20140957 Ver 2_Env Justice - No Date_20180427

XA 1� .,
TABLE U-1
Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within I Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian
Hispanic or
Black or
American
and Other
Some
Twoor
Latino
Percent
African
Indian and
Pacific
other
more
origin (of
Total Minority
Median
Below
Total population White (%)
a- American
Alaska
Asian
Islander
race (%)
races
any race)
Population
income
Poverty
Project/Location
a
b
(%)a
Native (%) a
(%)8
N"
a
Na
Na
N"
(dollars) a
Level (%) 0
United States
314,107,084
73.8
12.6
0.8
5
0.2
4.7
2.9
16.9
26.2
$26,714
15.6
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
West Virginia
1,853,881
93.6
3.2
0.2
0.7
0
0.3
2
1.3
64
$22,148
18.1
Harrison
69,069
95.8
1.7
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.1
1.3
1.4
4.2
N/A
N/A
CT 313
2,595
98.3
0.7
0
0
0
0.2
0.8
1
1.7
$25,184
12.5
CT 314
2,860
947
0
0
1 5
0
0.3
35
0.3
5.3
$20,998
15.5
Lewis
16,412
97.2
0.9
'0
0.2
0.1
0
1.7
0.2
2.9
N/A
N/A
CT 9672 c
3,549
95.5
0
0
0.3
0
0
4.2
0
4.5
$19,656
CT 9673
3,818
98.7
0.1
0
0
05
0
0.7
0
1.3
$24,754
9.8
CT 9674
2,596
99.2
0
0
0.3
0
0
0.4
0.8
0.7
$20,677
19.5
Pocahontas 1
8,710
96.7
1.5
0.1
0
0
0
1.7
0.4
3.3
N/A
N/A
CT 9601.01 d
1,186
99.9
0
0
0
0
0.1
0
0.8
01
$23,185
13
CT 9601.02
1,172
93.1
5.5
0
0
0
0
1.4
0
6.9
$20,815
15.1
CT 9602 d
3,800
95.8
1
0
0
0
0
3.2
0.4
4.2
$17,764
E: �3
Randolph
29,446
97
1.4
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
09
0.7
3
N/A
N/A
CT 9659 c
4,087
97.2
1.8
1
0
0
0
0
1
2.8
$18,578
16.1
CT 9664 d
5,579
98.8
0.3
0
0
0
0
0.9
0.2
1.2
$23,344
12.4
CT 9665 d
4,541
96.9
28
0.1
0
0
0
0.2
0.1
3.1
$15,620
E�-21 �-7
Upshur
24,487
97.6
0.9
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.9
1.1
2.4
N/A
N/A
CT9666d
4,690
97.8
0
0.3
0
0
0
1.9
0
2.2
$20,761
[ '20.9
CT 9668
3,673
995
05
0
0
0
0
0
3.6
0.5
$17,829
L,27.1
CT 9669
3,347
98.6
0
0
1.4
0
0
0
0
1.4
$26,125
17.1
CT 9670
4,870
96.4
2.1
0
0
1
0
0.5
0
3.6
$20,640
17.4
CT 9671
4,361
989
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
1.1
$20,290
16.7
Virginia
8,185,131
69.3
19.3
0.3
5.8
0.1
2.2
3.1
8.4
30.8
$31,329
11.5
Amelia
12.764
72.5
24.9
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.5
1.4
0.9
27.5
N/A
N/A
CT 9301
6,697
713
261
0.2
02
0
0.7
1 4
1.4
28.6
$30,589
10.8
Augusta 1
73,707
93
4.1
0.3
0.6
0
1
1
2.3
7
N/A
N/A
CT 701 d
5,477
74.5
22.6
0
0.6
0
1.5
0.8
2.8
E�77�5.5,
$15,487
-15.12
F
CT 702
3,666
