20070623 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20090212

D
`.C 'COSY PR (,RAC'
'?N,'?tyCEN4. tJT
1

CREEK
LITTLE WHITE OAK
STREAM RESTORATION
POLK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CONTRACT # D06027-B
.-??° oFE S
. Q
229 • a
01
SC?OTI
Prepared For: ti Ecosystem Enhancement Program
' Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1652 Mail Service Center
Ekowsteill
K 01111111, Raleigh' NC 27699-1652 ? - >- \??
?' ? t lONITORING REPORT (YEAR 1 OF 5)
j9 JANUARY 2009
P!C ECOSYSTEM
-NNANCEMENTPROGRAM.
' Owner NCDENR
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1652 Mail Service Center
' tosystelI I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
,i
EEP Project Manager: Guy Pearce
' Phone: [phone]
' Design and Monitoring Firm
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants
' MULKEY 6750 Tryon Road
fYGiu F.FR9 fi
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Phone: [phone]
' Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: Wendee B. Stith
Phone: [phone]$33
Project Engineer: Scott Hunt
Phone: [phone]
F
Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report Januarg 2009
Stream Restoration (Year 1 of 5)
Table of Contents
' 1.0 Executive Summary ....................................................................... 1
2.0 Project Background ........................................................................... 3
' 2.1 Project Location and Setting 3
2.2 Project Goals and Objectives 4
2.3 Project Restoration Approach and Mitigation Type 4
' 2.4 Project History 5
2.5 Project Monitoring Plan View 5
3.0
3.1 Project Condition and Monitoring Results .............................................
Project Vegetation Monitoring 6
6
3.1.1 Vegetation Monitoring Methodology 6
' 3.1.2
3.1.3 Vegetation Monitoring Success Criteria
Vegetation Monitoring Results for Year 1 of 5 8
8
3.2 Project Stream Monitoring 9
3.2.1 Stream Monitoring Methodology 9
' 3.2.2 Stream Monitoring Success Criteria 12
3.2.3 Stream Monitoring Results for Year 1 of 5 13
' 4.0 Project Monitoring Methodology ........................................................... 16
5.0 References ...................................................................................... 16
' Figures
' Figure 1. Location Map
Tables
' Table I. Project Restoration Approach and Mitigation Type
Table H. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table III. Project Contacts
' Table IV. Project Background
Table V. Stem Counts Monitoring Year 1 for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Table VI. Vegetative Problem Areas
Table VII. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
Table VIII. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Table IX. BEHI and Sediment Transport Estimates
' Table X. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table X1. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Table XI1. Stream Problem Areas
Appendices
Appendix A. Monitoring Plan View
Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C. Reference Point Photos
Appendix D. Cross Section Photos
Appendix E. Raw Data
Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report January 2009
Stream Restoration (Year 1 of 5)
' 1.0 Executive Summary
This annual monitoring report details the first year monitoring activities and their results for
the Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration Site (LWOC). All of the monitoring
activities were conducted and the subsequent results are reported in accordance with the
approved mitigation plan (Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, 2008) for LWOC. The
content and format of this report were developed in accordance with the contract
' requirements for the Full Delivery RFP 16-DO6027 (NCEEP, 2005). Accordingly, this
report includes project background information, project monitoring results, and description
of the project monitoring methodology.
' Mulkey Engineers and Consultants (Mulkey) submitted LWOC for the Full Delivery RFP
16-DO6027 to provide 18,200 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs). Mulkey was awarded the
' stream restoration contract and began work on the project on May 16, 2007 The primary
goals of LWOC were to improve water quality, to reduce bank erosion, to reestablish a
floodplain along each of the stream reaches, and to improve the aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife habitat. These goals were met through the following objectives:
• By using natural channel design to restore stable pattern, dimension, and profile for
' 18,290 linear feet of stream channel
• By establishing a conservation easement, which will protect the streams from cattle
intrusion and future development activities
' • By establishing a floodplain or reconnecting the stream back to its historic
floodplain, or a combination of both, for each project stream reach
• By creating or restoring floodplain features such as vernal pools, off channel ponds,
or riparian wetlands
• By increasing the amount of aquatic habitat through the addition of rock and wood
structures
• By reestablishing native plant communities throughout the conservation easement,
whereby reintroducing shading, cover areas, and travel corridors.
' LWOC is located in Polk County, North Carolina near the Community of Mill Springs and
is situated in the Broad River Basin. Past land use practices, including extensive cattle
' farming, stream channelization and dredging, and clearing of the riparian buffers resulted in
substantial degradation of the stream systems at LWOC. LWOC is comprised of seven
stream reaches totaling 18,290 feet of restored stream channel. All of the analyses, design,
' and restoration at LWOC were accomplished using natural stream channel design methods.
In addition to stream channel restoration, the restored stream banks and the riparian and
upland buffer areas along LWOC were also replanted with native species vegetation.
' The survivability of the planted vegetation at LWOC will be monitored at representative
vegetation plots as well as project-wide. Stem counts, photo documentation and
comparison, and visual assessment will be utilized. Bare root stock were planted at a
density of 680 stems per acre (8 foot by 8 foot spacing) and live stakes were planted on the
stream banks at a density of 1,742 stems per acre (5 foot by 5 foot spacing). A total of 24
representative vegetation plots were installed at LWOC based on the recommendations set

FI
L,
Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report January 2009
Stream Restoration (Year 1 of 5)
experiencing the expected minor adjustments indicative of movement toward increased
' stream stability and are attributed to vegetation establishment and natural channel
adjustments. Fluctuations in bed materials were expected to occur during the early years
following construction. Fining of the bed materials was documented by the stream bed
material monitoring. The stream systems at LWOC appear to be sand-dominated and
therefore coarsening of the bed may not occur. However, the monitoring results do suggest
that on-site sediment supply from LWOC has been greatly reduced as a result of the
' restoration. Fluctuations in bed materials are likely to continue and several years may be
needed to observe a consistent bed material. Six of the eight crest gages recorded flood
stages in excess of the bankfull stage. The evidence recorded by the crest gages indicates
that a storm event producing a stage in excess of the bankfull storm occurred at LWOC
during Monitoring Year 1. This documented the first of two required bankfull events over
the five year monitoring period in order to achieve success with regards to hydrologic
' monitoring at LWOC. No stream problems were documented through the photo
documentation comparison process. However, the project-wide visual assessment
conducted along each of the project stream reaches revealed 12 specific stream problem
' areas which included in-stream structure failures and associated stream bank erosion, areas
of floodplain and adjacent stream bank erosion, and an area of stream bank erosion. Mulkey
elected to promptly address all of the observed stream problem areas and conducted
' construction repairs of each in October 2008. All of the in-stream structures and the areas of
floodplain and stream bank erosion were repaired. The repairs to the all of these areas of
eroded stream banks included re-grading, re-seeding with appropriate temporary and
' permanent seed, re-installing coir fiber matting, and re-planting with live stakes. Upon
completion of the repair work, LWOC experienced no other stream problem areas and was
deemed a success for Year 1 Monitoring.
Therefore, based on the positive results of both the vegetative and the stream monitoring for
Monitoring Year 1 at LWOC, Mulkey does not propose any additional recommendations or
' actions other than to proceed with the annual stream monitoring.
2.0 Project Background
' 2.1 Project Location and Setting
' The Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration Site is located in Polk County, North
Carolina approximately 2.5 miles east/southeast from the Community of Mill Springs along
NC Highway 9 South, and approximately 0.5 mile northwest from the intersection of NC
' Highway 9 South and US Highway 74 (Figure 1). LWOC is situated in the Broad River
Basin 8-digit cataloging unit of 03050105 and the 14-digit cataloging unit 03 05010503 0010.
Mulkey proposed to provide 18,200 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) with LWOC under the
M Full Delivery RFP 16-DO6027 issued by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (NCEEP). Mulkey acquired and installed permanent
fencing along an easement covering 55.3 acres, which encompasses the restored streams and
' associated buffers at LWOC.

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report January 2009
Stream Restoration (Year I of 5)
the stream bed. The second approach involved building a floodplain at a level lower than
the historic floodplain through the construction of bankfull benches (the sections of the
project stream reaches that were restored using Priority Level II methodologies). In-stream
structures were installed along each of the stream reaches to provide grade control and
stream bank protection, and to increase in-stream habitat diversity. The in-stream structures
that were installed included rock cross vanes, j-hook rock vanes, rock vanes, constructed
riffles, and root wads. Stream banks were further stabilized through the installation of coir
fiber erosion control matting, temporary and permanent seeding, and the installation of
native species vegetation in the form of transplants, live stakes, and bare root seedlings. All
areas of the site that were disturbed during construction activities were stabilized using
temporary and permanent seeding. The riparian and upland buffer communities along
LWOC were also restored with native species vegetation using a target community which
will emulate the Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest described by Shafale and Weakley
(1990). The conservation easement was fenced to permanently protect the restored stream
and buffer areas. Information regarding the restoration approach and mitigation type for
each of the seven project stream reaches is detailed in Table 1.
2.4 Project History
' The existing conditions at LWOC prior to restoration were a result of cattle use for the past
50 years. When Mulkey initially became involved with this project, there were
approximately 200 livestock (cattle and horses) currently utilizing the pastures. The
' livestock had never been fenced from any of the stream channels within LWOC. This
continual livestock access to the streams resulted in substantial erosion along the stream
banks, incision of the channels, channel widening in some areas, and heavy siltation
' throughout LWOC, as well as reduced water quality due to large quantities of fecal matter
into the stream system. Based on information gained from the property owner, it was
determined that many of the streams at the LWOC, particularly the smaller tributaries, were
' historically maintained through channelization, dredging, and clearing of the riparian buffer.
As a result of these land and water quality issues, Mulkey submitted LWOC for the Full
Delivery RFP 16-DO6027 to provide 18,200 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs). Mulkey was
awarded the stream restoration contract by the NCEEP and began work on the project on
May 16, 2007. The project activity and reporting history are detailed in Table II. Table III
lists the contacts for the designer, contractor, relevant suppliers, and monitoring firm for
' LWOC. Table IV provides a complete listing of project background information.
2.5 Project Monitoring Plan View
Mulkey conducted monitoring baseline surveys along the entire length of each of the
restored project stream reaches using total station survey equipment. These surveys were
conducted to establish and document baseline conditions for the newly restored stream
channels for future monitoring activities. As-built drawings were developed using the
results of the monitoring baseline surveys. These drawing depicted the post construction
condition of LWOC and are included in Appendix A. The as-built drawings consisted of
plan sheets that include the following:

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report January 2009
Stream Restoration (Year I of 5)
appropriate, to restore the riparian and upland buffer communities along LWOC within the
conservation easement area. A complete listing of the planting zones, their corresponding
acreages, and the corresponding vegetation species was included in the approved mitigation
report (Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, 2008). The bare root stock were planted at a
density of 680 stems per acre (8 foot by 8 foot spacing) and the lives stakes were planted on
the stream banks at a density of 1,742 stems per acre (5 foot by 5 foot spacing).
As-Built Surveys were initiated immediately following the installation of plant materials. In
December 2007, during the as-built surveys and after the completion of planting, a total of
24 representative vegetation plots (vegetation plots 1 through 24) were installed randomly
across LWOC. An iron pipe was installed at each plot corner for monumentation and a
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe, along with a label specifying the plot number, was also
installed at one of the corners of each plot. The plot corners were strategically located such
that each plot has a total area of approximately 100 square meters. Between January and
February 2008, after the establishment of the plots, the species of each planted stem in each
plot was identified. Each of these stems was then tallied, by species, and marked with
loosely tied survey flagging (on lateral branches) to facilitate future identification. The
survivability of the planted woody vegetation at LWOC will be monitored using annual stem
counts at each of the plots. During the Year 1 Monitoring annual stem count, the planted
stems will be re-flagged as required to insure that all planted stems were accounted for and
considered in the survivability calculations. In addition to the stem counts, photos will be
taken at each of the plots. Where necessary, the corner of each plot will be remarked with
the PVC pipe and the plot number relabeled. This PVC plot corner will be used as the
reference point from which the annual vegetation plot photos were taken from the same
orientation for each plot. The photos will be compared to the photos from the previous year
to validate and document vegetation success. In addition to the photo reference points
established at each of the vegetation plots, a total of I 1 additional permanent photo reference
points were installed across LWOC. Subsequently, three additional photo points (photo
points 2.5Y1, 3.5Y1, and 8.5Y1) were added during the Year 1 monitoring period to insure
adequate photo documentation would be conducted within the monitoring limits of the
project stream reaches. These additional photo reference points were monumented using
steel rebar and PVC pipe and will be used for additional photo documentation of vegetation
growth across LWOC. Photos will be taken from each of the 14 permanent photo reference
points with the same orientation each year and used for photo documentation and annual
comparison of the vegetation growth across LWOC. This exercise will help to further
validate and document vegetation success at LWOC. Between January and February 2008,
after installation of the described 11 photo reference points, photos were taken from each of
the photo reference points to document the baseline conditions at LWOC with regards to
planted vegetation. Monitoring Year 1 photos were taken from all 14 photo points during
the visit in August 2008. Project-wide visual assessment will also be used for vegetation
monitoring at LWOC. A visual assessment will be conducted using annual field observation
and pedestrian surveys to identify any specific vegetation problem areas at LWOC during
the monitoring period. Any problem areas where vegetation is lacking or exotic vegetation
is present, will be identified and categorized as bare bank, bare bench, bare floodplain, or
invasive population. Such areas will be documented using representative photos and their
locations will be mapped.
7
L
Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report January 2009
Stream Restoration (Year 1 of 5)
3.2 Project Stream Monitoring
3.2.1 Stream Monitoring Methodology
Stream dimension, pattern, profile, stream bed material, bank stability, and bankfull
hydrology will be monitored to evaluate the success of the stream restoration activities at
LWOC. The monitoring of stream dimension, pattern, and profile, or morphometric
monitoring, along with the monitoring of stream bed material, will be conducted using
annual field surveys along with visual assessment. The morphometric, stream bed material,
and stream bank stability monitoring will be conducted along representative sections of the
' project stream reaches. Hydrologic monitoring will consist of field measurements of
bankfull events using crest gages. Project-wide stream monitoring will be accomplished
using visual assessment as well as photo documentation.
Major grading and channel construction were completed during the last week of November
2007. Immediately following the completion of the major grading and channel construction
activities, all remaining plant material was installed during the months of November and
December 2007. The as-built surveys of all of the stream reaches at LWOC were initiated
immediately following the installation of plant materials and were conducted utilizing aerial
' photography and total station surveys while following the protocols set forth by the 2003
USACE Stream Mitigation guidelines (USACE et al., 2003). In addition to documenting
the construction of LWOC for comparison to the proposed design, the results of the as-built
surveys were also used to establish baseline morphology for the proposed monitoring. This
information is presented in Table VII. A summary of the restored stream channel lengths is
outlined in Table I. A complete set of As-Built Drawings including a monitoring plan view
and longitudinal profile for the as-built conditions of the restored channels can be found in
Appendix A. After the completion of the as-built surveys, the limits and corresponding
lengths of the project stream reaches to be monitored at LWOC were determined using the
sampling rates outlined by the USACE et al. (2003). A total of 5,893 linear feet (32%) of all
restored stream channels will be surveyed annually during the monitoring period. Based on
these the sampling rates, the limits of the project stream reaches to be surveyed annually for
monitoring are as follows:
Reach R1 -1,974 Linear Feet Total (Stations 14+00-R1- through 33+74-R1-)
' Reach R1A - 500 Linear Feet Total (Stations 0+00-R1A- through 5+00-RIA-)
Reach R2 - 2,047 Linear Feet Total (Stations 25+13-R2- through 45+60-R2-)
Reach R2A - 326 Linear Feet Total (Stations 0+00-R2A- through 3+26-R2A-)
Reach R213 - 551 Linear Feet Total (Stations 9+35-R2B- through 14+86-R2B-)
Reach R21) - 495 Linear Feet Total (Stations 2+84-R2D- through 7+79-R2D-)
The upstream and downstream limits of these reaches were monumented in the field using
steel rebar/PVC pin. Each pin was also labeled with an aluminum tag identifying the
respective reach and the correct descriptor ("begin" or "end").
A total of 13 permanent cross sections, consisting of both riffles and pools, were established
' across LWOC and surveyed during the as-built surveys. The number of cross sections was

Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report January 2009
Stream Restoration (Year I of 5)
same pebble count procedures on an annual basis. The results of the pebble counts for each
' specified project stream reach will be compared on an annual basis.
BEHI information was collected during the existing condition surveys and sediment
transport rates were subsequently developed. The resulting information served as baseline
data for stream bank stability at LWOC. Stream bank stability monitoring using these
parameters is required in Monitoring Year 3 and 5. Data collected during these years will be
compared with pre-construction conditions to determine the change in bank erosion hazard
indices and sediment export rates for each reach assessed. Positive change, namely
reduction, in both the stream bank erosion rates and sediment transport rates at LWOC are
expected as a result of restoration and will be documented as described to demonstrate
success.
During the as-built surveys, a total of eight crest gages were installed across LWOC, with
one at each reach and one at the confluence of Reaches R1 and R2. At the base of each crest
gage a permanent vertical datum was installed. The locations of each crest gage along with
the elevation of the permanent vertical datum were surveyed during the as-built surveys. The
crest gages will be used for the hydrologic monitoring at LWOC to verify the occurrence of
bankfull storm events. Each crest gage was set during its initial installation and baseline
' photos were taken. The crest gages will be checked annually and the flood stage(s) recorded
by each gage and measured relative to the permanent vertical datum of the respective gage.
The results of these measurements will be used to document the occurrence of significant
' storm events, with the goal of specifically documenting the occurrence of bankfull and
larger stream flow events.
Photo documentation and project-wide visual assessment will be used for stream monitoring
at LWOC to complement the other stream monitoring practices. A total of 14 permanent
reference photo points were installed across LWOC (11 during the as-built surveys and 3
during the Year 1 monitoring period as described above). These photo points were
monumented using steel rebar/PVC pins. Photos were taken at that time to provide photo
documentation of baseline stream conditions. Photos will be taken from each of the 14
permanent photo reference points with the same orientation each year and will be used for
photo documentation and annual comparison of the stream conditions across LWOC. This
exercise will help to further validate and document stream restoration success at LWOC.
The visual assessment will be conducted using annual field observation and pedestrian
surveys to identify any specific problem areas along the streams at LWOC during the
monitoring period. Any such problem areas will be identified and organized under
appropriate categories. Such areas will be documented using representative photos, where
applicable, and their locations will be mapped. The suspected cause and appropriate
remedial action for each problem will be determined. If during any given year, the streams
are not anticipated to meet the final established monitoring criteria, corrective actions will
be considered. Such modifications will be documented and discussed with EEP.
11
I
Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report January 2009
Stream Restoration (Year 1 of 5)
export rates for each reach assessed. Positive change, namely reduction, in both stream bank
' erosion rates and sediment transport rates at LWOC are expected as a result of restoration
and will be documented as described to demonstrate success.
Hydrologic monitoring success will be based on the ability to document the occurrence of
bankfull storm events at LWOC. A minimum of two bankfull events, each occurring in two
separate monitoring years, are required to be documented within the five-year monitoring
' period. The described crest gauges will be used to determine and document the occurrence
of these bankfull events.
As described above, photo documentation and visual assessment will be used to complement
the other stream monitoring practices as part of the stream monitoring protocol at LWOC. If
during any given year, the streams are not anticipated to meet the final established
monitoring criteria, corrective actions will be considered. Such modifications will be
documented and discussed with EEP.
3.2.3 Stream Monitoring Results for Year 1 of 5
In late August 2008, the stream monitoring for Monitoring Year 1 was conducted. The
' methodologies described in the Stream Monitoring Methodology Section above were used
for the stream monitoring at LWOC for Monitoring Year 1. Detailed surveys were
conducted along the project stream reaches specified to be surveyed for annual monitoring
as described in detail above. The results of these surveys were used as the basis for the
morphometric monitoring, including stream dimension, patter and profile.
All of the 13 cross sections were surveyed to measure the bankfull width, floodprone width,
bankfull cross sectional area, bankfull mean depth, bankfull max depth, width to depth ratio,
entrenchment ratio, wetted perimeter, and hydraulic radius. The results of the cross section
surveys are presented in Table VIII. Appendix D compares photos taken during Monitoring
Year 1 with the initial baseline photos at each of the 13 cross sections. Appendix E provides
an overlay of the Monitoring Year 1 and baseline conditions along with the raw data for
' each cross section. The comparison of the baseline and Monitoring Year 1 stream
dimension morphometric data for each of the project stream reaches showed very positive
results, all of which were comparable to the originally proposed design parameters. The
' results showed that all of the reaches were experiencing the expected minor adjustments
including decreasing width to depth ratios, increasing entrenchment ratios, and minor
increases in depth. Each of these trends was indicative of movement toward increased
t stream stability and was attributed to vegetation establishment and natural channel
adjustments. The comparison of the Year 1 Monitoring cross section photos to the as-built
cross section photos strongly complement these suggestions, as no concerns, problems, or
negative trends were documented.
' The pattern for all of the stream reaches was surveyed to measure the parameters of
sinuosity, belt width, radii of curvature, meander wavelength, and meander width ratio. The
results of the pattern surveys are presented in Table VIII. The comparison of the baseline
and Monitoring Year 1 stream pattern morphometric data for each of the project stream
13
Little White Oak Creek Annual Monitoring Report January 2009
Stream Restoration (Year I of 5)
bankfull stage. The two crest gages that did not record flood stages in excess of the bankfull
stage were the crest gages at Reaches R2A and R2D. The crest gage at Reach R2A
apparently did not record evidence of a flood stage event. The crest gage at Reach R2D
recorded a flood stage that was 0.26 feet below the bankfull stage. Each of the crest gages
was reset after checking stage measurements to record future events. Table X lists the
information related to the verification of bankfull events at LWOC for Monitoring Year 1
while the raw data can be found in Appendix E. The evidence recorded by the crest gages
indicated a storm event producing a stage in excess of the bankfull storm occurred at LWOC
during Monitoring Year 1. This documentation of the first bankfull event at LWOC during
the monitoring period suggests success with regards to hydrologic monitoring at LWOC.
Photo documentation and project-wide visual assessment were used to complement the other
Monitoring Year 1 stream monitoring practices. Photos were taken from each of the original
11 permanent photo reference points. Three additional photo points (photo points 2.5Y1,
3.5Y1, and 8.5Y1) were also added to insure that adequate photo documentation would be
conducted within the monitoring limits of the project stream reaches. Photo point 2.5Y1
was added for Reach R2, photo point 3.5Y1 for Reach R2B, and photo point 8.5Y1 for
Reach R1A. After installation, photos were taken at each of the three added photo points.
Appendix C includes all of the described photos and provides comparison of the photos with
the initial baseline photos taken from the 11 permanent photo reference points. The new
photos taken at three additional photo points will serve as supplemental baseline condition
photos and subsequent photos at these same locations will be compared in Monitoring Years
2 through 5. No stream problems were documented through the photo comparison process.
A project-wide visual assessment was conducted along each of the project stream reaches to
identify any specific stream problem areas. Table XI presents the results of the project-wide
visual assessment. The project-wide visual assessment revealed 12 specific stream problem
areas. Each of these stream problem areas, including their description, location, and
suspected cause, are listed in Table XII. The stream problem areas included eight in-stream
structure failures and associated stream bank erosion, three areas of floodplain and adjacent
stream bank erosion, and one area of stream bank erosion. Mulkey elected to promptly
address all of the stream problem areas and conducted construction repairs of each in
October 2008. The eight stream problem areas categorized as failures of in-stream
structures and were determined to be caused by incorrect construction of the given in-stream
structure. The failed in-stream structures included j-hook rock vanes and rock cross vanes.
All eight of the structures and the associated areas of stream bank erosion were repaired.
Several of the j-hook rock vanes were converted to rock vanes during the said repairs to
prevent future point bar erosion. The three stream problem areas categorized as floodplain
and adjacent stream bank erosion were determined to be attributed to the incorrect
installation of floodplain interceptors. All three of the eroded areas were repaired and
floodplain interceptors were installed using both rock and log materials. The remaining
stream problem area categorized as stream bank erosion was determined to be caused by a
minor field adjustment made to the stream alignment in order to save an existing mature tree
at the request of the landowner. This area of stream bank erosion was also repaired. The
repairs to the all of the areas of eroded stream banks included re-grading, re-seeding with
appropriate temporary and permanent seed, and re-installing coir fiber matting. Black
willow (Salix nigra) and/or silky dogwood (Corpus anzomum) live stakes were harvested on-
15
- - - - WATAUG NEB/ ROANOKE CHOW N
Gm _ FRENCH rgRp PASQUOTANK
LITTLE BROAp CABA YADKIN qM??
-- - 1 TENNESSEE f c NELSE co
BROAD
HIWASSEE? gpFF
j ... - - f ..? - SAVANNAH Fq?
I u,.a+.. _ !L WHITE--OAK
030501051. MeF
I
_.__. "-
108
V T
it--
.:;nom I-
'Miu Sys f
LITTLE WHITE OAK
L ; --....__
MITIGATION SITE
35° 17' 211 80° 07' 00.4" W
f ?- . r 9 C
TO CHARLOTTE
1. h
• ' f.,?`?i r ,_ /- -Oaf 2 ? '"?cem .. .•?tn- I -- ---
white
?28
,r' 906'
ooa
d
X74
-1? TO ASHEVILLE I 0&?
?1t ? 1
1:36 000 Feet 1_-
0 1,000 2,000 3.000 4,000
999777::: _ _ I J I
USGS 7.5- Minute Topographic Quadrangles:
Mill Spring & Pea Ridge
Contour Interval 40 Feet
LOICATION MAP Figure
Ecosystem
LITTLE WHITE OAK STREAM RESTORATION
MULKEY POLK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT NO. D06027-B March 20, 2008

