20090171 Ver 1_Application_20090219

.x sTAIFo O V
U4_'
00 FB ` ?
?N"Yqr y 2009
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 8Qv
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION '' ''l'
III' BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A CONTI, JR
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
? February 13, 2009
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 0 9 0 17
i?
ATTENTION Mr Richard Spencer
Q. NCDOT Coordinator
SUBJECT Nationwide Permit 13 Notice of Use for the proposed Replacement of
.r Bridge No 59 on SR 1117 Over Jumping Run Creek in Harnett County,
V) State Project No 8 2451101, Federal Aid Project No BRZ-1117(3), TIP
B-3655
ti..
Dear Mr Spencer
Please find the enclosed permit drawings and half size design plans for the above referenced project A
Categorical Exclusion and Construction Consultation were completed for the project in May, 2007 and
January, 2009, respectively and distributed shortly thereafter Additional copies are available upon
request The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing
35-foot long bridge with a new 36-foot wide and 105-foot long bridge There will be 20 linear feet of
permanent impacts and 40 linear feet of temporary impacts to surface waters Traffic will be using a
temporary on-site detour during construction
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
General Description The project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030004) and
will impact the Jumping Run Creek Jumping Run (Index # 18-23-29)) is assigned a best usage
classification of C, by the N C Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Jumping Run Creek is not
designated as a North Carolina Natural or Scenic River, or as a National,Wild and Scenic River,
nor is it listed on the 2006 Final 303(d) list The project does not drain to a 303(d) stream within
one mile of the project limits No designated High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW), Water Supply I (WS-1), or Water Supply 11 (WS-II) waters occur within 10 mile
of the project No wetlands will be impacted on the project
Permanent Impacts Permanent stream impacts will total 20 linear from the placement of nprap
on the banks of Jumping Run Creek under the proposed bridge for bank stabilization No nprap
will be placed in the stream bed
{

_ L -r tit
t< Hay ,ood ` J 3 Widow p, 's " .
Bch r s1 G ' ' Cnnn2n ,; > ) a r l
t , 8ncl,havlcn, 7: r? ?, 7
11 9 6 ` t;5
Co <;1 ChalvLea ei - S - - - _ P
4 SP Ings
/l Z 4ngi2r/`? - „ -
J r r? ? er02?Nav eta t, i d?.6 f t 2 1.
d ` C
LII`mgto,i, :reek 4 Coats <
- Lemori '01) a y flamers
,,p mg 1 ?t r n v 1
3/l 3wanns 12 f ! ti on
2tiT
??Oi lra 17
?t = Prreview? `+? BJ _VCI 1 `1?snn • Z_ h l
u 9 p\? 7
Ci
0 ohnsonville po, N
,r J MLindenAvsra=boro N i 5? 9
0a ?, x'qz pi I * ?/ iLlti y BoitlcyrOLnd? r,
'f? l t ?^ Marichest2 ,° ? ^ , l ?, i 3-.? r God.,,,, 1 6,t
%
`POPE 7, r yraalcon
17
133
' r
1111'' c''I`??? Intl l y L.?/ J , 4 r/3
v
n
E
l
v
E
?Qo
d V tJ D® T
VICINITY
MAP
Permit Drpwing
Sheet! of ?T
SITE
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HARNETT COUNTY
PROJECT 3320111 (B-3655)
BRIDGE NO 59 OVER
JUMPING RUN CREEK
ON SR 1117
SHEET 1 OF 7
7/29/08
NORTH CAROLINA
SUMMARY OF AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
TRACT NO PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS SITE NO

lO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
C/0 DEPT OF THE ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS 100 WEST OGLETHORP STREET
SAVANNAH, GA 31401
I, 2,3

o<
Pemut Drawing
Sheet; of ??

-7, C C Z
O
f

O
Lo O
N
? ?
N
n
O ? ?] N
Z Z
v
C
F- z U
_
? ? v o
O
C
O
?
m
CL
O

Cl. Z W
w
2

cc ? > ? U O O

CL
v ? o
c
3
0,-o CC
01

CD
+ O

cc 1
CL U) C) Q

IL U)
2 -0 Q
Z
W
H
2
U
F
W
LL a) Cf)
Q
(D
a
a
H
W a

ca z _
O
73 U) w
=
N
U) ~
(n O

Z
W
07 F
W LL
J O

W U)
w N
~ U
Z Q

U) N

65

U

? ? LL

W
U)
F
d Z

CO

co 4 O W
Z
W
a
a
W
= w
F- LL
Q w
O Y
LL
F
U
W
:E 71: a.
J

P

m

o L
O z

W CC
Q ?

u) O
Z .- N

l

2

z C/)
?

? D1
C C (? ?-
-
F- ? E
(n m cc
a ? ? 0
v 0
v

U ?
z ? ?
? W U
-

?
c
0)
W C U C
Q N m ro o 0
a ? ? N C\j
? X ?
wU E ?
w a
U
?
N

W
>
> t0 U
?
O
?
O

c
>
? E
? E m o 0

? a

F a ? ?

N C C
C ?
c9 N ? c0
W L _N

z Q ?

a N
W ? m ? ? `?
Q

J W
F-
W N
a
D_ C C:
U

C N
N a
c
c
c ?-

Z
O Z
O

d H
Q
_
? J N
?

i
m
Q J
Q

Y
Z
Y
Q Z

N
t
t

O O
(n
li
?- rn
ch m
c i
W w
O ?

Q
z
CT) r N 0
a cn
Q N
_o
U
Q N
U) W w
F
1
3 OF 7
SHT

7/29/2008
I.\Hydraulics\dgn\permits\D3655-hyd-prm-tsh dgn
Ko & Associates P C

09/08/99
KCCPNTRA CT.• TIP PROJECT. B-3655
Lh Ln _
° ° z
I?
X - o ti??? Bak I?
H
;v 0
o C/)
O ° m
Z O Z n z C- I_? ?\ ??m A
N LA D n uca e46? `` O0 2, o m 14,
n o ?o o n - I C /N?son i )? l o m 7i u - m
0 13
J C)
r7 co (
U?
-M 0
O D Z )r / I c`
m D ?c
°D = O z o rn
T?o
fO G ?A p?
Z v v o j \ vZO m?? °°-C
Z 0c
1
< N O? H ' VC z aun? n 4eeio I? k
Z c f
< 10 10 n Z° ti G D D,
oN
X II II II II II II 'qQ 'r/0 -< o N
(? ?7
rn A? o 0 to m z °_ c , I o
o cn w co b m c
o o h z z
m 3 o a o°° a 1, i to Im
0 I
\ _ z -HO ci?OOS - ?^ \ r
z oo l
0 0
o x x o o d IP to Ip
? ° D ,? - ?. ? Im h ? to
:13 C)
o ,ti Z y I R4V PLANS
1 n 'b
14 y
b b b ?7 + O . y W
o ? y ? + n C ?? ? O? ,? h
,w
0 V ,
"C
n y n N o :;? vu ?a
, o + O Ul a
U l a I I ' C c ?7 C) y
C o ?y p >
m :5 z
I I II II O 0 w °
0 0 0 = D> (/t ?N
M l-+ Z CO) b ?+
®
m F-4 Z NO Z \
?? y z ? y.
o C)? rn ?? C y?? y
co m
y ?C-
?, a cn m
°o N b O m -O-I I O `/ ,b 1d
rn o ac °cn O rn 1?i ?? O
14 -fD ? >
Asa ?r I I ?? 0 !!%4 m
"' ?`+ try D b
-iw
ov 0m I b rn IS? Cllr
m a Ci7 `° m b b I. ?1 b
Z ° y /? '.tf
?A D N" HO kv b y
A c " O r b I a y N
° 'mil y m o N rn c7
m ?y
a y w +
- - - ??'?- -- - --- o° po y_ ---
+ oo o
n +
oo
W
b
Ul
o°
y No
z
?, z y 1 ? cu
z ~O -
WW
Lo w
it ?, N J 9
f
i
k
m
b b , M J J e Ul
V V ?d
yyreaa , O ti S c to ? o w w o
1??A 14f? Z y y I? ?I O ?' '" ^7 z
o ?' z? '? ? c ? oW
n c?r,r/off rM?`°?+ n g o cn z zee 9. m
1.4
y z r
M °m
z
t
Ly/ VUb
?nuL cs\dgn =n t \63655_hyd prm det psh dg,
0
O In O
?m cm
Z mZ
D nO 10
O -I D -1 r -
m cam m
n m In 0
z f? M
>I Z
cm mD
o 7,
m
D m
n-<
m-< z
E
n
o m
O 7a
N
V I
X_
Na

Fm V)C
V,
Z
no
0
o,IO
1
m N
o
z m
o y
I-
O
n
N
J
J
.g
V
Z
sm

n C
\ y
n °
° ° o
N O
m
ti N
z s o
n m m
D
m 3 m
N t ?
o n
m D
N N
mm
mm
7 °mn
?r
?r
I rn
-i
nm
° n
it
II I
x
ilI III
II II
0.
n o ?
O
o ^
vm °
N S N
o n
m o
m" m
N
y y O
ni
z m o
m> n
a
/R 1 it A
ll?
III
a
I II
b
\\ Il D
k ?` \ I s
? I ? III
?? I II
? ?`-I III
N N
TI
?
my ?
mm
°n r
m r.
/
I
D

F m
F c

O N D
m ? Z

v
n
r y
y n
i m

W m
n
z I
O
` m
z
? ? Ir
n
T
c O I
m I I I
m

V I
O
I
O m
I
D

n
m
/X n?(
/'?, mrm
^' z n
r oN
„
m n
I II
I N N /
I mn
o'
i "
n ~
°
JAI II t -----o _
y
N
I II m I
I n
'll II I c
u)3C
a
N N
I I I I I m m -I -I
?f I I II I m n 0 f1m ?
I `? i'r D
rC
I IOC O
I I Z
I ? II =
III II m ?
IT II
D
,Q11
- II ?I
it
\ I II
x p o i I? ?I I
I
lk ?I
N ? x xtv ?°+?? m III I
'o w
W O tf?? oo ' RE N II
En 'o
u c lMJ t0 L/ , 1I
r A ® II « f ?N I'
??? yak ? " " Il°NII -
? ? ,?'; I f III
D I I
6000
m I I
V_1
i
m
IJ
0
mm
o n?
N m
v ° ? D
y ? D
Y o 0
ti ..
??? '
? io3 v II II II II II ?
FsF -n? Nb?NCytt'AO
H D Q ?
_
n r a? NO
o
n n
x
n u " m
000
HHH
II II II II II ?
?
?
Ul
ulL4

00
3: s

,z M,
+ m r II II II II II ?
-
° e p V to (5
3 V
o u,
p? ? oi^ nn
O J ? S

+ o)
*J

it 11 11 11 o
?
vNivLn?
?

• T

15
OAZ
`'l O
rn
T?
V
O
r
om
n
NS N
y y
0o m N co 1
zim
c '
m? n
A ? s r+

I Njm
A v
3 C

mom
i
0
L
I
I
O
n
8E
3 ?
K H
p
n
ID Cn
ry
? n
o

ro g
= o
8
z
" m urn m
H ?--i
F L1
z
= (J) A
n
"z z
°
P
nz o

H
Cro
Z<
zz m
° N
" z°

u Ics\dyn\permrt \83655 hyd prm de t_psh dgn 5/I4
t I I II I c ?
1 I` ill 1 III / A 3 ??
' ? y It 11 III b -
? r 1 io m
I11 III ??? OIII? li / / `? n
?` I 1 > a ° _ O
' I I I I I I ? ? ° {"-
?I ? D
N O
C, - D
?<
,' II m
m I I III . I ? o p
I _. y
i? 1 I I II n C I + { 2
\ Z .
o 1 l I I II' ' A0 O
I Oa?O
A I I
?o cv, CD
m 11 I 11 n _
m cm o
z xz ' I I I m\ m ,I
m i ^, II iII i Z x1 ° O
o m0
o n
m nm
t^ In M In I 11 m
A? n
z-i Z? T ( 111 ?' III II'{ cv,i m i bob o ?y?Op?
L'm Z '? 1 I f' I n
\ 1 0 '" 03 v II it II II II i
n a _
II
TA A, r c ?\ 1a ?II? II' 1 m n ' , yts i -no Nb16D
Cyh
>? r n° I ?? \ 1 a I II >°'? a on-i LrI'pL.
m z o ?"\ II1n II 1 +++ _ D ?? t0
-t A m o h? ? , ? € I A."',N 'm" r ONO
m o o m O ,? ?M I Ig I 1111 1 I 1 8 N oZn i>1J1I
o I I r z= to ,k \\ co oo 'I a m
I O t71 m o '? I I 0 Z'
0 0
l M \l II Z.
G7' Z.
? O vl<A ? 4 I III I ' II II II II II U7
v n oT a M I rai V O7 p
!,' v?? ail,l iII II'I 'Al
?? ? I I III I I ?, Q ?
k I 1 I' I Li N ?I
O k ?` I I II II ' I ' ? QO 03 ??O
z r
11 1 I Ills I „'/ io? vti 0 ~ O
II g' r 1 N >mx) i m ?I
N mm II l Y o F- D
O m? FI ii I I Ilt'?? ? N I Ncr' II II Il II 11 ?
F
\ IT r F III I' I °oN ,..y _ O Nt?D
\? \ I nm 00
1 m
n ? n I II r? i I ? ? ?a - Q' p?W
I I ? ? `Ol
r
.1 01'0 ? ti l I ? r c ?? e o-y ~
N / J I III , s ~
rr,
N m I II, I I , N 1 ?' ??I?O??
PS 90
rn ??I ; I II II
l I II ,` , P If, \ -4 1 O
' ? mm ? I II I1 Into ? , OQ fQ f?'p`?y'
' oy /? I I III i mm I I pO IU
yr I °n' I V
FC T / I I
o-I / ?I II FI=
? oy I I I I n I ..? I °° ny ° '
Ai
4F
I x
p m? ,I JI?I I) 1 x i ,A
oy j
J? y n? 1 I r I ) r ? a
r? ' I r I I I' ` 2
y n m T i I J)
Ps-
II
4*4
Z <b
i
co ? ?? ,, 1 III ,; I i m
m ' N
F m' 1 N I\ (^??
I? ?ml
t:
1
1 1?
I
n r I ?i I?
?'I m 4BI
T m O
IF /? I I ? \??II II I? II ?1 N \\t 15 r
m I I HHC m
n I m n N \
m I I I II' 1, I ? o ? c) m
1 I ° -' o
O I Z
n II
I M I = \
A zj O I II I II;
n v
o a y
O , I I ' t) m
Z m m c I I I I m ??\
no z I I 'I ?i III A
? m z o o
1- Q
23. _) '__ II I "m I _ // \
1 N vm VI n I 'I L
mo -1 ? I, 1 ?
m y -° ° n + m I II .. I_ O
?? Z? ^O 1m ?I11, J Q
mn Im I?TI
Om N w O
3 o I? ? T n
IM O o D F RI 11 /?/ Ro
70 _ III I ?J \y S
-r mrv I II m--1 'n ?" I..j
vozu ,I l cZim° C17
z 0 C/J
1v ?? II 111 z> n
? O'D I II ? N? m p N
I 'A Q ro
? l I I m` ? D S
„ ©O Py j? II IIl 11 I \I Q? n
? ?? r; IIA II ?' H3C " N
ri 10
t! O + w ly Dt1 g z GI „
•? z ??.] 'z ,y W \JJ g II t -1?1 I ( w i S zc r A L m
w ?-3 O CJ1 ,/" E<- , '?F! I I ti l l¢ /(?, j y ., Z z
rJ w O /N ,I4t I I1I i Z . I m m
z o
O (7?0y a
V z
? ? cn ? r /'r >?' ?rI iI ? ,I? \\ \S \e \ ,n` / I \ z? zc N
CID Z
\ O
I i nII / I I \ I
c
m `' / , 11 `'n/
q
LJe 1-
as\d n\p rm, t,\63655_hyd p,m det psh_entorge dgn
I It
I
0
I O N O
m m
? Z m 2
I no mO
o -1 r
n-I
L,M n m m
^Vl CA 0
Z - ::E T
CAM >v Z
c K --i
mA ?
n
n-
m-< z
F
n
o m
z

(A 7a
rn 5:
cn Z
__m I
90 -
`rn
N
I
z
V,
m
3
z
x

a
ti ro d
V z
7
i
~
+
r O r Q
Z'l
N ?
Cb
N, '4
?
V
\ r

0
ro
C/) C/)
mm
mm
n
0 D
M r-
-i
D (7
F C
I' ; I
I
0
0
o
? III I
/ I I
III I
ti? ? ? I o
rn I I I °
cn
I
I II
?r I I m m '
/r I m m
/ I m C7
D /
rn !I I D C-) I/
I ri ? o
I III =
I II
rn
I I I II
I ?I
I I iI ?
I r ?? m
?I
I ?
I (? m
V
- I II
I
V7 i
I?_ -? I I\ I I o i (n
>rn
??I ! rn >
ril
Cmw
?I Cn 3 C
M,
m U) CA
m -u
I? II ! m
nm
III I CD CD 5; 0m -C
i
1

m

?

'
N
\
C7
x
c
?
?W
I I
Z I
C
n I
C
i
I W? C x
00
O
n
ap t2l
70 € °' H
C O CrJ
i rp ? ,o cn
z I
10
1 11 I ?? V ?1 1 y
C, EO I Il g t[f Z ? C4
Ln IN
36 21
0
>? pC co z
0
mm
mm
O D
mr
D F
F D
D m
D
_o
n
C/') ::u
m -D
m
o?:u
m D
m
D_ D
C) m
K
CO
D
z

z
N
rn
.
tsIB3655 hyd prm_psh dqn
o
-D m
r
0
0
o
11
( I ? I I
I
?? II
/0
°
m I I
?
I ? l
II 0 _
no
O
S t ii t r V °
V
O
A
N

t y H

10
O n O
m m r 1
i m
N
Z _
o I Y Zm 0
? ` ' I
I N j m
? : ? ??rpD?
? II t 0 n II II pQ
II
IIII
k ?
\
? z \
?Ac ? ii ?j
--
NOORR
p
m
o Mk\ _ I W ' .
(DO
???00?
v m J I. r M , OHO

0 a

00m
®I

(3

Z
'
Z Ln tj

man 4
?
A
0 n
?.?
1? I
y
W m
I' n u 11 p ncn
o
? t '
r 1 Nri"q
Ra
4
? I) l n L
O
? ?
1
I I ti N
-11:? ol
Ih V
_ _
J
mm f N ?? ?
D
O D
m r ti/ B ^'
Fr mamr9 z rti
n
-1 tJ <r
mvlm / t y

!
n m
<

D , r

Q =

0 T

Q
D
I I ? g
L c%' ,1 s
r m _
, Z n
rp
m ' y
n l? + o zn° M
n a
o ti
? _
'D n
rri ( /5 w ° ?
?
V
1
O
mii N
q
m
fn
O

°
or-
I rn ? ? s ? , Nx o ? ? ?<
W V - - S V -I
T `S r +

m

Rl IN mVia E I m
y ti-a -r m?z
Z x-00 my°
K -1 D N 71
o
t
`'" 1
co

Z o...,c
Z
m?
I ) .. r
' r
;c

m
a
k [
pm y
oNm
mA°\ An
A
-?
m m

4 „
r n
Y o
t a c N

+ -- g
E y A
?
M
yD
' I 1 Vr ? yse;
O m 0
vo I y m ? , -
-
y°~ N m O
m
I % / I v
%10. Ol
m?CV
u Jq
?g q O

g
,
ri s
,rl / I
I
' "mD w
Y
m
4
m °
p
?

c p I
m r
I
m )
i? z> r
-I
+ z
i °'
_ - D
< m
y mo

C o

? I I m
r
' '? . ?
o z s
y
?
v
m
t r R I ,
§ r
?? g
n
°
?
? l
I( I
I
' , -Nimz
i , n?a
n f
o m 5=
I
I '
I I (?3cj +oo
No T
-
-F rt 2,-
P?
' I ?
r Y
v I ` C -I -1 Dt r
mo

mm
I
l
I

I
I m
mG) fTl
o
°m?
> oo nc. i m I
I -I
m C° m -
ro ?m
mx ms., I I I ""
O
m? a ? 1 I
Z
0
x 0
n >0
m I
_ ai
T
A

O
r
m +
m
a m

\I

i
I
?? I m
l n
O C
° o Z
° 1

I

r
20
.v
o v
I '
`- ?
t
N N - -- T j I- I I r ate ' L - ^ ; '
10
Z m ° m x
?
m n n
yr i I
c I I ?
l 3 I/ I
I
°'d ,., ,?
`
2 n ?

0n Rd Tal
?' I] ? / ` a
g S p R°
3
I ? r °c On c
UD
Mmo go,

r

i N-4n
°°m

O
8a
oo
_ s ? .
f am 0 C?7

I w
O m;r
rfr<? ?y
tl b

Z on
D
n

? I
? I1
I
?3?
? 0 ?
? ?
i7
C ro t7 ?? m-cD? O -0 o 0
O ?'

O
b
C`"z1
`"
7
^?
i
j
c r ' L
J
°° t
iy
z W?
>o
t
z "j
,
M,
r
RFTA// I
} O
N
C
rl m
Z z

.-
' n CC ty z x ?N?m j O? V' P =
y \

V •" (n ?I ' O -i n ° y
D `III
I P I

z l ? \ \ ' ` x r.y
/ti C j,

ro r /
1 Z 60 °
I I
2 I i Cn Z
O
,o
C II
' I • I . ,
, `
7/29/2006
yd?aullcs\dgn\p.?- is\63655_hyd prm_psh dgn

'
II I I r
+ /
d I I I o°
I I? I I?r
U t , o / t
t
I
l0
I \
? I 1
I
r
? i I 1 I
r
5

n
m ? r
, I
I ?i
?
?
i
I
I ? z
i t
o } ,
o°

p I I I ? ?

