20130398 Ver 2_Response to Additional Information Request_20180209

Carpenter,Kristi
From: Hood, Donna
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 9:51 AM
To: Carpenter,Kristi
Subject: FW: [External] Oakdale Road Widening Project (DWR
20130398v.2, SAW 2013-00714) - Response to
Additional Information Request
Attachments: 2017-0505.Oakdale Road Widening.2.6.18.Response
to Additional Information Request.pdf
Kristi Lynn,
Response received from BIMS #20130398, the project I put on hold.
Thanks! !
Donna
From: Aliisa Harjuniemi [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 7:48 AM
To: Hood, Donna <[e-mail]>; Amschler, Crystal C SAW
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Oakdale Road Widening Project (DWR 20130398v.2, SAW 2013-
00714) - Response to Additional Information Request
Hi Donna,
For your review, please find attached response letter to the your comments. Let me know if you have
any questions or need anything else to mark this application complete.
Crystal,
Please see the changes in the temporary impacts.
Thanks,
Aliisa
�Illuilii,�� II Ill�urv���u��ui�ui��li II �II..�..
�" ' i,u
II �u ����� Il���ur�����urv
�;t�i��.zVli�t�\iU����il �i`�ff `��� i�nr�n��a li��r�:.
","�t� Im \fU�,^e,fNi�tfil���.�io,R��,<< IS�.ziGV�,,rt��srel
�,I��tsi�V��ff� I�,It ^t',",�'Ez
��F l I�.," C:'� � 4��i f i�.,^' �„r ��,4 I.,�.,^'.,^'

�,�111(.,�;',^ /�1%I';a)/ ll//
www.cws-inc.net

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES� INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177(office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
February 6, 2018
Ms. Donna Hood
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St., 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Response to Request for Additional Information
Oakdale Road Widening Project (SAW 2013-00714, DWQ# 13-0398)
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2017-0505
Dear Ms. Hood,
Thank you for your letter, dated January 29, 2018, requesting revisions to the Oakdale Road
Widening project Water Quality Certification No. 4135 and Nationwide Permit No. 12 application.
This letter is in response to your comments on the project. A copy of your comments letter is
attached. Comments are addressed in the same order in which they were asked.
1. In-stream sediment and erosion control devices (sediment traps) are used in both
water bodies.
Sediments traps are removed from the plan. Attached are the revised impact Figures 8
and 9 and revised Construction Detail Sheets EC1 and EC2.
2. There are no temporary impacts listed for dewatering either site.
Coffer dam and check dams will be installed in order to allow the culvert replacements
and installations to be conducted in the dry. The cofferdams, rock check dams, and
pump around systems will be removed once work has been completed. Attached are
the revised impact Figures 8 and 9 and the revised PCN to reflect these changes.
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 2

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Response to Request for Additional Information
February 6, 2018
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Thank you for the opportunity to provide a response to your questions on this project. Please do
not hesitate to contact Aliisa Harjuniemi at 980-259-1222 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this response.
Sincerely,
��
Aliisa Harjuniemi, WPIT
Project Scientist
Attachments: NCDEQ Comments Letter
Revised Impact Figures (Figures 8-9)
Revised Construction Detail Sheets EC1 and EC2
Revised Pre-Construction Notification
Cc: Ms. Crystal Amschler, USACE
Ms. Leslie Bing, City of Charlotte
Page 2 of 2
Christine Geist, PWS, CE
Principal Scientist

En vironm en ta I
Qua(ity
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RCCEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Leslie Bing
City of Charlotte Engineerine and Property Management
600 East 4'�' Street
Charbtte. NC ?8202
ROY COOPER
cn,t•rnur
MICHAEL S. REGAN
sro�rao�r
LINDA CULPEPPER
ln(trlxi Ufrecrnr
January 29, 2017
Subject Proposed improvements to Oakdale Road in Mecklenbur�; County. DWR 20I30398v.2
Dear Ms. Bing:
The Division of Water Resources has reviewed your submittal for a d01 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for making
an informed permit decision. The pemiit applica[ion was deficient in the followin, areas:
• In-stream sediment and erosion wn[rol devices (sediment traps) are used in both waterbodies.
• There are no temporary impacts lis[ed for dewatering either si[e
Therefore, pursuan[ to I SA NCAC 2H .0507(a)(5). we will have to place the permit applica[ion on hold un[il we are
supplied the necessar}' infonnation. You have ? I days to respond in writing with the requested information or
notification to this oftice diat the information is forthcoming. It; at the end of the 21 days, this office has not
received this information in writing, we will assume you are withdrawing your application and it will be retumed.
Furthermore, until the intbnnation is received by the NC Division uf Water Resources, we request (by copy of [his
letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place the permit applica[ion on hold.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Donna Hood at [phone] or
d o nn a. h o o d@ n c d e n c go v.
Sincerely,
,�,/. �d(�'�� ` 4
�, Linda Culpepper, Interim Director
Division of Water Resources
Electronic copy only distribution:
Q�ystal Amschlec US Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Field Office
Larry Thompson, Division 10 Environmental Ofticer
Donna Hood, NC Division of Water Resources Mooresville Re�ional Office
File Copy
"Nothing Compares "- ,
State of Nonh Carolina I[nvironme�[al Quahry
Ihl7 Mail Szrvice Centzr I Rnleieh, North Carolina 27699-1617

OdTi'M1f ELFV
7Ed. 00
� +."_ -��+5n =.I-�i;` 4I+51i � + ��;_ ?_+`�;: �1-6U 4 +-_ 44+GC -=+50
-_ _ _ _ .. --.,-:-.. ._,. -.:-.:-.:- _.__:__ . . .. , ._...-.,, _._..-._ _.-.-.._.-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ,. . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. ..
�� — — o i i W / SEE SHEET 13
� — — — — �� � � i es �� x o
�
r — — , � �
; ___—� —__ � � „�� ��{, ; es
i — � - — , �, �� i �I -� � �� �
oz
w�
� �z
w�
- O
O . '" a O
J = d N M
� � C � �
� J �A '_ W V
a
��i; winRaE
jF a°1i oV�c°y
� p ` W mzac
C � �' m
(� -'�, � O .,d. �
2= m0�3
�"Y � `03
O . - oVa
4 � ` N �
5�,-'a N •
x �o 0
w � n
N
2
�j`'�� �k�' %
"' •���,'.�.
°�� ��` ��.
