20180005 Ver 1_More Info Received_20180130

Goss, Stephanie
From: Hartshorn, Jason <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 3:34 PM
To: Alexander, Tasha L CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Goss, Stephanie
Cc: Montalvo, Sheri A
Subject: [External] RE: 2017-00623 additional information
Attachments: Station at Raleigh - Additional Information 20180130 11x17.pdf
I Tasha and Stephanie,
PI'ease find attached the Station at Raleigh Additional Information Package based on the USACE comments provided
earlier on January 18, 2018 (included below). If,you'would prefer a hard copy of the attached documentation for your
review, just let me know and I'll have one to you tomorrow via FedEx.
Based on the USACE comments, -the two crossings have been revised and permanent stream impacts have been reduced
from the December 21,,-2017 PCN. As outlined in the attached January 30, 2018 PCN, the impacts have been revised and
updated to the following (net change is shown after each revised impact quantity for reference):
® Site 1
o Culvert Installation: 118 LF (-16 LF)
o Outlet Protection: 9 LF (-1 LF)
o Temporary Construction Access: 29 LF (+21 LF)
o Buffer Zone 1: 8,460 sf (-8 sf)
o Buffer Zone 2: 5,524 sf (unchanged)
® Site 2
o Culvert Installation: 146 LF (unchanged)
o Outlet Protection: 8 LF°(unchanged)
o Temporary Construction Access: 38 LF (-7 LF)
o Buffer Zone 1: 7,037 sf (+28 sf)
o Buffer Zone 2: 3,378 sf (-32 sf)
® Site 3
o Buffer Zone 1: 859 sf (+576 sf)
o Buffer Zone 2: 678 sf (-543 sf)
Let me know if you have any questions on any of the attached documentation, and feel free to give me a call if you need
anything else!
Sincerely,
Jason Hartshorn, IPWS
imley-Born .1421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600; Ralelgh; NC, 27601
[Direct: 919 678 4155 1 Mobile: [phone] �6rvjw kirnlo - Lorn.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Alexander, Tasha L CIV,USARMY CESAW (US) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 12:57 PM

To: Hartshorn, Jason <[e-mail]>
Subject: 2017-00623 additional information
Jason,
I'm reviewing the PCN submitted for The Station at Raleigh and am I requesting additional information to complete my
review. The PCN indicates the purpose and, need it to construct a multifamily residential development however the
plans provided only show the construction of roads and division of new lots. Please provide a site plan for the
development which includes building footprints, amenities, parking, etc.- At this time it is unclear if the applicant has
avoided and minimized. It appears access from Trinity Rd can be utilized without impacts to waters of the U.S. Please
explain the need for access from Westchase Blvd. Please provide,a typical detail for the culvert installation at impact
area 1. Additionally, the applicant.is proposing to construct�a stub road in.the northeastern. corner of the property,
impact area 2. This road does not appear to have a logical termini/valid purpose and need., Please, revise the plans to .
avoid impacts associated with the stub road.
At this time the application is incomplete. Please provide the additional information within 30, days or we may withdraw
the PCN.
Thank you, .
Tasha Alexander
Regulatory Specialist .
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office .
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
919-554-4884, ext. 35
The Wilmington District.is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to .do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
http://www.saw.usdce.army.mil/missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx to complete the survey online.

Kimley»>Horn
January 30, 2018
Ms. Tasha Alexander
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: SAW -2017-00623 - Response to USACE Incomplete Application Notification
The Station at Raleigh, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Alexander and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of our client, LCD Acquisitions, LLC, Kimley-Horn is submitting the attached additional
information for the above referenced project per the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Incomplete Application Notification dated January 18, 2018.
Below is an outline of the USACE comments with a brief narrative addressing each item. The
USACE comments with Kimley-Horn response and explanation are as follows:
1) The PCN indicates the purpose and need it to construct a multifamily residential development
however the plans provided only show the construction of roads and division of new lots.
Please provide a site plan for the development which includes building footprints, amenities,
parking, etc.
a. Included with this response package is an additional plan sheet showing all proposed
development within the property.
2) At this time it is unclear if the applicant has avoided and minimized. It appears access from
T►inity Rd can be utilized without impacts to waters of the U. S. Please explain the need for
access from Westchase Blvd.
a. The north -south road crossing through the property that extends from Trinity Road to
Westchase Boulevard, shown on the attached Site Plan as Oglethorpe Avenue, is
required by the City of Raleigh as a condition of development within the property. The
proposed roadway is included in the City's transportation plan and a required component
of development in this area due to the property's location within the Arena Small Area
Plan in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The road will be a public right-of-way and
will improve the interconnectivity of the City's transportation network in the vicinity.
