20140957 Ver 2_JAB Notes_20171025

I
11
/ICF N�ekly lvlee-17ill
c2
—/Ow' Ch4nCe-- -,plAr, e J-O� WO
'd
any lon'la ArSoe-
latv- P,41
- A
t wu f— A A,
-"r-ee, Or- 1/1 rhigiZIQ� npk Ike- 4 C-V,?Ce,-*,7
i-voold bt I-e-Avee-d Ale, qt2d
fil ore- 1 -#,7 /0 d_ 42u -d /40 rlflj,
--lA oajj 10 oq:� -Awokv
TV
Pv)l

1��ev -C e- "eo w t-,7 4,-� /,kk- c
re vl,'e
-7[7 C
V
4,412
wl-// here vle-p--d 1� ge-
�-o a C A/0 IV X01. 17vk3s o 6
AJ'j
*7 q
Z I-e-n CJ"
1-efotli-ce I-e-vorl's sz,41w,#r�oo llve4SIA—
/ -f 0 /T O -f C
I mt2rove PrIor /4 �40 r—c-,oec
I
q4enc-x Colloern-S e ,--o
Se
-rerv?c- cj"d 4,�-()19 (2 ff, C', xcf a -1c
Leal

mo,lbc
�41 /�
M�s by
J. P7.111o(C'We-
'Lyfo- /,'-)7 e- /)? co wPif7V -, N� �- �-
,2
,/P/o, In 4 mi /7
K 4. (1-drf 1001�f 'T) a- // rdtl A -
is
MVA -e- C,&� le W1 -fA
E )-)e- A V4?/ le))Pd a- �%,- f �� � r o v) -c- A"ha li,�-e
is &JS I IT bul- S�IL
CA e O/V
kch 17,4
rovjdeJ-
C
? Jt1h ; p &r 00-
A -p- - ln"�
b hw4kew - cens. e-o�-se- vk7 Pf L�
jw,-kk) /7
—17&e -d ---4 �v de4rp"-' le,
pr-djreJf LlollOC-1�040-7
-cc,
a�so
ea -Y
n4l
fb r vw
a A do �V& 0 t��j o4r4e-a rtj S)
a-Pf /12j
JV JdtleJ

(2) Sin4)lex pump stations shall only be allowable for single-fanily residences. All other buildings
connected to the systemshall at a mininwrohave duplexpunips.
(3) Septic tanks shall adhere to the standards established in 15A NCAC 18A .1900.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.1; 143-215.3(a);
Eff. September 1, 2006.

CIZ)
ihiq /-)Is
V,/
�Iejl
fos� w1-.cDwf1Qit)l P/
-- Y-
Pmef
Jvrl i hi moviAor, 4
&,Ies /d IhA f,,CIW
ep
r
oc� A3
-YQ—V---Y
A/9 V / 3o
Pec 67
746
t7e a e

K�
A�-7qvl,-4o
CP
1.24 - mt,, fla ft- d "-&-j - if to" --"o*
-5 0)(, �7 A 00
cy?
A*
L.J�

0 �-2 J -s �7 0
re it
/'7/26//l
4u 'Ir. 1AAM
<7,A /)7
fl),2
'be- su� MF "e 4 loe
el 1, /11; B , VI
con liw v4i- Y4 YA
L->
'2_0 4 IV,/-
�c 6-
-,( - - I
A, ;2-
hea*lrij
o4 40o ge-
Lw

iG-e ac-, 7// 7
d -rPPa � kfLeo A;jj oXS
-1V
01 o /0 til
1wOfl�-IJ6
1-2,e,'T al"Xr -tloW)7 -Af
pack
)1- "0 I"PV4 C-TMe
L/
/7 e a CXI J Ote V
hal !2,f'r T2 Z
,,W/,
C/ fl
f & r2o nf)al
--n ie , 14 n -0/
&S7 de v 17,e .4 f- M 4Af
L/
A4C Ad 1-17 ea M,6,1.7 e J- t -le A/o d(f
/;I a V le4 A "two/, A,
e-)";J/-7�i4 L7,61,cleJ
J /
r-��At'lcj /Jav a-ilalej
704-41 w

la j Ll
/Z:
c
Ve- e
ML

Al,a Cyos
Z -i
/A,
12le v
Ao
/V d
A, /-e,7 74 Cle tle- 10p
In e n

e- -- C4,411 A/
/Vo �s �/
17
I C"C-fq.Co( ?74Ztr Co?�ICfVJUVI-1 lug",
/c, c a
o ee
l
le -4"- Aw
Z. J— dl
Peak 4v /S w J; O.'L qlm A,
PI 4-2
r L/ 3 0,*7, /
NOV
Alov

3
#PtIv Ar
e C Ve
72Y
LY110,141
'e -V
Vek� lf4-&l-4
A7 A
WAY
42- w il

/Yj,
MAU
el4n
We 4/1 c-
-/r/7 de s
/7r
M 4 or- J�re
a In c #,-,a -r-f/ il a f
17 P
-p
- j
e. i � c q,7
u
Le avv,- w Ve
r. D.
- eqt)
is-� ae-
rond,A-0 i, V&
CA
Z2ZZaj
BA
re vire d 14,;7
rt
n a
aoqvon
0,0 4z 're 4t Jjp-
emad
;L , wo V 2-
e Acp a .17 kS
resp
by
Dec
J

7qPb
--�Xed
)Plt*l
7K s / A-,�
re S 71- de 7401
i/ bot -e
J. a
JrA /�Y/7��
7qPb
--�Xed
)Plt*l
7K s / A-,�
re S 71- de 7401
i/ bot -e

)Ilo,l
TC V-//
1".Ob e- ri Vu
Memo
/,.�Jvo -v
Al.. XUL44— -4r /�ft-% -2
A14j
—Sw e0h I/it ye ?�ht,9 v-q� A9;plh-a o!!7ve V4,7 CeT
n��m tA-q e.
-10( 4A
AI&I ,bvi anevL-
1'. '01tis.1-c-and, atj CemveVe-c ?

