20180161 Ver 1_401 Application_20180118

0� \NA rE,, �
C, Niii� Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑x Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Durant Nature Park Lower Dam Repairs
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
City of Raleigh
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
002750-00721, 1979
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Gilles Bellot
3d. Street address:
P.O. Box 590
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC, 27602
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-996-4001
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
See owner information
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Rick Atkinson
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Angler Environmental a RES Company
5c.
Street address:
1408 Roseneath Road, Suite B
5d.
City, state, zip:
Richmond, VA 23230
5e.
Telephone no.:
804-729-8989
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

The wate
with fill sc
voids will
B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1727399804
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.892031 Longitude: -78.577295
1 c.
Property size: Project Area:
2.491 acres Total acres Durant Nature Park: 238
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Perry Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse River
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area covers a 2.491 acre area on the east bank of the Camp Durant Nature Park Lake Number 1. The lake is in the central portion of the
Durant Nature Park, a 237 acre public access recreational area land use 1.09.02.01. Surrounding area: Residential development with single family
homes surround the park, land use 1.01.01.03.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.04 within project area, of an unknown total on the property
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 133 within project area, of;
unknown total on the p
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
This project will stabilize and prevent wave erosion on the upstream bank of the Durant Park Lower Dam in the Camp Durant Nature Park Lake
Number 1. Maintenance will also be completed on the spillway to repair erosive voids and install a stilling basin to prevent further erosion and reduce
sediment
transport downstream.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
level in
the lake will be lowered, and storm flows will be passed via the existing lower level outlet to repair the upstream bank and spillway of the lower dam. The slope will be
Is. Geotextile and bedding stone will be placed on the flattened slope with articulated concrete blocks (ACB) lowered on top and buried at the top and bottom. In the spillway,
e graded and a concrete stilling basin installed. The work will require small dump trucks, excavators, and a crane. See attached plans for more information.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro'ect includingall prior phases)in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: RES
Name (if known): Jeremy Schmid, PWS
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD 2017-00337 received 5-3-17, attached.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
roperty
lattened
rosive

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑x Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d,
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b. 3c.
3d.
3e,
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 T
Stabilization UT
PER
Corps
15
48
S2 P
Stabilization UT
PER
Corps
15
85
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
133
3€. Comments:
Repairs are needed in the dam spillway to prevent erosion of the stream channel at the dam and downstream tributaries. Permanent impacts will
occur where erosive voids will be graded and a stilling basin installed to address the Issues in the spillway. Temporary impacts will occur where flow
will be diverted to allow for construction. A pump -around and silt fencing will be utilized to prevent impacts on downstream habitats.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list alio en water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 P
Camp Durant Nature Park Lake No. 1
Fill
Lake
0.096
02 T
Camp Durant Nature Park Lake No. 1
Drainage
Lake
12.695
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
12.791
4g. Comments: Stabilization of the east bank of the lake is expected to have permanent impacts where fill soil and articulated concrete block will be
installed. Temporary impacts are expected while water level is lowered during construction.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, I en you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h, Total Buffer Impacts:
6I. Comments: Project is dam maintenance and exempt from buffer protection rule. 15A NCAC 02B .0233.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
An articulated concrete block was chosen for bank stabilization and wave protection because this method has lower long-term maintenance
requirements when compared with alternatives. Reduced dam maintenance avoids repeated future impacts on streams and wetlands at the project
site. This work is required in order to protect the integrity of the embankment and the pond.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A pump -around will be used to prevent downstream impacts while the dam, spillway, and stream channel are repaired. Water levels in the lake will be
lowered to avoid impacts to water quality factors, e.g. dissolved oxygen and turbidity, during construction. Construction will take place during the
winter months to minimize impacts to water quality and habitat.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
EJ Yes No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e,
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f, Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
NIA
6h. Comments: Project is dam maintenance and is exempt from buffer protection rule, 15A NCAC 02B .0233. Additionally, the project will not
require broad tree clearing .
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identifiedX❑
Yes [] No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse Flow plan included? If no, explain why.
This is a dam maintenance project that is an existing use, and is an exempt activity in the Neuse River
❑ Yes Q No
Basin Buffer Rule, 15A NCAC 02B .0233, and thus does not require a diffuse flaw pian. Broad clearing
of
trees is not planned for this work. A new, permanent stilling basin will be installed during work.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
No inerea5e of
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
impetvious13ess will
% result from this work.
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The
project area and the drainage basins are less than 249/. impervious. No additional impervious surfaces will be installed as a result of this project.
The use of the pump -around during construction will allow storm water to follow normal flow patterns.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
NIA
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NIA
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
wake County
❑ Phase 11
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW Not applicable
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
Not applicable
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HOW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
Notapplicable
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No Not applic
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No Not applic
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
able
able

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the
X❑ Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
E] Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Project does not meet requirements for review by the State Clearing House under
Comments. SEPA,
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0599), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
Z No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the vioiation(s):
NIA
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This
project is repairs to an existing dam structure within an existing public access park in a developed area. Thus, it is not expected to result in any
further impacts to the downstream water quality or additional development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
X
❑ Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Dyes El No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The project was reviewed using the protocols oudlned on the USFWS Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office webshe
haps:/Nww.Ms.gov/ralelgh/PR_t.hbnl. A copy of the review and conclusions is Indudeci with this toren.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
61b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
IPaC database and the NOAA Habitat Conservation EFH Mapper, please see adached.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
El Yes x❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Online review of v w v hpo.dcr.mde.nc.us and meefing with hie NC Office of State Archaeology, please see adachetl notes.
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Be. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yesx❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
WA, please see attached NC flood map.
Sc. What sources) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Review of httpJAvww.ndloodmaps.com/.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
ApplicanUAgent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only k an authodsadon
leder from me applicant is hovideo.
Page 10 of 10

NORTH CAROLINA
January 20, 2017
RE: Lower Durant Nature Park Dam
Permitting Agent Authorization
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This letter authorizes Angler Environmental, a RES Company to act on behalf of the
City of Raleigh for the purpose of obtaining environmental authorizations and/or
permits as needed and/or required for the Lower Durant Park Dam project.
Should you have any further questions and/or comments, please contact Gilles Bellot,
PE, Project Manager at (919) 9996A001 or via email at [e-mail].
Thank you for your continued cooperation and assistance.
Sincerely,
Diane Sauer
PRCR Director
cc: Brian Smith, City of Raleigh PRCR
Gilles Bellot, City of Raleigh Stormwater Management
Gerald Robblee, Schnabel Engineering South PC
Samuel Keyes, Schnabel Engineering South PC
One Exchange Plaza City of Raleigh Municipal Building
1 Exchange Plaza, Suite 1020 Post Office Box 590 •Raleigh 222 -West Hargett Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 North Carolina 27602-0590 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
(Mailing Address)
Printed on Recycled Paper

ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT VICINITY AND LOCATION FIGURES

J
r
a
dw
i
0
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
Street Map Source:
PROJECT LOCATION MAP JSATopo Maps
E—,
NGLER E5KI Arc615 Online
NVIRONMENTALa fibres company DURANT NATURE PARKNPHONE ROAD, WARRENTON, VIRCING3018'!!03.393.48441 F: '!03.393.3934
Ang1erEnv1ronmen1i.com WAKE COUNTY, NC
I inch = 400 feet
Document Path: C:\Users\jschmADesktop\Local_015\Durant\maps\Durant_ProJect_ Location—d - Date Saved: 12113120 1 6

I.�lf�
lature
Park
SaYorms Ct
q
Durant
Nature FarA
` ❑od kd
S
Zc =S
-
5 tric.kla.,d
a
x °
bVr
Voccril
� �
• c
c� tr
n5�c
S-� �•s
'Rn
R
y �s
Y
d f
4
H E Mdthtag4 Fd
s �
�
��
�
H
11
i
V
LEGEND
°
Kvv;fpn�
Rai eigh -
He* SOYA
Kni
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
Street Map Source:
VICINITY MAP
World Street Map
ANGLER
gkkA
ESRI ArcGIS Online
N
ENVIRONMENTAL
a Pres company
DURANT NATURE PARK
CORPORATE 15367
TELEPHONE ROAD, WARRENTON, VIRGINIA 20187
P: ]03.393.48441 F: 703.393.2934
www.AnglerEn°1`9°m`ntal.c°m
WAKE COUNTY, NC
I inch = 400 feet
Document Path: CAU5cr5\j5chmADc5ktop\Loca1_G15\1)urant\map5\Durant_ Vicinity—d - Date Saved: 12113120 1 G

ATTACHMENT B
WETLAND DELINEATION AND PJD 2017-00337

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS COPY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 2017-00337 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Wake Forest
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner:
City of Raleieh Public Works Department
Gilles Bellot
Address:
P.O. Box 590
Raleieh. NC 27602
Telephone Number:
919-996-4001
E-mail:
gilles.bellot(araleighnc.eov
Size (acres) 2.28 Nearest Town Raleieh
Nearest Waterway Perry Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.892031
Longitude: -78.577295
Location description: The protect area is located at 8305 Camp Durant Road, Ra 1 'eh Wake County, North Carolina.
PIN 1727399804. The project area includes Portions of Camp Durant Lake One
Indicate Which of the Following Annly:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (C WA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate.
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 12/12/2016. Therefore
this preliminaryjurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they arejurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (C WA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this pmliminaryjurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHAjurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated MAP DATE. Ifyou
wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once verified, this survey
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to C WA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is
no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on SURVEY SIGNED DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Tasha Alexander at PM PHONE or PM E-MAIL.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 5/3/2017.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions ofthe Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps most determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, an at it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days ofthe date ofthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA fo t must be received at the above address by Not aopliceble.
"*It is not necessary to sub ' an RF form t",vi ce ifyou do net ob'ect to the determination in this correspondence."
Corps Regulatory Officia .
Date of JD: 5/3/2017 E ' in
Date of JD: Not applicable

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmal)u.usace.army.niil/en1 apex/t?p=136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Agent: Aneler Environmental
Jeremy Schmid
Address: 302 Jefferson Street. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone Number: 919-345-3034
E-mail: 0schmid(Z)2nglerenvironmental.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: City of Raleigh Public Works Department.
File Number: 2017-00337 Date: 5/3/2017
Gilles Bellot
_
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ernission A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or httn://www.usace.armv.mil/Missiom/Civil Works/RegulatorvProeramandPennits.wpx
or the Cors regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may acceptor object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section D of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concems, (b) modify the pennit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section lI of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form most be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved 1D in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved ID, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary 1D is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION 11- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Tasha Alexander
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room IOMI 5
3331 Heirtage Tade Drive, Suite 105
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportumtX to ici ate In all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent,
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Tasha Alexander, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room IOM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

ATTACHMENTA
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION 013): 1211=016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Jeremy Schmid. PWS -302 JaOemm Street, Suite 105, Re 19h. NO 27605
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Balogh Re9Watay Rek DMca
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish borough: wake city: Relegh
Center coordinates of site ([at/long in degree decimal formal):
Lat. aswnw °N; Long. 78.577039 °W,
Universal Transverse Mercator: NFD83
Name of nearest waterbody: ce-p Duren Lake
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
35 linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: R3
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: ON
Cowardin Class: Pro
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
ePPLY): Matt, �r •/J���
ffice (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
wchecked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
he
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
Data sheets preparedisubmitted by or on behalf of the
app consultant.
ffOffice concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:_
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ SGS 8 and 12 digft HUC maps
.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:_
U USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):_
❑ FEMA(FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
W�(/ (National Geo ctic Vertical Datum of 1929)
P. Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): or
F Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there maybe jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information
J7) � o -✓'1
and a e of 3ra017 Signature and date of
Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
D) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Wo89OEC(WC) NORTNCAROLINA PFO A. OAN ACRE DELINEATE 35.892011 -78.577103 Neuee River
P.M NORTH CAROLINA POW Aloe DH ACRE DELINEATE 35.892028 48W603 Neuse Ri.,

..b.
■;t"■ ANGLER
,Raw -mw ENVIRONMENTAL
Pi reS company
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Tasha Alexander
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Durant Nature Park
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Wake County
Dear Ms. Alexander:
Angler Environmental, a RES Company (Angler), has been retained by Schnabel Engineering South to
perform environmental services for the above -referenced project located in Raleigh, Wake County, North
Carolina. As part of this scope of work, Angler is submitting this request to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) for a confirmation of the limits of Waters of the U.S. on the subject site.
• Attachments for Reference
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
- Agent Authorization Form
Project Vicinity Map
- Project Location Map (with topography)
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Aerial Imagery
- Soils Map
- Wetland Delineation Data Sheets
- NCDWQ Stream Identification Forms
- Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map
Delineation Information
Angler completed its delineation of potentially jurisdictional areas on this property on December 5, 2016
in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual methodology. Flags
were numbered and placed onsite to mark the limits of potentially jurisdictional wetlands and other
waters of the U.S. The approximate size and location of these areas are depicted on the attached
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map.
Angler respectfully requests that the Corps confirm this delineation of Waters of the U.S. on this property.
I will contact you in the coming days to arrange a site visit for this purpose. Please contact me ((919) 345-
3034) if you have any additional questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Schmid, PWS
Ecologist
Attachments
cc: Samuel Kees—Schnabel Engineering South
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary J❑ finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later Wrisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary J❑
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

■v■ .ANGLER
,qmb.`1r ENVIRONMENTAL
prey company
AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
On our behalf, I authorize Angler Environmental, a RES Company, 302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110, Raleigh, NC, to act as our agent in the preparation of this application. I certify that the
documents submitted are correct. I acknowledge that all responsibility for complying with the
terms and conditions of the certification or approvals, still resides with
Dated this Day of
Agency expiration date:
M
Title:
On behalf of:
Address:
Telephone:_
20
Signature Printed
613 Poole Drive, Garner, North Carolina 27529

I.�lf�
lature
Park
SaYorms Ct
q
Durant
Nature FarA
` ❑od kd
S
Zc =S
-
5 tric.kla.,d
a
x °
bVr
Voccril
� �
• c
c� tr
n5�c
S-� �•s
'Rn
R
y �s
Y
d f
4
H E Mdthtag4 Fd
s �
�
��
�
H
11
i
V
LEGEND
°
Kvv;fpn�
Rai eigh -
He* SOYA
Kni
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
Street Map Source:
VICINITY MAP
World Street Map
ANGLER
gkkA
ESRI ArcGIS Online
N
ENVIRONMENTAL
a Pres company
DURANT NATURE PARK
CORPORATE 15367
TELEPHONE ROAD, WARRENTON, VIRGINIA 20187
P: ]03.393.48441 F: 703.393.2934
www.AnglerEn°1`9°m`ntal.c°m
WAKE COUNTY, NC
I inch = 400 feet
Document Path: CAU5cr5\j5chmADc5ktop\Loca1_G15\1)urant\map5\Durant_ Vicinity—d - Date Saved: 12113120 1 G

J
r
a
dw
i
0
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
Street Map Source:
PROJECT LOCATION MAP JSATopo Maps
E—,
NGLER E5KI Arc615 Online
NVIRONMENTALa fibres company DURANT NATURE PARKNPHONE ROAD, WARRENTON, VIRCING3018'!!03.393.48441 F: '!03.393.3934
Ang1erEnv1ronmen1i.com WAKE COUNTY, NC
I inch = 400 feet
Document Path: C:\Users\jschmADesktop\Local_015\Durant\maps\Durant_ProJect_ Location—d - Date Saved: 12113120 1 6

Document Path: C:\U5er5\j5chmADe5ktop\Local_015\1)urant\map5\Durant_NWI.m%d - Date Saved: 1 2/13/201 6

Document Path: C:\Users\jschmADesktop\Local_015\Durant\maps\Durant_ Aerial_lma jery—d - Date Saved: 12113120 1 G

Document Path: C:\User5\jschmADesktop\Local_015\Durant\maps\Durant_5oils.mxd - Date Saved: 1 2/13/201 6

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Durant Nature Park City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 05 -Dec -16
Applicant/Owner: Schnabel Engineering South State: NC Sampling Point: WC UPL
Investigator(s): ].Schmid Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 15.0% / 8.5 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.891953 Long.: -78.577396 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes O No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No O Is the Sampled Area Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ❑' within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No C
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No `�i
Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ NO
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ No 0
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: WC UPL
C .__;­�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Rel.Strat. Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2
0
❑
0.0%
Ll0.0
°
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
/o
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
0
❑
0.0%
5
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
Llo.o°ro
u
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
6•
o
7
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g
0
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
20
W50.0%
FAC
FACw species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Liguidambar styraciflua
20
d❑
FAC
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
2. Pinus taeda
50.0%
3.
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 65 x 4 = 260
4.
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5
0
❑
0.0%
column Totals: 105 (A) 380 (B)
6
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.619
7.
0
❑
0.0°ro
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g.
0
❑
o.o°ro
❑ Dominance Test is > SOa/o
10.
o
❑
0.0°ro
❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
40
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1. Rubus amutus
40
80.0%
FACU
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2. Rosa multiflora
10d❑
20.0%
FACU
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3.
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
7
0
Ll
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
50
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
1 • Andropogon virginicus
15❑
100.0%
FACU
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
2.
0
❑
0.0%
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
3
0
Ll
0.0%
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4'
0
Ll0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
Ll0.0%
in height.
5.
0
6
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
7
0
❑
0.0°ro
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
$
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
9.
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
1
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
11.
o
❑
0.0%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
12.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Woody Vine Stratum ( Plot size: 30' )
15
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous non -wood plants,
( y)
1
0
Ll
0.0%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
2.
0
❑
0.0%
m) in height.
3•
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
4
0
❑
0.0%
height.
5. o ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes O No
0
=Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: WC UPL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inchesl _ Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvne 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-18 7.5YR 5/8 100
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F33) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F39) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Durant Nature Park City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 05 -Dec -16
Applicant/Owner: Schnabel Engineering South State: NC Sampling Point: WC WET
Investigator(s): ].Schmid Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Pond fringe Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 35.892011 Long.: -78.577103 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla loam NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes O No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
y within a Wetland? Yes C-) No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes OO No O
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)d❑
FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 NO ❑
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches):
Yes C NO ❑
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ No 0
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant Sampling Point: WC WET
C .__;­�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Rel.Strat. Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
0/6 Cover
Cover Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2
0
❑
0.0%
Ll0.0
°
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
/o
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
0
❑
0.0%
5
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
Llo.o°ro
u
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
6•
o
7
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g
0
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
OBL species 70 x 1 = 70
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
30
W50.0%
OBL
FACw species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Alnus serrulate
30
d❑
FAC
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
50.0%
3
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
4.
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5
0
❑
0.0%
column Totals: 160 (A) 340 (B)
6
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.125
7.
0
❑
0.0°ro
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9
0
❑
0.0%
�/❑ Dominance Test is > so%
10.
0
Ll
0 Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
60
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1. Rubus amutus
20
d❑
100.0%
FACU
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3.
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
0
❑
o.o%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
7
0
Ll
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
20
= Total Cover
regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
1 • Persicaria sagittate
40❑
50.0%
OBL
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
2. Microstegium vimineum
20
d❑
25.0%
FAC
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
3. Juncus eff esus
20
d❑
25.0%
FACW
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4'
0
Ll0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
Ll0.0%
in height.
5.
0
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
7.
0
❑
0.0°ro
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
$
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
9.
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
1
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
11.
o
❑
0.0%
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
12.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Woody Vine Stratum ( Plot size: 30' )
80
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous non -wood plants,
( y)
1
0
Ll
0.0%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
2.
0
❑
0.0%
m) in height.
3.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
4
0
❑
0.0%
height.
5. o ❑ 0.0%
Hydrophytic
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Vegetation
Yes * No O
0
=Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: WC WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inchesl _ Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Locz _Texture
0-18 10YR 5/1 85 10YR 5/8 15 C M Clay Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑d Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F33) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F39) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes * No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SA
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 12-5-16
Project/site: Durant Park
Latitude:35.891473
Evaluator: Jeremy Schmid
County: Wake
Longitude: -78.577213
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent 35
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
at
if >: 19 or perennial if >- 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1"Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Document Path: G\U5er5\j5chmid\De5ktop\Local_615\Durant\map5\Durant_ I I x 17.mxd - Date Saved: 12113/20 J 6

