20180056 Ver 1_Modifications_20180208

7ALE
LOGICAL
SERVICES
EST. 2016
February 8, 2018
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Field Office
Attn: Ms. Emily Greer
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Rawls Church Road Sewer Extension
Revised request for NWP 12 & GC 4133
Sage Project #2017.72
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
On behalf of the Town of Angier, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) that the
activities associated with the residential development may proceed under Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 12 and the associated General Certification (GC) 4133.
Project Summary and Purpose
The proposed Rawls Church Road Sewer Extension (Project) involves the installation of
a sanitary sewer line and its associated easement totaling approximately 4,240 linear feet
of a 30 -foot easement bounded on the north by Rawls Church Road and Neills Creek
generally to the west. The Project is located immediately south of Rawls Church Road
approximately 0.75 mile east of Atkins Road in Harnett County, North Carolina.
The Project will install a sewer line that ties into a previously approved municipal sewer
line located to the south of the proposed easement and west of Neills Creek within the
Southern Acres subdivision (SAW -2013-00672). The project will provide additional sewer
service to meet the current demand in this area of Angier and Harnett County.
The Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall (Project) has been a part of the Town of Angier's
long-term waste water planning since prior to 2004. In 2012 the Town of Angier made a
major investment ($1,400,000) to purchase 1,000,000 gallons of capacity from Harnett
County. The extension of the Neills Creek gravity sewer is a major part of utilizing that
capacity investment.
Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall (Revised) Page 1 of 4

The extension of the outfall and the implementation of the town's long-term plan will
relieve the current high capacity on an existing pump station located at Johnsons Landing.
This will reduce the cost of operating and maintaining the existing pump station facility,
decrease the emissions associated with powering it, and reduce the potential for failure.
The Project is within the Neills Creek drainage which is a water supply watershed. This
area of Harnett County/Angier is within a corridor of expected major growth as the
southeastern portion of Wake County continues to grow and new major transportation
corridors are completed in the region. The Project is part of a Town of Angier planning
effort to protect the water supply watershed of Neills Creek by limiting and/or replacing
the expected sprawling development that would otherwise rely upon septic systems.
The Project will tie into an existing sewer line located to the south of the Project area on
the western side of Neills Creek. The Project will provide access to both the eastern and
western side of Neills Creek. The installation of this Project in the proposed location will
greatly reduce the likelihood that future wastewater crossings of Neills Creek will be
needed in this area. The Project will also reduce the negative effects of potential septic
system failures on the water quality of Neills Creek as well as the ecosystem of the
surrounding forested wetlands and riparian areas. The stormwater that may result from
future development in the area will be required to meet state and local standards.
Properties exist to the north of Rawls Church Road that are already within the planning
stages for residential communities which could utilize individual septic systems or tie into
the Project. Other properties in the area that area already developed and currently have
individual septic systems will have the potential to tie into the Project. By installing the
Project to Rawls Church Road, access is provided along the road corridor from the east
and west.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed sewer line alignment was aligned to minimize and/or avoid impacts to
streams and wetlands. The western side of Neills Creek was eliminated as a viable
alternative due to steep slopes; more property owners than the eastern side; and a large
property owner that refused to sell an easement. The steep slopes would require
additional excavation in order to achieve the necessary elevations. Wetlands were also
present at the base of the steep slopes.
The initial corridor for the easement planned on the eastern side of Neills Creek ran
approximately parallel to Neills Creek at a distance of about 20-50 feet from the top -of -
bank. The majority of the land within this initial corridor was confirmed to be riparian
wetland so the alignment was shifted further from the creek.
A detailed stream and wetland delineation (flagged boundary) was performed on the
eastern side of Neills Creek to overlay with topographic data and determine the best
potential corridor. The proposed corridor was finetuned several times to cross drainages
so as to have the least amount of impact to jurisdictional features. An example of this can
be seen on Sheet 6 of the attached site plans. The easement was moved to the west and
an additional manhole was added so as to cross an intermittent stream at a perpendicular
angle rather than cross a larger wetland area located further east in the same drainage.
Additionally, Impacts W-3 and W-4 were located to cross the wetland area at its narrowest
Kawis �_nurcn Koaa Sewer uucraii �KeviseG) Nage 2 or 4