ACCESS ROADS
DETI HAS IDENTIFIED ROADS WHICH WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED ACP PIPELINE ROW AND OTHER
FACILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROJECTS. IN SOME CASES, EXISTING ROADS WILL REQUIRE
IMPROVEMENT (SUCH AS GRADING, GRAVELLING, REPLACING CULVERTS, t-AINORWIDENING,AND/OR CLEARING OF
OVERHEAD VEGETATION) TO SAFELY ACCOMMODATE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES. DETIACCESSROAD
LOCATIONS ARESHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT SHEETS. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS HAVE BEEN
DEVELOPED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AND FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO REDUCE
IMPACT70 TRAFFIC FLOW. IT 15 ANTICIPATED T14E PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT IMPACT ROADS OR TRAFFIC DURING THE
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROJECT.
A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ANY POINT WHERE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LEAVES THE ROW
AND ENTERS A PAVED PUBLIC ROAD OR OTHER PAVED SURFACE, TYPICALLY, A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS COMPRISED OT
FILTER FABRIC OVERLAIN BY 6 INCHES OF COARSE AGGREGATE EXTENDING A MINIMUM OF 100 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF
THE PAVEMENT. THE AREA OF THE ENTRANCE MUST BE EXCAVATED a-3NCHES PRIOR TO LAYING THE FILTER FABRIC
UNDERLINER. THE ENTRANCE MUST EXTEND THE FULLWIDTH OF THE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA AND HAVE A
MINIMUM 18 -FOOT WIDTH. CONVEYANCE OF SURFACE WATER THROUGHCULVERTS UNDER THE ENTRANCE WILL BE
PROVIDED, AS NECESSARY,
THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MUST FUNCTIONTO REMOVE MUD FROM VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT LEAVING THE ROW,
AS MUD ACCUMULATES ON THE ENTRANCE, CLEAN STONE MUST BE ADDED OR THE TIRE MATS LIFTED AND SHAXEN TO
REMOVEMUD. ANY MUD THAT 15 CARRIED ONTO THE PAVEMENT MUST BE THOROUGHLY REMOVED BY THE END OF THE
DAY BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING. THE MUD WILL BE RETURNED TO THE ROW. THE USE OF WATER TO REMOVE SEDIMENT
TRACKED ONTO ROAI)WAYS tS PERMITTED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED AS STATED ABOVE.
MAINTENANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AND
CLEANOUT OF ANY STRUCTURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ADDITIONAtLY, THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MAY NEED TO
BE SHOVELED THEN 516'WEPT, FOLLOWED BY WASHING OF T14E ENTRANCE TO REMOVE ANY SEDIMENT BUILD UP. IFANY
INADVERTENTLYSEDIMENTTRACKING OCCURS ON THE PUBLIC ROADWAY, THE ROAD WILL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY BY
THE END OF EACH DAY.
DETI HAS IDENTIFIED BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC ROADS WHICH WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED ACP
PIPELINE ROW AND OTHER FACILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROJECT. INSOMECASF5,EXISTING
ROADSWILL REQUIRE IMPROVEMENT (SUCH AS GRADING, GRAVELLING, REPLACING OR INSTALLING CULVERTS, MINOR
WIDENING, ANDIOR CLEARING Of OVERHEAD VEGETATION) TO SAFELY ACCOMMODATE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND
VEHICLES. THE FOLLOWING COND91ONS APPLYTO THE USE OF ACCESS ROADS,'
• CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WILL HAVE STONE ACCESS ENTRANCEAND EXIT DRIVES AND PARKING AREAS TO REDUCE THE
TRACKING OF SEDIMENTONTO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADS. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ANY
POINT WHERE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LEAVES THE ROW AND ENTERS A PAVED PUBLIC ROAD OR OTHER PAVED
SURFACE.
• DURING CONSTRUCTION AND RESTORATION ACTIVITIES, ACCESS TO THE ROW 15 LIMITED TO THE USE OF NEW OR
EXISTING ACCESS ROADS IDENT)FIED ON THE CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT SHEETS.
• TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, ACCESS THROUGH WETLANDS WILL BE LIMITED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ROW AND THOSE
EXISTING ROADS REQUIRING NO MODIFICATION OR IMPROVEMENTS, OTHER THAN ROUTINE REPAIR, AND POSING NO
IMPACT ON THE WETLAND.
• THE CDNSTRUCTIDN ROW MAY BE USED FOR ACCESS ACROSS WETLANDS WHEN THE WETLAND SOIL IS FIRM ENOUGH TO
AVOID RUTTING OR THE CONSTRUCTION ROW HAS BEEN APPROPRIATELY STABILIZED TO AVOID RUTTING (E.G., TIMBER
MATTING). HOWEVER, ACCESS IS NOT ALLOWED THROUGH WETLANDS T14AT WOULD NOT OTHERWISE BE IMPACTED BY
THE PROJECT,
• IN WETLANDS THAT CANNOT BE APPROPRIATELY STABILIZED, ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OTHER THANTHAT NEEDED
TO INSTALL THE WETLAND CROSSING WILL USE ACCESS ROADS LOCATED IN UPLAND AREAS. WHERE ACCESS ROADS IN
UPLAND AREAS DO NOT PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCESS, LIMIT ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTTO ONE PASS
THROUGH THE WETLAND USING THE C014STRUCTION ROW.

MAINTAIN SAFE AND ACCESSIBLE CONDITIONS AT ALL ROAD CROSSINGS AND ACCESS POINTS DURING CONSTRUCTION
AND RESTORATION. ACCESS ROAD MAINTENANCE THROUGIA THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE MAY INCLUDE GRADING
AND THE ADDITION OF GRAVELOR STONE WHEN NECESSARY�
• MAINTAIN ACC55S ROADS IN A STABLE MANNER TO PREVENTOFF-ROW IMPACTS, INCLUDING IMPACTS TO ADJACENT
AND/OR NEARBY SENSITIVE RESOURCE AREAS, AND IMPLEMENT ALLAPPROPRIATE ESC MEASURES FOR
CON5TRU CTION/I MPROVEM ENT OF ACCESS ROADS.
• IF EROSION IS OBSERVED ADJACENT TO ACCESS ROADS, IMMEDIATELY REPAIR, STABILIZE, OR IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL ESC
MEASURES. ADDITIONAL MEASURES INCLUDE SILT FENCE, CHECK DAMS, OR EROSION CONTROL FABRIC. THEEIWILL
IMPLEMENT THE APPROPRIATE ESC MEASURE BASED UPON OBSERVED SITE CONDITIONS.
• MINIMIZE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE
MANA61 NG AGENCY,
• REMOVE ANY SOIL OR GRAVEL SPILLED OR TRACKED ONTO ROADWAYS DAILY OR MORE FREQUENT AS NECESSARY TO
MAINTAIN SAFE ROAD CONDITIONS.
• REPAIRANY DAMAGES TO ROADWAY SURFACES, SHOULDERS, AND BAR DITCHES.
• IF CRUSHED STONE/ROCK ACCESS PADSARE USED IN RESIDENTIAL OR AGRICULTURAL AREAS, STONE WILL BE PLACED ON
SYNTHETIC, NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRICTO FACILITATE REN40VAL AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
• ALL ACCESS ROADS ACROSS A WATERBODY MUST USE AN EQUIPMENT BRIDGE.
• FOR ACCESS THROUGH A SATURATED WETLAND, USE TIMBER MATS OR AN EQUIVALENT UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED
BY AGENCY PERMITS.
• LIMIT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OPERATING IN WETLAND AREAS TO THAT NEEDED TO CLEAR THE ROW, DIG THE
TRENCH, FABRICATE AND INSTALL THE PIPELINE, 13ACKFILL THE TRENCH, AND RES70RE THE CONSTRUCTION ROW. ALL
OTHER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT WILL USE ACCESS ROADS LOCATED IN UPLAND AREASTO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT
PRACTICAL
• ROADS WILL BE SURFACED WITH STONE OR ANOTHERSUITABLE MATERIAL TO PROVIDE A NON -ERODIBLE RUNNING
SURFACE.
• CUT -BANKS AND FILL -SLOPES WILL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS FEASIBLE TO A NON -ERODIBLE CONDITION USING
VEGETATION, ROCK, GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL, OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL
• SILT FENCE OR STONE OUTLET PROTECTION WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT OUTLETS OF DRAINA6E STRUCTURES.
• WHEN ACCESS ROADS INTERSECT PUBLIC HIGHWAYSTHE CONTRACTOR WILL USE A COMBINATION OF GEOTEXTILE AND
STONE (TEMPORARYSTONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE) To HELP KEEP MUD OFF HIGHWAY ENTRANCES, WHERE
SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTEDONTO A PAVED DR PUBLIC ROAD SURFACETHE ROAD SURFACE WILL BE CLEANED
THOROUGHLYATTHE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENTWILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROADS BYSHOVELING ORSWEEPING
AND TRANSPORTED TO ASEDIMENT CONTROL DISPOSAL AREA STREETWASHING WILL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER
SEDIMENT 15 REMOVED IN THIS MANNER.
ROADS WILL BE MAINTAINED 50 THAT WATER CAN FLOW FREELY FROM THE ROAD SURFACE.
TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADS WILL FOLLOW EXISTING CONTOURS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE

Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
925 White Oaks Blvd. Bridgeport, West Virginia 26330 / 681-842-8000
IWME. ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND
DISTmcrl I COUN71K. i OrAnNC GROUP D" mo, Rev,
DfiWtLE- ACMorth CarulinaMetalls �1 OF 1 10 1
ACCESS- ROAD - GLA�51QUTIQH:
EXIS7ING ROAD
YAJOR UKRADE
EXISTING ROAD NO MODIFICATIONS -EXISTING ROAD NOT REQUIRING 1ADDIFICATIONS
EXISTING ROAD MINOR UPGRADE -EXISTING ROADS THAT CONTAIN EITHER A COtOPACTED EARTH OR GRAVEL SURFACE,
WHOR RECRADING AND/OR PLACE11.1111141' or SUPPLELIENTAL GRAVEL W11HIN THE EXISTING ROAD FOOTPRINT BAY OCCUP.
EXISTING ROAD MWOR UPGRADE -GRADING AND ADDITION OF GRAVEL V.117HIN AN EXPANDED FOOTPRINT TO OCCUR
ALONG THE MAJORITY OF THE ROAD. THE ROAD FOOTPRINT POST-CONSTRUCTON 10AY EXCEED THAT EXISTING
PRE -CONSTRUCTION.
PROPOSED NEW ACCESS ROAD -CLEAR VEGETATION, GRADE, AND ADD GRAVEL ALONG FOLL LENGTH OF A NEW ROAD.

FIGURE 3.35.1
TYPES OF ROAD CROSS-SECTIONS
411 4X
------------ ------- 2.1
---- ------
amw FILL stmom
foot LOW GROUND USE
4
i 0
mwNm TudpiKr stenam
FOR LOW OROUND USE WHERE
FILL IS UN&VAMAMLE
oumorc sEc6m
FOR USE ON m SLOPE
AHMD'STrABBLE 501
NOT TO SCALE
Raleigh S&EC Plans 10/20/2017 Page 8 of 9
PD
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE I,__%f__11JECT
D I -NS
CONTRACTOR YAI%-" - RALEIGH REGION
HALIFAX AND JOHNSTON COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN LOCATION MAP
_m
IN WITH SECTION
ON So LLF A"
WITH POOR Sm
THE CHO= OF CROSS-
ON OVENDS
ON DRAINAGE NEEDS,
L STADIUM SLOPE.
AND EIPLUM
4X 4X
CROWNED AND VITCHED, SECTION
rOR H)GHM VOLUME RUN ON
STEP SLOPES
FROM US FOREST =V= AND MICHIGAN DNR
TYPES OF
ROAD CROSS-SECTIONS
NOT TO SCALE
Raleigh S&EC Plans 10/20/2017 Page 8 of 9
PD
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE I,__%f__11JECT
D I -NS
CONTRACTOR YAI%-" - RALEIGH REGION
HALIFAX AND JOHNSTON COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN LOCATION MAP

PROPOHD
SURFACE
EST. CUT/FrLL LINES
2-6% Z-6%
__j — ------ a-
----------------------
rxls-.ING Poto
SUPFACE
EXISTING
GPOUND
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIOJ�-�WOR UPGRADE
NOT TO SCALE
LOD PER PLA14S
--a- EXISTING PDAD SURFACE
EXISTING GREPJ14D ----
IL
2-6% 2-67.
L ------ ---- %
--------------- - ----------
noposcD SURFACE
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION -MINOR UPGRADE
NOT TO SCALE
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC_
925 White OaRs Blvd, Bridgeport, West Virginia 26330 1681-1342-8000
"mp-- ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
warmor. Tr-.Uury. I G;Wup owmmm
JwRtr4LE, ACPWDrih CarolinaDotails, 9 OF

-7
licly-- Oct
—iler,y 1vtvi'l-Acoa
-7-rclAi-cel Lon& exmwn,
L/
Orokci4in'a c tv4w�l-r m
y Oq;o KV1 lVeA if CL/ Qat-/2�e
��Y�lOrA-7�rV alrjllt�t4 -/0 Wekr-M,1n-e- oqr hol r-ock
(NAIO <
tnot2 ,Aor7 o J -kPa P"f j sv'r? .ms
Y-
One- y
r mv)7j:vr/hj ofj- 0.419 Y7,5k7-�;c 7tW
L-pa,.V,.c aj A�4r
W AOI X'IdCe Me �7 17 �Q�ne- 714, a
;7Ael-;C., I?Yj'r-A'br44-e- ly)/ 4to lo/ L/

Do ve- -r4
W,
.4 Mftk ly Al
q, v Iaselor. S Alw-"Og
dla,,
T -/and b'42/jo(14
kr5,ve,
Do ve- -r4
W,
re c
rea le n� v 16
—Ale ."e hr NC P4-0,,rj
--7e W- Cg4lej-
a Zo"" /--De/
cl-
gr ",t7k
/An, f Ah Pna /A
—C,/,z c,*c Aa A
J. 13
lvh ,-c.4 -c&,4WAe Kry.W adWre-ff nr2�hte,*; LIN &0 -
14.
, - / o- a c b YIO u
-5-e 1144- w 1) b cl-.

TV.,
-'w how waillal ik a Aq!Ck ,S-dc-c-
10
-02
xo,q)o
4
T V,
A,
ve ��e ",/
/Z le-
45C - - --
0 Wk --,p
llv/ VZ e2-�
PIE
Xl,#,-
7'�-,&,w ev
Oe
1. Akdy;� DA-ot- aC,17-V4-1'gf
Me
A,*WA kALr
-we
a It hXz- ye.17
LV
t-&ACt J)62,e :;4
Miov Ila &M no r",
-gay
c�royl i
6--
'wa /4-cp e pq A
AL
Lf /0 9
Allo- /-D 4tAl
cey- 7 IWAI-p
A/l.-
a cce-j--r
AL
i
eo 4,j7men-)L k-.
levayAtla ewC'
4
T V,
A,
ve ��e ",/
/Z le-
45C - - --
0 Wk --,p
A,-/ A /-fo -470A- 00 -17-y&/
r
t-&ACt J)62,e :;4
Miov Ila &M no r",
-gay
c�royl i
6--
'wa /4-cp e pq A
- A .71(
7, V �t/A,
respo4Ve-

(2
t, 9/1
lxj.;� i -A 0 / /Olpl�, 1 /9

,Y- Lf rl
'49 4W Qj�
W7
PR
I
17( 01
olq
al f
17 1 Af Y
i
tiv 7 2 A
4'"" IV
too vy -�fp va,
vl-4�rrw 6FW�P21 ait- "-"/a
-17t d"q
of vq" flo
fa QIP
at -J�t
�7 Al
df 7W3 (t 1!tvffuv.1
Y4 pll�s�p A/ �y
614f
.44
-,o A m
rd
.1-t dw //-y

4 CP 114ee�j h' q
7L-2
We,.,rk d �,j:
2Xer)(cr -Tt- rkdl.
k,-darel 40441L --oom"'?,am lNottlh- 111i've —
I
ila o o 17dd
I/ f 49k�
14-/P' - SA e /,-,t A�. Z-, — p E-6
1-b ss/) cl,-r I t7 dr
- /7/ Lf
U �7
r, �-7 C 0,17
1,21
D ta. 14
u
-..,Ya I ej rw (I-"
&,-7 P�e 7le-
!q77
1) J'7 06
L/
k1, 14
/'�l de- -ro In -f-
-3�Ae 4 41bq 4 k A,7.o n lvt-� >za
re vi s c , 0
Alr- C, o I —"4e 7LI,70,4
pf4oc2
Ulm