Development within this area is also required to be developed in a "gridded" road
network, which further requires the proposed roadway alignments to be oriented in a

Kimley>»Horn
Page 2
distinct north -south or east -west direction. Due to the multiple City requirements
concerning the placement and location of the roadway corridor, developing the property
without connecting to Westchase Boulevard is not possible and connections to both
Trinity Road and Westchase Boulevard are necessary. The roadway corridor in question
is also shown on the City's MAPS application clearly extending from Trinity Road and
continuing north to Westchase Boulevard. See the MAPS screenshot below (roadway
corridor shown in purple):
Given the required roadway extension within the property, LCD Acquisitions, LLC has still
avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional features to the extent practical by utilizing
the required public roadway corridor as the primary entrance/exit routes to the proposed
development, and by utilizing a retaining wall along the western slope of Oglethorpe
Avenue. Wingwalls and headwalls are proposed at all culvert inlets/outlets to further
reduce stream impacts from fill slopes (reduced from a total of 280 LF in the previous
submittal to 264 LF in the revised PCN application.
3) Please provide a typical detail for the culvert installation at impact area 1.
a. Typical details have been provided for impact areas 1 and 2. Additionally, culverts have
been upsized from the previous submittal based on comments received by the City of
Raleigh, and wingwalls have been used to reduce fill slopes. This has reduced impact
length along S1 and will better maintain flow and aquatic habitat in stream S1 following
construction.
4) Additionally, the applicant is proposing to construct a stub road in the northeastern comer of
the property, impact area 2. This road does not appear to have a logical termini/valid
purpose and need. Please revise the plans to avoid impacts associated with the stub road.
a. As discussed above, the project area is within the City of Raleigh's Arena Small Area
Plan and is subject to special requirements from the City as a condition of any

Kimley»>Horn
Page 3
development occurring within the property. One of those requirements is that the property
must be developed in a "gridded" layout, with logical north -south and east -west roadway
corridors on specific block intervals based on zoning. The property is currently zoned CX -
12 -CU which requires a block perimeter of 2,500'. Given the size of the property and the
location of the required north -south roadway, the eastern north -south road (shown on the
Site Plan as Thornberry Street) is required by the City of Raleigh's Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO) and must be located close to the eastern property line. The intent of
that secondary north -south road is to meet City requirements for development within the
CX- zoned property within the Arena Small Area Plan while providing logical
interconnection within the multi -family residential areas, amenities, pedestrian areas, and
to existing roadway facilities in the vicinity.
The proposed Thornberry Street terminates at a stub out located in high ground along the
northern property boundary as required by the City of Raleigh to maintain the logical
connections of the urban block network in the Arena Small Area Plan. Ample high ground
is available on the adjacent property to construct and/or continue the roadway corridor
towards a logical terminus at Westchase Boulevard (as required by the City) without
additional environmental impacts to complete. Additionally, due to existing commercial
and industrial development along the eastern property boundary, access to the adjacent
property parcel north of the project area would be substantially confined by the
construction of the Station at Raleigh development without the logical gridded street
network required by the City of Raleigh. The stub street termination is provided for
potential connectivity from that parcel to the larger Arena area by a presently unknown
and unrelated project independent of LCD Acquisitions, LLC's project. The stub street
termination is located at the property boundary to prevent the isolation of any parcel or
otherwise restricting access to City roads by other property owners.
To assist in your review of this NWP application, the following additional and/or revised information
has been included:
• Revised PCN Application Form
• Revised Figure 6a and 6b
• Revised Grading Plan
• Site Plan
• Culvert Crossing Details
If you need any additional information to assist in your review of this project, feel free to contact me at
919-678-4155 or [e-mail].
Very truly yours,
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Jason Hartshorn, PWS

r
ee
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) "Form
A. ApplicantInformation
1.. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: -
®Section 404 Permit ❑•Section 10 Permit
•
1b. Specify, Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit.(GP) number:
-77❑
1c. Has the NWP oe GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes
® No
1 d. Type(s) of,approval'sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401' Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because writtenapproval is not required? ,,
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu. '
fee program.
®Yes
El No
.1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
. ❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area; of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
The Station at Raleigh
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I'.P. or state
project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
LCD Acquisitions, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No,
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mark Jensen
3d. Street address:
315 Oconee Street
3e. 'City, state, zip:
Athens, GA 30601
3f. Telephone no.:
706-715-6951
3g. Fax no.:
n/a
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page I of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4: Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
46.. Business name_
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
14e;. City, state, zip:
'4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jason Hartshorn, PWS,
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn
5c. Street address:
421 Fayetteville St, Suite 600
5d. City, state; zip:
Raleigh, NC, 27601
5e. Telephone no.:
919-678-4155
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
.Page 2 of 13
PCN Form— Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax_PIN or parcel ID):
0784565495, 0784569220
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.799976 Longitude: - 78.710875
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD,DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
18.99 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name ofnearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Richland Creek
proposed p;roject� '�, ,
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c. River basin:_ ..
