The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20181192 Ver 1_Traffic Forecast Technical Memorandum - April 2014_20180122COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION TRAFFIC FORECAST TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NCDOT STIP Project R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 Wake County & Johnston County �� •�COMPLETE �• � �.;,.,- � NQRTH CAROLINA ; � Turnpike Authority PREPARED FOR: North Carolina Turnpike Authority PREPARED BY: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343 East Six Forks Road Suite 200 Raleigh, NC 27609 April 2014 COMPLETE 540 TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION :� COMPLETE �'• � NCDOT STIP PROJECT R-2721, R-2828 8� R-2829 TRAFFIC FORECAST TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM � NORTH CANOLINA � Turnpike Authority Prepared For: North Carolina Department of Transportation North Carolina Turnpike Authority Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343 East Six Forks Road Suite 200 Raleigh, NC 27609 NCBELS License #: C-1554 April 2014 beee�� !�{l� PoeBee ,vC�O,oti „'ss • 0��' ; � �o' , 2 : e- �'y � v "'a SEAL �; xA° 34318 a:� ��sA j;�ticiN��''�,�; � ��,�.,..�k...�� Zy-/�l NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report supersedes the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Final Traffic Forecast Technical Memorandum, dated June 19, 2012, prepared by HNTB. The superseded report includes the 2010, 2012 and 2035 No-Build and 2012 and 2035 Build forecasts for five Detailed Study Alternatives (DSAs 1-5). Since June of 2012, NCDOT has developed 12 additional alternatives (DSAs 6-17). As such, a total of 17 alternatives will be carried forward for detailed study in an Environmental Impact Statement, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The forecast for all 17 DSAs are included in this report and the previous forecast addressing DSAs 1-5 should not be referenced. The same forecasting methodology, described later in this report, has been consistently applied to all 17 DSAs to compare alternatives. Once a preferred alternative is selected through the NEPA process, an updated traffic forecast will be prepared for that alternative using the most current available model and data. PROJECT DESCRIPTION HNTB North Carolina, PC has been contracted by the North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA) to develop base, intermediate, and future year traffic forecasts for North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project R-2721, R- 2828, and R-2829. The projects combine to form the southern and eastern portions of the Complete 540 — Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension outer loop around Raleigh and surrounding communities in Wake County and Johnston County. The Complete 540, Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension will complete the Raleigh outer loop. Construction is currently scheduled to be completed in phases. Phase I(southern portion) is between N.C. 55 in Apex and I-40 near the Johnston County line. Phase II (eastern portion) continues the project at I-40 and ends at U.S. 64/U.S. 264 Bypass in Knightdale. The entire project is nearly 30 miles long. The project is located primarily in Wake County with a small portion of the project that extends into Johnston County. Transportation demands, social and economic demands and mobility considerations are the basis for additional transportation infrastructure in southeastern Wake County. The Southeast Extension will link the towns of Clayton, Garner, Fuquay-Varina, Holly Springs, Apex, Cary, Knightdale, and Raleigh. It will also connect major roadways in southern Raleigh and ease congestion on the Raleigh Beltline (I-440), I-40, NC 42, NC 55, and Ten Ten Road. The project would increase the overall capacity of the existing roadway network and divert traffic from secondary roads in an area that is experiencing substantial growth. PROJECT-LEVEL FORECAST OBJECTIVES This document provides design data (design hourly volumes (K-factors), directional distribution percentages (D-factors), and heavy vehicle percentages (single-unit trucks, tractor-trailer-semi- trailers)) as well as average annual daily traffic (AADT) estimates for the study corridor, and describes the methodology and data inputs used in the forecasting process. These forecasts will be used to perform capacity analyses, air quality analyses, noise analyses, and pavement design to aid the final design of the project. The forecasts for this project are derived primarily from comparisons between existing field- counted data/base year calibrated travel demand model data and future year growth trends/model estimates. The forecasts also include a review of previous study area forecasts, April 2014 ES-1 C�NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) output from the Triangle Regional Model (TRM) TRM V4-2008, TRM V4-2009 and TRM V5- 2010, along with engineering judgment. The TRM V4-2008 includes all fiscally-constrained projects contained in the 2030 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) and Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTP) dated September 15, 2004. The Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension was listed in the CAMPO 2030 LRTP with a 2030 horizon year. HNTB collected data from the CAMPO 2030 LRTP, relevant traffic forecasts, and NCDOT STIP projects to be included in the traffic forecast. In order to ensure all No-Build and Build DSAs are comparable and based on similar data, TRM V4-2008 was used as the primary modeling tool for all forecast scenarios. The 2010 Base Year (No-Build) Forecast was developed using a comparison of historic AADT data at 63 study area locations, 2010 travel demand model data interpolated from 2009 and 2012 No-Build model runs, and field-collected traffic counts (peak hour turning movement, 16- hour turning movement and 48-hour classification count) completed from 2009 to 2013. An intermediate year, 2012, was chosen because it is the opening year of the Triangle Expressway. The 2012 future year scenarios include forecasts for a No-Build alternative and seventeen Build alternatives with the projects as toll facilities. All Build alternative forecasts propose the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeways as controlled access, median divided six- lane freeway facilities. The forecasts use extrapolations of historic AADT in the study area, 2012 intermediate year TRM V4-2008 model data developed by HNTB, and comparisons/adjustments from the 2009/2010/2011 base year traffic counts as they applied to the historic and model information. The 2012 No-Build alternative forecast considers all horizon year 2010 projects in the fiscally constrained 2030 CAMPO LRTP, the 2030 DCHC MPO LRTP, and projects scheduled to be completed in 2012. The 2012 Build alternative considers those same projects, as well and the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway as controlled-access facilities. The 2035 future year scenarios include forecasts for a No-Build alternative and the seventeen Build alternatives with the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway projects as toll facilities. The forecasts use extrapolations of historic AADT data in the study area, 2035 TRM V4 data, and comparisons/adjustments from the field-collected traffic counts as they applied to the historic and model information. The 2035 forecasts consider all fiscally-constrained projects in the CAMPO and DCHC 2030 LRTPs. Once the preferred alternative is selected through the NEPA process, an updated traffic forecast is anticipated to be prepared for that alternative using the most current available model and data. FORECAST DATA COLLECTION/DEVELOPMENT Development of the 2010 Base Year forecast involved the following activities: • Existing/Historical Traffic Count Data HNTB collaborated with the NCDOT Traffic Survey Group (TSG) to obtain existing traffic count data (24 hour directional/classification counts) for study area roadways. NCDOT ATR count data was collected at two (2) locations and 2009 AADT freeway ramp counts were provided at seven (7) existing study area interchanges. Two (2) 12-hour intersection counts were also April 2014 ES-2 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) provided. Data was analyzed for applicability/relevance to traffic conditions and for inconsistencies between adjacent intersections/interchanges/roadway segments. Existing Project-Level Traffic Forecasts HNTB obtained project-level traffic forecasts for NCDOT STIP projects and/or municipal road projects in the study area from the NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch, TSG, and Feasibility Studies Unit (FSU) during the initial preparation of DSA 1-5 project-level forecasts. This included previous 2009 and 2000 forecasts of the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeways. Field Data Collection After researching the availability of existing traffic count data, HNTB collected and/or received, nine (9) peak hour turning movement counts (TMC), twenty-three (23) 16-hour TMC, and four (4) 48-hour vehicle classification counts. Some traffic counts were completed when local schools and universities were not in session. However, seasonal factors provided by NCDOT for the Triangle area were used to adjust these counts for school traffic. All tube classification counts were collected for a minimum of 48 hours of an average weekday (Tuesday-Thursday). Detailed traffic count information was collected and reviewed in the completion of this forecast. Trend Line Estimates HNTB reviewed all available NCDOT TSG AADT data from the previous 20 years in the project study area. Sixty-three (63) growth trend line estimates for 2035 for locations throughout the traffic forecast study area were developed using the 1990-2010 AADT travel history. Triangle Regional Model HNTB used the TRM V4-2008 obtained from ITRE on October 14, 2009 in the development of the traffic forecast volumes. The TRM V4-2008, TRM V4-2009 and TRM V5-2010 were reviewed, compared and considered in the methodology and forecast development as related to their respective socioeconomic data, highway network, and model validation in the project corridor. Due to the project forecast timeframe beginning in 2008, the TRM V4-2008 has previously been used throughout the Southeast Extension project process, including all of the following forecasts and reports: • Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway Final Traffic Forecast Report (HNTB, February 2009) • Southern and Eastern Wake Expressway Draft Upgrade Existing and Hybrid Alternatives Report (HNTB, January 2010) • Southeasf Extension — First Tier Screening Traffic Memorandum (HNTB, May 2011) • Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Final Traffic Forecast Technical Memorandum, (HNTB, June 2012) (Superseded by this document] While the TRM V4-2009 and TRM V5-2010 model version releases and corresponding output results were considered in the forecast, the TRM V4-2008 output is specifically referenced in the report tables. HNTB developed a Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model in December 2010 and applied these toll diversion curves/model to the TRM V4-2008 in an effort to more accurately assess April 2014 ES-3 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) tolling behavior in the region. With the Toll Diversion Model, the TRM V4-2008 is a Toll- capable tool that is very useful in projecting future traffic as well as the changes in travel patterns of new facilities. The model was used to evaluate the construction of the project as a Toll facility. 2010 BASE YEAR TRAFFIC FORECAST The 2010 Base Year traffic forecast for the Complete 540 — Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension project was developed through the use of historical traffic growth trends, traffic count data, and interpolated daily traffic assignment data from the 2009 and 2012 TRM V4 No-Build models. Land use information from the TRM V4 was used as one criterion in determining study area growth between the 2010 and future forecast years. The TRM V4 uses specifically delineated Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) as areas where trips are generated or attracted based on population and employment data. Appropriate design characteristics (Design Hourly Volume (DHV), Directional Distribution Percentages (D), and Heavy Vehicle Percentage (Duals/TTSTs)) were determined for the 2010 project study area by reviewing relevant historic traffic forecasts, NCDOT historical AADT count station data, and 2009-2013 field collected 48-hour tube count and 16-hour turning movement count data. After 2010 Base Year AADTs were estimated, bidirectional flow estimates were made at all project study area intersections. 2010 forecast results show that previous forecast and model predictions for daily traffic varied from field count data due to a quickly changing and developing study area and very low base year volumes, which make it difficult for the regional model to completely account for all existing conditions and recent changes. 2012 AND 2035 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Intermediate and Future Year forecasts were primarily derived from anticipated daily traffic assignment growth from the 2012 and 2035 TRM V4-2008 runs for study area roadways. This data was converted to growth rates along each roadway segment and results were balanced for consistent upstream/downstream traffic flow and consistency with existing 2010 traffic flow patterns and forecast results. The 2035 TRM V4-2008 model incorporates changes to future land use in the project study area through adjustments to population and employment data in specific TAZs. The model also includes all regional 2030 LRTP (September 15, 2004) projects, as mentioned previously. In certain instances, historical or model growth rates along facilities were averaged, based on engineering judgment, for select segments along individual facilities (i.e. I-40, US 64/264, US 64 Business and I-540) to provide consistent growth along each corridor and provide reasonable and balanced mainline and turning movement volumes. As with the 2010 forecast results, 2012 and 2035 data indicates that the application of model growth rates to 2013 forecast volumes produces results that can vary considerably from raw 2012 and 2035 TRM V4 daily assignment data and forecast data from previous forecasts. April 2014 ES-4 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX LIST/LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................... iii LISTOF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 Project Background ...........................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Request Information ......................................................................................1 1.2 Project History ................................................................................................. .........5 1.3 Area Information .............................................................................................. .........6 1.4 Route Information ............................................................................................ .........7 2.0 Source of Information and Data ........................................................................................9 2.1 Related Forecasts .....................................................................................................9 2.2 Historic AADT Data ......................................................................................... .........9 2.3 Field Data Collection ....................................................................................... .......10 2.4 Field Investigation ............................................................................................ .......14 2.5 Other Sources ................................................................................................. .......14 3.0 2010 Base Year No-Build Traffic Forecast ......................................................................17 3.1 Assumptions ............................................................................................................17 3.2 2010 Base Year (No-Build) Forecast Methodology .......................................... .......17 3.3 Determination of Base Year No-Build Design Factors ...................................... .......17 3.4 2010 Base Year (No-Build) Forecast Results .................................................. .......21 4.0 General Model Data ..........................................................................................................22 4.1 Model Information ....................................................................................................22 4.2 Model Validation .............................................................................................. .......23 5.0 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build Traffic Forecast .........................................................26 5.1 Assumptions ............................................................................................................26 5.2 Fiscal Constraint .............................................................................................. .......26 5.3 Development Activity ....................................................................................... .......27 5.4 Methodology .................................................................................................... .......27 5.5 Design Factors ................................................................................................ .......28 5.6 2012 No-Build Forecast Results ...................................................................... .......28 6.0 2012 Intermediate Year Build Traffic Forecast ...............................................................30 6.1 Assumptions .................................................................................................... .......30 6.2 Methodology .................................................................................................... .......30 6.3 Design Factors ................................................................................................ .......32 6.4 2012 Build Forecast Results ............................................................................ .......32 7.0 2035 Future Year No-Build Traffic Forecast ...................................................................36 7.1 Assumptions ............................................................................................................36 7.2 Fiscal Constraint .............................................................................................. .......37 7.3 Development Activity ....................................................................................... .......37 7.4 Methodology .................................................................................................... .......37 April 2014 � C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 7.5 Design Factors ................................................................................................ .......38 7.6 2035 No-Build Forecast Results ...................................................................... .......38 8.0 2035 Future Year Build Traffic Forecast ................................................................. .......40 8.1 Assumptions .................................................................................................... .......40 8.2 Methodology .................................................................................................... .......40 8.3 Design Factors ................................................................................................ .......41 8.4 2035 Build Forecast Results ............................................................................ .......41 9.0 2012 / 2035 Future Year Over/Underpass Traffic Forecast ............................................45 April 2014 �� C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) APPENDICES A. Figures B. Triangle Regional Model Study Area Network C. NCDOT Historic AADT Linear Regression Charts D. Toll Diversion Model E. Detailed TAZ Information F. Forecasting Summary Data List of Figures Figure 1)..... 2)..... 3)..... 4)..... 5)..... 6)..... 7)..... 8)..... 9)..... 10) ... 11) ... 12) ... 13) ... 14) ... 15) ... 16) ... 17) ... 18) ... 19) ... 20) ... 21) ... 22) ... 23) ... 24) ... 25) ... 26) ... 27) ... Detailed Study Alternative Corridors Traffic Forecast Study Area Study Area Long Range Transportation Plan Projects NCDOT Historic AADT Count Locations Study Area Traffic Count Locations Study Area Traffic Analysis Zones No Build Traffic Forecast Figures Sheet Key DSA 1-5, 13-17 Traffic Forecast Figures Sheet Key DSA 6-7 Traffic Forecast Figures Sheet Key DSA 8-12 Traffic Forecast Figures Sheet Key 2010 Base Year No-Build Traffic Forecast 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build Traffic Forecast 2012 Intermediate Year Build DSA - 1& 2, 13 & 14 Traffic Forecast 2012 Intermediate Year Build DSA - 3& 4, 15 & 16 Traffic Forecast 2012 Intermediate Year Build DSA - 5& 17 Traffic Forecast 2012 Intermediate Year Build DSA - 6& 7 Traffic Forecast 2012 Intermediate Year Build DSA - 8& 9 Traffic Forecast 2012 Intermediate Year Build DSA - 10 & 11 Traffic Forecast 2012 Intermediate Year Build DSA - 12 Traffic Forecast 2035 Future Year No-Build Traffic Forecast 2035 Future Year Build DSA - 1& 2, 13 & 14 Traffic Forecast 2035 Future Year Build DSA - 3& 4, 15 & 16 Traffic Forecast 2035 Future Year Build DSA - 5& 17 Traffic Forecast 2035 Future Year Build DSA - 6& 7 Traffic Forecast 2035 Future Year Build DSA - 8& 9 Traffic Forecast 2012 Future Year Build DSA - 10 & 11 Traffic Forecast 2035 Future Year Build DSA - 12 Traffic Forecast April 2014 III C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) List of Tables Table Page 1) Detailed Study Alternatives ................................................................................. 1 2) Forecast Scenarios and Alternatives ................................................................... 6 3) Existing Study Area Roadways ............................................................................ 7 4) Historic Traffic Forecasts in the Study Area ......................................................... 9 5) NCDOT Historic AADT Volumes .................................................................. 11-12 6) Field Data Collection ......................................................................................... 13 7) CAMPO 2030 LRTP Study Area Projects ..................................................... 15-16 8) Design Data Information ............................................................................... 19-20 9) 2010 Base Year No-Build Forecast Traffic Volumes .......................................... 21 10) TRM V4 2005 Base Year TAZ Data ................................................................... 23 11) Model Validation ........................................................................................... 24-25 12) 2005-2012 TRM V4 TAZ Data Comparison ....................................................... 26 13) 2012 TRM V4 Major Model Transportation Network Laneage ........................... 27 14) 2012 No-Build Forecast Traffic Volumes ........................................................... 29 15) 2012 TRM V4 Model Assignment Discrepancies .........................................31-32 16) 2012 Build Traffic Forecast Methodology .......................................................... 34 17) 2012 Build Traffic Forecast Volumes ................................................................. 35 18) 2005-2035 TRM V4 TAZ Data Comparison ....................................................... 36 19) 2035 TRM V4 Major Model Transportation Network Laneage ........................... 37 20) 2035 No-Build Traffic Forecast Data ................................................................. 39 21) 2035 Build Traffic Forecast Methodology .......................................................... 43 22) 2035 Build Traffic Forecast Volumes .................................................................44 23) Over/Underpass Traffic Forecast ..................................................................... 46 April 2014 �V C�NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1.1 Project Request Information HNTB North Carolina, PC has been contracted by the North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA) to develop base, intermediate, and future year traffic forecasts for the NCDOT STIP Projects R- 2721, R-2828, and R-2829. The projects combine to form the southern and eastern portions of the Complete 540 — Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension outer loop around Raleigh and surrounding communities in Wake County and Johnston County. The DSA traffic forecasts for the base, intermediate, and future year No-Build and Build alternatives will be used for the environmental documentation required by NEPA. Seventeen DSAs are being studied in the NEPA process. All alternative routes are displayed in Figure 1. All forecast figures are included in Appendix A. The corridors that combine to form complete alternative routes are illustrated in Table 1. Table 1. Detailed Study Alternatives . . . i . .- . . 1 Oran e Green 2 Oran e Green-Mint-Green 3 Oran e Brown-Tan-Green 4 Oran e Brown-Green 5 Orange Green-Teal-Brown-Green 6 Oran e-Red Green 7 Orange-Red Mint-Green 8 Oran e-Pur le-Blue-Lilac Green 9 Oran e-Purple-Blue-Lilac Green-Mint-Green 10 Oran e-Purple-Blue-Lilac Brown-Tan-Green 11 Oran e-Purple-Blue-Lilac Brown-Green 12 Orange-Purple-Blue-Lilac Green-Teal-Brown-Green 13 Oran e-Lilac Green 14 Orange-Lilac Green-Mint-Green 15 Orange-Lilac Brown-Tan-Green 16 Orange-Lilac Brown-Green 17 Orange-Lilac Green-Teal-Brown-Green Detailed Studv Alternative 1— This alternative features the Orange Corridor for the southern section of the project. The Orange Corridor, also known as the NCDOT Protected Corridor (August 1996, North Carolina Transportation Corridor Official Map Act, N.C.G.S. § 136-44.50), begins at the Triangle Expressway and NC 55 interchange in Holly Springs and travels eastward to the I-40 and US 70 interchange near the border of Wake and Johnston Counties. The Orange Corridor primarily runs to the south of and parallel to SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) for the majority of its alignment. The Orange Corridor includes planned interchanges at NC 55, SR 1152 (Holly Springs Road), SR 1386 (Bells Lake Road), US 401, SR 1006 (Old Stage Road), NC 50 and I-40. April 2014 � � �� NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) DSA 1 includes the Green Corridor for the eastern section of the project. The Green Corridor begins at the I-40 and US 70 interchange and heads north/northeast to the existing I-540 and US 64/264 interchange. The Green Corridor has planned interchanges with I-40, SR 2700 (White Oak Road), US 70 Business, SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Road), SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Road), SR 1007 (Poole Road) and US 64/264. Detailed Studv Alternative 2— DSA 2 utilizes the Orange Corridor (see description above) for the southern section. The eastern section includes the Green and Mint Corridors. The Mint Corridor has interchanges at the same locations as the Green Corridor. The only difference between the two alignments is that the section of the project between Rock Quarry Road and Auburn Knightdale Road has a proposed alignment slightly further to the east in the Mint Corridor option. Detailed Studv Alternative 3— The Orange Corridor is used for the southern section. The Green,B, and Tan Corridors are used for the eastern section of DSA 3. DSA 3 has planned eastern section interchanges with I-40, SR 2700 (White Oak Road), US 70 Business, SR 5204 (Old Baucom Road), SR 2555 (Auburn-Knightdale Road), SR 1007 (Poole Road) and US 64/264. The I-40, Poole Road, and US 64/264 interchanges are proposed to be at the same locations as the Green Corridor. The Brown Corridor's White Oak Road interchange is located slightly to the east of the Green Corridor interchange. The Brown Corridor then takes a more eastern turn to it proposed US 70 Business interchange, which is located near the Wake and Johnston County line. Next, the Tan Corridor alignment begins and heads north to the proposed Old Baucom Road interchange, different from the Rock Quarry Road location found in the Green Corridor. The planned Auburn-Knightdale Road interchange is at the same location in the Tan Corridor as it is in the Green Corridor. From that point, the Tan Corridor merges back into the Green Corridor alignment. Detailed Studv Alternative 4— DSA 4 is a slight variation of DSA 3. The Orange Corridor is used for the southern section. The Green and Brown Corridors are utilized for the eastern section of DSA 4. The Brown and Tan Corridors have interchanges on the same facilities. The only variations between the Brown and Tan are that the proposed Brown Corridor interchange with Old Baucom Road is slightly to the east of the Tan interchange location and the planned Auburn-Knightdale Road interchange location is slightly more to the east than the Green and Tan Corridor location. After the Auburn-Knightdale Road interchange the Brown Corridor merges back into the Green Corridor alignment. Detailed Studv Alternative 5— DSA 5 is a combination of DSAs 1-4. The Orange Corridor is used for the southern section. The Green, Teal, and Brown Corridors are combined to create the eastern section of the project. DSA 5 has proposed interchanges with I-40, SR 2700 (White Oak Road), US 70 Business, SR 5204 (Old Baucom Road), SR 2555 (Auburn-Knightdale Road), SR 1007 (Poole Road), and US 64/264. The planned I-40, White Oak Road, and US 70 Business interchanges are the same as the Green Corridor. The Teal Corridor then aligns to the east and shares the proposed Old Baucom Road and Auburn-Knightdale Road interchanges with the Brown Corridor. This DSA then rejoins the Green Corridor at the Poole Road and US 64/264 interchange locations. Detailed Studv Alternative 6— This alternative is a combination of the proposed Orange and Red Corridors for the southern section of the project. DSA 6 follows the Orange Corridor through the planned interchanges at NC 55 Bypass, SR 1152 (Holly Springs Road), and SR 1386 (Bells Lake Road). After the proposed Bells Lake Road interchange, the Red Corridor April 2014 2 C� HTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) continues eastward crossing SR 1010 (Ten Ten Road) and forming an interchange with US 401 north of SR 1010. The Red Corridor then continues northeast, traveling between Lake Wheeler and Lake Benson, featuring planned interchanges with SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) and NC 50 north of Lake Benson. The planned I-40 interchange location for the Red Corridor is located south of the existing I-40 and US 70 Business interchange (I-40 Exit 306) and north of the SR 2700 (White Oak Road) overpass. Continuing into the eastern section of the project, the Red Corridor does not have an interchange with US 70 Business, but instead has a proposed interchange at SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Road) that includes an extension of Rock Quarry Road to the south that forms an intersection with US 70 Business. The proposed Rock Quarry Road interchange on the Red Corridor is in the same location as the Rock Quarry Road interchange on the Green Corridor. After the Rock Quarry Road interchange, DSA 6 follows the remainder of the Green Corridor, with future interchanges at SR 2555 (Auburn-Knightdale Road), SR 1007 (Poole Road) and US 64/264. Detailed Studv Alternative 7— DSA 7 is a slight variation of DSA 6. DSA 7 utilizes the Orange and then the Red Corridor for the southern section, as described in DSA 6. The eastern section alignment includes the Red Corridor, Mint Corridor (see DSA 2 description above), and Green Corridor. Detailed Study Alternative 8— This alternative combines the Orange and then the Purple, Blue, and Lilac Corridors for the southern section of the project. The proposed DSA 8 alignment follows the Orange Corridor through the future interchanges at NC 55 Bypass and SR 1152 (Holly Springs Road). After the Holly Springs Road interchange, the Purple Corridor diverges southward from the Orange Corridor. The proposed Purple Corridor has an interchange with SR 1393 (Hilltop Needmore Road). The Purple Corridor alignment then continues southeast to a planned interchange with US 401. DSA 8 continues eastward on the Blue Corridor alignment, with a proposed interchange at SR 1006 (Old Stage Road). The Blue Corridor then merges into the Lilac Corridor alignment just west of the proposed NC 50 interchange. DSA 8 follows the Lilac Corridor alignment to the I-40 and US 70 interchange. On the eastern section of the project, the Lilac Corridor alignment merges into the Green Corridor prior to the White Oak Road interchange. After the future White Oak Road interchange location, DSA 6 follows the remainder of the Green Corridor alignment, with future interchanges at SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Road), SR 2555 (Auburn-Knightdale Road), SR 1007 (Poole Road) and US 64/264. Detailed Studv Alternative 9— DSA 9 is a slight variation of DSA 8. DSA 9 utilizes the Orange, Purple, Blue, and Lilac Corridors for the southern section, as described in DSA 8. The eastern section uses the Green and Mint Corridors (see DSA 2 description above). Detailed Study Alternative 10 — DSA 10 features the Orange, Purple, Blue, and Lilac Corridor alignments (see DSA 9 description above) for the southern section. The eastern section utilizes a combination of the Brown, Tan, and Green Corridors (see DSA 3 description above). Detailed Studv Alternative 11 — DSA 11 features the Orange, Purple, alignments (see DSA 9 description above) for the southern section proposed alignment features a combination of the Brown, and Green description above). Blue, and Lilac Corridor . The eastern section Corridors (see DSA 4 April 2014 3 � �� NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Detailed Study Alternative 12 — DSA 12 features the Orange, Purple, Blue, and Lilac Corridor alignment (see DSA 9 description above) for the southern section. The Green, Teal, and Brown Corridors are combined to create the eastern section alignment of this project alternative (see DSA 5 description above). Detailed Studv Alternative 13 — This alternative contains the Orange and Lilac Corridor alignments for the southern section of the project. The proposed Lilac Corridor diverges from the Orange Corridor east of the future SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) interchange. The planned Lilac Corridor interchanges with NC 50 and I-40 and US 70 are north of the locations of the proposed NC 50 and I-40 and US 70 interchanges on the Orange Corridor. On the eastern section of the project, the Lilac Corridor alignment merges into the Green Corridor prior to the proposed White Oak Road interchange. After the White Oak Road interchange, DSA 6 follows the remainder of the Green Corridor. Detailed Study Alternative 14 — DSA 14 is a slight variation of DSA 13. DSA 14 utilizes the Orange and Lilac Corridor alignments for the southern section. The eastern section features the Green and Mint Corridors (see DSA 2 description above). Detailed Studv Alternative 15 — DSA 15 utilizes the Orange and Lilac Corridor alignments (see DSA 13 description above) for the southern section. The eastern section contains a combination of the Brown, Tan, and Green Corridors (see DSA 3 description above). Detailed Studv Alternative 16 — DSA 16 features the Orange and Lilac Corridor alignments (see DSA 13 description above) for the southern section. The eastern section utilizes a combination of the proposed Brown, and Green Corridors (see DSA 4 description above). Detailed Studv Alternative 17 — DSA 17 features the Orange and Lilac Corridor alignments (see DSA 13 description above) for the southern section. The proposed Green, Teal, and Brown Corridors are combined to create the eastern section of this project alternative (see DSA 5 description above). The 2010 base year forecast includes existing No-Build conditions only and does not include the Triangle Expressway. The 2012 and 2035 No-Build alternatives include the Triangle Expressway constructed as a toll facility but contain no Southern or Eastern Wake Freeway. The 2012 and 2035 Build alternatives include the Triangle Expressway and Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway. This traffic forecast document provides design data (design hourly volumes (K-factors), directional distribution percentages (D-factors), and heavy vehicle percentages (single-unit trucks, tractor-trailer-semi-trailers) as well as Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) estimates for the DSA traffic forecast study area alternatives and describes the methodology and data inputs used in the forecasting process. The forecasts for this project are derived primarily from comparisons between existing field- counted data/base year calibrated travel demand model data and future year growth trends/model estimates. The forecasts also include a review of previous study area forecasts, output from the Triangle Regional Model (TRM) versions, along with engineering judgment. The TRM V4-2008 includes all fiscally-constrained projects contained in the 2030 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) and Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan April 2014 4 � �� NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTP) dated September 15, 2004. In order to ensure all No-Build and Build DSAs are comparable and based on similar data, TRM V4-2008 was used as the primary modeling tool for all forecast scenarios. Once the preferred detailed study alternative is selected through the NEPA project process, an updated traffic forecast is anticipated to be prepared for that alternative using the most current available model and data. 1.2 Project History The Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension was listed in the CAMPO 2030 LRTP (dated September 15,2004) with a 2030 horizon year, in the CAMPO 2035 LRTP (dated May 20, 2009) with a 2025 horizon year, and is currently listed in the 2040 MTP (dated April 2, 2013) with a 2030 horizon year. HNTB collected data from the CAMPO 2030 LRTP, relevant traffic forecasts, and NCDOT STIP projects to be included in the traffic forecast. Scoping meetings for this traffic forecasting report, and subsequent decisions agreed upon by NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch (TPB), NCDOT Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit (PDEA), and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) established the limits of the traffic forecast study area for traffic forecasting and capacity analysis for the 2010 base year and 2012/2035 future years. Figure 2 shows the traffic forecast study area for the base, intermediate and future year forecasts. Base year (2010) traffic forecasts for a No-Build alternative were developed using a comparison of historic AADT data and field-collected traffic counts. TRM V4-2008 model data was used in development of No-Build and DSA 1-17 forecasts. An intermediate year, 2012, was selected because it is the opening year of the Triangle Expressway Western Wake Freeway. The 2012 year scenarios include forecasts for a No-Build alternative and a Build alternative with the Southeast Extension as toll facility. All Build alternative forecasts propose the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeways (Southeast Extension) as controlled access, median divided six-lane freeway facilities. The forecasts use extrapolations of historic AADT in the study area, 2012 TRM V4 data, and comparisons/adjustments from traffic counts applied to historic and model information. The 2012 No-Build alternative forecast would include all horizon year 2010 projects in the fiscally constrained 2030 CAMPO LRTP, the 2030 DCHC MPO LRTP, and projects scheduled to be completed in 2012. The 2012 Build alternative considers those same projects, as well and the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway as controlled-access facilities. Figure 3 shows the study area CAMPO long range transportation plan projects for 2010, 2020, and 2030 per the 2030 LRTP (September 15, 2004). The 2035 future year scenarios include forecasts for a No-Build alternative and the various Build alternatives with the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway projects as toll facilities. The forecasts use extrapolations of historic AADT data in the study area, 2035 TRM V4 data, and comparisons/adjustments from the field-collected traffic counts as they applied to the historic and model information. The 2035 forecasts consider all fiscally-constrained projects in the CAMPO and DCHC 2030 LRTPs. The scenarios are summarized in Table 2. April 2014 rJ � �� NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 2. Forecast Scenarios and Alternatives . . . � . � . . . . Base Year No-Build 2010 N/A Existing Network Intermediate Year No-Build $0.12 Per Mile 2010 LRTP Projects + Triangle User Cost Expressway Toll Facility 2012 �0.12 Per Mile 2010 LRTP Projects + Triangle Intermediate Year Build Toll User Cost Expressway & Southeast Extension Toll Facilit Design Year No-Build $0.12 Per Mile Includes all Fiscally-Constrained 2035 User Cost 2030 LRTP + Southeast Extension Design Year Build Toll (Toll Facility) 1.3 Area Information The project is located primarily in Wake County with a small portion of the project that extends into Johnston County. The Southern Wake Freeway (STIP's R-2721 and R-2828) extends eastward from the NC 55 Holly Springs Bypass to the junction of I-40 and the US 70 Clayton Bypass in Johnston County. For DSAs 6 and 7 that include the Red Corridor for a portion of the Southern Wake Freeway, the southern portion extends from NC 55 to I-40 at a new interchange location north of the I-40/US 70 Clayton Bypass interchange. The Eastern Wake Freeway (STIP R-2829) begins at the I-40/US 70 Clayton Bypass interchange for DSAs 1-5 and 8-17 or the I-40 interchange for DSAs 6 and 7 and ends at the US 64 Knightdale Bypass, completing the outer loop. The entire project length is nearly 30 miles. Current land use in the traffic forecast study area is a mixture of urban and suburban commercial/residential development. Some interchanges in the traffic forecast study area feature dense "urban" development, while others have little to no existing development on more than one quadrant of the interchange. 1.4 Route Information Studv Area In collaboration with HW Lochner, NCDOT, CAMPO, and FHWA, the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway study area was defined for traffic forecasting related to the development of the project Purpose and Need statement and alternatives development and screening. The traffic forecast study area for traffic forecasting, shown graphically in Figure 2, includes the existing freeway and surface street arterials shown in Table 3. April 2014 6 � �� NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 3. Existing Study Area Roadways :. . � i' .