point. The sewer line in this area could not be moved further east to avoid the wetland
altogether due to topographic constraints as well as the property owner's refusal to have
the easement placed anywhere else on the property. It is also important to note that the
sewer corridor in the impact locations W-5 and W-6 was positioned to cross in a location
where a culverted dirt road already exists. In a similar manner the alignment was shifted
to avoid clipping the edges of jurisdictional wetlands. This planning process avoided and
minimized the resulting proposed impacts to those shown on the attached impact maps.
Impacts are only proposed in areas necessary to cross to maintain the proper sewer line
elevation required for the project.
Directional boring beneath wetlands and streams was considered however was
determined to not be feasible due to the additional cost and the often -unstable properties
of the soil material within the impact areas.
Construction and maintenance easements have been reduced in width through wetland
and stream areas to be less than 40 feet wide and further minimize proposed impacts.
Northern Long -Eared Bat
The majority of the proposed sewer line will extend through wooded areas. The northern
portion of the proposed easement (Impacts W-7, W-8, and S-3) is within existing
maintained and unwooded powerline and roadway (Rawls Church Road) easement.
Likewise, the southernmost portion of the proposed sewer line easement Impacts W-1,
W-2, and S-1) is within a maintained yard east of the crossing of Neills Creek and within
a previously logged property on the western side of Neills Creek (not within wetland).
Based on the US Forest Services estimate of NC timberlands containing approximately
800 trees per acre, it is assumed that approximately 156 trees will be cleared within the
0.1943 acre of jurisdictional wetlands that currently contain trees. Approximately 2,840
trees will be cleared in the easement outside of the jurisdictional areas.
This project does not require the maintenance or removal of any bridges. This project
does not propose the construction or installation of wind turbines. The project does not
propose the use of blasting or other percussive activities that would be conducted by
machines such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.
Project Impacts
Proposed permanent and temporary impacts will result from sewer line installation.
Overall stream impacts total 97 linear feet (LF) of which 67 LF are to perennial stream
and 30 LF are to intermittent stream. Proposed wetland impacts will total 0.2472 acre of
which 0.1597 acre will be permanent and within maintained easement and 0.0875 acre
will be temporary and within the construction corridor.
Mitigation
Wetland mitigation is proposed for permanently impacted wetland areas within the
permanent maintenance corridor of the project. Wetland mitigation was not available
within this HUC from private mitigation banks therefore payment to the NCDMS is
Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall (Revised) Page 3 of 4

proposed to satisfy mitigation requirements for the 0.1597 acre of wetland impacts.
Please see the attached letter from the NCDMS.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Sean Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1-USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 -Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Copy of NCNHP Report
Letter from NCDMS on mitigation availability
Restoration Plan for temporary impacts
Impact Maps (8 sheets)
Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall (Revised) Page 4 of 4