I
N i I
I N-1
o r O
? ,
1 m
N
O
o
zal
l i l l m y r
? ? I ms m r

..I
°
O ,k I I \/Ilr
Z
° O N M 60 0,
L
L I } )
O
- I
m * i rl -' O
;
min I

Om >
rK /R f
I m
m
? I W ? 5
r +
I W
t

Ill 01
N

II II ..{{IIaa II II ?
NOO ?Ro
?I"oLn
DO C? II II II II II ?
NU
pp N
?O
1 I
!
•
r y !I I
? I it G
r
\
' m
<
it AN l r
f
'
?? - •r
D
(?
1 r
u
t _
°
R O
°c c'

Z \
II S'
1
, r /
w I ? #. it
/ , N
. r I 1
r r
Y - O ' D
r I ° _
0

r"

I
+
15
d r ? ?, , c

_
m D
m I

o
.nom
o D
m ° -
03
Y
i
- o m °
i + ?
, +

I
I
a
CN
'
-
j
T I y,
1
i
?y m
? I II I
/
i
/ r I
I
m ?NmO,m£ N rl /
j"
T , / i
m r
11
r
r ?
ODp
\ ? ?IaO
"m? l 1 //
? ;
r
<??
NZ
o II m£N© I
I I
f'? r w
r
"ONmmN
D
O m'v
r?' m n + I ?/ > -co

4
'
ut
01
I D
2
e
?oN p
11
` ?
// t1 y[)
N m Z
N
mom.-.
s
„ m
I m 04!
/ m
II
J ` I I
Joom W
n
< O I t` e ,,' A r m

I ?

r
? ? 4T I
, ? I 1
\ \

J ,
<
I -M
, ,. ,, -rmz
v N
n II
I n;o
r

I ?? 3 'O; mix
O
' T I I Ul N-IC

mm ? m

? G?(Tl
' mm0
1 mo
O c.zl
(? -i O rn D
l -I
t?
fF? ? ?.a "P

s? I I ?
? ? I m
qq 9
r
4
\ m ° O m

3 r
i

z - < DLn
c n m r n

c n

° ? O
O7 C
2 ?
P 0
r
? m

n f o m a
P
w * ?
>o ?m I I I

mN
O? mo ?
I ' I O

,
N?. 1
I Z
C
p A n0

o z m -?
u I r
,m
I

o ( ?; 20
?° ° m I I I U1
"mp N I I '
NO W
:R m
ADD
r'
' ?
?
?
I /
r ,
T z
0
?

I
o .
-.I ?4
?
i ri COD
:0,) MO 0 uw
" /
00
m O
1
1 N
?

..
.. , C
i ?m°
mD n ?
Z ry C17
V]
` r
7 ' ZN m?L
K ?m
I I' m
N b

I

m or)

mn
n
x
s ?

C,
(n 3 C,
o
m?C), mg o
o b m 0, ? vm cn 0 g
? Z< m
u
•? '? ? Iy o
z ' , I ' I I ? rry
J ? m ? ; g
z ? m 0
A ? T
z w _ QFTA/ry I ?+ I Z N - I / S? i n
Z C? kg
frdp P1
"f
--
+
z
o
n - y . „ 10
> s air,
,?
p
r O - Oy .. O% = 4 x , ?? g
*` - - O , r N r A
V 4 r 4 . ? ty , I" rNmm ?' \
?
'"? N 'C ^ I N ,• Y <
o -=in° n 'III I?'I? ?1?r I / \ °az
0
m
?o
z c .p m
mo ^?
AN O

ulics ?c
n
v,? o
m
0
111_ - --
,t?\83655_hyd-p- psh enlarge dg,
\ frl D / d
?r ( r?'-jwCl) °
D I- r, r- K
I- D m r- i #
C
r mCf) c°
D
nT UO?D -
r
C / I i

° ? r
- l0

I +

cn I
s II `, I cn I

rr7

II ?

I
' r? ,
r
I 1 r

I ' I
II F
'
n, I 11

c
mmFri mcng c.n
r-rj
' m 1
C/) V1 C/
) p m -i
;
-I m
T (- n Z
ll I I , I ( ,N r
o
T? ° ° I II /? ?` 3J
^
`
l
`
! oil 61
_
a% >? r W
F-
TJ °'
r- C/) Iv ?'
o U-1 m
rn
N)
j
-? rn I ( " ,
70
m m o D
O
n1 m -o U) zmi v'
m
_

f = O

+
D
y ?:u r II ' i
O -
C- CD
_
-
0
0 r
(

i 0 (A 0
D
W
-
-

?mm 11
?,.
I
1 O ?
Mm
l nl

T r ='
v I
rrt' I `

rn

P 1 (A CD M
r
I I I -i m=
I N I Duo
,
m co :K cc,
Z m I I I ~~ CO, NBC
m

m u,
`
= , G7'(Tl
°o
m ?z
m0 cam

Cz

(

m -
0 C7 -1
I
I
D m
m C° m I
>
?°
m (/1
?:o = F ----l
??
cc) Un
m n m ?
° o
?=,
I j O
Z
O
C D

m
co
o

o z
v
' '
l

1
F- Cal
m
?:u j
m

'
I I
1 I
I rip
C
01
e? a
Q ro ? tIf Iy?' H \ i I i <
?1'? W ?o R 1AIN 3 CON"
j
m?
zzoo ox® _ '? ? ??
,
V C`1 z x
w -4 > ' I
? J

co) V -
I (D
g

? 5
n O

H

?
n
o
S ?y z < w

zr m-
l
L; ?
m
0
Z
= Z
m
oz z
Z O

n
z

0
o
0
7/29/2008
R \I ?dr-uI acs\dgnope, m?.\B3655 hyd-p,m pfl dgn
r
14
DD
%0
14
0)
10
0

rnm
c
rn crn
rn
om m ?m?
?
_ n
n
??
r 3b,
rn2C n
zrn m

_
? m
mrno?ac??
rn? rn

? ?g?2 z o
2 ?]
S 1 A 10 + ?7 77 RT 2
?m a
IN 191 0 1 II II II II II II II II 11 II II C

B GIN DET OUR RAD

o
I
N -<n ?? -cn
E 191

VC A /! 25 0

n
II
II
I ?
rn I
r ?
11 1 a
_
Q
11 v
c ` INV 19 20 = A
n I ? ? m
N O I N W I
°
I P RC A/ +25 0 r-
E 190 7
STA 12+3 - LT N< o
INV 18B 8 C
il
I I
r S A /3 70
I
n
1 11
cn
~
I I o, B GIN RES
- RFA ING
w

°

a

(I
FA 73
CLU
P85
2
ES l
4
R

UR

ACIN

)
LNU
STA
13+33
"T
- LT
I

Pv

7- S7

A 13

450

E

N DIT

H
INV 88 10
I N I S
INV 14+ 5
190 7 1 - R
I (n
o ST l3+ I00 ?
O

m

y m
?2 END
STA DITCH
0+2
332 -
RT
ST
14+
100
_ I
BE
ST
IN
I5+
RAD
000

z I rri
o
r BEGI DITC `
I EL
(IN 193
CLUD ES l ' RE URF C1NG '
m i
nj I Ilu INV i86 10 I
11 - ° PV ST l5+ 0 00
N
I
Q
ly
EL
882
ELl
09/
-

I
II r
11 - r = II I
II III
I ?
rn
END DITCH i II o x? ? ?
STA
INV 15+5
I156 43 - LT
N
Z
?
V -?y
Vt
CJ
k S A 17 00 - T

PV
C
A 16
00
1
V 187
00 PVT A/ +95 U
01

I

1?
EL
882
V
o orr-1 1 ph 9995 ED
4 ROG
r 1\3 STA .
6+9 00 -
Il L
-D
F1 . A
n iF
w
Z, 6
i rn n o END PRO OSE B DGE
O 4a STA 8+0 00
w m
0 x Pt T A 17- 00 0
01

EL l

98
v I E 188 4 °D P 184 15 00
_ F1 189
9 3
o w D ° r II .5 I
EN D OUR GR E P11 4
ETA 17+1S 0
ELl 8.5/ n g N= Q?
u, G PVR ST l8+ 500

EL 14 9 62
0° .p
II II
n II

1 ?
"'
1
VTS
A!9
450
ILI,
ND _`u
RAD
A / +50 0
N
( NCLU ES 5° R SUR ACl G)

' -- - -- wm
mx I

1) Q
? Q
N W
"
5 O

Cb rn n
3C

' K Un
ggg
g8 ?Ln (n? D ESU FACT G ??$ e
S A2/ 830
C? C,

N ai 6
N z
o
?c?? orn?; y
0
m ?
?
mornmx rnx
rn A
??mao
2
? I z
f
^

`n ??I???
=o +
il
ar
~ `? O s s
a
cam
z (7
22i
m q C
a II II II II II II II II II
?

? o
? H
?
0
?
z
o
n 1
> ? N to ? y 8 ? ?
< ?
yz
4 (,'
? ? zz
? ? O ?
W ?
y r
1--1 p
IT ?? m 41
Z ?
?
v

0
I ? ?
? ?
? ? ? - v m
O O l/101
1? 01 ?
o
0

`? z z .N Z
z pN `^ ?
?
r °
0
I I II ?
1,0 Li FI Eat 5`,_Rlf, _r h Jg l
TIP PROJECT: B-3655
?z
O
O
C7
O
z
D
OD
O
vi m
H ]7
zV
-o
' m
M.
z
O
H
z
m
m
z
c?
n
O
O
M
v
H
z
H
O
z
or
i>
mH
rz
ic z
CO _
mcn
CD m
H L
CD m
m ?
v
CD
CO D
m r
-q 03
om
0-0
H m
H O
ic
m
v
g M
?r
P r?
O ~
i
?r
z

y
O

V
rf ?
L J h--a
o
L-, I
N N e
O O_ £
N ? 0
I
? ;
ca ca z`
V V p L a
V P
m bi
c
H
Cl)
O
m
0
M
Cn
z
O
--I
H
z
?C D
c
z
z
H
I I
?til ? tim
Oy Z
yn b
w a' C
+
o+
x
°o
II
C)
O
a
„ O
(7
H
D
r
ao
Cl
c
z
D
C ? ftra' -CreaK
In \ - -V co
0 G)
Cr )? PZ n
C-) 1a ° ?-
? rO G1 r
m
40 \l o C3
\ ,o -U
ml?
O 0Op
m
D z mN n
T ?C 61 JA ,l _?
o
I
a? U
CD
w
mN
Jd ?
T
0
J
O
' ?. to Im
N
to ? O
?o ?ti i Ir _
N I-c
RM PLANS

? ? O
y x

I
? y
b
C
i
Coo) w ',?tl

O '? y

?b
C y
yy
?y
+ 00
?+
0
?o
II
y
y E ;?

clo?
00
°o
1
O
oeo
0
0
b
b
O
n
y
bey

r

, I x\
I ? E ?\
r ?

\k

b
O
C
n
n
O
b O
Q
Z
o?
b
C 14 14
y
L&I
b ?o
? C O
o x
?2 ?
a ?
T 'O N T W C = ,N« n N D7 C) T N N 'O T T T T T 'O '9 A n (7 N
?°-?o m ° N o ` = a ° c = `- `° m °c 3 m r° N fib'' o' -S'`'o o'o Q' ° o o SF o o p o ?b
cD ° ° f m m ?^ ° 3 o a 30 7 g= C v v v v v v '=t v f °
O o 'p O. o b n O W O. - T 3 3 ° 7 O O O 3 W A O 7 O Z r N 7
fO ° 7 s Z r
N m o. D N N ?. 3 S to o O c '° 0 m to
c p_ ° o 0 0 0° c 0 3 ?3 m m Q. ` a °a a T O rt° ' b
° co f m c o w h 7' o <^ a a o s 3 c° o°> ; o
O N N , ow O W A ?1 ] 7 7 w ° ?" C_ ? 1p 7 C 3 r fC
o 4 'n S m 3 ?- n. ' C$ 3 r-
O ° fND .Oy, 0a1 0. 2
. r 'W ?J
0 3 3? '?cy1 00. . o- Z rt
7 c 0. -n tr
a -n
X o b' 3 0
CL c °- ^ A $
' c
s z 0 b
C
T I ?_
BG ( I N N i i fo 0 c X w %0
I
)I I ? ?i??l I ? x I I I i
= N N C a v o n v vn ro g, T o N m°
7 O O N 7 7 < c O a O y, O O O O O O O O y, O y? O O O y? y? yi m- m
fD 7. p O_ tG t° ry ° 'O 7 '9 a- 'p 'O rt n'p V 'C = N -? y 7
O O O
O p O 0 7 °
C p d 0 N N 3 _ O 7 O 7 O O O O 7 7 O 7 O 7 O O N
l C N N N N N N N 0 (a CA 0 U1 N , 7 N N N f°7 7 ° °
CL ,- y m ° n m° o m m o o n m n m m co
7 s y 3 N o_ n o_ 3 I o_ a s Q. n m o. CL o_ o_ m Q. n a .o o_ a A ^] ° CL ° a
-0 -0 a n° O rt C v+ y c -1 n o m Z° 7 Z° Zc m m c ? G1
O p S O p C p S S O O m p O W ID m p 7 r° f° f° .5. 7 O
c s _s o c T ° m v v 3 3 3 Y 0 7- ° s 7 n a a c°
0 W D. G1 C lD fD !D lD O? ° ° 'O 'O 0 ' O "' 7a rt rt ,O,ti ?. O 0 m
p C C n n N N -p 7 7 M 0 O2. ? .0
C) a=° c'o s s °rt c o°°°
3 ::E a
o_ ° a °° y m rt 7 n o v° ° `? , y
ID a
a 'a
?D 3 3= c ? 3° 3 3 7 ° 3 3 0
rt ° ° o ?m m °
A a- Cj 3
Nc N T T
3 n 77 3 3 c
i
? I I? I I ;} x
CJ fl I I I I 2 y m I m I \i I D? I i + j? 10
n m a
£
m m m
x
I° a I I i }
p v p p A m p 7e = mm*mmm
0 N N 'o p T v= 3 0o m
0 0 0 o m r m o 0 0 SI' C° o
O n fD n O n O m o n I O O O O O O Z
0 a -0 _J. (G p g g W p m 3 S o. O f° (° O
p
IG
?
7 a 7 0_ 7 a -? s s s s ? ? = 7 a v ? ? ? ?, 3 p a 3 7o a ° ., 70 o co ;a
° m m o 0 0 o c? O o m 3 0 -? r; ° m f° ° o
C O ?° = 7 C `7
O. O_ W d p 7 7 7 7 Z A d O C 3 ° d` a .9 N N
a a
CL o_ a -00000 Q.
rt 'CaCy
m m a 7 7 4 o r_ f f S oo ° 7 7
n :L to
CL 0 -00
T -1 -i -1 to S S S O C N c
O
,n O W O G O 7 (D O N N W -0 O
S 1?u
o W tD O °n f N. O M O CD 7 S CD W
n ° O 7
1 'O W 'O -0 C O N O S = = x
7 0- N, -a p C
O 7 7 Q m r m a io 0 0_
fD n 0 n 7 CD c ?
° 7 C S m p c O
ID c- m m m °'
+ N ?: m
N V1 '
C o_
m m
I I ? I
I I I I ?
I I 1 I
a
oooo¢? Ion®o¢-do-. o I ?
I I I m f f
I I I I ? I I I n -
' s v c C C C C N m o o D c c D c7OD to- y
a p _ f1 n p 7 7 Z ° N n H H N H n N n O H n O ° O ° -a
M -+ r 7 0. W N c D ° 7 0. 3< 7 C.- 7 0_ o o° O p_ CL 3 O -.1 c o_ o_ Z a 3 vs vs ? °a m G1 a o «? o
0 CL 2 3; m m m 2 y o c m 'M N o a a CL as a c<u ?D T
3 D ° ` ::E ° n °- r O N N' CA CCD 0 7 0 ' S' l fOD-
O n W ° O ? N r. C N T d O_ fD C
_
Oo N' 7 7 o W N -on "a
n ° n T X C T = S ` `
° O O T Q ° °
c: 0
' m a O G? D7 2 D) C D r S r H r W C n tr CD
o v _O_ O 3 x ° ° ° ° O° °S c r
C 7 r f H n Cl W
r 1? C C C VI
? m s ° m c
w W m
n N "
N m c
r m
I I
I I
I { I
I ? I I
I I I
0 00 N O OO s i O z ®? G? o i® 0 0
_ A
I I I ?
I I
tt
y0•
n
C
n
0
Z
rn
Z
O?
Z
1 r?
D
ro
O
I I
Z?
v
rn
N
0
r
to
:it
tho
r?
n
f f ??I,. 3j F,I?f Cyr, Rcly tyF dyn
C
r 7° I CA
N Z T
D .?
0 D D 9
+ Z o0 0 9
p T + + r IQ 0 Op AQ P O (m
O 3 00 O Q
O
O 1 > '+ Z
_ CA O
M
Z OM Z
O
O O N (7 + NO
14
O - 2 A
O 0 N w
sN ?
z O
O p ,o O
A L1a p
+ = zZ
05
O m
N?
a
w
P

z
O
z
A
0
3
1
N
Z
0
O
N
z
O
N
0
r
i
P
o $ •
N 1n
?I
^ O
l / N
r ? N
r N m
rn
Z
Aw-
Q Zm
N N
c?
m
O O T
° p
N 1?/1
N
? lO I ?
m
- a -- -- -- -

O
A

icy o I
i
loo
op BE
zZ zZ
°9 Og:
°
I
D
N
O
O
O
O
r
+
ca
00
O
O,

Z
El
O
z
T
0
VI
z
O
O
m
z
0
r
N
X
V
DD
O CJ
L" cc
00
O A
00
r ?
+ +
co L"
W O
O O
N

D
v _
(
D +
+
r 0
N
N
A

z 0
z E;
0 +
00
N

A
I0a
0
Iz yz
I°r
l
I
I
m P
I V
O '^
I ZNN
I 0 7
jz
o0
Sx
n
N
I
z
c
P ?z
v
A0
= O
O °o
p a
N
V y
N m? Z°
m
m
0.
rz
< A
ti
10
Z I`
_sTp? 1
601 D
C
n I
CO
100
r I 2z
ID
Z
B
O
z
O
z
0
'i
z
O c
m
m
1
m
O
m
N
0
mm
co
m
mm
z
r
N
y
O
z
O
m
m
N
m

,
m j 0 D
D
a 1 1 v
-
i
0 D
a
m
0 a
O O
>
z D
0
a Z D
0
z 0

<m 4!
<v
O
my my < V
my a
x 0 x 0
0
m
m x
m D
z
am

m au?
y a ?+

m J

m
m- m D m z
O D O A O D z
m 9 T D T v ti
ND pi rj AD O
Vr mO Pr z
r
o ro r
o m
m
d
z m n
a y
z m

m m 0
m
D
m
a i mm
9 m
a <
m y m m
Om
D Oa
m ON
C A
z
<m <0 <m ?
o0 Om o
0 0 m
m s m0
m m0
Dm we
Ca
ti i mm
m 2
rm
m -,
v
z
m
O ?
F i
c
m
ow
w
m a D
N
m m
m
m
z

C L =

m
0
c

D
a x D x m
. a o
m ~ x
m z
G
j
y
mm a o
T
_ <
E l
a m
r m
m

y
G)
D
0 m
x ,
D m
r
?
E D
N
y m
< o
m ? o
c
z
A a
Z N
m
y

0
n
a R°

;eC
OA
n
8?
o

(
AH
R
A
n

a 9
z
S
q ?f
Z < D
p
A W
'T
?r Z In Z

oz m
z

> -e

i?
z
mo
m

A z
0

E ?`+
N
bbm
??M
o•? aa?
+ r
r
m T + + N
O ? ? O
OZ °OZ
+O 000
^J+ Ld
0
0
m
+ m
w?
Nv
{
0 O
oL.
i c,
Z
I
l
N
?N
Z
m --
w
w
b.
i 1
O
O
V
0 ?y °
0
P
IF-
0
0
O
O I ?
n 0
f r w O ? I r w
I N i ° N
m n 0 a M M
3
N
oQ
?^I ? U o ?-? ? ? ,Fl
0 0 rn Z / '?
V 0
c p g
N N
C
O w
O m
o
O p
O N
3
3 0
Q O _
O
Q
c
? y
v ?
C - w -
m ? Q
ti N
e?7 Q
$a n
CA
f+ w
G1 Q n
w 2!
c0
z?
0
0
9 0
°o OF L a
a y p
G + AZ U Z
rr m
oz
-z
y j
C
z a oz
cn W,
n z
z 0
1' 1
°
o N
f
° o
N Q
O
n
a o ? ?GO1
I N O y O
1m O
O
N
?° P

R \Rood gay 83655_Rdy dtl det dqn p
1

5/14/

II -D CD
IT O

" +
p
?Y

, o
O b ;o

j N
m
I
11 ?' I , l
i I
1 ?
,, s
6 a
? n
o

r I
I I
I ?
I 1
7 y
O ; Nnr
c D
\i
? p ° ^ O

\ 2
no

0 0 A O

i 0

N

- O
_
mm?r1m vE;
i p 0 N y N •

I
I
I"
'
_ ? p O y
' v v m " 1^
N
O
n O Z ?
z = O
f' o o m ^' T
?
I
'o m m ? a
?s m !

bbb
l on ???' G II II II II Il vl

?? \ s i -nom b\ Ln
o z \ i I. y
?
'' a a u s2
- m ?
U1 Cy ,p N
v v N *,k I I z ;i r T _ Nor Z°wl?
? \ 1
Il ~
?
I CD
rL
O? ?n m,
z - 0
z m"
° Fc
k \
4` (1
ca o
I
I
I Q ?au
,
000 m
-z+
I o
wee;m \
?ti` I I,
? III" c y
D 0 '^'z^z
Opp
? Non
n F? m
'?? III
' T II II II 11 II In
n m I ? 1 n
i Vco
V ° C I ?? ?I
? r + ' tnON
a
° I III I I W
V I
I t
bN
Q
8 ?? I
I .
li b
I
I b
n ?
W
N 01 r ? ?N?
4 I p Ul o 3r
pp
II - - III t Ln

/0
b
° '??

a ti

v

O
P I N P
s
mm ai 1v
g
B P ° I
Il- inn
• >
II
O ma v
i?a xo
r n
y a? p° II
'?
I

m mwm'm
LI
rar a
L m '??/I

7 r/,{ +N

°oN

> ?-
c
v p II II
II III
VlOQV ??
rn 2p
T I N
n <mym
1 ; S r do Oho (NII O?j?U1?U1
A
mv x
n L n S/ ?? m
c
Q
?
n r N o
+ 4 I I
I pl
d y m+- `°
x
o r

< c p n
O(
p
n o6 I N r
o
,
+
Y
or m
° I I m w
I 2 +
o n, -'
m ni C5
nnyV,, s / I I I ~ ? „

2 r
m ,v r W
WWWW
N
rn l I
I I it
' ?
1
?
Y
??f?0??
y PS PS II li t
? i ` II II
II II II (n
? ` Y I ? I
rn?l
h. 7
W ?' ?
I A rP
NN .S
b
1 ?
+
` ? N?
cy?
??1??I.I1 .?
?
02 . my
mm
?r 1
srI y NN i
mm OQ?
f

m
+
N
> "
o
I go
I71 ID' ld J

3

/
n
n

,I n `

ro ?r
rc m I ?C ?rf
ri)
r 0/
~ v
?I
p

y f-f

O ? OI
M
y = 55
m r' m s

r
IITTS?

