20081734 Ver 1_More Info Received_20090225

Marskwater
February 16, 2009
Cindy Karoly
NCDENR-DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
FF 6 -
9, 5 2009
JF?k v?arhnc(??,ulY
WETLA!4
Regarding: Diamond Falls Estates - DWQ Project # 08-1734
Anderson Creek RD, Franklin, Macon County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly,
Marshwater Company has completed the DWQ's request for more information
regarding the Diamond Falls Estates project Located in Macon County, NC.
Upon further review the permit has been changed from a NWP 27 to a NWP 29.
This change has been recognized by the USACE. The changes desired by the
developer are to reduce the number of ponds from two to one. Pond # 1 from the
previous PCN has been deleted from the original proposal. The pond previously
referred to as pond #2 will be noted as pond #1 from here on out. The changes
are reflected in a revised PCN which Marshwater Company has been included in
this package. There are no expected impacts to streams due to fill slopes or bank
stabilization within the Diamond Falls Estates. Additionally, individual septic
drain fields will be designed for each lot as they are sold. No impacts to streams
or wetlands are expected during septic installation. Also, the name of the permit
applicant has changed from Carolyn Love to Glen Goodwin.
Marshwater Company is pleased to be a part of this delicate issue. Regulatory
permitting is necessary for environmental stability of the future. Marshwater
Company will work diligently to ensure a viable resolution. Please call with any
questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Ronnie Dilbeck`
Marshwater Company
[phone]
0 09
cf,, _i i 11 IM
Office Use Only: ??P''
Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Che k all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[t Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
[401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: err 1 a o 10: ,
Mailing Address: , r/A
Telephone Number: 25- 3q 1 I O p Fax Number: 6 ?$- 3 Y 9- I/ 0 3
E-mail Address: ,.& a.. J r l 1S C < 1 e? T-o s . C_ fl t/*-
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be att ched if the Agen has si natory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: o n A:e__ e_ L L
Company Affilia#i ,n: AA Mailing Address: P - Ro m y
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address: A
0- 5 `/® - 3
Fax Number:
t-PA1I/ c
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity reap clearly shoeing the location of the property with. respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site glace showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity chap
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be include& If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plain drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE rewires information to be submitted on sheets no larger thann I I by 17-inch format
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers Pall-size construction.
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small skate such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will. be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided..
1. Dame of project:
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tarr PIN): "i ° : ' r ,
4. Location
County: Newest Town: ?..
Subdivision name (include phaseAot number): ? •.? - ? _ s ?` r ? ? '.' ? s ? ?"..
A
Directions to site (include road numbers, latndmarlcs, etc) ? z r` :. r-, ,
t{ k ?? _ t t /
T
rL,i
.
5. Site coordinates, ifauailahle (f3Tltl or )?at.`Loag)
(Nate - If project is linear, such as a road or utility lime, attach: a sheds that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
?l D.T
6. Property size (acres): t
7. Nearest body of water (streamfriver,sound/beeanflake):- --- `
g. Diver Basin. V f.
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us:'adrnninlmapsi.a
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and eneral land use in the vicinity of the project
P f T ``i
at the time of this application:
Page 6 of 12
.?pscribc tl overall project in detail, including the, yge of equipment to be rid:
Iw. f)
t
f 4 r
tv.
V.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work :-6 r
h
Prior Project ;history
.. s
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision.) in the past, please explain. Include
the USA,CE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or ether useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, seam: and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a. NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.f.P. project. along with
construction schedules.
'•
Future Project Flans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work;,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from. the current application..,
Vt. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and chap all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section Vff below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream:
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicants discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream.
mitigation, list arid. describe the impact in section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
r
1. Provide written description of thpro od intipacts 3 _ = {'' ,
ice ' j R? 'r 41- f .r n Te st
?? ? }.,v ?t n -}'? ? ? ?l e< di -, ..r ? t; 7 ? 1. !._.?? ? ?l ! t •?- ? ?
2. ludividually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
"indicate on Map)
Type of Impact* Area of :
Impact ?
(acres) Located within
i(lo-year Floodplain**
ves/no Distance to
nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Welland***