4 Cio
7L, -3117
rA�
,/,p
0.
ho
e__
MIY-
'Iraa_ioa� -hine clork
1�ld Ivr
y
f- M f-ro nj �5- 04 407
4e,

Burdette, Jennifer a
--'.�rorn, Higgins, Karen
k, -- -4ent: Friday, September 01, 2017 2:59 PM
To: Burdette, Jennifer a; Wrenn, Brian L
Subject: ACP and Water Supplies
I looked through the ACP map, the Basinwide Planning map, and the map provided by SELC. The proposed
route crosses WS-lVs and WS -111s, but no WS -I or WS -11 that I can see. The best I can tell from the map
provided from SELC, WS -IV watersheds are listed on their "WS -I: map; WS -III watersheds are listed on their
"WS -11" map.
Thanks -
Karen
Karen Higgins
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Supervisor
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807-6360 office
[e-mail]
512 N. Salisbury Street, Suite 942-E, Raleigh, NC 27604
V7 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
�-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

Sites Under Contract
ACP Centerline (12/21/2016)
River Basin
Cape Fear 06
Neuse 03
Lumber 03
Tar -Pamlico 01
Tar -Pamlico 02
0 1 2.5 25
Mies
, 7Robeson
Dominion Energy
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Sites Under Contract
June 30, 2017
Johnston
N, Sampson
EwBladen'
Nash
Wilson
Halifax
Date: 7/7/2017
Drawn by: FSL
Chocked by: DIPII — 10res

4
oy a a -.Y/ a/
_r.
Arta 7Tn

?
I-VSW '.J(7
J-//jA In --d -)w
7
Mwo

CP <; W #30117
LA-
Wif _r&td j12
WV4;
I�r 1�jonlAr,'�y
#7 On,

I f
U47' -e 64 107 16-,d
54 /7'a A- wo"-7c-,v
I 07oy-e Yicioy—&W I—evi-e-tAl of m,1A.,oilc orf Ahe Ja nr-.e-
.p &r- Of 11-QtV S4-cej zj
oil J�re-)--Hori /)7 &in dA,"
JS
97(-
J.b. 2.i
lof o
Ag t4j 4y
115.,
(711 �x c Dk-) Oj 0- JZ�-111'4 -le- --hV,-Ijd

---1'7g -.177 Y-- I --
A Z*P?e 44P ke a L�. e.
Alo, S i? -it Atl
_L,�le
4h
ice
A4�ej7et�, 1"23POP7,re- 1v d(/J, 1"IOx-c
-kioK q e- kA j _04 1, 17 e-- -C
ro'kimp"br
--��Cow
Aft
---1'7g -.177 Y-- I --

401 Water Quality Certification
1. Projects that require a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit from the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers must also receive a 401 Water Quality Certification
from the State for the permit to be valid
2. Certifications are issued where the Division determines that water quality
standards are met, including protection of existing uses
a. Water quality standards are a combination of numeric limits on
pollutants and criteria to maintain the characteristics that are typica
of these resources
b. Existing uses consist of aquatic life habitat including fishing, wildlife,
primary recreation such as swimming, secondary recreation such as
wading and boating, agriculture and water supply for drinking and
food processing
3. For a project to be issued a Certification, it must meet the following criteria
C) a. The project has no practical alternative
b. Minimizes adverse impacts to surface waters and wetlands based on
consideration of existing topography, vegetation, fish and wildlife
resources, and hydrological conditions
c. Does not result in the degradation of groundwaters or surface waters
d. Does not result in cumulative impacts, based upon past or reasonably
anticipated future impacts, that cause or will cause a violation of
downstream water quality standards and
e. Provides for replacement of existing uses through mitigation
(7)

ib
e 44z2i
"qoe,,�Az�q �ZY 7
1 ehv
no�
Ck rlo c/o
vz;z oZ �Qz:-Q
,I,,17ei
AWe,-- Ve 1 4 L4 -t, , 144
4-io- UJ--e-
Yes
a h -f -be-
etAla)4
qol tj
L bt,,Y-<, )v
A--)- ba
/ ce e? I -e, -'i 0 e1191- 4ret7ol-aZ &D Skj

w
J-mo761f,
S. ,ken tzce�62-9
-W-r�w
--se sj')
/0 t- /)ve
C. IP7,V"17 14 4j,
—17n
t,4
c 4"'1
� b7
Im"Xd oel AS
oi2 o2 CCQ,,fo�e4t
a,Ll4cad A14

'2
64011e -el -0,5 yrj,-49o7 / //
7re,vp and(,et,-Lr/a
AJ
4�e t? c I . rLs
e*--&ner-c- c
e r -Y-- I?
se

C/o 12 -2 7/-z
Ej)vi k0y) Me I I /-a/ ill's
�/, C,,�/ "/- r."1,41
/
e -r -Iva ol,01;-e ii- i�—Zd cl,,9 lve- illt
L
/--�p C- �c look& a a enllie pyzxc
-40)
7L
Z -1t
lid �7
Af Ve Zo 42 ef�;k 0 k", e -S
Ll/

4cllo - -
�Vll
,zc/— ee
7/
ed p /V Cc,, -7 17� &f-riTG;2

4cp
0
er, dc, c, i mui, p j- 4t k, Y)p
Y-11–OZ17
I,,-- /k,- ell "y V., 11e- t -,//P L/
A / Z. h
-A C', ihu
2 '1
. a,, d
Y?a
t)iAl,,,i
610
-hd vz
J-0ail
a/ Vj ';Pl, C '��Zkf J�v-Ll,,�i
�2,&
42, 'Orb erAe-
I—
.4 r
'Ci /7 (-)D
ra /V e -c
—e
czw cz
&
/&
a v V
k"5 -e V'r
4 o Jr
"-d
hitekil"
!
la -plop avh,� recokald-
w ......
1A�p
f7m
/
t�z ed
ly em
�rA AA v
Aah,,.-
k1
L%
vo
m th vh Ste) iva L4 i4 --d 41 Zu, 'I',
jo
,
-060
w5
ey
i ')
V-Ck d- 9,1,4t4 Xc / lkz-�

61-2,3117
Le, ou W
Z
Y' M
1"o le n h-
.26.3
f
4b, Ile-,
-wAlholLI
R.,271
k"klhol"�-f
he /0 tV
e-0 1#7 //&e I? C e— 7'�
�A A o /to -f
a ve -,,d
-5jr-eoi--�p XI-17�
1eal4lCed tv1 /�W.
-5� A
Y7,f
740 4Voi-d
--2 m,,- Jv1 j�k,7ea
I kvc M o

AWL
/I CP Ne�eAIU 1411k-W)f9'"s
i /
C,'U,? A ltne�
Ir-liceau de 11'r n i I
Le
Ir iowl e /I
J
YP14
J/ I
t-jill
& ��e /a 4 -,,a c A -r
0 c
Ac h/ -5�)c cc ke jv-) /1,-'
ez //C,( a )4P e -r
�le 4
eL. r -e- Ae-efe/
eo&WW1)1AV ee 141,y,
o V/ -j -
h4.