?
? >
m >
a c1 I

il

? m
m I
12
I f
?n ?m?
u li rnA I w
i ? ? r
?I m AN
0 +
`/
P5 PS C yam. F o I III oII
c o "`m r y ' ?I v
+
02 A Ol
1 0
z I
II??,,
o
I
f y m I
p 2
Z { r m

b I? N 01 (l?
w y 0
? ± n m
x
II ?i
?
1 / A

_
• y
? ?? ?
F II Ii 'i t
i
n m

r ? 211 + IT
L N N
d' I i

I I }

1 r 11 y
?
y
O
y
? A y
? I
r
I r rn
N+
N
1 ) rl
I ?
'
r L , {
I r
O
o I III I? 1 sI? ? 15

'
I r---? I
I ? U )m C ~
) m
" I m
mA I I N N ` L
C m
-
N
o?
n ?b e II n
>
?
m

r 'p
1; g
nm x?e
?1O O 4 4
I I ro
? ? I-m+r i 1 D
v
N I F O
'v
n y
° oz 1, I z
O I 1? II ? n r
r
G1D?p T
n
AZ ?i zN° , ?J { I v
C:
?<
Z CA m c al T
0 0
vOT pm$oGo n 2 5 jrr an+
23. 3 0? N v N O) ivr f r I >,^ r?l , H t i
mmo m?mom m O 1 % I u
[[TT11 ? 1 I ? ,
y < c1 ° o i x
'? Zm° II TI
a? a N+ I 1 lt` xo w ,
DO Nom ?g ?Ed? g1fCo <, F F° ,;z `oaf In
xc ma II ?Z 0n >T
L,) X
- no m \??? C!J
oomm C,
r vm N f5w'
t ..? mxom ?p1
-+r? \
, r
?l I

f o OO,y O
mUmmm '?
00.
nm
V f
n°cim°
rd
? ,? FODm r 7 P5 'I I L
om 1 VJ
'
? ov it 1 1 ° A;
NK? f1
y
'?
2

00 I I m
r02 y m+
A???
t I I T
I rZ
I ,
( °n S C?
M;D I p poi,
V
C ,
" H3
N
..
N
m
° 1
?
?rn ` F7
v
1
Q
? ??
y 0 2
o
I M-n
/ I
;a
I ,it) m
O
b g o
G)
?? C . ;
7 D N` <

I
y
? z r, Ln M,
A
Nz ?? RfTAN , z
N"
'I y Z z
m
T
?
d
I
Ell
r m
O
mm D ^

, II z r ?/y y_ 10
• .

I
l
„ r
L '
s

z
0
x m Y
m ' OR
I Gq z
zm ° Z
' mN?m I 0 Lh
N v m F L Z°
N cm -Z-10
LD \

z o
m
E.
m

•

ua a

\ z

N

z n
UD Z
? 9 m n I O
N r
1 N
I, I
.,4

Rdy-psh dgn
? l
rn
rn
2
Z
c

I
'

II ? Y ?
O
?
In CD
r
W
'

t r O
0
i O
I

fl I
I ??

?' ill
I I rl
?
f
I r ll?
? !
I mm
m m
i I m
y
?

, ?

I I

r y
a °
m w m o ?
m
a O

a °

o
?m o
m
0
m ,
n

m
.w

F` ? 1 ? II ? n II II
II II II i
, \ ..
m A ^' i a m r' rn m O
m W 0 O
O
m m N ,k \ li o0 0 ?I ' Z
I I 1 I 4
?G7
p l'2 °02
°um

?

I I } CN

D ?p

O I
I

I

o 93
w
I,
?ti?OD?
° n II II II II II V1
IN- O C
?p{. ? I
I I 1??
,i II
I? I I
r O W
V i,
, ,
? N?IUIRQ?
?pbt?cn o
I

S
I
;
n W Q
? goo
I N ON -
;
4. cn
(!1 F y
I ?
?N ro r
m ? ? I
? ?rn
m 2
. w
v
?
I
O i f
ra-? X o
° ?amm
? 2
< m

11+
"o i
I
°
?
m?
{
f
\ r 0
? .
q 0
5`
m rl ? ??
i
G7 r
4 ? r
m _ B n na
1 O '? T
/5 T

00

m o

D

I ^"o

mo o

o°
I EA 0 $ ° +n ' '! n
0102 ?a +r? Q ;? / ° ?~ § °o
Ij O ?I 40
I
R~j m m
m. -0M, F In
/n ,nam\-1
N rn
Q A

2

O 4
P S

l2 /r
2

P 4

S.

m

>,
I
0
-1 E xx?
l-? NN ME
n ?'
(
I` o I. a, >00 v
ll
i 1!
CO
[
te
f=VZiOtNiimmN A m `? T I ?I fM N r m
mm \ nm of
p v o _ 2
I O
?Kr Ar O
(/ m n W
° +
N
O av
v HBO ' m O
+ L'I
? i I? ` gyn.. 1n °? Z 2
icK0, n I O
T v ai
u p}
W y
I _ I )I >
i 1' m+ t , r m 21 -rl O O +
+ X N )
?E u)
OI I _ it v nmv
N I ;I t
n '? , n I I j? L
IC ? ? N
N I HHC,'''°°
?? In+m t I OP 02
f n mA 4 I f>l? -iA?
m ?m
0o AZ cim P P
} n? o° cm'I-civ,X+ 4 a 02 m iy Q \ D
£ qp 84
5 m
e

Ra 3 ?? 4

- m
g
q 9 o
9
i
3 9 m
Z _ - Z M
--j O
i <
- - D U)
a
E r 0
a O
mC

x
O
r
?c
A
a
° m
nlu °
°
n Eom $
Q

0

??°
?p mn
o
Am
ax
°
?i y
,Al I° .I I +/ 5 I
° V
II
0005 tP
I
?,~ ?f
`~
OZ
A nm # I

G1 D 10
7oz m > m -?
O m + x
`^
°
r r!
1 I
m

c0 ? o
?
a?
m I coo
? I

~ C
0 .
o
o
m
O ` a
?
m 20
CO p
V
m°
p
Nut` O
mm0 main
0 m
`
I
770
0 v? m
N O t'{ ? ,
? r U7 Z
7 °AM ` l1 T? b C D x
0? m O ?0,
n0
o n R T AI - I f mm / O.h? g' Re
m o
s ?
X C Cb G
4, 2 X+ , pol-il--1-
..` °t m O $C
oozm°? C17
I ?l °ozn t9 C!l
o.m;, wy
mm m
b
00 r0m2 I O I Z
.N I y0 2 C l
r O I O Q I', -1 -i D t 100 O
o? m/gym; COQ ig ?o
f
O'?i ?Dn y? mo Ulm
m n 101 -^ RfTA/ry m I Z 2 N c. p Z i
N !n c I i I i t-? W m "y _ m
M v D II 4 I RFrA/ry t ,? \ i, W _` ,. i ° 00 Z 10
0
v < pp Ol n
o m m mo m 0 z '-C
m n Z V + mNm I, O (11 ,
/n o ?y+mom? yz I \ '?? 0
I a
) i ' y pn Z
= m m j ' z '40
A x '< N I O
I`il
r
E, ,655 RJy FFI dye,
14 00
I

om g?Qmmm? yrn
rn

N' 9 1 c H
S 10 + 77 R T 2 11j
n
IN 191 0 I
I If II II II II II II II II II II

I
??
g?
?8 C
"
I A a ?
ti
?
+ I
I a
n
8 GIN DET UR RAO
I
O

A // 5

II 1 m r

Q INV 1
9 20
` ?
r-li
N I J w o ?
r
I RC T +25
` STA 12+ E 190 7 rn
6
INV t88 8(
U
II
I A /3 70

I
U
I it

N y

I I
GIN
RES
RF
ING I
w I

I

°? A

n
:5
r A. i
D.4

'
fl CLU ES l R UR ACIN 1
STA 13+33 - LT
I P? T S ST AIJJ 45DO
INV 88 10 6E IN DIT H
z
INV 14+5
190 7
-
I (n
a ST l3+ 00 r

rn END
STA DITCH
R-
32 -
RT
ST
l4+
IDO
_ I
•
I

a T
S /5+ 000
` EL /9/ 3
2 BEGI DlT r ON LUD S I ' RE URF LING
m
IV 1 < IO
' INV 186 10 I
m O PV ST l5 00
LA I N iv EL 882 + w ELl 91
yN c o

1
II
II z=
9
ry
II II I II
I
rn
END DITCH I it
o
c
s
`
S TA
INV
186 86 43 - LT N

?

?
_ y,

CCiJI

?
g S 7
A T
1 PV C Alb 0
00 18 00 PVT AI +95 0

I

?

1? EL 882, -
v
J
J
'? rrn
1 a STA 6+ 00
11 n c, 1
w
w m
+ g
rn G,
g
END
PRO
POSE
) B
DGE
I
cn S 00
ELf 98
S A/7
v j w E 188 4 00 184 15.00
rl ? F1 M,9 3
n
?D
1
11 It
r
It
N
I
t EL 4 8.57
w f'4R S7 /8+ 500

00 `o II N 11 1 a
n „ (p
I ? IVTS
A 19
45
NO RAD
A f +50 0
N
f CLU ES .5' R SUR ACI Gl
I ?

en

O u
_
N w
G

-4 0
y
gy

° Ut ? > n (
p
g?gg$ m?
m? D SU FACI G ?o
m ?iig
z
A2/
83
yrn
5 ?
n
t (/A OLY5 if
EE
N ??6 A =g A m S 2/+ 9 8 ou
rnr

I T
z? ?n
I*1 0 ?1 1?1 2 T? 1?I n? r m
`
+
nagn„? ?
8
O
0
2 n
i r"i
rn °3 C
If 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
ID 1-?
Vl - Qf
°Jga - AIVY O
N cnlo „? Z O O
N ? 8 m ii ? ?

w y Am
? o r N
z
z
1
0

a 7?
r ? C S
z A
z
0

o
\ i o

O
l
I
°

° I
0

O
o I I
I I o
I
° I I I
10

I I l

i

I ? I ?I
i
? I 'I I I ?

+
n m
r y
`? m
r
c m
r m
ry
?y
n
LO

W
Z
LP
W
f"

o - ?^ o

y I a

d mm?
_
A o r'°
1 I
I
I vw
m? i

O m
r
z
m
I 1
g
>e
Z
m i

a
2 3
10
c
c ?

o ? o
7 I I O
O
a C

N
? °
a I f i

o I o

tr °

J O ~ _ W m
I

°

z

I O
0 m

W
1 m
Z
c L
n n
m
4 •C I -' z

o

?r O
O

I I I I

z
0

J hJy pi Ian
? F L

I
I I I 0
I I i

O _
I
I
I _
0 Q
I
O 1 0
'
O I 0
I

I

I t I I
I I
i I

I

I?

I rn rn
z
I
? o

alD

0 0
-

°s
o

I
n
?r'n

?

?n

?7
n
D
n
rD

?

D al
L
tD?
001 ° IDS
O0?
J

A m?
-'?1 u
OD T
' 0 14- C
cn 0 °'

0
Q1 o 09-
0

o I 'D

O
I I
?"
O
I1
O
O
O
-
I I

?d O
°0 m
O
ti
O

'o a I r
u Ip F-
I
I
N
+
, I c>,
a
u
IM kll
IN I I
I w_ I w, I b 'w IN a - I I a rn

W m L III p w I I m
N w ?' III u I ?' I I In p
N IN II
_ ? I O
' I I L
'
w
\ q 1
I a?
L-0
?
0

y
?
I
rn
I I
O
I
I

I
0
o
?o

I
I o
?o

t I
a
A

o
I C I
W m
01 m
"' n
I ?
? z
G O
o I I
_ I
x N
=
O N
' Z
Z-1 ZI-
O
i i
??_ ?i r t
i ?
,?
Harnett County
SR 1117 (Nursery Road)
Bridge No 59 over Jumping Run Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1117(3)
State Project No. 8.2451101
WBS No. 33201.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-3655
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
APPROVED:
Sal d
Date Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. 15., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
`/3je9- 7 77
Date John F. Sullivan III, P.E.
Division Administrator
'? Federal Highway Administration
Harnett County
SR 1117 (Nursery Road)
Bridge No 59 over Jumping Run Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1117(3)
State Project No. 8.2451101
WBS No. 33201.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-3655
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
May 2007
Documentation Prepared By Ko and Associates, P.C.
Mark L. Re, P.E.
Project Manager
5-1
CAR
,
®ZES50
2*? SEAL
7 198,
yya eoE
For the North Carolina Department of Transportation
J 'fer M. ]fuller, P.E.
P 9 ject Development Engineer
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Harnett County
SR 1117 (Nursery Road)
Bridge No 59 over Jumping Run Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-1117(3)
State Project No. 8.2451101
WBS No. 33201.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-3655
In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit #33 and #23 Conditions, the General
Nationwide Permit Conditions, Section 404 Only Conditions, Regional Conditions,
State Consistency Conditions, NCDOT's Guidelines for Best Management Practices
for Protection of Surface Waters, NCDOT's Guidelines for Best Management
Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities, General Certification
Conditions, and Section 401 Conditions of Certification, the following special
commitments have been agreed to by NCDOT:
No Special Commitments Are Required
Categorical Exclusion Green Sheet
May 2007 Sheet 1 of 1
Harnett County
SR 1117 (Nursery Road)
Bridge No 59 over Jumping Run Creek
Federal-Aid Project No BRZ-1117(3)
State Project No 8 2451101
f WBS No 33201 1 1
T I P No B-3655
INTRODUCTION: Bridge No 59 is located in Harnett County on SR 1117 (Nursery Road)
where it crosses Jumping Run Creek Bridge No 59 is included in the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) 2006-2012 Transportation Improvement Program and is
part of the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement Program The location is shown in Figure 1 No
substantial environmental impacts are anticipated, therefore, the project is classified as a Federal
"Categorical Exclusion" and requires neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental
impact statement
1. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 16 8 out of a
possible 100 for a new structure The bridge is considered functionally obsolete and structurally
deficient The replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer and more efficient
traffic operations
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
SR 1117 (Nursery Road) crosses over Jumping Run Creek approximately 8 miles north of Spring
Lake in Harnett County Bridge No 59 is on an undeveloped portion of Federal property (Fort
Bragg) SR 1117 (Nursery Road) is classified as a Rural Minor Collector in the Statewide
Functional Classification System It serves to provide access to NC 24/ 87 from the residential
areas north of Fort Bragg
Bridge No 59, as shown in Figures 2A and 213, has an overall length of 35 feet (two spans at 17
feet, 6 inches) and a clear roadway width of 24 feet The existing two-lane bridge has a
reinforced concrete deck on timber foists supported by a creosote timber substructure SR 1117
(Nursery Road) has a current pavement width of 20 feet with 10-foot shoulders (2 feet paved) in
the area of the bridge The roadway approaches are a tangent section with a flat vertical
alignment in the proximity of the existing structure There is a slight right curve leaving the
bridge continuing east The curve will not be affected by any replacement alternative Sight
distance is good both to the west and to the east
The structure was constructed in 1956 It is currently posted at 19 tons for a single unit and 23
tons for truck-tractor senu-trailer Bridge No 59 has a bed-to-crown distance of approximately
10 feet The traffic volumes on SR 1117 (Nursery Road) at Jumping Run Creek are 5,200
vehicles per day (vpd) in 2006 and are projected to be 10,400 vpd for the design year 2030 The
volumes include an estimated 1 % truck-tractor semi-trailer (TTST) and 3 % dual-tired (DT)
vehicles The posted speed limit is 55 mph in the vicinity of the bridge
There are no utilities attached to the existing bridge Overhead power lines parallel SR 1117
(Nursery Road) along the north side, and underground/overhead telephone lines parallel SR 1117
(Nursery Road) along the south side Harnett County is planning to install a forced main sewer
line along the south side of SR 1117 (Nursery Road) to service Fort Bragg housing developments
west of NC 24/ 87 Scheduled for construction by early 2007, this sewer line is to be located
between the proposed bridge and the existing right of way so that it will not be disturbed during
the bridge construction period Utility conflicts are considered moderate
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program and the Department of Defense (Fort Bragg and Pope Air
Force Base) jointly developed the Overhills stream and wetland restoration project on the north
side of Bridge No 59 This project restored approximately 4,500 feet of Jumping Run Creek and
70 acres of adjacent riparian wetlands on the nulitary base property (see Figure 9 for restoration
plan) Substantial land use changes have occurred within the watershed as population increases
have occurred in recent years due to the rrulitary base expansions This restoration site is
intended to improve water quality in Jumping Run Creek
Development in the area beyond Fort Bragg is a mixture of residential and undeveloped land
Western Harnett County is experiencing heavy residential growth, especially in the area between
NC 24/ 87, NC 27 and NC 210 Known development in this area includes 800 to 1,000 homes
and two schools
Five accidents were reported on SR 1117 (Nursery Road) in the vicinity of Bridge No 59 during
the five year period between 2000 and 2005 Another accident occurred in early 2006 as a
vehicle struck the north bridge rail, cutting the rail in half
Public school buses cross the present bridge 26 times per day
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No 59 with a new bridge that is 39 feet wide by 105 feet
long with an approximate clear roadway width of 36 feet The bridge will be replaced at the
existing location The grade of the roadway over the new structure will be approximately the
grade of the existing bridge The approaches to the new bridge will have a pavement width of 32
feet including four-foot paved shoulders An additional 4 feet of grassed shoulder will also be
provided on each side
B. Build Alternatives
The studied alternatives were
(1) Replace the structure on the existing location with a temporary detour on the north side,
(2) Replace the structure on the existing location with a temporary detour on the south side,
(3) Replace the structure on the existing location and utilize an off-site detour, and
2
(4) Replace the structure on the existing location with a temporary detour on the south side,
minimizing the detour footprint
Alternates 1, 2, 3, and 4 are shown in Figures 3 - 6 The posted speed limit is 55 mph and the
corresponding design speed is 60 mph A minimum design speed of 45 mph is proposed for the
on-site detour No design exceptions are required Alternates 1 and 2 were not considered to be
desirable because of the environmental impacts associated with a wider temporary detour
footprint and the placement of a temporary arch culvert in the stream Alternate 3 was not
considered a desirable alternative because it would substantially delay emergency responders by
using an off-site detour during construction Alternates 1, 2, and 3 were developed using a 90-
foot long bridge with a 42-foot clear roadway width and 9-foot shoulders across the bridge The
wider shoulders were proposed to meet NCDOT's design standards for bridges less than 100 feet
in length
Alternate 4 was developed to include a temporary on-site detour while minimizing the roadway
footprint and environmental impacts Alternate 4 includes a 105-foot long bridge with 36 feet of
clear roadway width and 6-foot shoulders A longer bridge is proposed with this alternative to
convey more water under the bridge NCDOT's design standards allow narrower shoulders on
bridges greater than 100 feet in length Alternate 4 also provides a temporary bridge that spans
the recently restored Jumping Run Creek The recommended typical sections are shown on
Figures 8A and 8B
Alternate 1 replaces the structure with a bridge on the existing location and provides a
temporary detour on the north side An arch culvert is proposed for the temporary detour It is a
75-foot long, two-barrel 95-inch x 67-inch corrugated steel pipe arch The estimated cost of this
alternate is $988,000
Alternate 2 replaces the structure with a bridge on the existing location and provides a
temporary detour on the south side An arch culvert is proposed for the temporary detour It is a
75-foot long, two-barrel 95-inch x 67-inch corrugated steel pipe arch The estimated cost of this
alternate is $987,200
Alternate 3 replaces the bridge on the existing location, closes SR 1117 (Nursery Road) to
through traffic during construction, and utilizes an off-site detour The estimated cost of this
alternate is $704,700 The proposed detour route uses SR 1112 (Overhills Road), SR 1121 (Ray
Road), NC 210, SR 1451 (Manchester Road), and NC 24/ 87 The proposed detour route is
shown in Figure 7 The excess travel as compared to using SR 1117 (Nursery Road) is estimated
to range from 3 0 to 10 5 miles, depending on the origin and destination
In accordance with the NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Off-site Detours for Bridge
Replacement Projects (April 2004), the average delay per motorist using the off-site detour for
Alternate 3 is estimated to range from three to 12 minutes for a construction period of 12 months,
which falls under the Evaluation (E) range of the Guidelines The Evaluation (E) range suggests
that an onsite detour is justifiable from a traffic operations standpoint but must be weighed with
other project factors to determine if it is appropriate Harnett County emergency services and
law enforcement agencies expressed opposition to an off-site detour using existing roads
3
SR 1117 (Nursery Road) is an important connecting route between NC 210 and NC 24/ 87, and
road closure would substantially delay response times to fire, ambulance, rescue, and law
enforcement personnel For this reason, NCDOT does not consider a temporary off-site detour
to be acceptable
Alternate 4 replaces the structure on the existing location and includes a temporary detour on
the south side A temporary detour bridge approximately 26 feet wide by 70 feet long is
proposed The estimated cost of this alternate is $1,037,200
C. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study
The No-Build or "do-nothing" alternate was also considered, but this choice would eventually
necessitate closure of the bridge This is not a desirable alternative due to the traffic service
provided by SR 1117 (Nursery Road)
Investigation of the existing structure by the NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit indicates that
rehabilitation of the old bndge is not feasible due to its age and deteriorated condition The
existing bndge is classified as structurally deficient
D. Preferred Alternative
Alternate 4 is the preferred alternate It replaces the bridge on its existing location and uses a
temporary on-site detour on the south side of the bridge This alternate was selected because it
does not require temporary road closure that would delay emergency responders, and the
temporary detour nummizes environmental impacts The temporary detour on the south side
avoids impacts to the recently restored stream and wetlands north of the bridge Alternate 4
includes a temporary bridge instead of a culvert to avoid impacts to Jumping Run Creek during
construction Also, the temporary detour alignment has been located more closely to the existing
road to reduce the impact to red-cockaded woodpecker habitat under management by Fort Bragg
The studied route does not contain any bicycle accommodations, nor is it a designated bicycle
route, therefore, no bicycle accommodations have been included as part of this project
The Division Office concurs with the recommended improvements
IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated costs of the alternatives studied, based on current prices, are shown in the
following table
4
Alternate 1
With On-site
Detour North Alternate 2
With On-site
Detour South Alternate 3
With Off-
site
Detour Alternate 4
With On-site
Detour South
(Preferred)
Structure Removal $ 16,800 $ 16,800 $ 16,800 $ 16,800
Structure $ 378,000 $ 378,000 $ 378,000 $ 409,500
Roadway Approaches $ 194,250 $ 199,050 $ 84,050 $ 194,950
Mobilization & Miscellaneous $ 178,125 $ 171,125 $ 101,150 $ 187,475
Engineering & Contingencies $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 95,000 $ 130,000
Temporary Detour $ 57,825 $ 60,025 $ 0 $ 61,275
SUBTOTAL $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ 675,000 $ 1,000,000
Right-of-Way / Const Ease /
Utilities $ 38,000 $ 37,200 $ 29,700 $ 37,200
TOTAL $ 988,000 $ 987,200 $ 704,700 $ 1,037,200
The above estimates are based on functional design plans, therefore, 45 % has been included for
miscellaneous items and contractor mobilization, and 15 % for engineering and contingencies
The current estimated cost for the recommended alternate is $1,037,200 The estimated cost of
the project, as shown in the NCDOT 2006-2012 Transportation Improvement Program, is
$35,000 for right-of-way and $900,000 for construction
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
A. Methodology
Materials and research data in support of this investigation have been derived from a number of
sources including applicable U S Geological Survey (USGS) topographic mapping (Anderson
Creek, NC [1981] 7 5-minute quadrangle map), U S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping (Anderson Creek, NC [1981] 7 5-minute
quadrangle map), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (formerly the Soils
Conservation Service [SCS]) soils mapping (USDA 1994), and recent aerial photography
The site was visited on August 31, 2000 and again the week of January 10, 2005 The project
study area was walked and visually surveyed for significant features Special concerns evaluated
in the field include 1) potential habitat for protected species and 2) wetlands and water quality
protection in Jumping Run Creek
5

