20061152 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20090212

6,1151)-.,
Year 2 Monitoring Report for Stream Restoration of
Silver Creek and Unnamed Tributaries
Burke County, NC
SCO # D05016-01

Prepared for:
NCDENR - EEP
2728 Capital Blvd, Suite 1H 103
Raleigh NC 27604
1 )syst a'll
Submitted: December 2008

RECEIVED
UEi, 2 9 2008
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
•
Prepared by:
Wetlands Resource Center
3970 Bowen Road
Canal Winchester, Ohio 43110
Project Manager: Cal Miller
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
And
0
EMH&T, Inc.
5500 New Albany Road
Columbus, Ohio 43054
Project Manager: Miles F. Hebert, PE
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
Main: [phone]
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
Engineers. Surveyors, Planners, Scientists
0
• Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................1
Il. Project Background ..................................................................................................................2
A. Location and Setting
B. Project Structure, Mitigation Type, Approach and Objectives
C. Project History and Background
D. Monitoring Plan View
HI. Project Condition and Monitoring Results ........................................
16
A. ..................................
Vegetation Assessment
1. Soil Data
2. Vegetative Problem Areas
3. Vegetative Problem Areas Plan View
4. Stem Counts
5. Vegetation Plot Photos
B. Stream Assessment
1. Hydrologic Criteria
2. Stream Problem Areas
3. Stream Problem Areas Plan View
4. Stream Problem Areas Photos
5. Fixed Station Photos
6. Stability Assessment
• 7. Quantitative Measures
IV. Methodology .................
............................................................................................................22
List of Tables
Table I. Project Structure Table
Table 11. Project Mitigation Objectives Table
Table III. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table IV. Project Contact Table
Table V. Project Background Table
Table VI. Preliminary Soil Data
Table VII. Vegetative Problem Areas
Table VIII. Stem Counts for Each Species Arranged by Plot
Table IX. Stream Problem Areas
Table X. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Table XI. Baseline Geomorphic and Hydraulic Summary
LJ
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page i
List of Ap
• A pendices
ppendix A Vegetation Raw Data
1. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
2. Vegetation Data Tables
Appendix B Geomorphologic Raw Data
1. Stream Problem Areas Plan View
2. Stream Problem Area Photos
3. Fixed Station Photos
4. Table B1. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
5. Cross Section Plots
6. Longitudinal Plots
7. Pebble Count Plots
•
• Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page ii
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• The Silver Creek stream restoration project is located near Morganton in Burke County, North
Carolina. Prior to restoration, channelization and cattle intrusion resulted in vegetative denuding
and bank destabilization due to hoof shear. The vertical to undercut unstable streambanks were
contributing large volumes of suspended sediment and bedload material to the larger Silver Creek
watershed. The project reach includes the restoration of 2,905 linear feet of the Silver Creek
mainstem and 1,552 linear feet of an unnamed tributary (UTA); also included is 166 linear feet of
preservation along UTB, UTC and UTD. Restoration of the project streams, completed during
April 2007, re-established geomorphologic features consistent with natural stream channel
characteristics. Elements of the restoration included stable channel pattern, profile and dimension
consistent with reference reach conditions quantified within the Silver Creek watershed, upstream
from the project on Brindle Creek. In-stream structures were constructed to provide grade control,
streambank stabilization and aquatic habitat features. Restoration reconnected project stream
channels to functional floodplains with extensive riparian plantings The following report
documents the Year 2 Annual Monitoring for this project.
Vegetative monitoring was completed in September 2008 following the Carolina Vegetation
Survey methodology. Stem counts completed at ten (10) vegetation plots show an average density
of 300 stems per acre for the site. This density falls below the success criteria of 320 stems/acre
after three years of monitoring. Six individual plots have stem densities below the minimum; four
of these plots were located along the Unnamed Tributary, where seedling survivability ranged
from 22% to 60%. The overall Year 2 stem counts represent 69% survival from the initial
plantings. It is believed that the presence of large trees and the well-developed existing vegetative
cover along the tributary is providing substantial competition for the seedlings. It is
recommended that remedial plantings be conducted using larger woody stock, which should be
• better able to compete for resources in existing vegetative cover.
Visual stream stability assessment, conducted by EMH&T during September 8, 2008 revealed in-
stream structures are functioning as designed and built on Silver Creek mainstem and Unnamed
Tributary A (UTA). Point bars are well developed along inside meander bends on the mainstem.
Cross-vanes, J-hook vanes, log vane - J-Hook - root wad combination structures, rock vanes,
dual-winged jetties, rock-toe channel protection, constructed riffles, step pools and rootwad bank
stabilization structures are functioning as designed and built. Deep pools with excellent glide
features, comprised of well sorted gravels, are present throughout the restored mainstem reach.
Constructed riffles remain stable, with median particle distributions ranging from fine to very
coarse gravel. The substrate in the pools also remained stable, with median particle distributions
ranging from fine sand to fine gravel. Despite extreme drought and low flow conditions during
2008, the active channels are appropriately sized and are entraining their bedload. Based on the
crest gage network installed on the project reaches, no bankfull events were recorded since
construction was completed during April 2007. Remedial maintenance work on the mainstem is
neither warranted nor planned at this time. A few isolated areas on UTA are exhibiting bank
scour that will be addressed via live stem plantings during the Year 3 spring planting season.
In addition to the monitoring protocol required by EEP, additional monitoring has been required
by the NC DWQ under the Section 401 permit issued for the project on May 25, 2007.
Vegetation monitoring found that the average stem density for the combined tributaries exceeds
the minimum criteria of 320 stems per acre. Stream monitoring found no stability problems along
these tributaries.
• Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page 1
• IL PROJECT BACKGROUND
A. Location and Setting
The project is located approximately 3,000 feet east of Dysartsville Road and approximately
2,500 feet south of Patton Road, west of the City of Morganton, in Burke County, North Carolina
as shown on Figure 1. The stream channels included in this project are the Silver Creek
mainstem and four unnamed tributary streams designated UTA, UTB, UTC and UTD.
The directions to the project site are as follows:
From I-40, exit at Exit 94 and travel south along Dysartsville Road and turn left (east)
onto Seven Springs Lane. The project spans properties owned separately by Mr. and Mrs.
Frank Queen and Mr. and Mrs. Richard Conway (Seven Springs Farms, Inc.).
B. Project Structure, Mitigation Type, Approach and Objectives
Pre-restoration land use surrounding the project streams included active cattle pasture land along
the Silver Creek mainstem. The pre-existing riparian corridor along Silver Creek, including UTB,
UTC and UTD, varied from wide to denuded within the project area. The wide portion consisted
of a mature forested corridor, while narrow and denuded areas were the result of a recent pine
beetle infestation. Active pasture is located to the east and west of UTA. A sparsely wooded
corridor is present along the reach and has been maintained. Typical species observed along the
streams and adjacent forested areas include Pinus taeda (loblolly pine), Platanus occidentalis
• (sycamore) and Ilex opaca (American holly).
Prior to restoration, agricultural land use and channel incision had altered the Silver Creek
mainstem throughout the project reach, resulting in an unstable Rosgen F4 stream type. The
incised nature of the channel was attributed to channelization and cattle intrusion, which resulted
in vegetative denuding and bank destabilization due to hoof shear. The Silver Creek channel's
unstable width to depth ratio, entrenchment ratio, relatively flat average profile slope and poorly
defined active streambed resulted in a deeply incised channel disconnected from its floodplain.
Mid-channel, lateral, and transverse sand and gravel bar deposits were observed at locations
throughout the reach, demonstrating the stream lacked stable pattern, profile and dimension to
entrain its bedload. The locations of these depositional features in the near bank region deflected
flows from the center of the channel toward the incised vertical to undercut streambanks,
accelerating streambank erosion. It is estimated that approximately 5,570 cubic yards per year (or
6,980 tons per year) of sediment was being eroded from the unstable streambanks along the
impaired mainstem reach into the Silver Creek watershed prior to restoration.
The UTA channel was a classic Type I valley confined, Al-A2 stream type transitioning to a Type
II colluvial valley, B4 stream type in the lower third of the impaired reach. The upper two-thirds
of the reach exhibited some bedrock control, in-stream boulders together with flood placed woody
debris from leaning or fallen trees along the unstable, steep to undercut streambanks. The
impaired riparian vegetative communities were exacerbating streambank erosion rates and down-
slope movement of colluvium. Cattle intrusion had adversely impacted the entire tributary as
evidenced by vegetative denuding and bank failure attributed to hoof shear. Agricultural land use
• Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek 2008
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Monitoring Year 2 of S
Page 2
(pastureland) adjacent to the stream corridor and uncontrolled cattle access to the stream for
watering and shade resulted in unstable, steep to undercut streambanks, and accelerated severe to
• extreme streambank erosion. The unstable streambanks were contributing large volumes of
suspended sediment and bedload material to the larger Silver Creek watershed. It was estimated
290 cubic yards per year (or 375 tons per year) of sediment was being eroded from the unstable
streambanks along UTA prior to restoration.
The mitigation goals and objectives for the project streams were met by restoring physical and
biological functions of the project reaches beyond pre-existing conditions. Pre-restoration
conditions consisted of impaired, channelized, eroding and entrenched stream channels. The
mitigation goals and objectives were met by providing the attributes described below.
• Stable stream channels with features inherent of a diverse aquatic and riparian ecosystem
• Restored connections between the bankfull width and floodprone width of the channels by
restoring the floodprone area
• Improved physical aquatic habitat features
• Minimization of existing land use impacts on the stream
• Long-term protection of the stream corridors via a perpetual conservation easement
conveyed to the State of North Carolina.
Restoration of the project streams re-established geomorphologic features consistent with
reference reach conditions. Results achieved are listed below.
• Bankfull channels constructed with the appropriate geometries to convey bankfull flows
and transport suspended sediment and bedload materials available to the streams
• Stable channel pattern, profile and dimension consistent with natural streams in the
• region
• Grade control and bank stabilization in-stream structures, such as cross vanes, J-hook
vanes, rock vanes, dual-winged jetties, constructed riffles, step pools, root wad
revetment, rock-toe channel protection that enhance environmental attributes of the
stream channels though the use of natural materials
• Reconnection of project stream channels to functional floodplains
• Extensive indigenous riparian plantings
The primary, pre-existing land use within the immediate project site was agricultural. Based on
photographic interpretation, the site has been historically utilized for agricultural row crop
production and hayland. It is likely the project site has been farmed since early colonial times.
The site was degraded by past land management practices including mechanical land clearing,
straightening and dredging the stream channels. Silver Creek was one of the first streams in North
Carolina to be mined for precious metals and gem stones. The project site was most recently
utilized to produce hay for livestock feed. The stream banks were denuded and actively eroding,
with vertical to undercut streambanks. Vegetative cover was minimal along the stream corridor,
resulting in streambank erosion, channel incision leading to entrenchment and over widening.
The channels were deeply incised state and laterally confined. Prior to restoration, the floodplain
was functioning as an abandoned terrace perched above the bankfull elevation.
The project restoration goal was to restore channel dimension, pattern, and profile to stable and
self-maintaining conditions utilizing natural channel design methods and techniques. Physical
• Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of S
EEP Contract # D05016--01 Page 3
restoration and water quality improvements were accomplished by meeting the restoration goals
and objectives below:
• Constructed channels with the appropriate cross-sectional dimension, pattern, and
longitudinal profile based on reference reach boundary conditions
• Improve and create bedform and aquatic habitat features (riffles, runs, pools, and glides)
• Integrated a Priority Level H restoration approach creating a floodprone area (bankfull
bench) connected to the bankfull channel elevation and raised the streambed elevations,
reconnecting the bankfull elevation to the existing floodplain elevation
• Restored channel and streambank stability by integrating in-stream grade control
structures, root wads, and native revetment while also creating stable and functional
aquatic and terrestrial habitat
• Established a native forested plant community within the newly constructed and protected
riparian corridor. Eradicate exotic vegetation and protect the riparian corridor with a
perpetual conservation easement
• Provide aesthetic and educational opportunities.
Restoration of the streams has met the objective of the project along both the Silver Creek
mainstem and UTA, providing the desired habitat and stability features required to improve and
enhance the ecologic health of the streams for the long-term. Specifically, the completed
restoration project has accomplished the items listed below.
Silver Creek Mainstem:
• Reversed the effects of channel incision and entrenchment using a Priority Level H
restoration approach. The restoration has increased the median width/depth ratios
from 5.36 to 40.22 after construction completion and 2 years of monitoring.
• Restored natural stream pattern, profile and dimension throughout the 2,959 l.f.
mainstem reach, decreasing channel sinuosity from 1.46 to 1.40, while creating a
stable relationship between valley, channel, water surface and bankf ill slopes.
• Stabilized eroding streambanks by providing an appropriately sized channel with
stable streambank slopes using a combination of embedded stone, natural fabrics and
aggressive native streamside and riparian revetment. The average Bank Height Ratio
has been decreased from 1.95 (deeply incised) to 1.00 (stable) in Year 2.
• Provided a re-connection between the restored stream bankfull elevation and
floodprone area (Priority Level 11 restoration). The completed restoration changed
the average entrenchment ratio from <1.4 to 1.8, and restored the pre-existing
unstable, incised and entrenched F4 stream channel to a stable B4c stream type
(Rosgen, 1994).
• Created instream aquatic habitat features including deep pools; rootwad streamside
fish cover and streambank stabilization, constructed riffles, rock cross vanes, J-Hook
rock vanes, log vane - J-Hook - root wad combination structures with deep pools.
and native streamside revetment to enhance outer meander bend stability, shade the
pools, provide fish cover and lower water temperature.
• Revegetated the streambanks and riparian corridor with indigenous canopy and mid-
story trees, shrubs and herbaceous ground cover.
• Preserved the riparian corridor within a fenced, perpetual conservation easement
conveyed to the State of North Carolina.
• Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek 2008
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Monitoring Year 2 of S
Page 4
Unnamed Tributary A (UTA):
• • Reversed the effects of channelization utilizing Priority Level II natural channel
design restoration techniques. The average width/depth ratio of the restored stream
channel was increased from < 12 to 17.1.
• Restored natural stream pattern, profile and dimension throughout the 1,552 l.f
stream reach providing a more stable relationship between the Rosgen Type H Valley
(Rosgen, 1994) slope and bankfull channel slopes.
• Stabilized vertical to undercut, eroding streambanks by constructing an appropriately
sized channel with stable streambank slopes. The average Bank Height Ratio was
decreased from 1.91 (deeply incised) to 1.00 (stable).
• Raised the streambed elevation by constructing appropriately spaced step-pools and
riffle sequences, decreasing near-bank shear stress from 1.68 to 1.30 lb/sq ft.
• Restoration increased the average entrenchment ratio from < 1.4 to 1.84 restoring the
unstable, incised and entrenched A4 stream type to a stable B4a stream type
(Rosgen, 1994).
• Created instream aquatic habitat features including step-pools, log sills, streambank
slope stabilization, constructed riffles, rock sills and rock toe channel protection.
• Revegetated stabilized streambanks and the riparian corridor with indigenous
canopy, mid-story, shrubs and herbaceous plant species, where deficient.
• Preserved the riparian corridor within a fenced, perpetual conservation easement
conveyed to the State of North Carolina.
Information on the project structure and objectives is included in Tables I and H.
• Table I. Project Structure Table
Silver Creek Stream Restoration / EEP Project No. D05016-01
rrojecr aegment/Reach ID
Silver Creek Mainstem
Unnamed Tributary A (UTA)
Unnamed Tributary B (UTB)
--------------
Unnamed Tributary C (UTC)
Unnamed Tributary D (UTD)
TOTAL
Linear Footage or
2,905 ft
1,552 ft
66 ft
48 ft
52 ft
4,623 ft
is Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
Monitoring Report -Silver Creek December 2008
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract #D05016-01 Page 5
i
i
ATTO
i
/V
-
0

- E _
PINN
CHURCH -,
-
-- - - -- -
-- - Queen H. Frank
& Sarah M. ---
Map: 89 Page: 38 Blk. Lot: 4 7U -
Deed Reference: Bk
222 P
654 -- -- --
.
g.
-- ELK
\- COURT
?.

OB T
i
F
- -
F
-
?
- - --- SEVEN -- --- - -- ---
a --- ?_- _- SPRINGS -
- -?-. - LANE - --
j Conway Elizabeth ,
- B
T
t
--
.
rus
ee
-- Map: 89 Page: 38 i<..
POLLARD
Bik. Lot: 4 13 ?i
PATTON Deed Reference: DOE --- \
ROAD Bk. 1111 Pg. 995 COURT

Seven Springs
Farm Inc.
- Map: 89 Page: 38 Bik. Lot: 4 10U
Deed Reference: Bk. 1083 Pg. 924
-?