--. ' - � - I-40 Interstate 4-6 lane divided 67,000 65 - I-540 Interstate 6 lane divided 40,000 65 - US 64 Bypass Freeway 6 lane divided 60,000 65 - US 70 Bypass (Clayton Bypass) Freeway 4 lane divided 23,000 55 - US 1 Freeway / Principal Arterial 4 lane divided 18,000 65 - US 401 Principal Arterial 4 lane divided 33,000 55 - NC 50 Principal Arterial 2 lane undivided 15,200 55 - NC 55 Principal Arterial 4 lane divided 28,000 55 - US 70 Business Principal / Minor Arterial 4 lane divided 25,000 - 55 34,000 - NC 42 Minor Arterial 5 lane with TWLTL 26,000 45 - NC 42 Minor Arterial 2 lane undivided 12,000 55 1007 Poole Road Minor Arterial 2 lane undivided 8,600 45 1010 Ten Ten Road Minor Arterial 2 lane undivided 6 100 - 45 15,000 1152 Holly Springs Road Minor Arterial 2 lane undivided 8,900 45 2711 Vandora Springs Road Minor Arterial 2 lane undivided 7,900 35 2233 Smithfield Road Minor Arterial 2 lane undivided 17,000 45 2711 Vandora Springs Road Minor Arterial 2 lane undivided 7,900 35 1006 Old Stage Road Minor Arterial / Collector 2 lane undivided 9,200 45 1010 Cleveland School Road Major Collector 2 lane undivided 6,000 55 1393 Hilltop Needmore Road Major Collector 2 lane undivided 3,300 45 2542 Rock Quarry Road Collector 2 lane undivided 4,000 55 1386 Bells Lake Road Local 2 lane undivided 10,400 45 2700 White Oak Road Local 2 lane undivided 6,600 55 2555 Auburn-Knightdale Road Local 2 lane undivided 2,600 55 1172 Old Smithfield Road Local 2 lane undivided 1,000 35 1300 Kildaire Farm Road Local 2 lane undivided 10,600 45 1503 Donny Brook Road Local 2 lane undivided 3,000 45 2555 Raynor Road Local 2 lane undivided 3,600 45 2555 Auburn-Knightdale Road Local 2 lane undivided 3,200 55 5204 Old Baucom Road Local 2 lane undivided 1,000 55 2516 Hodge Road Local 2 lane undivided 9,200 45 1153 Old Holly Springs Apex Road Local 2 lane undivided 1,800 45 2779 Old McCullers Road Local 2 lane undivided 4,200 35 1421 Old Mills Road Local 2 lane undivided 600 45 2750 Norman Blalock Road Local 2 lane undivided 1,000 45 2753 Dwight Rowland Road Local 2 lane undivided 2,600 45 5204 Old Baucom Road Local 2 lane undivided 1,000 55 2515 Old Faison Road Local 2 lane undivided 4,100 45 '� - As defined on the NCDOT Urban Functional Classification Map (2006) TWLTL - Two-Way Left-turn Lane The following future roadway facilities were also included in the traffic forecast study area: • Triangle Expressway Western Wake Freeway from NC 55 (Holly Springs Bypass) to NC 55 near the Research Triangle Park (RTP) [This facility is now open to traffic] April 2014 � C� HTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) • Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension from NC 55 (Holly Springs Bypass) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale Bypass) These forecast locations and roadway facilities were chosen as forecast links primarily based on their proximity to and potential impact by the project. Forecasts for existing or proposed -Y- line intersections and/or interchanges were included in this detailed forecasting effort. Studv Area Roadwavs There are six major access-controlled freeways in the vicinity of the traffic forecast study area: I- 40, I-540, NC 540, US 64 Bypass (Knightdale Bypass), and US 70 Bypass (Clayton Bypass). The following are descriptions of the major roadways within the traffic forecast study area: • I-40 is the primary freeway corridor for regional connectivity between Raleigh, RTP, Durham and Chapel Hill in the Triangle. I-40 varies from a four-lane to an eight-lane freeway in the traffic forecast study area. The posted speed limit is 65 miles per hour (mph) through the traffic forecast study area. • US 1 is an existing controlled access freeway that serves regional traffic in Cary and Apex. US 1 features a four-lane cross section in the traffic forecast study area, with auxiliary lanes near interchanges. The posted speed limit is 65 mph. • I-540 is an existing loop freeway around the northern portions of Wake County. It currently spans from I-40 on the western side of Wake County to the US 64 Bypass near Knightdale in eastern Wake County. The facility features a six-lane cross section in the study area, with auxiliary lanes at interchanges and a posted speed limit of 70 mph. • NC 540 is an existing freeway facility that is an extension of I-540 in western Wake County from I-40 to NC 55 near RTP. The facility features a six-lane cross section with a posted speed limit of 70 mph. The segment of NC 540 from NC 55 to NC 54 is a toll facility. • US 64 Bypass (Knightdale Bypass) is an existing controlled access freeway in the traffic forecast study area providing access to areas of east Wake County to I-440 and further to I- 95. In the traffic forecast study area, US 64 Bypass features a six-lane cross-section, with auxiliary lanes at interchanges and a posted 65 mph speed limit. • US 70 Bypass (Clayton Bypass) is an existing controlled access freeway in the traffic forecast study area providing access to areas of Johnston County to I-40. In the traffic forecast study area, the Clayton Bypass contains a four-lane cross-section, with auxiliary lanes at interchanges and a posted speed limit of 65 mph. Other roadways that are specifically included in the traffic forecast study area include NC 42, NC 50, NC 55, US 70, US 401, Holly Springs Road, Bells Lake Road, Ten Ten Road, Old Stage Road, Rock Quarry Road, Auburn-Knightdale Road and Poole Road. These existing thoroughfares are primarily multi-lane facilities with 35, 45, or 55 mph speed limits in the traffic forecast study area and provide regional connectivity and access throughout Wake County, with interchange connections to the seven major study area freeway facilities. April 2014 8 C� HTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 2.0 SOURCES OF INFORMATION AND DATA 2.1 Related Forecasts HNTB obtained recent project-level traffic forecasts for NCDOT STIP projects and/or municipal road projects in the traffic forecast study area from the NCDOT TPB, TSG, and Feasibility Studies Unit (FSU). Historic traffic forecast information is summarized in Table 4. Table 4. Historic Traffic Forecasts in the Study Area .� � ' M I ' R-2721 • R-2828 2009 Forecast includes previous planning-level forecast of the R-2829 Southern and Eastern Wake Freeways I-4744 2008 Forecast includes areas along I-40 and US 1/64 from Aviation Parkway to Gorman Street U-4763B 2007 Forecast includes areas immediately to the west of the I-4744 2007 base year forecast along I-40 R-2000 AA- 2008 Forecast includes portions of I-40, I-540, and NC 540 located AF within the stud area R-2635 2007 Forecast includes Western Wake Freeway R-2721 Forecast includes previous forecast of the Southern and Eastern R-2828 2000 Wake Freeways R-2829 R-2552 1998 Forecast includes Clayton Bypass and parts of I-40 in the study area U-3101 1998 Forecast includes areas of the 2008 I-4744 base year forecast alon US 1/64 from I-40 throu h Ca Parkwa 2.2 Historic AADT Data HNTB reviewed all available NCDOT Traffic Survey Group (TSG) AADT data from the previous 20 years in the project study area. Each data point was evaluated and points that were considered outliers were removed from the data set. Some facilities have experienced fluctuations in AADT and diversions in traffic due to various factors, such as construction of new roadway facilities. For example, AADTs on NC 55 Business, US 70 Business, E. Garner Road, Hodge Road, Poole Road have experienced fluctuation primarily due to construction of NC 55 Bypass, US 70 Bypass and US 264/64 and diversion of traffic. Figure 4 details the study area historic AADT count locations. Sixty-three (63) growth trend line estimates for 2035 for locations throughout the traffic forecast study area were developed using the 1990-2010 AADT travel history. Appendix C contains linear regression graphs based on the historical data points. Table 5 shows the 2002-2009 NCDOT historic AADT volumes for key locations and locations where field traffic data was collected. April 2014 9 � �� NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 2.3 Field Data Collection HNTB collaborated with the NCDOT TSG to obtain existing traffic count data (24 hour directional/classification counts) for study area roadways. NCDOT ATR count data was collected at two (2) locations and 2009 AADT freeway ramp counts were provided at seven (7) existing study area interchanges. Two (2) 12-hour intersection counts were also provided. Specific locations where historic traffic data was obtained are shown in Figure 5. Data was analyzed for applicability/relevance to traffic conditions and for inconsistencies between adjacent intersections/interchanges/roadway segments. After researching the availability of existing traffic count data, HNTB coordinated with NCDOT to determine the locations and times of field traffic data collection activities. HNTB collected and/or received, nine (9) peak hour turning movement counts (TMC), twenty-three (23) 16-hour TMC, and four (4) 48-hour vehicle classification counts. Some traffic counts were completed when local schools and universities were not in session. However, seasonal factors provided by NCDOT for the Triangle area were used to adjust these counts for school traffic. All tube vehicle classification counts were collected for a minimum of 48 hours of an average weekday (Tuesday-Thursday). Detailed traffic count information was collected and reviewed in the completion of this forecast. Figure 5 shows traffic data collection locations. Table 6 provides a summary of the field data collection completed for this forecast. The 16-hour and 48-hour counts were first converted to daily traffic before conversion to AADT. 16-hour turning movement counts were adjusted to 24-hour counts by applying a 0.90 adjustment factor. 48-hour traffic tube/classification counts were analyzed during 16-hour periods and the resulting factors ranged from 0.90 to 0.94. Supporting information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) states 16-hour counts generally account for 90 to 95 percent of 24-hour traffic volumes. Based on this information, a conservative 0.90 adjustment factor was applied to 16-hour turning movement volumes to convert to 24-hour counts. Once volumes were adjusted to 24-hour counts, reciprocal turning movements were added together to estimate bidirectional turns at the intersection or interchange. HNTB converted the adjusted 24-hour counts to AADT volumes using seasonal adjustment factors provided by the NCDOT Traffic Survey Unit. For data related to interstate and mainline routes (US 264/64,US 70 Bypass, US 1, I-40), ADT volumes were adjusted by the NCDOT Interstate Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) Group 11 weekday average for the respective month traffic counts were collected. For non-interstate higher-volume urban secondary routes, such as US 64 Business, NC 42 and Ten Ten Road, ADT volumes were adjusted by the NCDOT non-interstate ATR Group 4 weekday average for the respective month and day traffic counts were collected. For all other study area roadway counts, non-interstate ATR Group 1 was applied. April 2014 � � C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 5. NCDOT Historic AADT Volumes _ 0� a o :,-i �.�,:, 1 9100872 I-40 from Exit 303 Jones Sausa e Road to Exit 306 US 70 83,000 82,000 88,000 86,000 91,000 93,000 87,000 94,000 99,500 - 99,500 9103495 I-40 from Exit 306 US 70 Exit 309 US 70 B ass - - - - - - 68,000 75,000 82,000 - 75,100 9100873 I-40 from US 70/S-E Wake Expw to Exit 312 (NC 42 51,000 49,000 52,000 53,000 56,000 58,000 51,000 55,000 56,300 - 36,800a 56,300 5000159 I-40 from Exit 312 NC 42 to Exit 319 NC 210 42,000 38,000 41,000 43,000 44,000 46,000 42,000 44,000 50,100 - 50,100 9103485 I-540 from US 64/264 to US 64 Business - - - - - 38,000 39,000 40,000 41,000 - 41,000 9103484 I-540 N of US 64 Business - - - - - 45,000 47,000 48,000 49,700 - 49,700 5000185 NC 42 E of SR 1628 (Cleveland Crossing Dr 13,000 13,000 20,000 14,000 15,000 15,000 13,000 15,000 14,800 21,400 21,000 5000184 NC 42 W of SR 1800 Technolo Drive 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 25,000 27,000 25,000 26,000 26,400 32,200 31,600 5000147 NC 42 N of US 70 B ass 12,000 12,000 13,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 - 12,000 15,000 11,700 11,700 9100133 NC 50 S of SR 2562 (New Rand Rd) / _ 18,000 - 17,000 - 19,000 - 17,000 17,900 19,6004 19,500 N of Southern Wake Expressway (Red) 9100133 NC 50 S of Southern Wake Expresswa Red) - 18,000 - 17,000 - 19,000 - 17,000 17,900 19,600 19,500 9100661 NC 50 N of Ten-Ten Rd SR 1010 - 13,000 - 12,000 - 13,000 - 12,000 12,100 14,000 14,300 9103452 NC 50 N of Southern Wake Expwy / _ _ - 13,000 - 15,000 - - 18,000 15,900' 15,200 S of Ten-Ten Rd SR 1010 9100659 NC 50 N of SR 1010 Cleveland School Road - 13,000 - 12,000 - 11,000 - 12,000 11,200 15,200 15,200 9102426 NC 50 S of SR 1010 Cleveland School Road - 6,800 - 6,100 - 5,800 - 6,100 7,000 8,000 8,000 9103432 NC 55 S of SR 1172 Old Smithfield Road - - - 19,000 - 23,000 - 26,000 27,900 28,200` 29,400 9103427 NC 55 from SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Road) to Southern Wake _ _ _ 19,000 - 25,000 - 28,000 30,800 27,7002 30,200 Ex resswa 9103427 NC 55 from Southern Wake Ex w to NC 55 Business - - - 19,000 - 25,000 - 28,000 30,800 27,700 30,200 9100145 SR 1006 Old Sta e Road N of SR 2711 Vandora S rin s Rd - 11,000 - 11,000 - 8,700 - 10,000 9,300 10,200 9,700 9100147 SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) S of SR 2711 (Vandora Springs Rd) - 17,000 - 16,000 - 15,000 - 16,000 16,900 15,800 14,800 9100841 SR 1006 Old Sta e Road N of Ten-Ten Rd SR 1010 - 15,000 - 14,000 - 13,000 - 13,000 12,800 15,800 14,800 9100843 SR 1006 Old Sta e Road S of SR 1010 Ten-Ten Rd - 10,000 - 9,600 - 9,100 - 9,200 10,600 10,800 7,900 9100843 SR 1006 Old Sta e Road S of S Wake Ex resswa N of SR 2724 Banks Rd - 10,000 - 9,600 - 9,100 - 9,200 10,600 10,800 7,900 9104172 SR 1006 Old Sta e Road N of NC 42 S of S Wake Ex w - 4,300 - 4,400 - 4,100 - 3,900 4,700 4,400 3,800 9104602 SR 1007 (Poole Road) E of Eastern Wake Expressway - 10,000 - 5,400 - 4,300 - 3,700 10,600 7,900 8,100 9100712 SR 1007 Poole Road E of SR 2516 Hod e Rd - 14,000 - 9,100 - 9,100 - 8,600 10,600 7,900 8,100 9100714 SR 1007 Poole Road W of SR 2516 Hod e Rd - 17,000 - 9,500 - 8,300 - 7,900 6,100 6,600 6,500 9103453 SR 1010 Cleveland School Road E of NC 50 - - - 5,900 - 6,100 - 6,000 6,100 7,800 7,800 9100743 SR 1010 Ten-Ten Road E of SR 1386 Bells Lake Road - 11,000 - 12,000 - 12,000 - 12,000 16,100 12,600 13,300 9100839 SR 1010 Ten Ten Rd E of US 401 - 13,000 - 14,000 - 16,000 - 15,000 16,000 14,700 12,800 9103440 SR 1010 Ten Ten Rd W of US 401 - - - 15,000 - 15,000 - 15,000 15,000 15,600 14,100 9103451 SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd W of NC 50 - - - 5,700 - 6,700 - 6,100 6,500 7,500 6,700 9102947 SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs-Apex N of Western Wake Freeway - 2,400 - 920 - 1,500 - 1,800 3,600 - 3,600 Road) 9102947 SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs-Apex S of Western Wake Freeway - 2,400 - 920 - 1,500 - 1,800 3,600 - 3,600 Road) 9104085 SR 1386 Bells Lake Road S of Southern Wake Ex resswa - 3,400 - 3,500 - 4,100 - 4,300 4,500 6,000 4,500 9100745 SR 1386 (Graham Newton Road) N of SR 1010 - 5,500 - 5,500 - 6,200 - 6,000 6,900 7,500 6,900 9103032 SR 1421 Old Mills Rd S of SR 1393 Hilltop Needmore Rd - - - - - - - 600 600 400 400 9103475 SR 2233 Smithfield Road N of US 64/264 - - - 9,000 - 8,000 - 8,300 7,900 6,300 6,300 9103474 SR 2233 Smithfield Road S of US 64/264 - - - 13,000 - 17,000 - 17,000 18,700 16,600 16,600 9103476 SR 2516 (Hodge Road) N of US 64/264 - - - 6,400 - 6,300 - 6,600 6,600 6,200 6,200 9100711 SR 2516 Hod e Road from US 64/264 to SR 1007 - 5,800 - 5,700 - 8,500 - 9,200 8,400 9,000 9,000 9100713 SR 2516 Hod e Road S of SR 1007 - 1,400 - 1,200 - 1,200 - 1,400 1,200 1,100 1,100 11 �INT� NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 5(Continued). NCDOT Historic AADT Volumes � , ;. � . � .- ,, �� .. . � �;,�� ;�� o, � ��a . � � � � . 9100725 SR 2542 Rock Quarr Road W of Eastern Wake Expresswa - 5,500 - 4,600 - 4,600 - 4,000 3,800 4,000 3,900 9100725 SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Road) E of Eastern Wake Expresswa - 5,500 - 4,600 - 4,600 - 4,000 3,800 4,000 3,900 9100723 SR 2555 Auburn Kni htdale Road N of SR 2542 Rock Quarr Rd - 3,600 - 3,300 - 2,800 - 2,900 2,600 2,700 2,600 9100731 SR 2555 (Auburn Knightdale Road) S of SR 2542 Rock Quar Rd) - 4,000 - 3,600 - 3,400 - 3,500 3,300 3,200 3,100 9100146 SR 2711 (Vandora Sprin s Rd) E of Old Sta e Rd (SR 1006 - 7,500 - 7,800 - 8,400 - 7,900 8,700 7,600 6,900 9102330 US 1 N of Western Wake Freewa - 17,000 - - - - - 18,000 20,400 - 21,700° 21,700 9102330 US 1 S of Western Wake Freewa - 17,000 - - - - - 18,000 20,400 - 21,700� 21,700 9100737 US 401 S of St Patrick Dr (SR 2777) / _ 33,000 - 31,000 - 33,000 - 32,000 32,200 33,100' - 33,300 N of Southern Wake Expressway (Red) 9103439 US 401 S of Southern Wake Expressway (Red) / _ _ - 31,000 - 33,000 - 31,000 31,700 33,1004 - 33,300 N of SR 1010 Ten Ten Rd 9100838 US 401 N of Southern Wake Ex resswa Oran e - 33,000 - 32,000 - 34,000 - 33,000 27,800 32,300 32,900 9100838 US 401 N of SR 1503 Donn Brook Rd - 33,000 - 32,000 - 34,000 - 33,000 27,800 32,300 32,900 9100707 US 64 Business W of I-540 56,000 - - - 32,000 - 30,000 37,800 31,700� 31,700 9103492 US 64/264 W of SR 2516 Hod e Road - - - - - 59,000 - 60,000 60,500 54,300a 60,500 9103493 US 64/264 from SR 2516 (Hodge Road) to I-540 / Eastern Wake _ _ _ _ _ 56,000 - 58,000 59,000 - 59,000 Ex resswa 9103472 US 64/264 from I-540 / Eastern Wake Expressway to SR 2233 _ _ _ 41,000 - 61,000 - 60,000 68,300 - 68,300 (Smithfield Road) 9103473 US 64/264 E of SR 2233 Smithfield Road - - - 35,000 - 51,000 - 49,000 55,500 41,500a 55,500 9100733 US 70 E of I-40 - 49,000 - 49,000 - 50,000 - 34,000 48,000 - 34,000 9100150 US 70 W of I-40 - 22,000 - 25,000 - 29,000 - 29,000 29,100 - 29,000 9100728 US 70 E of Guy Rd (SR 2558) / E of Rock Quarry Road _ 40,000 - 39,000 - 40,000 - 25,000 - 31,7003 31,700 Extension (Red) 5003514 US 70 B ass E of I-40 - - - - - - 22,000 23,000 24,000 - 12,900 23,000 + linear rate used, 1990-2010 -` - Data not available. 1- 2008 Project Specific TM Counts, factored to AADT estimates 2- 2009 Project Specific TM Counts, factored to AADT estimates 3- 2010 Project Specific TM Counts, factored to AADT estimates 4- 2012 Project Specific TM Counts, factored to AADT estimates 5- 2013 Project Specific TM Counts, factored to AADT estimates a- 2008 Project Specific 48 Hour Counts factored to AADT estimates b- 2009 Project Specific 48 Hour Counts factored to AADT estimates c- 2011 Project Specific 48 Hour Counts factored to AADT estimates �2 �INT� NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 6. Field Data Collection . .• . . NC 50 at Ten Ten Road 16 Hour TMC 11/03/2009 Wake NC 50 at Cleveland School Rd 16 Hour TMC 03/24/2010 Wake Holly Springs Road at Kildaire Farm Rd 16 Hour TMC 10/22/2009 Wake Raynor Road at White Oak Road 16 Hour TMC 11/04/2009 Wake Rock Quarry Road at Auburn Knightdale Road 16 Hour TMC 11/05/2009 Wake US 401 at Donny Brook Road 16 Hour TMC 11/10/2009 & Wake 10/05/2011 US 401 at Wake Tech Drive 16 Hour TMC 10/05/2011 Wake NC 55 at Smithfield Road 16 Hour TMC 10/28/2009 Wake Ten Ten Road at Bells Lake Road 16 Hour TMC 10/27/2009 Wake Peak Hour TMC 10/27/2009 Wake Poole Road at Hodge Road 16 Hour TMC 10/29/2009 Wake Rock Quarry Road at Old Baucom Road 16 Hour TMC 11/18/2009 Wake US 401 at Ten Ten Road 16 Hour TMC 09/06/2012 Wake Rock Quarry Road at E. Garner Road 16 Hour TMC 09/06/2012 Wake NC 50 at Ten Ten Road 16 Hour TMC 09/11/2012 Wake NC 50 at Timber Drive 16 Hour TMC 04/04/2012 Wake Timber Drive at Aversboro Road 16 Hour TMC 09/23/2009 Wake US 70 at White Oak Road 16 Hour TMC 04/04/2012 Wake US 70 at Guy Road (SR 2558) 16 Hour TMC 10/19/2010 Wake NC 50 at Buffaloe Road 16 Hour TMC 05/02/2010 Wake Old Stage Road at Vandora Springs Road 16 Hour TMC 09/06/2012 Wake Old Stage Road at Norman Blalock Road 16 Hour TMC 08/06/2013 Wake Hilltop Needmore Road at Old Mills Road 16 Hour TMC 08/06/2013 Wake US 401 at Dwight Rowland Road 16 Hour TMC 08/06/2013 Wake US 70 Bypass west of Cornwallis Road (SR 1525) 48 Hour Vehicle 11/17 through Johnston Classification Count 11/19/2009 US 70 Business west of Guy Road 48 Hour Vehicle 11/17 through Wake Classification Count 11/19/2009 Old Stage Road south of Ten Ten Road 48 Hour Vehicle 11/03 through Wake Classification Count 11/05/2009 US 1 south of NC 55 48 Hour Vehicle 01/04/2011 Wake Classification Count US 264 EB Off Ramp at Hodge Road Peak Hour TMC 05/12/2010 Wake US 264 WB Off Ramp at Hodge Road Peak Hour TMC 05/12/2010 Wake US 70 EB On/Off Ramps at NC 42 Peak Hour TMC 05/11/2010 Johnston US 70 WB On/Off Ramps at NC 42 Peak Hour TMC 05/11/2010 Johnston US 64 WB On/Off Ramps at Smithfield Road Peak Hour TMC 05/13/2010 Wake US 64 EB On/Off Ramps at Smithfield Road Peak Hour TMC 05/13/2010 Wake US 64 Business EB at I-540 Peak Hour TMC 05/20/2010 Wake US 64 Business WB at I-540 Peak Hour TMC 05/20/2010 Wake April 2014 � 3 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 2.4 Field Investigation Field investigations have been conducted throughout the project forecasting process (2009 to 2013) to examine various detailed study alternatives, observe project study area facilities and collect traffic data. 2.5 Other Sources HNTB collected information on relevant roadway improvement projects within and around the traffic forecast study area. These include NCDOT STIP projects and the projects listed in the CAMPO 2030 LRTP (dated September 15, 2004). A list of the 2030 LRTP fiscally constrained projects within the traffic forecast study area along with estimated dates of completion (horizon years) and other basic information are detailed in Table 7. The locations of these projects can be seen in Figure 3. April 2014 � 4 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 7. CAMPO 2030 LRTP Study Area Projects -. . �� . -. � . . . . . . A49a Poole Road Ma brook Dr. Barwell Road 1.00 2 4 - A91 Jones Sausa e Rd. Rock Quarr Rd I-40 1.46 2 4 - A95 NC 55 Widenin Holl Sprin s B pass SR 1108 Wake Chapel Road 3.30 2 4 R-2907 F9 US 1-64 US 64 Walnut Street 2.60 4 6 U-3101 A4b Ro ers Lane Extension NL End of Existin Ro ers Lane Ro ers Lane/New Hope 0.27 0 4 F1a I-540 North & East Se ment Trian le Town Blvd. US 64 Kni htdale 7.00 0 6 R-2000 F2 I-540 East Se ment US 64 US 64 B pass 2.12 0 6 R-2641 F4a I-540 Western Se ment I 40 NC 55 Morrisville/Car 4.01 0 6 R-2000 F8 US 70 Cla ton B pass I-40 South US 70 Business 9.50 0 4 R-2552 F41 I-40 HOV/HOT Pro�ect I-440/ US 1-64 Johnston Count 17.29 8 8 - F41 I-40 HOV/HOT Pro�ect I-440/ US 1-64 Johnston Count 17.29 8 8 - A114 Ten Ten Road Holl Sprin s Rd US 1 3.47 2 4 - A138a Timber Dr./Jones Sausage Road US 70 Timber Drive Extension 0.65 0 4 - Connector A138b Timber Dr./Jones Sausage Road Jones Sausage Road US 70 0.28 0 4 - Connector A142b Timber Drive East White Oak Road New Rand Road 1.27 0 4 U-4703 A163a Holly Springs Road Sunset Lake Rd Old Holly Springs Apex 3.58 2 4 - A166 Center Street/1010 US 1 Apex Peakway 1.04 2 4 - A217 Sunset Lake Road Connector NC 55 Optimist Farm Road 3.40 2 4 - A40 Kildaire Farm Road Swift Creek Ten Ten Road 2.00 2 4 - A480 US 401 (South) US 70 East Pkwy (FV) 9.85 4 6 - A51 Smithfield Road Carrington Drive Forestville Road 1.17 2 4 U-3441 A96a NC 55 Olive Chapel Road US 64 1.16 2 4 R-2906 A96b NC 55 Apex Peakway (south) Olive Chapel Road 1.67 2 3 U-2901 A120 Tryon Road Extension Garner Road Rock Quarry Road 2.90 0 4 U-3111 A207a Judd Parkway NE (part NL) Existing Judd Parkway NC 55 (Broad Street) 1.70 0 3 - F4b I-540 (Western Wake Expressway) NC 55 (Morrisville/Cary) US 1 101.00 0 6 R-2635 F4c I-540 (Western Wake Expressway) US 1 NC 55 Bypass 2.30 0 6 R-2635 A112 Smithfield Rd. Poole Road US 64 Bypass 1.90 2 4 - A113 Ten-Ten Rd. Holly Springs Rd Bells Lake Road 1.14 2 4 - A117 New Hope Road Old Poole Road Rock Quarry Road 1.80 2 4 - A118 NC 55 NC 42 Harnett County 4.40 2 4 R-2540 A122 Holly Springs Road Sunset Lake Rd. Kildaire Farm Road 0.91 2 6 - A137a Old Stage Road US 401 Ten Ten Road 4.19 2 4 - A138c Timber Dr./Jones Sausage Road �/hite Oak Road I-40 (South) 1.59 2 4 - Connector A140a Vandora Springs Road & Vandora Timber Drive Old Stage Road 1.01 2 4 - S rin s Road Ext. A142a Timber Drive US 70 White Oak Road 2.05 0 4 - A143 White Oak Road US 70 NC 42 Johnston Co. 7.32 2 4 - A149a Poole Road I-540 Kni htdale-Ea le Rock Rd. 7.64 2 4 - A158 Hillto -Needmore Extension Part NL NC 55 Broad Street US 401 5.70 0 3 - A16 Rock Quarr Rd. Old Birch Road New Ho e Road 2.00 2 4 - A172 Kell Road Jenks Rd. Old US 1 5.23 2 4 - A178a Olive Cha el Road Kell Road NC 55 1.93 2 4 - April 2014 � 5 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 7(Continued). CAMPO 2030 LRTP Study Area Projects -. . i�� . . .i -. - � . - .- - . . - . A187 Apex Peakwa NC 55 NC 55 6.19 0 4 - A192 Bells Lake Road Ten Ten Road Johnson Pond Road 2.66 2 4 - A193a Sunset Lake Road US 401 Hilltop-Needmore Road 2.58 2 4 - A193b Sunset Lake Road Hilltop-Needmore Road Optimist Farm Road 2.69 2 4 - A201 a Rock Quarr Road New Hope Road Battle Brid e Road 1.40 2 4 - A202 East Garner Road Rock Quarr Rd Shotwell Road 3.22 2 4 - A204 Bethlehem Road Smithfield Road Grasshopper Road 3.44 2 4 - A214 Garner Road Tr on Road Rock Quarr Road 7.16 2 3 - A218a Old Holl Sprin s Apex Road Holl Sprin s Road Jessie Drive 2.52 2 4 - A218b Jessie Dr. part NL Ten Ten Road Old Holl Sprin s Road 3.50 2 4 - A224 Johnson Pond Road US 401 North Bells Lake Road 3.52 2 3 - A403a Hod e Road Poole Road US 64 3.15 2 4 - A41 Kildaire Farm Road Ten Ten Road Kildaire Farm Connector 1.67 2 4 - A410 Lake Pine Drive/Old Ralei h Road Car Parkwa Apex Peakwa 1.70 2 4 - A42 Penny Road Ten Ten Road Holly Springs Rd. 3.05 2 4 - A426 NC 55 (Main Street) Holly Springs Road Bobbitt Road 2.96 2 4 - A427a Avent Ferry Road NC 55 Bypass Cass Holt 1.03 2 4 - A49b Poole Road Barwell Road I-540 1.57 2 4 - A4c Rogers Lane US 64 Rogers Lane NL 1.13 3 4 - A52 Smithfield Road US 64 Bypass Carrington Drive 2.21 2 4 - A69 Holly Springs Road Cary Parkway Penny Road 2.17 2 6 - A70 Holly Springs Road Penny Road Ten Ten Road 1.14 2 6 - A71 Holly Springs Road Ten Ten Road Kildaire Farm Road Connec 1.59 2 6 - A88 New Rand Road NC 50 Old Garner Road 1.63 2 3 U-3607 F44a I-40 (East) I-440 US 70 Business (Garner) 4.40 4 8 I-5111 F44b I-40 (East) US 70 Business (Garner) NC 42 6.30 4 8 I-5111 A157 Eastern Parkway US 401 US 401 7.39 0 4 - A159 Western Parkway (Fuquay Varina) NC 55 US 401 5.56 0 4 - A200 Creech/Jones Sausage Connector Creech Road Jones Sausage Rd 1.09 0 4 - A403b Hodge Road Extension US 64 Old Milburnie Road 1.30 0 4 - F3 I-540 (Eastern Wake Expressway) I-40 (South) US 64 Bypass 10.80 0 6 - F5 I-540 (Southern Wake Expressway) NC 55 Bypass US 401 (South) 7.80 0 6 - F6 I-540 (Southern Wake Expressway) US 401 (South) I-40 (South) 8.70 0 6 - - - Data not available. April 2014 � 6 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 3.0 2010 BASE YEAR NO-BUILD TRAFFIC FORECAST 3.1 Assumptions The 2010 Base Year scenario includes a forecast of existing study area conditions using actual field collected traffic counts from 2010 and historical NCDOT AADT data. The 2010 Base Year (No Build) scenario does not include NC 540 (Triangle Expressway / Western Wake Freeway). A 2010 Base Year Build traffic forecast is not included in this report because during the scoping process it was determined that the Intermediate Year (2012) Build forecast, which does include NC 540 (Western Wake Freeway), would be included instead of the 2010 Base Year Build scenario. 3.2 2010 Base Year (No-Build) Forecast Methodology A review was conducted for all available previous traffic forecasts and recent daily and peak hour traffic counts developed for the traffic forecast study area. 16-hour and 48-hour traffic counts were converted to AADT volumes using seasonal adjustment factors provided by the NCDOT TSG. Peak hour and 16-hour counts were used to supplement the forecasting process to help determine distributional splits at interchanges and aid in determining traffic factors where no additional information was available. To determine interchange and intersection forecasts, AADT volumes, Directional Flow (D), and Design Hourly Volume (DHV) were input into adjustable and non-adjustable peak hour breakout spreadsheets provided by NCDOT TPB. For the 2010 Base Year forecast, balanced volumes were developed at interchanges and intersections and in between roadway segments. Forecast break lines were included along roadways where intervening roadways, developments or large distances did not allow volumes to balance between intersections. The 2009 TRM V4 model run data was extrapolated to 2010 and shows daily assignment volumes varying (some higher and some lower) from existing count data along study area roadways. This can be attributed to a quickly changing and developing study area and very low base year volumes, which make it difficult for the regional model to completely account for all existing conditions and recent changes. 3.3 Determination of Base Year No-Build Design Factors Appropriate design characteristics (Design Hourly Volume (DHV), Directional Flow (D), and Truck Percentages) were determined for the study area by reviewing relevant previous traffic forecasts, NCDOT historical AADT count station data, and existing 16-hour and 48-hour traffic count data. Using this data, the base year (2010 No-Build) forecast was developed. Detailed information on how these values were calculated can be found in Table 8. Additional details in the forecast development are listed below. Peak Hour Directional (D) factors for this forecast were determined by comparing AM and PM peak hour approach/departure volumes to daily approach departure volumes for a particular roadway segment or corridor. The forecast attempted to provide a consistent D factor along a roadway corridor. The directional split (D) provides information on the direction of traffic flow in the peak period. Generally D is in the 55% to 65% range for most previous project forecasts. Given that Raleigh April 2014 � 7 �I NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) and Research Triangle Park (RTP) are centers of gravity for regional trip-making in this region, most roadway facilities, such as I-40, I-540, US 1, US 264 and US 64, act as radials. Based on existing traffic patterns, a D of 55°/o to 65°/o was used for most facilities. Design Hourly Volume (DHI� factors were determined by comparing approach and departure highest peak hour volumes for a particular segment to the 24 hour average AADT to approximate K30. Traffic forecasts normally report the K-value, which is the percentage of traffic that occurs during the peak period so that the DHV can in turn be estimated by multiplying K times the AADT (Pline, 1999). Typical values of K fall in the 8 to 12 percent range. Since ATR stations are not available throughout the study area, the highest hourly volume from the 16-hour and 48-hour ADT counts were used to determine the K-values. The K-values were estimated to be between 8 and 12, with lower K values generally occurring on primary routes and higher K- values occurring on secondary routes. DHV values are generally consistent with the field- collected 48-hour and 16-hour traffic counts, which were the raw data source from which the K estimates were made. Total inflow and outflow from intersection legs (or in both directions along a mainline) was calculated for AM and PM peak hours and then the highest value was divided by the raw daily traffic volume estimate (or actual field count) for that segment. The forecast attempted to provide a consistent DHV along a roadway corridor. In some instances, the DHV changed along the corridor to account for a change in traffic characteristics. Truck Percentage (Duals/TTST) estimates were made for this project with the consideration that the traffic stream is not uniform in its makeup. In addition to passenger vehicles, trucks and buses are generally present on all roadways. Heavier vehicles have a disproportionately large effect on both facility capacity and pavement design. While traffic along the urban I-40 corridor in the traffic forecast study area is dominated by commuters and does not include a single large truck destination point, the I-40, US 1/64, I-440, US 64 Bypass, and US 70 corridors provide primary regional routes for heavy truck traffic. Daily truck percentages in the study area were estimated to be between 3 and 18 percent, with lower truck percentages generally occurring on lower volume secondary routes and higher truck percentages occurring on higher volume primary routes. These values are generally consistent with the field collected 16-hour and 48- hour traffic counts. Truck percentages were determined by examining 16-hour counts, 48-hour classification data, NCDOT historic truck data from 2002 and 2005, and previous traffic forecasts mentioned in Table 4. From this data, overall truck percentages were separated into two standard classifications - Duals (single-unit trucks with at least one dual-axled tire) and TTSTs (multi-unit trucks with single and twin trailers) — and were forecasted. An attempt was made to maintain consistent truck percentages along roadway corridors except where system interchanges, roadway facility types, special roadway attractors, minor side-streets or other circumstances warranted a change in truck percentages. Table 8 provides design hourly volume, directional split information and truck percentages. April 2014 � 8 �I NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 8. Design Data Information - -. �� Eastern Wake Fw I-40/US 70 Bypass to 264/64 B pass 65', 60b - 55 10�106 - 10 I-40 I-440 to NC 42 55 , 65 , 65 60 60 9,13 ,13 8 9 NC 42 US 401/NC 55 to US 70 B ass 65 55-65 65 / 60 10 8-10 10, 7 NC 50 US 70 to Cleveland School Road 70 65-75 65 10 10,12 10 NC 55/B pass US 1 to NC 42 65 65 65 10 10 10 Southern Wake Fw NC 55 to NC 50 60 , 60 - 65 11 , 10 - 10 Southern Wake F NC 50 to I-40/US 70 B ass 60 , 60 - 65 11 , 10 - 10 Old Sta e Rd N/ S of Southern Wake Ex resswa - 60-65 60 / 65 - 9-11 10 Poole Road Hodge Rd - 65 65 - 12 12 Ten Ten Road US 1 to NC 50 55 50-60 60 10 9,10 11 Holl Sprin s Road N of Kildaire Farm Road - 60 60 - 9 9 OHS-A ex Road N of Western Wake Freewa 60 - 60 10 - 10 Bells Lake Road Ten Ten Rd - 65 65 - 12 12 Hilltop Needmore Rd Sunset Lake Rd to US 401 - 55 55 - 12 12 Rock Quarr Road W of Eastern Wake Expresswa - 65 65 - 12 12 Auburn Kni htdale Rd Rock Quarr Rd - 55 55 - 10 10 White Oak Road Auburn Kni htdale Rd / White Oak Rd - 65 65 - 12 12 Vandora S rin s Rd Old Sta e Rd - 65 65 - 10 10 US 1 N of Trian le Expresswa 60 - 60 8 - 8 US 64 Business E of I-540 - - 60 - - 9 US 64 Business W of I-540 - - 60 - - 9 US 264/64 B ass I-440 to I-540/Eastern Wake Fw 65 65 65 10 10 10 US 264/64 B ass I-540/Eastern Wake Fw to US 64 65 55 65 10 9 10 US 70 I-40/440 to I-40 60 60 60 9 9 9 US 70 I-40 to Gu Road 55 55 55 9 9 9 US 70 Bypass I-40 to NC 42 65 / 65 65 65 9/ 10 9 9 US 401 N of Ten Ten Rd to NC 42/55 - 65 65 - 9 9 Triangle Expressway US 1 to NC 55 60 / 60 - 65 11 / 9 - 10 "- Data not available. *- Forecast design data for referenced forecasts may vary along freeway segments at interchanges and intersections. Only one design data point was referenced for the above table for the noted forecast year. 1- R-2721, R-2828, R-2829 — Forecast Design Data (HNTB, 2009) 5- R-2635 — Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 2001) 2- I-4744 — Forecast Design Data (HNTB, 2008) 6- R-2721, R-2828, R-2829 — Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 2000) 3- R-2000AA-AF — Using 2012 Build Toll Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 2008) 7- U-3101 — Using 1998 Build Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 2000) 4- R-2552 — Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 1999) 8- U-47636 — Using 2030 Build Toll with McCrimmon Parkway Connector (MAB, 2007) April 2014 � 9 �I NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 8(Continued). Design Data Information -. �� Eastern Wake Freewa I-40/US 70 Bypass to 264/64 B pass (6/9)', 166 - (6 / 9) I-40 I-440 to NC 42 6/12 , 10 , 10 6/7 (6 / 12) NC 42 US 401/NC 55 to US 70 B ass 4/2 3/1 ^, 3/2 ^, 4/2 ^ (4 / 3) NC 50 US 70 to Cleveland School Road (4/2) (2/1)^,(3/1)^ (3 / 1) NC 55/B pass US 1 to NC 42 4/7 3/4 ^ (4 / 7) Southern Wake Freewa NC 55 to NC 50 6/12 , 18 - (6 / 12) Southern Wake Freewa NC 50 to I-40/US 70 B ass 6/12 , 18 - (6 / 12) Old Sta e Rd N/ S of Southern Wake Ex resswa - 1/1 , 3/1 , 3/2 (2 / 1) Poole Road Hodge Rd - (3/1)^ (3 / 1) Ten Ten Road US 1 to NC 50 2/1 1/1 , 3/1 , 3/2 (2 / 1) Holl Sprin s Road N of Kildaire Farm Road - 2/1 ^ (2 / 1) Old Holl S rin s-A ex Road N of Western Wake Freewa 2/1 - (2 / 1) Bells Lake Road Ten Ten Rd - 1/1 ^ (2 / 1) Hilltop Needmore Rd Sunset Lake Rd to US 401 - (6,4)^ (3 / 2) Rock Quarr Road W of Eastern Wake Expresswa - 2/1 ^ (3 / 1) Auburn Kni htdale Rd Rock Quarr Rd - 4/2 ^, 3/1 (4 / 2) White Oak Road Auburn Kni htdale Rd / White Oak Rd - 2/1 ^ (2 / 1) Vandora Sprin s Rd Old Sta e Rd - 3/1 " (3 / 1) US 1 N of Trian le Expresswa 6/10 - (6 / 10) US 64 Business E of I-540 - 5/3 ^ (5 / 3) US 64 Business W of I-540 - 5/3 ^ (5 / 3) US 264/64 Bypass I-440 to I-540/Eastern Wake Freewa 6/9 6/9 (6 / 9) US 264/64 B ass I-540/Eastern Wake Freewa to US 64 6/10 11/5) (6 / 10) US 70 I-40/440 to I-40 5/2 - (5 / 2) US 70 I-40 to Gu Road 5/3 7/6 (5 / 3) US 70 B pass I-40 to NC 42 4/3 , 8 4/6) (4 / 3) US 401 N of Ten Ten Rd to NC 42/55 - 3/1 ^, (3/2)^ (3 / 2) Triangle Expressway US 1 to NC 55 (6%/12%) , 18% - (6 / 12) "- Data not available. *- Forecast design data for referenced forecasts may vary along freeway segments at interchanges and intersections. Only one design data point was referenced for the above table for the noted forecast year. ^- Based on 16-hr, 12-hr or peak hour TMC. 1- R-2721, R-2828, R-2829 — Forecast Design Data (HNTB, 2009) 5- R-2635 — Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 2001) 2- I-4744 — Forecast Design Data (HNTB, 2008) 6- R-2721, R-2828, R-2829 — Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 2000) 3- R-2000AA-AF — Using 2012 Build Toll Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 2008) 7- U-3101 — Using 1998 Build Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 2000) 4- R-2552 — Forecast Design Data (NCDOT, 1999) 8- U-47636 — Using 2030 Build Toll with McCrimmon Parkway Connector (MAB, 2007) April 2014 2� �I NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 3.4 2010 Base Year (No-Build) Forecast Results Based on the methodology described in the previous section, a 2010 Base Year (No-Build) forecast was completed. . The 2010 Base Year (No-Build) traffic forecast is shown in Figures 11-1 through 11-7. Table 9 provides 2010 TRM V4 volumes, adjusted count data, 2010 NCDOT historic AADT trend line estimates, and 2010 No Build forecast volumes. Due to the large size of the study area, Table 9 shows only selected locations of interest. Table 9. 2010 Base Year No-Build Forecast Traffic Volumes � �� . -... . -. . - � I-40 from Exit 306 (US 70) to US 70 g4,900 - 82,000 75,100 B pass/Southeast Extension NC 42 E of I-40 20,800 - 14,800 25,900 NC 50 S of Timber Dr 19,800 - 17,900 19,500 NC 50 S of Ten-Ten Road 19,200 15,2002 18,000 15,200 NC 55 from Old Smithfield Road to 31,700 28,200' 30,800 29,900 Trian le Ex resswa Old Sta e Road S of Vandora S rin s Rd 15,200 15,800 16,900 14,800 Old Stage Road N of Banks Rd 10,900 10,800' 10,600 7,900 Old Sta e Road S of Norman Blalock Rd 6,200 4,400 - 4,000 Poole Road E of Hod e Rd 13,600 7,900 10,500 7,900 Ten-Ten Road E of Bells Lake Road 7,800 12,600 13,300 13,300 Ten-Ten Road E of US 401 18,700 14,700 16,000 12,800 Ten-Ten Road W of NC 50 11,100 7,500 6,500 6,700 Holl Sprin s Road N of Kildaire Farm Road 10,600 8,900 - 9,000 Old Holly Springs-Apex N of Triangle Expressway 10,200 - 1,900 1,900 Road Bells Lake Road S of Ten-Ten Rd 8,500 - 4,500 4,500 Hilltop Needmore Road E of Old Mills Rd 6,500 4,200 - 3,500 Rock Quarr Road W of Southeast Extension 11,800 4,000 3,800 3,700 Auburn Kni htdale Rd N of Rock Quar Rd 9,700 2,700 2,600 2,600 White Oak Rd E of Ra nor Rd 13,900 7,600 - 7,600 Vandora S rin s Rd E of Old Sta e Rd 8,400 7,600 8,700 6,900 US 1 N ofTriangle Expressway 32,800 21,700 20,400 21,700 US 401 N of Ten-Ten Rd 35,100 33,100 31,700 33,300 US 401 N of Donn Brook Rd 34,800 32,300 34,900 33,000 US 401 S of Dwi ht Rowland Rd 26,900 22,800 - 21,200 US 64 Business E of I-540 32,900 34,900 - 34,900 US 64 Business W of I-540 21,700 31,700 37,800 31,800 US 64/264 from Hodge Road to I-540 / SE g1,100 - 59,000 59,000 Extension US 64/264 from I-540 / SE Extension to 79,000 - 68,300 68,300 Smithfield Rd US 70 W of SE Extension 35,500 30,800 - 30,800 US 70 E of I-40 42,600 - 48,000 34,000 US 70 B pass E of I-40 29,000 - 24,000 23,000 1-2009 count data, 2- 2010 count data, 3- 2012 count data, 4- 2013 count data, "" - Data not available. � 2010 values obtained from AADT Historic Line Extrapolation using linear regression based on historical NCDOT AADTs from 1991-2009. April 2014 2 � C� NT B NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 4.0 GENERAL MODEL DATA The TRM is used by CAMPO and DCHC-MPO for evaluation of travel demand and air quality modeling for air conformity in the Triangle Region. The model has been developed in collaboration with NCDOT, the North Carolina State University Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE), and the MPOs. 4.1 Model Information The TRM V4-2008 was the official approved travel demand model used by the MPOs, Triangle Transit, and NCDOT in all plan evaluations and studies in the Triangle area at the beginning of this forecasting document and previous project forecasting efforts. Travel demand models are continually updated over time for various reasons. After the beginning of this project forecasting process, newer versions of the TRM (TRM Version 4-2009 and Version 5-2010) were officially adopted. Due to the project forecast timeframe beginning in 2008, the TRM V4-2008 has previously been used throughout the Southeast Extension project process, including all of the following forecasts and reports: • Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway Final Traffic Forecast Report (HNTB, February 2009) • Southern and Eastern Wake Expressway Draft Upgrade Existing and Hybrid Alternatives Report (HNTB, January 2010) • Southeast Extension — First Tier Screening Traffic Memorandum (HNTB, May 2011) • Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Final Traffic Forecast Technical Memorandum, (HNTB, June 2012) (Superseded by this document] HNTB used the TRM V4-2008 obtained from ITRE on October 14, 2009 in the development of the traffic forecast volumes in this report. The TRM V4-2009 and TRM V5-2010 were reviewed, compared and considered in the methodology and forecast development as related to socioeconomic data, highway network, and model validation in the project corridor. While the TRM V4-2009 and TRM V5-2010 model version releases and corresponding output results were considered in the forecast, the TRM V4-2008 output is specifically referenced in the report tables. The TRM V4-2008 has defined 2005 base and 2035 future year networks that were analyzed for the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension traffic forecasts. The 2035 future network considers all fiscally constrained projects contained in the CAMPO and DCHC MPO 2030 LRTPs (dated September 15, 2004). Figure 3 shows the location of all fiscally constrained projects in the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension traffic forecast study area. Appendix B includes plots of the TRM V4-2008 networks used in the development of the 2010, 2012, and 2035 forecasts. HNTB developed a Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model in December 2010 and applied these toll diversion curves/model to the TRM V4-2008 in an effort to more accurately assess tolling behavior in the region. With the Toll Diversion Model, the TRM V4-2008 is a toll-capable tool that is useful in projecting future traffic as well as the changes in travel patterns of new facilities. The model was used to evaluate the construction of the project as a toll facility. Documentation of the toll diversion modeling procedures can be found in Appendix D. April 2014 22 C�NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Land Use Assumptions Current land use in the traffic forecast study area is a mixture of urban and suburban commercial/residential development. Some interchanges in the traffic forecast study area feature dense "urban" development, while others have little to no existing development on more than one quadrant of the interchange. Land use information from the TRM V4 was used as one criterion in determining study area growth between the 2010, 2012 and 2035 forecast years. The TRM uses specifically delineated TAZs as areas where trips are generated or attracted, based on existing and projected population and employment data. Figure 6 shows locations of TAZs from the TRM V4 in the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension traffic forecast study area and Table 10, below, shows 2005 base year population and employment data from these TAZs and the entire TRM V4 region. Table 10. TRM V4 2005 Base Year TAZ Data � . � Employment 10,753 591,389 Special Generator Employment 400 87,824 Households 18,693 505,857 Population 51,797 1,149,114 Dwelling Units 20,513 498,562 Source: TRM V4-2008 5ocio-Economic Data 4.2 Model Validation Table 11 provides a listing of key study area segments that are included in the TRM V4 and comparable recent AADT information that provide validation for the use of the TRM V4 in project forecasting methodologies used in this report. The TRM V4 uses a 2010 base year for model calibration. The 2010 base year was used as the calibration year because major roadway network changes have occurred in the study area since the 2005 model year. Using 2005 as the calibration year would not provide as accurate a representation of existing and future year model calibration. April 2014 23 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 11. Model Validation . .