20060404 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20090212

? o?os
BEAVERDAM CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT FOR 2007-2008 (YEAR 2)
Project Number: D05016-1
Submitted to:
r~
Ecosystem
December, 2008
Prepared for: River Works, Inc.
01VER&
-WORKS
8000 Regency Parkway
Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
2728 Capital Blvd, Suite 1H 103
Raleigh, NC 27604
1447 South Tryon St., Ste. 200
Charlotte, NC 28203''' .

Prepared by: Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
,, u
N?A1Vhick ?0'08
C'C'4' p'i Ak
RpG&qA'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 2
1.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................. . 2
1.2 Mitigation Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................... . 2
1.3 Project Description and Restoration Approach ............................................................... . 2
1.4 Project History and Background ..................................................................................... . 4
1.5 Project Plan ..................................................................................................................... . 8
2.0 VEGETATION MONITORING ...................................................................................... 8
2.1 Soil Data ........................................................................................................................... 8
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol ............................................................. 9
2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria ............................................................................................. 9
2.4 Results of Vegetative Monitoring .................................................................................. 10
2.5 Vegetation Observations ................................................................................................ 12
2.6 Vegetation Problem Areas ............................................................................................. 12
2.7 Vegetation Photos .......................................................................................................... 12
3.0 STREAM MONITORING .............................................................................................. 12
3.1 Description of Stream Monitoring ................................................................................. 12
3.2 Stream Restoration Success Criteria .............................................................................. 13
3.3 Bankfull Discharge Monitoring Results ......................................................................... 13
3.4 Stream Monitoring Data and Photos .............................................................................. 14
3.5 Stream Stability Assessment .......................................................................................... 14
3.6 Cross-section, Longitudinal Profile, and Bed Material Analysis Monitoring Results... 15
3.7 Areas of Concern ............................................................................................................ 16
4.0 HYDROLOGY .................................................................................................................16
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................18
6.0 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS ...................................................................................... 18
7.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................19
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - Project Photo Log
APPENDIX B - Stream Monitoring Data
APPENDIX C - As-built Plan Sheets
APPENDIX D - Baseline Stream Summary for Restoration Reaches
APPENDIX E - Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary - Year 2 Monitoring
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Project Mitigation Approach
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Table 4. Project Background
Table 5. Soil Data for Project
Table 6. Tree Species Planted
Table 7. Year 2 Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Table 8. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 9. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Table 10. Comparison of Historic Rainfall to Observed Rainfall
Table 11. Hydrologic Monitoring Results for Year 2
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Topographic Map
Figure 3. Restoration Summary Map
Figure 4. Stage Recorder Locations
Figure 5. Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Annual Report details the monitoring activities during the 2008 growing season on the Beaverdam
Creek Stream Restoration Site ("Site"). Construction of the Site, including planting of trees, was
completed in March 2007. In order to document project success, twenty-four vegetation monitoring plots,
eighteen permanent cross-sections, 3,000 linear feet (LF) of longitudinal profile survey, and two
automated stage recorders were installed and assessed across the restoration Site. The 2008 data
represents results from the second year of vegetation and hydrologic monitoring for streams.
Prior to restoration, stream and buffer functions on the Site were historically impaired as a result of heavy
land timbering and subsequently farmed aggressively. Recently some areas have been reforested within
the project site, but it has continued to be actively farmed and grazed or converted to medium density
residential developments. After construction was finalized the project restored or enhanced 13,203 linear
feet (LF) of channelized stream on two unnamed tributaries of Beaverdam Creek: UT1 and UT2, and
preserved an additional 1,641 LF of Beaverdam Creek and 962 LF of UT2 to total 15,806 LF of restored,
enhanced, or preserved stream.
Weather station data from the for NRCS National Climate and Water Center (Charlotte WSO AP WETS
Station in Mecklenburg County - NC 1690) and the USGS Water Data for North Carolina (USGS
35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg County, NC) were used to document precipitation
amounts. For the 2008 growing season, March 2008 through October 2008 rainfall was recorded as
below normal except for during August when rainfall was recorded higher than the 70 percentile mark.
Twenty-four monitoring plots that are 10 meter by 10 meters or 0.025 of an acre in size were used to
assess survivability of the woody vegetation planted on Site. They are randomly located to represent the
different zones within the project. The vegetation monitoring indicated a survivability range of 280 stems
per acre to 680 stems per acre with an overall average of 483 stems per acre. Overall, the Site is on track
for meeting the initial vegetation survival criteria of 320 stems per acre surviving after the third growing
season and the final success criteria of 260 trees per acre by the end of year five.
In general, dimension, pattern, profile and in-stream structures remained stable during the first growing
season. Remnant bed scour noted in Year 1 has remained largely unchanged through Year 2 along UT1.
A few pools along UT1 experienced bed scour which is expected. The areas of pool scour are the result
of a large storm event that coincided with the one bankfull event that occurred in August of 2008.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016- I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
The Beaverdam Creek site is located within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, and lies within the Catawba River Basin (Figure 1). The site lies within North
Carolina Department of Water Quality (NCDWQ) sub-basin 03-08-34 and U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS)
hydrologic unit 03050101170040. The recent land use of the site consists of agriculture and medium
density residential development.
' The project involved the restoration, enhancement and preservation of 15,806 LF of stream along
Beaverdam Creek (the mainstem) and two unnamed tributaries (UT1 and UT2).
1.1 Project Location
The Beaverdam Creek sited is located approximately 3 miles southwest of the Charlotte-Douglas
International Airport. The site extends from the newly constructed Interstate 485 corridor to Brown's
Cove of Lake Wylie, an impounded reservoir on the Catawba River. The site can be accessed from Dixie
River Road (UT1 to the north and UT2 to the south) 1.5 miles northeast of the intersection with Steele
Creek Road. See Figures 1 and 2 for an overview of the project site.
1.2 Mitigation Goals and Objectives
The specific goals for the Beaverdam Creek Restoration Project were as follows:
' • Preserve/Restore/Enhance 15,806 LF of stream channel.
• Create geomorphically stable stream channel and floodplain conditions along UT1, UT2 and their
associated tributaries within the Beaverdam Creek watershed.
' • Improve the local hydrology through increased groundwater recharge, groundwater storage, and
hydrologic connectivity between the channel and the adjacent floodplain.
• Improve water quality in the Beaverdam Creek watershed by increasing dissolved oxygen
concentrations and reducing nutrient and sediment loads.
• Improve aquatic and riparian terrestrial habitat through improved hydraulic and biologic
diversity.
1.3 Project Description and Restoration Approach
For analysis and design purposes, Beaverdam Creek and the two unnamed tributaries (UT1 and UT2)
were subdivided into 15 individual reaches based on their hydrologic and geomorphic characteristics.
The mainstem of Beaverdam Creek consists of only 1 of the 15 design reaches, where only preservation
and no restoration activities were proposed. The remaining 14 reaches exist within UTI (8 reaches) and
UT2 (6 reaches). Among these 14 reaches, 12 were scheduled for restoration, the upstream reach of UTI
' was scheduled for enhancement and the downstream reach of UT2 was scheduled for preservation. All
reach locations are shown in Figure 3. The following describes the site's preconstruction conditions.
The project extents on UTI began at I-485 flowing from the northeast direction. UTI was divided into 5
' reaches starting in the upstream with Reach 1 and continuing downstream to Reach 5 and changing
designation at tributary confluences or at significant grade breaks. The three tributary confluences were
included within the design parameters on UTI and were identified as UT1B, UT1C, and UT1D from the
upstream confluence and continuing downstream.
UT2 watershed abuts the UTI watershed to the south, is bordered by Dixie River Road, and generally
flows in the southwest direction. The mainstem of UT2 was divided into four reaches starting upstream at
Reach 1 and continuing downstream to Reach 4. One tributary confluence, UT2A, was included within
the design parameters of UT2. Reach UT2A, upstream of station 10+00, consisted only of a non-
' Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 2
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
YADKIN
03-07-04
i
(Project Site j f
i ?
? Z
Charlotte
YADKIN q3-07-12
---- 1 J„
3
29 1
CATAWBA 03-08-34 601

-0711
?i
\ ! ! IN
CATAWBA 03-08-38 YADKIN 03; -14,
Map Inset LEGEND EEP Contract No.: D05016-1 Figure I: Project Vicinity Flap
I I'c Beaverdam ('reek
? '??? •
r?
i)WO pub-ba>m Year 2 lionitoring
Ecosystem s Mecklenburg County, NC
,?'? 1 it ; ,llilc?
Y,ak,n,, December 200 8
CATAWBA 03-08-33
ATAW BA
03-08-37
aT" S ;
The site can be accessed from Dixie River Road (UT1 to the north +:: =
and UT2 to the south) 1.5 mules a - +";a. r•
northeast of the intersection with
Stcele Creek Road. "
des DJ.
i - .
root
F a cy r t I ? _
y. may. .. ` ?" r 1. 1
(x: 7 1 C
2 - <z
Dorcas Ln
Masw - poU as
v n r
UT1 s?O?R,ry\S e?eb
z`4 h.t ?b 1:7sgrni e?
(1105 acres)
erald br
a o
N. 4?1
' m UT2 g
0.3 sgmi hoptop.,.Rd
B ake ove (199 acres)
c GT o?a°
p s
o Fr
6 .1
r
, iaht ?e
Yz' . r, RpC } S?op%00V0
m '??S?andRq' Riverdalely y A
p
o - H}rslih'
ante line Dr
EEP Contract No.: D05016-1 Figure 2: Site Topographic
---_ LEGEND Nlap
Project Watershed Botindarc - (;rock:
Beaverdam Creek
j ?-- Project Reaches -Roads Year 2 Monitoring
LrI ??SpStenl_ Mecklenburg County, NC
Js 0 800 1.600 3.200
Feet
December 2008
disturbance area (not for credit). The downstream section of UT2A, from a headcut at station 10+00 to its
confluence at the terminus of Reach 2, was 1138 LF with a channel slope of 1.4 percent.
Preservation was proposed for reaches within the project area that were currently in stable, functioning
condition and did not warrant restoration. The two reaches proposed for preservation were along the
' mainstem of Beaverdam and the downstream section of UT2. The reach along the mainstem of
Beaverdam Creek proposed for preservation had reach length of 1,641 LF. It began at the confluence
with UT1 and extended downstream to the confluence of UT2. The reach along the mainstem of UT2
proposed for preservation had a length of 962 LF. It began immediately downstream of UT2 Reach 4 and
ended at its confluence with the mainstem of Beaverdam Creek.
Throughout most of UT1, the restoration approach identified the existing evolutionary process and
established a naturally successional stable C/E-type stream channel. Additionally, soil bioengineering,
structural reinforcement, and revetments were applied to promote stability immediately following
construction when the stream was most vulnerable. Given the wide floodplain, relatively flat slopes,
generally stable nature of the soil, and favorable growing conditions at the site, this restoration approach
was an achievable goal. Removal of the majority of invasive species and planting of native vegetative
species throughout the existing riparian buffer complemented the channel restoration and promoted
climax successional habitat.
Similar to UT1, the restoration approach throughout UT2 entailed establishing a successional C/E-type
stream channel while maintaining the ability to accommodate subsequent natural channel evolution
towards an E-type channel, as warranted by future influences to the discharge and sediment regime. This
was accomplished through application of a Priority 1 design throughout with short segments of Priority 2
design to tie into the incised channels.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016- t, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Table 1. Proiect Mifleation ADDroach
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Si te: Project No. D05016-1
d
L
Q

bn a?i

O

=
•
;
C

?

?

v ai

C

?

°

=
•

0

Project Segment O b0

O ? s
LA O
r C6

L• L b0 C?
2 d
V.- %
ao y
3

or Reach ID y
L
° O _

Comment
UT I (Reach 1) 542 E El 567 1.5:1 378 10+00 - 15+67 Low slope, minimal meander and flood lain benching.
.
The beginning of channel utilizes the existing wide,
flat floodplain then narrows through the valley and
straightens through the Duke Power easement and
connects into the mainstem of Beaverdam through a
UTI (Reach 2-5) 5796 R P1 6,310 1:1 6,310 15+67 - 78+77 wide, flat flood lain.
The valley is pinched so floodplain grading will create
UTI B 743 R P2 778 1:1 778 10+00 - 17+78 adequate benching.
Step-pool design dominated by log drops. The valley
UTIC 744 R PI 624 I:l 624 10+00 - 16+24 is narrow resulting minimal meander.
The channel will have the appropriate belt width
throughout the ample floodplain. A series of drop
UTID 323 R PI 338 1:1 338 10+00 - 13+38 structures at the end of the reach will tie into LIT 1.
Increase sinuosity, pool development, and reestablish
connection with the floodplain and construct in
channel step pools in areas where the valley is
UT2 3130 R PI 3,448 1:1 3,448 10+00 - 44+48 confined and steep.
A step-pool channel will be constructed in the areas
where the valley is confined and steep. Transition
connections constructed between the constructed
UT2A 886 R PI 1,138 1:1 1,138 10+00 - 21+38 channel and the existing channels.
Beaverdam Creek 1641 P --- 1,641 1:5 328
UT2 962 P --- 962 1:5 192
Total linear It of c hannel restored or 15,806
Mitigation Unit Summation for Streams: 13,534
.. .. ............ i - nwuty I
E = Enhancement P2 = Priority 11
P = Preservation P3 = Priority III
El = Enhancement 1
1.4 Project History and Background
The chronology of the Beaverdam Creek Restoration Project is presented in Table 2. The contact
information for all designers, contractors, and relevant suppliers is presented in Table 3. Relevant project
background information is presented in Table 4.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 4
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Table 2. Proiect Activity and Rennrting Historv
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Scheduled Data Collection Actual
Activity or Report Completion Complete Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan Prepared Nov-05 N/A
Restoration Plan Amended Dec-05 N/A
Restoration Plan Approved Dec-05 N/A
Final Design - (at least 90% complete) Dec-05 N/A
Construction Begins May-06 N/A Jun-06
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area N/A N/A Jan-07
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area Mar-06 N/A Jan-07
Planting of live stakes Nov-06 N/A Jan-07
Planting of bare root trees Nov-06 N/A Jan-07
Survey of As-built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring-
baseline Jan-07 Mar-07 Apr-07
Repair work
Year 1 Monitoring Dec-07 Nov-07 Dec-07
Year 2 Monitoring Dec-08 Nov-08 Dec-08
Year 3 Monitoring Dec-09 Unknown Unknown
Year 4 Monitoring Dec-10 Unknown Unknown
Year T Monitoring Dec-11 Unknown Unknown
l able 3. Fro ect Contact
Beaverdam Creek 1
Full Service Delivery Contractor
River Works, Inc.
Designer
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Site: Proiect No. D05016-1
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Kevin Tweedy, Tel [phone]
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 5
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Table 3. Proiect Contact
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Construction Contractor
River Works, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Planting Contractor
River Works, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Seeding Contractor
River Works, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Will Pedersen, Tel. [phone]
Seed Mix Sources Mellow Marsh Farm, 919-742-1200
Nursery Stock Suppliers Mellow Marsh Farm, 919-742-1200
International Paper, 1-888-888-7159
Monitoring Performers
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 1447 S. Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28203
Stream Monitoring Point of Contact: Ian Eckardt, Te1.704-334-4454
Vegetation Monitoring Point of
Contact: Ian Eckardt, Tel. [phone]
it able 4. rro ect Background
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Project Count : Mecklenburg County, NC
Drainage Area:
UT1(Reach 1) 0.70 mil
UTI (Reach 2-5) 1.73 mi'
UT1B 0.34 mi'
UT1C 0.15miz
UT1D 0.16 mi`
UT2 0.3 mil
UT2A 0.1 mi`
Estimated Drainage % Impervious Cover:
UTI (Reach 1) 15%
UT1(Reach 2-5) 12%
UT1B 10%
UT1C 5%
UT1D 21%
UT2 4%
UT2A 2%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016- I, River Works, Inc. 6
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1
1
1
1
1
Table 4. Proiect Background Table
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Stream Order:
UTI (Reach 1) 1
UTI (Reach 2-5) 2
UT1B 1
UT1C 1
UT1D 1
UT2 1
UT2A 1
Ph sio ra hic Region Piedmont
Ecore ion Southern Outer Piedmont
Ros en Classification of As-Built
UTl Reach 1 C/E
UTI Reach 2-5 C/E
UT1 B C/E
UT 1 C C/E
UT1D C/E
UT2 C/E
UT2A C/E
Riverine, Upper Perennial,
Cowardin Classification Unconsolidated Bottom, Cobble-
Gravel
Dominant Soil Types
UTI (Reach 1) MO
UTI (Reach 2-5) MO, Dal), CeD2, PaE
UT 1 B MO
UT1C MO, PaE, CeD2
UT1D MO, PaE, CeD2
UT2 MO, CeD2
UT2A MO
Spencer Creek, UT to Spencer
Creek, McDowell Park, Latta
Reference site ID Plantation, McClintock Creek
(McNair & Stockwood), UT to
Cleghorn, UT to Lake Jeanette,
UT to Big Lost Cove
USGS HUC for Project and Reference sites 3050101170040
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and Reference 03-08-34
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference C
An portion of an project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a