� � � ��� � a�� I� ,d I - �������,_ SENSITIVEMATERIAL� ` °� ��' �
�� � - �
� o I� i-. - _ � � �
r v � =I I, il o mN I I� - --- F �-_ _` � ` Do Not Duplicate ''I,°'.:.,,;;;�„o•`v ,,'
i �J�� �� e� �
� � =� � a � i � — �' -- � � SEE SHEET 13 FOR
� e w f� I �
y md � �1s" PROP. IMPROVEMENTS
so '��� p Q�� � � � TO OAKDALE ROAD (L-1) ;
03509108 � 1 I � RI� � I� : I �
WOODMEN DF THE WOR!G LODGE 96 PRGP. TrTAPEZ0IDAL CHANNEL nY Q -
DB �95]/PC 80� 4' WI�TH WITH 3�1 SIOE S2 - RPW Stream A / I __� �II ` I � I �
OAKpALE ROAp SLOPES L1NE CHRN�IEL WITH II II � I ' J. I �;4 �— \ ;
Ec MnrriNe (coiR) ro r�e " r— � �
- 40 If permanent impacts ,� i � � � � a
(riprap apron) i� �� - ,��� � I,��� � � ���1, S2 - RPW Stream A � � �
I�� ��� � ��` ��= - 15 If ermanent im acts �� ;
� �' _� - z PROP s< � � � o :;�� V ��� �" � p p ��
OF ]2' RCP
�, _ � A1 oso� ' �� � � (riprap apron) � � �
�� � _ � I ��� I _ �
g � e — e � � I i I = a oa, ao ir , � o � ) ) - - '
�-,.�� �� � 1 � o �z' rzcP � -
� �' � ' � €� � �O � o � � � � ` . �I � � � a aso� �`l� \� � � O � 1 -
��. � �� - � �� f soe� CsAe soE soe � � � � � � � ) �;woon F o � 7
� - '� - _,r 1-5 � �
j � �� �r � � � _�� � �� soe ��1` "=� }
ae�a _ ��r.',' ��3 �`w i i
7 ( f so PROP. �,ss i � � g% )
'�, . � I I I E_ o�FIPRAP qPRON
r — — � P�� � � � 4-1 — — ;I i �_ � I I� , � so, � is w=is o 2s. �� )
� UNESD4 =='Y:, �oa — �. .��`��'� y � _ _ �� zs so. vos Fi�r�., I ,- I � ��{�� � .
5 0 � — .�` � ���t ��i _ _�r ` FAeRic � ��'-'-,-�.----�—, a�Re� w "t._� � ,.
r� _ - � , ' � �� W'� _�— F
— �� �J ti ) ��..� � rt�� � ' �� n la3 'I � I j^.___ i �' . � n_. P ' -� _ `s� 1 — _ _ i � 3 _
— ��-�-'— �-_r C 3' r� "r� � � � I �°. �w � `� , �� �.', — aa+szeo � ,
� .. ,
— _ � � ��i , � a �..�✓� e� , — �-� � � I i � �i'' - '� � ( ��� —"� �z^-'= —^�*� � - �— — � - -
�.. 55 55 J SS i5 5� SS -�
l
� S4 - RPW Stream A
- 12 If total temporary
impacts (check dams)
IMPROVEMENTS STA. 41+152
59
035091G�
J.4CI: B- DELLINGER AND
ALMA WILIA �ELLI�IGER
�B 1280/PG ��
1239 OAKCiALE ROAD
; S�
`, �) s
_ a _a _ — a� I
PROP. 40 SQ. YDS I LL I
S1 - RPW Stream A � I
- 35 If permanent � N
impacts (72" RCP) I
� I I
I I I
<i I
�� � �
I I
- � Io4A C � R�'a tl . _ � g / _ 1( - .
� �I I�, � / _I_ � \ �, , ��(n — — �_3'� 3 � J -
y
-�� , � � _ � � wl� - - - � � - � ��
� :� � �:� e, i �� , � ��` -- -- - - � � cHnNrRie��nT�=rni�oN��a�zo t � � Z c � 4
_� i I OP. iF2APEZ0IDAL CHANNEI �
4' WIDTH 64 ) '�' � �
� � I i; 8�� ��� ;;F � F — � J E� '°� S3 - RPW St_r_eam_A ; o � Q o
� � � � � � � ��— - � 8 If total temporary � � � � �*
�� �,, � � � �� � S1 - RPW Stream A impacts (coffer dam) �' � � � � �
' � �� - 34 If permanent -� � o� ¢ z z
��; - � i � impacts (72" RCP) �� �� w W x� a
�I j ��s � \ a,� o0�+
� w y I I �'� � Q O G
II: �Irl� = ' I (1� V�� � �� �1,C� CL
��I � 00 � � 1 4 r�.�"' O
� .,i i � � � I � N r' < `� `�., ,� � � � i � v�
. � � �� ���,; , , ,
EE SHEET 13 i I� � \�, Figure 8 -� `�
, � i ( A � A
_ � j

..�' I P OP. ROADWAY �
�
I �. , _
�-� �� p
PROP. W � / ' I
HCooT 57D 8382t I y'
��ii� STA. 2 +49.]0 0
INV OU =]�e.}e PROP. 3:1 MA% SLOPE — \ —��
� �
' /` EX-: GROUNB- '
/
„r /.,�_ . r - — ----- ---
�ro eE-nn�wm7 � -
/
- PROP. CHFNNE� B TfOM �p qT 1 OOR
- � � R�7�—
/ , 5�R
� � ��
PftOP. JB
NCDOT STD. 840.32
50-2 5 A. 22+41.69
--._� BEGIN PROP. CHANNEL IM ROVEMENiS - . +0_ e�< .�T
S�A 2 +053 GRATE tV.=]94.Bt
I V IN=7B1.52
INV OUT=]80.3�
DATC'1S ELEI
77U 00
m m � m _ a
-_0+0� Z0+50 21+00 21+50 2L+00 22+50
,.,.., � �_ �_ r-.r-.r-.r-.,-.,-.���..���,.� ��.,. ,r..r..r...........�-.,_.,,.�-�..�..�..�.., ,_ .. .. ... . . .. . . � -, -, � -, .-, _. _. _.. .. . _ _ _ � �. r.. r.. r.. r.. �. r.. _ _ _. _. _. _. _.., r- r- � � `..�.r..r..r..r...-. -.._„ -..�.�.-.-.-�-��.-�.._,._..,..,.