1
1
1

0

1

Table I. Project Restoration Approach and Mitigation Type
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027-B
Stream Reach Restoration Mitigation Linear
ID Approach Type Footage Stationing Comments
Channel relocation with floodplain
R1 P2 R 7,543 0+00-75+43 excavation
Includes 850 feet of P1 and 190 feet of
R1A Pl/P2 R 1,040 0+00-10+40 P2 channel relocation
R2 (Upper Channel relocation with floodplain
and Lower) P2 R 7,107 0+00-71+07 excavation
Channel relocation with floodplain
R2A P2 R 336 0+00-3+36 excavation
Includes 250 feet of P 1 and 1224 feet of
R213 P1/P2 R 1,474 0+00-14+74 P2 channel relocation
Includes 100 feet of P 1 and 690 feet of
R21) P1/P2 R 790 0+00-7+90 P2 channel relocation
R = Restoration PI = Priority I
El = Enhancement I P2 = Priority II
Ell = Enhancement II P3 = Priority III
S = Stabilization SS = Stream Banks Stabilization

1

C
1
Table H. Project Activity and Reporting History
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027-B

Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion Data
Collection
Completion Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan Prepared Oct-06 Aug-06 12-Feb-07
Restoration Plan Approved Nov-06 N/A 30-Mar-07
Final Design - 90% Dec-06 N/A 16-May-07
Construction Jun-07 N/A 13-Nov-07
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area Jun-07 N/A 13-Nov-07
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area Jun-07 N/A 13-Nov-07
Planting live stakes Dec-07 N/A 11-Jan-08
Planting bare roots Dec-07 N/A 1 I-Jan-08
End of Construction Dec-07 N/A 11-Jan-08
Survey of As-built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline) Jan-08 Jan-08 9-Jan-08
Monitoring
Year 1 - 2008 Dec-08 Sep-08 Dec-08
Year 2 - 2009 Dec-09 N/A N/A
Year 3 - 2010 Dec-10 N/A N/A
Year 4 - 2011 Dec-11 N/A N/A
Year 5 - 2012 Dec-12 N/A N/A
I Bolded items represent those events or deliverables that are variable. Non-bolded items
represent events that are standard components over the course of a typical project.
r
n

n

1

Table M. Project Contacts
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027-B
Designer
6750 Tryon Road
Mulkey Engineers Cary, NC 27518
and Consultants Contact:
William Scott Hunt, III Tel. [phone]
Construction Contractor
P.O. Box 796
Vaughan Contracting, LLC Wadesboro, NC 28170
Contact:
Tommy Vaughan Tel. [phone]
Planting Coordinator
150 Black Creek Road
Bruton Nurseries and Landscapes Fremont, NC 27830
Contact:
Charles Bruton, Jr. Tel. [phone]
Seeding Contractor
P.O. Box 796
Vaughan Contracting, LLC Wadesboro, NC 28170
Contact:
Tommy Vaughan Tel. [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
P.O. Box 669
Evergreen Seed Willow Spring, NC 27592
Contact:
Wister Heald Tel. [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
5594 Highway 38 South
International Paper Blenheim, SC 29516
South Carolina SuperTree Nursery Contact:
Geoffrey Hill Tel. [phone]
762 Claridge Nursery Road
North Carolina Forestry Service Goldsboro, NC 27530
Claridge Nursery Contact:
James West Tel. [phone]
Monitoring Performers
6750 Tryon Road
Mulkey Engineers Cary, NC 27518
and Consultants Contact:
William Scott Hunt, III Tel. [phone]

t

D

Table IV. Project Background
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027-B
Project County Polk County, North Carolina
Drainage Area [sq. mi(acres)]
R1 4.46 (2854)
RIA 0.11 (70)
R2 10.85 (6944)
R2A 0.54 (355)
R2B 0.12 (77)
R2D 0.05 (32)
Drainage Impervious cover estimate (%)
R1 2
RIA 2
R2 2
R2A 2
R2B 2
R2D 2
Stream Order
R1 3
RIA I
R2 3,4
R2A 2
R2B I
R2D I
Physiographic Region Piedmont
Ecoregion Southern Inner Piedmont
Rosgen Classification (As-built)
R1, R1A, R2 C5
R2A, R2B C4
R2D C6
Cowardin Classification R3UB2"
Dominat Soil Types Riverview-Chewacla-Buncombe
Reference Site ID UT to Ostin Creek
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
Project 03050105
Reference 03050105
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and Reference
Project 03-08-02 (Broad)
Reference 03-08-03 (Booad)
NCDWQ Classification for Project and Reference
Project C
Reference C,Tr
Any portion of any project segement 303d? No
Any portion of any project segement upstream of a 303d listed segment? No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor N/A
Percent of project easement fenced 100
lK) xivenne (s) upper rerenmal (uB) Unconsolidated Bottom (2) Sand
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0 o e d o o ? o 0 0 '? '° o 0 0 0 ? o 0

rn W

00 ? N O ? N d d -
N O _

n N O Y N .- ? r N N ... ? ? r', y' 7 rn ? - N
V G Gt
N [? N h 7 p
l N
O ..
?
N rn V O - 7 7 ?' NO r
o ?

N
P.
vt
D\
N
p v
?
O
N
N h p
O 00
?
O N V' a N ?

O O
O
O
QI
?
O
N
N
O.
O
N
p
?

?
O ?

Y ? 7 N ' p
A 0.1 n
1 ^ 0
W r
?
?
? .
. N N .--. op N O P
m O O ?
,A
Y a
?
:.
7
M
h
7
eI
?
O
N

W
L
W q
L d O
O a

L W o `D
d

?+
.M-?
N
r
P
P v
N
Ol
Ol
O aYi
• ? °
V G

W
O
??
11
C
O
i Q ?
a's o "
0

9
'
a
?

P

N

N

M

V'

rn

?

O
N
b
d
?
W
o?
N
vl
7
N
N
?

P

O
?
?
H ?
h OO i? N ? O O
o n
V ? O V O
N O N

O ?

?
-+
N
N
to
O
'a v
NO
O ?O
n
?
O

O ?
N N o0 N N h ? O
O N
?
.r
o? of r N ?
O ?
O 6
y ? d ? H
o = c v = ° 3 ?` ? ° ? °' Q
'? y c U a
Q c ? ? ? _ o a ° g
? v a a
? ? a y e E-O Q F

o
y
y

u K
_ -
v
_

o
Q
?.
- h
d
v
u
d
_
?n r" U Ci v? ? ,N Ir Qu O ?i i C Y c', a6, 81 d , rRI E
z
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
Table VI. Vegetative Problem Areas
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027-B
Photo No.
Feature/Issue Station / Range Probable Cause (If Available)
No vegetative problem areas observed All proiect reaches N/A N/A

1

1

1

1

1
'O o yr -- N
N W O C. --? N p h - D, h 0
G. rMi 7 N N N 7 oho O N N O 7 0,
X
c
d
i X
R o7
N 7
00 U
00
' y
cd ,-? h
N h oo
N
CY N

O M N
M
rn rr
G M O v'?
N O
O h N
M O 'r
h h
h U
O

O
h C' O N C' h h 'L7 O. O d. 7 (? •?
v'?
N oo
0, N
v1 O
N M
N N M O?
N 0 O M ?
c.
G p Coo' O
O
O, 00 a O

O
!2
W
"Z"
O
hoo
C.
p
?p
h U
Q N N O h
C oo O
C\ u1 C ... oo C C, C' o0
c
G M M <f• p N ?
E
C3 -a Vl

6 N

: M
Im C M oc oo ? O O O N •-- O?

C%] -
.G
o
r-
G
°
M
NO C
!.
.
v
OO
h
M
o0h
? N
i.
c
M
m
p
gyn
v?
cd
?
p
O
I.

Q
G
ON ? .
,
oo

"
O
O N

O

M

O

p

h

7 7

U
Gi

U A N CC_ O N It l- C' M C_ O O O C, ? C? M M
.? N U ?`' 'c
G M M c
G O
o oo O
A a
? O
^ly r.'i
O
d
C•
-?
M
N
M
D,
b
l7
O
•.
oo
'G
dd
00
h
h
V
N
'G
N
O
M
a
p
(.?y CQ r
G 00 c, M M h V'1 N N M m 1
M N " O rY
W O Tj

O ?N?/ w
CQ W M U
bo X
? M

O
oo l?

' M o
O
O:
00 iC
cd ?O o0 M
O?
"'? y?
cd C? V
N
p? N
p p

M 'D

O
'O
?' -' rr
G N I
D M ?' V? r M o7 M "' .. h O p h

Q 6 H W C_ m ?D O? O h N N C O et O N C ? tt V Q
C
G Rte ??-
++
G. I'D
vN'?
M
N
v-?
7 _
N
N
O _
O
r .
v .
1
,
0

G> U >
? c
W
N o
`u
N c
W
Wc
? x
y ?
? v ? oo a a
S7 c?
3 0

a
1 'O b 'O

Q

A RR
r
/ r
G r
G
C/j
,? = CC C
r
4v o ?v r g
4v ? Cv q
Q F 4' 4'+ O
v v
?
'L7 'L7 wN.. N N N? "O O ^D .^r C .U
^D O
O O C.
U
y W 00 =
. %
a

cq a G o 3 a?
- w? O o 9
-
0 Cj
6 44 >
91 r

Pr o
ai
U
i
O
C ed
8

A td
a L
a A
v', b
Q
N •-. 'O C' l? 00 b
c v? v? O
?" N M O O 'C
rG N ?..?
G O oo
O

G ? can N o?'O ? ? N p c? h O ° 00
. O
C CC V O v? pC O O ? ?
r
.4 ? O ? N G ? O r H
O

,G Om O O N M 0\ O G N N M G N M
DCD N O O ?o C> N 7 M h
ti
M
O 7 O

O N V' O N U
(? O
C N o, ,? C oo O N C ?D
00
N v?
O
M
N
N
C
n
N
'LS v? N m 7 O M CO 'C O O O b N --! U
r-- 6
N
?E
7
M
/..
O
M
r

C6 a?
d
oo
v,
'o
?
v
0
0
0
°
v?
o
o
v
N r tm+l N N vl N oo "`" O O M O C v°`i V

r O
• y O N ?t l?
v 7
v M C 0 0 0 C 0 M M
"?f' A
b

N ? ?

°'

M

M D1 M

m ?-+

rG
O
CO
O
h
\

'? w C D

I, W

M

m V'>
7 OP
00
? '7 00 l?

V M

O d u
C> V

I'a ?
7 O
U ?C
c
E
p
Vii
O`
cXa X
?
d
O
Im N
C'4
%0
O

vn
10
"a
'?I
j
p O pp
G ??
--
++
G O N . ??
--
++
G U oo v
. . C, O
X
C C% PL °O N n
1 o o
V

U W
?
C4 O ? a ? ?.. r, a a
b +?+ U ? N M nj .'? .?

o? a a
w ?

H
ca

m X

h
co
r
CIO
l E l I

b b
d
a
-
C
c c
h
o OD
= 4
? r-
i C
a
i a
?AAQ ?.r'- LZ
33
3
t um b .
°
o o
o
b? C
L o,,
?
CL - U •
O d W C O O E 7 N U

W 7
?
e
° 3 ^' G.
= a a
L Y s
[
, ? It
y u? 3 .
° ° L
c ° a
3 b N
iY
> to
W co u o

o a
0.i U a
c
on o w ::
cc C
w
v o a b
q a w e
TO
v V' .-.
o7 [- O
h oo
rV
h h
n 'C "'?
V 00
- 'O N E" M O

7
O
DD
M
N
N _
O "
V, N
V
N 7 o N M
W

4, Y,

C N
C) O

O o7 V

U O

7 v?
O v'i
.-.
O. X

C N

U .--

vl •-•

'V
N Y

?o ..-. N
O U 7

?t
'V
[?

O h
O v',
h ,?

M

?'
N r M m 7) ? ? V1 N It ? ? O V Cl N
Q N O h

m
M
N
O?
N
?O
N

N
h
7
N O
7
N C
c
G V'
O ^-?
00 M
O
h
O C

G ?D
M 'r
O D\
oo N
N
M
M i M r N
O
a, O vi M [? Ol 'C N h 'O
u U M
C'4
.G M [? N N C-4 M m N /_? 00 M O M

oD
' Y
? N
m lD Cl
'?
' h In
?n
Q I
M vl
In ,d, N O
N oo V
? L? O v? O
0 M vl
h U
0
C O C_ ?t O? O, C O oo
O N M M vi O OM o?0

b v? N M V O M o7 'O 0 0 0 b O0 .-- U
k 'V O M N .G r d' a M ,' O m
M 00
h
S
i [/J o
R ?

W
i
X
b
oo
N
h
'V
h
X
O
C>
O
?
O
- o

l?
ON
r
M
N
N
.
.
W)
00
O N
O
M
O
O
h
.0?
U
t% C) O
V
.
a
?
y
C
O
N
7
[?
7
?.,.?
?
C
0
0
0
c,
C
p
M
M
R? a ? N ? M ? M M C. ? V?
"O
O
F
W R CI'
6 :! O- DO h ? h d o0 00 C p h
N
c

N

r

h
-
m

7

h
6

N
N
N
ci

V
cc
.G
O
O
N

R v7 W

r °
O
h
-,t
V
M
X
ll
7
•-r

00
X
OJ
O
--?
V

00

V
('J
W
V"I
fi W
'C1
d
C 0 pp
,N N N
r- m p,
4 h O c0
" 7 N ' CD
) M O vi O vir- w) .
r
C O i c
Q W
y L ?
i W
Q

(y C M

N ?
h
l- ?
?
r-- M

M --?
rn
M h
h
M ? N
in h
O? 00 V"l
M ?
C

?G O
O ? [?

o0
x U
IGry
cu O
y
d
i _
m

.?. (?

y c

W o\N
v
oo
rn
N
c
W c

W
an 19
R O ?
O
ar U O 7 raj.
O ?
U O
0.0• a oO v° oo a a
y ? x

71 "0
R °? d
Q

It
It '? ro
It
C7

.2 .2

'D ? v% N N .'_.+ C N :fl b i W? DD 7> oD .C p 7 y OD
U

3 3
a w) co
a x" O a .?

o= _> 3 v T
d
U
-
F o
p p
m w 3 w Q o o
o ?:
a
W W
p W R C"
w 3 x U M t
h
h
a
w ?
x
u
o R
G y
eC C

A R L
m
Q
a a,
'
a T 1n 00 7 O N t- O, b .--. It
h
[?
c
,c, M V N N G N O N N O
O N O
O
M

y c
G c
G
7

N

O

M

d
?

7

r

p

N

O M

M V

N

U
O
C C N ?O 7 M DO [?
r ?
+ ?G
O
C ? O V cl, ? O v) ? N N O?
L 4 O O N M M O ?
++
G M v?'i M ?
+
/-. O N 7
. O
C
en
tt
O
o0
.-.
X
00
O
p
p
p?
d vl ?c+
.G a n ? ?
+ O M ? N O M N U
Q O O
_

C t7 rb C co
O
O?
C
?O
o0
c
C ? O M ? N N N ? 00 M
M "
0 In N
? M V" O M O? 00 ,a. 'O O O O
V c

F.. 06 r- C;

M

N

'

O\

M

G

O
O

M
00
C
C V

+
O
N
M
r-
M

O

1n

ON X

e0
10
O

N

O

M

v-1
o

O

O

V

.-.

N

0
?

N

t?

M

N

O o

O
U

? y S O O O cy, S ? M M
A C G ?O N M c
G M M ? O o0 O
\
L p D.,
? 0
"
' N
;1,, ' •C
`fir N
I? o0
M 7
N 00
p? N
M ?,.? 9 N •-r
' t3 00

C
o

G G N N r- G p M 'R

W
w
C: wi o
U x N .-. OP O N v-i i? N [? ry 7 O O
e

C DD

? c0+
a

N c

G

N

M

r?o- rc

G

?o
N
v)

O
r
M

M
t
a
v .
. !- O
•
O ? Q K
, q
L1 W C N O o0 t? ?n ,`y- C N 00 t
i. p`„ ??
-++
G. O C O cc
L. N 00 c O 00

6l ?

O a
?
W
O
M 17

U W W
?x
lA

O
U 0
o

1
a 1I') N 0

W
?a

Q

CIO

CIO

44 H
a w? .C V t. .
5 g .-? 0
w
o a
m
72a
on m .
o v
O0 c
` ?
a
2 a co vco 3 u$ o g- c a
i v
W m
c
c - w P.
o i
w v d
.
;
x 3 C>
= v a
,
`4 a o
o
w 04
LO
m co
d
0 NN
?1
o U °' a
.y ? w Z
? d
'q p, o; vi ?

1

v'? 7 ? O M M ? ? N
N v? M
?D
? O V v?
M
m O N N oo ^ O X ^ O co O v'i ?`? - 7
y [? O
O
M N
O
O
M
M

to_
N
M
O
O
p
O
7
O
U
Q O
4 T
- N O ? O O?
M N
- V'1 O O M N M O c O ? d d O v'?
d

M
v?
0
0
N
M
O 06
N _
N
VO
M
?-r
'
G
i
O
n
m
oq N O d. R v? vi t? ... W •-• '? a •M• 7 -- N
v'
M O 'D 7 10 06 c O N 7 7 N p O ? U
Q O O
N N a C O 0\
N O M .6 C0 N
N M V O M oo ? '
0 O O O O 'O N --? T
G ?D m - - M N '? c
G ?D 7 M O v M i o0
[?
i.
CC to O
?
F'1
y
?
?O
o?
'7
N
V
[?
x
O
O
O
.r
?O
C,
vl
O?
O
?
+ r- Cl N N '?cc oo " C0 ,NO. O M O C0 C', V U
C O
V

.
i
• Cl C14 r

N

v" C> c=>
? N ? M G M O? m
G C) GJ O
? b a

D c>
Ly
? ,?fp/ W O
M
x
x N
fi
W
p ?}' co R V'7
U
^• n
o0 M D7
7 t
crr
G 01
7 00
?'`? .
r
O OO
`2 ID
N h
U
.r
?
? O
.
r7 a
i 0.1 x

0? ? ? V ?n N M ? G
? x =

?
c
O
?
00 c c
.. V W v Cl
W
W
?x
W O z

U a
°, N a
ED

u o
FH ^ N .-? M N d, .-a r-7

H
Q

v O v °' m ou
a °' c D °
N
vi
m
W CO 2 ro ,bO 7 w 3 a?i w 0 0
O 8 = a? U
O

x 3 O

ICZ
j G
W id
-14
cc
>
W 3
x a
? U
o
VD
y o
CJ
rN tx
U
m

p" O /. ?
a u
o w w o
O x C v a C

A ; ` ' C
o a v
,
O O O M 7 O vl ? 00 M o0 ? R N O? O?
CD O M O ?
+
G N M ?-
++
G M O
O Vl .-?
.7 X
m X
ro O -• i? 7 M [? N
M h 0 0
rn -.
`"? h
c
G t?
-++
G
?
N
%0
N c
!-.
N
p
N
OOi
O o o
[?
?n U
Q , O
G C ?O N ?D C N O -

00
00 O O O
M
O
d O n 00 M h 'O 00 v:
?" 00 O
M h
O
O N M O? O ?'" N N 7 M ,G O
p h M
M
OGD N O ,d. ?i+e vi
1 v?
V t?
1 _ rX
O 'r
N v'?
7 `O
O
O C)
oho
vii
U
Q M O .0 0 O
O
o, G v? N N O? ? O O?

C. 06
N
O
M ?r
+
rr
00 ?
+
!.
O
O
n
N
'O r
22 N
r- M
C> O M
M 00 'C O O
c?
' O
O
M 'b N
O ^;
M ?
10 cn N C. " cf \ G O

CU
Ll Pa d 00 N ?D t? X

R
f O O O X

cd O, v'f Cl
O
-,t
w N r Mn N N N c
G '"" oo "Z"' 00 O M O
Cl v0`i
t7
U
."'S N .G t 0

U ?
^' O
•
y
G_
O
N
V
C
M
C
O
O
O
G_
p
M
M
? O ??
-++
C ?p M r
! M M O 00 O
t# \
it ? -
Gtr . N . O
? ?

cc G 'D vi
O
.
7 v?
O O

r
n
N icy N
G _. . ?
?
yI w O X N 0 0 00 N f?
d x
W O N 7 ? - '00
?
?I i
q pp ?C
"?" r N ?
v-? 0
0
O oo N c
?" ? C O O v? 0
0
?f i
O
h
?
+ ? 0
.
p
.? y y
o as
qy w Q
?
0 ? .t a ? M o0 N ? V'l ,Gr .G

? d
r, y W M cV O W W
?x
y
?