ATTACHMENT C
WATERS OF THE U.S. IMPACT MAP

N
A.A.1.A.A.A.A.►.4.1-►
A"A"A�ATA�A�A
••�•A•••.ff•.fff.f.f-Af-.f.t.t�.A.LAAAA.,
AA,.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.'►.7 1.1.��
�� 1�•�•��������Tt�������f�f�t�f�sys�??f,�!)A,�A,�A,�A,�A,�A,�A,�i�,�A,�A,�A.�A,�A.,�A.�A,�A,�A�'►�AS-
•
��� �f�f�I,�A�j,�A�A�A�A�A�j��A�,1�,1�,1�,1�,��,Q,�S�r,������f
. J
r ���ist��a^s��Ar�.t�PT�
A'.�e�.Ai-A P�4�4:p4A•
Via.-

ATTACHMENT D
FEMA 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN FIGURE

Northing: = 781,617, Easting = 2,123,426
Northing: = 781,617, Easting = 2,126,895
Northing: = 778,148, Easting = 2,123,426 Page 1 of 2 Northing: = 778,148, Easting = 2,126,895
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. This map incorporates changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest
product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov.
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
With BFE or Depth
Regulatory Flood way
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance
Flood Hazard
Areas Determined to be Outside the
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Jurisdiction Boundary
FIRM Panel Boundary
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
Iindr-500 feet 1:6004
G 125 250 0
0 25 50 100 V
0A1et�:.
E NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
M FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
❑ Panel (s):1728,1727
d CONTAINS:
4) COMMUNITY CID
C
CITY OF RALEIGH 370243
cc
i Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown
below should be used when placing map
LI3 orders; the Community Number(s) shown
above should be used on insurance
,❑ applications for the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
3720172800J 5/2/2006
3720172700J 5/2/2006
CID
Z
w0 , ZF�

Ar
FEMA: National Flood Insurance Program
Page 2 of 2
ria ss
Panel(s):1728,1727
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID
CITY OF RALEIGH 370243
Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown below should be
used when placing map orders; the Community Number(s)
shown above should be used on insurance applications for
the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
3720172800J 5/2/2006
3720172700J 5/2/2006
NOTES TO USERS
This is an official FIRMette of a portion of the effective panels
listed in the Title Block shown on Page 1. The information
represented on this FIRMette was extracted from the effective
digital flood hazard data available at http://fris.nc.gov/fris.
Base flood elevation data, floodway, nonencroachment widths,
information on certain areas no in the Special Flood Hazard
Areas protected by flood control structures, and other pertinent
data are available in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) available at
http://fris.nc.gov/fris. Users should be aware that flood elevations
shown on this FIRMette represent elevations rounded to one
tenth of a foot (0.1') and should be utilized in conjunction with
data available in the FIS.
NOTES TO USERS
Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRMette were obtained
from various organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and
federal agencies, and/or other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery
acquired by the State in 2010. Information and geospatial data supplied by the local
community(ies) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered the preferred
source for development of the base map.
See geospatial metadata for the associated digital FIRMette for additional information
about base map preparation. Base map features shown on this FIRMette, such as
corporate limits, are based on the most up-to-date data available at the time of publication.
Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map
users should consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current
conditions of jurisdictional boundaries and base map features. This map may contain
roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new
hydraulic model was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to either or both the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) or National Geodetic Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29), and are
labeled accordingly. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground
elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. To obtain current elevation, description,
and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, or for information
regarding conversion between NGVD 29 and NAVD 88, please contact the Information
Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at [phone], or visit its website at
hftp://www.ngs.noaa.gov/.
MORE INFORMATION
Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA)
1-877-336-2627
hftp://msc.fema.gov/
Letters of Map Revision (LOMR)
919-715-5711
www.ncfloodma s.com
Flood Insurance Availability
North Carolina Division of Emergency
Management (NCDEM)
919-715-5711
htti)://www.nccrimecontrol.org/nfip
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
1-877-638-6620
hftp://www.fema.gov/business/nfip
Questions about this FIRMette
1-877-336-2627
htti)://fema.gov

ATTACHMENT E
SECTION 7 COORDINATION
As submitted to the Raleigh Field Office of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on
November 22, 2017

.�. ANGLER
Kathy Matthews, Project Review
Raleigh Field Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Re: Durant Nature Park Lower Dam Repairs, Wake County, North Carolina
Threatened and Endangered Species and Cultural and Historical Resources Review
Dear Ms. Matthews:
Angler Environmental (Angler) conducted a review of known threatened and endangered species
and cultural and historical resources in order to determine documented occurrences or presence
of resources within the project impact area, and to assess the potential impact of the proposed
work on any of these resources. In the following narrative, Angler evaluated the findings and
identified the likelihood of these species either having habitat, or possibly occurring within, this
project area.
The proposed project includes repairs to the dam embankment and spillway, including the use of
articulated concrete block along the east shoreline on the embankment, and the construction of
a stilling basin below the spillway, of the Camp Durant Nature Park Lake Number One. The water
level in the lake will temporarily be lowered about ten feet to accommodate this work. This work
will help control erosion downstream and stabilize the dam embankment.
For this project, Angler queried the U.S. Fish and Wildlife's (USFWS) IPaC databases and the
USFWS North Carolina Wake County database concerning federally threatened, endangered, or
protected species that may exist within the project area (files included in attached figures). Five
federally -listed species were identified by these databases (Table 1). Angler also reviewed the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database of known occurrences of threatened
and endangered species in the vicinity of the project area; there were no NCNHP-documented
occurrences of any federally -listed species within the project impact area or in the immediate
vicinity.
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605 1 Main: 919.829.9909 1 Fax: [phone]
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

City of Raleigh November 22, 2017
Durant Nature Park Dam Repairs Page 2 of 3
Threatened and Endangered Species and Cultural and Historic Resources Review
Table 1. Federally -listed species with special designation identified by USFWS databases for the project
area.
Species/Resource Name
Federal
Habitat
Database
Status
Present
Dwarf wedgemussel (A/asmidonta
E
No
IPaC, Raleigh FWS —
heterodon)
Wake Count
Red -cockaded woodpecker
E
No
IPaC, Raleigh FWS —
Picoides borealis
Wake Count
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii)
E
No
IPaC, Raleigh FWS —
Wake Count
Bald eagles
BGPA
Yes
Raleigh FWS —
Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Wake Count
Yellow Lance
PT
Yes
IPaC, Raleigh FWS —Wake
Elli do lanceolate
Count
T= threatened
E= endangered
P= proposed
BGPA= Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Two mussel species, the dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and the yellow lance
(Elliptio lanceolate), were identified on both the IPaC and the Wake County databases. The dwarf
wedgemussel is a federally -endangered species known to occur from Connecticut to North
Carolina, and has historically been documented within the Neuse and Tar Rivers. This project is
located within the Neuse River Basin; however, the dwarf wedgemussel has been extirpated from
the Neuse River and no populations are documented in the project area or in the Neuse River
tributaries downstream from the project area. The closest extant populations are located in the
Little River approximately 11 miles from the project location. The yellow lance has been proposed
for listing as a federally threatened species. According to records from the NC Wildlife Resources
commission the yellow lance is found in the Neuse River basin but only within the Swift Creek,
Middle Creek, and Mill Creek subbasins. The project area and associated tributaries do not
overlap any of these subbasins. No sightings of either of these species are recorded for the project
area in the NCNHP database. This project should have no effect on either of these species.
The red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) are
listed as potentially occurring in the county by the USFWS.
The federally -endangered red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and the protected bald
eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) are listed as potentially occurring in the county. The red -
cockaded woodpecker excavates nesting cavities in mature living southern pine species,
especially longleaf pine (Pinus palustris). For nesting, the bird typically requires at least sixty -
year -old trees, and prefers forest stands with a regular fire regime. For foraging, the understory
must be clear. The scope of this project may require the selective removal of one tree; it will not
require broad clearing. All work will be done within maintained -cleared areas or areas containing
brush and understory-sized trees. Additionally, no sightings of this species are recorded in the
NCNHP database for this project area. There are also no sightings listed on the Cornell Lab of
Ornithology eBird website, which allows users to track sightings of birds by species and sighting
date. The nearest recorded sighting of the red -cockaded woodpecker on eBird is located over 25
miles southwest of the project site. Based on these findings, this species should not be affected
by this work.
Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) were identified as being likely to occur within Wake
County. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies
613 Poole Drive, Garner, NC 27529 I P: 919-615-0301
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

City of Raleigh November 22, 2017
Durant Nature Park Dam Repairs Page 3 of 3
Threatened and Endangered Species and Cultural and Historic Resources Review
of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0
mile of open water. A desktop -GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area
within a 1.13 -mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed on January
25, 2017 using 2016 color aerials on Google Earth. Camp Durant Lake Number One and Lake
Number Two are both located in the vicinity of the project area. No sightings of bald eagle have
been recorded by the NCNHP; however, historical sightings have been recorded on eBird. If any
bald eagle nests should be determined to be present within 660 feet of the project location,
activities should be restricted to outside the nesting season (June through mid-August), and the
lake should not be drained during the nesting season. Due to the presence of potential bald
eagle habitat, this project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, this species.
Finally, Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) is a federally -endangered perennial plant that grows
in sandy or rocky open woods or along forest edges in association with basic soils. The plant
needs some form of disturbance to provide an open area. The project in question will occur along
the banks of a man-made lake. The major soil series mapped within the project area were
identified as Altavista and Chewacla, along with other series as inclusions. All soil series mapped
within the project area are acidic with a pH of less than 6.2. Additionally, no sightings of this
species are recorded in the NCNHP Program database. Based on these findings, this project will
have no effect on this species.
The NCNHP did not record any federally -listed species observances for the project area;
however, two state -rare species were recorded within the last three years at Durant Nature Park.
The slender glass lizard (Ophisaurus attenuatus) and creeping spot flower (Acmella repens) have
both been recorded at Durant Nature Park in 2014. However, these species were not observed
within the project area. At this time there are no regulatory requirements regarding state rare
species.
To address potential impacts to cultural and historical resources for this project, Angler reviewed
the online database of the North Carolina Historic Preservation Office on January 17, 2017 for
known resources. Based on Angler's review of databases, Durant Nature Park was originally
Camp Durant, headquarters for the Occoneechee Council of the Boy Scouts. There are no known
cultural or historic resources within the proposed development or within Durant Nature Park. The
Raleigh & Gaston Rail Corridor (HPO Site ID: NC0008) is located to the east of Durant Nature
Park, and has been determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This
work on the Lake Number Two embankment and spillway will not affect this resource as it is well
removed from the resource. Mapping of the rail corridor with respect to the project site is included
with this letter. Angler also reviewed resources for the State Office of Archaeology on December
20, 2017; however, no archaeological findings were located within 500 meters of the project area.
The database findings of these queries are included with this letter.
Sincerely,
4�, �,,
Kathleen Webber
Environmental Specialist
613 Poole Drive, Garner, NC 27529 I P: 919-615-0301
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

Document Path: C:\Users\jschmADesktop\Local_015\Durant\maps\Durant_ Aerial_lma jery—d - Date Saved: 12113120 1 G

J
r
a
dw
i
0
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
Street Map Source:
PROJECT LOCATION MAP JSATopo Maps
E
�IGLER E5K� Arc615 online
I RONMENTALa ores company DURANT NATURE PARKNE ROAD, WARRENTON, VIRGINIA 3018'!4844 I F: 703.393.3934
rEnv1ronmen1l.com WAKE COUNTY, NC
I inch = 400 feet
Document Path: C:\Users\jschmADesktop\Local_G15\Durant\maps\Durant_ProJect_ Location—d - Date Saved: 12113120 1 G

I.�lf�
lature
Park
SaYorms Ct
q
Durant
Nature FarA
` ❑od kd
S
Zc =S
-
5 tric.kla.,d
a
x °
bVr
Voccril
� �
• c
c� tr
n5�c
S-� �•a
'Rn
R
y �s
Y
d
4
U)E Md1bf4og4ltd
s �
4
H
i
V
m w�
L:� _ _
LEGEND
°
Rai eigh -
ryt, g@,„ra
Kni
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
�'�•:t,�n�
Street Map Source:
VICINITY MAP
World Street Map
e
kkA
�
�
.(�NGLIER
ESRI ArcGIS Online
N
,4Mft.--W ENVIRONMENTAL
a Ores company
DURANT NATURE PARK
CORPORATE 15367
TELEPHONE ROAD, WARRENTON, VIRGINIA 50187
P: ]03.393.48441 F: 703.393.3934
www.AnglerEn°1`0°m`ntal.c°m
WAKE COUNTY, NC
I inch = 400 feet
Document Path: CAU5cr5\j5chmADc5ktop\Loca1_G15\1)urant\map5\Durant_ Vicinity—d - Date Saved: 1 211 312 0 1 G

bpt4li O` h}c, t �aa ,c'40 x ruins*
`k United States Department of the Interiornx�
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
k� $ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: November 15, 2017
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0139
Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-00296
Project Name: Durant Nature Park dam repairs
Subject: Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed
project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the

11/15/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-00296 2
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http://www.fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and
http://www.fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

11/15/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-00296
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List

11/15/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-00296
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

11/15/2017 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-00296
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0139
Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-00296
Project Name: Durant Nature Park dam repairs
Project Type: DAM
Project Description: Installation of stilling basin below dam and riprap repairs.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps:
https://www. google.com/maps/place/35.891731503146914N78.57891633464641 W
Ulk -
g � a
s �-A.&LL Ate: _
L}urawr,lOM
La
Counties: Wake, NC
2

11/15/2017
Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-00296
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on
this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species
that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list
because a project could affect downstream species. See the "Critical habitats" section below for
those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's
jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Clams
NAME STATUS
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: ht42s:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Proposed Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: h!Ws:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and ... Page 1 of 3
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
Wake County, North Carolina
Updated: 07-10-2017
Common Name
Vertebrate:
American eel
Bachman's sparrow
Bald eagle
Carolina darter
Carolina madtom
Pinewoods shiner
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Roanoke bass
Southeastern myotis
Southern hognose snake
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe
Diana fritillary (butterfly)
Dwarf wedgemussel
Green floater
Yellow lance
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush
Grassleaf arrowhead
Michaux's sumac
Sweet pinesap
Scientific name
Anguilla rostrata
Aimophila aestivalis
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Etheostoma collis lepidinion
Noturus furiosus
Lythrurus matutinus
Picoides borealis
Ambloplites cavifrons
Myotis austroriparius
Heterodon simus
Fusconaia masoni
Speyeria diana
Alasmidonta heterodon
Lasmigona subviridis
Elliptio lanceolata
Lindera subcoriacea
Sagittaria weatherbiana
Rhus michauxii
Monotropsis odorata
Federal Record Status
Status
FSC
Current
FSC
Historic
BGPA
Current
FSC
Probable/potential
FSC
Current
FSC
Current
E
Current
FSC
Current
FSC
Historic
FSC
Obscure
FSC
Current
FSC
Current
E
Current
FSC
Current
P
Current
FSC
Current
FSC
Historic
E
Current
FSC
Historic
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.httnl 11/20/2017

Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and ... Page 2 of 3
Virginia least trillium
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Trillium pusillum var. FSC Current
virginianum
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or
a significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information
to support listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC=Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered
Species Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or
otherwise in need of conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species
petitioned by outside parties and other selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans,
State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of
appearance with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not
biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential).
Experimental, nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened
species on public land, for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or
"PT", respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and
removed (de -listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took
effect August 8,2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16
U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of
bald and golden eagles and provides a statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The
USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land
managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid disturbing bald eagles. For mor information,
visit hqp://www.fws.aov/miaratooLbirds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A)):
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle
(from New York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from
Virginia south to Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T
(S/A) designation bans the collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles
from the southern population. The T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by
private landowners in North Carolina, part of the southern population of the species. In addition to its
official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service considers the southern population of the
bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.httnl 11/20/2017

Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and ... Page 3 of 3
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of
known records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.httnl 11/20/2017

Ed Kabay
From: Katie Webber
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 11:36 AM
To: Ed Kabay
Subject: FW: Request for EOIDs - Durant Nature Park
Attachments: Weber_AnglerEnvironmental_EOID_20161214_NCNHP_2016-10.dbf
Hi Ed,
We reviewed the updated, October 2017 downloadable files, and the species listed in the action area of the
Durant Nature Park Dam Maintenance project have not changed. Therefore, I did not contact Susanne Mason
for an updated file.
Thanks,
Katie Webber
From: Mason, Suzanne[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 3:41 PM
To: Katie Webber<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Request for EOIDs - Durant Nature Park
Hi Katie,
Thanks for getting in touch! Attached is a dbf with the full attributes of the EO—IDs identified in the email below. These
data are from NCNHP's 2016-06 data set. Please let me know if you have any trouble with the file, questions about the
data, or if I can be of further assistance.
Regards,
Suzanne
Suzanne Mason
Conservation Information Manager and NCDOT Project Specialist
Natural Heritage Program
Division of Land and Water Stewardship
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
919.707.8637 office/fax
suzanne.mason(aDncdcr.gov (*Please note new email address effective April 11, 2016*)
www.ncnhp.org
121 West Jones Street
1651 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1651
elNoth)ilr) COMPilres

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
From: Katie Webber[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:09 AM
To: Mason, Suzanne <[e-mail]>
Subject: Request for EOIDs - Durant Nature Park
Hello Suzanne,
Would you be able to help me identify these four EOIDs in Wake County, NC?
EO ID
LAST OBS
EO STATUS
EO RANK
ACCURACY
NAME CATGY
DATA DATE
32043
2004 -Pre
Historical
H?
5 -Very
Low
Animal
10/6/2016
34014
10/3/2014
Current
Ci?
2 - High
Plant
10/6/2016
34619
5/26/2014
Current
E
3-
Medium
Animal
10/6/2016
13796
5/20/1967
Historical
H
3-
Medium
Plant
10/6/2016
Thank you so much!
Katie Webber
Environmental Specialist
Angler Environmental, a RES Company
D: 540.905.4388 10: 703.393.4844
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.