909
08
0
0.3
0.1
7
0.8
9.4
9
$28,977
12.4
CT 708
5,868
96.2
2.6
0
0.3
0
0
0.9
0.3
3.8
$28,306
8.1
CT 709
4,822
94.9
3.4
0
0
0
0
1.7
1.5
5.1
$27,757
9.9

C�
t�j
TABLE U-1 (cont'd)
Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within I Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian
Hispanic or
Black or
American
and Other
Some
Two or
Latino
Percent
African
Indian and
Pacific
other
more
origin (of
Total Minority
Median
Below
Total population
White (%)
American
Alaska
Asian
Islander
race (%)
races
any race)
Population
income
Poverty
Project/Location
a
b
N 8
Native (%)
(%) a
N a
9
N 8
N a
N I
(dollars) 8
Level (%) 8
CT 711.01
4,163
93.7
3.2
0
0
0
1.1
2
1.5
6.3
$26,220
18.7
CT 711.02
5,934
97.5
2.1
0.5
0
0
0
0
2
2.6
$26,604
3.8
CT 712
5,876
93.6
3.8
0.1
1.2
0
0.3
1
0.4
6.4
$27,698
7.3
Bath f
4,644
91.7
5.9
0
0
0
0
2.3
1.8
8.2
N/A
N/A
CT 9201 C, d
4,644
91.7
5.9
0
0
0
0
2.3
1.8
8.2
$26,429
9.3
Brunswick
16,961
41.7
56.4
0.3
0
0
0.5
1.1
1.9
58.3
N/A
N/A
CT 9301
3,511
43.7
52.3
1.5
0
0
0
2.5
0
56.3
$22,048
16.9
CT 9302.01
2,301
24
75.2
0
0.2
0
0.2
0.3
0.8
75.9
$14,922
20.8
CT 9302.03 c. d
4.321
34.9
63.2
0
0
0
1.1
0.8
5.4
65.1
$18,389
28.9
CT 9303
5,231
60.1
39.3
0
0
0
0.1
0.5
0.4
39.9
$19,258
24.6
Buckingham
17,072
62.2
34.7
0
0.2
0
0.7
2.1
2
37.7
N/A
N/A
CT 9301.01
4,200
68.3
27.9
0
0
0
2.1
1.8
5.6
31.8
$22,752
26.6
CT 9302.01
5,954
54.4
42.7
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.4
2
1.2
45.6
$16,396
20.7
CT 9302.02 d
4.239
71.7
23.7
0
0.6
0
0.3
3.7
0.6
28.3
$23,583
22.5
Cumberland
9,916
63.1
34.4
0.7
0
0
0
1.8
0.1
36.9
N/A
N/A
CT 9301
6,375
64.3
33.4
1.1
0
0
0
1.1
0
35.6
$22,036
15.5
CT 9302
3,541
60.8
36.3
0
0
0
0
2.9
0.3
39.2
$26,778
24
Dinwiddie
27,993
64.8
32.7
0.1
0.3
0
0.4
1.6
2.7
35.1
N/A
N/A
CT 8401
5,446
71.7
27.1
0
0.4
0
0
0.7
0.3
28.2
$25,418
17.6
CT 9801
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
Greensville
11,911
38.2
59.7
0.4
0.4
0
0.4
1
2
61.9
N/A
N/A
CT 8801.01 c
4,253
41.8
57
0.5
0
0
0.3
0.4
1.3
58.2
$20,532
18.4
CT 88021
4,391
37.6
60.9
0.1
1.1
0
0
0.3
0
62.4
$20,473
21.5
Highland 1
2,258
99.8
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0
0.2
N/A
N/A
CT 9701 d
2,258
99.8
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0
0.2
$23,482
12.5
Isle of Wight e
35,518
71.4
23.4
0.1
1.1
0
1
3
2.3
28.6
N/A
N/A
CT 2804
3,773
84.2
15.6
0.2
0
0
0
0
0.5
15.8
$24,411
13.2
Nelson ' 1
14,892
83.6
13.6
0.2
0.4
0
1.6
0.5
3.3
16.3