I
U)

~ -
?
A
s -
N
QO
? ON ?
5
RR\
?
Mo

BURKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SILVER CREEK RESTORATION Y
FIGURE 1: SITE VICINITY MAP r4d
N.C. ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. Milos stem
~ Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists E an?'eem
Date: December, 2008 PRa?va
Not To Scale
• S. Table 7I.
>;Iver project
Project Creek Stream Resto?tion /on Ohjectives Tab
Reach ID entl M Linear EEP pro •ect No. D05016-01
Mitigation Foot Silver re T e
reek P"Ority Acrage or
Mitigation
Itlae tem re 2 ea a Restoration 2,905 Ratio Mitigation
UTA PrioritY2 ft 10 Units
Comment
Restoration 1,552 ft 2905 ft Restore di
UTB mension,
Preservation 1.0 atte
66 ft 1,552 ft Resto e, ?d rofle
UTC dimension
Prese 5.0 attern, and ,
rofle
rvation 13 ft p reserved
48 ft
UTD within the
5.0 conservation
Preservation 10 ft Preserved easement
TOTAL 52 ft within the
5.0 conservation
4,623 ft 10 ft Preserved easement
C. Project Histo
ry and within the
4,490 ft conservation easement Project activi Background
ty and re
provided in Table porting history are
N• TheprOject back provided in Table III The project ln'°und history is provided in Table contact info
able V. rmation is
Table III Project Activi History
t
Silver Creek Stream Restoration / and Reporting
• EEP Pro'eC g
No. D05016-01
Activi or e port scheduled Actual
Restoration Jan COT 116011 Data Collection Com fete Completion
Au 2005 or Delive
Final Desi - 90%? - Feb 2006 Ma 2006
Construction Feb 2006 --
Temporary S&E applied to N/A
A r2007
entire project areal Feb 2006 N/A
Permanent lantin s A r 2006 A r2007
rvrttatton plan/As-built Jun N/A A r2007
2006 Ma 2007
Year 1 monitorin Sep 2007 (vegetation) Se 2007
2007 Nov 2007
eomo holo Jan 2008
Year 2 monitorin 2008 Sep 2008 (vegetation)
Year 3 monitor, 2009 9 Dec 2008 eomo holo
Dec 2008
Year 4 monitorin
Year 5 monitorin 2010
'Full-deliv 2011
ery project;
Z 90% submittal not provided.
Erosion and sediment control applied incrementally
N/A: Data collection is not an throughout the course of
applicable task for these project activities. the project.
• Evans, Mechwart, IIambleton & Tilton
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek , Inc. December 2008
EEP Contract # D05016--01
Monitoring Year 2 ofS
Page 7
•
•
? J
Table II. Project Mitigation Objectives Table
Silver Creek Stream Restoration / EEP Project No. D05016-01
Project Linear
Segment/ Mitigation Footage or Mitigation Mitigation
Reach ID T e Acreage Ratio Units Comment
Silver Creek
Mainstem Priority 2
Restoration 2,905
,905 ft
1.0
2,905 ft Restore dimension,
pattern, and profile
UTA Priority 2
Restoration 1,552 ft 1.0 1,552 ft Restore dimension,
pattern, and profile
UTB Preservation 66 ft 5.0 13 ft Preserved within the
conservation easement
UTC Preservation 48 ft 5.0 loft Preserved within the
conservation easement
UTD Preservation 52 ft 5.0 10 ft Preserved within the
conservation easement
TOTAL 4
623 ft 4
490 ft
, ,
C. Project History and Background
Project activity and reporting history are provided in Table III. The project contact information is
provided in Table TV. The project background history is provided in Table V.
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of S
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page 7
I.--
Erosion and sediment control applied incrementally throughout the course of the project.
N/A: Data collection is not an applicable task for these project activities.

Table IV. Project Contact Table
Silver Creek Stream Restoration / EEP Project No. D05016-01

Designer Evans, Mechwart , Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
5500 New Alban Road, Columbus, OH 43054
Construction
Contractor South Mountain Forestry
6624 Roper Hollow, Morganton, NC 28655

Monitorin Performers Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
5500 New Alban Road, Columbus, OH 43054
Stream Monitoring POC Warren E. Knotts, PG, EMH&T
Vegetation Monitoring
POC Holly M. Blunck, Botanist, EMH&T
as Lney are rreservatton reaches.
In addition to the monitoring required by EEP protocol, monitoring has been required by the NC
DWQ under the Section 401 permit issued for the project on May 25, 2007. The 401 permit
conditions require monitoring data collection related to bank stability and success of vegetative
plantings installed along UTB and UTC, which were inadvertently impacted during restoration
construction along Silver Creek. The additional monitoring data is summarized under the
appropriate sections of this report.
• Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Monitoring Year 2 of S
Page 8
•
•
•
D. Monitoring Plan View
The monitoring plan view is included as Figure 2.
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of S
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page 9
94
IuTTaTuzauL u3
PION SV )43380 a3AIIS w sip
fo -? p a ." v
l.lA3js2so5 :u v N
Auvin8R11 a3WVNNn aNd M33HO M3A11S °^°° ' I'll
?l. ii.lwui? l
ao?
868 L-LOOZ 90OZ',Oenuef M31A NV-1d ONIHODNOW - Z 38nu
°N QOM °ea VNIIONVO H1aON'A1Nnoz) 3mno .w
Q
m
W
Z Z
M J W
a a ?
t? Q
?z Z
z O?Z DO
>: L.L CD
Z z p
o
0 D Z
U ?
? a
W N i
? W W
m ? W
(7 ?I
?i.
W
J
CL
.Q
a
3
SwyYi 33BY
O?
? ? ' cf?` an
} B
st i it"?
81- 1
?- did
tgV'LLE
o?
IL
a
a
N
i
/ I
ap
rlll? UtµY A ???'
uNN?y1fA ( 6
I Jill
n
Sa?
-46,
I?

4 = .l ,a
9/Z q 7117Vm4 "if NV IO Jump LIL LI F3 - n
Ob=..l :?oH N33 LI0213A1IS
W NS wolS vsrnv li v n?` ii ?s
Auvinami a3WVNNn aNH M332J3 MAIIS
868 [ooZ goOZ'tienuer aoj
M31A NV-ld ON18011NOIN - Z 3ano13 10 jul
°Na, ?du VNIlOaVO H1aON'A1Nf100 3Naf16
- ?
00'00+g o;S au
k, ; I 114o)o v
J O, I ? d
V AV
C4 I ?:;•
V
Ap 1 `,\
\1°
I 1
• I lI
a
Itoo)`r?'
b 'I
r?, I I
i 1 11 \ ? 1
Io
50
,/ ?a'? .•
i+
V)
/ ... --
,
"s3 0;
ci .r cn
o2
- R
d ? y 9CC
C ? 3 oO
O J f p. V y y
a ?¢ 8 c ? 2
I: ?5 Y Y (a Ix x 8
o
b g ?M M.0 mm m m o'p
> i3 vs zLa

/

W
N
r Eo
an
of

?iL ?rh
q
/
?1 n U
' II 0)

?I I

'p ?m
II
II
'AW
I w
V, -' rj N
w ?
P-)
?a
aM
CO ?u o
_ .? 1
A
_i? it
Ea - -

As
1SV7 -

s?
(1004S 6141 99S) 00'00+g •D}S aull4o}oyy
•

9/£ Dt:,aA 31Id08d 8 NVId _
06=.,L :I-H >13380 d3A1IS juauza uu Ug .e
Ativineitu a3WVNNn (3NV )133210 213AIIS LLIalS SO
Ltoaz'R enuep 80:1
M31A NHId ONIN011NOW - z 3unou
ON a°p °I°u VNIl021V0 HILTON 'AlNf10o 3N?Jf18
y O
1 kaY? ` Oc
O ? " L? CVCO C O Y ? Y O
a P .$ ?' U F O ? ? m 0 K C
«2 «N « « o
U ? O O O %? % ? %? % % L O
w w w < >3 < < ) < < IL
Mohr\?ne!'I
f -
4kzN l
oa
Y
gym ?
aia.
1\

C;
/
/
/
/
4% V .L
`A \ R
\ a
?oF
-r
I

ss °
r
O
2 N
a

o? s?

n?
ir i a 't to

U- (10
?nq CL?S
``-- A
"' V) CO
?d

o?
-r

o3n ds
- ?dx,vavr???bx r - <F
(;says BILU
00'00+q? •OIS aullyo}oh

j', U)
W
O
$_JCv
!n C4
q
` .
d
6f cn
U)
Ifs co
JlI) Q J?a.
L7 ?? . O
0 N
c• o c1':.
o ?-
Ol? co
\Or`
f 0
eh
w \
(Q
ti =t cii
Js ::
Or
D
) .. U
!n
C? Q. d
d
ddo0:
ie
i$
CV
= N
.?a
on
an
0
is
931 3lldOad 8 Nb1d ?UOLLIO 1? Lig -
.o9=..L:1OH A3380a3miS LLta?S SO
PNS a'?S ANvinswi Q3WVNNn aNV )433213 83AIIS
seat [ooz gopz'A,enuep 80:1
M31A NV-ld JNR1011NOW - Z 321f1E)lj
L
°N Q"t aiaa VNIl08V0 Hl8ON'A1NL100 3NaNa SNOISIA
\
\
\
?Sp JooS
T? Lr)
:E •t ?)
[A
?6 OQ
p _1 Cd
V) .4 04
a! M
U. N
a?
f7 ??
.f
'N
--
I d "" oox
IM ? ;s\ojs
1 aV7
0
_C.'
\ •?tp ? I I t
z
Ti
S ?•
o?6- s
c° •o a
a`n
3W
U
z:
a
1
,10 J041
Y O

yy?
.?
4
Vj c? ? € a`5
v
Y
? ?? « ? m 5

« «N a

« z Yet

!- C
E
o? F
E
?ffi I o
I I 18 I I o
U (?2 W CC
CW <O < < <N < < dJ

* o??ilu@??b

8 / rig
00-00 *oe
4
W ?
L1 P"'QOOJ19JAJ &-7nVY,?1- AB 031107d - "V 8Z'ZS'8 800'-191/l &3"VdJl' A8 03r1VS 1SN7 - S8X9661S ?YX / - <6 133HS>OMGM31A NN7d
t7
0
O
() CD m
N 01
o y `)
_' C 1V
--
..,a
Q1
t o
EI
W N
G Q
o
a 20 n 'L) (V
va 9?,th
6w? g.?ot
?za E [D
Cl
T) C4
p
A N
a .-
o°
co cr
n
l
:E
L?(1i) U')
?) cn
o:sa.
a °
L7 . q
in
`0 CA
61 `?
N i
C7 n. 6i
73
O N /'
- Z
E
4- L 1B? 31IJ08d V NVId
9I A- /5 04=.L :off N3380 83A1IS uaLLiaaLTE u -
°e S Wa S Azjvin8RI103W`dNNn aNV M33HO M3AIIS ? Lua?SASO??
y 11., ? N,y .w' r.3
860L-LOOZ BOOZ'Aienuep LIOd
M31 H'A - Z 3Nn1Jl3 kA
oNGop _ aieo_ VNIIOHV IlO2JV0 Hi8ON121ON AiNn lNf1OO 3N2if18
11 \
1J 9)
M
•[
whM
•-CJI d
rd m / ..
d
n r" o"
r, CJ
?.
o
\c3 C3
1' m
ED of \
O
E -? p
4 o C]_
L_ EU
W O CAp tD
?U C Cc r7
."p °yN •Cl • • 4j
d U) CA N
N Q
d
L7 co
?UZO. 1 d
g
0
a ?
*
y? ? y? ?s t`S rn ?€ rc rc
J 3 °
r
-3o A
4 $C? '? I p
V3 W 4'W <IS < < <N < < aj
I
a I ? ?J
•
A8 0.3AVS 1SV7 - S9X906lS 33&X / - <9 133HS>OMOY131A NV-7d 91Vl&O111VO'Y - Z
9/9 m Illuac w Pov 10
v -in Jumpooar
wols9so 11 H."' "n'. Poon A..qo -.N om
)133U3 H3AIIS 01 AwinewiOMYNNn "'u -PS .
'U3
G oW uWN9uolo QwoH NomyoaW suond
8613L-LOOZ Hozi
qor M31A NYId E)NI8011NOV4 - Z Mnou
VNIIONVO KLHOWAIWOO 3mune
(1004S 8141 DOS) 00.00+9 'DIS QUI1401DV4 (1024S 6141 DOS) 00'00+01 -DIS OU114010H
t�7 I i i t
77
C? C'4
t It
v.
............
0")
1I'I0 —0
CD y C,
7
'(D (D In
+
T
ch
+ V E
it 'll Q toL'i 0
ON
U')
%
(3
n.
lb
V)
LLJ
V) L) 2
LJ
f
Q 0
t t 75
beo
t*
7;os
%
t
!ji
it
r
N't W
w
II
AS 031107d —
03I65S&X91'Vjg —.:j3&
.* , — <_Q
— z
o
.2
8'5
t,
E 52
m .5
-5
m m m
0 0
L) 2
03I65S&X91'Vjg —.:j3&
.* , — <_Q
— z

III. PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
is
A. Vegetation Assessment
1. Soil Data
Soil information was obtained from the NRCS Soil Survey of Burke County, North Carolina
(USDA MRCS, January 3, 2006). The soils along the mainstem of Silver Creek include the
Colvard Series consisting of loamy sediments ranging from 40 to 60 inches or more in thickness
over deposits of sandy, loamy gravelly to cobbly sediments. Rock fragments range from 0 to 15
percent to a depth of 40 inches, and from 0 to 80 percent below 40 inches. Flakes of mica range
from a few to common.
The Rhodhiss Series is present along UTA and is residuum from the underlying felsic crystalline
bedrock. The Rhodhiss sandy to sandy-clay loam is found on 25 to 40 percent hillside slopes with
a depth to bedrock greater than 60 inches. The depth to the top of the argillaceous (clayey)
horizon ranges from 2 to 20 inches. The depth to the base of the argillaceous horizon is 20 to 60
inches or more. The pedon contains 0 to 20 percent mica flakes throughout, with mica content
ranging up to 35 percent below a depth of 40 inches when the C horizon is present.
Data on the soils series found within and near the project site is summarized in Table VI.
Table VI. Preliminary Soil Data
Silver Creek Stream Restoration / EEP Project No. D05016-01
•
Max. Depth
Series in.
Colvard sand loam CvA 60+
Rhodhiss sandy loam
% Clay on % Organic
Surface K' T2 Matter
8-18 0.24 5 1-2
Vulu) I 60+ 5-20 0 24 S I 0.5-2
'Erosion Factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion, ranging from 0.05 to 0.69.
ZErosion Factor T is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind or water that
can occur without affecting crop productivity, measured in tons per acre per year.
2. Vegetative Problem Areas
Vegetative Problem Areas are defined as areas either lacking vegetation or containing populations
of exotic vegetation. There were no problem areas identified along any of the tributaries in
Monitoring Year 1 to report in Table VII. There are several locations where the density of
planted woody stems is not high enough to meet the required stem counts. Densities of planted
woody species are discussed in the Stem Counts section of this report.
Several areas along the Silver Creek Mainstem were noted to have low overall herbaceous cover
along the riparian corridor. These areas are small and scattered throughout the corridor, with
none of the areas showing banks that are completely bare and none of the areas exhibiting
colonization by invasive species. It was also noted that the permanent seeding has begun to grow
and is expected to fill in the sparsely covered areas. Due to these reasons, these areas were not
mapped and are not considered to be a problem at this time. There is one area along the Unnamed
•
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page 16
•
•
•
Tributary in need of revegetation because this area relates to stream stability, it is discussed under
the stream problem area section of this report.
3. Vegetation Problem Area Plan View
The location of each vegetation problem area found in future monitoring years will be shown on a
vegetative problem area plan view.
4. Stem Counts
A summary of the stem count data for ea
h
i

data was compil c
spec
es arranged by plot is shown in Tabl
ed from the info
ti e VIII. This
rma
on collected on each plot using the CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation
Versi
4
0
,
on
.
. Additional data tables generated using the CVS- EEP f
t
are included in Appendix A. All vegetation plots are labeled as VP on Figure 2.
_ o rma
L ?
Table VIII. Stem counts for each species arranged by plot.
F Silver Creek Stream Restoration / EEP Pro'ect No. D05016-01
Ve etation Plots Year Year Year

