textuee
Light Loamy
Northeast 3-9 I 0 10 lOYR 6/4 Yellowish Clay No
Brown
II 10 20+ 2.SYR 5/8 Red Clay No -
Light Loamy
Northeast 3-10 I 0 10 lOYR 6/4 Yellowish Clay NO
Brown
II 10 20+ lOYEt 7/8 Yellow Clay No
Light
Northeast 3-11 I 0 10 lOYR 6/4 Yellowish C�a�Y No -
Brown
II 10 20+ lOYR 7/8 Yellow Clay No -
Light
Northeast 3-12 I 0 10 lOYR 6/4 Yellowish ClaynY No
Brown
II 10 20+ lOYR 7/8 Yellow Clay No
Northeast 3-13 I 0 5 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown C�a�y No
Light
Il 5 15+ lOYR 6/4 Yellowish Clay No
Brown
Northeast 3-14 - _ _ _ _ Not Dug -
Wetlands
Northeast 3-15 _ Not Dug -
Wetlands
Northeast 3-16 _ _ Not Dug -
Wetlands
Not Dug -
Southeast 4-1 - Standing
Water
Not Dug -
Southeast 4-2 - Standing
Water
Not Dug -
Southeast 4-3 - - Standing
Water
Not Dug -
Southeast 4-4 - - - Standing
Water
Southeast 4-5 I 0 8 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Lotazn No �obb el s
II S 12+ 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No Q°�
Cobbles
"NO NATIONAL RGG/S7F.R El.fGIBl,E OR /,lSTED ARCHAGOI.00ICAL SITL'S PRL•'SEN7' 0I2 AJ7�'F.C7EV
form for Minor %'ranspor�alion Projecis as Qualified in !he 2007 Programmalic Agreemenl.
8of13

Project TruckF No.: 1�-12-QD2A
14-12-0020
Table 1. Shovel Test Table
Quadrant Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soil Artifacts Notes
Test Pit (top) (base) Texture
Southeast 4-6 I 0 6 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No ��
Cobbles
II 6 12+ SI,RR�2/8 _ Red and Gray Clay No �bb el s
Southeast 4-7 I 0 8 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No
II 8 18 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No QII�
Cobbles
IlI 18 28+ 2SYR 5/8 Red C adY No �obb es
Southeast 4-8 I 0 8 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No Qu�
Cobbles
II 8 18 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No Q°�
Cobbles
III 18 28+ 2.SYR 5/8 Red C ayy NO C�o b es
Southeast 4-9 I 0 8 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No Q°�
Southeast I 4-10
Southeast I 4-11
Southeast I 4-12
Southeast � 4-13
Cobbles
II 8 15 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Silt No
III 15 20+ 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown C��aY No
Y
I 0 7 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No
II 7 20+ SYR 7/2 Gray CIaY NO C�obb el s
Y
I 0 10 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No -
II 10 20+ 5YR 7/2 Gray Clay NO C�obb el s
Y
I 0 8 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No
II 8 20+ SYR 7/2 Gray Clay No -
Y
I 0 5 lOYR 2/1 Black Loam No
II 5 17+ SYR 7/2 Gra Silty No -
y Clay
Southeast 4-14 I 0 5 7.SYR 4/3 Brown CIIaY No
Y
II 5 20+ 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No
Southeast 4-15 I 0 5 7.SYR 4/3 Brown CilaY No
"NO NAT/ONAL NGGISTER L'/.IGB[.E OR I,IS% EU AHCHAEOLOG/CA[, S/TES PRESENT OR AITECT(:D
form for Minor 7ranspor(alion Prajecls as Qualified in Ihe 2007 Programmalic Agreemenl,
9of13
Wet

Pro'rcd 7};u�kii{� No.: /4-12-0020
14-12-0020
Table 1. Shovel Test Table
Quadrant Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soil Artifacts Notes
Test Pit (top) (base) Texture
II 5 20+ 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No Wet
Southeast 4-16 I 0 5 7.SYR 4/3 Brown Cllay No
II 5 20+ 7.SYR 6/3 Light Brown Silt No Wet
Southeast 4-17 I 0 5 7.SYR 4/3 Brown �am No -
II 5 10+ 2.SYR 5/8 Red Clay No -
Archaeological investigation of the APE included both pedestrian walkover and systematic shovel testing.
