20081562 Ver 1_More Info Received_20090220

?'Al LM G
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
7W Environmental Consultants
February 18, 2009
TO: Mr. Chad Coburn C 10 U E, ? Y
N.C. Division of Water Quality COPY
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
LS k-L?
r 0" DO
FEB 9 0 2009
RE: 401 WQC Application; Additional Information WETONDS AND STORM MATER BRMCH
Asset Storage; DWQ Project# 08-1562; Brunswick County, NC
Dear Chad:
Thank you for your letter dated November 17`x, 2008 in which you request additional
information about the 401 Water Quality Certification application submitted for the Asset Storage
project in Belville, NC. Below is a response to each of your concerns.
1. Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
Utilities will be located within the development footprint as shown on the site plan. No additional
wetland impacts are needed to install utilities.
2. Based on the submitted plan drawings, and from review of the State Stormwater Permit
SW8071002, it appears that you have not accounted for all of the drainage areas. Please
submit a modification of the above-mentioned permit to account for the drainage area that
encompasses the 0.35 acres of proposed wetland impacts.
The applicant is in the process of submitting a Stormwater Plan for Phase 2 of development,
which includes the proposed wetland impacts. Please note that the applicant has revised the site
plan to reduce wetland impacts to 0.31 acre. Please see the revised PCN form. Because impacts
are now under a third of an acre, we believe that written concurrence from DWQ is no longer
required.
3. Please provide a written narrative explaining how you intend to comply with the
Construction Stormwater General Permit NCG010000 during construction and who will be
delegated to inspect the site and maintain required rain gauge and monitoring reports.
The applicant will include this monitoring in the contractor's scope of work to ensure that it is
completed.
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402