?; y ? a a a

G
0

Q

V)
a G = G

r .? .2 Cv
di C
C .
C r Q
+
. 4'i C
? ??i Cv .y O
v
v v v
v
?
b 'O it LL
a "' ?
N b 7 DD
t oD a)? Cl 7 N C G W
G
_
y y C
'O
cd a. Y G .
-.
G
'C
d G d G U

d O d ?n 00

'fl 'fl

y
IS,
d O a d y
a ? o w° w°' U' m 3 -°o o s- c U
?
W o
C ? :? '
al
d
O
? N p ? b W ? a O a6 ?
?' id C

,
c
C
b y
f1.
w ..
o
. 3
'
G _
R: A
m e C > ao
U
w
o _ s m
r
v
,

h
y
a p
o U d
n
8 ? ? o ? b

}
G
}
}
}
L
1]
G

}
}
rG
c}
G
}
G

C G

W W
B wj ? N
H r
o U

C ^ O? O? O N ? O ?
O C
•? O
W
j^ L
D
?
d
V ? _
o
7 B v
W
L ? h 0.O 2C
W ? V O
U N
? ? d
P ^. r
d 0
O y

? a c

0
U
P h
C O

P
L C
u °
0
U
r N P b ? P ?D Q
N
? C O v v 0 0 0^ ?^
9 9 u a

3
3 ,?
d
o"
ca =
v
E ?
?
Lt?
L
Y D ¢ d F" ?
? ? 9 R

m
`?3 43
x
u. y a

a.
?
e 0
v

?
E
A
•O
G 'O
G
O

O !!
G CC
G
}
G S..
9
N
O ? G

G F.

O
N

g
^o ?

_ C
v
P
N

?
o

c
O o
N P
m 9
?
N ?O
G O r
N ? m b O ri ? N - ° < m
N
o
h
o O

o
o h
N m V

?
U

C_ N
O b
W
-
tV
?
^ o
O
G h
vi o
P
<
^ u r a z? m E E a= z o ''
cJ
L
9 ? Op S Ep 00 .C
n v o v ?
C
a v c e w
6
? U
- r- V
?i
?[-r?! 3
y O
E d o Vi c- ? U

U m ? ? P. FA u v ? ?
C a o
a a o?

d a

e
d

t 10

;e
W.
a a m Q

?
1J
F.
?
f]
G
i<
G

?
yF
L
f]O
W

Iy?

d Q
V
V
?
O
G
X01 ?
O
v
.
.
Wap

a vs C4
10

a m
,. O

=a ?

F
IyN.?
G
I}
.,
L

O
ya
k

?
U N

N ? N h
G N
O ?
B
m r
C

3 o o
a
ms L m
3 d E 'E a
C4
[y -? Y 9
? 8 ??? 3 W 3 x
w y w
0
d C
o
o U

m
8
A

O
„"
6
ttl
O l!
+
G
iy
.

? u
N X

G
c HHG_
'p 9
O

O ??++
G
y
F
L

d v
0

c
lSl?
G O
N m
.?' ^
b O
^ S?+
G m
^ N
O 0.
' ^
O

tl
t r O ...
N N
i V .?
O p pOp N
~ O
O
U
C c
G N N r N p v
i G O O ?+

C 1? ,. b ? C m N "'
a c =
'
a ¢ a m?
a 3 E E
E E c s a i' ? o
a 3 3 .W
3 L
$
m? v
?` ` o u ? o e $ u? m S
3
`z ?3 ayay ?9 rya u a ?

? ? U
o a o
a? 0. a U
A Y 7 u
W f
? a - U o
a? V
a L . v
a ?? o' F
Q
F a
.
a
D
e r ? z
? ti $ e
a
a a rn 6

s

1
L'

G

}
z
N
c}
4
r
G

0 a
G
N a
0 ?
U
? ry
1}?
C
O
L ?
2
8 °
U
N
ao
C A
L ? N N rj P N ?
- ?O r P

?
C -
.
.
•q o
o m
L
.V. w n
V

W L J
,fl WWW N d
D
6 U
qi+p L Y
- -
ap -

y a o
D
?
? - - P P
b
N N
?
n
?
-
O f}
G
G
0

} O n m N ? P °'
R W
P - -
C C C, O ° C

v
3
a
3 y
,?
u s
a
Q =
a
Q a
r
a z

c
=
c

?
0

W a
w h a m s
Phi U
0
o
m
6
O
G 5-.
O
o
?
L
}
C C
z
9
L

o

v ?
a
N
?
yY
O

C_
t
?. O
O r
h ?
N
m 9
'F. N
< O
p r
N ?
r
O
?
O
cc?Y++
G
?
?
O
P
r
N
r
a
Va
?
-
°`
?
C
P
°`
v?
C
?D
O
?
O
O

P
O
N

_

r

U

? ? v
- ? °?
N o
O n o
r,? Y KA a s m E E a d s o_ m
'O 'O" m-

W3 C C C
2 O C 1 C C .C ? ty

=
'
v
?
F ?v
S ?' ado"
a s °' a -r -
-
° Y
:? F Ci $ U o
a
U
K s p 7

Pe, Y
a ;

E Y
4 ` a 9
a P. v? t

Q

Q
L

? O
L
OD O
w Q

'a

? w

L r] ?'
9 V]?j

m L d
a G
oU _
cm r
£
E?II
1C y

a

H

?
l}
G
b
O

U
y,
O
b ?
G
Q ?
b ?
? P
? P N
n ?
j b ?
y
?c ?a a ° _°-Oa f
° °
3 3 d a a
u ? c x

m o
5
I s o
w N m 3 x
0
°e m
'
o
d 9
0

S 'C
0
o ?

W i l l I

O

O
? ?+
4

c
E
y?rr
i4 Q
P r
N `D
O .a
N ?
? o
N ,^?
p r
O Q
O
O
O
v

N

o]

N

b

°

O

?

Q

?'+

O

O

b
Q

?

b

V
O G < N O N G N p Q ? O ? C O O

C P O ?n ,..i C_ N o m
m N a ry ?
+
G P O
O oO
a $ m E E a z 3 3
,?
d

9
as 0. L
??? C39
9
t
??
V d `0 7
s

a c
a ? ?
0
E 2 t 9
y p? fA e
G
}
}
G
N
G

fyV
G
}
}
C
G
}

W 4
8 ? N
j
?
O
OD O
o A
O ?
•? O

W a r
? v
ryry
•o rii R? <
a
W
? d
U MY
o 41
ap
?
o d
r
d a G

F
G
?
fy
G
C G
U
0

L m N Q O C ? (V P C

3 3 '?" A D a E ,E
W
w ? o c ?

? ?
?i v
3 d

W v
z
? ?, m a x

a 0
u
e
C w
f0
E
a
9
O xx
O
r
L
G
L V
O XX
O G

9
0

G _C
v
a
N

?
O cc
G
1}
.r

N ? '
D O
- ?
+
G
fv ? N N I? b qq ? m N m ? m h ? r ?
O ?, t? N b ?c
G b O h Q U

x

?C+
G. T
? Q
? C
vPi P
? ?C_+
/? b
P m
N
a°
= s d c c
r a r E E
E E c c¢ IF
a .. =
? c
Y? e
c a c "u
c o '*
a? m ? c ? W
p;
y
u
? ?
?
a
03 ?dG`' es ?
?
•o Y ? a
o
u o U
P:
? y
3 .o F
°
a m
o?
a
Y !
C G
t a
° e
a a m 'C

?
l

G
H i l l
?
1}

G

1yQ

W G
E ? N
B ?
° o

O A
L

o Q G
•? o
O ?
V
w

W L ~~
W •= N
Y W ?N?++.
4+

W
a
.

F
N

0
N

O
U N
r
. b
. O r
. b h
G p
.. h
. N a
N H
.. h
. p

s '.s.'1 c s s Ri G
3 c m?
?
33 v oa??. Ea

? 0
G
i m n c ? ? v 'm

w ?, m m

y 0
U
e
o m
8
A
9
G d
O
m
O

H I M I I I
9 9
N ? Y
O ??vv
++
G !
G

9 V
0

9 99c
G
a
0
N

X

%
O

c
9 t? ^ b p ? ? :?
N b N !!
G b Q
N m T Q l? N ? . r .•. ? Q ^ b C M P
c

l
F CJ. O
. .N- Q
. N n
O p
. C
? N
N N
fV
Q
v C?
z v t
u a c g a
. m
r E
E E 5 C C ?' G o
a 'S
c
9 ? C L ,?
L 6 C U? O Q 6 V Y E G

g-M
a w
a U v m o
u? 6? a d o o?

b' O
e v ?
4
p, ?
R. ?
W 9

s
1
1
Exhibit Table IX. BEIH and Sediment Export Estimates
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027-B

Time Point
Segment /
Reach Linear
Footage or
Acreage

Extreme

Very High

high

Moderate

Low

Very Low
Sediment
Export
ft % ft % ft % ft % ft % ft % tons/yr
R1 6530 5877 90 455
R1A 906 906 100 229
P
i R2 5979 5381 90 767
reconstruct
on
2006 R2A 625 625 100 32
R2B 1713 1713 100 1 120
R2D 526 526 100 4 1 250
TOTAL 16279 6813 42 6502 40 1713 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1853
R1 7543
R1A 1040
Monitoring Y3 R2 7107
2010 (NOT R2A 336
APPLICABLE) R2B 1474
R2D 790
TOTAL 18290 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R1 7543
R1A 1040
Monitoring Y5 R2 7107
2012 (NOT R2A 336
APPLICABLE) R2B 1474
R2D 790
TOTAL 18290 0 0- 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Exhibit Table X. Verification of Bankfull Events
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027-B
Date of Data
Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method Photo No.
(If Available)
8/25/08-8/27/08 Unknown Crest Guage N/A

Table XI. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Little White Oak Creek Stream Restoration / D06027-B
Reach R1 (7543ft)
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
Riffles 100% 100%
Pools 100% 100%
Thalwegs 100% 100%
Meanders 100% 100%
Bed General 100% 100%
Structures 100% 100%
Rootwads 100% 100%
Reach R1A (1040ft)
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
Riffles 100% 100%
Pools 100% 100%
Thalwegs 100% 100%
Meanders 100% 100%
Bed General 100% 100%
Structures 100% 100%
Rootwads 100% 100%
Reach R2 (7107ft)
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
Riffles 100% 100%
Pools 100% 100%
Thalwegs 100% 100%
Meanders 100% 100%
Bed General 100% 100%
Structures 100% 100%
Rootwads 100% 100%
Reach R2A (336ft)
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
Riffles 100% 100%
Pools 100% 100%
Thalwegs 100% 100%
Meanders 100% 100%
Bed General 100% 100%
Structures 100% 100%
Rootwads 100% 100%
Reach R2B (1474ft)
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
Riffles 100% 100%
Pools 100% 100%
Thalwegs 100% 100%
Meanders 100% 100%
Bed General 100% 100%
Structures 100% 100%
Rootwads 100% 100%
Reach R2D (790ft)
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
Riffles 100% 100%
Pools 100% 100%
Thalwegs 100% 100%
Meanders 100% 100%
Bed General 100% 100%
Structures 100% 100%
Rootwads 100% 100%
Notes: The results shown above for each reach for MY-0 1 reflect the repairs made in October 2008 to the stream
problem areas described for MY-O1 in Table XII. Stream Problem Areas.

z?

d z z z z z z z z z z z z
r
a?
oL
c
3
0
-o
c
ca
V
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 ate. ? Y ? L
c c c
b y 0 0 O N
cm
cm 0
o O
0 O
0 c
0 O
0 c
0 Q
0 O
0 L
0 L
0 L
o U
Y c

?
C U
U U
N U
U U
N U
U U
N U
U U
U
y
y
y
p ?
[
[? U U U U U U U U
p U
C U
G U
? ? ?,'

5 L
, aL+ aL+ y
, _ _
?
A v m rn rn rn v?
O
b
y
,
F
O
O cu
O
O
O
O
O O
O (?
O CL
O O
O d

L?.i
°
d }'
r0-+
S
S
O
r%
O
w
O
w y
N ro
w In L

A y X
a
-
00
01
O
N

in CI1 ? ? p L O N L QJ
CA E E ? .? ?
!
E ? .?
a?
?.y y
U a c
z
3?. a
z
L W c
z[^ N?
Fem. ?
7 NN/
z • a
z N
yam. c
zW N/ ?
z
1 c

N

(i

W

W
?/
W
I V ,?
CC a 7 p =1 vl u .-. p y?
U 7 7
U N i p?
y 00 7
pp
U O kn O O
Q cd y)
+ M y N Y 7 "+O
OL + ?! 0+0 ±
F y C/] Cn M Q N L kn to i In .
.
V1 M M lp
? ? ? O ? O ? O ? O ? O ? O ? O O O O O
3 ?
i
w ? c03
i ?
i ?
y 9 , > w ?
m V ?• ro
i
M

U
n
X
U
U
X of

U N
,
n
y U
x
n
U U
Y

U U
>

U

w
U p

U

vi
N

w
N

n
N

?'
Ly' N
R
O E
L
0.? E
C? E
O
L
E CIS
a x0 c X X U X 0 X x0 >(
0 () X
O X
0 X
O X
O X
O X
O
O .0
x :? O
x a O
x
° U
o p
x a p
x a L
V
o l
O
x a a a
a Q a
0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c
44
c c
LO
? y
C13 N
c
CIS
co p

a
v v -o
cz -o
m -a
m o o •o E
L11 E
cl
c u
L L L y0 y
Q) N vl fn
'3 7 7 7 ,
? 'O O .?. C L' G

c W
c w
c w
c w
c w
c w
c w U U U
L .p L .2 L .2 L .p L .2 L .? L .? L .O O
_7 ?n
U O _p
U O O 2
U O p O 2
U Y
U O ",' y
U O O
U L U O G
L O
'D cd
'O 0
b O
L
?
VI y U
.Y.
c Y U
X
c :3 U
?i
N c ap+ N
..1C
c '3 U
aL+ Y
c O N
L ?
C 7 U
aL+ x
c 7 U
L ? c
? C
CO c
CC U
?(
c

ca -0
-0 cl
-0
E
-0 C
E cl
.0 G
.7 c ?

-0
cl
E
L ca
E
L m
E
L
" E Cd
U E 0.
.
O
..
a
"
E
w ro Y ro
L aL+ L ?
a
O O
O ?
O fC
O
.
a C C i Y L.

a
0
U
O
w?
l
O
O
A
0
Q
0
V
E4
W
`O
l1
O
?o
j
U
W
W?
O
V
i
o
U6Q
J
O
U
a
2
m
uiIIff,"
Np V V?
N !.,{ C
0
y O
O
N ? a
0
o0
o ? zc?
N
? a
Z r
W?
CQ.)
V)
2
ww
wo
Ln
W
w
z
w
r
a
? w F-
w a
LD N
w _
c w - ~
z ¢
= z - z
ar car w?
z z
w N w
H N =
W m O O Q
Q w w 0 w m
w w u N w
r >- r
w 3 Y 2
LLI O
Q Y
J J D F

F
Z
?m
Q
J

7

r m
Z F
?
? QU
U
o NNmZ
a m N •PP
W
w
CL
W Y
? W ,nn 3
N
z
J Z

p %Immf
a0
mWPP;
a Z
W U <";
Lm

x x
3 o s? s s o°
w O
J =
U In
Na .. ? s x 5 c
wa
o ? o u
0

w w w ?¦¦ ? ?¦ w w w w w w w w ?'' w w w w
i
3 o
CL -Nd
c o,
°
aL, m 103
..
c p d o m O
c
w m o ° s
(? vi 0 0 t O o U U O
m
[. m _J ui a m -°
c m m o w 3 m m > d E
.0 0
CL (n
N N m c c m Z w m 0 m~ rn o ° m H °? c c 0)
t -0
a a ? 'L ° t W o as 3 Q 'O d o ' ' c o w i a
O V` > o L 3 ° L 2
2 o L 3 o v c a ° O o , o N C7
vi -x In
N
0 CL
C, O O = O 0 C 2 OWC ° O ° L `t C O. E O d W O, O O m
V) oe o: U U O V aL 3 O> voi V) am in £ LL > C CL V V
N
(D F F1
? dC
A
z
w
w
a

4N 43 d) co
C4
z,, O m
I
l

c N
a
V
o
U
U
a
?,? ??` y
?,, = c c a
O c J
ItHttt
°
m L
3 m
sa s
a
u, s
CL
d
L L L
m
o
C S S y H U r LL a
3
3
m

U m CL
U
•L -0
s
m
O
L
4) Z ~ C
O a, O C
O C
O C
o m
d 'a
m
- 'a
m
'°m °
10 a
>
=
m OL
2
= c s
w
T s
m s
d s
m F- o
u v
3 w
3 F.W.. L L L
w ?
O m
O
.
CK
Y O O ? o o O O
W

0
V

m

V
a _
m
=
O
x
vi
i m
'
C o

"a
c
U
L
m
H
°
Ti
0 0
m
O
0 v
O
0
C t O
C
`
O

a

=

LL

s

O
C
L
L

° c o d

u m

N o

N
V

m h

O

3

m a

u c

0 m

3 m

3

Q a

E L
W
3 3 ;

Z o

N
a W 3
m a U m
z m O
U Y

4) O N m m
V) V) O N
w -ma 3 d

- d g
d
as
-°+
o
ca
2
co
t' z'
0
O
4)
N CL FO 2 p LL, 1 Oc p H ° N > 'a
($?
J m" d
w u -0 C Z C C
N
° ($? O
-0 V
0
< J Q W V
I
y J Q me
o } I l i? i ? ii Y
s 3 I Q a i o c) ® IE o I
g
W m
Q . 0
t _
O
m V ' "O w C
E o° ,? U o m° m m r ? r- c
_ 0 -j
a a m a w L t m CaL y N
0, a ° o° O O -t C- ° 3 v U ? I ao m 3 i C7 O
j C Q m O m w p d N [*; m O f- w U m C
O C7 -Oa ° o <d° Q' m 2. . c m m co 3 3 ?, c o c m c m a° L c
a, N
C LL, U N< V fw`?.j, L p C a ]/IV?? `1] H st/f J L l? a 3 Lv
O O "O m aJ Q N d ?'1 a C ° m m -a V
aal CD al J H O m d m L
C N u Q ? C C _m On a -O -0 E E C 01 L L L 'O m
a (Oy H °, °, O V m 1i O v (m 0) -o O a m a a> L h W xN Ti X3 3 3 LL V N V 0 0 -a
N oe N
3t w tr ^Gj x W W W W ?•1 N N = 3 O 5 m m < 2 0. 1L a d J. N O W W a i a _ w C9 m Q
I I ? X I ? I ? r? !I ( i
° I r? I ?
44
C PQ
o? ....
D
o C
? m u m ? 'O
4 C u C
LL) LOL)
LL ID S4
0,? . . . . 3 3 c 3 . Q . . . z E
m c L E S c c v 'i c E d m
(D B C, 42-
-00
W J 7 w N rm-
C J m a i r U m O t O C
•• m e c s o V U. 46 r 3 U m m co, O o a o C9 L c c 6-4 o m 3 rn °
CL .2 w~ J s `a rn m m m° m Z m a ~ a .o y m o. y
A Q a m 0 E o u
O c o ?i o ?
a 0 C -' d 0 Q a a n a Oa a 0 0 y N o ° -o q
-8 u
L a ; o 0
QO v F°- v ome a LLi a` a u'3 g a, a 2 d a ° 0 0 'E a o m v 0 o, a c 8 'c
t- V) CL 0
3 U U J V in Q m N U = me LL O of t- $ co
44

Mm m ?6 m= m m m m= m mm (1) =
$311{5 601$ $11 VO
O
Z ?

H ?(? MMA??
Z
W
W Q Q

= F-
J
o N O
Z m QV

Z °
w ? NNmZ
r
O N
tim7W
w Y
Et
N

w
? ~ Z ?ommf
3 (? mWmN3

S
??yS
yj1
' V

T

J
11
%

I o

I 1

}- I

i 1

1
S _C'
I
?, - ......
?? d o

-I+
J
'1 0
f o

LO
o r

M

O V

cp d. M ?p

N O

O ?

N

O
I

Q

m

tD N tD

O ?[1

cp

W

M
LLJ
J
W aOD
m
m
? N 1? tD N
m m
? 0
? M
? V
? O
M I?
?
O
m
J
O . . N r YMJ M r M V M O? M cM1 N MN
z O N O M O N Y a0 ?- i? a0 r r O N O N
r m r O m m O O Y m M N QD N t0
O a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '? m
0 0 0 0 t
0 M
0 0 0 0 0
U w
H
U
O
4
N

M

N

M

M
W Z m
O O>
I? .-
N O
O Q
O .-
O .-
O W
Y
m N
m O
N N
O O
M
N
V
N O>
N V
O? N
?-
0
O _ (V
N t'i
O? t7
N M
ry
P M
N
m r

V
r Q a0
O
rn N
O
W
N V
m
m
.
"
m
N 0
? .
n .
n
n
.
. ?
0. .
F-
? 00
a
0 N
0 M
0 Q
0 off
0 lp
0 I?
0 m
0 W
0
V O
'-
Q
?
Q N
?
Q M
?
Q
?
Q
N
Q
N
Q
?
Q
M
Q
O
Q
"rr-1
Cl
i
77
O
0
?

1
; I
I
.
1 ? y
I

li f :

1 a
J
I N?

I. ?F O
+

1
I N

I
1 I ,o
?U
Q
3z O
oa O
.NZ
_ +
1110 `-
I
-t-
°
00
,,.

ion mm m
Ii I, J. C.- sIiva
O
Z
F
W
W
T

?

? N

X

J
O
Q
O
z

o

Y [r N
v
a
a
W ? ? ? NNmZ
z Y O NNW
(d N
? o ? ?
w mZ??J
w
w
?
ti w W NN7
Z ximmF
3 L9 mW01 Qr?
Z oach';
w w aM--
0
a-
w
w

pill,,
•.. 1y 1%
C'4
CV o 2 • 'CO

???lllll 111111`

x ?

I
? ?
I
\
40100
a+
I I ?

I
i
i
I

? I
h

J X

I?
i I
X

f I
r

/ 1 /? I I I/ I i
I
X I

/

/ I
/
I l
? ? i , I

'
I' I
I I
I

?100

I
I I
# W
?
I I I
I I 1 C
: m W
J

I I

C3
Q
LLJ
V /
W
O
z
t
W

+
+
O
O
+
M
0
0
i
I
+

O
100
I
+
J 1t_il
+

,0
.I Lj- ?.
I
I z. 0
'I O
I
Z! Q)
I I
I o
I 0
M
I O
O
M
I I I } M
.o?.
I I O
_ cl LLI
I Z> O
I
I JQ N
I' M
07 0
U
N=
-F-
oz O
?.: .._ I=F- +
w M
U W
? I I O
0
.? .I_. ._ - ._ d?
LJz
i
W
i
k- 0- za 00
+
? o r ?i o m ?
-
r
N
`n
w
2
ll.l

W v
i
O .

V

f0

N 0 0 O?
c';
6

N

N

O?