Plant community descriptions are based on a classification system utilized by N C Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) (Schafale and Weakley 1990) When appropriate, community
classifications were modified to better reflect field observations Vascular plant names generally
follow nomenclature found in Radford et al (1968) with exceptions for updated nomenclature
(Kartesz 1998) Jurisdictional areas were evaluated using the three-parameter approach
following US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) delineation guidelines (Environmental
Laboratory 1987) Jurisdictional areas were characterized according to a classification scheme
established by Cowardm et al (1979) Aquatic and terrestrial requirements and distributions
were determined by supportive literature (Martof et al 1980, Potter et al 1980, Webster et al
1985, Menhimck 1991, Hamel 1992, Palmer and Braswell 1995, and Rohde et al 1994) Water
quality information for area streams and tributaries was denved from available sources
(NCDWQ 2000, NCDWQ 2004a, and NCDWQ 2004b) Quantitative sampling was not
undertaken to support existing data
At the times of the initial field investigation, the most current USFWS listing of federally
protected species with ranges extending into Harnett County was dated June 16, 2000 The June
16, 2000 list was consulted prior to the 2000 field investigations The USFWS listing of
federally protected species with ranges extending into Harnett County was updated on December
11, 2006 (USFWS 2006) The most recent list has been reviewed to ensure that all federally
protected species are accounted for within the project study area In addition, NCNHP records
documenting presence of federally or state listed species were consulted in 2000 and again in
December 2004
Definitions for descriptions used in this report are as follows Project Study Area denotes the
area bounded by proposed construction limits, and has been determined to be approximately
1,000 feet in length and 300 feet in width Project Vicinity describes an area extending 0 5 mule
on all sides of the project study area, and Project Region is equivalent to an area represented by a
7 5-minute USGS topographic quadrangle map with project study area occupying the central
position
B. Physiography and Soils
The project study area is underlain by the Cape Fear geologic formation within the Sandhills
physiographic province of North Carolina Topography is characterized as gently undulating
with wide floodplams The project study area is located in the floodplam of Jumping Run Creek
The land surface is mostly level to gently sloping Elevations in the project study area range
from approximately 200 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) on the interstream flats
on the outer edges of the project study area to approximately 190 feet NGVD in the stream
channel (Anderson Creek, NC [1981] 7 5-m mute quadrangle map)
The dominant soil mapping unit underlying the stream corridor at the existing facility is
Wehadkee loam (Typac Hapludults) Soils mapped adjacent to Jumping Run Creek include
Roanoke loam (Typac Endoaquults) adjacent to the east and west banks of Jumping Run Creek
and Altavista fine sandy loam (Aquic Hapludults) adjacent to the west bank south of SR 1117
(Nursery Road)
6

The Wehadkee series is characterized by nearly level, poorly-drained soils located on flood
plains with loamy and sandy underlying layers throughout These soils commonly occur in
broad floodplains and along mayor drainageways (USDA 1994)
The Roanoke and Altavista series are typically found on nearly level to strongly sloping stream
terraces, and are well-drained to poorly drained soils with loamy or clayey subsoil (USDA 1994)
Within Harnett County, both Wehadkee and Roanoke series are considered to be hydrnc soils,
while the Altavista series is considered to be a non-hydrnc soil (USDA 1996)
C. Water Resources
1. Waters Impacted
The project study area is located within sub-basin 03-06-14 of the Cape Fear River Basin and is
part of USGS Hydrologic Unit 03030004 of the South Atlantic/Gulf Coast Region (NCDWQ
2000) The structure targeted for replacement spans Jumping Run Creek with no direct
involvement of additional streams or tributaries The section of Jumping Run Creek within the
project study area has been assigned Stream Index Number 18-23-29 by the N C Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) (NCDWQ 2004a)
2. Water Resources Characteristics
Jumping Run Creek is a well-defined, deeply incised, Coastal Plain river with high flow over a
sandy substrate NWI mapping indicates that Jumping Run Creek has been previously excavated
to its present-day depth Jumping Run Creek, at the existing bridge, is approximately 15 feet in
width and 6 feet from top of banks to stream bed Water clarity was moderate on the day of the
site visit, a result of tannin and lignin staining During field investigations, Jumping Run Creek
had approximately 2 feet of water depth with high flow velocities The deeply incised channel
appears to support temporary, high-volume flows No species of submerged aquatic vegetation
were identified in the stream channel within the project study area Stream banks and the
adjacent floodplain support pine forest and shrub assemblage vegetation Local disturbances
within the project study area consist of a power line parallel to and north of the existing bridge, a
pipe outfall parallel to and in the southeastern quadrant with water flow entering Jumping Run
Creek, and previous forest harvesting activities to the north and south of the bridge
The NCDWQ has assembled a list of impaired waterbodies according to the Clean Water Act
Section 303(d) and 40 CFR 130 7, hereafter referred to as the draft N C 2004 Section 303(d) list
The list is a comprehensive public accounting of all impaired waterbodies An impaired
waterbody is one that does not meet water quality standards including designated uses, numeric
and narrative criteria, and anti-degradation requirements defined in 40 CFR 131 The standards
violation may be due to an individual pollutant, multiple pollutants, or an unknown cause of
impairment The impairment could be from point sources, non-point sources, and/or
atmospheric deposition Some sources of impairment exist across state lines North Carolina's
methodology is strongly based on the aquatic life use support guidelines available in the Section
305(b) guidelines (EPA-841-B-97-002A and -002B) Those streams attaining only Partially
Supporting (PS) or Not Supporting (NS) status are listed on the draft NC 2004 Section 303(d)
7

list Streams are further categorized into one of six parts within the draft N C 2004 Section -
303(d) list, according to source of impairment and degree of rehabilitation required for the
stream to adequately support aquatic life Within Parts 1, 4, 5, and 6 of the list, North Carolina
has developed a priority ranking scheme (low, medium, high) that reflects the relative value and
benefits those waterbodies provide to the State Jumping Run Creek is not listed on the draft
N C 2004 Section 303(d) list (NCDWQ 2004b)
Classifications are assigned to waters of the State of North Carolina based on the existing or
contemplated best usage of various streams or segments of streams in the basin A best usage
classification of C has been assigned to Jumping Run Creek (NCDWQ 2004a) The designation
C denotes that appropriate uses include aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife,
secondary recreation, and agriculture Secondary recreation refers to human body contact with
waters on an infrequent or incidental basis No designated High Quality Waters (HQW),
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), Water Supply I (WS-1), or Water Supply II (WS-II)
waters occur within 10 mile of the project study area
The NCDWQ (previously known as the Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality
Section [DEM]) has initiated a whole basin approach to water quality management for the 17
river basins within the state Water quality for the proposed project study area is summarized in
the Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan (NCDWQ 2000) Jumping
Run Creek was given a bioclassification rating of Excellent in 1998 (NCDWQ 2000) Waters
classified as C are rated as Supporting their designated uses (NCDWQ 2000) In terms of
stream mitigation, Jumping Run Creek is classified as a Warmwater stream (USACE et al
2003)
The sub-basin (03-06-14) supports two mayor point-source dischargers and nine minor
dischargers Total permitted flow is 2 72 million gallons per day (MGD) for mayor dischargers
and 1 50 MGD for minor dischargers (NCDWQ 2000) Non-point source discharges include
construction, wastewater disposal, and solid waste disposal Sedimentation and nutrient inputs
are mayor problems associated with non-point source discharges and often result in high
concentrations of fecal coliform, heavy metals, oil from roads and parking lots, and increased
nutrient levels in surface waters
3. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
a) General Impacts
Impacts to water resources in the project study area may result from activities associated with
project construction Activities that would result in impacts are clearing and grubbing on
streambanks, riparian canopy removal, in-stream construction, fertilizers and pesticides used in
revegetation, and pavement/culvert installation The following impacts to surface water
resources could result from the construction activities mentioned above
• Increased sedimentation and siltation downstream of the crossing and increased erosion
in the project study area
8
• Alteration of stream discharge due to silt loading and changes in surface and groundwater
drainage patterns
• Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and
vegetation removal
• Changes in and destabilization of water temperature due to vegetation removal
• Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or additions to surface and
ground water flow from construction
• Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed areas
• Increased concentrations of toxic compounds in roadway runoff
• Increased potential for release of toxic compounds such as fuel and oil from construction
equipment and other vehicles
The proposed bridge replacement will allow for continuation of pre-project stream flows in
Jumping Run Creek, thereby protecting the integrity of these waterways Long-term impacts
resulting from construction are expected to be negligible
Temporary construction impacts due to erosion and sedimentation will be minimized through
implementation of a stringent erosion control schedule and the use of Best Management
Practices (BMPs) The contractor will follow contract specifications pertaining to erosion
control measures as outlined in 23 CFR 650 Subpart B and Article 107-13 entitled "Control of
Erosion, Siltation, and Pollution" (NCDOT, Specifications for Roads and Structures) These
measures include the use of dikes, berms, silt basins, and other containment measures to control
runoff, elimination of construction staging areas in floodplains and adjacent to waterways, re-
seeding of herbaceous cover on disturbed sites, management of chemicals (herbicides, pesticides,
de-icing compounds) with potential negative impacts on water quality, and avoidance of direct
discharges into steams by catch basins and roadside vegetation
b) Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and Removal
The bridge structure is built entirely of timber Therefore, there is little potential for components
of the bridge to be dropped into "waters of the United States " No temporary fill is expected to
result from removal of the existing bridge NCDOT's Best Management Practices for
Construction and Maintenance Activities must be applied for the removal of this bridge
D. BIOTIC RESOURCES
1. Plant Communities
Three distinct plant communities were identified within the project study area pine forest,
disturbed/maintained land, and shrub assemblage Descriptions of plant communities are
provided below
a) Disturbed/Maintained Land
Disturbed/maintained land includes roadside margins and areas regularly maintained for utility
lines Invasive weeds present in roadside margins and utility right-of-ways include crabgrass
9
r
(Digitana sanguinalts) and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) Common herb species include
broom pamcgrass (Dichanthelium scopartum), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium),
goldenrods (Sohdago spp ), giant plume grass (Erianthus giganteus), white sage (Artemisia sp
clover (Lespedeza virginica), elderberry (Sambucus canadensts), partridge pea (Cassia
fasciculata), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), greenbrier (Smilax sp ), dayflower
(Commelina communes), and poison ivy
b) Pine Forest
Pine forests in the northwest quadrant of the project study area are characterized by a closed
canopy and support a canopy dominated by (over 70 percent coverage) loblolly pine (Pinus
taeda) This community appears to be approximately 40-50 years old and contains a well-
developed hardwood subcanopy and a dense shrub assemblage Other canopy species include
live oak (Quercus virgeniana), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and tulip popular
(Liriodendron tulipifera) The understory is primarily canopy species, along with mockernut
hickory (Carya tomentosa), dogwood (Cornus florida), white oak (Quercus alba), blackjack oak
(Quercus velutina), willow oak (Quercus phellos), post oak (Quercus stellata), and American
holly (Ilex opaca) The forest floor supports a dense growth of shrubs, vines, and herbs such as
bitter gallberry (Ilex glabra), wax myrtle (Myrica cenfera), highbush blueberry (Vaccinium
corymbosum), Amencan holly, muscadine grape (Vitts rotundifolia), cat greenbriar (Smilax
glauca), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), and bracken
fern (Pteridium aquilinum) The pine forest that exists in the southwestern quadrant of the
project study area also consists of 40-50 year old trees dominated by loblolly pines Similar
hardwood species occur here as in the northwest quadrant The pine forest in the southwestern
quadrant appears to have undergone recent fire activity which has cleared the forest floor of most
shrub and herbaceous vegetation
c) Shrub Assemblage
Within the project study area, shrub assemblages are areas which previously supported pine
forest communities and have experienced logging activities These areas are presently
dominated by shrubs and opportunistic tree species Shrub assemblage vegetation is
characterized by shrubs and herbs such as silverberry (Elaeagnus umbellata), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), dog fennel, goldenrods, clover, and
opportunistic tree species such as loblolly pine, sweetgum, and red maple
2. Wildlife
During the field visit, mammal signs (tracks, scat, remains, etc ) were noted within the project
study area for only one species white-tailed deer (Odocoeleus virginianus) Several species not
in evidence but also expected to occur in project study area woodlands and fringe areas are
muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), eastern cottontail
(Sylvilagus floridanus), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), Virginia opossum (Didelphis
virginianus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), mink (Mustela vison), meadow dumping mouse (Zapus
hudsontus), and house mouse (Mus musculus)
10

Birds observed within or adjacent to the project study area include Carolina wren (Thryothorus
ludovtctanus), eastern bluebird (Stalta sialis), northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), red-eyed
vireo (Vireo oltvaceus), pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus), Carolina chickadee (Poectle
carolinensis), white-eyed vireo (Vireo gnseus), common yellowthroat (Geothlypts tnchas), red-
tailed hawk (Buteo jamatcensts), and northern mockingbird (Mtmus polyglottos) Other species,
such as American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), blue day (Cyanocttta cnstata), mourning dove
(Zenatda macroura), eastern screech owl (Otus asio), and American robin (Turdus mtgratonus)
were not observed but are expected to occur within the project study area
Several terrestrial reptiles and amphibian species were documented within the project study area
including Carolina anole (Anolts caroltnensts) and several toads (Bufo sp ) Terrestrial reptiles
and amphibians not observed but likely occurring within the project study area include eastern
box turtle (Terrapene caroltna), eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus), broadhead skink
(Eumeces lattceps), five-lined skink (Eumeces fasctatus), rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta), eastern
kingsnake (Lampropeltts getulus), eastern garter snake (Thamnophts strtalts), black racer
(Coluber constrictor), copperhead (Agktstrodon contortrtx), marbled salamander (Ambystoma
opacum), and dwarf salamander (Eurycea quadrtdtgttata)
3. Aquatic Communities
Lirruted investigations resulted in no aquatic reptiles or amphibians identified in the project study
area Aquatic or serm-aquatic reptiles and amphibians which may occur within the project study
area include snapping turtle (Chelydra serpenttna), yellowbelly slider (Trachemys scrtpta), river
cooter (Pseudemys conctnna), mud turtle (Ktnosternon subrubrum), brown water snake (Nerodta
taxtsptlota), redbelly water snake (Nerodta erythrogaster), cottonmouth (Agktstrodon
ptsctvorus), eastern newt (Notophthalmus vtrtdescens), southern dusky salamander
(Desmognathus aunculatus), mud salamander (Pseudotnton montanus), green frog (Rana
clamttans), southern cricket frog (Acrts gryllus), and pickerel frog (Rana palustns) (Martof et al
1980)
Visual surveys of Jumping Run Creek did not reveal the presence of molluscan fauna, fish, or
any other aquatic life Detailed sampling was not undertaken in Jumping Run Creek to
determine fishery potential, however, fish species representative of streams within the county
include dusky shiner (Notropts cummtngsae), pirate perch (Aphredoderus sayanus), eastern
mosquitofish (Gambusta holbrookt), tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedt), margined madtom
(Noturus tnstgnts), American eel (Anguilla rostrata), coastal shiner (Notropts petersont), and
creek chub (Semottlus atromaculatus) Potential game fish which may be present within the
project study area include redbreast sunfish (Lepomts aurttus) and largemouth bass (Mtcroptents
salmotdes) (Menhinick 1991, Rohde et al 1994)
The N C Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) (1998) has developed a Significant
Aquatic Endangered Species Habitat database to enhance planning and impact analysis in areas
proposed by NCWRC as being critical due to the presence of Endangered or Threatened aquatic
species No Significant Aquatic Endangered Species Habitat occurs within or near the project
study area (NCWRC 1998) The nearest Significant Aquatic Endangered Species Habitat occurs
on Pocket Creek, approximately 17 riles northwest of the project study area (NCWRC 1998)
11
This project is in the Sandhills and includes the crossing of a stream delineated on the most
recent USGS 7 5-minute topographic quadrangle Since, Jumping Run Creek is a tributary to the
Cape Fear River, anadromous fish passage was considered in the planning of this bridge
replacement The project area is upstream of the Cape Fear lock and dam and a pond For this
reason, the portion of Jumping Run Creek in the project area does not support habitat for short
nose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) or other anadromous species, and the National Marine
Fisheries Service concurs with this determination No special provisions for anadromous fish
passage are required for this project
4. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Proposed alternatives include both permanent and temporary impacts Permanent impacts are _
considered to be those impacts that occur within proposed cut-fill limits Temporary impacts are
considered to be those impacts that occur within the cut-fill footprint associated with the
temporary detours of Alternates 1, 2, and 4 Temporary impact areas will be restored to pre-
project conditions once construction is complete Plant communities within the project study
area were delineated to determine the approximate area and location of each A summary of
potential impacts to plant communities is presented in Table 1
Alternates 1, 2, 3, and 4 have identical total permanent impacts (0 08 acre) Total temporary
impacts for Alternate 1 (0 70 acre) are similar to those for Alternate 2 (0 63 acre) and Alternate 4
(0 54 acre) Alternate 1, however, temporarily impacts greater amounts of forest vegetation,
while Alternates 2 and 4 temporarily impact greater amounts of disturbed shrub vegetation
Alternate 3 impacts are mostly limited to disturbed/maintained land Upon completion of
roadway improvements, temporary detours will be removed and natural communities will be
restored
Table 1. Area of Plant Communities within Cut-Fill Limits
t C
it
Pl A lternate 1 A lternate 2
an
ommun
y Permanent Temporary Total Permanent Temporary Total
Pine Forest <0 01 0 32 0 32 <0 01 0 17 0 17
Disturbed/Maintained 0 05 0 08 0 13 0 05 0 08 0 13
Shrub Assemblage 0 03 0 30 0 33 0 03 0 38 0 41
Total 0.08 0.70 0.78 0.08 0.63 0.71
A lternate 3 A lternate 4
Pine Forest <0 01 0 00 <0 01 <0 01 <0 01 0 01
Disturbed/Maintained 0 05 0 00 0 05 0 05 0 15 0 20
Shrub Assemblage 0 03 0 00 0 03 0 03 0 38 0 41
Total 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.54 0.62
Areas are given in acres
Due to the limited extent of infringement on natural communities, the proposed bridge
replacement will not result in significant loss or displacement of known terrestrial animal
populations No significant habitat fragmentation is expected since most improvements will be
restricted to existing roadside margins Construction noise and associated disturbances will have
12