303d listed segment? No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor? N/A
% of project easement fenced 10%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 7
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1.5 Project Plan
Plans depicting the as-built conditions of the major project elements, location of permanent monitoring
cross-sections, and locations of permanent vegetation monitoring plots are presented in Appendix C of
this report.
2.0 VEGETATION MONITORING
2.1 Soil Data
The soil data for the Site are presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Soil Data for Prniert
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
% Clay on
Series Max Depth in Surface K T OM %
Cecil Sandy Clay Loam (CeD2) 80 20-35 0.28 5 0.5-1
Monacan Loam (MO) 80 7-27 0.43 5 2-3
Davidson sandy clay loam (DaD) 75 20-35 0.28 5 0.5-2
Pacolet sandy loam (PaE) 62 8-20 0.2 5 0.5-2
Pacolet sandy loam (PaF) 62 8-20 0.2 5 0.5-2
k? --, -. vun,ml oUu ocuca vcscnpuuns: nup:iisous.usua.2ov/tecnnicauclassmcation/os(l/in(lex html)
General taxonomy of soils:
Cecil: The Cecil series consists of well-drained soils with moderate permeability on and near
floodplains. They formed in residuum weathered felsic igneous and metamorphic rock, such as granite.
Slopes range from 8 to 15 percent (USDA, 2006. "Soil Taxonomy").
Monacan: Soils of the Monacan series are deep, moderately well and somewhat poorly drained with
moderate permeability. They formed in recent alluvial sediments of the Piedmont and Coastal Plain.
Slopes are commonly less than 2 percent (USDA, 2006. "Soil Taxonomy").
Pacolet: The Pacolet series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed
in material weathered mostly from acid crystalline rocks of the Piedmont uplands. Slopes commonly are
15 to 25 percent but range up to 2 to 60 percent (USDA, 2006. "Soil Taxonomy").
' Davidson: The Davidson series consists of very deep, well drained moderately permeable soils that
formed in materials weathered from dark colored rocks high in ferromagnesian minerals. These soils are
on gently sloping to moderately steep uplands in the Piedmont. Slopes are commonly 2 to 15 percent but
range up to 25 percent (USDA, 2006. "Soil Taxonomy").
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc. 8
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
11
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol
The Site was planted in bottomland hardwood forest species in early - mid March of 2007. There were
twenty-four vegetation-monitoring plots established throughout the planting areas.
The following tree species were planted in the restoration area:
Table 6. Tree Species Planted
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Proiect No. D05016-1
ID Scientific Name Common Name FAC Status
1 Alnus serrulata Tag Alder FACW+
2 Asimina triloba Paw paw FAC
3 Cercis canadensis Redbud FACU
4 Celtis laevigata Sugarberry FACW
5 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush OBL
6 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood FACW+
7 Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood FACU
g Diospyros virginiana Persimmon FAC
9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash FACW
to Juglan nigra Black Walnut FACU
11 Liriodendron tulipiferra Tulip poplar FACW
12 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore FACW-
13 Nyssa sylvatica Blackgum FAC
14 Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut oak FACW-
15 Quercus phellos Willow oak FACW-
16 Quercus rubra Red oak FACU
17 Sambucus candensis Elderberry FACW-
18 Viburnum dentatum Arrow-wood viburnum FAC
tUSDA, 2007: nttp://piants.usda.eov)
The following monitoring protocol was designed to predict vegetative survivability. Twenty-four plots
were established throughout the Beaverdam Creek Site. The number of sites was based on the
species/area curve method and their location was based on EEP monitoring guidance. The size of
individual quadrants was 100 square meters for woody tree species, 25 square meters for shrubs, and 1
square meter for herbaceous vegetation. The locations of the vegetation plots are shown on the as-built
plan sheets in Appendix C.
Individual quadrant data provided includes density and coverage quantities. Relative values were
calculated, and importance values were determined. Individual seedlings were marked to ensure that they
can be found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality was determined from the difference between the
previous year's living, planted seedlings and the current year's living, planted seedlings.
2.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 3-year old
planted trees per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period. The final vegetative success
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft

criteria will be the survival of 260 5-year old planted trees per acre at the end of year five of the
monitoring period.
2.4 Results of Vegetative Monitoring
The following table presents stem counts for each of the monitoring plots. Each planted tree species is
identified down the left column, and each plot is identified across the top row. The numbers on the top
row correlate to the vegetation plot IDs. Trees are flagged in the field on an as-needed basis before the
flags degrade. Flags are utilized, because they will not interfere with the growth of the tree. Volunteer
species are also flagged during this process.
During the initial counts of species totals during the as-built monitoring report, some tree species were
unidentifiable (no buds or leafs) and documented as Unknown Quercus in the stem plot counts or were
labeled incorrectly. During Year 1 vegetative monitoring, three of the four Unknown Quercus were
identified as Quercus michauxii and updated. Additional tree species that were labeled incorrectly have
been updated and coded within Table 7 to represent the correction.
The average stem count per acre for Year 2 Monitoring was 483. The range of stem counts throughout
the 24 vegetative monitoring plots was from 280 - 680. The current survivability rate for Year 2 is
77.3%. The data reflects that the overall site is on trajectory for meeting the minimum success interim
criteria of 320 trees per acre by the end of year three and the final success criteria of 260 trees per acre by
the end of year five.
No volunteer species were noted in any of the Site's vegetation plots, or were too small to verify. If any
woody volunteer species are observed in subsequent monitoring years they will be flagged and added to
the overall stems per acre assessment of the Site.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc. 10
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
a
Z7
b?C
c
L
h
'v
vl
?I
v
CC
W
L
w
O
0
U
a?
N
L
Y
CC
F?
:?
?,
oA
`"
?
O
?C M
M O
V? O
C O
?
O ?
?:J t`
O? t`
`O cA
? ?O
? M
00 ?
cA C
a C
?
o O
? V";
N [?
l ?"
?
QI

N v:

r-s
C -?
y r,

N

oc

M

M

?

O

M

M

?

N

N

?

O

v

ON

'?

N

ti

d
tr)
Q ? rr;
N
O

O
?, oo O O O tn
rl O
N N N M rr tn
O

O
r1 M M N
O
M N O N ?C O M N
tn
17 0
r C N r••? x M
C
C
v
O
,
N O

0
z

w
y
??'
-
O
O
M
N Q
00
C'
L
GS,
O

y ? ? M N -+ M •? ?
- ?
R

a O
r
CC
L
w N M M N M --? M N
?i
? o
y
L N - o ?r co N
M
U

:C
'LS h N N ? ? ,?
L
v
>
y

O

C

r
O
d0
N
O
;A M ? in M ,-1 ? 7
0

0

0
Lr,
0
o N M cv m N
v;
o
r1 O

0
00

Z
Z
O
^Q Q Z
O
O a
CY O R C y
q ,
v
-Z Z: ZZZ, Z_ L, LW

v
•
Q >{ t O i O

v Ji
z
i ?? .y .C
y
h N O O p i v y
.

C
7
O
U
I
c
? L
O
U ?
.
?
? O

cC
7 y
L
i ?r
rn
Q y

C ? 'O p G C

'? U 3 o U '
' Q U • j
? O ? ? ? O ? C .
,

,
Q C •? ? O
• y ?• y ? ?
Q ?
? ..C 7 y
C ?
, v: ? •D ? ? y ? y
V, a
cz y - C's
? ? cC 7G cC rte',
.. r
6

c o ° Ir v
c
.D y >, o = y

a ?'
d O
cr,
CIZ$ o o a d o °
-
p y a? in E? 'v y -p
c? y y

?n
'
v,
y
3

0
?
cd
7Z
?
>•.
?,
cc
7
R
ro 3 3 M o0 b 3 3
3 ? o vi 3 ? 3 3
? ?
M M l [ ? t` t` ? a 00 ti

y y y y y y y y y y y
y y y yy y y y y y y y
(( C? r
T = T fl - M
c
v:
3
CJ

o C'Z
O D
zN
C's
:_
o ?
W c
W ?
y
J O
E N
c3 ?
'o .fl
`y E
m U
y y

2.5 Vegetation Observations
During September 2008 minor repairs were made to the stream-side vegetation. The repairs included the
re-staking of matting at Stations 42+15, 48+40, 54+20, 55+92, and 68+60 along UT1. A portion of torn
matting at Station 18+00 was re-matted. All of these locations will have live stakes installed during the
winter of 2008/2009. Station 11+50 on UT1B and the surrounding floodplain were reseeded where a
Department of Transportation fencing crew drove across the channel as they installed fencing along the
' 485 right-of-way immediately above the project site. Reseeding also took place around Station 10+00 of
UT1C to address a small terrace scarp in the floodplain. Trees that had fallen across the channel were
removed on UT2 at Station 17+40 and UT2A at Station 16+10. In both cases no damage was done to the
stream. Beyond these minor repairs, the stream-side and floodplain vegetation has continued to
successfully establish throughout the project site.
2.6 Vegetation Problem Areas
At this time, there seem to be no invasive species problem areas throughout the project site. However,
though none seem to be posing any problems, invasive species can very quickly affect the survivability of
the planted stems the weedy species should be maintained aggressively to prevent any major mortality
issue.
2.7 Vegetation Photos
' Photos of the project showing the on-site vegetation are included in Appendix A of this report.
3.0 STREAM MONITORING
3.1 Description of Stream Monitoring
To document the stated success criteria, the following monitoring program was instituted following
construction completion on the Beaverdam Creek Restoration Project:
Bankfull Events: The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period was documented by the
use of two automated stage recorders. The University of North Carolina (UNCC) installed and monitored
the readings from both stage recorders. Gauging station BD2 was installed on UT1 and gauging station
BD3 was installed on UT2. Each data logger recorded the watermark at 15 minute intervals at each Site
and was checked at each Site visit to determine if a bankfull event had occurred. Photos of the bankfull
events were not available from UNCC. Figure 4 shows the locations of the stage recorders.
Cross-Sections: Two permanent cross-sections were installed per 1,000 linear feet of stream restoration
work, with one located at a riffle cross-section and one located at a pool cross-section. Twenty four total
' cross sections were established. Each cross-section was marked on both banks with permanent pins to
establish the exact transect used. A common benchmark was used for cross-sections and consistently
referenced to facilitate comparison of year-to-year data. The annual cross-sectional survey included
points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner berm, edge of water, and
thalweg, if the features are present. Riffle cross-sections were classified using the Rosgen stream
classification system (Rosgen, 1994). Permanent cross-sections for 2008 (Year 2) were surveyed in
November 2008.
Longitudinal Profiles: A representative longitudinal profile was surveyed for 2008 (Year 2). The initial
3000 linear feet of profile was collected for the mainstem reach of UTL Measurements included thalweg,
' water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank. Each of these measurements was taken at the head of each
feature (e.g., riffle, pool, glide). In addition, maximum pool depth was recorded. All survey was tied to a
single permanent benchmark.
' Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, Baker Engineering/River Works, Inc. 12
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
s
f_
d
ft
L J. 'W c
C Duicay'j,n . �
GA UT18 viarkswood Kd. x
C n Don las M
(I lil; ac
It -
v t'i'tald Dr
l Slml ton Rd
Station BD3 n. `y,,,;
Brown's Cove � _
(Lake Wylie) (199 acrd) o f
Y�ti_�0 ri'q� first �4
'a lillia is GI
rA
Idnrl Ird ,Rig erd. r '.. .r.Y 44
o' (enter Ifne DC o�L yr
ND
EEP Contract No.: D05016-1 Figure 4: Stage Recorder
- Crest Gauges Creeks Locations
As-built Alignments Roads Beaverdam Creek
QProject Watershed Boundary Year 2 Monitoring
&myiMm_ Mecidenburg County, NC
0 950 1,9011 3.800
PROGRAM
Fecl �
December 2008