o�oF w a r9o�
T_
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. SAW -2016-
01126
DWQ project no.
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
FN Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
R
Rawls Church Road Sewer Extension
2b.
County:
Harnett County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Angier
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Easement for the Town of Angier
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Coley B. Price
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 275 (mail), 55 N Broad Street West (physical)
3e.
City, state, zip:
Angier, NC, 27501
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-639-2071
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Sean Clark
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
3707 Swift Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
5e. Telephone no.:
919-559-1537
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel
ID):
Town of Angier Easement (see impact map sheets 1 and 2 for list of PINs)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Lat: 35.524° N Long: 78.764° W
Lat: 35.534° N Long: 78.763° W
1 c. Property size:
4,240 linear feet with a 30 -foot easement
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed
Neills Creek
project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest
WS -IV
receiving water:
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear River Basin (03030004)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The easement encompasses wooded areas, a powerline easement, a maintained field and an early
successional forest area.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2649 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 132 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to install a sanitary sewer line to Rawls Church Road to meet the demand for sanitary
sewer service in this part of Harnett County. The Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall (Project) has been a part of the Town of
Angier's long-term waste water planning since prior to 2004. In 2012 the Town of Angier made a major investment ($1,400,000) to
purchase 1,000,000 gallons of capacity from Harnett County. The extension of the Neills Creek gravity sewer is a major part of
utilizing that capacity investment.
The extension of the outfall and the implementation of the town's long-term plan will relieve the current high capacity on an existing
pump station located at Johnsons Landing. This will reduce the cost of operating and maintaining the existing pump station facility,
decrease the emissions associated with powering it, and reduce the potential for failure.
The Project is within the Neills Creek drainage which is a water supply watershed. This area of Harnett County/Angier is within a
corridor of expected major growth as the southeastern portion of Wake County continues to grow and new major transportation
corridors are completed in the region. The Project is part of a Town of Angier planning effort to protect the water supply watershed
of Neills Creek by limiting and/or replacing the expected sprawling development that would otherwise rely upon septic systems.
The Project will tie into an existing sewer line located to the south of the Project area on the western side of Neills Creek. The
Project will provide access to both the eastern and western side of Neills Creek. The installation of this Project in the proposed
location will greatly reduce the likelihood that future wastewater crossings of Neills Creek will be needed in this area. The Project
will also reduce the negative effects of potential septic system failures on the water quality of Neills Creek as well as the ecosystem
of the surrounding forested wetlands and riparian areas. The stormwater that may result from future development in the area will
be required to meet state and local standards.
Properties exist to the north of Rawls Church Road that are already within the planning stages for residential communities which
could utilize individual septic systems or tie into the Project. Other properties in the area that area already developed and currently
have individual septic systems will have the potential to tie into the Project. By installing the Project to Rawls Church Road, access
is provided along the road corridor from the east and west.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project is a sanitary sewer line that will connect to previously approved sanitary sewer lines in the Southern
Acres subdivision (SAW -2013-00672). Heavy equipment typically used for utility installation projects (e.g. back hoes, bull-
dozers, etc) will be utilized. The project does not propose the use of blasting or other percussive activities that would be
conducted by machines such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream
El Yes ®No El Unknown
determinations by the Corps or State been
requested obtained for this property /
Comments: The USACE was contacted in reference to scheduling a site
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
meeting.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional
determination, what type of determination was
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Name (if known): Sean Clark & David Gainey
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested
or obtained for this project (including all prior
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands
® Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on
the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number
Type of impact
Type of
Forested
Corps (404, 10)
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
wetland
or
Temporary (T)
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
-
Choose One
Choose one
Yes/No
-
0
W-1 (P)
Maintained
Excavation
Riparian
No
404
0.0229
Easement
W-2 (T)
Construction
Land Clearing
Riparian
No
404
0.0110
Corridor
W-3 (P)
Maintained
Excavation
Riparian
Yes
404
0.1026
Easement
W-4 (T)
Construction
Land Clearing
Riparian
Yes
404
0.0518
Corridor
W-5 (P)
Maintained
Excavation
Riparian
Yes
404
0.0258
Easement
W-6 (T)
Construction
Land Clearing
Riparian
Yes
404
0.0141
Corridor
W-7 (P)
Maintained
Excavation
Riparian
No
404
0.0084
Easement
W-8 (T)
Construction
Land Clearing
Riparian
No
404
0.0106
Corridor
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.2472
2h. Comments:
Page 5 of 12

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number Permanent
Choose One
(PER) or
stream
length
(P) or Temporary
intermittent
Choose One
width
(linear
(T)
(INT)?
(feet)
feet)
S-1 (T)
Excavation
Neills Creek
PER
Corps
14.5
36
S-2 (T)
Comments: This project does not propose Pond or Lake construction
UT to Neills
INT
Corps
3
30
yes, permit ID no:
Excavation
Creek
Expected pond surface area (acres):
S-3 (T)
Excavation
Neills Creek
PER
Corps
30
31
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
97
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individuall list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water impact
Name of
number -
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
Temporary T
01 Choose one
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
0
4g. Comments: There are no open waters within the project boundaries.
5.
If pond
Pond or Lake Construction
or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5g.
Comments: This project does not propose Pond or Lake construction
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If
yes, permit ID no:
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k.
Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer mitigation
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
Stream name
required?
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The proposed project is not within a drainage basin that has riparian buffers regulated by NCDWR.
Page 7 of 12