N/A
N/A
CT 9501
5,588
79.7
18.7
0.3
0.7
0
0.1
0.5
1.3
20.3
$25,272
19.8
CT 9502
4,965
90.2
7.2
0
0.6
0
1
1
2.8
9.8
$30,657
6.9
CT 9503
4,339
81.1
14.5
0.2
0
0
4.1
0
6.5
18.8
$23,182
15
Nottoway
15,756
56.4
39.4
0.3
0.3
0
2.1
1.6
3.9
43.7
N/A
N/A
CT 1
6,395
50.3
43.5
0.6
0.5
0
3.6
1.5
5.9
49.7
$19,181
20.8

TABLE U-1 (cont'd)
Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within I Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
I '�-
Hawaiian
Hispanic or
Blackbr
American
and Other
Some
Two or
Latino
Percent
AfricaK
Indian and
Pacific
other
more
origin (of
Total Minority
Median
Below
Total population
White (%)
American
Alaska
Asian
Islander
race
races
any race)
Population
income
Poverty
Project/Location
a
b
N2
Native (%) 0
(%) 11
N 2
a
N 8
(%)-a
N a
(dollars) a
Level (%) 11
CT 2
2,731
71.6
26.3
0
0
0
1
1.2
1
28.5
$26,161
20.3
1
CT 3
6,620
56
40.6
0.2
0.2
0
1.2
1.8
3.3
44
$20,084
L 21.3
CT 9801
10
0
1 00.j.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
_I00
L--- --- -- J
-
0
Prince Edward
23,140
63.7
33.6,
0.1
1.2
0
0.5
1
2.4
36.4
N/A
N/A
CT 9301
7,241
53.3
42.6,
0
3.4
0
0.3
0.3
1
[-41-6.6 -1
$16,842
F-36�
Rockbridge f
22,367
93.9
29
02-
0.7
01
07
16
1 5
6.2
N/A
N/A
CT 9301 d
8,117
94.1
2.7
0
1.2
0.2
0
1.7
0.9
5.8
$24,280
14.5
CT 9302
4,087
96.7
0.5
0
0.6
0
1.3
0.9
1.8
3.3
$20,586
L 15.2
Southampton
18,364
61
363
0 3
0 1
0
03
2.1
1 3
39.1
N/A
N/A
CT 2004
6,298
61.4
36.2
0.3
0
0
0.7
1.4
1
38.6
$27,520
16.4
CT 2005
3,516
53.1
42.7
0
0.5
0
0.1
3.7
0.3
47
$22,512
E 13.3
Chesapeake, City of
228,168
625
29.8
0.3
32
01
1 1
2.9
49
37.4
N/A
N/A
CT 205
1,381
47.7
28.2
0
2.4
0
21.4
0.3
29.5
52.3
$21,671
7.1
CT 206
4,240
82
15
0
0.3
0
0
2.7
7.1
18
$29,805
7.3
CT 207
5,305
22.3
751
0
0
0
0
25
5.7
j7-7-7.6--]
$22,972
CT 209.03
2,588
26
70.5
0.2
1.8
0
0
1.5
4.7
74
$32,525
9.9
CT 209.04
8,616
59.9
31.7
0
4.3
0
0.2
3.9
2.9
40.1
$41,867
10.2
CT209.05
2,753
787
17.1
0
3.9
0
0
0.3
12.5
21.3
$34,107
7.7
CT 213.01
5,401
68.1
27.8
0.2
1.4
0.2
1.1
1.4
3.5
32.1
$36,708
7.8
CT 213.02
9,740
59.1
33
0
2.1
0
1.2
4.5
5.8
40.8
$42,722
6.5
CT 214 01
1,884
65.9
283
0.5
0
0
23
3
23
34.1
$39,132
8.3
CT 214 02
6,534
75.2
19.7
0
1.8
0
0.2
3.2
0.9
24.9
$34,986
10
CT 214.03
4,586
59.2
30.6
0.8
0
0
6.6
2.7
8.3
40.7
$23,675
F .8
CT 214 04
7,620
22
75
0
1.5
0
1.4
02
6.7
781
$26,045
L __14.9
CT 216.01
10,725
51.1
38.6
0.5
3.9
0
1.9
4.1
6.8
49
$36,667
10.5
Franklin, City of
8,534
38.8
58
0
0.9
0
0.2