Species MS MS MS MS MS MS UTA UTA UTA UTA 0 1
1 2 urvival

Shrubs 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 otals otals otals %
Alnus serrulata 2 1 1 1 2

Amnia 5 5 7 100%
lanocar a 3 1 8 8 4 50%
rpus amomum 2 2 5 4 4 1 1 1

ees
r 31 25 20 65%
er rubrum 2

Acer saccharum 2 2
1 1 10 1 2 100%

Fraxinus 18 18 13 72%
enns lvanica 1 1 3 4 15 15 9 60%
Liriodendron
tuli i era 2 1 1 4 4 4 100%
Platanus
occidentalis 2 4 2 16 11 8
50%
uercus michauxii 1 2

uercus alustris 3 3
1 3 100%

Salix ni ra
3 1 100%

Totals
Live Stem Density 5 5
11 8 11 6 17 4
3 2 6 6 107 96 3

74 60%

69%
stems er acre
Average Live 446 324 446 243 689 162 122, 81 243 243
Stem Density
stems per acre 300
The average stem density for the site falls below the minimum criteria of 320 stems per acre after
three years. Six individual plots had stem densities below the minimum. The largest deficit
occurred along the Unnamed Tributary, where all four plots fell below the three-year threshold.
Seedling mortality occurred along the entire length of the unnamed tributary, with the vegetation
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract #D05016-01 Page 17
plots exhibiting survival rates between 22% and 60%. Plot 4 along the mainstem also exhibited
poor survivability, with a survival rate of 50%.
• The Year 2 stem counts represent 69% survival from the initial plantings. As mentioned above,
the plant mortality is highest along the unnamed tributary. The riparian corridor along the
majority of this stream is already forested. While the woody plantings were focused on areas of
open canopy in the existing tree cover, the presence of large trees and the well-developed existing
vegetative cover shades the smaller seedlings and provides substantial competition for resources.
To address the issue of low plant stem counts, specific areas will be targeted for replanting within
the Silver Creek and Unnamed Tributary riparian corridors, which will include the deficient
sample plots and surrounding areas within the buffer. All deficient portions of the riparian
corridors will be supplemented with additional native tree and shrub plantings. These
supplemental plantings will follow the specifications of the project proposed in the project
Restoration Plan and Mitigation Plan documents. Consideration will be given to using larger
woody stock, such as three-gallon potted material versus bare root specimen in performing the
remedial plantings. These larger saplings should have a more developed root system and thus be
better able to compete with the existing vegetation. Supplemental replanting will occur during
spring 2009. The subsequent Year 3 (2009) monitoring report will contain specific documentation
of this remedial planting effort including the specific locations of replanting, and the quantity and
species of tree and shrub material installed.
Section 401 Permit Monitorin
In addition to the vegetative monitoring plots on the Silver Creek Mainstem and UTA, one
vegetation monitoring plot each has been placed on UTB and UTC, as required by the NC DWQ
• under the Section 401 permit. Monitoring for these plots includes simple stem counts by species,
and does not follow the full methodology of the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.0. A summarv of the efpm nrom4 Al +4 C «+1.,.,.,_
- - -- - .u -m nil iu i auic v 111i
Table VI1Ia. Stem counts for the additional lots on UTB and UTC
Plots Year 1 Year 2
Species UTB UTC Totals Totals
Shrubs
Aronia melanocar a I 0 1
Ce halanthus occidentalis 1 1 0 2
Cornus amomum 6 2 6
Trees
Acer saccharum 1 7 7 g
Fraxinus enns lvanica 1 6 1
Liriodendron tuli i era 3 1 2 4
Platanus occidentalis 1 0 1
uercus alba 3 2 3
Year 1 Totals 13 13 19 26
Live Stem Density 527 527
Average Live Stem Density 527
• Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page 18
The average stem density for these tributaries well exceeds the minimum criteria of 320 stems per
acre after three years. The few supplemental plantings added to the site in the spring of 2008
successfully contributed to the large stem count total, and no further plantings are anticipated for
• these tributaries.
5. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation plot photos, including photos for the additional plots on UTB and UTC, are provided
in Appendix A.
B. Stream Assessment
1. Hydrologic Criteria
Two crest-stage stream gages were installed on the project reaches, one each of the Silver Creek
Mainstem and UTA. The locations of the crest-stage stream gages are shown on the monitoring
plan view (Figure 2). No bankfull events were documented for this site during the first or second
years of monitoring.
2. Stream Problem Areas
A summary of the areas of concern identified during the visual assessment of the stream for Years
1 and 2 is included in Tables IXa and IXb.
Table IXa. Stream Problem Areas - Year 1
Silver Creek Stream Restoration / EEP Pro'ect No. D05016-1
is Feature Issue Station Numbers Suspected Cause Photo Number
Stressed/failing Natural log sill - concern for long-
structure 5+75 UTA term stability SPA 1
11+00 - 13+00 Nearly vertical banks - need to be
Other UTA stabilized with mattin and vegetation SPA 2
Table Xb. Stream Problem Areas - Year 2
--------------------------- -
Silver Creek Stream
Restoration / EEP Pro'ect No. D05016-1
:Feature Issue Station Numbers Suspected Cause Photo
N
Stressed/f
ili umber
a
n
g Natural log sill -removed due to concern
structure 5+75 UTA for long-term stabilit ; channel stabilized SPA 1
2+50 UTA Bank scour/ sloughing on left bank
Bank scour 3+55 UTA Bank scour/ sloughing on right bank
5+60 UTA Bank scour/ sloughing on left bank SPA 2
10+50 UTA Bank scour/ sloughing
Nearly vertical banks - have been
11+00 - 13+00 reshaped, still in need of matting and
Other UTA revetment SPA 3
• Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page 19
Areas of instability were not observed along the Silver Creek Mainstem. On UTA, a natural log
sill was preserved during construction. The long-term stability of this feature was a noted concern
during the EEP scheduled site visit upon completion of restoration. This structure has been
• removed, and the channel has been stabilized with appropriately size rock quarried on site. This
area remains on the problem area table to ensure it is closely monitored in the following years of
monitoring to document the success of the channel stabilization activities. An additional area of
concern exists along UTA concerning the steep slopes of the stream banks, also noted by EEP
during the construction completion site visit. These banks have been regraded to stable slope
conditions and will be revegetated with live stakes to further enhance stability.
Areas of bank scour noted on UTA include a few small areas of minor streambank erosion.
Because these areas are small, the use of mechanical means to regrade the banks is not warranted.
The areas noted are located in short, narrow channel reaches surrounded by existing forested
cover. Any areas deemed to require maintenance to improve stability will be stabilized using
vegetative means using live stakes, which provide rapid growth and dense root systems for soil
stabilization.
3. Stream Problem Areas Plan View
The locations of problem areas are shown on the stream problem area plan view included in
Appendix B. Each problem area is color coded with yellow for areas of low concern (areas to be
monitored) or red for high concern (areas where maintenance is warranted).
4. Stream Problem Areas Photos
Photographs of the stream problem areas are included in Appendix B.
• 5. Fixed Station Photos
Photographs were taken at each established photograph station on September 8, 2008. These
photographs are provided in Appendix B. Photographs of UTB and UTC are also provided, as
required by the NC DWQ under the Section 401 permit.
6. Stability Assessment Table
The visual stream assessment was performed to determine the percentage of stream features that
remain in a state of stability after the second year of monitoring. The visual assessment for each
reach is summarized in Table Xa and Table Xb. This summary was compiled from the more
comprehensive Table B1, included in Appendix B. Only those structures included in the as-built
survey were assessed during monitoring and reported in the tables.
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Page 20
Table Xa. Categorical Stream Feature Visu
• Silver Creek Stream Restoration / EEP Pi
Se ment/Reach: Mainst
Feature Initial MY-01 My.
A. Riffles' 100% 100% 101
B. Poolsz 100% 100% 101
C. Thalwe 100% 100% 101
D. Meanders 100% 100% 10(
E. Bed General 100% 100% 10(
F. Vanes / J Hooks etc. 3 100% 100% 10(
G. Wads and Boulders4 N/A N/A N
Table Xa. Categorical Stream Feature Vi
Silver Creek Stream Restoration / EEP
Segment/Reach: Tribu
•
•
it Stability Assessment
•oject No. D05016-01
em
MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
r

1%
1%
1%

'A
iual Stability Assessment
Project No. D05016-01
to A
Y-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
00%
N/A
determined to be stable based on a comp

an a evasion with respect to the as-built profile. arison
2Pools are assessed using the longitudinal profile. A pool is determined to be stable based on a comparison
of location and elevation with respect to the as-built profile and a consideration of appropriate depth.
3Physical structures such as vanes, J-hooks, and root wads are assessed using the as-built plan sheets to
define the location of such features. A structure is considered stable if the feature remains functional in the
same location as shown in the as-built plan.
4Those features not included in the stream restoration were labeled N/A. This includes structures such as
rootwads and boulders.
Feature Initial MY-01 M
A. Riffles' 100% 100% 1
B. Pools2 100% 66% 1
C. Thalwe 100% 100% 1
D. Meanders 100% 100% 1
E. Bed General 100% 1000 1
F. Vanes / J Hooks etc.' 100% 98% 1
G. Wads and Boulders4 N/A N/A
'Riffles are assessed using the longitudinal profile. A riffl e is
of location d 1
Visual stream stability assessment, conducted by EMH&T on September 8, 2008 revealed in-
stream structures are functioning as designed and built on the Silver Creek mainstem and UTA.
Point bars have formed along the inside meander bends on the mainstem. Cross-vanes, J-hook
vanes, rock vanes, dual-winged jetties, rock-toe channel protection, root wad bank stabilization,
step pools and constructed riffles are functioning as designed and intended. One natural log sill
noted as an area of concern by EEP during As-Built site visit in April 2007 was removed during
Year 2 and the channel and streambanks stabilized and regraded using native stone quarried on
site. Live branch and bare root seedlings will be planted during the Spring 2008 planting season.
This location will continue to be monitored for long-term stability on Tributary A. Deep pools
with excellent glide features, comprised of well sorted gravels, are present throughout the restored
mainstem reach. Pool depths on the mainstem have noticeably increased to As-Built depths.
Constructed riffles remain stable, with median particle distributions ranging from fine to very
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
Monitoring Report -Silver Creek December 2008
Monitoring Year 2 of 5
EEP Contract #D05016-01 Page 21
coarse gravel. The substrate in the pools has remained stable as well, with median particle
distributions ranging from fine sand to fine gravel. Despite extreme drought and low flow
conditions during 2008, the stream channels are appropriately sized and are entraining their
• bedload without aggrading or degrading.
Section 401 Permit Monitoring
Monitoring is required by the NC DWQ under the Section 401 permit to ensure that stability is
achieved along the restored portions of Unnamed Tributaries B and C. These streams were
visually assessed for stability at the same time that the visual stream stability assessment was
performed for the Silver Creek Mainstem and UTA. Both UTB and UTC appeared to be stable
during this assessment. Photographic documentation of the stability of the preserved portions of
Tributaries B and C is included with the Fixed Station Photographs in Appendix B.
7. Quantitative Measures
Graphic interpretations of cross-sections, profiles and substrate particle distributions are presented
in Appendix B. A summary of the baseline morphology for the site is included in Table XI for
comparison with the monitoring data shown in the tables in the appendix.
The stream pattern data provided for As-Built, Year 1 and Year 2 is the same as the data provided
from the As-Built survey, as pattern has not changed based on the Year 2 stream surveys and
visual field assessment.
Bedform features continue to evolve along the restored reaches as shown on the long-term
longitudinal profiles. Riffle lengths and slopes are stable. Pool to pool spacings are representative
• of As-Built conditions. The deep pools have developed excellent glide features, providing
spawning habitat for native fishes; riffle substrates are conducive for benthic macro-invertebrate
populations to re-emerge. Comparison of As-Built, Year 1 and Year 2 long-term stream
monitoring data show stability with minimal change from as-built conditions.
The constructed riffles remain stable, with a median particle distributions ranging from fine to
very coarse gravel. The pool substrate remains stable as well, with median particle sizes ranging
from fine sand to fine gravel based on Year 2 substrate analysis.
IV. METHODOLOGY
Year 1 vegetation monitoring was conducted in September 2007 using the CVS--EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0 (Lee, M.T., Peet, RK., Roberts, S.R., Wentworth, T.R. 2006).
Year 2 vegetation monitoring was conducted in September 2008 using the same protocol. Year 1
stream monitoring was conducted in November 2007 to provide adequate time between the as-
built survey (completed in May 2007) and the Year 1 monitoring survey. Stream monitoring for
Year 2 occurred in the fall of 2008, providing a full year between the Year 1 and Year 2 surveys.
Subsequent stream monitoring will occur in the fall of Years 3 through 5 to provide a full year
between surveys. Vegetation monitoring will continue to be conducted in the fall of each
subsequent year of monitoring, providing a full year between vegetative surveys.
is Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. December 2008
Monitoring Report - Silver Creek
EEP Contract # D05016-01 Monitoring Year 2 of S
Page 22
110 M (01 O (0\ 'r, N ON O 00 l- M O ?10 v) IC ?t O) C? O N O l
? r-
-0 N ?,- 00 O\ "t M N t-? C v ? ?t l? ? oo l? O\ M l? d oo l? ? l\ ?

+
00
00
-•
M
p
--
--
C14
00
N
.-r
N
^
N
O
r p
O O
rt
O ) 00 O O
^ ^ O O O
N
O
O d ^ ON
M M
\C in
N l?
0 O p v) v ? p Q ON \O 00 Ol? Ol, d Oo

+ ^ o O 00 ?O N ?t rl? 00 pp Q? W) O?
Q cz ? ? ? ? ^ . - ? 0 ^ ?O ? 00 N N N
.
- 0
0 O\
p

0 00 O\ O\ 00 '-+ O O N r- M r- 01 l- kn O 00 - 00 M
}, C o0 a\ `D M O ^ O " . M O? O l- Wn l-? ? C-- O? O\ v)
" ? ^ M N ^ t ^ 0 It ? ^ ?t
"t 00 0
0 O

?O
N l-
"I O\ z
O V) It
N m
l O
O l-
O N
"D M
- O
l z Ql, 00 V) M N ^ ^ ?O O 00 00
: n - - (
? r
: OO [? r.? z N M 'I N N
+ 4)
" 00 r-
W 00 N ^ M Z -- '-- 00 -- N 00 zt -- N O V) M ^ o
Q
O O d.
00 n O\ O\ M W) O z N
i
O
O O
o0 V)
N ?n
- N o0 N O O 00 v? O O O M 00 t- M v? M

+ oo ?t
M ^ 00 O ^ t? N V r? 00 _
cz oo C O
O ^ r- -- -• C, - t ' ,-- "-t C) t'- N N
C6 ^ O

?O
O ^ O\ O\ It o0 M "O O O? V O? O z r` 00
00
-:
O
w 0 0 -- N N -, .-, r- C,4 ? ^ 0 N
d 0
0 0
0 00
w 0

CC
U `O
N O
O M
?O l-
W) Wn
W) 00
N 'IT
00 O\
S
O O\
V) M
V? O\
l? O
l?
O0
O0 N
? rl:
W) N
^ oo [? to
O O
ch z
N [-
N
.? U 00 00 ? M 00 O 00 N -, N M 't N N N '" p O u
x kf) 00 O

00 rt ?n o0 l? ^ O N O1 'IT r- 00 0 O
N rrM CN
Z ,I- O M WN ^ W) 7 N -zt Ln 0
0 N M
00 00 7, M
?' O O
??-+ 00 ^ O\ D\ 0 - O\ O 00 r, ^ r- O\ C,? Q\ r V N
^" 00 V7 N 00 ?n v? p O\ N 00 O r-? rl? M
" It 00 00 N
A C ? 00 It r- .a
O
O
_V
•., z o O
O W) O
C D\ O
C [- N O
C 00 -• O? C 01 M O? z

V O

U

00

O

O\

O

?--?

M

00

M

^

M

N

?

z

N _

M

M

z _

M

N

O

^
N
pNp

0
" M O? ^ M N N 0 0 U
? ? O O O O
R
'
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
x - - - - - - - - - -
a
Z7 a+ C%?

b
0o

s?

W-?