� � � � / / / /� �
4
�, � � /
1i il / /
4
� � � I �/ 3 Aw� �o f e /
\ \ I I I I / 03�0�9101 -....�� (... owc�l I I '
N HUSBA C NEILEMHUEMMEL � �l� �,�"� �^Rowoo�
I I I S7 - RPW Stream B AND JOHN W. MCLEMORE ( �� v I N
\� \ I �B 8351/PG 18 ��,�-- ^
- 12 If temporary 1019 OAKDALE ftOAD I
��, � � � �� impacts (check dams) �� r` �,� �
i I ii i �� �
\ TIE PR41P. OUTFALL TO E%. o( i "� �
fHANNCL AT STA. 20+OSt s? ��u I
T
W I ) /I / "''-`-r Pc ,._;v I
N\ PROP. CLA55 I RIPP,AP APRON RESET I]] LF OF !�J _� 4
L=30'. Wi �45 W2-13.5'. �=1.5' W9�e PPIVACY FENCE �
/ 6] SQ. vp5. FILTER FABRIC , N
m \\ \ UNE EXISTING CHANNEL S -_� � y I I
g�
� — _ — \IW}� � `� �ar..c+,..o y �� �� � � �
I / "O� h _ _ ( i)I � I ... _ W LL
� e ' � �o
� — � � �'� a° o � �� a:� � r_ W ��,— ,—_ � FF ,.C� � N
r �
r 2` - '\— � ✓' 2i+oo � LINESD-�— - �— — — 22�� ssn �
I ��E �n� � �°° � _ � ``� 3� � — — � — — —� — — — � — �E�„-
SOE _� W,�oio. �.s1
3
� ! � F�' E
III '� p E E I ' I
I IN �� oi /+ � "�, I _ E�—�— t ...
_ � II H�� ,�� -� � - - -I i� I �\ ���
�� S�E SDE *�'�- \ �. �
I w I� � III ,� .. .e� �\.—s / � I REMOVE 192 LF �I I I PROP. 1•J2 LF OF I I u I 42 \\�� I � I_I�.
I la ✓� I I SiABI�IZE CHANNEL % � OF EX. 48" RCP 54" RL"P Ai I.00�
� I IMPROVEMENTS WITH I I I 03509238
PEALHTREE FOAD
' 3] SO- YPS. I OB 3C1�jPG 64G . ILL
I Ia EC MN171NG (C'OIR) R VEN RIpGE HQMEOWNEftS
I � n°'oM �o � I � � S5 & S6 - RPW Stream B s�,�_ oF ME�k�ENa�R� ,N� ,� �
p o� �Ilm I e � � - 25 If of existing riprap to be replaced with 30 If rip rap � F�
I �` °�" w��M �w "'�� �` o35o9Z�6 � � o,- 5 If net permanent impacts due riprap apron and I 03��, ;�-
I I X HOLDINGS LLC
I I� DB 2]253/I'G 188I K �AN MOSEF. COMFANY INC
�� 413 PE4CHiREE ROH� I I I CiB 27 grading (S5) UB IS38?/PG 212 . I�.
q�� P� I4�3 PEACHTREE ROAC1
� �, , � � II �� � I I - 15 If net permanent impacts due grading (S6) � t"1 ���i
� W' � I��,. ��� � I� i �-- i I I
� _ ' � � 1 " ` ,I�� _���� ow � _,_,
— �— . 1 _
-- �—� = ���— — ----�-- — — — _�—��� — — —
��,� � �� �
------ �.�G- �— --� .w_ -- —T— -- --- ---- --- -- — —
---- - - �-��--- �--� � � �
---- - --
-- ---
� ��RE — ---y --- - --- -- ---- -- -- �---�
_ _ ,� II,-.f PEACNT��E �o�� ��o° Pua� « � i�n������ � _� �a�� �
i e
�
,�_��_ � �,_
S�E SHEET 10
EYisting:
192 linear feet of 48" RCP
25 lf of riprap
Proposed:
l92 linear feet of 54" RCP
301inear feet of riprap
oe / J�
IT
�� U
II
I'v4 �
Q W
I� Q � <I
, `I ` i i
I
I' I I
� i; � SENSITIVE MATERIAL
; ° �' � Do Not Duplicate
>oS, -(_�� SEE SHEET 10 FOR
� � PROP.IMPROVEMENTS
�`� TOOAKDALE ROAD (L-1)
� ���'?\
�,\
\ t �� \\
,
a �� \
�^ � �
N I /'�
/ /
II� _ N.
I `I� I / /�c"
I � �� yo
�. \
I �
♦
�i I �� �
Ii ���,�. �
I \
\
I II s��\ I
4A � o �
'� � I \ couc. �/
� � /
T -\ \
� ��
>
��I \ J � �
I � \/ )
�I.< r��_ ,,
� 1��, \o �
� �
\ ��2 .. 511E"
�I �I' � � P
I� ��, -.
h� ����
i �
e y' ;
" � F �
> �_ F �
F �� - �
� - ... � f �„E / `�,.00 �i�i
�i EE ROA � � � .. iI"'� � �
�5 ������ -Figure 9/ -
��, -,_ �
O
O . '" a O
J = d N M
� � C � �
� J �A '_ W V
a
��i � w inRaE
jF a°1i oV�c°y
� p ` W mzac
C � �' m
(� -'�, � O .,d. �
2= m0�3
�"Y � `03
O — o V H
� � � N n
S� , <N •
x �o 0
w � n
¢
C: 'a
z� �
a
z� �
o� Q�
Q
N � O fy
3� a`�a
Q vJ' a a U.
oz Qz�
�F a¢�
�w '���
'� o °
Y 0. a
Q O
o �
�

WOVEN FlLiER FnBRi(
�
SiEEL POSI
� FILiER fnBFiG
� o�
o �=LOW
ys�
�_ __ __
��MIN
GENERAL NOTES:
1. WOVEN FlLiEH FPBRIC BE lJSED WHFRE SILT FENCE IS TO REMAIN FOR A PERIOD OF
MORE THAN 30 DnvS.
2. SiEEL POSiS SHALL BE 5'-0" IN HEIGHT AN� BE OF iHE SELF-FASTENER ANGLE SiEEL
ttPE MAINTENANCE NOTES-
3. i11RN SILi FENCE UP SLOPE aT ENOS- 1, FlLiER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED 9Y THE FINANCIALLY RESPON516LE PAkTY
4. ORANGE SPGEfY FENCE IS REOUIRE� Ai BACK OF SIL7 FENCE WHEN GRApING IS OR HIS ACENT IMME�I�TELY ATER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST �AILV Ol1RING
PROLOrvGED RAINFaLL. ANY REPAIRS NEEOC� StWLL BC �nADE IMMEDIATELY.
