20171548 Ver 1_401 Application_20180218

-1&
DIAMONDBACK
GCC'.:, T ; ; C
v
Q
January 26th, 2018
2018
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Water Quality Certification Fee PAID
AID
To Whom It May Concern:
Please find attached check to NC Division of Water Resources in the amount of $90.00 for the
remaining balance (Corps Action ID# SAW -2017-02386) from Diamondback Investment Group.
Sincerely,
nnifer Rosenfeld
Executive Administrative Assistant
DIAMONDBACK INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC * 3907 NORTH ELM STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27455

WETLANDS
WATERS
Mr. David Bailey
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: Huffman Point — NWP 14 Verification
3040 B Longpine Road
Burlington, North Carolina, 27215
Mr. Bailey and Ms. Higgins,
R, [2@R0W19D
\0IJ082017,
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
November 2, 2017
Attached please find a Pre -Construction Notification for a Nationwide Permit 14 verification requesting
authorization to construct two road crossings, each separately totaling less than 150 linear feet of
impacts, in order to establish connections to existing public right-of-way. Impacts of 83 linear feet are
requested for the eastern road crossing, and 145 linear feet for the southern road crossing, both of
which are depicted on the enclosed overall grading plan. The road crossings will provide required ingress
and egress to a planned residential subdivision referred to as Huffman Point, and provide internal
circulation necessary for the planned residential subdivision onsite. All roads were designed to support
the Alamance County thoroughfare plan and provide continuity with pre-existing infrastructure on
neighboring property. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NC DWR for the above referenced
impacts.
The project is located 3040 B Longpine Road, Burlington, NC and consists of approximately 49.25 total
acres, 3,300 linear feet of jurisdictional intermittent and perennial surface waters and 0.84 acres of
jurisdictional spring/seep wetlands present onsite. The project is located in the Cape Fear River basin
and drains to Gum Creek.
Project Purpose
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct two road crossings to establish connections to
existing infrastructure and public right-of-way. The road crossings will provide continuity with the
Alamance county thoroughfare plan, and internal circulation and ingress/egress to a planned residential
subdivision on the project site.
Proiect Need
145 Linear feet of impacts to an unnamed, perennial tributary are requested at the southern boundary
of the project site to provide for the primary ingress/egress route to the site from Grand Oaks
Boulevard, and to provide continuity to the pre-existing portion of Longpine Road to connect to Grand
Oaks Boulevard. 83 linear feet of impacts to an unnamed, intermittent tributary are requested at the
eastern boundary of the project site to provide an extension of Cambridge Road into the property, and
to provide another point of ingress/egress for the planned subdivision. All road connections were
designed in consideration of the Alamance County thoroughfare plan, and located to connect to pre-
existing infrastructure in order to maintain continuity and minimize impacts from construction.
CHRISTOPHER HUYSMAN
1 70 DEW DROP ROAD
SPARTA, NC 28675
336.406.0906
[e-mail]
WETLANDS & WATERS, INC.
TAMP BANDY
41 OB LB PROPST DRIVE
CONOVER, NC 2B61 3
B2B.302.3437
[e-mail]

Additionally, the proposed roads and associated road crossings were designed to ease access for
emergency vehicles, and to provide alternative routes for commuters to ease traffic loading along the
major thoroughfare Grand Oaks Boulevard.
Avoidance and Minimization
The project site was designed to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional features wherever
possible. The placement of infrastructure serving the planned community was specifically chosen to
connect to existing infrastructure, and to limit impacts to the two tributaries for the purposes of
constructing the proposed road crossings. The overall site plan for the planned community was designed
to avoid impacts to all wetlands and marginal areas, as well as Gum Creek, which runs along the western
and southern portion of the property boundary.
All temporary fills associated with each road crossing will be removed, and elevations restored to pre -
construction elevations.
Mitigation
As there is no clear mandate for compensatory mitigation below threshold amounts, the applicant is not
proposing additional mitigation beyond the onsite avoidance and minimization methods.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or require further information to process this
request.
Best regards,
Perry Isner
704.773.4239
CC: Paul Holst, Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
CHRISTOPHER HUYSMAN WETLANDS & WATERS, INC. TAMP BANDY
1 70 DEW DROP ROAD 41 08 LB PROPST DRIVE
SPARTA, NO 28675 CONOVER, NO 2861 3
336.406.0906 828.302.3437
CHRIS. H [e-mail] [e-mail]