M
00

O
0

00

M
00

?n

N

w
R W U ? ct cF d M U Ri U

o '" ? Y v
a
? a
?
O
0
0
0
0
a\
? ? R
?^ .?
O pp O ? V? C5 00
.
. u CA
O w it U U v

CJ ?^
C
'n (L
U C `O
N
o0
S `O W)
O? It
O 00
l rn
N 00
C1 N
M M
N O
?O D\ v rn M `p M O 9f • O
O
_ O
O O
U
00
O
O
M
l? ?
?n
?+
M
v1
M
O o
N
N
N
C4
r O
O N
O O
b? .O
y U ?D ?O l?
^ N [r- O .? N M O Li. ry, C ?
b O O OA O O
U
W U] U?
C

y U O d N
?G d
^ '-+ ' a0 d 00 W ?o ^ O N
?.w
C
pp
cz
N
O
W)
r-
W) ON
•- O O
,
N N
d 00 M O z a, 00 O O 3
.
L
O
C
"
N
^
00
M
0 I M M `O O 00 co
E
O i
? ? p p U b U
. .
" N

F --
w
N g o OO
00 r ? rn ? OO ^
M
^
'
O
^ W, M z
O 00
M r,
..
O
O
N
O N C U
O
O ?1r N M M M p O 00 4.
? U
..r
CQ .-? ? I O 7 O 11
Q

1 1

?O
^?
N
O
O
O
r
l-
00
N
N
[-
[-
t-
z
z
O p
o0
W)

N

z

0 00 0

00

?

-
:
W?
N
p
p
N
O Z: o
O U
a

N
M
C

m
-
--
00
O\
N
w)
r-
0
..
N
NO

r-

l?

00
M

0 O O

M

^

' O Li
U 0 '" p N
W)
M O
O O
O U E o 3
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -

L?
O
It
O
?
O
?n - - -
C O >
k
r- r4
? tU.
^• O ? c? O O

w - - - - - - X O
>

U - - - - - - - - - - - -
p
^ n M It O O `O 'y Z O
-i N 0
^
p
^
\O
'O U L7
d 00

- .-? .? -

lul
U Q)
s" U G bA bA d m U Rs
3 3 ? N
Q U
Q U
Q O
°' a4 E O 3 - y
a .
r. ..
u p
W) 00 q
c ip
c U U .,
m. U
c .r Q
U .. ?,
Q
E
a?
C
= U o
°
b
b LA V) a
o a
o 0 `3
U R, U a x c a . ? . ? . o u o

o ? w Q 0 ?
pq ti c L
?" " a. Rs r ct
x
Q o ? q W °' >, o - o ea > an E
=
w x - ? b q A. U v' 0 3 ?= n'

w w
_ a?
? cst
O ? O
c

? ? ? o c v

z
• •
0
C) ,0 O O\ r- 'S W) O l? g N ?n l? oMO O M O^ NO -• It In 00 00
C D et M O ^ N ^ !? O N M M .? M l- O ~ O O
cq r- r
.,

g O
N M
00 oo
O t-
v) N
O M
^ 00
d
g O V l? 0 0 'IT O t7 0 0 00 a1
x W) kr) O\ M 00 kr) ..y l?
O m r r 4 O ^ r-? N ^ r- O N ^ C N

? O V
RS O

N N
?G W)
^ O\
N O
V
S M I p r- l? O N N N to M 0 0 ?T ?D
) ?C 00 O O\ d 00 M OO 00 00 l- M 11D
N
-•
Ll ?O N M O N ^ ^ ?D O O D\ 00 M ?O O

O

M

d
.0 00
O V)
O O
a\ wl? ^ N
00 N
O O
r- N
M O\
?t kn
a\ d\
tq N
l? C7
ao
00 00
[- ^
00 00
[- M

tf? 00

^ t-

cM M O\

O V)

00 l-

IC
N O l? -- M O O d ^ ^ l? O N CM c+) ^ N N M 00

}
O

?
^

N

[?

^

0

M .-. 0 0

U
i - - - - - - C C

o
O
N
M
v)
M
l-
W)
M
V) -
^
O -
W)
N -
r-
C-, -
pp
O -
?O
W) -
O
W.) -
l-
W' -
O
Q -
O --
ON
O
O
M
W)
N
M
) \ M \ V) Q\ N N 00

^
^ N C)
Rs ^" O

r- 00 V) N 00 M O\ M O 00 l? O N N Q\ W)
C1
N
N
?D t- d C O 00 M 00 W)
M
O
a\
N
a\
?O O M O O N ^ ^ C O a\ oo ^ N O

w
00 ?O M V)
kr) 00 00

00 00

00

8 M z V)

, C\

) N

-

r O

M O\

0 vM M

N

N
i
O
N
?C

N
O
l?
^
M
O
O
-+
^
O
N
M
M
^
V)
M..
N
V> ^
^ ^
M
^
^ N r-
^
^ tr)

?
O O O

O? -- l? ON M Z v) O 00 O l.- O O v) C V C? C 00 I?P

l\
O ?
RJ ^"
00 V?
? ?
M V)
O O
^ o0
00 a\
^ C
.? N
00 V)
O ?
V d\
rt M
?O ?
^ d\
? a\
O ? N
M
?
•
l N Q

ry ' ^ 00 ^ M ^ V) O O [? N O N N th N

k 00 N V? 00 00 00 O O\ 00 M 00 lzt M 'I O ^
o ?_
n C ?O M M O O N ^ -? ?D O O C, 00 r- M
p ?p p N
° O
o+
C
U z C',
,
O
g
0
0
0
Q
0
W)
O p
O
M Ic M r- W) kr)
w+ ti N M O N v) G.

py
w S g c o
c

W p

a? X

^

o W)

o T
R
(L
, Q ?
O O Q ? •
? ?
C a
.
C O O ? ¢ t
U .+
O cn fn
O ? p O a

a? v? ?-.
i
? y ?
O
O .
V ?? .
C

a
00
O
00
N
-

O

N

N

00

"o

W- a

? r
: ) W? G1 N O
O )
N
•
y
^ p O M
-" N
- M O O N
W O ^ M C, It W)
- ?t O>
G
y H «• ) p T

yC ? ?-' tin Rs ?
E

ea
E
T
? x o ?

O
A: T o ; a
F„ H I M H ? I o Q ;-rsb
1 >

u
b ?O N
o O
o l-
[- 00
N N
r? l?
l? \p
"O p
O 00 ?p N l- O
o0 00
Oo
v?
N pp S p
N , °
> ~ ?"
"t
N N
N 0
M - - 00
^ c,
? C'4 00 0 O
O
v j

^ ?
N 11
M o u '"
?
E o
o ?, °' Rs 3
"t O
x o a ?
"
?o
?n

-a
O

C
1:t
N

^ M o

M

_
c?
rO. O
`?' C

N 00
^
~
^
O
F.
^ 00 O p

_ U O b
U
U L7 >

cl 4.
3 3 Q 0 0 3 >
0 . ?. ? o

w 3 y 0, O O N U U w U x ' a O>
?
T to
L i, x A b U coo
p
3 u C
U x ° E
U RS • o
U N ?
it ?
ay 3 ?
t+= w
a?

? •

O
x w
cc
as 3

a A a a ° o
, z
0 0 0
•
APPENDIX A
Vegetation Raw Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
2. Vegetation Data Tables

•
Vegetation Plots Photographs 2008
U
s d? i ?# wi
•

J S
4a 4
t ^T^ f l??a.^ k
:'k ?fM' dS ?t '? '. 3 4• 9 r _ R. a t i i T d
4, Tal:-
Vegetation Plot 1 on Mainstem
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
*#
{ 4 T ?
lE {1 ?
t a
9
1 '`' `.
Vegetation Plot 2 on Mainstem
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 1 of 6
F
Vegetation Plots Photographs 2008

•
•
S' s
i. e
t '?` r Tw?? a l ,
@g?? f
rc?#-s?a t 'r ' y t .d f i1[ M ..
? ? ? '?` • has . r
i
3
- t
Vegetation Plot 3 on Mainstem
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)

.
y V, ,

n
.. h re
.
-A
- 4
O

{a

lot,

r
o
.

Vegetation Plot 4 on Mainstem
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 2 of 6
E
Vegetation Plots Photographs 2008
•

M

Vegetation Plot 5 on Mainstem
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
t
1mi"3 A,t
^k
3 t
f ?
t. a
Vegetation Plot 6 on Mainstem
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 3 of 6
Vegetation Plots F
Photographs ? 2008
•
•
Vegetation Plot 2 on Tributary A
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 4 of 6
Vegetation Plot 1 on Tributary A
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)

•
Vegetation Plots Photographs 11 2008
Vegetation Plot 3 on Tributary A
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
RE
t k - ; ??' a v ?" is *? ? s ? ? ? w'? g ?i? ? >y?? 3 ?3° r ? w ?+ ?t " ?'?
43? ' ? ?{y.? y ?'R lken' ?i?ttq 4f ?? ?sc - '. ?r
Ali ? 7
?+3 i ?°' r F '? ? 1 j 6 ? ? .. Ptf i t? ?d r ?
a :- ryry s ??s t? ??? r ?r¢.y bt ? a F
%
. , . - ^'q?'nx 1' ?l fsn'. E iy???s ( kty p ? ?f p
?y. i 1: ?ttt?` ft ?( x k., yf? R wt? a
d` FsE ,

Vegetation Plot 4 on Tributary A
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 5 of 6
Vegetation Plots Photographs 2008
•
:yam

j ?
g.ZX •q Y k 5r t ?Af' .,N `, @' Ka 3T •F?',
i tY ' cY
s
t y
Tin
'N Aw
* s { I, q;F
•
•
Vegetation Plot on Tributary B
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
.?s
t• T+.}r
• .,? ?r3; Vie.. 4a I (,? .
t ,? s
qi 04,
Vegetation Plot on Tributary C
Monitoring Year 2
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 6 of 6

O
N

O U

O O
C t0
O
L O
E
C a)
co a O

m c
•
0
a) 5i
N
0 E Q

? O
L
D $D
_0

L
. L

m
4. f0
-0
N Q

(n

U c

'
=3
m
cu

0 _0
C
a)
0
co
O c

F-
w co N O _0 'O
g m O m
-
O E

C
cu
OL
>
C
E
O m

C
N
'^O,
O
^U U
Co c
• ^`
>
L +:
O
?+ W
O
a)
O
r
+ y CL -
O
Lo
m W O a) N O D
CO U
C O
E
W (a y N 0 CD O U
N V m
!_
O c
'
i C
U (E
U L L
0 VI
c
d
m E L
g ;

O

O

O

O a) a)
co m
I CO _ ? U
F- O O ; fU > > c0 + +- O Y

>
?
N v-
O
O
cu
.n
.0 N
4- a>
p
F-
Z s c
O c
O -0 'o
a) -O
a) O U
c W L O c E
O

f0 W E.
N
Q
O
7
O
>
co
is
U .L L G O CO
Y U Z 0 a)
am
I CO O
4?-- 7 0 c i O

c

=3
OJ

O
4
U
D

CO) -
O
Ng: cn

O

D

U
iq

O
m

>
co

>
>

=
i
N

0
c

0
N W
W > = O Q c: c: E a, O CD U cu
L fn W O ,O O
i ? Z O N N y N N O 0 O
01 01 U) F- J LL L.L J ? ? U i 0 cn ?

W
W

CL w m
Y
0 c m m o a

to m
p }
Q a
)
Z
*-
d
a
va
c U. ?
0 a•+ ' C
G V 4, • L N r d
L a R Z O m o
m o a
m
R o

a
L Q _ 0 c n a C p m o d a
C CL
O a L- `? Z
I L d y a ak . o M o F - a
t o m m a
m
m
m
m
o
V
v
W
ea
'D
• C

L .0 . G V
W ? a
' N L
p L (u lC R '
0 w
O
d
? l?
o a ? O
a• ) o
o
o d1 a
a o > > n
•
•
Table 2. Vegetation Vigor b Species
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing
Acer rubrum 2
Acer saccharum 4 9 1 1 2 3
Alnus serrulata 6 1 1 1 1
Aronia melanocar a 2 2 4
Cornus amomum 2 14 4 3 8
Fraxinus penns Ivanica 5 2 2 6
l_iriodendron tuli ifera 1 2 1
Platanus occidentalis 5 2 1 1 8
Quercus michauxii 1 2 1
Quercus palustris 1
Salix nigra 3 2
TOT: 10 23 31 20 0 6 33
0
•
•
Table 3. Vegetation Damage b Species
E
L.
O

E _

Q
U
(D 4)
t
Y
E

d E E 0

N

N = O
p C
4)
0 d o 0
0
s ?- C
Y d
CL
Q
c
W1
104,
p 0
LL U)
_
=
O
65
p
Acer rubrum 2 2
Acer saccharum 13 10 3
Alnus serrulata 7 6 1
Aronia melanocarpa 4 4
Cornus amomum 20 16 3 1
Fraxinus enns Ivanica 9 7 1 1
l_iriodendron tulipifera 4 3 1
Platanus occidentalis 8 8
Quercus michauxii 3 3
Quercus alustris 1 1
Salix nigra 3 3
TOT: 11, 74 63, 0 5 0 0 0 01 -01 6 0
0
•
•
Table 4. Vegetation Damage b Plot
aNi
L OI
E
O N
E _
a
v 0 as
m
16
m d
w
V c
Y
C m
m
eta m ° w

m

c

`m 0

F-
3
°
c
-a
`m
O
CL -
Q c
?, 111
I d
o _N
o O
E:
5
0
v> C w
D0501601-01-0001 (year 2) 11 9 21 -1
D0501601-01-0002 (year 2) 8 8 -
D0501601-01-0003 ear 2) 11 9 2
D0501601-01-0004 ear 2) 6 5 1
D0501601-01-0005 ear 2) 17 15 2
D0501601-01-0006 ear 2) 4 4
D0501601-01-0007 (year 2 1
D0501601-01-0008 (year 2
D0501601-01-0009 (year 2) 2
D0501601-01-0010 ear 2) 1
TOT: 10 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0
C,
•
•
Table 5. Stem Count b Plot and Species

N N N N N N N N N N
L L L L L L L L L L

r
O N
O M
O e}
O N
O ?C
O ??
O Op
O 01
O O
r
O O O O O O O O O O
r
9 r
01 r
9 r
Oi r
OI r
01 r
9 r
01 r
Oi V-
O

W

y
r
?
r
t00
r
?
r
tOD
r
?
r
tOC
r
tOD
r
tOp
r
? i
r
?

N E
r E
O r
? r
N r
? r
N r
N r
? r
N r
? r
? r
?
d
.v ? N
O N O O
O O O O
G O
C O O
0 O O
0
C.
y O
f- C. O
C O O O O O O O O O
ea L CL a C a CL c. a. a C.
Acer rubrum 2 1
2 2
Acer saccharum 13 4 3.25 11 1 1 10 1
Alnus serrulata 7 5 1.4 21 1 1 11 1 1 2
Aronia melanocarpa 4 2 2 3 1
Cornus amomum 20 8 2.5 2 2 5 4 41 1 1 1 1
Fraxinus enns lvanica 9 4 2.25 1 11 1 3 4
Liriodendron tuli ifera 4 3 1.33 21 1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis 8 3 2.67 2 4 2
Quercus michauxii 3 2 1.5 1 2
Quercus alustris 1 1 1 1
Salix nigra 3 1 3 3
TOT: 11 74 11 11 8 11 6 17 4 3 2 6 6
?J

APPENDIX B
Geomorphologic Raw Data
1. Stream Problem Areas Plan View
2. Stream Problem Area Photos
3. Fixed Station Photos
4. Table B1. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
5. Cross Section Plots
6. Longitudinal Plots
• 7. Pebble Count Plots
L
Zip ''aa4s M31A Nd1d b32id W31SUtld WV32AiS i A x x w 0 w
0084'SLL'419:xod 00Sb'SLL'419:9u04d
9 XIGN9dd`d tiS0£Y HO 'sngLunloO pooa Auogly mGN 0099
8M-LOOZ 0N 40f s*sl4u9l3S. sJauuald • sJoAaAjnS. sjaaul6u3
ONNODNOW -oul 'uo4lll 8 uo4algwoH '4Jomyo9W 'suoA9
.0oz = „6 :eleos J mvinsimi a3WVNNn aNV M33113 tGAIIS
8002 'jagwaoaa :91ea VNIIObdO H1bON 'AiNnO0 3mns I1

Z
z.

r „
.
M
%

?Ae
}
0
Z/Z 1084s M31A NVId d32]V W31802ld Wd32116 X X W W
868E-LOOZ N q r 8 XIGN3ddb V°O£V`HO 'sngwn 009V9 0090
0 o q Io? 'Poo?1 AuogIV gl`d - ^^aN OOSS
s?Squa!z)S . sjauuo!d . UOA9njnS . sjaau!Bu3
ONWOlINOW -ou! "uo4!!1'8 uo4algW0H'4JDmq::)9y4 •suon3
,OOZ=..6 :91835 Ativinsi 11 (13WVNNn aNV )133213113AIIS
80OZ `jagwa3aa :91ea VNI IO?IVO HI2JON `AIW0O 3>ian8

uaa0u03 g6iH
t
a
U
O
.f
F
07
??
OOl 0 OOl
NI
I.

ti.
b„
Rye
f
A ?
Stream Problem Area Photographs 2008
•
•
•
•"
"

ax *'ai
t i
xy?
_
+w i ate a
. 4i
45

. ,,,. Y' s _
; s i.? wi
t ..ws x y,

....._
I? - r E
SPA 1
Natural log sill on Unnamed Tributary A near station 5+75. Log sill was removed and
channel stabilized with rock.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
SPA 2
Right streambank scour on Unnamed Tributary A near station 3+55.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 1 of 2
Stream Problem Area Photographs 2008
•
•

4
?
F
e
d
F
47
?.
1

for

_ .
MR

1

SPA 3
Close-up of right streambank scour on Unnamed Tributary A near station 3+55.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)

..
i S L

1

t fir:
f
SPA 4
Steep streambanks on Unnamed Tributary A, looking downstream near station 12+00. The
• streambanks have been mechanically reshaped; the remaining stabilization will occur using
vegetative means.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 2 of 2
Fixed Station Photographs *2008
•
•
Fixed Station 1
Overview of the Silver Creek Mainstem, facing upstream near the bottom of the mainstem
restored reach.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
It 4
Al
1 ,qV w .q °`d, 9
M}
i
'Al
4 `
*t t, Fixed Station 2
• Overview of the Silver Creek Mainstem at Riffle #3, facing downstream.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 1 of 6
Fixed Station Photographs t 2008
•

•
Fixed Station 3
Overview of the Silver Creek Mainstem at Riffle #1, facing downstream.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)

Fixed Station 4
• Overview of the Silver Creek Mainstem at Riffle #1, facing upstream.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 2 of 6
i
Fixed Station Photographs
' 2008
E
ay t '4 4 g+`,E'
y T
f
W?
O.P
r z_:: .r ##??i r
::.
Fixed Station 5
Overview of the Silver Creek Mainstem, facing downstream near station 2+60.
• (EMH&T, September 8, 2008)

?f
"
,nq. ?•^.i ,jB'i.
?" .6.54-1. ??-
.:
. :•??
T 3-
?