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed sewer line alignment was aligned to minimize and/or avoid impacts to streams and wetlands. The western
side of Neills Creek was eliminated as a viable alternative due to steep slopes; more property owners than the eastern
side; and a large property owner that refused to sell an easement. The steep slopes would require additional excavation
in order to achieve the necessary elevations. Wetlands were also present at the base of the steep slopes.
The initial corridor for the easement planned on the eastern side of Neills Creek ran approximately parallel to Neills Creek
at a distance of about 20-50 feet from the top -of -bank. The majority of the land within this initial corridor was confirmed
to be riparian wetland so the alignment was shifted further from the creek.
A detailed stream and wetland delineation (flagged boundary) was performed on the eastern side of Neills Creek to
overlay with topographic data and determine the best potential corridor. The proposed corridor was finetuned several
times to cross drainages so as to have the least amount of impact to jurisdictional features. An example of this can be
seen on Sheet 6 of the attached site plans. The easement was moved to the west and an additional manhole was added
so as to cross an intermittent stream at a perpendicular angle rather than cross a larger wetland area located further east
in the same drainage. Additionally, Impacts W-3 and W-4 were located to cross the wetland area at its narrowest point.
The sewer line in this area could not be moved further east to avoid the wetland altogether due to topographic constraints
as well as the property owner's refusal to have the easement placed anywhere else on the property. It is also important
to note that the sewer corridor in the impact locations W-5 and W-6 was positioned to cross in a location where a culverted
dirt road already exists. In a similar manner the alignment was shifted to avoid clipping the edges of jurisdictional wetlands.
This planning process avoided and minimized the resulting proposed impacts to those shown on the attached impact
maps. Impacts are only proposed in areas necessary to cross to maintain the proper sewer line elevation required for the
project.
Directional boring beneath wetlands and streams was considered however was determined to not be feasible due to the
additional cost and the often -unstable properties of the soil material within the impact areas.
Construction and maintenance easements have been reduced in width through wetland and stream areas to be less than
40 feet wide and further minimize proposed impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt
fencing and temporary basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the streams and wetlands. Construction
will be completed during dry periods. The top soil of the removed soil material within the wetland areas will be reused as
top soil to cover the installed pipe. The excavated areas will be returned to preconstruction grades. Stream banks will be
stabilized immediately following installation.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 8 of 12

3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
3c.
Comments: N/A
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.1597 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: Wetlands temporarily impacted during construction will be restored as specified in the attached Restoration
Plan.
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone
1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone
2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h.
Comments:
Page 9 of 12

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The diffuse flow plan is part of the Stormwater Management Plan being
reviewed by the County.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No impervious surface is proposed.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
N/A
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Durham County
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
® Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will tie into offsite regional utility lines located adjacent to the project site.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Data Base (2017) was referenced and a report received from NCNHP identified no recorded
federally listed species on the project site or within a 1 -mile radius. Please see attached cover letter for NLEB discussion.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project takes place in Harnett County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH
(i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/ * Utilizing the HPOWEB GIS mapping service, no structures or sites were mapped within or
adjacent to the project area. A physical records check at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State
Archeology was not performed.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: No permanent structures will be added within the floodplain to
restrict or increase the flow of floodwaters.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Flood Risk Information System
(www.fris.nc.gov/fris) FEMA DFIRM Panels #0674; Dated October 3, 2006
Sean Clark
r
02/08/2018
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 12 of 12

SAGE
4A
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner, Municipal Official or Legal Representative
Name:
Address:
S� S. S roaoL 5+re e* vii -sf (phi s i caA
Phone:
Email: I t� /��1 n/1 i "o r r Q
Project Name/Description: Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall
Sage Project # 2017.72
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Ms. Emily Greer
Field Office: Wilmington
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Prr e' N..
1, an authorized municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services,
Inc. to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications and to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this
project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact
Sage to arrange a meeting prior to visiting the site.
BY: 0—D - e -N B. BY:,a
Print Nam6 of Municipal Official Signature of Municipal Official
or Legal Representative or Legal Representative

r
V
Map Location
.11
",
B !
r
oo¢E�
USGS Topographic Map
17t
CI
LS
MORGAN LN
Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall
Sage Project #2017.72
Fuquay-Varina Quadrangle
December 12, 2017
0 400 800 ft
' Legend
Sewer Outfall
J
Q
Figure 1
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
MROffice: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