4. The Office believes that the mini-storage buildings shown on the site plan can be moved or
reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the jurisdictional wetlands. Please revise the plans
to minimize the impacts.
Enclosed is a revised site plan that utilizes retaining walls and reduces total wetland impacts to
0.31 acre. Because impacts are now under a third of an acre, we believe that written concurrence
from DWQ is no longer required.
5. Please submit detailed site plan drawings showing what alternatives were considered to
avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands.
The original site plan reviewed proposed 0.46 acre of wetland impacts (enclosed). After meeting
with Kim Garvey of the Corps, the applicant and project engineer redesigned the project and were
able to reduce impacts to 0.35 acre by decreasing a side setback (submitted with original permit
application). As mentioned above, the applicant has revised the site plan yet again to include
retaining walls, which has reduced wetland impacts to 0.31 acre. The project engineer was unable
to design an alternate site plan that would have less wetland impact and would still meet the
applicant's minimum economic return (see attachments).
I hope this response adequately addresses your concerns. Please let me know if you have any
other questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Kim Williams
Wetland Scientist
Encl.
C: Mr. Dan Cameron, Asset Storage, LLC
Mr. David Bowman, Bowman and Assoc.
Mr. Clark Wright
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
Ms. Kim Garvey, ACOE
4-
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
February 18, 2009
TO: Ms. Kim Garvey
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
RE: NWP 39 Application; Additional Information
Asset Storage; Brunswick County, NC; Action ID# 2006-32731-010;
Dear Kim:
Thank you for your letter dated October 31", 2008 in which you request additional
information about the NWP application submitted for the Asset Storage project in Belville, NC.
Below is a response to each of your comments.
1. Based on your PCN and site plan it appears that you will exceed the Loss of Waters limit
authorized by Nationwide Permit 39. Specifically, this office is concerned that the proposed
existing and future stormwater ponds will drain wetlands. Please explain how hydrology will
be maintained to on site wetlands post construction. This office recommends revising your
stormwater management system to ensure that all wetlands on-site retain hydrologic input.
The permanent pool elevation of the stormwater retention ponds shall be higher than the water
level of adjacent wetlands. Therefore, these ponds are not anticipated to drain wetlands located
nearby. The stormwater management plan for this phase of the project is currently being
developed.
2. The site plan you submitted is unclear, please address the following issues:
a. Please provide a detailed plan view and cross section of each of the proposed impact
areas. The information you submitted is insufficient.
Enclosed are a detailed plan view and cross section of the impact area.
b. Your site plan needs to clearly indicate the locations of all utilities not within road
rights-of-way. Please be aware that permanently maintained rights-of-way are
considered permanent impacts by this office. Please include these in your impact
assessment and provide compensatory mitigation.
www.imgroup.net - [e-mail] - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
Utilities will be located within the development footprint as shown on the site plan. No
additional wetland impacts are needed to install utilities.
3. Based on your application, it does not appear that you avoided and minimized impacts to
waters and wetlands of the US to the maximum extent practicable (NWT General Condition
20 (a)).
a. Without a detailed plan view and cross section, this office is unable to determine if
this impact has been minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Enclosed are a detailed plan view and cross section of the impact area. Please note that
the applicant has revised the site plan and total wetland impacts have been reduced to
0.31 acre. A revised PCN form is enclosed.
b. Please provide this office with a detailed list and drawings of on-site alternatives
that were evaluated for the project.
The original site plan reviewed proposed 0.46 acre of wetland impacts (enclosed). After
meeting with Kim Garvey ofthe Corps, the applicant and project engineer redesigned the
project and were able to reduce impacts to 0.35 acre by decreasing a side setback
(submitted with original permit application). As mentioned above, the applicant has
revised the site plan yet again to include retaining walls, which has reduced wetland
impacts to 0.31 acre. The project engineer was unable to design an alternate site plan that
would have less wetland impact.
c. This office also recommends retaining walls to further minimize impacts to wetlands.
The site plan has been redesigned to incorporate retaining walls. This has further reduced
wetland impacts to 0.31 acre.
4. Your mitigation plan is not accepted. Compensatory mitigation will be required for this
project.
a. Please be aware that you must comply with the Corps Final Rule on Compensatory
Mitigation for Losses ofAquatic Resources.
We do believe the mitigation proposal complies with the Corps Final Rule on Mitigation.
The applicant proposes to buy into the NC EEP at a ratio of 1.6 to 1 for restoration
within the Cape Fear River Basin, which is the basin that the project site is located in.
Additionally, remaining wetlands within the site (approximately 0.3 ac) will be preserved.
b. The Town of Belville easement is not consistent with the intent of preservation and
will not be accepted as a part of your mitigation plan.
The applicant agrees to remove this preservation from the mitigation proposal.
c. Please explain why Mitigation Banks were not considered.
According to the NC EEP, there are no private mitigation banks currently available within
the Cape Fear River Basin.
d. Please explain why you believe 1:1 payment to NC EEP is appropriate given the
temporal loss of wetlands due to these projects not being constructed prior to credits
being released.
The applicant proposes to buy into the NC EEP for the restoration of 0.5 acres of non-
riparian wetlands. This is a 1.6 to 1 ratio. Additionally, the applicant proposes to preserve
the remaining wetlands located on the project site, which is approximately 0.3 acres.
Wetland areas to be preserved will follow the Corps' standard preservation language.
Please note that the 5.79-acre project site is owned by Asset Storage LLC and the larger
adjacent tract is owned by Noremac Enterprises LLC. Wetlands located within the tract
owned by Noremac Enterprises cannot be preserved at this time because the tract is
owned by a different entity.
e. This office recommends 2:1 payment to NC EEP for the proposed impacts as well as
full preservation of all remaining waters and wetlands onsite. Further, this office
recommends preservation of upland buffers to provide further protection to these
wetlands and enhance their functions.
The applicant has reduced wetland impacts significantly on the Asset Storage site. We
believe that payment into the NC EEP at a ratio of 1.6 to 1 and preservation of remaining
wetlands on the 5.79-acre site is sufficient mitigation for impacts to 0.31 acre ofwetlands.
I hope this response adequately addresses all of your concerns. Please give me a call if you
have any additional questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
? Y ' ?-
Kim Williams
Wetland Scientist
Encl.
C: Mr. Dan Cameron, Asset Storage, LLC
Mr. David Bowman, Bowman Design and Engineering
Mr. Chad Coburn, DWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
Mr. Clark Wright
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. [Ys- I S Lo 2
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check hqlq- `; 9
II. Applicant Information L?4
1. Owner/Applicant Information FE B 2, 0 2009
Name: Asset Storage LLC r 004'E Q1 IN I Y
Mailing Address: c/o Mr. Dan Cameron WFTLAWDSANDSTORf?iN'ATER$RANCt'1
3504 St. Francis Drive
Wilmington NC 28409
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kim Williams
Company Affiliation: Land Management Group, Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 2522
Wilmington, NC 28402
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: kwilliamsglmgroup.net
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Asset Storage
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0380003002
4. Location
County: Brunswick Nearest Town: Belville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Not Applicable
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Wilmington, take
US 17/74/76 into Brunswick County. Take the Village Road/Highway 133 exit in Leland
and turn left at the light onto Village Road Turn right onto Blackwell Road. Site will be on
the right (see vicinity map)
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.2244 ON 78.0079 °W
6. Property size (acres)
5.49
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Brunswick River
8. River Basin: Cape Fear 03030005
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enK.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The applicant is currently constructing Phase 1 of the mini-
stora2e development that is located entirelv in uplands. In addition, stormwater ponds have
been installed. The rest of the tract is undeveloped. Adjacent land use is commercial or
undeveloped.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project consists of the development of two mini-storage buildings (30,900 sf (already
constructed) and 40,300 sf) an outdoor storage area, and associated accessways. A
stormwater pond will be located to the north of the buildings. The development will tie in to
the Town of Shallotte's sewer system.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To construct Phase 2 of the site: a mini-storage
building for the residents of Leland.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Staff of LMG delineated the wetlands. Ms. Jennifer Frye with the Corps
approved the line and signed the wetland survey on 8/21/07 (Action ID# 2006-32731-010). The
applicant applied for an Individual Permit in 2006 for the construction of a truck stop within both
the project area and an adjacent tract. This application was withdrawn.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The project site is owned by Asset Storage LLC and an adjacent tract is owned by Noremac
Enterprises LLC. The applicant may apply for a 404/401 permit at a later date for future phases
of development within the Noremac-owned site. Any potential future development is many years
off and a site plan has not been designed. The applicant understands that any future wetland
impacts would have to be evaluated cumulatively with impacts proposed in this application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: One building will impact 0.31 acre of
404 wetlands
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
ePnnr'nfAx7 liet imnni-fQ tim- to lhnth Ctrncture. and flooding.
--t
Wetland Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)

ype of Impact
Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no)
Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet)
Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Fill Forested No 2000 0.31