° List each Impact separately and identify Wmiporaq impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill.
excavation. flooding, ditching/drai , etc, For dams. separately list impact.-. due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year tioodplair are identified through the Federal Emergericli Management Agency's (FNMA) f%od ltxsttrW= [fate Maps
(FIRM), or FER1h-approve! local fioodpiain maps. Maps are available througgt the FEMA, Map Service Ceutc r at 1-8f?Ef-359-9616, or
online at hup_/icvww.teniaeov.
**# List a wetland type that best describes wetland to he impacted (e.g., ii-eshwatedsaltwat" marsh, forested wetland, beaver per d.
Carolina flay, berg, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be atade by USA:CE only).
List the total acreage (est'lmated) of all existing wetlands on the prope ty:_
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of hnpact* Length of
impact
linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width:
of Stream
before l Impact Peremial or
Intemlittett?
( lease

* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. impacts include, but are nett limited to: culverts and associated rip-rasp
dames (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include Linear feet before and after, and net l4!Wgdn)-.
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall. gabions, etc..), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc:. ff S=tream, relocation is
proposed. plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streaetts must he included,
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. if a stream has no name, list as LIT (unrolled tributary) to the ne rest
dcnvn Mam named sircarn into which it tows. USGS -.flaps are available through the USGS at t-$00-359-%16. or online at
wZVU.uses.sov. Several internet site, also allow direct download and printing of USCYS maps (e g., w vw OZO 'Con
W%'%-jnagqur-st.cctm etc;.).
r;r
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in felt) to all streams on site: : { -e.-?
page 9 of 12
4. hidividually lint all open water impacts (including takes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other w-vrater of the U.S_) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indiea on map)
Tt -pe of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
?`a liacabieble) is
(if appE Type. of Waterboc;y
(late, pond, estuany? sound.
ba •, ocean, etc.)

c

* List =h impact separairly and idestdN €ernparary impacts. tmpac Ls include. but are uac limital to: tilt. excavation. d edging,
Hooding. drainage. hulkheac s. etc:.
Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wettand and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on arty` maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (cheek all that apply): ? uplands FT-stream El-i?ettaands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, exeavatiop, installation of
_ t
t..? a
draft`-down valve or s?}tili?a , etc.): S- A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e g.. livestock w.aterin$, irrigation, z?esthetic, tfrp? pond,
local stormwater requirement. etc.}
} f
Size of watershed draining to pond: %, 1....z <<.r? Expected pond surface area: Y 3 rD -71-'
V11. impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe; measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
i.ntorm.ation related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach draxings of alternative, lowver4mpact
site layouts, and explain washy these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to he followed during construction to reds impacts.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with ls"A LiCA.C ?H .0500. mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Qualit)T for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
fresh%vater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with. the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and fiurction and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wvedand
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan roust be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft 't'echnical. Guide for 'stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htta:/ h.lo.enr.state.nc.ass/ncwetlands/smnn ide.httnl.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description: should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsikte), affects stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan. views,
preservation mechanists (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation casement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
4
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWI P). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a P'CN, For additional information regarding the application proc4ss for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at littp://hI?o.enr.state.nc;.usAvrp/indea.htm. tf use of
the NCWRP" is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): f;
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet)-.._.._-. '
?l1_
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): ti ..
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): t'v'' '
f
Page 10 of 12
M Environmental Documentation (required by LlWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federallstate) land?
Yes 0 No F
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina. Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a 1'+t+EPA//EPA. document is required, cull the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes F1 No ElIf yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Cle=aringhouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or 3EPA final approval letter.
Yes F1 No 0 -
3L Proposed Impacts on. Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applie arkts (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section: VII above. All proposed impacts crust be listed herein.
and must be clearly identifiable on. the accompanying site plan. All buffers roust be shown on a
neap, whether at not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ?
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 29 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Mules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify I?
yes [No [D'. If you answered "yes provide the following information
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each. zone of the riparian buffers.. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
zones Impact
(square fivt) Multiplier Requited
I
2 1.5
Total
Zone t extends out 30 fret pegmadivular fmm near bank{ or channet. Tmme 2 e.?-tends an
aMitionak 20 feet from the edge of Zone k.
Page l t of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what t),pe of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration f Enhanecment, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified. ,Mthin 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or .026(1.
XL
5tormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
d`ownstream. from the property,
an
L'! ??, ? J er? f ? } 5
L
XH.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non.-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, oraavailable capacity of the subject facility,.
XHL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ ,Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211,0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes Q No Q
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes No
MI. Other Circumstances (Optional):
[t is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant tray
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered an
ThreaWed Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