*1 V-1 Ild- XAnCll
1,- 11,'7' -e /7 4 M4� 0
Id �c
tw
-74e rCl
Ei7c--"-�y
411 roLl�-- se-1,-Cl-ew 0.41- /Z,eC/e-d

Burde
I -e- 6-1641-1-k 11-t A6ke-
I-e W,)Y- vo I ell S. -n q 4 do 0-142 le
re
aloer J2Q-S2�RDk2-e- eo en t17, Pe
1-20

Burdette, Jennifer a
C--1- 0 Stancil, Vann F
_1=t Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:55 AM
To: Higgins, Karen; Burclette, Jennifer a; Garrison, Ga,briela
Subject: ACP PCINI questions & comments
Hey Karen and Jennifer, here are some comments and questions I made based on he 02 — PCN Supplemental Info
file. We've also reviewed the water crossing table and remain somewhat confused on a few issues so we're looking for
some clarity on that. Talk to you at 3:00...
Thanks,
Vann
From: Sta n ci 1, Va n n F
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 5:39 PM
To: Garrison, Gabriela <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: compressed table
Hey, so it looks like there are a few discrepancies — intermittent/perennial and mil e�s posts, plus a few new ones. Would
be good to know why. In addition, there's still the issue of the blue line, named strleams/swamps that they just call
wetlands or (hopefully not) have overlooked entirely. We named these in our DE1., I ) comments, will be interesting to see if
they change it for the Final. These are Mingo Swamp, Black River, Big Marsh Swamp, Tenmile Swamp, and Saddletree
Swamp. We should mention these again for the 401.
Q)ther comments that I've come up with (with page numbers as on the printed PCN, Supplement) are:
p. 12 — they discuss ROW thru wetlands, with the 10' herbaceous width and 30' no tree area. I'm thinking this is the same
for forested areas (including riparian areas) but couldn't see where it said it.
p. 16 and also p. 78 — construction equipment will be allowed 1 pass thru waterboldies before bridges are installed. It's
not clear if this refers to 1 piece of equipment or several pieces one time each. I a ssume that streams crossed with HIDID
would never be crossed —that equipment would come from both directions beyon, d the stream, but this is not crystal
clear either. This needs clarification and the timing as well. Is the temporary crossing put in at the time of ROW clearing
I
and stays there the whole time? That could be 8 months or so. Is it sized properly to handle large flows (doubtful). How
do we want to revise our relocation efforts in light of this??
p. 19 — talks about removing fish that are trapped — should also include other aqu#ic organisms
p. 23 — source of water for HIDID is still up in the air
p. 25 — equipment will also be allowed to pass thru wetlands once before stabilization. Stabilization methods will include
rip rap and timber mats. Temporary materials will be removed during restoration�
I
p. 27—JDs are 98 %clone but access was not allowed some places soother sources including NWI was used. Doesthe98
% represent only those done on the ground or does it include NWI assessments? �
48 — 49'— Progress Energy alt. route in Cumberland Co. was not used.
76 or nearby — maybe add something about equipment / chemical storage in floodplains — avoiding it.
d

p. 77 — details of wetlands restoration monitoring — how long will it be done? How long for success?
p. 79 — adding fuel 100'from waterbodies/wetlands or from the water's edge??
p. 84 — discussion of buffer mitigation for Tar and Neuse
p. 90 — cumulative impacts section does not address the fact that there will be more impacts like this (on a smaller scale)
because of the new supply of natural gas
p. 94 — NC spiny crayfish counties should be the same as for Neuse River waterclog
p. 95 — WRC mussel relocation description is not totally accurate — but will probably suffice.
Later,
VS
From: Garrison, Gabriela
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:30 PM
To: Stancil, Vann F <[e-mail]>
Subject: compressed table
I hope this doesn't choke up your email. I got it down to 18MB.
Let me know if it works.
G.
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Sandhills Depot, P 0. Box 149
Hoffman, NC 28347
Office and Cell: 910-409-7350
[e-mail]
www.ncwildlife.org
C 3 M E
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N C Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
2

)e
Ael-en 17'o /-if 4,7 Iy re-� Yre,7,n All e -
S at7d
oil
all
F72

5Y)-eO,r",f "D-�J-,,'S�ecl
Afc- a, k

Pvcmc0d-,�-Jr- -Can
r -ecir#.OD)
41-201, 7 __
d7s,
i-va At- ZorJ, 'e4r
Wa V-1 PA ltl-/� "i O)e w
0,0� o?
4X4
a)-.rA ad� i --v-1
tn
etT-
_2—Lf-T- 4-o )FIA,�40c
10;
2- Fla 7
AT -715P. -,7 Sa ,4 �- Ck 4 1, J,.
cd. li-s4 fm�DP7,do,
)"- Jkpo v cy/—
Ir
i've
7410
147- y

C 0 0 V7
C/C c 06.0-7,f
C e -
kc C&,sA�Ijer- !�Z�/ C,�,&
11 alz e' 2� z�lc,, 17 9.f
04 Zo W,6�- 0 /A -.7
low

Ad S4 -.k g' ce, J. 9111-41C&
h;7
-Ay
/Wz� ifo�ze — mit
f
tse A&Z
elf

4.9.9 Environmental Justice
EO 12898, Federal Action to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low -
Income Populations, requires federal agencies to consider if impacts on human health or the environment
(including social and economic aspects) would be disproportionately high and adverse for minority and
low-income populations and appreciably exceed impacts on the general population or other comparison
group. We received comments expressing concern that ACP and SHP pipeline and aboveground facilities
were sited through areas with disproportionately high concentrations of low-income and minority
populations, thus unduly impacting these environmental justice communities.
Consistent with EO 12898, the CEQ called on federal agencies to actively scrutinize the following
issues with respect to environmental justice (CEQ, 1997a):
the racial and economic composition of affected communities;
health-related issues that may amplify project effects on minority or low-income
individuals; and
public participation strategies, including community or tribal participation in the process.
Tlie EPA's Environmental Justice Policies focus on enhancing opportunities for residents to
participate in decision making. The EPA (2011) states that Environmental Justice involves meaningful
involvement so that: "(1) potentially affected community residents have an appropriate opportunity to
participate in decisions about a proposed activity that will affect their environment and/or -health;, (2) the
public's contributions can influence the regulatory agency's decision; (3) the concerns of all - participants
involved will be considered in the decision-making process; and (4) the decision -makers seek out and
facilitate the involvement of those potentially affected."
In accordance with EO 12898, all public documents, notices, and meetings for ACP and SHP were
made readily available to the public during our review of the project. Atlantic and DTI met with many
different stakeholders during the initial development of the route, including local residents and affected
landowners. These efforts involved a number of open houses with the affected communities and local
authoriti6s. Atlantic and DTI also established, and are maintaining, a project website to share project
information with the public.
Atlantic and D11 also used the FERC's Pre -filing Process (see section 1.3). One of the major goals
of this process is to increase public awareness and encourage public input regarding every aspect of the
project (e.g., design, routing, environmental concerns and impacts) before an application is filed. As part
of this process, FERC staff participated in several of Atlantic's and DTI's open houses and hosted several
FERC scoping meetings to receive input from the public about ACP and SHP. Interested parties have had,
and will continue to be given, opportunities to participate in the NEPA review process. To date, this
included the opportunity to participate in the public scoping meetings within the project area to identify
concerns and issues that should be covered in the EIS, and the opportunity to submit written comments
about the projects to the FERC. Stakeholders will also have the opportunity to review this draft EIS and
provide comments directly to the FERC staff in person (during scheduled comment sessions) or in writing.
4.9.9.1 Demographic and Economic Data
Based on published EPA guidance concerning environmental justice reviews (EPA, 1998), we used
a three-step approach to conduct our review. These steps are:
4-411 Socioeconomics