Surface visibility in the wooded central portion of the APE was approximately 10 percent, while the
eastern and western portions were approximately 40 percent because of this area being agricultural and
pastureland. No artifacts were observed and all of the shovel tests were negative.
No further archaeological investigations are recommended for the proposed replacement of Bridge No.
157 in Union County. The proposed improvements will not impact any significant archaeological
resources.
Figure 1. Map Showing the Location of the Project APE
Figure 2. a.) View of APE Facing Southwest. b.) View of APE Facing Northeast
Figure 3. Aerial View of Project Area Showing Shovel Test Results
Stefanie M. Smith
Archaeologist
New South Associates, Inc.
"NO NA7%ONAl, R/iG/STER h_'L.1GfA/,Ii OR I./STG:D ARCHAF.O/,OGICAI, S/TESYRF,SEN7' OR AI�ITCTIiD
form for Minor Transporlalion Projec�s as Qualified in �he 2007 Programma(ic Agreemenl.
10 of 13

Pra�ec( 7'ruckirrb No.: la-�2-0020
14-12-0020
Figure 1. Topographic Map Showing the Location of the Project APE
� �1 � �,,; , - - �, . �-� �/� � , - � , �, � s
� �.�.'' •+ r . f,�f.' ' • � � V ' ,�LP , � , :��' �"— ,� �
�,r 'l �� �� �. - � �PGTi` . . � � ,
��/FT� � ° ���.� " ' �� � .'� :- W . . �,�+,• 4�_ . �y����� �•A^+.
1i ^ . 635�; ~�J. ` ' �'i � � ���' 3 ,�
;� n ./ ``���r�: � ��� � , fi .��*. �,� , •
/� Yl3�' ' �i "y �n, �r : - � � .
� � ' ' 1� �� L+�+ ✓ 1-f . '\� 6��7 ` � �f � � �±! �' �` � � �"``��
t. � t�u1C1 r �r.. .YX'atDMei �(�15:,{�T�;�� �` �� � . . �` - `�'/ �'.� � ;', f 1\.
�t' � �
r? l5 , .� �� 1; • � � I ,.
� , �'�'`'` ' . - r P • . � -_ ,.;
� � . ' � } r' � �� � _ _ I ,�;..�� _.
• � ` - � � } • • ---� �-%� . '� ,` r'� _
-- � ' � � „ _•_ -� e � , � �
\. . �—. �,' --1 G
� . M , : �/� . , � � yf � �'�� '
, � �4C„> ` � r•• �
� . , '. . � — �-
` _ / �'� - `'�� � � ':iiJ), '� � .r,.q, , /
��^ � ` �; � %� r4' f
�� ,f '} � ` _' �
. �� "�'I'�.�'.d8d `y � ' � �� r�� oJ� ,
' ' �'dt'��5pr lank ,•� � ��` , .
_.� ti 2 s: ,�i b � �, � i
� ' \ (' . i a`� ,ri `
� , J � � • . �R.<r�d �:��' r. .� j �� • "-
1��. = � ' l.;B�!Bfr: 4'�h . �. � � ` _ . �-� .'>
� u� � " �• 1'ra+D�ct.�• E!T- `� �, ''.�Cr,!' ' ~ '
} r.h • .�, �---� ;-� APE (Bridge No. 157) �
�, ' `, i�
. '� ��- • . > �
`` - � �
l `•�. �� �� cQ� . �� ' 1�, � . ���y� . �
\ , �r� } / � 5 '� � �J ��
�i1 �i" � � �'- ,-�.._.-� � j ' �� ". ` � :
7!/, � c� ` ,.
" S. � �
�� ���v'�. :/ n _ , � � . ' � :. . . . , i .. �� /I
�{ • i r�.� � � \ � /
� � ` � / . � � ` �,�l:� �^ �v I
`
'b �: �%��y ��
� �� • � •�c = ��� � `j i. � f'�
,
i� - `F'�1, h�+ �_ `-� .� �\ r �
� � ��r`�� , . , ��i7 �� J ��s ' ;�., ' �
t � — - .� �
,
.. �.: . � ��..� - : , _ \
�4i_?8". y �` l� - �' \ . , � � / �+.�„��
r.�-- , �
. �,�� dt�� �\_- ,��'�Tl '�
` .ti ' - �_ ;: _ -- _ �' !�r ' ' 4' � Union
- -• ��_
� � � �' ' County
�I APE (Bridge No. 157) ~'`,�
0 300 600 1,200 Meters
I_ u i i I i � i I ---' �-.,. ��' �,�.'