`VAS pficantfAge4t's Svgnalur'e - Date
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
DeLorme Street Atlas USA® 2009

DeLorme Street Atlas USAW ZUU9
SR 1310

{ m
,
2 v
i P
,y ?1
m
p TyRFF ? a ?

Cge 0
A
p r
NTRC Ao
O
D
D
g
z
a
HUNTER GREEN RD
WAYAH XING
O 09
P,tj ?
GA
CRAWFORD RD
l2
F
?P M?
O
m ?l
90 ??
?z -9O
SR 1310
9
L
Lf,
F?
?P
G ?m? J
yr O ?
? a
? cy0 Z // , "
O
m
?TS?RRo z r
s °
MUSk?rV?C?rCN
<ry
MS.
oy
o?
MOSKRAT RD
a
p z
Q? w
? a
O
GpVti ?D
? Ppp?PR
O
Z
O
L
U
2
QP
ti
?v
ANDERSON Cy' RD
Diamond Falls Estates
p
rlata imp q1 lhiart to liranne
o?
U J?

5
4
a
rv
w
U

D
Qf D co
ti
D
z =
co
Ln
z A
rrnn
0
TN
1 ' 25-000
<O;.
U 64' qP Mc
UQ 2?`cP 'FFFeR
S ',
a p v P'`??i yRO
-
40
pG Q OD ?p?
C9R 3 F
cOL n Op?
RRO
a

VANDYKE DR rllN° QO
?
O
P

O9
O00
2
p
?
Z O
P PO G
P?
O T?
o p
o
w
F
0
c
GREEKSIDE LN uj
a
a
o wo _ixoo ieoo x_aoo aooo I
w? __-? fl
DeLorme, DeLorme Street Atlas USA® 2009. MN (5.3-W) *
mm.delorme.com 1" = 2,083.3 ft Data Zoom 13-0 J
RAINBOW SPRINGS QUADRANGLE
AaORTE CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) 159-SE
?yJ4 ?Ul
_
1+3 * -. ., t 1710 65D000 FEET 791
35007' 306
-T
Se
i?? ` , J c?a f Ilk ' 1 5310 NO
d"z
?? r i ? J;Nlcl FE'E7
f ` 1. ? Iti ?? _I .,? { ?, ? •- ?•", d =J` Pty ? `_ _---
=
L_ J \ \%
-KP
>lw
s y 1 `fir y Y
1 r t, ?s, I
?' \ ?? ??? 1, ? J 1 ?'?! ?'?r y ? ??.? f 1 ? J??•?.` `I + - ?? "???,j ``,'d,>^j? ? r i !r `
• ?.?.?, ?" ,` -r h ,? ({ ,ir+. ter` ?, r"' T
I 1 - M? d I ?4A?Z4,::1.G?[•?Y`'f ('?.- ?' ? ! ?d.? ?''. ^ , ? /•-lr __ _ t, `?--r?. ?. t
ili yr,,1 d. ->a.T?' _ _ '--? _ _ •lf
V34 I
3pak K ®r _i
3987
k - t T Q
1 `? 9'? r yp 1 557
I j*' ? -' 1•? ? ? it ? t
Its
yt 447.,
4 SCALE 1:24000 ?l ? 1 ? t3 S Mt! F ?y
?-V 106 0 1Ci(}0~ 1t7CYJ 1 4W0 51 J 00 ;01111 FEET ? !,- tl l 14
F-i
- 7 .5 U 1 K.tLaME7ER I
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET r ?
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
C, 'N
i/
1 Eii
j".
E-
(Ican j.
^ F i
64
" —. r•.. i;s.sil 1 < .. ,. � �1 lt' - t(t� vS _/ --,,�
.,•tea-�. _ ,/ r/ � +r, S FI � ' /t c s'.,
,
Ea f s�fi /,, tvc
Pot 't
edf
.'' I � t : ,`�. a /� .i v j ! • / f // / i•, � �/ l
�. ��P _ �%..�-� t `-_, ��•%',?� .t�. J'/ r iii?
EVE
r' ) ;
Ej % •% • f o� � Eif � E jI 1a 13
� ' t
L Ob
tJ
3000 FFFT 5uo n 50 MILF.S
( —
1000 METERS - S00 SCALE 1:12000 .SO 1 KILOMETER +
AL.4A�Pi3�'. d3. '`� y6�.:,.;;.$k,.__S:,u ay.l4' ., :: :