1. Determine the existence of minority and low-income populations.
2. Determine if resource impacts are high and adverse.
3. Determine if the impacts fall disproportionately on environmental justice populations.
For the purposes of this review, a low-incom population exists when the percentage of all persons
living below the poverty level is more than the percentage for the state where the census tract is located
Also, for the purpose of this review, minority population exists when:
the total racial minorities in a.U.S. Census Bureau-defmed census tract (U.S. Census
Bureau, 2013) are more than 50 percent of the tract's population;
2. the percentage of a racial minority in a census tract is "meaningfully greater"20 than in the
comparison group;
3. the total ethnic minorities in a census tract are more than 50 percent of the tract's
population; or
4. the percentage of ethnic minorities in a census tract is meaningfully greater than in the
comparison group.
Racial and ethnic minorities include: African American/Black, Native American or Alaska Native,
Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, two or more races, and other races; and the Hispanic or
Latino ethnicity.
A endix V provides an overview of the racial and economic characteristics of the population
within the 136 unique census tracts within a I -mile radius of all ACP and SHP facilities (this includes the
pipeline, compressor stations, all aboveground facilities, and contractor yards). In West Virginia, minorities
comprise 6.4 percent of the total population. The percentage of minorities in the West Virginia census
tracts within I mile of ACP or SHP ranges from 0. 1 to 6.9 percent. No census tracts within I mile of ACP
or SHP have a minority population meaningfully greater than that of the county in which it is located. In
Virginia, minorities comprise 30.8 percent of the total population. The percentage of minorities in the
Virginia census tracts within I mile of ACP ranges from 0.2 to 100 percent. In 10 of the 63 census tracts,
the minority population is meaningfully greater than that of the county in which it is located. qn North`
Carolina, minorities comprise 30.5 percent of the total population. The percentage of minorities in the
North Carolina census tracts within I mile of ACP ranges from 12.5 to 95.5 percent. In 13 of the 42 census
tracts, the minority population is meaningfully greater than that of the county in which it is located. In
Pennsylvania, minorities comprise 18.1 percent of the total population. The percentage of minorities in the
Pennsylvania census tracts within I mile of SHP ranges from 0. 1 to 42.8 percent. In one of the nine census
tracts, the minority population is meaningfully greater than that of the county in which it is located.
To restate, for the purpose of this analysis, a low-income population exists when the percentage of
all persons living below the poverty level is greater than the percentage of persons below poverty level for
the state where the census tract is located. In West Virginia, 18.1 percent of all persons live below the
poverty level. Eight of the 22 census tracts in West Virginia within a I-milc radius of ACP and SHP project
facilities have a higher percentage of persons living below the poverty level when compared to the state.
In Virginia, 11.5 percent of all persons live below the poverty level. Thirty-four of the 63 census tracts in
Virginia within a I -mile radius of ACP facilities have a higher percentage of persons living below poverty -
level when compared to the state. Iffi North Carolina, 17.6 percent of all persons live below the poverty
20 "Meaningftdly greater" is defined in this analysis when minority or ethnic populations are at least 10 percentage
points more than in the coniparison group, which was the county in which the census tract was located.
Socioeconomics 4-412

level. Twenty-seven of the 42 census tracts in North Carolina within a I -mile radius of ACP facilities have
a
j,bigher percentage of persons living below poverty -level when compared to the state. In Pennsylvania,
13.5 percent of all persons live below the poverty level. No census tracts within I mile of SHP project
facilities have a low-income population meaningfully greater than that of the state.
The construction and operation of the proposed facilities would affect a mix of racial/ethnic and
socioeconomic areas in the ACP and SHP project area as a whole. Not all impacts identified in this EIS
are considered to affect minority or low-income populations. The primary adverse impacts on the
environmental justice communities associated with the construction of ACP and SHP would be the
temporary increases in dust, noise, and traffic from prQject construction. These impacts would occur along
the entire pipeline route and in am with a variety of socioeconomic backgrounds.
The proposed new and modified compressor stations would be gas -driven; air quality impacts and
mitigation measures associated with compressor station operation are discussed in section 4.11. 1. Health
issues related to ACP and SHP would be the risk associated with an unanticipated pipeline or compressor
station failure, gas leaks, and blowdowns at compressor stations. Section 4.12 describes the risks to public
safety that could result from a pipeline failure and describes how applicable safety regulations and standards
would minimize the potential for these risks. Because the projects would generally traverse rural areas, the
number of persons who would be at risk of injury due to a pipeline failure would be low, and there is no
evidence that such risks would be disproportionately bome by any racial, ethnic, or socioeconomic group.
Atlantic and DTI would implement a series of measures that would minimize potential impacts on
the nearby communities, including environmental justice communities near project facilities. For instance,
Atlantic and DTI propose to employ proven construction -related practices to control fugitive dust, such as
application of water or other commercially available dust control agents on unpaved areas subject to
frequent vehicle traffic. Similarly, noise control measures would be implemented by Atlantic and DTI
during construction and operation of the projects. Additionally, Atlantic and DTI (per their proposed
mitigation measures and our additional recommendations) would ensure that the operational noise
attributable to the new compressor stations and compressor station modifications would be less than 55 Ld.
at nearby NSAs, and the increase in the overall noise due to the new stations would be below the threshold
considered perceptible to the human ear at most NSAs.
The impacts on the natural and human environment from constructing and operating ACP and SHP
are identified and discussed throughout the environmental analysis section of this document. Potentially
adverse environmental effects associated with the projects would be minimized and/or mitigated, as
applicable, and are not characterized as high and adverse. Although the racial and economic composition
of some counties and census tracts that would be crossed by the projects have racial, ethnic, and economic
deviations from state -level and county -level statistics, there is no evidence that ACP or SHP would cause
a disproportionate share of high and adverse environmental or socioeconomic impacts on any racial, ethnic,
or socioeconomic group.
Construction of ACP and SHP would result in minor positive impacts on the local economy due to
increases in payroll taxes, purchases made by the workforce, and expenses associated with the acquisition
of material goods and equipment. Operation of ACP and SHP would also have a minor to moderate positive
effect on the counties and local communities due to the increase to property taxes that would be collected.
4.9.10 Socioeconomks on Federal Lands
ACP's AP- I mainline would cross approximately 21.0 miles of NFS lands and 0.1 mile of NPS -
owned land (associated with the BRP). Table 4.8.9-1 identifies the number and location of crossings of
ACP over federal lands.
4-413 Socioeconomics