DOB
CeD Fla
Ga W R� W
F a B OC
t4i5 WaB
NeL) f m
` Do B
Ce B`�?
y
B_
Ne
LO.
L- Fa
,
C• ~ 7
Ir
�e D
CeD
FaB
Legend
CeS Ce B -Sewer Outfall
Y.
B
Map Location
IMKLb boiis map rigure 1
Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall
Sage Project #2017.72
USDA Soil Survey
Harnett County Sheet 2 Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
December 12, 2017 Office: 919-335-6757
0 400 800 ft Cell: 919-559-1537

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Govemor Roy Cooper
January 10, 2018
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606-2543
RE: Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall; 2017.72
Dear Sean Clark:
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
N C N H D E-5049
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler o_ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Tele hone: [919', 7D7-8107 LOCA.TICN
16`1 MaiI Ser,rice Center w rsv.ncnh2.org 121 VVest hones S-reat
Ralaigh, NC 27899-1881 Ralaigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall
Project No. 2017.72
January 10, 2018
N C N H D E-5049
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Last
Element
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Rank
Date
Rank
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
2004 -Pre
H?
Damselfly
Rare
Dragonfly or 33751 Somatochlora georgiana Coppery Emerald
2004 -Pre
H?
Damselfly
S2?
Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Accuracy Federal
State
Global
State
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
5 -Very ---
Significantly
G5
S2?
Low
Rare
5 -Very ---
Significantly
G3G4
S2?
Low
Rare
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on January 10, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2017. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-5049: Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall
,nor r fr
LIr
Y
x I
ClalybeaW Sprin95 Ft" eef
n3s
mw�4
a Circle pr
a'
N
�a J Angler
L
S Coharla Sdtsa
January 10, 2018
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Suffered Project Boundary
Page 3 of 3
1:30,599
0 0-25 0.5 1 mi
0 0.4 0.8 1.6 km
Sources: Esn, HERE, neLomre, WI.—p, increment P Corp., GESCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN. Geo9ase. IGN, Kadas[er NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan.
METI. Esri China (Hong Karg)- 5wis tops. Mapmylndia- ® Open5lreeWap
"Inhutors, and [he GIS Vser Commundy

Midgatio4 iLvs
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 2, 2018
Coley Price
Town of Angier
55 N Broad St
Angier, NC 27501
Project: Rawls Church Road Sewer Extension
ROY COOPER
Golernor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
Expiration of Acceptance: 8/2/2018
County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by
an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8 -digit HUC
Cape Fear 103030004 , Riparian Wetland 0.26
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 0213 .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Sean Clark, agent
Sincerely,
Jamesthagement
tr)
Asset 7sor
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

Restoration Plan for Rawls Church Road Sewer Outfall
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts where
practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts due to temporary construction and within
the permanently maintained easement, the following plan shall be implemented to restore
temporarily -affected wetlands and streams. This plan entails restoration of temporarily -disturbed
areas to their original contours and conditions to the degree practicable upon project completion.
No fills or spoils of any kind will be placed within wetlands or along the stream banks. Further,
disturbed wetland areas and streambanks will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative
cover. The measures outlined below will be specified in the contract documents prepared for
construction of the proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of excess soil material and restoration of
original pre -construction contours. Excavated material shall be returned to the trench to the extent
possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an upland site. Excavated native
topsoil (the upper 6 to 12 inches) will be stockpiled separately, kept viable, and then replaced
uniformly over the area of excavation from which it was removed. The native seed mix identified in
Table 1 below will be utilized within wetland and stream impact areas at the recommended
application rate of 20-25 lbs. per acre. The appropriate seed mix shall be applied to all disturbed
wetlands or streambanks and extend 10 feet beyond wetland boundaries.
Table 1: Wetland Seed Mix
Species..-
of Mix
Bidens aristosa
Showy tickseed sunflower
7
Carex vul inoidea
Fox sedge
12
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deer tongue
8
El mus ri arius
Riverbank wildr e
20
Juncus effusus, NC Ecotype
Soft rush
4
Panicum dichotomiflorum
Smooth panicgrass
14
Panicum ri idulum
Redtop panicgrass
8
Panicum vir atum
Switchgrass
23
Polygonum pensylvanicum
Pennsylvania smartweed
2
S ar anium amencanum
Eastern bur reed
2
out.
100
To provide quicker cover for soil stabilization, the mix specified in Table 1 above should also be
augmented with the appropriate cover/companion species, as identified in Table 2 below. The
specific species used from Table 2 will be dependent upon the time of year construction occurs.
Table 2: Cover/Companion Crops
Species
Secale
Cereal or
Early Spring
30
Grows 3-4' tall, but not a strong a
Winter rye
or Fall
competitor.
cereale
lbs/acre
Lolium
Perennial
Early Fall or
30
Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years, then dies
rye
Spring
out.
perenne
lbs/acre
UrocloBrown
e
Top
Spring,
30
Good germination; dies off with frost; does
Millet
Summer
not tolerate mowing.
ramose
ramose
lbs/acre