2.2
0.6
il.i
N/A
N/A
CT 901 d
4,830
604
35
0
1.4
0
0.3
3
1
397
$26,535
7.7
CT 902
3,704
10.7
87.9
0
0.2
0
0
1.2
0
777-89.3
$12.684
48-9
Suffolk, City of
85,477
52.3
41.9
0.1
1.4
0
0.6
3.8
3.3
4i.6
N/A
N/A
CT 753 02
2,271
718
20.4
04
1
0
1.1
53
1.7
28.2
$34,259
19.2
CT 754.02
4,117
53.7
40
0
0.8
0
1.6
4
68
46.4
$44,191
5.2
CT 754.03
4.314
46
46
0
1.2
0
3.1
3.8
4.4
54.1
$41,023
5.8
CT 754.04
971
90.7
9.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.3
$41,773
1.3

14
TABLE U-1 (cont'd)
Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics
for Census
Tracts Within
1 Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian
Hispanic or
Black or
American
and Other
Some
Two or
Latino
Percent
African
Indian and
Pacific
other
more
origin (of
Total Minority
Median
Below
Total population
White
American
Alaska
Asian
Islander
race (%)
races
any race)
Population
income
Poverty
,ct/Location
b
a
Native a
(%) a
M I
a
M a
M 8
M I
(dollars)
Level (%)
CT 754.05
2.192
92.5
6.9
0
0
0.4
0
0.2
0.5
7.5
$36,129
1.7
CT 755.01
4,735
46.2
48.2
0
0.7
0
0.1
4.8
1.2
53.8
$26,866
20.4
CT 755.02
4,370
51.8
40.5
0
5
0
0.7
2
2.3
48.2
$36,964
7
CT 757.02
3,555
74.6
22.4
0
0
0
0
3
2.4
25.4
$37,386
7.6
CT 757.03
1,344
70.3
29.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
29.7
$26,313
4.9
CT 758.01
2,872
80.2
17.2
0.9
0.3
0
0.2
1.2
0.6
19.8
$26,891
4.7
CT 758.02
1,677
53.5
44.1
0
1
0
0
1.4
0
46.5
$24,979
7.9
CT 758.03
1,343
75.9
20.5
0
0
0
0
3.6
2.6
24.1
$33,772
15.3
)rth Carolina
9,750,405
69.6
21.5
1.2
2.4
0.1
3
2.3
8.7
30.5
$24,957
17.6
Cumberland
324,002
52
36.2
1.2
2.3
0.3
2.5
5.4
10.4
47.9
N/A
N/A
CT 14 d
6,038
47.7
45.4
3.1
0
0
0.3
3.5
5.4
52.3
$20,906
23.6
CT 26 c
4,041
69
25.7
1.5
1.2
0
0.1
2.5
0.4
31
$27,145
17.2
CT 27
8,742
69.8
20.7
0
2.3
0.4
2.5
4.3
6.3
30.2
$28,/829
8.2
CT 28
6,538
80.2
12.1
1.7
0.2
0.7
0.8
4.3
2.3
19.8
$26,374
12.2
CT 29
4,639
67.3
24
1.3
1.8
0
0
5.7
5.6
32.8
$26,484
17.1
CT 30.01
11,543
65
19.3
5.5
1.2
0
3.7
5.3
10.5
35
$31,878
8.9
CT 30.02
2,789
69.2
24.1
3.4
0
0
1
2.3
9.5
30.8
$25,432
13.4
CT 37
7,035
72.4
22.2
1.1
0.2
0
0
4.2
6.3
27.7
$29,625
13.1
Halifax
53.803
40
51.6
3.3
0.8
0
0.9
3.4
2.4
60
N/A
N/A
CT 9306
4,085
36.4
57
0.7
1.2
0
1.2
3.5
2
63.6
$17,943
26.6
CT 9308
5,667
8.3
51
Co>
1.2
0.1
1.6
8.5
3.4
91.7
$15,304
29.7
CT 9309
5,026
9.1
8 .6
0.1
1.6
0
0
0.7
0
91
$13,533
34
CT 931 0 d
3,285
25.4
6 .1
9
1.3
0.2
0
0
6
1.1
74.6
$18,516
17.3
CT 9301
3,272
24.4
73..