The socioeconomic data for the counties crossed by ACP where federal lands are located'
(Pocahontas, West Virginia for the MNF; Highland, Bath, and Augusta Counties, Virginia for the GWNF;
and Augusta and Nelson Counties, Virginia for the BRP) are presented in the tables throughout section 4.9.
Information regarding specific recreational and special interest areas on federal lands are discussed in detail
in section 4.8.9.
4.9.10.1 Recreation and Tourism
Potential visual impacts of ACP on federal lands as it relates to recreation are discussed in detail in
section 4.8.9. There are a wide variety of recreational activities that take place on federal lands that would
be crossed by ACP. As further described in section 4.8.9, we do not believe construction and operation of
ACP would have a significant adverse effect on recreation on federal lands. There is a possibility of conflict
between pipeline construction traffic and visitors using roads on federal lands, particularly during peak
tourism season (see section 4.9.10.2). Additionally, due to the influx of non -local construction workers to
the project area, there may be increased competition (and cost) for short-term housing, which may decrease
housing availability for tourists and recreationalists in the vicinity of federal lands. However, given the
sufficient amount of short-term housing available in the entire ACP and SHP project area and surrounding
metropolitan statistical areas, we do not believe the construction of ACP would create a significant adverse
impact on visitors looking for accommodations during trips to federal lands.
4.9.10.2 Transportation and Traffic
Pipeline construction would require the use of a number of existing roads and the construction of
new access roads on FS land to access the pipeline right-of-way during construction and operation (see
table 4.8.9-3). Access road construction activities would affect public access. To minimize and mitigate
potential impacts, Atlantic would prepare spread -specific traffic and transportation management plans for
managing vehicle traffic during construction of ACP, taking into account peak travel times, emergency
services, and visitor traffic.
4.10 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Section 106 of the NHPA, as amended, requires the FERC, as lead federal agency, and the
cooperating agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings on properties listed in or eligible
for listing in the NRHP and to afford the ACHP an opportunity to comment. Atlantic and D'TI, as non-
federal parties, provided us with information, analyses, and recommendations, in accordance with the
ACHP's regulations for implementing section 106 at 36 CFR 800.2(a)(3), and the FERC's regulations at
18 CFR 380(f). The federal land managing agencies have obligations regarding cultural resources under
other federal laws and regulations, including the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the Antiquities
Act of 1906, section 110 of the NHPA, the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974, the
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) of 1979, and the Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act.
Construction and operation of ACP and SHP could adversely affect historic properties (i.e., cultural
resources listed or eligible for listing in the NRHP). These historic properties could include prehistoric or
historic archaeological sites, districts, buildings, structures, and objects, as well as locations with traditional
value to Native Americans or other groups. Such historic properties generally must possess integrity of
location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and must meet one or more of
the criteria specified in 36 CFR 60.4. Direct effects could include destruction or damage to all, or a portion,
of an historic property. Indirect effects could include the introduction of visual, atmospheric, or audible
elements that affect the setting or character of a historic property. Atlantic's and DTI's inventory of cultural
Socioeconomics 4-414

resources sites within the projects' area of potential effects (APE), and recommendations of their eligibility
for listing in the NRHP, is presented below.
If a historic property would be adversely affected by the projects, avoidance or other mitigation
would be proposed. Avoidance might include, but would not be limited to, realignment of the pipeline
route, relocation of temporary workspace, use of boring, or changes in the construction and/or operational
design. Nfitigation might include the systematic professional excavation of an archaeological site, the
preparation of photographs and/or measured drawings documenting standing structures or other historic
features, or the use of landscaping or other techniques that would minimize or eliminate effects on the
historic setting or ambience of standing structures or other resources.
4.10.1 Cultural Resources Investigations
In the NOI, the FERC stated that the APE for natural gas facility projects encompasses at a
minimum all areas subject to ground disturbance (examples include construction right-of-way,
contractor/pipe storage yards, compressor stations, and access roads). Project -specific APEs were
developed for archaeological and historic architecture surveys according to the guidelines and requirements
for each state.
4.10.1.1 Atlantic Coast Pipeline
ACP is in West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. The ACP route crosses the XINF in West
Virginia and the GWNF in Virginia. Atlantic consulted with the FS and prepared separate survey reports
for each of the national forests. The cultural resources studies for federal lands, which include the MNF,
GWNF, and the BRP, are discussed in section 4.10.6.
Atlantic contracted with ERM (formerly Natural Resource Group, LLQ to assist with the cultural
resources investigations for ACP. Atlantic described the APE for direct project effects as the construction
footprint where ground -disturbing activities are possible. Atlantic surveyed a 300 -foot -wide linear corridor
for the pipeline, a 50 -foot -wide corridor for access roads, and the footprint for off -corridor facilities and
extra workspaces. Atlantic described the APE for historic architecture (above ground) resources as the area
for direct effects plus the surrounding areas within view of new construction, or changes to the landscape.
The size of this APE varied according to the topography and surroundings.
Atlantic conducted surveys for the original route, reroutes, and smaller route adjustments. This
discussion addresses only the cultural resources within the current APE. Atlantic has completed cultural
resources surveys of approximately 94.5 percent of the proposed project facilities, leaving 2,938 acres, or
5.5 percent of the project workspace remaining to be surveyed.
Surveys, reporting, and NRHP determinations are not complete for cultural resources along ACP.
Atlantic continues to conduct reconnaissance surveys for those areas not yet surveyed, and has begun
evaluative testing for sites in the APE that cannot be avoided. Atlantic would file with us reports on surveys
and evaluative testing as they are prepared, and will continue to consult with the relevant SHPOs and other
stakeholders regarding site significance, as well as evaluative testing plans, treatment plans, and mitigation
of adverse effects on historic properties.
West Virginia
In West Virginia, Atlantic submitted separate reports for archaeology and historic architecture
surveys. As described in section 2.1, the portion of ACP in West Virginia includes a portion of the AP -I
mainline, two new M&R stations, one pig launcher, and a newly proposed Compressor Station 1 (in Lewis
4-415 Cultural Resources

F Pe- I
h 4e--
rf
F.pl?eo,l $I crvgz
ot o -11;v 111,edf 16
Rtlj�k / -re /0 Co�-247.0".7 _ /C 16,�
— re m t) ve Av-1 lell, 4. A"
:E�/
;qD7L- 15�Ilelole—
PIT, W -a
Z-& M
7 1p
Ale