Y` WETLANDS
& WATERS
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, WBSCPE Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604
RE: Agent Authorization
The undersigned, registered property owners of the noted property, do hereby authorize Wetlands &
Waters, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing of this jurisdictional
verification, permit or certification request and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
I/we reserve the right to accept or appeal all final, proffered actions, jurisdictional determinations,
permits or certifications and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner/ Applicant:
Contact Name:
Street Address / PO Box:
City, State, Zip Code:
Phone / Fax Number:
Project Name:
Property Street Address:
Owner/ Applicant Signature
Date:
Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
Paul Hoist
3907 N Elm St
Greensboro, NC 27455
336 839-0001
Huffman Point
3040B Longpine Rd, Burlington, NC
(Street Address, City, State, and Zip, or County and Tax PIN)
�gs_y5--/972_6,
e,sySl 36 v 0
10-24-2017
CHRISTOPHER HUYSMAN WETLANDS & WATERS, INC. TAMP BANDY
1 70 DEW DROP ROAD 4 1 DB LH PROPST DRIVE
SPARTA. NC 26675 CONOVER, NC 2861 3
336.406.0906� 628.302.3437
CHRI5.HUYSMAN`DGMAIL.COM JTAMPBANDY@GMAIL.r-om

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑x No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
x❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑Yes No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Huffman Point
2b.
County:
Alamance
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Burlington
2d.
Subdivision name:
Huffman Point
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
B. 3701, p. 459,463
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Paul Holst
3d.
Street address:
3907 N. Elm Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27455
3f.
Telephone no.:
336.839.0001
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Perry Isner
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
5c. Street address:
6018 Little Mountain Road
5d. City, state, zip:
Sherrills Ford, NC 28673
5e. Telephone no.:
704.773.4239
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
113366, 003367
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 36.06235 Longitude: -79.48847
1 c. Property size:
49.05 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Gum Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -V; NSW
2c. River basin:
j Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site is vacant and primarily consists of wooded areas. Existing power and fiber optic utility easements are present on site. General land use in the
vicinity of the project is primarily residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.84
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3300
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a low density, residential subdivision to meet growing demand for housing opportunities in the
region and to meet the economic expectations of the owner.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Project includes construction of single family, low density homes with internal circulation roads and safe ingress/egress options. Project will be
constructed under an approved sediment and erosion control plan. Typical earth moving equipment will be used, including excavator, pan, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes 21 No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): P. Isner
Agency/Consultant Company: wetlands & waters, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past.
❑ Yesx❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑x Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert/riprap apron
UT to Gum Creek
PER
Corps
5
145
S2 P
Culvert/riprap apron
UT to Gum Creek
INT
Corps
3
83
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
228
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Project has been carefully designed to avoid impacts to regulated features whenever possible. Impacts are necessary for access to high ground and
to provide connectivity to existing right of ways. All impacts to on site wetlands have been avoided, and over 3000 linear feet of streams will remain
un -impacted. Utility lines, including sanitary sewer and water, have been located in the roadways to minimize impacts to regulated features.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Project will be constructed under an approved sediment and erosion control plan to ensure that construction techniques provide maximum protection
for on site and downstream aquatic resources.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑x No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
23
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project meets low density stormwater requirements. Project will include non -concentrated dispersal through vegetated conveyances at
approximately 2% slopes in order to minimize velocity.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yesx❑
No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
❑x No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
Q No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yesx❑
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project includes construction of on site sanitary sewer. Proposed sewer utility lines will tie into existing sanitary sewer located near Gum Creek and
will run through the roadways to minimize impacts to aquatic resources.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. WIN this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
© Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWc concerning Endangered Species AA
❑ YEs ❑x No
impoata?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have oorvalcted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would irrpact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
quary of NC NHP �e howed oomrrenoft of n Project
Nother n A1 `1 � � range of
LOV-GWW howe as w 10OW 11 0�W1�wW10u' via NO 090" lgb0 FD RI@'
6. Essential Fish Hhbitat (Corps Requirerrmnt)
6a. NIN this project o=v in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would irrpacl Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or iPrehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Witl this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
oovemments have designated as having historic or caitural preservatloo
❑ Yes Q No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or pMeriles signiBcantin
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What date sources did you use to determine wheiheryour site would irrpact historic or arheological resources?
NC SHPO AreGIS
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corp Requlrernen t)
8a. MR this project oacur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
0 Yes ❑ No
8b. if yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c. ARW source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Aiananoe county CIS I FEMA AreGIS
4-1-7
Applicant/Agenfs Printed Name
icant/Agelnt's nature
Date
(Agerift signature is wMd or* if an authorization
leder from ftte is
Page 10 of 10

