20180101 Ver 1_More Info Received_20180201

SAGE
February 1, 2018
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Mr. Ross Sullivan
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Nichols Farm Subdivision
Revision to Request for NWP 12 and GC 4133
Sage Project #2016.10
2Q 0 131
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Stephanie Goss
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This submittal is intended to address questions posed by Mr. Sullivan during the initial review of
the January 22, 2018 permit application. The attached revised PCN form reflects revisions made
in an effort to respond to these questions. The stormwater pond discharge with associated
impacts labeled "62" has been redesigned so as to avoid any stream impacts (previously
proposed temporary stream impacts of 12 LF). This redesign eliminates the need for requesting
the use of NWP 18 and the corresponding GC. The remaining changes to the PCN just include
additional description detail and explanation. Please replace the previously submitted PCN and
impact maps with those attached to this submittal.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Sean Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form revised 01-01-18
Impact Maps (4 sheets) revised 01-01-18

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. SAW -2016-
01126
DWQ project no.
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
tb.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:4133
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
Forthe record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ®No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ®No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
®No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Nichols Farm Subdivision
2b.
County:
Durham County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Durham
2d.
Subdivision name:
Nichols Farm
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
E C Perry
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
007335 / 000809
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
E C Perry
3d.
Street address:
100 Whispering Oaks
3e.
City, state, zip:
Talladega, Al 35160
3f.
Telephone no.:
205-369-1873
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a: Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone'no.:
4g. Fax no,:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Sean Clark
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Sage Ecological Services, Inc. .
5c. Street address:
3707 Swift Drive
5d. ,City; .state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
5e. Telephone' no.:
919-559-1537
5f. Fax no::
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN orparcel ID):
0860-03-03-6223
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.956731' N Longitude: 78.795100° W
1c. Property size:
50.161 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Lick Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV, NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
3, Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The property is wooded but has an existing sewer easement that runs along the southern and western
property lines. Immediately adjacent properties are wooded.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 0.1 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: +/- 3,900 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct single-family housing and associated utilities to meet the demand in
this part of Durham County.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will be a, single-family residential subdivision with residential streets and utilities that will connect to existing
adjacent roads and utilities in the area. The proposed impacts result from utility construction. The utility installation
within -proposed impacts to streams will require temporary open cuts. The material removed from the excavated trench
will be temporarily placed in adjacent upland areas and fenced off so as to avoid potential runoff into the jurisdictional
areas down slope. Once the pipe has been installed, the native soil material will be used to backfill the trenches over.the
pipe., Excess.spoil will be removed to suitable upland areas, and stabilized. The plan does not propose the use of riprap
for bank stabilization. Heavy equipment typically used for utility installation projects (e.g. back hoes, bull -dozers, etc) will
be utilized.
The sewer line will connect to an existing sewer line located along the western property line and west of Lick Creek. A
sewer line will also extend from the property located to the north (proposed Sagewood subdivision) which will provide
connection to a proposed pump station that will be temporarily used until Durham installs a larger lift station (not on the
subject property) within the overall sewer basin.
Proposed stormwater BMP discharge locations will not result in stream impacts. Proposed riprap used for ground
stabilization will not be placed in the stream.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Corps or State been.'requested or obtained for this property /
Comments:
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional, determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name.(if known): Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation:
A site meeting Was held with Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of the USACE on 08/3/2016 and Mr. Rick Trone of the NCDWR on
04/01/2016.
Page 3of10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ®No El Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. .
6'. . Future Project Plans
6a.• Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed'lmpacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which •sections were completed below'for your project (check all that apply):
❑' Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ®Buffers El Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2., Wetland.lmpacts
If there,-ar'•e'wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. �' ,.i
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland,ihioact
Type of jurisdiction
i; number ;
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Corps (404, 10) or
Area of
Perrnan°ent�(P) or(if
known)
DWQ (401, other)
impact
ra, ,�..
Tern or"' "" (T)
(acres)
Choo,9e''one
Choose One
Choose one
Yes/No
-
0
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments; No wetland impacts are proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are'perennial'or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question;for'all'stream sites impacted.
3a.: 's '
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name.
Perennial.
Type of jurisdiction
Average stream
Impact
number.'
(PER) or
width
length
Perman,ent'(P) or
intermittent
(feet)
(linear
Ternp'orary, (T)
(INT)?
feet)
;A:J,,).,''
Excavation
Lick Creek,
PER
Corps
11.-
36
B11(T),
Excavation
UT to Lick
Creek
ANT
Corps
3
41
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
77
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below:
4a. ;
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of
impact number-
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
(acres)
Temporary T
01 Choose one
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
0
4g. Comments: There are no open waters within the project boundaries.
Page 4 of 10