EO—ID SCI—NAME EO—NUM COM—NAME SURVEYDATE LAST—OBS FIRST—OBS EO—STATUS EO—RANK ACCURACY NC—STATUS USA—STATUS S_RANK RND_S_RANK G_RANK RND_G_RANK HAB_TYPE NAME_CATGY TAXO_GROUP
32043 Coryphaeschna ingens 8 Regal Darner 2004 -Pre 2004 -Pre 2004 -Pre Historical H? 5 - Very Low SR S2? S2 G5 G5 Aquatic Animal Dragonfly or Damselfly
13796 Matelea decipiens 8 Glade Milkvine 1967-05-20 1967-05-20 1967-05-20 Historical H 3 - Medium SR -P S3 S3 G5 G5 Upland Plant Vascular Plant
34619 Ophisaurus attenuatus 1 Slender Glass Lizard 2014-05-26 2014-05-26 2014-05-26 Current E 3 - Medium SR S2 S2 G5 G5 Upland Animal Reptile
34014 Acmella repens 4 Creeping Spotflower 2014-10-03 2014-10-03 2014-10-03 Current Ci? 2 - High SR -D S1 S1 G5T5 T5 Wetland Plant Vascular Plant

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name
Durant Nature Park
Date: 11/22/2017
Species / Resource
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Notes / Documentation
Name
Determination
Dwarf wedgemussel
No suitable habitat present.
No effect
This project is located within the Neuse River Basin;
(Alasmidonta heterodon)
however, the dwarf wedgemussel recovery plan lists only
historical sightings in the Neuse River. The closest extant
population is located in the Little River approximately 11
miles from the project location. No sightings of this species
are recorded for the project area in the NCNHP database.
Red -cockaded
No suitable habitat present.
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential habitat present.
woodpecker
This species requires mature pine stands with a clear
understory, prefers habitats with regular fire regiment. This
(Picoides borealis)
habitat is not present at the project location. Additionally,
the project does not require broad tree clearing. According
to eBird range map of listed sightings and the Cornell
Ornithology Lab sightings database the nearest recorded
sighting of this species is over 25 miles to the SW of the
project.
Nlichaux's sumac (Rhus
No suitable habitat present.
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential habitat present.
michauxiz)
This plant grows in sandy or rocky open woods or along
forest edges in association with basic soils. The plant needs
some form of disturbance to provide an open area. The
project will occur on the banks of a manmade embankment,
and the mapped soil series associated with the project have
low (acidic) pHs.
Bald eagles
Does not intersect with an eagle
No Eagle Act permit required.
Habitat assessment indicates no potential habitat present. No
concentration area, no suitable
nest within action area or within 660 feet of the action area.
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
habitat present, unlikely to
Sightings were reviewed on the NCNHP - Natural Heritage
disturb bald eagles.
Element Occurrences (NHEO) database.
Yellow Lance
Species not present
No effect
According to ncwildlife.org this species is located in the
(Ellptio lanceolate)
Swift Creek sub -basin within Wake County. The project is
not located within the Swift Creek drainage area.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Signature /Title Date

ENT OF
Qp�tt fj � lye'
� y1�
United States Department of the
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 11/22/2017
Self -Certification Letter
Durant Nature Park Dam Maintenance
Project Name
Dear Applicant:
l4li
—111
i;�x�•u:u
Interior
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
❑✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

ATTACHMENT F
SECTION 106 COORDINATION

1408 Roseneath Road, Suite B
res Richmond, VA 23230
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
November 28, 2017
Durant Nature Park Lower Dam Repairs; Wake County, North Carolina
Section 106: Cultural and Historical Resources Review
Resource Environmental Solutions (RES) conducted a review of known cultural and historical
resources in order to determine documented presence of resources within the project area, and
to assess the potential impact of the proposed work on any of these resources.
To address potential impacts to cultural and historical resources for this project, RES reviewed
the online database of the North Carolina Historic Preservation Office on January 17, 2017 for
known resources. Based on RES's review of databases, Durant Nature Park was originally Camp
Durant, headquarters for the Occoneechee Council of the Boy Scouts. There are no known
cultural or historic resources within the proposed development or within Durant Nature Park. The
Raleigh & Gaston Rail Corridor (HPO Site ID: NC0008) is located to the east of Durant Nature
Park, and has been determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This
work on the Lake Number Two embankment and spillway will not affect this resource as it is well
removed from the resource. Mapping of the rail corridor with respect to the project site is included
with this letter.
RES also reviewed resources for the State Office of Archaeology on December 20, 2016;
however, no archaeological findings were located within 500 meters of the project area. A SE
High Speed Rail property is located 800 meters south of the site and was surveyed, report
reference/title is available if needed. Four unassessed and one non -eligible sites are located 900
meters to the northeast. A 14 -acre stream and wetland mitigation site 500 meters to the east of
the proposed project was confirmed by the office archaeologist to have no findings.
The database findings of these queries are included with this letter.

.6
.
-
,�
.
�
f
Ear I41 F
�
£
4
,
����
\tst
_ 3e
«
�0r
c n
\
A
'�)iifH#
gL
%
�
®kD10
°
« ■
a �
�■sb�
�
Pres¥rim
Omani
Noms % Aco
C
Pa® WAKE
$
�
_i
�W_ Pmwk _
n ----- {
Well In qton C
$ V IV a
1
4
m�Mc■ -. 00
m
January 25, 2017
DOE Points
I
Determined EjtG
A DOE Gone
S and DoE
S and DOE, Gone
%1312
o &»s 0.3 0.5w
J
o 0.225 E« E9 m
Sources: Esd HERE, DeL=»&maIwra acrmmTR,m«
Japan,Esri «T Ea mm (Hong Kong), K_, Ea9»zt
_pmyw4mc,»o«_wncontributors, and the GIS _r
Community

ATTACHMENT G
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT

11/21/2017
EFH Mapper
EFH Data Notice: Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the fishery
management plans developed by the regional Fishery Management Councils. In most cases mapping data can
not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report should be used for general
interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive evaluation of EFH at this location. A
location -specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes must be performed by a regional expert. Please
refer to the following links for the appropriate regional resources.
Query Results
Map Scale = 1:72,224
Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = 35053'30" N, Longitude = 78034'50" E
Decimal Degrees: Latitude = 35.89, Longitude = -78.58
The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and/or HAPCs for the following
species/management units.
EFH
No Essential Fish Habitats (EFH) were identified at the report location.
HAPCs
No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report location.
EFH Areas Protected from Fishing
No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location.
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/ 1/1

ATTACHMENT H
SITE PLANS

N
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT QUANTITIES
PHASE NUMBER
0
NUMBER OF LOTS
0
LOT NUMBERS BY PHASE
0
NUMBER OF UNITS
0
LIVABLE BUILDINGS
0
OPEN SPACE
0
NUMBER OF OPEN SPACE LOTS
0
PUBLIC WATER (LF)
0
PUBLIC SEWER (LF)
0
PUBLIC STREET (LF)
0
PUBLIC SIDEWALK (LF)
0
THE CITY ROFALEIGH
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RUFFIN L. HALL
CITY MANAGER
,F
O
\ti
\fs�'18L ISHEO 1291
��
Q
C A �
NANCY McFARLANE
MAYOR
DURANT NATURE PARK
LOWER DAM REPAIRS
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1"=500'
0 500' 1000'
NC DAM SAFETY ID WAKE - 001
PREPARED BY
SCHNABEL ENGINEERING
SCHNABEL PROJECT NO. 16C21037.00
CITY OF RALEIGH PROJECT NO. SM 2017-0011
OWNER INFO
CITY OF RALEIGH STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION
PROJECT MANAGER: GILLES BELLOT, PE
127 W. HARGETT ST., SUITE 800
RALEIGH, NC 27601
919-996-4001
[e-mail]
DEVELOPMENT
Project Data Sheet'' SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
Development Services Customer Service Center I 1 Exchange Plaza, suite 4001 Raleigh, NC 27601 1919-996-2495
Litchford Satellite 0171ce 18320 -130 Litchford Road 1 Raleigh, NC 27601 1919-996-4200
GENERAL INFORMATION
Development Name: DURANT NATURE PARK Proposed Use: DAM REPAIRS
Property Address(es):8305 CAMP DURANT RD, RALEIGH NC 27614
Wake County Property Identification Number(s) (PIN) for each parcel to which these guidelines will apply:
PIN #1728.18 41 5750 PIN # PIN # PIN #
What is the project type? ❑Apartment ❑Bank ❑Elderly Facility ❑Hospital ❑Hotel/Motel ❑Industrial Building
❑Mixed Residential ❑Non -Residential Condo ❑Office ❑Religious Institution ❑Residential Condo ❑Retail
❑School ❑Shopping Center ❑Single Family Residential ❑Telecommunication Tower ❑Townhouse 00ther
Scope of work:
Repairs to dam and spillway including flattening upstream slope and protecting It with
p P� Y 9 9 p p p 9
articulated concrete blocks and constructing a concrete stilling basin downstream of the
existing spillway.
FOR APARTMENTS, CONDOS, AND TOWNHOMES ONLY
1. Total number of townhouse lots: Number attached: Number detached:
2. Total number of apartment or condominium units:
3. Total number of Congregate Care or Life Care Dwelling units:
4. Overall total number of dwelling units (from 1-3 above):
5. Number of bedroom units: 1 BR 2BR 3BR 4BR or more
6. Overall unit(s) per acre densities per zoning district(s):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE AND SITE DATA TABLE (applicable to all developments)
Zoning Information Building Information
Zoning District(s): R-4 Proposed use of building(s): NIA
If more than one district, provide acreage of each: Proposed Sq. Ft. of building(s) gross:
N/A N/A
Overlay District(s): NIA
Existing Sq. Ft. of buildings) gross: N/A
Total site acreage: 2.61 Acres Total Sq. R. gross (existing and proposed): N/A
Off street parking: Required 0 Provided 0 Proposed height of building(s): NIA
COA (Certificate of Appropriateness) case # N/A FAR (floor area ratio) %: NIA
BOA (Board of Adjustment) case #A -N/A Building lot coverage %: N/A
CUD (Conditional Use District) case # Z - N/A Inside City Limits? 0 Yes ❑ No
STORMWATER INFORMATION
Existing impervious surface: 0 acres/square feet
Proposed impervious surface: 0 acres/square feet
Neuse River buffer: ❑■ Yes ❑No Wetlands: Eyes ❑No
Flood Hazard Area: Yes ■ No If yes, Alluvial Soils: Flood Study: FEMA Map Panel #: 1727/1728
Total disturbed area: 2.61 /113,690 acres/square feet
PAGE 1 OF 1
WWW.RALEIGI IVC.GOV REVISION 03.22.16
DURANT NATURE PARK LOWER DAM REPAIRS
CITY OF RALEIGH, NC
LIST OF DRAWINGS
SHEET NO.
DRAWING NO.
TITLE
1
G-01
COVER SHEET
2
G-02
STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS, LEGEND & SHEET INDEX
3
A-01
ACCESS AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
4
A-02
EXISTING SITE PLAN
5
C-01
CLEARING AND DEMOLITION PLAN
6
C-02
GRADING PLAN
7
C-03
FINAL SITE PLAN
8
C-04
ACB SECTIONS
9
C-05
CIVIL DETAILS
10
S-01
STILLING BASIN STRUCTURAL PLAN AND SECTIONS
11
S-02
STILLING BASIN STRUCTURAL DETAILS
12
S-03
GROUTING PLAN AND DETAILS
13
S-04
STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES
14
E-01
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
15
E-02
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS (1 OF 2)
16
E-03
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS (2 OF 2)
�
K
m
o
N
N
K
Q
0
N
pCl
C
w
a
m
U
0
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
r
m Y
z Y
<U)
0
m
o Y
z Y
(D U)
7n
0
mono (D
Q) Z
wo Iti
W
LU
CZ
Z
VZ
N LU
U)
W
2i Z
Q Z_
� J
_ 0
WU'Q
3: W U
J
O Q
<00
LLI
� 0 0
� W
aQ
Z ry
Z
a
0
of RA t
W
Q
U
a
2
Hrn
Dal
O «'
N
0U
z 0
w Co
Ji
zZ
Z
Ow
Z U)
wZ
J W
w U
QJ
Z
U
U)
W
W
N)
L.L
W
>
O
U
Lu
W
U
Z
U-1
0
O
❑
Lu
Z
O
F-
0 -
U
rn
w
❑
E
o�
rE
N a'
N ,
m
Z
Z �
o L
U
O N
E �
E�
N
>Q0
❑ M
=u-
U
ECD
2 LO
m�
rn
Y �
O N
Qco
M
— M
H-
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
G-01
SHEET
01 OF 16