�pg1�n'�prA
Alornorice
crossirq
l
yO
.;�b Alomonce
Regl+araat
Medkal
Cerner
(3r.,rd C05 6'6
X10+
a
q
S Church St
Site
�Iz
Zambridge Rd
Grerd o^ .
to len Rive.:
E10- Ccdege
W-asctf
i� T
Surlkigton g
Akwranu
pwr,01
IYOS*,-
R0
a —1 43
jklw4
Q
Rockl al
O�*
Burlington -Alamance
;Reg'I
$ Airport
�;ron`1 ftd
�
Q`c
Ce5S',a
Cl-
2500 feet 500 m
© 2017 HERE
Project Name: Grand Oaks
WETLANDS owner / Developer: Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
W,
& WATERS City / County: Burlington / Alamance
Tax PIN(s): 113367 & 113366
Vicinity Map Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat: 36.06235 Long: -79.48847 graphic 03/30/17

List of Aquatic Features
Wetland A - 0.20 acres
Wetland B - 0.04 acres
Wetland C - 0.33 acres
Wetland D - 0.20 acres
Wetland E - 0.07 acres Potentially
UT to Gum Creek - 1100 linear feet WL DF 1 �,/-- Jurisdictional
Wotland A
Gum Creek - 2200 linear feet
UPDF1
Potentially
Juosdictiona
UT t
Gum Creek
Potentially
Jurisdictional
Wetland E
'Wetland Sketch provided for illustrative purposes for
preliminary planning use only. Not intended to be relied
upon for exact location, dimensions, or orientation. All
findings and assessments made by wetland consultants
regarding limits of lunsmction or permitting W L DF 2
requirements are subject to verification by the US Army
Corps of Engineers and other appropriate state and local
authorities.
Potentially
Jurisdictional
Wetland B
1+ 200 ft -Ilil N
Project Name: Grand Oaks
WETLANDS owner/ Developer: Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
W& WATERS city/county: Burlington / Alamance
Tax PIN(s): 113367 & 113366
Figure 1: Approximate Depiction Coordinates: Scale: Date:
of Waters and Wetlands Lat: 36.06235 Long: -79.48847 graphic 03/30/17

W& WETLAN DS
WATERS
Figure 2: County GIS
Project Name: Grand Oaks
Owner / Developer: Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
City / County: Burlington / Alamance
Tax PIN(s): 113367 & 113366
Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat: 36.06235 Long: -79.48847 graphic
03/30/17

a o.5 Mf Map provided by MyTopo.com
0 2000 Ft
Project Name: Grand Oaks
Owner / Developer:
WETLANDS Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
& WATERS city/county: Burlington/Alamance
Tax PIN(s): 113367 & 113366
Figure 3: USGS Topo Quad Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat: 36.06235 Long: -79.48847 graphic 03/30/17

Soil Map—Alamance County, North Carolina
W& WETLANDS
WATERS
Figure 4: Soil Survey
63M s3e000 MOD
Proiect Name:
Owner / Developer:
Tax PIN(s):
Coordinates:
Lat: 36.06235 Long: -79.48847
Grand Oaks
Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
Burlington / Alamance
113367 & 113366
Scale: Date:
graphic
03/30/17
0

.w.s�wsr�
National Wetlands hventor
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Freshwater Forestei/Shrub Wetland D Other N
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Pond Rivenne
ED Freshwater Emeroen Wetland
Lake 'A
W& WETLANDS
WATERS
Figure 5: National Wetland
Inventory Map
Froject Name:
Qwner / Developer:
(:ity / County:
Tax PIN(s):
Coordinates:
Lat: 36.06235 Long: -79.48847
Grand Oaks
Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
Burlington / Alamance
113367 & 113366
Scale: I Date:
graphic
03/30/17