0.1
0
0
0
1.7
0.3
75.6
$14,967
40.2
Johnston
175,343
78.5
15.1
0.4
0.7
0
3.1
2.2
13.1
21.5
N/A
N/A
CT 401
6,263
85.5
13.2
0
0
0
0.9
0.4
8.8
14.5
$22,975
22.8
CT 403.01
3,535
53.7
20.7
1.8
0
0
(79)
1.2
(-K5
46.3
$15,600
41.2
CT 404
4.335
82.6
10.5
0
0.1
0
6
0.7
16.7
17.3
$22,165
20.3
CT 406 d
3,354
59.1
27.6
0
0.6
0
11.6
1.1
15.5
40.9
$17,420
23.6
CT 407 1
3,399
60.9
27
0.2
7.1
0
2.5
2.2
6.4
39
$18,182
18.3
CT 412.02
5,413
87.4
7.5
0.5
0.1
0
4.4
0
(ffl>
12.5
$17,267
35.7
CT 413
5,686
76.8
14.7
0.4
0
0
3.9
4.2
9.4
23.2
$20,622
23.1
CT 414
6,768
71
14.5
0
1
0
11.5
2.1
17.3
29.1
$20,698
26.8
14

Pennsylvania
12,758,729
3 1 Ll Lo .3j 1610 &
10.9
0.2
3
0
2
2
6.1
18.1
$26,729
13.5
Greene
38,171
TABLE U-1
(cont'd)
0.5
0.2
0
0.3
1.3
1.3
7.7
N/A
Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census
Tracts Within
1 Mile of the Atlantic
Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
6.5
0
0.1
0
0
0.3
0.9
6.9
Native
10.4
CT 9703 d
4,520
98.9
0.2
0
0.2
0
0.1
0.6
0.3
1.1
Hawaiian
12.4
CT 9705.01
Hispanic or
57.3
33.3
2.8
0.3
0.1
2.1
Black or
American
42.8
and Other
Some
Two or
Latino
Percent
African
Indian and
Pacific
other
more
origin (of
Total Minority
Median
Below
Total population White a-
American
Alaska
Asian
Islander
race (%)
races
any race)
Population
income
Poverty
zt/Location
a
b
N,
Native (%) '
(%) a
N I
a
N I
N 8
N a
(dollars) 8
Level (%)
Nash
95,174
55.1
37.8
0.7
0.8
0
3.4
2.3
6.4
45
N/A
N/A
CT 107
2,538
39.1
(2)
0
1.3
0
0
4.4
1.8
60.8
$22,102
11.4
CT 108
7,087
79.1
20.2
0.3
0.1
0
0.2
0.2
0.8
21
$30,743
9.9
CT 111.01
5,582
49.5
43.7
0
0
0
3
3.9
7.7
50.6
$26,202
11.7
CT 111.02
7,647
65.8
29
3.2
0
0
0.9
0.9
1 6
34
$22,013
19.1
CT 113
5,163
72.9
9.4
0
0
0
elf F)
2.2
23.6
*6
27
$22,208
13.4
CT 114
4,748
52
27.9
0.5
0.4
0
1.1
48
$23,612
18.1
Northampton
21,310
40.1
56.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
2.9
1.7
59.9
N/A
N/A
CT 9201
5,141
65.1
32.6
0
0
0
0
2.4
1.8
35
$24,813
16.4
CT 9203 c
6,180
19.1
<S)
0.2
0.1
0
0
5.1
0.4
81
$17,625
32.3
Robeson
134,913
30.8
24.1
37.6
0.8
0.1
3.8
2.9
8.1
69.3
N/A
N/A
CT 9601.01
4,057
54
CiD
5.3
0
0
4.1
2.1
<jD
45.9
$17,859
43
CT 9601.02
4,970
54.9
21.5
16.7
0.5
0
2.5
3.8
9.3
45
$17,449
23.3
CT 9602.01
5,879
46.4
30.7
16
0
0
2.9
4
5
53.6
$19,557
22.5
CT 9602.02
4,446
22.5
9.8
Qg�)
0.9
0
4.4
3.9
QjC>
77.5
$18,844
33.1
CT 9603
7,167
36.6
C-3-59-)
22.1
0.3
0.5
2.2