short-term impacts on avifauna and migratory wildlife movement patterns However, long-term
impacts are expected to be negligible
Potential down=stream impacts to aquatic habitat will be avoided by bridging the stream to
maintain regular flow and stream mtegnty Short-term impacts associated with turbidity and
suspended sediments will affect benthic populations Temporary impacts to downstream habitat
from increased sediment during construction will be rmmnuzed by the implementation of
stringent erosion control measures
E. SPECIAL TOPICS
1. Waters of the United States
Surface waters within the embankments of Jumping Run Creek are subject to jurisdictional
consideration under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as "waters of the United States" (33
CFR section 328 3) NWI mapping (Anderson Creek, NC [1981] 7 5-minute quadrangle map)
indicates (and field investigations confirm) that Jumping Run Creek is a bank-to-bank system
(with no immediately adjacent wetlands) that exhibits characteristics of a nvenne intermittent
streambed that is seasonally flooded and previously excavated (R4SBCx) (Cowardin et al 1979)
Wetlands are subject to jurisdictional consideration under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as
waters of the United States (33 CFR Section 328 3) These areas are defined by the presence of
three primary criteria hydnc soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and evidence of hydrology at or near
the surface for a portion (12 5 percent) of the growing season (Environmental Laboratory 1987)
Field investigations indicate that there is one wetland within the project study area This wetland
exhibits characteristics of a palustnne, forested, seasonally flooded system consisting of a
mixture of broad-leaved deciduous and needle-leaved vegetation (PF01/2C, Cowardm et al
1979) This wetland satisfies the three-parameter approach outlined by the USACE
(Environmental Laboratory 1987) Vegetation within the wetland consists of a canopy of
loblolly pine, sweetgum, and red maple, and an understory dominated by giant cane Vegetation
is growing in Roanoke soils which exhibit values, chromas, and mottles characteristics of hydnc
soils Evidence of wetland hydrology included oxidized root channels and water stained leaves
In terms of mitigation, the NCDWQ would consider these wetlands to be "nvenne "
All four alternatives avoid impacts to wetland areas, however, Alternates 1 and 2 are expected to
result in temporary impacts to Jumping Run Creek Temporary impacts to Jumping Run Creek
associated with Alternate 1 total approximately 81 linear feet Temporary impacts to Jumping
Run Creek associated with Alternate 2 total approximately 53 linear feet Proposed impacts to
jurisdictional areas are shown in Table 2
13
Table 2. Projected Impacts to Jurisdictional Areas
Jurisdictional Alternate 1 Alternate 2
Areas Permanent Temporary Total Permanent Temporary Total
Wetland* 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jumping Run
Creek* 0 81 81 0 53 53
Alternate 3 Alternate 4
Wetland* 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jumping Run
Creek* 0 0 0 0 0 0
-Areas or impacts to the wetianci are given in acres
**Linear distances for impacts to Jumping Run Creek are given in feet
There is little potential that components of the existing bridge may be dropped into "waters of
the United States" during construction Therefore, no temporary fill is expected to result from
bridge removal NCDOT will coordinate with the various resource agencies during project
planning to ensure that all concerns regarding bridge demolition are resolved In addition,
NCDOT's "Guidelines for Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance
Activities" will be applied for the removal of this bridge
2. Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional areas are anticipated from the proposed project As a result,
construction activities will require permits and certifications from various regulatory agencies in
charge of protecting the water quality of public water resources
This project may be processed as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) guidelines The USACE has made available Nationwide Permit (NWP)
No 23 (67 FR 2020, 2082, January 15, 2002) for CEs due to expected minimal impact
NCDWQ has made available a General 401 Water Quality Certification for NWP No 23 (GC
3403) If temporary structures are necessary for construction activities, access fills, or
dewatering of the site, then a NWP No 33 (67 FR 2020, 2087, January 15, 2002) pem-ut and
associated General 401 Water Quality Certification (GC 3366) will be required In the event that
NWP No 23 or 33 will not suffice, minor impacts attributed to bridging and associated approach
improvements are expected to qualify under General Bridge Permit No 031 and its associated
General 401 Water Quality Certification (GC 3404) Notification to the USACE Wilmington
District office is required if this general permit is utilized The USACE may exert discretionary
authority and require an Individual Pernut if avoidance and minimization have not been
adequately addressed, or if mitigation is inadequate (assuming mitigation may be required)
No designated HQW, ORW, WS-I, WS-II waters, or watershed CAs occur within 10 mile of
the project study area Permits likely to be required for this project study area include Section
14

404 NWP 23, 33, and 3, in addition to the corresponding Section 401 Water Quality
Certifications
3. Mitigation
The USACE has adopted through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) a wetland
mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing The
purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity
of waters of the United States, and specifically wetlands Mitigation of wetland impacts has
been defined by the CEQ to include avoiding impacts (to wetlands), minimizing impacts,
rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508 20)
Each of these three aspects (avoidance, nummmzation, and compensatory mitigation) must be
considered sequentially
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts
to waters of the United States According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
between the U S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the USACE, in determining
"appropriate and practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts, such measures should be
appropriate to the scope and degree of those impacts and practicable in terms of cost, existing
technology and logistics in light of overall project purposes
Mmmmnuzatmon includes the exammnatmon of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the adverse
impacts to waters of the United States Implementation of these steps will be required through
project modifications and pernut conditions Minimization typically focuses on decreasing the
footprint of the proposed project through the reduction to median widths, nght-of-way widths,
fill slopes, and/or road shoulder widths All efforts will be made to decrease impacts to surface
waters
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to waters of the
United States have been avoided and mmnmmmzed to the maximum extent possible It is
recognized that "no net loss of wetlands" functions and values may not be achieved in each and
every permit action In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H 0506(h), NCDWQ may require
compensatory mitigation for projects with greater than or equal to 1 acre of impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total perennial stream
impacts Furthermore, in accordance with 67 FR 2020, 2092, January 15, 2002, the USACE
requires compensatory mitigation when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic
environment are mmnmmal The size and type of the proposed project impact and the function and
value of the impacted aquatic resource are factors considered in determining acceptability of
appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation Appropriate and practicable compensatory
mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and
practicable mmmrruzatmon has been required Compensatory actions often include restoration,
preservation and enhancement, and creation of waters of the United States Such actions should
be undertaken first in areas adjacent to or contiguous to the discharge site
Mitigation for Section 404 jurisdictional areas may not need to be proposed for this project due
to the potentially limited nature of the project impacts However, utilization of BMPs is
15
recommended in an effort to minimize impacts Temporary impacts to floodplams associated
with construction activities could be mitigated by replanting disturbed areas with native riparian
species and removal of temporary fill material upon project completion A final determination
regarding mitigation rests with the USACE and NCDWQ
F. Rare and Protected Species
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T), officially proposed
(P) for such listing, or Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance (T[S/A]) are protected under
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 US C 1531 et seq ) The term
"Endangered species" is defined as "any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all
or a significant portion of its range" and the term "Threatened species" is defined as "any species
which is likely to become an Endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or
a significant portion of its range" (16 U S C 1532) The term "Threatened due to Similarity of
Appearance" is defined as a species which is not "Endangered" or "Threatened", but "closely
resembles an Endangered or Threatened species" (16 U S C 1532)
As of the signing of this document, the USFWS lists four species as being federally protected in
Harnett County (FWS 2006) These species are listed in Table 3, along with their federal status
Table 3. Federally Protected Species Listed for Harnett County.
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Bald eagle Halaaeetus leucocephalus T
Red-cockaded woodpecker Pacoades borealis E
Cape Fear shiner Notropas mekastocholas E
Rough-leaved loosestrife Lysamachaa asperulaefolaa E
Halaaeetus leucocephalus (Bald Eagle)
Threatened
Farruly Accipitndae
Date Listed March 11, .1967
The bald eagle is a large raptor with a wingspan greater than 6 feet Adult bald eagles are dark
brown with a white head and tail Immature eagles are brown with whitish mottling on the tail,
belly, and wing linings Bald eagles typically feed on fish but may also take birds and small
mammals In the Carolinas, nesting season extends from December through May (Potter et al
1980) Bald eagles typically nest in tall, living trees in a conspicuous location near open water
Eagles forage over large bodies of water and utilize adjacent trees for perching (Hamel 1992)
Disturbance activities within a primary zone extending 750 to 1500 feet from a nest tree are
considered to result in unacceptable conditions for eagles (FWS 1987) The FWS recommends
avoiding disturbance activities, including construction and tree-cutting within this primary zone
Within a secondary zone, extending from the primary zone boundary out to a distance of 10 mile

16
from a nest tree, construction and land-clearing activities should be restricted to the non-nesting
period The FWS also recommends avoiding alteration of natural shorelines where bald eagles
forage, and avoiding significant land-clearing activities within 1500 feet of known roosting sites
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
No suitable habitat for the bald eagle exists in or near the project study area, which consists of
pine and pine/hardwood forests The nearest large body of open water is Buffalo Lakes,
approximately 2 8 miles northwest of the project study area The project will have no effect on
the bald eagle
Picoides borealis (Red-cockaded woodpecker)
Endangered
Family Picidae
Date Listed October 13, 1970
This small woodpecker (7 to 8 5 inches long) has a black head, prominent white cheek patches,
and a black-and-white barred back Males often have red markings (cockades) behind the eye,
but the cockades may be absent or difficult to see (Potter et al 1980) Primary habitat consists of
mature to over-mature southern pine forests dominated by loblolly, long-leaf (Panus palustris),
slash (P ellaotaa), and pond (P serotana) pines (Thompson and Baker 1971) Nest cavities are
constructed in the heartwood of living pines, generally older than 70 years that have been
infected with red-heart disease Nest cavity trees tend to occur in clusters, which are referred to
as colonies (USFWS 1985) or colony sites (Henry 1989) The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW)
excavates holes into the bark around the cavity entrance, resulting in a shiny, resinous buildup
around the entrance that allows for easy detection of active nest trees Pine flatwoods or pine-
dominated savannas, which have been maintained by frequent natural fires, serve as ideal nesting
and foraging sites for this woodpecker Development of a thick understory may result in
abandonment of cavity trees
Site plant communities include pine forest, disturbed/maintained land, and shrub assemblage
vegetation Within the project study area only the pine forest community provides suitable
habitat for RCW Two distinct tracts of suitable habitat for RCWs occur within the project study
area one in the northwest quadrant (Tract 1) and one in the southwest quadrant (Tract 2) (Figure
10) Tract 1 is estimated to be 40 to 50 years of age, and suppression of fire has allowed
hardwood species to grow into the sub-canopy and encroach on the canopy, thus reducing its
suitability for this species Tract 2 is also estimated to be 40 to 50 years of age, and fire activity
has left the forest floor relatively free of vegetation
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION:
ALTERNATE 1 MAY AFFECT, NOT LIKELY TO ADVERSELY AFFECT
ALTERNATE 2 MAY AFFECT, NOT LIKELY TO ADVERSELY AFFECT
ALTERNATE 3 NO EFFECT
ALTERNATE 4 NO EFFECT
17

Active colonies are not present within the project study area, however, since the project study
area does contain suitable RCW foraging habitat, ESC biologists Heather Saunders and Elizabeth
Scherrer conducted a nesting habitat survey within 0 5 nule of the bridge the week of January 10,
2005 As a result of this survey, two colonies (Colony 1 and Colony 2) were located Colony 1
contains completed cavities, while Colony 2 contains only start holes The center of Colony 1 is
located approximately 2625 feet north of the subject bridge, and the center of Colony 2 is located
approximately 1250 feet west of the subject bridge
The project study area contains no suitable foraging habitat within 0 5 mile of the center of
Colony 1, therefore, the proposed project will not affect Colony 1 However, the project study
area occurs at the edge of suitable foraging habitat within 0 5 mile of the center of Colony 2
The land west of the project study area is owned by the federal government (part of Fort Bragg)
and is currently actively managed for RCW
Implementation of Alternate 1 would result in the loss of 0 32 acre of suitable foraging habitat in
Tract 1 Tract 1 is situated on the outer edge of the area of suitable foraging habitat for Colony
2 Tract 1 is fragmented narrow (maximum width of 150 feet) and bounded to the south by a
highway and to the north and east by recently timbered land Based on the landscape position of
Tract 1, the availability of extensive suitable foraging habitat managed for RCW west of Colony
2, and best professional judgment, implementation of Alternate 1 "may affect, but will not
adversely effect" RCW
Implementation of Alternate 2 would result in the loss of 0 17 acre of suitable foraging habitat in
Tract 2 Tract 2 is situated on the outer edge of the area of suitable foraging habitat for Colony 2
(Figure 10) Tract 2 is bounded to the north by a highway and to the east by active agricultural
fields Based on the landscape position of Tract 2, the availability of extensive suitable foraging
habitat managed for RCW west of Colony 2, and best professional judgment, implementation of
Alternate 2 "may affect, but will not adversely effect" RCW
Implementation of Alternate 3 will result in a loss of less than 0 01 acre of suitable foraging
habitat for RCW which will have "no effect" on RCW
Implementation of Alternate 4 (the preferred alternative) would result in the loss of less than 0 01
acre of suitable foraging habitat for RCW which will have "no effect" on RCW Fort Bragg and
USFWS staff biologists concur with this conclusion
Notropis mekistocholas (Cape Fear Shiner)
Endangered
Family Cypnmdae
Date Listed September 25, 1987
The Cape Fear shiner is a small (to 2 inches), moderately stocky minnow It is pale silvery
yellow with a black band along the sides, and the moderate-sized eyes are located on the sides of
the head (USFWS 1988) This species is distinguished from all other Notropis by having a
18
1
coiled alimentary tract that is visible through the wall of the belly (Rohde et al 1994) Food
items probably include bottom detritus, diatoms, and other pernphytes (USFWS 1988) Habitat
of the Cape Fear shiner is generally slow pools, riffles, and runs over gravel, cobble, and
boulders (USFWS 1988) Little is known about the Cape Fear shiner's life history Present
distribution (November 1988) includes portions of Randolph, Chatham, Lee, Moore, and Harnett
Counties (USFWS 1988) As of December 10, 1993, the NCWRC has designated Critical
Habitat for this species in the Deep River, from its confluence with the Haw River (on the
Chatham/Lee County line) to the NC Route 42 bridge (also on the Chatham/Lee County line),
approximately 20 miles north of the project study area
Excavation activities to Jumping Run Creek within the project study area have altered channel
morphology and instream habitat Suitable Cape Fear shiner habitat such as slow pools and
riffles and runs over gravel and cobble were not found within the project study area Instead,
Jumping Run Creek is deeply incised, has an approximately 2-foot water depth, and contains
high water flow over a sandy substrate bottom NCNIIP records show no occurrences of Cape
Fear shiner within 2 0 miles of the project study area
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
As a result of channel alteration from excavation activities, the project study area does not
contain suitable stream habitat for Cape Fear shiner Construction activities should not impact
possible Cape Fear shiner fish populations located outside the project study area Based on
NCNHP record searches and lack of appropriate stream characteristics, this project will have no
effect on the Cape Fear shiner, and the proposed bridge replacement will have no direct impacts
to suitable in-stream habitat
Lysamachia asperulaefolaa (Rough-leaved loosestrife)
Endangered
Family Prnmulaceae
Date Listed June 12, 1987
Rough-leaved loosestrife is a rhizomatous, perennial herb that often reaches the height of 2 feet
Plants are dormant in winter, with the first leaves appearing in late March or early April The
triangular leaves typically occur in whorls of three or four Leaves are typically sessile, entire,
0 3 - 0 4 inch wide, broadest at the base, and have three prominent principal veins (Godfrey and
Wooten 1981) These leaf characteristics help differentiate this species from Loomis' loosestrife
(L loomisn), which may occur in the same areas as rough-leaved loosestrife (Kral 1983)
Individuals of rough-leaved loosestrife, especially young plants, have been observed to have
paired, opposite leaves rather than whorls of three or four, this pattern has also been observed on
new growth re-sprouting from the upper leaf axils in individuals that have been browsed or
mowed Five-lobed yellow flowers, approximately?0 6 inch across, are produced on a loose
terminal raceme 1 - 4 inches long (Godfrey and Wooten 1981) Rough-leaved loosestrife is
reported to flower from late May to June (USFWS 1994), however, ESC biologists have
observed scattered individuals flowering through mud-July in New Hanover County Seeds are
formed by August, but the small, rounded capsules do not dehisce until October Populations
also reproduce asexually from rhizomes, with rhizomes producing several shoots
19
V
Rough-leaved loosestrife is endemic to Coastal Plain and Sandhills regions of the Carolinas
Typical habitat for rough-leaved loosestnfe consists of wet ecotones between long-leaf pine
savannas and wet, shrubby areas, where lack of canopy vegetation allows abundant sunlight into
the herb layer This species is fire maintained, suppression of naturally-occurring fires has
contributed to the loss of habitat in our state In the absence of fire, rough-leaved loosestnfe may
persist for several years in an area with dense shrub encroachment, however, reproduction is
reported to be suppressed under these conditions, leading to eventual local extirpation (USFWS
1994) Kral (1983) indicates that rough-leaved loosestnfe is typically found growing in black,
sandy peats or sands with a high organic content Because rough-leaved loosestnfe is an obligate
wetland species (Reed 1988), drainage of habitat also has an adverse effect on the plant
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
NCNHP records have documented this species within 2 0 miles of the project study area and
plant communities within the project study area may provide suitable habitat for rough-leaved
loosestrife A survey for Rough-leaf Loosestnfe was conducted within the project study corridor
on June 23, 2005 Suitable habitat for this species exists within the project study corridor along
roadside edges and the edges of pasture and other open areas No specimens of Rough-leaf
Loosestnfe were located, and the presence of this species within the project study area can be
discounted The project will have no effect on this species
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966, as amended, and implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800 Section 106
requires Federal Agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings (federally-funded,
licensed, or permitted projects) on properties included in or eligible for the National Register of
Histonc Places (NRHP) and to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a
reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings
B. Historic Architecture
A field survey of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) was conducted on February 29, 2000 All
structures within the APE were photographed, and on April 28, 2000, an NCDOT staff
architectural historian reviewed these photos There were no structures within the APE over fifty
years of age The photographs were shown to the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) in a
meeting on June 1, 2000 At that meeting HPO staff concurred that there are no National
Register-listed or National Register-eligible properties within the APE for this project and a form
was signed to this effect Copies of all correspondence are included in the Appendix
20
C. Archaeology
In their October 18, 2000, letter (see Appendix), the HPO stated "We have reviewed the subject
project and note that there are a number of archaeological sites recorded in the vicinity of the
project While consultation will be necessary in any event, sites 31HT239 and 31HT269 have
been recommended for additional testing, which will be required, should they be affected Other
sites, depending on the exact location may require testing also "
A survey was conducted by NCDOT Archaeologists The results of the survey concluded that no
significant intact cultural resources were discovered within the APE The previously recorded
site 31HT239, adjacent to the APE, does not possess the level of preservation to yield significant
information and demonstrates a lack of research potential The proposed project will not impact
any archaeological sites that are on or are eligible for inclusion on the NRHP The survey report
was reviewed by the HPO In a letter dated March 14, 2006, the SEPO concurred that no further
archaeological investigations will be necessary A copy of this letter is in the Appendix
VII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact by replacing a potentially unsafe
bridge
The project is considered a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and
environmental consequences
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or natural
environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulations No
significant change in land use is expected to result from replacement of the bridge.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is anticipated The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, econonuc, or religious opportunities in the area
The proposed project has been coordinated with the US Department of Agriculture The
determination has been made that no prime, unique, or important farmland will be converted as a
result of this project in accordance with the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
There are no publicly owned parks, recreational facilities, or wildlife and waterfowl refuges of
National, state, or local significance in the vicinity of Dthe project Therefore, the proposed
project will not require right of way acquisition or easement from land protected under Section
4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966
21
V
Harnett County is a current participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program This
crossing of Jumping Run Creek is located in a designated flood hazard zone and is included in a
limned detailed flood study The approximate limits of the 100-year floodplain are delineated on
the Flood Insurance Rate Map in the appendix The existing floodplain is rural, wooded or
agricultural, and there are no buildings in the project vicinity with floor elevation below the 100-
year level The proposed bridge replacement will provide equivalent or improved conveyance
compared to that of the existing bridge, therefore, the project will not have any significant
adverse impact on the existing floodplain or on the associated flood hazard to the adjacent
properties and buildings
The project will not result in any meaningful changes in traffic volumes, vehicle mix, location of
the existing facility, or any other factor that would cause an increase in enussions impacts
relative to the no-build alternative As such, FHWA has determined that this project will
generate minimal air quality impacts for Clean Air Act criteria pollutants and has not been linked
with any special MSAT concerns Consequently, this effort is exempt from analysis for MSATs
EPA regulations for vehicle engines and fuels will cause overall MSATs to decline significantly
over the next 20 years FHWA predicts MSATs will decline in the range of 57 percent to 87
percent, from 2000 to 2020, based on regulations now in effect, even with a projected 64 percent
increase in vehicle rules traveled (VMT) Therefore, both the background level of MSATs and
the possibility of even minor MSAT emissions from this project will be reduced
The noise levels will increase during the construction period, but will only be temporary This
evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise of Title 23, Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 772 and for air quality (1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and
the National Environmental Policy Act) and no additional reports are required
An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Waste Management revealed no leaking underground storage tanks or
hazardous waste sites in the project area
In compliance with Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low Income Populations) a review was conducted to determine
whether minority or low-income populations were receiving disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental impacts as a result of this project The investigation
determined the project would not disproportionately impact any minority or low-income
populations
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no significant adverse environmental
effects will result from implementation of the project
a
22