1

Bed Material Analysis: Pebble counts were conducted for the permanent cross-sections (100 counts per
' cross-section) on the project reaches. Pebble count data was plotted on a semi-log graph and are
included in Appendix B.
Photo Reference Stations: Photographs were used to visually document restoration success. Fifty-one (51)
' reference stations were established to document conditions at the constructed grade control structures
across the Site. These photos are provided in Appendix A. The GPS coordinates of each photo station
were noted as additional reference to ensure the same photo location was used throughout the monitoring
period. These stations are included in the As-built Plan Sheets in Appendix C. Reference photos were
taken once per year.
Each streambank was photographed at each permanent cross-section photo station. For each streambank
' photo, the photo view line followed a survey tape placed across the channel, perpendicular to flow
(representing the cross-section line). The photograph was framed so that the survey tape is centered in the
photo (appears as a vertical line at the center of the photograph), keeping the channel water surface line
horizontal and near the lower edge of the frame. These photos are presented along with the cross-section
' monitoring data in Appendix B.
3.2 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
The approved Mitigation Plan requires the following criteria be met to achieve stream restoration success:
• Bankfull Events: Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five-year monitoring
' period. The two bankfull events must occur in separate years.
• Cross-Sections: There should be little change in as-built cross-sections. If changes to channel cross-
section take place, they should be minor changes representing an increase in stability (e.g., settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio).
• Longitudinal Profiles: The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining
stable (not aggrading or degrading). The pools should remain deep with flat water surface slopes and
' the riffles should remain steeper and shallower than the pools.
• Bed Material Analysis: Pebble counts should indicate maintenance of bed material.
• Photo Reference Stations: Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or
degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation and effectiveness of erosion control
measures. Photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel, no excessive
bank erosion or increase in channel depth over time, and maturation of riparian vegetation.
3.3 Bankfull Discharge Monitoring Results
On-site data loggers documented the occurrence of one bankfull flow event during the second year (2008)
of the post-construction monitoring period (Table 8). The bankfull flow event measurements documented
by the data loggers during Year2 monitoring were stage heights of 5.92 for 13132 and 0.86 feet for 13133.
Table 8. Verification of Bankful Events
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: Project No. D05016-1
Date of Data
Station Number Date of Occurence Method of
Data Gage
Height
Collection of Bankfull Event
Collection (feet)
F BD2 N/A 8/26/2008 Datalogger 5.92
BD3 N/A 8/26/2008 Datalo er 0.86
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, Baker Engineering/River Works, Inc. 13
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
3.4 Stream Monitoring Data and Photos
A photo log of the project showing each of the fifty-one (51) permanent photo locations is included in
' Appendix A of this report. Survey data and photos from each permanent cross-section are included in
Appendix B of this report.
3.5 Stream Stability Assessment
' Table 9 presents a summary of the results obtained from the visual inspection of in-stream structures
performed during Year 2 of post-construction monitoring. The percentages noted are a general overall
field evaluation of how the features were performing after repair work had been completed at the time of
' the last photo point survey on December 2, 2008. These percentages are solely based on the field
evaluator's visual assessment at the time of the site visit.
' Visual observations of the various structures throughout Year 2 growing season indicated that structures
were functioning as designed and holding their elevation grade. Root wads placed on the outside of
meander bends provided bank stability and in-stream cover for fish and other aquatic organisms. Cover
' logs placed in meander pool areas allowed scour to keep pools deep and provide cover for fish. During
Year 1, scour was observed immediately underneath a few of the cover logs and other log vane structures.
This was observed at stations 41+50, 53+80, 56+00, 56+50, and 63+90 of UT1. Isolated pockets of bed
scour were also observed at stations 50+15, 56+00, 56+50, and 63+90 of UT1. This minor amount of
scour was the result of the large storm event that dropped 3.5 inches of rain on the project site shortly
after construction was completed. The channel at these stations and throughout the project has remained
largely unchanged through Year 2.
In September of 2008 minor channel repair work was performed. The work included resealing the log sill
at station 56+50 and the removal of the log vane structure at 56+60, which had been pulled out of the
right bank during a storm event. The right bank at station 56+60 was filled in. A debris jam at station
39+25 on UT2 was also removed. The debris jam caused no damage to the channel.
Observations during the site visit on December 2, 2008 noted that log sill structures at stations 12+05,
25+90, 56+50, and 69+00 on UT1 had been bypassed either by scour under the structure or failure of the
fabric seal. This is reflected in the slightly lower performance score of 95.
Table 9. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stabilitv Assessment
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site : Project No. D05016-1
Performance Percentage
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
Riffles 100% 100% 100%
Pools 100% 100% 100%
Thalwe 100% 100% 100%
Meanders 100% 100% 100%
Bed General 100% 99% 99%
Vanes / J Hooks etc. 100% 97% 95%
Wads and Boulders 100% 100% 100%
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, Baker Engineering/River Works, Inc. 14
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
3.6 Cross-section, Longitudinal Profile, and Bed Material Analysis Monitoring Results
Cross Sections
Year 2 cross-section monitoring data for stream stability were collected during November 2008 and
compared to as-built conditions (collected March 2007).
The twenty four permanent cross-sections along the restored channels (twelve located across riffles and
twelve across pools) were re-surveyed to document stream dimension at the end of the second monitoring
year (Year 2). Cross-sections are provided in Appendix B, and data from the cross-sections are
summarized in Appendix E. The cross-sections show that there has been minor adjustment to stream
dimension within the last year.
A couple cross-sections show point bar formation along UT1 and include cross-sections 10 and 11, which
are located across pools found at the apex of a meander bend. Flow through a meander bend possesses
higher conveyance velocity along its boundary with the outer bank of the bend, and lower flow velocity
along its boundary with the bend's inner bank. As flow reduces, its sediment transport capacity also
reduces, causing flow to drop some of its transported sediment as it slows down. Point bar formation
along the inside of a meander bend indicates flow velocity vectors occurring as designed, and is therefore
expected.
Year 1 observations of Cross-section 10 attributed a slight adjustment in channel geometry to aggradation
along the outside bank of a meander. This slight adjustment was believed to reflect a plug of sediment
deposited during the large storm event that occurred shortly after construction was completed. However,
channel geometry has changed very little through Year 2 monitoring and may instead reflect a difference
in where survey points where collected on the outside bank of the meander between the As-built and Year
1 surveys. Photographs of Cross-section 10 indicate that the banks of the stream are stable with
vegetation.
A few cross-sections show evidence of bed scour along UT1 and include cross-sections 3, 13, 16, and 17,
which are located across pools found at the apex of a meander bend. The outside of meander bends
experience an increase in shear stress during large storm events that can cause scour. The project site
experienced a 7.54 inch precipitation event between August 25 and 27, 2008, which likely lead to the
' scour in these pools. Scour and deepening of some pools is expected and has not resulted in any
observed channel instability. The installation of cover logs at meander bends promotes habitat and
encourages scour.
' Cross-section 15 also experienced scour but unlike the other cross-sections it's located in a straight
section of channel immediately upstream of a large in-stream boulder. During storm events streamflow is
diverted around the boulder and has causes bed scour on the upstream side, which is seen in Cross-section
15. This change in channel geometry will be monitored but doesn't require other action.
t Longitudinal Profiles
The Year 2 longitudinal profile was conducted during November 2008. The initial 3,000 LF of channel
was surveyed along the mainstem of UTL The longitudinal profile is included in Appendix B. A
summary of parameters measured are provided in Appendix D. Please note that this summary represents
only the portion of project that was surveyed.
The representative longitudinal profile along the restored channel was resurveyed to document stream
profile at the end of monitoring Year 2. Riffle slopes and pool-to-pool spacing were calculated for Reach
1 and Reaches 2-5 of UT1. The Year 2 riffle slope for Reach 1 is 0.009 ft/ft and pool-to-pool spacing has
t a mean value of 54 ft. These values are on par with the design values, which are respectively 0.009 ft/ft
and 44 ft. Reaches 2-5 riffle slopes range from 0.008 ft/ft to 0.018 ft/ft are also similar to their design
values that range from 0.005 to 0.018 ft/ft. The Year 2 pool-to-pool spacing of Reaches 2-5 ranges from
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, Baker Engineering/River Works, Inc. 15
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft

72 to 144 ft with a mean value of 108. These values are similar to the design value range of 101 to 120 ft.
Sinuosity for Reach 1 was 1.04, which is slightly lower than the Year 1 value of 1.05. The difference is
the result of a five foot difference in surveyed channel length and thalweg migration. Reaches 2-5 had a
sinuosity of 1.3 which is the same as that calculated in Year 1.
' Profile remained largely unchanged with a few exceptions where pools had deepened due to scour.
Overall pattern shows little to no change.
' Bed Material Analysis
Year 2 bed material samples were collected at each permanent cross-section during November 2008.
' The pebble count data were plotted on a semi-log graph and will be compared with future monitoring
data. Data indicates maintenance of a coarse bed in constructed riffles and a relative fining in the pools.
All pebble count data are provided in Appendix B.
' 3.7 Areas of Concern
During Year 1 Monitoring several Best Management Practices (BMPs) were noted as areas of concern.
The BMPs are located just within and immediately outside the conservation easement along UT2 and
' UT2A of the Restoration Project. The BMPs consist of both temporary and permanent detention ponds
which are discharging stormwater into the Project Site, and a retaining wall. Locations of the BMPs are
shown on the as-built plans included in Appendix C. Adjacent to the Site's property boundaries are new
residential developments under construction.
During the site visit on December 2, 2008 the BMP, located within the conservation easement at the top
of UT2A, had been removed and work was being done to restore the area to its existing slope. In Year 1,
it was noted that discharge from the BMP adjacent to Station 20+00 along UT2 had caused some minor
scour below the riffle at the log sill. The channel at station 20+00 on UT2 has remained stable through
Year 2 and it appears that the BMP, which has been enlarged during Year 2, is no longer impacting the
project site. Currently, none of the BMPs are impacting the restored channels. Therefore, they are no
longer considered areas of concern.
4.0 HYDROLOGY
Rainfall data were collected to document the hydrologic conditions throughout the project area in the
2008 growing season. Since no rain gauges were installed within the project boundaries, monthly rainfall
totals were calculated from data downloaded from the Withers Cove USGS gauge 35090308100454 in
Mecklenburg County, NC. Historical rainfall data were collected from the Charlotte WSO AP WETS
Station in Mecklenburg County (NC 1690) using NRCS National Water and Climate Data Center web-
site.
Monthly rainfall data were recorded as less than the historic average for 2007-2008, expect for August,
which was recorded above the 70 percentile mark. Hydrologic monitoring results are shown in Table 10
and Figure 5.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, Baker Engineering/River Works, Inc. 16
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Table 10. Comnarison of Historic Rainfall to 01hserved Rainfall
Beaverdam Creek Restoration Site: EEP Contract No. D05016-1
Month Average 30% 70% Observed 2008*
Precipitation
January 4.00 3.21 5.15 2.19
February 3.55 2.34 4.42 2.71
March 4.39 3.01 5.54 4.t4
April 2.95 1.98 3.73 2.81
May 3.66 2.33 4.29 2.11
June 3.42 2.43 4.68 1.42
July 3.79 2.49 4.76 2.48
August 3.72 2.34 4.57 9.34
September 3.83 2.00 4.68 2.44
October 3.66 1.80 4.49 1.18
November 3.36 2.51 4.24 1.2
December 3.18 2. t 1 3.81 4.24
Total Rainfall 43.51 28.55 54.36 36.26
trvttk_.?- rvanonai k..nmate ana water renter, zuu3 ana uNul', mus)
Monthly rainfall data was calculated based on rainfall data from 12/1107 - 11/25/08 using the nearest USGS rain gauge
data (USGS 35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg County) to the project site. (USGS, 2008)
Figure 5. Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
Comparison of Historic Average vs. Observed Rainfall
10,00
8.00
6.00
w 4.00
Q
2.00
0.00
40
c° e
Month
-Average
30%
70%
Observed 2008
Precipitation
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, Baker Engineering/River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
l7

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Vegetation Monitoring. Vegetation monitoring efforts have calculated the range of stems per acre
' for each plot to be from 280 to 680 stems per acre on the 24 vegetation plots. The average
number of stems per acre is 483, which is a survival rate of greater than 77%n, based on the initial
planting count of 625 stems per acre. Assuming that preventative methods will be used to
maintain any invasive exotics, vegetation survivability should remain excellent on the Site and
vegetative success criteria will be met.
Stream Monitoring. The total length of stream channel restored and/or preserved on the Site was
15,806 linear feet. This entire length was inspected during Year 2 of the monitoring period
' (2007) to assess stream performance. Based on the data collected, riffles, pools, and other
constructed features along the restored channel are stable and functioning as designed. Minor bed
scour was noted at isolated pockets along UT1. A few log sill structures should be resealed along
UT1 to restore functionality. The lack of major problem areas along the length of the restored
channels after the occurrence of two stream flow events larger than bankfull discharge further
supports functionality of the design. It is expected that stability and in-stream habitat of the
system will continue to improve in the coming years as permanent vegetation becomes more
' established.
' 6.0 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS
Observations of deer and raccoon tracks are common on the Site. During certain times of the year, frogs,
turtles, turkey, and fish have also been periodically observed.
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, Baker Engineering/River Works, Inc. 18
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
7.0 REFERENCES
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
2006. Soil Series Descriptions. httl2:Hsoils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html
USDA. NRCS. 2006. Soil Taxonomy, A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting
Soil Surveys. ftp://ftp-fc.sc.e2ov.usda.gov/NSSC/Soil Taxonomy/tax.pdf
USDA. NRCS. 2003. Climate Information for Mecklenburg County in the State of North Carolina (1971-
2000). TAPS Station : CHARLOTTE WSO AP, NC 1690
ftp://ftp.wcc.nres.usda. og v/support/climate/taps/nc/37119.txt
USDA, NRCS. 2007. The PLANTS Database (28 November 2007). National Plant Data Center, Baton
Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. http://plants.usda.gov
U.S. Geological Service (USGS). 2007. Real-Time Data for North Carolina - Precipitation USGS Water-
Data Site Information for North Carolina. USGS 35090308100454 Withers Cove in Mecklenburg
County, NC. Retrieved on 2008-11-26 09:43:06 EDT
http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nc/nwis/current/?type=precip&group key=county cd
' Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, Baker Engineering/River Works, Inc. 19
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
APPENDIX A
PHOTO LOG
PROJECT ID PHOTOS
PHOTO LOG - UTI
a,
t $?
J Clp r+ Y
tdJ
UTI - PID I

r
•f"d of
yLM?w , `?Cdv t ..?
I. s!^0. iy
A?w

xxR?'??+ ? ,l 1 '.

UTI - PID 2

I*Mlkw
UTI - PID 3
x
?, rY
f ? ?' may, . x
a
UTI-PID5

UTI - PID 4
Y'
RRy a
I? a ,M? ;tlrlt :+" ? 7 ? r'yr
4` ';^ u ? ?'? r we $ Ito - ?.
UTI - PID 6
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
PHOTO LOG - UTI
p
UTI - PID 7
s ??'??f? yt,?r Xn
UTI - PID 9
UTI - PID 11

UTI - PID 8

UTI - PID 10

Nj
!I a
,

.
? Y may
ats
f 1
a P.

} ^ i
?
i '

UTI - PID 12
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016- I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
PHOTO LOG - UT1

UT1- PID 13
J ?
,,ma?yy ?, ?. ry Fyn `yI
?rc gg
H
UT 1- PID 14
i
UT1- PID 16
- x r
1
UT1- PID 18
6eaverdam Creek, EF,P Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1- PID 15
UT1- PID 17
PHOTO LOG - UT1
IF 7
air
UT 1- PID 19
a .Sn2*IIVF-
J.K d
UTI ka?,
- PID 21
$4 IFi 4
{
?r L
s k ?? A.'{ l Yi
I,
i A
UTI - PID 23
UT1- PID 20
1 rftF'
y

-
Y 1 '.
6
y ! ?t
c y??

• kl
?'0 A
,
? ,
??' ? . rte
:
Site r `,. a

UT1- PID 22
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
PHOTO LOG - UTIB, UTIC, & UTID
4 - 4xfp
of ?,a?i' > < ? s
li
41
UTIB - PID I

o- ?

UTIB - PID 3
r
UTIB - PID 5

s
r<
Y

e.
t "r?, 4
'? .?v^• ?
' ?
ra ?w1{Y , . <.
y ??,?
y:?f

»F s 4. ?r'P
1 Mq
4' At Mll
7L \r17i6

UTIB - PID 2
yyyy??