ADJALENT i0 SWIu BUFFERS. SiREpMS OR WEfLANpS (REFER TO SWIM BUFFER
GUIDELINES). THE COLOR ORANGE IS RESERVED FOR VISUAL IDENTIFICATION OF 2. SHOUiD iHE FABRIC �ECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTNE PRIOR i0 iHE ENp
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSIVE AREAS. OF THE EXPECTED USABLE �IFE ANO THE BHRRIER STILL IS NECESSARY. THE
FABftIC SHnLL BE REPLnCED PROMPTLY.
5. �RAINAGE AREA CAN NpT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FT OF FENCE.
3. SECiIMENT �EPO511'S SHOUL� EE REMOVED WHEN �EPOSITS REACH APPROX. HAL:
6. SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT EXCEED CRITERIA SHf1WN IN TABLE 6.62A NORTH CAROLINA THE HEIGHT OF iHE BPRRIER. AN7 SEDIMENT DEPOSiTS REMAiNING IN PWCE
EROSION AND SE�IMENT CONiROL PLANNING nND �ESIGN MANUaL. ARER THE SILT fENCE IS REMOVED SHALL 8E �RESSEO TO CONFORM TO IHE
E%ISiING GRnDE, PFEPaRE� nNl] SEE�ED.
l. DO NUT INSTALL SE�IMENT FENCE ACRU55 STFEAMS, �ITCHES, WATERWAVS OR OTHER
ARE45 OF CONCEIJTReIEp FLOW.
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE
�� LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS T E M P O RARY S I� I F E N C E
UL�qLO�ITG INCLi1DES CHARLOT'f'E ETl
GENERAL NOTES:
1, UN[FORMLY GRADE F SHALL�W
DEPRESSION APPROACHING THE
INLET,
2. DRNE 5-FOOT STEEL P�STS 2
FEET 1NT� THE GROUND
SUFiROUNDING THE iNLET. SPPCE
POSTS EVENLY AR�UND THE
PCRIMETFR OF THE INLET, A
MAXIMUM OF 4 FEET APART.
3. Sl1RR0UN➢ THE POSTS WITH WIRE
MESH HARDW.4RE CLOTH. SECURE
THE WIRE MESH TO THE STEEL
P�STS AI IHE TOP, MIDDLE, aN�
BaTTOM� PLACWG A 2-F��T FLAP
�P THE WIRE MESH UNDER THE
GRAVEL FOR ANCH�RING IS
RtC�MMENDED,
4. PLPCE CLEAN GRAVEL cNC D�T q5
�R #57 ST�NE; �N A 2�1 S�OPE
WITI-i A HEiGHT �F 16 iNCHES
AROUND THE WIRE, AND SMODTH T❑
AN EVEN GRADE�
5. CNCE THE CONTRIBUTING ➢RAINAGE
AREA HAS BEEN STABiLIZED,
REMOVE ACCUMU�ATE➢ SEDIMENT,
AN➢ ESTABLISH FINAL GRA➢ING
ELE V ATIONS.
6. C�MPACT THE AREA PROPERLY AN➢
STABILIZE➢ IT WiTH
GRDUN➢COVER.
I 4' MAX. �
I
NCDOT /j5 OR #57
WASHED STONE ��. :
_. .�_._.- � �z�.
�� � .. r.. �.. -
NC�OT j�5 OR #57
WASHED STONE�
-Y�:.raY ii:�T �?.'3�'�
L�_ .3,iTi. _ _
a
I� j
�� -'�sv�.Y Z� ����'
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL
�! LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
CII.\RLOTlIi INCLUDES CIIARLOTTE ETJ INLET PROTECTION
NOT TO SCALE
30.06Fl
19—GAUGE HARDWARE CLOTH
(�" MESH OP[NINGS)
"""""""' I '
2'
T� "I 16 � MIN.
NOT TO SCALE
30.09
�
�1
CI I.\RIA'I'77:.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEDIMF_NT SHALL BE REMOVED ANG TRAP
RESTOREC� TO ITS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS
WHEN iHE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATE�
TO 1/2 iHE DESIGN GEFiH OF THE TRAP.
2 REMOVE� SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED
IN A SUITABLE AREA AND IN SUCH A
MANNER THAT IT WILL NOT ERO�E.
J. THE SrRUCTURE SHALL BE INSPECTED BY
THE FlNANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY OR
FIIS nGENT AfTCF EACH STORM EVENT
AND REPAIRS MAGE AS NECESSARY.
4. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE CARFIED
OUT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT FROSION AN�
WATER POLLUTION ARE MINIMIZED.
5. THE SEDIMENT TRAP SHALL BE REMOVEO AND
THE AREA STABILIZEU WI1EN TFIE URAINAGE
BHSIN HAS @EEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
6. ON LARGER DRAINAGE AREAS RIP RAP MAY
BE REOUIRE� UN�ER lHE WASHED STONE.
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETd
`°� \ C � � / %'
/ !2
� � �5 WASHED gTONf �
A\ � 5� GE
Ia_,_e � _e_,_ AR�
STORAGE
AREA
� �
1�
��0, �
CATCH
RASIN
� � \
�
/ � �
� � � ����
PLAN VIEW
/ � 1
_ �StONEt�Eu
' � \ m� � a F/
z � CF�TCH
BASIN
SECTION A—A
STONE INLET PROTECTION
GENTLE SLOPES STEEP SLOPES
NOT TO SCALE
100 Ibs/acre toll fescue
SEEDING 30 Ibs/acre Sericea lespedeza
MIXTURE 8a Ibs�acre of tall fescue (unscarified after August 15)
70 Ibs/acre Kobe lespedeza
FALC August 25 — October FALC August 25 — October 15
Late wintec February 15 — April 15 Late winter. February 15 — April 15
SEEDING To extend spring seeding into June, add To extend spring seeding into June, add
�ATES �5 Ibs�ocre hulled Bermudograss 15 Ibs�acre hulled Bermudagross
Overseeding of Kobe le<pedem over fall—seeded Overseeding of Kobe lespedem over foll—seeded
tall fescue is very effective. tall fescue is very effective.