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.31
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: - 0.5
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
meet ha inrr1nr1M Tn rnlrnlntP nnrPnae mrnltinly length X width- then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name v
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill axnnvntinn dredvinu flnntlinu drninnge_ bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) v v Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 12
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): N/A
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.31
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.31
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): N/A
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Stormwater
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Permanent impacts are limited
to the construction of part of a mini-storage building that will impact 0.31 acre of wetlands. The
extent of wetlands within the site made avoiding all wetlands impossible. Please note that the
applicant originally qpplied for an IP to construct a truck stop within the protect site and an
adjacent tract Approximately eight acres of wetland impact were proposed. The applicant has
substantially modified the project to reduce wetland impacts. Once the applicant decided to
construct a mini-storage facility on site the first site plan showed 0.46 acre of wetland impacts.
However, the project engineer reduced the size of the second building and associated vehicular
accessways. This reduced wetland impacts to 0.35 acre. The site plan has since been revised and
now includes the construction of retaining walls which will further reduce wetland impacts to
0.31 acre. This is a 33% reduction in impacts. The economic return with two buildings (assuming
85% occupancy) is break even (see enclosed economic information).
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stri,ngide.htm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
To mitigate for impacts to 0.31 acre of wetlands approximately 0.3 acres of wetlands will be
preserved which is the remaining amount of wetlands on the Asset Storage tract. Wetland
areas to be preserved will follow the Corps' standard preservation language. In addition the
Uplicant will buy into the NCEEP for the restoration of 0.5 acre of non-riparian wetlands.
Wetlands located within the tract owned by Noremac Enterprises cannot be preserved at this
time because the tract is owned by a different entity.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.litin. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 12

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.5
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Updated 1 t/l/2005
Page 11 of 12
e
4
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The applicant has obtained a stormwater permit
from DWQ (SW8 071002) and from Brunswick County (2008000460) for Phase 1 of the proiect.
A stormwater plan for Phase 2 is currently be developed
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The applicant proposes to tie into the Town of Leland's sewer system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Project
will not provide connections or utilities to surrounding tracts. In addition, some remaining
wetlands will be preserved The applicant may have future wetland impacts from other phases of
development located on another tract. However, he will apply for any required 404/401 permits
prior to these impacts and will show all impacts as cumulative.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12
Building 1
Belville, NC 1/27/2009
Current unit IvIIX reruuiiLd(Y.CJ d11U CJLIII ICLVU IXVIrL rULCAOw
Non-climate controlled units:
Number Monthly % of % of Monthly
of Units Rent non-clim total Income
Parking 20 $55 $1,100
5 x 10 5 $60 8.8% 2.5% $300
10 x 10 31 $80 54.4% 15.2% $2,480
10 x 15 12 $90 21.1% 5.9% $1,080
10 x 20 3 $100 5.3% 1.5% $300
10 x 25 1 $120 1.8% 0.5% $120
10 x 30 4 $130 7.0% 2.0% $520
15 x 20 1 $140 1.8% 0.5% $140
Total non-climate controlled units: 57 Total: $6,040
Percent of non-climate units to total units: 27.9%
Total sq. ft. of non-climate control: 7,500
Percent of non-climate sq. ft to total sq. ft.: 29.8%
Climate controlled units:
Number Monthly % of % of Monthly
of Units Rent non-clim total Income
5 x 10 30 $75 20.4% 14.7% $2,250
10 x 10 55 $105 37.4% 27.0% $5,775
10 x 15 37 $125 25.2% 18.1% $4,625
10 x 20 24 $150 16.3% 11.8% $3,600
10 x 25 0 $175 0.0% 0.0% $0
10 x 30 0 $210 0.0% 0.0% $0
15 x 20 1 $210 0.7% 0.5% $210
Total climate controlled units: 147 Total: $16,460
Percent of climate controlled to total: 72.1%
Total sq. ft. of climate control: 17,650
Percent of climate sq. ft to total sq. ft.: 70.2%
Total number of units:
number % of
of units total
5 x 10 35 17.2%
10 x 10 86 42.2%
10 x 15 49 24.0%
10 x 20 27 13.2%
10 x 25 1 0.5%
10x30 4 2.0%
15 x 20 2 1.0%
Total number of units: 204
Total rentable square footage: 25,150 Total monthly income: $22,500
Estimated rent per sq. ft.: $0.85
Income Statement Building 1 Annual
Income
$270,000
Less Vacancy of 15% $40,500
Gross Income $229,500
Expenses: Taxes $10,000
Salaries $50,000
Utilities $15,000
Maintenance $5,000
Landscaping $1,000
Advertising $20,000
Insurance $11,000
Telephone $2,500
Legal & Professional $3,500
Credit Card Fees $2,500
Office Supplies $1,500
Computer / Software Support $2,500
Total Expenses $124,500
Net Income available to Service Debt $105,000
Gateway Bank Loan $2.60 million, 7.0%, 20 years $20,158 $241,896
Negative Cash Flow after Debt Service -$136,896
Cash flow Coverage 0.43
Gross SF Total Bldg Cost
Building # 1 30,900 $1,170,000
Land Cost $740,000
Site Work $450,000
Total Construction & Land Cost $2,360,000
Operating Expenses (Shortfall) $40,000
Loan Interest Carry $182,000
Bank Fee & Loan Closing Costs $18,000
Total Cost & Loan Amount * $2,600,000
* See Statements from banks
Building 2
Belville, NC 1/27/2009
Chi irrPnt l ]nit Mix Percentages and Estimated Rent Totals:
mate controlled units:
Number Monthly % of % of Monthly
of Units Rent non-clim total Income

