Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140957 Ver 2_JAB Add Info2 rewrites_201709141. The project involves numerous stream crossings that have a potential to affect downstream water quality both temporarily during construction and permanently if these impacts are not avoided or minimized to maximum extent practicable. Your application and responses to the Division provide thorough general descriptions of the plans for the project. However, more site-specific detail is necessary to ensure that downstream water quality is protected. Provide the additional justification requested below: a. Add a column to the Wetland and Waterbody Crossing table (Appendix C-1) for each waterbody more than 30 feet in width that provides site specific reasons why each crossing could not be completed using the HDD method or a conventional bore to avoid impacts to the stream channel. b. Many crossings are proposed to be installed using the open cut method that do not make accommodations for the work to be completed in the dry or without exposure to flowing water. This type of crossing has the potential to introduce sediment into the stream channel that can cause degradation of downstream water quality with lasting effects. Provide the additional justification requested below: Provide a site-specific justification and crossing plan for all open cut crossings proposed. These plans should include turbidity curtain locations, and upstream/downstream water quality sampling locations for turbidity and total dissolved solids (sampling for total dissolved solids is only required within Water Supply Watershed areas). ii. Your July 12, 2017 response to the Division indicated that the open cut method was proposed for several crossings due to the presence of inundated wetlands. Many of these wetlands do not appear to be inundated based on aerial photography and identification of a discrete channel by the field survey. Provide documentation that the adjacent wetlands are inundated beyond the discrete channel for each of these crossings. iii. Your July 12, 2017 response to the Division also stated that utilizing a dry method for several stream crossings would result in more impact for a longer duration. Provide an explanation of the additional impact and duration of the impact compared to using a dry method, including site- specific plans showing the additional impact. iv. Both dam and pump and the flume method are listed for many stream crossings, provide the criteria for selecting one method over the other, including who will make the decision and when the decision will be made. v. The typical diagrams for each stream crossing method indicate that a temporary bridge will be installed if needed. Provide the criteria to determine if a temporary bridge will be needed. 1. If a temporary bridge isn't needed, explain how equipment will operate without crossing back and forth within the stream channel. c. Provide a restoration plan for all stream crossings. This can be accomplished by assigning a typical restoration plan for each different restoration plan that may involve restoration of preconstruction contours, laying back banks on incised streams or placement of riprap to ensure streambank stability where the conditions at the crossing warrant this protection. 2. Provide a plan to monitor all stream restoration through two growing seasons once vegetation is established. The plan must include visual monitoring at a minimum of quarterly for the first year or two bankfull events (whichever is longer), and then annually until the site is stable (particularly after storm events) and vegetation is successful. The plan must also include a requirement to provide annual reports to the Division including any failures of structures, stream banks, or vegetation that may require future repairs or replacement and coordination with the Division to ensure the stability and water quality of the stream and downstream waters. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(2) and (b)(3)] 3. Provide a plan to monitor all wetland restoration through two growing seasons once vegetation is established. The plan must include visual monitoring at a minimum of quarterly for the first year, and then annually until the site is stable and vegetation is successful. The plan must include provisions to