- I . .: . . , � � ..- , ..- . �. �. ��. from Exit 306 (US 70) I-40 to US 70 75,000 94,900 75,100 10.3% 96,000 95,000 75,800 257,000 138,600 108,900 Bypass/Southeast Extension NC 42 E of I-40 15,000 20,800 25,900 -- 16,400 22,700 26,400 14,800 26,300 31,000 NC 50 S of Timber Dr -- 19,800 19,500 -- 18,800 21,100 20,800 19,100 29,100 28,700 NC 50 S of Ten-Ten Road -- 19,200 15,200 7.4% 20,000 21,600 17,100 43,000 25,400 19,600 from Old Smithfield NC 55 Road to Triangle 26,000 31,700 29,900 -- 35,300 40,700 39,600 87,000 50,600 51,300 Expresswa Old Stage Road S of Vandora Springs 16,000 15,200 14,800 3.9% 17,400 16,200 15,800 23,700 42,500 41,400 Road Old Stage Road N of Banks Road -- 10,900 7,900 -- 11,100 11,800 8,500 16,700 25,200 18,200 Old Stage Road S of Norman Blalock __ 6,200 4,000 -- -- 6,600 4,300 -- 13,900 9,100 Road Poole Road E of Hodge Road 8,600 13,600 7,900 0.3% 10,600 15,500 9,000 11,500 46,600 27,100 Ten-Ten Road E of Bells Lake Road 12,000 7,800 13,300 -- 14,000 10,100 17,200 22,400 19,200 32,700 Ten-Ten Road E of US 401 15,000 18,700 12,800 5.6% 16,700 21,500 14,700 24,700 27,700 18,900 Ten-Ten Road W of NC 50 6,100 11,100 6,700 1.7% 6,700 12,500 7,500 9,000 17,500 10,500 Holly Springs N of Kildaire Farm __ 10,600 9,000 -- -- 10,800 9,100 -- 28,300 23,800 Road Road Old Holly Springs- N of Triangle 1,800 10,200 1,900 -- 2,100 10,100 10,100 4,600 29,800 29,800 A ex Road Ex resswa Bells Lake Road S of Ten-Ten Road 4,300 8,500 4,500 -- 4,700 9,200 4,900 8,000 30,400 13,200 Hilltop Needmore E of Old Mills Road -- 6,500 3,500 -- -- 7,400 3,900 -- 13,800 7,300 Road Rock Quarry Road W of Southeast 4,000 11,800 3,700 -- 3,300 13,700 4,300 -1,900 30,800 10,000 Extension April 2014 24 �I NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 11 (Continued). Model Validation � . -, :. .: ,_ .. � . . ..- � � ... � �- . Auburn N of Rock Quarry 2,g00 9,700 2,600 -3.5% 2,400 12,600 3,400 -600 28,000 7,600 Kni htdale Road Road White Oak Road E of Raynor Road -- 13,900 7,600 -- -- 15,700 8,600 -- 31,400 17,200 Vandora Springs E of Old Stage Road 7,900 8,400 6,900 4.3% 9,200 9,300 7,600 14,600 27,400 22,400 Road US 1 N ofTriangle 18,000 32,800 21,700 -- 21,800 37,300 24,700 38,000 66,600 44,100 Ex resswa US 401 N ofTen-Ten Road 31,000 35,100 33,300 0.0% 31,700 37,100 35,200 31,700 62,300 59,600 US 401 N of Donny Brook 33,000 34,800 33,000 -- 36,400 38,100 36,100 54,500 64,200 60,800 Road US 401 S of Dwight Rowland __ 26,900 21,200 -- -- 28,200 22,300 -- 45,200 35,700 Road US 64 Business E of I-540 -- 32,900 34,900 -- -- 36,600 38,600 -- 48,900 56,300 US 64 Business W of I-540 30,000 21,700 31,800 -- 36,700 23,900 35,100 24,000 37,600 50,600 US 64/264 from Hodge Road to I- 58,000 81,100 59,000 1.8% 61,000 88,500 65,700 84,000 130,700 98,200 540 / SE Extension from I-540 / SE US 64/264 Extension to Smithfield 60,000 79,000 68,300 10.0% 77,800 88,600 76,100 187,000 137,400 116,900 Road US 70 W of SE Extension 34,000 35,500 30,800 -- -- 36,900 32,000 -- 50,200 43,500 US 70 E of I-40 34,000 42,600 34,000 -- 49,400 44,700 35,700 64,900 54,000 53,000 US 70 Bypass E of I-40 23,000 29,000 23,000 -- 26,000 28,800 25,400 49,000 45,600 40,200 Triangle From Old Holly Springs __ 18,500 -- -- -- 19,800 19,800 -- 34,800 34,800 Ex resswa to NC 55 *- 2010 AADT Data Not Available - Results are for 2009 AADT ** - IY and FY Forecast Results Taken from Data in Sections 5.0 Through 8.0 +- Historic Growth Rate = Average Annual Growth Rate From Available 1990-2010 AADT Data --" - Data not available April 2014 25 �I NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 5.0 2012 INTERMEDIATE YEAR NO-BUILD TRAFFIC FORECAST The 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build forecast uses extrapolations of historic AADT data in the study area, 2012 intermediate year TRM V4 model data developed by HNTB, and comparisons/adjustments from the 2010 Base Year field data counts as they applied to the historic and model information. 5.1 Assumptions Future land use in the traffic forecast study area is projected to remain a mixture of rural and suburban commercial/residential development, with higher development intensities in many of the TAZs employed in the TRM V4. Table 12 shows population and employment data from study area TAZs and the entire regional model from the 2005 base year and 2012 model and the percentage change in socio-economic data expected between those years. This information was compared to the growth in traffic assignments for the traffic forecast study area to check for consistency. TRM V4-2008 TAZ socio-economic data can be found in Appendix E. Table 12. 2005-2012 TRM TAZ Data Comparison �� • Employment 10.8 591.4 21.1 809.8 96.6°/a 36.9% Special Generator Employment 0.4 87.8 0.4 94.1 6.0% 7.2% Households 18.7 505.9 29.5 551.7 57.6°/a 9.0% Population 51.8 1,149.1 81.3 1,306.1 57.0% 13.7% Dwelling Units 20.5 498.6 32.1 609.2 56.6% 22.2% All 5tudy Area and TRM values shown fn thousands (1000s) �- 2012 TAZ data interpolated from 2005 to 2035 5.2 Fiscal Constraint The 2012 Intermediate Year No Build forecast considers all fiscally-constrained projects scheduled for completion by 2012 in the CAMPO / DCHC MPO 2030 LRTP (dated September 15, 2004). The roadway projects listed in the NCDOT's 2009-2015 STIP and CAMPO / DCHC MPO 2030 LRTPs were included in the model used to develop the 2012 traffic forecasts and is reflected in changes to travel patterns/daily traffic assignments in the traffic forecast study area. In addition to changes in the TAZ socio-economic data between the 2005 and 2012 models, all fiscally constrained projects from the 2030 LRTPs were added from the base network. The laneage used in the 2012 TRM V4 for major roadways within the study area is listed in Table 13. April 2014 26 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 13. 2012 TRM V4 Major Model Transportation Network Laneage . -... i ..- Triangle Expressway Six-Lane Freeway Triangle Expressway N/A Southeast Extension I-40 Four/Six-Lane Freeway I-540 Six-Lane Freeway US 64/264 Six-Lane Freeway US 1 Four-Lane Freewa US 401 Four-Lane Divided Arterial US 70 Four-Lane Freeway 5.3 Development Activity No specific major anticipated developments in the project study area were included in the development of the 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build forecast. Changes in land use intensity are reflected in interpolated changes in the study area (and regional) TAZ socio-economic data found in the TRM V4. 5.4 Methodology The methodology used to develop the 2012 No-Build forecast is based on the TRM V4 and comparisons with model results, model growth rates on specific network links, historic traffic data extrapolations and comparisons with existing traffic count data. The 2012 No-Build forecast volumes were developed by applying historical AADT growth rates or 2010 to 2012 TRM V4 annual growth rates to 2010 Base Year forecast volumes. 2012 intermediate year TRM V4 model data was developed from the 2010 model by straight-line interpolating socioeconomic data inputs to year 2012, modifying the network as necessary, processing the model and extracting raw model output for use in the forecast development. Bidirectional turning volumes were grown at appropriate rates to reach intermediate year volumes. They were then adjusted to balance with mainline volumes. In certain instances, historical or model growth rates along facilities were averaged, based on engineering judgment, for select segments along individual facilities (i.e. I-40, US 64/264, US 64 Business and I-540) to provide consistent growth along each corridor and provide reasonable and balanced mainline and turning movement volumes. The 2012 No-Build forecast volumes were adjusted as necessary based on a review of all available data, the study area roadway network and engineering judgment. The 2012 TRM V4 volumes and those derived from linear regression are very similar in most locations throughout the forecast. Many of the discrepancies can be attributed to changes in the highway network that would have a large impact on travel patterns (i.e., opening of the Triangle Expressway and I-40 widening from Wade Avenue to US 1/64). Most discrepancies occur on lesser facilities that have development potential along them. Model Growth Rates One of the primary functions of the 2012 model for this forecasting effort was to serve as a basis for determining model growth rates between 2010 Base Year and 2012 Intermediate Year daily forecast estimates. Data from the 2010 and 2012 No-Build models were compared and annual April 2014 27 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) growth rates were calculated for each link in the study area network using an exponential growth rate method (Future = Base (1 + rate)n). The resulting growth rates were applied to the 2010 Base Year forecast AADTs to calculate 2012 unadjusted AADTs. This data was checked for reasonable growth assumptions. Several adjacent links are not expected to have similar growth patterns if 2012 year data a) did not match a relatively constant growth rate between the 2010 and 2012 model volumes, or b) was likely to increase by a different rate due to changes between the 2010 and 2012 models due to construction of new facilities in the traffic forecast study area. Due to the changing nature of the study area, certain roadways produced growth rate data that resulted in inconsistent projections using this method. Inconsistencies in growth rate projections were addressed in these areas by using assignment data from the TRM V4 model or adjusted by engineering judgment. Model growth rates on select study area roadways are shown in Table 14. Table 14 also provides a comparison of 2012 TRM V4 daily model assignment data to 2010 Base Year and 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build forecast data. 5.5 Design Factors Forecast design characteristics (D, DHV, truck percentages) were determined to remain unchanged from the 2010 Base Year, based on a review of relevant TRM data, roadway network changes, future land use growth and engineering judgment. No data collected for this forecast suggests that major changes are expected in the study area for peak hour directional flow changes, changes in percentage of daily traffic expected in the peak hour, or changes to truck percentages along freeway facilities (Triangle Expressway, I-40, US 1, US 64/264, US 70 Bypass) or surface street facilities. 5.6 2012 No-Build Forecast Results The 2012 No-Build traffic forecast is shown in Figures 12-1 through 12-7. Table 14 provides 2012 TRM V4 No-Build volumes, historic, model and applied growth rates and 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build forecast volumes for selected locations. The applied growth rate along Old Holly Springs-Apex Road is much greater than the historic and model growth rates because the 2010 No-Build forecast volume was based on historic AADT volumes for Old Holly Springs-Apex Road (see Table 9), while the 2012 No-Build forecast volume is primarily based on 2012 TRM V4 volumes. The 2012 TRM V4 volumes were used for the 2012 No-Build forecast at this location because they better reflect traffic assignment changes due to an interchange on the Triangle Expressway at Old Holly Springs- Apex Road and future development near the interchange. Linear regression data does not provide close correlation to the selected 2012 forecast AADTs for all roadways. The regression data in inconsistent in many locations, since historic data is limited in the area recently opened roadway networks will alter future traffic volumes on existing facilities. April 2014 28 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 14. 2012 No-Build Forecast Traffic Volumes ■*r�r_� , . - � _ .. � I-40 from Exit 306 (US 70) to US 70 Byp/SE Ext 75,100 8.2% 0.05% 0.47% 77,000^ 95,000 75,800 NC 42 - E of I-40 25,900 5.3% 4.47% 0.96% 19,000^ 22,700 26,400 NC 50 - S of Timber Drive 19,500 0.3% 3.23% 3.28% 16,000 21,100 20,800 NC 50 - S of Ten-Ten Road 15,200 5.4% 6.07% 6.07% 14,000 21,600 17,100 NC 55 - from Old Smithfield Road to Triangle 2g g00 6.1 % 13.31 % 13.33% 25,000 40,700 39,600 Expresswa Old Stage Road - S of Vandora Springs Rd 14,800 1.5% 3.24% 3.32% 16,000 16,200 15,800 Old Stage Road - N of Banks Rd 7,900 2.3% 4.05% 3.73% 9,400 11,800 8,500 Old Stage Road - S of Norman Blalock Rd 4,000 - 3.18% 3.68% 3,700 6,600 4,300 Poole Road - E of Hodge Rd 7,900 0.5% 6.76% 6.74% 7,100 15,500 9,000 Ten-Ten Road - E of Bells Lake Road 13,300 2.6% 13.79% 13.72% 12,000 10,100 17,200 Ten-Ten Road - E of US 401 12,800 - 7.23% 7.17% 15,000 21,500 14,700 Ten-Ten Road - W of NC 50 6,700 - 6.12% 5.80% 6,400 12,500 7,500 Holly Springs Road - N of Kildaire Farm Road 9,000 - 0.94% 1.12% - 10,800 9,100 Old Holly Springs-Apex Road - N of Triangle 1,900 5.1% -0.49% 130.56% 2,500 10,100 10,100 Expresswa Bells Lake Road - S of Ten-Ten Rd 4,500 2.2% 4.04% 4.35% - 9,200 4,900 Hilltop Needmore Road - E of Old Mills Rd 3,500 - 6.70% 5.56% - 7,400 4,000 Rock Quarry Road - W of Southeast Extension 3,700 -1.4% 7.75% 7.42% 3,900 13,700 4,300 Auburn Knightdale Rd - N of Rock Quarry Rd 2,600 -3.9% 13.97% 14.35% 2,900 12,600 3,400 White Oak Road - E of Raynor Rd 7,600 - 6.28% 6.38% - 15,700 8,600 Vandora Springs Rd - E of Old Stage Rd 6,900 2.8% 5.22% 4.95% 7,800 9,300 7,600 US 1- N of Triangle Expressway 21,700 3.4% 6.64% 6.69% 17,000 37,300 24,700 US 401 - N of Ten-Ten Rd 33,300 0.0% 2.81 % 2.83% 31,000 37,100 35,200 US 401 - N of Donny Brook Rd 33,000 2.1% 4.63% 4.59% 32,000 38,100 36,100 US 401 - S of Dwight Rowland Rd 21,200 - 2.39% 2.56% - 28,200 22,400 US 64 Business - E of I-540 34,900 - 5.47% 5.17% - 36,600 38,600 US 64 Business - W of I-540 31,800 -1.5% 4.95% 5.23% 28,000 23,900 35,100 US 64/264 - from Hodge Road to I-540 / SE 59,000 1.7% 4.46% 5.53% 62,000 88,500 65,700 Extension US 64/264 - from I-540 / SE Extension to 68,300 6.7% 5.90% 5.56% 63,000 88,600 76,100 Smithfield Rd US 70 - W of SE Extension 30,800 - 1.95% 1.93% 35,000 36,900 32,000 US 70 - E of I-40 34,000 1.4% 2.44% 2.47% 35,000 44,700 35,700 US 70 Bypass - E of I-40 23,000 4.1 % 4.38% 4.47% 25,000" 28,800 25,400 Triangle Expressway - From Old Holly Springs _ _ 3.45% 3.45% - 19,800 19,800 toNC55 - — Data not available. GR Methodology F = B(1+r)n 2012 AADT's not available at most locations ^2012 AADT April 2014 29 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 6.0 2012 INTERMEDIATE YEAR BUILD TRAFFIC FORECAST 6.1 Assumptions The land use and transportation network assumptions, fiscal constraints, and development activity for the 2012 Intermediate Year Build forecast are consistent with those stated in the 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build forecast (Section 5.0). The 2012 Intermediate Year Build forecast includes the completion of the Southeast Extension, in addition to the Triangle Expressway (assumed complete in the 2012 No-Build forecast. For all DSAs, some existing roadways are proposed for relocation. The following facilities were relocated in the 2012 Build scenarios and forecast volumes were adjusted accordingly to account for the redistribution in future traffic volumes: • Kildaire Farm Road; relocated north of Southeast Extension on Holly Springs Road opposite Sancroft Drive. • Donny Brook Road; relocated south on US 401 opposite Wake Tech Main Entrance. • Old McCullers Road; relocated south to connect to Wake Tech internal roadway. • Raynor Road and Cascade Drive; relocated west on White Oak Road to align opposite each other. • Old Baucom Road; realigned east on Rock Quarry Road. 6.2 Methodology For the 2012 Build forecast, models including the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension were developed for 2012 DSAs 1— 17 Build conditions. The 2012 Build model runs for each DSA were then compared to the 2012 No-Build model run results to determine 2012 No- Build/2012 Build growth rates. These growth rates were then applied to the 2012 No-Build forecast data to produce estimates of 2012 Build forecast daily traffic for facilities existing in the No-Build model network. Five different model runs (DSA 1, 2, 13 & 14, DSA 3, 4, 15, & 16, DSA 5& 17, DSA 6& 7, and DSA 8& 9) were performed to account for the DSAs in the 2012 build scenario. Minimal model volume differences between the DSA 1, 2, 13 & 14 model run and the DSA 3, 4, 15 & 16 and DSA 5& 17 model runs led HNTB to use the same traffic forecast volumes for all facilities west of I-40 for these DSAs. Similarly, DSA 10-12 volumes for facilities west of I-40 were set equal to the DSA 8-9 volumes. Certain interchange and intersection locations at and east of I-40 have the same forecast volumes in all DSAs. Different forecast volumes were assigned at interchange and intersection locations in the eastern portion of the DSAs where model assignment volume differences warranted. As in the 2012 No-Build forecast, adjustments to the model growth rate methodology were necessary in certain areas of the network to produce reasonable and balanced daily traffic volume estimates. Any adjustments made for the 2012 No-Build traffic forecasts with regard to incorporating actual 2012 model data were applied consistently to the 2012 Build DSA forecasts. Once the growth rates and adjustments were applied to 2012 Build segments, bi- directional turning movement volumes were then adjusted throughout the study area to account for change in traffic volumes and patterns between the 2012 No-Build and Build forecasts. Daily directional traffic assignments indicate some traffic reassignment patterns from the 2012 No- Build, due to constructing the Southeast Extension. These patterns generally indicate slight April 2014 30 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) increases in -Y- line traffic volumes at Southeast Extension interchanges and a reduction in traffic along parallel facilities. The Southeast Extension also provides some traffic reduction for major arterials such as I-40 and US 264. The project also redistributes local traffic at each interchange. Local traffic shifts represented in the 2012 Build model are characterized by traffic shifting onto Southeast Extension and a corresponding slight decrease in traffic on parallel facilities. Both system-wide and local traffic shifts additively exhibit large-scale changes in traffic patterns in the 2012 model network. The largest percent volume changes in daily assignments generally occur along I-40, Ten Ten Road and Auburn-Knightdale Road, which will be parallel facilities to the Southeast Extension. TRM V4 Model Assiqnments The approved model used by the CAMPO and DHCHMPs provided a basis for the development of growth rates on study area roadways. On certain links in the study area, the TRM V4 daily traffic assignments do not provide daily assignment data that is consistent with existing or anticipated travel patterns. For the DSA corridors, TRM V4 daily traffic assignments are generally very similar for most roadway segments. These areas and relevant descriptions of observations are described in Table 15. Table 15. 2012 TRM V4 Model Assignment Discrepancies � . . Daily link volume assignments show a large amount of traffic exiting the Southeast Extension Southeast Extension and taking Sunset Lake Road and NC 55 as toll-free from NC 55 to Holly shortcuts before rejoining the Southeast Extension west of NC 55 and east Springs Road of Holly Springs Road. This was an unrealistic travel pattern, based on engineering judgment, and volumes in the traffic forecast were adjusted to account for the TRM's assignment behavior in this area. DSAs 1, 2, 13 and The Orange and Green Corridors (DSA 1) are the alignments coded into 14 the official highway network of the TRM. It was determined through the highway network evaluation of TRM volumes that this network would also apply to the Mint Corridor used in DSAs 2 and 14 and the Lilac Corridor used in DSAs 13 coding and 14, due to no interchan e relocations and ver similar TRM out ut. DSAs 3 and 4 required edits to the TRM highway network on the eastern section of the Southeast Extension. The projecYs interchanges with White Oak Road and Auburn-Knightdale Road were left unchanged for DSAs 3, 4, 15, and modeling purposes. The US 70 Business interchange was relocated east 16 of Guy Road. The Old Baucom Road interchange was relocated from its highway network original location on Rock Quarry Road in the official TRM network. All coding network attributes remained unchanged from the official highway network. It was determined through the evaluation of TRM volumes that this network would also apply to the Lilac Corridor used in DSAs 15 and 16 due to no interchange relocations and very similar TRM output. DSA 5 required edits to the TRM highway network on the eastern section of the Southeast Extension. The projecYs interchanges with White Oak Road, US 70 Business, and Auburn-Knightdale Road were left unchanged DSA 5 and 17 for modeling purposes. The Old Baucom Road interchange was relocated highway network from its original location on Rock Quarry Road in the official TRM network. coding All network attributes remained unchanged from the official highway network. It was determined through the evaluation of TRM volumes that this network would also apply to the Lilac Corridor used in DSA 17 due to no interchan e relocations and ver similar TRM output. April 2014 31 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 15 (Continued). 2012 TRM V4 Model Assignment Discrepancies � � . DSA 6(Red Corridor) required edits to the TRM highway network on both the southern and eastern section of the Southeast Extension. The projecYs interchanges with Holly Springs Road, Bells Lake Road and Auburn-Knightdale Road were left unchanged for modeling purposes. The US 401 interchange was relocated north of Ten Ten Road. The Old Stage Road interchange was relocated south of Vandora Springs Road. The NC DSAs 6 and 7 50 interchange was relocated south of Timber Drive. The interchange with highway network I-40 was moved between Exit 306 (US 70 Business) and Exit 309 (US 70 coding Bypass) on I-40. The interchanges with White Oak Road and US 70 Business were removed. The Rock Quarry Road interchange remained in the same location, but Rock Quarry Road was extended south to intersect with US 70 Business. All network attributes remained unchanged from the official highway network. It was determined through the evaluation of TRM volumes that this network would also apply to the Mint Corridor used in DSA 7 due to no interchan e relocations and ver similar TRM output. DSA 8(Purple-Blue-Lilac Corridor) required edits to the TRM network on the southern section of the Southeast Extension. The project's interchanges with Holly Springs Road and NC 50 were left unchanged for modeling purposes. The Hilltop-Needmore Road interchange was DSAs 8-9 relocated from its original location on Bells Lake Road in the official TRM highway network network. The US 401 interchange was relocated south of Dwight coding Rowland Road. The Old Stage Road interchange was relocated south of Norman Blalock Road. All network attributes remained unchanged from the official highway network. It was determined through the evaluation of TRM volumes that this network would also apply to the Mint Corridor used in DSA 9 due to no interchange relocations and very similar TRM output. Appendix F includes a chart of 2012 DSA Southeast Extension forecast volumes, a summary table of data used to aid in determining 2012 study area forecast volumes, and raw model output comparisons of the TRM V4-2008 and TRM V4-2009. 6.3 Design Factors All available information was evaluated, along with engineering judgment, to determine the 2012 Build forecast. All other forecast characteristics (D, DHV, truck percentages) were determined to remain unchanged based on a review of relevant TRM data, roadway network changes, future land use growth and engineering judgment. The proposed Western Wake Freeway and Southeast Extension are new location roadway facilities that require design data not produced in the 2010 Base Year and/or 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build scenarios. The design data for these roadway segments were generated by comparing previous traffic forecasts, comparing traffic characteristics of similar nearby/parallel facilities, examining existing I-540 and NC 540 traffic data, reviewing the TRM data and producing traffic factors reasonable to the study area characteristics based on engineering judgment. The design factors for the new location roadways are included in Table 8. 6.4 2012 Build Forecast Results Table 16 provides 2012 TRM V4 and forecast volumes for selected DSAs at particular locations of interest, along with the model diversion percentage and the applied diversion percentage for facilities existing in the 2012 No-Build scenario. Table 17 provides 2012 Intermediate Year Build April 2014 32 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) forecast volumes for all DSAs and 2012 Intermediate Year No-Build forecast volumes for comparison. DSA 1, 2, 13 and 14 DSA 1& 2 forecast volumes range from 17,600 to 33,300 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 3, 4 and 5, and 20,900 to 48,600 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 13.1 through 13.6 show 2012 forecast volumes for DSA 1, 2, 13 & 14. DSA 3, 4, 15 and 16 DSA 3& 4 forecast volumes range from 17,600 to 33,300 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 1, 2 and 5, and 18,900 to 51,800 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 14.1 through 14.6 show 2012 forecast volumes for DSA 3, 4, 15 & 16. DSA 5 and 17 DSA 5 forecast volumes range from 17,600 to 33,300 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 1, 2, 3 and 4, and 20,900 to 46,000 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 15.1 through 15.6 show 2012 forecast volumes for DSA 5& 17. DSA 6 and 7 DSA 6& 7 forecast volumes range from 15,200 to 25,300 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway and 23,000 to 43,800 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 16.1 through 16.5 show 2012 forecast volumes for DSA 6& 7. DSA 8 and 9 DSA 8& 9 forecast volumes range from 17,100 to 29,000 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway and 18,800 to 48,500 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 17.1 through 17.6 show 2012 forecast volumes for DSA 8& 9. DSA 10 and 11 DSA 10 & 11 forecast volumes range from 17,100 to 29,000 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 8& 9, and 17,000 to 51,700 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 18.1 through 18.6 show 2012 forecast volumes for DSA 10 & 11. DSA 12 DSA 12 forecast volumes range from 17,100 to 29,000 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 8, 9, 10 & 11, and 18,800 to 45,900 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 19.1 through 19.6 show 2012 forecast volumes for DSA 12. April 2014 33 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 16. 2012 Build Traffic Forecast Methodology _ �: �, . .� Y e . ;;; , �� , , - , , - , ::,� ,,_, ,�� _:.�� :- . � U � : _ _ . ., ' � . ... ._ _ , __.. r - .. � _ . �,:�: . -. K , , . a e• •• o e ` r o SE Ext (NC 540) - E of NC 55 - - 17,600 - - 17,600 17,100 - - 17,600 15,200 - - 15,200 16,500 - - 23,600� SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Holly Springs Road - - 21,800 - - 21,800 21,100 - - 21,800 19,800 - - 19,000 29,000 - - 29,000 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Bells Lake Rd / Hilltop Needmore Rd - - 30,500 - - 30,500 30,000 - - 30,500 22,500 - - 22,500 28,100 - - 28,100 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of US 401 - - 33,300 - - 33,300 33,000 - - 33,300 22,100 - - 22,100 20,400 - - 20,400 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Old Stage Road - - 26,100 - - 26,100 25,800 - - 26,100 21,800 - - 21,800 17,100 - - 17,100 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of NC 50 - - 24,200 - - 24,200 24,300 - - 24,200 25,300 - - 25,300 21,200 - - 21,200 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of I-40 - - 20,900 - - 20,900 18,900 - - 18,900 23,000 - - 23,000 18,800 - - 18,800 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of White Oak Road - - 27,200 - - 27,200 20,600 - - 20,600 - - - - 25,700 - - 25,700 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of US 70 Business - - 34,700 - - 34,700 37,800 - - 37,800 - - - - 32,200 - - 34,000 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Rock Quarry Rd / Old Baucom Rd - - 37,800 - - 37,800 - - - - 33,400 - - 33,400 37,900 - - 37,900 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Auburn Knightdale Road - - 37,700 - - 37,700 41,200 - - 41,100 34,100 - - 34,100 37,600 - - 37,600 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Poole Road - - 48,600 - - 48,600 51,900 - - 51,800 43,800 - - 43,800 47,300 - - 48,500 I-40 from Exit 306 (US 70) to US 70 Byp/SE Ext 95,000 75,800 87,300 -8.11 -8.18 69,600 85,900 -9.58 -8.18 69,600 92,500 -2.63 -2.77 73,700 86,300 -9.16 -9.23 68,800 NC 42 - E of I-40 22,700 26,400 16,900 -25.55 -25.38 19,700 16,500 -27.31 -25.38 19,700 - - - - 16,100 -29.07 -29.17 18,700 NC 50 - S of Timber Drive 21,100 20,800 - - - - - - - - 23,800 12.80 12.98 23,500 - - - - NC 50 - S of Ten-Ten Road 21,600 17,100 15,600 -27.78 -26.90 12,500 15,600 -27.78 -26.90 12,500 - - - - 21,600 0.00 0.00 17,100 NC 55 - from Old Smithfield Road to Triangle Expressway 40,700 39,600 40,300 -0.98 0.51 39,800 41,200 1.23 0.51 39,800 37,400 -8.11 -6.31 37,100 33,900 -16.71 -14.65 33,800 Old Stage Road - S of Vandora Springs Rd 16,200 15,800 - - - - - - - - 21,800 34.57 35.44 21,400 - - - - Old Stage Road - N of Banks Rd 11,800 8,500 14,000 18.64 45.88 12,400 14,000 18.64 45.88 12,400 - - - - - - - - Old Stage Road - S of Norman Blalock Rd 6,600 4,300 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5,900 -10.61 -11.63 3,800 Poole Road - E of Hodge Rd 15,500 9,000 14,800 -4.52 -3.33 8,700 14,100 -9.03 -3.33 8,700 13,900 -10.32 -7.78 8,300 14,300 -7.74 -7.78 8,300 Ten-Ten Road - E of Bells Lake Road 10,100 17,200 2,300 -77.23 -22.09 13,400 2,300 -77.23 -22.09 13,400 3,800 -62.38 -29.65 12,100 - - - - Ten-Ten Road - E of US 401 21,500 14,700 - - - - - - - - 17,000 -20.93 -21.09 11,600 - - - - Ten-Ten Road - W of NC 50 12,500 7,500 5,800 -53.60 17.33 8,800 5,800 -53.60 17.33 8,800 - - - - 11,000 -12.00 -12.00 6,600 Holly Springs Road - N of Kildaire Farm Road 10,800 9,100 11,000 1.85 2.20 9,300 11,000 1.85 2.20 9,300 10,300 -4.63 -3.30 8,800 25,500 136.11 51.65 13,800 Old Holly Springs-Apex Road - N of Triangle Expressway 10,100 10,100 10,600 4.95 4.95 10,600 10,500 3.96 4.95 10,600 9,700 -3.96 -3.96 9,700 9,800 -2.97 -2.97 9,800 Bells Lake Road - S of Ten-Ten Rd 9,200 4,900 16,400 78.26 142.86 11,900 16,300 77.17 142.86 11,900 10,900 18.48 61.22 7,900 - - - - Hilltop Needmore Road - E of Old Mills Rd 7,400 4,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12,000 62.16 57.50 6,300 Rock Quarry Road - W of Southeast Extension 13,700 4,300 11,800 -13.87 -13.95 3,700 6,800 -50.36 -51.16 2,100 11,600 -15.33 -9.30 3,900 12,100 -11.68 -6.98 4,000 Auburn Knightdale Rd - N of Rock Quarry Rd 12,600 3,400 3,600 -71.43 -70.59 1,000 8,000 -36.51 -35.29 2,200 4,600 -63.49 -64.71 1,200 3,200 -74.60 -73.53 900 White Oak Road - E of Raynor Rd 15,700 8,600 15,200 -3.18 -3.49 8,300 18,800 19.75 19.77 10,300 - - - - 15,200 -3.18 -3.49 8,300 Vandora Springs Rd - E of Old Stage Rd 9,300 7,600 - - - - - - - - 10,400 11.83 22.37 9,300 - - - - US 1- N of Triangle Expressway 37,300 24,700 36,100 -3.22 -3.24 23,900 36,300 -2.68 -3.24 23,900 36,400 -2.41 -2.02 24,200 36,700 -1.61 -2.02 24,200 US 401 - N of Ten-Ten Rd 37,100 35,200 - - - - - - - - 38,100 2.70 9.38 38,500 - - - - US 401 - N of Donny Brook Rd 38,100 36,100 45,900 20.47 20.50 43,500 45,800 20.21 27.15 45,900 - - - - - - - - US 401 - S of Dwight Rowland Rd 28,200 22,400 - - - - - - - - - - - - 25,800 -8.51 -8.93 20,400 US 64 Business - E of I-540 36,600 38,600 37,600 2.73 2.85 39,700 38,300 4.64 2.85 39,700 36,600 0.00 0.00 38,600 37,200 1.64 1.55 39,200 US 64 Business - W of I-540 23,900 35,100 26,400 10.46 10.54 38,800 26,800 12.13 10.54 38,800 26,000 8.79 8.83 38,200 26,500 10.88 10.83 38,900 US 64/264 - from Hodge Road to I-540 / SE Extension 88,500 65,700 87,900 -0.68 -0.61 65,300 91,500 3.39 -0.61 65,300 85,300 -3.62 -3.65 63,300 87,600 -1.02 -1.07 65,000 US 64/264 - from I-540 / SE Extension to Smithfield Rd 88,600 76,100 86,000 -2.93 -2.76 74,000 85,600 -3.39 -2.76 74,000 86,300 -2.60 -2.63 74,100 86,100 -2.82 -2.76 74,000 US 70 - W of SE Extension 36,900 32,000 36,100 -2.17 -1.88 31,400 29,500 -20.05 -19.69 25,700 - - - - 35,900 -2.71 -2.81 31,100 US 70 - E of I-40 44,700 35,700 37,200 -16.78 -16.81 29,700 35,300 -21.03 -20.73 28,300 37,900 -15.21 -15.13 30,300 36,800 -17.67 -17.37 29,500 US 70 Bypass - E of I-40 28,800 25,400 37,700 30.90 30.71 33,200 33,600 16.67 16.54 29,600 28,500 -1.04 -2.36 24,800 32,400 12.50 11.02 28,200 Triangle Expressway - From Old Holly Springs to NC 55 19,800 19,800 23,200 17.17 17.17 23,200 23,500 18.69 17.17 23,200 17,700 -10.61 13.64 22,500 18,300 -7.58 17.68 23,300 -' - Data not available. Note: DSA 5& 17, 10 & 11, and 12 were forecasted using similar methodology as discussed in Section 6.2. All 2012 DSA forecast volumes are presented in Table 17. April 2014 34 C�NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 17. 2012 Build Traffic Forecast Volumes � . . . . �� SE Ext (NC 540) - E of NC 55 - 17,600 17,600 17,600 15,200 23,600 23,600 23,600 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Holly Springs Road - 21,800 21,800 21,800 19,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Bells Lake Rd / Hilltop Needmore Rd - 30,500 30,500 30,500 22,500 28,100 28,100 28,100 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of US 401 - 33,300 33,300 33,300 22,100 20,400 20,400 20,400 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Old Stage Road - 26,100 26,100 26,100 21,800 17,100 17,100 17,100 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of NC 50 - 24,200 24,200 24,200 25,300 21,200 21,200 21,200 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of I-40 - 20,900 18,900 20,900 23,000 18,800 17,000 18,800 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of White Oak Road - 27,200 20,600 25,800 - 25,700 19,500 24,400 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of US 70 Business - 34,700 37,800 27,500 - 34,000 37,000 26,900 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Rock Quarry Rd / Old Baucom Rd - 37,800 - - 33,400 37,900 37,100 33,100 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Auburn Knightdale Road - 37,700 41,100 35,300 34,100 37,600 41,000 35,200 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Poole Road - 48,600 51,800 46,000 43,800 48,500 51,700 45,900 I-40 from Exit 306 (US 70) to US 70 ByplSE Ext 75,800 69,600 69,600 69,600 73,700 68,800 68,800 68,800 NC 42 - E of I-40 26,400 19,700 19,700 19,700 - 18,700 18,700 18,700 NC 50 - S of Timber Drive 20,800 - - - 23,500 - - - NC 50 - S of Ten-Ten Road 17,100 12,500 12,500 12,500 - 17,100 17,100 17,100 NC 55 - from Old Smithfield Road to Triangle Expressway 39,600 39,800 39,800 39,800 37,100 33,800 33,800 33,800 Old Stage Road - S of Vandora Springs Rd 15,800 - - - 21,400 - - - Old Stage Road - N of Banks Rd 8,500 12,400 12,400 12,400 - - - - Old Stage Road - S of Norman Blalock Rd 4,300 - - - - 3,800 3,800 3,800 Poole Road - E of Hodge Rd 9,000 8,700 8,700 8,700 8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300 Ten-Ten Road - E of Bells Lake Road 17,200 13,400 13,400 13,400 12,100 - - - Ten-Ten Road - E of US 401 14,700 - - - 11,600 - - - Ten-Ten Road - W of NC 50 7,500 8,800 8,800 8,800 - 6,600 6,600 6,600 Holly Springs Road - N of Kildaire Farm Road 9,100 9,300 9,300 9,300 8,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 Old Holly Springs-Apex Road - N of Triangle Expressway 10,100 10,600 10,600 10,600 9,700 9,800 9,800 9,800 Bells Lake Road - S of Ten-Ten Rd 4,900 11,900 11,900 11,900 7,900 - - - Hilltop Needmore Road - E of Old Mills Rd 4,000 - - - - 6,300 6,300 6,300 Rock Quarry Road - W of Southeast Extension 4,300 3,700 2,100 3,500 3,900 4,000 2,200 3,600 Auburn Knightdale Rd - N of Rock Quarry Rd 3,400 1,000 2,200 1,500 1,200 900 2,100 1,400 White Oak Road - E of Raynor Rd 8,600 8,300 10,300 8,500 - 8,300 10,300 8,500 Vandora Springs Rd - E of Old Stage Rd 7,600 - - - 9,300 - - - US 1- N of Triangle Expressway 24,700 23,900 23,900 23,900 24,200 24,200 24,200 24,200 US 401 - N of Ten-Ten Rd 35,200 - - - 38,500 - - - US 401 - N of Donny Brook Rd 36,100 43,500 45,900 43,400 - - - - US 401 - S of Dwight Rowland Rd 22,400 - - - - 20,400 20,400 20,400 US 64 Business - E of I-540 38,600 39,700 39,700 39,700 38,600 39,200 39,200 39,200 US 64 Business - W of I-540 35,100 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,200 38,900 38,900 38,900 US 64/264 - from Hodge Road to I-540 / SE Extension 65,700 65,300 65,300 65,300 63,300 65,000 65,000 65,000 US 64/264 - from I-540 / SE Extension to Smithfield Rd 76,100 74,000 74,000 74,000 74,100 74,000 74,000 74,000 US 70 - W of SE Extension 32,000 31,400 25,700 33,900 - 31,100 25,600 33,700 US 70 - E of I-40 35,700 29,700 28,300 29,700 30,300 29,500 28,100 29,500 US 70 Bypass - E of I-40 25,400 33,200 29,600 33,200 24,800 28,200 25,400 28,600 Triangle Expressway - From Old Holly Sprin s to NC 55 19,800 23,200 23,200 23,400 22,500 23,300 23,300 23,300 -' - Data not available. April 2014 35 C�NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 7.0 2035 FUTURE YEAR NO-BUILD TRAFFIC FORECAST The 2035 Future Year No-Build forecast uses extrapolations of historic AADT data in the study area, 2035 model data, and comparisons/adjustments from the 2010 Base Year and 2012 Intermediate Year volumes as they applied to the historic and model information. 7.1 Assumptions Land Use Future land use in the traffic forecast study area is projected to remain a mixture of rural and suburban commercial/residential development, with higher development intensities in many of the TAZs employed in the TRM V4. It is likely that several interchanges with limited existing development could see higher density development by 2035. Table 18 shows population and employment data from study area TAZs and the entire regional model from the 2005 base year and 2035 model and the percentage change in socio-economic data expected between those years. This information was compared to the growth in traffic assignments for the trafFic forecast study area to check for consistency. TRM V4 TAZ socio-economic data can be found in Appendix E. Table 18. 2005-2035 TRM V4 TAZ Data Comparison �� ,. Em lo ment 10.8 591.4 55.2 1,244.2 413.7 110.4 P Y Special Generator 0.4 87.8 0.5 113.8 25.0 29.6 Emplo ment Households 18.7 505.9 64.8 973.2 247.0 92.4 Population 51.8 1,149.1 178.3 2,264.0 244.2 97.0 Dwelling 20.5 498.6 70.3 986.7 242.6 97.9 Units All Study Area and TRM values shown fn thousands (1000s) Studv Area Transportation Network The roadway projects listed in the NCDOT's 2009-2015 STIP and CAMPO and DCHC MPO 2030 LRTPs (dated September 15, 2004) were included in the TRM V4-2008 model used to develop the 2035 traffic forecasts and is reflected in changes to travel patterns/daily traffic assignments in the traffic forecast study area. Besides the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension, many other important projects are anticipated to open in 2035. Scheduled major roadway network changes in the TRM V4 are listed below in Table 19. April 2014 36 � � � � NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 19. 2035 TRM V4 Major Model Transportation Network Laneage . -... i ..- Triangle Expressway Six-Lane Freeway Triangle Expressway Six-Lane Freeway Southeast Extension I-40 Eight-Lane Freeway I-540 Six-Lane Freeway US 64/264 Six-Lane Freeway US 1 Four-Lane Freewa US 401 Six-Lane Divided Arterial US 70 Four-Lane Freeway 7.2 Fiscal Constraint The 2035 Future Year No Build forecast considers all fiscally-constrained projects scheduled for completion by 2035 in the CAMPO / DCHC MPO 2030 LRTP (dated September 15, 2004). 7.3 Development Activity As with the 2012 Intermediate Year forecast assumptions, development activity in the project study area was accounted for by changes in socio-economic data for study area TAZs in the TRM V4. No specific traffic generators were analyzed beyond changes in TAZ data between the 2012 and 2035 forecast years. 