The supplier of the native seed mix will most likely be Mellow March Farm (see below for contact
information):
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, NC 27344
Phone: [phone]
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
21
Sean Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.

Zi V1I4coit�o
tz;
�
o 00 o v o ��J 11 1' \ `— +`� �' 1,'� I 1 wU1�1a,�� a
�-q2 N�
Acd
��
� cd D ���Nm 111 I 4 o� —� -I--, �\ �
to
� 4ft�r,� _ ���, J'I •.,� r•� .�~1, � r� L � jj V � � �j���'- f J� � .� __ � �, �f'F� f
��_-` _ n :� 1r„J"�.•-+`.,v ,r -�� �� .a 1 � � _"`�..v 4 � -"'tip. � � �1 J � � \ tnV� /
dord
13 CV
1�
cv
VOL-
-Ira dor-
�Y
=s s�� a p'��
L � A7Lj
C
m
ilk

NC Grid North
NC GNSS RTK Network
AG 14P
ti
4G
*G 74P4
Southern Acres, LLC
Deed Book 3349, Page 363
Map Number 2913-76
WC kIR
THIS DOCUMENT IS Sheet Three of .L igh t
FOR REWEW PURPOSES
ONLY AND SHOULD NOT Wetlands Survey
BE CONSIDERED A
CERTIFIED PLAT. THIS Sanitary Sewer outfall
PLAT SHOULD NOT BE
USED FOR CONVEYANCE
07 TITS OR ` TI Black cls Ri ver Township shi Harnett Count NC
OTHER TR.4N5ACTIONS. I3 3'•
Scale: 1 " = 60' Date 1-2-18
PIN, • 0664-94-1836.000 REID: 0080549
7PIN: 0674-15-3518.000 REID: 0046780
Town of Angler
f ❑ 60 120
�-�
Lr-�� �s"A GRAPHIC SCALE
13 � �-
qP
tr
�L
Approximate 100 t
year flood limit
Jursidictional boundaries of wetlands
on the west side of Neill's Creek
were previously appoved see
C�
op CPT BO -11
/ Constru on x Corr.
e
I Im at W2
Easemeb.t
5tll
WR
Jursidictional boundaries
of wetlands on the West
Q side of Neill's Creek /
W
ere previously appoved see
SAW -2013-00672
on August 9, 2017
—.r.. 9
14 Permamently Maintain
Easement Wetlands
1 a W-
\1� ❑� � P� g5
Iii @ •► � e'
I�cao+�
1
1
Neills Creek -
Development Company
Deed Book 1529, Page 162
Map Number 2000-437
IN
N 043821'W
110.03'A
` (Tie)
I
1
Wetlands Area
Avery L. Moore
Brenda Chatham Maore
Deed Book 2814, Page 120
Permamen tly Maintain
Easement Wetlands
Impact W-3
;; rro used 2Q S
'Mer .�'$8� entltat-l=
qtr ed
1O
Pros-
1
~TemPorar k
action Easenxenty
Construction Corrior
Impact W-4
SAiP-,2013-00672 on August 9, 2017
ort9 J
Proposed
rop
construe;
�. �•
Limit of Investlgatio
_
O
./
Felly M McLeod
gun�•�•� Deed Book 1529, Page 159
•�•
� r
Plat
Cabinet "E". Slide 78C
wa-s
.
r
Permanently Maintained
Easem en t
Wetlands Impact W-1 1,000 sq. ft.
Course Bearing
Distance
I
S-4 N 43045',29" W
20.87'
PI -1 N 62'51'37" E
52.22'
Temporary Stream
Impact S-1
PI -2 S 31'2926" E
,20.06'
36 IF (513 sq. ft.)
PI -3 S 62951'37" W
47.78'
Construction Corridor
Wetlands
Course Bearing
Distance
Impact ii' -2 481
sq. ft.
Course .Bearing
Distance
S-1 N 13954.22" E
21.30'
S-2 N 60'05'01 " W
16.61'
Course Bearing
Distance
W-19 N 34'2127" W
104-05,
,S-3 N 5,2951 '37" E
16.31'
S-6 N 17952'40" YW
8.12'
W-20 N 31'2928" W
53.52'
S -4S 434529" E
20.87'
E-5 N 43945 29" lig
2.07'
W-21 N 58'2746" 1;
98.03'
9-5 S 4394529" E
2.07'
PJ -3 N 82`51'37" E
47.78'
W-22 N 69'1329" E
91.14'
S-6 I S 17"52'40" E
8.1.2'
T7-1 S 31'2928 " E
10.03'
W-23 N 89"5421 " E 1
102.75'
1 T-7 1 4 G2n51 379 W
2a �S?' I
Tr -.9 4 eP';5 / 'q r" W
A❑ 9s'
Easemeb.t
5tll
WR
Jursidictional boundaries
of wetlands on the West
Q side of Neill's Creek /
W
ere previously appoved see
SAW -2013-00672
on August 9, 2017
—.r.. 9
14 Permamently Maintain
Easement Wetlands
1 a W-
\1� ❑� � P� g5
Iii @ •► � e'
I�cao+�
1
1
Neills Creek -
Development Company
Deed Book 1529, Page 162
Map Number 2000-437
IN
N 043821'W
110.03'A
` (Tie)
I
1
Wetlands Area
Avery L. Moore
Brenda Chatham Maore
Deed Book 2814, Page 120
Permamen tly Maintain
Easement Wetlands
Impact W-3
;; rro used 2Q S
'Mer .�'$8� entltat-l=
qtr ed
1O
Pros-
1
~TemPorar k
action Easenxenty
Construction Corrior
Impact W-4