� APE
rv a �� {Bridge No. 15�)
� 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet �
r` lr
Source: USGS Tradesville, North Carolina Quadrangle
"NQ NA%70NA1_ ItL'GlS7'F.R GLIGIBLB' OR LLS%'ED ARCHACOLOG[CAL SIT(SS PRF.Sl:N7' OR ArFEC7GD
form for /L/ir�or 7ransponalio�i Projec�s as Qiaalifivd in �he 2007 Programmn�ic Agreemen�.
]lofl3

f'r����er '1'ruckrn� ;Vu_ !a-l�-flfl?II
14-12-0020
Figure 2a. View of APE Facing Southwest
Fi�ure 2b. i�iew ofAPE Facing Northeast
"NO NATlONA/, RI;GlS"1'L'R L'L/G/BLL�' OR L/S7'ED ARCHfI EOLOCIC.AL S/TIiS PR/t'SI:NT Olt AFI�'h.'C7ED
jonn for Minor 7'ransporlalion Projecls as Qualified in 1he 2007 Progrummalic Agreemenl
12 Of 13

Pira�ec� Tr•aCknrg N'o.: la-!?-0020
14-12-0020
Figtrre 3. Aeriad View af the Project Area Showing Shovel Test Restrlts
Source: ESRI Resource Data
"NO NA%70NAL IU:GlS%'FH /i/,/G/B/,E 012 /,IS%'Ii4 Alt('HAFOLUG/C'A/. S'/%ES PRIsSEN']' UR,4hY�L('TL'D
J�rrn /im Adirior 7'rnn.+por�a�inn Prnjeci.+� o.r OunlJied in dre Z(/07 Prngrmumn�ic Agreenien�
13 of 13

Project Tntcki��g No. �Inter�ial Use�
14-12-0020
UPDATE
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PRn.TF.(''T iNFnRMATi01�1
Project No: B-5377 County: Union
WBS No.: 46092.1.FD 1 Document PCE or CE
T e:
Fe�! Ai�l No: BRZ-2170(6) Funding: State Federal
Federal Yes No Permit
Permil s: T e s:
Proiect D�scrinlio�t: Replace Bridge No. 157 on SR 2170 (Irby Rd) over Polecat Creek.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Descriniion af'review nclivilies. results, anaf conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undeitaken on October 4, 2017. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is UPDATED to the map provided. There are several
fi•ame outbuildings, which appear to be chicken houses, within the APE. They are not eligible for
National Register listing. In addition, Bridge No. 157 is not eligible for NR listing. There are no National
Register listed or eligible properties, and no survey is requiced. If design plans change, additional review
will be re uired.
Whv the �v�rilable infor►rratioa nravides a relin6le 6asis for reasona6lv nredictere� thnt tlrere
rrre no unirlentif�ed si�niTcant lristqric archl�eclural or lrrndsc�r�ne resnurces t►e llte t�roiect
area:
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS propeirties for the Union County
survey, Union County GIS/Tax Information, and Google Maps are considered valid for the purposes of
determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no National Register listed or
eli ible ro erties within the APE and no surve is re uired.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
�Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. �Photos OCorres�ondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Lany�seapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
Nisroric Archileclui�e nnd /.miJscapes NO SURVIiY RGQU/RIsD jor�n jor Minor'!'ransporinfion Projecls a.r Qualified in Uie 2007 Prograirunalic Agreemeni.
Page 1 of 3

�� ��„ � - '��� j��; � . �` 7. ��p - . . .. 1� °� ���'� s:
�il'.�- ' "r� " .p�j �0 ti � � � ��I� �S .. � ! � p � � � �
� .'J� I .i„!"'ill ��,,�i% i:y� :..h•� �.. � f � _ . . � ,��` y �
t � •r. � � � 1 y„ cp f � *.� . ;r y�a ��`S' .