7.4 Methodology The methodology used to develop the 2035 No-Build forecast is based on the TRM V4 and comparisons with model results, model growth rates on specific network links, historic traffic data extrapolations and comparisons with existing traffic count data. The 2035 Future Year No-Build scenario was completed based on a review and comparison of 2010-2035 and 2012-2035 TRM V4 model growth rates, 2035 TRM V4 data, and historical trend line estimates. Model runs were completed for the 2035 No-Build forecast by removing the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension from the 2035 model network. The model 2012 No- Build/2035 No-Build growth rate was applied to the 2012 No-Build forecast to determine 2035 No- Build forecast volumes. Adjustments were made to produce consistent daily traffic flow patterns upstream and downstream along study area freeways and surface streets. Bidirectional turning movements were forecasted at interchanges to calibrate, as closely as possible, with 2012 and 2035 TRM V4 daily turning movement volumes while accounting for roadway network changes and traffic flow pattern shifts. As discussed in Section 3.2, the differences in 2010 TRM V4 and Base Year forecast volumes translated into 2035 volume differences, based on a similar proportion or ratio. For instance, I- 40, US 1, and US 64/264 forecast volumes are much lower than the TRM V4 volumes and US 64 Business volumes are higher due to differences in 2010 TRM V4 and forecast volumes. Model Growth Rates One of the primary functions of the 2035 model for this forecasting effort was to serve as a basis for determining annual growth rates between the 2012 Intermediate Year and 2035 Future Year daily forecast estimates. Data from the 2012 and 2035 models for both Build and No-Build April 2014 37 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) alternatives was compared and annual growth rates were calculated for each link in the study area network. The resulting growth rates were applied to the 2012 Intermediate Year forecast AADTs to calculate 2035 unadjusted AADTs. This data was checked for reasonable growth assumptions. Several adjacent links are not expected to have similar growth patterns if 2035 year data a) did not match a relatively constant growth rate between the 2012 and 2035 model volumes, or b) was likely to increase by a different rate due to changes between the 2012 and 2035 models due to construction of new facilities or major TAZ differences in the traffic forecast study area. In most instances, 2012 Intermediate Year forecast volumes are less than 2012 TRM V4 daily assignments. Therefore, based on model growth rates, 2035 forecast volumes are generally less than 2035 TRM V4 daily assignments on major network facilities such as I-40, US 1, US 64/264, NC 42, NC 50 and NC 55. Due to the changing nature of the study area, certain roadways produced growth rate data that resulted in inconsistent projections using this method. Inconsistencies in growth rate projections were addressed in these areas by using assignment data from the TRM V4 model or adjusted based on engineering judgment. Model growth rates on select study area roadways are shown on Table 20. Table 20 also provides a comparison of 2035 TRM V4 daily No-Build model assignment data to 2012 Intermediate Year and 2035 Future Year No-Build forecast data. 7.5 Design Factors Forecast design characteristics (D, DHV, truck percentages) were determined to remain unchanged from the Intermediate Year based on a review of relevant TRM data, roadway network changes, future land use growth and engineering judgment. No data collected for this forecast suggests that major changes are expected in the study area for peak hour directional flow changes, changes in percentage of daily traffic expected in the peak hour, or changes to truck percentages along freeway facilities (Triangle Expressway, I-40, US 1, US 64/264, US 70 Bypass) or surface street facilities. 7.6 2035 No-Build Forecast Results The 2035 No-Build traffic forecast is shown on Figures 8-1 through 8-6. Table 20 provides 2035 No-Build AADT estimates through interpolation/extrapolation of NCDOT historic count linear regression data, 2035 TRM V4 volumes and the proposed 2035 No-Build forecast volumes. April 2014 38 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 20. 2035 No-Build Traffic Forecast Data . ..- . . . ..� � � � � I-40 from Exit 306 (US 70) to US 70 Byp/SE Ext 75,800 8.2 1.66 1.59 138,600 108,900 NC 42 - E of I-40 26,400 5.3 0.64 0.69 26,300 30,900 NC 50 - S of Timber Drive 20,800 0.3 1.41 1.41 29,100 28,700 NC 50 - S of Ten-Ten Road 17,100 5.4 0.71 0.71 25,400 20,100 NC 55 - from Old Smithfield Road to Tri Expwy 39,600 6.1 0.95 0.95 50,600 47,700 Old Stage Road - S of Vandora Springs Rd 15,800 1.5 4.28 4.29 42,500 41,500 Old Stage Road - N of Banks Rd 8,500 2.3 3.35 3.37 25,200 18,200 Old Stage Road - S of Norman Blalock Rd 4,300 - 3.29 3.31 13,900 9,100 Poole Road - E of Hodge Rd 9,000 0.5 4.90 4.91 46,600 27,100 Ten-Ten Road - E of Bells Lake Road 17,200 2.6 2.83 2.83 19,200 32,700 Ten-Ten Road - E of US 401 14,700 - 1.11 1.10 27,700 18,900 Ten-Ten Road - W of NC 50 7,500 - 1.47 1.47 17,500 10,500 Holly Springs Road - N of Kildaire Farm Road 9,100 - 4.28 4.27 28,300 23,800 Old Holly Springs-Apex Road - N of Tri Expwy 10,100 5.1 4.82 4.82 29,800 29,800 Bells Lake Road - S of Ten-Ten Rd 4,900 2.2 5.33 4.40 30,400 13,200 Hilltop Needmore Road - E of Old Mills Rd 4,000 - 2.75 2.76 13,800 7,300 Rock Quarry Road - W of Southeast Extension 4,300 -1.4 3.73 3.71 31,800 10,400 Auburn Knightdale Rd - N of Rock Quarry Rd 3,400 -3.9 3.53 3.56 28,000 7,600 White Oak Road - E of Raynor Rd 8,600 - 3.06 3.06 31,400 17,200 Vandora Springs Rd - E of Old Stage Rd 7,600 2.8 4.81 4.81 27,400 22,400 US 1- N of Triangle Expressway 24,700 3.4 2.55 2.55 66,600 44,100 US 401 - N of Ten-Ten Rd 35,200 0.0 2.28 2.28 62,300 58,800 US 401 - N of Donny Brook Rd 36,100 2.1 2.29 2.29 64,200 60,800 US 401 - S of Dwight Rowland Rd 22,400 - 2.07 2.07 45,200 35,700 US 64 Business - E of I-540 38,600 - 1.27 1.63 48,900 56,000 US 64 Business - W of I-540 35,100 -1.5 1.99 1.63 37,600 50,900 US 64/264 - from Hodge Road to I-540 / SE Ext. 65,700 1.7 1.71 1.85 130,700 100,100 US 64/264 - from I-540 / SE Extension to 76,100 6.7 1.93 1.85 137,400 116,000 Smithfield Rd US 70 - W of SE Extension 32,000 - 1.35 1.34 50,200 43,500 US 70 - E of I-40 35,700 1.4 0.83 1.73 54,000 53,000 US 70 Bypass - E of I-40 25,400 4.1 2.02 2.01 45,600 39,700 Tri Expwy - From Old Holly Springs to NC 55 19,800 - 2.48 2.48 34,800 34,800 - - Uata not available. April 2014 39 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 8.0 2035 FUTURE YEAR BUILD TRAFFIC FORECAST 8.1 Assumptions The land use and transportation network assumptions, fiscal constraints, and development activity for the 2035 Future Year Build forecast are consistent with those stated in the 2035 Future Year No-Build forecast (Section 7.0). For all DSA corridors, some existing roadways are proposed for relocation. The following facilities were relocated in the 2035 Build DSA scenarios and forecast volumes were adjusted accordingly to account for the redistribution in future traffic volumes. • Kildaire Farm Road; relocated north of Southeast Extension on Holly Springs Road opposite Sancroft Drive. • Donny Brook Road; relocated south on US 401 opposite Wake Tech Main Entrance. • Old McCullers Road; relocated south to connect to Wake Tech internal roadway. • Raynor Road and Cascade Drive; relocated west on White Oak Road to align opposite each other. • Old Baucom Road; realigned east on Rock Quarry Road. 8.2 Methodology For the 2035 Build forecast, models including the Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension were developed for 2035 DSAs 1— 17 Build conditions. Seven different model runs (DSA 1, 2, 13 & 14, DSA 3, 4, 15 & 16, DSA 5& 17, DSA 6& 7, DSA 8& 9, DSA 10 & 11, and DSA 12) were performed to account for the DSAs in the 2035 build scenarios. Minimal model volume differences led HNTB to use the same traffic forecast volumes for all facilities west of I-40. Certain interchange and intersection locations at and east of I-40 have the same forecast volumes in all DSAs. Different forecast volumes were assigned at interchange and intersection locations in the eastern portion of the DSAs where model assignment volume differences warranted. TRM V4 model assignment discrepancies and differences between DSAs are described in Table 15. The 2035 Build model runs for each DSA were then compared to the 2035 No-Build model run results to determine 2035 No-Build/2035 Build growth rates. These growth rates were then applied to the 2035 No-Build forecast data to produce estimates of 2035 Build forecast daily traffic for each DSA. As in the 2035 No-Build forecast, adjustments to the model growth rate methodology were necessary in certain areas of the network to produce reasonable and balanced daily traffic volume estimates. Any adjustments made for the 2035 No-Build traffic forecasts with regard to incorporating actual 2035 model data were applied consistently to the 2035 Build forecast. Once the growth rates and adjustments were applied to 2035 Build segments, bidirectional turning movement volumes were then adjusted throughout the study area to account for change in traffic volumes and patterns between the 2035 No-Build and 2035 Build forecasts. Daily directional traffic assignments indicate some traffic reassignment patterns from the 2035 No- Build, due to constructing the Southeast Extension. These patterns show shifts to the Southeast Extension from I-40/I-440 traffic otherwise going through Raleigh and from traffic previously on parallel facilities such as NC 42 and Ten-Ten Road. The Southeast Extension reduces traffic on the eastern side of Raleigh/Wake County, particularly on freeways such as I-440 and the US 64 Bypass. These patterns generally indicate slight increases in -Y- line traffic volumes at Southeast Extension interchanges and a reduction in traffic along parallel facilities. Local traffic shifts at April 2014 4� C� HTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) interchanges are characterized by traffic shifting onto Southeast Extension and a corresponding slight decrease in traffic on parallel facilities. Both system-wide and local traffic shifts additively exhibit large-scale changes in traffic patterns in the 2035 model network. The largest percent volume changes in the study area generally occur along I-40, Ten Ten Road and Auburn- Knightdale Road, which are parallel facilities to Southeast Extension. All available information was evaluated, along with engineering judgment, to determine the 2035 Build forecast. Appendix F includes a chart of 2035 DSA Southeast Extension forecast volumes, a summary table of data used to aid in determining all study area forecast volumes, and raw model output comparisons of the TRM V4-2008 and TRM V4-2009. 8.3 Design Factors All available information was evaluated, along with engineering judgment, to determine the 2035 Future Year Build forecast. All other forecast characteristics (D, DHV, truck percentages) were determined to remain unchanged based on a review of relevant TRM data, roadway network changes, future land use growth and engineering judgment. The 2035 Future Year Build scenario design data for Southeast Extension is the same as the 2012 Intermediate Year Build scenario design factors. The design factors for Southeast Extension are included in Table 8. 8.4 2035 Build Forecast Results Table 21 provides 2035 TRM V4 and forecast volumes for selected DSAs at particular locations of interest, along with the model diversion percentage and the applied diversion percentage for facilities existing in the 2035 No-Build scenario. Table 22 provides 2035 Future Year Build forecast volumes for all DSAs and 2035 Future Year No-Build forecast volumes for comparison. DSA 1, 2, 13 and 14 DSA 1& 2 forecast volumes range from 47,400 to 71,600 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 3, 4 and 5, and 45,900 to 91,900 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 21.1 through 21.6 show 2035 forecast volumes for DSA 1, 2, 13 & 14. DSA 3, 4, 15 and 16 DSA 3& 4 forecast volumes range from 47,400 to 71,600 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 1, 2 and 5, and 43,900 to 95,300 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 22.1 through 22.6 show 2035 forecast volumes for DSA 3, 4, 15 & 16. DSA 5 and 17 DSA 5 forecast volumes range from 47,400 to 71,600 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 1, 2, 3 and 4, and 44,300 to 89,100 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 23.1 through 23.6 show 2035 forecast volumes for DSA 5& 17. DSA 6 and 7 DSA 6& 7 forecast volumes range from 48,800 to 64,800 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway and 64,800 to 94,000 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 24.1 through 24.5 show 2035 forecast volumes for DSA 6& 7. DSA 8 and 9 DSA 8& 9 forecast volumes range from 42,000 to 68,300 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway and 37,900 to 91,400 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 25.1 through 25.6 show 2035 forecast volumes for DSA 8& 9. April 2014 41 C� HTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) DSA 10 and 11 DSA 10 & 11 forecast volumes range from 42,000 to 68,300 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 8& 9, and 41,000 to 94,800 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 26.1 through 26.6 show 2035 forecast volumes for DSA 10 & 11. DSA 12 DSA 12 forecast volumes range from 42,000 to 68,300 AADT along the Southern Wake Freeway, similar to DSA 8, 9, 10 & 11, and 41,400 to 88,600 AADT east of I-40 along the Eastern Wake Freeway. Figures 27.1 through 27.6 show 2035 forecast volumes for DSA 12. Discussion There are some discrepancies between NCDOT AADT linear regression estimates, raw TRM V4 model volumes and selected forecast volumes. The following points highlight some of causes of variation and impacts on the selected forecast values: 2035 Historic Forecast Extrapolations — The previous forecasts for STIP R-2635 (Western Wake Freeway) do not replicate with 2010 Base Year, 2012 Build or 2035 Build forecast results, due to a lack of a Base Year scenario and no scenarios with the Old Holly Springs/Apex Road interchange. STIP R-2635 forecasted 2011 and 2030 Build Toll scenarios. Based on direct comparison of data and extrapolations to 2012 and 2035, STIP R-2635 volumes are generally lower in 2012, except along US 1, and are generally higher in 2035, except along NC 55 and Old Holly Springs Apex Road. The planning-level STIP R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 2011 and 2035 No-Build and Build Toll forecasts are largely based on TRM V4 output and do not include certain TRM V4 model updates, such as the toll diversion module. Therefore, while the volumes presented in this forecast are different, they are generally within a reasonable range. While some discrepancies exist, the variation in forecast volumes can be attributed to the toll diversion module, model growth factors, and an updated TRM V4, which has adjustments to socio- economic data, 2030 LRTP (dated September 15, 2004) projects, and various other inputs, based on information used in this forecast. 2012 and 2035 TRM V4 Raw Daily Assignment — In the study area and surrounding areas, there are parallel east-west and north-south facilities (I-40, US 264, NC 42, Ten Ten Road, Sunset Lake Road and Auburn-Knightdale Road). Few existing east-west parallel facilities will compete for traffic with Southeast Extension. However, in the 2035 TRM V4, the Kildaire Farm Road Connector appears to attract traffic from Southeast Extension by providing a non-toll parallel facility for a short distance. While this parallel route serves as an attractive option for local and commuter routes, the model appears to over-assign traffic on this connector and under-assign traffic on the segment of Southeast Extension between NC 55 Bypass and Holly Springs Road. While this facility may remain an attractive non-toll route during off-peak periods, the Southeast Extension corridor may be more attractive during the heavier peak hour periods when signalized corridors become congested and travel times increase. TRM V4 raw daily assignment volumes were adjusted along the Southeast Extension to account for this assignment adjustment. This traffic assignment approach was based on a review of appropriate roadway growth rates, facility operating capacities, previously approved forecasts and engineering judgment. 2012 and 2035 Linear Regression from Historic Count Data — Linear regression results do not provide a useful correlation between the selected 2012 and 2035 forecast AADTs for all roadways. The regression data is unreasonable in many locations, since historic data is limited in the area and new roadway networks would alter future traffic volumes on existing facilities. April 2014 42 C� HTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 21. 2035 Build Traffic Forecast Methodology �. � - ,��' _- . . � i � . _ i . , ;.. , �`".. - -. .. . . : _:�� v . � � . . _ , --=' � -'- --'-- � ,. �.-�_ �-._;-_ � ,��___ - ;- - -- ..- :a -m -- - ..- �.. -. SE Ext (NC 540) - E of NC 55 - - 41,400 - - 47,400 40,300 - - 47,400 42,800 - - 48,800 45,100 - - 51,100 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Holly Springs Road - - 57,800 - - 57,800 57,200 - - 57,800 57,500 - - 57,500 67,500 - - 67,500 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Bells Lake Rd / Hilltop Needmore _ _ 70,300 - - 70,300 70,200 - - 70,300 61,300 - - 61,300 68,300 - - 68,300 Rd SE Ext (NC 540) - E of US 401 - - 71,600 - - 71,600 71,300 - - 71,600 59,100 - - 59,100 50,800 - - 50,800 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Old Stage Road - - 57,300 - - 57,300 56,700 - - 57,300 64,800 - - 64,800 42,000 - - 42,000 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of NC 50 - - 51,800 - - 51,800 51,800 - - 51,800 58,200 - - 58,200 49,300 - - 49,300 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of I-40 - - 45,900 - - 45,900 43,800 - - 43,900 64,800 - - 64,800 37,900 - - 42,900 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of White Oak Road - - 54,000 - - 54,000 46,700 - - 46,700 - - - - 51,500 - - 51,500 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of US 70 Business - - 64,000 - - 64,000 66,400 - - 66,400 - - - - 66,900 - - 62,500 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Rock Quarry Rd / Old Baucom Rd - - 69,300 - - 69,400 67,200 - - 67,200 73,700 - - 73,700 73,800 - - 69,400 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Auburn Knightdale Road - - 72,200 - - 72,200 75,700 - - 75,800 75,500 - - 75,500 76,400 - - 72,000 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Poole Road - - 91,900 - - 91,900 95,300 - - 95,300 94,000 - - 94,000 95,800 - - 91,400 I-40 from Exit 306 (US 70) to US 70 Byp/SE Ext 138,600 108,900 120,700 -12.91 -12.95 94,800 122,300 -11.76 -12.95 94,800 140,200 1.15 1.29 110,300 126,100 -9.02 -9.00 99,100 NC 42 - E of I-40 26,300 30,900 23,700 -9.89 -10.03 27,800 23,200 -11.79 -10.03 27,800 - - - - 22,800 -13.31 -13.27 26,800 NC 50 - S of Timber Drive 29,100 28,700 - - - - - - - - 35,300 21.31 21.25 34,800 - - - - NC 50 - S of Ten-Ten Road 25,400 20,100 18,600 -26.77 -26.37 14,800 18,800 -25.98 -26.37 14,800 - - - - 26,200 3.15 3.48 20,800 NC 55 - from Old Smithfield Road to Triangle Expressway 50,600 47,700 49,700 -1.78 3.77 49,500 49,300 -2.57 3.77 49,500 50,500 -0.20 5.24 50,200 49,700 -1.78 3.77 49,500 Old Stage Road - S of Vandora Springs Rd 42,500 41,500 - - - - - - - - 57,200 34.59 34.94 56,000 - - - - Old Stage Road - N of Banks Rd 25,200 18,200 26,300 4.37 15.93 21,100 26,600 5.56 15.93 21,100 - - - - - - - - Old Stage Road - S of Norman Blalock Rd 13,900 9,100 - - - - - - - - - - - - 11,800 -15.11 -14.29 7,800 Poole Road - E of Hodge Rd 46,600 27,100 39,600 -15.02 -15.13 23,000 41,200 -11.59 -15.13 23,000 39,500 -15.24 -13.28 23,500 40,000 -14.16 -14.02 23,300 Ten-Ten Road - E of Bells Lake Road 19,200 32,700 6,200 -67.71 -21.71 25,600 6,100 -68.23 -21.71 25,600 8,500 -55.73 -21.10 25,800 - - - - Ten-Ten Road - E of US 401 27,700 18,900 - - - - - - - - 24,800 -10.47 -10.05 17,000 - - - - Ten-Ten Road - W of NC 50 17,500 10,500 8,800 -49.71 -49.52 5,300 8,800 -49.71 -49.52 5,300 - - - - 14,000 -20.00 -18.10 8,600 Holly Springs Road - N of Kildaire Farm Road 28,300 23,800 27,400 -3.18 -3.36 23,000 27,800 -1.77 -3.36 23,000 29,500 4.24 4.20 24,800 68,600 142.40 15.13 27,400 Old Holly Springs-Apex Road - N of Triangle Expressway 29,800 29,800 32,900 10.40 10.40 32,900 32,100 7.72 10.40 32,900 43,000 44.30 10.40 32,900 43,300 45.30 10.40 32,900 Bells Lake Road - S of Ten-Ten Rd 30,400 13,200 38,200 25.66 63.64 21,600 38,600 26.97 63.64 21,600 34,600 13.82 48.48 19,600 - - - - Hilltop Needmore Road - E of Old Mills Rd 13,800 7,300 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21,000 52.17 52.05 11,100 Rock Quarry Road - W of Southeast Extension 31,800 10,400 29,600 -6.92 -10.58 9,300 22,100 -30.50 -33.65 6,900 27,200 -14.47 -14.4% 8,900 30,100 -5.35 -9.62 9,400 Auburn Knightdale Rd - N of Rock Quarry Rd 28,000 7,600 13,700 -51.07 -51.32 3,700 19,800 -29.29 -27.63 5,500 13,600 -51.43 -51.32 3,700 12,700 -54.64 -55.26 3,400 White Oak Road - E of Raynor Rd 31,400 17,200 33,200 5.73 5.81 18,200 38,000 21.02 20.93 20,800 - - - - 33,400 6.37 6.40 18,300 Vandora Springs Rd - E of Old Stage Rd 27,400 22,400 - - - - - - - - 22,600 -17.52 -17.41 18,500 - - - - US 1- N of Triangle Expressway 66,600 44,100 65,800 -1.20 -1.13 43,600 65,500 -1.65 -1.13 43,600 68,900 3.45 3.40 45,600 70,400 5.71 5.67 46,600 US 401 - N of Ten-Ten Rd 62,300 58,800 - - - - - - - - 70,900 13.80 9.01 64,100 - - - - US 401 - N of Donny Brook Rd 64,200 60,800 78,700 22.59 22.70 74,600 78,800 22.74 22.70 74,600 - - - - - - - - US 401 - S of Dwight Rowland Rd 45,200 35,700 - - - - - - - - - - - - 50,600 11.95 -3.92 34,300 US 64 Business - E of I-540 48,900 56,000 49,800 1.84 1.79 57,000 50,800 3.89 1.79 57,000 50,500 3.27 3.21 57,800 50,200 2.66 2.68 57,500 US 64 Business - W of I-540 37,600 50,900 40,900 8.78 8.84 55,400 40,700 8.24 8.84 55,400 41,400 10.11 10.22 56,100 40,700 8.24 8.45 55,200 US 64/264 - from Hodge Road to I-540 / SE Extension 130,700 100,100 126,300 -3.37 -3.40 96,700 128,400 -1.76 -3.40 96,700 126,200 -3.44 -3.40 96,700 129,900 -0.61 -0.60 99,500 US 64/264 - from I-540 / SE Extension to Smithfield Rd 137,400 116,000 133,800 -2.62 -2.59 113,000 133,000 -3.20 -2.59 113,000 133,100 -3.13 -3.10 112,400 132,500 -3.57 -3.53 111,900 US 70 - W of SE Extension 50,200 43,500 51,300 2.19 2.53 44,600 49,200 -1.99 -2.07 42,600 - - - - 50,900 1.39 1.38 44,100 US 70 - E of I-40 54,000 53,000 48,100 -10.93 -10.94 47,200 45,800 -15.19 -15.09 45,000 50,700 -6.11 -6.04 49,800 48,200 -10.74 -10.75 47,300 US 70 Bypass - E of I-40 45,600 39,700 56,000 22.81 24.69 49,500 53,500 17.32 19.14 47,300 44,200 -3.07 -2.77 38,600 47,700 4.61 17.38 46,600 Triangle Expressway - From Old Holly Springs to NC 55 34,800 34,800 51,900 49.14 49.14 51,900 51,500 47.99 49.14 51,900 55,700 60.06 47.70 51,400 57,100 64.08 51.15 52,600 - - Data not available. Note: DSA 5& 17, 10 & 11, and 12 were forecasted using similar methodology as discussed in Section 8.2. All 2035 DSA forecast volumes are presented in Table 22. April 2014 43 NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 22. 2035 Build Traffic Forecast Volumes � i . . . . . • � � � � � � � � SE Ext (NC 540) - E of NC 55 - 47,400 47,400 47,400 48,800 51,100 51,100 51,100 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Holly Springs Road - 57,800 57,800 57,800 57,500 67,500 67,500 67,500 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Bells Lake Rd / Hilltop Needmore Rd - 70,300 70,300 70,300 61,300 68,300 68,300 68,300 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of US 401 - 71,600 71,600 71,600 59,100 50,800 50,800 50,800 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of Old Stage Road - 57,300 57,300 57,300 64,800 42,000 42,000 42,000 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of NC 50 - 51,800 51,800 51,800 58,200 49,300 49,300 49,300 SE Ext (NC 540) - E of I-40 - 45,900 43,900 44,300 64,800 42,900 41,000 41,400 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of White Oak Road - 54,000 46,700 50,200 - 51,500 44,500 47,900 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of US 70 Business - 64,000 66,400 56,100 - 62,500 64,800 54,800 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Rock Quarry Rd / Old Baucom Rd - 69,400 67,200 63,700 73,700 69,400 67,300 63,800 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Auburn Knightdale Road - 72,200 75,800 69,800 75,500 72,000 75,600 69,600 SE Ext (NC 540) - N of Poole Road - 91,900 95,300 89,100 94,000 91,400 94,800 88,600 I-40 from Exit 306 (US 70) to US 70 Byp/SE Ext 108,900 94,800 94,800 94,800 110,300 99,100 99,100 99,100 NC 42 - E of I-40 30,900 27,800 27,800 27,800 - 26,800 26,800 26,800 NC 50 - S of Timber Drive 28,700 - - - 34,800 - - - NC 50 - S of Ten-Ten Road 20,100 14,800 14,800 14,800 - 20,800 20,800 20,800 NC 55 - from Old Smithfield Road to Triangle Expressway 47,700 49,500 49,500 49,500 50,200 49,500 49,500 49,500 Old Stage Road - S of Vandora Springs Rd 41,500 - - - 56,000 - - - Old Stage Road - N of Banks Rd 18,200 21,100 21,100 21,100 - - - - Old Stage Road - S of Norman Blalock Rd 9,100 - - - - 7,800 7,800 7,800 Poole Road - E of Hodge Rd 27,100 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,500 23,300 23,300 23,300 Ten-Ten Road - E of Bells Lake Road 32,700 25,600 25,600 25,600 25,800 - - - Ten-Ten Road - E of US 401 18,900 - - - 17,000 - - - Ten-Ten Road - W of NC 50 10,500 5,300 5,300 5,300 - 8,600 8,600 8,600 Holly Springs Road - N of Kildaire Farm Road 23,800 23,000 23,000 23,000 24,800 27,400 27,400 27,400 Old Holly Springs-Apex Road - N of Triangle Expressway 29,800 32,900 32,900 32,900 32,900 32,900 32,900 32,900 Bells Lake Road - S of Ten-Ten Rd 13,200 21,600 21,600 21,600 19,600 - - - Hilltop Needmore Road - E of Old Mills Rd 7,300 - - - - 11,100 11,100 11,100 Rock Quarry Road - W of Southeast Extension 10,400 9,300 6,900 6,000 8,900 9,400 6,700 5,800 Auburn Knightdale Rd - N of Rock Quarry Rd 7,600 3,700 5,500 4,800 3,700 3,400 5,100 4,400 White Oak Road - E of Raynor Rd 17,200 18,200 20,800 18,300 - 18,300 20,900 18,300 Vandora Springs Rd - E of Old Stage Rd 22,400 - - - 18,500 - - - US 1- N of Triangle Expressway 44,100 43,600 43,600 43,600 45,600 46,600 46,600 46,600 US 401 - N of Ten-Ten Rd 58,800 - - - 64,100 - - - US 401 - N of Donny Brook Rd 60,800 74,600 74,600 74,600 - - - - US 401 - S of Dwight Rowland Rd 35,700 - - - - 34,300 34,300 34,300 US 64 Business - E of I-540 56,000 57,000 57,000 57,000 57,800 57,500 57,500 57,500 US 64 Business - W of I-540 50,900 55,400 55,400 55,400 56,100 55,200 55,200 55,200 US 64/264 - from Hodge Road to I-540 / SE Extension 100,100 96,700 96,700 96,700 96,700 99,500 99,500 99,500 US 64/264 - from I-540 / SE Extension to Smithfield Rd 116,000 113,000 113,000 113,000 112,400 111,900 111,900 111,900 US 70 - W of SE Extension 43,500 44,600 42,600 47,300 - 44,100 42,200 47,000 US 70 - E of I-40 53,000 47,200 45,000 47,200 49,800 47,300 45,100 47,300 US 70 Bypass - E of I-40 39,700 49,500 47,300 48,900 38,600 46,600 45,300 46,700 Triangle Expressway - From Old Holly Springs to NC 55 34,800 51,900 51,900 51,900 51,400 52,600 52,600 52,600 April 2014 44 NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) 9.0 2012 / 2035 FUTURE YEAR OVER/UNDERPASS TRAFFIC FORECAST Thirty-five (35) overpass and underpass locations were identified based on the preliminary roadway designs of Southeast Extension alternatives. AADT forecast volumes and traffic factors (design hourly volume, directional split information and truck percentages) were developed for - Y- line facilities using the similar forecasting methodology as the other study area roadways. 48- hour traffic counts, model data, historical AADT's, previous forecasts, comparing traffic factors from parallel facilities, preparing daily trip generation volumes for residential neighborhoods, and engineering judgment, where applicable, were considered. The forecast volumes shown in Table 23 relate to the numerically lowest DSA corridor number that applies for that location. Appendix F includes additional -Y- line forecasting data. April 2014 45 C� NTB NCDOT STIP PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829 Complete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Traffic Forecast Report (DSA 1-17) Table 23. Over/Underpass Traffic Forecast . - . - .. .-.,. Old NC 55 (Main St.) UP 10 65 SB 4 1 17,300 20,000 33,900 17,100 26,500 � Sunset Lake Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 10,200 13,200 23,900 8,500 17,500 � Sunset Lake Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 7,900 10,200 22,900 6,800 15,900 Pierce-Olive Road OP 10 60 SB 2 1 3,300 3,600 9,400 3,600 9,400 West Lake Road OP 10 55 SB 5 1 7,300 8,000 16,800 8,000 16,800 � Rhodes Road OP 11 60 SB 7 1 1,000 1,100 2,200 1,200 2,200 � Deer Meadow Road OP 10 60 SB 2 1 1100 ` 1,100 1,400 1,100 1,400 � Johnson Pond Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 2,500 2,800 4,300 2,100 3,100 � Lake Wheeler Road UP 10 65 SB 2 1 7,000 8,200 14,800 6,500 11,000 Optimist Farm Road OP 10 65 EB 2 1 7,200 9,400 16,500 5,500 11,300 Johnson Pond Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 3,800 3,900 19,200 2,100 11,500 Hilltop Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 4,200 4,800 8,400 3,000 5,100 � Norman Blalock Road OP 10 65 WB 3 2 1,100 1,100 1,800 1,100 1,800 ao Barber Bridge Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 700 800 1,300 800 1,300 � Rock Service Station Road OP 10 65 SB 3 1 2,700 3,300 10,300 2,200 7,100 d � Mal Weathers Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 800 900 1,500 900 1,500 r � N Sauls Road OP 10 65 SB 5 1 1,700 1,900 3,900 1,500 4,200 Ten-Ten Road UP 9 55 EB 3 2 15,000 15,600 20,500 10,300 14,700 Buffaloe Road OP 11 65 EB 3 1 3,200 3,300 7,500 3,200 5,900 ti Thompson Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 1,300 1,300 1,700 1,300 1,700 �° Aversboro Road OP 10 60 SB 3 1 7,300 8,100 13,200 8,300 14,000 Bryan Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 1,000 1,100 1,800 1,100 1,800 White Oak Road OP 12 65 SB 2 1 10,400 12,100 27,700 11,300 25,800 � Old McCullers Road UP 10 65 SB 2 1 1100�� 1,200 1,900 1,200 1,900 � ri Fanny Brown Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 4,700 4,900 7,500 3,900 7,500 � � Holland Church Road OP 10 70 SB 6 1 3,300 3,500 6,500 3,500 6,500 � Sauls Road OP 10 65 SB 5 1 3,400 3,600 6,800 3,800 9,200 � � Jordan Road OP 10 65 SB 2 1 2,000 2,200 4,800 2,200 4,800 �� New Bethel Church Road OP 10 65 EB 2 1 400 500 900 300 600 � r� Waterfield Dr UP 10 65 EB 3 1 3,000 3,300 6,500 3,500 6,500 �O Raynor Road UP 12 65 SB 2 1 5,900 7,200 12,300 6,500 11,400 _n rn� � N � E. Garner Road UP 16 75 EB 2 1 3,100 3,700 21,800 3,200 19,900 i � N d i+ � o � Guy Road OP 8 55 SB 2 1 7,500 8,700 17,200 9,500 19,000 w �� M� E. Garner Road UP 15 75 EB 3 1 6,400 6,000 19,400 6,000 20,400 ti � Battle Bridge Road OP 15 55 EB 12 4 1,100 1,500 3,900 1,400 4,800 � "OP" - overpass; "UP" - underpass * 2010 No-Build AADT for Deer Meadow Road determined using ITE Trip Generation rates. The 2010 No-Build AADT forecast was then grown at model rates "* Old McCullers Rd AADT (near the underpass location) calculated as 25% of Old McCullers Rd forecasted AADT at intersection with US 401. April 2014 46 C� NTB Appendix A - Fiqures u Bypass Western Wake ; � Freeway; � � � � � \,�+V, ; D u DSA1-17 SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) �1��° �o 0 � —106 PM 10 —► 65 103 (2,1) � �� o � i SR 1172 � � SR 1172 (Wake County �6 10 (Old Smithfield Landfill Access) 65 � 8 � � � �� 65 Rd) (2Q35) (4,7) � Bypass SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) — 157 — PM 11� 60 �2,�) SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I N v Ci � f� v � � 26 �. .* 17 fJ y SR 1010 133 —�Ten Ten Rd) PM 17 2 11 � 60 (2,1) DSA1-7,13-17 _`� � � � � � � � �DSA8-12 �� — — — —�� u N I ` �� A � (� ` N ` ` SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) ` SR 1152 Matchline B (Holly Springs Rd) 2O � O DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements No-Build STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 11.2 � �4o�i —f— Matchline B � . _. �. _. _ � ,/� -I I W �N N � j N I I I SR 1393 SR 1393 (Hilltop 35 35 � 35 (Hilltop Needmore Rd) PM h � PM PM Needmore Rd) 12�55 2 1'I' 2 12—►55 12—►55 (3,2) �3.2) I i3.2) N I �� SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) �0 w�� A N � W v � � 7 SR 2753 27 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 4 11 —1 60 (3,1) r SR 2750 (Norman — 11 Blalock Rd) PM 65 �— 10 4 (3,2) o ` I o � � w � � ` W � � i N � O N � � SR 1421 m (Old Mills Rd) � � ` � DSA8-12 � — — — — — — — — � � o W�� wl�.� N � N N �v � � v � � N � !`�-�^ �401� 2O � O DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) Matchline D ._.�._._ I I I Future / Norman Blalock Rd / Western Wake Freeway / 5u / � / No-Build STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 11.3 o I SR 1006 � i �401 � N � � cn (Old Stage Rd) � � � co � �— � V SR 2711 � � m � � � � (Vandora `� � j`° � W � gg — Springs Rd) � o„r DSA 6& 7 � �� ' v�� A ' °� W DSA6&7 so65�—,0 / ' � — — — — — — — � � W '3 � id / 3� �s ' 29 � � � —141 128 — SR 1010 � j SR 1010 67 f� �,; PM PM (Ten Ten Rd) ;�. �� (Ten Ten Rd) PM � m / 10 —1 60 4�' �4 9—► 60 a 9—� 55 3� DSA 8— 17 � (3,2) (3,1) � (3,1= � � � � Southeast Southeast 3; DSA 1— 5 � Extension 3 � _ _ _ _ DSA 1 — 5, 13_17_ _ _ _ _ � � /� _ _ Extension � u �� / � 5u SR 1503 30 — (Donny Brook Rd) pM 10 —► 65 (2.1) o , 1O iv v V o ' � �D � �� W �� N � O vo � N rn N I � �15 .� 33 � SR 2779 43 —�Old McCullers PM Rd) 9 4 10 � 65 ��,�) � I � �� 6 � .� 24 / Chandler g � 34 — Ridge Cir PM PM 65 � 11 2� � 65t— 8 (2,1) iZ,1) � �� V 3 � rn N ��-�, �� SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) I 4,�, �, 7z ISR 5324 t� � SR 1010 (Stevens — 8 78 (Cleveland Rd) Oaks Dr) se f— 10 1�' � 10 —► 60 DSA 8— 12 I c2.,> (3,1) I I . � . �• � • � Matchline D Wake 2 01 O DAILY� RAFFICUAL Tech Drive LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split (%) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements u No-Build STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 11.4 Business �� 290 — �� PM 9 � so (5,2, ��a �. � 235 � 3 gusiness f� �1 � 340 �� p � Southeast PM 88 �' 17 9—► 55 �'*� � EX�@IISIOII (5,3) u Matchline G . _ . i . _ . _ / � � � � � � � �� Southeast I Extension � m � V 5u �1�, 0 �DSA6&7 W 1 � � � � � � � c�� y � DSA 8-17� � SEE � INSET A � � DSA 1-5 � ; — — — — — � I m w�� v � c.i 0 1 ��42� 371 - _- PM 60�-8 (3.2) 158 �. .* g2 fJ �1 259 — PM 87�' 71 55 �— 8 (4.2) - 230 — PM 9 —165 (4.3) Southeast Extension � u u � I � O� O DAILY TRAFFICUAL °' �,� � LEGEND N � ' `� o = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 W � , PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements �Southeast � Extension 5U � � � Clayton �9�► Bypass �� 70 � ti INSET A �� Clayton 510 BYPass PM 9 —�65 � 7� (4,3) � No-Build STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension '�'� •5 SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N I �l� � � �SR 2555 P6 �� (Raynor Rd) N �8 65 �— 12 iv -o V (2�1� � �1� �, ; N DSA6&7 Business ( 70 1 � Matchline F SR 2555 (Auburn- �� 31— Knightdale Rd) PM 55 L— 10 (3,1) SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) 11 � .� 5 f� �1 4 ♦ � N W v W � V � � � � � � � � � � � � � � v� I � ` cn I ` Southeast 3 � � Extension �; DSA 8, 9, 12 — 14, 17 � S� — — — — — — — — — — — — —�� — — — � 5u � ; � S� i N ` INS ! ��, � o �° DSA 5, 12, 17 — i �, �, � �' ` � V�� i V I N � DSA3&4,10&11,15&16 �' � ' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � — � — � SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) INSET A I SR 2542 N v�, 3 y (Rock Quarry Rd) � � Rock Quarry Rd � EXt. t0 US 7O � DSA 8 & 9 � 33 I pM �� 65 F 12 `� (2,�) N m � � " � � SR 5204 � (Old Baucom Rd) SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) Business �) 70 1 2O � O DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements ' 3 SR 2555 — 26 ��-! � (Auburn- 55 t— 10 �= Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 ; � Southeast DSA 1, 2, 8, 9, 13, 14; s Extension � ' = 5u � DSA 3— 5, 10 — 12, ;� Southeast , _ 15=17 � s Extension '� u._ SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) No-Build $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 11.6 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� G1 � � �� 2� Southeast Extension u � DSA 1, 2, � 8, 9, 13, 14 ;• — — — 1 d� o n ? � A � 3 � N � fD ' _ � N � � DSA 3-5, � 10-13,15-17 � � � 1 SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 „ � � „7 (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � PM 60 �— 11 4 � �9 (5,3) �i�� N I — — % — I N rn I N I � � � � 1 `�" � I � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I � � � � � � c�n � — 71 ��-- 91— PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) DSA1-17 SR 2233 —166 — (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) I I � 64 SR 2555 SR 1007 r (Auburn- (Poole Rd) 1 Knightdale Rd) � �_ , , _o SR 2516 � �� (Hodge Rd) 45�' �5 12 —► 60 3� � 12 —� 60 (3,1) ^' (3,1) � w -� w N � V � � � � � O v N I �' ISR 2515 159 (Old Faison Rd) � �52 — 411 — PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) o � rn�� o W N 121 �. � 25 t/ y SR 2233 62 PM (Smithfield Rd) 1� � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� N o � N N � I� � Knightdale ��( ) Bypass ��64� 2O � O DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements Business �64` �✓. Business �64� — 498 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) No-Build $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 11.7 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s 198 _ \J'+V, ; D ,� P : 65 u (6,12) u Bypass O I A -p w J � � N I DSA1-17 SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � � � i O � —107 PM 10 —► 65 104 (2,1) � �� ' � � � N 10 * 24 SR 1172 y SR 1172 (Wake County 17 29 (Old Smithfield Landfill Access) 65 � 8 � � � �� 65 Rd) (2Q35) (4,7) � Bypass SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) — � 88 PM 11� 60 �2,�) SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I N v �I � V v � � 26 �. .* 24 fJ y SR 1010 172 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 18 4 11 � 60 (2,1) DSA1-7,13-17 _`� � � � � � ` � `DSA8-12 �� — — — —�� u N I ` ;�� ` N ` ` SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) ` SR 1152 Matchline B (Holly Springs Rd) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements No-Build STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension �2•2 � �4o�i —f— Matchline B � . _. �. _. _ � ,/� -I I W �N N � O N I I I SR 1393 SR 1393 (Hilltop 40 40 � 40 (Hilltop Needmore Rd) PM h � PM PM Needmore Rd) 12�55 2 1'I' 2 12—►55 12—►55 (3,2) �3.2) I i3.2) N I �� SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) �0 w�� A N � Ci v � I �SR 2753 30 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 7 11 —1 60 (3,1) r SR 2750 (Norman — 11 Blalock Rd) PM sst—�o 2 (a,z) Matchline D ._.�._._ I I � ' SR 2750 / 6 — (Norman PM Blalock Rd) Western 4 �o —f 65 c2��) � Wake � ` I , Freeway o � o i ` ��3 N N�� W / 5U .p � SR 1421 (Old Mills Rd) N / ` � � � _ _ _ _ DSA8-12 _ � � � o N��N w�� N� iv � W � I v � I l� -`--' �401� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) No-Build STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 12.3 o I SR 1006 � i �401 � N � � � (Old Stage Rd) � � � � � �� N SR2711 �� — � m I o 10 (Vandora `� � `° 76 — Springs Rd) � , ; � � � � PM � � �f` DSA 6 & 7 • N N DSA 6& 7 ss 65 (�,;) �� ' � '.�� N i � � � � � � � � � . � 1� / 3� �3 ' 28 ?' � � —156 147 — SR 1010 � j SR 1010 75 � ,� PM � � PM (Ten Ten Rd) v�. �� (Ten Ten Rd) PM � � m / �o —� so s2 32 s—►so o s—> ss a� DSA 8— 17 • � = �3,2> �3,,� �3,�� , Southeast Southeast 3 ; Extension 3 L _ _ _ _ DSA 1_5, 13 — 17 _ _ _ _ _ � � �� _ DSA 1 — 5 � Extension � u "' N�v °° � 5u �� / SR 1503 36 — (Donny Brook Rd) pM 10 —► 65 (2,1) i � � o ' o � ;�,� af I v�,� � � � � N ' � �s .� Sa � SR 2779 45 —�Old McCullers PM Rd) 11 5 10 � 65 �Z.1) � I v�� N �� A cn f Y$ Chandler 9 38 _ Ridge Cir PM PM 65 � 11 2�' � 65t— 8 (2,1) i2,�) � v�� O � � rn � ��-�, �� SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) I a,�, �, ss ISR 5324 t� � SR 1010 (Stevens — 8 89 (Cleveland Rd) Oaks Dr) 65 � �o �, � �o � so DSA 8— 12 I cz�> �3,�� I I .�.�•-.- Matchline D Wake 201 2 DAILY� RAFFICUAL Tech Drive LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements u No-Build STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 12.4 Business �0 ( 320 — 1 PM ' 9 —� 60 (5,Z) 123 � f� —E 95�� Southeast I Extension � rn y 5� �1�� 0 ;DSA6&7 W' � � � � � � � a� '� � s � DSA 8-17 � SEE ° � � INSET A �; DSA 1-5 � � � — — — — I 1 m �1�� N �O 0 1 * 237 � y � Business � 3PM� ��, ; ( �� S Southeast �s 9 —► 55 � -� — — Extension (5,3) u Matchline G ' � ' i � ' � / ' � � � � ! � � �� 161 �. .j� 64 ,� 37$ tJ y V PM 60 [— 8 89 72 (3,2) — 254 — PM 9 —165 (4,3) Southeast Extension ►� u u o � A � ' °J � O rn 0 — 264 � PM 55�8 (4,2) �Southeast � Extension 5U I / INSET A �� '� 38 Clayton y Bypass 322 PM � 7O � 0 9 —� 85 �. �� (4,3) � � I � O � � DAILY TRAFFICUAL N 1� � LEGEND o = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 ' �' PM = PM Peak Period i� D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Clayton Bypass r�� No-Build STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 12•5 SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) Business ( 70 1 � Matchline F SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) �z 16 8 SR 2555 � � 46 SR 2555 (Auburn- ��41 PM �� (Raynor Rd) �� Knightdale Rd) PM �4 65 �— 12 55 L— 10 � � i2,1) W I � o (3,1) vr � N � DSA6&7 �' W -� A ' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �,�� w i � � � � i � Southeast 3; DSA 8, 9, 12 — 14, 17 � Extension � • � S' — — — — — — — — — — — — — � �� — 7� � 5u � ; si INS � N i ;1 � � V `° � � DSA 5, 12, 17 ` — i � N � _ _ _ DSA3&4,10&11_15&16_ _ I_ _ _ _ � _ s i SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) INSET A I SR 2542 N v �, 3 �,�,, (Rock Quarry Rd) � � Rock Quarry Rd � Ext. to US 70 9 DSA 8 & 9 � 37 I pM �� 65 F 12 `� (2,�) N m � � " � ^' SR 5204 � (Old Baucom Rd) SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) Business (��) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements ' 3 SR 2555 — 34 ��-! � (Auburn- 55 t— 10 �= Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 DSA 1, 2, 8, 9, 13, 14! d Southeast _ � � � � 3 Extension -1 ' = u i DSA 3— 5, 10 — 12, �� Southeast 15-17 •� _ � � Extension '° u._ SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) No-Build $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 12.6 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� � �� 2� SR 1007 (Poole Rd) ' SR 2516 „ � � „9 (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � —21 PM Southeast so � ii s� as (5,3) Extension N � � �• � O 5u � � ' N . DSA 1, 2, � 8, 9, 13, 14 ; — — — — — % — 1 I �� o S � A 'D W 3• N lr �� I N � � � _ . � W � � ' ' � � � � DSA 3-5, N �10_13,15-17 � 1 SR 2555 SR 1007 (Auburn- (Poole Rd) Knightdale Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I rn v � `° � A c�n � —102 ��-129— PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) DSA1-17 SR 2233 _ 172 _ (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) 64 4„ � � �Z SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) 102 75 — PM � � PM 5�' �7 12 —► 60 36 9 12 —� 60 (3,1) ro (3,1) � w � � A rn � � N � N �� 3 V v N I �' SR 2515 I 163 (Old Faison Rd) � 430 — �67 PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) o � rn�� V o � � N 137 �. � 40 t/ y SR 2233 s2 PM (Smithfield Rd) 1� � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� o � � � I� � Knightdale ��( ) Bypass ��64� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements Business �64` �✓. Business �64� — 527 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) No-Build $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension �2•7 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s .