Neuse
3. Project Description'
3a. Describe the'ezisting conditions on the site and;the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application-,'
Land 'use within the project parcels consists of a cleared grass and gravel lot used for event parking during stadium and
NC State Fairground events. The northern ;portion of the project area is forested and crossed by a perennial stream. A
single family house is located in the middle of the' project area, but the structure is abandoned. Land use in the vicinity of
the project is generally urbanized, and developed for industrial, commercial; and institutional uses. The developments in
the vicinity are interspersed with pockets of undeveloped forested land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the'total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
515 LF
3d. Explain the, purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project would construct a mixed-use development located south of US -64 Business in Knightdale.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project involves the construction of a multifamily residential development, including the residential
buildings', various ammenities, interior roadways, and walking paths. Typical site development and structural construction
equipment will be utilized including dump trucks, graders, bulldozers, cranes, asphalt pavers, excavators, and concrete
trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Preliminary JD was submitted to the USACE and
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
confirmed in May 2017, but documentation is pending
(USACE AID SAW -2017-00623). NCDWR issued a Buffer.
Determination for the Site on March 28, 2017 (NBRRO
#17-088)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Name (if known): Ross Sullivan
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE - May 2017, NCDWR - March 28, 2017
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version .

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ®No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
n/a
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project will be constructed as a single development. The stub road in the northeastern corner of the Site is a required
roadway extension by the .City of Raleigh as a condition of site plan approval due to the Site's location within a planned
urban development district. The road alignment continues from the Station at Raleigh development to northern property
boundary, providing clear and logical connections to the interior road network and residential/parking areas. The road
terminates with a stub street at high ground at the property boundary, and ample high ground is available on the adjacent
propertyto construct any City of Raleigh -required road corridors independent of the proposed project and without
additional environmental impacts. Any development undertaken by others at any point in the future is entirely beyond the
control of LCD Acquisitions, LLC and would be subject to independent permitting with the USACE for any jurisdictional
impacts proposed.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):.
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.' .
Wetland.
Type of jurisdiction
impact
Type of impact
Type' of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
number-
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Permanent
(P) or
Temporary
T
W1 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
42g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments: No wetlands will be impacted as a result of the proposed project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all, stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3'd.
3e.
3f.
3g
Stream
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
impact
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
number -
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear feet)
Permanent
-(INT)?
other)
(feet)
(P) or
Temporary
(T)
Site 1 -S1
Road Crossing/Culvert
Stream S1 - UT
®PER
®Corps
❑ P El
Installation
to Richland
Creek
F1 INT
❑ DWQ
g
118
Site 1 - S1.
Stream S1 - UT
® PER
® Corps
®P F-1 T
Outlet Protection
to Richland
❑INT
F-1 DWQ
8
9
Creek -
Site I -S1
Temporary
Stream S1 - UT
® PER
® Corps
El P ®T
Dewatering/Construction
to Richland
F-1 INT
❑DWQ
8
29
Access
Creek
Site 2 - S1
Road Crossing/Culvert
Stream S1 - UT®PER
to Richland
®Corps
8
146
®P ❑ T
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 2 - S1
Stream S1 - UT
®PER
®Corps
®P ❑ T
Outlet Protection
to Richland
El INT
El DWQ
8
8
Creek
Site 2 -
Temporary
Stream S1 - UT
® PER
®, Corps
P T
❑ ®T
Dewatering/Construction
to Richland
❑INT
El
8
38
Access
Creek
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
281 LF (P),
67 LF (T)
Page 6of13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to stream S1 will result from.the proposed project. S1 will be permanently, impacted as a
result of two perpendicular road crossings associated with the project. Site 1 is the primary entrance and exit road into the
property carrying•traffic from Westchase Boulevard and Trinity Road; and also includes impacts associated with outlet
protection at the downstream end of the culvert. Riprap will be utilized.for outlet protection and will be keyed into the bank,,
during installation` so no permanent loss of waters will result from the outlet protection. Site 2 is a secondary road that
terminates as a.stub road in the northeastern corner of the property, and is a required road connection by the City of Raleigh
as a condition of'site plan approval due to the project's location within a planned urban development district (a "block layout"
district). The road alignment continues from the Station at Raleighdevelopmenttonorthern'property boundary, providing clear
and logical connections to the interior road network and residential/parking areas. The road terminates with'a stub street at
high ground at the property boundary, and ample high ground is available on the.'adjacent property to construct any City of
Raleigh -required road corridors'independentof the proposed project by•adjacent;,land owners'and without additional
environmental impacts. Temporary impacts'to'S1 will also occur due to temporary' dewatering activities needed to facilitate'
construction access in the stream bed for the culvert construction/installation. All temporary disturbance areas will be" returned
to pre=construction contours after completion of the project.
, 4. ' Open'Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts -to lakes„ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or•any other open water of
the�U.S., then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.. ,.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e., ! j
Open•water
Name ofwaterbody.
impact„
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area• of impact (acre's)
number—
.
Permanent
(P) or
j
Temporary
T
01 ❑P❑
T
02 ❑ P ❑
T
03 ❑P❑
T
04 ❑ P ❑
T.
4. Tota1 open water. impacts
0 acres
4g. Comments: No open water impacts will resultfrorn the proposed project.
5. Pond or Lake Construction:
If and or lake construction proposed, then com Tete the chart below.,
5a.
5b.
C.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts.(feet)
Upland ,
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
,Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: No ponds or lakes will be constructed as a result of the proposed construction.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
N/A
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
Page 7 of 1;3
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If� project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
'6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
:Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
,6f.
6g.