Construction Corridor Wetlands
Impact W-8 463 sq. ft.
Course
Bearing
Distance
TI -12
S 60'02'57" E
10,35'
TI -13
S 744558 " E
19.75'
TI -14
N 89'16'18" W
63.24'
5-16
N 05"36'30" E
6.35'
TI -15 I
N 89'16'18" W
63.24'
PI -14 I
S 89"16'18" E
34.97'
Course
Bearing
Wetlands
Distance
Course
Bearing
Angler
Distance
W-149
N 02"5543" E
46.53'
W-184
S 0757,21"
W
17.71'
W-150
N 09'18'17"
W
46.17'
W-165
S 04",24'11 " E
42.34'
W-151
N 7445'58"
W
36.96'
W-166
S 12'01'.27"
W
34.96'
W-152
N 60'02'57"
W
47.87'
W-167
S 3605243"
W
15.56'
W-153 I
N 65'2938"
W
5.81'
W-168
N 39'51 b2"
W
Z1.41'
W-154
S 15'2526" E
4.18'
W-169
N i56'04'20 - E
25.62'
W--155
S 05'53'05" E
20.45'
W-170
N 18'23'14 " E
27.20'
W-156
S 05'38'30"
W
6.2.33'
W-17'1
N 17"41'52" E
25.69'
W-157
E ,26'16'44"
W
21.34'
W-172
N 40"2654"
W
2,2.22'
W-158
S 48'06'12"
W
24.62'
W-173
N 67"¢6'11 "
W
25.88'
W-159
N 0348'01 "
W
5.34'
W-174
S 84'10'54"
W
37.82'
W-160
N 30055'00 "
W
7.10'
W-175
N 65"03'07"
W
43.48'
W-161
N 68,51,19"
W
16.36'
W-176
S 82'19'42 "
W
57.03'
W-162
S 34'46'40"
W
7.04'
W-177
S 49"43'00"
W
39.49'
W-163
S 140.25'41 "
W
12.94'
W-178
S 70'1928 "
E
195.28'
SHG Holdings, Inc. I
Deed Book 2511, Page 806 1
Map Number 2012-9
Book of Maps 2012, Page 448 l
N 03'03'41 "W
30.,23'
his SR 1415 Rawls Church Road
....... Road Sign a
ECS
.0001" %10-, .0�
N 88,4928"W EPK
87.95%Ile]
f00000
OHE - -
j *c`r
0
it
I
WC -11
1 Approxim ate 100
`'pear flood limit
N 89 44 40 "W 16Z51'
of Pavement
❑NE - - T
OHJ
Proposed Variable Temporary
Construction Easement f
256
162
Road ign i
Headwdll
I
t
REVISED, 1-31-18
- - 60' Public
{Road Sign
Etlge yr r'avament 1
ECs Wetlands Araya 11
1
�-W-160 a,
W:• 6
S 3
Sheet E gh t
of Eight
Wetlands
Survey
Sanitary sewer outfall
To wn of
Angler