ABBREVIATIONS
AB
ANCHOR BOLTS
ABC
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
ADH
ADHESIVE
ALT
ALTERNATIVE, ALTERNATE
ANC
ANCHOR
BM
BOOK OF MAPS
BOT
BOTTOM
BF
BOTTOM FACE
BST
BITUMINOUS SURFACE TREATMENT
C -C
CENTER TO CENTER
CHK
CHECK
CG
CENTER OF GRAVITY
CJ
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
CPA
CONCRETE PLACEMENT AREA
CTR
CENTER,CENTERS
CM/SEC
CENTIMETERS PER SECOND
CNTR
CENTER
CONC
CONCRETE
DBA
DEFORMED BAR ANCHOR
DEG
DEGREES
DET
DETAIL
DIA
DIAMETER
DIP
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
D/S
DOWNSTREAM
DWG
DRAWING
DWL
DOWEL
EA
EACH
EF
EACH FACE
EL
ELEVATION
EMB
EMBEDMENT
EQ
EQUAL
ES
EQUALSPACE
EW
EACH WAY
EXP ANC
EXPANSION ANCHOR
FF
FAR FACE
FPS
FEET PER SECOND
FS
FAR SIDE
FUI
FUTURE UNIT INTAKE
GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE
HDPE
HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE
HK
HOOK
HORIZ
HORIZONTAL
HS
HIGH STRENGTH
HW
HEADWATER
HYDRO
HYDROPHILIC
ID INSIDE DIAMETER
IN INCHES
INJ INJECTION
LB POUND
LFT LEFT
LG LONG, LENGTH
MAX MAXIMUM
MIN MINIMUM
NF
NEARFACE
NOM
NOMINAL
NS
NEAR SIDE
NTS
NOT TO SCALE
OC ON CENTER
OCJ OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT
PL PLATE
PT ANC POST TENSION ANCHOR
PROJ PROJECT
PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE
R
RADIUS
RCP
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
REINF
REINFORCING, REINFORCED
REF
REFERENCE
REQD
REQUIRED
RT
RIGHT
RHT
RIGHT HAND THREAD
SHT
SHEET
SIM
SIMILAR
SL
STOP LOG
SP
SPACE
SPEC
SPECIFICATION
SS
STAINLESS STEEL
STD
STANDARD
STL
STEEL
SYM
SYMMETRICAL
TEMP
TEMPORARY
TF
TOP FACE
TR
TRASH RACK
TS
TUBE STEEL
TYP
TYPICAL
TOS
TOP OF STEEL
TW
TAILWATER
UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
U/S UPSTREAM
UV UNIFORMLY VARYING
VERT VERTICAL
VWPZ VIBRATING WIRE PIEZOMETER
W/ WITH
W/O WITHOUT
WP WORK POINT
WS WATER STOP
WSTUD WELDABLE STUD
EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND
EXISTING IRON PIN
EXISTING REBAR
NO POINT SET
IRON REBAR SET
LIGHT POLE
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
ELECTRIC METER
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
UTILITY POLE
BOLLARD
SEWER CLEAN OUT
SEWER MANHOLE
SIGN
STORM MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER MANHOLE
WATER METER
WATER VALVE
WELL
MANHOLE
TREE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONCRETE MONUMENT
CHORD
SIGHT EASEMENT
DEED BOOK
PLAT BOOK
CURB AND GUTTER
REINFORCED CONC PIPE
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE
BOUNDARY LINE
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
EASEMENT LINE
TREE LINE
WATER LINE
FENCE LINE
EDGE OF WATER /CREEK
DELINEATED WETLANDS
ASPHALT
CONCRETE a°
a
GRAVEL
RIPRAP
WETLANDS . . .
DIRECTION V
SECTION IS SHOWN
O EIP
O EIR
• NPS
0 IRS
0
M
OY
0
O
❑w
®WV
0
QMH
O
R/W
CM
CH
SE
DB
PB
C&G
RCP
CMP
CPP
SS ss ss ss
UE UE UE
—
E E E—
W
x
WLB
SECTION INDICATOR
DURANT NATURE PARK LOWER DAM REPAIRS
CITY OF RALEIGH, NC
LIST OF DRAWINGS
SHEET NO.
DRAWING NO.
TITLE
1
G-01
COVER SHEET
2
G-02
STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS, LEGEND & SHEET INDEX
3
A-01
ACCESS AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
4
A-02
EXISTING SITE PLAN
5
C-01
CLEARING AND DEMOLITION PLAN
6
C-02
GRADING PLAN
7
C-03
FINAL SITE PLAN
8
C-04
ACB SECTIONS
9
C-05
CIVIL DETAILS
10
S-01
STILLING BASIN STRUCTURAL PLAN AND SECTIONS
11
S-02
STILLING BASIN STRUCTURAL DETAILS
12
S-03
GROUTING PLAN AND DETAILS
13
S-04
STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES
14
E-01
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
15
E-02
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS (1 OF 2)
16
E-03
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS (2 OF 2)
SECTION NUMBER*
DRAWING NUMBER ON
WHICH SECTION APPEARS
DETAIL NUMBER
4
A-110
DRAWING NUMBER ON
WHICH DETAIL APPEARS
DETAIL INDICATOR
tY
U)
E
Z X
O
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
0
U
Lu
if
Of
Q
o
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
Z
Z
CNR�y
D Q
WC7Q
w W
�C
U
z�
w
�
WLU
7)
m cn
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
o
D_ >- -
N
U)
U
�
m
0 U LD
Z
Z�
c00
Z
PLAN, SECTION OR DETAIL LABEL
N
Q
DRAWING NO.
V
Lu
Z
�, N
z
tnZU)
�5�
M
o�
02 OF 16
a
s
m
m
w
J WU
LuU
CO J
c co
@Lo
w
S
U
0
m p�j
z
x
o�
0 N
a co
DRAWING SYMBOLS LEGEND
z
0
LuLu
a
U)
}
w
U
Z
U-1
0
a
0
w
0
Li
D
co
o
w
Q0
m
C,
co
0
o
CD
0
Wo
W
w
U
W
Z
w �
(n
Q Z
W
p w
J
W
z
m
Y
o
Z Y
�
Y
D
Y
W
0
w
J
0
LU
o
D
Z
0
r
m
U)
U
LLI Y
U
~
w0
0
z
SECTION NUMBER*
DRAWING NUMBER ON
WHICH SECTION APPEARS
DETAIL NUMBER
4
A-110
DRAWING NUMBER ON
WHICH DETAIL APPEARS
DETAIL INDICATOR
tY
U)
E
Z X
O
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
0
U
Lu
if
Of
Q
o
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
Z
Z
CNR�y
D Q
WC7Q
w W
�C
U
z�
w
�
WLU
7)
m cn
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
o
D_ >- -
N
U)
U
0 "7
0 U LD
Z
Z�
c00
Z
PLAN, SECTION OR DETAIL LABEL
m
Lu
0
Cc,Lu
DRAWING NO.
V
Lu
Z
�, N
z
tnZU)
�5�
M
o�
02 OF 16
W
w
J WU
LuU
CO J
c co
@Lo
a
m p�j
z
x
o�
0 N
a co
DRAWING SYMBOLS LEGEND
�M
SECTION NUMBER*
DRAWING NUMBER ON
WHICH SECTION APPEARS
DETAIL NUMBER
4
A-110
DRAWING NUMBER ON
WHICH DETAIL APPEARS
DETAIL INDICATOR
VERBAL SCALE**
SCALE: 3/4"=1'0" SCALE: 1/2"=1'0" SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'0"
0 1' 2' 0 2' 4'
0.75" 1.00" - � 1.50"
SCALE INDICATOR
* SECTION AND ELEVATION INDICATORS ARE SIMILAR. SECTION AND ELEVATION NUMBERS ARE
COMBINED AND SEQUENTIAL ON EACH DRAWING.
** VERBAL SCALE IS SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE. ALL DRAWINGS SHOULD BE CHECKED TO INSURE
THAT THE SCALE BAR ITSELF IS SHOWN AT ACTUAL SIZE. DRAWINGS NOT PLOTTED AT THEIR
INTENDED SIZE (ANSI D 22" x 34") WILL NOT SCALE PROPERLY.
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
tY
U)
Z X
O
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
W
Lu
Of
Q
Q
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
z
Z
CNR�y
D Q
WC7Q
w W
PLAN, SECTION OR PLAN, SECTION OR DETAIL TITLED
Q =
w
DETAIL NUMBERY
PLAN / SECTION / DETAIL
Q o
m cn
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
o
D_ >- -
Q
O45
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
0 U LD
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
W
Z
PLAN, SECTION OR DETAIL LABEL
Z < 0
I---
w
Z V
DRAWING NO.
Z
Q w
FIRE
�J
SHEET
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
02 OF 16
VERBAL SCALE**
SCALE: 3/4"=1'0" SCALE: 1/2"=1'0" SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'0"
0 1' 2' 0 2' 4'
0.75" 1.00" - � 1.50"
SCALE INDICATOR
* SECTION AND ELEVATION INDICATORS ARE SIMILAR. SECTION AND ELEVATION NUMBERS ARE
COMBINED AND SEQUENTIAL ON EACH DRAWING.
** VERBAL SCALE IS SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE. ALL DRAWINGS SHOULD BE CHECKED TO INSURE
THAT THE SCALE BAR ITSELF IS SHOWN AT ACTUAL SIZE. DRAWINGS NOT PLOTTED AT THEIR
INTENDED SIZE (ANSI D 22" x 34") WILL NOT SCALE PROPERLY.
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
of �L
� �
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
�� ��S
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
7
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
CNR�y
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
DRAWING NO.
PLANNING/ZONING
G_02
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SHEET
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
02 OF 16

ti
��
i
sow r\ \ \\
:4 1212 A
(\ J I I I I I I I I III \\ \ c \ \ — —\` \ •
1 �— � — \ I I ) / I I I I � III 1 1 1 \ ` � \ \ -• ••� -
�J/
fJ
ACCESS ROAD TO SPOTTSWOOD
J \ l
STREET AND GRESHAM. ROAD
00,
_.,, •.
- 1 -
I i \ /
10,
"o,
��
-,.-ACCESS ROAD TO DURANT ROAD
kL
Eff
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
1070 FEET TO PARK ENTRANCE AT DURANT ROAD
^1 � �i =;\\ I l l \ \ '/ 1 I,,--•/'/\ \\ \ \ J ( \\ �� \\ \ Lam— 1 � \ \ \\ / / I I I \ I I I I \ I I \ \ \ \
I ! I / / , 1 \_ \ .1, _ _ ► . / _-, \\ \ `. \ . -. . REVIEW - .
■■■■■■00

TOP=243.38'
INV(W)=238.78'
INV(NW)=228.88'
INV(SW)=226.18'
INV(E)=226.08'
IS
NE
JG
INV=251.72'
_ /,1
'1O4�AK
�v
\ 15"POPLAR 18"BEECH 1 \
\ ✓ . 18"SYCNMOF f
1' 1 POPLAR I 1 \
\ \\ \ I \ I '\\\V 8'POPLAR 6"PINE \ \\
\' ' \ 1)"PIN 12'PINE �
CONCRETE BOLLARDS 1 " AP E/ V \V�VA� y� 1oG
(TYPICAL 6 -FT ON CENTER) 8 GUM 8"GU
1 I
\ 6"HICKORY II � '"
20"POPLAR 21—W/1 �\
8"GUM } { •A 21'�POPL,n
�AR
\ 10"GUM I 14"GU M
6"MAPI- V=2447V'-- 24 CMP,
U
11"PINE INE 6"POP ��� 50.90'
LA INV 2
N \
CL
15"GUM 24"PINE
245' 1
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF // /// / \ 1 / --- _ — I —'� \ GON�P� N
BOTTOM DRAIN CONDUIT
— / m
® ®® ® �_ _ .255
TOP=252.79'
VV(N)=245.49'
V(W)=243.19'
(SE)=242.59'
/ U
INV 52.20'
TPI
I! 8"PINE
6"PINE /
INV= 4.81'
151
I NV=258.02'
I NV=257.63'
KinTC:C
W00 -
a —00I
11
X55
167' 4R
255
LOW LEVEL OUTLET STEM /
LOW LEVEL OUTLET STEM
� �, • / SUPPORT COLUMNS /
\ I
S
s j ,
0 /
/
s �
s
JR --�
TBM IN 12" OAK
ELEV=260.04'
1. SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY CH ENGINEERING DATED JANUARY 05, 2017. THE HORIZONTAL AND
VERTICAL DATUM WAS ESTABLISHED BY USING THE NC RTK NETWORK. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS
NAD 83/NSRS 2007. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 88.
� EXISTING SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=30'
0 30' 60'
a
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
OF
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
�
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
,m v
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
CN 0
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
Lu
N
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
O
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
PUBLIC UTILITIES
Q
�
PLANNING/ZONING
A-02
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SHEET
N
�
p
L
Q
r
O
N
01
N
C
C
W
7a-)
U)
Q
m Y
z Y
< U
p
AMORE p
LU
INV=255.23'
YCA ORE W
p
N:
W .6 TBM IN 18" OAK
14"PINE ELEV=258.88'
LLI
0—
C6
LLI
Y
J
LLI
W``Q^
Z
mac
to w
CW
Z
VZ
� w
U)
Q
w
Q
Q z
� J
O
LU
O J U
J Q
LL
<OZ
W
� U U
LU
Q Q
Z
H
Z
Q
0
Z
0
Lu o
of U)
} w
U 0
Z
W
C�
Q
0
LL
0
ILL
D
U)
o w
w
Q
p
I� v
o m
U N C
a
U
O) Z
off' 2
C/)N O y
U �
Z
Ew m
W (D4
Z Z m N
CD wco
Z cn O M
J W U LL
00 LO
Q J m V
Z Y °P
2 m �
LU U N
M
Z
J
L.L
W
V
Z
U)
x
w
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
OF
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
C~S l0�
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
,m v
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
CN 0
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
DRAWING NO.
PLANNING/ZONING
A-02
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SHEET
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
04 OF 16

NOTES
TOP=243.38'
INV(W)=238.7£
INV(NW)=228.8
INV(SW)=226.1
INV(E)=226.08
12"PINE
1
C�
DEMOLISH AND REMOVE
EXISTING BASKETBALL GOALS
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
\ / /
245 I'A 10 1 000
- - - -
-�
® + + +
®' 5+5
22"TWINOAK ®
-� f'Z Ixi
r + /
10,
,4 V�61Z5/�
�1
sT
z ,
s
7�
LO
TBIVI IN OAK CLEARING AND DEMOLITION PLAN
ELEVLEV=260.04'
1 SCALE: 1 "=20'
0 20' 40'
1. SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY CH ENGINEERING DATED JANUARY 05, 2017. THE HORIZONTAL AND
VERTICAL DATUM WAS ESTABLISHED BY USING THE NC RTK NETWORK. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS
NAD 83/NSRS 2007. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 88.
I I 1
I
I I 114" IAK\
� ` 1
/ l A 15' PO� R II I I 1V E�l
LA
1 \
P 12"-I1NE\ \
" 11 P E \ V / �� 10'
8 GUM n \_ A�\�
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
LEGEND
AREA TO BE FULLY CLEAR AND GRUBBED
X X
X AREA TO BE CLEARED OF ALL TREES AND WOODY VEGETATION
X X (GRUBBING IS NOT REQUIRED)
h
a
co
O
co
O
L L
LU
�
Z
J
O
w
"
LU
�w �
U
W
N
w
W
U)
Iii
p
z
�
W
J
<0Z
O
W
LLJ
� U U
LU
Z
O
Z Y
nZ�/
Q
�
<W
Z
Q
W
U
0
J
N
�
p
L
w
o_
z
CD
G
O
}
Of
Y
Q
U
LU
r
LU
LU
O
O
E
ZU
m
�
N
m
a
N
_
H
U
Z
�
rn
L.LI
O
62-
LU
N
N
W
U
O yU
r. Z
Z_ W
E m
O
Lu
�CN
V"
wZ
Z Z
N
Z
CD w6
coM
tillZ
cn
O
0
W jo TBM IN 18" OAK
14"PINE ELEV=258.88'
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
Al NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
Z
O
uj
w on
_
Lu
0 p
U
Z
W
c�
Q
O
p
w
D
U)
Cn
O W
y
m
co
O
co
O
L L
LU
V
Z
J
O
w
"
LU
�w �
U
O J
w
W
U)
Iii
p
z
�
W
J
<0Z
W
LLJ
� U U
LU
Z
O
Z Y
nZ�/
(n
<W
Z
Q
W
U
0
J
J
LL
�
0
w
o_
z
CD
G
O
}
Of
Y
vJ
U
LU
LU
LU
O
Z
E
ZU
�
N
m
a
N
_
H
U
Z
�
rn
L.LI
O
62-
LU
N
N
W
U
O yU
r. Z
Z_ W
E m
O
Lu
�CN
V"
wZ
Z Z
N
Z
CD w6
coM
tillZ
cn
O
I
r- w
J W
LO
Z
Y °'
2
m �
U
O N
U)
¢
M
r M
VJ
O
L L
LU
Z
J
�z0
75
�w �
W
O J
O
Q 0Z
J
<0Z
n
LLJ
� U U
LU
Z
nZ�/
H
Q
Z
Q
W
J
0
U
CN 0
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
C-01
SHEET
05 OF 16

CONSTRUCTION LIMITSIn
14"OAK \
18"BrEQH 1 `\
"POPLAR
6"PINE \
12"PINE
NEW STILLING BASIN 1 "G
m 8"GUM '
6"HICKORY
N
� 8"GUM \ � � I 20"POPLAR / � ,/ � � � �
10"GUM 1 GSM o
\ / / 7
INV-_ 234.67 o
\ \
-- � �---240-- � � /� \�
- - -� - ,/ /
245-_ �_ �__ /- ----- - _-
J U LJ `/ v v v `/ • v
i
- rn1
nl
Al
6+0 _-----7
EXISTING LOW LEVEL OUTLET INTAKE STRUCTURE
SEE DETAIL 5 ON SHEET C-05
;F7
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
TBM IN 18" OAK
14"PINE ELEV=258.88'
V � 25
O 0
p
0
10"GUM \
o \
- -
16"POPLAR
PROPOSED 2 -FT COFFERDAM
.01
a
�
Lu
ON
Q
�
r
�
o
0
N
m
0
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
GRADING P LAN 1. INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES.
SCALE: 1"=20' 2. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION FENCING AND OTHER ACCESS CONTROLS.
0 20' 40' 3. DRAIN EXISTING RESERVOIR WITH EXISTING LOW LEVEL OUTLET.
4. INSTALL COFFERDAM ACROSS EXISTING SPILLWAY.
5. CLEAR AND GRUB AREAS AS DENOTED ON THE CLEARING PLAN.
6. PERFORM STEPS BELOW LISTED FOR UPSTREAM SLOPE AND STILLING BASIN CONCURRENTLY.
7. REMOVE COFFERDAM.
8. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES.
NOTES 9. CLOSE THE LOW LEVEL OUTLET TO ALLOW THE RESERVOIR TO RE -FILL. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
CONTROL OF WATERAND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
UPSTREAM SLOPE CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
1. SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY CH ENGINEERING DATED JANUARY 05, 2017. THE HORIZONTAL AND CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
VERTICAL DATUM WAS ESTABLISHED BY USING THE NC RTK NETWORK. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS 1. THE CONTROL OF WATER CONCEPT SHOWN INCLUDES THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 -FT HEIGHT 1. STRIP EXISTING UPSTREAM SLOPE, AND EXCAVATE ANIMAL BURROWS AS NEEDED. Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
NAD 83/NSRS 2007. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 88. COFFERDAM ACROSS THE EXISTING SPILLWAY ALONG WITH DRAINING THE RESERVOIR VIA THE 2. FLATTEN UPSTREAM SLOPE WITH IMPORTED FILL SOILS AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
EXISTING BOTTOM DRAIN. THE EXISTING BOTTOM DRAIN WILL REMAIN OPEN DURING CONSTRUCTION 3. COVER SLOPE WITH GEOTEXTILE, PLACE BEDDING STONE ON GEOTEXTILE. be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
2. ANY ANIMAL BURROWS ENCOUNTERED WHILE STRIPPING THE UPSTREAM SLOPE SLOPE SHALL BE TO PROVIDE AN OUTLET FOR STORM FLOWS. 4. INSTALL THE ALBS. development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
EXCAVATED DOWN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BURROW PRIOR TO PLACING FILL.. 5. VEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS. contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
2. THE CONCEPT SHOWN PROVIDES PROTECTION FOR THE 6 -HR, 10 -YEAR STORM, WITH ONE FOOT OF Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
3. 1.5H:1V SLOPE ON SPILLWAY EXIT CHANNEL SHALL BE IN WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK. FLATTEN FREEBOARD. THE 6 -HR, 10 -YEAR STORM IS THE MINIMUM LEVEL OF PROTECTION REQUIRED. THE STILLING BASIN
SLOPE TO 2.5H:1 V SLOPE AT TRANSITION FROM WEATHER ROCK TO SOIL. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO DESIGN THE CONTROL OF WATER PLAN AND ALL CONVEYANCES AND construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
COFFERDAMS. CONTRACTORS DESIGN SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY 1. EXCAVATE SOIL AND ROCK DOWN TO STILLING BASIN SUBGRADE. must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
DESIGN ENGINEER AND NCDEQ LAND QUALITY DAM SAFETY OFFICE. 2. CORE EXISTING SLAB, INSTALL TEMPORARY BULKHEAD AND GROUT BENEATH EXISTING SLAB. TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
3. INSTALL UNDERDRAIN BENEATH STILLING BASIN. PUBLIC UTILITIES
4. CONSTRUCT STILLING BASIN. STORMWATER
5. INSTALL STILLING BASIN SIDEWALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PLANNING/ZONING
6. BACKFILL AREA AROUND NEW STILLING BASIN AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. FIRE
7. VEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS. URBAN FORESTRY
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
m Y
z Y
<U)
0
m
� Y
Z Y
U)
CO
LU
0-
LU
Y
Y
J
LUD
(a
Z
wa
W
Cw
Z
V0
Z
N w
U)
Q
a
W
Q
Q Z
J
=O
LU C� Q
J U
OQILL. 0�
�0Z
LU
� U O
LU
a Q
Z
H
Z
a
ry
0
Z
O
r
w a
Lu
} w
U
Z
LU
a
O
w
0
w
D
CO
U)
o w
w
Q
0
� o
O U
U � �
N �
a
= U �
H Z
rn �
0. o �
U) N U N
U �
Z 0Y
Lu
Lu 2i 0 a
Z Z N
O
Lu ''-M
ZU) oc)
LU Z
J w U
00 E2 LO
Q J 00 V
Z rn
2 m r_
0 ON
am
Z
J
a_
Z
Q
CD
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
C-02
SHEET
06 OF 16