SEEDING Apply lime and fertilizer per soil tests, or 4000 Apply lime and iertilizer per soil tests, or 4000
AMENDMENTS �6s/acre limestone and 1000 Ibs/acre 10-10-10 Ibs/acre limestone and 1000 Ibs/acre 10-10-10
fertilizer. fertilizer.
30.08
NOTE 1
Ground Cover-- protective cover must be established on all disturbed areas within 21 calendar days after
land disturbing actrvity is com�leted or has tempororily ceased.
NOTE 2
Groded slopes and fills--protectrve cover must be established on oll groded slopes and fills within 21 calendor days after
a phase of groding is completed or hos tempororily ceased.
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE
K�% LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS � E E D I N G S C H E D U� E sro. No
CIL�RLOf7T INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 30.1 7A
C
O �
� O
d' � � O �
�Q _ W �C%�
3 o m d+RaE
h < m od^u
`V 0 � � � V Xo
O=R�
�� o W O.m. LL �
?o 'fqmp0;
] � m � e O 3
et
�sfja+��
S<O� s N O
� � A
K
; �`�'��CARO( j'�.
�� ��t�QFE�S /n�9�9 ��.
te �EAL�.k i
; ; 036 i 88 � -'
% iy':!✓G I NE��,��,
,��' <<� WEA1H�„'o'�,,:
�
�
�
f
€
�
�
II �
6 '
� �
� g '
- _ � � _
V �
� O ¢
-%� O
A O .� Q.
3 ir tY' GL .7
� � � F Q
oz �o�-
� F �U Q
z
Qo 00
ka O
� 0. W
� �--� �O
N FT] � W

T_-%CFLSSaP
�?�1�� �i��77 �i r,� �i�
S�(IR�
�
ISOMEZREC WIE4M
F v Y p M
�J A E E
p � Ma,% )-. 2' UFS�OP€
� STANE NATl1HAL Gii9Yf4�
I I ��I �o f.f �. \ ' 1 ��� ��
__F�'.. � j\ I�
r
���- ; _/ •, �'. -.
MATTING-- �' . ' 2' [WNiaSLOPE
SFA%E
CROSS SEGTIQM
VEE Di7CH
O::li[9:
:tSf AII�i1YUM i2 IN. GI/�Y�tER f%CE2S14R xKfitif.
US£ i Fi, WpppEM SiAKE3 iA'ITN A 2 9N. 6��' 2 IN. MW:�+A�
�noss sccnoa-
Qy},': INSI,LLe wiillElS1 9l1 A MEtbnT IW DIIG4 SO FtUY M9LL w:a�
WnSH pN011Yb 1atTLE 41D SCOUp ptltCFl SLOfES PHO I5 IItRLCFCO.
INSia�t A YINIMUI OF 2 4PSLOP€ STAN€3 AND + DDM1940�'E
ST�VtES �l eN �I�CaE TO WfbOE N4TTILF EO BOTTpY OF 8➢Tbi.
PR9V[DE STPPLES YAGE OG O.f25 EN. PFN1EiER SiEEi FIA€
FqiYEO [MO A U 3NAPE N4i LE53 1�2" [N �ENGTH�.
THNN
IN4i441 SiMiF9 AFPRq%IWiELV [Y{PY 1 lIIliEkX F96S �pX
B4TH S14E3 0� NATxLE ANO�AT CACn CNp Tp SE6UPE ]4 ip inE ;OIt.
IxSiu� �utt�x� Ix,W.�OqaiKKE'nITH SERG�pn 163+ OF Ti[
STNIIlkA[I SP'FCIFiCAFIpfS.
���
.� �� ,'
`�";twc[s ,�
INSET A
WPSLOPE
STAKE
Z IN' 2 UPSLOPE FLOW -
� STAKE r NA7UH.AL GA9UND � -
/' � -.. / '�, �
� .
�T� 11 I � . .. �' ;.t� ;�; I -1 ��
� �
A41TTItlG � � : ' �. '�' � �� 2' �]ONMSibPE :lY':1
CROSS SEGTT�QN STl�KE /�j
TRAP�E2DIDAL �ITCH
-r �vi rr,-.� ': � • .
`l.. ..
ENSET B
-se. �aa� e ��YAI7ING
TDP YIEW
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
GENERAL NOTES
1. �ISTURBE� ARE4: B.� ACRES (INC.U�ES ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PROPOSE� TEMPORARY CONSTRt1CTI0N �
EASEMENTS ANO EXISTING PERMANENT EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY)
2. SOIL iYPES: CLAYEY SILTS
SILtt CLAYS WITH ROCK FRAGMENiS
SANDV CLAYEY SILTS
SANDY SILTS
3. ALL PRACTICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE wITH THE GUIDELWES, CIiV OF CHARLOTiE AN� STANDARDS AND
PRACTICES OF THE STATE OF N�RTH CARO�INA AS SEf FORTH IN THE "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CDNTROL PLANNING
AND �ESiGN MANUAL.
4. THE CONTftACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER INSTALL4TION MAIMENANCE AND REMOVAL OF ALL
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DESIGNATE� ON THESE PLANS.
5. TME EROSION CONiROL PIANS DEPICT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FOR 'ME ENTIRE PROJECT. iHESE OEVICES SHALL
9E PLACE� IN ACCOROANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE OUTLINEO HEREIN AS ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN
THE WORK AREA PROGRESSES. RCFER TO TRAFFIC CONTROL PlANS FOR GETHILE� SEOUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
6. THE EROSION CONT20L MEASURES SPECIFlED ON THESE PLANS ARE INTENL�ED TO REPRESEM THE MINIMUM
RE9UIREMENT� FOR THIS PROJECT. ADDITIONAI_ TEMPORARY MEqSURES AND/OR nDJUSTMENT Of THOSE SHOWN MAY BE
REOUIRE� AS FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE INCLU�ING BUT NOT LIMITED T0: iEMPORARY PIPING, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT
FENCE ANO/OR INCIDEMHL SiONE.
J. THE CONTRACTOR IS AOVISED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE ANO CARE IN THE PIACEMENi OF EROSION CONTROL
ME45lIRES AOJAC�NT TO FND/OR FFFECTING PRIVNTE PROPCRTY, MEASl1RE5 SHALL 6E PLACED TO PERMIT DRNEWAV
ACCE55 AND TO PROVIDE PEDESiRIAN SAFEtt AT ALL TIMES.