1:9,028 N
SurfweWater Classificatiom 0 ).075 0.15 0.3 mi
OWR 2014 It Overall Cat (Zoom is for faster results) 0 0.0'50.15 0.3
No Qua
W& WETLANDS
WATERS
Figure 6: Stream Classification
roject Name:
owner / Developer:
bty / County:
`ax PIN(s):
Coordinates:
Lat: 36.06235 Long: -79.48847
Grand Oaks
Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
Burlington / Alamance
113367 & 113366
Scale: Date:
graphic
03/30/17

FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (Official)
ni
Project Name: Grand Oaks
WETLANDS Owner / Developer: Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
& WATERS City / County: Burlington /Alamance
Tax PIN(s): 113367 & 113366
Figure 7: FEMA Floodplain Coordinates: Scale: Date:
Lat 36.06235 Long: -79.48847 graphic 03/30/17

7u1,�1�Ir.2r tl1�11 • II M ��� ` I I
I
Impact S-1
145 linear feet I I
Huffman Point (Grand Oaks)
Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
November 2nd, 2017
Permit Drawings
Sheet 1 of 2
Overall Site/Grading Plan
R-1� zaxxw REaURBIExrs:
YNrIW LOi rOTN 91Y
— Ee�
PRELIMINARY
SEPTEMBER20,2017
-
MAMwM Lm c°w+Aa - mx
7u1,�1�Ir.2r tl1�11 • II M ��� ` I I
I
Impact S-1
145 linear feet I I
Huffman Point (Grand Oaks)
Burlington Grand Oaks, LLC
November 2nd, 2017
Permit Drawings
Sheet 1 of 2
Overall Site/Grading Plan
R-1� zaxxw REaURBIExrs:
YNrIW LOi rOTN 91Y
PRELIMINARY
SEPTEMBER20,2017
-
MAMwM Lm c°w+Aa - mx
FOR REVIEW
mal sEmAa - w'
ONLY
BBF YnIAO< - 10'
sBE ABlmxc sEle.a
NOT FOR
S-11 - 2D'
IFAR sETBAa - 25'
CONSTRUCTION
BJ -NG NOOIT - 2 STWES OR 32'
in. 8 9
Q5 ,5= t E
w�� €
0
z
GENERAL NOTES: Q
\ I. BOUNDARY ANO TCP—WHIC iNEORMAnON WAS O6iME
xED P.,
\ \ \ FROM A SUR— PROMDED BY CAROLINA CORNERSTONE S
\ \ \ AI YNG ANO LAND DESIGN DATED 2-I6-17.2.
q°EjhMPROFE 5R E«TO
L—ON OF THE SEAMRS ANNOO—ANDS Z o
z
1 c n =.'4
.7� R
ax m
O
La��,�
I
I
I
I
I
Impact S-2
83 linear feet
i
Ex snxc
LEGEND F — —
PRov_O S T.RY sENER — ss
11GPw2D I—R UNE —w
r.RD NLET OR a+av IxLEr o
CURB IHIEi .
PROWSEDBS OIN YtrER
w n.Nn
POmxnu M;nulOs
GRAPHIC SCALE
C-4.0