Buffer
,
impact
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
number
impact
Stream name
mitigatio
(square feet)
(square feet)
Permanent
required?
(P) or
Temporary
T
Site 1
Road .
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
❑ Yes
® P El
Crossing
Creek
® No
g 460
5,524
Site 2
Road
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
❑ Yes
® P [_1T
Crossing
Creek
® No
7 037
3,378 .
Site 3
®P El T
Drainage
Conveyance
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
Creek
❑ Yes
859
678
(Treated)
®No
N.No
Total buffer impacts
16,356
9,580
6i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to the protected riparian buffer associated with stream S 1 (UT to Richlands Creek) will
result from the proposed construction of a main north -south connector road between Westchase Boulevard to the north and
Trinity Road to the south. This main north -south connector road will serve -as the entrance and exit route into the development:
A second road crossing will result from the proposed project in the northeastern corner.of the Site due to the project's location
within a City of Raleigh,urban development block district: The secondary road is also oriented in a north -south direction from
Trinity Road in the south to the property line in the north. A third impact site will result from the construction of a stormwater
management pond outfall below Site 2. All riprap protection at Site 3 will stop at or before top of bank to prevent stream
impacts to S1.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. ,Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to the streams and buffers within the project corridor were minimized to the extent practical.'Stream impacts were
minimized by aligning the road crossing to be as close to perpendicular crossing over S1 as possible at the crossing locations.
Headwalls have also been utilized in the design to allow narrower fill slopes and minimize the culvert length and impacts to
S1. Stream S1 crosses the entire property along the `northern boundary, preventing any,access to Westchase Boulevard
without a stream impact. The stream crossings were selected to utilize perpendicular crossings with minimal buffer impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts'to streams and buffers within the corridor will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction, process
by avoiding stream and buffer features whenever possible. Where feasible, staging and construction access routes will be
located in upland areas throughout the corridor., Silt fencing, sediment basins, and other Stormwater Control Measures
(SCMs) will be used -throughout the construction process to minimize impacts to downstream receiving waters and minimize
runoff from the construction sites.
2. Compensatory, Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.'or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑, Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which, mitigation option will be used for this project?
'® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version" 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a: Name of Mitigation Bank: n/a
3b: Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes,, .
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
528linearfeet.
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
®.warm, ❑cool ❑cold
4d. Buffeir'miligation requested (DWQ only):
n/a square,feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
n/a acres
4f. Non Lriparianwetland mitigation requested:
n/a acres
4g. Coal 'al (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:.
n/a acres,
4h'. Comments: Stream .impacts associated with culvert installation at Site '1 and Site 2 will be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio using
NCDMS's'ILF, prog'ram.',butlet stabilization associated with Site 1 does not require mitigation since the proposed permanent
impact will not,result in a loss ofiwaters due to'th,el riprap being keyed into the banks.
5. Complete if Using,a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a' permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact; to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation.' Calculate the.,
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
'Total impact
,(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
0
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
n/a
6h. Comments: The three proposed buffer impact areas are all considered "allowable" under the NCDWR Neuse River Basin
Riparian'Buffer Rules Table of Uses. Site 1 and Site 2 are both perpendicular road crossings impacting less than 150 LF
of riparian buffer and less than 1/3rd of an acre of riparian buffer, which is,"allowable".Site 3 is a new drainage
conveyance through the riparian buffer, but is carrying a treated stormwater outfall with attenuated flow from a BMP•
located outside of the,riparian buffer, which is also considered "allowable".
Page 9 of ,13
PCN Form —.Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No -
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
55%
2b..Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: N/A
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The, stormwater BMPs and infrastructure have been designed to meet the City of Raleigh's stormwater requirements.
Stormwater will be captured and treated by two ponds, which outfall to stream S1.
® Certified Local Government
2e.. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
El DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh .
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed.
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply .
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
El Session Law 2006-246
❑ .Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate, requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental .Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered, "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c: If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the'NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter:)
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is'the site'in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQSurface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
❑ Yes No
2c. If you answered, "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
30. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
❑ Yes No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most' recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Development within this site will serve existing and currently projected growth in this urban, developed area of the City.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer connection approval will be obtained from the City of Raleigh prior to site construction.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
El ®No
habitat.
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
El Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
El Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrence Database (updated October 2017) indicates no known
occurrences any federally listed threatened or endangered species within 1.0 mile of the project area. Suitable habitat is
not present within the study area for Michaux's sumac due to the open field being used for parking and regularly
maintained through mowing, and field edges are overgrown with vine shrub species. Habitat is not present for red -
cockaded woodpecker due to the lack of mature pines and historic development within this area resulting in successional
forests. Suitable habitat is also not,present for dwarf wedgemussel due to the low -flow, encised, and rocky nature of
stream S1.
Incidental take of Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is prohibited if it occurs within a hibernaculum, or if it results from tree
removal activities within 0.25 mile of a known hibernaculum or the activity jeopardizes a known maternity roost tree or
trees within a 150 -foot radius of the maternity roost tree. Per the NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrence
Database (updated October 2017), there are no known occurrences of NLEB, hibernaculums, or roost trees within 1.0
mile of the project area.