B. dl1RING CONSTRUCTION, THE COMRACTOR SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO DIRECT AND/OR DIVERT POTENTIAL
SE�IMENT-LADEN RUNOFF TO EROSION CONTRGL �EVICES IN PIACE P.5 L4ND DISTURBING ACTIVItt PROCEEDS.
9. EROSION CONTROL ME4SiJRES SHALL BE INSPErTE� wEEKLV AND AFTER RAINFALI EVENTS. SEDIMENT SHALL BE
PERIODICALLY ftEMOVE6 AN� PROPERLY f]ISPOSED OF AS REOUIftED. DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAMED AND/OR P,EPL4CE�
AS NECESSARY TO ENSt1RE TFIAT THEY PERFORM AS I�EN�ED.
lO.ERO510N CONTROL IAN SHEEI'S PRE IMENDED FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ONL .
P Y
RE�R TO ROADWAY PLANS FOft ACTUAL �7AILS OF ROAOWAY CONSTRUCTION.
11. ALL EROSION AND SEfJIMENT CONTROL PRACiICES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STA91LIlY AND OPERAiION EVERY WFEK AND
FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF-PROOIJCING RAINFALL. ANY NEE�E� REPAIRS WILL BE MA�E IMMEOIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL
PRACTICES O.S DE9GNED.
12. PREFHBRICATION SILT FENCE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, USE CIT' OF CHARLOTfE LANO OEVELOPMEM STAN�AR� 30.06A.
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
1. ENGINEER TO OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL HNp OTHER APPIJGABLE PERMITS AS REOUIRED.
2. HOLD PRE-CONSiRUCT10N CONFERENCE AS �ICTATED PRIOR TO �EGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
.,. IAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTION OF CURB AN� GUTfER, SI�EWALK AND PAVEMENT. TRAFFIC IS
THEN SFIIRED ONi'0 TFIE NEw SECTION AN� CONSTRUCTION IS C6MPLEfE� ON THE OTHER SIOE. fINAL wORK WILL
CONSIST OF PLqCEMENT OF FINAL PAVEMENT LIFf, CONCREfE MEDIANS, EfC.
THE EROSiON GONTROL MEASURES TO 9E iMPLEMEME� ARE AS FOLLOWS:
i. PLACE SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE ALONG THE PROPOSED TOE OF FILL AT THE LOCATIUNS IN�ICATED ON PlANS.
2. PLACE INLET PROTECTION MEASURES AS SDON AS EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTE� TO PREVCNT SEDIMENT MGRE55.
3. TEMPORARILY DIiCH OR OIVERT RUNOFF TO PROTECiED LOCATIONS UNTIL ALL MEASURES ARE IN PL4CE.
4. SEED ALL DENUDED AREAS IN ACCOR�ANCE WIiH THE SEEDING SCHEUULE GROUNU STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WI�HIN
] DNYS ON PERIMEfER ARE4S ANO SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1, AND GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 14
DAVS ON OTHER AREAS.
5. ANY BASIN OUTLEf STRUCTURES WITH DRAINAGE AREAS EOU.4L TO OR GREATER iHAN I ACRE MUST WITH�RAW WATER
FROM THE SURFACE.
6. ANY AREAS USEO FOR STAfING OR STOCKPIUN6 OUTSIDE THE PERMITfED LIMITS JF THE PROJErT WILL REOUIRE AN
EftOSiON CONTROL PLAN.
7. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROiION CONiROL DEVICES A�ER THE PROJECT HAS BEEN PERMANEMLY STABILIZED.
tJTILiZE /N ENERGY
UISSIPATER IN PUMPING
CLEAN WATER
CLFiSS B RIPRlP l TON
SPECSAL STILLING BAS[N�
(SEE NC➢OT STD. 1630.06)
NOTE:
ENSURE TO ANCHOR ALL
PUMPS AND PIPES SECURELY.
IMPERVIOt1S
fIIKE
DISCHARGE HOSE
E-- FLOW
IMPERVIOUS DIKE �
WITH OVER FLOW PIPE
SEE SECTION A-A
INTAKE
MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. CHECK ALL EROSiON CONiF20L ME4SURE5 WEEKLV AN� AFiER EACH RAINFPLL.
2. P.EMOVE SEOIMEM FROM BEHIND SEDIMEM FENCE WHEN THE ACCl1Ml11ATED MATERIAL IS 0.50 FEEf OEEP. RESEf
AN�/OR REPLACE FENCE AS REOUIREO THROUGHOl1T CONSTRUCIION.
3. SEE� NEYVLY ,RADE� AREAS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE RESEED. AS NECESSARY. AN1' REMAINING OR NEWLY �ISTURBED
AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES THROl1GH0UT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIO�.
VEGEfATIVE PLAN
1. AL ISTURBEO AREAS WIL B STA�3ILI]_E� E�V PCR ANEMLY V CfATINC WITFI EEO AN Ml1LC41 AS F[COMMENDED
� E M EG S D
BY THE SEEDWG SCHEDULE AND SPECIFlCATIONS DUE i0 THE RESTRAINTS ON THE LENGiH OF IMPROVEMENTS ANO OR
/
�l1RATI0N OF EXPOSEL� OISTl1REED AREAS.
2. TO PROMOTE R �ENSE VEGETATNE COVER IN .4REA5 WHERE RUNOFF CONCENTRATES OR IN AREAS WHERE VEGEfAT10N
IS HARD TO ESTABLJSH A MATTING FOft EROSION CONTROL WILL BE USE�. THE MAifING TO BC USEO WILL BE A
MATTINC THAT CONSISTS OF ]09, STRAW AND COCONUi AND BE BAC'RE� OR APPROVED EOUAL. THE MATTING FOR
EROSION CONTROL WILL BE CONSTRUCTEO AS PAkT OF tHE PROPOSEO IMPROVEMEMS ANO SFALL AL50 SeRVE FOR
VEGETATNE STA9ILIZATION PURPpSES.
BYPA55 PUMPING
F N T PI AL W K R :
1. INSTALL SPECIA� STILLING BASIN(Sj OR STABILIZED OUTLEf IF PUMPING CLEAN WATER.
2. INSTALL UPSiREAM PUMP ANO iEMPORHftY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AN� BEGIN PUMPING OPERA710N5 fOR STREAM OIVERSI�N.
4. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS. �EWATER ENTRAPPEO ANFA. AftFA i0 BE
DEWP.TERE� SHAIL 6E EQl1A� TO ONE DAY'S WORK.