5 x 10 4 $60 5.4% 1.6% $240
10 x 10 34 $80 45.9% 13.7% $2,720
10 x 15 4 $90 5.4% 1.6% $360
10 x 20 32 $100 43.2% 12.9% $3,200
10 x 25 0 $120 0.0% 0.0% $0
10 x 30 0 $130 0.0% 0.0% $0
15 x 20 0 $140 0.0% 0.0% $0
Total non-climate controlled units: 74 Total: $6,520
Percent of non-climate units to total units: 29.7%
Total sq. ft. of non-climate control: 10,600
Percent of non-climate sq. ft to total sq. ft.: 31.4%
Climate controlled units:
Number Monthly % of % of Monthly
of Units Rent non-clim total Income

5 x 10 27 $75 15.4% 10.8% $2,025
10 x 10 62 $105 35.4% 24.9% $6,510
10 x 15 51 $125 29.1% 20.5% $6,375
10 x 20 24 $150 13.7% 9.6% $3,600
10 x 25 2 $175 1.1% 0.8% $350
10 x 30 5 $185 2.9% 2.0% $925
15 x 20 4 $190 2.3% 1.6% $760
Total climate controlled units: 175 Total: $20,545
Percent of climate controlled to total: 70.3%
Total sq. ft. of climate control: 23,200
Percent of climate sq. ft to total sq. ft.: 68.6%
number of units:
number % of
of units total

5 x 10 31 12.4%
10 x 10 96 38.6%
10x15 55 22.1%
10 x 20 56 22.5%
10 x 25 2 0.8%
10x30 5 2.0%
15 x 20 4 1.6%
Total number of units: 249
Total rentable square footage: 33,800 Total monthly income: $27,065
Estimated rent per sq. ft.: $0.80
Income Statement
Less Vacancy of 15%
Gross Income
Expenses:
Taxes
Salaries
Utilities
Maintenance
Landscaping
Advertising
Insurance
Telephone
Legal & Professional
Credit Card Fees
Office Supplies
Computer/ Software Support
Total Expenses
Building 2
Annual
Income
$324,780
$48,717
$276,063
$5,000
$15,000
$4,000
$500
$0
$1,000
$4,000
$0
$1,500
$1,000
$1,000
$500
$33,500
Available to Service Debt $242,563
Building 1 & 2
Belville, NC 1/27/2009
Gurrent unit Ivllx refGeIILd(J.e5 dIIll C511IIIQIGU INUIIL I v?aia.
Non-climate controlled units:
Number
Monthly
% of
% of
Monthly
of Units Rent non-clim total Income
Parking 20 $55 $1,100
5 x 10 9 $60 6.9% 2.0% $540
10 x 10 65 $80 49.6% 14.3% $5,200
10 x 15 16 $90 12.2% 3.5% $1,440
10 x 20 35 $100 26.7% 7.7% $3,500
10 x 25 1 $120 0.8% 0.2% $120
10 x 30 4 $130 3.1% 0.9% $520
15 x 20 1 $140 0.8% 0.2% $140
Total non-climate controlled units: 131 Total: $12,560
Percent of non-climate units to total units: 28.9%
Total sq. ft. of non-climate control: 18,100
Percent of non-climate sq. ft to total sq. ft.: 30.7%
Climate controlled units:
Number Monthly % of % of Monthly
of Units Rent non-clim total Income
5 x 10 57 $75 17.7% 12.6% $4,275
10 x 10 117 $105 36.3% 25.8% $12,285
10 x 15 88 $125 27.3% 19.4% $11,000
10 x 20 48 $150 14.9% 10.6% $7,200
10 x 25 2 $175 0.6% 0.4% $350
10 x 30 5 $185 1.6% 1.1% $925
15 x 20 5 $190 1.6% 1.1% $950
Total climate controlled units: 322 Total: $36,985
Percent of climate controlled to total: 71.1%
Total sq. ft. of climate control: 40,850
Percent of climate sq. ft to total sq. ft.: 69.3%
number of units:
number % of
of units total
5X10 66 14.6%
10 x 10 182 40.2%
10 x 15 104 23.0%
10 x 20 83 18.3%
10x25 3 0.7%
10x30 9 2.0%
15 x 20 6 1.3%
Total number of units: 453
Total rentable square footage: 58,950 Total monthly income: $49,545
Estimated rent per sq. ft.: $0.82
Income Statement Building 1 & 2 Annual
Income
Less Vacancy of 15%
Gross Income
Expenses:
Taxes
Salaries
Utilities
Maintenance
Landscaping
Advertising
Insurance
Telephone
Legal & Professional
Credit Card Fees
Office Supplies
Computer / Software Support
Total Expenses
Net Income available to Service Debt
Gateway Bank Loan $3.80 million, 7.0%, 20 years
Net Cash Flow after Debt Service (Annual)
Cash flow Coverage
Total Gross Feet-Building # 1
Total Gross Feet-Building # 2
EEP Payment - Building # 2
Retaining wall - Building # 2
Land Cost
Site Work - Building # 1
Site Work - Building # 2
Total Construction & Land Cost
Operating Expenses (Shortfall)
Loan Interest Carry
Bank Fee & Loan Closing Costs
Total Cost & Loan Amount *
$29,500
30,900 sf
40,300 sf
$594,540
$89,181
$505,359
$15,000
$65,000
$19,000
$5,500
$1,500
$21,000
$15,000
$2,500
$5,000
$3,500
$2,500
$3,000
$158,500
$346,859
$354,000
-$7,141
0.98
Total Bldg Cost
$1,170,000
$880,000
$21,000
$24,000
$740,000
$450,000
$250,000
$3,535,000
$40,000
$200,000
$25,000
$3,800,000