Black River Township
Harnett County, NC
Scale: 1 " = 40'
Bate 1-2-18
PIN. 0674-18-2766.000
REID: 0022516
❑ 40
80
7,15'
GRAPHIC SCALE
S 89"20'29" E
2U.81'
S-14
S 0304801 " E
t
THIS DOCUMENT IS
S 15025'Z6" E
4.18'
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES
S 05"53'05" E
,20.45'
ONLY AND SHOULD NOT
S 05-36-30" W
6.35'
BE CONSIDERED A
CERTIFIED PLAT. THIS
PIAT SHOULD NOT BE
USED FOR CONVEYANCE
OF TITLE OR ANY
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
v
re5
.. ftp
-R-lav(ru. r
1
-W-153 V 1, f '' � "` f! f �
PRPerm.ane�tly Maintained`" "�'
N r .� - IiL OHE - ❑HE
ry i , 4 i , ss ry _ s "' I
B n Ban4 : I =� �1 W ' •
� � ;� .ry:, �:�:;:��.;�r � � � 1�• � � � � � � Approximate 100
year flood limit
Permanently Maintained Easem en t
Wetlands Impact W-7 366 sq. ft
Course Bearing
Distance
PI -14 N 89'16'I8" W
34.97'
PI -15 N 05053'05 " W
16.75'
W-154 N 152526" W
4.18'
W-153 S 65'2936" E
5.81'
PI -18 S 600257" E
37.52'
WC -5 ZZ
Bon
1
WC --4 .
Ban
Bon e,
Leonard Hoey
Susan Hoey
Deed Book 1921, Page 452
4r Otha McLea
Inez McLea.
Deed Book 357,1
Wetlands Area
m
Temporary Stream Impact S-3
31 IF (941 sq. ft.)
Course
Bearing
Distance
S--10
N 89018'18" W
3.2.17'
S-11
N 040,24'11 " W
� -
W-164
1
17.71'
S-12
N 14'25'41 " E
7,15'
S-13
S 89"20'29" E
2U.81'
S-14
S 0304801 " E
0.06'
W-154
S 15025'Z6" E
4.18'
W-155
S 05"53'05" E
,20.45'
5-16
S 05-36-30" W
6.35'
m
Temporary Stream Impact S-3
31 IF (941 sq. ft.)
Course
Bearing
Distance
S--10
N 89018'18" W
3.2.17'
S-11
N 040,24'11 " W
6.19'
W-164
N 0 7'5 7 X21 " E
17.71'
S-12
N 14'25'41 " E
7,15'
S-13
S 89"20'29" E
2U.81'
S-14
S 0304801 " E
0.06'
W-154
S 15025'Z6" E
4.18'
W-155
S 05"53'05" E
,20.45'
5-16
S 05-36-30" W
6.35'
Se SheTt Seven
Of - for Con tin ua tion
LHBR-879 FF