O
Q! C7
z ?
0 aD ?
O ?
N <D
V r ? N ? N ? ? r O> ?O
T
N
F m N O M < N
Z
< o
0 < m <p th O> (O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1-
U aD N 7 N N D D m aD N
W ? O m O? f0 N V Obi amp N O a?'1 N V N Obi
?
O ? N
V c'l
m M
? b
N ?
M O
N r
r V N
O r
<p N
N o
` aD O r
M V aD N M
a z ?
T in
M _ ?'
.1111$ aAl I. s11 -
`1111 1111111j1,
?; ?O? ,? o v>lyt '
co
v? C) -a z 0=
-7 CO
s'?d •k did `? •
\ // ,f/llllllll 111j111``
? \ V
+

O
O
+
+
+

O
O

I+
LO

O
O
O
In
i
O
O
+
0%
IO
O

> O ? ? 2 N O A N N N
W O O Q N O
i Q N O
i <p
M O
M
W m m m m ? N A m m ao m m m m
J
. O m N tD r N (p N M N N A O? (O
G/ Z O M O N P m (p m N rn
1-
N N
A O
N M
A N
N N
? P
01 ?D
O O?
M N
P M
< P
of N
M N
N O
? ? M ? N [p
Z
Q
w m
?o
?
o
m O
°i
Qi

0
?

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (

0
n

0 O>
co

0
no

0
m

0

0
U

H - - - - - - - - - - - -
C)

W

?

O

r

m

m
N
N
M
V

m

0

N

O

"

V

A

Q

0
=
N
M m
(O
A O?
?p f0 a0 4 [
)
O ?t1
r

V

? N O
i
M
O H
N
N
N
N
I?
N
O
N
O
N
?
?
?
Q ?
A ?
A h
A N ? N ? O V M V f
P ? M tM'J M M O
M M P
CL
a Z
- -
-
-
-
-
-
- N
- N
- ?
- N N - - - - - - -
J
N

--

a
O

0
P

0
^
P
N

0
P
0

P
P

0
P

,

Q
-

0
P
0
0 -

m
0 -

O -

? -

N

M
-

Q
-

N
-

<?
-

A
-

p

m
P Q P P Q P P Q P P V P Q
0
O

+
+
,am
u
m r
Z O z a
N F ??? • I ? ??i
O J_
v O rNNm} Q? f. «
ZY M "UmmY .v•u1 can) C3
O-
o w mZ ---i 1111 C*4
w w mm? I V' N CO -
w x=mmf - ?rdo?,
3 2(`J mWQ?N3 oryI? •?
w w a I m 3

W m
O I?
N
m
0 v
m ?
- M
? m
N v
O ?
N
O?
<
N
m
cp N
? o m
m
m
J m r m
m m
m N
'
m
io Y
m m O
m t?l
m Q
m t'i
m r
m O
.-
rn
W m m
J
o
C7
N m
? N
•- m
N N
1? M
N
tD m
?- ?
N N
m
M ?
V N N
? N
M
O? O?
M m
M
N
m
Q! Z O O? N O M O N V m 1? '- a r m I? r m N O? N
amp N

r O

N m

? u7 V

rn d'

rn m

o rn
M N
V rn
V o N
M N
N O
m ? m O
m N m
Z
o ul
a m
o
o
o
o
?
o
o
s
s
s
o m
o
o m
o
o n
o
o m
o co
o w
m
U W
I-
0
m
W z M
. ° m ? m m `m m v m m o o ?° ? v ? N m m
O i
F N O? N N M N N O r N 0 m 0 f- V
N m M amp
l
o
.

?
.
.
..
.
.
.

°
.
.
..
. .-
.

N
..

?
.
N

rMi
N

M
N O?

M m

M O>

M

a
a z

a
O
v
O
v
O
v
O
v o

v
O
v
m
v
r
v
0
v
0
v
0
v ?

v N

a M

v

a

v
m
a
r
v m

v T

+
!r? l l I `

_:

A0
MA
o I
0
J- +
1 10

o
o

r,
.0

0
.0
.0

- o
0
LO
__ i ... 10

0

{,..__
_ 10

4111]4 613" .)IVO'.

O
O
+
ch
r-
+
o
z
h
w

x
w
N

m
?r 1A. N
h
z
Q
h
?
O N O
Z m
a
0 h
ti <
n
? d
Z w Z NNmz
v
Z
? O
? N[]m?y
o w
z oom"mF
c 3
?y L7 mWNN3
z a i 3
w w arc
e
o
te ~
J fi
f
?
?
a
. .>i,.
+
+
+
LO
O
O
v
+
I W
t
I11 ? -
1'
11,'
_I f ' I

o

h ? o

i 10
It
I' I _
Ill i _._ O
LO
O

o
t
?
r C I I o

} 1 a
W uj
_
`I =
1 o>
t-
O
L
.
z
> o
I of
~
a
?a
m0
N

N M
M o V
m

r M N O
N r
O, O?
N N
O>
m N m
O
m
M I -(n OU
J

W o
m

m
r

m
r
r

m
r

m

m
N

rn
r

m
m
m
m

m

m

m

m

m

m
M
m
r
m
o
m

m

.. r.
I

..I
I? 1

?
Q
??
J
O

?
N

O
m
C2

O>
N
N

N
N
m

O
N
r

M
r
o

N

N

p,
m

V
N

m
n

M

-
N

r
N

m
-

r
r

r
-

m
m

N

`n
-
O?

N n

;

I

E.

3 Z_

O

O
h-
Z h- m

m
. N

m
r O
N m
r

. h
N

. O
M

. V
T

. o

.

. N
V

. O
i
°

. a?D

. M

. N

N

. a

m M

n p m

' ,. _
-__
.
?a

O

+
O Q< ao
o m
o .
o
0
0
0
0
0 o
0 c
0 co
0 m
0 io
0 m
0 o o
0
I
? Z 0
O
r

`• I I
..
... JU
II
. i W
w Z

= mo
M M
r N
m - - M
- N
m m
a'np M
R m
Omi m
m M
N m
0 m
M M
? N
V rn
N m
N N
Obi m
m (
1 I

... ?

. O
C X
O 7 W N
N
v M
O?
m M
u)
v? cD
N
N f?
M
m m
N
O> r
I?
V V
N
M
O
M
m
Qi N

N O
O
?
N
m
?
M

M V

? m

Of v,

?

OOi

m

I
'

?
- a-.23

Z
WW
za
F- oo ? N M

v a

o `n

v m

a r

v m

v

v o ? N M V `n m w y.
+
v a v v v v o LO to O O
C)

o
z ?

o ?r 11??
Z
w
w
= d
J

F

ELI 7
o 0
M
o a
o Y u t
r

Z
w
w Z
NNmZ

}
O [? N
O?Ny
j

o U
Y
w " ", :,
w u ~ z oommF

~ 3
Z mWNQ3
?
C,
`
?
w w °
_ 3
22

I I I __ _ IM
O
O
+
01
N
i d
?d3tyY
C,4 -Z ,lg Z,
1111t• 1,
+ I
+ I
I
+ I
+
j. N
1 I

i
N
i
i
O

ch
N

I '
O

!. ., N
O
0
_ a
r
I
I?
> o A M m V M o ?
N AO? V N m N o N
W
16
m
m
1O
rn
m
m
m m m O t. I M n o
W
- m m m w m m m w m rn m
J
O U'
N
©
`r'
vmi
?
?
m
1p
?n
m
n
o
?
r
m

?

M

?n

m
?/
LL z O O> O M O N V m A _ - A o h A m N O? N
N N N
? N O?
b V N M
?
N m N m O?
Z
N

¢
.-

o
r

o
o
N

co
0
A
o

A
0
m

o
0
O
i
o
O

n
M
O
O
a
D
?
c
'?
o
m

m
0
?
A
o
M
A
m
"
D
m
m
m
m
0

ao
?

m
O W
-
- 0 0 0 0

H - - - - - - - - - - - -
C7 m
w ? M r m W O> m m O O? m N 0 M N V N N Obi m
? = N
V
tO M
m
N
N
N A
M
° m
N ?
< V
cN'1
- m
-
m N
N
V O
?
O
aN0
M O
M N
M ?
?n
m°
m
O?
?
O - - r
N A A
N
N M M M M M V
a Z
- ?
- - - - - N
- N
- N N N E h ? ?

.
O

o
-
O

v
-
N

v
-
M

v
-
O

o
-
O

v
-
O

v
- -
O

v
- -
O

v
- -
O

o
- -
O

v
- -

v
- -
N

v -
M

v -
V

v -
N

a
m

v
A

v
m

<
W

<
I,IIII
N co
?
? r
a r
V?
o>
'f=o
ow
z
OUF O
O
F
?a
W +

r
.. ?_. _ D
:O
co
I Q U

I _. _w
In =
F-

'?
? 3Z
o a O
O
_ v) - +
+

S3 llj$ S;I 15 YI I161

B { 11J6
u
z
H
W
=

N
? m

Z
Q
J
?F p m < U
Y
W ¢ 11 Z
r
z
Z in N
m?

w y U
Y
w mJ
w o ti Z xlmmF

?
3 00
? mwmm3
W ai z 13
W w
a=
--
w
aa__3
CH T C HEE
M?T I;
I I I ? I
I I I ;F I l
I I I ? `? \
I I I '?? \
I I I i l ? ?\
I l I ? II H.
II ? HH
L4 O
la lO, O
Ol] OOI O

1 O
0
I
I
I
I
i
O

O ?
L O

0
+
0 0
L O
II?
I'
I.
I -.
)
I
ti
O
O
+
Ln
o
0
_ 10

+

lIII''
O
J, M
? I
IO
tC3

z
z
0
LO

i
. 0

LO
+

>

W o N M
M o
t
D

A M (p

N V

O

N

O? O?

O O?

N

Oi

t
p N o N

aO

eD

M
J m r ?7 r .1 f0
0 m f m O M m m r
W m m w °O rn m m m m m m m m
m
m
O o O N h N O m u7 1? m N
af z N O O r m N W N
F-
z F-
N m N

m ?n

? ?

r r

o ?

T rn

V
T v

(O r

N

M
O ?

00

N o

N
N ?

tp ?

M m

OI rn

t0 e

0

-
o o o o o 0 0 0 o o o o `D O O O O O O
w

m M
LLI ?
= O
N m
M
O m phi O
(p O
1? m
V V

O Omi
1? m
N N 0 M
O N
r
< N
a0 N m
O
s ? V N N m ? ? M ? Nv O N ? Y] ? ? ? ? m
a z - -

x O
0 ?
0
Y N
0
« M
0 sf
0
V ?
0
V tD
0
Y 1?
0
Y m
0
V O
0
< O
?
V ?

Y N
?-
Y M
r
O V

V N
?
Y f0
?
V A

Y m
?
Y O?
?-
<
Q
W
0
z
LLJ
n F--LL,7
o
LLJ
°F- O
1 V `'? J a
?_ m0

i I ? F-
I
Z (n

o O
Z
Q
Z
J° v 10
,
i mow
1 ?

h
j O
ww

I
1 •F-a-
ago
1

I {?
I
/ / , i• j ///J I I
II 11 I i ? I, ?d
\ \ ` lp
45+00 x
H HH --HH- i
H H ?' }
of HH V
Y
a \
r° -
0 Z
i
i
O w (r a N N m Z /?/+/+ +\ \ \\
cJ 0 N NNW + .+..
Q? o OW
w z xoommf +
3 C7 m W N
z o
w alt--3 v
+ v
sum w
lA
x v
w I I 1-?Ix ?_ \\ ?
w I
1-4
/ fl l / l 1 X O'er \+
+ 00
LnC? 0 N \+
I ? ? \ O
?o Q \\ \) 11 ? I
00,
O
Ill A' C13 W \ LLJ
'z 4
"?
L) cn
fill
?? I \ 71 1 1
65+00
a
LLJ
W
0
z
w
0
0
w
v
I \ i
I
• f I II ?/ -x_?x
+ I

+ I

+ I
+ I
+ I
+
O
'O
- O
O
n
10
O
O
10
10
0
i o
+ +
+ I
+ I
w 0 O N O m N O
J om m N
O?
m c
m O
m N O? m -
W m
J
U` ? N m n ? m ? u?i cNO M V N an rn m ?
? Z o o m o N V m
r
m ? i? co ? rn N
.
m N
r N
N ?
? ? ? ? <
0 1?
0 N M ? M N m
N Y?
M ? m 0 ?
O ¢ O O m 0 0 0 m O 0 0 0 0 m m 0 0
U w
H

w Z
M
M
N
r
O
M
0
N
m
m
? = O . m m . m N N

V
O> M
N m
N ? m
N I? N m
O 1?
m N
N O
O m
N 1? V
m m

O
r
r
.

.

Y ?

N ?
<
<
M

N ?
a z m 1 m N N N

a O
'
d O O O ? m r
V V V V O V V V V V V V < V V V

C;
z rA
v z
w '- g
w W J
? J
xo
O i F
w t4 .U ?°
v _
\ f
f
\ f f. _
1 1
14
O N - O .1 - ?, N O N I I ", m m ?! O 2 ro
W
w O
m m n m

?

N

m O>

m V O

Mm

aD

OOi m 0
W m m m ao m m m m m m m m m

O
o m N m
o
n
o m r
m N
`
°
?
? N m
? m r O> m
Z m n N V i r r n <o N ?

Z c0
m N

r ?
O
N N
m
r r
?/)
N uJ
V
O>
<
T
O
m
M
N
V

V
V
N
N
V
m
N
t?

O

I?

Q

o

o

o O rn

° .- --
rn m

° m
m m ?n
O W o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0
U
F -
C) m
O
W ? O m A O> m m V Omi m N O M N V N N Obi m

O = N
N M
O [7
N m
N m
2 r c m
o N O
o m O N < N
m
W .1 - 2 2 2 `?
. 11 1 1 Y W " m M M M O
. N N
a_ Z N N N N h N N N N N
F- o ? o ?
0 a
0
0 m
0
0
0 m
0 o ?
? ? M
? ?
? ?
? m
? r m ?
? ?

tN F-
J f- O
QWZ
W
~ v ... .. . _ Zto
3:z
Sf-
In
O W
W

l
I I* Oa

N Z
r-j
-lnS

I
I

. O
WU
_
?
O? ,... .. . ? J
?w
WHO
0ll? _ 0 0
_
LL LL
Q ww
a
W Oa.
Za

C3
z

w
~
x
?n

?
?

Z

Ir
"N m

q
Z
F
J

_
I
o m O
Z m Q

o
Y ti
O 4 C]
Z
L,j w Cq
El
v o ? N
NNW
z
? '?
o
? ?
Y
mZ
?J
?
w
w

3 ti Z apmmf
mwmm3
?
w J z as^?3
w arc°iQ'3
IL J _
%
lL
e.JO Co
?i
Q
a0 W,
?.J
W
x z
w
a
x D
x
x
X
X
f

i

I?
O r N V N O Ori V m O O a?D
J
W O
p m
m v
m
?

O Y
m N
- cp A M
O I?
N O
°
"
° N N
r
r
N
m
?
z
?
m
N
N -I
I
T <
O
m
V
m
V -
M m
N
? O
N
cp
z (1)
x ` .. . l N
. . ` . N (
O M
O
w o 0 0
U
~
W Z 0 m o rn N O :? M N ? M
0 m
M M ?n rn
?
O ? N rn N
h Of
N O>
N c0
N V
O 0
i
T c0 N
O O
N 0 h V N M
0 . N N N tD
V N <
tp V
n N
n f O M cm'1 ?
d Z
F--
a O
s ? N M o O O O O O
a ?
< N
; M
?
< N
? (O
? 1?
?
a
e
5to`?
?P
z
w
W
LL-
WLL-
J Q
Q
u V)
J ~ O O
awz V
O w
N W
_ S
O
L
w?0
O
LL
L
?
w
O
N

;I
'I
",
I
I ?
w
w
a

m

o
??

.....
.......
j
I

------------ - ------- -
I

j
I
I _
?
U
t I

? f
I L?

T Q
j?

...

........

C7

- ;
-

cj?
f`

00
..:.... _......... J .:::

i
Cl N--
?J .

o ?
o ? o

c
' ?o
O I ?

_ Lij
?:
.. .

LO
-14

I f, ?
Q t -

o
2? h
I ..

1 °o
. M
0 V)
c:) w

/ uuj
°
?j
LLI o
m
F"' N
L'i CL

i
I
z
r
y
?
?=a
O
'
+
JO

J
ax
z
L.0 a
Z , C

+
m to
r?

O

F C,
N{I PROTOGRA-PMC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Strewn Restoration
Vegetation Plot 1

? a
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
1 t PHOTOGRA-PRIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
LI L_ K_ E_
Strearrc Restoration
Vegetation Plot 2
t z "wi -
As-built Survey: January 2008
g° .,,.?.vvx?+»•+=w rev:
'::mom ?, ;;? ??? ? .?4 t yk c.•_'? '
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
:?t> P IIOTOGRAJ'MC LOG Little 17,7iite Oak Creek
Ha Stream. Restoration
Vegetation Plot 3
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
3
U L_ - `- PHOTOGI),k['R[C LOO Little JU?ite Oak Creek
?1:G;,1??., ..
Sty°eam Restoration
Vegetation Plot 4
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
4
Year 5 Monitoring:
M U L_K E"` PHOTOGRAR RIC .LOG Little Tf,77.ite Oak Creek
I c.- - Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 5
As-built Survey: January 2008

Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
5
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
l PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little TT177ite Oak Creek
"- Stream Rest07°atio77

As-built Survey: January 2008
Vegetation Plot 6
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
6
Year 5 Monitoring:
E L_K EE'L" PRO. OOIRAPRIC LOG Little TT77ite Oak Creek
? StreaI77 RestOrati.072
Vegetation Plot 7
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
7
I
?s ?:r' ?' x ?' yati r« ny 3y?; s
'.
rn
J
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
U L_ K EPHOTOGRATTEC LOG Little YVhite Oak Creek
- J -. Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 8
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
S
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOGRATHIC LOG
Vegetation Plot 9
As-built Survey: January 2008

Little iT177ite Oak Creek
Stream RestOrati0 l
e as!N"'
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
9
,- PH®TOG:€ APMC LOG Little R77ite Oak Creek
Strean? Restoration
Vegetation Plot 10
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:

t
i
j_
b '
r ? e

Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
10
L_K E PHOTOGRA-PRIC LOG Little TT77ite Oak Creek
Sh•eanz Restoration
Vegetation Plot 11
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
L-11 L- KE_
PHO T OGR-A-t C LO
Vegetation Plot 12
As-built Survey: January 2008

't

41,

X
Little iJ'hite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008

1
1

Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 3 Monitoring:
12
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHO OGRA-PffIC LOO Little IJl7zite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Vegetation Plot 13
I
As-built Survey: January 2008 Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
E
I Year 2 Monitoring: Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
13
U L-K E'," PH0T0 R_,kPIffC :LOG Little TViite Oak Creek
- .- -'J = Stream RestOrati071
As-built Survey: January 2008
Vegeation Plot 14
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
14
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOG PHIC LOG-
Vegetation Plot 15
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
_ I
??dK?, x=??' A ."?MUrM sy?u¢ t
kr`+ j
YW? r Y
y,w ¢ yk13 p ",
?;+
+n ,y 'X6' 1
4

Little Tf7iite Oak Creek
Stream. Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
15
C L_ KE-y-
PHOTOO?A`p O LOCH
Vegetation Plot 16
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Little White Oak Cr°eek
St1°ea»z Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
1
1
Year 3 Monitoring:
16
Year Monitoring:
U, L_ K PHOTOGRAT HIC LOG Little Tfqiite Oak Creek
Strea777 Restoratio»
Vegetation Plot 17
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
17
NAE U L_ K_ E- s P OTOGRAPBIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Sh•eanz Restoration
Vegetation Plot 18
c Ar ?Y ?"? 1 ? 1
A
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
i8
Year Monitoring:
MU F "; PHOTOGRA-PHaC LO Little White Oak Creek
_.1-. 3 ? Stream RestOrati072
Vegetation Plot 19
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
19
UL_KE",r
P HOTOGRATMC LOG
Vegetation Plot 20

Little TT,7iite Oak Creek
Strewn Restoration
z
?r
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
1
1
1
1
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
i
i
1
1
1
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring: 1
20 ,

H F tOGRA_pE [C LO
Little Uiite Oak Creek
Stream. Restoration
Vegetation Plot 21

As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year') Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
21
M U1, L_ `K E., L? PHOTOGRAPPIC.LOG Little White Oak Creek
. Streann Restoration
Vegetation Plot 22

E
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
22
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTO GFcAPTC .LOG Little TJrhite Oak Creek
Strea797 RestOrati072
Vegetation Plot 23
i
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
23
?,?? PHO ?'OGRAPPIIC LOG Little i?hite Oak Creek
-:
- - Sty°eam Restoration
Vegetation Plot 24
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:

Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitorins:
Year Monitoring:
24
m M U L_ K ? e- PHOTOGRAl HIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Strea777 Restoration
Photo Point 1; Looking Downstream on Reach R2
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
PHO 1 OGRAP:HIC LOG Little nite Oak Creek
- Strea772 Restoration
Photo Point 2; Looking Downstream on Reach R2

^-
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

VI U L_ K E"10, P: OTOG PMC LOG Little iflliite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 2; Looking Upstream on Reach R2
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
3
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:

PHOTOGRAPHIC :LOG
Little ff,77ite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 2: Looking upstream on Reach R2A
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:

a i

t
a 4s ti: j
Y
s
x
a F ,
e
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
4
Year 5 Monitorina:
Liitle white Oak Creek
Strean? RestOrati077
Photo Point 2.5Y1; Looking Downstream Along R2
Not Applicable
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
r! .+kf"" r 5'FPi r ?" ,. d SEA r ?, ,k ,y,
e a"f +r^ b a' d k A??
L ?
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
5
M U L_ K E PHOTOORA.P IC LOO Little ifhite Oak Creek
_ -11 -, 3 a _ - -- Strea»i RestOratiO77
Photo Point 2.5Y1; Looking Upstream Along Reach R2
Not Applicable
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
6
U L_ [< E ? PROTOGRATBIC :ACC Little THhite Oak Creek
I.,,;11-11, & I. . StreGM RestOrati011
Photo Point 3; Looking Downstream
''YY = ? w+ J{I
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
7
M U L_ K ':-P OTOGRARRIC LOO Little iJ'hite Oak C7-eek
Strea772 RestOrati077
Photo Point 3: Looking Upstream

{
u
t

As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year Monitoring:
S
NAEU UK E•:PHOTOGRAT' IC LOG Little TTrhite Oak Creek
.,_.,_?%_ -. -1 - Stream Restoration
Photo Point 3.5Y1; :Looking Downstream Along R2&rR2B
Not Applicable
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitorina:
9
M U L_K E"-k.' PHOTO GRAPHIC LOO Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 3.5Y1; Looking Upstream Along R2
Not Applicable
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
10
W E :. P OTOGR PIRIC LOG Little TVhite Oak Creek
Strea192 Restoration
Photo Point 3.5Y1; Looking Upstream Along R2B
Not Applicable
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:

Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little IUhite Oak Creek
StreaM Restoratio7i
Photo Point 4; Looking Downstream
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
12
Year 5 Monitoring:
L_ K E: - R- PHOTOGRA-PRIG LOG Little fflliite Oak Creek
...__, - _. StreaM RestOratiO72
Photo Point 4- Looking Upstream at Confluence ofRl&R2
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
13
A L-K E PHOTOORAPPIC LOO Little 97iite Oak Creek
-- _ Stream Restoration
As-built Survey: January 2008
Photo Point 5; Looking Downstream
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
14
Year Monitoring:
N11 U ?K EPHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
-_ Strea777 Restoration
Photo Point 5; Looking Upstream
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
15
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
Li L_ E< E, r" PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek I
_.,G.,._t- -- Stream Restoration
Photo Point 6; Looking Downstream Along Reach R1
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
16
PHOTOGRATHIC LOG
Photo Point 6; Looking Upstream Along Reach RI

?
00 o•
"a

4., ,
a ?