5. PERFOHM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCOR�ANCE WIiH THE PlANS.
6. IXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AN� DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOt15 �IKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOt15
DIKES, PUMPS. AND iEMPOR4RY FLEXIB�E HOSE. (�OWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FlRSi.)
]. ALL GRA�ING �N� STABILIZHTION MUST BE COMPLEfED IN ONE DAY WITHIN iHE PUMP AROUND ARUS �CiWEEN THE
IMPERVIOUS DIKES. TFiE IMPERVIpUS OIKE LOCAiIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEEf ONLY SHOW THE UPPER AND LOWER
EXTENT OF WORK FOR EACH STREAM SEGMENT. THE CONTR4CTOR IS RESPONSIeI£ fOR OETERMINING THE LOCHTION
OF THE IMPERVIOUS �IKE 5 FOR EACH �AV'S WORK.
�)
8. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLNG BASIN(5) ANO BACKFILL STqSILIZE DISTURBED AREA WIl'H SEED AN� Ml1�CH.
� F��W
NO�ES'
1. ALL E%CAVATION SHALL BE PERFORME� IN ONLY �RY OR ISOL4TE� SECiIONS OF CHANNEL.
2. IMPERVIOUS OIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM STRE4M FLOW WHEN NECESSARY.
3. ALL GRADED AREAS SNALL BE STABILIZED WRHIN 24 HOURS.
4. MAINTENANCE OF Sii2EAM FLOW OPERAT10N5 SHALL 8E INCIDENTAL TO TNE WORK. TNIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING, DIVCRSION FIPES. PUMPS ANO HOSES.
5. Pt1MPS AN� HOSES SHALL BE OF SUFFlCIENT SIZE TO �JEWATER THE WORK AREA
OF BP.NK
fi MIN HEIGHT FROM
STREAM BOTTOM � ��
TEMP_ I I POLYEfHYLENE FABRIC ON
4z" CMP� �FACE (8 ML. THICK)
� STREAM
18'� � y :... FLOW
MIN. SANDBAGS
NT;
STRFAM OOTTOM
INSTALL SANDBAGS IN PIPE INVERT & FABRIC WHILE PUMPING
AROVN� �URING CONSTRUCTION IN STREAM.
REMOVE SANDBAGS & FABRIC TO ALLOW FLOW THROUGH
PIPE WHFN NOT PUMPING AROUND.
SECTION A-A
/ 12'MIN,
3' MIN HEIGNT FROM
SiRE/M H01TOM� I�fLASS B RIPRaP
WORK AREA E- FL�WAM
sTREnn Borron Nrs
BYP�SS PUMPING �OR CU�VEP I INS IAL�ATION
SECT1❑N B-B
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
ti
O
O�'^o O
J ? O � M
� N C e �
� i 4 ��N
�o°.mwaE
= a _m e
0
� < � a u
m r
N
n .
�i � C
�
m a
Q i C f V 1C0
, N C j LLp
o W o
� �
O
� ' m"�'O�
�
� � � o .�'j�03
Q' N fi.1 � � b
A
%'.O� `N O
.=e � n
¢
e
�
E
0
��
��
�
zo
zo
O O
�
G �'
�O
F
� W
ati
�o
a
Qa
0
F N
= W
�
�
� �
� � �
W
F
Qp0
xz
o°
�
w
�
o V
W

o��� w n rEqQ�
� y
> r
�
O -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: 0 Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes 0 No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu ❑ Yes 0 No
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ❑x No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑x No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Oakdale Road Widening Project
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Keziah, Kimberly; Woodmen of the World; Dellinger, Jack and Alma; Thuemmel, Linda and
Neil
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 8579-413; 7997-807; 1239-77; 8381-18
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A
applicable):
3d. Street address: Oakdale Road, Charlotte, NC
3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28216
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑x Other, specify: Local Government
4b. Name: Ms. Leslie Bing
4c. Business name City of Charlotte Engineering and Property Management
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 600 E. Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: N/A
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.: 704-408-1683
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Multiple - Linear Transportation Project
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.287755° Longitude: -80.892419°
1 c. Property size: 26.4 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Gum Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS- IV
2c. River basin: Catawba (HUC 03050101)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project corridor is approximately 26.4 acres in extent and is comprised of road right-of-way along Oakdale Road and
portions of adjacent single family residential and commercial properties with maintained lawns and asphalt parking lots.
Dominant vegetation within the project area consists of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), boxelder (Acer negundo), multiflora rose
(Rosa multiflora), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and Canada goldenrod
(Solidago altissima).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acre of jurisdictional wetland areas
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 437 If perennial stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Oakdale Road is a minor thoroughfare located in northwest Charlotte approximately five miles from the central business
district. The purpose of this project is to upgrade Oakdale Road to a complete urban "Avenue Type" street with intermittent
landscaped medians and median divided left turn lanes. The project is necessary to reduce speeds and improve public
safety along Oakdale Road.
As a part of the upgrade of Oakdale Road the drainage system for the road will also be upgraded to convey the 25-year
storm event per City of Charlotte design standards. The existing 60" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) under Oakdale Road
at 1320 Oakdale Road will be replaced with a 72" RCP. Riprap aprons will be installed upstream and downstream of the
culvert for energy dissipation entering and exiting the pipe.
In addition, the existing 48-inch RCP that parallels Peachtree Road, west of Oakdale Road, will be replaced with a 54-inch
RCP of the same length and a riprap apron will be installed at the outlet.
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Unavoidable impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. under Nationwide Permit Number 14 total 144 linear feet of impacts
to RPW Stream A and 32 linear feet of impacts to RPW Stream B.
Impacts to RPW Stream A include 124 linear feet of permanent impacts and approximately 20 linear feet of temporary
impacts. Impacts to RPW Stream B include approximately 20 linear feet of permanent impacts and 12 linear feet of
temporary impacts. No single crossing exceeds 150 linear feet of permanent impact to a jurisdictional water of the U.S.
Permanent impacts to RPW Stream A are the result of 69 linear feet of pipe extension and 55 linear feet of riprap apron to
be installed upstream and downstream of the new pipe for energy dissipation purposes (Figure 8, attached). The existing
60-inch RCP under Oakdale Road at 1320 Oakdale Road will be replaced with 54 linear feet of 72-inch RCP. Junction
boxes will be installed upstream and downstream of this pipe, and an additional 30 linear feet of 72-inch RCP will be installed
at the upstream and downstream ends of the pipe system (Figure 8, attached). The new pipe system will be 115 linear feet
in length with a net permanent impact length of 69 linear feet (Figure 8, attached). Additionally, a 15-linear foot riprap apron
will be installed at the upstream end of the pipe system, and a 40-linear foot riprap apron will be installed at the downstream
end. These riprap aprons are necessary to dissipate the energy of the water entering and exiting the culvert and to protect
the stream bed from erosion.