�--232— � ; W , 0 � 6 5 (6.��) SR 1172 (Wake County Landfill Access) u Bypass SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) o � A '0 w � � N U1 � o � A -p w J � � N I �o �, .� Za tJ y —17 29 — PM PM 65/— 8 7 5 11 —1 65 (2Q35) (4,7) 0 A 'p W J � � � u Bypass —176— PM 10 —► 65 (6,12) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � (G � w rn 0 � —124 PM 10 � 65 122 (2,�) � � � � j � � O 18 �. � 51 fJ � 33�' �2 SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) SR 1010 _ 148 - (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11� 60 �2,�) —218— PM 10—►65 (6,12) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I i N � j � V v � � 10 �. .* 34 fJ `1 42 �' `�4 N � N � � � � � I —134— SR1010 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11 � 60 (2,1) f �9 ' � m 305 � � PM � � � �' �5 10 —► 65 � D ��4U� (6,12) '- SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) Build-DSA1&2,13&14 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 13.2 Southeast 3 ; �� .� Zo Extension � ; 305 y � 5� �; , � P: 65 54 �. '�'6 i6.�2) — 333 PM 10 —► is,�2) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) o � � N '0 j _. � o SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) —P6— 9 —� 55 (2.11 SR 1503 SR 2779 (Donny (Old Brook Rd) McCullers Rd) (Proposed (Proposed Realignment) Realignment) Chandler Ridge Cir 261 — PM —► 65 (6,12) SR 5324 (Stevens Oaks Dr) 8 PM 65 L— 10 (2.1) 2� '► ,� a� SR 1006 �� y Wake (Old Stage Rd) — 36 61 Tech PM PM Drive ^ 0 � ^ io —� so ��► �0 9—► 55 AVERAGE ANNUAL cz��> c2�>> L L DAILY TRAFFIC �401� LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No, of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' _ , = Daily Turn Movements u o � W � co �� m � � � 28� ♦ " 0 � -`° -p N �. � f7� rn cn � � 43�' �8 DSA 13 & 14 Only _ 19 Red Brick Rd PM Connector 10 —� 60 /2.11 � � Southeast — 242 ; s Extension PM 1 m 10—►65 'W u (6,12) I o I �� N � � a �. .(� so f �l 68 — � � 10-1 60 (3,1) SR 1010 (Cleveland Rd) o I W � � �' � A � I u Build-DSA1&2,13&14 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 13.3 Business �� 1 106 �. * 197 � g f/ � � Business — 281 297 ��•. � � 70 � PM pM � �, Southeast 9—► 60 83�' � 9—► 55 � � ' Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; � 242 1540� W � io � j U(6,12) ��-D �% � � � � rn 0 161 �. .� 43 f� `1 u 323 197 — PM PM 6o F 8 59 51 55 �— 8 (3,2) �4,2) 5u Matchline C U9 P�� 55 �6 91 332 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p � w�� V � 15 �. � 35 t� `► 46� ♦ 32 o � A � ' w � � rn 0 S, 2O � � DAILY TRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 84� � � Q8 �1 ^"� 1 ..�. .� Clayton — 338 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass � 70 � �r Build-DSA1&2,13&14 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 13.4 Southeast 3 ; Extension � • S � 209 — � � � PM 5\401 n; ,�—/ 55 V (6.9) INSET A SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N I N 'p � � � .... � �SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) �1 65 �— 12 �2,1) N N 'Q � � W v N I SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 272 PM 10 —► (6,9) Business I 70 1 � Matchline C SR 2555 (Auburn- ��12— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) ^' I SR 2542 � �, � N (Rock Quarry Rd) m � � �? — 33 PM �y 65 �— 12 `� (�,� ) N m v ' " � "' SR 5204 °� (Old Baucom Rd) 347 — PM —, 55 (6.9) Business �� , �70� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) � �$ 5`�' �3 N W �� ni m � SEE INSET A N � � � w � � ' 3 SR 2555 —10 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � o Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � 3 Southeast — 37$ � s Extension � o � s5 � v ��540j (6,9) � _- °� SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build-DSA1&2,13&14 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 13.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� n � �1 � � 0� SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 „ � � ,Z (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � -9 PM Southeast so � ii s� �� (5,3) Extension � N A � (d,i � N . � (ji ; � � CD 5u � v� m N °' � f� � f� �Z ? � 378 377 � � PM PM o i �o � ss 10��r � io � ss 4�' �3 (6,9) (6,9) SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I rn v � m � � c�n � —31 �j�-63— PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) — 486 — PM 55t-10 (6,9) SR 2233 —133 — (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) 64 �„ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) 104 55 — 6�' �7 12—► 60 5� � 12—� 60 (3,1) ^' (3,1) � w � �, N � �' rn � �0 3 W v N I �' SR 2515 �os �. ,� 7s (Old Faison Rd) � y 553 PM $$ �80 60 t— 10 (6.9) 0 rn�� O N 112 �. � 46 t/ y SR 2233 79 PM (Smithfield Rd) � � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� N � I� j Knightdale �� Bypass �264� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL Business �64` �✓. 100 '. .� 114 t� �i 65� �58 Business �64� — 660 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build-DSA1&2,13&14 LEGEND $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, = Existing Roadway 35517.1.TA1 - Future Roadway COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DATE: Apri12014 DHV —► D (d,t) HNTB North Carolina, P.C. DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 pREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 PM = PM Peak Period Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 �Z D= Directional Split (%) LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass �—► = Indicates Direction of D Klll htdale �G (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure 4, = Daily Tum Movements EXt21lSlOn 13.6 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s .�--232— � ; W , 0 � 6 5 (6.��) SR 1172 (Wake County Landfill Access) u Bypass SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) o � A '0 w � � N U1 � o � A -p w J � � N I �o �, .� Za tJ y —17 29 — PM PM 65/— 8 7 5 11 —1 65 (2Q35) (4,7) 0 A 'p W J � � � u Bypass —176— PM 10 —► 65 (6,12) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � (G � w rn 0 � —124 PM 10 � 65 122 (2,�) � � � � j � � O 18 �. � 51 fJ � 33�' �2 SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) SR 1010 _ 148 — (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11� 60 �2,�) —218— PM 10—►65 (6,12) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I i N � j � V v � � 10 �. .* 34 fJ `1 42 �' `�4 N � N � � � � � I —134— SR1010 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11 � 60 (2,1) f �9 ' � m 305 � � PM � � � �' �5 10 —► 65 � D ��4U� (6,12) '- SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) Build-DSA3&4,15&16 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 14.2 Southeast � � Extension � ' 305 — �� u D; 10165 (6,12) SR 1503 (Donny Brook Rd) (Proposed Realignment) Chandler Ridge Cir �401� 14 � f� � 54� 21 �. ,� ai tJ �► — 36 PM t0—►60 11 �0 (z. � ) � �� 401� 333 PM 10 1 65 �6. � �) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) —P6— 9 —1 55 (2.1) SR 2779 (Old McCullers Rd) (Proposed Realignment) SR 5324 (Stevens Oaks Dr) SR 1006 Wake (Old Stage Rd) - 61 DSA15&160 _ 19 Red Brick Rd pM Connector 10 —► 60 (2.1) o' I ;�� N � N rn cn y �, * 5 � 3 Southeast fJ y • � Extension 261 242 ' � PM PM � m � 65 43 �" �8 10 —1 65 i W �J� (6,12) (6,12) 0 �� N � a '. .� so 8 � y s$ SR 1010 PM PM (Cleveland RdJ 65 t— 10 � � 10 —► 60 (2,1) (3.1) Tech 9 —►55 Drive ^O� ^ AVERAGEANNUAL �2�'� L L DAILY TRAFFIC LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements u Build-DSA3&4,15&16 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 14.3 Business �� ) 112 � * 191 � g f/ � � Business — 281 283 ��•. � �) � PM PM � ; ( �� Southeast 9� 60 aa�► � s—► ss � � —'� Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 242 U� W � 10 —] (6,12) ��-D �% � � � � rn o . 161 �. .� 43 f� `1 u 323 197— PM PM 60 �— 8 59 51 55 �— 8 (3,2) (4.2) 5u Matchline C 89 P�� 55 �6 91 296 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p � W � � � � � 14 �. � 35 t� `► 44 - ♦ 31 o � A � ' w � � rn 0 S, 2O � � DAILY TRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 7/ so � `� ti ^ � ..�. .� Clayton — 304 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass � 70 � �� Build-DSA3&4,15&16 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 14.4 Southeast � � Extension � • ? � 189 5u �; ,o P: (6.9) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N I N 'p � � � .... � �SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) �1 65 �— 12 �2,1) N � N � W SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) 206 PM —/ (6,9) Business I 70 1 � Matchline C SR 2555 (Auburn- ��28— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) INSET A I SR 2542 N v � � � (Rock Quarry Rd) rn � SR 2542 �9 (Rock Quarry Rd) — 15 PM �y 65 /— 12 `? ��,�) N "�i � ^' SR 5204 � I (Old Baucom Rd) (II "� W � � c�n � IBusiness (�� 378 — PM —► 55 (6.9) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period ��, D = Directional Split ( % ) ,.� —► = Indicates Direction of D (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) 13 �. ,* 16 t� � 12 �j '� 3 N w�v N � ' � SEE INSET A N � � � io � N rn N a� �z ' 3 SR 2555 — 22 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � o Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � 3 Southeast • � Extension — 370 � � ,o P ; 55 ; o u (6,9) SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build-DSA3&4,15&16 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnston� DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 14.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� � �� 0� Southeast Extension u d' ? �— 370 — A � PM O � 10—► 55 (6,9) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 „ � � ,Z (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � -9 60 �— 11 5 � �7 (5,3) �i�� V rn N s /�. � so � y 3�' �3 SR 2555 SR 1007 (Auburn- (Poole Rd) Knightdale Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I rn v � m � � c�n � —31 �j�-63— PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) —518— PM 55t-10 (6,9) SR 2233 —133 — (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) 64 �„ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) 104 55 — 6�' �7 12—► 60 5� � 12—� 60 (3,1) ^' (3,1) o w -9 � � �, N � �' � � W vN � �' SR 2515 1z� . . F� (Old Faison Rd) f1 Z► 553 7� �87 PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) 0 m�� O N 112 �. � 46 t/ y SR 2233 79 PM (Smithfield Rd) � � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� , o N � I� � Knightdale ��( ) Bypass ��64� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL Business �64` �✓. 100 '. .� 114 t� �i 65� �58 Business �64� — 660 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build-DSA3&4,15&16 LEGEND $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, = Existing Roadway 35517.1.TA1 - Future Roadway COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DATE: Apri12014 DHV —► D (d,t) HNTB North Carolina, P.C. DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 pREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 PM = PM Peak Period Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 �D= Directional Split (%) LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Z� —► = Indicates Direction of D Knl htdale (�) = Duals, rr-sr�5 �i> PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure NTS 4% = Daily Tum Movements EXt21lSlOn 14.6 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s .�--232— � ; W , 0 � 6 5 (6.��) SR 1172 (Wake County Landfill Access) u Bypass SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) o � A '0 w � � N U1 � o � A -p w J � � N I �o �, .� Za tJ y —17 29 — PM PM 65/— 8 7 5 11 —1 65 (2Q35) (4,7) 0 A 'p W J � � � u Bypass —176— PM 10 —► 65 (6,12) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � (G � w rn 0 � —124 PM 10 � 65 122 (2,�) � � � � j � � O 18 �. � 51 fJ � 33�' �2 SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) SR1010 _ 148 — (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11� 60 �2,�) —218— PM 10—►65 (6,12) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I i N � j � V v � � 10 �. .* 34 fJ `1 42 �' `�4 N � N � � � � � I —134— SR1010 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11 � 60 (2,1) f �9 ' � m 305 � � PM � � � �' �5 10 —► 65 � D ��4U� (6,12) '- SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) Build - DSA 5 & 17 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 15.2 �401� Southeast 3 � �4 �. ,� Zo Extension � • f� �1 � ' 305 \�`+Vj D ; ,o P : 65 5�• ,�6 u �s, � 2> 333 PM 10—►65 (6,12) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) P6 9 —► 55 (2,1) SR 1503 SR 2779 (Donny (Old Brook Rd) McCullers Rd) (Proposed (Proposed Realignment) Realignment) Chandler Ridge Cir 261 — PM —�► 65 (6,12) SR 5324 (Stevens Oaks Dr) 8 PM 65 t— 10 (2,1) 21 �. ,� a7 SR 1006 � y Wake (Old Stage Rd) — 36 61 Tech PM PM Drive ^ O�^ AVERAGE ANNUAL io�so 11 �0 s �55 (��) (��) L L DAILY TRAFFIC ��-�' �401� LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements u o � w � � �w � � � �j 2�8�' � 0 ;�� N � N rn cn � � 4� �8 o � �� j � � N m � a �. .� so � � ' ♦ ♦ , DSA 17 Only _ .19 Red Brick Rd pM Connector 10 —► 60 �z��) • 3 Southeast �� Extension — 242 � � 10—►65 �� 5� (6,12) � _ 68 SR 1010 PM (Cleveland Rd) 10 —► 60 (3,1) u Build - DSA 5 & 17 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 15.3 Business �� 1 106 �. * 197 � g f/ � � Business — 281 297 ��•. � � 70 � PM pM � �, Southeast 9� 60 83�' � 9—► 55 � � ' Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 242 U� W � 10 —] (6,12) ��-D �% � � � � rn o . 161 �. .� 43 f� `1 u 323 197— PM PM 60 �— 8 59 51 55 � 8 (3,2) �4,Z) 5u Matchline C U9 P�� 55 �6 91 332 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p � w�� V � 15 �. � 35 t� `► 46� ♦ 32 o � A � ' w � � rn 0 S, 2O � � DAILY TRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 84� � � Q8 �1 ^"� 1 ..�. .� Clayton — 338 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass � 70 � �r Build - DSA 5 & 17 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 15.4 Southeast 3 ; Extension � • S � 209 — � � � PM 5\401 n; ,�—/ 55 V (6.9) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N I N 'p � � � .... � �SR 2555 P6 �� (Raynor Rd) �3 65 �— 12 �2,1) N N 'Q � � i.ii v� � SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 258 PM 10 —► (6,9) Business ( 70 � � Matchline C SR 2555 (Auburn- ��17— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) INSET A I SR 2542 N v � � �`^'„ (Rock Quarry Rd) m � � �1 SR 2542 _ 36 (Rock Quarry Rd) PM �y 65 S— 12 �d (z,� ) N m� v W " � �' SR 5204 v � I (Old Baucom Rd) � � Business �70� �� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period ��, D = Directional Split ( % ) ,.� —► = Indicates Direction of D (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � = Daily Turn Movements �– SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) � 7 5 � � N W v W � � � SEE INSET A N � � � W W � CTI rn cn 1 �. .� 30 � y �. ,�9 ' 3 SR 2555 —15 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � o Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � 3 Southeast • � Extension —330�� ,o P ; 55 ; o u (6,9) N I W � (� W � � � � SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build - DSA 5 & 17 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 15.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� � �� 0� Southeast Extension u d' ? '— 330 — A � PM O � 10—► 55 (6,9) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 „ � � ,Z (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � -9 60 �— 11 5 � �7 (5,3) �i�� V rn N � �Z � �L SR 2555 SR 1007 (Auburn- (Poole Rd) Knightdale Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I rn v � m � � c�n � —31 �j�-63— PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) — 460 — PM 55t-10 (6,9) SR 2233 —133 — (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) 64 �„ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) 104 55 — 6�' �7 12—► 60 5� � 12—� 60 (3,1) ^' (3,1) o w -9 � � �, N � �' � � W vN � �' SR 2515 9„ � . q3 (Old Faison Rd) � � 553 9� �80 PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) 0 m�� s � o N 112 �. � 46 t/ y SR 2233 79 PM (Smithfield Rd) � � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� , o N � I� � Knightdale ��( ) Bypass ��64� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL Business �64` �✓. 100 '. .� 114 t� �i 65� �58 Business �64� — 660 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build - DSA 5 & 17 LEGEND $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, = Existing Roadway 35517.1.TA1 - Future Roadway COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DATE: Apri12014 DHV —► D (d,t) HNTB North Carolina, P.C. DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 pREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 PM = PM Peak Period Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 �D= Directional Split (%) LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Hoily Springs) to US 64 Bypass Z� —► = Indicates Direction of D Knl htdale (�) = Duals, rr-sr�5 �i> PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure NTS 4% = Daily Tum Movements EXt21lSlOn 15.6 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s .�--225— � ; W , 0 � 6 5 (6.��) SR 1172 (Wake County Landfill Access) u Bypass SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) o � A '0 w J � � � I 56 �. .A 59 f� �1 99� �3 o � A -p w J � j N I �o �, .� Za tJ y —17 29 — PM PM 65/— 8 7 5 11 —1 65 (2Q35) (4,7) 0 A 'p W J � � � u Bypass — 152 — PM 10 —► 65 (6,12) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � � � � O 10 �. tJ —113 PM 10 � 65 103 (2,�) � � � � ' � � 0 15 �► � 39 fJ � 31�' �3 SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) SR 1010 _ 132 — (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11� 60 �2,�) — 198 — PM 10—►65 (6,12) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-STs (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I N v �I � � v � I 7 �. .* 23 fJ `1 29�' `�2 N N � �I � � � � — 121 — SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11 � 60 (2,1) r �0 ' � m 225 � � PM � � � 20 �' �6 10 —► 65 � D ��4U� (6,12) '- SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) Build — DSA 6 & 7 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 16.2 Southeast 3 ; Extension � � 225 — 3 - \J`�V, D ; ,� � 65 u �6,,2� SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) �401� — 221 — PM 10 � 65 (6,12 ) 34 �. * 35 f� �1 - 103 116 - PM PM 9—► 55 15 '�27 9-1 60 (3,2) (3,1) m �� m � �_�� 01 � SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) o � � N -0 � � o �(Proposed 93 Realignment) PM 83 65 t— 10 o �3�'� Vandora v I � � Springs � 0 Buffaloe Rd so �. * sa Rd �� y 218 PM 6 25 10 —► 65 (6,12 ) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-STs (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements u 46 �. * 58 fJ `1 32�' �5 u • 3 Southeast i� � � Extension — 253 � � 10�65 �W rJ�4�j (6,12) -� Build — DSA 6 & 7 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 16.3 m � m�� N ^' � N o . SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) Matchline C _.�_._ � � A � � N � N 0 SR 2542 � y1 (Rock — 33 Quarry Rd) �z P i ss s`�• �s (3,1) SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) �oa �. .� zoo Business � y 273 303 � 7O � PM PM 9—► 60 9�' �5 9—] 55 (5,2) � (5,3) �� V v g W rn V 0 Southeast � ; so �. .� S5 Extension � ' f� y � s � 253 230 � i PM PM �5401 W i 10 � 65 60�' �2 �0 —► 60 u (6,12) �6.9) � � �� ^' � A � .(� 221 \, Clayton 248 BYpass PM � 27 9 � 65 � %Q � �° (4,3) � Nl� o o I �,;� — 39 — 12 —1 65 �3.1) Southeast Extension u Matchline C � ( rn � W � � � o � — 8PM iz—►ss (3,1) — 2$% — PM 9 —155 (5,3) 2O � � DAILY TRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-STs ( % ) NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements 15 — SR 5204 pM (Old Baucom Rd) 13 12 —► 65 �� (6,3) �2 N I N � v � O N * 39 y 47 _ SR 2542 PM (Rock Quarry Rd) $ 12 —� 65 n� (6,3) ��,�c�"'c RockQuarry �; I Rd Extension �� '� 38 Business \r 324 PM � �� 9 —► 55 � (5,3) Build - DSA 6 & 7 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 16.4 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� n � �� 'm' C> � SR 1007 (Poole Rd) ' SR 2516 „ � � ,Z (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � — 9 PM Southeast so � ii s� �� (5,3) Extension � N a � � w � Oo � �'� � N � l,� W 5u v " �; �� 6 A. ,* 11 3� * 44 „ • f� y fJ b ? � 334 341 � � PM PM (� i 10 —► 55 7�' `�9 10 � 55 2�' '�58 (6,9) (6,9) SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � � O rn v � m � � °� 1 — 31 ��--- 63 — PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) — 438 — PM 55t-10 (6,9) SR 2233 —133 — (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) 64 3_ , , �o SR 2516 � �� (Hodge Rd) 103 52 — 6�' �4 12 —► 60 5� �� 12 —� 60 (3,1) N (3,1) � w �rn � � W V 1 � cn �o � 3 W � I `� SR 2515 az �. � Si (Old Faison Rd) � y 502 PM 83 768 60 <— 10 (6.9) 0 rn�� o � � rn N 97 I� 54 y SR 2233 80 — PM (Smithfield Rd) 1� � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� o � � � I� j Knightdale �� Bypass �264� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL Business �64` �✓. Business �64� —610— .� PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build — DSA 6 & 7 LEGEND $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, = Existing Roadway 35517.1.TA1 - Future Roadway COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DATE: Apri12014 DHV —► D (d,t) HNTB North Carolina, P.C. DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 pREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 PM = PM Peak Period Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 �Z D= Directional Split (%) LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass �—► = Indicates Direction of D Klll htdale �G (d,t) = Duals, TT-STs ( % ) NTS � PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure 4, = Daily Tum Movements EXt21lSlOn 16.5 Western Wake Freeway u 345 — PM 10 —/ 65 (6, 12) �1� �� a, � N � A o � N W O 36 �. * 46 fJ �1 3�8�' �9 — 356 — PM 10-165 (6, 12) SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) o I �� O 54 � .* 3 fJ �► 84�' �0 O I � N � W W v o � SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) — 233 — PM 1 D —► 65 (6, 12) SR 1172 (Wake County ��— Landfill Access) PM 65 �— 8 (20, 35) u Bypass o � A1� W J � � � N 47 �, �7 fJ 35� �8 0 A�� :n% V � � � � 10 �. * 24 f� y 29 — PM 7 $ 11 —► 65 (4. �) 2O � � DAILY RAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV--► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) �� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' „ = Daily Tum Movements u Bypass • 3 Southeast id . Extension — 236 � ? PM � D u 10 —� 65 I (6, 12) SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) Build — DSA 8 & 9 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 17.1 �401� 7 21 SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) o � wl� � �y3 � � SR 2753 — 44 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 11 —� 60 (3,1) Southeast � . Extension SR 2750 f� �(Norman — 11 u Blalock Rd) PM 65 �-10 2 (3.2) Matchline B � o' v O N � A rn N 281 � � PM 10 � 65 113 �0 (6, 12) � N�� , ��401 � — 204 — PM 10 � 65 (6, 12) �SR 2750 6 — �-- �,o�ss (2.1) � � 4�0 �' �9 0 w�� Cp N � � � � SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) — 171 PM 10-1 65 (6, 12) SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) U o � �l� � � o � 19 �. * 6 .� �i — 66 PM 9 —1 55 45 � 11 (2,�) o I v�� v y � � � 10 �. * 30 f� �l 171 PM —1 65 3 �4 (6, 12) 0 .� I � � .� � � � u 2O � Z DAILY TRAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No, of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' _ , = Daily Turn Movements — 19 Red Brick Rd PM Connector 10-160 (2, 1) • 3 Southeast � °1 Extension .� — 212 ''' /� PM � I � ,o � 65 ; � u (6, 12) Build — DSA 8 & 9 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 17.3 Business �° S 104 �. * 193 � �/ y � Business —2�6 295��•.� ( �� Southeast s—► so a�► �s s—► ss � m ' Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 212 U � � �� (6.12) m -� N � � C1 rn 0 153 �. .� 29 f� `1 u 319 187— PM PM 60/— 8 52 44 55/— 8 (3,2) (4,2) 5u Matchline D $$ P�� 55 �6 91 282 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p � w�� O � � 15 �. � 3p t� `► 36 � �7 o � A � ' w � � rn 0 S, 2O � � DAILY TRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 64� � � Qs � ,�� ..�. .� Clayton — 308 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass �70; —� Build-DSA8&9 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 17•4 Southeast 3 ; Extension � • S �188— 5u o� �o Pi ss (6.9) INSET A SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N I v � � � � �SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) �2 65 �— 12 �2,1) N N 'Q � � W v N I SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 257 PM 10 —► (6,9) Business I 70 1 � Matchline E SR 2555 (Auburn- ��12— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) ^' I SR 2542 � �, � � (Rock Quarry Rd) m � � �3 — 39 PM �y 65�-12 � (�,� ) N "V� � A SR 5204 °� (Old Baucom Rd) 340 — PM —, 55 (6.9) Business �� , �70� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) 4�� 18 y 4�' �9 N m � � ()1 w � � m � SEE INSET A N � � � w � � �3 °: SR 2555 — 9 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � � Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � � Southeast • � Extension — 379 ' ? 10 � 55 ! �t �4U (6.9) � � °� SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build — DSA 8 & 9 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 17.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) �� iN � n � �� N' �� SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 , � � ,Z (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � -9 PM Southeast so � ii a� �� (5,3) Extension � N A � (d,i � N . � (f� � � � � 5u w v� m N °' � f� � f� �Z s � 379 376 � � PM PM �n � 10 —► ss 11 � � �o � ss �' �3 (6,9) (6,9) SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I � � � `° � V c�n � —30�j�-63— PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) — 485 — PM 55t-10 (6,9) SR 2233 —136 — (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) 64 �_ , , .o SR 2516 � �� (Hodge Rd) 104 51 — 6�' �5 12—► 60 5� � 12—� 60 (3,1) ^' (3,1) o w � � N � (n � � � � � O v N I �' SR 2515 �o�. ,� (Old Faison Rd) � 551 PM 89 780 60 <— 10 (6.9) 0 rn�� O N 112 �. � 46 t/ y SR 2233 79 PM (Smithfield Rd) � � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� o � O �O � I� j Knightdale �� Bypass �264� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL Business �64` �✓. 100 '. .� 114 t� �i 62� �55 Business �64� — 658 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build — DSA 8 & 9 LEGEND $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, = Existing Roadway 35517.1.TA1 - Future Roadway COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DATE: Apri12014 DHV —► D (d,t) HNTB North Carolina, P.C. DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 pREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 PM = PM Peak Period Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 �Z D= Directional Split (%) LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass �—► = Indicates Direction of D Klll htdale �G (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure 4, = Daily Tum Movements EXt21lSlOn 17.6 Western Wake Freeway u 345 — PM 10—► 65 (6, �Z) �1� �f � � �' � A o�� N rn 0 36 � .* 46 tJ � 38�' �9 w • rn�� N �A: o � V 0 � �_.S — 356 — PM 10 —> 65 (6, 12) SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) a I �� rn 0 54 � * 3 tJ �1 8�2 � �0 o � � N � w .� W o � SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) — 233 — PM 10—►65 (6, 12) SR 1172 (Wake County ��— Landfill Access) PM 65 /— 8 (20, 35) u Bypass o � A � � CA% � � � rn N 47 � .* 47 tJ �1 3� �8 0 A � � Cd � � � � � • 3 Southeast id . Extension — 236 � ? PM � D u 10 —1 65 I �6� �2) 10 �. ,* 24 f/ y SR 1172 29 (Old Smithfield PM Rd� 7 � 11 � 65 �4, 7) 2O � � DAILY RAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV--► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) �� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' „ = Daily Tum Movements u Bypass Build - DSA 10 & 11 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 18.1 �401� 7 21 SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) o � wl� � �y3 � � SR 2753 — 44 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 11 —� 60 (3,1) Southeast � . Extension SR 2750 f� �(Norman — 11 u Blalock Rd) PM 65 �-10 2 (3.2) Matchline B � o' v O N � A rn N 281 � � PM 10 � 65 113 �0 (6, 12) � N�� , ��401 � — 204 — PM 10 � 65 (6, 12) �SR 2750 6 — �-- �,o�ss (2.1) � � 4�0 �' �9 0 w�� Cp N � � � � SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) — 171 PM 10-1 65 (6, 12) SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) U o � �l� � � o � 19 �. * 6 .� �i — 66 PM 9 —1 55 45 � 11 (2,�) o I v�� v y � � � 10 �. * 30 f� �l 171 PM —1 65 3 �4 (6, 12) 0 .� I � � .� � � � u 2O � Z DAILY TRAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No, of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' _ , = Daily Turn Movements — 19 Red Brick Rd PM Connector 10-160 (2, 1) • 3 Southeast � °1 Extension .� — 212 ''' /� PM � I � ,o � 65 ; � u (6, 12) Build - DSA 10 & 11 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 18.3 Business �� 1 104 �. * 186 � g f/ � � Business — 276 281 ��•. � � 70 � PM pM � �, Southeast 9-160 83�' � 9—► 55 � o ' Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 212 U � � ,o —. (6,12) m -� N � � C1 rn o . 153 �. .� 29 f� `1 u 319 187— PM PM 60 �— 8 52 44 55 �— 8 (3,2) (4.2) 5u Matchline D 1� P�� 55 �6 91 254 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p � w�� O � � 14 �. � 3p t� `► 3� �7 o � A � ' w � � rn 0 S, 2O � � DAILY TRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 64� Q � <o S ..�. .� Clayton — Z82 Bypass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass � 70 � �r Build - DSA 10 & 11 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension '�$•4 Southeast � � Extension � • ? � 170 5u o; ,o P: (6.9) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N I �� SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) �2 65 �— 12 �2,1) N � N � W SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) 195 PM —/ (s,$) Business I 70 1 � Matchline D SR 2555 (Auburn- ��28— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) INSET A I SR 2542 N v � � N (Rock Quarry Rd) rn � SR 2542 �9 (Rock Quarry Rd) — �� PM �y 65t-12 Q ��,�) N m v � " � �"' SR 5204 v � I (Old Baucom Rd) (II "� W � � W � IBusiness (�� 370 — PM —► 55 (s.$) 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period ��, D = Directional Split ( % ) ,.� —► = Indicates Direction of D (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) 13 �. ,* 16 t� � 12 �j '� 2 N w v N � N � SEE INSET A N � � � W 3 W rn N 4 ij�. �3 tJ ' 3 SR 2555 — 21 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � m Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � 3 Southeast • � Extension —371 �� to —� 55 � m �'S4U� (s,$) �� SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) BUILD - DSA 10 & 11 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnston� DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 18.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) i G1 � � ` J� W� m� Southeast Extension u d' '' '— 371 — � � PM m� �o—► ss (6,9) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 , � � ,Z (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � -9 60 �— 11 4 � �7 (5,3) �i�� (A: m N z /�. � as � y � �L SR 2555 SR 1007 (Auburn- (Poole Rd) Knightdale Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I � � � `° � V c�n � —30�j�-63— PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) —517— PM 55t-10 (6,9) SR 2233 —136 — (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) 64 �_ , , .o SR 2516 � �� (Hodge Rd) 104 51 — 6�' �5 12—► 60 5� � 12—� 60 (3,1) ^' (3,1) o w -o � N � (n � � � � � O v N I �' SR 2515 1z� . . F� (Old Faison Rd) f1 Z► 551 7� �$$ PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) 0 m�� O N 112 �. � 46 t/ y SR 2233 79 PM (Smithfield Rd) � � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� o �o � � I� � Knightdale ��( ) Bypass ��64� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL Business �64` �✓. 100 '. .� 114 t� �i 62� �55 Business �64� — 658 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build - DSA 10 & 11 LEGEND $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, = Existing Roadway 35517.1.TA1 - Future Roadway COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DATE: Apri12014 DHV —► D (d,t) HNTB North Carolina, P.C. DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 pREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 PM = PM Peak Period Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 �D= Directional Split (%) LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Z� —► = Indicates Direction of D Knl htdale (�) = Duals, rr-sr�5 �i> PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure NTS 4/ = Daily Tum Movements Extension 18.6 Western Wake Freeway u 345 — PM 10 —/ 65 (6, 12) �1� �� a, � N � A o � N W O 36 �. * 46 fJ �1 3�8�' �9 — 356 — PM 10-165 (6, 12) SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) o I �� O 54 � .* 3 fJ �► 84�' �0 O I � N � W W v o � SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) — 233 — PM 1 D —► 65 (6, 12) SR 1172 (Wake County ��— Landfill Access) PM 65 �— 8 (20, 35) u Bypass o � A1� W J � � � N 47 �, �7 fJ 35� �8 0 A�� :n% V � � � � 10 �. * 24 f� y 29 — PM 7 $ 11 —► 65 (4. �) 2O � � DAILY RAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV--► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) �� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' „ = Daily Tum Movements u Bypass • 3 Southeast id . Extension — 236 � ? PM � D u 10 —� 65 I (6, 12) SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) Build - DSA 12 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 19.1 �401� 7 21 SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) o � wl� � �y3 � � SR 2753 — 44 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 11 —� 60 (3,1) Southeast � . Extension SR 2750 f� �(Norman — 11 u Blalock Rd) PM 65 �-10 2 (3.2) Matchline B � o' v O N � A rn N 281 � � PM 10 � 65 113 �0 (6, 12) � N�� , ��401 � — 204 — PM 10 � 65 (6, 12) �SR 2750 6 — �-- �,o�ss (2.1) � � 4�0 �' �9 0 w�� Cp N � � � � SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) — 171 PM 10-1 65 (6, 12) SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) U o � �l� � � o � 19 �. * 6 .� �i — 66 PM 9 —1 55 45 � 11 (2,�) o I v�� v y � � � 10 �. * 30 f� �l 171 PM —1 65 3 �4 (6, 12) 0 .� I � � .� � � � u 2O � Z DAILY TRAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No, of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' _ , = Daily Turn Movements — 19 Red Brick Rd PM Connector 10-160 (2, 1) • 3 Southeast � °1 Extension .� — 212 ''' /� PM � I � ,o � 65 ; � u (6, 12) Build - DSA 12 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 19.3 Business �� 1 104 �. * 193 � g f/ � � Business — 276 295 ��' � � 70 � PM pM � � Southeast 9-160 83�' �3 9—► 55 � o ' Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 212 U � � ,o —. (6,12) m -� N � � C1 rn o . 153 �. .� 29 f� `1 u 319 187— PM PM 60 �— 8 52 44 55 � 8 (3,2) �4,Z) 5u Matchline D $$ P�� 55 �6 91 286 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p � w�� O � � 15 �. � 3p t� `► 3� �g o � A � ' w � � rn 0 S, 2O � � DAILY TRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 64� N � QS � ,�^ ..�. .� Clayton — 314 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass � 70 � �r Build - DSA 12 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 19.4 Southeast 3 ; Extension � • S �188— 5u o� �o Pi ss (6.9) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N I v � � � � �SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) �4 65 �— 12 �2,1) N N 'Q � � i.ii v� � SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 244 PM 10 —► (6,9) Business ( 70 � � Matchline D SR 2555 (Auburn- ��17— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) INSET A I SR 2542 N v � � � (Rock Quarry Rd) m � SR 2542 ��s (Rock Quarry Rd) — 40 PM �y 65 S— 12 ��9 (z,� ) N m� v W " � A SR 5204 v � I (Old Baucom Rd) ,i � Business �70� �� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period ��, D = Directional Split ( % ) ,.� —► = Indicates Direction of D (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � = Daily Turn Movements �– SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) \ � 5 � � N W v W � � � SEE INSET A N W � � � � � � �2 2� �3 ' 3 SR 2555 —14 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � m Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � 3 Southeast • � Extension —331 �� to —� 55 � m �'S4U� (6,9) �� N I W � (� W � � � � SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build - DSA 12 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 19.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) i G1 � � ` J� W� m� Southeast Extension u d' '' '— 331 — � � PM m� �o—► ss (6,9) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 , � � ,Z (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � -9 60 �— 11 4 � �7 (5,3) �i�� (A: m N � �Z � �L SR 2555 SR 1007 (Auburn- (Poole Rd) Knightdale Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I � � � `° � V c�n � —30�j�-63— PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 (3.1) �3,1) — 459 — PM 55t-10 (6,9) SR 2233 —136 — (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 (3,2) 64 �_ , , .o SR 2516 � �� (Hodge Rd) 104 51 — 6�' �5 12—► 60 5� � 12—� 60 (3,1) ^' (3,1) o w -o � N � (n � � � � � O v N I �' SR 2515 9„ � . q� (Old Faison Rd) � � 551 9� �81 PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) 0 m�� s � o N 112 �. � 46 t/ y SR 2233 79 PM (Smithfield Rd) � � 10 � 55 (3.2) 0 rn�� o �o � � I� � Knightdale ��( ) Bypass ��64� 2O � � DAILY� RAFFICUAL Business �64` �✓. 100 '. .� 114 t� �i 62� �55 Business �64� — 658 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build - DSA 12 LEGEND $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, = Existing Roadway 35517.1.TA1 - Future Roadway COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DATE: Apri12014 DHV —► D (d,t) HNTB North Carolina, P.C. DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 pREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 PM = PM Peak Period Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 �D= Directional Split (%) LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Z� —► = Indicates Direction of D Knl htdale (�) = Duals, rr-sr�5 �i> PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure NTS 4% = Daily Tum Movements EXt21lSlOn 19.6 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s 348 — \J'+V, ; D ,� P : 65 u (6,12) u Bypass DSA1-17 SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � � �1�W �� 0 35 �. t� —212 PM 10 —► 65 177 (2,1) � �� o � i 16 �. * 46 SR 1172 � y SR 1172 (Wake County 29 56 (Old Smithfield LandfillAccess) 6s� 8 �3�. �o �� 6s Rd) (2Q35) (4,7) � Bypass SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) — 357 — PM 11� 60 �2,�) SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I i N � � � � v � I 46 �. .* 45 fJ y SR 1010 32� (Ten Ten Rd) PM 42 13 11 � 60 (2,1) DSA1-7,13-17 _`� � � � � � ` � �DSA8-12 �� — — — —�� u N I ` �� W m N ` N ` ` SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) ` SR 1152 Matchline B (Holly Springs Rd) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements No-Build STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 2�•2 � �4o�i —f— Matchline B � ._.�._._ � ,/� '1 I W � � N � � N I I I SR 1393 SR 1393 (Hilltop 76 73 � 73 (Hilltop Needmore Rd) PM h � PM PM Needmore Rd) 12�55 5 1'I' 2 12—►55 12—►55 (3,2) �3.2) I i3.2) ;�� I SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) �0 W � � � rv � V v � � 119 SR 2753 147 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 2$ 11 —1 60 (3,1) 13 �. SR 2750 �/ (Norman — 18 Blalock Rd) PM 65 �— 10 4 (3,2) Matchline D ._.�._._ I I � ' SR 2750 / 10 — (Norman PM Blalock Rd) Western 6 10 —i 65 c2��) � Wake o ` � I o I Freeway ` W �� N�� / 5u N '1' � SR 1421 m (Old Mills Rd) m � /� ` � � � _ _ _ _ DSA8-12 _ � � � o W w � N � � N � � i V v� I � I �--`--' �401� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) No-Build STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 20.3 o I SR 1006 � i �401 � N � � w (Old Stage Rd) � l � o, � ��' � � SR 2711 m V � � � '� (Vandora `� � � � `° 224 — Springs Rd) � ; � � � � PM � � �f` DSA 6 & 7 : °n � DSA6&7 13565 (�-10 ' � ;�� i � � .3 / 55 �. .� 63 ' 44 � � � —205 `/ y �gg — SR 1010 � � SR 1010 105 f/ �° PM � � PM (Ten Ten Rd) v�. �� (Ten Ten Rd) PM � �"' �,o —� so �� 53 s—►so 0 9—� 55 s� DSA 8— 17 . �3,2> �3,,� �, �3,�� i Southeast Southeast 3 ; � � ; Extension 3 L � _ _ _ DSA 1 — 5, 13_17 _ _ _ _ � � � _ _ DSA 1 — 5 ; Extension u �' � � 5U SR 1503 74 _ (Donny Brook Rd) pM 10 —► 65 (2,1) o , � N � � o . ;��a ��N I v�� o � � N I � 33 �. � 47 t� � SR 2779 78 —(Old McCullers PM Rd) 29 19 �o � s5 i�,1) � I �� V � � c�n � �4 Chandler 9 78 _ Ridge Cir PM PM 65 � 11 2�' �3 65t— 8 (2,1) i2,�) � v�-° A � � rn � ��-�, �� SR 1006 � (Old Stage Rd) s ,�' '� 9z SR 5324 f� �� SR 1010 I (Stevens —13 107 —�Cleveland Rd) Oaks Dr) 65 � �0 2`�► �o �o � so DSA 8— 12 I cz�> �3,�� I I . � . �• — . — Matchline D Wake 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL Tech Drive LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements u No-Build STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 20.4 Business j �� 475 - ( PM ' 9 � 60 (5,2) 203 �. .* 358 ' f� y ' � Business 530 �� v pM � ; � �� Southeast 15/2�r �2 s � ss � �+ —'- Extension Southeast I Extension � m i 5►4i � � N � � m � O �DSA6&7 � � � � � � � � d� � � ; DSA 8-17 � SEE « � � INSET A �' DSA 1-5 � ^-- — — � — � i I � rn � � � N � � �.. m o • u (5,3) u Matchline G . � . i . � . � / � � � � � � � �� -402- PM 9 � 65 (4,3) 205 �. .� gg fJ �1 - 442 310 - PM PM 60{— 8 109 94 55 �— 8 (3,2) (4,2) Southeast Extension � u u O I A � v w � v 0 34 � .� gp �J y 24 ♦ ♦ 106 o � A � � ia 3 W rn 0 � � � 2035 DAILYTRAFFICUAL N,�� LEGEND " o = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 �PM = PM Peak Period � � D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements �Southeast � Extension 5U / / ,� Clayton 3s�► Bypass � ��o� � � INSET A �� Clayton 510 BYPass PM ) 70 �, 9 —► 65 � (4,3) �� No-Build STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 20.5 Business SR 2700 ��" j ,- (White Oak Rd) �� - - - Southeast 3 ! Extension � � S ' � � � 5u �' � , , N 1 N .9 V � � N � N � - - - � Matc line F �9 SR 2555 P9 �� (Raynor Rd) � `� �0 65 �— 12 �2,1) v�� W :.ii DSA6&7 � I SR 2555 (Auburn- ��98— Knightdale Rd) PM 55 L— 10 (3,1) - - - - - - - - -- � � SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) ♦ DSA 8, 9, 12 - 14, 17 � � � � � � � � � � � �� I �, � A �, � A -- N N _DSA3&4,10&11,158�16 _ I_ _ _ _ � - � - DSA 5, 12, 17` �, SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) INSET A � ^' SR 2542 v�, 3 0 (Rock Quarry Rd) � � Rock Quarry Rd � Ext. to US 70 '� DSA 8 & 9 � 70 I pM �� 65 F 12 �7 (2,�) N m � C71 " � ^' SR 5204 � (Old Baucom Rd) SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) Business �0 � 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements ' 3 SR 2555 — 76 ��-! � (Auburn- 55 t— 10 �= Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 DSA 1, 2, 8, 9, 13, 14 � � � � � � ; : � Southeast ' � Extension .