Due to the lack of known occurrences within the study area and the lack of suitable habitat within the study area, the
proposed project is not anticipated to have any effect on any federally listed threatened or endangered species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper (Accessed December 21, 2017)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
®Yes El No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (Accessed June 21, 2017) was reviewed
and no National Register sites or National Register Study List sites are present within the project area. A single structre
within the project area is listed in the database as'"Survyed" in 1989, but is not listed on the NR or NR SL. Thestructure
in the project area is the Medlin House (WA0945), and a family cemetary is located along the! eastern property boundary.
Due to the presence of the surveyed structure and the location within the central area of Raleigh resulting in over 40
known properties/sites, within a 1.0 -mile radius of the project, Kimley-Horn conducted an Environmental Review With the
NCSHPO in advance of this permit application. Attached is the Kimley-Horn project review request outling the findings of
the historical properties investigation, as well as the concurrence letter from NCSHPO (dated August 22, 201,7) confirming
that the proposed development will have No Effect on historic or archaeological sites.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone. Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in.a.FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A .
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the, floodplain determihation? FEMA Floodplain Mapper, FRIM Panel 3720078400J
Effective 05/02/2006 (Accessed December'21, 2017).
Jason Hartshorn
1/,30/2018
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
i Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature " :
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 13of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

NEW -LOT 4=
�•}J 'I .k s'riq�. � q k'� .asl I' — _ •o, 1V. IL -L �:•_1.—I "� I: J1 ' .��
• (MAX IHHl—Y OUS.4REA-014 AC}." I j'.,'P°' "+.lh zS,S's ,.1Fi: \��i^ .I• Iw=e,.,, - m ,
-
PacPcum sa• wL9 wwwr ! '�. 'y .•"z � , � ', i ' : , - \) - - - - - _
J '
rm v anwt`�-'ii/,i � A � � i .I I a. ,°v s x ,`; - . •,tiysz - i I I
xc, tvm
:Ir, :!FJ. J.: .i•b vwvmm .' / '- .-: _ rx-.n se`.J ear Zw� °ni•(p" V•v �LL w� -m� .._ __. ... i/� �: I� � `s
J/f
•61 �� I
x-•ei,p ,z ve. I �A� aaY fm rii. (' _ - I � Ali ��`t` \
C)
oll
r
,E
6 � I7 � xs slccrs noo � ,'II •,.ti ; .j-.- 1: !i mf
•r f �' � . Am ao, rw � �'�•
C
V
,wm
" gg'
RI�En ourfrtR- x J • l _ 7 . ��
,•.y' Q .l.:�I: < :\% �, r:., : ,,: 1 ill I 'I',�li zstce ,°I` ti _ , ' 1;1 f-"
.¢ °.,,<,.. ,,' .. ' Hwy"' y'. '• o I � , i;` , pxOxo,� ," � X.1A'1 •R�1�SA .A .I
— 1
...... / 3....
s�
.�I\ _ •d ...___-_- -'1_... t
c •l:• �.,.. .�.,.• eH.uvb '�,°": n' Fnl , "_..__. I Imo'- '
2
1
r s
i
- - .. E ;i -s �L� � ,;z>.��aw= • .4' i .'Y„%IIG�' •�, • „�' "tl I, I I , I u lam - --L_..,...... ; , t
- - Y9 .r �” - - •�(�m` Y;. 'i III 1 .sl. I b.mtm ,ol I .I -f-
id �� � � J •x W O$ � �1 � I .I I I I - w � m
.� ._Ili I I' (m-,1 I I I' •('.. m R
ow Ar�i�.�sei -J
II.I
a r.�w`nr�'•x,�'�� ri ;. �S � }i,�.:s :?:,i, a i. ��a^. ^_'�` � .c.a, ,,,. - _ ,` „ �'� �:�' �u�o-�srlm f�
R z
x
P xv w,Do
•As ice" - Q ®as
µe e1
ioIvv mr
i�
sc°:. ,:4!,P ��`' n mavz •ssnt�xa) wv uu °m luras) ° - s, tiv-rzw , Svi'itne,.(cx-q 'd
r•../ 'e%:»_o: wv ur his (®-•3 ' I / j
J a-�
,
0
' i.arn aza - 't � em.xeer ox. raa ,s' arr ce-v) a
Hry ar sam (®-n) ,.; (ff5 .,s"1,^ :_sT`O:MY.vi i•
E 4•I' r msms - IAiu ®-• I.I .i, O
.... NGW LOT 3
a (w-,) :.: « m n 4zm m -a'1 I II•� : f ,!/ ¢
acwH IN a w pmil u Orval en Lf Ld<:. F - l I 1
ncwwucgnvpu�c4f•-+,f;.(expehr. :r,.. wv a,. ..s "-•Is _ - -(MAX IMPERVIOUS AREA-O.fSO Ail �vay
'( 9FR I::Y{';•":!q'.t .... ... ... .:. ...�. .. _. ... .. I I II: ;� I%as
N,
, els':. }•At .+.:A.