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE AND FOREST SERVICE
MACON COUNT'S
SOIL LEGEND
Map symbols and rames are alphabetical. Msp symbols are letters or a combination of laUrm and a number. The t sr Istter is capitalized and is rite fist!suar of the series {or
hgf+er level of tsassificafani name. The second latter is lowercase. The hrd etter is csgsrlahzed and denotes the slope phase. The au roar 2 at iAe grad of a Wrap aril symbd
denotes a moderately eroded phase.
SYMBOL NAME
ArA Arkaqua loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, -ett:;entiy flooded
BeA 54 more sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded
8kB2 Braddock clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
8kC2 Braddock clay loam, S to 15 percent slopes, eroded
Ore Braddock-Urban land Complex, 2 to 15 peroart slopes
BrD Braddock-Urban land complex, 15 to 30 palrem slopes
SsC Brasstown-Junaluska compex, 2 to 15 percent slopes
Bso Brasstown-Junaluska complex, 15 to 30 percent slapas
BsE Brasstown-Junaluska complex, 30 to 50 pervert slopes
so Brass!own-Junaluska complex. 50 to 95 paroent slopes
BUD Burton-Craggey-Rack outcrop complex. windswept, 15 to 30 percent slopes. stony
BUF Burton-Craggey-Rock oulrop complex, windswept, 30 to 95 percent slopes. stony
CaE Cashiers gravetty fire sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes
CaF Cashiers gravely fine sandy loam, 50 to 95 percent so"
CcF Cataska-Sy(co complex, 50 to 95 percent dopes
CdD Charder gravelly fire sandy loam, 15 to 30 pa cent slopes
CdE Chandler gravelly fine sandy loam, 30 to 5o percent slopes
CdF Chandler gravelly line sandy loam. 50 to 95 percent Slopes
ChE Chaoah Camery barn, 30 to 50 percent slopes
ChF Cheoah chancery loam, 50 to 95 percent dopes
CrtC Chestnut-Edneyvitle complex, windswept. 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony
CnD Chestnut-EdnayvU'e complex, windswept, 15 to 30 percent slopes, story
CnE Chestnut-Edn"lle complex. windswept, 30 to 50 percent slopes. story
CpD Ctevetand-CheSW-Rollo outcrop cowpox, windswept, 15 to 30 percent slopes
CpE CteveWM-Chastnut-Roel outcrop complex. windswept, 30 to 50 percent slopes
CpF Cfeveand-Cheatwt-Rock outcrop complex, w ndswW. 50 to 95 percent slop"
050 Cwlasaja very cobbiy fine sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, extremely bouldery
CsE Cana==l very cobhly fine sandy oa"n, 30 to 50 percent stapes, extremely bouldery
CUD Cullasaja-Tudcasegee complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes. story
CUE Cuttasaja-Tuckasegee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony
C:F Cullasaja-Tuckasegee complex, 50 to 95 paroom slopes, stony
Ogg Deltwood gravely fine sandy foam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, ±reauenty flooded
Ore Dillard loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, rarely hooded
Ds8 Millsboro man, 2 to 8 percent slopes
DsC Ditlsboro loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
NAME
SYMBOL
FaC Fannin 'ine sandy loam, a to 15 percent slopes
FWD Fannin fine sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent siapas
FaE Fannin fine sandy loam, 30 to So percent stapes
FaF Fannin fire sandy loam. 50 to 95 percent slopes
HaB2 Hayesvills cay loan, 2 to 8 peroant slopes, eroded
HaC2 Hayesviile csy loam, 8 to 15 percent stapes, eroded
HaD2 Hayesvle cay roam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, eroded