VIII. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on May 26, 2005 at the Overhills Middle School to
provide information, answer questions, and accept wntten comments on the replacement of
Bndge No 59 on SR 1117 (Nursery Road) over Jumping Run Creek in Harnett County
Seventeen people attended the workshop, including representatives from Fort Bragg, Anderson
Creek Fire Department, and the public
Residents and Business Owners voiced no objections to using an off-site detour dunng
construction People using the Anderson Creek golf course, along Ray Road, may be
inconvenienced in accessing the course from NC 24/ 87 Directions for the course are given
using SR 1117 (Nursery Road) from NC 24/ 87 A developer of a new subdivision near Ray
Road and NC 210 agreed with the idea of an off-site detour using Ray Road
Fort Bragg officials commented that military base housing and a school (west of NC 24/ 87) near
SR 1117 (Nursery Road) will be constructed by 2008 To service this area, Harnett County may
need to extend water and sewer lines along the SR 1117 (Nursery Road) right of way in the area
of the bndge First responder emergency service will be requested from Anderson Creek or
Spout Spnngs Fire Departments Military Wildlife Enforcement officers may need access across
Jumping Run Creek If the road is closed dunng construction, this could be done from an
unpaved road southwest of the bndge, connecting to a utility easement, and joining SR 1117
(Nursery Road) east of the bndge They noted the project area is included within Fort Bragg's
red cockaded woodpecker management plan
Anderson Creek Fire Department is located on Ray Road near the Overhills Middle School As
part of a mutual agreement, this department travels along SR 1117 (Nursery Road) to NC 24/ 87
to provide first response in case of emergencies The department would prefer traffic to be
maintained on site dunng construction If an off-site detour is used, the department would need
to coordinate with adjoining departments in Spnng Lake, Spout Spnngs, or areas north
A meeting was held on June 23, 2005 with representatives from Harnett County emergencies
services agencies The purpose of the meeting was to discuss on site traffic maintenance options
for emergency vehicles dunng the project construction penod Representatives from fire,
rescue, ambulance, and law enforcement agencies agreed that delays approaching 15 minutes
would be problematic in responding to emergencies (see Appendix for specific comments)
NCDOT representatives agreed to investigate on site detours that would balance costs and
rrunimize environmental impacts Alternate 4 was developed in response to these comments
23
IX. AGENCY COORDINATION
Letters requesting comments and environmental input were sent to the following agencies
*US Department of the Army
*US Army Corps of Engineers- Wilmington District
*US Fish and Wildlife Service
*US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
State Cleannghouse
*NC Department of Cultural Resources
NC Department of Public Instruction
*NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NC Wildlife Commission
NC Division of Water Quality
NC Natural Heritage Program
*County Manager, Harnett County
Chairman, Harnett County Commissioners
*Office of the Shenff, Harnett County
*Emergency Services Department, Harnett County
*Anderson Creek Emergency Services, Inc
Superintendent, Harnett County Public Schools
Asterisks (*) indicates agencies from which written comments were received The comments are
included in the appendix of this report
24
X. REFERENCES
Amoroso, J L 1999 Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North
Carolina North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N C
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh
Cowardin, L M , V Carter, F C Golet, and E T LaRoe 1979 Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States FWS/OBS -79/31 Fish and Wildlife Service, U S
Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 103 pp
Department of the Army (DOA) 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual
Tech Rpt Y-87-1 US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS 100
PP
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) 1998 Classifications and Water Quality Standards Assigned
to the Waters of the Cape Fear River Basin North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Raleigh
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) 2000 Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality
Management Plan (Draft) North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (Draft), Raleigh
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 1985 Red-cockaded Woodpecker Recovery Plan U S
Department of the Interior, Southeast Region, Atlanta, Georgia 88 pp
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 1988 Cape Fear Shiner Recovery Plan U S Fish and
Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA 18 pp
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 1992 Small-Whorled Pogoma Recovery Plan U S Fish and
Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA 78pp
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 1994 Agency Draft Rough-leaved Loosestrnfe Recovery
Plan U S Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA 37 pp
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 1995 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants,
Determination of Endangered Status for Neonympha mitchelli franccsci Federal Register
60(17) 5264-5267
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 2006 Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern, and Candidate Species, Harnett County, North Carolina, available from
http //www fws -ov/nc-es/es/count fry html, December 2006
Godfrey R K and J W Wooten 1981 Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United
States Dicotyledons The University of Georgia Press, Athens GA , 933 pp
25
Hamel, P B 1992 Land Manager's Guide to the Birds of the South The Nature Conservancy,
Southeastern Region, Chapel Hill, NC 437 pp
Kral, R 1983 A Report on Some Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Forest-related Vascular
Plants of the South U S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Technical Publication
R8J-TP 2 1305 pp
LeGrand, H E and S P Hall 1999 Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species
of North Carolina North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, N C Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh
Martof, B S , W M Palmer, J R. Bailey, and J R Hamson III 1980 Amphibians and Reptiles
of the Carolinas and Virginia The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC 264
PP
Massey, J R , D K S Otte, T A Atkinson, and R D Whetstone 1983 An Atlas and Illustrated
Guide to the Threatened and Endangered Vascular Plants of the Mountains of North Carolina
and Virginia Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, North Carolina 218 pp
Menhinick, E F 1991 The Freshwater Fishes of North Carolina North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, Raleigh 227 pp
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 1996 Hydnc Soils Harnett County United
States Department of Agriculture Technical Guide, Section II-A 2
Newcomb, L 1977 Newcomb's Wildflower Guide Little, Brown, and Company, Boston, MA
490 pp
Palmer, W M and A L Braswell 1995 Reptiles of North Carolina The University of North
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC 412 pp
Potter, E F , J F Parnell, and R P Teulings 1980 Birds of the Carolinas The University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC 408 pp
Radford, A E, H E Ahles, and C R Bell 1968 Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas
The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC 1183 pp
Reed, P B , Jr 1988 National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands Southeast (Region
2) US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26 2)
Rohde, F C , R G Arndt, DG Lindquist, J F Parnell 1994 Freshwater Fishers of the
Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware The University of North Carolina Press,
Chapel Hill, N C 222 pp
26
Schafale, M P and A S Weakley 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina Third Approximation Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, N C Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Raleigh 325
PP
Thompson, R L and W W Baker 1971 A survey of red-cockaded woodpeckers nesting
habitat requirements (pp 170-186) In R L Thompson ed, The Ecology and Management of
the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL
U S Department of Agriculture (USDA) 1994 Soil Survey of Harnett County, North Carolina
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Weakley, A S 1993 Orchzdaceae (Orchid Family) Isotria Rafinesque (Whorled Pogoma,
Five-leaves, Fiveleaf Orchid) P 491 in Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas and Virginia,
Working Draft of 22 October 1993
Webster, W D , J F Parnell, and W C Biggs, Jr 1985 Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia,
and Maryland The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC 255 pp
27
I Y -
7117 r_ -?
Spout Spnngs ? ? ? •
l :V \I ?/ .i
pG =
, 24 O i y '1
`? - 87 1120 1120
1117 \
1 (n 121
BRIDGE NO 59 y
\ Dub ' - 1 --

, - 1121
1 `? -
1 ?W

,
X24`
87
v
/ ?
N
_ ? \ r
sro t?
` ,co ` ?'-
co -
1

1 1

1
/ - '43
\ SPRING LAKE
POP 8238
Pope Air Forco Base
vt uaY
, wui.. ao?.s J O ?H $
Z Vema,
? r 8
;i .d. % M
.¦•.„ 101 ?• .„w s '
421
H ASR fr T y 01° . rot
r...e
F all
.em u..Y.
13 /
N D $ A 6( P (I
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
'. ENVIROSIENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
BRIDGE NO. 59
SR 1117 OVER JUMPING RUN CREEK
HARNETT COUNTY
B-3655
VICINITY MAP
0 1 2 3
GRAPHIC SCALE (MILES) FIGURE i

? ?
e r
? {y
t } ?r
al t.1
w
n
? il
?
I :
4 I I {
r
ll ? ?IF?
r
i

'
rt f i
i
l?'? A! III
I` i
I
? ? ? ,
I

L l },
k r:

f = ?L'f'
-
I f k''? : •. .
:
l
?..:. I?
,? w '?, ? ???
. ?
+
yam
? l
,,
y

LOOKING WEST AGIROSS 3RiDGE
E. NV, yC
yF.f•,r*? ....Nl.?
LOOKIN G EAST ACROSS ROSS BRIDGE
?.aM
?
4 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
?
, ®
PN TRANSPORTATION
1
J
t
^ / ? 4
t PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
BRMGE NO. 59
ON SR 1117 OVER JUMPING RUN CREEK
HARNETT COUNTY
R-3655

FIGS 2A

l
t SL`
1 ?
DOWNSTREAM STRUCTURE PROFILE - SOUTH SEDE
EAST E
? - z ? ? ? - - ? - -_•-^?? r - "?6,?..:?-'ti` . a`?`?`off ?:? ''?,?" ? ? -w ? ? ,e'u
LELE S„
t 2 cf ? t
f
`a fl v t S ? a
+u,
i i
UPSTREAM STRUCTURE PROFILE - OR SIDE
WEST E
i t i 17
Spout Spcmrs. ,
--
24
1` a/ c?~ 11'E. ?tom L
_` \ !
[ 1117
s _n
oab ` 1121 \ • `J? a'-
'
co Rio t
1481 . ,
y
f
? -S, ? CGS ?' ? [ t
C?'' AA \ SPRING LAME
POP 8238 ` r
/ PopC Air FO'C8 BCSC ?- •?, F / _ l J
fiLI[.. r !p ` C+4--T N,A"`,r ' we(ie<aN.z (. , "
? ? ?c ? d R Mea?ten ,
{? L
t, tan xn- ?ul? RF ? 1
f r s
.y
' STUDIED DETOUR ROUTE -
v
S A W P i,\ S JO
'34
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPBIENT AND
'mmr ENVIRDMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
BRIDGE NO. 59
SR H17 OVER JUMPING RUN CREEK
HARNETT COUNTY
B-3655
STUDIED DETOUR ROUTE
_ ? 3 FIGURE 7
GRAPHIC SCALE WILES)
VAR. SLOPE45 10' " 1 " 6'
-
9,y
6\
CL -L-
12' 8' 12' 12' 30'
GRADE
4I POINT 4' VAR. SLOPE
OB 02 02 .08
? 6:l
*I I' WITH GUARDRAIL
TYPICAL SECTION NO.
SR 1117
Q'
7'-6° 12' I 12' 7'-6° 0. .1
GRADE
POINT
02 V 02
? ? o ? o a ? o ? ? o ? o ? o ? ? ? ? ? ? ? o ? o ? ? ?
TYPICAL SECTION NO.2
SR 1117 BRIDGE
PROPOSED TYPICAL
SECTIONS
FIGURE 8A
3'
12' MIN. DEPTH
? -DET-
6' 10' 10' 6'
GRADE 2'
v 1 POINT
PS PS
02 02 _ 08
Q
* 9' WITH GUARDRAIL
TYPICAL SECTION NO.3
TEMPORARY DETOUR
-DET-
i
2 6'
TYPICAL SECTION NO.4
TEMPORARY DETOUR BRIDGE
3' 10' 10' 3'
GRADE
POINT
oz o2
PROPOSED TYPICAL
SECTIONS
FIGURE 8B

???
""""
PPP
v • !

L3

lJ 0
ctj 0??qqy
?
Lf'3 CO
ryry?? ?'}
x
W 4eff ,'
c o pyd S6d
_
CIO y
tJ CW Z
'..l•••0.7 {
LL
?VpY` s5
_ ? q w- I
?? V cz ( a
t a3 f.._ C C3 '` E ?9
i L H
££ ?

3: -2
L
U
C) uj

s... s... ?- to ?

L1 cu >

3

j'

11

•
•
t t
I ,

'
i r a
•ti n F ?I,
? ? J

..fit .
r
Y } 1

L?
l

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
HEADQUARTERS, XVIII AIRBORNE CORPS AND FORT BRAGG
FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA 28310
REPLY TO September 22, 2000
ATTENTION OF
Public Works Business Center
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
ATTN Mr Drew Joyner
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr Joyner
This is in response to your letter dated August 15, 2000 We have
reviewed the proposals for the bridge replacement and have the
following comments
a Bridges 29 and 53 over NC 55 are not on Fort Bragg land and
would not be used in a deployment We have no input for the proposal
for these bridges
b Fort Bragg Military Police respond to non-emergency calls only
in the area accessed by Bridge No 59 over Jumping Run Creek The
North Carolina State Patrol is responsible for responding to emergency
calls in the vicinity Fort Bragg Military Police do not foresee a
problem in responding to non-emergency calls in the case of any of the
proposed project alternatives.
c Fort Bragg Fire Department does not respond to calls in the
area due to the distance Anderson Creek Fire Department, per
agreement with Fort Bragg, is responsible for emergency calls Spout
Springs Fire Department also responds to calls in the nearby area A
detour should be as close as possible to the current bridge site to
minimize response time Please coordinate with all agencies during
aesign and construction.
d Fort Bragg does not anticipate problems with access to the
training areas in the case of any of the proposed detours The design
loading for standard state roads will suffice for Fort Bragg's
anticipated traffic
e Fort Bragg Wildlife personnel who patrol the area are
concerned about an off-site detour which would seriously hamper their
ability to patrol the area
f Please be advised that we have entered into a multiple-agency
pr03ect to develop a mitigation wetland both immediately north and
immediately south of this bridge and the raised road section leading
up to it from the east There will likely be a very strong interest
C
-2-
in altering the main stream course back to its historical place The
current bridge location has been identified as an obstacle to that
effort We request that you delay your decision about the bridge for
9 to 12 months because some investigation is required to determine the
optimal configuration of the wetland drainage and water courses
Regardless of the alternative chosen, any significant alterations
to the terrain, creek, or bridge should be cleared through Fort Bragg
Point of contact for further information is Ms Kathryn Haught, Real
Property Planning Team, [phone]/6761
Sincerely,
P-"OX?t'jz c6?4t'
Robert L. Shi.rron
Colonel, U S Army
Director of Public Works
Business Center
R
JAMES*B HUNTJR-P,
-GOVERNOR BILL HOLMAN -
SECRETARY
DAVID S VOGEEL
DIRECTOR
?r

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
MEMORANDUM:5= Aug Est 21, 2000
TO. Melba McGee
FROM. David Harrison
SUBJECT. NCDOT Bridge Replacement Projects B-3500 (Person County), B-
3654 and B-3655 (Harnett County), and 13-3706 and B-3707 (Warren County)
If additional land is needed beyond the existing right-of-way the
environmental assessment should include information on adverse impacts to
Prime or Statewide Important Farmland
The definition of Prime or Statewide Important Farmland is based on the
soil series and not on its current land use Areas that are developed or are witlun
municipal boundaries are exempt from consideration as Prune or Important
Farmland
For additional information, contact the soils specialists with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, USDA, Raleigh, NC at [phone]
Cc William D Gilmore
1614 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEICIH NORTH CAPO-INA 27699-1614
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
II/? WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO February 14, 2001
Regulatory Division
Action ID No 200100213, 200100214, 200100215, 200100216, 200100227, 200100229,
200100347, 200100348, 200100349, 200100350, 200100351, 200100352, 200100353
Mr William D Gilmore, P E, Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N C 27699-1548
Dear Mr Gilmore
Reference your letters July 28, 2000, August 15, 2000, October 20, 2000, and
November 15, 2000 regarding our scoping comments on the following proposed bridge
i eplacement projects
2
?Lu 3
i ,)' J j 4
t ?' ZLk, 5
j 6
- rj t 7
;?? b'x
9
TIP Project B-3698, Bridge No 15 on NC 50 over Youngs Swamp, Sampson
County, Action ID 200100347
TIP Project B-3699, Bridge No 67 on NC 903 over Cohane Creek, Sampson
County, Action ID 200100348
TIP Project B-3514, Bndge No 100 on SR 1246 (Butler Island Bridge Road)
over South River, Sampson County, Action ID 200100349
TIP Project B-3654, Bridge Nos 29 and 53 on NC 55 over Mingo Swamp,
Harnett County, Action ID 200100213
TIP Project B-3655, Bridge No 59 on SR 1111 over Jumping Run Creek,
Harnett County, Action ID 200100214
TIP Project B-3692, Bridge Nos 62 and 82 on NC 72 over Richland Swamp,
Robeson County, Action ID 200100229
TIP Project B-3693, Bndge No 211 on SR 1527 over Raft Swamp, Robeson
County, Action ID 200100350
TIP Project B-3507, Bridge Nos 155 and 157 on SR 1303 over Lumber River,
Robeson County, Action ID 200100351
TIP Project B-3881, Bridge No 26 on US 117 and NC 133 over CSX
Transportation, New Hanover County, Action ID 200100227
TIP Project B-3896, Bridge No 24 on NC 20 over CSX Transportation,
Robeson County, Action ID 200100352
10
11
?4
11 TIP Project B-4139, Bridge No 106 on SR 1780 over Black River, Harnett
County, Action ID 200100215
12 TIP Project B-3875, Bridge No 78 on SR 1456 over Grassy Creek, Moore
County, Action ID 200100216
TIP Project B-3404, Bridge No 314 on SR 1127 over South Fork Jones Creek,
Anson County, Action ID 200100353
Based on the information provided in the referenced letters, it appears that each
proposed bridge replacement project may impact jurisdictional wetlands Department of
the Army (DA) permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of
1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material in waters
of the United States or any adjacent wetlands in conjunction with these projects, including
disposal of construction debris Specific permit requirements will depend on design of the
projects, extent of fill work within the waters of the United States, including wetlands,
construction methods, and other factors
Although these projects may qualify as a Categorical Exclusion, to qualify for
nationwide permit authorization under Nationwide Permit #23, the project planning
report should contain sufficient information to document that the proposed activity does
not have more than a minimal individual or cumulative impact on the aquatic
environment Our experience has shown that replacing bridges with culverts often results
in sufficient adverse impacts to consider the work as having more than minimal impacts
on the aquatic environment Accordingly, the following items need to be addressed in the
project planning report
a The report should contain the amount of permanent and temporary impacts to
waters and wetlands as well as a description of the type of habitat that will be affected
b Off-site detours are always preferable to on-site (temporary) detours in wetlands
If an on-site detour is the recommended action, justification should be provided On-site
detours, unless constructed on a spanning structure, can cause permanent wetland impacts
due to sediment consolidation resulting from the on-site detour itself and associated
heavy equipment Substantial sediment consolidation in wetland systems may in turn
cause fragmentation of the wetland and impair the ecological and hydrologic functions of
the wetland Thus, on-site detours constructed in wetlands can result in more than
minimal wetland impacts These types of wetland impacts will be considered as
permanent wetland impacts Please note that an onsite detour constructed on a spanning
structure can potentially avoid permanent wetland impacts and should be considered
whenever an on-site detour is the recommended action