2.3
C20,73
'W7
63.3
$16,283
43.8
CT 9604.01
7,782
9.1
2
(�8�2.�4
0.7
0
0.6
5.2
90.9
$17,623
36.3
CT 9604.02
3,654
11.2
7.3
1 .3
0
4.3
2
5.8
88.8
$19,864
29.4
CT 9605.01
3,612
4.5
9.3
0
0
0.2
4.7
0.7
95.5
$17,737
32.3
CT 9606
6,920
16
10.9
1.1
0
4.1
0.7
6.5
84.1
$17,718
29.8
CT 9607.01
6,253
22.4
6.1
1
0
12.7
3.5
QM
77.5
$19,694
36.3
Sampson
63,842
58.5
26
1.7
0.3
0
10.8
2.7
17.5
41.5
N/A
N/A
CT 9703.01
5,932
75.2
15.2
0.1
0.3
0
5.2
4.1
13.4
24.9
$25,698
18.7
\Mlson
81,499
51.1
38.6
0.4
0.9
0.1
6.9
2.1
9.8
49
N/A
N/A
CT 15
5,668
69.6
15.2
0
0.1
0
12.4
2.6
17
30.3
$26,142
13.1
CT 16
3,179
69.2
20.4
1.1
0.4
0
8.8
0
8.8
30.7
$26,047
17.6
Pennsylvania
12,758,729
81.9
10.9
0.2
3
0
2
2
6.1
18.1
$26,729
13.5
Greene
38,171
92.3
5.4
0.5
0.2
0
0.3
1.3
1.3
7.7
N/A
N/A
CT 9702
3,204
93.2
6.5
0
0.1
0
0
0.3
0.9
6.9
$23,707
10.4
CT 9703 d
4,520
98.9
0.2
0
0.2
0
0.1
0.6
0.3
1.1
$26,172
12.4
CT 9705.01
5,130
57.3
33.3
2.8
0.3
0.1
2.1
4.2
7.2
42.8
$15,159
4.2

TABLE U-1 (cont'd)
Racial, Ethnic, and Poverty Statistics for Census Tracts Within 1 Mile of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Supply Header Project
Native
Hawaiian
Hispanic or
Black or
American
and Other
Some
Two or
Latino
Percent
African
Indian and
Pacific
other
more
origin (of
Total Minority
Median
Below
Total population
White
American
Alaska
Asian
Islander
race (%)
races
any race)
Population
income
Poverty
Project/Location a
b
N
Native
(%) 0
N
a
N 8
N a
N a
(dollars) e
Level (%) a
Westmoreland 362,587
95.1
2.3
0.1
0.9
0
0.2
1.3
1
4.8
N/A
N/A
CT 8017.02 4,607
99.9
0
0.1
0
0
0
0
0.3
0.1
$32,063
4.2
CT 8017.03 2,750
99.8
02
0
0
0
0
0
04
02
$24,167
4.3
CT 8019 d 6,605
95.6
1
0
1.1
0
0
2.2
0.3
4.3
$25,504
4.7
CT 8020.01 c 2,562
96.1
1
0
2.5
0
0.1
0.4
0.8
4
$29,909
3.1
CT 8020 02 7,673
94.8
07
0.2
3.3
0
0.1
1
1,2
53
$31,727
6.6
CT 8021.02 c 6,048
96.5
0
6'
1.8
0
0
1.6
3.2
3.4
$37,182
5.7
West Virginia 1,853,881
93.6
3.2
0.Z
0.7
0
0.3
2
1.3
6.4
$22,148
18.1
Doddridge 8,282
97.2
09
0.1
0
0
0
1.8
1
2.8
N/A
N/A
CT 9650 d 3,906
97.8
0.4
0.3
0
0
0
1.6
0.7
2.3
$19,244
11
Harrison 69,069
95.8
1.7
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.1
1.3
VA
4.2
N/A
N/A
CT 314 c 2,860
947
0
0
1 5
0
03
3.5
0 3
5.3
$20,998
15.5
Lewis 16,412
97.2
0.9
0
0.2
0.1
0
1.7
0.2
2.9
N/A
N/A
CT 9672 c 3,549
95.5
0
0
0.3
0
0
4.2
0
4.5
$19,656
F --?2
Marshall 32,716
978
0.9
0.3
0.4
0
0.2
0.5