•• mtx eu'rtE •ALL Ina [:[w•ssm .. .. -
w .q-
_
2 U
- LEND rm B,v .,,.m .• ,°Irv: m.I,iF rNL -' • _ - • - • -
6 rro ¢zr. .s,.m \ / '.. .-. i;sY !•;",^" t.."-'". :`i�: ``i^� J.
—Irv— PROPOSE.LOMIXIft as ,s ff •e' wrP •'-' '`_'_""-- ` GONOMRF✓ENT REVIEW ARPflOVAI V
V
"e ... I:.1...._.. RX6,IN GIMURas V m wT wm Ma wv-waea ,a' ua WrtEI W
s .-io so
—E. —T • wv-••+°° A Ixv_..s we m a,o° MY OF RALmH - Pwm AurxowxEo Pdi eox9Tmci,Dx ' J QUr z
GIy uwrsa DI9IURBArcB - B y mam: ,LLrcoo,. srwre Aw rru,wu woes o u Z
p ® CATcII BASH SECTION B -B A' ON
AND
BE IN ACCORDANCE ,MM AIL n m—B=fEaw¢z O
C HP
HIGH= SECT CN A -A SPEOFICARON9� ND/Oft NCOOi STAN .. AND • ftU
3 ,POIIN ole, ,w F-• H _
n SURVEY NOTE: - fA
$ I x EswALe A -. xx.cnox�xc
€ ® °uOxOr!ONOCALA15c BCAIE IN fEE;lq E%I SU VEOP 0 G iBY, FROM71TA;A n,s --- E SURVEY. HE E BY.MLNIM �.•c¢cewn ET NUMBERXHH --i VM9rY ORIW. 4JRE 1 AN DATED 3PHONf: 919-301-8091 NO OA EO C'.O

.LOT 4 - _ _ ev�Oou i -ACL
"= - �•`. ,'xTfnF.P\IOiisnPEA-s[(m'" - oal S^:
.. _._-. ,•._.+, r'—......: ...-,.... IM1IAh IM1WE PEA
,.._•... w --:f.. -
_...>. _ .-•'s:., ..:_' r'�na lat�vmlls �ItEVnlli3C,trED D�4 nCl
. , +sem m,�—fir- o.d---lemaM4i*SAfE,TiEnJ
<f F - " •r-:> — � I�ua es° I'wx^ I.•-,,, i� .iuxeo _ I _
ix
.. { E ,oa
-
�.I
e THORNBERRY .,„�: .-;_. .r.,r._-_::.�_.: ., .. ;. �: -;i i:r� ^,�-= .�*Ir - _ _
,.aj.
_ f
STREET --t_ � t , , , ;-55 , . .....:.......r
t71 41
sx. k.
it {
rf
a
� /.s,x;,',,; .,.; r. -.'G:.L-. :, r . j :1 .f `0v 141 I'� r "�;.1: `.I ••»�I -/,- _ `'tiAtf' \
i4f
;fr - : o: n -,: Do -R ,. 4 ; I" I'="'• i•r' � I _ I � I i7 `. `�
s
6 I.r°' � 0v � .. %.( , at,,'MM/'. ir:) rili l <r�'�' - II' .'f•a11_¢ - P t- _- � I {I' ` �r'r
i3r1 t:x:. I�:: EF: F � r `%, l'i:,, _ ::11i o }F.. - � , \ r i• ,e:. I..p :.:' .i �f��,. N
a +' ND r9.E. 3-xF.,i. i ,I/r:`,•: __ I1:: - 1 N+. __ � I .l.i aS�M
E: •.:
� .ei 5' t'..• �, "P `. --_ i, �,e _ _ -- ta: e I � ..,,'�J, -frr, �"`�
i •
.i
i }i ; rn %`'M. •� ' I2A s , `� - 'P 4 - g .,.1_.�I% {tst', a;
:fr .;" ., rja y '__= PE +x.11 ,'� �•^ •IMI'ERMIDt:.S APEA�31:5 AL1 = }.;' I Il,��i'
LOT 5
III
''T'$A�f' „" 7r ;;'• �p���l, A IMA\IMPEftVIDVS AIIE.1 -231 A<:1
rMnc rw'EPvuxau
��,. �, n • .. I , t
� I
"N
f .fa ,t ::c s..l :.:: - :_ • '.. r' ,��r ,,;. I, , . •,•,,,Y.11 � ;r `€' _ "i..;M _: '€-3. �^i'i�h' Q `N I ri.:
lr,
111
i�
a:
,
:f, : >4 1�,,.y / , / ,,; •..: s.. .i°' 14• Vo ,fit"i '�'� �r �J2 d . I I; it :. I ,
L
I
{{ ,t ._' T, -' ..''. ,r,,il ..' 1 ,;! __b ." ___-fr4`�. .I'"' i •r�4�, 3 3 i I%1,. i�i�t
,! }' / . t•'. J1f.�' i(r : 'r� ,/fI i3 I :}a -_ ') .` � I I'i f i' '�i J, '!f'1, - 6
t '
e t � , ,; i,E�ilr � o. • \' �CoMiris':,�i(; y�, __ _ c9J .°p ; �, .i i� � .9 � I 1 --- r:..} ,; t tail \ � � $
- Ii•, i. it t,
5 ,I -f -' !' r1,;.;@f%,<<.., •r '` ,"..�,II' \Y;- - ''� s Iv;�'3 I,'�i
i
5 a I's. '+✓�:f:;. \\r,'6'�/'" 3 +` r- %a1 ill �3 ---� - +i`.r' ^�d�-,<_�. _ I ��''i ,:r: I' U'
d
•s
,
.:, ,. � :irl .,, ri ..a•. :i.. ,- :: .,,T� __L• q: _-.—.-.n.gx,W_.� Z
— J
., m, ,.r Ensluat — -
i, t1ry,r, �,! .-._ .fr':' .,4• .i' ,....Y. , 9 i �b�....-. -
r„ ,..• r v , Bunn . rt / :: ..: - ..