C-37
APPENDlXC-1
REVISED
Weiland
and Waterbody Crossings for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline within
the
U.S. Amy Corps of Engineers – Wilmington District
WB
permancat
Access
Temporary
Affmied
Road
Affected
Bank
single
Walaboaly
Center-
Bank
Length pecia—cal
Weiland
Complete
Centerline,
Ime
I.,ength
Access WaterbGdy
Temporary
Wetland
Welland
Crossing
Project Facdvty
Watborly Waterbody Crossing
Crossing
Workspace
Road Impact
Construction Cowardat
Impact
Conversion
Loss State Reg
Taneol'Year
fly'
MP Feature, ID' County HUC 8 Crossed '
Name Reg-. (feel)
(fee)
(fina)
(fee) (.—)
Method' Class
(.—) I
(—) '
(a—)' Class
Restrictimis
Lamudc
Longitude
NC AP -3
9 9 wam002f Northampton 03010204 Penn ROW, Surv,
Welland NA 149
NA
NA
NA NA
op. Cut- PFO
037
010
000 NA
NA
3653496
-7733990
029
County Co., Tempi
Weiland
ATWS, Tenap
ROW
NC AP -3
100 wnrbl02f Northampton 03010204 Penn ROW, SurA,
Welland NA 1405
NA
NA
NA NA
Open Cut- PFO
242
098
000 NA
NA
3653448
-7733632
030
County Corr, Troup ROW
Welland
100 sim,004 Northampton 03010204 SmAr Cou, Temp
UNT to Cypms Permanial NA
NA
128
NA NA
Not Crassed by NA
NA
NA
NA C
NA
3653398
-7733938
County ROW
Creek
Centerline
100 s=003 Northampton 03010204 Perot ROW, Sury
Cypress Creek Perennial 33
NA
92
NA NA
Open Cut NA
NA
NA
NA C
NA
3653397
-7733878
County Cort, Tempi ROW
NC AP -3
102 s-002 Northampton 03010204 Perar ROW, Sury
UNT to Cypress Perenumal 4
NA
52
NA NA
Dam and Pump or NA
NA
NA
NA C
NA
3653438
-7733486
030
county Corr
Creek
Flume
103 smartoot Northampton 03010204 Penn ROW, Sm
Cypress Creek Perennial 3
NA
77
NA NA
Data and Pump or NA
NA
NA
NA C
NA
36.53493
-7733326
county Corr, Tempi ROW
Flume
NC AP -3
10.5 wnrb101f Northampton 03010204 Penn ROW. Surv,
Welland NA NA
NA
NA
NA NA
Not Crossed by PFO
000
000
000 NA
NA
36.53664
-7733103
031
county coff
Conterme
NC AP -3
107 wnvbl00f Northampton 03010204 Perot ROW, Sury
Weiland NA 329
NA
NA
NA NA
Open Cut- PFO
055
0.23
000 NA
NA
36.53744
-7732786
032
county Corr, Tempi ROW
Welland
NC AP -3
108 surrOO4 Northampton 03010204 Penn AR, Sury
UNT to Mchermi Ephmcml NA
NA
0
NA 000
Perot AR NA
NA
NA
NA C
NA
3653424
-7732370
033
County coff
River
NC AP -3
112 s-001 Northampton 03010204 Penn AR, S—
UNT to Mehmn Intermittent NA
9
32
NA 000
Perm AR NA
NA
NA
NA C
NA
3653818
-7731916
034
County coff
RiAcr
NC AP -3
116 sarp,012 Northampton 03010204 Penn ROW, Sury
UNT to liftermattent 4
NA
76
NA NA
Dam and Pump or NA
NA
NA
NA C
NA
3654196
-7731219
035
County Coff, Tempa ROW
Melarrim River
Flume
NC AP -3
.."itarrap-it 03010204 Penn ROW, Surv,
Welland NA 1044
NA
NA
NA NA
open cut- PFO
188
072
NA
NA
36.54379
-7730551
036
Corr, em
T p ROW
i
FNA
Welland i
Northampton 03010204 Penn ROW, Sure
Welland NA 80
NA
NA
NA
Open Cut- PFO
012
005
rO 00
00 NA
NA
3654447
-7730312
County riania ROW
_ I
Welland I
Single and Complete project ID identities each separate and distant crassing as a Single and Complete Project, or groups crossings water fratures according USACE guidance A Single and Complete Project my include mom than one wctland andlorwtcrbody together and subtatals an,
p—ded for where, nndhple water feature
—��.gswmtitutcaSmglemdComplc[cPmjm
FmtmiDnmquetomchwalabodyorwetlmddelm�iod Features starting w�th a "W'am wetlands, features starting with "e'am Avaterbodics, features starting with "o" Ame open water ponds, and features starting wnh "DIC' areAvellands
or watediorlies that have
been added based on
desktop nevico, where survey access
is not
available
Project Facility Crossed calumn includes die following cracgones and each is defted below
Penn AR = Pervienticat Access Road
Temp AR = Temporary Access RoadCPY
Penn ROW = P—.t Right-af-Way
Tempi ROW = Temporary ROW
Tomp, CPY = Temporary Contractor Yard (impacts on writers at contractor yards will be avoided)
Temporary Affected Bank Length Workspace win= represents temporary impacts wsocialod wah numaline pipeline construction
and is determined based on the waterbody bank length �thrn the construction workspuee
Temporary Affected Bank Lesigth Access Road column represents the waterbody bank length that my be liaripmardly impacted due to access mad we or temporary improvement
Coustnuctima Method cohmar, includes trenchlum construction methods for waterbodica that have a pipchne cratedure coassing length For waterbodim That are not crossed by the pipeline conterlion
or other =quo facility cornporrents
this colarnin
=its "Not Crossed by Centerline" For mdands that intersect Perin ROW, wetlands
will be open cut, as indicated in the table. For watcrboibc� and wetlands that unmect unique facility components (eg, compressor stations, contractor yards) the column refers to the unique facility
crossed and identifies the natum ofthe plmmW
impacts Planned access mad unianiveratents ano also identified in this column
(mg ,
Replace CuIvcrL Penn AR – Wedand Loss,, ctc )
Cowardin Classification for wetlands, PEM = palmume conergent, PSS = palustrune scrub -shrub, and PFO = palustrine forested
Welland Impact columus include acreagc of temporary impacts with pmjmt workspacc that will be restated and allowed to revegetatc to pre -construction canditions, after construction is complete, conversion impacts will result from operational maintenance ofthe
pipeline right-tif-way, changing PSS and PFO
wetiand types
to PEM and
PEMIPSS respectively, and loss impacts will result from filling wetlands for permanent access mad construction or improvements
Survey Features represent wetlands and waterbodua that have been documented during field surweys and for which data theez ame included in the Welland and Waterbody Delineation Report. Provisional Fcaturcs have been aided via
deskilop —
ofavailable desktop resources and other available data
Section 10, Nawgable Water crossang
Conversion impacts to wetlands As well as other temporary impacts �11 not occur between HUD entry ad exot pornis
C-37

)Oro r- e- 141 -e-
OWN
IC
no � e
h t --(r 'w
L/
�T WA 617ce 647 rA Ili Ose;,7
L/
A AV" 47 4EAlLt- IVC- 0 Wk -17;- a
h
Le,
D. S
k514 etj deorloak-e- rCver
r I-VIall e-je rv-e-

ACP - Possibility
5/8/2017 Application received
6/23/2017 Public Notice Issued
7/25/2017 Public Hearing 1
7/27/2017 Public Hearing 2
7/28/2017 Comment Period Ends
9/25/2017 60 days / Final Decision
46 days between app received and notice
32 days between notice and 1 st hearing
35 total comment period (rule is 30)
60 days between last hearing and decision
Sutton
12/22/2015 Application Received
1/28/2016 More info Received
2/4/2016 More Info Received
2/11/2016 Public Notice
3/15/2016 Public Hearing
4/14/2016 Comment Period Ends
5/14/2016 Ready to issue
51 days between app received and notice
33 days between notice and 1 st hearing
63 total comment period (rule is 30)
60 days between last hearing and decision

KIWRAM
�rpl
4c /4j
4e- '
517
/V'O v 20 1-7 '7
oldv-,et, U -o
1-e c V
J,
epic
*,,6; r� Al 140'2 --7f!7,.,6jW i 74 e417
0)
4cce,55-.1-*ok -A
? . K
6 A--,eXe,,lf /7_o,-)
4 4_ci c /eg vs At q
71vlly_�Ien removAl2 41CAA-�:f
o vel— 7- 0 o nip e,,; -,v 4cfr
�7
V r)-7 e.,'/ 4,74i/ -e - /trcl
j
- — ?�'l �? If 111-1 1 zb k,
a -7

Acv
li c Xect 4 'A -L,2
vv. O_Oce_�_f
hns- 10 -ark Pe. In A, -e --
j6 e / al Red -7h e, h(j-
/7 cev-,7,,, J
A4o.-1 lkLe-
C/&s 0
I
—cloy
Check 1"

c
Email
J& 14 o0accle,04.0 a
-,�Q f, in c sg r r-,. ('� P— 0 -�L ri t 1) /-N SPOnceC 801\ COA-\

J�' -kayz-k
A "t C' amp lip -A A, et -/761)7 /1 /-/7
f -.- -#�q—
%5il-e- Suj�Ail'lj- jo 6NL'--4 01-on't Alr-'��
Y
ca vle-
Or- e CA 'KY C""ej kv
-IV araA--,l 2 '�?4 bveyLe
.7 It
-4e X^c
gt" -APl t IrAhdA17d?!;z
lelf'V1OgA74e-"71
robn 19/01.1- . > Ar )��c re- m 0 "A
le 117 e n zov�&- Ile, V'h It-l-l"Vaqc
lei/ -1 exy /7,7
A
I-VA/f -7 1� 0 r A,( til L72e 1017 (14 r-zt--ILP Oft
Ll eye ,,I -
aa A7 143Se ff �-VeO
c,� 7 6 7w e- /ec,�7 -i c
x
-�y Ke c
�lk,,-C,4 /Yom xj�vro
A

jo
0 k7a If& Go, 1-400"n e-17 W/,
Af SD-fk !Y--kVw Oe,--1)z-ne e- o �e
6,--e-e-r