0 9
2.3
N/A
N/A
CT 209 4,435
98.1
1.1
0.1
0.3
0
0
0.3
0
1.8
$22,830
11.4
Ritchie 10,221
98.3
0.4
0
0
0
0
1.3
0.6
1.7
N/A
N/A
CT 9623 d 4,333
985
0.3-,
0
0
0
0
1.2
1 2
1.5
$19,398
1-ilE_-
Tyler 9,084
98.8
0.2
0.1
0
0
0
0.8
0.6
1.1
N/A
18
CT 9620 2,161
99.4
0
0.4
0
0
0
0.3
0
0.7
$18,830
16.8
Wetzel 16,314
986
0.1
0
0.5
0.1
0
0 7
0.6
1.4
N/A
N/A
CT 304 2,936
99.5
0
0 2
0
0
0
0.3
0.5
0.5
$18,190
F 24.6 -
CT 305 C. d 4,251
98.6
0
0
0.6
0.3
0
0.5
0
1.4
$19,390
L 23.6
Sources:
a U.S. Census Bureau 2014.
b White Alone, Not Hispanic or Latino
C Census tract contains permanent aboveground facility.
d Census tract contains contractor yard.
e Includes census tracts within one mile of the proposed pipeline facilities and major aboveground
facilities, but does not contain
any project facilities.
f Counties with federal lands crossed by the
projects.
P[eyAlghlightqq values indicate percentage exceeds thresholds defined in text, and is an environmental justice population.

"'Nnthing Compares -
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Justice Basic Process, 2016
Department ofEnvironmental Quality

NCDEQ will go beyond state
and federal requirements to
ensure minority communities
are not negatively impacted by
Duke Energy Corporation coal
ash landfills.
NCDEQ will conduct an
environmentaijustice review of
each Duke Energy coal ash
landfill application and ask the
EPA Office of Civil Rights, the
U.S. Commission on Civil
Rights and its North Carolina
Advisory Committee to review
and approve the environmental
NCDEQ will conduct an environmental justice review of
each Duke Energy Corporation Coal Ash landfill
application, prior to permit issuance.
Community and Environmental
Data Collection
EPA EJ SCREEN — collect
demographics and environmental
d ata
US CENSUS BUREAU
Communication with local officials to discuss EJ concerns and options.
Open house forum with locals. (multiple, If needed)
Would the proposed facility contribute to greater adverse impacts, rather than
relying on just demographic data? Consider potential for multiple exposures or
cumulative exposure to HH&E in affected populations, as well as historical
patterns of exposure to environmental hazards.
Communicate and submit EJ analysis with EPA Office of Civil Rights, the
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and its North Carolina Advisory
Committee.