•
'R 24c iI
b9s 9 `d 1
TI
t
? '"` Y
Y
??
f¢
r

UTIB - PID 4

?y
\k 5
I

UTIC - PID 6
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
PHOTO LOG - UT1B, UTIC, & UT1D
J1
..

G

r ?
,
3 .. ,? yy
!d '4
r
?„ ?t

1
y?,y

UTIC - PID 7
UTIC - PID 9
UT1D - PID 11
UTIC - PID 8
t 1
N
,., yaw t,
'rte 4A y
4.0
y ?T? r 1
UTD - PID 10
71
aTrF y?i 1 p
M
W S i C
a?
r ? Fe? ? ?? qty 'per ] 'K
UT1D - PID 12
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A
UT2 - PID 2

d,
- ?t
tit
UT2 - PID 5
Beaverdam Creek, FIT Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT2 - PID I
UT2 - PID 4
UT2 - PID 6
PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A
i
F"F }"A i?. i e
.4
UT2 - PID 9

rl
t - ?J
..
A
4 t 4 _ ,11
` l
s
UT2 - PID 11

r
s c¢'.'
UT2 - PID 10
Beaverdam Creek, PEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2006, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT2 - PID 8
UT2 - PID 7
UT2 - PID 12
PHOTO LOG - UT2 & UT2A
UT2A - PID I
UT2A - PID 2

c _ 10,
,.

ray
?l

UT2A - PID 4
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05014-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT2A - PID 3
VEG PLOT PHOTOS
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UTI & UTIB - UTID
?t
!l
.f
`f .+?A t
UTI - Veg Plot I
t d ?? J )f •. ? 1 RS ..

i•'
`
"' a P P'
•
?7
?
e e??ca;,-.
,.,.
- '
- "
-
'

a ta s
L ? A y
4
~ Zi Oi TT .. ?1 t1, r

d
UTI - Veg Plot 3
"4 Ilk,
Aii+
UTI - Veg Plot 5
IS"
I?
f?
>aar° .?c ,?,
N ? ? + SA
UTI - Veg Plot 2
y J'; R
ti
wtlk
s
tea ' •?.? ???.. ?` ?tt+nv?.r . ?' ' ; `: ?.. _ :? ? ?i
UTI - Veg Plot 4
UTI - Veg Plot 6
Beaverdam Creek, F.EI Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT1 & UT1B - UT1D

tpf ?
10 4,;
!

I y '
y.. y

,• t
UT1- Veg Plot 7
JJ a3 i[
UT1- Veg Plot 9
a"'hy

4
JA
UT1- Veg Plot 8
?;orY 'A
Y? A-?
L ?1?44 d R
i ,..:
t" s
r ? 4? .7??{ ?, 7 i.C,"SA? ?. -
?wk y,
UT1- Veg Plot 10

UT1- Veg Plot 12
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1- Veg Plot 11
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT1 & UT1B - UT1D
Y ?3 ??•? ` ypi- ? 1? ? ,?yik ? ?q
f
I Q t (• +
+e
• 4
a(y?} r
UT1 - Veg Plot 13
t
h
UT1B - Veg Plot 15
t
f t?
?Y 4• :t,
UT1D - Veg Plot V

UT1- Veg Plot 14
y. s' }
UT1C - Veg Plot 16
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT2 & UT2A

ffS ;yrr{_r
?_ y y?rs - 't T
UT2A - Veg Plot 2
a s . tle.0
xyy r r K
UT2 - Veg Plot 4
. .. 1 'A
d {
UT2 - Veg Plot 6
Beaverdam Creek, FF,P Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT2A - Veg Plot I
UT2 - Veg Plot 3
UT2 - Veg Plot 5
VEG PLOT PHOTOS - UT2 & UT2A

. 1'E
'
'"? '?'?' -
? YA ??i?
? R
nx,

4
!
_ iF ^ ?+
f
_ ;

UT2 - Veg Plot 7
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
APPENDIX B
I STREAM MONITORING DATA
O
O
2
co
O
O
N
N
O
L
a
E
as
y
C
LT
r
Y
O
i
U
E
L
m
0
0
0
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
N
o c
0 0
O
r
cn
O
0
co
0
O
O
O
O
'IT
O
O
O
v
C
.i
O
a.+
C
O
2
00
Q
N
O
L.
a
E
d
c
`T
r
d
L
V
E
c?
L
m
O
O
co
co
O
O
O
co
O
O
It
Cl)
O
O
N
M
C
O O
0
O m
C')
cn
O
O
OD
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
''
N
O
O
N
N
O
O
O
Ln N
r-
Ln
O LO O LO O
a) 0) co co
LO LO LO LO
UOIIBAS13
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X1
Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)

?
.

71-

r
?w¢

Looking at the Left Bank
at the Right Bank
Strea m BKF Max BKF
F eature Typ e BKF Area BKF k&h De th De th KO B Ratio ER BKF Elev T B Elev
Pool 31.8 19.89 1.6 2.93 12.42 1 599.53 599.53

X1 Pool
603

602 ----- --•----------- ------------------- ---- ------ -------- ..............

601
600
c 599
0
i 598
d
w 597
596
595
I
594 J Bankfull o Floodprone -x - As Built ---*--Year 1 -0- Year 2 j
593

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X2
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)

Looking at the Left Bank
tip
.?r•...'VF-._.i" ? ..flied/,. ?+'?'a?"? r?^ _? '?? -,^

at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature T e BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 17.8 12.75 1.4 1.97 9.11 1 5.9 598.85 598.85
X2 Riffle
602 - - ---
- -
--- -- -- ----
-- - -- -- -
601 ?J
600

599 ->
11106

o
598
d

w
597
596
595 c, Bankfull o - - Floodprone - As Built Year 1 ?1- Year 2
594

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
13eaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05010-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008. Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X3
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)

a

?.? ? ? • - ??7f.??i ",.
a' 3 a
?.
s t r
! ookina at the Riaht Bank
Stream Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width BKF Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 19.4 14.82 1.31 2.97 11.35 1 599.77 599.77
X3 Pool
604
i
603 1
0
602
601
c 600 -
.2
599
d
w 598
597

596
o Bankfull o - Floodprone -? As Built ? Year 1 Year 2
595

594 I

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Crock, UP Contract No. D05016-1• River Works, Inc,
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Dratt
Looking at the Left Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X4
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
Avw err r 7
Looking at the Left Bank

L
L Rr w t ""- 0174
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 15.6 11.09 1.41 2.35 7.89 1 6.8 599.75 599.75
X4 Riffle
603
602 ----- ------- -- -------------•------ ----------------- ------------------ ------ ---------
601
600
o -
> 599
m
w
598
597

596
O Bankfull
o Floodprone
- 0 Year 1
-- -- As Built
--t?- Year 2 i
595

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. Dt1i016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X5
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
Looking at the Left Bank
s? S „? t
\
/
?2? y j , WwL
-a 1
}
Fry?e '

14

1

Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 23.6 15.32 1.54 2.36 9.94 1 4.9 597.93 597.93
X5 Riffle
601

600 -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ ----------------------------------
d
599
598
0

597
d
W
596
595

o Bankful l - - o - • Floodprone --0 Year l As Built - Year 2
594
593

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X6
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
Str eam BKF Max BKF
Feature T ype BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 41.2 23.62 1.74 3.39 13.56 1 597.06 597.07
X6 Pool
602

600 --- -------------- --------------------- ---------------------------------------------------Q
598
C
0
596
d
W
594
i
592
o - Bankfull - - o - - Floodprone * As Built -?- Year 1 -0 Year 2
590

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
' icaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 21N18. Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X7
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
ti
-
?. w
I
Looking at the Left Bank
? y f f
r
ti> )J ,.0
ytz

Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 9.5 13.2 0.72 1.14 18.38 1 5.4 594.95 594.96
X7 Riffle
597.5 -- -- - ---- - - ---
596.5
596.5

-------

-----------

----------------- -

------------------

--------------------------

595.5 i
o
594.5
m
w
593.5
592.5
Bankfull - - o - Floodprone --?- As Built -? Year 1 -- Year 2
591
5
.
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1. River Works. Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X8
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
"V?

Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 30.3 12.43 2.44 3.22 5.1 1 593.45 593.46
X8 Pool
599 ----
597
------- ---------- -------------------- ----------------------------------------------------0
595
c
0
r
593 - -
j
d
w
591
i
589
o Bankful l - o - - Floodprone -- As Built 0 Year 1 ->? Year 2
587

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works. Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X9
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
T-
f r {
Ilk t
r. wyJSe, e.
li
t '
t t l , 'h ??yih ;r ' a1
1 9i
s '?4 n
Looking at the Left Bank
& y e
ta , 79*fl ?'
?? 5 n 1
u
y a
t F!
4'+
,dye; r41 .; ? r
4-A 1
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 29.4 17.62 1.67 2.76 10.56 1 4.3 590.86 590.86
X9 Riffle
595 ---- - -- --- ----- - -- --- - _ _ .. _ .,.
594
------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------ol
593
592
c 591

> 590
I
d
w 589
588

587
0 Bankfull o - - Floodprone -? - As Built ? Year 1 -Dt- Year 2
586 j

585 I

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008. Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X10
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)

Looking at the Left Bank
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 42.7 22.42 1.9 3.4 11.78 1 588.8 588.81
X10 Pool
593 ?e .- -- - -- - _ _ . - -- -
592 •-------- ------------------------------ -----------------------•---•------------------------0
591
590
C 589 'e

588
d
w 587
586
585
584 a Bankfull o Floodprone X As Built -4-- Year 1 -» Year 2
583

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works. Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X11
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
1.. . i

Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
Stream Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width BKF Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 18.9 15.06 1.25 2.15 12.03 1 589.89 589.89
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X12
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
f
M 'R,,,?:'
v7",

?q ? :;.
'.
tom' + x
w .

Looking at the Left Bank
k a ^
71
y ? r
' #' 1 7 - : - rte/" ? ?? h V M A? S^? K? ?'.`F. Y .. ?i
201,
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 9 11.39 0.79 1.07 14.37 1 6.6 589.02 589.02
X12 Riffle
590.5
590 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------o;
589.5
1
589
c
- _ ---.'
r-
588.5
d
w
588
587.5
587 a Bankfull o - - Floodprone - *- As Built ---*--Year 1- Year 2
586
5
.
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works. Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X13
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool 77.6 28.64 2.71 6.59 10.57 1 586.8 586.81
X13 Pool
596

594

........

...........

.•----------------

------------------ i

----------------....-......-.-...--

1
592
i
590
c
588

w 586
i
I
584 ,
i
582
580

578 f

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
0 Bankfull - - o - - Floodprone ?-- As Built - 0 Year l ?I- Year 2

Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008. Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X14
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
rA

y'wr

Looking at the Left Bank
r s +`xd
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 39.4 20.15 1.95 3.26 10.31 1 3.7 585.27 585.27
X14 Riffle
591 _
589
------------------ ---------- ----------- ----------------- ------ ------- -------------- - 0;
587 ?I
c
0
585
m
w
583
581
o Bankfull o - Floodprone -X As Built -a Year l a Year 2
579

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek. FFP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works, Inc.
December 2008. Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X15
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
r t. 4, i
A
S r
1? TT

5 A F?

010', 7
e Awl

Looking at the Left Bank

r
?p
Looking at the Right Bank
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 62.4 26.01 2.4 4.72 10.84 1 3 579.55 579.55
X15 Riffle
586 - - -- -- -_ ---- - - ,
584 •---•---- ---------- ------------------- ------------------ --------------•
--
-----------------i
582
i

o 580 A;F i
m
m
W 578

576 i

i
574
n Bankfull o • - Floodprone - As Built -0 Year 1 ->«-Year 2
572

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works, Inc.
December 2008. Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X16
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
L 1. •LA' f Y. 9 'y?Y'Jyfreq i,
f ? d
,.

Looking at the Right Bank

F
eature Stre
Ty am
pe
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 45.2 21.61 2.09 3.66 10.33 1 576.76 576.76
X16 Pool
582 ----

580 ---- ---------------------------------------- .------------ ......-------- .......----------- p I
578
o "
576

w
574
572

a Bankfull o Floodprone - * - As Built --4-- Year 1 - Year 2 1
570

100 110 120 130 140 150
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Looking at the Left Bank
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X17
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
4 ', * e

lit

±? v 5'?.ry...J.t#

"?'Ca N 4?4.M.g1+ 1. !'aNft Ak, ?..

? n?•.
,
r
..
? .
+tl
l Y

Looking at the Left Bank

Looking at the Right Bank
36.1 1 23.33 1 1.55 1 4.44 1 15.08 1
X17 Pool
579
578
41-
577
576
c 575
574
d
W 573
572
571
570
569
100
o Bankfull - - o - - Floodprone -As Built +- Year 1 -* Year
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016- 1. River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
110 120 130 140 150 160
Station
UT1 Permanent Cross Section X18
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width
BKF Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C/E 34.8 23.39 1.49 2.73 15.71 1 3.4 574.27 574.28
X18 Pool
578 . - _ _ - - - _ --- _ -1
577 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------?
576
575
c
:. 574
M
°-' 573
ELI
572
571 j

570 o Bankfull o Floodprone -T- As Built ?- Year l -x- Year 2
569

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180
Station
13eeverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016- 1, River Works. Inc.
December 21MI8. Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Looking at the Right Bank
Looking at the Left Bank
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X1
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
?at

Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 10.4 13.4 0.78 1.15 17.24 1 3 612.78 612.78
X1 Riffle
615
614
-------- ------------------------------ ----------------- -----------------------------------Q
c 613
0
-
i

m
w 612
611
i
o Bankfull o - • Floodprone ->E- As Built ---*--Year 1 - - Year 2
610

100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
November 21N18, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X2
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Pool 21.3 20.6 1.04 2.16 19.89 1 611.57 611.57
X2 Pool
614 ..._..._-

613 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
612
c
0 e??
611 I
d
w
610
609
o Bankfull - o - - Floodprone -- - As Built - 0 Year 1 -rF- Year 2

608
100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1. River Works, Inc.
November 2(H)S, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Looking at the Right Bank
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X3
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
x
71 7,...
? * a+c
Looking
Stream BKF Max BKF
Feature Type BKF Area BKF Width Depth Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 11.2 17.25 0.65 1.07 26.58 1 2.3 623.18 623.18

X3 Riffle
625

624

-

-------- i
I
E
0

d 623 )

w
622

? Bankfull
- • o - - Floodprone i
---- As Built -0 Year l ---x-Year 2 ?
621

100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
13caverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
November 2(X)6, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft

UT2 Permanent Cross Section X4
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)

7=. t -
i
{
? 1 hry f

S , -.: -`Ry'e' ,•{i?wi•r ^?• . :. ,', ?...?, X?".§.