As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Little IVhite Oak Creek
Strea»a Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
17
U L_K E: PHOTOGRAPIEIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 7; Looking Downstream Along RI
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
18
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
M U I K E `I'HOTOGR PMC :BOG Little Tfgiite Oak Creek
I Stream Restoration
Photo Point 7; Looking Upstream Along RI
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
19
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOGRA-PHIC LOG Little 97nte Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 8; Looking Downstream Along R1
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
20
MWL_K
PLO'T' RYC L©C
Little U77ite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 8- Looking Upstream Along RI

As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
21
MUIKFEN,,`
PHOTOGRA IffC LOG
Little IT17iite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Photo Point 8; Looking Upstream Along R1A

a - IJpE`?y? t
C
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
22
U L- K E"d
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Photo Point 8.5Y1; Looking Downstream Along RlA
Not Applicable
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
23
M ? PHOTOGI2A TIC SLOG Little TVhite Oak Creek
- Stream Restoration
Photo Point 8.5Y1; Looking Upstream Along R1A
Not Applicable
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring:
24
[LL_f '? ? r PROTOG l' C LOG Little TAite Oak Creek
_ Stream Restoration
Photo Point 9; Looking Across Reach RI
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
25
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Eh=, _ _ ._ Stream Restorati072
Photo Point 9; Looking Downstream Along Reach RI
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
26
PHOTO RPEItC LOG Little White Oak Creek
- - Stream Restoration
Photo Point 9; Looking Upstream Along Reach Rl
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
27
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
M U L_ K E- 6- PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Photo Point 10; Looking Across Reach R1

As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
28
MU@.._KE:,Y
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Little TV cite Oak Creek
Stream RestOrati077
Photo Point 10; Looking Downstream Along Reach RI

f

is

As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
29
U L-K E"T'- PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Photo Point 10; Looking Upstream Along Reach R1
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Little W77ite Oak Creek
Streans Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
30
M U L_ K ES - RHOTOOIAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
_ ._ _ ,_.._ ... Strea»i. Restoration
Photo Point 11; Looking Across Reach R1
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
31
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
ME U L_ K
Photo Point 11; Looking Downstream Along Reach R1
1 ? P
Y<'
?1
.. rt t '. {. F ? y(? ? e * T
%
.. t
?» 1
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
32
U L-K E PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Photo Point 11; Looking Upstream Along Reach RI
_" .des{ +» .r •
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Little TVhite Oak Creek
Strewn Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
Year 5 Monitoring:
,3)
?', , nA, F4 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little i?hite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 1
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:

? i
i

?1Y y
Q
! t : ? T c '!
! yA Y t
St' 4L 11? f +y.n 7
?,
],.?
L ?w .JL.kk ??' k ': Y? 4. T ?k •N{'v. 1A.j?

I
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
1
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
, .?
Stream Restoration
As-built Survey: January 2008
Permanent Cross Section 2
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
2
Year 5 Monitoring:
ULIIEY
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Little 17117 ite Oak Creek
Streann Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 3
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
3
Year 5 Monitoring:
?. ,? PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
?? - Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 4
ffi w
W"
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year I Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
4
Year 5 Monitoring:
I U ,ram r
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Little >J'hite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 5
W2
R a ! ?
r
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
e? 4
P
a
L r
« t ,M1*
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
5
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little Uiite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
As-built Survey: January 2008
Permanent Cross Section 6
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
6
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 7
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
7
Year 5 Monitoring:
tff U L K 7 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little if7iite Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
As-built Survey: January 2008
Permanent Cross Section 8
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
8
Year 5 Monitoring:

PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Pennanent Cross Section 9

As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
9
Year 5 Monitoring:
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
As-built Survey: January 2008
Permanent Cross Section 10
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
10
Year 5 Monitoring:
z ?? Lr Y; PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak Creek
s < Stream Restoration
Permanent Cross Section 11
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
11
Year 5 Monitoring:

PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Permanent Cross Section 12
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:

s
- _ try

{
??yA??
Y?? ??r IC I?(It °.`y ?R'?4J? 1
'-
4
a
'
.1.
L; „IS'-
Little White Oak Creek
Stream Restoration
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
12
Year 5 Monitoring:

' U L K ', PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Little White Oak C7-eek
Stream Restoration
Pennanent Cross Section 13
As-built Survey: January 2008
Year 2 Monitoring:
Year 4 Monitoring:
Year 1 Monitoring: September 2008
Year 3 Monitoring:
13
Year 5 Monitoring:

1
1
1
1
N ?
N e'
R II
w
c x
o A
U
N
U) O
o W
L Q
cu
N
C
CV
a
U m
W
to u
LL ? q
1
r
4-a O
U 6
a)
U)
V/ Y
Cl) c
m c
O m M
L' ? II
U N 44
? x
A
N 3
c
0
U
y e-
N ?
O O
U?
O
0
0
0
O
O)
O
00
0
$
C.
U
C
N
o N
L 0
f?
r-+
C
0
o N
0
2
0
:n
11
(4) UOIJen913
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY

River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 1)
' Reach Name: R2
Cross Section Name: Cross Section 1 - Riffle (R2, Year 1)
Survey Date: 11/10/2008
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
---------- FS
--------
- ELEV NOTE

0 -
---
0 ------------------
877.2423 -----------------------------
GS
9.98 0 876.9775 GS
15 0 876.5338 GS
24.95 0 874.4637 GS
35.26 0 873.9631 GS
39.7 0 874.1106 GS
44.33 0 873.7856 BKF
48.52 0 872.7499 GS
51.63 0 871.508 GS
52.37 0 871.4202 LEW
52.85 0 871.2242 GS
54.8 0 871.0079 GS
56.12 0 871.2656 GS
58.58 0 871.0046 GS
61.73 0 870.8115 GS
63.24 0 870.5582 GS
64.3 0 870.884 GS
65.13 0 871.3534 REW
66.91 0 871.6119 GS
69.53 0 871.907 GS
71.79 0 871.8985 GS
75.74 0 873.1833 GS
78.29 0 873.8027 RB
82.61 0 873.9535 GS
91.99 0 874.3521 GS
97.68 0 875.892 GS
104.5 0 876.8015 GS
109.64 0 877.1228 GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
channel Left Right
'
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 877.02 877.02 877.02
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 873.79 873.79 873.79
Floodprone width (ft) 99.71 ----- -----
Bankfull width (ft) 33.97 16
98 16
99
Entrenchment Ratio 2.94 _ _
Mean Depth (ft) 1.89 1.95 1.82
Maximum Depth (ft) 3.23 2.95 3.23
'
width/Depth Ratio 17.97 8.71 9.34
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 64.13 33.16 30.97
wetted Perimeter (ft) 34.94 20.4 20.44
' Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.84 1.63 1.51
Begin BKF Station 44.27 44.27 61.25
End BKF Station
78.24 61.25 78.24
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
0
N
N N
r
O
d II
N W
C x
O ?
U
N
co O
O (p
r U?
L Q
cu
W
y
C
N
a
a) N
L li
x
? R
LL > O
1 ?
N
C
O
y
U °
N
rn U_
C/
,,^^ C
V'^! w
VI C N
LO m
CJ ' ..
N
W
x
o ?
o
IL
N
C
O
U
(D
U)
y `-
fp ?
O N
U >
O
O
r
O
O
O
m
O
O
O
N
CD c
ca
cn
n +,
C
O
N
.`
O
It Z
h
V

D
(4) UOIIBA91=1
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY

River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 1)
' Reach Name: R2
Cross section Name: Cross section 2 - Pool (R2, Year 1)
Survey Date: 11/10/2008
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
---------- FS
--------- ELEV NOTE

0 ----
0 ------------------
876.5906 -----------------------------
GS
9.04 0 876.5554 GS
16.89 0 876.3899 GS
18.86 0 876.0113 GS
27.9 0 873.7327 GS
38 0 873.376 GS
49.59 0 873.458 LB
52.65 0 872.7189 GS
55.75 0 871.8763 GS
59 0 871.5102 GS
61.11 0 870.9945 GS
61.8 0 871.4367 GS
63.15 0 870.998 LEw
64.61 0 870.3188 GS
66.55 0 870.2556 GS
66.99 0 870.0193 GS
69.56 0 869.6106 GS
71.17 0 869.0673 TW
72.1 0 871.0466 REw
72.85 0 872.3305 GS
75.92 0 873.3031 BKF
78.71 0 873.1089 GS
87.56 0 873.1096 GS
93.37 0 873.0317 GS
108.43 0 876.5328 GS
112.28 0 876.7982 GS
115.19 0 876.4244 GS
118.8 0 876.4646 GS
-------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------
channel Left Right
' Floodprone Elevation (ft) 877.53 877.53 877.53
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 873.3 873.3 873.3
Floodprone width (ft) 118.8 ----- -----
' Bankfull width (ft) 44.23 22
12 22-16
Entrenchment Ratio 2.69 _
Mean Depth (ft) 1.2 2.15 0.25
Maximum Depth (ft) 4.23 4.23 1
81
'
width/Depth Ratio 36.86 10.29 .
88
64
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 53.17 47.57 .
5.6
wetted Perimeter (ft) 47.2 26.23 24
58
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.13 1.81 .
0.23
Begin BKF Station 50.24 50.24 72.36
End BKF Station 94.52 72.36 94.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left Side Right side
Slope
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
o°
?- u
c+) w
x
o
U
N
N
N O
O ca
l0
r r)
L Q
y
., c
N °
IL
a) N
r
in ii
O w
x
? o
I ?
M
C
O y
U °
U
'v
c
W c co
0 m
N
CY W
x
o R
O 3
a
M
C
O
U
N
N ?
N
O l9
U>4-)
O
W t- co ? ? ? It n ti n O o) ao ? uj
o co o 0 co co co co co co co r- co
co co co coo
(4) U011BA913
0
ti
0
cD
0
u?
0
v
0
O
r
0
0
0
o ?
O) a)
U
C
o ?
co N
o t?
c
N
o •?
0
2
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
-------------- ----- ------- ----------------- ---------------------------
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2
Cross section Name: Cross section 3 - Pool (R2, Year 1)
Survey Date: 11/10/ 2008
------------- ------ ------- ----------------- ---------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
' BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Readi ng: 0 ft
' TAPE
---------
---
FS ELEV NOTE

0 -

0 ------- -----------------

874.3382 --
----------------------
GS
10.22 0 874.1291 GS
19.99 0 874.1371 GS
24 0 874.0576 GS

' 31.95
38.37 0
0 872.9249
872
7133 GS
GS
48.13 0 .
872.774 GS
52.98 0 872.4855 LB
56.11 0 871.9301 GS
57.69 0 871.527 GS
57.41 0 870.3392 GS
59.68 0 870.0057 LEW
' 59.91 0 869.3558 GS
61.35 0 869.0455 GS
62 0 868.8563 TW
' 63.61 0 869.173 GS
64.94 0 869.2617 GS
68.28 0 869.9383 REW
' 69.32 0 870.1478 GS
75.56 0 871.1376 GS
81.3 0 872.3463 BKF
86.04 0 871.8262 GS
' 96.01 0 872.0181 GS
113.9 0 875.991 GS
119.98 0 876.1569 GS
126.11 0 876.0048 GS
138.05 0 873.9475 GS
147.94 0 873.7047 GS
' 156.67 0 873.9106 GS
163.99 0 874.7447 GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
------------------------------------------------------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
Floodprone width (ft)
Bankfull width (ft)
' Entrenchment Ratio
Mean Depth (ft)
Maximum Depth (ft)
width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
wetted Perimeter (ft)
channel
875.84
872.35
150.18
43.76
3.43
1.24
3.49
35.29
54.41
46.29
Left
875.84
872.35
21.88
2.07
3.49
10.57
45.23
25.41
Right
875.84
872.35
21.88
0.42
1.2
52.1
9.18
23.27
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.18 1.78 0.39
Begin BKF Station 53.74 53.74 75.62
End BKF station 97.5 75.62 97.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

0
N
CV
N N
v)
? II
V W
C X
O R
U ?
N
00
CO)
O N
Ur
L Q
N
C
CV _o
a
U ?
N ? II
4,
N ? x
Q
C
U N
U
YV JJ 'D
''^^ C
U)
cn Y
C
O IO ?
CD N
L ?
U II
N
W
x
N R
et
C
O
U
N
fn .-.
y r
N ?
O N
U?
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
co
O
? c
c?
D
o
C
O
L
v° 2
O
M
O
N
O
r
O
(4) U0118A913
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY

River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
' Reach Name: R2
Cross section Name: Cross Section 4 - Riffle (R2, Year 1)
Survey Date: 11/10/2008
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE

0
0
874.6785 ------------------------
GS
8.41 0 874.7499 GS
17.62 0 872.3206 GS
23.06 0 872.1019 GS
33.21
41.03 0
0 872.1239
871
9659 GS
BKF
42.95 0 .
871.4335 GS
45.62 0 870.1768 GS
' 48.1 0 869.3806 LEW
48.93 0 868.7304 GS
50.08 0 868.7305 GS
51.71 0 868.7208 TW
53.91 0 868.949 GS
56.01 0 868.8795 GS
57.56
58.45 0
0 869.0718
869
1806 GS
REW
59.74 0 .
870.2013 GS
63.92 0 870.7265 GS
68.54 0 872.6206 RB
78.04 0 872.3378 GS
86.05 0 872.1115 GS
95.96 0 873.7782 GS
106.06 0 873.2136 GS
116.03 0 873.3264 GS
120.37 0 872.8616 GS
______
Cross sectional
---- ____________
Geometry
------------ _______________

--------------- ____________________________

----------------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
Floodprone width (ft)
Bankfull width (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio
Mean Depth (ft)
Maximum Depth (ft)
width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
wetted Perimeter (ft)
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
Begin BKF Station
End BKF Station
channel
875.22
871.97
120.37
26.13
4.61
1.99
3.25
13.13
52.1
27.49
1.9
40.83
66.95
Left
875.22
871.97
13.06.
2.09
3.25
6.25
27.33
16.8
1.63
40.83
53.89
Right
875.22
871.97
13.06
1.9
3.09
6.87
24.77
16.74
1.48
53.89
66.95
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified shields curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

Q. ?
O M
IL II
? x
o FZ4
U
N
u)
y O
O f6
r U (D
L}? Q
cu
`}W
/ y
,C
N
°
? a
0 C/) n
O ° x
c?
0
I
LO
c
O
U)
°
L)
U_
(1)
co
''^^ C
?V/ w
N C
OL co
N
U ' II
N
w
x
O 'Q
O 3
a
C
O
U
y ?
y ?
O N
U >-
O

i

I

O rn c o ? CD t0 v m N n d
co
co
bo ?o bo b6 o0-
00 op co
(q) uOIJeA913
00 co co co co co
0
D
D
D
m
D
D
D
D
a)
U
c
ca
N
n
c
O
N
? L
O
2
h
u

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
------ -------- --------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2
Cross Section Name: Cross section 5 - Pool (R2, Year 1)
Survey Date: 11/10/2008
------ -------- --------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
---------- FS
----------- ELEV NOTE

0 ---
0 -----------------
871.583 -----------------------------
Gs
13.95 0 871.7439 GS
28.86 0 871.5156 GS
44.92 0 871.6589 GS
48.04 0 871.5644 LB
56.68 0 869.0614 LEW
58.98 0 868.4758 GS
60.93 0 868.1979 GS
64.76 0 868.1371 GS
66.53 0 868.0677 TW
68.6 0 868.9981 REW
69.1 0 870.1017 GS
70.46 0 870.5481 GS
73.09 0 870.8062 BKF
77.3 0 871.1763 GS
81.51 0 871.3567 GS
88.56 0 871.5819 GS
99.23 0 873.4296 GS
104.55 0 873.5183 GS
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
-------------------------------------------------------------
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 873.55 873.55 873.55
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 870.81 870.81 870.81
Floodprone width (ft) 104.55 ----- -----
Bankfull width (ft) 22.49 11.25 11.24
Entrenchment Ratio 4.65 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1.6 1.54 1.67
Maximum Depth (ft) 2.74 2.63 2.74
Width/Depth Ratio 14.06 7.31 6.73
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 36.06 17.31 18.75
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 23.83 14.21 14.86
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.51 1.22 1.26
Begin BKF Station 50.64 50.64 61.89
End BKF Station 73.13 61.89 73.13
------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
-------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left Side Right side
Slope
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
0
0
0
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
N
N
N ?
? II
i w
? X
C R
O ?
U
N
U) O
O t0
L.. U }
Q
Q ..
c
°
LL U O
? II
4- ? R
LP o
U
N?
? c
?/? w
VJ Y
N C ,
(0 ?
I'0
0 ? II
U N W
? X
R
,o
c 16
N ?
N N
O
U >-
O

\
\
1

I

I
I
I
II
I
II
I
cl i c o
Ln v r?
co m ap co CC) r r r r r Cl)
co co co co cp co co co co co co co co
(4) UOIIBA913

0
DO

?
:o
n ?
U
C
cu
N
a o
fu
C
N
.`
O
D
N

0
64 0
co co co
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
-------------------------- ------------------ --------------------------
River Name: Little white Oak Creek ( Year 1)
Reach Name: R2A
Cross section Name: Cross Section 6 - Riffle (R2A, Year 1)
Survey Date: 11/10/ 2008
-------------------------- ------------------ --------------------------
Cross section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
' TAPE FS
-------------- ELEV NOTE
------

0 0 ------------------

880.2035 -
----------------------
GS
19.31 0 880.4614 GS
' 28.46 0 880.1445 GS
38.46' 0 876.9752 GS
42.25 0 876.1676 GS
47.22 0 876.2584 GS
50.41 0 875.8145 LB
51.88 0 875.4357 GS
' 53.11 0 874.8245 LEW
53.84 0 874.586 GS
55.44 0 874.4496 GS
56.6 0 874.2772 GS
57.19 0 874.1423 TW
57.97 0 874.4357 GS
59.42 0 874.4946 GS
61.02 0 874.7021 LEW
62.77 0 875.6016 RB
64.87 0 876.0269 BKF
72.82 0 876.5574 GS
79.31 0 879.4803 GS
84.11 0 879.8364 GS
' 89.27 0 879.9175 GS

' --------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
--------- -------- ------------------ --------------------------
channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 877.92 877.92
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 876.03 876.03 -----
Floodprone width (ft) 40.35 -----

Bankfull width (ft)
16.06 26.14 _____
Entrenchment Ratio 2.51 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1.01 1.01 -----
maximum Depth (ft) 1.89 1.89 -----
width/Depth Ratio 15.9 25.88 -----
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 16.17 16.17 -----
wetted Perimeter (ft) 16.66 16.66 -----
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.97 0.97
Begin BKF Station 48.86 48.86 -----
End BKF station 64.92 64.92 -----
Entrainment calculations
------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left side Right side '
slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft) '
Movable Particle (mm)
F-I
L
1

O
O
Ed
N Co
?' II
t` W
x
c ,p
O ?
U
N
U) _
N O
N
r? O (6
L U ?
a a
N
m .?
N a°
L) N
U Ln
co
^` ? II
W w
`m x
o
C
}, o
U U
N
N c
U) c r
m
0 m
L ? II
U m w
N x
d' A
N
r
C
O
U
N
U
N
U) t0
O
U >
O
O
00
O
0
O
U
C
f6
N
(6
C
O
N
0 O
co _
0
:V

7
(4) uOIJEAG13
1

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2B
Cross Section Name: Cross Section 7 - Riffle (R2B, Year 1)
Survey Date: 09/04/2008
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
--------- FS ELEV NOTE
-
0 -------------
0 ------------------
874.9463 -----------------------------
GS
9.83 0 874.9017 GS
18.92 0 874.8935 GS
24.96 0 874.789 GS
32.98 0 874.7125 GS
35.97 0 874.652 GS
39.98 0 874.7078 GS
42.03 0 874.1088 GS
43.99 0 873.4516 GS
47.11 0 873.2923 GS
49.07 0 872.9583 GS
49.96 0 872.9506 LB
51.05 0 872.7587 GS
51.99 0 872.4992 GS
53.03 0 872.1381 GS
53.96 0 872.0547 GS
55.02 0 872.0194 Tw
56.08 0 872.088 GS
57.09 0 872.4319 GS
57.85 0 872.7895 GS
58.89 0 872.908 BKF
61.14 0 872.9226 GS
64.23 0 872.8586 GS
66.76 0 873.2168 GS
69.18 0 874.0729 GS
73.05 0 874.2865 GS
80.86 0 874.3224 GS
89.9 0 874.0824 GS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cross sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
Floodprone width (ft)
Bankfull width (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio
Mean Depth (ft)
Maximum Depth (ft)
width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
wetted Perimeter (ft)
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
Beqin BKF Station
channel
873.8
872.91
25.46
8.7
2.93
0.52
0.89
16.73
4.48
8.96
0.5
50.19
Left
873.8
872.91
5.93
0.6
0.89
9.88
3.57
6.86
0.52
50.19
Right
873.8
872.91
2.77
0.33
0.81
8.39
0.92
3.72
0.25
56.12
End BKF Station 58.89 56.12 58.89
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
' channel Left Side Right side
slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
' movable Particle (mm)
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
N
lY
N
Ii
i W
? x
c A
o
U
a>
mo
o m
V}
Q
0 ?
c
N .o
N d r
LL a? `n
a) II
W ?
U) W
a) x
o
??// A
ry
1
W
O
U
/N/??
co
Y r
[0 ?
O?
? ? II
U W
x
A
3
m
}
W
co
x
0
I
I
I

?I

1

1

LO V M N n _
r
co
r, f-- co CD b 5
co co co co 00 co 00 00
(4) UOIIEA913
D

D
n
m
U
C
7
n cu
c
O
.`
O
2
D
V

0
co
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY

River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
' Reach Name: R2D
Cross Section Name: Cross section 8 - Riffle (R2D, Year 1)
Survey Date: 09/04/2008
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
---------- FS
-------- ELEV NOTE

0 -----
0 ------------------
871.6481 ------------- ----------------
GS
4.49 0 871.5795 GS
9.75 0 871.4383 GS
16.6 0 871.058 GS
21.71 0 870.8233 GS
26.47 0 870.7301 GS
28.47 0 870.6976 BKF
29.43 0 870.5376 GS
30.77 0 870.2071 GS
31.2 0 869.8295 LEW
31.67 0 869.6601 TW
32.54 0 869.8094 GS
33.7 0 869.9324 GS
34.91 0 869.919 GS
35.77 0 869.7881 GS
36.42 0 869.8455 REW
39.25 0 870.6034 RB
42.19 0 870.961 GS
49.21 0 871.1897 GS
59.31 0 871.0629 GS
64.11 0 870.9877 GS
69.62 0 870.8823 GS
-------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
-------------------------------------------------------------
channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 871.74 871.74 871.74
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 870.7 870.7 870.7
Floodprone Width (ft) 69.62 -
Bankfull width (ft) 11.72 5.86 5.86
Entrenchment Ratio 5.94 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.57 0.59 0.56
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.04 1.04 0.91
width/Depth Ratio 20.56 9.93 10.46
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 6.69 3.43 3.25
wetted Perimeter (ft) 12.08 6.88 6.75
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.55 0.5 0.48
Begin BKF station 28.32 28.32 34
18
End BKF Station 40.04 34.18 .
40.04
-------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------- -------------
----.------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left side Right side '
slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm) '