' F k . � � f / . � Ri � _�� �i'� �I ti ? `Y r �'.` �_Tj r_
�p �' Y j
� � 'F . . � ��iq-�� d1l / . ..♦ � �Mn� 1 u i - y4 - d � ;Nd '� F � �-�,
1'\'t / 4� r� .�� �P . �._ , ti �' ,� Y� � � .rq r
tR <" ���. q�j��'�.,�. �� x � � � 1 ��y\��- �.,^ y�� � ,� ed7 .
�'' ' �'�� `•��r ,✓ � I p �
� �.� . -F '� � � � t ' '1�ti� ,; � �.� � �1 ",; ,;� ` � .' . � � ' r�^'4 ` r� ,.
t � ��'� �;`� � • � ' x� ,
ry �} �� y � i,!.• �{�9h���t " � �� �'`°+�; �� f �. �`, ' ��k
� �rS� i�.,,� I , � � �_' ��.�: `; I� ! ��
� �,; �t`� i�� �� '%r,� , ` ,`, ;; >"� �� ,.;,� _ . -�' '� �,.:
� �..
� I
1 �• , � � MJ v �' �s ` � �,
� � '
� �� � �� iY ` \� / . � ��f. i
���p�;.�ir�t'.�4 ��,�i`�A� � �,`,b� Y` �'�.
�.1 41��i�. �"�', M�r.. �.'� � c 1 � �r ♦..
, � � ���, ��' �!;
M � �
,+I � e� , , . i � i�+ �J' S , _
rr• \� ��-` J+ x�� C f.
�� � f -^ '� �� � � r1 � � 1
��� 3 � � �l �,. ��, -� , :;/
`��;`,�Y ��''a���;,,�` ��+� �1� :;s " '�,�; "
���°��¢�yt �^�!���R��� ��:,�+� �� � � � _
; f ��a �}.
{w �,- � �', �p, "'p � t y ,
� � � i�"�, ��' � ,�f`; 1, �� :a •
� ', _�' �y � �;,��� .; � ' :'' " ' .' �'�. � - +�i+, ,s''a°: �,
I
+ �,�'.�"f '1F�',"0'�Pj�li��� �� '' ` ���' '�'. ,i4 . ��
i r U ,r �
� i' +'j''. �
1 e \��1 � � ._� `
� 'R?i�� o pu d +, i�e,` ti ' . B dl. �lh
�il � �nl }} , ,� aa✓� ... �r�p� : R 1 ' 'i \ ., � � +� � �� 7�� ,.Y . .
�.,, 1r ��,,yy .; ��, y��, "� �`��` _ 7�: -�'��zAi� Yys.' � �.
;+�,,� C� I��',!r "', '"F'/�yQl`�ti, � � _� ft5�,�tsti,. ,i� .�� � �
� t� -t' �; �� � � i a. � ��� r „
I Y I 1��. ,
� � -- ��� t � � }. ��'��� ��� 1', -�� ��l��r. ��:}� � `..
�I' 'ha�"'1,.,��t y��"�w �,{;'r ,���t � + ��4��p ��^i ar:: ,'
p� SP^ s (
� �` ''til � � � T'_ R :�✓
, � .,I '`�y,�.... .P!` . ^ ��t�'4.. -',f�.+,. . �' r ,s� .r 4 � e ' �
P 11 � f .
`l � . �� irld��'rtl�+` '4���:� 1� -•.��1^l ' '� �' ��f-d` ° �' �'!,�' � . ,����11
�4v.•� ,i # � �-.�= ,�a'� '���. ✓ . "f� �b ,
."�. r5 �' �. �
�' ' �j � J +� � S "�� �. . ,. �I �'4•s I
r «�rl �„ � +�'� � ;��.'
yA't !4ti° � �'.v�� « '� �, �' 4 ` ��
!, ''�' =` _'(�..- ��'r . �.� �h,s ��: :•I�� Q� �.,t u � �� q �% a, � �'
E�-��� - �J,�>� � ¢•i�� �` �,,�L ,-�� ���'� "?� ,`4'.�j ��'��l� •� F 4����, �•
__� _,d,,� ',,�'� 4�1�`��I�R�� �� ,"�\�,� ' � G � , :��o . �'a� Y ��� <,.� wr '`� ��,�- � �w� M�: '
� �'? '��,. , ha, r��' . .�,., � l.� � ':'���, , �4 °�l�r ��j�,�►�. �� ,�d�,' .
� �i � \ t9. "''' I r� r"�, c �,.