3 ee
r7 > - 8
g 0 •
- 5
rn

3 6SbSZ tlN `021tl0 H.I.MON '3d.L01'ItlHS
4VUH HOtl'38 N2O'IOH £ £bT 'SbL X08 Od
era S20IA HS
DNI2I?31?IIYJI?I3 28

NOISSQ l?tVWMOS VNFIOUVO HI'dOM `H''IIA'Ia9

dOJ
tit ?a pis

B

o

10

U
i I
I
y0
o? {
1
I I II I I
.I
a
z0?, U

-1U Z
X41 IN W W W W {u rl W ? W?J eW? ? W ? yl Wtu Q

mN?Nln y? 1pb p1+? N b O?11pp -
Pi'. P
P?
w

I
I
I
j

I
t
z
}< Hz-
o ?
n
?r?Ti M
2 2 y y IA (n y 2 2 N y

I i
'
3 Z (p -, k
Q? J w
S W
U
?? m
?p m1p g ? u?r?
I
ap??.
` ^'^m?hhvlnMh???Fnl??'? ?N
O i

II 1

1
y
j O ?
a
V>
J a ,3 W 1
1..
{{
=?"3NNNw'^hNt?yNhw)fV ^N'IN[by N?'1 'FN^ I I I
I
? I I. I ?
?? ? ? '
I I) I I
II
I I I I
' I t
I i t (? .7? bhb oa0.^..^ ^.?. ^b ^?O?NON^NN tl
J J J ?J JJ.-J JJ?J =
°
rv I
I
II
I I
1
?
?
c I t I

? 11
II
t ?
g II
II
? I i I ? I I;
?
=a I I I
II t
?g
<
QQ
II
1
I
a 1 I
z $3a
m

Vo? \

V
Sz2
'
? ?

? i I
,y?,?
Q
a?
'/ :
/ / m
b?
F
? 11
? I
Q
ob ?

C
53
'
I
w3
?
3
I
z3 ey
y
`?ym3??

(-
Co
'Y N???p

<

O<
o

?
\

? ?

Y I
1
II
I

I
I I
y
my
l
I
p?py?m O
M Ji
.o Uo0
d'Jm

? n I
' I I I
I
y?
k
gO1;?p V>
??JJ
??<??go aO /
?
u o??,, A

r; I

%? I t II I I

; I
I
;

L <u?< zar I t II+
?
OA SZ.

< V
S 'yz' >ry c $
° -
- ? U

? Iiln
3

•? t I
?

t
II

_rv d Ox
?q N
Q I I I;?
,I
c 1 ? ry m O I I tit ' I

W F
b
< V
la
`3 t I II{
- ---- --i l 11
I I
I

n m
e

31P g a I
8
i I l

I

.m
rn
??
'? ? ? /

J.7VHdStl
T III
I
{ ,
; 1
' I
I
- z MY y Il i,

/

??
` <
it
<
/ ?II
V II
I? III
m II

;I
1
/ \ ? \ °? m m l a I I I
I I I
? rv
?
g I
I I
I
/
?
\? +
55 y? j 1
/
'
YI? rn. a
6 I
?m ?
a
a
x lip o

/
a
r
x
:
_
-n
- ___

x
x _ _
U
?<
a
r
II
t I I
x
:
:

f
it
I

.?....... ..........
...-
........
\
..N
. ........
...
..
..
......
.
...-
..
..-
41 34'59' W 12.71'
m ....
. ..
.......
..........
. .. i.l
..
I I
V 1

/ .-

I 1
.................. ...................
98.48' N 34'55'21' W
138.77' ;
, m•
?
X<<
i3 W
? y
?
8 v
Yl?
iiCC a 6
?
3
m I I I
W I I
I-- -?
?