o -. I • ., .'F ..-..-,... �S I .i' - . u ¢
E :.I,..•.�-r-.-:._,.: r' -,z,,..• ,"-.. ,�; � .r d - .a .1. ,< ,,.:1', � •,�z.. >'r»..;,.°-"''_.�... --- ^r : .�T�,,; 0 �
,
r'
a
y... ,t... "t•V--
._,.,. _...............�.... r._.,_, -_r.:::;,, ..w._ -.- .:c,_
All
c «, �-,—='^��,-+� � .^'--r`/�tr✓^i�""'. -';' mow°- - 1m-- - ._ _ . - - _ -
' Im ... , 1 , , , , .,.,,t„ : � '.. `-...____ > rr r f �r:,r.rr..• ^r.:_�v..:a '`I : I ..� �
E,
/
I
v
1 i roc .�Wc
NI. '
u" l
GRADING LEGEND
• —1°B— PROPosPnwurouR '�. "g "m�"� - -
s ,w NGG N DGR LOT 3 W S2
D
—o
o
_.
? -wow PRDrossosPorELEvaTroN In1A.x IMPERvroLsnnea-owAn -- - Q I
INIPERVIDLSARE.A AU.00ATED-O.GOACI LL
-ICH —IN
O
® DRrtPwE� PRELIMINARY ¢ v a
° NCPPIPe _ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Z w Z
—P umrts or OlsiuRBAncE � _ u o
///Jtlt tom\ ALL N- ­N TO BE w ACCORDANCE MPI Al O �
5 RP N Ott't RaLDGN AND/OR NGpOT STANOAROB ANO Q
TP ow PwNi 5\yV�II r/+/ SPEGIfICATI0N5 uj
8 c DP or cues SURVEY NOTE: (/1 W -
NPs NIGN PaNrGT swue _ - ~
€5 ® JUNCTION BO% DGNP SC SCALE M DEET O vAhSE SGN TNNPRWNED BY MGx NTANEN NAN k CREW, 1730 taN
v %xP NION POWr _ ft9 ., 9GITE BOON,, N c r OB. O 9ifEi�JNUNBFA
PHONE: U919-233-8091 DAZED JANUARY 23. 201J. CJ.O

CULVERT
2
F -6
CULVERT TO BE
EMBEDDED 11' INTO
STREAMBIED
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
n 7n An Ion
CROSS-SECTION-"-
N.T.S
HORIZONTAL
KHA PROJECT
_ SHEET NUMBER
DAM
KimleylMorn o""000% THE STATION AT RALEIGH
24/20 CULVERT
M
0 2018 KIM�NC -HOPA AND ASSO—S. NC. AS SHOPREPAREDFOR STREAM CROSSING EXHIBIT
F — STREET. SUNS —. RA H. 276Dl DMMM Gy MC THE STATION AT RALEIGH, LLC
PHONE: H NE. S19-835-4
--- COM c
H, REISH.HS DATE By —16 11 CDB RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA
'-
2
....
--44
2+00
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
- --
a
o 10 20 40
a .
..... . . ......... ............ . .. . ....
3b—
4.
ODrJ
. ...... ......
A
. .. .. ..... ........ . .
—436
. . .................
..... ......
6—
n &
j
..4
.................. .............
. .
ILI,
2
F -6
CULVERT TO BE
EMBEDDED 11' INTO
STREAMBIED
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
n 7n An Ion
CROSS-SECTION-"-
N.T.S
HORIZONTAL
KHA PROJECT
_ SHEET NUMBER
DAM
KimleylMorn o""000% THE STATION AT RALEIGH
24/20 CULVERT
M
0 2018 KIM�NC -HOPA AND ASSO—S. NC. AS SHOPREPAREDFOR STREAM CROSSING EXHIBIT
F — STREET. SUNS —. RA H. 276Dl DMMM Gy MC THE STATION AT RALEIGH, LLC
PHONE: H NE. S19-835-4
--- COM c
H, REISH.HS DATE By —16 11 CDB RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA
'-
2
....
--44
. . .. . ... .... .............. ....... . ..
..... . . ......... ............ . .. . ....
3b—
.........
............ . . ........... ..............