C3
6"HICKORY
8"GUM
10"GUM 14"GUM
I NV=234.67'
&_fINA�!l:
\ 0 20' 40'
ninTr-:c
1. SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY CH ENGINEERING DATED JANUARY 05, 2017. THE HORIZONTAL AND
VERTICAL DATUM WAS ESTABLISHED BY USING THE NC RTK NETWORK. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS
NAD 83/NSRS 2007. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD 88.
RIPRAP PROTECTION
EE DETAIL 6 ON SHEET C-05
PLACE ACBS AROUND STEM SUPPORTS.
GROUT VOID BETWEEN SUPPORTS AND ABS.
M&%yel-1►VA[Qag-
0
10"Gun
GROUT VOID BETWEEN ACBS AND WALL
a
�
Lu
N
O
Q
K
N
�
�
L
r
O
m
C
m
W
0
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
m Y
z Y
< U
0
Z
maa
cc W
CW
Z
VZ
� w
V� /JJ
L.1.
w
Q
Q Z
� J
O
LU (D Q
O J U
J Q �
LL
<Oz
W
� U �
W
Q Q
Z
Z
0
Z
O
Lu r
Lu o_
> E
Lu U
of U)
} w
U 0
Z
Lu
C�
Q
O
LL
0
Lu
D
U)
O W
E
U N C
U 2
Z
O `n ° U
C7)
U �
Z °
�w I�
m
w� �4
Z Z ° N
O Luco
Z O LU Z M
J w U w
00 Lo
Q J m
Z Y °P
2 m �
U O N
U Q (0
r M
r M
Z
J
LL]
J
Q
Z
LL
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
C-03
SHEET
07 OF 16

50
'40 4-
-50
FINAL GRADE
NP EL 249.
BACKFILL SOIL EL;8,2.—
— — — — — — — — --
260
250
240 L-
-50
-40
-30
-20
EL 256---------
/�
2.7
/
PERMANENT
/ SEED SLOPE
ABOVE ACBS
-10
ARTICULATED CONCRETE BLOCK SECTION
NP EL 2,
EL 248.2 —
BACKFILL SOIL
-40
SCALE: 1"=5'
0 5' 10'
-30
-20
STA 4+90
260
250
4 240
0
EL 256 i---------
2.7 / /i
i
oli PERMANENT
SEED SLOPE
ABOVE ACBS
-10
ARTICULATED CONCRETE BLOCK SECTION
SCALE: 1"=5'
0 5' 10'
TOE -IN ACB \
MIN. 3 -FT ON 1 `
1 H:1 V SLOPE 1 --
6" �
01
EXCAVATION MAY BE
REQUIRED TO REACH
DESIRED TOE DEPTH \
STA 2+50
260
250
J 240
0
260
250
240
BACKFILL SOIL
-50
1
NP EL 249.2
EL 248.2
2.7
-40
EL 252.2
i
-30
-20
EL 256 /iT----
PERMANENT
/ SEED SLOPE
ABOVE ACBS
-10
ARTICULATED CONCRETE BLOCK SECTION
SCALE: 1"=5'
0 5' 10'
STA 3+70
260
250
+ 240
0
/ FINAL GRADE \
KEY -IN ACB MINIMUM 2
/ BLOCKS ON 1 HAV SLOPE
/ I 2.7
/ 1 F
/ I
/
/ 6"
2.7
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE \
TOP AND BOTTOM OF BEDDING STONE
� 0" 1
6 - INCHES
BEDDING
STONE
ARTICULATED CONCRETE BLOCK TYPICAL DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
\ 6 - INCHE
I \ BEDDING
STONE
1 �
/
/X
/
TURN GEOTEXTILE END UP
i
K
o�
C,
N
Lu
Q
�
CL
Q
0
N
m
W
0
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
m
LU
ry
Y U
LU
x
U
co
0�
0
LU
07
LU
W
J
W
CD
G
Q
U)
Z
W
W
Z
VZ
� w
Q
LU
� Q
Q Z
p J
O
WC7Q
O J U
J Q
IL
<OZ
-
LLJ
� U U
LU
Z �
H
Z
0
Z
O_
w o_
U)
0 w
U �
Z
w
c�
a
o:
O
1
0
w
D
U)
o w
w
Q
0
E
r` °
o m
U N C
N
a
U o
H rn Z
O `n p s
U N p
U -o
Z W x o
Ew
LEE
w2 (D4
Z Z N
Ow
ZCOUJ Z
Oc>
J wLu C)U w
co
aJ mU)
Z °'
2 m �
0 O N
a co
co
r �
U)
Z
O
U
w
m
U
Q
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
C-04
SHEET
08 OF 16

1m
SUPPORT ROOTS LESS
THAN ONE INCH DIAMETER
EXAMPLE EXCAVATION LIMITS
NOTES:
EXAMPLE 10 -IN TREE PROFILE (NTS)
VALVE BOX SUCH AS OLDCASTLE
TRAFFIC BOX B1017-51JH OR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT
//Y
/x�.� �— REMOVABLE THREADED STEEL PLUG
�
DATION SIDE SLOPES NO TOP 4' OF CLEANOUT PIPE TO BE GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE
'ER THAN 1H:1V FILTER SAND
1. TREES DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL AND THEIR ASSOCIATED ROOT BALL SHALL BE
REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 31 11 00,
CLEARING AND GRUBBING.
2. EXCAVATIONS RESULTING FROM TREE AND ROOTBALL REMOVAL SHALL BE
BACKFILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 31 23 23, FILL
PLACEMENT.
� TREE REMOVAL DETAIL
NTS
,S- GATE VALVE
t& 5TRUCiuRE iRtMOVr SEGMENT
UPSTEAM OF DAPI WIDN
N�4,!EGT GQ�F'LEr10N
` REWYE sEDWnTATlD4
UA4I�QkILE7Ei.i' LIP�N
It" 239.26 RROJIE�T CO►.�LETMN. Ahn
INS I ALL ITO'k RLAIXZI IN
DRAIN STRUCIUn.
LOCALLY STEEPEN FILL SLOPE-OPOSED lfi"
TO AVOID EXISTING LOW LEVEL' — DIP ORa4w
OUTLET STRUCTURE
,`. 1...;t.bd.Ir
k
f { p TER;
SANG Q"IN � _ � � � � •
up DRAIN
p INV ZS5. .5 �
l � 1 k
r SLS I w ) t s~ --
IFEW,E f
e/ STaLIQ M
EXISTINGLOW LEVEL OUTLET PLAN
NTS
i" DIA. SOLID WALL PVC
'IPE (LENGTH VARIES)
45° BEND
AP
DRAIN SYSTEM CLEAN OUT DETAIL
DRAIN OUTLET NOTES
1. PIPE AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 31 27 10 DRAIN SYSTEM PIPING AND APPURTENANCES.
2. CHECK VALVES AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 31 27 10 DRAIN SYSTEM PIPING AND APPURTENANCES.
FTtIIIJIOVAB�E 'STOFL06S
FOR REULATM THE P4
OR IBRANNO TKE LAKE
rwrW. W*AT M W)
R46EFf
PRECAST 60'X
IIS" OUTLET
V"
24-Y 24-K 4$" .h! iLD.J
P.REUS-T BOX 'WAROOVES
FOR 2X4 570F' LOOS,
FOOTER
CLASS B
EL 238
6 -INCH DIA. PVC PIPE
FOR DRAIN OUTLET
-VE ORIENTED
VERTICALLY
290
L EXPANSION RING
3 DRAIN OUTLET DETAIL
0 i' 2'
n
z w
C) �
y N a
� N D
N �
L
a
n
0
N
m
C
W
d
N
L
CO
Q
Z
O
Lu a
Lu
U)
} w
U �
Z
Lu
a
O
0
W
D
Cn
CHECK VALVE INSTALLED
INSIDE DRAIN OUTLET WITH o
EXPANSION RING.
FLOW
SOLID WALL 6 -INCH DIA.
PVC PIPE FOR DRAIN OUTLET
RIPRAP PROTECTION TYPICAL SECTION
SCALE: V=5'
0 5' 10'
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
4
AND/ORNCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
5
Z
NTS
a
W
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Z
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
V "
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
Z
tn
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
L EXPANSION RING
3 DRAIN OUTLET DETAIL
0 i' 2'
n
z w
C) �
y N a
� N D
N �
L
a
n
0
N
m
C
W
d
N
L
CO
Q
Z
O
Lu a
Lu
U)
} w
U �
Z
Lu
a
O
0
W
D
Cn
CHECK VALVE INSTALLED
INSIDE DRAIN OUTLET WITH o
EXPANSION RING.
FLOW
SOLID WALL 6 -INCH DIA.
PVC PIPE FOR DRAIN OUTLET
RIPRAP PROTECTION TYPICAL SECTION
SCALE: V=5'
0 5' 10'
m
❑
Of
Y U
w U
U
co
� Y
f�
❑
LIJ
0—
C
W
W
Y
Y
J
W
73
Q
W
Z
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
EXISTING LOW LEVEL OUTLET DETAIL
AND/ORNCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
5
Q
NTS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
W
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Z
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
V "
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
Z
tn
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
w
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
��0
O
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
NOTESFederal
laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
Z
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
01
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
1. DETAILS OF EXISTING LOW LEVEL OUTLET FROM PREVIOUS REPAIR RECORD DRAWINGS BY CAMP
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
DRESSER & MCKEE DATED MAY 27, 1 998.
PUBLIC UTILITIES
2. ELEVATIONS PROVIDED ON EXISTING DRAWINGS ARE NGVD 29 VERTICAL DATUM AND MUST BE
STORMWATER
SHIFTED -0.912 FEET TO CONVERT TO NAVD 88 VERTICAL DATUM.
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
G
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
m
❑
Of
Y U
w U
U
co
� Y
f�
❑
LIJ
0—
C
W
W
Y
Y
J
W
73
Q
W
Z
U
J_
d
Q
W
= To
ON
W
� U
�
Z
Z
Lu C°
V "
Z Z
Z
tn
Z w
w
wZ
��0
O
J w
LU
LuU
QJ
Z
Z
01
Z
Q
J
Q
Q
U
�
U)
a
W
J_
�
Q
Q
ZJ
2
LU0
O
W
LU
U
U)
OQ
2
D
0
��0
O
LU
0- >-
Z
Z
LU
C
Q
J
Q
Q
J
LU
�
Of
U
Z
Q
U)
__
�
G
of
C AR0
E
o°
r ID
N N
U @
Z �
O L
U
0 N
(n(�o
C W
C7 rv`'
N
> (O
Cl)
D M
Q LL
mLO
m 0')
Y 4
ON
M
r Cl)
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
C-05
SHEET
09 OF 16

SUPPORT EXISTING FOOTING DURING
EXCAVATION FOR NEW SIDEWALL o ~
y N Q
� � 0
L
m
Q
13'-0"
0
N
m
3
S-01
SUPPORT EXISTING
5 FOOTING DURING
L
S-02 EXCAVATION FOR U)
NEW SIDEWALL EXISTING TOP OF NEW WALL
Z
WALL EL 256.6 O
UJ a
— 2'-0" w U
U)
} w
U �
CRJ WITH w
HYDROPHILIC a
WATERSTOP 0
1 8'-0" o
0
S-02 I D
EL 248.7
S-02 EXISTING WATERSTOP W
15'-0" R1 Ll
SLAB
U U 0'-8" U o
S 01
1'-4" 2'-0„ \ EL 247.3 U LU ui
Uj = w
HORIZONTAL WATERSTOP \ FINAL GRADE z
(TYPICAL)
EXISTING FOOTING EXISTING W o w
TOE WALL 10'-4V8"
CHUTE BLOCK Y g
J co
CRJ
'-0" co
a Cn w
—1 LY
��3J 0
LU
5'-0" z
3'-358" EL 240.0 o
1 3 1 3 m
Q Q
co
U
EL 238.3 Z Y
I
d d
_
HUTE ° ° ° LD C/) Of
"BLOCKS 5-2z
d d° ° / o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° o 0 0 0 0'-9" o c,
13'-0" 4 R2 I L2 0 -9 G
S-01
0'-6"
g SEE DETAIL 7
S-02 SHEET -6 SHEET S-04
11'-6" 30'-0" - - 11'-6" 3 STILLING BASIN PROFILE
5-01 SCALE: 1/4"=1'0" o
53'-0" � o
FLOW o 4' 8, Z N
_ a
U ID
LU
HE
O U
STILLING BASIN PLAN Z N
,
=ZZDmSCALE: 1/4"=1'0" c
{1 6 V Lu
Z) 6"
FLOW
I N
0 4' 8' Zc7 w '-
ZU) O Cl)
LLJ
° ^ w J w U w
/i m U C:
(0 Ln
d ° Q J m
Z Y
d 2 co
U ON
U) Q
CO
rM
n
J
�1 6 �1-6 Q
VAR�
IES
(13.3 FT MAX) ° < a
W
° a d � 5 �� � 1 ��
3/4" CHAMFER ° ° 2 -034,. 1'-8y2" 3 -3 �8 1 -8�2 2'-034" 2 Z U Z
(TYPICAL) ° � I Q J O
° d ° ° = O
D
°
° a ° d° ° °dIwJY
�
�
° a
C)
O5-0" °
° a ° ° 5-0 w
° ° a Q
VARIES ° ° Z
° d ° a ° 0_0(18.3 FT MAX) ° ° a ° ° OZ U)° d
I , 0—>- - Z
5-0" 30'-0" 5-0"
w l— 2 Q a
C) C� m
53'-0" LU n Z
° z � J
Z
6'-0" d
5'-0" 6'-0" 4 STILLING BASIN SECTION —
[IT-0" d ° ° 5-01 SCALE: 1/4"=1'0" Z J
° CJ (TYPICAL) ° SIDEWALL DRAINAGE o 4' 8'
° SEE DETAIL 6 SHEET S-04 ° SEE DETAIL 7 SHEET S-02
5'-0" ��D� d �W ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
�� ° F�T AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
t of 1
Alwo� ° p - CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL Cwt jC�
e- ° CRJ CRJ 1 6 CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
d
° d ° ° ° d ° ° ° Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
° ° ° ° d ° ° a ° ° ° ° ° °
1'-6" ° ° ° d ° ° ° °4 d d ° ° ° d d ° ° ° applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
° ° ° ° ° ° be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for � CAR ov
12'-6" --i-- 30'-0"
W.L. 12'-6" development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
55'-0" Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES COR P#: SM 2017-0011
2 STILLING BASIN SECTION PUBLIC UTILITIES DATE: DECEMBER 2017
5-01 SCALE: 1/4"=1'0" STORMWATER DRAWING NO.
0 4' 8' PLANNING/ZONING S-01
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY SHEET
SITE ACCESSIBILITY 10 OF 16

#8@8" —\ I[ 11 #5@8..
#5@8"EF
INSIDEOUTSIDE
SPILLWAY If �I SPILLWAY
6'-0" 5'-0"
#8@8"
2.11 V-6"
#8 @ 8" ` WATERSTOP
#5@8"EF
R1 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
i • i
F
L1 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
SCALE: 1/4"=1'0"S_01 SCALE: 1/4"=1'0"
0 4' 8 0 4' 8'
#5@8"
#5 @ 8"
OUTSIDE
SPILLWAY
Ans
V-6"
#5@8"
INSIDE
SPILLWAY
#5@8"EF
WATERSTOP
#5 @ 8"
#5@8"EF
R2/L2 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
DRAIN CLEAN O
SEE DETAIL 3 ON DRAWING C
SLAB STRUCTURAL DETAILS
SCALE: 1/2"=1'0"
0 2' 4'
OUTLET
=TAIL 4 ON DRAWING C-05
DRAIN FILL
2'-3"
i
i -INCH DIA.
PERFORATED
PVC PIPE
STILLING BASIN UNDER DRAIN DETAILS
SCALE: 1/4"=1'0"
0 4' 8'
FINAL
F
SCALE: 1/4"=1'0"
0 4' 8'
EXISTING
SLAB
0'-8"
EXISTING FOOTING
EXISTING
TOE WALL
#5 EPDXY ANCHORS INTO
EXISTING SPILLWAY AND
ROCK ON 24 INCH GRID
3'-3V8" #3 STIRRUP (TYPICAL)
SPILLWAY ENDWALL
#5 @ 8" 1
#5@8"EF
0'-8"--,-4
SPILLWAY ENDWALL DETAILS
#5
@ 8" I #5 @ 8" I
(TYPICAL) STILLING BASIN SLAB
(REINFORCEMENT NOT SHOWN)
6 CHUTE BLOCK DETAILS - ELEVATION
SCALE: 3/8"=1'0"
0 2' 4'
SIDEWALL DRAINAGE DETAILS
SCALE: 1/4"=1'0"
0 4' 8'
f
ON DRAWING C-05
SCALE: 3/8"=1'0"
0 2' 4'
#5 C
*3 STIRRUP (TYPICAL)
CHUTE BLOCK DETAILS - SECTION
SCALE: 3/4"=1'0"
19
0 1' 2'
Z Y
�: Y
<�
0
r
m
� Y
z Y
U)
W
0
Uj
0-
C6
W
W
Y
Y
J
Uj
73
U)
W
a
0
Z
O
Lu a
Lu U
U)
} w
U �
Z
Lu
O
a
O
LL
0
W
D
W
U)
o w
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
_ ,^
0O U
Z
U N
d �
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
Cwtof
U 20
c
LU
= E ° U
O N 0 N
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
LU
Z
Z C W
CP1
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
EEm Q�
Lu 2 (D4
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Z Z N
Z
>(O
ZU) 0 M
LU
LU J Z U LL
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
a J m
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
Y
Zco
U ON
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
PUBLIC UTILITIES
U a (D
DRAWING NO.
PLANNING/ZONING
-2
FIRE
U
URBAN FORESTRY
J
W
11 OF 16
Q
0 -
LU W
10�
D
Q
Z
U
J
D
W
U Q
0.
0Q=
U) J
0~
Z Q
QLLp
F---
Z
(n W
LU
Q 0
C) C�
m
W
�n
Z
of
Z
z
Z
J
Q
J_
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
Cwtof
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
CP1
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
DRAWING NO.
PLANNING/ZONING
S-02
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SHEET
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
11 OF 16