Hn1A ?!"till loam, 010 3 percent Slopes, rarely ftooded
NkA tdkw" fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, [resluorroy flooded
OwE Oconatuftee eery loam, winfsivaM 301m 50 pervert slopes
PwC Pipet fire lardy loam, a to 1s percent mopes, stony
PwD Platt fine sandy leach. 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony
PAeE P=ott fine sandy team, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony
PWF Pooh fine sandy loam, 50 to 95 percent slopes, stony
ReA Reddias `ne sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent sops!, treque" trooded
RhF Rock outcrop-Cataska oomptex, 30 to 95 percent slopes
P*F Rode outcrop-Ckvefand cnmislex, winds, sM 30 to 9S pement slopes
RsA Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent scopes, frequently flooded
SbC Saunook gravelly foam, 8 to 1S percont gam, goy
SbD Saunook gravely loam. 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony
ShE Saunook gravelly loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes, sandy
ScB SaUnoCk loam, 2 to 8 perconf slopes
SCC Saunoek loam, 8 to 15 percent stop"
SOD Saco-Stecaah complex, IS to 30 percent stops
SOE Sooo-Stecoah complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes
SoF soeo-Stemah complex, s0 to 95 percent slopes
SVC Spivey-sa-Rattah complex, 8 to t 5 percent slopes, starry
SrD Spivey-Sameattah complex, 15 W 30 percent mopes, stony
S.=E Spivey-Sarreatiah complex, 30 to So percent slopes, stay
Sts Stellar fire sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded
SxE soco-Ca*,askao mptex, 3010 50 percent gapes
SyA Syiva-Whiteside cwrplex, 0 m 3 pervert slopes
Ed8 Edneyville4ChosUwt corrox, 2 to 8 percent slopes, stony
EdG Edneyvlire-Chestnut complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes. stony
EdD Edneyvilte-Chrestnut oamplex. 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony
EdE Edneyville-Chestnut complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony
EdF Edneyville-Chestrlut contpox, 50 to 95 parcert slopes, stony
EeC EdneyvIIs4Ch stnut-Urban land complex. 2 to 15 percent slopes
EeD Ednayville-Ctestmd-Urban I" complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes
EvB Evard Cowee complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
EvC Evand-Cawee, complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
EvO Evard-Cowee complex, l5 to 30 percent slopes
EvE Evard-Cowee complex. 30 b 50 percent slopes
EvF Evard-Coronae complex. 50 is 95 percent slopes
ExC Evard-Ccwee-Urbacr land co rplex, 8 to 15 percert s`ooes
ExD Evard-Cowee-U+Darr zrlo complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes
TOA Toxaway cam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
TrE Trimont wayef'y loam, 30 to s0 peroant slopes, stony
TnF Tdment Snavely loam, 50 to 95 perroant dopes, stony
TSC Tudcasegae-Cullw0a complex. 8 to IS percent slopes, stormy
TWO Tudmsega5-WhAesida complex, 2 b 8 percent alopas
TwC TLtccaseaee-Wtutesfds complex. 8 to 15 peradrt sdopem
W udodhenr, loamy
UfB Udodtter-s-ftarr !arid compllex, 0 to 5 peuant spas, rarely ttnoced
Well Wayah sandy foam. w ndwept, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony
WeD Wayah sandy loam. wind wept, IS to 30 percent slopes, starry
WOE Wayah sa^dy loam. windswept, 30 to 50 percent stapes, stony
WeF Wayah sandy roan. windswept, fro to 95 pecoatt gapes, stony