600
590
580
Impact S-1
145 linear feet
STORM LINE AA
0400 1t00 2400
620
610
600
Impact S-2
83 linear feet
HLIPoZONTAL SCALE: 1• = 40'
10
-• T -
a
' - ------
VERTICAL SCALE: 1' = 4'
-
- TW: 611.50----
TW: 611. --- - - -
BW: 604.50
BW: 604.00
-
NOT FOR
HW VY 1 �� • _
u=a
-- --
I I I •
I T—
p10
CIS T—.�
I 1 0' PU
Q
INV
30.0'
' '
ZS M
I
J
I
INV OUT=
QI U-1 J
F. w�f � � E
TW: 11
u ao•
Rcv a a.Tox
PROPCSFD B"
)
-
tHW
O
e=
AA -4
RIM=594.00'
O
Z
E
BW-. 604.50
INV wT-5S5.50' ]
'
TF SO• RCP a 0,70%
x w a�^'
26Lf 60"
O0.T01t
m O
x6
EXISTING
PR
P
GRADE
RIP—RAP
PAD
TW: 594.00
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 40'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1' = 4'
BW: 586.50
STORM LINE T
JLINE
a2..76EPRO7
L_EXISTING
GRADE
RIP—RA/41211ILF'
72
RW O 2.76;
STORM LINE AA
0400 1t00 2400
620
610
600
Impact S-2
83 linear feet
STORM LINE T
10
-• T -
a
' - ------
un�ll
_ --
- TW: 611.50----
TW: 611. --- - - -
BW: 604.50
BW: 604.00
-
NOT FOR
HW VY 1 �� • _
HW T-1
-- --
I I I •
I T—
p10
CIS T—.�
I 1 0' PU
Q
INV
30.0'
' '
•�w
I
J
I
INV OUT=
QI U-1 J
F. w�f � � E
TW: 11
u ao•
Rcv a a.Tox
BW: 604.00
STORM LINE T
u4w Itw
t10H MUST
4$ V(1L I TY A�
PRELIMINARY
SEPTEMBER 20,2017
1q,
At
FOR REVIEW
un�ll
ONLY
P P
GRADE—__'.I'll
NOT FOR
HW T-1
-- --
RIM=611.05'
HW V -I
Q
INV
IN -603.00' 60•
IM -611.
•�w
INV OUT=
03.50' 60'
F. w�f � � E
TW: 11
u ao•
Rcv a a.Tox
BW: 604.00
<
O
Z
TW: 611.50
BW-. 604.50
TF SO• RCP a 0,70%
x w a�^'
26Lf 60"
O0.T01t
m O
x6
EXISTING
PR
P
GRADE
RIP—RAP
PAD
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 40'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1' = 4'
STORM LINE T
u4w Itw
t10H MUST
4$ V(1L I TY A�
PRELIMINARY
SEPTEMBER 20,2017
1q,
At
FOR REVIEW
g
ONLY
<'
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
BMK= YOU MI
013IPAC17CM!, .400411111M
1-40111-60-49e
Q
GRAPHIC SCALE
•�w
rear l•
F. w�f � � E
A
W
<
O
Z
x w a�^'
m O
x6
luffman Point (Grand Oaks) E -
ii
lurlington Grand Oaks, LLC d 'z
November 2nd, 2017 L-� 0.
Permit Drawings a
Sheet 2of2aj
Profile and Plan X x
O
F
rn
C-4.13

d e� STJ17f o
aQ
VWa
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
September 20, 2017
Perry Isner
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
2712 Minden Rd.
Pleasant Garden, NC 27313
RE: Grand Oaks
Dear Perry Isner:
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
NCNHDE-4371
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler(a)ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Telephone: [phone] LOCATION -
1651 Mail Service Center www.ncnhp.org 121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 Raleigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Grand Oaks
September 20, 2017
NCNHDE-4371
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element
Group Observation Occurrence
Date Rank
Amphibian 17763 Hemidactylium scutatum Four -toed Salamander 1992 -Pre H?
Butterfly 34484 Neonympha helicta Helicta Satyr 1980 -Pre H
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Accuracy Federal
State
Global
State
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
4 -Low ---
Special
G5
S3
Concern
5 -Very ---
Significantly
G3G4
S1?
Low
Rare
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httpsoHncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on September 20, 2017; source: NCNHP, 03 July 2017. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

N
W+ R
Sapte-nbe- 2C, 2017
[] Pro.ect B:xxd a p
El &cerec mroieci 3cunda-v
NCNHDE-4371: Grand Oaks
Page 3 of 3
1:24,475
0 0.2 C, 0.3 ral
a 0325 3es 131n
=.i *8F, D,[—, lrw—p nYrer,ar P Cp. WSCO, t--33,
FAD UP& 141CAJI. Gb.Esi,. C -N (.dow FIL, Or*mw*S, t). Et,,Jg.,.
NEI) Lwi Chrm #4w9 rArgi wmitopD, -Awvyrk*&. 0 0pmStm*UUF
cmbbio-s in$ ft GE tJw, Co rti
Ilk
1:24,475
0 0.2 C, 0.3 ral
a 0325 3es 131n
=.i *8F, D,[—, lrw—p nYrer,ar P Cp. WSCO, t--33,
FAD UP& 141CAJI. Gb.Esi,. C -N (.dow FIL, Or*mw*S, t). Et,,Jg.,.
NEI) Lwi Chrm #4w9 rArgi wmitopD, -Awvyrk*&. 0 0pmStm*UUF
cmbbio-s in$ ft GE tJw, Co rti