Smaller side systems will be tying to the new 72-inch diameter pipes at the proposed new junction boxes. Because of this,
City of Charlotte requests a waiver from the General Condition No. 3.6.1 as the proposed new pipe system will not be buried
(Figure 8, attached). The current system has not been buried.
There are two proposed side connections at each of these junction boxes ranging in size from 15-inch to 24-inch diameter
pipes. These side systems will have inverts that are significantly higher than the inverts of the boxes, with drops ranging
from three to eight feet. If the proposed 72-inch diameter pipe were to be buried in order to create a natural bottom, there
would be significant erosion of the natural bottom within the junction boxes during every storm event because of these side
system drops. This would create an unstable bottom, and would result in scour, turbidity, and the deposition of the eroded
sediment load in the channel downstream. As this would create a permanently unstable condition within the pipe, it was
determined that the most environmentally sensitive option would be the one that is currently proposed in the plans (see
Figure 8, attached).
Permanent impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream B total approximately 15 linear feet and consist of riprap apron and grading
(Figure 9 attached). The existing 48-inch RCP will be replaced with a 54-inch RCP of the same length. The pipe to be
replaced outfalls from the closed system into the beginning of the Stream A, and it is not carrying a stream like a culvert.
Therefore, the pipe replacement doesn't need to be buried. The stream channel will be regraded for 45 linear feet
downstream of the pipe to eliminate the existing unstable headcut. The existing 25-foot long, serviceable riprap apron will
be replaced with a 30-foot-long riprap apron. This will result in a five linear feet net permanent impact due riprap and 15
linear feet net permanent impact due grading.
Temporary impacts to Perennial RPW Stream A total 20 linear feet and are the result of the installation of a temporary
coffer dam (8 linear feet) upstream of the proposed work area and two temporary rock check dams (6 linear feet each) to
be installed downstream the work area. The temporary cofferdams are necessary in order to allow the culvert
replacements and installations to be conducted in the dry. The check dams are a temporary erosion and sediment
control measure. The cofferdams, rock check dams, and pump around systems will be removed once work has been
completed. Temporary impacts to RPW Stream B total 12 linear feet and are the result of the installation of two
temporary rock check dams (6 linear feet each) to be installed downstream the work area as a temporary sediment and
erosion control measure. Details of the temporary erosion control measures are attached (Construction Detail Sheets EC1
and EC2, Attachment J).
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: Features have been verified but a
determination has not been issued.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑ Preliminar ❑ Final
of determination was made? y
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Wetland Services
Name (if known): (CWS)
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The site was originally delineated On February 4, 2013 and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was requested along
with the Nationwide Permit No. 14 application. On May 29, 2013 the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the 404
Verification for 129 If of permanent impacts and 47 If of temporary impacts (SAW 2013-00714; Attachment C). The permit
expired March 18, 2017. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued the Water Quality
Certification on June 11, 2013 (DWQ# 13-0398; Attachment D). This PCN is a request for reauthorization of a of a previously
permitted project. Minor revisions to the proposed grading limits and rip rap aprons have been made since the permits were
previously approved.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
On May 29, 2013 the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the 404 Verification for 129 If of permanent impacts and 47 If of
temporary impacts (SAW 2013-00714; Attachment C). The permit expired March 18, 2017. North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued the Water Quality Certification on June 11, 2013 (DWQ# 13-0398; Attachment D). This
PCN is a request for reauthorization of a of a previously permitted project. Minor revisions to the proposed grading limits and rip
rap aprons have been made since the permits were previously approved.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands 0 Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Area
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 _
W2 _
W3 _
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 P Culvert Extension Stream A PER 404 3-S 69
S2 P Rip Rap Apron Stream A PER 404 3-5 55
S3 T Coffer dam Stream A PER 404 3-5 8
S4 T Check dams Stream A PER 404 3-S 12
S5 P Riprap Apron Stream B PER 404 4-6 5
S6 P Channel Grading Stream B PER 404 4-6 15
S7 T Check dams Stream B PER 404 4-6 12
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 176 If
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3i. Comments:
144 If of permanent impacts and 32 If of temporary impacts
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary (T)
01 _ Choose One Choose
02 _ Choose One Choose
03 _ Choose One Choose
04 _ Choose One Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose One
P2 Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number- mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square (square
Temporary (T) feet feet
B1 _ Yes/No
B2 _ Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 _ Yes/No
B5 _ Yes/No
B6 _ Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent possible. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. All work will be constructed
in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No. 4088.
Piping of jurisdictional stream channel has been limited to 69 linear feet, the minimum necessary to facilitate the road
shoulder and embankment. Headwalls will be used to limit culvert lengths to the maximum extent practicable. Riprap
apron lengths have also been minimized to the greatest extent practicable while still meeting Charlotte Department of
Transportation standards.
Proposed Stream B outfall is located in the same location as existing, only five new linear feet of rip rap is being used to
supplement currently serviceable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction
activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permits 14
and Water Quality Certificate No. 4088. All work will be constructed in dry and all temporary fill will be removed following
the work.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes 0 No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose One Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose One Quantity:
Quantity:
Type: Choose One
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Makin a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Pro ram
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose One
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes 0 No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Linear Transportation project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYsjurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑x Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes 0 No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional future development as there is an existing road.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes 0 No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CWS scientists performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on
October 26, 2017 to determine the presence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical
habitat located within the project area. Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally-protected species
within the project limits. Within a mile of the project area, there is one element occurrence record for the Carolina
heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). A copy of the NCNHP report is attached (Attachment I). There is no suitable habitat
for Carolina heelsplitter within the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 25, 2013 to determine
the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project.
CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service a Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission's webpage
and found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits. In a response letter dated March
12, 2013, the SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore,
we have no comment on the project as proposed." A copy of the SHPO response letter is attached (Attachment H).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑x No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requir^�^^}^:
There will be no fill in the FEMA floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. FEMA FIRM No. 3710453600J
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

� e_
2.6.18
Mr. Gregg Antemann
Applicant/Agent's Signature (AgenYs
Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name signature is valid only if an authorization letter Date
from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009