scale Pond Renovation

12_n-2009 LSA E j bn rm!Goft
MOL& aam By,
CM799
LSA
jolp No. i• Luther E
smith & Associates
P
A

ATTACHMENT .
.
.
,
LAND PLANNING - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ttg Q pof)Wf7: x3418
.
W!)939
17: a9"
R n tirtYtbef t jhoAdOpal /oft
's1R! G
+bR LZOkITAL
'4SFZp4&-I_ c

-*.zr=T?,aa LMY vWA=T'a-,04
-vz::, -t-&cvStw.-T w1up L»p-

rE! -n:=' M14
t? ? ?r-?na?.?c+
/rc?A?Y Fu??Gu?r?
0
?-?tiat..--mot k?e.
OVA
Scale Fishing Point

17_174008 L$A
Diamond Falls
prew

oti??s» SSA
.k* Nm ° ?' Luther E
Smith & Associates
P
A

ATTACHMENT .
.
.
,
LANDPLANNING - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
#8 Phone[phone]
Fax (828) 697$458
E-mail Isadesign0bellsouth.net
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 1 iJ J D ? Project: 5 Latitude:
Evaluator: ?? J 5 a Site: Po n ST e0. tk Longitude:
Total Points: n n Other
Stream is at least intermittent 0.7 5 County: // ?/ ` e.g. Quad Name: Z Ij"'j Sj?,
if? 19 or perennial if _> 30 O
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 6, ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank LO-) 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 C 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 1
__ 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 (1T 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 (2) 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
oo--
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrlrnlnnv fSiihtntal = 6 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or growing season 0 1 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 .5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
g • )
C. Bioloav (Subtotal=
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 (-2,) 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves (0 1 2 3
24. Fish \0 0. 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 5 1 1.5
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.54 FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
- Items 2u and 21 tocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
S< 4e_ -Z;-V o S
Photos: Intermittent Stream (74 linear feet) proposed for impact upon Pond #1 construction.
Intermittent Stream - Downstream
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjectlSite: Diamond Falls Project No: 548 Date: 05.28.08
Applicant/Owner: Diamond Falls, LLC; Attn: Steve County: Macon
Gravett
Investigators: David Nestor State: NC
Plot ID: Wetland
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Cullasaja-Tuckasegee complex, 30 to 50% slopes, stony
Map Symbol: CuE Drainage Class: Mapped Hydric Inclusions? No
Taxonomy Typic Haplumbrepts Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
(Subgroup):
Profile Description
Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Munsell Moist) (Munseff Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 7.5 YR 3/2 7.5 YR 518 Many, prominent
2-9 7.5 YR 4/4 7.5 YR 5/8 Common, prominent
9-12 10 YR 4/3