Lookina at the Left Bank
Pool 25.1 20.83 1.21 2.45 17.29 1 619.54 619.42
X4 Pool
623 --__- _
622
.......................................••---..............................---....---.....o
621
i
620
0
619
m
w
618
617
616 o Bankfull o - - Floodprone ?- As Built ?- Year 1 Year 2
615
100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek. F.FP Contract No. D051116-I, River Works. Inc.
November 21X18. Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X5
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
Riffle C 21.4 16.18 1.32 1.88 1 12.25 1 2.5 585.95 585.94
X5 Riffle
588 --_
----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
587
586
0
585
m
w
584
583
o Bankfull - o - - Floodprone - < As Built 0 Year 1 --x- Year 2
582
100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek. EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works. Inc.
November 21918, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Looking at the Right Bank
UT2 Permanent Cross Section X6
(Year 2 Monitoring Data - collected November 2008)
14.42 1 1
X6 Pool
587 --- - - ----------- ------- -- --- -
586 --------------------------------------•------------------------
585
584
t.-.
0
583
w
582
581
7
580
c> Bankfull - - o - - Floodprone X- As Built -0 Year 1 r Year 2
579
100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Station
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I. River Works. Inc.
November 21918, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X1-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/12/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 20 20% 20%
Very Fine .063-125 42 42% 62%
s-
Fine
.125-25
12
12%
74%
A Medium 25-50 22 22% 96%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
4
4%
100%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 100%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 100%
O E Medium 11.0-16.0 100%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
n o0on
Very Coarse
32 - 45
100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
2M Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90- 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128- 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BO
LD
U
ER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft

1
1
1
1
1

C
Q
L
N
0
N_
N
r Q N
?a ?
X coo
a
c
Q
V
m
CD
M
co
0
0
0
0
d
I
0 0 0 OR
0 0 0 0
o CA co r-
T
0 0 0
0 0 0
Co U7 IT
aauid }uaaaad
0 0 OR
0 0 0
Cr) N r
0
0
0
0
T
O
C]
O
T
0
O
T
E
N
N
O N
T
t
cc
a
0
4 o
00
0
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X2-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/12/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 0%
Very Fine 063-1125 18 18% 18%

S Fine .125-25 18%
A Medium .25-50 18%
N
p
Coarse
.50-1.0
18%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 18%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 18%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 18%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 18%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 18%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 18%
E Medium 11.0 - 16.0 18%
L V
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 18%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 4 4% 22%
?O Very Coarse 32 - 45 18 18% 40%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 28 28% 68%
Small 64 - 90 4 4% 72%
Small 90 - 128 18 18% 90%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 10 10% 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
B ULDER
? Medium 512-1024 100%
FQ Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
0
0
0
T
c
0
7
N_
N
N
d Cl)
r ? d
?a
c
0
V
m
.a
a?
CL
ca
Y
0
_(D
Q Q Q Q
O 0 0 O
O O CO N
T
Q Q Q
0 0 0
co In It
Maui j IUOOJad
Q Q Q
O O O
Q7 N r
O
T
E
E
a?
O ,?/N/?
T V/
d
cc
a
T
0
T O.
0
0

11

1
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 B X3-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/12/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
I DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 26 26% 26%
Very Fine .063-125 22 22% 48%
s

µ
Fine
125 - .25
26
26%
74%
A Medium .25-50 10 10% 84%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
14
14%
98%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 2 2% 100%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%
Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 100%
V
E
Medium
11.0-16.0
100%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
n o00 Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
Small 64 - 90 100%

2 Small 90 - 128 100%
OBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
O
T
C
O
?L
N_
G
N
N
O Cl)
m p C!
= X E
CL
C
3
O
V
as
.a
m
CL
0
0
la
I
0 0 0 OR 0 0
O N 000 r- (OD lLO It
r
O
O
r
E
E
d
O dw
T V!
d
t
m
A
r
O
I I I t o
0
0 OR 0 1010
Cep N O O
Jauid IUGOJad
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 B M-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/12/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % cum
Silt / Clay < .063 14 14% 14%
Very Fine .063-125 45 45% 59%

S _ Fine 125-25 22 22% 81%
A Medium .25-50 19 19% 100%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
100%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%
Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 100%

O V
E
Medium
11.0-16.0
100%
0 L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
n OOon Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
0?( Small s4 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128- 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%

?tff Small 256 - 362 100%

- Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
--
K Medium 512 - 1024 100%
K
? Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
O
T
C
0
L
N
D
m
N
N co
m ? N
r ? V
d' t
X
a
c
0
U
as
.Q
m
a
ca
Y
L.L
0 0 0 0
O O O O
O O O n
T
0 0 0
O O O
co In v
Jsuizl Iuaoaad
O
O
T
E
E
m
N
O N
V
CL
T
O
0 0 0
O O O O
CO) N T
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X5-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/12/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 0%
Very Fine .063-125 12 12% 12%

S Fine 125-25 12%
A Medium 25-50 12%
N
p
Coarse
.50-1.0
2
2%
14%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 14%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 14%
Op ?( Very Fine 2.8-4.0 14%
Fine 4.0-5.6 14%
G
R ?

C
Fine
5.6-8.0
14%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 14%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 14%
L V Coarse 16.0-22.6 14%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 2 2% 16%
n o Ocx?c
Very Coarse
32 - 45
18
18%
34%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 16 16% 50%
001 Small 64 - 90 4 4% 54%
Small 90 - 128 24 24% 78%
COBBLE
<
Large
128 - 180
18
18%
96%
O Large 180 - 256 4 4% 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512- 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
O
O
O
O
T
O
O
O
T
c
0
L
N
w?
W
N
_d N
r ?_ d
A
X
a
c
0
V
m
a
m
CL
al
Y
M
O O O IOR O ? O
O O co f? CO L
r
Mid IUOOJgd
O O O
M N
O
O
T

0
O N
T ?•
V
a
T
O
4-9
0 O
O
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X6-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/12/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: 1E/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 55 55% 55%
Very Fine .063-125 15 15% 70%

S
M1} Fine .125-25 15 15% 85%
Medium 25-50 10 10% 95
N
D Coarse .
50 - 1.0
5
5% t
Very Coarse 1.0 - 2.0
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 1000
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%
Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 100%
V
E
Medium
11.0-16.0
100%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
C ?On Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
OU Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE C Large 128 - 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER
Medium
512 - 1024
100%
K
Large-Very Large
1024 - 2048
100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
O
T
L
O
7
L
d
N
V- O O
= X ea
a
c
O
U
as
d
a
s
CO
^o
LL
0 0 0 0
O O O O
O O O n
T
0 0 0
O O O
CO LO [F
GUI J ;ua3Jad
O
T
G
E
d
N
O N
d
cc
a
T
O
O
0 0 OR
0
O O O O
CY) N T
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 C X7-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/12/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % cum
Silt / Clay < .063 0%
Very Fine .063-125 0%

S Fine 125-25 6 6% 6%
A Medium .25-50 6%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
2
2%
8%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 8%

O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 8%
?p Very Fine 2.8-4.0 8%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 8%
R
C Fine 5.6 - 8.0 8%
A
V Medium 8.0- 11.0 g%
^n E Medium 11.0-16.0 8%
V L O C Coarse 16.0-22.6 8%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 4 4% 12%
n o Don
Very Coarse
32 - 45
16
16%
28%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 22 22% 50%
Small 64 - 90 14 14% 64%
Small 90 - 128 30 30% 94%

COBBLE
Large
128 - 180
6
6%
100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOU ER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
T
C
0
7
N_
D
d
N
4D Cl)
X ?
a
c
0
V
as
m
a
c0
M
0
m
LL
OR 0?
O O O O
0 O
T
0 0 O
CD LO Iq
JOUIJ IU83JOd
0 o a
0 O 0
M N T
0
Q
T
E
E
m
N
O cn
_V
CL
T
O
1 O
O
0
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 C X8-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/12/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 66 66% 66%
Very Fine .063-125 10 10% 76%

ST Fine 125-25 20 20% 96%
A Medium .25-50 2 2% 98%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
2
2%
100%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%
Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
100%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 100%

O V
E
Medium
11.0-16.0
100%
V L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
n on Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
1r-- 1
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
O
T
C
O
fA
D
d
N
-6 U)
U O m
co
CL
c
7
O
U
m
m
CL
O
O
E
E
d
N
0
0
0
0
0
Cl
T
O N
m
a
T
O
0 0 0 0
O O O O
O O 00
T
0 OR 0
O O O
co LO v
JGUTA IuaaJad
O
0 0 0 0
O O O O
ch CV T
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X9-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/11/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 0%
Very Fine .063-125 0%

S Fine .125-25 4 4% 4%
A Medium .25-50 2 2% 6%
N
D
Coarse
.50 - 1.0
12
12%
18%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 2 2% 20%

O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 20%
Qj "C)l Very Fine 2.8-4.0 20%
G Fine 4.0-5.6 20%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 20%
Q A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 20%
E
C Medium 11.0-16.0 20%
L O C Coarse 16.0-22.6 2 2% 22%
C Coarse 22.6 - 32 12 12% 34%
n o 0oc>R Very Coarse 32 - 45 24 24% 58%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 2 2% 60%
Small 64 - 90 14 14% 74%
Small 90 - 128 18 18% 92%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 8 8% 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BO
D
UL
ER
Medium
512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
T
L
0
7
N
w?
W
N
d cn
F..
G1 ?
X ?
IL
c
0
V
m
m
IL
a
iC
0
m
I.L
O OR 10-0 0-0
C) a
O O co ti
r
O O O
co L
JOUW IUOOJad
O O O
C7 N r0
O
T

d
N
O
d
V
t0
a
T
4
O
O
O

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT

n

BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X10-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/11/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: 1E/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 48 48% 48%
Very Fine .063-125 6 6% 54%

A Fine
Medium .125-25
25-50 16
4 16%
4% 70%
74%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
6
6%
80%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 80%

O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 80%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 80%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 6 6% 86%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 6 6% 92%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 2 2% 94%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 2 2% 96%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 96%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 4 4% 100%
n o 0??
Very Coarse
32 - 45
100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
(? Large 180 - 256 100%

?tff Small 256 - 362 100%

_ Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
C
O
L
H
D
d
_ N_
O N
T O d
a
c
O
V
m
a?
CL
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
r
0
0
T
E
0
N
O y
T
r
a
m
m
0
0
la
I
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
o rn m N
r
0 0 0
0 0 0
(D In
Jauid IUOOJad
0 0 0
0 o O
M N r
0
?. o
o
0
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 D X11-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/11/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 9 9% 9%
Very Fine 063-125 6 6% 15%

S Fine 125-25 18 18% 33%
A
` Medium .25-50 40 40% 73%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
15
15%
88%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 7 7% 95%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 95%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 1 1 % 96%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 1 1 % 97%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 1 1 % 98%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 1 1% 99%
E 1
1
f1? Medium 11.0-16.0 99%
L C
T
v Coarse 16.0-22.6 99%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 99%
n OOon
Very Coarse
32 - 45
99%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 1 1 % 100%
Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%

C
T E
Large
128 - 180 °
100 /o
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER

10 Medium 512- 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
I Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
O
T
L
0
L
N
N
_ N_
O N
oa°?m
T L
X t0
CL
c
0
U
m
.o
d
CL
O
O
T
E
E
d
N
o
_V
co
a
0
cc
0
0
d
f
0 0 0 0
O 000 N
T
0 0 o
O
(D LO 11
JGUW 4UGDJad
T
O
T?TT ?
O
0 OR 0 0
C N O O
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 D X12-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/11/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 1 1 % 1 %
Very Fine 063-125 9 9% 10%

s Fine .125-25 10%
A
N Medium .25-50 10%
D Coarse .50-1.0 10%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 10%

O
O^ ?(
l? Very Fine

Very Fine 2.0-2.8

2.8-4.0 10%

10%

G 0 Fine 4.0-5.6 10%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 10%
A
V C Medium 8.0-11.0 10%
E Medium 11.0-16,0 10%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 2 2% 12%
C Coarse 22.6 - 32 21 21% 33%
Very Coarse 32 - 45 36 36% 69%
n O ?cxlc t Very Coarse 45 - 64 17 17% 86%
Small 64 - 90 10 10% 96%
Small 90 - 128 2 2% 98%
C
OBBLE
<
Large
128 - 180
2
2%
100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
? Medium 512 - 1024 100%
PQ Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
Q
O
O
T
c
0
L
m
N
T L
X co
CL
c
0
U
m
a
m
a
R
Y
CIS
O O O O O O OR
0 co O CO LO IT
T
O O O
COO CM TO
O
O
T
E
E
d
N
O N
d
r
ca
a
T
O
1 O
O
O
Jauld IuaaJad
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X13-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/11/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 43 43% 43%
Very Fine .063-125 5 5% 48%

S Fine .125-25 27 27% 75%
A Medium .25-50 13 13% 88%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
7
7%
95%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 3 3% 98%
Very Fine 2.0-2.8 98%
l? Very Fine 2.8-4.0 1 1 % 99%
0 Fine 4.0-5.6 99%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
99%
A
V Medium 8.0- 11.0 1 1 % 100%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 100%
ran L Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
O Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%

BOULDER
Medium
512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
C
O
L
N
d
_ N_
O N
a-
X
CL
c
O
V
m
m
IL
ca
0
0
0
dl
do, OR 0-0 I
0
00 rn co n
r
0
CC DD lO °v
JOU j }uaaJad
oao
C7 N 0r
0
0
0
0
T
0
O
Q
T
O
0
T
2
d
N
O N
T
r
a
0
?-9
O
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT

1
1

1
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X14-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/11/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 9 9% 9%
Very Fine 063-125 11 11% 20%
s
Fine
.1125-25
14
14%
34%
A Medium 25-50 27 27% 61%
N
p
Coarse
.50-1.0
5
5%
66%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 4 4% 70%

O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 70%
^ Oa
l? Very Fine 2.8-4.0 70%
0 Fine 4.0-5.6 70%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
70%
A
V C Medium 8.0-11.0 70%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 1 1 % 71%
L Coarse 16.0-22.6 1 1 % 72%
O
C
Coarse
22.6 - 32
4
4%
76%
Very Coarse 32 - 45 7 7% 83%
n O Very Coarse 45 - 64 3 3% 86%
Small 64 - 90 8 8% 94%
Small 90 - 128 3 3% 97%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 2 2% 99%
O Large 180 - 256 1 1 % 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512- 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
C
0
L
it
N
as
? N
Cl)
t
r m
X a
c
0
L)
m
w?
W
CL
cis
ca
0
r
f
OR 0 0 0 o \°
O O Co ? co LO IT
T
JOUTA WOOJad
0 0
O O O
M N r
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
O
T
O
T
E
d
O N
T
a
T
0
o
O

1
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X15-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/10/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 4 4% 4%
Very Fine .063-1125 3 3% 7%
Fine .1125-25 21 21% 28%
S
A
Medium
.25-50
27
27%
55%
N Coarse .50-1.0 29 29% 84%
° Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 8 8% 92%
Very Fine 2.0-2.8 1 1 % 93%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 1 1% 94%
Fine 4.0-5.6 1 1 % 95%
Fine 5.6-8.0 95%
Medium 8.0-11.0 1 1 % 96%
V
F Medium 11.0 - 16
.0
3
3%
99%
Coarse 16.0 - 22.6 1 1 % 100%
C Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
-
,
0

Very Coarse

32 - 45

100%
n O ion Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
O Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER Medium 512 - 1024 100%
arge-Very Larg 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
L Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1
L
0
L
H
d N
T
,A V
YJ t
T m
X CL
0
V
0
72
.n
m
a
OR

' O
T O
O O O-R O
O
CD CD 0
0 O U')
Jauid ;uaoJad
O O O
O O O
C7 N r
0
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
T
Q
T
E
0
O N
T
R
CL
T
0
I Q
O
0-0
O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X16-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/10/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
IDATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 61 61% 61%
Very Fine .063-125 5 5% 66%

S Fine .125-25 26 26% 92%
A Medium .25-50 7 7% 99%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
1
1 %
100%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
Very Fine 2.8-40 100%

G Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 100%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 100%

U E
( Medium 11.0-16.0 100%
V L O
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
n o Ooc?
Very Coarse
32 - 45
100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90- 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
= Small 362 - 512 100%
B
OULDER
? Medium 512 - 1024 100%
PQ Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
0
0
0
0
T
O
0
O
T
C
O
7
L
cl
d
_ N_
O
O
r ?
Xa
c
O
V
m
d
a
0
Y
0
0
0
la
T
0
Q
T
2
E
m
O '/N
T A
V
?o
a
r
0
T
O
O O \ OR O O O p 0
O p
0 C) C)
O 00 COO to CV) N O
aauid 3ua3aad
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X17-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/10/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 25 25% 25%
Very Fine .063-125 25%

S Fine .1125-25 23 23% 48%
A Medium 25-50 25 25% 73%
N
x. D
Coarse
.50-1.0
19
19%
92%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 4 4% 96%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 96%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 96%
Fine 4.0-5.6 1 1 % 97%
G
R
Fine
5.6-8.0
97%
A Medium 8.0-11.0 97%
V
E
Medium
11.0-16.0
1
1%
98%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 2 2% 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
00?? Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
OU Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512-1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
Q
Q
T
L
0
7
L
N
_ N_
O N
T 0 d
a
Xa
c
0
V
G)
N
M
O
T

m
O I/N
T A
r
?o
a
ca
cu
0
6
0
O O O O
O O O O
o O co n
T
O
O O
O O O
co In IT
JOUN ;uaoJad
O O O
O O O
C7 N T
T
O
4-9
o O
O
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BAKER PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT1 X18-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/10/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 10 10% 10%
" w
8 pie !