For proposed projects and associated on-site detours that cause minimal losses of
wetlands, an approved wetland restoration plan will be required prior to issuance of a DA
nationwide or general permit For proposed projects and associated on-site detours that
cause significant wetland losses, an individual DA permit and a mitigation proposal for
the unavoidable wetland impacts may be required
in view of our concerns related to onsite detours constructed in wetlands, recent
field inspections were conducted at each of the proposed project sites, except for TIP
Project B-3875, and a cursory determination was made on the potential for sediment
consolidation due to an onsite detour Based on these inspections, potential for sediment
consolidation in wetlands exists at several of the proposed projects Therefore, it is
recommended that geotechmcal evaluations be conducted at each project site to estimate
the magnitude of sediment consolidation that can occur due to an on-site detour and the
results be provided in the project planning report Based on our field inspections, we
strongly recommend that geotechmcal evaluations be conducted at the following
proposed project sites
1 TIP Project B-3698, Bridge No 15 on NC 50 over Youngs Swamp, Sampson
County, Action ID 200100347
2 TIP Project B-3514, Bndge No 100 on SR 1246 (Butler Island Bridge Road)
over the South River, Sampson County, Action ID 200100349
3 TIP Project B-3654, Bridge Nos 29 and 53 on NC 55 over Mingo Swamp,
Harnett County, Action ID 200100213
4 TIP Project B-3692, Bridge Nos 62 and 82 on NC 72 over Richland Swamp,
Robeson County, Action ID 200100229
5 TIP Project B-3693, Bridge No 211 on SR 1527 over Raft Swamp, Robeson
County, Action ID 200100350
6 TIP Project B-3507, Bridge Nos 155 and 157 on SR 1303 over Lumber River,
Robeson County, Action ID 200100351
c Project commitments should include the removal of all temporary fills from
waters and wetlands and "time-of-year" restrictions on in-stream work if recommended
by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission In addition, if undercutting is necessary for
temporary detours, the undercut material should be stockpiled to be used to restore the
site
d All restored areas should be planted with endemic vegetation including trees, if
appropriate
e The report should provide an estimate of the linear feet of new impacts to
streams resulting from construction of the project
f If a bridge is proposed to be replaced with a culvert, NCDOT must demonstrate
that the work will not result in more than minimal impacts on the aquatic environment,
specifically addressing the passage of aquatic life including anadromous fish In addition,
the report should address the impacts that the culvert would have on recreational
navigation
g The report should discuss and recommend bridge demolition methods and shall
include the impacts of bridge demolition and debris removal in addition to the impacts of
constructing the bridge The report should also incorporate the bridge demolition policy
recommendations pursuant to the NCDOT policy entitled "Bridge Demolition and
Removal in Waters of the United States" dated September 20, 1999
h Based on the recent field investigations of the referenced project sites, the
apparent level of wetland impacts and scope of the referenced projects do not warrant
coordination pursuant to the integrated NEPA/Section 404-merger agreement
Should you have any questions, please call Mr David L Tunpy at the Wilmington
Field Office at 910-251-4634
Sincerely,
7 ,
E David Franklin
NCDOT Team Leader
Regulatory Division

pt?ENT OF Th
F
WQP ?4?
y O
? a
a
M4RCH
United States Department of the Intenor
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636.3726
September 28, 2000
Mr William D Gilmore, P E, Manager
NCDOT
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Mr Gilmore
Thank you for your August 15, 2000 request for information from the U S Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) on the potential environmental impacts of proposed bndge replacements in
Harnett County, North Carolina This report provides scopmg information and is provided in
accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (16 U S C 661-
667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U S C 1531-
1543) This report also serves as initial scopmg comments to federal and state resource agencies
for use in their permitting and/or certification processes for this project
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the following
bridge structures
1 B-3654 Bridge Nos 29 & 53 on NC 55 over Mingo Swamp, and
2 B-3655 Bridge No 59 on SR 1111 over Jumping Run Creek
The following recommendations are provided to assist you in your planning process and to
facilitate a thorough and timely review of the project
Generally, the Service recommends that wetland impacts be avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practical as outlined in Section 404 (b)(1) of the Clean Water Act Amendments
of 1977 In regard to avoidance and minimization of impacts, we recommend that proposed
highway projects be aligned along or adjacent to existing roadways, utility corridors, or
previously developed areas in order to mimmize habitat fragmentation and encroachment Areas
exhibiting high biodiversity or ecological value important to the watershed and region should be
avoided Crossings of streams and associated wetland systems should use existing crossings
and/or occur on a structure wherever feasible Where bndging is not feasible, culvert structures

that maintain natural water flows and hydraulic regimes without scouring, or impeding fish and
wildlife passage, should be employed Highway shoulder and median widths should be reduced
through wetland areas Roadway embankments and fill areas should be stabilized by using
appropriate erosion control devices and techniques Wherever appropriate, construction in
sensitive areas should occur outside fish spawning and migratory bird nesting seasons
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps of the Anderson Creek and Dunn 7 5 Minute,
Quadrangles show wetland resources in the specific work areas However, while the NWI maps
are useful for providing an overview of a given area, they should not be relied upon in lieu of a
detailed wetland delineation by trained personnel using an acceptable wetland classification
methodology Therefore, in addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the
environmental documentation for this project include the following in sufficient detail to
facilitate a thorough review of the action
1 The extent and acreage of waters of the U S , including wetlands, that are to be impacted by
filling, dredging, clearing, ditching, or draining Acres of wetland impact should be
differentiated by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the National
Wetlands Inventory Wetland boundaries should be determined by using the 1987 o s of
Eniineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U S Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps)
2 If unavoidable wetland impacts are proposed, we recommend that every effort be made to
identify compensatory mitigation sites in advance Project planning should include a detailed
compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting unavoidable wetland impacts Opportunities to
protect mitigation areas in perpetuity, preferably via conservation easement, should be
explored at the outset
The document presents a number of scenarios for replacing each bridge, ranging from in-place to
relocation, with on-site and off-site detours The Service recommends that each bridge be
replaced on the existing alignment with an off-site detour
The enclosed list identifies the federally-listed endangered and threatened species, and Federal
Species of Concern (FSC) that are known to occur in Harnett County The Service recommends
that habitat requirements for the listed species be compared with the available habitats at the
respective project sites If suitable habitat is present within the action area of the project,
biological surveys for the listed species should be performed Environmental documentation that
includes survey methodologies, results, and NCDOT's recommendations based on those results,
should be provided to this office for review and comment
FSC's are those plant and animal species for which the Service remains concerned, but further
biological research and field study are needed to resolve the conservation status of these taxa
Although FSC's receive no statutory protection under the ESA, we would encourage the NCDOT
to be alert to their potential presence, and to make every reasonable effort to conserve them if
found The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program should be contacted for information on
species under state protection

The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project Please continue to advise us
during the progression of the planning process, including your official determination of the
impacts of this project If you have any questions regarding these continents, please contact Tom
McCartney at 919-856-4520, ext 32
Enclosures
cc
COE, Wilmington, NC (David Timpy)
NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC (John Hennessy)
NCDNR, Northside, NC (David Cox)
Sincerely,
a? r Garlandardue
Dr
Services Supervisor
FWS/R4 TMcCartney TM 09/28/00 919/856-4520 extension 32 \2brdghar net

V
COMMON NA_N1E SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS
HARNETT COUNTY
Vertebrates
Bachman's sparrow Azmophzla aestzvalzs
Cape Fear shiner Notropzs mekzstocholas
Red-cockaded woodpecker Pzcozdes borealis
Northern pine snake Pztuophzs melanolezzcus melanolezicus
Invertebrates
Atlantic pigtoe Fusconaza masonz
Yellow lampmussel Lampszlzs carzosa
Vascular Plants
Georgia indigo-bush Amorpha georgzana var georgzana
SandhiIls milkvetch Astragalus mzchauxzz
Resinous boneset Eupatorzum resznosum
Small-whorled pogonia Isotrza medeoloides
Sandhills bog lily Lzlzum zrzdolae
Rough-leaved loosestrzfe Lyszmachza asperulaefolza
Savanna cowbane Oxypolzs ternata
Carolina grass-of-parnassus Parnassza carolznzana
Wavyleaf wild quinine Parthenzum radfordu
Sandhills pyxie-moss Pyxzdanthera barbulata var brevzfolza
Sun-facing coneflower Rudbeckza helzopszdzs
Spring-flowering goldenrod Solzdago verna
Pickering's dawnflower Styltsma pzckerzngn var pzckerzngu
Carolina aspholdel Tofeldza glabra
Roughleaf yellow-eyed grass Xyrzs scabrzfolza
HAYWOOD COUNTY
Vertebrates
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergzz
Olive-sided flycatcher Contopus borealis
Hellbender Cryptobranchus alleganzenszs
Cerulean warbler Dendrozca cerulea
Eastern cougar Felzs concolor couguar
Carolina northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrznus coloratus
Bald eagle Halzaeetus leucocephalus
Southern rock vole Mccrotus chrotorrhznus carolznenszs
Southern Appalachian woodrat Neotoma florzdana haematoreza
Alleghany woodrat Neotoma magzster
Southern water shrew Sorer palustrzs punctulatus
Appalachian cottontail Sylvzlagus obscures
Appalachian Bewick's wren Thryomanes bewzcku altus
FSC
Endangered
Endangered
FSC*
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
Threatened*
FSC
Endangered
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC

T(S/A)'
FSC
FSC
FSC
Endangered
Endangered
Threatened
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
January 15, 1999
Page 21 of 49

U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19B4 451 15911324
U S Department of Agriculture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART I (TQ be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request
ICS-25-?
Name Of Project _ X055

Proposed Land Use Federal Agency Involved L
Pejern(
L(fIw a i
County And State r Co J
PART I I (To be completed by SCS) _ Date Request Receiv By SCS
Does the site contain prime, unique, statewide or local important farmland?- -'ic`es No
(!f no, the FPPA does not apply - do not complete additional parts of this
Major Crop(s) = Farmable Land to Povt Jurisdiction. 10?,.
Acres f3 `?-`?_
Name Of Land Evaluation System Used Name Of Local Site Assessment S stem "
lY 4 -cres Irrigated Average Farm Size

Amount Of Farmland As Defined in l;PPA
Acre$ -`

Date Lan Eva lion fleturnedBy $
ry
PART 111 (To be completed by Federal Agency) Alternative Site Rating
Site,k I Sited 2- Site Site b--]
A Total Acres To Be Converted Directly ,57 0,57 D,5?
B Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
C Total Acres In Site O, 5-7 0,57 05-7
PART IV ITo be completed by SCS) Land Evaluation Informati6n-'=M"5
A -Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland
B Total Acres Statewide And Local Important Farmland
=?a?=?
- C Percentage Of Farmland In County Or Local Govt Unit To B6 Converted
D. Percentage Of Farmland In Govt Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value -VOCr -' - - - , -
ART V (To be completed by SCS) Land Evaluation Criterion
- 'Relative Value Of Farmland To Be Converted (Scale ofO to 100 Points)
PART V 1 (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Site Assessment Criteria (These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658 5(b) Maximum
Points
1 Area In Nonurban Use is I ?s IS I
2 Perimeter In Nonurban Use 10 l 0 10 10
3 Percent Of Site Being Farmed 2 -X-
4 Protection Provided By State And Local Government 2o
5 Distance From Urban Builtup Area I IS I -
6 Distance To Urban Support Services
7 Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average ?? 2 2 2
8 Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland l0 D b 0
9 Availability Of Farm Support Services 5
J
10 On Farm Investments 20 0 0
11 Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services 1-O C5 c?
12 Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use 10
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 47 14-1 4-7
PART V I I (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100
Total Site Assessment (From Part VI above ora local
site assessment) 160 43 47
TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 211nes) 260
I
Was A Local Site Assessment Jsed?
'Rte Selected Date Of Selec*.lon Yes ? Flo
Reason For Seiect?on
r
Vlf s
jV1
? ??? ?fe fr i0 ? 605 0!LL)?Oal?P`?i 1"7 One
?1 f?
i) irF n ip 1?? i?9? : 1 i iirellei- ULon ?10 _c? loe-

v
??r? ?AryE a?
>a
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
"ct4T B ti°udbccl, Ndmmr L'n-•
MICI'14 I 1 i.i« (,n anon
1 M-uh ( 1 1111 "LL ILI 11-\
)tlttlr ( rot I)L. Uit'NtLrLt 1-%
March 14, 2006
NT IE,IMOILINDUM
Ottilt Of lnhn?? lnd l 11,t0f?
Dni,ion of I lr.toriczl Rt.4urc,
Diiid Brook Director
To Matt V L1 M011 _ViLbaeologr Supeztiisor
NCDOT - Office of Hum-in Environment
I-ROM Peter. Sandbeckv",` ?-R/ \ ?,Nc Ce 7???L
'J
SUBJECT -archaeological Suive-,, Replacement of Budge No 59 on SR 1117 (Nursery Road) Ovei
Jumping Run Creek, B-3655, Harnett County, ER 01-7360
Thank N ou for your letter of Februan 20, 2006, transmitting dic arch ieolo ncal sun•ey rcpoit for the above
project
The report author noted that no significant intact cultural resources were discovered -vitlvn the Alea of
Potential Effect (.APE) during the archaeological surrey and that no further archaeological irivestigations aie
necessar} and/or warianted The author further states that previously iecorded archaeological site 31 HT239
located adjacent to the proposed APE does not possess the level of preservation to yield significant
information and therefoie demonstrates a lack of research potential We concur with this iecommendation
the above comments aie made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preseivation pct and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Pait 800
Think you for youi cooperation and con,,ideiations If you have any- questions concerning the above
comment, please contact Renee Gledlull-Eailcy, environmental review cooidinatot, at 919 733 4763 In all
future communication concerning this ptolect, please cite the above referenced tracking number
U)canon M uhng Addrtss 7 elcphnnc/F to
4DMINISTR.4TION 1 )7 \ hl ui? `rttt+ Riluyh \ ( d=+I' ?i ul kn+ct i cnuc 13,11" lI \i ?-=+1'}4G7 }7 A- i ," ;, '31465 i
RESTORATION Ila% ilkunu Con r 17 11L'1,11 M Jbl' \Iaol +vct i ?nttr R11t vh \( 2-6 ri}461- J I );i3 ai4i l i I! (rl
SLR',EI R PLANNING 515 `+ r3lount'IrMtr R11„ h \+( 411-'1v1\tnkl ( tn?cr 1UL1,11 \.t 2-(W461' (4l Y)-3iG54? "15-4Y, 1

STATE' w
v
e ?Z= n
D
u o
Wyr
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L S Brook, Administrator
James B Hunt Jr, Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J Clow, Director
October 18, 2000
MEMORANDUM
To William D Gilmore, P E, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
From David Brook-
4,-? ?-
Deputy State Histo Preservation Officer
Re Bndge #59 on SR 1111 over Jumping Run Creek, B-3655, Harnett County, ER 01-7360
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures of historical or
architectural importance located within the planning area However, since a survey has not been
conducted in over a decade, there may be structures of which we aie unaware located within the
planning area
We have reviewed the subject project and note that theie are a number of archaeological sites
recorded in the vicinity of the project While consultation will be necessary in any event, sites
31HT239 and 31HT269 have been recommended for additional testing, which will be required
should they be affected Other sites, depending on the exact location may require testing also
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section
106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800
Thank you for your cooperation and consideiation If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Enviionmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763
DB kgc
cc Maiy Pope Furr, NCDOT
Tom Padgett, NCDOT
Roy Shelton, FHwA
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N Blount St Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] • 733-86`-
ARCHAEOLOGY 421 N Blount St_ Raleigh W. dr1o U-1 c>r.,, o [---. D-1-1 - -„1,,., 1- .,..,.. _-- __ .- _.

Fedeial aid 413 RZ-1117(3) TIP 413-3655 Counn Harnett
CONCLRRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR fHE NATIONAL
REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Pi oject Desci iption Replace Bridge No 59 on SR 1] 17 over McLeod Creek
On June 1, 2000, representatives of the
EV North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
QV Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
©/North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Reviewed the subject project at
a scoping meeting
photograph review session/consultation
F other
All parties present agreed
there are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effect
[V there are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criterion
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effect
there are properties over fifty years old (list attached) within the project's area of potential effect,
but based on the historical mformation available and the photographs of each property, properties
identified as are considered not eligible for the National
Register and no further evaluation of them is necessary
there are no National. Register-listed properties located within the project's area of potential effect
Signed
Representative, CDOT Date
(" i 1,7102
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date
4entative, SHPO Date
State Historic Preservation Officer Date
If a survey report is prepaied a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included
-"1COSYSTem
fl fl, ei
yPROC,Knrn
iice?;; (` I t tt .J rr, ?-
ti.,l ,? ?..a;..,t ia ...1?.v_i:f G' ssCl [ sI ?s1st1G il.?.tl?

November 19, 2004
Mr Michael Penney
NCDOT- PDEA
1548 Mail Center Service
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
RE B-3655 No 59 on SR 1117 over Jumping Run Creek,
Harnett Co
Jumping Run/Overhills Stream Restoration Project
Dear Mr Penney,

This letter is to serve as a follow up to the November 9, 2004 meeting regarding the replacement of the above
referenced bridge over Jumping Run Creek The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) currently has a
stream restoration project in the construction phase adjacent to, and upstream of, the existing bridge EEP is
amenable to the replacement of this bridge provided the new bridge would not involve the installation of a
culvert or impact the current channel's dimension or profile As the newly constructed channel was designed
based on tying in to the existing channel immediately upstream of the bridge maintaining the existing channel
conditions is imperative to ensuring a stable restoration project Thank you very much for the opportunity to
comment on the future bridge replacement, your coordination is greatly appreciated
If you have any further question please feel free to contact me at 919-303-7821
Sincerely,
Jf (? r-(- /Z- - -
Melorue Allen
NCDENR - EEP
Environmental Specialist
-ccsv Tim ?r;Ce1r rg, am One
hCaroliina
1 ;?2,, IS tr i 1??, e p? 4 a l W 1rr? Nort
?? !rl i ?. ?1, L?f -2 Naturally
r91`-7`-13 19-7 i5-2219 e h2
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
DAN B ANDREws, Irt, Chairman
BFATRicE B Hn-L. Vice-Chairman
JosEpti T BowDEN
TIDY BYRD
WALT T n mNm

COUNTY OF HARNETT
P O BOX 759 • LILLINGTON, N C 27546
[phone] • FAX [phone]
October 19, 2000
Mr William D Gilmore, P E, Manager
Project Development acid Eiiv L,onmental Analysis Biancii
N C Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr Gilmore
P,w,u
COUNTY MANAGER
NEIL. EMoRY
Wm A (Tour) W(waz, Assistant
CLERK TO THE BOARD
KAY S Bt ANcHARD

rnG.)
OCT
The purpose of this letter is to respond to request for comment regarding three
bndges in Harnett County In your letter dated August 15, you note several options
regarding Bridge Nos 29, 53, and 59 We have reviewed each of these and would
request that each bridge be replaced In addition, we have reviewed the impact of
replacement projects on our emergency services and have deternuned that the provision
of services would not be interrupted by these projects Thank you for the opportumty to
provide input regarding these projects
Sincerely
Nei Emory
Comm;, Manager
NE sw
F \USERS\SHIRLEY\D0I'\Gilmore doc
Harnett County does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or
disability to emolovment or the orovtston of services
4
QPpY ti0[(/?,
'Z - 1'? >t?1?
. ETT co
July 19, 2005
Mr Michael Penny
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N C 27699-1548
RE Replacement of Bridge No 59
Dear Mr Penny
www harnettshentf com

PO Box 399
1005 Edwards Drive
Ldlington, NC 27546
ph 910-893-9111
fax [phone]
As Uniform Patrol Supervisor for the Harnett County Sheriff's Office, we request that
you not detour the emergency services vehicles as a result of the closing of Bridge No 59,
located on SR 1117 (Nursery Road) over Jumping Run Creek That bridge is necessary
for us to provide timely emergency services to our county's residents and is also an
important link to Highway 24/87 If this bridge is closed and our emergency service
vehicles have to detour, it would take them approximately fifteen minutes to respond to a
call on the other side of this bridge This is entirely too long and could result in a life
hazard situation We definitely to do not want this to happen at any cost) If there is any
way possible to allow our emergency vehicles to maintain access of this area while
Bridge No 59 is being replaced, we would certainly appreciate it
Ifyou have any questions, please give me a call
Sincerely,
Eddie Holder
Captain of Patrol
Office of the Sheriff of Harnett County
Sheriff Larry Rollins
Harnett
0 0 0 N T Y
NGP r - .
Emergency Services Department
A-0 www harnett org
PO Box 370
Ullington NC 27546
ph 910 893 7580
fax [phone]
July 11, 2005
Mr Michael Penny
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
RE Replacement of Bridge No 59
Dear Mr Penny
As Director of Harnett County Emergency Services we request that you not detour the
emergency services vehicles as a result of the closing of Bridge No 59 located on SR
1117 (Nursery Road) over Jumping Run Creek That bridge is necessary for us to
provide timely emergency services to our county's residents and is also an important link
to Highway 24/87 If this bridge is closed and our emergency service vehicles have to
detour, it would take them approximately fifteen minutes to respond to a call on the other
side of this bridge This is entirely too long and could result in a life hazard situation We
definitely to do not want this to happen at any cost) If there is any way possible to allow
our emergency vehicles to maintain access of this area while Bridge No 59 is being
replaced, we would certainly appreciate it
If you have any questions, please give me a call
Sincerely,
?CLc2rvj ??7
Gary Pope
Director
GP bw
strong roots • new growth
ANDERSON CREEK
EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC
2980 RAY RD
SPRING LAKE, NC 28390
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
Michael Penney,
06/28/2005
This letter is in reference to our concern about the bridge replacement
construction project proposed for SR 1117 (Nursery Road) in Harnett County SR 1117 1s
the most direct route for our emergency services department to access Highway 87 Fire
and EMS vehicles use this route to provide emergency response on a daily basis This
includes vehicles from our agency responding to calls in our district, mutual aid calls in
neighboring districts, and EMS transports to area hospitals In addition, we depend on
other agencies using that route to provide us with emergency assistance Closing SR 1117
would lengthen response tunes to such a degree that our district and the districts we
provide mutual aid to would be put at increased risk The extended transport times would
also be detrimental to patients being taken to hospitals
It is in the best interests of Anderson Creek Emergency Services and the citizens
who depend on our services that SR 1117 remain passable The risk of compromising the
safety of surrounding communities would be greatly reduced by providing at a minimum
a single lane temporary detour for emergency vehicles Such an alternative would need to
be able to accommodate vehicles up to ten feet wide and weighing as much as 39,000
pounds Thank you for your kind consideration of our need to provide and receive
emergency services We will cooperate fully and assist in this matter in any way possible
Sincerely,
Robert J Wilson
Cluef, Anderson Creek Emergency Services

r
? e r

??? J9
s.
I
P^c'I
...I I
O
rn
m
Z

?? m
i7
•.ti
G
T t };lr`r?

v
?
''*T*al? ,

Y

s f ? ?x , r r
l T,
+. S r
4_4
r ?tR
rl
R
r .,

r ?
x ? ,s ?r fr {
4?1F ,? M q )J} r `?} ? >?'? t ? r "f h y*+: " r`r'" J
?,..-
1 I r - ?y +y? ??yy,??r
14
?Y ? * • S?F ?Z-?t }? h i ?L 1
?1c7 r G• _ I ,. I ? ? - i .? ?" L `,1J4?t?J it
?, SG
t{
401 4
:??fi?'; ??t11?,1E. { 'a'R?} . r `k' ?.E'F'y,;'??`,: `i rwF},
? , ? I ? r y?pi t 'F
Y
+ :.u. t.. lo j,. ~ l rt J f
:r J
1 ? v
I ` ? I I
h
J
a J
Y;??I? .,? ?-t it '? ? 3 1+jI'?, ? ? '.? ?? ?) -? ? ` ?. .Ui?.h .b.E ?!•.r'c.
;i
A b t4! 1 ? 1"
f
?

? SfiY s ,? y f 7?^
r
!T G ?? j
,
?
?
) I
/l
`ls' 7 '. . C1?' ?T o
g
?jz
W b ca
1z ? `„? r 4•
41 ? Ly y :' ? 1 ?' s }
4 1 c h ? z' `F
y
Cn
G
J- 3 r ?s z My }Y?;`?
? 4
A
t
?7®
J.y ti <
[
v f
® o r '?

4N ? d ,? r,.w T ? ;:1

r
r
?- r

y? ? y y aF.

