20201514_DWR Mapping Comments w-responses 1-29-18_20180201

I-5883, I-5878, and I-5877
NCDWR Mapping Comments
Received from Joanne Steenhuis via Email — January 29, 2018
Over all — make perennial one color blue and intermittent a different color blue
• i ne� C ��e� C a �C�� reatures tna� ���re aUUCU arte� u i� SILe YeVl�vv �uasea or� an upaatea review or
project design) —just let me know if you would like to see photos, or if you need to see in the
field.
I-5883
Fig 3-A
S-B OK
Fig 3-B
Why is S-A two different colors of blue? Why do the lines not connect?
S-C — the blue line of S-C is not long enough. There are 2 arrows and one points to the project boundary
(there is no blue line there).
S-E — OK make the blue more visible
��«s�.«��«�..��..�.���•.���.,�:,
Fig. 3-C
Same comment for S-A
Fig. 3-D
S-G has two different colors for perennial
S-H — OK
Fig. 3-E
S-I — OK
S-K it didn't show up on the field aerials and I don't have it in my notes. Please explain
Fig 3-F
S-K -OK
Fig. 3-G
On the field sheets S-J was on both sides of the interstate and I had in my notes that S-J was ok? On this
aerial it is only on one side.
ide of interstate is/was outside of project area; therefore, eastern
portion was removed from map.

Fig 3-H
Same comment about S-J
. .
.
Figure 3-A
OK
Figure 3-B
SA -OK
SB — OK
Figure 3-C
OK
Figure 3-D
OK
Figure 3-E
SD — OK
�-58%%
Figure 3-A
OK
Figure 3-B
Ok
Figure 3-C
OK
Figure 3-D
OK
Figure 3-E
SH- Intermittent was not identified on field aerials or my notes. If it is downstream of SF perennial then
it should also be perennial or if it's upstream then it is intermittent. I also do not see a feature drawn on
the aerials. Please explain.
eature that we changed from perennial to intermittent during the site
vis�t, �t wa� ���� snowing up well on the map since it was within the wetland boundary. GIS file
was modified so it would easier to make out.
• If you are referring to SF Intermittent, this was a small piece of SF that was added after the site
review based on the updated project limits. It is on the opposite side of I-95 and upstream of
the perennial portion. It was not showing up well since it was on/under the project boundary.
GIS file was updated so it would be easier to make out.