NI I
?I I

A I
$ A ? 1
n
- a g'- h"
v
v
I
Y n
' ao
gi
n a it
t I I
I
I
, a
;`
agP?g1 y]
i y
' `?
5
y
O
m
V
t ? I I I , I
I I
I ;
R9
9
` ? 11
gg IJ ?
CC I I II II
: a

R
a Z
O 333666 C W ,`
A a _ I

?
O `" h
W
p.My
NON I I
t II
I I I
? I ;,
i 1
I
?
rn 4? J *
7 -i <'' Sy
GG
.a ,1
?i
l , ?
';
" U pp?? 6 y?
CC7A +ti
v?
C
p
I
I
I 1 1
a
a a a
NMtYAlif ?
a a a a S ZO?
NM IA7'al {
+ v
i I I
I I
.-i it
?
!
/. ?
? b •\ e
Fp
2
? I I
?
I I
I
V7 1 1
,S
/
/ 2i?
W
i I
g
q 1
I
? 1
I
/ I { O

„ I I
?I ? II
?, I I I
/ 1
a a a a
NOLLYATIt
I tII
I I I

? ,
I I
I I
11
bIl
I I m!? I
,,

n

x
-

0

j `

-

'
;
E
?

I

`

`

L'V
=R

"

'

G

" LZS9-99L-OI6XVd W99-99L-0163NOHd
6948Z VNI'MVO HZNON'N.L.LOTIVHS
QV021 HOVNB N3Q'IOH £-£bi `8bL X08 Od
Vd `s20InxSs

I?II2I33I?IIrJ1?3 28

mols2Q NIVWM02

dNlIO?d7 H.I.??N '1n??g
EID dols lassv
zi

o3

Ndaa ails
x
c
r

Q
d

y ? a S
J
aH

N?

O?
M

g?

U

O

W W W W MW
W W W W l w.,- W W W W W W W W

- I
I

I

I II
I
II
II
I
I
'
I,

I
I
I'
^J
°Z N
q Nn Nhu1 bb u1 Y OMO bcOOOn cp
N Y NO:-Nh M2V v 000 NNO;?N a e I I
I
;?-
?G. M_ V^ n Y W h0 v hOOrMb NNUIn vl
Z P:?;'1Q d A:'I t;? O V NryIV ,'1 V :'1A V ;A V i t

z? V p?O?l0Mm0.1b `t dOlndh V OrnnM
¢ to In 21n2 2?U1 UI Vbj Vbj U1 Vbj 2 ?2 c/1 cb/1 (b/I COil vMi coil I
j
I
J j Z
°z z w m I I
i'
?Ez z m I l
u
,Oz w rnh OO? YnOlh Mn W

W
Q bn v N
b
1' bNMMMho
OMnnµcp NlO CO an

3 JZ? Z

?i V 16-Yi .-c6c6
N
Nj
Z O "I NryN V r
MNM NN NM`?N ^
fNN
IT
I

I
`e V w F
° O F Z J R ? 2
W I
l
c y S O E ? LL
w C X25 ?] V >

e
"
JMY J? Jlja O?Nh Ohbn 4101NNN

?
II
'-
; A "'
W I
00K I
F
I
j
I
"
l
I
• C<i 5z
I I I
j i i i o =?=
- I I
? ? I I pZ
?- 6 I 1 1
1
VC=
z I I
?m ? II
w O , I
B
1
?

_ C a
Y a
w w u z
O Q
e u F o I I
I

rc
O w ? r I
V Q 1 \
11

t`?
F
w,yCjV
>
I
IIj ?
I I
w

3
<z WT
a j
iI
O?
C I V] 1
I I
N7

X50 •
• ?z
• S

Vw II
1
j
om _
.. o

k a 0 ¢ a
Z 5
Z s

V
°
,0w
,00
S?
•
?I '?O
co
b .7

4 I

11
5 C U I
F<w
J
O ? I
j 5 .
f?
ti N C O Q / . ? 1
11

a
Z>
LL
5iC,
w

°
a<

°
>
W
?°?o
- ??Q z }I II
"
zy"7 (G 7 I

OV?w
wKCFOa
>r•J
°}w0

UJLL
0

+ • I I I
I
I
I
C
C F?? J d ? ? 1 I
Cci?G O? / GPP p3'? r
+ N I
YYJCJ. °T - I
Z?w?F
/
? ? o
b

jOn GZ6
}LzNON /+ I

100' I
N
a i i
m 1
r=j,?CU-C
q°??%
/
20' t0
N ,
I
Je
O z N = ° b *
-
p32?Zx w
w5
o?JO.c

I m

V II

I
20. c 10'

F
1Nz?° _
I 'n
n I

W > uu11 -
U< II- 1 1
? W Q V * 10' - - I
O
a a 310' d F 1
,
? n

m

?

z 1

, I
N
n
Z
+ I IVHJSV N u
R
W
it
310'
Q 1
?

zc
Cw
u
N

L W

J O

4 11
I

I I
H ?
- OOF
O `? I m I

/
V u I 1
I
/ bozo ?_ - I
/

/.

O¢
oS.
I`ZI??