&_�GRO PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=50'
0 50' 100'
GROUTING SECTION
2 SCALE: 3/8"=1'0"
0 2' 4'
(TYPICAL)
STING TOEWALL CAST AGAINST WEATHERED ROCK
z
y
�
N
L
J_
0
M
0 ()f
Q
n
o
N
N
r
Q
❑
Q
Z
o
W �'
LL]
Q
W0Q
U
Z
Q
w
W
Q
J
W
Z
�
LL
0
vJ
LU
Q
p
n
Z
J
LL]
Q
Y
Z
0
m Y
ZW
Z
Z
U
f
Y
W
N
J
L.L
LL
o
LU
o:
0-
m
Z Z
o
}
U)
m
U
z Y
=
C
LU
LU
O
o
C
E
W
0
waft
0 o
d
�
d
_
U �
Z
a
(0
Q'
rn
c
LU
=
ON
° U
CO
^'^S BENEATH EXISTING SPILLWAY
PHOTO OF AREA TO BE GROUTED
SCALE: 1/4"=1'0"
0 4' 8'
-1IP AWAY PROTRUDING NOTES
DNCRETE, AND/OR SPACE FORM 1. SEE SECTION 03 60 00 GROUTING OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR GROUT SPECIFICATIONS.
ITH COMPRESSIBLE MATERIAL.
2. START INJECTING AT HOLE #1 WHILE ALLOWING GROUT AND AIR TO VENT FROM HOLES 2-7.
2 -INCH DIA. GROUT
OUTLET WITH VALVE 3. CLOSE VALVE AT VENT HOLES IF GROUT FLOWS FROM VENT.
(TYPICAL)
4. STOP INJECTING GROUT WHEN PRESSURE AT NIPPLE EXCEEDS 10 PSI OR WHEN GROUT IS
OBSERVED FLOWING FROM ALL OPEN HOLES/VENTS.
IPORARY BULKHEAD
5. START INJECTING GROUT AT NEXT HOLE IN SEQUENCE UNTIL REACHING MAX INJECTION PRESSURE
OR GROUT RETURNS FROM ALL HOLES
6. REPEAT INJECTION SEQUENCE AT SUBSEQUENT HOLES AS NEEDED.
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
i
Lu
W
}
U
Z
W
O
Q
O
LL
❑
W
W
Z
O
a
U
U)
w
W
of
m
J_
0
M
0 ()f
Q
0
Y U
Q
Z
o
W �'
LL]
Q
W0Q
U
Z
3 W
w
W
Q
J
W
Z
�
LL
0
vJ
LU
Q
p
Z
W
J
Z
J
LL]
Q
Y
Z
Z
O
m Y
ZW
Z
Z
U
f
Y
W
o
J
L.L
LL
o
LU
o:
0-
Z Z
o
}
U)
m
U
z Y
=
LU
LU
O
o
Z
E
0
waft
0 o
�
d
_
U �
Z
Q'
rn
c
LU
=
ON
° U
wLu
aN
N
Z
Lu m
r
UI
W
ZZdN
Z
�5 Lu>
(O
ZULU
❑ M
LU
Z
U LL
J W
Lu
03
Q J
m
Z
_
�4
U
ON
U
Q(6
r Cl)
r M
U)
J_
Q
Q
Q
Z
w
D
0 =
0
Q
W0Q
Z
3 W
U
Q
J
Z
LL
0
Z
J
Lug=
C)
Q
W
Q
Z
Z
Z
Z
O�/
L.L
in
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
S-03
SHEET
12 OF 16

AS SPECIFIED
ON DRAWINGS
WATERSTOP 6 -IN RIBBED PVC
WITH CENTER BULB AS SPECIFIED
CARRY ALL VERTICAL
STEEL THROUGH JOINT
ROUGHENED JOINT 1/4 -IN
(SEE SPECIFICATIONS)
EXPOSED FACE OF WALL
24 -IN WIDE STRIP
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
WHERE WALL IS BACKFILLED
SEALANT WHERE WALL WITH SOIL
V� IS BACKFILLED WITH SOIL
AS SPECIFIED
ON DRAWINGS
24 IN WIDE STRIP • a
• NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE
(WHERE WALL IS BACKFILLED
• ��Ai WITH SOIL) AS SPECIFIED a C
ON DRAWINGS
•
KFILLED FACE OF WALL
HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT (CJ) IN WALLS
NOT TO SCALE
AVOID CUTTING MAIN BARS FOR
SEE NOTE 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN PENETRATIONS.
ADJUST SPACING OF MAIN BARS BY
1 -INCH MAXIMUM TO CLEAR PIPE.
2'-0" TYP
TOP OF FOOTING
PROVIDE BENT BARS
IF NECESSARY
NOTE: FOR PIPE OPENINGS LARGER THAN 6" DIAMETER,
ADD VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL BARS TO COMPENSATE
FOR CUT BARS OF MAIN REINFORCEMENT AND ADD
DIAGONAL BARS AS SHOWN EACH FACE OF WALL.
PIPE OUTLET REINFORCEMENT
NOT TO SCALE
3/4 -IN CHAMFE
SEALANT WHERE WALL
IS BACKFILLED WITH SOIL
ENTIRE FACE PAINTED WITH
BOND BREAKER
WATERSTOP 6 -IN RIBBED
PVC WITH CENTER BULB
a
3/4 -IN x 24 -IN SMOOTH
DOWEL 12 -IN OC,
GREASED ON ONE SIDE
/ INSIDE FACE OF SIDEWALLS
2"
TYP
DO NOT CARRY HORIZONTAL
STEEL THROUGH JOINT
CONTRACTION JOINT (CRJ) IN WALLS - PLAN
AS SPECIFIED
ON DRAWINGS
FOOTING/SLAB,
INTENTIONALLY ROUGHEN I II
BELOW WALL I II
1/2 -IN CLEARANCE
MIN
BOTTOM OF FOOTING ° °
°
AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGSA
3 -IN CLEARANCE
D a
a
° 4 a
4 4
4
a
NOT TO SCALE
WATERSTOP, CONTINUOUS ALONG
VERTICAL FACE OF STEPPED SECTIONS
24 -IN WIDE STRIP NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE (WHERE CONCRETE
�A IS BACKFILLED WITH SOIL)
3 -IN CLEARANCE
° a °
°
a
a
a° n
FOOTINGS
CONSTRUCTION JOINT (CJ) AT WALL BASE - SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL NOTES FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE:
a
TOP
OTHER
9.
JOINTS
1. EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THESE GENERAL NOTES SHALL APPLY TO THE CONCRETE STRUCTURES.
#4
14
a
°
�
4
2. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO THE CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
J
°
CONCRETE STRUCTURES, ACI 350-06.
#7
a
24
#8
a
3. STRUCTURAL DESIGN IS BASED UPON CONCRETE WITH A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4500 PSI AT 28 DAYS AND
#9
44
D
#10
c. 6 -IN WATERSTOPS REQUIRED ON ALL CONCRETE CONTRACTION JOINTS AND CONSTRUCTION JOINTS UNLESS
42
#11
a
BOTTOM OF FOOTING ° °
°
AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGSA
3 -IN CLEARANCE
D a
a
° 4 a
4 4
4
a
NOT TO SCALE
WATERSTOP, CONTINUOUS ALONG
VERTICAL FACE OF STEPPED SECTIONS
24 -IN WIDE STRIP NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE (WHERE CONCRETE
�A IS BACKFILLED WITH SOIL)
3 -IN CLEARANCE
° a °
°
a
a
a° n
FOOTINGS
CONSTRUCTION JOINT (CJ) AT WALL BASE - SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL NOTES FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE:
BAR
SIZE
TOP
OTHER
9.
JOINTS
1. EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THESE GENERAL NOTES SHALL APPLY TO THE CONCRETE STRUCTURES.
#4
14
12
#5
a. CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, IDENTIFIED CJ, SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
2. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO THE CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
#6
21
CONCRETE STRUCTURES, ACI 350-06.
#7
b. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS OR RELOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION JOINTS MAY BE USED SUBJECT TO
24
#8
APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.
3. STRUCTURAL DESIGN IS BASED UPON CONCRETE WITH A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4500 PSI AT 28 DAYS AND
#9
44
REINFORCEMENT WITH A MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH OF 60,000 PSI.
#10
c. 6 -IN WATERSTOPS REQUIRED ON ALL CONCRETE CONTRACTION JOINTS AND CONSTRUCTION JOINTS UNLESS
42
#11
OTHERWISE SHOWN.
4. CONCRETE TESTING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS: C31, C39, C138, C143, C172,
#8
13
C173, AND C231.
4
d. CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, HOWEVER, HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN THE
#9
15
RETAINING WALLS MAY BE OMITTED PROVIDED THAT THE MAXIMUM THICKNESS OF THE SECTION OF WALL TO BE
5. FOR REINFORCING STEEL:
9.5
PLACED IS LESS THAN 24 -IN AND A SUPERPLASTICIZER, ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER IN QUALITY AND IN BATCHING
16
15.5
AMOUNT, IS USED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, HOWEVER, MAY A SECTION OF WALL BE PLACED HIGHER THAN 12
a. FOR MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT (EMBEDMENT) AND LAPPED SPLICE LENGTH, SEE TABLES ON THIS DRAWING.
#11
FEET DURING ANY ONE PLACEMENT UNLESS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.
b. VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CONTINUED ITS DEVELOPMENT (EMBEDMENT) LENGTH INTO THE BASE
10.
ABBREVIATIONS
ADJOINING SECTION.
Z
2
m
U
BF = BOTTOM FACE EW = EACH WAY OH = OPPOSITE HAND
c. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE DRILLED AND EPDXY GROUTED INTO THE CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
U)
BOT = BOTTOM FF = FAR FACE SD = SMOOTH DOWEL
MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS ONLY AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. DOWELS SHALL BE
CJ = CONSTRUCTION JOINT FS = FAR SIDE SPA = SPACE OR SPACES
INSTALLED IN CLEAN, DRY HOLES.
0
CL = CENTERLINE FTG = FOOTING SS = STAINLESS STEEL
CLR = CLEAR GALV = GALVANIZED T&B = TOP AND BOTTOM
d. REINFORCEMENT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 20'-0" BETWEEN SPLICES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
W
CONT = CONTINUOUS GR = GRADE TF = TOP FACE
CRJ = CONTRACTION JOINT HORIZ = HORIZONTAL TW = TAILWATER
e. SPLICES SHALL NOT CROSS CONSTRUCTION JOINT OR CONTRACTION JOINT.
U
CTJ = CONTROL JOINT HW = HEADWATER TYP = TYPICAL
CTR = CENTER OR CENTERS MIN = MINIMUM LION = UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
6. FOR DOWEL BARS:
0
EF = EACH FACE NF = NEAR FACE UV = UNIFORMLY VARYING
EJ = EXPANSION JOINT NS = NEAR SIDE VERT = VERTICAL
a. PLAIN DOWEL BARS SHALL BE 2 -FT LONG AND 3/4 -IN DIAMETER SMOOTH STEEL. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
EL = ELEVATION OC = ON CENTER WP = WORKING POINT
MATERIAL.
ES = EQUALLY SPACED, EACH SIDE OCJ = OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT WS = WATER STOP
b. ONE-HALF OF EACH DOWEL BAR SHALL BE COATED WITH HEAVY GREASE TO PREVENT BOND WITH CONCRETE.
11.
EMBEDDED MATERIALS
C. DOWELS SHALL BE KEPT IN STRAIGHT ALIGNMENT, IN THE ORIENTATION SHOWN, DURING AND SUBSEQUENT
TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT.
BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN THAT ALL EMBEDDED ITEMS ARE IN POSITION AND SECURELY
FASTENED IN PLACE. ANCHOR BOLT LOCATION AND SETTING ARE SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL STEEL, MISCELLANEOUS
d. DOWELS SHALL BE PLACED NO CLOSER THAN 12 INCHES FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ANY JOINTS.
METAL, CONCRETE, AND EQUIPMENT DRAWINGS. CONDUITS AND GROUNDING CABLES ARE SHOWN ON THE
MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS. ALUMINUM EMBEDMENTS OF ANY KIND ARE NOT PERMITTED. ALL PROJECTING
7. FOR CHAMFERS:
WATERSTOPS SHALL BE SUPPORTED AND PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE AND EXPOSURE.
a. CHAMFER ALL OTHER EXPOSED CORNERS 3/4 -IN UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR DESIGNATED.
12.
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE CALLED OUT ON THIS SHEET REFERS TO NON -WOVEN, POLYETHYLENE FIBER GEOTEXTILE.
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE PLACED ON SOIL SIDE OF EVERY CONTRACTION JOINT AND CONSTRUCTION JOINT.
8. CUT OR BEND STEEL REINFORCING BARS AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL DRAINPIPES.
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SHALL EXTEND 1 -FT MINIMUM ON EITHER SIDE OF JOINT.
1/4"
1
PRIMER
BOND BREAK TAPE
1/2"
`JOINT
3 SEALANT DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
1/2 -IN ID AND
1 -IN OD
HEAD PRESSURE = 125 FT
4 TYP 6" PVC WATERSTOP
NOT TO SCALE
1'-6"
LONGITUDINAL CONTRACTION JOINT (CRJ) IN SLABS - SECTION
MINIMUM REINF. BAR
DEVELOPMENT LENGTH
(IN)
BAR
SIZE
TOP
OTHER
#3
12
12
#4
14
12
#5
18
14
#6
21
17
#7
31
24
#8
35
27
#9
44
34
#10
54
42
#11
65
50
MINIMUM REINF. BAR LAP
SPLICE LENGTH (IN)
BAR
SIZE
TOP
OTHER
#3
14
12
#4
19
14
#5
23
18
#6
28
21
#7
40
31
#8
46
35
#9
57
44
#10
70
54
#11
84
65
MINIMUM END HOOK
DEVELOPMENT LENGTH (IN)*
BAR
SIZE
Ldh
Q
Z
D
#3
6
4.5
2.5
2.25
#4
7
6
2.5
3
#5
8
7.5
2.5
3.75
#6
10
9
3
4.5
#7
11
10.5
3.5
5.25
#8
13
12
4
6
#9
15
13.5
4.5
9.5
#10
16
15.5
5.5
11
#11
18
17
6
12
T
I
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES: * SIDE COVER MUST BE > 2 -IN
* END COVER MUST BE >-2-IN
1. TABULATED VALUES ARE BASED ON UNCOATED GRADE 60 REBAR AND CONCRETE WITH SPECIFIED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND 2"
MINIMUM COVER.
2. TENSION DEVELOPMENT LENGTHS AND TENSION LAP SPLICE LENGTHS ARE CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 12.2.3 AND 12.15,
RESPECTIVELY.
3. LAP SPLICE LENGTHS ARE MULTIPLES OF TENSION DEVELOPMENT LENGTHS; CLASS A=1.0*Id AND CLASS B=1.3*Id (ACI 12.15.1).
4. BAR CENTER -TO -CENTER SPACING WAS ASSUMED TO BE GREATER THAN TWICE THE CONCRETE COVER PLUS ONE BAR DIAMETER,
SO THAT "c" WAS GOVERNED BY CONCRETE COVER RATHER THAN BY BAR SPACING. THEREFORE TABULATED VALUES ARE NOT
APPLICABLE FOR CENTER -TO -CENTER BAR SPACING LESS THAN 6".
5. TOP BARS ARE HORIZONTAL BARS WITH MORE THAN 12 INCHES OF CONCRETE CAST BELOW THE BARS.
(-) STANDARD DEVELOPMENT, LAP SPLICE AND HOOK LENGTHS
r.
�
E
a
W
0
U
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
oN
N
w
Q
D
a
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
Q
a
W
CN 0
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
U
a
p
° U
U
") N
U N
LU
U
��
C Z
Z �
C:00
J
Q
�Lu
m
<0Z
ILLY
Lu
ca
0
PLANNING/ZONING
r-
>N
Z
pw
Z (n
'
Cl)
D M
W
LU Z
U
N
m
J W
w U
c (o
Z
Z
2
m
U
ON
U)
a6
r CO
� M
m
0
W
U
0
m
o �
y U
W^
U n
vJ
W
W
m
Y
z 1'
Y Y
J
W
2
Q
co
0 Y
U)
W Y
CU)
O
W
0
W
p
Z
0
w a
Lu
w
} w
U
Z
LU
(D
a
0
w
0
w
CO
U)
o w
U)
E
a
W
0
U
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
UtiS Ick
O
Z
Z
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
Q
a
W
CN 0
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
U
W
p
° U
U
") N
U N
LU
U
��
C Z
Z �
C:00
J
Q
�Lu
m
<0Z
ILLY
Lu
ca
VZZ
PLANNING/ZONING
r-
>N
Z
pw
Z (n
'
Cl)
D M
W
LU Z
U
LU
Q
J W
w U
c (o
Z
Z
2
m
U
ON
U)
a6
r CO
� M
0
U)
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
a
W
� pF RALE'
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
UtiS Ick
2i
Q
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
Q
Z
W
CN 0
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
J
Z
LU
U
w
W 0
CD
()
_jQ�
J
� �
J
Q
W
<0Z
ILLY
PUBLIC UTILITIES
O
DRAWING NO.
PLANNING/ZONING
S-04
FIRE
W
�_ =
SHEET
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
a
LU
Q
U
D
Z
Z
Z
W
0
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
� pF RALE'
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
UtiS Ick
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
CN 0
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
DRAWING NO.
PLANNING/ZONING
S-04
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SHEET
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
13 OF 43