S
a Very Fine

Fine
Medium .063-125

.125-25
.25-50

5
7

5%
7% 10%

15%
22%

t?

N r'I
I Coarse .50-1.0
19
19%
41%
°
?
l Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 3 3% 44%
?
t
4 4k,
Very Fine
2.0-2.8
1
1%
45%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 45 /°
Fine 4.0 - 5.6 2 20 470
G Fine 5.6-8.0 47%
0 A Medium 8.0-11.0 47%
V Medium 11.0-16.0 1 1 % 48%
g0 E n
0 Coarse 16.0-22.6 3 3% 51%
L Coarse 22.6 - 32 7 7% 58%

0 Very Coarse 32 - 45 26 26% 84%
0,
on Very Coarse 45 - 64 10 10% 94%
Small 64 - 90 2 2% 96%
Small 90 - 128 4 4% 100%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 100%
Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER Medium 512 - 1024 100%
arge-Very Larg 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-I, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
O
T
a
0
f?
dr
L
N
0
N
CD N
? ?/? V
W
r ?
X o,
c
0
C)
d
.a
m
a
cc
Y
LL
O O O O O O p
p
10
O rn 000 M co °on °v M N rO
T
JOUW Iuaaad
O
O
T
E
E
0
N
O
T
V
V-

4 O
c O
O
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT2A X1-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 1132008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 17 1 ?0 117.
Very Fine .063-125 1 Yio

s Fine .125-25 1 1 % 18%
A Medium .25-50 18%
N
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
18%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 18%

00 Very Fine 2.0-2.8 18%
qj Very Fine 2.8-4.0 18%
o
G Fine 4.0-5.6 18%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 18%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 18%
E Medium 11.0-16.0 18%
0 L V
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 1 1% 19%
C Coarse 22.6 - 32 12 12% 31%
n C9 Very Coarse 32 - 45 30 30% 61%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 30 30% 91%
Small 64 - 90 5 5% 96%
Small 90 - 128 3 3% 99%
COBBLE Large 128 - 180 1 1% 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 1000
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512-1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
I..... _,
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
6.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
C
0
L
d
N
d (n
N CD
0
=X?
CL
c
0
U
m
m
a
v
is
0
l?
T
O O O
O O O o
O O OD ED
O O O
to
Jauid ;uaoaad
O
O
O
O
T
O
O
O
T
O
O
T
E
0
O N
T N
r
a
0
T
O
O
O OR 10-0 1010
[ N O O
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT2A X2-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/7/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 98 98% 98%
Very Fine 063-125 98%

S Fine 125-25 98%
A
N Medium .25-50 2 2% 100%
p Coarse .50-1.0 100%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%

O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%
G Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 100%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 0
100 /o
E Medium 11.0-16.0 100%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
r7 ODOC) Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
C
OBBLE Large 128- 180 100/
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
1
1
1
1
c
O
H
D
N
e;
a
g
?a?
IL
c
O
U
CD
?AA
W
CL
ro
co
0
0
0
al
1
0 o 0 0 0 o OR 0 0 0 OR °
O O Go 19 co OLO tt M N r0
r
Jsuid IuaOJad
0
0
0
0
r
O
T
O
T
E
0
N
O
'/
T A
2
t
0
IL
T
0
4o
0
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT2 M-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 1 1 /4/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/KS
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay <,063 11 11% 11%
Very Fine .063-125 11%

S Fine .125-25 11%
A
N Medium .25-50 1 1 %
D Coarse .50-1.0 11%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 11%
O 0 Very Fine 2.0-2.8 11%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 11%
o
G Fine 4.0-5.6 11%
R
C Fine 5.6-8.0 11%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 11%
E (?
(1 Medium 11.0 - 16.0 1 1 % 12%
L i
J
?
v
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 2 2% 14%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 10 10% 24%
(, ^ 00? Very Coarse 32 - 45 42 42% 66%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 18 18% 84%
0?( Small s4 - 90 3 3% g?O
Small 90-128 6 6% 93%
C
OBBLE Large 128-180 4
0
4 /° 93°
O Large 180 - 256 3 3% 100%
Small 256 - 362 10000
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 -2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
' Largest particles:
(riffle)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft

CD
0
0
0
T
Q
Q
T
L
0
W
o
W
N
co
N a)
`' V
MM/
X
CL
c
0
U
as
a)
IL
as
O O O O O -010 O O
O ? 000 19 (00 U) It M N TO
T
T
E
E
O cn
T
V
IL
d
N
T
O
4
O
10 O
Jauid IUOOJOd

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT2 X4-Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/4/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: 1E/KS
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 100 100% 100%
Very Fine 063-125 100%
S
Fine
.125-25
100%
A
N Medium .25-50 100%
-
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
100%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 100%
00- O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 100%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 100%
G Fine 4.0-5.6 100%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 100%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 °
100 /°
E Medium 110-16.0 100%
L O Coarse 16.0-22.6 100%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 100%
t7 O X00 Very Coarse 32 - 45 100%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 100%
Small 64 - 90 100%
Small 90 - 128 100%
COBBLE
< Large 128 - 180 100%
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 1

BOULDER 00%
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100710
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
C
0
L
0
m
N
-6 U)
N O d
X eta
a
c
0
V
m
a
.a
m
IL
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
T
O
T
E
N
O N
T
ca
a
cts
as
0
0
0
ld
T
T
O
O O O
O O O -
O O co to
T
O O O
co LO IT
JOUid }UBOJOd
T
O
O O p
O O
O O
M N O O
PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: RIFFLE 100-COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT2 X5-Riffle
DATE COLLECTED: 11/72008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Riffle Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 15 15% 15%
Very Fine 063-125 15%
s
Fine
.125-25
8
8%
23%
A
N Medium .25-50 23%
Coarse .50-1.0 3 3% 26%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 26%

O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 26%
Op Very Fine 2.8-4.0
1
1 %
240
0
G Fine 4.0-5.6 1 1 % 28%

R ?

C
Fine
5.6-8.0
28%
A
V Medium 8.0- 11.0 1 1 % 29%
E nn Medium 11.0-16.0 29%
L O
C Coarse 16.0-22.6 29%
Coarse 22.6 - 32 13 13% 42%
. ODoC1 Very Coarse 32 - 45 27 2T0 9%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 19 19% 88%
Small 64 - 90 3 3% 91%
Small 90 - 128 6 6% 9TO

COBBLE Large 128 - 180 3
0
3 /0
0
100 /o
O Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
I..... _/
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
0
0
0
0
T
O
O
O
T
C
O
7
L
W
d
N
d (n
N CD
Y/ t
X w
a
c
O
V
d
.o
m
a
cis
Y
LL
CJR O O O OR p
O a) co OB co OLO qt M N
T
O
T
E
E
d
N
O co
T
_V
a
T
0
1 O
O
I O
JOUN ;ua3Jad

1
1
1

PEBBLE COUNT DATA SHEET: POOL 100-COUNT
BUCK PROJECT NO. 108528
SITE OR PROJECT: Beaverdam Creek 2nd Year Monitoring
REACH/LOCATION: UT2 X&Pool
DATE COLLECTED: 11/7/2008
FIELD COLLECTION BY: IE/CT
DATA ENTRY BY: KS
PARTICLE CLASS COUNT Summary
MATERIAL PARTICLE SIZE (mm) Pool Class % % Cum
Silt / Clay < .063 96 96% 96%
Very Fine .063-125 96%
Fine .125-25 96%
A
N Medium 25-50 96%
p Coarse .50-1.0 L
96%
Very Coarse 1.0-2.0 96%
O Very Fine 2.0-2.8 96%
Very Fine 2.8-4.0 96%
G Fine 4.0-5.6 96%
R Fine 5.6-8.0 96%
A
V Medium 8.0-11.0 °
96 /o
E Medium 11.0-16.0 96%
L O
( Coarse 16.0-22.6 96%
AN Coarse 22.6 - 32 96%
n Don, Very Coarse 32 - 45 96%
Very Coarse 45 - 64 96%
Small 64 - 90 2 2% 98%
Small 90 - 128 2 2% 100%
n Large 128 - 180 100%
c_)o Large 180 - 256 100%
Small 256 - 362 100%
Small 362 - 512 100%
BOULDER
Medium 512 - 1024 100%
Large-Very Large 1024 - 2048 100%
BEDROCK Bedrock > 2048 100%
Total 100 100%
Largest particles:
(pool)
Beaverdam Creek, EEP Contract No. D05016-1, River Works, Inc.
December 2008, Monitoring Year 2 - Draft
Distribution
Plot Size (mm)
0.063
0.125
0.25
0.50
1.0
2.0
2.8
4.0
5.6
8.0
11.3
16.0
22.6
32
45
64
90
128
180
256
362
512
1024
2048
5000
1
1
1
1
D
D
r
O
O
O
T

c
0
L
N
d
N_
H a0 v
(p 'C
X
CL_
0
V
m
.a
w?
W
IL
CIS
0
la
T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
°o rn OD lL OV
T
Jauid ;uaaJad
0 0 0
M N
O
O
T
E
N
O N
T
V
r
co
A
T
T
O
4o
010
O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
APPENDIX C
AS-BUILT PLAN SHEETS
W
v)
Y a.
w
6-
~ J w
u Y 4 m W
p U z w
z (n
Q
13
WOO ? I- w
J J
o QM
• w I
tt m Q
w
J V)
< It N
V) -?
I I Ob r- w J
0 0 1- IN- x Q tD Orr] N tD
.CD
00 00 d -t 0
Z 1! 11 II !I li II
Q
Z
J
O X !?-
0
U LLJ w
Q m ._1
~ z z Z
w V) z Wcn ?o ?o
W 0
W ,Q Z Z a a
Q wo w (n z - z?
LL- ? U v=i w wa wd o
U O w LL- 1a1 L) (. L ?( ?CA:E 2:
L1_ V) x wwwm L?? ?? Of :2 w U.1 w
r /1 n ?W ! OIL tna cn`rJ W?
V J ?--- ? r=te Q CLLno U? C~J?0 Ua
W WM00 WL WL" F= mH
- ° 0 0-1> o>
n-- w (L Q- LLJ Li W
r?y? 6 1 co I co ? > fn
L W Z }= z w i N w I w < W
Q
Q
W
? ? Q
cj?
4g5
EL
JAN R EK
o- CL 0 ?? 0
1 Oa,
d' r i ° r
a U
P 4
ODR ? Nti
r
CL d ?. g
O ?
f
w
_>
Ck? U
+ 1 w
w
,?I td S _Z g
U R
W
RO?? I ~ 4
I
?GPP
Qbp? ?3/41? ?N? 4 s
3lk?? c? O
0
3
m
a o s Y a
3
w < N ( t'?
U Y yam, rAA??r LJ m
o Will g? d
Z
W
> J
m
w! w 7.
m Q
V)
o O w r
r z
2 (3
W
M v `< W n
L7 w < r
> >
u v inn d c W
r , a s r w+ o 0 a °a 7d
pw r x
x x a x O O x
Q s
o a
w
0
CJ
it
F

W
°? iz5 gym'? p( S i ?'? j\ f t? I YCL j
:Y. LJ
LLI
A•V Ot3n 7 LLl
i' € ri J 1
w j Lam!
5 0-1
U s(
r f
r
r
R r!J ?\
P15
r
? t a
l $
7
d _?Ltn
t L ` t9+tfi t
rr .t' .. °°°h f
tr t rf? ?`_ ._ °
10
.440
Ck-
`t !
r {J ;
I j
wr•? ! N
//?? ! 1 JjJ yZ.
11 j J` vw. I
,j
.1 } LLJ
! 1 ! ? f LLB
! tV?{ i C
t ,t
t
cv t cs.sr ? ?,,,.
CL LiJ
!
JJ t
It
i j
l j
! lj -'? t
'` Op+O t
t
1 J
ti
:i
m = W !_

m = = M m
m
° x cv
ci Y 3 a w
? s O
r r.
% ??? r
t
J !
!
?- I
Il !
b
O
N
F-

W

? g

S+9 r ! i ?
f !
o ?
Q
t
i t
r j
? i
r !
t ? ? ! !
I I r
f
i t l
l 1 '
i
t .i
i
O
J
LL.
r\
a
N
?j
w
LLJ
a ??aa tarn ?
U
tz
LLJ
Q
mW
l ' N' -?
1 ? t
fF ? ?
l
1 + ? I
i
Q f 'fib bb
? r lI
w h??M ?3 ? S?Qww??
?? 1 ? I ? C1?Spd4?d
Ir:. ? •.
i ?
IN-
X.,
r
? 1?
` NI \ '.
U
xa F-
'`' g W
? Q]
U V)
U
J W
w> a x
<M Li
L.L
ma w
a

oo} o
N t
` Y I F' LLJ
J b a g LLI M
O
z S ~ W

R' J U-i

49
?! M Q
w
'

m V)
f
1

1
WE??? z 1
Ulm%

W
F?
-
J
1 1 / J .....'
"... /
J Jj/? /
/
r I .
1 ?
^? ?
QEt ?'IZ

I
i
l
f F
'•
'ter '
i
1
1
E ?
i E
I E
N ?..?
N 1E1 I
Q l < J
t I ? U
t i
i I
1 ? o
I i
I
?,F 3

d
E N
u !
co
N
?
i
t
a ?2
a 0 i ootal V
i r
i W
W
r LY
I
i

I
i
i
I I ? Q
`
1 a Q
1 1 Of
1 ` LLJ
i >
<L
W
m

19+lt d1S -
__.._.. --.-_--__--_. _.- _. ._._.._k-"

r?
k
w
lhisao:
S'AA?
??Ym
TQ? P
133HS - 3NIlH31t/IN
m
m
O.-
R? k1t
1
m
1
m G
i
\ l
+? m
\ m
m
m
\ ?F
R \f
W
dL
4
?I
a
U
N
W
J
a
U
N
SL+Z1 tl1S - £d 133HS - 3N1H31YW
s ?
?° 1 t M
? ?1 11
1
1 ? 1
1
l \
t ?? 1
1 ?
1 ? sr
m
r`
3umm tx t
a? 1 r ?
/ \ g
Ing
I. 1
I 1 ? /
I J I + ?/
I ? i l? a
+I l _ J L W
1 f ? 1 /
voe of
11 1 ? m
' N L
1 m
i ? rf 1
1 ?
v 1}I
r \ ` ? m
\ t
\ 1 m
.? -- l- L9+11 ZS 1d133HS?3NI-Mi YY --------------