I O
1
11

.a
r

W 30 + ?
?O' \
O
t
II i I
II
II
'
I

N N
w I
- - - - - - - - - - - -
I
_
j0 W z-z-z- - x Ix
ifn
I
I
MI
Z N 34'59'30' W 412.71- _
r z ?z
N 32'22'27' W
/ 96.48' N 34'55'21" W - , m w
/ 136.77'
m W
/ 3 W m m I
? • }QC F 1 3rn 1 I
i7N °0<
Z F
'^ WW
C 1 V
Z 11
I
n ti
rn 5
I
I
I
U
-
I I
II
II
I
I

w
?
NW
w '^ ?
m??l
'
I I

II
?'
I

??ry? I
I
it
it
am??o 1
¢ >
ca a
_
a
nz I
a I
F

W O
n
I II
,
$ I
o 6
I
1
r ? 0 3
,1,
I / I 1 rc

I/
/
I .7
? I I
I
/
I
I II
I
I
\/ 1
I I
'
II
?I
Q
0-
Z
a
w
L. L
0
w
U
W
O
z
Q
1..L
w
w
Q
Z
Ir
w
J
Q

'2.5w
`
5A
3:E
eon
-30
i
f Revisions
~ . \ 47~76~~ota
Loc>~tton

~ 57~dfi$~~ uce dve
Area A e Future Bui dui # 2 Removed
\ . ~ LEGEND BEM .asement
\
1 ~s I ~ N TES I RiGHTAF-WAY LINE 6117cf ~wld'tn Mo~i~ e Builc[in
. 0 FUTURE BUQ.DiNG \ , an Par g Area
=3LZS . ~ ~ \ I. TOPO AND SURVEY INFORMATION PR ORMATION PROVIDED BY HANOVER DESIGN SERV[CES. _ _ 404 WETLANDS, AS DELINEATED BY
~ / ~ 2. OWNER /DEVELOPER: ASSET STORAG LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. OF 87~3Tbg= l~ec~uce uture ?SSET STORAGE, LLC., 3405 ST. FRANCIS DR.WiLMINGTON, NC 28409. WILMINGTON , NC ui mg ire et an s
x RETAINING _ \ c WAtL ~ • ~ 3. THIS PROPERTY ZONED ALL ADJACE)' ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES ZONDED BH.
I~ ~ ~ 4. THIS AROJECT HAS BEEN PERMITTED N PERMITTED BY THE NC DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY FOR STORMWATER - - - - -EASEMENT 1L19/09 (ar1411-Reduced
~s PROPOSED EXTENT OF WETLANDS IN WETLANDS AND NC DIVi5i0N OF LAND RESOURC AND RESOURCES FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL ! STORMWATER - _ - - Wetlands Added Section
2e S. THIS PLAN REPRESENTS PHASE I DEV as PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT OF THE OVERALL TRACT OF LAND. x -CHAIN LIMO FENCING
FUTURE .
zb / FUTURE POND ExisTING GRAD POND ~ S 54'41'56" E ® VEGETATIVE SCREENING
PARCELBOUNDR ( 81.83°
~j Q N
SECTION A-A ~ 5® . IG,4 ~ N
2~'•6 f ` ~dN'N
00 tf1 ~ H ~ I, U N l~
/ ~ . ~ . ~
/ 1 ~~aWZd
I W ~~aa•
\ ~ w'~~'~a~
1 i Q ',Wq~~
;Z I • f " \ ~ i N 8139 01 E I w ~ a U '
1 FU1vRESUQ,DING : . ;N ~ ~ . 33.17
= 31.25 m ' ~ . \ 32 ~ : N -'PROP05ED ' ~~~~x
; N RETAINING 07 : N ` ~ /
` Z WALL ' ; v ~z~
\ C ~ EXTENT OF ~VETLANILS • 7 ~ PROP05ED FQ.L ~ ' > IN WE!'LAIVDS . ~J, ~ W ° tt'I tINE TABLE ~ ^ i op ~
\ ~ ~ ~ LINE LENo;TH BEARING ~ W ! !"+i ~ 0 ~
_it~c..,a~,_3f~.i1~ ` ~ L1 32.11 S61b9'S9"E ~ ~ ~ a ~
i \ 26 ~ ~ ~ EXISTEVGGRAD t2 22.16 S6133°42"E O 0 Q ~
PARCBLBOUNDR m er ~ ~ L3 20.67 N86'31'27"E ~ , pq x Z
• ~ 0~0 14 21.54 S701~4'02"E ~ Q" a
1 \ SECTION B-B ~ ~ L5 42.32 N78'14'15"E
L6 4D.31 N89'41'25"E
\ ~ ~ R STORMWATE / 1 L7 16.56 S58'0T51 "E j
\ POND SIREN ACTIVATED L8 23.77 57334'36"E I
~ ~ \ / z : ~ GATE L9 29.39 S78'18'26"E ~
w: ~ L10 24.55 588'55'45"E I
\ ~ : • . + ~ uo L1f 25.81 S66'40''45"E i
~ ~ ; FUTURE POND ; ~ L12 32.48 S74'44.01 "E
.I N : EXPANSION isr • r ; I } U3 37.36 S54'25'00"E , !