� �� ;= 5u DSA3-5, 10-12, ; _ _15_17 ; N I I rn � � i^' � N v c�n I SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) No-Build $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 20.6 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� � �� 2� SR 1007 (Poole Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � o I rn v � m � � c�n � ' SR 2516 (Hodge Rd) � �a �zs �. ,� '�� f� �► —31 237 �j�-343 236 PM pM � � Southeast 60 �— 11 12� �27 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 166�' �5 12 —► 60 30 7 (5,3) �3.1) �3,1) � (3,�� ro Extension N � w � -� j � �1� N �`�'� � N � � � 3 � v � 5� N� � •� m N cn I � DSA 1, 2, � 8, 9, 13, 14 ; — — — — — % — � ' / S � o A � � N I N � � � SR 2515 �68 (Old Faison Rd) DSA1-17 — — — — — — 723 �55 PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) 0 rn � U � o � � _ • � I N � O] ' � N u' � V I ��3 � � DSA 3-5, ' �; , �ss'► ,q� �oo �� 10-13,15-17 � � — — � SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) Business �64` �✓. SR 2516 (Hodge Rd) � 126— � -� "' w � o PM � 12 —� 60 v o (3,1) SR 2233 — 268 22� — SR 2233 (Smithfield Rd) PM � � PM (Smithfield Rd) 65 �— 10 30 58 10 � 55 (3,2) (3.2) 0 rn�� p o � � � � I� i 64 � Knightdale �264�( I SR 1007 �� J Bypass �_; (Poole Rd) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL 112 �. .� 153 t� �i 100� �22 Business �64� — 886 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) No-Build LEGEND $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, = Existing Roadway 35517.1.TA1 - Future Roadway COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DATE: Apri12014 DHV —► D (d,t) HNTB North Carolina, P.C. DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 pREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 PM = PM Peak Period Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 �Z D= Directional Split (%) LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass �—► = Indicates Direction of D Klll htdale �G (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure 4,� = Daily Tum Movements Extension 2�•7 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s .�—�519— � ; W , 0 � 6 5 (6.��) SR 1172 (Wake County Landfill Access) u Bypass SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) �6 �, .� as tJ y —29 54 — pM PM 65/— 8 13 8 11 —j 65 (2Q35) (4,7) 0 A 'p � �� A � u Bypass — 474 — PM 10 —► 65 (6,12) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � � � Q � O 27 �. tJ — 224 PM 10 � 65 197 (2,�) � � �� 0 � O � O zs ,�► � as � � 7�6 �' �18 SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) SR 1010 _ 281 _ (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11� 60 �2,�� — 578 — PM 10—►65 (6,12) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I i N � � � j v � I SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) — 256 — SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11 � 60 (2,1) i� — 703 � � PM � � � 10 —► 65 � D ��4U� (6,12) '- Build-DSA1&2,13&14 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 2� •2 �401� Southeast 3; sz �. * Zs Extension � • 703 tJ �1 3 � u D; 10 —► 65 , o�. ,�4, (6,12) — 716 — PM 10 —►65 (6,12 ) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) SR 1503 SR 2779 (Donny (Old Brook Rd) McCullers Rd) (Proposed (Proposed Realignment) Realignment) Chandler Ridge Cir SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) —53— PM 9 —► 55 (2,1) — 573 — PM 10—► 65 (6,12 ) SR 5324 13 — (Stevens Oaks Dr) PM 65 !— 10 (2,1) 3s �. ,� S5 SR 1006 � y Wake (Old Stage Rd) — 57 117 Tech PM PM Drive 2035 AVERAGE ANNUAL 10 � 60 16 �4 9� 55 (��) (��) DAILY TRAFFIC ��. �401j LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements o � `' I � �I �� rn � 6 �. .� 93 tJ � 2 `r' - b DSA 13 & 14 Only Red Brick Rd — 19 Connector PM 10 � 60 (2,1) � 3 Southeast • � Extension —518�s 10—�65 ;� 5u (6,12) — 104 SR 1010 PM (Cleveland Rd) 10 � 60 (3,1) u Build-DSA1&2,13&14 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 21.3 Business �� 1 149 � * 316 �g f/ � � Business — 404 472 ��•. � � 70 � PM pM � � Southeast s—►so ��2 �s s—► ss � � —'� Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; � 518 1540� W � io � U(6,12) rn�-� � � � � C1 rn 0 177 �. .� 77 f� `1 u 382 278 — PM PM 60 �— 8 91 87 55 �— 8 (3,2) (4.2) 5u Matchline C ,59 P�� 55 �6 91 495 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p j W�� N � Z� '► � 40 t� �► 5s ♦ ♦ 74 o � p � N " � N rn 0 S, 2035 DAILYTRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A 12� � � � � ^ � �� .� Clayton — 529 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass � 70 � —� Build-DSA1&2,13&14 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 21 •4 Southeast 3 ; Extension � • S � 459 — � � � PM 5\401 n; ,�—/ 55 V (6.9) INSET A SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N � � � � � � O � �SR 2555 P� �� (Raynor Rd) �6 65 �— 12 �2,1) N �1� � � N � I 32 � � 55 f� �1 8 � �6 SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 540 PM 10 —► (6,9) Business I 70 1 � Matchline C SR 2555 (Auburn- ��47— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) ^' I SR 2542 � �, � � (Rock Quarry Rd) m � �g0 — s% PM �y 65�-12 8 (�,� ) N "V� � 00 SR 5204 °� (Old Baucom Rd) 640 — PM —, 55 (6.9) Business �� , �70� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) 24 � .� 16 f� �1 12 � '� 10 N W � CO �W v � � 9 � � 33 f� y 9�' �9 N W v CO � � m � SEE INSET A N W � � � ' 3 SR 2555 — 37 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � o Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � 3 Southeast — 694 � s Extension � o � s5 � v ��540j (6,9) � _- °� SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build-DSA1&2,13&14 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 21.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� n �� 'm' 0� Southeast Extension � A � � QQ N � (f� 5u v � � � 1� ''�694� � � PM o � 10 —► 55 1�' (6.9) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 , � � ,3 (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � PM so �— i i 15� �5 (5,3) �i�w � o N I .* 30 5 �► y .� � 722 � PM 29 10 � 55 24 (6,9) * 69 b � �57 SR 2555 SR 1007 (Auburn- (Poole Rd) Knightdale Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � � O � a, � o m � N� °� 1 ��_ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) —117��-- 217 194 104 — PM PM PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 S�r �71 12 —► 60 108� 18 �2 —� 60 (3.1) �3,1) � (3,1) ^� �3,�) O (J -U j v�� N � � � � � � � � N I �' SR 2515 �sa �. ,� Sz (Old Faison Rd) � y 919 954 PM PM 55 t— 10 156 267 60 t— 10 (6,9) (6,9) 0 rn � v �a � � O N � 165 �. � 102 SR 2233 t/ y — 214 (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 16� � (3,2) — 183 — SR 2233 PM (Smithfield Rd) 10 � 55 (3.2) o � rn�� p o � N V � I� �`"j Knightdale ��( 64 � Bypass �264� 20�� DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements Business �64` �✓. 176 '. .� 168 t� �i 12`4�' �36 Business �64� —1058 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build-DSA1&2,13&14 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 21.6 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s .�—�519— � ; W , 0 � 6 5 (6.��) SR 1172 (Wake County Landfill Access) u Bypass SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) �6 �, .� as tJ y —29 54 — pM PM 65/— 8 13 8 11 —j 65 (2Q35) (4,7) 0 A 'p � �� A � u Bypass — 474 — PM 10 —► 65 (6,12) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � � � Q � O 27 �. tJ — 224 PM 10 � 65 197 (2,�) � � �� 0 � O � O zs ,�► � as � � 7�6 �' �18 SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) SR 1010 _ 281 _ (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11� 60 �2,�� — 578 — PM 10—►65 (6,12) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I i N � � � j v � I SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) — 256 — SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11 � 60 (2,1) i� — 703 � � PM � � � 10 —► 65 � D ��4U� (6,12) '- Build-DSA3&4,15&16 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 22•2 �401� Southeast 3 � sz �. ,� Zs Extension � � 703 t� �► S � ,J`+Vj D ; , � � 65 , �`�. ,�4, V (6,12) — 716 — PM 10—►65 (6,12) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) as �. .� �a t� � �' ♦ ♦ O 0 �l� � � � N I SR 1503 SR 2779 (Donny (Old Brook Rd) McCullers Rd) (Proposed (Proposed Realignment) Realignment) Chandler Ridge Cir SR1010 _53— (Ten Ten Rd) PM 9 —► 55 — 573 — PM 10-165 (6,12) SR 5324 13 — (Stevens Oaks Dr) PM 65 t— 10 (2,1) 33 ,� .�, S5 SR 1006 t� y Wake (Old Stage Rd) — 57 117 Tech PM PM Drive 2035 AVERAGE ANNUAL 10 —1 60 16 � - 24 9-1 55 (z�) (z�) DAILY TRAFFIC �� 401 � LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements u o � � v I�� y�A rn � 11 ?' � g f' y 4� � 0 �l� ' �� N 11 � .� 7 �� y 9`6 �' �5 0 j�� N 3 � � 6 �. * 93 �� y z ♦ � DSA 15 & 16 Only — 19 Red Brick Rd PM Connector 10 —► 60 (2.11 • 3 Southeast i� • � Extension —518�5 ,� P:65 'W 5,40, (6,12) � v — 104 SR 1010 PM (Cleveland Rd) 10 —► 60 (3,1) u Build-DSA3&4,15&16 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 22•3 Business �� ) 157 �. * 306 � g f/ � � Business — 404 450 � : � I � PM � � PM � � ( �� Southeast 9-160 113 �o s—► ss � � —'� Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 518 U� W � 10 —] (6,12) rn�-� � � � � C1 rn o � 177 �. .� 77 f� `1 u 382 278 — PM PM 60 �— 8 91 87 55 � 8 (3,2) �4,z) 5u Matchline C 39 P�� 55 �6 91 473 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p j W�� N � Z6 '► � 40 t� �► 5i ♦ ♦ 75 o � p � N " � N rn 0 S, 2035 DAILYTRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A 127� N ^ �� ^� �� .� Clayton — 511 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass �70; �r Build-DSA3&4,15&16 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 22•4 Southeast 3 � Extension 3 � 439 — � � � PM 5� 401 n � 10 —1 55 u (6,9) INSET A SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) as �. .� as � y 7�' � 6 N N�� ' �o N I SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) 65 �— 12 �2,1) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 467 — PM 10 —► 55 (6,9) ^' I SR 2542 V � � � (Rock Quarry Rd) � � �A? — 34 PM �� 65 F 12 ��,� ) N "�i � CO SR 5204 °� I (Old Baucom Rd) Business I 70 1 � Matchline C SR 2555 (Auburn- ��70— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) 59 �. .� 139 tJ �1 664 — PM 49 �66 io � 55 � �6�9j W � � W �' Business 1 70 ) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) 36 �. .� 19 �� s � y 10 N W � O: � � m � SEE INSET A N O� � U .p ia � CO rn � 6�� 13 y ' 3 SR 2555 — 55 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � o Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � 3 Southeast °' Extension — 672 � '' � ,� � 55 ' � ,� �4U, (6,9) � V SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build-DSA3&4,15&16 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Hoily Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 22•5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� � �� m' 0� SR 2516 (Hodge Rd) -31— PM 60�-11 (5,3) o I A � � � N � � ` � �I Southeast � � / Extension �, � � .� � � � u �I �� 10�. d tJ '' '�— 672 � � I PM O � 10 —► 55 �' (6,9) .* 65 � ♦ 34 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) a /�. � ss � y 22�' �55 SR 1007 (Poole Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � � O � a, � o m � N� °� 1 Business �64` �✓. ��_ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) � —117��-- 217 194 104 — v I� �, PM PM PM PM + A 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 S�r �71 12 —► 60 108 18 12 —� 60 � (3.1) �3,1) � (3,1) ^� �3,�) O (J -U j v�� N � I � � rn �y� � N I �' SR 2515 18�� „Z (Old Faison Rd) � — 953 954 PM PM 55 t— 10 183 269 60 t— 10 (6,9) (6,9) 0 rn � � � � � o N 165 �. � 102 SR 2233 — 2�4 t/ y 183 — SR 2233 (Smithfield Rd) PM � � PM (Smithfield Rd) 65 �— 10 16 48 10 � 55 (3,2) (3.2) o � rn�� cp o � N V � I� 64 � Knightdale �264�( ) Bypass �_� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements 176 '. .� 168 t� �i 12`4�' �36 Business �64� —1058 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build-DSA3&4,15&16 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 22•6 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s .�—�519— � ; W , 0 � 6 5 (6.��) SR 1172 (Wake County Landfill Access) u Bypass SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) �6 �, .� as tJ y —29 54 — pM PM 65/— 8 13 8 11 —j 65 (2Q35) (4,7) 0 A 'p � �� A � u Bypass — 474 — PM 10 —► 65 (6,12) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � � � Q � O 27 �. tJ — 224 PM 10 � 65 197 (2,�) � � �� 0 � O � O zs ,�► � as � � 7�6 �' �18 SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) SR 1010 _ 281 _ (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11� 60 �2,�� — 578 — PM 10—►65 (6,12) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I i N � � � j v � I SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) — 256 — SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11 � 60 (2,1) i� — 703 � � PM � � � 10 —► 65 � D ��4U� (6,12) '- Build — DSA 5 & 17 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 23•2 �401� Southeast 3 � sz �. ,� zs Extension � ' 703 f/ \� �� \�`+uj D � to —► 65 10� �41 �� (6,12) — 716 — PM 10—►65 (6,12) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) as �. � 1a � `1 79`� � 0 ;�� N �, , N I SR 1503 SR 2779 (Donny (Old Brook Rd) McCullers Rd) (Proposed (Proposed Realignment) Realignment) Chandler Ridge Cir SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) — PM — 9 —1 55 (2.11 — 573 — PM 10 —�► 65 (6,12) SR 5324 13 — (Stevens Oaks Dr) PM 65 !— 10 (2,1) 3s �, ♦ $s SR 1006 f� y Wake (Old Stage Rd) — 57 117 Tech PM PM Drive 2 0 3 5 io � so �s �a 9� 55 AVERAGE ANNUAL (z�) (z,�) DAILY TRAFFIC �401 �� LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements u o � � �1�� A rn � 11 � � 6 f� y 4� � 0 ;�� A � � rn cn 11 �. * 7 f� � 96� �5 DSA 17 _ 19 Red Brick Rd PM Connector 10 � 60 (2.11 • 3 Southeast id Extension —518�� 10—►65 �� 5� (6,12) � — 104 SR 1010 PM (Cleveland Rd) 10 � 60 (3,1) u Build — DSA 5 & 17 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 23.3 Business �� ) 149 � * 316 �g f/ � � Business — 404 472 � : � I � PM � � PM � � ( �� Southeast 9-160 ��2 13 s—► ss � � —'� Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 518 U� W � 10 —] (6,12) rn�-� � � � � C1 rn o � 177 �. .� 77 f� `1 u 382 278 — PM PM 60 �— 8 91 87 55 �— 8 (3,2) (4.2) 5u Matchline C ,q.3 P�� 55 �6 91 489 PM —1 65 (4,3) u o I A 'p j W�� N � � Z6 '► � 40 t� �► 5L - ♦ 74 o � p � N " � N rn 0 S, 2035 DAILYTRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A Southeast Extension 5u � � 13� � � � � ^ � �� .� Clayton — 525 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Clayton Bypass �70; �r Build — DSA 5 & 17 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 23.4 Southeast 3 ; Extension � • S � 443 — � � � PM 5\401 n; ,�—/ 55 V (6.9) Business SR 2700 �� f SR 2542 (White Oak Rd) �� (Rock Quarry Rd) IMatchline C_ I N � � � � � � � � �SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) �1 65 �— 12 �2,1) N �1� � �W � I 32 � � � 46 f� �1 �� 3 SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 502 PM 10 —► (6,9) SR 2555 �° (Auburn- ��54— � I� � Knightdale Rd) PM �� W 10—►55 (3 1) INSET A I SR 2542 N ; � � o (Rock Quarry Rd) rn � �� SR 2542 _ 65 (Rock Quarry Rd) PM �-y 65 /— 12 ?8 (�,� ) N W � � j SR 5204 �' I (Old Baucom Rd) Business �� 70 � �„_ 32 A► .� 23 � 3 �/ y � SR 2555 48 ��-! � (Auburn- a yi � 1D —1 55 � o Knightdale Rd) �4 2� 1 N W v Oi �o m � SEE INSET A N r v�� c� �, � � � m N z� � Ss � � Southeast ~ 637 � s Extension $�r �$ 10 � 55 ! O �� 4U� N �6,9) � .� ;1�� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build — DSA 5 & 17 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnston� DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 23.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� � �� m' 0� Southeast Extension u 3' � � = 637 � m � PM v� io—� s5 4� (6,9) SR 2516 (Hodge Rd) -31— PM 60�-11 (5,3) SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) f �8 25�' �55 SR 1007 (Poole Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � � O � a, � o m � N� °� 1 Business �64` �✓. ��_ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) � —117��-- 217 194 104 — v I� �, PM PM PM PM + A 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 S�r �71 12 —► 60 108 18 12 —� 60 � (3.1) �3,1) � (3,1) ^� �3,�) O (J -U j v�� N � I � � rn �y� � N I �' SR 2515 �sz �. ,� S3 (Old Faison Rd) � y —891 954 PM PM 55 t— 10 133 265 60 t— 10 (6,9) (6,9) 0 m � � � � � o N 165 �. � 102 SR 2233 — 2�4 t/ y 183 — SR 2233 (Smithfield Rd) PM � � PM (Smithfield Rd) 65 �— 10 16 48 10 � 55 (3,2) (3.2) o � rn�� p o � N V � I� 64 � Knightdale �264�( ) Bypass �_� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements 176 '. .� 168 t� �i 12`4�' �36 Business �64� —1058 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build — DSA 5 & 17 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 23.6 Western Wake ; � Freeway; s .�—�514— � ; W , 0 � 6 5 (6.��) SR 1172 (Wake County Landfill Access) u Bypass SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Rd) �6 �, .� as tJ y —29 54 — pM PM 65/— 8 13 8 11 —j 65 (2Q35) (4,7) 0 A 'p � �� u Bypass — 488 — PM 10 —► 65 (6,12) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) � I N � � � � � � O 14 �. f� — 237 PM 10 � 65 223 (2,�) � � � � � � V � O 31 �► � 89 <J � 77�' �06 SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) SR 1152 (Holly Springs Rd) SR 1010 _ 282 — (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11� 60 �2,�� — 575 — PM 10—►65 (6,12) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements SR 1386 (Graham Newton Rd) N I i r:� v V � O v � I 16 �. .* 44 fJ `1 69 �' �7 N � N � � � � � � 50 �. � 59 f� y 28 � �7 SR 1386 (Bells Lake Rd) — 25$ — SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) PM 11 � 60 (2,1) i� —613�� PM � � � 10 —► 65 � D ��4U� (6,12) '- Build - DSA 6 & 7 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 24•2 Southeast 3 ; Extension � ; 613 — 3 - \J`�V, D ; ,� � 65 u �6,,2� SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) �4015 110 �. .� 23 t� � 102 �' �67 — 591 — PM 10 � 65 (6,12 ) 49 �. * 55 / - 147 f 170 - PM PM 9—► 55 24 �1 9-1 60 (3,2) (3,1) � v�� O � N � N �401� �� SR 1010 (Ten Ten Rd) SR 1006 (Old Sti ge Rd) 0 N � N .' ,1 � � o * 23 y 185 (Proposed Realignment) PM 162 65 �— io � c3��) Vandora V �, � o Springs °' Buffaloe Rd 0 11a � ,� �2s Rd � �� 648 PM 13 58 io —► 65 (6,12 ) 0 N � �% � � o I SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway #M# = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 � PM = PM Peak Period `` D = Directional Split ( % ) l� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's (%) NTS ' �� = Daily Turn Movements U u ' 3 Southeast i� � � Extension — 582 � ? 10�65 �W rJ�4�j (6,12) -� Build - DSA 6 & 7 STIP: R27�1, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 24.3 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) . � Matchline C _.�_._ � � A �` � (,J N I � V 0 9 �. I� 10 SR 2542 t/ y (Rock — 89 Quarry Rd) �z P i ss z`s�r �a (3,1) SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 158 .* 318 Business y 444 498 � 7O � PM PM 9—► 60 159�' �3 9—] 55 (5,2) � (5,3) � rn I � � � � � W rn 0 Southeast � ; ss �. .� 132 Extension � ' f� y � s � 582 648 � i PM PM �5401 W i 10 � 65 109 � 1 � 0—► 60 u (6,12) �6.9) � , �� , N � N W � .(� 3s� \, Clayton 386 Bypass PM � 49 9 � 65 � %Q � CO (4,3) � � � � � � N o I �,;� - 89 — 12 —1 65 �3.1) Southeast Extension u Matchline C � ( rn � y m � � O ' - 148 - PM 12—►65 (3,1) - 403 - PM 9 —155 (5,3) 2035 DAILYTRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements 50 — SR 5204 pM (Old Baucom Rd) 44 12 —► 65 �� (6,3) �s N I N '9 � � � � N �4 SR 2542 PM (Rock Quarry Rd) � 12 —� 65 n� (6,3) ��.� � RockQuarry �; I Rd Extension 3� .� 54 BUSI11@SS y 454 PM � �� 9 —► 55 � (5,3) Build-DSA6&7 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 24.4 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) 3� m� n �� 'm' C> � Southeast Extension � A � QQ N � � 5u v � � ; ZZ �, 01 f� ?�737� � � PM (� i 10 —► 55 19 �' (6.9) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 , � � ,3 (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � PM so �— i i 19� �3 (5,3) �i�w � N N I .* 30 15 * 65 y b � 755 �9 io � 55 28�' 163 (6,9) SR 2555 SR 1007 (Auburn- (Poole Rd) Knightdale Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � � O � a, � o m � N� °� 1 ��_ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) —111��-- 217 194 103 — PM PM PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 S�r �1 12 —► 60 109� 18 �2 —� 60 (3.1) �3,1) (3,1) n� i3�1) o � rn � � N�.� V � � 3 V N �' SR 2515 �a7 �. � Ss (Old Faison Rd) � y 940 933 PM PM 55 /— 10 ��$ ZZZ 60 t— 10 (6,9) (6.9) 0 rn � v �a o � N� rn N � 161 �. � 97 SR 2233 t/ y — 222 (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 16� � (3,2) _ � �g _ SR 2233 PM (Smithfield Rd) 10 � 55 (3.2) o � rn�� p o � � � I� �`"j Knightdale ��( 64 � Bypass �264� 20�� DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements Business �64` �✓. 153 '. .� 148 t� �i 10� �17 Business �64� —1044 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build — DSA 6 & 7 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 24.5 Western Wake Freeway u 718 — PM 10 —/ 65 (6, 12) �1� �� m 'p o �� m O 46 �. * 92 fJ �1 111 �8 — 731 — PM 10 —1 65 (6, 12) SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) o � � ,� � W � N � � O 7r � 171�' �0 SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) — 526 — PM 1 D —► 65 (6, 12) SR 1172 (Wake County 29— Landfill Access) PM 65 �— 8 (20, 35) u Bypass o � A1�� J � � � N 64 �, �1 fJ 79� �7 16 �. * 46 f� y 54 — PM 13 8 ��—►ss (4. �) 2035 DAILY RAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV--► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) �� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' „ = Daily Tum Movements u Bypass • 3 Southeast id . Extension —511 �? PM � D u 10 —� 65 I (6, 12) SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) Build — DSA 8 & 9 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 25.1 �401� 7 `� 49 SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) o � w � w N 3 N ..., � SR 2753 — 131 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 11 —� 60 (3,1) Southeast �2 � Extension SR 2750 f� �(Norman — 18 u Blalock Rd) PM 65 �-10 5 (3.2) Matchline B � (a � W N � W W � 9� � 683 PM 10 � 65 128 �2 (6, 12) � w�� A N � O � . ��401 � — 508 — PM 10 � 65 (6, 12) SR 2750 U 2� * SR 1010 �► Red Brick Rd (Ten Ten Rd) —$s P9 Connector 9—►55 5�' � 10—►60 (2,1) (2. 1) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) — 420 PM 10-165 (6, 12) o I `�� o � � rn � „ �. .� Si � y 420 PM —> 65 21 � 68 (6. 12) 0 v �� N � 'P rn �� 2035 DAILYTRAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No, of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' _ , = Daily Turn Movements u � � Southeast • � Extension —493�� PM ' � u i o —► ss i (6. 12) Build—DSA8&9 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 25.3 Business �° S 139 � * 309 � �/ y � Business — 426 4 �3 ��•. � � � � Southeast s—►so �2s�► �s s—► ss � m ' Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 493 U �� (6.12) m � � � � W rn 0 174 �. .� 72 f� `1 u 375 268 — PM PM 60 �— 8 82 77 55 �— 8 (3,2) (4.2) 5u Matchline D ;29 P�� 55 �6 91 466 PM —1 65 (4,3) u O I A 'p j W � � ' � 34 �. � 45 t� `► 48 � �p o � A � j " � N rn 0 S, 2035 DAILYTRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 11� N N 63. � � ^ W .� Clayton — 501 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass �70; �r Build-DSA8&9 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 25.4 Southeast 3 ; Extension � • S � 429 — 5u o� �o Pi ss (6.9) INSET A SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) N � � � � � � V � �SR 2555 P� �� (Raynor Rd) �8 65 �— 12 �2,1) N �1� � � W � I SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 515 PM 10 —► (6,9) Business I 70 1 � Matchline E SR 2555 (Auburn- ��50— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) ^' I SR 2542 � �, � �`°„ (Rock Quarry Rd) m � �`�9 — 63 PM �y 65�-12 (�,� ) N "V� � °' SR 5204 °� (Old Baucom Rd) 625 — PM —, 55 (6.9) Business �� , �70� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) 24 � .� 11 f� �1 12 � '� 9 N W � CO 3 A v � � � �2 8`�' �3 N W � CO � � m � SEE INSET A N W � � Qi �3 °: SR 2555 — 34 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � � Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � � Southeast • � Extension — 694 ' ? 10 � 55 ! �t �4U (6.9) � � °� SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build — DSA 8 & 9 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 25.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) �! iN � n . / S �7 � N' �� Southeast Extension � A � � QQ N � y 5u v � � ' Zo �. f� s�694� � � PM 'n i 10 —► 55 1�' (6.9) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) SR 2516 „ � � ,3 (Hodge Rd) ` �� C � PM so �— i i 15� �4 (5,3) �i�w � w N I .(� so s /�. � 720 � PM 29 10 � 55 24 (6,9) � ss � �57 SR 2555 SR 1007 (Auburn- (Poole Rd) Knightdale Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � � O � � � � Q � � N c�n � ��_ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) —114��-- 222 190 99 — PM PM PM PM 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 Sq��r �65 12 —► 60 109� 18 �2 —� 60 (3.1) �3,1) � (3,1) ^� �3,�) O (J -U j v�� N � � � � v � � � N I �' SR 2515 ��Q . . qz (Old Faison Rd) f1 Z► 914 922 PM PM 55 t— 10 150 245 60 t— 10 (6,9) (6,9) 0 m j U � O � ' � N � 165 �. � 99 SR 2233 t/ y — 218 (Smithfield Rd) PM 65 �— 10 16� � (3,2) _ � �� _ SR 2233 PM (Smithfield Rd) 10 � 55 (3.2) o � rn�� p � � N � I� �`"j Knightdale ��( 64 � Bypass �264� 20�� DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements Business �64` �✓. 167 '. .� 168 t� �i 122� �36 Business �64� —1037 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build — DSA 8 & 9 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 25.6 Western Wake Freeway u 718 — PM 10 —/ 65 (6, 12) �1� �� m 'p o �� m O 46 �. * 92 fJ �1 111 �8 — 731 — PM 10 —1 65 (6, 12) SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) o � � ,� � W � N � � O 7r � 171�' �0 SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) — 526 — PM 1 D —► 65 (6, 12) SR 1172 (Wake County 29— Landfill Access) PM 65 �— 8 (20, 35) u Bypass o � A1�� J � � � N 64 �, �1 fJ 79� �7 16 �. * 46 f� y 54 — PM 13 8 ��—►ss (4. �) 2035 DAILY RAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV--► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) �� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' „ = Daily Tum Movements u Bypass • 3 Southeast id . Extension —511 �? PM � D u 10 —� 65 I (6, 12) SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) Build - DSA 10 & 11 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 26.1 �401� 7 `� 49 SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) o � w � w N 3 N ..., � SR 2753 — 131 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 11 —� 60 (3,1) Southeast �2 � Extension SR 2750 f� �(Norman — 18 u Blalock Rd) PM 65 �-10 5 (3.2) Matchline B � (a � W N � W W � 9� � 683 PM 10 � 65 128 �2 (6, 12) � w�� A N � O � . ��401 � — 508 — PM 10 � 65 (6, 12) SR 2750 U 2� * SR 1010 �► Red Brick Rd (Ten Ten Rd) —$s P9 Connector 9—►55 5�' � 10—►60 (2,1) (2. 1) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) — 420 PM 10-165 (6, 12) o I `�� o � � rn � „ �. .� Si � y 420 PM —> 65 21 � 68 (6. 12) 0 v �� N � 'P rn �� 2035 DAILYTRAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No, of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' _ , = Daily Turn Movements u � � Southeast • � Extension —493�� PM ' � u i o —► ss i (6. 12) Build - DSA 10 & 11 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 26.3 Business �� 1 157 �. * 298 � g f/ � � Business — 426 451 ��•. � ) �� Pm PM � „ ( Southeast 9-160 �2s�► �2 s—► ss � o —'� Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 493 U � � ,o —> (6,12) m � � � � W rn o � 174 �. .� 72 f� `1 u 375 268— PM PM 60 �— 8 82 77 55 � 8 (3,2) �4,z) 5u Matchline D .10 P�� 55 �6 91 453 PM —1 65 (4,3) u O I A 'p j W � � ' � � Z9 '► � 44 t� �► 46 � �g o � A � j " � N rn 0 S, 2035 DAILYTRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 111� N � ss � � ^,� W .� Clayton — 490 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass � 70 � —� Build - DSA 10 & 11 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 26.4 Southeast 3 � Extension 3 � 410 — � � � PM 5� 401 � � 10 —1 55 u (6,9) INSET A SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) 37 �. .* 43 �� y ♦ ♦ 3$ N N�� ' �� N I SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) 65 �— 12 �2,1) SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 445 PM 10 —► (6,9) Business I 70 1 � Matchline D SR 2555 (Auburn- ��74— Knightdale Rd) PM 10—►55 (3,1) ^' I SR 2542 V � � � (Rock Quarry Rd) � � �A? — 33 PM �� 65 F 12 8 ��,� ) N "�i � � SR 5204 °� I (Old Baucom Rd) 648 — PM —► 55 cs,s� W � � � �' Business 1 70 ) 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 2542 (Rock Quarry Rd) 38 �. .� 15 �� s �' � N W � Oi � V m � SEE INSET A N O� � U (i1 ia � O rn � 5�� 23 y ' 3 SR 2555 — 51 ��-! � (Auburn- 1D —1 55 � m Knightdale Rd) (4,2) 1 � 3 Southeast • � Extension —673�� io —� ss � m �'S4U� (6,9) � -� SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build - DSA 10 & 11 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnstonl DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Hoily Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 26.5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) � G1 � � �� W� m� SR 2516 (Hodge Rd) -31— PM 60�-11 (5,3) o I A 'p � N � N `� o Southeast � � / Extension �, � � .� � � � u �I � � 10 �. tJ ? ',�— 673 � � I PM ITI ; 10 —► 55 �' (6,9) SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) a /�. � ss � y 22�' �52 SR 1007 (Poole Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � � O � � � � Q � � N c�n � Business �64` �✓. ��_ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) � —114��-- 222 190 99 — � -� °" �1� � PM PM PM PM N 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 Sq��r �65 12 —► 60 109 18 �2 —� 60 � (3.1) �3,1) � (3,1) ^� �3,�) O (J -U j v�� N � I � � � �y� � N I �' SR 2515 �sa �. ,� 1Oo (Old Faison Rd) — 948 � y 922 PM PM 55 t— 10 175 243 60 t— 10 (6,9) (6,9) 0 m j � � o � � � a° 165 99 SR 2233 _ 218 � � �� _ SR 2233 (Smithfield Rd) PM � � PM (Smithfield Rd) 65 �— 10 16 41 10 � 55 (3,2) (3.2) o � rn�� cp � � N � I� 64 � Knightdale �264�( ) Bypass �_� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements 167 '. .� 168 t� �i 122� �36 Business �64� —1037 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build - DSA 10 & 11 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 26.6 Western Wake Freeway u 718 — PM 10 —/ 65 (6, 12) �1� �� m 'p o �� m O 46 �. * 92 fJ �1 111 �8 — 731 — PM 10 —1 65 (6, 12) SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) o � � ,� � W � N � � O 7r � 171�' �0 SR 1153 (Old Holly Springs- Apex Rd) — 526 — PM 1 D —► 65 (6, 12) SR 1172 (Wake County 29— Landfill Access) PM 65 �— 8 (20, 35) u Bypass o � A1�� J � � � N 64 �, �1 fJ 79� �7 16 �. * 46 f� y 54 — PM 13 8 ��—►ss (4. �) 2035 DAILY RAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV--► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) �� N� —► = Indicates Direction of D \� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' „ = Daily Tum Movements u Bypass • 3 Southeast id . Extension —511 �? PM � D u 10 —� 65 I (6, 12) SR 1172 (Old Smithfield Rd) Build - DSA 12 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 27•� �401� 7 `� 49 SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) o � w � w N 3 N ..., � SR 2753 — 131 — (Dwight PM Rowland Rd) 11 —� 60 (3,1) Southeast �2 � Extension SR 2750 f� �(Norman — 18 u Blalock Rd) PM 65 �-10 5 (3.2) Matchline B � (a � W N � W W � 9� � 683 PM 10 � 65 128 �2 (6, 12) � w�� A N � O � . ��401 � — 508 — PM 10 � 65 (6, 12) SR 2750 U 2� * SR 1010 �► Red Brick Rd (Ten Ten Rd) —$s P9 Connector 9—►55 5�' � 10—►60 (2,1) (2. 1) SR 1006 (Old Stage Rd) — 420 PM 10-165 (6, 12) o I `�� o � � rn � „ �. .� Si � y 420 PM —> 65 21 � 68 (6. 12) 0 v �� N � 'P rn �� 2035 DAILYTRAFFIC AL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No, of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV—► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS ' _ , = Daily Turn Movements u � � Southeast • � Extension —493�� PM ' � u i o —► ss i (6. 12) Build - DSA 12 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 27•3 Business �� 1 139 � * 309 � g f/ � � Business — 426 473 ��•. � � 70 � PM pM � m Southeast 9-160 128�' �5 9—► 55 � o ' Extension (5,2) (5,3) Southeast � ; Extension s ; 493 U � � ,o —> (6,12) m � � � � W rn o � 174 �. .� 72 f� `1 u 375 268— PM PM 60 �— 8 82 77 55 �— 8 (3,2) (4.2) 5u Matchline D .1� P�� 55 �6 91 467 PM —1 65 (4,3) u O I A 'p j W � � ' � � 33 �. � 45 t� `► 4� �p o � A � j " � N rn 0 S, 2035 DAILYTRAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway --------- = FutureRoadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period D = Directional Split ( % ) � N —► = Indicates Direction of D � (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % � NTS ' � � = Daily Turn Movements Southeast Extension u INSET A � 111� � N 6S � � ^� W .� Clayton — 504 BYpass PM 9 —►65 70 � (4,3) �- Southeast Extension 5u Clayton Bypass � 70 � �r Build - DSA 12 STIP: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass (Knightdale) PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 27•4 Southeast 3 ; Extension � • 5�414— 5u o� �o Pi ss (6.9) Business SR 2700 �� f SR 2542 (White Oak Rd) �� (Rock Quarry Rd) IMatchline D_ I N � � � � � � V � �SR 2555 PM �� (Raynor Rd) �0 65 �— 12 �2,1) N �1� � �W � I Z�T�1 9 �� 4 SR 2700 (White Oak Rd) — 479 PM 10 —► (6,9) SR 2555 �° (Auburn- ��57— � I� � Knightdale Rd) PM �� O 10—►55 (3 1) INSET A I SR 2542 N ; � � � (Rock Quarry Rd) rn � ��A SR 2542 _ 62 (Rock Quarry Rd) PM �-y 65 /— 12 ?8 (�,� ) N W ,� � N SR 5204 �' I (Old Baucom Rd) Business �� 70 � �„_ 35 �. .� 19 � 3 �/ y � SR 2555 44 ��-! � (Auburn- a yi � 1D —1 55 � m Knightdale Rd) �4 2� 1 N W v �TI �� m � SEE INSET A N j1 w � (}1 � � N � rn N z� � a� � 3 Southeast � • � Extension 638 � ? g� �3 � o� ss ! m � N (6,9) I ;1�� .� �� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements SR 5204 (Old Baucom Rd) Build - DSA 12 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: ^37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, COUNTY: Wake/Johnston� DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 2�•5 SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) � G1 � � �� W� m� Southeast Extension u �� = 638 � m � PM RI � 10 —► 55 4� (6,9) SR 2516 (Hodge Rd) -31— PM 60�-11 (5,3) SR 2555 (Auburn- Knightdale Rd) SR 1007 (Poole Rd) f �8 25�' �53 SR 1007 (Poole Rd) � 64 � K Bypassle � 264 � � O � � � � Q � � N c�n � Business �64` �✓. ��_ � � „$ SR 2516 f 1� �� (Hodge Rd) � —114��-- 222 190 99 — � -� °" �1� � PM PM PM PM N 65 E— 12 65 t— 12 Sq��r �65 12 —► 60 109 18 �2 —� 60 � (3.1) �3,1) � (3,1) ^� �3,�) O (J -U j v�� N � I � � � �y� � N I �' SR 2515 �s�. q� (Old Faison Rd) � —886 922 PM PM 55 t— 10 135 230 60 t— 10 (6,9) (6,9) 0 m j � � o � � � a° 165 99 SR 2233 _ 218 � � �� _ SR 2233 (Smithfield Rd) PM � � PM (Smithfield Rd) 65 �— 10 16 41 10 � 55 (3,2) (3.2) o � rn�� p � � N � I� 64 � Knightdale �264�( ) Bypass �_� 2035 DAILY� RAFFICUAL LEGEND = Existing Roadway - - - - - - - - - = Future Roadway ### = No. of Vehicles Per Day in 100s PM DHV —► D (d,t) DHV = Design Hourly Volume = K30 PM = PM Peak Period �� D = Directional Split ( % ) Z —► = Indicates Direction of D �G� (d,t) = Duals, TT-ST's ( % ) NTS � � = Daily Turn Movements 167 '. .� 168 t� �i 122� �36 Business �64� —1037 — . � PM 60 t— 10 (6.9) Build - DSA 12 $T�P: R2721, R-2828, R-2829 WBS: 37673.1.TA2, 35516.1.TA1, 35517.1.TA1 COUNTY: Wake/Johnston DIVISION: 5/4 DATE: Apri12014 HNTB North Carolina, P.C. PREPARED BY: 343 East Six Forks Rd Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 LOCATION: NC 55 Bypass (Holly Springs) to US 64 Bypass Kni htdale PROJECT: Triangle Expressway Southeast Figure Extension 2�•6 Appendix B- Trianqle Reqional Model Study Area Network 2(�'I� Na-Quild TRI�I �letw�rk 24"12 hJ�-Build TRI� Netv�uc�rk ��12 DSAs� 1& 2 Buil�! TRM Netuvc�rk ��12 DSAs� �& 4 Buil�! TRM Netuvc�rk 2�]'I� []Sl� a� Build TRI�1 Netr�rc��k �� 2012 DSAs 6& 7 Build TRM Network 2012 DSAs 8& 9 Build TRM Network 243� hJ�-Build TRI� Netv�uc�rk ��35 DSAs� 1& 2 Buil�! TRM Netuvc�rk ��35 DSAs� �& 4 Buil�! TRM Netuvc�rk 243a D��4 � Build TRM Netv+uc�rk �� 2035 DSAs 6& 7 Build TRM Network �� 2035 DSAs 8& 9 Build TRM Network Appendix C- NCDOT Historic AADT Linear Reqression Charts AADT TREND ANALYSIS 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 #1 -- AUBURN KNIGHTDALE RD (SR 2555) N OF ROCK QUARRY RD (SR 2542) 0 ' i , 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG �— EXP REG —�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 1- AUBURN KNIGHTDALE RD (SR 2555) N OF ROCK ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT VRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2003 3600 7005 3300 Z007 Z800 2009 290C FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 2433 ?_51�. Z55G 260i 161J 1951 1033 1629 450 13u1 -133 1136 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL -117 -3.5% -130 -4.0% 0.8244 0.8139 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 4 �inear Reg 2240 2370 1330 680 30 -620 exp keg 2358 2i56 1774 144 3 llsl 964 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 ' , 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 2- CLEVELAND SCHOOL RD (SR 1010) E OF NC 50 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #2 -- CLEVELAND SCHOOL RD (SR 1010) E OF NC 50 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2005 5900 7007 6100 Z009 6000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 67_0� 61_0? G075 6076 6275 6284 6-^:0� 6417 6525 655� c�so 6�� STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 25 0.4% 25 0.4% 0.2500 0.2542 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg 6150 6125 6325 6�k50 6575 6700 exp keg 6153 6127 6336 6471 660� 6748 AADT TREND ANALYSIS `P�IPI17 10000 8000 6000 4000 `��I�I�7 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 3- E GARNER RD (SR 1004) W OF I-40 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION 0 LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #3 -- E GARNER RD (SR 1004) W OF I-40 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. 3500 i993 4400 1995 5100 1998 5Ei0C ?_OGI 7000 2003 6F�00 2005 6500 ?007 5800 Z009 4300 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 4478 450:p_ �^',3 d4�C Wib'9 4876 5011 5163 5233 54u7 5^�6 5789 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 44 1.2% 91 1.8% 0.2246 0.2429 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 6�Q2 6511 7236 7689 8142 859� exp keg 6714 6592 7629 8359 915� 10034 AADT TREND ANALYSIS [Ci1I1Z1I17 25000 20000 15000 10000 4�II1I17 #4 -- FANNY BROWN RD (SR 2723) S OF TEN—TEN RD (SR 1010) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 4- FANNY BROWN RD (SR 2723) S OF TEN-TEN RD ( ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. 1500 i993 2100 1995 2300 1998 290C ?_OGI 3700 2003 4�100 2005 4100 ?007 4900 Z009 4400 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 5U44 5589 %R883 52��F 6172 8493 6978 11�452 7783 15�142 b5e9 2082Z STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 161 6.2% 180 6.3% 0.9493 0.9231 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg �63� 5�453 6895 7793 8695 �59? exp keg 6781 6352 10372 14050 19032 25782 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 ' , 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 5- HODGE RD (SR 2516) N OF US 64 BYP ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #5 -- HODGE RD (SR 2516) N OF US 64 BYP HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2005 G400 7007 6300 Z009 6600 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc Avg nnn Rate 6�� 6806 6750 675� 7150 7183 740� 746h 7650 7757 790D 8061 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 50 0.8% 50 0.8% 0.4286 0.4228 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg 6�3; 6633 7085 73�3 7585 %53? exp keg 6736 665� 7109 7387 7677 7978 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #6 -- HODGE RD (SR 2516) S OF FAISON RIDGE LANE (SR 2515) 0 ' � ' , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 6- HODGE RD (SR 2516) S OF FAISON RIDGE LANE ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. 3700 i993 4100 1_995 4600 1998 5i0C ?_OGI 5200 2003 5F�00 2005 5700 ?007 8500 Z009 9200 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 1U422 11.264 10117 � 07Cf3 12561 16052 14089 2067� 15617 26u26 1%i44 3429Z STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 306 5.2% 268 4.6% 0.8163 0.8898 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg ais� 8921 ll064 12404 13743 15082 exp keg qs3� 9i0� 13499 169?0 21209 26585 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 #7 -- HODGE RD (SR 2516) 5 OF POOLE RD (SR 1007) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 7- HODGE RD (SR 2516) S OF POOLE RD (SR 1007) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. 1900 i993 7_600 1995 1500 1998 150C ?_OGI 1500 2003 �..400 2005 1200 ?007 1200 Z009 1400 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 1259 1308 lsl7 �3�1 1094 1162 956 1067 817 980 678 901 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL -28 -1.7% -28 -1.8% 0.7006 0.6995 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg i110 113b 914 775 635 496 exp keg ➢.14� 1167 1006 917 835 761 AADT TREND ANALYSIS KIIZIPIIII] 250000 200000 150000 100000 :YiI�I�I�I 0 ' � , 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG � EXP REG —�+—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 8- I-40 FROM EXIT 303 TO EXIT 306 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #8 -- I-40 FROM EXIT 303 TO EXIT 306 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT .199� 5�000 1_994 57G00 1995 59000 1996 6b000 1998 70000 l9�)9 7300G 2000 7i000 ?001 81000 Z002 83000 2UO3 82000 2004 58000 2005 86000 2006 91000 2007 �3000 Z008 87000 z009 94000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 1U4500 1�8996 101875 105036 122875 141222 1�6000 169923 149iL5 204458 1FiZZ50 246011 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 2625 3.8% 2525 3.5% 0.9400 0.9146 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 16 �inear Reg i071�5 1G4581 124780 137405 150029 1GZ654 exp keg ➢_14�4� 5 v 110570 145767 173250 205914 244737 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 ' � , 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG � EXP REG —�+—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 10- I-40 FROM EXIT 306 TO EXIT 312 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #10 -- I-40 FROM EXIT 306 TO EXIT 312 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L99� ?%000 1_994 28G00 1995 33000 1996 ?5000 1998 40000 ?.99g q600G 2000 46000 ?001 49000 Z002 51000 2003 49000 2005 53000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc Avg nnn Rate 7U333 83090 68167 78549 8551�0 123145 96333 163103 107167 216028 11H00� 2861Z5 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 2167 5.8% 2343 6.2% 0.9447 0.9199 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 11 �inear Reg 74993 7Z6�0 91398 103115 114833 126550 exp keg 95268 89725 144942 195601 263965 356223 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 �; � 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs �— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG � EXP REG --r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 11- I-40 FROM EXIT 309 TO EXIT 312 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #11 -- I-40 FROM EXIT 309 TO EXIT 312 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 200L 5.1.000 7003 49G00 Z004 52000 2005 53000 ?