?.4 d0..., ? `'.?'1^}

SF"• tr

Fixed Station 6
• Overview of UT-A, facing upstream near station 0+50.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 3 of 6

Fixed Station Photographs 12008
Fixed Station 7
Overview of UT-A, facing upstream near station 8+00.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
-lip
,a r a
g
Lam'' t iF ? }r $ ?? e; Ft sxMi?? f .
?•.Y .19'_y wY??6.9r ? 3 4?;* +?; ' ?'",?R= ?' ?? :....1&°?z t.
fr
.; r F
Jk. t
r. _
Fixed Station 8
• Overview of UT-A, facing upstream near station 11+00.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 4 of 6
Fixed Station Photographs 2008
•
k
yyyp # Y
•
Fixed Station 9
Overview of UT-B, facing upstream from the confluence of UT-B with Silver Creek.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Sm
r..
i •/1?G 1?e. /i 4
ink v
.sv

4 4
A,
N

•
Fixed Station 10
Overview of UT-B, facing downstream towards the confluence of UT-B with Silver Creek.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 5 of 6
Fixed Station Photographs 2008
E
?a
•
•
Fixed Station 11
Overview of UT-C, facing upstream from the confluence of UT-C with Silver Creek.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Fixed Station 12
Overview of UT-C, facing downstream towards the confluence of UT-C with Silver Creek.
(EMH&T, September 8, 2008)
Page 6 of 6
•
•
•

C 0
o 0
? 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
Q
p Z
a) O
T O
T O
T O
T O
T T
Q) ? fa
L L
y
O O O

i a
L
o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 \ \
Z Z
E c
p O
v
a c

o Li U
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O +? + O O O O Q Q
O cu a)
\
\
y e 12? w Z Z
ta
+r O O
E =
O
O
7
?
Z c
M N
H
w ?
L Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln v ?F v Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln ¢ Q Ln o Ln Ln o 0
+ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ ri r-I r-I H
r-. Z Z
.r E

in <
A 0 a)

Z N N N \ \ ? o N
. (a N N N N N N N N N N N r
•i r
-I H r
-I
to z Z Z Z
E a)

Q64
D Ln 4E)

I%
W
u Z a c
u W
.
v
O o O
O R Ca

M1• C

~ Vi C _
M1• M1• O c 1
O 6>

? a E

• to V O
U

OA
?_
L `
v
•L
c
M1•
E
?
ra
+
R cn E c 4? o O E 0
L
O
M1•
w
0 H
O
to

-o ri o) -0 ro
-4 d a) (a ^ O c a Q M1• M1•
G.0 W ,wy u O CU N ?
V a) M1• c m CD () U O OL w a)
c
3

CC LA

C

i

M
L

to
L
-
-
FI > a) a) 41 O
O m L c O O
L `
-

V1
U
E
C
(D
7
a)
`?
a3
O N
ca
a
F
O
v tea M1'
a) ?O
O O h0 w u p m m u
CL
'n a) +
u
0
U
L _
E
u
a) m
c M1. co
41
a)
L
"O
?
O ?
X
"O _ O
u
a)
U u UA
to
O O
O
Q N

n
v

CL) ,?

O

3
ca

`^ L
O C ? O n aj
f "O a) a) *t O_ -a -O M1• ?, ..C
+r 00 a) m m -0 O
3 u c • v a) L E O
v Q
O
UO W
O E 0
E
.-
3 0
o
c
? L
O
Q
O
to
c,. M1.
CU

Q
'>
O
a?
>
Q 4-
O
E
oc C
aI
U O
L a)
•c L
3
L co a a) O_ a. O_ a) c aJ , , , , t -0 r`• m Q- CL O ;a

cu
O

c
c
m
-0

n

a c

v
-0 m
a 11 V)

OA
. a) L
O 4-1 t C u t
++ a)
L VI
c L O L • m
L y
C ?
O ro O v-
O c
v E v .E °
° N
v to V 3 ° - a v Cu c a' L
°D }
L c Q a
+ c
v v a) oA a) a) O
4J L
d Q L.L. c
G J a Vt O
J 0 O 4--
O CL
Q O a)
C7 -O a) c N a)
V) U m LL = Q u. LL LL
ri N M Ln N N M c-I N ri r,4, M ri
N L
H
N
M
R*
ri
r4

L
O
- a)
••O
OD Fa
O

U
to L
-
O a)
v O
co
a) n
a !n 3 O
c (9 Ln Ln

Y
"
°o ra
) -0
m c a >
LL Q m C1 LLI LL 0
•
r?
•
c e O p p G C Q
O
r O
r O
r p
r p
r C
r Z

1 O O
ra L
i a
L
o

C 0
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q Q
0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \

E z z
C
o °

c
a
ra
' o
%
t 1 1 1 1
O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - + 0 0 0 0
Q
Q
a) N
N
0 Z Z
- O O
3 7 O O
Z
ra ?, N

1- 4T H
L
N u1
N ul
N ul
N Ill
N ui
N Vl
c-1 ul
r-1 In
-1 N N N N N N
\
\
N
^
^
O
O
r H ri r-1 r-I ri ri r
••I r
•I
_
E Z Z
r
y
. C
Q Q
rA O
A
? O n
i
a I-

?-+ to
m ul
N ul
N ul
N ul
N Ln
N ul
1--1 ul
14 ul
14 N
H N
H N
H N
H N
H N
H
\
^
?
^
Q
Q
z \
Z r
-I -1
r 14 r
i
d Z Z

? O E (L
X1 ?
GIS
1 CC
w
w ,, O c
?
a N v
ee W 's,
F
0 `
0 ? p
c
e
M1•

O a q ?+ OA M1. O C u
`"1 C ' O

T

t?0

? L c

c
.L

1' E

E

m C

3

i, U C U; 42
O

V] O M1•
v
O
L
w a4

C
-a lD C U L ra L
r-1
i M1• 0 O d N vl
bA 0 v
fJ N M1• fw CO v U O p
CL C
=3
el d to
a
tF
v
C
C
`Q
'E
-
w-
CL
F .?. N \ U) N \ C v O O

cu
E ?
c
>
a)
2
v O
u m
tf
o C
p
m
a
ra
C U 'O en D 72 E
C
+•+
L
Q'
7

a)
Q) O "O OA ,?,
uo y "O U
w Q- -U U p L C M1, C i
ru
N :3
'O
N a) 0-
X U
p v
U W p
O !Z
Q
O vl v- ra L C w•
p \ Q ra
ra C ? p Y V1 ? a1 ? N ? ? C ? a1 ?
fa M1• i a+
+?•' to N U rB O (a r6 m
ra
?,,,
O
cl
CL C L
CL C v i N ,? v'?i
c +? 0- v bD
v
Q

-9
ai
O
tip
a
O
?
p
O
3
O
O
C
a?
O
CL
O O
bD
M1
U
l
LM
Q Z
>
!Z
N
Q
O

ra
O
U
j=
O
`T
C
'p
N
Y
O
b
M
.
C
M1 ro
w M1• E P - u M1•
-0 an u
m Q - p . a O . N

N
O_ -,
,
v

to M m

r ,

a c m M ,-,

in N v C C

a) C -0 M C a H
N
v p M -
- 'T = v O v •
u rLo
E r +,,
C a+ r•-
O +, M 4 -
p 4--
p W
C
'
+
d
D_
Q M
U- C
G CU
J L
a 7
vl d
J CL O
O 4-•
O Q
Q 3 N
C7 S v
i N C v O
p
N U m I 2 Q L L LL I l
-1 N M 4 ul r-I N M H N c-1 N M cr H N L rl N M I t r-I N

L L

to
cu H 7
r6
U

to

a) v

C O

m
l1 v Ln 3 c C7 w
a ra m - 0 v
c _ 0
m O H C
C c o >
Q c o ( J p ui LL
a?
c
M 14
Y O Il
d ?
T U Iy
U +-
a f0
> Ln } I
o?
fA o 1-- 53
U
w C
O
O M
a. a0i E CD Z w I
a
U) u
0 c to f- I
¢w w x ,
U Uw LL
F I
i ..
U p
Y U w
I
H ¢ G s v
?I
O
? w
00 00 V]
00 l? M N - aI r ,' ^
00
^
5
O" w r,'a t 1 ? O
? i
v S" cCf r '
roo
.? -.,4
f--.*
w
•
0
I
M -- -- I
, r
x I *,
--- ------- -------- ---- ---- I -----
LL r r
" " r r
LL , , r I I
Ll 1. J_
x I
_______ _______
U ? I
I r
1 r " I
O r r , I
? I
(6
------- ------- ------- -------
II I JJ- r?
------------
------------
I ,
r
?-
.mss;
? M C'7 M M M M N N N N N
I K! 9,
0
_o
-o
rn
m
Co
m
Ln
0
ti
(m
co
m
Ln
Il
0
L
tr)
M
0
M
CN
0
N
r
O
XS1 RIF YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY

•
r?
River Name: Silver creek & Trib Restoration
Reach Name: Mainstem
Cross Section Name: XS-1 RIF YR2
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0 0 1137.75 HT
2.77 0 1137.73 HT
6.73 0 1136.5 bm
11.62 0 1134.29 fp
23.61 0 1129.12 BKF
30.1 0 1127.2
33.1 0 1126.06 lew 0.0
38.27 0 1125.77 cv 0.2
42.41 0 1126.04 rew 0.0
46.03 0 1127.15
52.84 0 1127.79 fp
67.47 0 1129.12 BKF
80.34 0 1131.06 fp
86.81 0 1132 bm
97.82 0 J.132.26 it
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
Bankful l Elevation (ft)
Floodprone width (ft)
Bankfull width (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio
Mean Depth (ft)
Maximum Depth (ft)
width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
wetted Perimeter (ft)
Channel
1132.47
1129.12
81.98
43.86
1.87
1.68
3.35
26.11
73.69
44.62
Page 1
Left
1132.47
1129.12
14.6
2.06
3.35
7.09
30.07
18.44
Right
1132.47
1129.12
29.26
1.49
3.35
19.64
43.62
32.87
XS1 RIF YR2.txt
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.65 1.63 1.33
Begin BKF Station 23.61 23.61 38.21
End BKF Station 67.47 38.21 67.47
Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.0027 0 0
Shear stress (lb/sq ft) 0.28
Movable Particle (mm) 59.3
•
•
Page 2
•
•
0

d
c
> -
Y
d ai
0 I ?

L
U

?
L
U

I
j

> Q
L0n } m
o I

V1 0
N a 0
a
o
a
U I
®
0

a 0 co
G? m Z
N cnO

?

°
N h
co
V) o O U
a I
.
I

CC uj
L) ? L) co
Lu
LL

I `
'-N

I
_
7

Y U W
to
w a r I

I

M 00
O? -- 00 - [? - U ?+ Cr

O? N tic 00
? O
E . N
?
? 00

4 O w .Q

CZ X b CA
M M i r
6 k T ..
/?0

a
Q ----- -'
Cf)
x
1' I
- ---- --- ----
I
7C r I
N I ,---- ----
,? µ I
-- -
a+ I
i ?
r
---------------
m II ?
-- ---- ._..
a
x J~
ar co ti co Ln v M N O
M M M M M M M M M M
0
0
O
O
ko
--------------
..... a
.. A_. _. O
i0
?
' kf)
rR?l?
- o
__.__-__?______-._.. O
N
0
R UD 47 Ict Cl)
N N N N N
XS2 POOL YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY

•
•
River Name: Silver creek & Trib Restoration
Reach Name: Mainstem
cross section Name: XS2 POOL YR2
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
-------------- FS
------------- ELEV
-------------- NOTE
-----------
0 0 1138.52 fp
2.27 0 1138.77 bw/ht
7.42 0 1136.68 bm
13.93 0 1134.35 fp
25.89 0 1130.56
39.4 0 1126.98
41.79 0 1125.89 lew 0.0
50.62 0 1123.61 p 1.55
55.37 0 1125.93 rew 0.0
59.39 0 1127.39
74.83 0 1129.02 BKF
82.46 0 1130.13 fp
91.71 0 1132.17 bm
100.25 0 1132.15 fp/lt
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
Floodprone width (ft)
Bankfull width (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio
Mean Depth (ft)
Maximum Depth (ft)
width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
wetted Perimeter (ft)
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
channel
1134.43
1129.02
86.54
43.13
2.01
2.18
5.41
19.78
93.99
44.8
2.1
Page 1
Left
1134.43
1129.02
16.97
2.46
4.91
6.9
41.68
22.6
1.84
Right
1134.43
1129.02
26.16
2
5.41
13.08
52.32
32.01
1.63
XS2 POOL YR2.txt
Begin BKF Station 31.7 31.7 48.67
End BKF Station 74.83 48.67 74.83
• ---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left Side Right Side
slope 0.0027 0 0
Shear stress (lb/sq ft) 0.35
Movable Particle (mm) 70.8
•
•
Page 2
•
a
Y
Y =
d *-
U ¢
c w c
} 0 -
N 0 N M d $ a
w c I`
¢
IL Z w
cn m co
NO 0 4
c o 00
0 a UN LL
m I
•
Ul Q H ! • •r
w Q
H ¢ 0
C..
C.e
'It
o? N M N W-? 6
6l
4 r- 00 M
00 d r. V? N M U
O
0 C N cr?C 0" ` x f0„
?? 4

I
-
I

I
'
aD f

J "
O I

Q
a .

