Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0001990_Staff Report_20180207State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Water Quality Permitting Regional Staff Report FORM: APSRSR 04-10 Page 1 of 3 February 7, 2018 To: DWR Water Quality Permitting Section Central Office Application No.: WQ0001990 Attn: Troy Doby Regional Login No.: From: Bev Price Asheville Regional Office I. GENERAL SITE VISIT INFORMATION 1. Was a site visit conducted? Yes or No Data review only on 2/2/2018 & 2/7/2018. a. Date of site visit: b. Site visit conducted by: c. Inspection report attached? Yes or No d. Person contacted: and their contact information: e. Driving directions: II. PROPOSED FACILITIES FOR NEW AND MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS 1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit) 2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? Yes or No If no, explain: 3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? Yes or No If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? Yes No N/A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: 9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? Yes No N/A If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B) DocuSign Envelope ID: 92193898-79E4-49B2-982A-19FC624DCA0C FORM: APSRSR 04-10 Page 2 of 3 III. EXISTING FACILITIES FOR MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS 1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? Yes No N/A ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #: 2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? Yes or No If no, please explain: 3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately assimilating the waste? Yes or No N/A If no, please explain: 4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance boundary, new development, etc.)? Yes or No Not Evaluated If yes, please explain: 5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? Yes or No If no, please explain: 6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? Yes or No Not Evaluated If no, please explain: 7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? Yes No N/A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: 8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? Yes or No Not Evaluated If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? Yes or No If no, please explain: 10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? Yes No N/A If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary): Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude ○ ′ ″ - ○ ′ ″ 12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (e.g., NDMR, NDAR, GW)? Yes or No Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: 13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? Yes or No If yes, please explain: 14. Check all that apply: No compliance issues Current enforcement action(s) Currently under JOC Notice(s) of violation Currently under SOC Currently under moratorium Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.) 15. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? Yes No N/A If no, please explain: 16. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? Yes No N/A If yes, please explain: DocuSign Envelope ID: 92193898-79E4-49B2-982A-19FC624DCA0C FORM: APSRSR 04-10 Page 3 of 3 IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? Yes or No If yes, please explain: 2. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request: Item Reason 3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued: Condition Reason 4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued: Condition Reason 5. Recommendation: Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office Issue upon receipt of needed additional information Issue Deny (Please state reasons: ) 6. Signature of report preparer: Signature of APS regional supervisor: Date: V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS This minor modification is for a reduction in monitoring of the TCLP/Ignitability/Reactivity/Corrosivity. Data from 2015, 2016 and 2017 was reviewed and found to be within permit limits. DocuSign Envelope ID: 92193898-79E4-49B2-982A-19FC624DCA0C 2/7/2018 DocuSign Envelope ID: 92193898-79E4-49B2-982A-19FC624DCA0C