Hydric soil Indicators
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
X Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Other: (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks: - -
Wetland "NH" meets the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual's criteria for jurisdictional wetlands.
Wetland "NH" is a wetland.
Explanation for response to: Normal Circumstances? Atypical Situation? Potential Problem Area?
2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Diamond Falls Project No: 548 Date: 05.28.08
Applicant/Owner: Diamond Falls, LLC; Attn: Steve County: Macon
Gravett
Investigators: David Nestor State: NC
Plot ID: Wetland
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Field Location: Wetland "NH"
needed, ez lain on the reverse side
V .C.RTAVON
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Juncus effusus/soft stem rush Herb FACW+ Toxicodendron radicans/poison
ivy Herb FAC
Hypericum densiorum/bushy St.
John's-wort Shrub FACW- Acer rubrumlred maple Tree FAC
Lindera benzoinlnorthern spicebush Shrub FACW Impatiens capensislspotted touch-
me-not Herb FACW
Parthenocissus
uin ue olia/Vir inia creeper Vine FAC Thylepteris noveboracensis Herb FAC+
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: FAC Neutral 410 = Pass
(excluding FAC- = 8/8 100% Numeric Index: I = %
Remarks: A rocky, seepy area adjacent to stream NE. Flagged as `NHI' to `NH91,
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data
Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water: 0-2 (in.)>
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6 (in.)>
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0-6 (in.)>
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
z Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
z T Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
z Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Diamond Falls Project No: 548 Date: 03.18.08
Applicant/Owner: Diamond Falls, LLC; Attn: Steve County: Macon
Gravett
Investigators: Scott Taylor, David Nestor State: NC
Plot 101): Wetland
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Culiasaja-Tuckasegee complex, 15 to 30% slopes, stony
Map Symbol: CuD Drainage Class: Well drained Mapped Hydric Inclusions?
Taxonomy Typic Haplumbrepts Fleld Observations Confirm Mapped Type?
(Subgroup):
Profile Description
Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) unsell Moist unsell Moist Abundance/ Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6" 7.5 Yr 4/1 7.5 Yr 3/3 Common, distinct Loam clay
6-12 73 Yr 4/1 7.5 Yr 3/3 Few, distinct Loamy Clay

Hydric soil Indicators
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Other: (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks: See attached USDA Soil Map for Macon County, Sheet 52 and 60, Figure 3.
(ReA) Reddies fine sandy loam; 0-3% slope on floodplains and small streams.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks:
Wetland "SA" meets the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual's criteria for jurisdictional wetlands.
Wetland "SA" is a wetland.
Explanation for response to: Normal Circumstances? Atypical Situation? Potential Problem Area?
2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Diamond Falls Project No: 548 Date: 03.18.08
Applicant/Owner: Diamond Falls, LLC; Attn: Steve County: Macon
Graven
Investigators: Scott Taylor, David Nestor State: NC
Plot ID: Wetland
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ED: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? No Transect ID: .
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Field Location: SA
needed, a lain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant S ecies (LIthl/COMMOD) Stratum Indicator
Juncus a usus/soft stem rush Herb FACW+ Carex sp./sedge Herb NI
Aster novae-angilae/New England
Aster Herb FACW Rumex crispus/curly dock Herb FAC
Ranunculus recurvatus/hooked
buttercu Herb FAC
Cardamine
pensylvanicum/Pennsylvania
bittercress Herb FACW+
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: FAC Neutral %
(excluding FAC- = 5/5 100% Numeric Index: %
Remarks: A wet meadow seep in a field of Walnut trees. Flagged as `SAI-SA6.'
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data
Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water: 0-.5" (in.)>
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >11" (in )>
Depth to Saturated Soil: >10" (in.)>
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
a Inundated
a Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
x Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
S FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Diamond Falls Project No: 548 Date: 03.18.08
Applicant/Owner: Diamond Falls, LLC; Attn: Steve County: Macon
Graven
Investigators: Scott Taylor, David Nestor State: NC
Plot ID: Wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Cullasaja-Tuckasegee complex, 15 to 30% slopes, stony
Map Symbol: CuD Drainage Class: Mapped Hydric Inclusions? No
Taxonomy Typic HapIumbrepts Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
(Subgroup):
Profile Description
Depth
(Inches) Horizon Matrix Color
(Munseff Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-4 7.5 YR 3/2 10 YR 2/1 Many, prominent Fe and M concretions
4-7 7.5 YR 3/2 5 YR 5/8 Common prominent
7-12 Rocks and pebbles

Hydric soil Indicators
HistosoI x Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydrie Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Other: (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
TION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks:
Wetland "DG" meets the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual's criteria for jurisdictional wetlands.
Wetland "DG" is a wetland.
Explanation for response to: Normal Circumstances? Atypical Situation? Potential Problem Area?
2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Diamond Falls Project No: 548 Date: 03.18.08
Applicant/Owner: Diamond Falls, LLC; Attn: Steve County: Macon
Gravett
Investigators: Scott Taylor, David Nestor State: NC
Plot ID: Wetland
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Field Location: Wetland "DG"
needed, a lain on the reverse side
- (if VEGETATION