Q-

1

o _.
I

I _

-------- ---- ----

I
=
t
n

I ,

0
N
O
O
----------------- -----------
i
------ ------ ---'•- ------- --- cmm
°v
0
O
O
co
o
? rn
CD
0
1 V I ?,;
CN I
s
a
I :
3 `
(Y s
O
d
M N CD m OD
tD
M M M M N N N ry
.-___f.__._-_co
O
Ul
-- -- --. _ o
M
0
N
O
r-T O
M N O
N N N N N N
•
•
•
xS3 POOL YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Silver Creek & Trib Restoration
Reach Name: Mainstem
cross section Name: X53 POOL YR2
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0 0 1132.35 fp
7.4 0 1132.25 bm
9.56 0 1132.16 It
19.8 0 1131.61 bw
34.46 0 1128.47 fp
47.14 0 1126.99 fp
58.5 0 1125.57
62.7 0 1123.53 lew
68.26 0 1121.16 tw2.3 p
74.09 0 1123.38 rew
79.9 0 1125.23
88.07 0 1125.63 fp
98.34 0 1126.49 BKF
108.4 0 1127.74 fp
133 0 1131.31 bm
149.4 0 1131.77 fp
191.11 0 1130.41 bw
192.68 0 1130.6 ht
----------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
--------------------------------------------------
channel
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 1131.82
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 1126.49
Floodprone width (ft) 176.79
Bankfull width (ft) 47.2
Entrenchment Ratio 3.75
Mean Depth (ft) 1.8
Maximum Depth (ft) 5.33
Page 1
Left Right
1131.82 1131.82
1126.49 1126.49
19.93 27.27
2.41 1.35
5.33 4.26
width/Depth Ratio
• Bankfull Area (sq ft)
wetted Perimeter (ft)
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
Begin BKF Station
End BKF Station
XS3 POOL YR2.txt
26.22 8.27 20.2
84.95 48.05 36.9
48.95 25.4 32.07
1.74 1.89 1.15
51.14 51.14 71.07
98.34 71.07 98.34
----------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right side
slope
Shear stress (lb/sq ft) 0.2927 0 0
Movable Particle (mm) 61.7
•
•
Page 2
•
•
0
m

0
> o
o W
to a N v ¢
s
i •?
w
0 C i
a d E oo Z
cl) v
O
N N
y

O

i .
,
V a Vcn LL
-
t
i
i

. j
vYi a ui
a w a

'
I
H ¢ o j ? I

I

O O N

O? O" -? 00 M Q1 U ; `-
'
?

O
oc "c
00

O

t ?
n
.
i
Q

t 't

L
O
+
¢
Q

h
:. _ Ali., o
44

•
CN
0.
r pp
?? II
Y
v a
cn
A
O
LL
x
T
N T
= II
o
d µ
d Y
i6 a
7
C!]
61
f76
7
N_
O
[6
c
o.
c e?i
(a .p
m
n
Y
a
N
d"
LL_
V
co
x
fl
t
0
0
0
0
v
r
O
M
0
N
O
O
O
O
6]
O
O
O
ti
O
(O
O
Lt)
0
c
0
M
O
N
0

0
XS4 RIF YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
•
•

River Name: Silver creek
Reach Name: Mainstem
Cross Section Name: XS4 RIF YR2
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
& Trib Restoration
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0 0 1130.11 fp
11.06 0 1130.31 bm
12.93 0 1130.04 It
22.37 0 1130.37 bw
38.96 0 1127.73 fp
55.15 0 1126.23 FP
89.19 0 1124.58
93.83 0 1123.41 lew
100.57 0 1122.83 tw0.65 r
109.11 0 1123.4 rew
120.18 0 1125.16
125.65 0 1125.91 BKF
133.83 0 1127.03 fp
144.62 0 1128.86 fp
154.57 0 1131.31 bm
162.06 0 1131.35 fp/ht
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
-------------------------------------------------------------
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 1128.99 1128.99 1128.99
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 1125.91 1125.91 1125
91
Floodprone width (ft) 114.11 ----- .
-----
Bankfull width (ft) 63.9 39.15 24.75
Entrenchment Ratio 1.79 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1.41 1.2 1
74
Maximum Depth (ft) 3.08 3.08 .
3.06
width/Depth Ratio 45.32 32.63 14
22
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 89.9 46.95 .
42.95
Page 1
XS4 RIF YR2.txt
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 64.31 42.41 28.02
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.4 1.11 1.53
•
Begin BKF Station 61.75 61.75 100.9
End BKF Station 125.65 100.9 125.65
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields curve
channel Left Side Right Side
Slope
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.2427 0 0
Movable Particle (mm) 52.5
•
•
Page 2
•
?I
J
•
co

Y ?
L r ?
U ,o
_> N W
N N N
W
O c
? .4
I

CL 0 co
E
02 °' ° vn0
U) w
a 0L
CC w ) .x

_ -IIFr' -
U 2 r U v1 U. ?

1C U W
co
w a
H oC o

? I

I
?t f F
r f£% w ?'.

M?o?v?NO
'
"?
•
?
?`?
?
O? ? /dam
/v?, ?LJ ?0/0? M
V ^? ?? fi.?
f- , 1
..?
-•, 0?0
f
? 4 i /q
? 1?1

in,

cC iC ^? ?• v? ? U
3

0
LA
a
? u
LL
66
X
A
0
LL
u,
6]
x
a
M
ul r
u
O
C µ
a? s
? a
t °
m
m
is
N
_O
U
a
c
? ao
? b
m
n
s
a
3
N
LL_
co
x

co
O
0
N
0
0
0
0
rn
0
co
O
n
0
0
n
CD
r

CD
V
7
UAL uotl??
XS5 RIF YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
•
n
U
•
River Name: Silver Creek & Trib Restoration
Reach Name: Mainstem
cross section Name: XS5 RIF YR2
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
Cross section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
---------- FS
------------- ELEV
------------------ NOTE
------------
0 0 1126.6 FP
9.04 0 1126.49 BM
21.36 0 1126.94 FP
40.27 0 1123.36 FP
58.45 0 1121.09 FP
75.08 0 1120.4 LB
76.42 0 1119.32 LEW
81.34 0 1118.03 TW1.25 R
84.07 0 1119.7 7H
90.64 0 1119.48 REW
93.25 0 1120.44 RB
102.1 0 1121.63 FP
118.16 0 1122.18 BKF
134.15 0 1126.09 BW
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
Floodprone width (ft)
Bankfull width (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio
Mean Depth (ft)
Maximum Depth (ft)
width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
wetted Perimeter (ft)
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
Channel
1126.33
1122.18
109.57
68.44
1.6
1.39
4.15
49.24
95.39
69.8
1.37
Page 1
Left
1126.33
1122.18
5.14
0.32
0.64
16.06
1.65
5.82
0.28
Right
1126.33
1122.18
63.3
1.48
4.15
42.77
93.74
65.27
1.44
XS5 RIF YR2.txt
Begin BKF Station 49.72 49.72 54.86
End BKF Station 118.16 54.86 118.16
i ---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
Channel Left Side Right side
slope 0.0027 0 0
Shear stress (lb/sq ft) 0.23
Movable Particle (mm) 51.7
•
•
Page 2
r
Y ?
Y 0
d
U io ¢
is
a`r o W
> c > o
(n o N o I
?o a
8Y I
w c e a.
? o
Ir d CD
IL O Z co o CC
ln_
uyi C O oU Q 12
?o
° a ¢w w
U 2 U v1 LL
W
H 2 G ?, ??N I
r j
M t7 ?D '?:; 1 : 00
N l? 00 N [? 4,
cC c C C?
9z 2
Q O * a} ' '

m
? r
}
J II
O
O }
CL s
,9 a
co
x
0
}
J
O
O
IL
(D
co
x
ti
.p
r
y II
o µ
CL y
N a
m °
't
m
F
N
O
IC
U
'a
c
N
? N
C ti
i6
M II
Y
a
3
N
}
J
O
O
IL
ED
co
0
O
r
0
0
m
O
N
0
0
0
0
rn
0
0
0
ti
0
ID
0
in
Co
v
O
M
0
N
0
0

XS6 POOL YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
•
•

River Name: Silver Creek & Trib Restoration
Reach Name: Mainstem
Cross Section Name: XS6 POOL YR2
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0 0 1126.47 HT
11.7 0 1126.46 BM
22.37 0 1127.08 HT
37.52 0 1124.19 FP
54.38 0 1121.81 FP
65.29 0 1121.17 FP
71.56 0 1120.78 LB
75.64 0 1119.02 LEw
83 0 1117.79 Tw1.05 P
87.61 0 1118.87 REw
91.11 0 1119.32 FP
101.33 0 1121 RB
123.36 0 1122.27 BKF
138.51 0 1125.63 FP
142.41 0 1126.76 BM
-----------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
--------------------------------------------------------
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
Floodprone width (ft)
Bankfull width (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio
Mean Depth (ft)
Maximum Depth (ft)
width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
wetted Perimeter (ft)
Channel
1126.75
1122.27
134.97
72.24
1.87
1.67
4.48
43.26
120.32
73.09
Page 1
Left
1126.75
1122.27
36.12
2
4.48
18.06
72.38
40.25
Right
1126.75
1122.27
36.12
1.33
3.49
27.16
47.94
39.82
XS6 POOL YR2.txt
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.65 1.8 1.2
Begin BKF Station 51.12 51.12 87.24
End BKF Station 123.36 87.24 123.36
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
slope
Shear stress (lb/sq ft) 0.2827 0 0
Movable Particle (mm) 59.3
•
•
Page 2
C7
•
0
? I
? I
U ip ¢
Q !
f
W
d1 o N ?- cc
I
I
H
U
w
c ® I
I
? o
a co
z
to N U)
o
W
I
I
-
_
N F
c a o oU H
Q l
I
a ¢w
V r U fn w
LL

? I
N
I ?
i
I
CO) a LLI
a w a

/ I
i"

fiw
7 U ih

M
\C O O - - r
,

4-. O
•
1 4
I
A ? ? ?? ? ? C t
p,?
,T? ?? d ? I

con
r?aa3wv

kc)
tf)
tf)
O
C%
0:
? II
L
Q
CO
x

0
x
y II
C
O ?
a Y
a
CD c
`!
t
d
[6
lop,
O
(6
a
c
N
C ?
to
m 11
Y
a
n
r
a`
d
H
r?
x
C)

0
a
LCi
co
0
M
Ln
Ctrl
7
V
n
7

LM ICE
XS1-UTA RIF YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
•
River Name: Silver Creek & Trib Restoration
Reach Name: UTA
Cross section Name: XS1-UTA RIF YR2
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
---------- FS
------------- ELEV
------------------ NOTE
----------------------
0 0 1191.99 fp
7.59 0 1190.13 bm
10.33 0 1189.16
18.75 0 1186.13 lew
18.85 0 1186 Tw0.0 r
19.38 0 1186.12 rew no water
• 22.9 0 1187.02 BKF
32.56 0 1189.71
42.09 0 1191.04 fp
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 1188.04 1188.04 1188.04
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 1187.02 1187.02 1187.02
Floodprone width (ft) 13.12 -
Bankfull width (ft) 6.62 4.27 2.35
Entrenchment Ratio 1.98 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.5 0.6 0.3
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.02 1.02 0.6
width/Depth Ratio 13.24 7.12 7.83
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 3.29 2.58 0.71
wetted Perimeter (ft) 6.97 5.14 3.03
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.47 0.5 0.23
Begin BKF Station 16.28 16.28 20.55
End BKF Station 22.9 20.55 22.9
• ---------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1
XS1-UTA RIF YR2.txt
Entrainment calculations
• --------------------------------- ___- ------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields Curve
Channel Left side Right Side
Slope 0.03856 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 1.13
Movable Particle (mm) 166.4

•
Page 2
•
? I
d i
?j oC a I
c w
f/1 N
N IL I
o s I
w C 1 • "? I
O I
x V co
w
a N 8 U)o I
6 I
I
0 H 2 W W I
U n V co LL
E t r
Y U w
Q W Q -
F- cc G I
'g I
? I
a ? t
I
? I
A.W
w, ` ? 'F r
: 00 00
O ?L./ O ? ? ?' .y? 'f` Y?\?y? • ?.. ICI
3. , ?? moo
" 0 0
;, a ? f 9su> ?,re v, ? N
L
n ^ W a '?,. ? ? O G?
w U
Q all,
Vol*
r
•
K
} II
J
O 4
O ?I
C t
N C
cn
x
A
0
J
O
O
IL
N
co
x
Go
N II
C
0 Y
IL d
61 p
U
7
C2
d
l6
All.
N
O
4O
V
c
m
c ?
to
m II
4-
.0
N
J
O
O
a
H
N
co
x

0
v
M
O
M
47
N
O
N
C]

7

xs2-UTA POOL YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
•
•
C?
River Name: silver creek
Reach Name: UTA
Cross Section Name: xs2-UTA POOL
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
& Trib Restoration
YR2
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation:
Backsight Rod Reading:
TAPE FS
0 ft
0 ft
ELEV
NOTE
0 0 1175.02 fp
5.07 0 1173.9 bm
11.22 0 1172.07
13.87 0 1171.66 BKF
19.1 0 1170.63 lew no water
19.8 0 1170.58 p TW0.0
22.68 0 1170.68 rew no water
28.8 0 1173.74
30.31 0 1174.11 bm
36.24 0 1177.74 fp
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
-----------------------------------------------------------
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 1172.74 1172.74 1172.74
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 1171.66 1171.66 1171.66
Floodprone width (ft) 17.83 ----- -----
Bankfull width (ft) 10.77 3.91 6.86
Entrenchment Ratio 1.66 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.68 0.39 0.85
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.08 0.77 1.08
width/Depth Ratio 15.84 10.03 8.07
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 7.36 1.51 5
85
wetted Perimeter (ft) 11.11 4.76 .
7.89
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.66 0.32 0.74
Begin BKF Station 13.87 13.87 17.78
End BKF Station 24.64 17.78 24.64
---------------------------------------------------
Page 1
XS2-UTA POOL YR2.txt
• Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields curve
channel Left Side Right Side
slope
Shear stress (lb/sq ft) 1.59856 0 0
Movable Particle (mm) 213.6
•
•
Page 2
•
y
? r I
U tp ¢
d O W
O
fA o N CO a
a
U
W c v \
0 r
¢ V co
a. w
N O o
uy1 Q a co P d
00
U ' I
a xw w
U rn U.
y
? -,at
a W a -
I
ac o I
? f
? I
I
? I
HIT
• - _ - - -
f ??f 1''.r i
O? M ?^?', a `;?n"'?x4; ? ?.. k? " , ? t t • ?"-° ? O
it
v waR t"?h ? r?
po
4? ?, p y
SAY u w V
MMme" M?" Cz r?,'? CCS rho T'A
`dwr,.y 47? y? a p GJ
Y,r
l

r
a
>- u
J
O 4
o y
CL r
M G
67
x
44
0
J
O
O
CL
Cl)
co
x
M
b
N II
C
O ?
IL s
CL) a
o
7
d
l4
N
O
lE
U_
c r-
m u
s
a
C^1 3
J
O
O
a
r,
CO
x
0
Lr)
Lf)
Ln
?n
a
0
-r
M
co
m
r?
V
V
n

xS3-UTA POOL YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
•
•
•
River Name: Silver Creek
Reach Name: UTA
Cross Section Name: xS3-UTA POOL
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
& Trib Restoration
YR2
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation:
Backsight Rod Reading:
TAPE FS
0 ft
0 ft
ELEV
NOTE
0 0 1157.44 fp
7.46 0 1156.06 bm
17.13 0 1154.33
19.91 0 1152.36 fp
22.2 0 1151.15 BKF
26.49 0 1150.19 lew
27.25 0 1150.05 p TW0.11
29.65 0 1150.22 rew
34.39 0 1151.54 fp
39.15 0 1153.82
46.58 0 1155.19 bm
53.09 0 1156.1 fp
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 1152.25 1152.25 1152.25
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 1151.15 1151.15 1151
15
Floodprone width (ft) 15.75 ----- .
-----
Bankfull width (ft) 10.79 6.8 3.99
Entrenchment Ratio 1.46 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.63 0.69 0.54
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.1 1.1 0.98
width/Depth Ratio 17.13 9.86 7
39
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 6.83 4.66 .
2
17
wetted Perimeter (ft) 11.04 7.9 .
5
09
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.62 0.59 .
0.43
Begin BKF Station 22.2 22.2 29
End BKF Station 32.99 29 32.99
Page 1
XS3-uTA POOL YR2.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.03856 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft) 1.49
Movable Particle (mm) 204.0
•
•
Page 2
•
Y 4
N I
7 I
v ?o ¢
> LO W °) I
o } I
fA O N a ¢
W c sa I
O0 I
¢ u co
Z W
d N a N O a:
FL a CC W W I
U UU1 LL
I \
I
I
N a ? ,
¢ o e I
? I.
I
a r
I
`
I f .
CIO
00 N O Z
O O O N d 1?r a k a '? rjv, " !? 00
CAr r ' `
19
1X.y& T ?P µ F A, 4a
WYA
U t- Vow
W U Y 4 ? yiiiw d y??Y'? r''?X X t l ?\ t
PA

a
c
? u
? Y
v L
Co a
x
O
L?
CD
x
u?
N
? II
0 4.
? Y
d a
? o
t
7
CA
W
0
ca
U
c
N
C ti
f6
m II
µ
Y
a
N
v
co
x
0
4'1
Ln
Lr)
?n
0
?I7
M
0
M
LO
N
0
N