EXTENTOFFiITUREBI)IIDING =31~ EXTENTOFWEfLAND ~ ~ ; PRIVATE ACCESSI L14 21.70 N89~0'03"E
PROP03BDGRADE OFBUII.DEdGP00TING UTILITY EASEMENT / L15 32.79 S67'29'12"E TI'
FJCfENf OF WETLANDS + ~ ~ GRAVEL ~ ~ i.29 ACRES 3s iiii ii iaiiriiiii L16 24.44 N84'33'20"E
~ iiiiiiissiiairiiiiiiiiiiiiiioiiioiiiiiiiiasiii ii PROPOSED FII,[, . iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiaii i i i OUTDOOR , ~ U' /////////////////////////t/////////////////////// / ` L17 26.87 S73'46"26"E
y iiiisaiiriiiseniiiiiiiaiiiiiiiisiiisiaiiiiiiia.IlQ wET[,AtdDS v iiiiniiiiiiiiiiaiai'iiiiiiiieiiiiiiri~ri t STORAGE Lib 28.29 S64'32°08"E
~ i i ii iii io ii iii ii ii ii ii iii ii \ , Li9 33.65 S89'02'50"E
°a L20 41.83 S8T45'20"E
EXISTING GRADB L21 28.47 S373T47"E
SECTION C-C ~ . GRAVELED 40' L22 16.78 S83'45'46"E
~ ASPHALT " AREA _ - -
S 5T33 O6 W •x
33.21' C , 20 ` 1 PARCEL BOUNDARY
73' o 1 1 FOLLOWS WETLAND
:x \ BOUNDARY SCALE: 1" = 40' a
' 10' 0 20 40 80 120 ~ li
A A 10 I
:x N O i
i / ~
r ~ : O ' x
~ :x ~ ~
la a~ H o~~
PROPOSED
RETAINING ~ ~ ~ Ix 10 ~ WALL H~'~0'~
10' . • EXISTING 8" WATERLINE V1
o `
BOUNDARY FOR :x 15' WATERLINE EASEMENT MINI STORAGE SITE ~ 20' w
(5.5 ACRES) 0.31 ACRES OF a !
to ° WETLANDS ~ •t ~1 a I ~ .t ~
W~ V 1 y~' I'!
SITE DATA: TO BE FILLED ' en; i-~
BUILDING AREA: 71,2 SF 30' .V ' ~ ~ N/F ~ W
AND DRIVE AREA: 103 Ob7 SF w° PARKING NOREMAC ENTERPRISES, LLC
TOTAL SITE AREA: 239 232 SF i
' ~ a ~ 9C IlVIPERVIOUS: 73 % o ~ o ~ • d .a 9~~~ ~ ~
B . B ~.x~. ~
w; ~ ~ j
v: PARCEL BOUNDARY '
EXISTING N :x 205 UMT g ~ FOLLOWS WETLAND I ! BOUNDARY f~f
~ MIrIt-STORAGE
C N F BUILDING #I ` ~ \ I Date ,1 ~ 9/15108
NOREMAC ENTERPRISES, LLC 30900 S ~ 1 \ ~ " Scale: 1" ~ 4d
Ix .ti
Drawn B AKAIBSE3 y'
SIREN ACTIVATED GATE : GRAVE ED 24' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Checked 8y: DBS
•x ARE
FUTURE PROPOSED ~ ~ \ ~ ! i
MIM-STORAGE 1 RETAINING ~ BUILDING # 2 `,~~~g `g ~ ` ~ I
WALL (40,300 SF) I y FED 9 ~ 2109
( 1 • . \ ~ ! '
EXISTING 4" SEWERLINE ~ * ~ ~Efdl3 - WATirF t~~'Ate!FY
Y ~ \ ~ ~ ''~I:iIAtiDS1+NDS1'ORP~YS',~fFR6RAPdG4~~ i .C~~ ~ . ` I
130° 120' ~ I ' ` ~
i I , 32 ~ ~ ~ ` THIS PLAN IS RIOT ISSUED FOR ,
i 170' 25 x - • ` ~ AFFlXED CORPORATE SWEAL.
' ~I 40' ASPHALT 401 i
I x '\i~ \ n 1111 ~y
50' UTILITY EASEMENT ~ i
82.4'toEO - ~ \ ~ - - - .r._ iii
I .I ' ~ ` ~ L i
1M QTaia1RAT ~ A eF11,tFloi't' RYrc~rn?r~ ru a rmrv cl:u>Ftrt.nvta > , _ BELVILLE 20 ACCESS EASEMENT ` I A i'I\I ~ A V \l n/ur ~~ll ~ 2 i
- ~ - - - - we.++w-• w.«s~w++«.r.•...+.+aar..ew.e..®.w. «..s....w....«s.+r+... .s..e e~wses.ar wsr aa~.u...r.r ...~...+r+.
- " - S 54°57'59" W 569.42' 6'X I O' SIGN 1
(20' TOTAL HEIGHT) EOP
EOP 7
1 PICKET FENCE 60' 20' 20' 1551 ~ ?else 10
BLACK MLL ROAD - S.R. 1551 BLACKWELL ROAD S.R.
EOP EOP
EXISTING WATERLINE - - L- _ _ _ - _ _ - - CT.2 '
R/W R/W
This drawing shall not b=CV=- n PPn.?Frr Mn nFn-l
whole or in art without 'on