� ss
� ss �
� ss �
� ss
SS
X �
�X
PS ® TS
I v
,
DOWNSTREAM
COFFERDAM TOP EL 240.0'
CONTRACTOR TO PUMP STANDING WATER FROM LOW-LYING AREA
THROUGH A SEDIMENT BAG BEFORE DISCHARGING
RUNOFF OUTSIDE EXCAVATION LIMITS.
�`�A' L(i�LL�l �► vvl I L_1 \vrvvi
INSTALL AFTER EXCAVATION
INSTALL CHAIN-LINK GATE
ACROSS ROAD, MATCH AND
TIE INTO EXISTING FENCING
Z
O
Lu r
Lu o_
W O
of
W
0
U
Z
W
c�
a
O
1
0
W
D
U)
W
o w
y
co
co
O
Cl)
O
V
O
"O
W
LU
U
W
U)
w
o
Z
W
J
W
Z
O
Z Y
(n
<
Y
W
W
0
J
W
�
w
o_
D
z
0
}
m
Y
``^^
vJ
U
LU
LU
LU
O
0
Z
E
Z
U
a
N
Z
Z
LU
_
O
O U
LU
N
W
O N
Cn
Z
C
of COID
V0
W�
Z Z
�r
> N
Z
0 L
rm
Z cn
O M
LU
LU Z
W
J W
O
LO
ZY
°P
2
m �
L)
O N
U)
a co
r M
r M
\ i I SILT FENCE OUTLET�—
V (TYPICAL)
CHAIN-LINK GATE ACROSS ROAD
10 \ / / W Z
�S / I LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE W
i> vv v � Z
/cz�i L J
'd �� \ w cD W
`� ✓� \\ ` 3: Lu Cn
1 0_z J
INSTALL ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY \ \ \ Y < O O
of
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WHERE 1 \ W O Z
GRAVEL ROAD MEETS PAVED PARKING \ \ Q O Z Q
AREA (OFF PAGE) v \ V I 0- >_ -
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WO_ O
\ SCALE: 1"=30' J
\ \ 0 30' 60' Z of v J
0
Z ry
LEGEND W
0
PROPOSED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE:
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY AND PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH THE REQUIRED
SUBMITTALS FOR APPROVAL AT LEAST 7 DAYS PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION TO THE SITE.
2. HOLD PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO STARTING
CONSTRUCTION.
3. FLAG LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. CALL NORTH CAROLINA 811 TO MARK UTILITIES.
4. INSTALL ALL PUBLIC SAFETY MEASURES (DESIGN BY OTHERS), INCLUDING TRAFFIC
SIGNAGE AND CHAIN-LINK GATES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DAM
5. INSTALL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES:
a. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES
b. CONSTRUCTION ROAD STABILIZATION (IF APPLICABLE)
C. SEDIMENT FENCE WITH STONE OUTLETS
6. CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM COFFERDAMS.
7. INSTALL PROPOSED STILLING BASIN DOWNSTREAM OF THE SPILLWAY
8. INSTALL ACB BLOCKS ON UPSTREAM SLOPE.
9. GRADE SITE TO FINAL ELEVATIONS, AND PERMANENTLY MULCH AND SEED.
10. ONCE THE SITE AND STAGING AREAS ARE STABILIZED REMOVE ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES.
11. UPON NCDEQ APPROVAL CLOSE LOW LEVEL DRAIN GATE AND BEGIN IMPOUNDING.
KIInTGc
1. TEMPORARY SEED BELOW THE ARTICULATED CONCRETE BLOCKS AFTER THERE
INSTALLATION TO PROTECT SLOPE PRIOR TO RE -FILLING THE RESERVOIR.
6.02 LAND GRADING
6.06 TEMPORARY GRAVEL
CONSTRUCTION ENTER/EXIT
CW CONCRETE WASH OUT
TS 6.10 TEMPORARY SEEDING
PS 6.11 PERMANENT SEEDING
0
6.14 MULCHING
6.62 SEDIMENT FENCE
x 6.62 TREE PROTECTION/SEDIMENT FENCE
CRS — 6.80 CONSTRUCTION ROAD
STABILIZATION
C 6.84 DUST CONTROL
AREA TO BE SEEDED WITH NC
PIEDMONT MEADOW MIX
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
CN 0
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
E-01
SHEET
14 OF 16

50' MIN.
BUT SUFFICIENT TO KEEP
SEDIMENT ON SITE
0o O o0 0 0 000 0 00000 00 00
Oo 0000 O0000000�0000 0o OooO<
0 0 000000000 00 0 0000 opo 00
0 00 0 o O 000c
000 000
o O�
EXISTING o O 2" - 3" STONE TO BE USED o0
ROADWAY 000 ( SURGE STONE OR o
00 o RAILROAD BALAST) 0 0
000 0 o C)
000000 00 00000o
00000000000000000 00 00000
0o O
o�o0 0000000n0o0or,oCD-'�oc
NOTES:
1. PUT SILT FENCE OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE UP
TO ENSURE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS USED.
EXISTING ROADWAY 35' MIN.
6"MIN. 00 0 00 0 0 0 000 000 00 0000 00 0 00 0000
° O O 000 000 0 0 0 0000000000 0 00000`
— FABRIC UNDER STONE
CROSS SECTION
NEW CONSTRUCTION
15' MIN. —
00 00000000000 0
00 00 � 00000 OO
0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 000 112" MIN.
DO 000 O 00 00 000 �O
� 000000o0000p0000 0
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
FILTER BAG NOTE:
1. USE FILTER BAGS AS NECESSARY TO TREAT WATER PUMPED FROM EXCAVATION.
2. PLACE FILTER BAGS IN WELL VEGETATED AREAS UPSTREAM OF ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES SUCH AS SEDIMENT TRAPS.
M 1 C+ 1- 1 I A M i-+ r I Ill C+ r-
WELL
PLAN VIEW
DISCHARGE HOSE
WELL VEGETATED, GRASSY AREA
r1 • ffIr.w■
IIV 1lll XL- 1 IVVL
MENTA
PUMP '
INTAKE HOSE
SEDIMENT FILTER BAG DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL SEEDING NOTES:
1. IF WORK IN DISTURBED AREAS STOPS FOR MORE THAN 7 WORKING DAYS ON THE DAM SLOPES OR 14 WORKING DAYS ON
THE DAM CREST, TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED TO STABILIZE THE AREA.
2. COMPLETE GRADING BEFORE PREPARING SEEDBEDS, AND INSTALL ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES SUCH
AS, DIKES, WATERWAYS, AND BASINS. MINIMIZE STEEP SLOPES BECAUSE THEY MAKE SEEDBED PREPARATION DIFFICULT
AND INCREASE THE EROSION HAZARD.
3. TILL OR DISC THE PREPARED AREAS TO BE SEEDED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF FOUR (4) INCHES. REMOVE ALL STONES
LARGER THAN THREE (3) INCHES ON ANY SIDE, STICKS, ROOTS, AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS AT THE SURFACE
DURING THE BED PREPARATION.
4. RECOMPACT THE AREA USING A CULTIPACKER ROLLER. THE FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE A SMOOTH, EVEN SOIL SURFACE
WITH A LOOSE, UNIFORMLY FINE TEXTURE. ALL RIDGES AND DEPRESSIONS SHALL BE REMOVED AND FILLED TO PROVIDE
THE APPROVED SURFACE DRAINAGE. SEEDING OF GRADED AREAS IS TO BE DONE IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINISHED GRADES
ARE OBTAINED AND SEEDBED PREPARATION IS COMPLETED
5. REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE AND MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING REPAIR OF
EROSION DAMAGE.
TEMPORARY SEEDING:
LIME: BASED ON SOIL TEST OR 1 TO 1.5 TONS/ACRE ON COARSE TEXTURED SOILS OR 2-3 TONS ON FINE -TEXTURED SOILS.
APPLY LIMESTONE UNIFORMLY AND INCORPORATE INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. SOILS WITH A PH OF 6 OR HIGHER
NEED NOT BE LIMED.
FERTILIZER: BASED ON SOIL TESTS. APPLY 10-10-10 GRADE FERTILIZER AT 700-1000 LBS/ACRE AND INCORPORATE INTO
THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. IF A HYDRAULIC SEEDER IS USED, DO NOT MIX SEED AND FERTILIZER MORE THAN 30
MINUTES BEFORE APPLICATION.
MULCH: MULCH SHALL BE CLEAN STRAW AT 4000LBS/ACRE STRAW. ANCHORED WITH TACKING AGENT APPROVED BY
CONTRACTOR. APPROVED METHODS ARE ASPHALT, NETTING, OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET
NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS AN ANCHORING TOOL.
LATE WINTER AND EARLY SPRING DATES: SEED TYPES:
SEEDING RATE:
MOUNTAINS (> 2500 FT) FEB 15 -MAY 15 RYE GRAIN 120 LBS/AC
MOUNTAINS (< 2500 FT) FEB 1 -MAY 1 ANNUAL LESPEDEZA* 50 LBS/AC
PIEDMONT JAN 1 - MAY 1
COASTAL PLAIN DEC 1 -APR 15
SUMMER DATES: SEED TYPES:
MOUNTAINS MAY 15 -AUG 15 GERMAN MILLET
PIEDMONT MAY 1 -AUG 15
COASTAL PLAIN APR 15 -AUG 15
FALL DATES: SEED TYPES:
MOUNTAINS AUG 15 - DEC 15 RYE (GRAIN)
PIEDMONT AUG 15- DEC 30
COASTAL PLAIN AUG 15- DEC 30
*KOBE IN PIEDMONT AND COASTAL PLAIN, KOREAN IN MOUNTAINS
MAINTENANCE
SEEDING RATE:
40 LBS/AC
SEEDING RATE:
120 LBS/AC
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED AND MULCH AREAS WHERE SEEDLING EMERGENCE IS POOR,
OR WHERE EROSION OCCURS, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. DO NOT MOW. PROTECT FROM TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
PERMANENT SEEDING:
PREPARATION FOR PRIMARY/PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK WITHIN THE
PREPARATION AREA IS COMPLETE.
AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITH NC PIEDMONT MEADOW MIX
SOIL PREP: APPLY LIME IF THE pH IS BELOW 5.5. ALUMINUM SULFATE MAY BE ADDED IF pH EXCEEDS 7.5. DO NO APPLY
NITROGEN. ADD PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM AS DICTATED BY A SOIL TEST.
FERTILIZER: APPLY 2 -INCH OF WELL DECOMPOSED COMPOST TO THE SITE FOLLOWED BY ROTOTILLING TO A DEPTH OF
6 -INCHES.
SEED TYPES: (NC PIEDMONT MEADOW SEED MIX, ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS INC.) 40% LITTLE BLUESTEM, 10% BEAKED
PANICGRASS, 10% VIRGINIA WILDRYE, 6% BLACKEYED SUSAN, 4% SLENDER LESPEDEZA, 4% PINKSCALE
BLAZING STAR, 3% WILD QUININE*, 3% SPIKED WILD INDIGO, 4% SENSITIVE PEA, 1.5% ORANGE
CONEFLOWER, 6% ZIGZAG SPIDERWORT, 2.5% LICORICE SCENTED GOLDENROD*, 1 % WHORLED TICKSEED,
3% BUTTERFLY MILKWEED, 2% SPOTTED JOE PYE WEED*. * - SUBJECT TO HARVEST
SEEDING RATE: 20LB PER ACRE
OTHER AREAS
LIME: APPLY 2 TONS/ACRE OF LIMESTONE UNIFORMLY AND INCORPORATE INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. SOILS WITH
A PH OF 6 OR HIGHER NEED NOT BE LIMED.
FERTILIZER: APPLY 10-20-20 GRADE FERTILIZER AT 20 LBS PER 1000 SF AND INCORPORATE INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF
SEED TYPES: SEEDING DATES: SEEDING RATES:
(POUNDS/ACRE)
TALL FESCUE SEP 1 - APR 15 100-200
GERMAN MILLET MAY 15- AUG 15 10
RYE (GRAIN) AUG 15 - APR 15 40
MULCH AND MATTING:
TYPE AND RATE OF MULCH: CLEAN STRAW AT 4000 LBS/ACRE STRAW
METHOD OF ANCHORING:
ANCHORED WITH TACKING AGENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. METHODS ARE ASPHALT, NETTING, OR A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS AN ANCHORING TOOL.
GENERAL AND TEMPORARY SEEDING & MULCHING NOTES
SUMMARY OF DISTURBED AREAS
2. IF CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITES ARE SUCH THAT
AREA (AQ
THE MUD IS NOT REMOVED BY THE VEHICLE TRAVELING
25' OR FULL WIDTH
PROPOSED STAGING AREA
0.50
OVER THE STONE, THEN THE TIRES OF THE
OF PROPOSED STREET
NONE
AND SLOPES
VEHICLE MUST BE WASHED BEFORE ENTERING THE
OR ENTRANCE,
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW) ZONES
7 DAYS
PUBLIC ROAD.
WHICHEVER IS
7 DAYS
GREATER.
W
LU
3. IF A PROJECT CONTINUES TO PULL MUD AND DEBRIS
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
ON TO THE PUBLIC ROAD, THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY
7 -DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50 FEET IN LENGTH
WILL CLEAN THE AREA AND INVOICE THE FINANCIALLY
14 DAYS
RESPONSIBLE PERSON AS INDICATED ON THE FINANCIAL
FLATTER THAN 4:1
RESPONSIBILITY FORM.
EXISTING ROADWAY 35' MIN.
6"MIN. 00 0 00 0 0 0 000 000 00 0000 00 0 00 0000
° O O 000 000 0 0 0 0000000000 0 00000`
— FABRIC UNDER STONE
CROSS SECTION
NEW CONSTRUCTION
15' MIN. —
00 00000000000 0
00 00 � 00000 OO
0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 000 112" MIN.
DO 000 O 00 00 000 �O
� 000000o0000p0000 0
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
FILTER BAG NOTE:
1. USE FILTER BAGS AS NECESSARY TO TREAT WATER PUMPED FROM EXCAVATION.
2. PLACE FILTER BAGS IN WELL VEGETATED AREAS UPSTREAM OF ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES SUCH AS SEDIMENT TRAPS.
M 1 C+ 1- 1 I A M i-+ r I Ill C+ r-
WELL
PLAN VIEW
DISCHARGE HOSE
WELL VEGETATED, GRASSY AREA
r1 • ffIr.w■
IIV 1lll XL- 1 IVVL
MENTA
PUMP '
INTAKE HOSE
SEDIMENT FILTER BAG DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL SEEDING NOTES:
1. IF WORK IN DISTURBED AREAS STOPS FOR MORE THAN 7 WORKING DAYS ON THE DAM SLOPES OR 14 WORKING DAYS ON
THE DAM CREST, TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED TO STABILIZE THE AREA.
2. COMPLETE GRADING BEFORE PREPARING SEEDBEDS, AND INSTALL ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES SUCH
AS, DIKES, WATERWAYS, AND BASINS. MINIMIZE STEEP SLOPES BECAUSE THEY MAKE SEEDBED PREPARATION DIFFICULT
AND INCREASE THE EROSION HAZARD.
3. TILL OR DISC THE PREPARED AREAS TO BE SEEDED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF FOUR (4) INCHES. REMOVE ALL STONES
LARGER THAN THREE (3) INCHES ON ANY SIDE, STICKS, ROOTS, AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS AT THE SURFACE
DURING THE BED PREPARATION.
4. RECOMPACT THE AREA USING A CULTIPACKER ROLLER. THE FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE A SMOOTH, EVEN SOIL SURFACE
WITH A LOOSE, UNIFORMLY FINE TEXTURE. ALL RIDGES AND DEPRESSIONS SHALL BE REMOVED AND FILLED TO PROVIDE
THE APPROVED SURFACE DRAINAGE. SEEDING OF GRADED AREAS IS TO BE DONE IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINISHED GRADES
ARE OBTAINED AND SEEDBED PREPARATION IS COMPLETED
5. REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE AND MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING REPAIR OF
EROSION DAMAGE.
TEMPORARY SEEDING:
LIME: BASED ON SOIL TEST OR 1 TO 1.5 TONS/ACRE ON COARSE TEXTURED SOILS OR 2-3 TONS ON FINE -TEXTURED SOILS.
APPLY LIMESTONE UNIFORMLY AND INCORPORATE INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. SOILS WITH A PH OF 6 OR HIGHER
NEED NOT BE LIMED.
FERTILIZER: BASED ON SOIL TESTS. APPLY 10-10-10 GRADE FERTILIZER AT 700-1000 LBS/ACRE AND INCORPORATE INTO
THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. IF A HYDRAULIC SEEDER IS USED, DO NOT MIX SEED AND FERTILIZER MORE THAN 30
MINUTES BEFORE APPLICATION.
MULCH: MULCH SHALL BE CLEAN STRAW AT 4000LBS/ACRE STRAW. ANCHORED WITH TACKING AGENT APPROVED BY
CONTRACTOR. APPROVED METHODS ARE ASPHALT, NETTING, OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET
NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS AN ANCHORING TOOL.
LATE WINTER AND EARLY SPRING DATES: SEED TYPES:
SEEDING RATE:
MOUNTAINS (> 2500 FT) FEB 15 -MAY 15 RYE GRAIN 120 LBS/AC
MOUNTAINS (< 2500 FT) FEB 1 -MAY 1 ANNUAL LESPEDEZA* 50 LBS/AC
PIEDMONT JAN 1 - MAY 1
COASTAL PLAIN DEC 1 -APR 15
SUMMER DATES: SEED TYPES:
MOUNTAINS MAY 15 -AUG 15 GERMAN MILLET
PIEDMONT MAY 1 -AUG 15
COASTAL PLAIN APR 15 -AUG 15
FALL DATES: SEED TYPES:
MOUNTAINS AUG 15 - DEC 15 RYE (GRAIN)
PIEDMONT AUG 15- DEC 30
COASTAL PLAIN AUG 15- DEC 30
*KOBE IN PIEDMONT AND COASTAL PLAIN, KOREAN IN MOUNTAINS
MAINTENANCE
SEEDING RATE:
40 LBS/AC
SEEDING RATE:
120 LBS/AC
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED AND MULCH AREAS WHERE SEEDLING EMERGENCE IS POOR,
OR WHERE EROSION OCCURS, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. DO NOT MOW. PROTECT FROM TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
PERMANENT SEEDING:
PREPARATION FOR PRIMARY/PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK WITHIN THE
PREPARATION AREA IS COMPLETE.
AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITH NC PIEDMONT MEADOW MIX
SOIL PREP: APPLY LIME IF THE pH IS BELOW 5.5. ALUMINUM SULFATE MAY BE ADDED IF pH EXCEEDS 7.5. DO NO APPLY
NITROGEN. ADD PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM AS DICTATED BY A SOIL TEST.
FERTILIZER: APPLY 2 -INCH OF WELL DECOMPOSED COMPOST TO THE SITE FOLLOWED BY ROTOTILLING TO A DEPTH OF
6 -INCHES.
SEED TYPES: (NC PIEDMONT MEADOW SEED MIX, ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS INC.) 40% LITTLE BLUESTEM, 10% BEAKED
PANICGRASS, 10% VIRGINIA WILDRYE, 6% BLACKEYED SUSAN, 4% SLENDER LESPEDEZA, 4% PINKSCALE
BLAZING STAR, 3% WILD QUININE*, 3% SPIKED WILD INDIGO, 4% SENSITIVE PEA, 1.5% ORANGE
CONEFLOWER, 6% ZIGZAG SPIDERWORT, 2.5% LICORICE SCENTED GOLDENROD*, 1 % WHORLED TICKSEED,
3% BUTTERFLY MILKWEED, 2% SPOTTED JOE PYE WEED*. * - SUBJECT TO HARVEST
SEEDING RATE: 20LB PER ACRE
OTHER AREAS
LIME: APPLY 2 TONS/ACRE OF LIMESTONE UNIFORMLY AND INCORPORATE INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. SOILS WITH
A PH OF 6 OR HIGHER NEED NOT BE LIMED.
FERTILIZER: APPLY 10-20-20 GRADE FERTILIZER AT 20 LBS PER 1000 SF AND INCORPORATE INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF
SEED TYPES: SEEDING DATES: SEEDING RATES:
(POUNDS/ACRE)
TALL FESCUE SEP 1 - APR 15 100-200
GERMAN MILLET MAY 15- AUG 15 10
RYE (GRAIN) AUG 15 - APR 15 40
MULCH AND MATTING:
TYPE AND RATE OF MULCH: CLEAN STRAW AT 4000 LBS/ACRE STRAW
METHOD OF ANCHORING:
ANCHORED WITH TACKING AGENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. METHODS ARE ASPHALT, NETTING, OR A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS AN ANCHORING TOOL.
GENERAL AND TEMPORARY SEEDING & MULCHING NOTES
SUMMARY OF DISTURBED AREAS
DISTURBED AREA
AREA (AQ
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
2.11
PROPOSED STAGING AREA
0.50
TOTAL
2.61
GROUND STABILIZATION TIMELINE REQUIREMENTS
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME EXCEPTIONS
LU
TIME FRAME
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES
7 DAYS
NONE
AND SLOPES
o
Lu o
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW) ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10 -FT OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1,
W
LU
14 DAYS IS ALLOWED.
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 -DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50 FEET IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES
14 DAYS
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HQW ZONES)
FLATTER THAN 4:1
�
W
THIS CHART WAS INTERPRETED FROM STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT- NCG 010000. PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE
FOR EROSION CONTROL WILL REFER TO GENERAL PERMIT - NCG 01000.
NOTIFICATION OF LAND RESOURCES SEDIMENT
AND EROSION CONTROL SELF -INSPECTION
PROGRAM:
a
y
L
m
CD
M
LU
O
N
r
W
�
<
p
(Y
Z
o
Lu o
LU
w
w
U
Z_
J
a
W
LU
O
L
z
�
OQ�
(n
LU
p <
z
w
J
�
W
Qoo
m
Y
W
0
Z
<
Y
0
C0
w
fr U)
Z
J
w
m
J
O
Of
�
LU
0-
O
�Z
Z z
o
}U
m
0
LU Y
2
Z
0U
W
U
LU
o
o
Z
E
Z
U
N�
—
F
U
Z
0
�
LU
rn
O L0
c
OU
LU
U) N
p V7
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN 2006 TO REQUIRE THAT
PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH
PHASE OF THE PROJECT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL PLAN IS BEING FOLLOWED. RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE
INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010. THE SELF -INSPECTION PROGRAM IS SEPARATE
FROM THE WEEKLY SELF-MONITORING PROGRAM OF THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE FOCUS OF THE SELF -INSPECTION REPORT IS THE
INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES
ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN. THE INSPECTIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH
PHASE OF THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCGS 113A-54.1 AND 15A NCAC 4B.0131. THE SELF -INSPECTION REPORT
FORM IS AVAILABLE AS AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET FROM
HTTP://PORTAL.NCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS
THE FORM, PLEASE CONTACT THIS OFFICE AT [phone]..
GENERAL NOTE:
1. THESE SPECIFICATIONS WERE REFERENCED FROM THE NC EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL, REVISED 2013.
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
PLANNING/ZONING
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
Z
O
Lu a-
Lu a-
5; 0�
Lu U
W
0 p
U
Z
Lu
O
O
w
p
W
D
CO
U)
O W
m
CD
M
LU
O
'�T
Y U
Z
o
Lu o
LU
w
w
U
Z_
J
5
`
W
LU
O
L
z
�
OQ�
(n
LU
p <
z
w
J
�
W
Qoo
m
Y
W
Z
O
Z
<
Y
0
C0
w
fr U)
Z
J
w
o
J
O
Of
�
LU
0-
O
�Z
Z z
o
}U
m
0
LU Y
2
Z
0U
U
LU
o
o
Z
E
Z
U
N�
—
F
U
Z
�
LU
rn
O L0
c
OU
LU
U) N
p V7
Z
Z W
� M
� m
aa)i -,
W
'n
l/
V
Z
z
CL) N
�w
Z(n
>�
DM
W
w z
L w
J W
U
WED J
U
m LO
<
m
Z
_
�4
U
ON
Q
CO
r M
CO
a
N
LU
Z
LL
lal�
Q
w
0
Q
Z_
J
5
`
LU
O
W
U)
OQ�
w U
J
Q
�
Q
Qoo
Z
W
a-
Z
Q
0
LU0(D
Z
J
w
O
z
�
Q
O
�Z
w0
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
DRAWING NO.
E-02
SHEET
15 OF 16