1
1
r

r

C

1

O
O
a II
rn w
c x
o
U
N
w
y O
O
r Ua)
Q
m
0
/ y
C_
O
CL
U
O ? II
0 y w
x
? o
rn
c
O y
U^' °
) U_
c
VJ ?
? w
N Y r
C
O m
L . ro
w
x
O 'A
O
a
o?
0
0
U
N
U)
V)
O N
N
U >-
0
0
c->
0
N
O
0
0
O
O
0
0
o ?
(D
U
C
tII
O aCl)
o
Lo N
.`
0
2
0
7
7
(4) UOIJeA913
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
-------------- ----- ------- ----------------- ---------------------------
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
' Reach Name: R1
Cross section Name: Cross Section 9 - Pool (R1, Year 1)
Survey Date: 10/14/ 2008
-------------- ----- ------- ----------------- ---------------------------
Cross section Data Entry
' BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Readi ng: 0 ft
' TAPE
-------------- FS
-
---- ELEV NOTE

0

0 ------- -----------------

888.982 --
----------------------
GS
5.16 0 889.0535 GS
' 10.01 0 888.953 GS
14.69 0 888.7614 GS
20.01 0 888.2744 GS
' 25.28 0 887.0475 GS
29.69 0 885.071 GS
32.62 0 884.3704 GS
' 37.33 0 883.8159 GS
41.92 0 883.5905 GS
47.68 0 883.5139 GS
52.13 0 883.1962 GS
' 56.75 0 882.8811 BKF
57.81 0 881.9791 GS
60.37 0 880.331 GS
' 61.09 0 879.9773 LEW
61.96 0 879.1695 TW
63.63 0 879.2015 GS
' 65.26 0 879.4292 GS
65.74 0 879.7095 GS
66.1 0 879.7933 GS
66.8 0 879.8549 GS
67.48 0 880.0727 REW
69.56 0 880.6332 GS
70.54 0 881.2023 GS
73.9 0 882.009 GS
76.39 0 883.123 RB
78.92 0 882.9899 GS
84.96 0 882.8646 GS
90.78 0 882.8831 GS
96.3 0 884.4865 GS
100.27 0 885.8104 GS
' 105.44 0 887.0679 GS
112.31 0 888.4927 GS
115.92 0 888.8783 GS
120.51 0 889.0468 GS
130.51 0 889.2544 GS
----------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
------------------------------------------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
Floodprone width (ft)
channel Left Right
886.59 886.59 886.59
882.88 882.88 882.88
77.18 ----- -----
Bankfull width (ft) 24.68 12.34 20.71
Entrenchment Ratio 3.13 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1.66 2.65 0.66
Maximum De th (ft) 3.71 3.71 2.37
width/Depth Ratio 14.87 4.66 31.38
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 40.9 32.72 8.18
wetted Perimeter (ft) 26.55 16.12 15.16
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.54 2.03 0.54
Begin BKF Station 56.75 56.75 69.09
End BKF Station 89.8 69.09 89.8
--------------------7-----------------------------
Entrainment calculations
--------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left Side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
O O
O
a u
0 4-1
x
o R
U
N
N O
O ?p
L U?
CU Q
N
? .C
O
IL
U
f6 N
O ? u
0 14
CL +O X
O O
I
o?
C
O
U
(
U U
C
)
N 7
U) Y O
C
O m C-
U •
w
X
N
}
O
O
a
0
U)
X
0
0
M
I O
N
O
1 0
0
I
O
rn
o
co
o $
ti
U
I ?
O (n
(D
LO N
0
I =
O
7
O
M
0
N
O
0
0
0 0
rn co t -
co o
(4) UOIIBA913
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY

River Name:
' Reach Name:
Cross section
Survey Date:

Little white oak
R1
Name: cross section 10
10/14/2008
creek (Year 1)
- Pool (R1, Year 1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cross section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
------ FS
------ ELEV NOTE

0 -----

0 --------------

886.8813 ----
----------------------
GS
3.79 0 886.0528 GS
9.29 0 884.8979 GS
14.21 0 883.7397 GS
19.42 0 882.4609 GS
24.33 0 881.9533 GS
29.42 0 882.0849 GS
34.51 0 882.0655 GS
39.54 0 882.0581 GS
44.08 0 882.0574 GS
49.18 0 882.0207 GS
54.46 0 882.0533 GS
59 0 881.8604 GS
64.23 0 881.6602 GS
65.39 0 881.5705 LB
67.14 0 880.9866 GS
69.2 0 880.3866 GS
70.93 0 879.8058 GS
72.47 0 879.6055 GS
73.93 0 879.6784 GS
73.68 0 879.5218 GS
74.96 0 879.3781 LEW
74.92 0 879.1477 GS
76.11 0 878.5523 GS
76.5 0 878.3553 GS
77.73 0 878.0727 GS
81.1 0 877.8557 TW
81.89 0 878.2374 GS
82.08 0 878.7193 GS
83.55 0 879.3932 REW
83.66 0 880.8109 GS
84.3 0 881.5577 BKF
85.85 0 881.7273 GS
87.52 0 881.8809 GS
93.49 0 881.9836 GS
98.71 0 881.9906 GS
103.76 0 882.3211 GS
105.66 0 882.8868 GS
110.08 0 884.6739 GS
116.28 0 886.2119 GS
119.07 0 886.6256 GS
128.85 0 886.7806 GS
------------------------------------------
cross sectional Geometry
-------------------------------------------------
channel Left Right

Floodprone Elevation (ft)
885.26
885.26
885.26 ,
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 881.56 881.56 881.56
Floodprone width (ft) 104.91 ----- -----

Bankfull width (ft)
18.9
9.45
9.45 '
Entrenchment Ratio 5.55 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 2.15 1.32 2.99
Maximum Depth (ft)
width/Depth Ratio 3.7
8.79 2.17
7.16 3.7
3.16
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 40.71 12.5 28.22
wetted Perimeter (ft) 22.46 12.46 14.34 ,
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.81 1 1.97
Begin BKF station
i 65.42
32
84 65.42
87
74 74.87
84.32
on
End BKF stat . .
-------------------------
Entrainment calculations
------------------------- ------------

------------ -----------

----------- -----

--------------------

--
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left side Right side '
slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
? r
o m
o lD
a
u
w
c x
o
U
N
c
N O
O
U a>
L }
M Q
_ N
O
10
U I
0 C II
°3 w
m x
? .a
I O
r
r
0 ?
U ca
(D
C5 _
A Y
N N
O m N
L ?
C) ? II
4-I
x
o 'A
O 3
a
c
O
W
N `-
N
O N
U?
O
(4) U011BA913
0
M
O
N
0
0
0
O
O
0
CO
ti
m
U
C
ca
o 'r
o cn
0
C
`f' N
.L
0
0
'IT
O
M
O
N
O
0
RIVF_RMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
-------------- ----- ------- ----------------- ---------------------------
River Name: Little white oak creek (Year 1)
' Reach Name: R1
Cross section Name: Cross Section 11 - Pool (R1, Year 1)
Survey Date: 10/14/ 2008
-------------- ----- ------- ----------------- ---------------------------
Cross section Data Entry
' BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Readi ng: 0 ft
' TAPE
-------------- FS
--- ELEV NOTE
=

0 --
0 ------- -----------------
886.4446 -------
-------------------
GS
4.45 0 886.3885 GS
' 8.89 0 886.041 GS
14.31 0 885.9687 GS
' 19.04
23.9 0
0 885.8056
885.2437 GS
GS
25.92 0 884.6872 GS
29.23 0 883.4106 GS
' 34.23 0 881.9198 GS
37.62 0 881.2731 GS
42.28 0 881.003 GS
47.68 0 880.8922 GS
' 52.21 0 880.6289 GS
56.46 0 880.8102 GS
57.23
58.91 0
0 880.9086
880
9018 GS
LB
60.55 0 .
880.2154 GS
62.48 0 879.0119 GS
' 63.13 0 878.3965 GS
64.11 0 877.8867 LEW
65.98 0 874.5401 TW
66.46 0 874.5685 GS
' 67.06 0 874.9805 GS
68.1 0 875.5934 GS
' 69.4
70.99 0
0 875.8088
876
3042 GS
GS
72.16 0 .
876.678 GS
72.15 0 876.9484 GS
' 72.8 0 877.7078 GS
74.05 0 878.1792 REW
78.63 0 880.3916 GS
80.2 0 880.8648 BKF
' 85.13 0 880.7019 GS
91.49 0 880.6985 GS
96.52 0 881.1097 GS
101.52 0 882.5236 GS
106.37 0 883.6097 GS
111.71 0 884.6097 GS
' 116.53 0 885.24 GS
121.18 0 885.4989 GS
129.26 0 885.5481 GS
------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----- ---------- ---------
-- -----------------

----------------- ---------------------------

---------------------------
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 887.18 887.18 887.18
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 880.86 880.86 880.86
Floodprone width (ft) 129.26
Bankfull width (ft) 42.91 21.46 23.78
Entrenchment Ratio 3.01 -----
mean Depth (ft) 1.48 1.94 1.11
Maximum Depth (ft) 6.32 6.32 4.96
width/Depth Ratio 28.99 11.06 21.42
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 63.68 37.35 26.33
wetted Perimeter (ft) 47.48 27.41 30
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.34 1.36 0.88
Begin BKF Station 48.23 48.23 69.69
End BKF Station 93.47 69.69 93.47

1

-------------------------------------------------------------------- ,
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left Side Right side
slope 0 0 0
Shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
m
II
?w
=x
o A
a
U
UI
U) O
O ?p
L U D
Q
? c
N o
LL a
?.? U N
tU Co
I
x
? Q
N
0 N
U L)
? a
Cn c
m N
O ? II
U? W
?. x
o ?
N_
C
O
U
O N
U ?
G
c
c
(4) UOIJEA913
0
0
0
O
co
O
n
0
m

c
cu
D
0
0
N
O
2
0
Cl)
CD
N
C)
00
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
' Reach Name: R1
Cross section Name: Cross Section 12 - Riff le (R1, Year 1)
Survey-Date-
- 10/14/2008
-----------------------------
---------

Cross section
Data Entry ------------------

BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
' TAPE
- FS
---- ELEV NOTE

0
5.11 --------
0
0 -----------------
885.5536
885
0686 ---------------------------
GS
GS
.
8.4 0 885.1329 GS
10.88 0 884.0396 GS
15.31 0 882.4954 GS
20.48 0 880.4338 GS
25.31 0 880.1904 GS
30.79 0 879.9968 GS
35.26 0 880.1614 GS
38.76 0 880.1768 BKF
40.24 0 879.2987 GS
' 41.26 0 878.6773 GS
42.52 0 878.2842 GS
43.52 0 877.7308 LEw
' 43.44 0 877.2998 GS
45.12 0 877.0887 GS
46.54 0 877.0537 GS
47.14 0 876.9615 TW
' 49.21 0 876.9972 GS
51.41 0 877.0275 GS
52.9 0 877.8304 REW
53.72 0 878.066 GS
55.81 0 878.301 GS
57.26 0 878.1469 GS
' 57.08 0 878.3326 GS
59.91 0 878.8881 GS
61.44 0 880.197 GS
62.4 0 880.4494 RB
' 64.34 0 880.4467 GS
69.35 0 880.5116 GS
73.7 0 880.7063 GS
' 78.73 0 880.7546 GS
84.22 0 882.6033 GS
89.69 0 883.8705 GS
94.44 0 884.557 GS
100.3 0 884.9515 GS
---------------

Cross Sectional
--------------- -----------

Geometry
----------- -----------
-------

--------------
--------------------------
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elev ation (ft) 883.4 883.4 883
4
Bankfull Elevat ion (ft) 880.18 88018 .
88018
Floodprone widt h (ft) 74.93 _ _
Bankfull width (ft) 24.42 6.51 17.91
Entrenchment Ratio 3.07 ----- -----
mean Depth (ft) 2 0.95 2.39
Maximum Depth (ft) 3.22 2.89 3.22
width/Depth Ratio 12.21 6.85 7.49
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 48.92 6.19 42.73
wetted Perimeter (ft) 26.82 10.54 22.05
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.82 0.59 1.94
Begin BKF Station 37 37 43.51
End BKF Station 61.42 43.51 61.42
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
Channel Left Side Right side
slope 0 0 0
Shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
a
II
C W
°- o x
a) m
rn r
cn
U
L Q
rn
Q O
d
r? N
U
? II
y= ? w
CV)
r
0
U
U
Q? w
v J t9 v'
?A Co m
N r
0 Q
w
U
Q
O
O
U
N
CO
cn
O (
U>-
0
c
c
c
c
(4) u011BA913
0
0
0
0
0
Cl
m
O
co
i1
O
U
C
tr>
O
N
O
I
0
,It
0
co
0
N
O
O
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
------------------------- ------------------ ----- ----------------------
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 1)
' Reach Name: R1A
Cross Section Name: Cross Section 13 - Riff le (R1A, Year 1)
Survey Date: 09/03/2008
--------------
---
-----
----------------------
Cross section Data Entry
' BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE-----------FS
-- ELEV NOTE
------

0 0 ---------
-------------
887.5046
-----
GS
----------------------
9.4 0
19
4 0 887.5958
887
573 GS
. . GS
24.35 0 887.5662 GS
29.36 0 887.4985 GS
t 34.15 0 887.4824 GS
39.37 0 887.4705 GS
47.34 0 887.3477 GS
51.43 0 887.6029 GS
54.46 0 887.7488 BKF
55.33 0 887.4676 GS
56.11 0 887.0532 LEW
56.36 0 886.934 Tw
58.27 0 887.0104 GS
59.16 0 886.9374 GS
59.71 0 887.0366 GS
61.09 0 887.4172 GS
62.49 0 887.8024 RB
69.22 0 887.5323 GS
74.28 0 887.5082 GS
79.11 0 887.6218 GS
89.14 0 887.4987 GS
a 98.92 0 887.5286 GS
109.24 0 887.3593 GS
124.24 0 887.5896 GS
-

Cross Sectional Geometry ------------------

------------- -----

----- -------
--------------

---------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 888.571 888.57 888.57
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 887.75 887.75 887
75
Floodprone width (ft) 124.24 .
Bankfull width (ft) 7.84 3.92 3
92
Entrenchment Ratio 15.85 ----- .
-----
mean Depth (ft) 0.54 0.58 0
5
Maximum Depth (ft) 0.82 0.82 .
0
81
width/Depth Ratio 14.52 6.76 .
7
84
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 4.21 2.26 .
1
95
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 8.13 4.85 .
4
78
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.52 0.47 .
0
41
Begin BKF Station 54.46 54.46 .
58
38
End BKF Station
--------------------------- 62.3 58.38

---------

----- .
62.3
---------------------
Entrainment Caicuiations
--------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
a?
.
=.oO
+
O M
?J Cl)
vA?

+
C) a
M X
1
1
0
0
CO
W
O
O
L
n
0)
CO
O
J
LL
U-
T- Y
0]
?Lt ?
co
W
U)
O
U
•
O

G
O
O ?
O ?

6 yea ) '' 721 EU N - Z L uoijoas s sa, -
V ?
a
a

O
O
O
?
? O
' a food - uogoas ssoj
Cam' ?
COW
?
O ?
O
O
O?

O ?
O
? V

TeaJ77a) food - p u011oag ssa?
O ?
? O
p

?
? O
0*
G?
?
ll
?ea? La food - g uogoaS ssaO

O ?
? G
?O
O

0
0
0
0
Cl)
0
N
O
O
M
0
0
Cl)
0
N
O
N
0
0
N
O
O
co
N
O
O
N y_
O cu
V (y
N L
N
O
C
N
0
C6
00
N
U
N
O (n
O
N
0
N
rn
0
O
0
O
0
Ofl
0
0
0
0
LO 7 N a
co co co M co ?
r co r- to r r r
co co co W OD OD co O O O co co co co
(:4) U01jena13
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
-------- --------- --------- --------------- -------7---------------------
River Na me: Lit tle White Oak Creek (Yea r 1)
' Reach Na me: R1
Profile Name: (Year 1) R1 Long. Profile ( STA 14+00 -- 33+74)
Survey D ate: 12/ 31/2008
-------- --------- --------- --------------- -----------------------------
' Survey D ata
DIST CH WS BKF LB RB P3 P4
-------- --------- --------- --------------- -----------------------------
1400 880.093
1400 883.591
1400 881.096
' 1401.17 881.109
1404.645 883.681
1416.793 881.214
' 1417.99 879.503
1434.563 883.185
1434.563 881.19
1434.563 879.79
' 1439.29 881.052
1442.865 883.269
1458.437 879.856
' 1459.888 881.101
1486.805 882.887
1487.407 883
005
t 1487.902 881.12 .
1488.733 881.08
1488.936 880.841
' 1514.502 883.106
1516.787 880.749
1518.283 880.653
' 1518.283
1519.755 880.014
883.522
1542.837 883.386
1546.723 880.64
' 1546.723 880.235
1546.723 883.14
1548.746 880.604
1574.525 883.747
' 1576.288 880.368
1577.367 879.622
1577.367 883.11
1577.687 880.446
1619.186 880.342
1619.186 883.014
' 1619.186 879.58
1624.867 880.231
1626.102 882.879
1643.007 880.191
' 1643.721 879.105
1644.267 882.828
1648.005 882.472
' 1670.378 883.091
1670.578 880.244
1671.816 880.17
1672.296 879.659
1674.389 882.992
1689.592 660.159
1689.921 879.534
1713.763 880.198
1714.727 880.18
1715.554 879.551
1715.554 882.865
1719.304 883.105
1727.095 880,083
1727.899 878.944
1745.156 878.673
1748.437 879.988
1748.858 882.959
1751.429 880.063
1756.206 883.126
1784.368 879.17 880.025 882.881 883.123
1804.642 882.791
1808.197 879.989
1810.109 878.666
1810.577 880.04
1832.579 882.285
1834.019 880.056
1834.33 879.28
1836.651 879.852
1838.248 882.566
1864.157 882.608
1865.295 879.878
1867.245 882.773
1867.49 879.822
1867.49 878.783
1891.154 882.613
1891.28 879.143
1891.28 879.833
1891.966 879.836
1893.182 882.476
1922.604 881.72
1922.604 877.339
1926.101 879.679
1930.257 882.394
1945.504 878.845
1952.603 879.762
1954.143 879.112
1954.143 881.939
1955.641 879.719
1956.28 882.547
1982.254 879.534
1982.605 878.493
2000.546 882.386
2004.712 879.599
2008.575 878.366
2010.319 879.527
2010.521 882.78
2034.002 879.52
2034.223 882.731
2034.269 879.56
2034.269 878.653
2036.227 882.58
2058.83 882.838
2058.83 877.956
2059.991 879.626
2062.449 879.506
2068.17 882.373
2096.912 882.263
2098.623 879.492
2100.037 878.931
2100.031 879.573
' 2101.135
2128.404
879.544 882.052
2129.473 878.686
2129.473 881.727
' 2131.656 879.462
2137.859 882.174
2159.4 879.459
2161.36 878.951
' 2182.694 878.626
2182.999 879.404

i 2183.214
2190.953
879.386 881.9
2192.495 881.728
2208.14 878.736
' 2211.877 879.516
2237.897 877.856 879.386 881.558 881.571
2259.893 881.732
2264.284 879.388
' 2267.14 881.831
2267.14 877.846

' 2267.14
2287.183 879.53
881.528
2288.22 879.357
2291.556 878.52
' 2291.556 879.437
2293.88 881.185
2310.994 878.684
2311.024 879.333
2331.429 879.391
2331.496 881.549
2332.257 878.49
' 2332.257 880.89
2333.041 879.337
2339.798 878.29
2341.598 879.361
' 2354.676 881.529
2357.902 879.329
2358.182 880.694
2360.068 879.412
2360.507 876.965
2376.569 881.36
' 2376.888 879.426
2376.888 878.057
2380.234 879.405
' 2384.902 881.45
2397.651 879.447
2399.448 881.242
2399.448 878.765
' 2401.476 879.243
2402.084 880.862
2406.889 878.737
' 2406.889 875.589
2415.701 878.245
2418.142 878.614
' 2421.957 881.423
2423.205 878.652
2423.313 881.693
2449.983 880.891
' 2452.902 878.166
2452.902 878.571
2455.481 878.626
' 2455.779 881.277
2478.114 881.586
2478.114 877.727
2478.583 878.583
2481.539 878.515
2487.516 881.047
2517.191 880.748
2519.501 878.469
2520.448 878.046
2520.448 878.538
2520.448 881.145
2553.334 877.644
2554.698 880.942
2555.502 878.336
2561.731 880.714
2588.189 878.277
2589.841 878.238
2590.248 880.88
2590.248 877.637
2593.643 880.73
2619.741 878.326
2619.921 881.105
2620.234 878.329
2620.234 877.755
2621.423 881.187
2648.872 877.331
2649.313 880.476
2649.831 878.148
2651.133 878.29
2651.574 881.099
2670.752 876.285
2671.116 878.183
2689.438 874.54 878.033 880.865 880.902
2711.569 881.185
2711.569 877.562
2712.641 878.221
2716.771 878.124
2717.497 880.699
2737.589 880.522
2737.903 877.339
2738.244 878.123
2744.458 880.854
2758.05 879.96
2764.098 878.128
2766.14 880.58
2766.14 877.343
2766.282 878.133
2787.259 880.23
2789.975 877.888
2793.343 878.171
2794.212 875.261
2794.212 880.201
2805.964 877.203
2806.712 880.212
2807.127 877.872
2809.02 880.192
2834.916 877.914
2835.756 876.572
2835.756 880.558
2839.254 877.907
2844.711 880.12
2861.716 877.884
2863.48 880.642
2863.48 877.232
2868.692 880.641
2890.859 877.837
2891.042 880.844
' 2891.042 877.184
2891.993 877.839
2894.54 880.417
2921.337 880.407
' 2922.632 877.755
2924.706 876.746
2924.706 880.257
2924.706 877.689
' 2950.104 880.554
2953.918 877.858
2956.493 877.886
' 2957.169 876.709
2957.169 880.539
2993.532 880.54
' 2993.745 877.781
2993.745 876.859
2996.974 877.78
2999.46 880.583
' 3018.666 879.729
3020.321 875.733
' 3020.321
3022.415 877.826
877.781
3026.556 880.463
3041.593 877.797
' 3042.27 880.254
3043.299 877.808
3043.299 876.732
3049.557 880.368
3058.831 876.962 877.781 880.177 880.449
3101.904 879.59
3107.345 877.776
' 3107.345 876.951
3131.305 877.717
3134.873 877.792
' 3134.873 880.152
3134.873 876.244
3144.332 879.799
3171.91 880.051
' 3174.463 877.673
3178.362 877.728
3178.362 880.306
' 3178.362 877.328
3221.428 879.834
3222.507 877.407
' 3223.993 876.807
3224.621 877.113
3228.188 879.669
3242.079 876.612
3242.401 879.802
3243.182 876.643
3243.202 875.788
' 3247.672 . 879.92
3266.861 876.521
3269.584 876.578
3270.066 875.598
3270.066 879.06
3281.061 879.735
3304.575 876.489
' 3304.69 879.15
3305.911 875.664
3307.184 876.416
' 3309.42 879.408
3329.722 879.703
3331.643
3332.231 879.717
3332.966 876.459
3333.273 875.576
3356.608 879.522
3357.862 876.326
3358.154 879.165
3358.646 875.816
3359.433 876.439
3401.07 878.443
3406.927 876.321
3407.277 875.724 876.411 879.285
Cross section / Bank Profile Locations
Name Type
------------- Profile station
-- ----------------
------
cross --------
section ---
9 - ---------------------
Pool (R1, Year 1) Pool XS 1784
Cross section 10 - Pool (R1, Year 1)Pool XS 2237
Cross Section 11 - Pool (R1, Year 1)Pool XS 2689
Cross Section 12 - Riffle (R1, Year 1)Riffle XS 3058
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull slope: 0
Variable Min Avg Max
--------------------,------
--------------
S riffle ---
0 ----------------
0 -----