_OGG 56000 2007 ;800G 2008 51000 ?009 55000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 57286 57�I7_� S�il�a s�sc� c>lza, �Z�z� 6^:143 65361 6700G 68983 69857 72805 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 571 1.1% 702 1.3% 0.3295 0.3341 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 8 �inear Reg 58393 57690 63310 66821 70333 73845 exp keg 55585 57815 64270 68665 73360 78376 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 160000 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 ' � , 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG � EXP REG —�+—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 12- I-40 FROM EXIT 312 TO EXIT 319 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #12 -- I-40 FROM EXIT 312 TO EXIT 319 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT .199� 23000 1_994 23G00 1996 29000 1998 ?�;000 1999 36000 2000 3900G 2001 40000 ?002 42000 Z003 38000 2U04 41000 2005 �3000 2006 44000 2007 45000 2003 4�000 Z009 44000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 19250 51.747 ��7938 49�91 55438 68729 65000 8417� 71563 103090 iSi7_5 126257 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 1313 4.1% 1363 4.1% 0.8584 0.8224 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 15 �inear Reg 53043 51680 62581 69394 7G207 83020 exp keg 58332 56009 77521 94932 116376 142590 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 13- I-540 FROM EXIT 24 TO EXIT 26 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #13 -- I-540 FROM EXIT 24 TO EXIT 26 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 200i 38000 7008 39G00 Z009 40000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 140�0 q4>2:L �30�0 43199 51000 53037 56000 6029� 61000 68543 66000 77921 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 1000 2.6% 1000 2.6% 1.0000 0.9999 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg 4�i�OC? 43000 51000 56000 61000 66000 exp keg 44326 4320'! 53043 60300 68550 77929 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 #14 -- JOHNSON POND RD (SR 1404) S OF TEN—TEN RD (SR 1010) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 14- JOHNSON POND RD (SR 1404) S OF TEN-TEN RI ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION 0 LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT .1991. 1800 i993 2700 1995 z200 1998 260C ?_OGI 2600 2003 2600 2005 2300 ?007 Z400 Z009 2600 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 2778 �82:a_ ?733 276� 3089 3255 3311 3605 3533 3993 3%�6 4422 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 44 2.1% 18 0.9% 0.1672 0.1925 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 2557 2639 2786 2�75 Z970 306� exp keg )(iQ� 2670 2866 2995 3131 3272 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 #15 -- JORDAN RD (SR 2731) S OF TEN-TEN RD (SR 1010) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 15- JORDAN RD (SR 2731) S OF TEN-TEN RD (SR 10 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. 1.300 i993 1400 1995 1800 1998 200C ?_OGI 1900 2003 27.00 2005 2100 ?007 Z300 Z009 1900 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 2033 2�67 200G 202<} 2267 2396 2433 2662 26Q0 2958 276% 3287 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 33 2.1% 42 2.5% 0.6712 0.6702 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 2406 2364 2i02 2913 312? 3336 exp keg 25i4 2i5; 2984 3373 381� 4309 AADT TREND ANALYSIS Ki1I1Z1I17 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #16 -- NC 42 E OF CLEVELAND CROSSING DR (SR 1628) 0 �: � 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs —� AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE t LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --�r� USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) � USER-0EFINED (F.P.) SHOW HIST�RIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: � AVG ANN INC � AVG ANN INC 16- NC 42 E OF CLEVELAND CROSSING DR (SR 162 ❑I AVG ANN RATE � AVG ANN RATE Fur vRs: I 2013 � LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 � EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION ❑� EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PRO7) #3 2025 � HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #5 ?O35 Cornplete 540 - Triangle Expresswiy Southe�st Ex�tension - wal<e and 7oV�ns�on Counties, North Carolina NCDOT STIP Project Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT ZOOZ 13000 2003 13000 2005 14000 2006 15000 2007 15000 2008 13000 2009 15000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: Avg Ann Inc Avg Ann Rate 16143 ]_6278 15857 �15949 18143 18782 19571 20804 21000 23043 22429 Z5523 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 286 2.1% 228 1.6% 0.3424 0.3404 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 7 Linear Reg 15663 15435 17261 18402 19543 20685 Exp Reg 15729 15475 17629 19124 20747 22507 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 �; � 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs �— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG � EXP REG --r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 17- NC 42 E OF CLEVELAND RD (SR 1010) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #17 -- NC 42 E OF CLEVELAND RD (SR 1010) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 200� ?4000 7003 24G00 Z004 Z4000 2005 2�;000 ?_OGG 25000 2007 2700G 2008 25000 ?009 Z6000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 27143 272:Y.7 ?6857 269C7 29143 29485 30571 31220 32000 33057 334Z9 3500Z STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 286 1.2% 345 1.4% 0.5641 0.5769 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 8 �inear Reg 27464 27119 29881 31607 33333 35060 exp keg 27562 2 718'! 30356 325?3 34545 37333 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 #18 -- NC 50 N OF CLEVELAND SCHOOL RD (SR 1010) 0 ' , 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG �— EXP REG —�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 18- NC 50 N OF CLEVELAND SCHOOL RD (SR 1010) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2003 d-3000 Z005 �_ZG00 Z007 ll000 2009 12000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 11333 11.>76 17.500 11529 10167 10362 9333 969h 85Q0 90u8 �r,c� 848� STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL -167 -1.3% -200 -1.6% 0.4000 0.3832 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 4 �inear Reg lococ 1G800 9200 8200 7200 6200 exp keg ➢.0683 ios5a 9527 8779 8090 7454 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 ' � � 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG �— EXP REG --r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 19- NC 50 S OF BIRDIE DR (SR 2883) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #19 -- NC 50 5 OF BIRDIE DR (SR 2883) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L99� 3900 1_994 q.�J00 1995 3600 1996 ?000 1997 4900 ?.998 ;400 1999 5900 ?001 6300 Z003 E,800 2U05 6100 L007 S80O 200� 6100 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc Avg nnn Rate 665� 6822 65L' 663� 761.3 8296 8300 95�11 8988 10972 9675 izci� STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 138 2.8% 170 3.5% 0.6514 0.6521 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 12 �inear Reg 7455 7315 8674 JSZ�� 10374 11Z23 exp keg 5053 778� 10231 12138 14401 ll085 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 , , , 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs t AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE � LINEAR REG � EXP REG �� + � USER-0EFINED (A,G.R.) � USER-DEFINED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ A4'G ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 21- NC 55 BUS N OF FELDER AVE (SR 1301) ❑ AVG ANN RATE � AVG ANN RATE FUT vrts: I 2013 ❑ LLNEAR REGRESSION � LINEAR REGRESSION #1 I 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION � EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 � U5ER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA � USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #5 2035 Coinplete 540 - Triangle Expressway southeast Extension - wake and 7ohnston Counties, North Carolina NCDOT STIP Project Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #21A -- NC 55 BUS N OF FELDER AVE (SR 1301) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 1998 19000 �001 24000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: Avg Ann Inc I. Avg Ann Rate ��k000 u1100 <?2333 56523 55667 105384 G4000 155551 72333 229598 80667 338894 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: 1667 AVG ANN RATE: 8.1% LINEAR REG: 1667 EXPONENTIAL REG: 8.1% R-SQUARED LINEAR: 1.0000 EXPONENTIAL: 1.0000 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 2 Linear Reg ?aoon 4�333 55667 64000 72333 80667 Exp Reg r,tlni� 5�4�3 105384 155551 229598 338894 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' � , , 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs t AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE � LINEAR REG � EXP REG —�— USER-0EFINED (A.G.R.) � USER-DEFINED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ A4'G ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 21- NC 55 BUS N OF FELDER AVE (SR 1301) ❑ AVG ANN RATE � AVG ANN RATE FUT vrts: I 2013 ❑ LLNEAR REGRESSION � LINEAR REGRESSION #1 I 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION � EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 � U5ER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA � USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #5 2035 Coinplete 540 - Triangle Expressway southeast Extension - wake and 7ohnston Counties, North Carolina NCDOT STIP Project Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #21B -- NC 55 BUS N OF FELDER AVE (SR 1301) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT �003 110G0 �005 14000 �007 17000 �009 15000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: Avg Ann Inc I. Avg Ann Rate 7667 1_8445 i7000 17516 %2333 26487 'S667 34Z99 ?9000 44416 32333 57516 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: 667 AVG ANN RATE: 5.3% LINEAR REG: 750 EXPONENTIAL REG: 5.8% R-SQUARED LINEAR: 0.6000 EXPONENTIAL: 0.6293 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 4 Linear Reg 19>00 1g750 24750 28500 32250 36000 Exp Reg j(�S(i7 Vj%�6 30932 40974 54277 71898 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 ' , 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 22- NC 55 BYP S OF TECHNOLOGY DR (SR 1191) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #22 -- NC 55 BYP S OF TECHNOLOGY DR (SR 1191) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2005 �-�G00 7007 25G00 Z009 z8000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 370�0 �1.263 3475G 37451 52750 8133� 6^:000 132C61 7525G 214428 b6�00 348166 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 2250 10.2% 2250 10.2% 0.9643 0.9456 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg 3T50� 35250 53250 64500 75750 87000 exp keg 42386 38470 83547 135655 220264 357642 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 #23 -- NEW BETHEL CHURCH RD (SR 2703) E OF I-40 0 ' � ' , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 23- NEW BETHEL CHURCH RD (SR 2703) E OF I-40 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. ?20 i993 ?30 1995 250 1998 620 ?_OGI 980 2003 �..000 2009 330 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 354 361 348 353 397 423 azs 4�3 458 530 4S9 593 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 6 2.3% 26 5.8% 0.2116 0.2736 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 7 �inear Reg �89 864 1069 Zl�s 1326 1a54 exp keg 959 907 1422 iss� 2497 3308 AADT TREND ANALYSIS `P�IPI17 10000 8000 6000 4000 `��I�I�7 #24 -- OLD FAISON RD (SR 2515) E OF HODGE RD (SR 2516) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 24- OLD FAISON RD (SR 2515) E OF HODGE RD (SR ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. ?100 i993 ?700 1995 2800 1998 320C ?_OGI 3600 2003 3400 2009 4100 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate }5G4 4757 ;�.4;3 d5b<} 5322 6171 5878 7431 6433 8949 c98� io�� STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 111 3.8% 101 3.3% 0.9252 0.8779 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 7 �inear Reg 4555 4�434 5291 5795 6300 �so� exp keg 4928 4769 6204 7313 8620 lolci AADT TREND ANALYSIS 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 #25 -- OLD HOLLY SPRINGS APEX RD (SR 1153) S OF PRINCE DEAD END RD(SR 1177) 0 �'—G�G}—G�—� '�"�.,— �� ` �" -�'" �� 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 25- OLD HOLLY SPRINGS APEX RD (SR 1153) S OF ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT VRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT .199L 1.80 1_994 Z20 1996 2Z0 1998 ?i0 ?_OGI 400 2003 2400 2005 920 ?007 1500 Z009 1800 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 27_�' i 3�94 Z086 2702 2548 7986 33z5 15720 3801 30943 4Z78 60909 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 95 14.5% 107 16.6% 0.5929 0.8157 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 2216 2:L09 2966 3501 4037 457� exp keg �Si4 3322 11375 24551 52992 114377 AADT TREND ANALYSIS [Ci1I1Z1I17 25000 20000 15000 10000 4�II1I17 #26 -- OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) S OF TEN—TEN RD (SR 1010) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 26- OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) S OF TEN-TEN RD (SF ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. 5000 i-993 5900 1995 7Z00 1998 820C ?_OGI 9500 2003 �..0000 2005 9600 ?007 9100 Z009 9200 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 1U133 1�53� 990� �0184 11767 1335� iz�3� 15si� 1410G 187�9 15Z67 22197 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 233 3.4% 244 3.4% 0.7630 0.7540 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg i1306 11062 13013 14233 15452 16672 exp keg ➢.�220 ilsz�. 15421 18209 21501 25385 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 #27 -- POOLE RD (SR 1007) E OF HODGE RD (SR 2516) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 27- POOLE RD (SR 1007) E OF HODGE RD (SR 2516) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. 8100 i-993 3900 1995 11�000 1998 1i000 ?_OGI 12000 2003 �..400G 2005 9100 ?007 9100 zoon �coo FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate �711 �715 �3�a, s�s� 8�06 8921 9044 907C 9183 9222 93Z2 9377 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 28 0.3% 41 0.4% 0.0184 0.0186 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg loci�. 1G570 10897 11101 11306 11510 exp keg ➢.0439 10399 10722 109?9 11139 ll354 AADT TREND ANALYSIS `P�IPI17 10000 8000 6000 4000 `��I�I�7 #28 -- POOLE RD (SR 1007) E OF CLIFTON RD (SR 2511) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 28- POOLE RD (SR 1007) E OF CIIFTON RD (SR 251 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. � 500 i-993 5�J00 1995 5700 1997 550C 1999 6000 2001 �)400 2003 10000 ?005 5400 Z007 4300 2009 3700 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 3522 35�l3 35�� 35s� 3211 3283 2989 3109 2767 2945 ?544 2789 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 0.0008 0.0024 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 10 �inear Reg �oso 6G70 6150 6200 6250 6300 exp keg 5452 5196 5384 5316 524� 5181 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 #29 -- POOLE RD (SR 1007) W OF HODGE RD (SR 2516) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 29- POOLE RD (SR 1007) W OF HODGE RD (SR 2516 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. �-OG00 i993 7_1G00 1995 13000 1998 15000 ?_OGI 16000 2003 �.JOOG 2005 9500 ?007 8300 Z009 7900 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate �'433 7497 �S�G 7596 661J 68�1-0 6033 6407 5450 6001 4867 5620 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 0.0594 0.1045 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg i0299 1G429 9385 �3732 8080 i4z� exp keg 9588 9728 8661 8055 7491 6�6c AADT TREND ANALYSIS :Y1I1I17 5000 4000 3000 2000 f[�I�I�7 #30 -- ROCK QUARRY RD (SR 2542) E OF AUBURN KNIGHTDALE RD (SR 2555) 0 ' �; 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG �— EXP REG —�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 30- ROCK QUARRY RD (SR 2542) E OF AUBURN KNI ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2003 5500 7005 4600 Z007 4600 2009 ?OOC FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate �00{1 32> 5 32�G 341_�i 1_250 2231 0 1711 -R5G 1312 -? ;00 1006 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL -250 -5.2% -225 -4.7% 0.8824 0.8933 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 4 �inear Reg 3100 3325 1525 400 -%25 -Z�So exp keg �'s25 3487 2380 187� 1476 1162 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 #31 -- OLD BAUCOM RD (SR 5204) E OF ROCK QUARRY RD (SR 2542) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 31- OLD BAUCOM RD (SR 5204) E OF ROCK QUARR ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. G80 i993 750 1995 91�0 1998 120C ?_OGI 1i00 2003 2�}00 2005 1500 ?007 1100 Z009 1000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 1U71 1�59 1053 �066 1196 1266 1284 1409 1373 15u8 1^6Z 1746 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 18 2.2% 35 3.4% 0.2444 0.3308 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg i547 1612 1889 2063 2Z36 21"10 exp keg 1730 1673 zlso 257? 3035 3581 AADT TREND ANALYSIS �.Y1IIZ1I17 50000 40000 30000 20000 fiGI�I�I�I #32 -- LAKE WHEELER RD (SR 1375) N OF OPTIMIST FARM RD (SR 1390) 0 ' � ' , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 32- LAKE WHEELER RD (SR 1375) N OF OPTIMIST F ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. ?100 i993 2200 1995 z500 1998 ?OOC ?_OGI 5900 2003 5300 2005 6200 ?007 6600 Z009 E,500 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc Avg nnn Rate 747t3 5355 7Z',J 7�4� 9189 12965 10411 177h5 11633 24285 12a56 3324Z STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 244 6.5% 289 7.5% 0.9280 0.9087 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg alsz 7993 i0306 11751 13196 1�4641 exp keg �os-rs 9835 17605 25333 36452 52452 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' � , 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 33- SUNSET LAKE RD (SR 1301) E OF NC 55 BUS ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #33 -- SUNSET LAKE RD (SR 1301) E OF NC 55 BUS HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L998 ?300 700i 3800 Z003 3700 2005 SFiOC ?_OG7 6900 zooa ;zoo FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 62�5 6996 5991 6496 8100 11757 9418 1703� 10736 24u80 1?055 35759 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 264 7.7% 349 9.0% 0.7123 0.7689 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 6 �inear Reg 7316 7467 10260 12005 13751 15496 exp keg 9�61 87i2 17459 268�2 41270 63451 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #34 -- TEN—TEN RD (SR 1010) E OF GRAHAM NEWTON RD (SR 1386) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 34- TEN-TEN RD (SR 1010) E OF GRAHAM NEWTON ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. 5600 i993 72G0 1995 8000 1998 900C ?_OGO 9200 2001 �..7_OOG 2003 11000 ?005 12000 Z007 12000 2009 12000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 1�i�!!� 34�.�.� 13067 �3�25 159ll 19ll9 ll689 23626 1946% 29197 zizn4 3�osi STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 356 4.3% 364 4.2% 0.9335 0.8996 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 10 �inear Reg i436C 13996 16908 18728 20548 22368 exp keg �5884 15250 21120 25836 317�8 38889 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 100000 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 �� 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 35- US 1 N OF TINGEN RD (SR 1156) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #35 -- US 1 N OF TINGEN RD (SR 1156) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L992 i900 i-993 7900 1995 9300 1996 9500 1997 11000 ?.998 �..200G 2001 16000 ?003 17000 Z009 18000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 2U376 ?_1.549 i�i�Z zosi5 24535 30668 27506 39073 30476 49782 33447 63425 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 594 5.0% 706 5.9% 0.9145 0.8959 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 2250C 21794 27442 30972 3450? 38032 exp keg )(iiO4 25226 39773 52865 70267 933�7 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 36- US 401 S OF TEN-TEN RD (SR 1010) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #36 -- US 401 S OF TEN-TEN RD (SR 1010) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. ?:I.000 i993 22G00 1995 z5000 1998 22000 ?_OGO 24000 2001 2600G 2003 33000 ?005 32000 Z007 34000 2009 33000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 35G67 36437 350GG 35582 �0�33 43498 a3�� 4�3i� 47000 5591n 50333 63394 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 667 2.5% 784 2.9% 0.8092 0.8173 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 10 �inear Reg 3�2;7. 3644% 42717 46635 50554 54472 exp keg 33713 37612 47383 547'�0 63240 73059 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 900000 800000 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 ' , 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 37- US 64 BYP FROM EXIT 423 TO EXIT 425 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT VRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #37 -- US 64 BYP FROM EXIT 423 TO EXIT 425 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2005 �:l.000 7007 61G00 Z009 60000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate �'G0�0 �7805 ��z5o ��s3z 112250 170967 li6000 275183 159750 442925 153�00 712918 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 4750 10.0% 4750 10.0% 0.7106 0.7175 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg 8250� 77750 115%50 139500 1G3250 187000 exp keg 940i5 85532 183175 294832 474552 763824 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 38- US 641264 FROM EXIT 420 TO EXIT 422 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #38 -- US 64/264 FROM EXIT 420 TO EXIT 422 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 200i 59000 7009 6�J000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 620�0 62051 G]S 00 615;2 6551�0 6581LL �s000 6s63� 7050G 71580 i3000 7465Z STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 500 0.8% 500 0.8% 1.0000 1.0000 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 2 �inear Reg 6200C 61500 65500 �s000 70500 73000 exp keg 6'05�. 615�� 65811 68635 715�0 74652 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 100000 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE t LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 39- US 641264 FROM EXIT 422 TO EXIT 423 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #39 -- US 64/264 FROM EXIT 422 TO EXIT 423 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 200i 56000 7009 58000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 62��0 622:Y.7 Ci7.OGG 61l i 5 6��000 70347 740�0 76798 790flG 83839 b?000 91527 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 1000 1.8% 1000 1.8% 1.0000 1.0000 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 2 �inear Reg 6200C 61000 69000 74000 79000 84000 exp keg 6'217 611�5 70347 76798 83s39 91527 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' � , 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE t LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 40- US 70 BYP E OF CORNWALLIS RD (SR 1525) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT VRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #40 -- US 70 BYP E OF CORNWALLIS RD (SR 1525) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2003 7_2000 7009 23000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 270�0 ?_7�tl76 260�G 26281 34000 37505 39000 46539 44000 58497 49000 73057 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 1000 4.5% 1000 4.5% 1.0000 1.0000 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 2 �inear Reg 2TOOC 26000 34000 39000 44000 49000 exp keg ?7476 2628�. 37505 46839 58497 73057 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 41- US 70 E OF WHITE OAK RD (SR 2547) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #41 -- US 70 E OF WHITE OAK RD (SR 2547) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. �-6G00 i993 7JG00 1995 Z0000 1998 2i000 ?_OGI 21000 2003 2200G 2005 25U00 ?007 Z9000 Z009 29000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 31889 33097 31167 32022 36944 41709 40556 492C2 4416% 58039 47778 68465 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 722 3.4% 700 3.2% 0.9140 0.9331 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 31169 3G469 36077_ 39572 43073 46574 exp keg ��699 31677 40836 47861 56094 6574h AADT TREND ANALYSIS 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 42- US 70 E OF GREENFIELD PKWY (SR 4142) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION 0 LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #42 -- US 70 E OF GREENFIELD PKWY (SR 4142) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. 3�000 i993 3�G00 1995 38000 1998 ?2000 ?_OGI 46000 2003 4�900G 2005 49000 ?007 50000 Z009 34000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 34444 34�161 34333 34�<t5 35222 35283 35�� 35ssZ 36333 36492 36889 3711Z STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 111 0.3% 674 1.7% 0.3371 0.3307 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 50055 49384 547%7 58147 61518 64888 exp keg 50424 49599 56593 61456 66737 724%1 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #43 -- W LAKE RD (SR 1387) 5 OF TEN-TEN RD (SR 1010) 0 �� 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 O AADTs —� AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE t LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --�r� USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) � USER-0EFINED (F.P.) SHOW HIST�RIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: � AVG ANN INC � AVG ANN INC 43- W LAKE RD (SR 1387) S OF TEN-TEN RD (SR 10' ❑I AVG ANN RATE � AVG ANN RATE Fur vRs: I 2013 � LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 � EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION ❑� EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PRO7) #3 2025 � HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #5 ?O35 Cornplete 540 - Triangle Expresswiy Southe�st Ex�tension - wal<e and 7oV�ns�on Counties, North Carolina NCDOT STIP Project Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT Z001 5100 2003 4900 2005 6800 2007 7600 2009 7600 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: Avg Ann Inc Avg Ann Rate F�850 9278 8538 �8826 11038 13153 12600 16877 14163 21656 15725 Z7788 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 313 5.1% 385 6.4% 0.8494 0.8312 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 5 Linear Reg 9480 9095 12175 14100 16025 17950 Exp Reg 10309 9691 15893 21651 29496 40183 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 #44 -- SUNSET LAKE RD (SR 1301) W OF HOLLY SPRINGS RD (SR 1152) 0 ��`� 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 44- SUNSET LAKE RD (SR 1301) W OF HOLLY SPRI� ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. 1600 i993 1800 1995 Z000 1997 ?OOC 1999 5900 2001 �600 2003 5800 ?005 6900 Z007 8900 2009 6600 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 7711 ��I3 74,3 5358 9656 15690 11044 23259 1Z433 34475 13HZ2 51108 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 278 8.2% 389 10.3% 0.8299 0.8388 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 10 �inear Reg 99u4 9575 12686 14630 16574 18518 exp keg 14832 13452 29380 47873 78006 127105 AADT TREND ANALYSIS KIIZIPIIII] 250000 200000 150000 100000 :YiI�I�I�I #45 -- PIERCE—OLIVE RD (SR 1389) N OF OPTIMIST FARM RD (SR 1390) 0 �Q--�O—r1—{.1�1--r-C�C.I�.,�trz- ' 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 45- PIERCE-OLIVE RD (SR 1389) N OF OPTIMIST FAI ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION 0 LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. 1.60 i993 ?80 1995 450 1997 520 1999 920 2001 �.J00 2003 1500 ?005 Z000 Z007 2700 2009 2900 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 3509 552:a_ 3s57 d70C �'S74 ll035 5336 38095 6097 85190 cs�8 190507 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 152 17.5% 161 17.5% 0.9458 0.9519 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 10 �inear Reg 3404 3243 4529 5333 6138 694� exp keg 7389 6259 22833 51ll6 114435 256187 AADT TREND ANALYSIS [Ci1I1Z1I17 25000 20000 15000 10000 4�II1I17 #46 -- BATT�E BRIDGE RD (SR 2552) E OF AUBURN KNIGHTDALE RD (SR 2555) 0 ,'--`.�C�T" � �, � 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 O AADTs �—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LWEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 46- BATTLE BRIDGE RD (SR 2552) E OF AUBURN KI ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 0 HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L99� 300 1_994 190 1996 270 1998 270 ?_OGI �40 2003 540 2005 98U ?007 1300 Z009 1300 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 153� 1836 1n7� �68� 1�J47 3357 2241 5165 2535 7954 ?SZ9 12244 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 59 9.0% 69 12.1% 0.8024 0.8477 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg i465 1399 1950 2295 2639 Z984 exp keg ��982 1767 4419 7835 13s93 24635 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #47 -- NC 50 S OF NEW RAND RD (SR 2562) / N Of 5 WAKE EXPWY 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 47- NC 50 S OF NEW RAND RD (SR 2562) I N of S WI ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT .1991. ll-� 000 1_993 �_ZG00 1995 14000 1998 1Fi000 ?_OGO 18000 2001 �.JOOG 2003 18000 ?005 17000 Z007 19000 2009 ll000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 187.� 1 18368 iis,3 �aol� 20056 21032 21444 23169 22833 25523 ??Z22 28116 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 278 2.0% 345 2.3% 0.6458 0.6548 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 10 �inear Reg 20614 2G269 23028 24753 26477 28201 exp keg 21523 210�0 25314 284?5 31918 35840 AADT TREND ANALYSIS `�i�1PI17 20000 15000 10000 5000 #48 -- NC 50 5 Of S WAKE EXPWY / BUFFALOE RD (SR 2711) 0 ' , 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 48- NC 50 S of S WAKE EXPWY I BUFFALOE RD (SR ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2005 ?OG00 7007 Z<000 Z009 18000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate icoao i��oo 16500 16632 1251�0 13472 i0000 11sio 750fl 10353 500�� 9075 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL -500 -2.6% -500 -2.6% 0.2500 0.2754 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg l�ooc 17500 13500 si000 8500 6000 exp keg l�oiy 17473 14153 iZqo� 1Os76 9534 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 49- NC 50 N OF TEN-TEN RD (SR 1010) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #49 -- NC 50 N OF TEN—TEN RD (SR 1010) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT .1991. 6700 i993 6700 1995 8800 1998 10000 ?_OGI 9600 2003 �.300G 2005 12000 ?007 13000 Z009 12000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 13178 13659 1288; 13224 15239 ll13� 16711 201h5 18183 23u85 19656 27847 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 294 3.3% 359 3.8% 0.8484 0.8484 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg i4757. 14423 17297_ 19083 20876 22668 exp keg ➢.Ei046 15452 20893 252?8 30462 36782 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 20000 18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 #50 -- SR 1006 (OLD STAGE ROAD) N OF SR 2711 (VANDORA SPRINGS RD) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 50- SR 1006 (OLD STAGE ROAD) N OF SR 2711 (VAP ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. G900 i993 7700 1995 8300 1998 870C ?_OGI 11000 2003 �..7_OOG 2005 11000 ?007 8700 Z009 10000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 1U689 1�560 10517 �0638 11894 12545 12756 139C7 L3617 15417 1^478 17091 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 172 2.1% 175 2.0% 0.5141 0.5491 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 1:L�456 11312 12709 13581 14454 15327 exp keg �1785 11553 13548 14966 16533 18264 AADT TREND ANALYSIS �.Y1IIZ1I17 50000 40000 30000 20000 fiGI�I�I�I #51 -- SR 1006 (OLD STAGE ROAD) S OF SR 2711 (VANDORA SPRINGS RD) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 51- SR 1006 (OLD STAGE ROAD) S OF SR 2711 (VA� ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. 8000 i993 9300 1995 10000 1998 12000 ?_OGI 15000 2003 �.JOOG 2005 16000 ?007 15000 zoon lc000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 17778 18664 17333 �7959 20889 24�139 23111 29628 25333 35919 27556 43545 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 444 3.9% 487 4.1% 0.8483 0.8561 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg i9369 Zsssz 227%9 25214 27650 3oos5 exp keg 21333 20488 28314 34660 424�7 51936 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #52 -- SR 1006 (OLD STAGE ROAD) S Of 5 WAKE EXPWY / N Of TEN-TEN RD (SR 1010) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 52- SR 1006 (OLD STAGE ROAD) S of S WAKE EXPV ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT .1991. %100 i993 3Z00 1995 9600 1998 11000 ?_OGI 14000 2003 �.500G 2005 1;�000 ?007 13000 Z009 13000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 1_43 i � �4570 13`;�>; l4�%9 1661�6 1881� 18z44 22256 Z�s�3 26327 ?1�Z2 31144 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 328 3.4% 378 3.7% 0.7332 0.7552 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg l��s� 16111 19137 21028 22919 21811 exp keg ➢.7949 17313 23104 27670 33138 39687 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' � ' , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 53- SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) E of US 401 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #53 -- SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) E Of US 401 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. 5600 1_993 66G0 1995 81�00 1998 9bOC ?_OGO 11000 2001 �.300G 2003 13000 ?005 14000 Z007 16000 2009 15000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 17089 1867)_ 16567 �76%7 20744 27390 23356 36012 2596% 47349 ?S�78 62255 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 522 5.6% 590 6.0% 0.9607 0.9393 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 10 �inear Reg i3729 18139 22857 25806 28754 31703 exp keg 2�347 21080 33620 45008 60254 80665 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 ' , 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 54- SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) W of US 401 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #54 -- SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) W Of US 401 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2005 �5000 7007 7_5G00 Z009 15000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 150�0 15000 150�G 15000 15000 15000 150�0 15000 150flG 15000 15000 15000 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg i500C 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000 exp keg 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000 AADT TREND ANALYSIS `P�IPI17 10000 8000 6000 4000 `��I�I�7 0 ' , 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 55- SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) W of NC 50 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #55 -- SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) W Of NC 50 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2005 5700 7007 6700 Z009 6100 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 650� 6523 G'!OG 641g 7200 7351 770� 8001 82Q0 8709 b70D 9480 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 100 1.7% 100 1.7% 0.1579 0.1745 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg ��c� 6667 746% 796% 84G7 896� exp keg 6312 6697 7670 8349 90s� 9892 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #56 -- SR 1004 (E GARNER ROAD) E OF ROCK QUARRY RD EXTENSION 0 ' � ' , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 56- SR 1004 (E GARNER ROAD) E OF ROCK QUARR ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991_. ?800 i993 3300 1995 4000 1998 5Fi0C ?_OGI 7400 2003 �)7_00 2005 7600 ?007 7700 Z009 5900 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 65�9 6963 c��i� ��sc 7794 9304 8656 11�4h� 9517 14077 io,is i�3i� STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 172 4.2% 272 5.6% 0.6188 0.6861 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 9426 9155 11328 12686 14044 15402 exp keg 1108� 1050'! 16203 212�5 27556 3652'4 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #57 -- SR 2711 (VANDORA SPRINGS RD) E OF OLD STAGE RD (SR 1006) 0 ' � ' , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 57- SR 2711 (VANDORA SPRINGS RD) E OF OLD ST, ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. 3700 i993 3800 1995 4100 1998 530C ?_OGI 6000 2003 7500 2005 7800 ?007 8400 Z009 7900 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 8533 �350 �60� 59�5 10^-.67 12559 11633 1550� 1Z80G 19141 i�� z3c�o STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 233 4.3% 291 5.3% 0.9455 0.9485 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 9 �inear Reg 9179 9488 11819 13276 14733 ic��o exp keg ➢_1115 10559 15914 2056'I 26574 34339 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 #58 -- US 401 5 OF ST PATRICK DR (SR 2777) / N Of S WAKE EXPWY 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 58- US 401 S OF ST PATRICK DR (SR 2777) / N of S 1 ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. �-�G00 i995 23G00 1998 z9000 2001 ?2000 ?_OG3 33000 2005 3100G 2007 33000 ?009 32000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 34589 35930 3n167 349C5 39944 44005 43556 50862 4716% 58757 �o��s 6�� STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 722 2.9% 755 3.0% 0.7948 0.7833 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 8 �inear Reg 3i966 37211 43252 4702% 50803 54578 exp keg 40326 39167 49458 572?1 66203 76595 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #59 -- US 401 S Of S WAKE EXPWY / N Of SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) 0 ' , 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG � EXP REG -�r— USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 59- US 401 S of S WAKE EXPWY / N of SR 1010 (TE� ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT VRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2005 31_.000 7007 33G00 Z009 31000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 310�0 31.000 37.O�G 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 31000 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0000 0.0000 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 �inear Reg 31667 31667 31667 31667 31667 31667 exp keg �1653 31653 31653 31653 31653 31653 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 60- US 401 S of SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT VRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 #60 -- US 401 S Of SR 1010 (TEN TEN RD) HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. ?:I.000 i993 22G00 1995 z5000 1998 22000 ?_OGO 24000 2001 2600G 2003 33000 ?005 32000 Z007 34000 2009 33000 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 35G67 36437 350GG 35582 �0�33 43498 a3�� 4�3i� 47000 5591n 50333 63394 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 667 2.5% 784 2.9% 0.8092 0.8173 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 10 �inear Reg 3�2;7. 3644% 42717 46635 50554 54472 exp keg 33713 37612 47383 547'�0 63240 73059 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 #61A -- US 70 E OF GUY RD (SR 2558) / E of ROCK QUARRY ROAD EXTENSION 0 ' � , , 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 O AADTs t AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE � LINEAR REG � EXP REG —�— USER-0EFINED (A.G.R.) � USER-DEFINED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 61- US 70 E OF GUY RD (SR 2558) I E of ROCK QUA ❑ AVG ANN RATE � AVG ANN RATE FUT vrt5: I 2013 ❑ LLNEAR REGRESSION � LINEAR REGRESSION #1 I 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION � EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 � U5ER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA � USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #5 2035 Coinplete 540 - Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension - Wal<e and 7ohnston Counties, North Carolina NCDOT STIP Project Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT �003 4-0OGO �005 39000 �007 40000 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL: 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0000 0.0000 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 3 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: Avg Ann Inc I. Avg Ann Rate I Linear Reg Exp Reg %0000 �1��000 95(i7 966� �.. <?0000 40000 I3966i I�9664 �0000 40000 39667 39664 =!0000 40000 39667 39664 40000 40000 39667 39664 40000 40000 39667 39664 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 #62 -- SR 1006 (old stage Road) N of NC 42 (s of s wake Expwy) 0 ' � , 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 O AADTs —t—AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE �— LINEAR REG �— EXP REG --��—� USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-0EFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 62- SR 1006 (Old Stage Road) N of NC 42 (S of S Wal ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT :L991. ?400 i993 24G0 1_995 Z600 1997 ?�;OC 1999 �900 200"1 �900 2003 4300 ?005 4400 Z007 4100 2009 3900 201i 3i00 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 3�3�� 3864 3765 378� �285 4496 a�io So�c 4935 5582 5?60 6220 STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 65 2.2% 88 2.8% 0.6168 0.6343 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 11 �inear Reg 4504 4515 �221 5662 6103 6544 exp keg 4330 4699 5863 673? 