4d 133HS - 3NIIHO1Vri

m
m
m
i
fm
1
I?
I
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
(m
1
m
m
N
Q
N
N
I
Y
a
W
TW
V1
z
i
Q

06 a
I f \f
\f
i \ f
i \F
i
a 1 ?
\ f
r
a
? 1, s 1
i
1
l \
i \ \ \ 4
\ ?.
?Fr1i ?
7W $$
\ I
\ 1 ? L
\ C
i
\ 1
v
r
/
/
w
U
N
09+L£ V1S - 9d 133HS - 3NIIHXVW
I
m
M
l?
I
fi
ro
t pr - -
m1
1
0. `
/ l
5Ric
® a ^'
? I I
I
I
F
r
y
?r

SZ+gt ViS -Vtd 133HS - 3NIIHO1VA
w
V
N
86+Zy tl1S -
f'
a
I ?
I y ? ?
WI i
z t
JI
I ?
t
I ;{
I ?
I 1
I !
I !
I
I
I
I
f
\ \ os
\ F ? ? /?2
\F /
- 3NIlHOIVn
? l !w
!1
}
/ w
/ w
/ W
! w
I 1
r?Y
? f I
I ?!
r ( 1w
l? l frlw
' Jn 1
1 I rw
! ? fw
! ! i
l
! I w /
! I
1 Iw /
I I? /
1 /
/
/
/
/
h

/

6 `
W
J
......... - - _. _ _.7.£36>?_V1S --?d-133H
l 1
m f 11 ? ?
rm J, ?
r i1 1? ? , I' ?1
5!
1 ?
? j
W
\ I ? W
/ ` ( W

\ W
\

gg x?
?

\
go ?
AS
I t

\ c7 G .- °? a
?? k'??? 1
1 \
t W
? ?S 1
? t

l
? `\

' r r 1
r
r r
1
,
r
` !W

"' ? o ? \ 1

l
/
r / 1
I
r ? r\
W
1
/
/p

?
\
I /l ?/

l f \

rF( r
\ I WV
1 I 1
\ ? ?! y r
1
\ i I W

\ I' I

?1S \ I I
/ /

P
m
l
m
I
A
f
m
l?
I
1
I
Al
1
1
P
1
1
n
1
l
1
yd
N yQw? (?
7 U g <
Z6+9999 V1S - 6d 133HS - 3NIIHOldri
`------? ?. N
i/) W
i
W
w
W
W
f
W l so
t
ixm_
r W W ~ O
r '
I
{ f
l /
l
W
? 1W
1 /
1 W
11 f
! w
I
J! w
f / I
/ w
f
l
W
t
r W
ffr l
W
W{yf
1
W
W
y'
P A9? ?

c O
d
$m
$ a g
en i
d CL
XQ.
W M
m

J
g Q 19s3? `v ?`' c.? F d
J Q

.o"'F

+ a
Q UU1
?' J _
{n
< m t-

•!
N Ld I
m a ::)

/ a
/ (
I
A }

1 1

/ 1'0
A 1?

/ 0
a
i W
Ob N

o a
/ ? j
? tv
Iz
ag
g
"
w W O ?-_-

/ o ? 1

/ f I
i

Y Al

1 ' $ b
/l a /
1
/ I I ?
L

NA
/ f
? w s(??
(x
N F10.

41 ? '/ 1 w #

1\
?
Y
r - P
' I w
1
2 ? 1

s 41
Q

1 Jrw
!
1 ?
1

1 f -E
E
1 E
1
1
1
1
m
---------------
6
/ J' /.
J
P 7
T ?
m 1? \9
t I
I
M
l
w
1
I W
l+ j Big
8
/ f4I
w
1
\ W
l
? w
{IW \
1 `
W \
W \
W `
W
1
1? W
W
W
a
? f ? r W
r
o.
C; N?o? , 4r
I /
? '1 w
m
s
` sa I
?y r
? I
y`?1
(\ W
N
C,c
ti
Q
O vUi
b
N
I_ w
g i 01+94 tl1S - Zld 133HS - 3Nmoivri
m ? 1
J }
1 /
W
_ y W
1 K w
? / 1 W
r } ? / ? / ;, , rw
/ W
/ /*
l ?
r ? s w
P
`' °g
5
Gt-?
-PIC
Sa w
j
r ? ; w
,ry
w
1
c \
W
W
\ \ 71 on ?? // I
/ WI
\ 33,
i \
rn i ?`.. w/ G yaya
\ ?Np
Gi:+L9 V1S - 01d 133NS - 3NIIHOiVn
a
o
N v
W
Q
U
N
N

O \
Of v
La \
ZO
\ U d a/
-
A?
/ "A
,i "3'I? ! \
wot f ` / W
?r
/ I 11
w
? y w
u I ' W
d ?
01+9L V1S - Lid 133HS - 3NIIHO1VFY
M
m TT ? j ? i/1
Y 0. Z
l+1 g a
CX CL
0
a v)
U ? t-
1 ?t0 LLLJ , F-
•• I + a m
/ / Ala a
/ + 14
N
? a
/ It
sa /t7 r
{ f { I \
1 ? 1 I
I ?
l ?
I, l
l
?l
`I 1
i ! ll
l
l 1 ??
l
l
{
a

0

m 4
N f
F
(!)
!e (L

z
4 e s Vii W
Q

<?
a LLJ
F
a ?
p V) U
u

+1 j
m Q
D
N
2Ztst V15 :_?S 133HS - 3NIIHOIVYf
W
3 I
€5
{M W
W W
111, ,. 1
W ' w
W 1 W
1
?? W \ \
W S f?\ \ W
i
W W
W ? ?? y 10? ! W
W , W
E? f
1? W
I
!1 ? 1
1 W
\i
HAIR
? W
U?r?? 1J
1 } W
I
/ W
f
W
1 0?..
1 I W
do
f , , W
' W
i
1 y
& z f
Ux ma /
a sa
rgSg ?U'
r
M = m = M i_
m $
a
x Y(L

LJLJ z

Q
~? Q K N
u Y 3 = ?
Is `
PPZ 14
o
LAI m
Q
LL
Q e p
$ }
ia_di
Q
Q
0 V)
Q ? I

Li I F-
f1 p m Q
?
n??
ti
a
?41 m
A
\ m
\ A
A
\ m
\ A
\ m
ry
m

i.
F W
,

l

1
y
1
1
1
1
1
1

?W
U+9L VIS - Ltd 133HS - 3NIIHOiVA

T
w ? Q
1
8 m
LL
w 4

P
W

f t
M
I
W

W T

W
I
W kXs
F
a?
W N

m

d ?
O N pS
QiUal 143 W
ix14s'
?
W
u
W
L
=

W vs n?r? ,or
A
W
m
n
m
1
m
$
m
j

1 t
m

m
1 l

?
1 m ? ,
1
I
1 rn 1

1 l
m
1 m l

`!
1 '^ 3
{ s3

r

V al
1
1
1
1
?I
a
r r r rr rr rr r? r r r r rr r rr r r r r r
4t^,

f /
,f
l

£6+OZ diS - Bid 133M - 3NIWlVW
- - - -
Y ? ^ ? P
V?y?Ahf?
sx??p=
u
W
1
1
w
w
l
w
w
I
W
t
w
/ ®o
w ?
/ ?RR
w S
41
I
w
l
l
w
W
1
L
? f

S9+lZ VSS - 61d 13PHS - 3NI"IHOIVNE
f T
? t
\
? l
t I N-
_ a?
! I o-
l
1 I?
I
t
t? f
r?rra ,a
x
? I
f J ?? 1
/ IN
n
U -?
' N
? i
? N
V Q
W
? W
J ?
a ! i
?? fJ w
Z
/ t F `F
f? n
r ?F
1
I
J? f 1
/ f l
I
1
I
t
j ,
l
1
T I
i ? (f
F
ftf
i 1 J
C6tOZ VIS - ILd 133HS - 3NIlHO1Vri

6Z+CC d1S - OU 133HS - 3NIHO1MW
m
W ?It p
r
'001?
J
w
W
W
1
W
W
W ,
e
l
W
l
W
w
W
l s,
W
l
W O b?
W
1 +
I I7
W 1
W
e
Wt{
1
W
W
W
W
l
1
W
I \ \
Sbi-?z
J
i
m
l J
m
J J
ff}rm
m
J
J
®?Pbn?p
IR $ O
V
fn #
}
I
I
M40'CWJS T Y
I SEA EASEMENT
1
l
`" I 1
l
I
A
1
m I
I I 1
l ?
l '
1
m
n
F
1
1 F
' 8!d 13314Sr?
3N?7 '?

? t
]e D L? s
3
.w ^ ? Q
a.
I
n
r it
? o`C W
? z
J
?p ?b ? IQ
n 4 ? f ly..Up-N'IlL ?
u G / ?
9 i
Six
m
? I 1
4 1?
F r i
W M1 g ?1
W ?
J ?
l J loo
W /? t! yC
d ?avlr?vs nw?"? <
W I4
J J
1 t ? J
J
W ?
? J J
?J
W @ fi
J a
W ro
1 J
I J
J
W 1
J
W ?
~! 6Z+££ ViS - 61d 133HS - 3NI401VA

WY IV?Z
® o?$a=
x

W
1 1 1
W
1
w
1
m

W
g

w

( s
W ? I G
f
I

w m
'
J
qq*m .n ::1 ? v+&
Is?z ? Vg?N
ZN?
/
?ON
?p

?ry 1,
G
?
py
vU?1?i MfV
S
W ny
TO
r
V
?? f

9 r
'
W
1 °D
f
3 I
W

W m

.
iN3N3SV3 83M3S
.k8VIINVS nrio ,04
1 1

W 1
1 m
m
f I
Jw
j
w ` 1
L1 m

r„

w ? m

?w / m
1 f
f

? r I
(
0
xO \ ?
m
d? \
S f
aZ
l M
S f

h'
(

00+Zt V1S - £Zd 133HS -- 3NIIHO1VNE
I
m
N
v
fv
W
f
f
W
!
W
!
W
f
W W
! f
W W
W
W
!
t l
W W
W W
l f
W W
I !
W W
! !
W y?
f
I
w
w
1 1
M W
1
in
w
f
1
W
E ._..-- £
E E -E ?•E
oo
C
.415
s
LJ
J
a

w
w
w
w
1
I

1,711
? so
u
N
K
3
m
I
I
1
I
m
l
m
N
m
m
m
Im
f
im
1
IM
f
m
I
m
m
m
I
m
I
00 +Z t b1S - ZZd 133HS - 3NIIHOIVri

APPENDIX D
' BASELINE STREAM SUMMARY FOR
RESTORATION REACHES

1
1
1

o
° o Cl)
c
n
r •
0
c
o ,
ao
0
°o ?°Or,? vo°OrOO ' a
cm 'T d r N r O a O
L0
\

? O
v
M
N O
00
rn O
h
O
O ?
N ld "'? 7 ti 00 N r O rn
00

M
kr)
N
.C
u
co
1-4 If) °
F

u
ri 06 16
v'3
O
L
O
y Q

d

L,
d

CD
CG q
O O v O O O v
N
C, r-4 C-
Q
b
O O ?
C
O
^ N •O O O ,n
'fl 'O
a
t C L
? .fl C .? > Oq R w G
a
i ?
..
33ACa¢ lu to
3 ?45 c d
o .
C U 7
00 _? N
?? o
?erx? ?u
? ? a e
c'v?3w
Y = n ? yo
U
f
EL C y t •p C 'MO vyi G A o
Cq?U ?? ?'O? ° CC

Y 3 0,

O?i
? pp ? w
?
? q e1 CL v 1

a A a

t
i
e
SA
? N
5 c
? •o
0
e
i o0
x
N
7 A
se
a u
? A
m
°•CO V nv?rn
N w v co
N m N a f
0 . r v
r i
Cl)

10 0
O
a
N
yr
? O r
' O
M
a
m

clcgU-)afOrno

o a N
O
!9 It I.: C? CO 6 cli
p
c
N

00
n n
^" M U M,

N
17 ?G7 N a vi M ? ?O T ? i ?

rM
F

O
pp

Q'1
61
Oi

7 T r W N 7
N N a M
a
co
0' 00 'n
Li N i N N `L N^

30

'

aa? Y
? m tj
33c
aca¢
a
o ,r
?? ob
o a b Ma t=
_
_pp
pp
Q :d b C t O _
O O> 3 O In cn .
. U :a v y
C .1C '7
?' 'O O C - a1 U =? d

c
3 C O 8

`.'°-, y
p G p,
.gqaa
? o C bq U ?' GL

Q Co
?
=
ev v ? a?a
$° cn 3 Y °
a
a o ov' CC•
a
x is?
u
r 6 a
i
s.
U

u W U ? ?`?in tb.?

3
.°. q
.1 ?. chi 0. .
y? CJ e O

:J
C
9
a
N
9
m
.o
x
N
L
a

.7 ?

pp M
O
N

O

?
S
.N.r p
tO b ... 7 M? h M y

V

F j
a
.r
00 'It

d

ar ^
^
ao
M
d .
.

x
a

s

y
.?. 00
M
7

D ^

Q O
N

? .? L L CL fY fY
b 'D 0. 6 ` L L v L (Y
'C 7 a0 L ? L b4
00
? ? ? L ? ? O ?=
C t
o
3 3 ca ca ¢ ,0., °' on
-
? ,?
V
v b v b0 .
r.
o n ?,
"to 00 of C a
i
r =

-
?A x ?e
x v
c: m -S
Q °' o s x
c
Z
;
Go U
a `v
?