ID

XS4-UTA RIF YR2.txt
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
•
•
•
River Name: Silver Creek & Trib Restoration
Reach Name: UTA
Cross Section Name: XS4-UTA RIF YR2
Survey Date: 12/02/2008
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation:
Backsight Rod Reading:
TAPE FS
0 ft
0 ft
ELEV
NOTE
0 0 1157.45 FP
14.21 0 1154.34 LB
19.76 0 1151.79 fp
23.76 0 1150.05 BKF
25.55 0 1149.45 lew
27.87 0 1149.05 p Tw0.5
29.32 0 1149.43 rew
35.87 0 1151.9 fp
42.26 0 1154.18
53.03 0 1155.38 fp
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
---------------------------------------------------------------
Channel Left Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft) 1151.05 1151.05 1151.05
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 1150.05 1150.05 1150.05
Floodprone width (ft) 12.15 ----- -----
Bankfull width (ft) 7.2 6.61 0.59
Entrenchment Ratio 1.69 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.57 0.61 0.11
Maximum Depth (ft) 1 1 0.22
width/Depth Ratio 12.63 10.84 5.36
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 4.08 4.01 0.07
wetted Perimeter (ft) 7.5 7.09 0.86
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.54 0.57 0.08
Begin BKF Station 23.76 23.76 30.37
End BKF Station 30.96 30.37 30.96
-----------------------------------------------------
Page 1
Xs4-UTA RIF YR2.txt
• Entrainment calculations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen modified shields curve
Channel Left Side Right side
Slope 0.03856 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 1.30
Movable Particle (mm) 184.3
•
•
Page 2
•
•
•
rl ?
? N
O
V7
A
a
W
W
CC
`o E
00
v,
C pp
?_ 00
CO
v
U
s
a A

?Q
Q
h
x
O
N
v-,
N
W
N
?E
'OE
a
_d
V
a

v
N
0
0
O
O
O
0
'- N

N N

O
O

C O

? E

4 N
h
A
Y
N f%?
?+

p

a
u

0.

i
0
O O O O O O O O O O O
O O? 00 l? ? v; d' r'N
3u13 a6 anheInwna

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° M, ? ?; ? ? S S S S S S S S S S S
U

v

E c
ca
x

O

o

0

0

0

0

0

0

?,

N

N

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

°o

s
N
II
y
OQ
A C O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O
E

II
p

A
ti

? ?

y
y
w
a N
O
O
O
V N

O

p
p N
O

N

O ?
O
V7
N O

O O

N
O O

d'
O
N ?

V?
O
?t O

00 ?

^ O

cr, ?
N
N
O
`p N
M,

N

N

c+';
V

v?
-t
O

?c op O
oo

oo
N ?
n
N
O
00 N
O
M,
?c

N N

N

cr, N oc
O

N
O
00
O

V

E

CY,
=

U
?^

_

CQ
•?

07

U

>

c3

?_
LL.

>

;
c
w

C

o

U
-a

Fes:
p
U

>

r.

C
Lz,
i
>

a
U
c
w

y

C
U
c
w

>
L
C'

>
i..
V

N
>
(7
u
cz
U

>

(?
0.)
c
U
>

U

L.
>
>

U

>

N
?+
O
U
cli

L

O
U
03

c>
L
O
U

y

O
U

?
O
CG
ro
cn

N
'?
O
G1
ro

Q

N
V

W
°'

U

o
W 0
F,
`^ avueH ui % -
•
•
r JJI
?J
O
M
Cl
+
,.y N
O
A
O
z
o
.,.., v z
a ? n
a
W
W
C
0
Lo E
0.
ea ?
L
L
U
L ?
U y
0
E
L
a?+
x
V
O
N
N
N
vE
?E
NN
mN
_d
V
fir
CL
00

N
O
O
O
0
0
0

O
°
o

o°

E

•? u
N
h

N d
O `
V? "' CC
d a

a

0
O O O O O O O O O O O
O 10 v: V M N
au?3 oy aeijelmmnj
v
D
y
C?
6
?
O
oo
N
kr)
00 O
O O
O p
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
U

w
C
cc
?"
C

O

?

?

M

N

?

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

r-i y
C

c';

N
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
A

OII

A

N

N
(?

y

y.

p

O
N

O

O

O

N

O

O

O

O
r-

v'1

O

O
i

O

O

O

N

O

6

l

v?

cr

6

^;

N

?.

N

M

)

c

N 00

Lb

N

N

?0
-

M

)
N

N

?

M

N 00

p

N

N
O

00

"t
C

V

O
y

0
6a

a

?

1

v>

)

>

.O
cC

w

E

/)
cn
cz

u

.
O

Q)
>

~

I.C
W

O
>

?
f?i'
V`

c
w

)
r?
V

c
w
5
>
L
U

O
3
>

N

v

V

M
v

u

a
v
L.

O
u

?..
>
L

p
U
>-
L
>

.fl
O1
V
7-z

Q?
.n
r0,
V
-7z

u
:E
I0 1
V

Q

/0
V

Q)

/y0
Mq

R

q

MO
W

R

a

?

"p

O
W

i

V

O p
O ? O v1 O v, O v". O
v M M NaSB?g iii %"
•
E
•
M, +
0
V7
A
O
z
o
a
w
w
c
O
sue.
° E
6J cn ?
6>
L
Y
L
U
s
is
6> ?
? A
E
O
x
x
a
0
N
Ic
N
N
vE
'OE
a
x
V
N
0
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
r N co --
c0
I O
O
o"E
A ?E
v
N ^
O t
a
P,
9
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O Q` W l? ? V; } M N
4w,3 0IC 3A!)LInwn3

a O O O O
N
? O O p
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
U

a?

ea
0 0 0 0 4 00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
°o
E ?
w,

a

?
II
?
A
?
U
O
O
O
O
N
M
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O o
?
E
E

A

frj

y

y
L
C`l

O

U ,,,

N

p
O
N

Irl
N
O
v'1

N
O

n

O
O

O
O

O

N
?

O

V
O

?
m

O

r,

O

N

N

c+

v

c
00
N

l

W

00
N

v')
N

C
00

M

C
N

,--,
V

N
Ic
00
O
N

ON

00
O

N
U
? a
?
o

O
U

a

_
cC

?

_

rJ.

L
>

O

,A

?
w

O

m

?

cz
C4

?

° v
`n

p

U

?
>
La

rC_'

W

a)
>

aJ
r a,

U

C
w

y
Ca

U

C
w

L

=

aJ

L
U

=

N

V

U

CC
U
y
O
U

V

C3
U °'
U
v0
a

U

L
> y
V

ro

U

L
>
u
.L)
O

U

?
?
u
O
°

U

?`
u
t
°

U
a)
L
.?
a)
O
°

U
a)
L
"U
O
MO

4

CC
C,
C

M°
=
_
CC
-°

?
i
C7

M°
W

L
.a

V

O H
0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0
a`ue? u! 0/0
•
•
•
O
O
A
O
z
a
p; ? cyn
a
W
W
O
`o E
y " O
00
a
E
6
L
y
67
L
U
L ?
U y
CO ?
?, a A

L
r?+
W
x
v
O
N
N
W
N
E
?E
m
N
NN
M,
V
a
x
It
N
O
O
0
0
0
_ O
0
? N
N N.
a) Q)
o
A
y
Q d
N
d o.
a i
0
O O O O O O O O O O O
O Q? x L? 10 V i 7 M N
auI,4 o 3niaelnwn3

8 0 0 0 0 0 o v `? M c °o o° °o °o °o °o o° o° °o S S S
U
s
a?
e

Cyr ai
C O O O O O O ? a\ ? M N N O O O O O O O O O O O O

M S

II ?
? ? O O O O O O ? O? Q` ? N N O O O O O O O O O O O O
A U

8
E

II
O
A

? ?

N
v

a

I
?
O
U
N

O
?
OO

N

O

O

N
O

O

`?
O

O
N
O

O
?
O
N

[?
?
O

O
oo
t`
v'1

?:

?

p
cr,

N

O
?p

N
?;
?
N

?
N
M,

?

?

O

?

pp
N
^

O
oo
oo
N

O
?
O
x

N
?
?
N

N
.,
N
`p

N

p

?
O

0
O
V

y

i7
U
6)

a

?

y

A

O

U

ri
C

C

>

C

G
w

E

C
`

rn
N
R3
O
U
N
>
>
m
I'1

O
fi
N
>

O,
C7
C
w

J

t.
C7
G
u;
N

/c^C
V
?'

N

cC
U

u

.

U

> >
s•,

N
Y.
p
U
i-.
> > >
L

s,
p
U
i.
v)

u

O
U
7-Z
?

)

O
U
ct

u

L
O
U

.?
L
O
U
1..

U

O
Ca
C3

N

"?
O
?Q
m
V5
y

O
'?
E

N

.G
O
Qa

.?

x

s
o . o v, c v; o
7 M M Na??'?? ? 0?
•
•

N
O N
O
Q
z
a
w
w
O
i+
`0 8
y N 00
? O
C p?q
RS
6J
L
.1
L
U
a a
s
L
y
x
x
0
N
N
N
?E
m
mN
_d
V
CL
x
v
N
0
0
0

?
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
l?
N
,r
? 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O o
O O
O o
O
U
s
v
c

? c? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °O ° M ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o
ao
o;
N

A U O O O O O O O O O oo rM, oo O O O O O O O O O O

R

II

O

?c
co

N

a
N

p

O

O

O

O

O

t
N

?
d"

o
tIl

M

p

M

N

t

Z

O

N

o

"

N

M

N 00

p
O

0
U

E cz

a

?

U
6!

a

_

?

t1
Con
C
N

C

C

R,

?

C

p

U 73
cu
V?

L
O
?

>
>
C13
L

C
N

>

C

,

a

C_

w
"7j

>
L

a
"75

>
L"

y

N

(d
U
cG

U

y

CC
V
R1

U >

?

L

> >

?
(n

L

>

N

,a
O
c3

60

)
:E
O
M

?

N

.n
O
i.

N

:
O1
y_

a

N

MO
cG
E

N

nO
MO
RY
E
uo

?

0

'O
V
?

?

"C?
MO
L

.a

b

G
o v, o v; o v; o v, o
v M, ?, Na??g ui o? ""
•
•
•
O
O
IN
O
z
C
.o z
a`, x
a
W
W
C
O
o E
Y o
00
a
L
L
U
L Y
? V a+
L
OA
O

v
O
N
N
00
_£
,.£
4
d
U
a
oc

O
cv
O
O
0
0
0
0
r N -'
`m m`
O
°o
°e
A ?
A u
u
0
? 0.
a
0
O O O O O O O O O O O
O O? 00 l? ? V`, V cr, N
aul3 0/, ae!aelnmqj

a

?
?
0
0
0
o
m
„
?
? 0
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
U

a
?+
C O O O O rte', ? ? N `p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
S

? ? O O O O m ? ? N ? O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O
U
A

E
ao
II
lfi
A
?D

?
E
N
6>
V
tom.

?

C
V

N

?
N
O

O

N

O

O

N

O

'n
O

O

O

O

O
N

?

O
?'

O

l
v'7

r

?

M

N

O
?O

m

(V
N

?

M

?
kn
?.

O

?O

?

p
Cr

po
00
N

?

Op0

?

V'1
N

?

M

N

N 00

p

N
O

0
ON
V
? a

°
a
N
a
O

y

a

O

•?

?

U

_
cn

C

W

y
>

c

C

C'
[x.

C

N

O

?

O
U C4

u
O,
U

N
> m

L
V
C

a)
>

M

C

I
ti,

V

C

u

>
L
V

N

>
L
V

?

7
m
C'
u

cC

U -7,

7
>

v

c?

U T

v,
O
U

L

> 7

O
v,
O
y

L

>

_1.)
.tJ
p

?

_U

O
U

?

V
L.
O
U

t,

. a

_a.)
?,
O
U

?

a

U
'?
ryO?
""

CC

O
'G
MMO

W
CG

rn

=
O

D

O
'O
ryO

n'1
U

.a

U

LO

CA E
O k(', C v', O v, O v', O
V m r? Na?&?g UI
•
•
•
v?
Con M,
? Q
A
O
z
v v o
w z
a v
a
W
W
O
O
L
0
a
L
U
L V U
U
c x A

L
O
2
V
0
N
W"
N
00
E
?E
N
NN
M ?
U
IL

vl
N
0
O
O
0
0
0
0
N -
m`m
I O
O
0
.G
•y v
Q ?
a?
N ? .L
? CE
3! a
a
O
O O O O O O O O O O O
O Q, oo (? 'D -, V m N
alm OZ, ae!Ielmmn.)
w

O o o
°
?
?
?
?
pip
? O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O p
O O
O p
O O
O o
O O
O
U
b`

8 ?
?
o a o 0 0 ? N p ? p o o ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o
0o
n s

00
Ca
c
o
O
O
N
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
? U

N
II ?
Q

?

10 N

,
r+

p

V

O

O N

O

N

O

O

O O

'?
O O

O O

O

N

)
O
?' O

oc
r M

? O

O

cr,

N

O
`O N

r

?
N
kr)

N
M

?t

v?
?t

O

?
?p pp

' O

x

oo
N

v?

O
o0 N

p

?D
N
N

N
?p

N

'

p

?
O

00

?
V
a

C

o

^
ICI
_

C

U

) Con

C

1

>

]

C

rrtt
W
O

y
=

'?'

cC
O
U
L
O
U

i.
N
>
U

u•

w.
N
Q>
ro O.
0

N
rrTCT_
W
U
t0.,
u

N
rr'C'_
W

=

'D
U
L

?_

'D
G?
c3

?

ccz
O
U
cC

?•''

cz
O
U
cn

U

L
U
>
Vi

U

t.
N
>
.f

U

cC
E
cn
,L

V

=
E
Cn
.D
Q
U

N

"m
L

U
v

CG
'C
?yO•.

C
E
cl?
O
0
pa
_

m
E
DI)
MO
w

U
D

(Ya
y

CC`

o

O
O N O v? O v; O
AtMH U!%
•
•

O
N +
rl ?
O
A
z
o
o ?
a
w
w
ti
O
C4
0
w
? o
a 00
y
L
U
Id A
E

x
oc
7
0
N
kn
(N
00
E
?E
a)
d
V
R
IL
x

r
N
O
0
0
O
O
O
.- N
N cu
O
O
0
s °"e
•y N
A ?
N O •y
a
a
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O? 00 !? ?D 4"; V M N
3ul3 0ZI an!lelnwn,)

?
e_
0
?
o
?
?
N
cr';
M
v?
?
?
pMp
? O
O C
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
U
s
E

? a
R
cG

p

r

o

?

?

p

o

?n

o

,?

o

?

p

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0°

u s

ao
A w

? c
o
o
?
p
?
?
p
o
?
o
?
o
,,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
°o
oA
r;
O
A

d

N

?
N

a

=

CQ
a

C
O

V 'n

p

O v?
N
O
N_

O

O
N

p
O

r

O
O
N
O
O

O

N
r
v?
O
O
oo

v?
?`'

r

N
O

?p
N
cr,

N

'n
N

M

-1

O
-t
00
N
O
oo

N
V)
n
c

000
N
D

?
N
N

r;

N

?

O
't

N
O

00

N
V

0
0
I

o

a

'
R

z
v

..

>

)

R

?

?

O
s=

o
U
N

>
y

w

N

>

a

D
C

w

a

U
G

w

E

N

>

E

y>

C
U

ro

u

C
U

cQ

u

U
V]
o
U
L

>

U
ran
0
v
s-.

>

0

u

?

y
L'
0
U

?

'
0
U
i,

i

a?
-C

U
i„

s

a`i

0
a1
cJ

U
0
a
cC

E

-p

y
'C
o
as

x

O 0
O v', O v'; O
N N -VgueH'ui v/,,
•
•
I I1
J
C
OC
rl ^
O
A
O
z
u u o
a
W
W
I?r
Q
w
L
y Q O
a 00
ca
w
w
L
U
0
a ?
E
L
0
y
x
oc
O
N
N
W
N C
?E
N
N V)
M, G>
V
a

'IT
N
O
0
0
0
0
0
(0 tri
I o
0
O
s °s
'y d
N
H
A d
y u
N O 'y
d ?w
u
•L
a,
i
0
o ? m o ? o v° 0 0 0 0
4ul3 0/, aelaelnwn3
u

?
o
0
o
r,
?
?
?
S o
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
0 c
0 o
0 0
0 0
0
U

u
e
?+
O
O
O
?M,,,
?
??f,'
O
d-
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

8
ri
II

A C

E
G
U
O
O
O
?`
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C p
S
ao
o E

A

d
E"'?
n?.