S pool
0
0 0
S run
S glide 0
0 0
0 0
0
P- P 0 0 0
Pool length 0 0 0
Riffle length 0 0 0
Dmax riffle 0 0 0
Dmax pool 0 0 0
Dmax run 0 0
0 0
0
Dmax glide 0 0
Low bank ht 0
Length and depth 0
measurements in feet, slopes in ft/ft.
0
RIVERMORPH
PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
River Name: Little White
Reach Name: R1
Profile Name: (Year 1) R1
Survey Date: 12/31/2008
DIST Note
Oak Creek (Year 1)
Long. Profile (STA 14+00 -- 33+74)
----------
1400 -------------------------- ---------------------------------
LEW
1401.17 REW
1416.793 LEW
1434.563 LEW
1439.29 REW
1459.888 LEW
1487.902 REW
1488.733 LEW
1516.787 LEW
1518.283 REW
1546.723 REW
1548.746 LEW
1576.288 LEW
1577.687 REW
1619.186 REW
1624.867 LEW
1643.007 LEW
1670.578 REW
1671.816 LEW
1689.592 LEW
1713.763 LEW
1714.727 REW
1727.095 LEW
1748.437 REW
1751.429 LEW
1784.368 XS9 - TW Intersect
1808.197 REW
1810.577 LEW
1834.019 LEW
1836.651 REW
1865.295 LEW
1867.49 REW
1891.28 REW
1891.966 LEW
1926.101 LEW
1952.603 LEW
1955.641 REW
1982.254 LEW
2004.712 REW
2010.319 LEW
2034.002 REW
2034.269 LEW
2059.991 LEW
2062.449 REW
2098.623 REW
2100.037 LEW
2128.404 LEW
2131.656 REW
2159.4 LEW
2182.999 REW
2190.953 LEW
2211.877 LEW
2237.897 XS10 - TW Intersect
2264.284 LEW
2267.14 REW
2288.22 LEW
2291.556 REW
2311.024 LEW
2331.429 REW
2333.041 LEW
2341.598 LEW
2357.902 REW
2360.068 LEW
2376.888 LEW
2380.234 REW
2397.651 REW
2401.476 LEW
2406.889 LEW
2418.142 REW
2423.205 LEW
2452.902 LEW
2455.481 REW
2478.583
2481.539
2519.501
2520.448
2555.502
2588.189
2589.841
2619.741
2620.234
2649.831
2651.133
2671.116
2689.438
2712.641
2716.771
2738.244
2764.098
2766.282
2789.975
2793.343
2807.127
2834.916
2839.254
2861.716
2890.859
2891.993
2922.632
2924.706
2953.918
2956.493
2993.745
2996.974
3020.321
3022.415
3041.593
3043.299
3058.831
3107.345
3131.305
3134.873
3174.463
3178.362
3222.507
3224.621
3242.079
3243.182
3266.861
3269.584
3304.575
3307.184
3331.643
3332.966
3357.862
3359.433
3406.927
3407.277
REW
LEW
LEW
REW
LEW
LEW
REW
REW
LEW
LEW
REW
LEW
XSll - TW Intersect
LEW
REW
LEW
LEW
REW
LEW
REW
LEW
REW
LEW
LEW
REW
LEW
REW
LEW
REW
LEW
LEW
REW
LEW
REW
REW
LEW
XS12 - TW Intersect
REW
LEW
REW
LEW
REW
REW
LEW
REW
LEW
REW
LEW
LEW
REW
REW
LEW
REW
LEW
LEW
REW
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Q N
ofad. O o
o
(6
CD C: C O
O U, O
J - m
+
1-\
O
O
+
LO a
X
O
O
O a
Q +
U)
O o
L
n
0 m
J J
Q
ne,
U-
7- Y
m
L .
W
U)
0
U
•
?v
n
O
O
.
O?

O .
? O

.o

b
o ??
0

o
?o
? o

? o
? o

?o
O

O
.

a
o •

°

N
n 0
(7
co
m m m of m
w co co co
(4) UOIJeA@13
co co
co co
0
N
D
V
h
E
m
a?
cm
c
0
m
0
v U
c
co
cn
0

co
co
. ? `
`'si .. : j
?I''. •?_?tY
\ ?? .. ti.
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
-------------
River Name:
' Reach Name:
Profile Name:
Survey Date:
-------------
------------------- ------------------------------------
Little white Oak Creek (Year 1)
RlA
(Year 1) RlA Long. Profile (STA 0+00 -- 5+00)1
12/31/2008
---------------------------------------------------------
Survey Data
DIST CH WS BKF LB RB P3 P4
0 891.14
0 891.379
0 891.872
4.838 891.794
25.316 891.781
26.084 890.953
26.084 892.033
37.61 892.072
37.61 890.969
38.98 891.485
' 48.441 891.522
48.86 890.598

' 49.107
61.815
890.183 891.442
61.994 890.955
62.456 890.754
84.29 890.01
84.29 891.092
89.073 890.883
95.595 890.702
' 97.22 890.096
97.339 889.904
' 97.751
115.474
889.726 890.513
115.474 890.785
115.97 889.961
116.886 890.633
124.946 890.778
124.946 889.733
126.721 890.463
138.059 889.529
138.059 890.19
139.79 890.355
' 155.924 889.145
155.924 889.876
158.324 889.519
165.933 888.91
165.933 889.067
165.933
167.475 889.572
' 177.14 889.713
177.636 888.988
177.799 888.897
' 178.331 889.33
188.768 889.201
188.768 888.999 889.139
189.748 889.441
205.147 888.344
205.416 888.644
205.654 888.796
206.016 889.376
213.907 888.421
215.805 889.125
217.54 889.28
224.92 889.682
227.768 888.48 888.62
229.605 889.199
239.09 887.644
239.09 889.023
239.09 888.001
239.483 888.616
244.978 887.985
245.021 887.643
245.021 888.768
246.998 888.697
254.91 887.952
254.91 888.579
254.91 887.804
255.818 889.149
273.434 887.566
273.434 888.777
273.715 887.696
275.031 888.84
283.194 887.378
283.334 888.852
284.036 887.653
284.575 888.607
295.301 888.588
295.848 887.533
296.667 887.361
296.667 888.485
317.606 888.347
317.606 887.303
318.234 887.491
320.045 888.138
329.538 888.57
329.538 887.46
329.538 887.16
331.726 888.102
340.503 887.188
340.546 887.319
341.068 887.897
341.437 888.287
357.909 886.959
358.574 887.646
359.696 888.017
362.204 887.853
363.244 887.299
365.175 888.016
365.175 886.879
373.964 887.134 887.253 887.949 888.002
397.683 886.942
397.683 887.65
397.683 886.748
399.13 887.596
404.935 888.088
404.935 886.661
407.392 887.773
4-13.469 886.746
413.469 887.926
413.469 886.869
415.552 887.656
.- Y?
436.349 887.813
' 436.364
436.913
886.499 886.841
436.991 887.931
443.049 887.757
445.183 886.668
446.119 886.868
449.122 887.798
457.99 887.928
' 459.867 886.813
461.276 886.676
' 461.629
479.115
886.546 887.305
479.115 887.252
479.115 886.756
' 480.771 887.308
492.769 886.144
492.769 887.257
492.769 886.509
495.237 887.161
499.196 887.185
499.196
499.196
886.54 887.16
499.196 886.275
cross section / Bank Profile Locations
Name Type Profile Station
Cross Section 13 - Riffle (R1A, Year 1)Riffle XS 373
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull Slope: 0
variable Min Avg Max
---------------
S riffle -
0 -----------------
0 ----------------------
0
S pool 0 0 0
S run 0 0 0
S glide 0 0 0
P- P 0 0 0
Pool length 0 0 0
Riffle length 0 0 0
Dmax riffle 0 0 0
Dmax pool 0 0 0
Dmax run 0 0 0
Dmax glide 0 0 0
Low bank ht 0 0 0
Length and depth measurements in feet, slopes in ft/ft.
0
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Little white Oak creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: RlA
Profile Name: (Year 1) R1A Long. Profile (STA 0+00 -- 5+00)1
Survey Date: 12/31/2008
DIST Note
---------
0 -------------------------------------------------------------
LEW
97.22 LEW
115.97 LEW
165.933 LEW
177.636 LEW
205.416 LEW
239.09 LEW
244.978 LEW
254.91 LEW
273.715 LEW
284.036 LEW
295.848 LEW
318.234 LEW
329.538 LEW
340.546 LEW
363.244 LEW
373.964 x513 - TW Intersect @ station 373.964
397.683 LEW
413.469 LEW
436.364 LEW
446.119 LEW
459.867 LEW
479.115 LEW
492.769 LEW
499.196 LEW

1
1
1
1
N co
O +
?a.Ln
N O
N CT Q CD
O ( j
J fQ
+
O
(C)
+
LO
i
M
Ln a
N +
Q
U)
N cr
4=- o
O
L
n
? co
O
J
N
U_
mm
L ?
W
x
U
•
O
0
0
0
v
0
0
v
v
0
0
r?
v
N
7
O
7
0
0
v
0
0
0)
M
O
0
M
0
n
Cl)
o ?
O
0
In
m
c
O 0
0
m
o U
o C
M ?
00
N
Co
0
0
M
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
I-
N
0
O
CD
N
O
N
V Ch N O Q? co N
n O
OD mn co W -D m m CD m
b
O + ? _
yea ' Za food - 9 Ugoas s sa3
O?
O
O
O

?

O ?-h
G?
O

a

? o

z
-
- - -
real. zld
o
d c do-[Togs s sojcj -
p
e
0
?O

O ?

L aeal ' Za lood-- Z Uoijoes ss a? 1 0 -
? 0
+
tl
?
O ?

?
? O
? O
4 -
L JeaA
ni 9UH -- l uolloas ssa:5 -

?
O ?
J
(4) UOIJeA813
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
' Reach Na me: R2
Profile Name: (Ye ar 1) R2 Long. Profile ( STA 25+13 -- 45+60)
Survey D ate: 12/ 31/2008
-------- --------- --------- --------------- -----------------------------
' Survey D ata
DIST CH WS BKF LB RB P3 P4
-------- --------- --------- --------------- -----------------------------
2513 869.741
2513.849 874.418
2514.284 871.557
' 2518.555 873.781
2523.697 870.154
2545.662 874.048
' 2548.026 873.69
2548.026 871.521
2548.026 869.824
2568.445 870.65
' 2568.445 871.491
2586.049 874.43
2587.96 871.468
' 2588.323 870.665
2592.202 873.873
2610.537 870.51
' 2610.537 871.383
2637.424 870.558 871.42 873.786 873.803
2685.713 873.949
2688.734 870.462
2688.734 873.833
2689.814 871.248
2715.311 873.878
' 2720.561 870.445
2720.875 873.215
2724.349 871.181
2744.866 873.836
2748.829 869.696
2749.493 873.504
2752.306 871.18
2764.119 871.155
2766.473 868.779
2766.473 873.994
' 2773.694 873.852
2782.605 870.379
2783.639 871.089
2803.733 871.09
2806.415 869.964
2808.145 873-196-
2816.072 873.797
2824.932 873.753
2829.838 870.478
2831.791 873.706
' 2831.844 871.211
2871.889 870.246
2871.889 873.793
' 2872.455 871.293
2882.558 874.213
2909.129 614.43)
2911.839 873.483
2912.202 869.551
2929.616 870.214
2930.093 871.073
2955.318 870.589
2955.318 873.349
2955.401 871.241
2967.13 873.379
2995.814 873.401
3003.571 870.267
3003.976 873.513
3004.908 871.079
3053.903 873.822
3055.617 871.077
3057.756 870.477
3057.756 873.498
3088.215 870.276
3088.215 873.135
3092.693 870.958
3101.037 873.489
3110.016 869.067 870.998 873.303 873.458
3141.232 873.243
3145.092 870.878
3145.913 870.159
3149.068 873.147
3199.709 869.98
3199.737 873.618
3204.248 870.73
3206.51 873.038
3218.594 873.549
3227.71 870.637
3228.086 872.833
3228.086 869.474
3261.793 873.171
3265.347 868.481
3266.262 870.725
3267.499 873.097
3291.994 873.004
3291.994 869.173
3300.001 873.407
3338.602 872.872
3340.272 870.614
3340.852 872.93
3341.601 870.125
3383.74 870.103
3384.116 873.21
3384.726 869.594
3426.832 869.276
3426.832 872.639
3428.963 870.061
3433.888 872.842
3452.787 872:955
3459.426 869.914
3464.621 871.833
3464.621 869.069
3485.677 868.95
3485.677 872.607
3488.704 872.627
3528.102 870.034
3528.324 869.229
3529.176 872.984
3572.293 869.274
3572.293 870.059

G

1

G
1
1

u

n
0
J5%L.z93 6/1.419
3576.748 872.309
3594.75 868.533
3594.75 870.028
3614.704 868.856 870.006 872.346 872.486
3651.82 872.354
3659.121 868.954
3659.531 872.244
3660.078 869.953
3687.058 869.83
3687.058 871.845
3687.058 869.302
3688.891 872.356
3726.846 871.276
3727.983 869.093
3729.485 869.914
3730.534 872.485
3754.555 872.257
3757.015 869.749
3760.788 868.935
3760.896 872.075
3776.667 868.426
3779.441 869.872
3780.434 872.259
3784.861 872.148
3800.827 872.236
3806.004 869.786
3812.2 869.15
3812.492 872.309
3835.424 869.263
3837.525 869.772
3837.805 872.043
3843.893 872.274
3862.689 872.433
3863.221 869.674
3864.912 869.119
3872.856 871.986
3911.713 872.143
3918.364 869.635
3918.422 868.666
3918.422 872.051
3932.844 871.823
3947.068 868.582
3947.641 869.454
3950.453 872.179
3960.232 872.317
3994.006 871.944
3994.008 868.414
3995.294 869.427
3999.273 871.617
4015.932 871.96
4015.932 869.487
4015.932 868.582
4021.377 871.489
4046.851 867.747
4046.882 872.117
4047.067 869.348
4053.5 872.18
4068.858 868.721 869.381 871.966 872.621
4121.678 869.133
4122.145 871.447
4123.004 868.413
4123.004 872.033
4150.446 867.957
4152.595 tsil.4uy
4153.609 869.093
4158.572 871.39
4166.893 869.115
4167.247 867.557
4185.909 871.132
4185.909 868.451
4189.007 868.993
4196.36 871.184
4215.33 871.196
4219.709 869.157
4221.019 868.162
4222.878 871.226
4269.601 871.459
4272.641 868.483
4272.684 869.003
4273.657 871.025
4294.374 870.66
4294.374 867.396
4294.529 869.08
4306.565 871.473
4328.568 871.376
4337.8 870.925
4337.8 867.958
4337.8 869.208
4366.229 871.037
4366.28 869.128
4366.383 868.415
4374.701 871.427
4411.983 871.124
4413.963 869.038
4415.301 868.446
4415.301 871.283
4435.033 870.955
4437.165 869.047
4439.741 868.305
4442.199 871.063
4477.775 867.574
4477.775 871.081
4483.025 869
4490.888 871.002
4516.567 868.068 869.061 870.806 871.564
4529.045 871.965
4534.383 869.032
4537.585 867.999
4537.585 871.192
4553.263 869.014
4554.473 868.277
4578.852 871.104
4585.663 868.328 868.968 871.183
cross section / B ank Profile Loca tions
Name Type
----
----------- Profile station
---------
-----------------
Cross Section 2 - ----------------
Pool (R2, Year ----
1)Pool X S 3110
Cross section 3 - Pool (R2, Year 1)Pool X S 3619
Cross section 4 - Riffle (R2, Year 1)Riff le XS 4076
cross section 5 - Pool (R2, Year 1)Pool X S 4524
Cross section 1 - Riffle (R2, Year 1)Riffle XS 2637
Measurements from Graph
Ban Kruii 5iope: U
' Variable Min Avg Max
--------------
S riffle ----------------
0 ---------------
0 -------------------------
0
S pool 0 0 0
' S run 0 0 0
S glide 0 0 0
P- P
Pool length 0
0 0
0 0
0
Riffle length 0 0 0
Dmax riffle 0 0 0
' Dmax pool 0 0 0
Dmax run 0 0 0
Dmax glide 0 0 0
Low bank ht 0 0 0
Length and dep th measurements in feet, slopes in ft/ft.

' RIVERMOR PH PROFILE SUMM ARY

------------ Notes
--

River Name: ---
-------------
Little White Oak
---------------
Creek (Year 1)
-------------------------
Reach Name: R2
' Profile Name: (Year 1) R2 Long . Profile (STA 25+13 -- 45+60)
survey Date: 12/31/2008
' DIST
Not e
------
-----
2514.284 LEW --
-------------
---------------
-------------------------
' 2548.026 LEW
2568.445 LEW
2587.96 LEW
2610.537 LEW
' 2637.424 XS1 - TW Intersect
2689.814 LEW
2724.349 LEW
' 2752.306 LEW
2764.119 LEW
2783.639 LEW
2803.733 LEW
2831.844 LEW
2872.455 LEW
2930.093 LEW
2955.401 LEW
3004.908 LEW
3055.617 LEW
' 3092.693 LEW
3110.016 xs2 - TW Intersect
3145.092 LEW
3204.248 LEW
3227.71 LEW
3266.262 LEW
3340.272 LEW
' 3383.74 LEW
3428.963 LEW
3459.426 LEW
' 3528.102 LEW
3572.293 LEW
3594.75 LEW
3614.704 X53 - TW Intersect
' 3660.078 LEW
3687.058 LEW
3729.485 LEW
3757.015 LEW
3779.441 LEW
3806.004 LEW
3837.525 LEW
3863.221 LEW
3918.364 LEW
3947.641 LEW
3995.294 LEW
4015.932 LEW
4047.067 LEW
4068.858 Xs4 - Tw Intersect
4121.678 LEW
4153.609 LEW
4166.893 LEW
4189.007 LEW
4219.709 LEW
4272.684 LEW
4337.8 LEW
4366.28 LEW
4413.963 LEW
4437.165 LEW
4483.025 LEW
4516.567 xs5 - Tw Intersect
4534.383 LEW
4553.263 LEW
4585.663 LEW

1
1
Q
N -ca
[r C
O ?
N ?
} CO O
'' J d

N
+ a
M x
I
O
O
IL
Q
CO
\^`/
W
m
Lr- d2
O O
O m
J
?
Q
N
r' Y
m
L ?
W
N
0
2
U

O ?

?

?
? O

O
O

? O

O ? I
i

?
O i
i
I
? Ct
i

O c
c
c

c
CD
co
CD

0
n
(4) U0118A213
O
Ln
co
O
0
0
N
M
O
LI)
0
0
ro
0
m
N
O
N
O
N
O
;D
N
D
n
N
D
N
N
D
N
u
N
O E
m
D a)
L
D U)
D
n O
D N
? U
D
? Q
J
0
i
i
i
i
------- ---------- ---------------- -------- -----------------------------
River N ame: Lit tle White Oak Creek (Yea r 1)
' Reach N ame: R2A
Profile Name: (Ye ar 1) R2A Long. Profile (STA 0+00 -- 3+26)
Survey Date: 12/ 31/2008
------- ---------- ---------------- -------- -----------------------------
' Survey Data
DIST CH WS BKF LB RB P3 P4
-0------ ---------- ---------------- -------- -----------------------------
0 874.525
0 877.364
1.811 877.38
' 2.689 875.913
9.785 877.29
10.058 875.874
' 10.116 875.087
12.689 877.266
22.995 876.605
28.783 876.921
28.783 875.065
28.783 875.798
37.494 876.978
' 37.494 875.768
37.494 875.116
41.118 876.439
' 51.829 876.875
56.163 875.136
57.207 875.297
57.656 876.614
70.82 876.928
72.016 874.083
72.666 875.262
' 72.719 876.912
79.938 875.24
82.116 874.5
' 82.116 876.878
87.787 876.87
96.498 876.692
' 97.679 875.085
98.856 874.423
98.856 876.265
109.795 876.744
' 110.246 876.009
110.38 874.332
111.166 874.917
' 123.656 874.142 874.825 875.602 875.815
145.213 874.024
145.213 874.681
145.213 876.127
146.502 875.843
158.888 875.995
159.075 874.082
' 159.075 874.423
162.296 875.908
176.963 875.411
' 177.619 873.857
177.619 874.254
178.461 875.26-
202.635 875.392
204.948 873.551
205.698 874.734
205.698 872.389
214.389 875.048

219.181
874.191 '
219.181 872.556
221.582 873.387
235.218
874.124 ,
236.704 873.344
238.954 872.484
239.55 874.089 '
263.265 873.297
263.687 872.037
263.687 873.787

264.824
873.534 ,
290.606 873.587
291.201 873.207

291.201 872.12 '
295.406 874.014
313.387 874.118
317.52 872.117 873.176 873.871 '
cross section / Bank Profile L ocations
Name Type Profile station
--------------- '
------------------------------
cross section 6 - Riffle (R2A, -----------
Year 1)Rif --------------
fle XS 123 '
Measurements from Graph
,
Bankfull slope: 0
Min
Variable Avg Max
--------------------- '
------------
--
-------------
S riffle 0 0 -------- ----
---
0
S pool 0 0 0

S run 0
0
0 '
s glide 0 0 0
P- P 0 0 0
Pool length 0 0 0 '
Riffle length 0 0 0
Dmax riffle 0 0 0
Dmax pool 0 0 0

Dmax run 0
0
0 ,
Dmax glide 0 0 0
Low bank ht 0 0 0

Length and depth measurements
in
feet, sl
opes in ft/ft. '
0
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY

Notes
------------------------------ --- -------- -----------------------------
River Name: Little white Oak cr eek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2A

Profile Name: (Year 1) R2A Long.
Profile
(STA 0+00 -- 3+26) '
Survey Date: 12/31/2008
DIST Note
------------------------------
---
--------
----------------------------- '
2.689 LEW
10.058 LEW
28.783 LEW
37.494 LEW
57.207 LEW
72.666 LEW
79.938 LEW
97.679 LEW
111.166 LEW
123.656 X56 -
145.213 LEW
159.075 LEW
177.619 LEW
204.948 LEW
221.582 LEW
236.704 LEW
263.265 LEW
291.201 LEW
317.52 LEW
TW Intersect @ station 123.656
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
co ?,
N _
X = u-)
O co
oIL+
a? F T+
0 U)
3

CO
00
CL
X
M
CF) d
CU
W LO
O o
L
C
O m
J
m
ry
Y
r m
L ?
O
x
U
O
?o

O?
0
j ?
O
? O
d
?o
O?
?o
O?

a?
?o
O
O
?O ?
O? O
?
G O
O

o .
?O
0*
O
O ?