C °o o

p
1

a a

to U ?^ u
07
C
E 9? a ? '9 C S 7
3
CG C ?
G R' w 0.. 0. ^
?
r3 ? O c+ a C ? Q
.
L '
w
acn
? a v e
ci L 'v °? s ? v o. Q° x
,
41
m
Y a ? w

C

d ? ? q
W yp
GI L
? ?
? '.??
a A Q a ?
u
1
i
e
? q
5a
? N
e?
O
1 O
L G
N
e a`?
E
?o
11,

n

C. v

n

C. M
..9. N

U

a
+
n

7 q{ '== N C O a0 X 7 0 M

w

N 0

61 ,..
00 N "• 70 a O? T O N 00 ,n ?
A ,?., O C oo 76 - M i i i i 7 Nt- q
^ O

b 9 S
d w .wi .w.•.
? .w..
v

O fl
4
a
?

b0 to
3
to
C
L b U O w
a
i a
i ? ? C L .
3 3 A A¢ a °' to
c
E y
72 8
b g a? oq •
?
o v ?v b c y
? a a m° 00 a w G y

" .? b o
b L
r -1
uu '.5
3
? x
N
w
? ?9 ?? ?? ?
? UL1 ow
a e v ? U b e a.
p,
? a C
?

3 a '
a CA
a
?E
? a
a
e r
j

s
7
i
C
i O
i c
? O
T
;o6
? X
N
7 ?
Y
io

UO
00
8 ?
`

oo'r c L
q U

M
N

M ?•
O
N
pn
N

M
N

A

ry 00
rr
M
a+

..
C
..?
7
7 V1 00 N N

n?+ Fi O
y
d
Y

F7
R
'fl
x

Q?
p

Q
00
^ N , O „ O ?, ^ p N ^ ,?'+
,cr?.c.c xxx
.fl .9 0. d y s ?tx
O
a0 s"? oo ???
00
C ,?r"b V cam'
U y 7 I
b

.'?. ? '-'
:
7
t
2 72
? T
ai oA .
q ,o
x
= b3 ro
o c
?
' 2 .off a
e
`.,d coU a nnU `
?'

SF+i Q b L •p G '? p. 'O ?' 0. Q T Y
?
b a p W
aq ? U U b u
a ? CL ? ? ? a?
w `? in ? a a
?

?
W u Q• ?

ii

w A a, y '°
c
i
io
N
oq
? c
? o
l o
3b
' Nyy
f L
se
? U
iq
a

ti? '•? ^ N N N
7 O
DO
8 ?
?

N
Ic U

VN?
C
_
IC C, 14 N
M
n
S M
?

^ M
.••? a r ,.., a N C,

7 ? M M
y '..,may M '? N N N N i i . . . i i .
M

. 3 ? M
,
0 i M

R

70 14 'n V1

N
a

N N
.r M i ^ i ' M

en

N
N a
. N
.
. i
.. i
j
O O O ?
a c ?c?cG
o a n c ?s `w
a r o?
3 V .?.
7 x
?y
5 c s .?
33car?¢?0
_ o
3 q v
o a T
o y
o OD q
c
??

>
e ?
'
? U b 3
te
-
n m
=
q o
r
U F
c
° o C a
,
o a c e
n U

?
? o cn va? g ? ? x? ?
? ?

a
" x

S
7
? a0
0. Pr V1 .,
C

a
A
.o
0
N
a
v
A
0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ? 1 ? 1 ? X
1 1
00 ?
o

0
C? 00 N 0
a

U
n^
, O 1
'~ M^ 1 1 1 1 i i 1
1 M 1 1 i 1 1 1
,1 M
?
/. M

O
l.- 1 f i 1 1? f i i 1 1 1 1 i i f i 0 i 1 1 f i f i
?
. i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 i i ,? O 1 1 1
00
p
C M
v'?
N• N 00 00 ti .O V1 M N
'? H M O .-i O? M^ 1 1 1 i 1 i i 1 i M 1 1 U
1 1 1 .-

rq
N
i 1 1 1 1 f i f i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Q
N

? C
O
a+

Q
O
oD N
0 0

CD
H M O M^
M ^^
1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 U O
r?
? i 1 1 i 1
^ O
h

F
Q

i W
kr)? O [?
0 Q _
O
'. 1
1 i 1 i i ? O
q
OL
y? O D? N N 4\ O^
a5
0
N
?
0
0 In
? O I i i 1 1 1 1 1
'"? O O O
V ctl A cd d
A
.? kr,
N
O? ? ? O ?..?
?..? ? .? ? •N w
? ?
33caca¢ 4v ?? L r o c - N a
o

o
t

°-° a,? a a ao U
o c-
a,
? 03 a

`
c =a
o

a 0. v E
yro
aA ?°

•
a'
o cX
r ?
a
c
? _ v ?
`
Nn7
o
U

o f?] u ? ?
a°i ?? ?
a? a Oy
a O
a a

a .
?E

o; A R; ?n 9
e
i
i
iA
? N
m
i c
? o
i
? N
f `v
7 ?
E
a,
1 U
A
APPENDIX E
MORHOLOGY AND HYDRAULIC
MONITORING SUMMARY
1
1

u

1
n

1

1
1
n

0
? x
c_
v
lu
o
0
N
7 ?
C
.D
d
O
N

b
O
O V
A ? ?r C
z $ N ? ?

u O
.
N M
U
O E.

F
a
oo r
? i
o ?"
a r ti ? oo v
o ,- rn ?o r, o o
,
O
? v

OO
•
'r A W V ..w N I? O N N V1 N
°\
?+ H fV d\ Vj .- 7 h i C i i

s
o M
M v U

y p 7

c
> u ° g
,? ? °? N 00 ,° O 7 a0 ^ 7 .- M N
x

U
D` M ti N^ M N^
C
c
0

.-r
^ m 10 10
w) oq
i
O O
? O 00
.-
N v
M
7
N r M ..y M M N O O ?
. In h
V V

L L L L (,y L1 ?? E? L P L a. t i t CO .C t O 'v ? A
'O 'O N 4 aai L. C N 'fl C 'O 7

q C N U
by by 1
10
=
?
CIO -;a 10
c cn Ln
w °' ° r k U
v, n. •u ? [z.. ? ? ? 5
' -Z r-
o „ rA 3 w c a z, L o 00
EE 3 U a
a
8 v
6
i
a U
?
3
LT. a
o a ?

U C L u ? y o
8 ?
/
10, a °
q
N
. c
,o
N
E
c

r

d
•° M
r ?
r x
nap
7 p
I- 0? V x m
ti N .
N 7-0
ti M
?
M
U .
.
N n 7
N .: v

7r N
"t
N CCCC N M M N .: -
v
V

h
T+
N

O M
>
G7
? w
H a N ., 7 t? x c m
p ?ni r N~
r
U ? N a
00
N 'o oM0 N N
rl ^ .4 N .. M r- N
O
O -
M

6

d
r =

?.
o

en

r ?
'P. J 00 V1 V N `-' v; N 7 N x
.
4 r4 i i ? i i i

4
B
Q? M M U

> r

U ? ,may r
r
U
N
M x ?p h V T p\
v

r N p; x .p M I? p? M M vl V1 = r- ri
m
i i
N M
b
0
? lJ.. ?'' '?' '? Ri 4Y «: ? E E V ._
, by L L O ?
L w aL
+ a = ?t
'0 'O 4 4 C U ;9 .. ••
.
b 7 oD L b0 ai b4 .E b0 b0 F v y

3 3 Q A ,°, .? c'e
000
° v c? j n o o y
T
a
° w
3
• w
Y
° v
x a a° q ??
0
o
ce > L a a
? co W
'
a: "? u
y g
b .? o a'i
O
? ? U to
U'O
d
W y ?
d c
d
U

a 04
U
c 16,

Q
F b
a 3

d
°
a

m o ?; ? a
y L 6.1
d a y
' A ?i a a C
G
3
a
Ic
AQ
C N
z?
c ?
o E
U o
w 'c
w?
EN
L
•p A
v?
0.i z

n

IJI

1

o ?.

Pr M
N en 00
;
:
V
.-i f
V
N M pp N V
N in 7 N
U v

V1 ?"
?

,
N M
? ca

?' '? V I? ^ O 10 7 C
"
j ,?," . UO N
?f
N r N 7 M M N C
C
,
A , N r Vaj N N M

rl v
O gQQw q
Q

z N N
V C

w.
a
3 .r
C7
M
C
M

'?
N N 7
M a eq 7

W
y
?" O M
[?
.C 7
(V n M N zn

y t.
M N
N M^ N d'
U a
J U ,
UF

ti F- M N M a M N '- M '?^ N Gb M ""' N^ M N '.

kf)

Ca
L ? ?

L M
'r

Oq en r

? C ? ? C
rna _
a C N 'M •^? = rno,
0
?
M N^ c v- a 7? M W
V N T r N .?. M M N U 2 N M "? 7 N N •--? O

1- 7 M .., 00 ..M ?O O N N N vi a v1 v? ..
M JTi l- N V'1 M M N Ic en^ N N N N ••
E E
e a
E 6
a c zs.o a
a ; v e
E E

Ls?rtaa ?
a
,
v?v??L?v? ^? ,
?°b ??YGVb ^a
33?oA v E Ea ? 0 33¢cA ? E.Ea ??
?oG?e
a?
C
a mra3w v; d ° ?m°?3
??

8 ,
3x w
.
?' 3x
va
s. p y OF
w ? a v
wm o u.
P?
C
y
.
? H Q r
h d
5 c
0
9
m
G
.o
X
N
L
n-

L

0

c_

o ?
0
cv,
v ?

c

o
o ?
0

M

O
O ? C
A V ?
++
G
O
?-+ O M

.
? a
1= 10 -It -It C? 00 C,

v

O
'. M
00 O M M M N
Z
06 , , , i , ,

U 7
>"

? C
R V) 4
'o rn

M p, kr- T N G O V1
ti .-i Nom.. 7 O O O
00 r^ ()
, , 10

e cG x ;, ; E E r c a s Vs m s Ss
v v a4i a4i a t'y o a nq r oq bb .°_ m oq c v
3 3 q C5 000

?.
w a 2 Z o e c c a a N
.2 .2

_
e s
p O p i C L .7 > 3
m U
w °? O O °-? C u u. U
LT "
0.
?
>
v o?
.w
u
;i2
s o
v
A a
'
3

3 N
m
0
y U p
U
a ? 00 ? ? a 3
ff
o m o
. s
u a
v? a 3

y
0 y
? _
?
i u L y
U ?
04
N
r
c
?c
N
E

N

? ro
C

o a
?
0
k
v ?

F

'v

°o

O F
z O M

d N U
O ?
5
?I ? .

U v

C e
W
!p6
?"
M N O, V1 ^ N N X
. . . . . . . . . .
N M V1 V1

r
v?
F

C
r
>.
?
U o ? ?

„ Na y
y ? ? N N v1 r .-+ 'I: 7 `O ?p
? O -- >1
0? U ?" My r O 'r v O O

?.. ° 00 r 'r O? r N N F '.
t °o06-;?R -o yr . . . . . T
'. U

.ro w E E
.?" ` y
w
wy w w o
w?
A
E E
L L .? .q ? LK ? ? .
.
.
ro a
L
N ? LX L " L OO L L O ? ? iy

F
'D 'O y 0. L
p O
?
T
: _
00
t
o
q
y
ap ..
00
o
p
'?
G v
33?C0 ,a, ?.
a
s
E
? 3 ?
o
?
2
-
°F'
CO- ° N
n ?
?
`n

ao9 .

c uwU
v
o
O
?
:» w ??

?3 y L
; w
o G a C
u
C
6
??
°' w3x
?°'
? ? L
'?
' ti d U c
d N ,
x
1
,
a
U

0
6`0 6
3
a

o w
rA
a.
w

v u
?°

v?
Cl

3 a
O r ? C
py

`" A ? a s a d
C
0
3
a
IC
A c
o
z?
0
U
W `c
E
a
? L
? E
S J
02 c
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
c_
v
d
o ?
0
? x
c_
? S
M x
o
A N _C
Z C G
O
u w }
Ln
o N v v o co v o 00
00 CD C
r
fq V% ?t 00
v > '
'Q V
ti
cm N
r'l ..
O O 'p M V1 ?--. xN
pq U ?
M
M 1? y? M O N O N C i i O M^
8 E ?w ?"Yww o
s s? s s p; p; ? a E 8 s a? s a s V ? oA s s o? '? .?
;^ 'O v d a4i L G a) 'O O 7 ? .?+ Op ,G 00 a) bq •C Oq bq C a1 d V
3300 u E.Ea WM)? o o y
o xa e c 0. CQ U> 3 W v o y a? a? Ln U
w° v 0 3 a x w a° °o L G w 0 °
u °o °' 07 0 3 W °' ' d a J o No
CA U
3x d ???? ? ?, a
?
off. v ? ? ? a co
w
o Cq 'u
u b w
rid a 3
U ? cY" y k ;e
"" A ? Cb a ? d
.c.
3
iX
Ic
11
A .?
z
4 N
A
0
U?
0. ..
W c
E N
'O L
> E
m c
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
vl ?
c
a
o ?
0
v x
e_
°o
rl N
O ?"' M A
in
A 7
d ? 5
Z N
u
rjQQ O M
W' U
p N ? O M O N D\ ? !` ? ??
V1 U N N '? ni N O 0 0
C ? V V v
`r
R Ci ?.. rr 0 0 Q; 00 O r. c, O O N cx7
a oN ° o ?i N o O O
v v
a ?
Ul w O
00 ?" O
0 7 D\ OO N N 0 0 r-
C) 0 cxd

UI

G
}i
N o0 'D W ,--1 v? M t`
CA C,
en a;
,ry M
C
i
O N
U
-E -E
r c x x 7 E E s s z s r oo s
'C :D v P
O G V
G d
. v c
d o F e
cn
o o
w a ro e r
00
0. a? o> 3 v C
y p C v ?••? t c
a
?
?
a W U ro
;
3 o w u O
° °
w
i v
? w U
W
rr ?
„
•.,
w
;
a co 3 L , 0
m o
a
a
?; " 2 ?
> r w
ap
, >
w
3 x
? °' 0
U ro ro? ? U o
?' a
N
a

cn

'" a
8
A
a
rn 3
a
G
?
at

°
a
o

Q

roo
is
,
i
i
1 L
E
1_
I'l
1
1
1
1
1

C
O M ? x

6.
w
y
O
? M M
7 a0 D\ t` O 7 0? 7 ? ?
G
C-1 eq CD CD
_+
?

?"? 1- 'D W) O
O
7 00 M
t`
O
ti N N 4 N 06 N
V V
? O
O

v ? x

. u ? M

N ? r
!r ?r
0 0 C4 N 7 M O M W) 00

N

V

O
p y

O W -•+ N V1 M C,
M^ O C
0
R ?
U
G O O W) ^ M .-.
N 7 N ""+ N ^ N O
O
O
r
00
i N O N '? N^ N O
? .
t
y
L tn
C

O
V] p

y
O
N
M O N ?O M O B
^-
x
u

Q, r 'y a, v1 D` C O N M
O ?--? N N O M h i N M^ i U

c0 cd
E
l N ,C (,y .L ,?"'? .y Qq L L O
v iC
w~
.
.i
O
w 3 Qy A A u E E n e a
J3 ° c?
0a
om

roQ?0.x
O C Y ?+ t C ?
>3
a1 U A a) O y a) u w U
°
?b
o ???3 v x
">s ao
w O
y ?
0.?

a 0 6
u a 3
o 4. a a
V
V
z
rig p 3
C ? u
oy
i
•
d o
L 77
y ? y
0
G
.1S
3
0.'
A
O t
z
N
.`a
u
o ?.
w c
U
E N
:7 U
E L
a > E
u u