Administration's
leadership is
addressing the
decades -old issue
ofcoalash

including human health, econornic, DEQ would talk to Local Government about human
npn and nnnlicant will hold Public Meetings as
DEQ will draft an Environmental Impact Staterne eeded with local communities. Will have power
(EIS) for discussion and submittal to the EPA Offic points, posters, tables, handouts, one on one
Civil Rights, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and
; Ki k r, I; A,4 ; (I ;++ communication, Will discuss mitigation measures and
LZ) UIL C11U HO V Ouly u111111 VV
I
and social effects of Federal actions,
health, economic, and social effects of Federal
includinq effects on minori
actions, including effects on minority
populations, low-income populations,
populations, low-income populations, and Indian
and Indian tribes, when such analysis
tribes. Conduct Road Recon.
is re uired
. Mitigation measures identified as
part of an environmental impact
statement (EIS), should, whenever
feasible, address significant and
Community and
adverse environmental effects of
Environmental Data
proposed actions on minority
Collection
s
populations, low-income populations,
EPA EJ SCREEN — collect
disparate
and Indian tribes.
demographics and
unity?
- Must provide opportunities for
environmental data
effective community participation in
US CENSUS BUREAU
the NEPA process, including
identifying potential effects and
q
mitigation measures in consultation
with affected communities and
improving the accessibility of public
meetings, crucial documents, and
notices.
I

7"i S reening Tools
c
EJSCREEN and US CENSUS BUREAU
What is EJSCREEN?
Ilk,
7'ij;
` 117
EJ Screen - Further information can be found at httos://www.ei)a.qov/eiscreen . EJSCREEN can be used at: -'Ltps://eiscreen.ena.qov/mapper/
EPA has released EJSCREEN to the public in part to be more transparent about how the agency considers environmental justice in its work. There is no mandate or
guidance expressed or implied that state governments or other entities should use the tool or its underlying data.
EJSCREEN's EJ Indexes also include demographic information that is obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS). The 2015
version of EJSCREEN includes 2008-2012 ACS 5 -year summary file data, which is based on 2012 Census boundaries.
The American Community Survey (ACS) produces an annual estimate. Beginning in 2010, the ACS started using 5 year averages to provide estimates for all areas down to
Census Tracts and Census Block Groups.
EJSCREEN uses demographic factors as ve!y general indicators of a community's potential susceptibility to the types of environmental factors included in this
screening tool. EJSCREEN is not a detailed risk analysis, It is a screening tool that examines some of the relevant issues related to environmental "ustice, and
there is uncertainty in the data included. It is important to understand both of these limitations.
US Census Bureau?
U.S. Census Bureau — exampie. Race and Ethnicity Data -
ht4p-//'actfino�. I I I I :�': �', /'a bleservices/i sf/paq es/prod uctview. xhtml?pid= DEC 10 SF1 QTP3&prodType=table
Factors evaluated by either EJSCREEN or U.S. Census Bureau.:
Any tribal communities, sensitive communities (churches, schools, hospitals), sites reported to EPA, etc.
Race, Ethnicity, Age, Sex, Disability, Poverty, Household Income, Limited English Proficiency Populations
Department ofEnvironmental Quality
4 USEPAj

Section Guidelinesfor Evaluating EJ
The Section will be analyzing:
• Environmental effects on human health
• Economic effects of actions
• Social effects of actions
Effects on Minority Populations
• Effects on low-income populations
• Effects on Indian Tribes
Council of Environmental Quality, 1997, Environmental Justice - Guidance for NEPA,p.4
Buffers used for EJ evaluation:
0 1 mile radius evaluation of proposed landfills that are NOT transporting coal ash off-site.
i.e. North Carolina National Heritage Program provides lists of rare plants and animals, natural communities, and important
animal assemblages within a one -mile radius of a given polygon.
0 5 mile radius evaluation of proposed landfills that ARE transporting coal ash off/on site.
During EJ Evaluation:
A disparate community will be determined as:
0 50% or more minority
0 10% or more above county average
* 5% or more above county average for poverty level
Formulas used by NCDOT
Department of
Environmental Quality

dl!lDn6 ID]UdlUUOIIAUgjb jUduipDdd(j