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction ro osed,•then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or
(acres)
number
purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
I Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total
0
0
0
0
0
0-
0
5g. Comments: This project does not propose Pond or Lake construction
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: .
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then'you MUST fill out Section D. of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ElTar-Pamlico El Catawba El Randleman El Other:
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason for
Buffer mitigation
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2.impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
Stream name
required?
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
A (P)
Sewer Line
Lick Creek
N/A
2,192
1,441
B1
Sewer Line
UT to Lick
N/A
.2,336
2,641
(P)
Creek
B2
Stormwater
UT to Lick
N/A
423
305
(P)
Outfall
Creek
6h. Total'buffer impacts
4,951
4,387
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Proposed subdivision roads were aligned' to avoid impacts to streams and wetlands. No impacts to wetlands are proposed.
Proposed impacts result from the ,installation of a sewer line and a stormwater BMP discharge. The project was designed as a
low impact development with an impervious surface cover-of 17.2%. As part of this planning process, permanent impacts
resulting from roads and. lot fill were avoided, wetland, streams, and .riparian buffers were not 'platted in lots and most of the
forest vegetation was documented and preserved.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and ,prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt
fencing and;temporary basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the streams'and wetlands. The jack and
bore construction technique was considered for the proposed sewer crossings of streams however was determined to not
be a feasible option due to topographic, lack of ease ^of access, and economical constraints.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this'
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Bu,ffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:.
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments' N/A
5. Complete`if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Page 6.of 10

5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation. plan.
6.. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer. Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet 'of impact to'each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet) -
Zone 1
3 �(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment ie to an approved in-lieu.fee fund).
NIA-
i
6h. Comments: j
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer, Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow, plan included? If no,. explain why.
Comments: The diffuse flow plan is part of the Stormwater Management Plan being
❑ Yes ®No
reviewed by Durham.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
17.2%.
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ®No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management. Plan, explain why: The overall proposed impervious surface
area is less than 24% however a Stormwater Management Plan will be reviewed by Durham, which is a delegated
authority.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater. Management Plan', then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:•
Stormwater will be directed to 2 stormwater BMPs located on the Site (see attached maps). The stormwater BMPs will
discharge through stabilized portions of the riparian buffers and other upland areas. Stream and/or wetland impacts
resulting from ground stabilization associated with stormwater BMPs are not proposed.
2e. Who will be responsible for the ieview of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Durham
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Durham
® Phase II
® NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management,prog rams
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
® Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN' Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the _
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the ;project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements,of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized, by the
State Clearing House? (If'so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? ;
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts.(DWQ-Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which.could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a'short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will tie into offsite regional utility lines located adjacent to the project site.
Page 9of10
PCN Form, —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version.

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ®No
habitat?
5b.Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources'did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Data Base (2017) was referenced and a report received from NCNHP identified no recorded
federally listed species, on the project site or within.a 1 -mile radius.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No .
.6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project takes place in Durham County which is not near any coastal or tidal.habitat that would support EFH
(i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.):
7. Historic'or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.. Will this;project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you'use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoWeb% * Utilizing the HPOWEB GIS mapping service, no structures or sites were mapped within or
adjacent to the project area. No sites are located within the project area. Records check at the State Historic Preservation
Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Z No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Utility lines will cross through the floodplain however no permanent
structures that will restrict or increase stormwater flow will be placed in the floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Flood Risk Information System
(www.fris.nc.govlfris) FEMA DFIRM Panels #0860; Dated May 2, 2006
Sean Clark02/01/2018
5_05�02� M42
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
A licant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 10 of 10

/ 1
?J/!jll is IMPACT
AREA "A"
,t f / J l• (I�
r / �
7 I1 I — - •
IV
�'—
/\\`J�'�il�'II1�1•%i_�-.\:/`.
SWMF
Qv�y�',�;(!tl(
i J/)''4
y
r \�;,\�\\„�'j1i\
I r' Il i
,(�I •fit
QP
4ti"a�«�'
t \ _
j 11 1i �fE
�
Irf1,!�r� --: ;A ',rr' =— Yir ui/%;
DOC NICHOLS ROA
S.R. 1908
(80' PUBLIC R/W)
TOTAL:
ZONE BUFFER IMPACT AREA = 4,951 SF
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT AREA = 4,082 SF
STREAM CHANNEL IMPACT = 544 SF; 89 LF
re — - SMD -18000 ,
SS!D16000-Eq-SOUTH NICHOLSI �ry',
'��
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA.
12/8/2017 sTREAm BUTTER IIY PACT EXEHIBIM
IT - PACT AREAS
i��
Ai
D
i
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 100 200 400
I inch = 200 ft..
zmaomaay.ea&ms
CONFeNr. MM
aso5mwemra.x�y .
muazm. xora caotw ants'
na>,� xo.: coxes
WADAms