. ...... ......
.. .. .......... ..
38
. .. .. ..... ........ . .
—436
. . .................
..... ......
6—
j
.................. .............
. .
. ........ ........ . . . .... ....
ae RCP'
... . .......
4
:
.. ............ ..............
.. ..........43
4.,V ...... .. . . 4;W F . . ........
\
... ..... .. r\.......:....f
................. .... ..........
4.0..........
—428
. .... .
.............
428
7
......... . . ......
........ . ....
.. ......1 ....... . . ...... I ..............
426..........
424 1
CULVERT BE
1-0
94
r. 1-
CLASS 2 RIP RAP
INTO STREAMSED
(MIN 23- DIAMETER)
PARTIALLY EMBEDDED
IN STREAM BANK
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
2
F -6
CULVERT TO BE
EMBEDDED 11' INTO
STREAMBIED
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
n 7n An Ion
CROSS-SECTION-"-
N.T.S
HORIZONTAL
KHA PROJECT
_ SHEET NUMBER
DAM
KimleylMorn o""000% THE STATION AT RALEIGH
24/20 CULVERT
M
0 2018 KIM�NC -HOPA AND ASSO—S. NC. AS SHOPREPAREDFOR STREAM CROSSING EXHIBIT
F — STREET. SUNS —. RA H. 276Dl DMMM Gy MC THE STATION AT RALEIGH, LLC
PHONE: H NE. S19-835-4
--- COM c
H, REISH.HS DATE By —16 11 CDB RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA
'-

—�-:4r�
• ,u4 -"Sr1 I C FJ 1
I 6 )
r. Www_ esu .-L.._ • �� i s4 I _ '�`_"... ��__� _.. __. I� i _ __ _
e • �$fi {{ I I
_�L� � I��L_1.i L�LI-c1oi. Ill I ��
1 " JU _ rrTHrO�NNHEWY 91 ME I
. .. • s. �'% �'r___t �",�I1♦-p�y-�j� _ -_ 1"� � i __ �� �k�ti I,In'L ��@�_. I-'rf
Aenv s� •a a rm ma• i � 94 � i I �� u .�' r� 1
IiU FTFITIJUI
J1, I I I L./
_ff
..�....� ..� ��`,. �! • CI i L01
I _
LOTS r-
f ✓f 1 III � d�
iT
if
li 1 / :� I` i �E1��,+c .y�N.� ti. ��i •i I...�i��I- M_3�I Z.
I' 13 'f -""'_L'YI I w
Fu
''.II •.ten Iml I _ B i`, I �
II fA 9 i 9 I d
U -
I�-�.;;:;k.J +•�^+ PRELIMINARY Qqa
_ NOT FOR CONslvucnON -L 80
� �➢�� I � � s�xvtr Nti lf:.w�' .xos wo y • W
�...�•,,, • ....�.,,.d„n •.nay ...< ,, », »o, ,, .«v.w. ,, ,a „CZ♦O„

-TggF�
CULVERT
llllv�l
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
�\ AOS i
i
'f
0
E
464---
--.__ .
464_...
462
mcnosn
462
i
_460...
a
460.....
WL\4RT
4
456
458
12
456
4-56
"
t
i
454
-
454._-
1
452
U
F 6
— ^
-_.452
WLY£RT TO BE �
I
--- 450
-- - -
450 - -
> EMBEDDED P INTO
'
3 STREAMBED
CROSS-SECTION A
i-.448
ENSIING
rnAa
448_....
-A
N.T.s
_...
446446
aa\rnr ro ec
m V
446 _.
INro S AMNm
44.4 _
444
443
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
2 W
0 30 60 120
Div tupv�
d
PMIINLY GlIDOEb
HORIZONTAL
t+oo z+Do
3+W
o+oD
a
KimleyoHorn
411
;,row
THE STATION AT RALEIGH
THE STATION AT RALEIGH, LLC
CULVERT 2
STREAM CROSSING EXHIBIT
�w
EX -2
- -
N�rivp�a
---
-

N
tended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document with
Buffer is Existing NCDOT Right-of-Way
Roadway Facility
iw+awf\ J `` \
LWc c" _/
LM
CR
A.
41
A44-
L��`�� i
�'a ;'� 118 -F Permanent Stream Impact
z C:0Ar ? 9 LF Outlet Protection
- , ~ 29 LF Temporary Stream Impact
rn ;� i
0 25 50 100 8.460 sf BZ, Impact
Feet 5.524 sf BZ2 Impact V N
Al —o
Legend m
C
Streams NRB Buffer Zone 1 Limits of Disturbance
m
*w\.* Temporary Construction Access Buffer Zone 1 Impacts Project Study Area
Permanent Culvert Installation NRB Buffer Zone 2
Permanent Outlet Protection Buffer Zone 2 Impacts
r _
Kimlep) Horn
Figure 6a: Proposed Impacts
Station at Raleigh Site
Raleigh, NC
January 2018

ILI
1% �
"X"=
491
Ao
�141, M♦♦ . +s. s 4
f
K L
A71,
f f� i�lE. 1r
25 0 100