Dominant Plant S edes atiotCommon Stratum Indicator Plant S cies (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Juncos e}fusus/soft stem rush Herb FACW+ Eupatorium perfoliatum/common
boneset Herb FACW+
Aster novae-angilae/New England
Aster Herb FACW Dichanthelium
dichotomuml ress witchgrass Herb FAC
Hypericum densiorum/bushy St.
John's-wort Shrub FACW-
Rosa multi ora/multiflora rose Shrub UPL
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: FAC Neutral 4/1 = Pass
(excluding FAC- 5/6 83% Numeric Index: %
Remarks: A wet meadow seep on a gentle slope located in between streams DA and DJ. Flagged as `DGP to `DG9'.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge - Primary Indicators
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
x No Recorded Data Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: o(in.)> Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 7 (in.)> a Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.)> Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigators:
Diamond Falls
Diamond Falls, LLC Attn: Steve
Gravest
Scott Taylor
Project No: 548
Date: 03.27.08
County: Macon
Remarks:
SOILS
State: NC
Plot ID:
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Edvard-Cowee complex
Map Symbol: EvE Drainage Class: Well drained Mapped Hydric Inclusions? No
Taxonomy Not Available Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
(Subgroup):
Profile Description
Depth
Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Munseil Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-6" SYr 3/4 Clay
6-12" 5YR 4/6
E

Hydric soil Indicators
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Other: (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: See attached USDA Soil Map for Macon County, Sheet 52 and 60, Figure 3.
(EvE): Evard-Cowee Complex, 30-50% slope. A steep, very deep soil.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophyde Vegetation Present? No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks:
This area does not meet the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual's criteria for jurisdictional wetlands
This area is not a wetland.
Explanation for response to: Normal Circumstances? Atypical Situation? Potential Problem Area?
2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(9987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Diamond Falls Project No: 548 Date: 03.27.08
Applicant/Owner: Diamond Falls, LLC Attn: Steve County: Macon
Gravett
Investigators: Scott Taylor State: NC
Plot ID:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Field Location:
needed ea lain on the reverse side)
VF.V.V..TATFnN
Dominant Plant Species (fAtio/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Liriodendron tulipfera/tulip poplar Tree FAC Rhododendron maximum/great
roseba laurel Shrub FAC-
Quercus alba/white oak Tree FACU Kalmia lati olia/mountain laurel Shrub FACU
Tsuga canadensis/Canada hemlock Tree FACU Smilax rotundiifolialcatbriar Shrub FAC
Acer rubruWred maple Tree FAC
uercus rubra/red oak Tree FACU
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: FAC Neutral %

(excluding FAC-
=
3/7
7
43%
-
Numeric Index:
%
Remarks: An upland slope of mixed woods with rich cove affinities. Approximately 40-50 years old.
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream,Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data
Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water: 0" (in.)>
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" (in.)>
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" (in.)>
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Solt Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1887 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Diamond Falls Project No: 548 Date: 03.27.08
Applicant/Owner: Diamond Falls, LLC Attn: Steve County: Macon
Graven
Investigators: Scott Taylor State: NC
Plot ID:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Field Location:
needed explain on the reverse side
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S dulcommon Stratum Indicator Plant Species tin/Common Stratum Indicator
Liriodendron tulipfera/tulip poplar Tree FAC Rhododendron maximum/great
roseba laurel Shrub FAC-
uercus albalwhite oak Tree FACU Kalmia lati olia/mountain laurel Shrub FACU
Toga eanadensis/Canada hemlock Tree FACU Smilax rotundtfoho/catbriar Shrub FAC
Acer rubrum/red maple Tree FAC
ercus rubra/red oak Tree FACU
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: FAC Neutral %
(excluding FAC- 3/7 43% Numeric Index: %
Remarks: An upland slope of mixed woods with rich cove affinities. Approximately 40-50 years old.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream,Lske or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
x No Recorded Data Drift Lanes
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0" (in.)> Secondary Indicators (2 or more required).
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" (in.)> Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" (in.)> Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1