O ?
O
131,
O
O
O

o>
o]
r
co
u
-
- 0
O
co
o> 'CO co co rw r- r
co coco co
(4) UOI?EA913
0
0
0
0
0
?2
E
Y
r ()
0)
O
m
N
U
C
m
N
>
>
0
rn
co
cn
co
K1VEKMOKNH NKOFILt SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------
River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Na me: R2B
Profile Name: (Year 1) R2B Long. Profile (STA 9+35 -- 14+86)
Survey D ate: 12/31/2008
-------- ------------------ --------------- -----------------------------
Survey D ata

DIST CH WS BKF LB RB P3 P4
935 877.62
935 878.365
' 935.913
945.086
878.326 878.724
946.014 877.663
946.014 878.867
' 954.842 878.567
957.596 877.297
957.596 878.618
963.394 877.124
' 963.4 878.656
965.197 878.17
973.138 877.262
' 973.138 878.529
974.319 878.456
985.058 878.355
' 985.663 877.884
986.278 876.835
1000.531 877.622
1000.555 876.908
' 1003.52 877.825
1013.865 877.895
1015.654 876.829
' 1015.799 877.423
1030.21 876.87
1031.601 876.382
' 1032.766 877.467
1040.98 876.777
1040.98 876.029
1043.457 876.921
' 1051.006 876.461
1052.54 875.594
1053.478 876.582
' 1072.95 876.291
1075.166 875.55
1075.166 876.445
' 1086.834 875.834
1086.834 875.061
1088.681 876.148
1095.843 874.839
1095.843 875.727
1097.049 875.94
1102.359 876.245
t 1103.764 874.668
1104.546 875.723
1115.92 876.338
1115.983 874.703
' 1124.348 876.451
1124.348 874.796
1127.954
1133.145 874.611
1133.145
1147.068
1147.371 874.467
1147.709
1163.62 874.072
1163.62
1167.645
1177.155
1179.601
1179.601 874.298
1198.363
1198.363 874.073
1198.713
1208.158
1210.165 873.692
1210.165
1222.636
1225.546 873.887
1226.866
1238.671 873.244
1239.675
1240.112
1252.826
1252.826 872.939
1255.217
1259.72
1263.485
1263.485 872.958
1284.295
1286.902
1286.902 872.429
1292.895
1294.705 872.096
1294.705
1306.975
1309.432 872.563
1309.432
1321.238 872.019
1336.896
1337.11 871.944
1341.606
1348.361
1350.922 871.254
1350.922
1363.852
1365.618 870.311
1365.618
1366.807 870.397
1375.393
1377.408 869.946
1379.89 870.426
1381.049
1384.547
1386.931 870.423
1388.679 870.427
1388.679
1388.679 870.473
1400.433
1400.997
1402.302 870.113
1402.452 870.069
876.288
875.867
875.535
875.76
875.535
875.383
875.317
875.073
874.983
875.033
874.905
874.628
874.507
874.424
874.279
874.181
874.218
873.974
874.006
874.126
873.516
873.676
873.629
873.438
873.251
873.567
872.908 872.951
872.884
872.703
872.258
872.216
871.872
871.339
871.348
871.58
871.514
870.939
871.042
871.254
1410.973 870.027 v 1vvv
' 1410.973 870.077
1414.571 870.876
1423.108 870.505
1426.176 869.691
1426.698 869.855
1426.97 870.356
1461.105 870.604
1462.326 869.483
1462.603 869.279 870.354
Cross section / Bank Profile Locations
Name Type Profile Station
Cross Section 7 - Riffle (R2B, Year 1)Riffle xs 0
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull slope: 0
Variable min Avg Max
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S riffle 0 0 0
S pool 0 0 0
S run 0 0 0
S glide 0 0 0
P- P 0 0 0
Pool length 0 0 0
Riffle length 0 0 0
' Dmax riffle 0 0 0
Dmax pool 0 0 0
Dmax run 0 0 0
' Dmax glide 0 0 0
Low bank ht 0 0 0
Length and depth measurements in feet, slopes in ft/ft.
RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------
' River Name: Little White Oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2B
Profile Name. (Year 1) R2B Long. Profile (STA 9+35 -- 14+86)
Survey Date: 12/31/2008
DIST Note
------------------------------------------------------
' 1321.238 xs7 - TW Intersect
1366.807 LEW
1379.89 LEW
1386.931 LEW
1388.679 LEW
1402.302 LEW
1410.973 LEW
1426.698 LEW
1462.326 LEW
D ?
?`om
°I- N
m o<
o +
J I+
+
VJ
1A_
a
X
00
N
Q a
I-
CO
1-1
4=, co
o Ir
L O
n
c
O m
J J
D ?
N
LL
Y
L m
W

O
U
•
O

O?
O
O

O
O
O
O
?
? O ?f
?O
?
?O
t
? O
? O ?
a

? o
?O
?o

?

?O

O

i I I I I I I I I
M N O 01 co t` (D Lf)
r r r O (D In ED
co c0 co co fA W m 00 00 ro
0
_ co
r-
0
_00
O
O
_ co
N
E
(B
O
C
O
cB
o N
v U
C
CB
N
0
0
_ co
m
0
N
co
co
(4) U0112A913
r\1vF-ixmuKrn rmu 1LC JujvnviHKT
------- ------------------- --------------- -----------------------------
River N ame: Little white oak Creek (Yea r 1)
Reach N ame: R2D
Profile Name: (Year 1) R2D Long. Profile (STA 2+84 --7+79)
Survey Date: 12/31/2008
------- ------------------- --------------- -----------------------------
Survey Data

DIST CH WS BKF LB RB P3 P4
284 869.799
284 870.856
284 870.886
' 288.453 869.66 869.83 870.603 870.698
300.231 869.131
300.231 870.492
301.491 870.974
' 307.295 870.586
307.49 868.745
313.289 870.814
320.13 870.922
321.334 869.738
321.334 870.928
' 336.079 870.64
338.804 870.939
338.804 869.267
353.457 868.828
353.457 870.094
356.651 870.283
365.201 870.591
367.492 869.314
367.492 870.083
382.987 870
052
384.043 869.467 .
385.948 870.079
396.423 869.005
396.423 870.147
400.905 870.094
408.189 870.038
412.129 868.82
' 412.633 869.513
427.154 869.608
430.894 868.314
430.894 869.368
440.226 868.076
440.226 869.43
443.545 869.605
454.098 869.237
455.264 868.348
455.607 868.833
472.269 869.022
473.16 869.126
473.488 868.06
480.597 868.834
483.18 866.976
486.727 869.069
494.317 867.608
' 494.317 868.651
496.411 any.vvy
510.023 867.452
510.126 868.389
511.494 868.382
521.519 868.085
525.384 866.755
525.384 867.826
538.798 866.674
538.798 867.65
540.771 868.32
558.311 867.696
559.985 866.691
560.295 867.718
568.452 867.56
568.452 865.716
572.372 867.432
583.284 867.06
585.995 865.774
586.849 866.781
604.225 866.317
606.366 865.32
607.741 866.212
619.492 865.259
619.492 866.287
622.991 866.477
633.904 865.346
633.904 866.091
639.151 866.379
647.999 866.15
652.843 866.039
652.843 865.16
661.793 866.248
662.914 865.985
663.104 865.114
676.118 866.371
676.118 865.061
678.559 866.185
683.265 865.529
685.837 865.977
685.837 864.794
694.384 864.645
695.36 866.257
695.861 865.893
708.52 864.589
708.52 865.404
710.939 865.76
719.257 865.547
720.816 865.356
720.816 864.268
738.832 865.464
746.465 865.589
746.465 863.948
cross se ction / Bank Profile Locations
Name Type
--- Profile station
-
cross se ----------------
ction 8 - Riffle (R2D, --------
Year 1)Rif fle Xs 288
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull slope: 0
V Cl I i au i s ri I i i H V 9 IVIdX

' --------------
S riffle --
0 -----------------
0 -------------------------------------
0
S pool 0 0 0
S run 0 0 0
S glide 0 0 0
P- P 0 0 0
Pool length 0 0 0
Riffle length 0 0 0
' Dmax riffle 0 0 0
Dmax pool 0 0 0
Dmax run 0 0 0
' Dmax glide 0 0 0
Low bank ht 0 0 0
Length and dep th measurements in feet, slopes in ft/ft.
o
' RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2D
Profile Name: (Year 1) R2D Long. Profile (STA 2+84 --7+79)
Survey Date: 12/31/2008
DIST Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------
288.453 XS8 - Tw Intersect
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
N
C
L1.
C
N
U
a
(Year 1) R1 Reachwide Pebble Count
0
iu 1uu 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
? (Year 1) R1 Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
¦ (Year 0) R1 Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------------------
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R1
' Sample Name: Reachwide Pe bble Count (R1)
Survey Date: 09/25/2008
---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------------------
size (mm)
---------------- TOT #
---------------- ITEM %
----------- CUM
---------------------------
0 - 0.062 19 19.00 19.00
0.062 - 0.125 0 0.00 19.00
0.125 - 0.25 37 37.00 56.00
0.25 - 0.50 14 14.00 70.00
0.50 - 1.0 30 30.00 100.00
1.0 - 2.0 0 0.00 100.00
2.0 - 4.0 0 0.00 100.00
4.0 - 5.7 0 0.00 100.00
5.7 - 8.0 0 0.00 100.00
8.0 - 11.3 0 0.00 100.00
11.3 - 16.0 0 0.00 100.00
16.0 - 22.6 0 0.00 100.00
' 22.6 - 32.0 0 0.00 100.00
32 - 45 0 0.00 100.00
45 - 64 0 0.00 100.00
64 - 90 0 0.00 100.00
' 90 - 128 0 0.00 100.00
128 - 180 0 0.00 100.00
180 - 256 0 0.00 100.00
' 256 - 362 0 0.00 100.00
362 - 512 0 0.00 100.00
512 - 1024 0 0.00 100.00
1024 - 2048 0 0.00 100.00
' Bedrock 0 0.00 100.00
D16 (mm) 0.05
D35 (mm) 0.18
D50 (mm) 0.23
D84 (mm) 0.73
' D95 (mm) 0.92
D100 (mm) 1
Silt/Clay (%) 19
sand M 81
' Gravel (%) 0
cobble (%) 0
Boulder (%) 0
' Bedrock (%) 0
Total Particles = 100.

1
1
(Year 1) R1A Reachwide Pebble Count
(Year 1) R1A Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
tv
C
IL
C
N
U
4)
D-
(Year 0) R1A Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
U.U i U.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY

River Name:
Reach Name:
Sample Name:
Survey Date:
creek (Year 1)
Count (R1A)
Little white oak
R1A
Reachwide Pebble
09/25/2008
------------------- -------------- ---------- ------------------
' Size (mm)
------------------- TOT #
-------------- ITEM %
---------- cum
---------------------------
0 - 0.062 34 68.00 68.00
0.062 - 0.125 0 0.00 68.00
' 0.125 - 0.25 5 10.00 78.00
0.25 - 0.50 4 8.00 86.00
0.50 - 1.0 7 14.00 100.00
1.0 - 2.0 0 0.00 100.00
' 2.0 - 4.0 0 0.00 100.00
4.0 - 5.7 0 0.00 100.00
5.7 - 8.0
8.0 - 11.3 0
0 0.00
0.00 100.00
100.00
11.3 - 16.0 0 0.00 100.00
16.0 - 22.6 0 0.00 100.00
22.6 - 32.0 0 0.00 100.00
32 - 45 0 0.00 100.00
45 - 64 0 0.00 100.00
64 - 90 0 0.00 100.00
' 90 - 128 0 0.00 100.00
128 - 180 0 0.00 100.00
' 180 - 256
256 - 362 0
0 0.00
0.00 100.00
100.00
362 - 512 0 0.00 100.00
512 - 1024 0 0.00 100.00
' 1024 - 2048 0 0.00 100.00
Bedrock 0 0.00 100.00
D16 (mm) 0.02
' D35 (mm) 0.03
D50 (mm) 0.05
' D84 (mm)
D95 (mm) 0.44
0.82
D100 (mm) 1
Silt/Clay (%) 68
Sand (%) 32
Gravel (%) 0
cobble (%) 0
Boulder (%) 0
Bedrock (%) 0
Total Particles = 50 (need at least 60).
1

1
1
(Year 1) R2 Reachwide Pebble Count
(Year 1) R2 Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
N
C
lL
C
a)
U
Q)
CL
(Year D) R2 Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
0 L
.Ui U.-i i tU 1D0 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------------------
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2
Sample Name: Reachwide Pe bble Count (R2)
Survey Date: 09/25/2008
---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------------------
Size (mm)
---------------- TOT #
---------------- ITEM %
----------- CUM
---------------------------
0 - 0.062 30 30.00 30.00
0.062 - 0.125 0 0.00 30.00
0.125 - 0.25 20 20.00 50.00
0.25 - 0.50 20 20.00 70.00
0.50 - 1.0 27 27.00 97.00
1.0 - 2.0 0 0.00 97.00
' 2.0 - 4.0 0 0.00 97.00
4.0 - 5.7 0 0.00 97.00
5.7 - 8.0 0 0.00 97.00
8.0 - 11.3 0 0.00 97.00
11.3 - 16.0 2 2.00 99.00
16.0 - 22.6 1 1.00 100.00
22.6 - 32.0 0 0.00 100.00
32 - 45 0 0.00 100.00
45 - 64 0 0.00 100.00
64 - 90 0 0.00 100.00
' 90 - 128 0 0.00 100.00
128 - 180 0 0.00 100.00
180 - 256 0 0.00 100.00
' 256 - 362 0 0.00 100.00
362 - 512 0 0.00 100.00
512 - 1024 0 0.00 100.00
1024 - 2048 0 0.00 100.00
' Bedrock 0 0.00 100.00
D16 (mm) 0.03
D35 (mm) 0.16
D50 (mm) 0.25
D84 (mm) 0.76
' D95 (mm) 0.96
D100 (mm) 22.6
Silt/Clay (%) 30
Sand (%) 67
Gravel (%) 3
Cobble (%) 0
Boulder (%) 0
Bedrock (%) 0
Total Particles = 100.
(Year 1) R2A Reachwide Pebble Count
A (Year 1) R2A Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
U
C_
LL
C
N
U
0]
0-
M (Year 0) R2A Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
v.v 1 1U 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------------------
River Name:
Reach Name: Little white
R2A oak Creek (Year 1)
sample Name: Reachwide Pe bble Count (R2A)
Survey Date: 09/25/2008
---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------------------
size (mm)
---------------- TOT #
------------ ITEM % CUM

0 -0.062 ----
14 -----------
28.00 ---------------------------
28.00

' 0.062 - 0.125
0.125 - 0.25 0
12 0.00
24.00 28.00
52.00
0.25 - 0.50 4 8.00 60.00
0.50 - 1.0 11 22.00 82.00
1.0 - 2.0 0 0.00 82.00
2.0 - 4.0 0 0.00 82.00
4.0 - 5.7 0 0.00 82.00
5.7 - 8.0 0 0.00 82.00
8.0 - 11.3 1 2.00 84.00
11.3 - 16.0 2 4.00 88.00
16.0 - 22.6 1 2.00 90.00
' 22.6 - 32.0 1 2.00 92.00
32 - 45 4 8.00 100.00
45 - 64 0 0.00 100.00
64 - 90 0 0.00 100.00
90 - 128 0 0.00 100.00
128 - 180 0 0.00 100.00
180 - 256 0 0.00 100.00
' 256 - 362 0 0.00 100.00
362 - 512 0 0.00 100.00
512 - 1024 0 0.00 100.00
1024 - 2048 0 0.00 100.00
Bedrock 0 0.00 100.00
D16 (mm) 0.04
' D35 (mm) 0.16
D50 (mm) 0.24
D84 (mm) 11.3
' D95 (mm) 36.88
D100 (mm) 45
silt/Clay (%) 28
' sand (%) 54
Gravel (%) 18
cobble (%) 0
Boulder (%) 0
Bedrock M 0
Total Particles = 50 (need at least 60).
1
1
1
1
1
1
C
!L
U
4)
t1
(Year 1) R213 Reachwide Pebble Count
(Year 1) R213 Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
(Year 0) R26 Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
u.ul u.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------------------------
River Name: Little white oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2B
' sample Name: Reachwide Pebble Count (R2B)
survey Date: 09/25/2008
----------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------------------
Size (mm) TOT # ITEM % CUM %
0 - 0.062 40 80.00 80.00
0.062 - 0.125 0 0.00 80.00
0.125 - 0.25 0 0.00 80.00
' 0.25 - 0.50 4 8.00 88.00
0.50 - 1.0 6 12.00 100.00
1.0 - 2.0
2.0 - 4.0 0
0 0.00
0.00 100.00
100.00
4.0 - 5.7 0 0.00 100.00
5.7 - 8.0 0 0.00 100.00
' 8.0 - 11.3 0 0.00 100.00
11.3 - 16.0 0 0.00 100.00
16.0 - 22.6 0 0.00 100.00
22.6 - 32.0 0 0.00 100.00
' 32 - 45 0 0.00 100.00
45 - 64 0 0.00 100.00
64 - 90 0 0.00 100.00
' 90 - 128 0 0.00 100.00
128 - 180 0 0.00 100.00
180 - 256 0 0.00 100.00
' 256 - 362 0 0.00 100.00
362 - 512 0 0.00 100.00
512 - 1024 0 0.00 100.00
1024 - 2048 0 0.00 100.00
' Bedrock 0 0.00 100.00
D16 (mm) 0.01
' D35 (mm) 0.03
D50 (mm) 0.04
D84 (mm) 0.38
D95 (mm) 0.79
D100 (mm) 1
Silt/Clay (%) 80
sand (%) 20
' Gravel (%) 0
cobble (%) 0
Boulder (%) 0
' Bedrock (%) 0
Total Particles = 50 (need at least 60).
1

1
1

(Year 1) R21D Reachwide Pebble Count
A (Year 1) R2D Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
C_
j
C
N
' U
N
(Year D) R2D Reachwide Pebble
Count (PC)
10000
lu 100 100D
Particle Size (mm)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
----------------- --------------- ----------- ---------------------------
River Name: Little white Oak Creek (Year 1)
Reach Name: R2D
' sample Name: Reachwide Pe bble Count (R2D)
Survey Date: 09/25/2008
----------------- --------------- ----------- ---------------------------
size (mm) TOT # ITEM % CUM
----------------- --------------- ----------- ---------------------------
0 - 0.062 24 48.00 48.00
0.062 - 0.125 0 0.00 48.00
0.125 - 0.25 9 18.00 66.00
' 0.25 - 0.50 14 28.00 94.00
0.50 - 1.0 3 6.00 100.00
1.0 - 2.0 0 0.00 100.00
2.0 - 4.0 0 0.00 100.00
4.0 - 5.7 0 0.00 100.00
5.7 - 8.0 0 0.00 100.00
8.0 - 11.3 0 0.00 100.00
11.3 - 16.0 0 0.00 100.00
16.0 - 22.6 0 0.00 100.00
22.6 - 32.0 0 0.00 100.00
' 32 - 45 0 0.00 100.00
45 - 64 0 0.00 100.00
64 - 90
90 - 128 0
0 0.00
0.00 100.00
100.00
128 - 180 0 0.00 100.00
180 - 256 0 0.00 100.00
256 - 362 0 0.00 100.00
362 - 512 0 0.00 100.00
512 - 1024 0 0.00 100.00
1024 - 2048 0 0.00 100.00
' Bedrock 0 0.00 100.00
D16 (mm)
D35 (mm) 0.02
0.05
D50 (mm) 0.14
D84 (mm) 0.41
D95 (mm) 0.58
D100 (mm) 1
Silt/Clay (%) 48
Sand (%) 52
Gravel (%) 0
Cobble (%) 0
' Boulder (%)
Bedrock (%) 0
0

Total Particles = 50 (need at le ast 60).

1
I?LO0)r ?cO 0 0or'
u
N O
c LO N
N CO
r U) N M N -,;r
?- L
N N
?JOdX??
?uawipaS L
O Co co 'IT CD Cn co CD M
10 C r ? ? ?

?.we
N
nnq-??1L?ajs=' w
G

01t

to
w
?
4
? m
w+ i ;tom
w ?
co w1 ? o
a apv

0 0 ?;

o °
U)
?-
? v- " ch
CQ ?ti ?
? S
W
U)

t 19
p k O O
Q C C)
X
W U
6

c O
Q u
w ?
N
CO
CU L '
0 0 0 1=1 O O
0 1

co
= J ? v' r,? 00 U? rn
6 co CD m

CA co U) t- co U
CO r r
O CA to co Ul O

Ctt co CO O
r
O
Cn
Lo
LCj

ze. LO
to
C)
m
0
co OD
? 0)
?
?
r-
CO
Q

L
(V L

Q co ? J Q co U ?
? ? ? N N N N N N

c
0
U
N
c
O
U

Q
O
N
'IT
N
r
t
R t

C ?
o
r

?
en a
C
C

a O

U U
Y ?
N
0 O
Z

C
7
O
' O U
Y
J
O
d
ai ai
'
E
+
m
m v
Z cn
'
u
d ?
O ?

o- U

U m
ca ? t?
? ? r r r r Q r r Q Q Q
0
c
nn
d ''
d V
V

W

f4 O O O O O O O O O O

d'
m O O O O O O O O O -)
d
}
M
m O O O O O O O O O O

i }
I
N
L
I m O O O O O O O O O O

}
O
Q L
O M r r r r O r r O 0 `. O
N }
00
O
O O O O O O O O O O O
N }
O ~ O
0
0 N lf) (p
C. = LO N
ti r- (D m O

0 R

N
ao
0
0
O
c4
. ? ao 00 0o N o0 0o a0 00

E-' LU
o

"t C) C) C) 0 0 co

(D N Lo m co 0) (0

tai m

C? m
W

G

CA r N C+7 "T in c0 r,- co rn O
3
fC
I

11
1
1
A
CU
U CU
C
`co ?. r r r r O r r 0
NU
L)
X
W
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
T
r _O 0 0 _a O _O _O _O O
O _O _O O O O _O O _O O
T O O N CD (V O N N
-0 n n -0 -0 n -0
? o _O _O _O _O o _O _O O
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ O
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
ti o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
n.n-0 -0 -0 .0 .0
C7'
N
m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
(1 N 6 N O O N N N
m
?' X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
m -0 m wm -0 -0 .0 V
m
:X
W
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
? O N? d N d? N
l0
m
Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 _O O O
N N O N O Cu N 0
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
N N? N N? N N
mmnm _omm
N co y y O co
0 o a n 3 -o -0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
76
d N d O O O O O M
W r 0 C0 r CM I- C? C)
LL c0 N LO co CO O (O
co N ? ti I- O co m
? ?-- N M 'ct (f7 O ti aO
eo
(9

N
'm
U
C O
m C.
kx ?
W co
4-
a
0
z'