?rN ,Vt r-x .j rlflkJ a r r _ - { ?', Ir ??
K v: i i `yf f
?, Rw wr.
40,
jq;
y? ?%xwr t?z' ?'
r I r S s
?j} r
ll( 1 z t ?
P 'L, >r r - ,rK
1, K
J 'A 6 ?, t
?r
y
40
}
j6 4,
i5
a ;.?j i'"r x YG6 ?^?,ry,;,:,`y?•. r ` ,, ,? i+
i ? r s ?, i?'" 'i .''? c r ? 5. ? C4 f ?` :?? -: a ,? r ''? ? ? :- ? " ?y`?-?"
At
ST;4 ^'tt t ,
y y? 1 I l r ,???tyy ? f ?? J e L? -.a7 y '??J}..?^• i
1.?., ''. >iht.f''^ ?+1hN yy?'?w. r'..." .` ?`.. !,..,?k1 ' •?': s.''?, #C -t ?>?n? r #...k 1-
?j3. ? 4,?Y.?Y r tt7, •+! 'x'P'.r •r." ?' ?i. y h V r ? y .:; F`'?T+ h v? 5,1 +?r ?F?u?? ? 4 +? r1F .?r? Z Y Y? ,Ar? ? ? } _ *`. V' ?:
-#.t),. 11' v y
-?. Y ?l i f Z. r : ?- ' r 1?.i f?'`leh ???y ? ? ? ?it 4? !.n i ? !? :. 'I? ' w-.. - «'? ? 1•
..{,;• ;,j `'}j . 4` w Me. ])]'-L??,y"i X1+1;• 'r ! ,•sfsal.:-._ i r,,t' ,4?."t :'` ?"y? ?..v
TE,
bE'r'j?i
: i. .'?'. y?r?' t'?F- j» ?y 'l'l? h..q 4"> 1'x ? ?1.??•? ? ? f L??"T'i?,y`?"??, F?4 `' ":4 ? ¢:?
jy{'! V V -. ciµ?t{? °`"?./yrS. S 7k ??? L?'J f(??? „? ?l s. ? - f• \ ?' {t?,?,°?° `? ? ? ? ,t. - ? 7 ` :.F = - ?
r* f ? M r ?! x ( -'
? r1r'`, '"?.x t' .. i i. . .? `1 Y?w I S I ,jr} 1• :?. • ?>4 ? .S' ?y.? -. 1
.??r; /i- ,? I "?`k ?? 7 f,h r? 7 r . .?•,i..? t? 1 ! j ? i ,- ? * ?s??' ?? .rater "" 'll 's . » [y"a ??', ? 3 '
4" 3r i ?? + lye l? x;'7 kk r; ; 3 a ?t yt ?x"t i 41
'CD
4 tM ?,
e?
#k A
too
m
• ? ? }? i' t --s ?'E 1r'R?? 4.? „?, '?l r, i' 1 ?i ?-n^? Z??i ? 't`om'.`" `. 1
,..fir
70
k O ?? r ? r (, 2! r - kf ??JI -Jb ? . 'Ir
r" ?' s( 1 r?? ?' `! ri1jk
R9 17 ' {?. i S ? { ,? +--_. ?,L,.'r 1 ?r? !f !< a ? ? +f'/r Lf GIr'f
L ? •{ i? i. : i - ,? ? '?C ! ? TR ?? r?? ? i F? ? i-. , mil`- ''^ j
K
yy?,? ?? 1
`t
t ?.• r s 4 Y.. .. 0 QT (. °..,. Y ,? ,? s si. x : jt?'?K' y'} j;. ii V ?i?'? !! r ? t.. ? } ,'r.: h ? .? 1 X11 ?'
?Ej1.,? -?lal
":x'?`!* .,?Yfty..?.. R '+Z", y?i'(` ?'?`?'i '` r4? ?,r ;? 1 y?? t,1 ? lif ?? ? •,r :'i fr •-i.[.r
its _i f? 'y`•.,^ r ? ?'? ??+s r.. c t? .i '1liS? „ .`r iS" 1E"'1-.,_ ' ?nj rl )f
-'C3 Y ? f k 1 ? ? r { ( ?
z
!
0 ? .m C t??t.'J ]]+® ? '? (? ? -r 'ys .ixY' ' {r tk "_.??k?s ?rL r ? G"rrt 4?, j?.i,?v t ? aF?•f,?[s 9a ? f• \,1'd rc (,4e +??,, }?y?r M .r??7r.t ,t ,,r . ` ,# ?•y '?' S}. .S?i S r i t ?w - t,, j ?f k '??.1jf
- `
? W nO y ? 'rtl A
? ? ?z?ii PVy! 7' i I t l'.?' ?•1F ?'.??i ? %'d? S* ? :i.??iX. ?? ? .?? t s'' ?JJJ
°? [ty? ygy ? r?' {rr?x 'w *r ?i?]H.-? ? ?2. ii Y ? r:.r -r •.. 'lry? {?. !'7 x ? t + ?..
°•+ '? (!?, r] 'i" }J ?"' F•i 3?+`. h'2s !`'•?F. > "?M •1f?i k,l,? t 1'? c •; t ?_•t"
7 n vio- y? ° 4s t r' Y
t+l SS ' '
? {? _. ,S ? l.7_I ? >f' ,? tit ^ r1.? 'b? -} Y I.-
?. ? •, _ ? ? " '?' ?. t ? r a ,r ? r?-.?c?i ? 2 1 i?=1f •t "."k k t
, Ali'
® d y 7 ;? ?,, a i? ! r4 'r pct
t?J ? tsl ?yA , ?? -r it $ it. {rte- t ?S `:+5'? MtC;i.i ( F#t. ry ?` ?C" ?4 ?r% YJ; c
b `A ?• : ? - ?„ 'ice ?? ? r?.-.??'.'.? "?? - ?,,? _ } '"?'..'
O 7 V L•? ?.i .itc '?';° Jam: ..
lvi? 'W,
?j ? ?.. 'Z> ? ~1. -'t,"'f T Hrry ?` ..,y y .7"'7 ?'y ?.. X? ? 1 :?'' ?: It ,•? ?;?'?F t
IP?
C?pj ? 'y ? ? : ?, ?N,c +?.s?? ? r'' ?, r •? ? ? 9 ,1wr ? pl ? "+?'?- `a
? v+ Y ?. '" A, {'?"?" t ?'"'„' t^ • "y a ?iN t"' •'F? , ?:3* 'k i ? . r ? F ? ? ???'?
"
r lt"
fJ" r.
- Y tiy?7y E Y '?;
Y ? f4
f? ' A
r t ,r
r r ? ?
"? 'F U ? ??ftll 1.
^t"Y
..k fix, - ?^ Xar ,?

tf ?
W;4f 'Y
? 1J1J1J
;ray zc r a "t ' `?"'
.tE {y,,ma,?c ?. ? 'i
,G ?•? rt. ? .: ? ?j ilk 'F+`??` ?7? r : „? ?y.? ? ?
{? 4 ???r "? ?, • 1
b"
.4f 4t
Y ?. 7. ?Lp?e 1
Pt
"LJ
}w
c y r r ??'. Pa, E ? ,\;
r ?-
1 1 R 1 1 J
? r tta 17i 1 t' ? -'Y4r' !?
, I x c r"
t? :. ?r ,i r i^ syq I
m
m
--1
[t
m
-q

r ?
Z ? L

" s
z

4)i 'r ?t
?F
j ILp?
i
r
H

T?
Y
x

?
s
letr 1 }

t
c,
r f K:
xrf v
a alA ? r Z ? ,.
i
1 !

? 1a+

? t) y'

Y

t
i 4 J.j h
I
1

1
'?
F
`
=
r?-Y ` ?
?r c? 1

t

F ?r ? f ? ?I (f1
-?? v r tv ?
Sr r ? f ?`7f - i
ttt?i?i? i ]1
S na so 010,
V l
1
W b?? y
49
z ?
Z L
.-
?'? ou o? 'r- `L h r C v .^

fsl 14
ty._,,JJ S .:

41 J 4 ?C ..? ?1

i D

M 4
y t'
N ? t rat i ?

,rf r
fl ?Yt ..?C ?, i
4 ?! f
t r
II f
?. ?'.. - ??' - :?...: .w.r. ?.? ?.. r3 ? kF 1!cM' - ate. ?
np ? 7 _ ?tn ?*r rO M © ?- %?s? ? ^f1 ! `1 Y`LJ -
r
s Ayn ?.XtY S ??r r+. ., ?r s•
•- a? na? Yy„? `r` ? 1? ? e 'r`te .i. ?'a U ' 1
?1F r
ri',r a }?'-? aka''- z t ? ? ? tt? ? b +?'.
r '. f 1 f` T 7,i..,t f' ""s...-- y-? ?°.. ',. ?. r. > ?„°?":.' -11, .; *,°. °Y'i. i 's >. 4. '-Y -.
f '" ?J?j?`• E"a.'y'".i4 r _ r*r ?" k iy +- ' ?zn_ 71 y c t t ti Y. Z• ?.s ' .Y ,i .;"• ? ??: , r i'u i tr ?` ?e s Pi k 1. - x t r, ?f ? > r; T t ;{
1 r Ta r
- 11 1:1,11- :Lt t< r4 . 'M 1 if , 4 - It ? ?h: .?. Y? 1't (.. T z '1T -." r' l`,i' -t -1 I
.Y r L ' ?t 3r' }7 ,{'Sr 44>' w?'??, f > i ?;b r _ t'4' a ..r _-
'., 1 , ,F ?' y;.,•i. y 1^:." 5 -i r^.u t " r. ? r Z w i a `: y.,. < -
rr 5 t' .:}? s q.?-r r ?:S'r h tv<'a' ",' i ? , J? `
v
r ; r' v k?r e xit r - ,,r w. { • t y ii 'II '? '; 1 r '` 11 ? - I A - , ,' , '?'- ?'4L?e" , , ?' ? ',?L' ., "I ? ?? - I ' - 1' - - ? 'aft. ^" i rv '^ 7 } h, ?w
>; r ;,f ? ? ? ?.!o? tom' if ' ?' 4" ?'' ` a. a'
? -1 ' , ? ?? ? te
- I 1, ?? ?'? -, ]??' , , , ? , , , t "?-??'- I I I ? - 'r ?-
i'.1s,' = i ?-I '? ? ?I ' „r'?f 1r _y i- ?IL> ? f'
2'ti .? ? . , .-? ij ` .,t T. . f
I
-;tt 1-1 I 1, 'V
?j{j.a F?- As , e 7y? } S' ,t ti IYtry}.. jyk '' ?i49 1 '_`t y''• .t4 w?ir?' o• ti '-
b* ', '!"^... 1 _ I J, ( I.. , ?I 11 I
?r "' 'S. -.- r 1` rY: ? Jk - •-- 't y y 't 5 ry'{y- 11
a. J" ^ _i,}.A?' • fr y'i? f, t. ""k K ,t.S• . ', 7?"?j 4's` - '-.* ;.??'? .fit:' - Al r I \?.1 v, t` ??'
r ?.,'<'" s.•r i' ? s- f ih 'JC j v ! T s ?• r c I I
r,. ! i ,?3„c :. Yr'a? Ve'.',,?.'.C x > r ''1' ., a•o s.? I? : ? {{
` t ,
t': c '
2N ?fY '.r? J - s > f... f • !f t q s ki ' 1 'i `l?ir??L.
' . '
.y ` , h f ?::?-" riy :?(. rr' .,.ji t t f a: ti r4_- ,?,.. e ?,! r l i 'E? ry -: b 1 ,?
11 "
22-1
?- - ?? ""'? j? ?' , 6" -'? ?' .. ,
" ?Tw - , -
, , I , , '?? ' --?' I "? ?L ' ?4"' ?' - ? - '?" "'?
.t, ,;.? Mg.. k€ .,' .•'. +-,.,wy« .j- " ? 8
w.
?'" 7 I I I I "'1 ..C? ?1 ?;; t.\ \.,
v'a A r r, r• t i f _?? "Fj ! I f TT" `.
11 I { .rrf?. xr`.., y \`
ti.- tf f 'i,... _ r' ~-yi. :.. ?t.J:.
J `? f S t 0 r! ?r}' ?'`" S yy? ' r : . ?4 J" 1 -14 1
5 ?- -
p. -:I 'A ??,t
I «. Y"? v , tihTT" •t ? '. i. ,''a 3'Sk lw :,ii E 1L. ha r? ' i r. I? .r? Y _?- ? ? `? 1r
rf d :, t e
,, ," -* .r ?,, r I ly Wf i df ?I s y , 1a i ?? ?w iy" r '
{,., i , . T?,?" m " r Y s., r r y. r1'' ` .- I t}Stt ?, ?y^ ,k t { J ; 11 " !? ti_ c 7 „Z ?. p i a
''.: ?€ r : r Y11 f f'.?1,fr s ! ?? ?,:.. I .1 er, I "".i 1 ie '' ... ??
..yj,. , 1? 1 ' «: '? 'l \
.at +,{? ,? -r-»F ,. ;N I Y ij P, 1, T F ?j- + ,`-V' 1 ? M .G \
{ .? a. t } ? e;t. ;- i„ 1 i` ?i ?. '. ?..r"' i,' '? Nit ,I \
Ll-I s s.d "'7§ ,74 ?.,IIF 5
s m ` Y` ;C r 4 A
I k F
, ?*'
" -'? , -,',' " Y?"" I , , '-'??;', ti, ?? , ? '?' ?' , , - 4 , - , ++,
'y ?, ,x'I,w. l'' 3: v '-Fi - ^ - i r r a • -_ , J? , I , " ,G 1 X , r ?`S 7 . L. <.'k'r
v ,i _ %% 1? ,zT _G -">< •¢i, *Y .r*af - h .?f P,c' r.F ?.I - -.,,/ ?, ?+'r ' } 1'a, ! ,?St ? s* ';? ,('
?,? P l' O .Irrc: a,? m © ` ?-Jr s > r T? _ ` s - of-Q ?I,"{'".'r"{ t?,:t •.r'r?.?`ti,
? ?' + ' ? i i ",+ ? ,11 v ?' - - ? ?' I "I ' i? 1- ';- r `s . - 1 Ma L 1 J
i _ v'fi''yr r 'imir"' •.? i r 'ir r ' - ??,?p ??' 9' y a -" '? y .w ` ,\ t` } °` I
?, 1'M /
, j
< w 1 :3 j r t i- u ! 14 t -? •? 2 I?' s «., ` e'' o - A : J ? ? ??? -f,ty' '* 1- y}„??¢T? '? r t? 1 1 - ? 1?? '."? I I
?j > 0 R 3 j r ??+r r+; i II ( ,d& i__.1n t?*"F ^ 1 tlG
- " ? 4 , ?"-"? 3 - I , I ? . ?
I j
I N, 7? 1, 3t I L t ' ? rte"` ?J ?; ' ' E ,?, -? - ?ak...i r?.f
? ' L - t t
i --I i X 'k. * >` v '! r 1:_ t I I?t 'r _ '31 9x
Y3
I? r :?? -W-11"k *?'! ?"' y` ,fe1:, ?Fc r.. as ? ?I; 3 ?? '
s ?' _ 01i' -'`> ?;'?'tr > ?. 1 I
? ?? '-'? -,- " ?'%"O-'- r -
II
"_ '
' s?? .? ;r r t I' i r3x ''? I
, +
M y 91.- '3 Y•, ;?;,?' i 1._q/ I t, )[1 Y1 ,iH _ --,, r
} -s .,}-, ? :€ ?. , \ ,?'r 4' ' '? ? k- ' I
r{ tl ,i 1I? '-4 °R" _ 'v z 1 >.i _ I? f _:, I
1? 2 :} - ? hti.: r r '`?j1 ?c Y {6 111, ?T 'T ' re?, k ?.• ` ,.r •Vt' r?{. l?
_# _ ?-' , ! f. ?{ :. y,,, .. n Ids ?.
-.A? , "?' I -- ? "" ?' ??' ' , " + '+ ,"- ";"l' -- ?' -: ? -. ? , ," t'l - ? , I , -
t r ? %> - '?" ' 3 7 (f? ?r r h" 1 t '. `` Gl ?.P I 14,11 +
11
U' .I - ?e it '4 K S;?L3e ?d{t?1 I 'I {p; , ice,? II
' _ t t '{t?r"7S .? ??CCr* y,..? x > C,oi "• ?? - € 1 { I _ tt - ? ?l ?
r ?- i??
{ _r -J' y ??, r.^-F'?C-'?, - •c r' r, _7 u.? ?' , I I ..4 I ?12'i?k1 ?.:.-.'
yt : j` t1 ar ?5 K !A* * x ` r f j!! i y r i Tl ri? f.;; eta - „" - dw a 11 ?. _ 'tP 7 " t ti p,' , n S ? ?h # ; ??w ) . t --- 7 rwr , V
{?
? , ? 1? % " '?? '- , , ? - , I ?1??'?"?? - ? '? ? -- _ I ":;. r 3 ', i } }I II -rte / tq
k -?j IT, nA , r '' >> r
11
?` z { . i P{ _ f u t t ...
- c w -- r, t - .yam"1s f: 'it'rfr tl? ?t 5 " r..
. r rf a,a E ?1I -f
' } r ?I y,? TS fw J X11 ? Yn s t - -
"k '?•I { ' ati %y =t .gi-.? r , '' 4 "' S ?? c E -
,, j rr'' A ? J`? .i t. is tl 7L t
jLFH : Ilr `{f ?'
? I I I ? I ? . I -'?'P?+- - ' - ' . 0-' ?" f- "fi"r .sXat? y i t '?. x ' - `s` l?? ,,
, 1
bEC r ?.% ' t ? 11 .. "7w-? 1 + i' "- y I r t , 1 1
r'at ; -;1 kk ? r+' 7 , ..?_. t } `, '^, ? ?i> Ii 1 !q -- i•?)" ' moo) .7"
cn s ` f " f 7M1+ L I ` 1 !x %1£ ra" %4 ?i : , i ; i -
p ro -a sita x r.T r t F? =.- 'ji I =-'?- cr -?rl, a? tS.{a' 'i,..
1. I O p? ,gyp d ?'r ?, i , , 4 : ? *,?d. - ' 11
.z 6Tj y? '"? rl?'i f+- <?y; L > t' 1 I'r :?4 , " - }?'f {'- _ ?w??
0 VAM A P, t'« ,'C > f?X r:' m 1[_ ii t,;, I ` I "' t '?7 1 ! {
Iii rA I C` O _ '•1 K- .',?r } €" ?.1 _.i t aepr
lV v ri. a: 7 EI 1 I I I.
{ i x ° t?y -,°' ?i i? I t1'T
A ° I
4
I+
8 ;? I I?-.? , ??? ? ??
R 0 N41 E 07 ?r e# { t ? ,I s +? r ?! II t - 't7Cti?} l?a i n? ?IJr ? ! " I
1 "I,
Jy dd
3 -.t ,?' t 11.{ I l? Lic ?"
LLLL
I [?
oil. r% ?
T 0'`?? ? r
a } (.
- - ? --?' +? , - ? ? ., + ? - ? -+ ?'--?) , - ?-' I ?
. - ? " -- il2*-'tl - ? -----?--? ... ... ?'? ? I if ?; L ? ? + , ? I
- _ r _ _t ?'i?'Q??(r! is •j `dfI *.." 'I Y n ?'* 3 a?. r'`I ^' y_ f j
111 -? ? ' "
j
y.£ `' t ?' 'v L ?r, 'S'ir. }'Y I it ?? "1 - Ti
• !ex :+ -,> lr? > .y?'S'?r - :-tv ' III f ?I[ kIr "' A? I`"
II
per,, ?' r
rho+7r !A ?a Y?r 7i II ."`?r?'rSr r ' °- ?w j .
7. r t' s
d f ° 1 + . =II II
E ly. Ii II?` t } S __ 1 {
i bg Z? I, ? ?: - , ,?. -t, -? --'--:?:.-- ?'-"' ' ' , ,, -'--? ..' -1 - r-, I ?? R - S€'?a r* k, , .? 4 I ni s?{ "? y 1-ar. -,.^lµ,,,
1 -
b O 1 " t I. r :.r 3 '? ti?'•' >Y 3 ?' _ •, f r+,a ,i is r _ ,r <S'< t.
%" ? I ? ? --- -?? ...... ? 4?' ??j ", ??'?' "'??'?' , 1 1, >a a=? - -? ?? -?' - A - , ":
j [:;? ?®? f Y' ,' 1 ,r, >- I x.' y- ,mss 1 ':..
ill -11 `d - ?®)', ? .? .K. .4r y l ;! 14 , M y sifc? * ?..` e ,tE', I -
w .? P '17, ? , , +? 7? 1 , I t I k ;' ,, t ??° `'fit s` a
j
o ? "? r?
© '''
? I ? ( ' O /^ ` . },.r ; '? rit f r r' St' ^' t klSrv..,,:y.
I{ v •fi: 1 ( yr r XY
,® z' 7c:? t (?e i r - < ] (.) /c 4 l ~ :. to ;. _ ,"':? aL i j y
?J w'?' I3 L'/ -f '. l[ t "i t}I."rr {? ?? J .1' Y9. rt.4 ?'w;' 4 ?' >,Y,?.„ '" ?,.
5 i -? I ?;j , ? I - . '.? i 'J h1 S
pp?? ` r ?I .? u s ,'' P.
Ur V [ r i`.'-l k r, "ir .t.'?? I P i .'ti : i =',r?4y '?.uw„ I
,,a _
w
+1 a ?j? _ r f y, s ., ,.. - tt ' - ` 4.j ?? 'f„ 1 " v,grf ....` , <a1< rr. r tit ,
?.. ?y '1"w
9
P. x _] ;? 1 ,Y K` , ' 1y 1 ;,? 1> -? ?y#` y .1+`. , ? \ r ?1.sh ,q