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Grand Oaks City/County: Burlington / Alamance Sampling Date: 03/28/17
Applicant/Owner: Diamondback Investment Group State: NC Sampling Point: WL DF t
Investigator(s): P. Isner Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.06367 Long: -79.48685 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Iredell NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil. or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil. or Hydrology. . naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ ✓ _ No_ _ within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. ✓ _ No_ _
Remarks:
WL Type WL Series A Appx. Acreage
24 HR Weather
Recent Weather
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
✓ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (610)
_✓ Saturation (A3)
✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
2. Liquidambar styracif/ua 10 Y FAC
5.
Grand Oaks
Sampling Point: WL DF 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88 (A/B)
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Poa spa
2. Juncus effusus
3.
NFA
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
10 Y FAC
5 Y FACU
10.
11.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera iaponica 5 Y FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
30
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover: 6
Total %Cover of:
Multiply by:
15
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
Acer rubrum
5
Y FAC
FACW species
x 2 =
1.
2. Juniperous virginiana
5
Y FACU
FAC species
x 3 =
3. Liquidambar styracif/ua
5
Y FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
4.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Poa spa
2. Juncus effusus
3.
NFA
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
10 Y FAC
5 Y FACU
10.
11.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera iaponica 5 Y FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Grand Oaks
SOIL Sampling Point: WL DF 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Dark Surface (S7)
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type
Loc Texture Remarks
0-6
Gley 2 5/5PB 100
(MLRA 147, 148)
clay loam
6-16
10 YR 6 /1 60
7.5 YR 5 /8 30
clay loam
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
7.5 YR 4 /6 10 C
PL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
✓ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Sandy
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present.) Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Grand Oaks City/County: Burlington / Alamance Sampling Date: 03/28/17
Applicant/Owner: Diamondback Investment Group State: NC Sampling Point: UP DF 1
Investigator(s): P. Isner Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.06370 Long: -79.48678 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Iredell NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil. or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil. or Hydrology. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ! No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No_ ✓ _ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. _ No_
WL Type
24 HR Weather
Recent Weather
HYDROLOGY
WL Series Paired WL A
Appx. Acreage
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (81)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Grand Oaks
Sampling Point: UP DF 1
30
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4
(A)
2. Acer rubrum
15
Y FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 7
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
17.5 20% of total cover: 7
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
15
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
Liriodendron tulipfera
5
Y FACU
FACW species x 2 =
1.
2. Juniperous virginiana
5
Y FACU
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Poa spa 5 Y FAC
2. Allium canadense 5 Y FACU
7
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera iaponica
2.
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
5 Y FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Grand Oaks
SOIL Sampling Point: UP DF 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 2.5 Y 4 /3 100 Clay loam
2-8 2.5 Y 5 /4 60 7.5 YR 6 /8 40 C M Clay loam
8-16 2.5 Y 6 /6 80 7.5 YR 6 /8 20 C M clay loam
'Tvoe: C=Concentration. D=Deletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Grand Oaks City/County: Burlington / Alamance Sampling Date: 03/28/17
Applicant/Owner: Diamondback Investment Group State: NC Sampling Point: WL DF 2
Investigator(s): P. Isner Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.05979 Long: -79.48940 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mixed alluvial land NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil. or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil. or Hydrology. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ ✓ _ No _ within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. ✓ _ No
Remarks:
WL Type WL Series WL D Appx. Acreage
24 HR Weather
Recent Weather
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (614)
✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Grand Oaks
Sampling Point: WL DF 2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum 30 Y FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 51 )
1. Zephyranthes atamasca 15 Y FACV
2. Carex spa 5 Y FAC
3. Juncus effusus 5 Y FACV
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Remarks
50% of total cover: 12.5
50% of total cover:
numbers here or on a separate
e-0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 5
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
I� 3 - Prevalence Index is 153.01
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Grand Oaks
Sampling Point: WL DF z
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Matrix
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Redox Features
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist)
%
Tvae
Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3
10 YR
3 /2
100
` Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
loam
4-8
10 YR
5 /2
70
10 YR
2 /1
10
D
M
Clay loam masses
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
7.5 YR
5 /8
10
C
M
10 YR
5 /6
10
C
PL
Soil Present? Yes No
8-14
10 YR
5 /2
80
7.5 YR
5 /8
20
C
M
Clay loam
14-20
10 YR
6 /1
80
7.5 YR
5 /8
20
C
M
sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
` Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
✓ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0