N
?
u
CJ
?,

?
p
c
V
N
?

p
?

p
?
N

O

p
yj
N
O

O

n
O

O
N
O

O
?
O
N

[?
V?
O
d'

O
00
r
v'?

?`:
?

`p
^
r

N
N
O
`p

M

N

?
d'
N
M

d-
?D
v?
?t

O
O?
d
?O

°O
?

opo
.-,
oo
N

v?
N
O
o0

`p
M
D
?
N

?
v1
N

M

N
?
N
^
? 00

p
N

N
p

o0
O
N
V
O O
O p
p
I
O
U

Y
a

_
?

U

c

Li
O
>

=

V]
=
w

?

?

c
?
??
O
s=

O
U
O
>
?

?_
Lt.
O
>

o
C7
C
w

?

V
C
u

?

N

?

y

as
v
u
cG
U

V

a?
cV
U >

?
U
c,
> >

?
U
i.
>

Z
o
U
?

Z
O
U
?

z
o
U
y_

Z
O
U
`

:2
O
as
cC

2
O
M
cC
u
o
?

"p

U
O
Cq

x

rA H
M O N O v,, c v. O
SSuelfln OL-
•
•

•• O
(/) N
O Q
O
Q
O
z
o
a
w
w
O
O
it
00
000
a?
L
U
L ?
? Q
E
L
bA
x
0
N
v;
N
00
?E
N
M
d
U
IL
x

N
O
0
0
bd

a
U

O

O

O

O

O

?

N

N

c,

oc

c-,
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a?
?
E eo
M ?: 0 0 0 0 0 v N N o 0 0 S
? C 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o

II b\
et
00
Q

++
C
O O O O O N N
U O O O O O O O O O O O O O

M
O?
11

O
O
c^
N
M
O
N
opo
N 00
p
o0
O N v oo
F" O O O O M
y
V N N O N N
' v'? d' 00 O ?O N N N
V
td p O O N V v'? 06 ?p N ?
' `O N oo N V
d' O O N m O
? i.
? a

5
1 = ti
y

c v

a? C?s
n

U _
C7
C7
°
° o
C° ° o cc V V 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
y U U fi U V y U U U U U U U Pa CG E GQ
c
` c o - o

a a
?
>
r o c
" c o o a ? E E i ro v v
U > > u
, w U U > > a a
.
M M N stugrbI 0,?-
•

Riffle Cross-Section 5, looking from right to left across channel (September 8, 2008)

•

? 9 q rel. .. }..
?f J
Pool Cross-Section 6 looking
g from right to left across channel (September 8, 2008)
Page 4 of 4

•

Page 1 of 4
Silver Creek Mainstem, Monitoring Year 2
Monumented Cross-Section Photographs
t 'Y
y y

Riffle Cross-Section 1, looking downstream (September 8, 2008)
nuue t-ross-section 1, looking right to left (September 8, 2008)
0
5
4 °r
.4'a
r #? aY
a 1( g
a "
w
fi
.h ^n a ! 1. '^11"4.1@. '? }
°
r '` ?;x*
41,
x
•

Pool Cross-Section 3 at J-Hook, Log Vane, Rootwad Combination Structure
(September 8, 2008)
- n
Page 2 of 4
•

•
r?
LJ

Riffle Cross-Section 4, looking downstream (September 8, 2008)
A?
•= n
r ?a
114
F - .:;_.' •. ma'ke' a 3x?ttf r:in?' r1
Q
vm?
?0
? _ <p tltRLJ??? •q?' :'?I ?\LM?' k J'+ .I ? Ra
g
-ol
* t i aCn ' t} to .«
Riffle Cross-Section 4, looking upstream, from top to bottom: Riffle run, pool sequence
with sand and gravel point bar formation (September 8, 2008)
Page 3 of 4
r 1
?, rvt? 1 nu ?
N

Z Y
W m m co OV
C)
f= °o 0 0
0
W - o
l
LL
y
II
II
m va cr, v?
T _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ..,_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _r _,_ _ _ _ _ _ -i
I I ?
' I ' J J
( 1
' 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 i
!
- - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _' _ - - - _ _
- - - - - - - - - - --
1 f
I 1 I 1 '
r
I I
1 I ' ' J !
1 1 1 , 1 I
- - - - - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - -?- - - - - - - - - - .. '.... _ - !, .. '
1
I
1 ? 1
r 1 1 I
I 1 1 I
! J
L - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - L _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ J - - - - - - - - - - J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.-.
1 1 1 1 -i
+ ? JI , J r
1 i 1 tfP/ 1
I ,
--------------------------------•----------+-------- ,r- ---------- ----------- _ _ _
IJ
1 I I I J
---------- ---------- ---------------- ----------- ----------
1 I +f I r
' I 1
1
I
I 1 ,
____--'___i_--_-_-__- I i -----------r`--- ' ----- L--------- i-------- _. -.-- ... - ` ._-________1_-__-____-
f
f I
rr' ?
/ , 1 1
r I ,
1
--------------------- ----------
- ------------------- -------- ..
1 1 ,
1 i ? ! f
1
1 I , ,
l 1 ,
------------------------------- ----------
---------------------
, ( I 1 1
I
e ? t I ! 1 ' 1 I
I r , ,
I Y 1 / I 1 ,
r------- --------r------ --r-------- ,. . --------- --------- ----------' - -
1
' I I
1 , I ? i 1
' ' 777111 '
i ,
1 I ' 1 1
'--'------`-'-___--____ ,--------------------J_-_-------
1 1 I f 1 i
f!
1!
°
0
C'4
°
°
°
C4
°
°
m
T
°
°
OD
r
°
°
r~
r
O
O
Lo
r
0
°
X27
r
°
O
r
°
°
M
O
1 - I
1 I
1 1
1
I 1 ,
1 1 I ,
' 1 1
---------------L----------1----------1----------
1
1 ,
1 1 ,
1 1 ,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 , I I
I I i
I '
I I ,
I I i ,
°
O
°
°
°
r
°
°
rn
°
°
OD
Co
°
Y+
?? 1 J
1 ' I
1 i 1 ,
L - - - - - - - - - - L' - - - - '
1 1 1 1
1
1 1 ; f !
' ' I 1
---------------------
1 ' , I
I I 1
I
i ? I J J
I y r I
I / -
I r J
f r
J r
-d 160d ZSX-------_r
GA _
°
°
co
. v. . .. .. .. .., _. .. °
°

°
°
'rr
°
°
M
A
------ -
CN
r r 1
1
+
L - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - I
C6 c In CN 1 I
co CN - r C T C14 fwl CSI C14 ? 6?
r
r c- r r t- r T r ?--- r r s_
r i- r r ?
r
(}}) uoiaen9
l3
°
0 0 0
CV 0

0 y' N N ti
Z U- GJ = O Q

Q
Q
O
W m C3
•? +?"?.. Q G Q
W LL II II

m cn cn ?n
Q
J J
Ct] co
x x
t>
- --- ----------;----------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ------
gip-
__________r___-____-_r__________r__________?_- ___---- _______________ __-
------ --------- ______
I ,
I
1 1 i 1 I
I ` I 1 -
L______---_L__________ __________a-_________?_--__-__-_ _______
1 1 , ; Y ?7?_ - ,y
------------ -------- ---------- ----------- -----------
I 11? I 1
I 1 ----------------
1
! 1 1
I 1 I
- - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ?--i___-___-_
1 I !
I 1 I 1
1 i I 1
1 i 1 1 I ?V, ' '
1 ! 1 1 I 1 1 I
1
I ; 1 i 1 r - ?
1 ,
1 1 1 1 1
I I 1
1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1J•. '
-1
--d ?oQd CS? - --- --
- - - - - - 1
1 , 1
! , I
1 I , ,
1 I
1 1 I ly
------------ _ _ _ _ _ J -----------------
------------ 1 ;
I ,
Y ? V~y, ?4 1 1
' 1 1
I 1
'-----°-----r_°-------°r , ------ ° -- --------
, 1 ? r•
1 ,
- - - - - - - - L - - - - - ° - - - ` - - - -£ - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ._ - - - - -- '` _ _ _ _. .. _ _. .. . - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - -
rr
I 1 1
rI r ------ i------ - ----------1
1
1 I ' ;
I
I I I I ?
1 I ' 1
---------- ---------------------------------- ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I 1'
1
L----------- 1-----------
- _-_..-____
1 1 + 1
1 I I
1 f
1 ? I ? 1
- ----------
I I r
.. 1
' r
I I
--------- --
ZIA?OOd ZS ---------.
L[]A JIi] 6-bls
; ',...
----------- --------
O a) co
M CN ty C N
++I
'
----------- ----------
CV
r
r ['^I
r Ctrl
? L`4
? ?
? ?
itil O
CY 6i
x---
? 's r
p al to] p
0
M
O
Q
co
C'11
Q
O
6?
O
Q
co
Q
O
O
Lo
TO
O
ko
T
O
O
v
r
O
co
Crl
a
O
O
CO
O
d
O
O
C37
O
co
Q
O
r?
O
O
Lo
Co
O
LD
O
O
tr
0
0
m
O
0
N
O
Q
r
O

Q
z LL- 7- ?

_ co ^ co

M o

M
W m U O +'
o a O
0 ?
W ? 0
= LL
II
II c;
II

-r----?----- ^ ---r---------------- r----r----i-----r----r----7-----r-----r----i----------
1 I
' I ; 1 1 I
1 i 1 1
1 1 ? i
i f
1'

' 1 1
1
1 1 1
I r
5

_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ ' _ _ _ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _I_ _ _ _ _'
_ _ _ _ S - _ _ _ i _ _ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ ;_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ ' _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -? i

1 _ _ _ / _ _ _ _
? 1
r 1 r 1 r 1 I
1 I 1 1
' 1 1
1
? 1'

?
1 r , r 1 1 1 r
1 1 r
1 1 ? 1 ? ; ' r 1 1
1 1 ,
, > , ,
I •'
, r 1 1 1
1
r 1 1 1 I r 1 1 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 ? '
1 1 I r 1 1 1 1 ?
1 1 ', ? , ,

1 L _ - 1 ------ L
I I i I i

,
1
I
1
' 1 I
' I I 1 1 t

I ,
_ _ _ _ _ L _ _ _ _
1 1
------ ,
_ _ _ _ I ......... -------
_ _ _ _ 1 _ _ J _I_ _ _ ; _
--------
I I 1
1 1 I 1 I 1
?
----------
?
I
1

-------
+ I I
; 1 1 I ,
1 1 1 1
---------- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
r _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _,_
y

• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f - - - - - - --- - - - - - r - - - - 7 - - - - -r - - - - r - - - - I-- r,- - r " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r ----
- f r
1 1 ? ?
-----
-----
- - - - - - - - - - ! - - - - - ! 1 1 - - - - 1 (
1 1

-----------
?
'
I
'
I 1
1 ? 1 r I
I
I 1
I I 1 ? ;
1 I
1 1
1 I
I

I 1 1 1 1
1 1

1 1 1
r 1 r
---------------- _I_ L - _ _ _ ......
1 I 1 , ,
.......... ------

1 ; 1
1
1
j 1 I (, f r
/
1

1 i 1
1 1
1
I
--------- -
------- ---------------- J _ _ _ _ _I_
?
( 1 '
I r
1 1 ?
?' 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
? ? ; r r
f 1 1
1 1
1
- 1 1
--- --
-------
, 1 1 1
1
1 1 1
, ? ' 1 1 1 1
1 ' 1 I 1 1 1 1
1 1

, , 1 r 1 ,
, ,
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 r 1 1

I 1
1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - -1- - - - - I - - - -
i
---- - 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - - 1 - - - - !- - - - -1- - - - - I - -
- 1 1
- - i - - - - -?
- 1----- 1 1
1
7-----------------
-----------
'

- -
- -
----------
--
-
- - - - --
I , - - ;- - - - - -- --- -; -- - --- - --- ---; - -
, r ' 1 1
I
_ _ _ ..
------------------ i _ _ _ _ _ _

' _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _
I r 1
r 1 I
-----
1
1 -
----
1
1

1
-------
r 1 I
---
I

J
r r
30-
I
I 1 1

I I 1

I r 1
1
1 1
1 1 1? r 1 1
r 1 7
r 1

1 1 r r r
I I 1 1 1 1
I r 1 1 I r 1
1 1 1 r r ,
1 1 1

r ,

1
?

r

1 1
1 '
1 1 1 1 1

i I
1 1 I

1 1
;

. 1 1

1 1
___ ___ !to -- 1 r I
r 1 ; ? 1 1 1
'
1 1
1 1

I I
' I
1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1
I 1 1
1 1
1 1

' 1
1
1

1 1
1
1 i
' i 1
1 I 1 1
1 1 1
I
CD
ko
CD
CD
O
O

CD
C7
CD
L1-)
OD
CD
CD
LSD
CD
Lrj
CD
CD
fl-
CD
L[)
co
co
C)
Lo
CD
LCS
Ln
C=p
C7
Lj j
O
Lt}
C:)
C=?
L17
co
CD
co
m
CD
L[}
C-1
d
CD
CV
C=l
LL )
r
Q
O
r
_ _ _ _ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ L _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ J _ _ _ - _1_ _ _ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ CD
f ' 1 I 1 1 1 _ - _ ._
f 1 1 !
C7
CD Go co . ' 1 I I I I 1 I I
O co {Q co CM f? CJD CD CSI [[? {4 CV C7 06 C4
Cl C37 C37 6? 6i CSY C70 co
co I,- F+ Fti F - Cg C? co co C9 LC] ko LD
C'*1 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
L(U) UOIJEAaG
•

y yl?

W C
Y U} _ t CG
O O '^
?
M
m S C} •L F.. 4 O
W LL

-? t
pjy ?
Y = w
SO II

J
co
rr
0-
J
f-
H

-----------'----- --------------------------------'--------------- i----- ,- --- ------ ------------- o
' 1 I I I 1 I I I ' ' r ,
I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I , , ' 1 I
----------- L L ----------- 1 _ _ _ _ J ------ _ _ _ _ J _ _ - _ _I_
[Z)
r
1 I 1
' ' 1 1 1 1 I , r r
I I I 1 , , ' 1 , , ' r
_ I
T - - - - _,- - - - - - - - - - f - - - - l - - - - - f --------------- - - - ----------------- ? ----------- r -? - ---?-----r----r----
CD
I 1 I
---- ---- -----'----- ----'I-- 1 ' 1 1 i ,;i r 1
i ; 6}
1 1 I ?
1 I 1 ' 1
1
I 1 ? r
----------- 1 ------------------------ '? - - - I _ _ _ _ - 1 I
r -r- C)
----
--- - =- -----------i - ------ I
------ L ----------- I _L____J__ _I__ 1 ' ' I ' I I I r
_ _ _ _ _1_ - - _ _. L ..
CD
' I i 1 I 1
CZ)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
, 1 ' I 1 r
L L J l 1 1 I
1 J I L J L 1
I r ' 1 1 1 1 1 r
___________ _________r 1 1
___ ---- __ '___ ' CD
Lf)
- LD
1 1 , 1 I 1
, r , , ? I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r
---------------
I 1 r.• y _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 _ _ _ _ ----------------------- ' i O
-----------
, 1 I I
' ? _ 1 1 1 ' , ' 1 1
--------------- CD
---------- ----------
Lf)
1 - - - - - - O
' I 1 r
, 1 I 1 1 I ; 1 r
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
CD
- - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - -
- -- - --- -----y-- - ---- ---- - --?---- o
M -- - - o
a ,
T
--------------------- ------ -<'- -- -----,-----'----'-----------
T ICD
; -----,-----,- --------,---- --- ---- r Lf)
----------------
I r I ' ' 1 I r - - - - - - - - - - - CD
I , , 1 i I 1 1 1
1 1 ' I ' ' ' 1 r
L '
__ __J (_ _ ' _L _ ' 1 1 , ' 1 I ' 1
_ _ _ _ - ' ? _ - _ _ J _ _ _ _ _I_ _ _ _ _ L _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _
, 1 1 1 r 1 r
_ i _ _ _ _ -------- _ _ _ _ _ --------------------- ' I I 1 1 ,
T
1 -----------
;' - '---- i-----1-----f ---- 07
? 1 1 1 ,
--------------------
O
O
CD 0) OD co tt rv O7 OD L:7 sr S"^! 07 tMT7T
6? C<7 CA CA OD 00 00 OD co T r tti L4 co Lq {g CO 47 4) 4 i
r 'r r r' r r r r r r r r r .? r r r r r
r r r r r
r
• •
0