MAINTENANCE: CLEAN OUT AT 50% CAPACITY
LIFE OF FENCING: 6-9 MONTHS
MIN. 10 GA.
LINE WIRES
STEEL POST
-WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
CD
N
M
6"
MIN
0
N
SIDE VIEW
FILL SLOPE
GRADE
SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
8' MAX.
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
SILT FENCE FABRIC I
INSTALLED TO SECOND
WIRE FROM TOP I
VIII
FRONT VIEW VIII VIII
_
'911
NOTES:
1. FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
3. SEE N.C. STATE DENR PRACTICE STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS
SEDIMENT FENCE SET FOR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES;
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS & DESIGN CRITERIA.
� STANDARD SILT FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
ao
TREE PROTECTION AREA
M DO NOT ENTER
Q
WARNING SIGN DETAIL
STEEL POST
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
WARNING SIGN
MIN. 10 GA.
LINE WIRES
o N FILL SLOPE
GRADE
-111-111-111-11P-11111-
MIN IIII-lTliii=i J
MIN SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SIDE VIEW
PLASTIC OR
WIRE TIES
MIN. 12-1/2 GA.
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
GRADE
8' MAX.
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
MAINTENANCE: CLEAN OUT AT 50% CAPACITY
LIFE OF FENCING: 6-9 MONTHS
NOTES
PLASTIC OR
Z WIRE TIES
MIN. 12-1 /2 GA.
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
GRADE
1111111'
I
1. WARNING SIGNS TO BE MADE OF DURABLE, WEATHERPROOF MATERIAL.
2. LETTERS TO BE 3" HIGH MINIMUM, CLEARLY LEGIBLE AND SPACED AS DETAILED.
3. PLACE A SIGN AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTION AND 50' ON CENTER THEREAFTER.
4. FOR TREE PROTECTION AREAS LESS THAN 200' IN PERIMETER, PROVIDE NO LESS THAN ONE SIGN PER PROTECTION AREA.
5. ATTACH SIGNS SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS AND FABRIC.
6. MAINTAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT.
7. ADDITIONAL SIGNS MAY BE REQUIRED BY CITY OF RALEIGH INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.
8. FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
9. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
10. SEE N.C. STATE DENR PRACTICE STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS SEDIMENT FENCE SET FOR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES;
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS & DESIGN CRITERIA. (HOWEVER FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALELL WITH THE TOE OF THE FENCE).
TREE PROTECTION SILT FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
STAPLES
(2 PER BALE)
STRAW
BALE
WOOD OR
METAL STAKES
(2 PER BALE)
VARIES
10 MIL
PLASTIC LINING
NATIVE MATERI
F (OPTIONAL)
SECTION B -B
NOT TO SCALE
-s%•
BINDER
E
00-1
Q
0
_
n
C)
N
N
�
Lu
1--
Q
D
ZU
Z
N �
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
a
VA
-
-a%•
-s%•
TREE PROTECTION AREA
DO NOT ENTER
1--0)
W U
LU
=
O
o U
5wcU
�
��2
r
XT
c�
SILT FENCE FABRIC
INSTALLED TO SECOND
WIRE FROM TOP
Lum
M>
X
Lu Z
Ur -
O
W
Z Z
III
III
_III
lu
I_IIII VIII=11111111111111111111=11111111111111111111=11111=11111=11111=111111111111111=11111=11111=11111
111111
=
VIII
FRONT VIEW (IIII
nn
I_II
II
III
=
MAINTENANCE: CLEAN OUT AT 50% CAPACITY
LIFE OF FENCING: 6-9 MONTHS
NOTES
PLASTIC OR
Z WIRE TIES
MIN. 12-1 /2 GA.
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
GRADE
1111111'
I
1. WARNING SIGNS TO BE MADE OF DURABLE, WEATHERPROOF MATERIAL.
2. LETTERS TO BE 3" HIGH MINIMUM, CLEARLY LEGIBLE AND SPACED AS DETAILED.
3. PLACE A SIGN AT EACH END OF LINEAR TREE PROTECTION AND 50' ON CENTER THEREAFTER.
4. FOR TREE PROTECTION AREAS LESS THAN 200' IN PERIMETER, PROVIDE NO LESS THAN ONE SIGN PER PROTECTION AREA.
5. ATTACH SIGNS SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS AND FABRIC.
6. MAINTAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT.
7. ADDITIONAL SIGNS MAY BE REQUIRED BY CITY OF RALEIGH INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.
8. FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
9. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
10. SEE N.C. STATE DENR PRACTICE STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS SEDIMENT FENCE SET FOR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES;
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS & DESIGN CRITERIA. (HOWEVER FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALELL WITH THE TOE OF THE FENCE).
TREE PROTECTION SILT FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
STAPLES
(2 PER BALE)
STRAW
BALE
WOOD OR
METAL STAKES
(2 PER BALE)
VARIES
10 MIL
PLASTIC LINING
NATIVE MATERI
F (OPTIONAL)
SECTION B -B
NOT TO SCALE
-s%•
BINDER
E
00-1
Q
0
_
n
C)
N
N
�
Lu
1--
Q
D
ZU
Z
N �
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
a
VA
-
-a%•
-s%•
TOP OF SILT FI
MUST BE AT LE
ABOVE THE TC
THE WASHED
a
y
�
L
m
E
00-1
Q
0
_
n
C)
N
N
�
Lu
1--
Q
D
ZU
Z
N �
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
a
W
_
a
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
U �
Z�
Q
1--0)
W U
LU
=
O
o U
5wcU
N
O N
N
r
<�
c�
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
Lum
�4
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
Lu Z
Ur -
O
W
Z Z
N
Z
LU C)0
> (O
Z
Z U)D
M
N
m
LU Z
U LL
Z
LU W
O
J
m
2
ZiaQ
Y �
c6
W
O N
�U
M
LU
0
m
U
u FILTER FABRIC >
m
AND HARDWARE o Y
NOTES: STEEL POST SET CLOTH IN TRENCH. 0 Y
1. REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN HALF OF STONE OUTLET IS COVERED. MAX 2' APART MIN LIJ
2. REPLACE STONE AS NEEDED TO ENSURE DEWATERING. 2' INTO SOLID GROUND O
Lu
U Q
STEEL POST W
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC y i
m
Z
HARDWARE CLOTH ¢ Z Y
fr
o J
OooW
FILTER OF #57 0 0
o SECTION VIEW �
WASHED STONE
'Q^
000° 0 o 0 16"MIN 3' FILTER FABRIC APRON co00 0 vJ
0800 000 0o ON GROUND g
0000° 2 Z
oo°o g ° ocb°o°o°000°oo 0 W
0000 0000 0 0000 °
QQ00 0 0000°o�oo° 0 0
6"—
BURY 6" UPPER EDGE OF
BURY WIRE FENCE AND 4" FILTER FABRIC APRON IN TRENCH
HARDWARE CLOTH
u
BINDER
WIRE PLYWOOD
48"X2"
PAINTED WHITE
IUUNUKt I t
WASHOUT
3 SILT FENCE OUTLET
NOT TO SCALE
SANDBAG
_ BLACK LETTERS 10 MIL PLASTIC LINING
6" HEIGHT -� -1 SECTION A -A
3NOT TO SCALE
-III =IIII-II ' BERM
LAG LATH AND
SCREWS FLAGGING ON10' MINIMUM
_ WOOD POST 3 SIDES 0 O O O O SANDBAG
36" 3.5 IX3.5 'IV 8'
IoII= IILIIILIIIE 111IF—ji, 0
36" A
VARIES 0
B CONCRETE WASHOUT
SIGN DETAIL (OR
EQUIVALENT) 0
2"
CD o CD o
J+III 1.12" DIA 10 MIL PLASTIC LINING
8" rlo.#/ STEEL WIRE
M
BERM
PLAN STRAW BALE I SHAPE 10 MIL PLASTIC LINING
10 MIL —/ NOT TO SCALE (TYP) DETAIL
PLASTIC LINING
TYPE "ABOVE GRADE" WITH STRAW BALES
WOOD FRAME SECURELY SECTION B -B
FASTENED AROUND NOT TO SCALE
ENTIRE PERIMETER
NOTES WITH TWO STAKESTWO-STACKED
10' MINIMUM 2X12 ROUGH
1. ACTUAL LAYOUT TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. WOOD FRAME
B B
2. A CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 30' OF
THE TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY. STAKE
VARIES (T P.)
3. MATERIALS USED TO CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONCRETE
WASHOUT FACILITIES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE OF THE
WORK AND DISPOSED OF OR RECYCLED.
4. HOLES, DEPRESSIONS OR OTHER GROUND DISTURBANCE CAUSED
BY THE REMOVAL OF THE TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT PLAN TYPE "ABOVE GROUND"
FACILITIES SHALL BE BACKFILLED, REPAIRED, AND STABILIZED TO 10 MIL PLASTIC LINING NOT TO SCALE WITH WOOD PLANKS
PREVENT EROSION.
4 CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAIL
NTS
GENERAL NOTE:
1. THESE SPECIFICATIONS WERE REFERENCED FROM THE NC EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL, REVISED 2013.
Z
O
Lu o
W U
U)
} w
U �
Z
W
C7
Q
O
LL
0
W
W
U)
o W
of
U)
N-
E
00-1
Q
0
_
N
o
ZU
Z
N �
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
a
W
_
a
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
U �
Z�
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
1--0)
W U
LU
=
O
o U
5wcU
N
O N
N
C.LUZO
Z
<�
c�
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
Lum
�4
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
Lu Z
Ur -
UI
W
Z Z
N
Z
LU C)0
> (O
Z
Z U)D
M
LU
LU Z
U LL
Z
LU W
O
J
m
2
ZiaQ
Y �
c6
W
O N
�U
M
U)
N-
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
00-1
Q
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
N
LU
Z
LL
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
Q
W
O
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
Z
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
W U
Q
0
U)
5wcU
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
J_
Q
<�
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
QLL
OO
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
Z
W
0- >-
Z
Q
0
LU C)0
Z
J
SHEET
W
O
Z
W
O
Q
Z
0
W
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF RALEIGH
AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONCURRENT REVIEW APPROVAL
Cwtof
CITY OF RALEIGH - PLANS AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Plans for the proposed use have been reviewed for general compliance with
applicable codes. This limited review, and authorization for construction is not to
be considered to represent total compliance with all legal requirements for
CAROy
development and construction. The property owner, design consultants, and
contractors are each responsible for compliance with all applicable City, State and
Federal laws. This specific authorization below is not a permit, nor shall it be
construed to permit any violation of City, State or Federal Law. All Construction
SCHNABEL P#: 16C21037.00
must be in accordance with all Local, State, and Federal Rules and Regulations
COR P#: SM 2017-0011
TRANSPORTATION FIELD SERVICES
DATE: DECEMBER 2017
PUBLIC UTILITIES
STORMWATER
DRAWING NO.
PLANNING/ZONING
E-03
FIRE
URBAN FORESTRY
SHEET
SITE ACCESSIBILITY
16 OF 16