IfPACT
ARRA „A„
I
DOC NICHOLS ROAD
S.R. 1908 _
(60' PUBLIC R/R) - 1
TOTAL:
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT AREA = 41951 SF
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT AREA = 4,082 SF
STREAM CHANNEL IMPACT = 544 SF; 89 LF
x�vrokcts\sMn�sao—i eo�o\�ene•,A.n.a,a�+rencna :m ,s�curren: u
L PRCIECT Na. SMO -16000
FARM
iBJOfRl$
—A— SMDI60Do-ECI-SOUTH
- '
-ma�nnr. use.
SEA[F: 1"=zoo'
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
rn:.aam, rrmre camtm znts
�
��m,s4wae.b��m
nATs: 12/8/2017_
STREAM BUFFER IMPACT E%III rr - IMPACT AREAS+�«
MCADAR48

LE
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT a a G o a e a G a G a a a a o ad TEMPORARY STREAM
/ G G e G a a G G a G G C G G CG I IMPACT = 36 LF
�� Ga GGGCGa CGGGaa G❑
�::� M.R1f1LL2G.
30' PUBLIC
SANITARY SEY+ER
J,91� jII
j f r lr /AIMP
REh BOB SF ACT i �• / i� / / // -/ i^-�' / r '/ / / ' / // \
I / Z6NF{ 2' EIPFU I1 IACT /
r ( I AREA1721 'SF ss
ss
1 T
j r
1 I I!��ss �/� //� �� // %✓ �/ i % /.��/ice '\i /�
RIM=
E%.
314.$5
INV. .N=296.
r+
WV. OUlI=29 651,1 .^, I I �}•. d� r !/r+ // I
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT ,.
4 1 / I I -/ / / / AREA= 398 SF, 35 LF i
1
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT' /
I p
'� 1 \'" �'<��, o •1 r / / AREA= 1,111 SF
V. I /''� ❑ / / ZONE 2 BUFFEP—I00PACT
AREA= 7 --SF
$�UFJRIAM�
30' PUBLIC \
SANITARY SE'VIER
lf.�j /.�/ r/ / EASEMENT \\r/
NE
f,P / r
LIMITS IOF
DISTUFfANCE \\
PROPERTY
LINE
li}
r
GRAPHIC SCALE x
40 0 20 40 6^
' 1 inch = 40 ft.
rnwecr ±+o: SMD -16000 ''
SM016000-E2-SOUTH N 1, C My,
im
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINAN�
1.
=s
Ytrnx [:a: GO'19:1
°" E' 12/8/2017 STREAM BUFFER DAPACf EXHIDIT - AREA "A"
MI ADAMS
IBOp �� s•M "°� c°

LEGEND
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT eoeuuocoeeuaco:j TEMPORARY STREAM
❑ o o o o o c o c cocca�aq IMPACT = 41 LF
!� ❑000ao❑❑ea❑❑cocob
10 NIC, _K_
�E78a.CK
LC \
STREAM
BU —
6UFFER
'IMPACT B1
\ (EASEMENT
'
CROSSING)
vasa ne n=y
DURHAM,
\
OZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
DATE: 12/8/2017
AREA 61= 1,324 SF
McADAms
\
\�ZONE
1 BUFFER IMPACT
AREA Bt = 1,181 SF
I
��` TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT
AREA 61 =124 SF, 41 LF
ZONE 1 BUFFER
F+`-
IMPACT AREA B2 =,423 SF
IMPACT, B,2
(STORMWATER
OUTFALL)
-- - i — -
ZONE 2 BUFFER -----
IMPACT AREA 82 c 305 SF .-"-- _��- �/ =�-_ •,_�
vn:,� --.
10 NIC, _K_
�E78a.CK
LC \
"N11e`S6!D16CC0-E2-SOUTi''
'IMPACT B1
\ (EASEMENT
'
CROSSING)
vasa ne n=y
DURHAM,
\
OZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
DATE: 12/8/2017
AREA 61= 1,324 SF
McADAms
\
\�ZONE
1 BUFFER IMPACT
AREA Bt = 1,181 SF
I
��` TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT
AREA 61 =124 SF, 41 LF
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT
/ \
AREA 61= 7,1555E
--ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
-AREA B1 = 717 SF
=tea'-'---------' �------ \,_----'-�
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
?UBLIC
SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT
VARIABLE WIDTH SCM
ACCESS & MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT
i'
4 \
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
z
I � u
1 inch = 30 ft. -
L v.—c— SMD -16000
"N11e`S6!D16CC0-E2-SOUTi''
OLS FARM
yxsas
NORTH • CAROLINA
vasa ne n=y
DURHAM,
lumx 10.: C�a93
DATE: 12/8/2017
STREAM BUFFER IMPACT EXHIBIT - AREA "B"
McADAms