Y �•. �i:�: r `1r �
r�� . � . "s,r �` �t�;�' '��rr �r:Jt a� �+ �, ^} .
������ � . . ��, � . �f a�� �ry�� �� �
� `� � �A - , r �1��''. .
� ��' ' " ,?\ � ,s'e� �+ � `�F yt�
� �1 `� `', � ��
� �' �
y t � \ b�l, , r+ '. �/ /
� + `� �' �,, � �
x ��t �, . `" �, , n .,_.�. , .
„��';P r i °"1 i1 _ t �g. ,rq� dh �,��� .�. - ,vp t .
,�� Y � h �',1"�ht �l l � ? r ,�,,`
�\ �� i Y �� � '� ' 1a w'�c1 � 'il� i4, ��
: ''�„�5 1 ' ' .' � _b�. � 1�, ' a ;; , �,
�" "^ °M`" '�'�+ ' '� '' s
�� r'Li. itl ,ti�� 2 � t i �� �1� � r�� � r k �� . . itM1'�� � ♦v � � .:�Y , -� �+��_
� F
-,!� ,� «��� r �'o �u�\� � y xy ,,.
,l� �, � i �.o
. �,� ` 'ti ��` s,,--
Uuion Couun; NC: ' y S7Ip B�377
�y �R+ SR:170
P° Lec�end t {IItsl'Ro�)
F 13R1DC:F 890157
� Bridge 890�157 � Cemetery „ }� �pi-��EI�[EI°n'O\'ER
� � PSA POLEC 1T CREEIi
a Historic Site '�L L'1GIUN CO[JNTY
; � . .��i �
�oF�� Slream L SCho01 September?017
('� Floodplaln 'k ��'�,
CT Parcel
.71 �1+'� /� l0U I. ] NWI Wetland sytiry„:Lve m,YoI� nepu�.�s LOCATioNb[AP
° 1••��� ACOorSSp.��flPOGLSPd7iL
�� Church ���d��i�
Hi.rraric Archileclnre aud /.an�l.scape.� NO SUItVIiY RGQU/RIiD fa•m ja• Minor 77rmsparmrion ProjecLr n.r Qualified in Ihe 1D07 Progrrnronaric Agreexienr.
Page 2 of 3

�,+ a.`'y�`..�.�' j,�?� .�X'Lt �r '�+ � �A.�
..'. � � � � y �
I �ti' ►r �� r`.r �_"'�F'ur��. . . �.��. . � � C �+� r' � I�,.' �.�� � '
y ''� �� 3 w�/w r. i � .R • J.
�1 � i
�s',�,�G.�`..,� eK; �� : . � .�..� .
� R �
� �� � .�.,�:' k5 q� 1 _. . � { � 2 _ . . � n� , }'�� . } �
� � �.��„�.'�� ' . ..�,�'e+ ��` , ��'� . ...' .'��1
I , � r` � �'' o
r r-
wp .�:k�w ., � c�
� , r , � ,.
�
IB � . �, ",t,. ', ,, � ' �� �... �
, ; � �j�; �`` �:� �; r f �p
�� ' ?. . �
r
������ " , �, ..;L, . ''��' �.
��r ��r. � �� ��S *yl^ 1�,�1 �Yy •.). i ��� ..�.����
b - ' r S- ,/ . r
��.���� . � _ �� , , "�_ , ���� � � T _'�
Bing Maps Birds �ye View, Bridge Location in red.
I �I'�.�� �
�,• ;�•: y.
� ;� .;��; {.
�y i j,' _
f: �'`.Vl'��4 ti-:�
'���,;._
� �`
�/ �i
1 . .�i
F.r�% . .,.��'+ %
�i . .. �
��,�� p ,.;
t � �
�Z � I
1C Y
.� �: P
�,, �i 1
f�'� �=1h� /fl'�, ' '
� � ,� �r �
r'-5:���'i ,�' f_+
i-aVf�� ���. u��•���e i��+. Y�7 dc�c�taua�ui.
Hisloric Ar•chilecBu•e �nd l.nnd.rcnpes NO SU/tV/iY RIiQUIf?1sDjorni ja•Minor Transporfalian Projecl.r as Qrralificd iir 1He 1007 Nragr•nniumrre Agieeurenl
Page 3 of 3