7731 8878 AADT TREND ANALYSIS 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 #63 -- SR 1421 (Old Mills Rd) 5 of SR 1393 (Hilltop Needmore Rd) 0 ' � 2008 2013 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 O AADTs —t— AVG ANN INC t AVG ANN RATE t LINEAR REG �— EXP REG –��r � USER-0EFWED (A.G.R.) —� USER-DEFWED (F.P.) SHOW HISTORIC DATA: SHOW FUTURE DATA: SHOW STATION #: ❑ AVG ANN INC ❑ AVG ANN INC 63- SR 1421 (Old Mills Rd) S of SR 1393 (Hilltop Neei ❑ AVG ANN RATE 0 AVG ANN RATE FUT YRS: 2013 ❑ LINEAR REGRESSION �❑ LINEAR REGRESSION #1 2012 ❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION �❑ EXPONENTIAL REGRESSION #2 2020 ❑ USER-DEFINED (FUT PROJ) #3 2025 �❑ HISTORIC DATA ❑ USER-DEFINED (A.G.R.) #4 2030 NORTH �AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION / TRANSP. PLANNING BRANCH #S 2035 Complete 540 - Trianyle expi-essway southeast Extension - wal<e and �oY�nston Counties, Nor,th Carolina NCDOT STIP PY'0]eCt Number R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 HISTORIC DATA Year AADT 2009 560 701i 6�J0 FUTURE PROJECTIONS: a,vg ann inc .4vg nnn Rate 640 643 Ci20 62l 7�0 818 880 973 98Q ll56 1080 137� STATISTICAL RESULTS AVG ANN INC: AVG ANN RATE: LINEAR REG: EXPONENTIAL REG: R-SQUARED LINEAR: EXPONENTIAL 20 3.5% 20 3.5% 1.0000 1.0000 NUMBER OF DATA POINTS: 2 �inear Reg 640 620 730 3�0 9so 1080 exp keg 643 621 sls 973 1156 1373 Appendix D- Toll Diversion Model Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Triangle Regional Technical Memorandum Toll Diversion Model Development Technical Memorandum December 2010 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Background Technical Memorandum The proposed Southeast Extension in the Triangle area is one of several candidate toll facility projects under consideration by the North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA). The Southeast Extension will extend the Triangle Expressway and complete the Raleigh Outer Loop. It will link the towns of Clayton, Garner, Fuquay-Varina, Holly Springs, Apex, Cary and Raleigh. It will also connect major roadways in southern Raleigh and ease congestion on the Raleigh Beltline (I-440), I-40, NC 42, NC 55, and Ten Ten Road. According to the NCTA, the project would increase the overall capacity of the existing roadway network and divert traffic from secondary roads in an area that is experiencing substantial growth. The primary objection of this task is to develop a new toll diversion modeling procedure for the Triangle Regional TransCAD Travel Demand Model to help better estimate the traffic and revenue of the proposed tolled Southeast Extension. MPO toll modeling procedures range from simple time penalties applied in the assignment process to a complex set of interactions between multiple model components including auto ownership, mode choice (toll / non-toll nests), distribution (logsum composite impedance) and time-of-day choice. Currently, toll facilities in the Triangle regional model are evaluated using simple time penalties based on the charged toll rates and Value of Time (VOT). The VOT for Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) was assumed to be $12/hour; the VOT for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) and Commercial Vehicle (CV) was assumed to be $18/hour. The new procedure applies the toll diversion modeling in the traffic assignment for the Triangle Regional model. It calculates the toll diversion for each origin-destination pair based on Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) diversion curves and travel time savings that a toll facility can provide. It then estimates toll diversion within traffic assignments by assuming trips (autos, commercial vehicles and external-external trips) that can use either a toll or a non-toll path during each iteration of the assignment, with final toll volumes being the equilibrium weighted average of the iterations. With WTP diversion curves, trips are split into toll and non-toll trips prior to being assigned permitting the trips to be assigned to appropriate toll or non-toll paths for each iteration. This new toll diversion modeling process has been designed to provide a greater degree of user flexibility. It provides an improved level of evaluation of the intermediate results. This should result in improved estimation of traffic and revenue by time of day and by vehicle type (auto vs. commercial vehicles). Recommended Methodology The Willingness-To-Pay methodology was chosen and applied in the Toll Diversion Modeling process to assess the traffic and toll revenue for the following reasons: • It is relatively easy to understand and apply • The value of time and WTP curve can be developed from the stated preference surveys conducted in North Carolina • It allows the flexibility to apply different WTP curves to individual trip type (autos, commercial vehicles and external-external trips) Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum • It produces meaningful and intuitive traffic and revenue results ranging from low per mile toll rates to high per mile toll rates Toll Diversion Curve Development As part of the development of the auto and truck toll diversion curves for use in the Triangle Regional travel demand model, HNTB reviewed a number of surveys conducted within North Carolina and in other states. These stated preference surveys provided information on drivers' value of time through systematic evaluation of their willingness to pay for travel time savings. Raw data from three studies within North Carolina was analyzed to develop example willingness to pay curves for comparison purposes. These studies included the Metrolina Region Stated Preference Travel Study (2010), the Monroe Connector/Bypass Stated Preference Travel Study (2009), and the Triangle Expressway Stated Preference Travel Study (2008). In addition, summary information was gathered from a number of studies conducted in other states in order to gain national perspective and establish a range with which to compare the results from the North Carolina studies. A more detailed review of each study is contained in the Appendix. After a thorough review, three sets of auto and commercial vehicle willingness to pay curves were developed to be incorporated into the Triangle Regional's toll diversion travel demand model set. Toll Diversion Curve Set #1 The auto WTP diversion curve in the first set was developed based on the Triangle Expressway Stated Preference (SP) Survey, which was conducted in January and February 2007. This was the most extensive of the three North Carolina surveys reviewed as part of this study, with 4,725 respondents. The relatively large number of responses led to the most complete picture of willingness to pay and smoothest diversion curve from the North Carolina surveys. Each of the respondents in the SP survey was presented with several scenarios designed to understand willingness to pay. The approach involved a series of detailed trade-offs between travel time and tolls, and respondents would state whether they would take the tolled or free route for each scenario. This survey provided the detailed information to allow an analysis of toll sensitivity by trip type in the route diversion modeling. Average values of time (VOT) were also calculated (in $2010) for the respondents from the Triangle Expressway SP Survey. The calculations took into account only those who responded that they would be willing to pay under at least one of the scenarios presented to them. The average VOT for Triangle Expressway is $10.72/hr, which is well within the range of comparable studies across the country (the majority of estimates for value of time nationwide fall within a range of $10-$15 per hour). The three North Carolina studies did not address the value of time for trucks, however there is an extensive body of national research available for use in truck VOT estimation. Truck usage is often a key determinant in the total revenue generation of a new toll facility, so it is crucial to establish an accurate estimate for use in traffic forecasting tools, like the Triangle Regional travel demand model. A national literature review shows a broad range for truck value of time from $14 per hour up to $200 per hour or higher. Despite this broad range, it appears that in surveys including analysis of both auto and truck drivers, the value of time for trucks is approximately three times that of autos. Using the typical range for autos, $10-$15 per hour, this equates to an average truck value of time of $30-$45 per hour. 2 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum As part of this analysis, a truck diversion curve was developed based on a ratio of 2.5 times the auto diversion curve. Trucks and autos generally have different responses to toll rates and toll rate increases, and this curve reflects these facts. The primary assumptions used to develop this curve were that a larger share of trucks are willing to pay a toll to save time and that those trucks that are willing to pay a toll are less sensitive to toll rate increases. Figure 1 displays the first set of willingness to pay curves for autos and trucks. As the cost of travel time savings increases from zero, there is a significant drop-off of auto users willing to pay. Only about 20% of these users would be willing to pay $15 or more per hour of time savings. Trucks are generally less sensitive to price, and subsequently the drop-off in the curve for trucks is less drastic than that for autos. 30% of trucks are willing to pay $30 or more per hour of time savings. Relative to national averages, these curves are toward the low end of the willingness to pay spectrum. In addition, the shape of the curves is not precisely in line with national norms, because they begin to fall quickly at even small changes in value of time. For these reasons, additional curves were developed to test the sensitivity of the toll diversion model and the subsequent impact on forecast revenues. Figure 1- WTP Diversion Curves (Auto and Commercial Vehicle) 3 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Toll Diversion Curve Set #2 Technical Memorandum The second set of toll diversion curves was developed to reflect a higher value of time and willingness to pay for both cars and commercial vehicles. Under this set of curves, approximately 50% of autos would be willing to pay $15 or more for an hour of travel time savings, and over 70% of trucks would be willing to pay $30 or more. This reflects an average value of time for autos of between $20-25 per hour, and an average value for trucks of over $45 per hour. In addition, the shapes of these curves are different from the previous set. The curves in this set indicate that a large percentage of users are willing to pay small amounts for travel time savings. Then as the price for travel time savings increases beyond a nominal amount, willingness to pay begins to rapidly decline, as seen in the previous curve set. Figure 2- WTP Diversion Curves #2 (Auto and Commercial Vehicle) �oo.o� 90.0% 80.0 % 70.0 % 60.0� 50.0% 40.0�0 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% i. .i. _________....��.R�.G....�.�...�.uwu�s�u OA d ._ :. ., .. : ;_ :. _ ;. : �. -i -.- . 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Value of Time for Cars and Trucks ($/Hour) Toll Diversion Curve Set #3 The third set of toll diversion curves was developed to reflect an aggressive assumption of willingness to pay. Under this set of curves, approximately 50% of autos would be willing to pay $22 or more for an hour of travel time savings, and over 70% of trucks would be willing to pay $45 or more. This set of curves was helpful for evaluation and comparison purposes, as the subsequent revenue estimates serve as an upper bound on the forecasts and provide improved understanding regarding the sensitivity of the toll diversion model incorporated into the MPO's 4 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum travel demand model stream. However, it should be noted that these curves are associated with high levels of willingness to pay that are outside of the range determined through a nationwide literature review. Figure 3- WTP Diversion Curves #3 (Auto and Commercial Vehicle) ioo.oi 90.0% 80.0 % 70.0 % 60.0% 50.0% 40.0 % 30.0% 20.0% 10.0 % 0.0 % _',. I_ '_ ! ;. _� .�,. .{. _ �._ ,:. _;. { , . . ' ' � "��F - . 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Value ofTime for Carsand Trucks ($/Haur) 5 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Process Overview Technical Memorandum It should be noted that the model execution process requires user intervention. Users must set up folders and input files for subsequent steps in the process. The following is a summary of the recommended toll diversion modeling process: 1. Set up a toll assignment folder for the specific horizon year 2. Prepare data inputs i) Required network input file ii) Required input trip tables iii) Required toll rate DBF table 3. Run script to perform toll sensitivity assignments i) Multi-Modal Multi-Class Assignment (MMA) Assignment ii) Summarize sensitivity assignment results (traffic and revenue by time-of-day and by vehicle type) The following section describes the details of each step. Step 1: Set up a toll assi�nment folder for the specific horizon vear Specific file structures are recommended for the toll diversion modeling. A new folder is recommended for addition to the standard Triangle Regional travel demand model folder system. This special application can be placed in a new folder named "Toll Diversion Model" under the project main folder and specific horizon year. Within the "Toll Diversion Model" folder, subfolders for different toll diversion curve can be created. C:\TRM Model\2035\ C:\TRM Model\2035\Toll Diversion Model\ C:\TRM Model\2035\Toll Diversion Model\Toll Diversion Curve 1\ C:\TRM Model\2035\Toll Diversion Model\Toll Diversion Curve 2\ C:\TRM Model\2035\Toll Diversion Model\Toll Diversion Curve 3\ Step 2: Prepare data inputs • Required network input file Since ToIIID and additional special coding are required for the tolled facility, it is expected that the input network will be manually edited and placed in the Toll Diversion Curve folder. A network with special coding, speed and capacities is required for input to the toll diversion model assignment GISDK codes. It recommended that the user copy the "Highway_Line.dbd" file under \Input\Highway\ folder to the Toll Diversion Model\ and edits the network named for toll diversion assignment. To prepare the input network for the toll diversion assignment process, ToIIID for the tolled facility corridor must be added. In TransCAD, a new attribute (ToIIID) can be added to a network using the Dataview-Modify Table... menu option as shown in Figure 4 on the next page. 0 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum � ��.� IJLJJauF�e��a. -J'��.� #�*mY€��<��JJ��J�J`�'�I ��J . . � J��, .ABGONGSPUIBAGONGSPDI ABFFTIMEI BAFFTIMEI ABALPHAI BAALPHAIABGONGTIMEIBAGONfTIMEI ToIIIDI504TRateIHOVTHaIeIGVTRaIeISOVToIIIHOVToIII GVTolll 15 15 0.18] 0_18i 6.000 l.000 0_188 0.188 - - - -- - - - ^ 15 15 0.229 0.229 4.000 d.000 0.224 0.229 "" "" "" "" "" '" "" 15 15 0.548 0_548 4_000 4.000 0_548 0.548 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 15 0.16d 0_16! �_000 d.000 0_166 0.16� - - - -- - - - 15 15 0.337 0.337 4.000 1.000 0.390 0.340 - - - - - - - 15 15 0.109 0_709 4_000 4.000 0_109 0.109 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 15 0.238 0_238 6_000 d.000 0_238 0.238 - - - - - - - 15 15 0.142 0.112 4.000 1.000 0.193 0.143 - - - 15 15 0.109 0_709 4_000 4 �-- -- -- -- 15 15 0.153 0_153 1_000 f'ieldName Type W'id�h�ecimalalndex 15 15 0.211 0.219 4.000 OK 15 15 0.288 0.288 4.009 BCONGTIME Realleby!ea] 1� 3 �ALONGTIME ReallBbyt�sj 10 3 Cancel � 15 15 0.218 0_219 4_00� 4 � TI - - - - 15 15 0.215 0.255 4.000 SOVTFate FeallehYres] 6 2 AdtlField I- - - - 15 15 0.210 0.210 4.000 q HOVTReIe Ra�I�Fhytesj E 2 LVTFlaIe ReallBbytz-] 6 C ��pFizJd 15 15 0.239 0239 1_000 SOVToII Reallehytza] E 2 - - - - 15 15 0.569 0_5�9 6000 HOVT,ilI Red�3b1'[zsj 6 Mo��.relJp �_ _ _ _ 15 15 0.489 0.989 4.009 �Tcll Real�3byte�,] 6 � MweCiown -- -- -- 15 15 0.719 0_719 4_000 4 FieldStoiaoelrrfoirtialion 15 15 0.�2] 0_]2] 6.000 PllachCodesl - - - - 15 15 0.740 0_790 4_000 Naina �j .�.i r] i Ind�� _ _ _ _ l5 l5 0 552 d552 4_000 TYPE Jlntagei 14 bY'tes - �� I .. I"" "" '" "" 15 15 0.39] 0_39] 6000 Gelauli � - - - - 15 15 0.779 0.779 4.009 pgoiaoation I' " " " 15 15 031Y R311 4_000 q� Feld��uplay5�iings. � __ __ __ 15 15 0.511 0_511 6.0� Frnma� INone � Forma[c_ � � � - - - - 15 15 0.686 0.686 4.000 9 � -- -- -- 15 15 0.679 0_679 4_000 ��F�IayPlame� � Widik� 3] 35 0.3]9 R3]9 � 000 Geu.iiption I - - - - l5 15 11 ]SR 11 ]5� a nnn -- -- -- i x - � �_ - .,�. 1 .C�d r � { 7 �. _ , � .�i (, � r'. ,: � 1a �� -"'�- � I �' � � S; " � � �� +-r F � �! i y ; � �� i � , i } �k''. '� - i1 � � i , �Y'�� 1 �T' `�T .�_L�r�-" �: ^xi -,F� ��'� -,..� ��`. c�aaamew�, uecords �- w oP �b�ea ^�I xl Neowork: mone For this study, ten unique ID were assignment to the study corridor/segments. Table 1 on the next page lists the Toll ID and associated segments. Toll ID Description Direction 11 Segment 1: Toll Route 147 from I-40 to Toll Counterclockwise (SB) lZ Route 540 Clockwise (NB) 21 Segment 2: Toll Route 540 from Toll Route 540 to Counterclockwise (56) ZZ Bypass 55 Clockwise (NB) 31 Segment 3: Toll Route 540 (proposed Southern Counterclockwise (SB/EB) 3Z Wake Expressway) from Bypass 55 to I-40 Clockwise (NB/WB) 41 Segment 4: Toll Route 540 (proposed Eastern Counterclockwise (NB) 42 Wake Expressway) from I-40 to US 264/US 64 Clockwise (SB) 51 Counterclockwise (NB/WB) Existing I-540 from US 264/US 64 to I-40 52 Clockwise (SB/EB) 7 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum To prepare the input network for the toll diversion assignment process, special code for the tolled facility corridor must be updated. The following table lists the existing special codes utilized in the Triangle Regional model and four additional special codes included as part of toll diversion model. The additional special coding will allow the toll diversion model to estimate traffic and revenue for HOT lanes (HOV Free, SOV pay, Trucks prohibited), Toll Lanes (Trucks prohibited), Truck Only Lanes and Truck Only Toll Lanes. Tak ile 1—Special Code List Special Code Transit SOVs HOVs Trucks Note 1 (,j� ��' ti,/ �,� Interstate/Freeway 2 � 1/ �1' �/ Suburban Freeway 3 � �,/' '�,/ �qf Urban Freeway 4 � ��' �,/ ��l Rural Highway 5 � 4,1' �I' 1,+ Suburban Freeway / Expressway 6 (�j ��` t� ��' Collector / Distributor 21 (� 1J �„d' �l Freeway to freeway ramps 22 � -�' ��P �,J Freeway to freeway loop ramp with weave 23 (Zj �,� �,/ �,' Freeway to freeway loop ramp 24 � �,;" � ��:�` Freeway to arterial ramp/loop 25 (,� 1r' °�,� �,�` Arterial to freeway ramp/loop 26 (� 1� �,�" �,j` Arterial to arterial ramp/loop 31 � ��I °v� �I Centroid connector 41 � � �,f � HOV Lanes 42 � � �, HOT Lanes � (HOV Free, SOV pay, Trucks pay) 43 (�j � � � Mixed Toll Lanes (for all vehicles) HOT Lanes 44* � � (HOV Free, SOV pay, Trucks prohibited) 45* � � Toll Lanes (Trucks prohibited) 46* � � � Truck Only Lanes 47* � � � � Truck Only Toll Lanes 55 ��„� � � � Transit Only Links *: Additional special coding included in Toll Diversion Model d: AiVowec� �: Prohibited $: Priced Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum • Required input trip tables The following three trip tables are required inputs for the toll diversion model process. o TOTAM_OD.mtx o TOTPM_OD.mtx o TOTOP_OD.mtx - Total AM vehicle trips matrix - Total PM trips matrix - Total Off-Peak trips matrix The Time-of-day AM, PM and Off-peak are defined as follows: o Four hour AM peak period: 6:00 am to 10:00 am o Four hour PM peak period: 3:30 pm to 7:30 pm o Off-peak (the remaining time of the day) These three trip tables can be found in the "Trip Distribution" folder under different horizon years. The user will need to copy and paste these trip tables into the in the \Toll Diversion Model\ folder under different horizon years. No other special preparations are required for the trip tables. Under each original trip TOD matrix, there are three matrices (SOV, HOV and CV) and six additional trip matrices will be generated automatically by the resource file: \ TotalAM.mtx, TotalMD.mtx, TotalPM.mtx, TotalOP.mtx Matrix Name(s) Description SOV Total Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Trip Matrix (by TOD) HOV Total High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Matrix (by TOD) CV Total Commercial Vehicle (CV) Trip Matrix (by TOD) SOV T* Total Tolled SOV Trip Matrix (by TOD) HOV T* Total Tolled HOV Trip Matrix (by TOD) CV_T* Total Tolled CV Trip Matrix (by TOD) SOV NT* Total Non-Tolled SOV Trip Matrix (by TOD) HOV_NT* Total Non-Tolled HOV Trip Matrix (by TOD) CV NT* Total Non-Tolled CV Trip Matrix (by TOD) *: these matrices will be generated automatically by the resource file. E Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model • Required Toll Rate DBF Table Technical Memorandum For the toll diversion assignment process, a toll rate dbf table is required. Table 2 lists the range of toll rate by vehicle type (SOV, HOV, and CV) and by ToIIID used in this study. This allows the toll diversion model to estimate traffic and revenue by different toll rates by vehicle type and corridor segments. Table 2-Toll Rate DBF Table Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV)/ Commercial Vehicle (CV) ToIIID High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Toll Toll Toll Toll Toll Toll Toll Toll Toll Toll Rate 1 Rate 2 Rate 3 Rate 4 Rate 5 Rate 1 Rate 2 Rate 3 Rate 4 Rate 5 11 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 12 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 21 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 22 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 31 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 32 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 41 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 42 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 51 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 52 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.30 0.45 0.60 Step 3: Run RSC file to perform toll sensitivitv assi�nments Once the highway network, time-of-day trips tables and toll rate dbf table have been saved and modified in the toll diversion folder, toll assignments can be performed by running the RSC file called "TOLLDiversionModel_TDnumber.rsc". It needs to be noted that all trips tables, revised network of "Highway_Line.dbd" with coding of special and ToIIID attributes, toll rate DBF table and "TOLLDiversionModel_TDnumber.rsc" need to be saved under the same project folder. The "TOLLDiversionModel_TDnumber.rsc" automatically calculates link capacity (AB direction and BA direction) and free-flow travel time (AB direction and BA direction) for different time-of- day (AM, PM and OP) and consists of three time-of-day assignments using the same per mile toll for every tolled link/facility. A step-by-step description of how this approach will be applied within the model framework is presented below: • Travel time skims are run for SOV, HOV and commercial vehicles with and without use of the tolled facilities The appropriate willingness-to-pay curves are then used to determine the percentage of travelers who are willing to pay to use the tolled facilities for the predetermined price. This percent willing to pay is determine by: value of time, per mile toll rate, and the travel time saving offered by the tolled facilities. o A combined auto willingness-to-pay curve that reflects the composition of the trip purpose in the study area are applied to the total SOV and HOV trip table o A Commercial vehicle willingness-to-pay curve are applied to CV trip tables 10 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum • Once the fraction of travelers who are willing to pay is determined, the corresponding trip tables (SOV, HOV and CV) are separated resulting in two trip tables for each vehicle/trip type — those willing to pay (SOV_T, HOV_T, CV_T), and those not willing to pay (SOV_NT, HOV_NT, CV_NT). • A Multi-Modal Multi-Class Assignment (MMA) with stochastic user equilibrium process is then applied with eligibility restrictions lifted on the tolled facilities for the "willing to pay" travelers. The willing to pay trip table represents the universe of those eligible to use the tolled facilities for a price and does not reflect actual usage. Actual usage is determined through the MMA assignment process. • The entire process is performed iteratively for each analysis period until the prescribed equilibrium tolerance (<1%) is achieved. A screenshot of "TOLLDiversionModel_TDnumber.rsc" is provided as follows: Fde Ed�it �eardi V�iew Tools I✓ycros ConFgwe Window Melp L� fm' I-;_ � � �d � : .. � . - a �? ¶ � vs� z+ C� � 4� �1 • � : rlipLibr�ary ¢ X T�LL6iversionModel TUl.rsc kNSI Characters - 116 1 �. crRvnMacin["TCB Init") �� folderpath = "H'��TF.M Mode1��2035tIT��To1lDiversion_TDC1'��To1lLookllp��" 118 Highwa.yL�B = Eolderpath + "Highwa.y_Line.�BD" v ��S "� —To11 Sensitivity Test ��n -r T= 1 to S 3n ��21 1u if T=1 then do 122 z TH-..T1�� 1-3 { SOOTkate = "SOVTRI" ��4 � HOVTRate = "HOVTkl" �z5 } CVTRate = "CVTR1" �z6 end 12ft Euro zlse iE T=2 then do 13B $ C £ p ¥ § C Tk= T2 SnVTRate = "SOVTR2" 30VTkate = "HOVTR2" �?rTkate = "CVTR:" and else iE T=3 chen do TR="T3" SY�VTRate = "SDVTk3" H��VTRate = "HOVTk3" fVTRate = "CVTR3" end =.lre iE T=4 then dn Tk="T4 SG�iTRata = "SOVTR4" HGVTF.ete = "HGVTR4" i?�TP.atF = "lVTk4" end =1se do TR="TS" SY�UTRate = "SOVTkS" HGVTRata - "HOVTRS" cuTrate = °cvTes•• ena ��-- �dd the ner� Toll ka.te and Toll field= ir. the L�BL� fi1= — inEo = Gatiglnfo(Highwa�DB) s cope = .nfo[1] CreateMap("New Map". {{"Sco�" scope}.i"Auto Project". "Truz"}.{"Location". 100, 150}}) n�m_lVr = AddLayer("Nzw Map". "Network Road�", Hi4haayD9, "Networlc koads") xield a ray = GetFields (new_lyr, "All") fld_n mes = Eield_a ray[1] 4iPld Elacl = 0 r j= 1 to fld n s.length do if (fld_xi mes �� ame50UTP te" r fld n e[j] _"HOVTRate" r fld n s[i] _"CVTRate" a o _ ame o _ ame or Eld_names [�] _"SOVToll" or fld_naman [�] _"HOVToll" ox fld_nsmes [�] _"CVToll") then do field_fla.gl = 1 end end if Eield_Elagl = I] then do old strct = GatTablzStPuct�ss�z(nzx_19r) for i= 1 to old strct.length 30 old_strct[i] = old_,trct[i] + {old_�trct[i][1]} =nd netv struct = old_etrot + {{"504TP Ce", "Real", 6. 2, "False", , , , , , , null}} + {{"HnpTkate" "Real", 6, 2, "False". . . . . . , null}} + {{"COTRate"_ "Real" 6. 2. "Fal�e", _ _ _ . . . nu11}} + {{"S]VToll". "Cteal" 6, 2. "Falsa". . . _ . . . nu11}} + {{"HiipToll" "Real". 6, 2. "False". . . . _ _ . null}} + {{"CVToll"_ "Raal"_ 6. 2, "Falss", , , , . . . null}} IlodifyTable(new_lyx. n _struct} �. � < In the "TOLLDiversionModel_TDnumber.rsc", the user will only need to revise the folder path to reflect the right folder location. Once "TOLLDiversionModel_TDnumber.rsc" runs successfully, the following bin files will be generated under each toll rate scenario: 11 �X � Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum \ MMA_LinkFlow_T1AM.bin; \MMA_LinkFlow_T1PM.bin; \ MMA_LinkFlow_T10P.bin \ MMA_LinkFlow_T2AM.bin; \MMA_LinkFlow_T1PM.bin; \ MMA_LinkFlow_T10P.bin \ MMA_LinkFlow_T3AM.bin; \MMA_LinkFlow_T1PM.bin; \ MMA_LinkFlow_T10P.bin \ MMA_LinkFlow_T4AM.bin; \MMA_LinkFlow_T1PM.bin; \ MMA_LinkFlow_T10P.bin \ MMA LinkFlow TSAM.bin; \MMA LinkFlow T1PM.bin; \ MMA LinkFlow T10P.bin Field Name(s) Description AB Time Congested Travel Time in TOD (AM/PM/OP): AB Direction BA_Time Congested Travel Time in TOD (AM/PM/OP): BA Direction Max Time Maximum Value of Congested Travel Time in TOD: Total AB + BA AB voc Volume Capacity Ratio in TOD (AM/PM/OP): AB Direction BA_voc Volume Capacity Ratio in TOD (AM/PM/OP): BA Direction MAX voc Maximum Value of Volume Capacity Ratio in TOD: Total AB + BA AB vmt Vehicle Miles Traveled in TOD (AM/PM/OP): AB Direction BA_vmt Vehicle Miles Traveled in TOD (AM/PM/OP): BA Direction TOT_vmt AB vht BA vht TOT_vht AB_speed BA_speed Total Vehicle Miles Traveled in TOD: Total AB + BA Vehicle Hours Traveled in TOD (AM/PM/OP): AB Direction Vehicle Hours Traveled in TOD (AM/PM/OP): BA Direction Total Vehicle Hours Traveled in TOD: Total AB + BA Vehicle Speed in TOD (AM/PM/OP): AB Direction Vehicle Speed in TOD (AM/PM/OP): BA Direction AB VDF Volume Delay Function in TOD (AM/PM/OP): AB Direction BA VDF Volume Delay Function in TOD (AM/PM/OP): BA Direction MAX VDF Maximum Value of Volume Delay Function in TOD: Total AB+BA AB Flow SOV T Volume of Tolled Single Occupancy Vehicles in TOD: AB Direction BA_Flow_SOV_T Volume of Tolled Single Occupancy Vehicles in TOD: BA Direction AB Flow HOV_T BA Flow HOV_T AB Flow_CV_T BA Flow CV T AB Flow_SOV_NT BA Flow SOV NT AB Flow HOV NT BA Flow_HOV_NT AB Flow CV NT BA Flow_CV_NT AB Flow BA Flow Tot_Flow Volume of Tolled High Occupancy Vehicles in TOD: AB Direction Volume of Tolled High Occupancy Vehicles in TOD: BA Direction Volume of Tolled Commercial Vehicles in TOD: AB Direction Volume of Tolled Commercial Vehicles in TOD: BA Direction Volume of Non-Tolled Single Occupancy Vehicles in TOD: AB Direction Volume of Non-Tolled Single Occupancy Vehicles in TOD: BA Direction Volume of Non-Tolled High Occupancy Vehicles in TOD: AB Direction Volume of Non-Tolled High Occupancy Vehicles in TOD: BA Direction Volume of Non-Tolled Commercial Vehicles in TOD: AB Direction Volume of Non-Tolled Commercial Vehicles in TOD: BA Direction All Vehicle Volume in TOD: AB Direction All Vehicle Volume in TOD: AB Direction Total Vehicle Volumes in TOD: Total AB + BA 12 Triangle Regional Toll Diversion Model Technical Memorandum The resource file will also generate new loaded network files under each toll rates under the same project folder. The fields included in those loaded network files are summarized as follows: \ Highway_Line_T1_loaded.dbd \ Highway_Line_T2_loaded.dbd \ Highway_Line_T3_loaded.dbd \ Highway_Line_T4_loaded.dbd \ Highway_Line_T5_loaded.dbd SOVTRate Toll Rate for Single Occupancy Vehicle ($/mile) HOVTRate Toll Rate for High Occupancy Vehicle ($/mile) CVTRate SOVToII HOVToII CVToI I AB Flow AM BA Flow AM Tot Flow AM AB Flow OP BA Flow OP Tot Flow OP AB Flow PM BA Flow PM Tot Flow PM AB Flow Daily BA Flow Daily Tot Flow Daily AB Rev AM BA Rev AM Tot Rev AM AB Rev OP BA Rev OP Tot Rev OP AB Rev PM BA Rev PM Tot Rev PM AB Rev Daily BA Rev Daily Tot_Rev_Daily Toll Rate for Commercial Vehicle ($/mile) Tolls for Single Occupancy Vehicles ($): SOVTRate*Length Tolls for High Occupancy Vehicles ($): HOVTRate*Length Tolls for Commercial Vehicles ($): CVTRate*Length All Vehicle Volume during AM Peak Period: AB Direction All Vehicle Volume during AM Peak Period: BA Direction All Vehicle Volume during AM Peak Period: Total AB+BA All Vehicle Volume during Off-Peak Period: AB Direction All Vehicle Volume during Off-Peak Period: BA Direction All Vehicle Volume during Off-Peak Period: Total AB+BA All Vehicle Volume during PM Peak Period: AB Direction All Vehicle Volume during PM Peak Period: BA Direction All Vehicle Volume during PM Peak Period: Total AB+BA All Vehicle Daily Volume: AB Direction All Vehicle Daily Volume: BA Direction All Vehicle Daily Volume: Total AB+BA Revenue During AM Peak Period: AB Direction Revenue During AM Peak Period: BA Direction Revenue During AM Peak Period: Total AB+BA Revenue During Off-Peak Period: AB Direction Revenue During Off-Peak Period: BA Direction Revenue During Off-Peak Period: Total AB +BA Revenue During PM Peak Period: AB Direction Revenue During PM Peak Period: BA Direction Revenue During PM Peak Period: Total AB+BA All Daily Revenue: AB direction All Daily Revenue: BA direction All Daily Revenue: Total AB+BA 13 Appendix E- Detailed TAZ Information TAZ ATYPE HH HH_STUD POP MEANINC DWELLUN UBEDS IND 1507 2 341 0 964 78792 359 0 1508 2 574 13 1623 78918 614 0 1737 2 397 0 1126 78523 417 0 1818 2 647 1 1837 62119 682 0 1538 2 704 1 1992 65157 743 0 1817 2 288 10 816 65998 311 0 1509 1 1046 22 2920 73554 1149 0 1510 2 1024 9 2858 65627 1116 0 1739 2 417 9 1179 72951 444 0 1741 2 234 3 653 68889 256 0 1389 2 47 0 132 84683 52 0 1390 2 214 6 598 148453 237 0 1382 2 556 0 1552 65692 605 0 1736 2 469 5 1308 82133 512 0 1512 2 466 18 1300 88034 516 0 1383 2 470 15 1331 110091 508 0 1511 2 469 1 1327 78813 495 0 959 2 421 25 1239 114759 456 0 1436 2 385 15 1102 116217 433 0 1735 2 257 3 728 86808 272 0 1731 2 334 8 982 103674 354 0 1729 2 388 11 1142 113252 414 0 1727 2 305 18 763 108197 338 0 1733 2 166 3 469 77700 189 0 1506 2 324 4 918 78145 371 0 1332 2 582 22 1648 78058 675 0 1331 2 447 10 1249 83481 492 0 957 2 151 4 377 100573 165 0 1313 2 330 10 827 68514 358 0 1716 2 46 1 130 69438 54 0 1732 2 83 3 235 118020 97 0 1715 2 432 8 1222 67149 496 0 1717 2 16 1 46 67303 20 0 1719 2 553 12 1564 61937 636 0 1503 2 79 0 223 53390 89 0 1315 2 228 4 571 86088 247 0 1499 2 657 12 1860 78701 706 0 1698 2 214 2 604 57536 229 0 1314 2 434 12 1084 44839 471 0 1316 2 288 6 815 85351 310 0 1318 2 750 8 2122 66774 803 0 1498 2 358 7 1014 64453 385 0 1695 2 434 8 1229 82613 466 0 1696 2 230 4 650 52335 246 0 1697 2 356 3 1009 66580 381 0 1320 2 72 4 205 67492 79 0 1319 3 44 0 125 149194 47 0 1502 3 52 4 149 81417 58 0 1711 2 189 0 517 52867 195 0 2184 2 366 3 931 76277 383 0 2188 3 21 0 61 51413 21 0 TAZ_2002XP_SE_2009 RET HWY 14 31 36 171 1056 83 291 36 539 66 2 0 6 45 11 61 3 21 0 108 0 21 0 3 0 3 19 30 56 22 1 18 0 8 21 7 33 276 10 16 0 0 29 5 35 1 27 10 6 0 14 5 15 0 3 8 29 129 0 40 10 23 92 33 67 55 518 11 1 18 22 0 8 7 0 1 17 11 1 20 26 15 23 10 11 18 5 0 12 28 0 0 7 0 4 10 68 0 38 76 1 1 OFF 0 69 79 10 24 0 10 53 15 10 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 12 8 0 15 1 3 4 0 0 12 119 8 4 3 13 1 4 0 2 5 0 0 16 4 5 2 0 0 2 0 16 45 1 Page 1 SER SPUNIV SPSC SPAIR SPHOSP INDPERC RETPERC HWYPERC OFFPERC SERPERC 30 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 288 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 373 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 236 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 418 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 465 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 139 408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 4 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 519 37741 195 0 494 78037 187 1 1641 63944 632 1 692 89903 281 4 151 60592 59 1 738 58290 285 2 223 59136 87 1 1193 60443 473 7 408 64255 162 3 599 58352 225 0 54 64504 19 5 982 73171 476 9 1127 84412 465 0 138 49365 58 0 17 27778 7 0 44 34222 18 2 117 80863 50 8 104 75672 45 11 601 72934 240 3 439 60707 176 19 1250 60741 498 17 492 69825 204 12 3656 59131 1546 0 835 54971 333 5 1455 52478 570 15 1389 61417 548 7 843 67529 333 5 471 58356 189 TAZ_2002XP_SE_2009 366 89 28 8 6 0 0 0 5 0 12 0 34 17 10 4 5 2 90 23 142 3 2 8 3 7 4 4 13 0 3 7 0 230 0 156 0 4 0 0 4 13 46 2 1 5 19 5 27 32 5 12 0 5 0 72 Page 2 270 57 40 20 9 46 22 25 74 106 29 56 44 46 14 301 3 4� 85 23 131 57 61 39 TAZ ATYPE HH HH_STUD POP MEANINC DWELLUN UBEDS IND 1507 3 384 0 1085 63977 402 0 1508 2 599 14 1696 73351 652 0 1737 2 1661 0 4715 63727 1751 0 1818 2 761 1 2161 63110 802 0 1538 2 1045 1 2958 63784 1106 0 1817 2 290 10 821 65998 315 0 1509 2 1008 21 2813 70324 1111 0 1510 2 876 8 2445 63964 955 0 1739 2 394 9 1116 66879 464 0 1741 2 242 3 673 65149 264 0 1389 2 59 0 165 84683 64 0 1390 2 224 6 626 148453 249 0 1382 2 538 0 1502 64010 586 0 1736 2 414 4 1154 82133 452 0 1512 2 427 17 1190 88034 475 0 1383 2 482 15 1363 110091 522 0 1511 2 461 1 1305 78813 488 0 959 2 394 23 1157 114759 430 0 1436 2 382 14 1093 116217 432 0 1735 2 173 2 491 86808 184 0 1731 2 336 8 988 103674 358 0 1729 2 394 11 1158 113252 421 0 1727 2 319 19 796 108197 356 0 1733 2 175 3 495 69018 201 0 1506 2 339 4 961 72351 389 0 1332 2 645 24 1826 71554 751 0 1331 2 474 10 1324 74334 523 0 957 3 204 6 512 100573 223 0 1313 2 316 9 791 64380 367 0 1716 2 66 1 186 65822 77 0 1732 2 105 4 297 118020 123 0 1715 2 444 8 1255 65692 510 0 1717 2 21 1 61 65536 26 0 1719 2 649 15 1837 62887 748 0 1503 2 138 0 391 62504 156 0 1315 2 266 5 667 72048 288 0 1499 2 724 14 2049 71242 780 0 1698 2 217 2 614 60799 249 0 1314 2 361 10 902 56024 415 0 1316 2 305 7 863 74113 330 0 1318 2 791 8 2239 65247 865 0 1498 2 361 7 1020 64090 409 0 1695 2 428 7 1210 73835 491 0 1696 2 292 5 827 60001 313 0 1697 2 412 4 1166 64596 442 0 1320 3 97 5 274 64562 106 0 1319 2 53 0 149 149194 56 0 1502 3 108 9 307 64884 118 0 1711 3 392 0 1069 63243 404 0 2184 2 390 4 1004 65154 408 0 2188 3 25 0 72 55370 26 0 TAZ 2002XP_SE_2012 RET HWY 17 43 36 210 1502 363 309 48 602 69 2 0 7 70 11 92 3 29 0 157 0 33 0 3 0 3 27 46 59 30 1 26 0 8 21 10 38 358 20 22 0 0 34 5 51 1 29 10 6 0 14 5 15 0 3 19 29 126 0 53 10 34 106 60 69 58 518 13 1 27 22 0 8 8 0 2 17 11 1 20 27 16 23 11 11 18 5 0 12 28 0 0 7 0 4 10 106 0 43 101 1 2 OFF 0 94 164 17 38 0 13 59 25 16 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 1 15 8 0 15 1 3 4 0 0 16 118 11 6 9 14 2 6 0 3 8 1 0 18 7 6 2 0 0 3 0 24 61 1 Page 1 SER SPUNIV SPSC SPAIR SPHOSP INDPERC RETPERC HWYPERC OFFPERC SERPERC 47 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 376 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 1060 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 393 236 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185 495 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 565 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 165 423 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 4 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2174 2183 1710 2251 1709 1501 1707 2164 2204 2217 2218 2160 871 1708 873 872 1704 1705 1677 1676 1491 868 867 1679 1492 1678 1496 1687 2 160 3 199 3 738 2 267 3 112 2 294 3 95 3 403 3 156 2 222 2 19 2 453 3 637 2 83 3 10 2 29 3 51 3 34 3 243 3 146 3 467 3 201 2 1430 3 480 2 604 3 714 3 299 3 263 0 428 55193 161 0 551 61843 208 1 1999 63588 772 1 729 76355 292 9 304 63294 118 1 795 58290 308 2 257 60922 101 1 1082 57015 426 9 418 59445 170 4 610 57290 236 0 54 60791 20 6 1081 63233 510 14 1664 67255 687 0 216 61002 90 0 26 27778 11 0 79 57695 31 2 134 80863 57 7 90 64646 39 12 653 65004 261 3 390 63051 156 19 1251 63309 498 18 521 63973 217 12 3732 61191 1581 0 1309 63391 523 6 1648 61086 647 20 1948 63066 769 7 803 64152 319 8 706 62770 281 790 14 21 0 25 45 10 5 20 116 5 29 0 11 151 5 1 20 8 6 29 7 5 226 61 0 24 25 35 376 57 15 13 55 27 0 7 1 66 63 45 73 23 12 5 TAZ 2002XP_SE_2012 364 88 38 11 9 0 0 0 3 0 19 0 39 27 9 4 7 3 96 24 143 3 2 8 3 7 7 2 10 0 4 11 0 694 0 143 0 4 0 0 5 18 70 12 1 5 28 8 40 51 7 18 0 5 0 111 Page 2 267 75 42 20 4 55 3 20 30 77 110 31 56 48 27 14 463 1 67 93 30 155 67 90 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TAZ ATYPE HH HH_STUD POP MEANINC DWELLUN UBEDS IND 1507 2 1509 0 4269 63977 1583 0 1508 2 854 17 2417 73351 935 0 1737 1 6999 0 19860 63727 7378 0 1818 1 1778 0 5051 63110 1872 0 1538 1 2991 0 8466 63784 3162 0 1817 2 303 9 858 65998 320 0 1509 1 1402 28 3912 70324 1523 0 1510 2 2297 23 6408 63964 2497 0 1739 2 740 15 2095 66879 962 0 1741 2 546 5 1522 65149 593 0 1389 2 66 0 184 84683 72 0 1390 2 229 7 639 148453 249 0 1382 2 1371 0 3824 64010 1491 0 1736 2 517 5 1443 82133 561 0 1512 2 563 23 1571 88034 611 0 1383 2 493 15 1395 110091 522 0 1511 2 464 0 1313 78813 490 0 959 2 455 27 1337 114759 477 0 1436 1 396 16 1132 116217 435 0 1735 2 204 2 578 86808 215 0 1731 2 399 8 1174 103674 417 0 1729 2 488 15 1435 113252 511 0 1727 2 521 31 1302 108197 561 0 1733 2 349 7 988 69018 397 0 1506 2 511 5 1447 72351 581 0 1332 2 1047 42 2963 71554 1192 0 1331 2 774 15 2160 74334 841 0 957 2 452 14 1132 100573 486 0 1313 2 873 26 2188 64380 1040 0 1716 2 131 3 371 65822 151 0 1732 2 108 4 305 118020 123 0 1715 2 673 13 1904 65692 765 0 1717 1 36 2 102 65536 42 0 1719 2 1293 26 3659 62887 1471 0 1503 2 462 0 1305 62504 520 0 1315 2 538 11 1351 72048 579 0 1499 2 1227 25 3472 71242 1307 0 1698 2 359 4 1016 60799 450 0 1314 2 666 20 1666 56024 807 0 1316 2 535 11 1514 74113 571 0 1318 2 1259 13 3562 65247 1406 0 1498 2 484 10 1370 64090 600 0 1695 2 620 12 1754 73835 792 0 1696 2 653 13 1850 60001 695 0 1697 2 858 9 2429 64596 917 0 1320 2 238 12 672 64562 255 0 1319 2 58 0 164 149194 64 0 1502 2 384 31 1093 64884 414 0 1711 2 1571 0 4285 63243 1619 0 2184 2 717 7 1685 65154 747 0 2188 2 81 0 237 55370 83 0 TAZ 2002XP_SE_2035 RET HWY 48 174 44 629 3120 1518 466 182 1164 105 2 0 18 296 11 370 3 122 0 614 0 142 0 3 0 3 98 196 81 107 1 113 2 8 21 31 82 1111 64 96 0 0 79 5 200 1 44 10 6 1 14 5 15 0 3 65 29 148 0 170 10 131 234 199 87 198 518 38 1 117 22 0 8 10 0 8 17 11 1 20 34 18 23 18 11 20 7 0 12 28 0 0 7 0 4 10 454 0 113 405 3 7 OFF SER SPUNIV SPSC 0 200 465 0 307 17 1082 0 622 2220 4345 0 72 431 360 0 161 1661 236 0 0 1 13 0 41 5 184 0 110 156 435 0 105 0 89 0 70 33 432 0 0 16 2 0 0 7 26 0 0 730 1200 0 0 195 1493 0 0 1 134 0 92 12 488 0 0 13 8 0 3 16 59 0 36 1 37 0 12 0 33 0 0 132 49 0 15 0 31 0 5 8 35 0 4 0 16 0 4 0 51 0 0 6 128 0 0 90 23 0 32 18 110 0 131 84 96 0 36 2 221 0 27 42 293 0 39 124 369 0 48 191 558 500 9 4 111 0 25 32 304 0 0 4 3 0 12 8 38 0 34 0 47 0 3 5 110 0 1 2 39 0 29 13 111 0 28 1 67 0 12 9 45 0 2 0 9 0 0 4 24 0 0 0 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 104 0 30 0 257 80 470 0 3 0 9 0 Page 1 SPAIR SPHOSP INDPERC RETPERC HWYPERC OFFPERC SERPERC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2174 2183 1710 2251 1709 1501 1707 2164 2204 2217 2218 2160 871 1708 873 872 1704 1705 1677 1676 1491 868 867 1679 1492 1678 1496 1687 2 620 2 480 2 1999 2 372 2 403 2 391 2 146 2 996 2 320 2 370 2 31 2 826 2 1807 2 236 2 10 2 79 2 55 1 121 2 722 2 429 2 1681 2 718 2 2351 2 1984 2 1581 2 1918 2 879 2 806 0 1655 55193 620 0 1349 61843 505 0 5417 63588 2089 0 1019 76355 443 32 1096 63294 419 0 1059 58290 409 3 397 60922 153 0 2629 57015 1060 17 851 59445 326 7 1093 57290 377 0 104 60791 34 9 1710 63233 972 36 4718 67255 1932 0 612 61002 255 0 26 27778 11 0 214 57695 85 2 144 80863 59 24 315 64646 133 36 1939 65004 765 9 1146 63051 457 67 4499 63309 1780 65 1864 63973 764 24 6135 61191 2588 0 5411 63391 2164 16 4318 61086 1688 58 5237 63066 2047 18 2358 64152 928 24 2163 62770 854 806 58 21 0 70 172 24 16 20 121 5 125 0 15 619 6 25 8 27 56 7 5 297 254 5 6 53 4 108 94 493 104 43 18 90 116 0 7 1 0 246 258 3 192 247 41 51 5 TAZ 2002XP_SE_2035 410 102 161 49 38 0 0 0 12 0 81 0 86 115 38 10 31 12 163 35 148 3 10 10 3 7 28 9 43 0 18 49 0 2707 0 614 0 4 0 0 23 62 301 52 5 5 119 31 173 217 29 79 0 5 0 474 Page 2 350 297 53 20 16 137 3 80 88 110 151 50 56 87 117 14 1923 1 3 231 4 166 90 355 149 348 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Appendix F— Forecastinq Summary Data Southeast Extension 2012 Build DSA Forecast Volumes Facility Location DSA 1-2,13-14 DSA 3-4, 15-16 DSA 5, 17 DSA 6-7 DSA 8-9 DSA 10-11 DSA 12 from NC 55 to SR 1152 Holl S rin s Road 17,600 17,600 17,600 15,200 23,600 23,600 23,600 from SR 1152 Holl S rin s Road to SR 1386 Bells Lake Road 21,800 21,800 21.800 19,800 29,000 29,000 29,000 from SR 1386 Bells Lake Road to US 401 30,500 30,500 30,500 22,500 28,100 28,100 28,100 from US 401 to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road 33,300 33,300 33,300 22,100 20,400 20,400 20,400 from SR 1006 Old Sta e Road to NC 50 26,100 26,100 26,100 21,800 17,100 17,100 17,100 Southeast Extension from NC 50 to I-40 / US 70 B ass 24,200 24,200 24,200 25,300 21,200 21,200 21,200 from I-40 / US 70 B ass to SR 2700 White Oak Road 20,900 18,900 20,900 23,000 18,800 17,000 18,800 from SR 2700 W hite Oak Road to US 70 27,200 20,600 25,800 23,000 25,700 19,500 24,400 from US 70 to SR 2542 Rock Quarr Road 34,700 37,800 27,500 23,000 34,000 37,000 26,900 from SR 2542 Rock Quarr Road to SR 2555 Auburn Kni htdale Road 37,800 37,000 33.000 33.400 37,900 37,100 33,100 from SR 2555 Auburn Kni htdale Road to SR 1007 Poole Road 37,700 41,100 35,300 34,100 37,600 41,000 35,200 from SR 1007 Poole Road to US 64/264 48,600 51,800 46,000 43,800 48,500 51,700 45,900 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 - from NC 55 to SR 1152 (Holly Springs Road) DSA 1-2,13-14 ■ DSA 3-4, 15-16 ■ DSA 5, 17 ■ DSA 6-7 � DSA 8-9 DSA 10-11 DSA 12 I�� from SR 1152 from SR 1386 from US 401 to from SR 1006 from NC 50 to I- from I-40 / US from (SR 2700) from US 70 to (Holly Springs (Bells Lake SR 1006 (Old (Old Stage 40 / U5 70 70 Bypass to (SR White Oak Road SR 2542 (Rock Road) to SR Road) to US 401 Stage Road) Road) to NC 50 Bypass 2700) White to US 70 Quarry Road) 1356 (Bells Lake Oak Road Road) from SR 2542 from SR 2555 from SR 1007 (Rotk quarry (Aubum (Poole Road) to Road) to SR Knightdale US 64/264 2555�Auburn Road)toSR Knightdale 1007 (Poole Road) Road) 10/15/2013 Southeast Extension 2035 Build DSA Forecast Volumes Facility Location DSA 1-2,13-14 DSA 3-4, 15-16 DSA 5, 17 DSA 6-7 DSA 8-9 DSA 10-11 DSA 12 from NC 55 to SR 1152 Holl S rin s Road 47,400 47,400 47,400 42,800 51,100 51,100 51,100 from SR 1152 Holl S rin s Road to SR 1386 Bells Lake Road 57,800 57.800 57,800 57,500 67,500 67,500 67,500 from SR 1386 (Bells Lake Road to US 401 70,300 70,300 70,300 61,300 68,300 68,300 68,300 from US 401 to SR 1006 (Old Stage Road 71,600 71,600 71,600 59,100 50,800 50,800 50,800 from SR 1006 Old Sta e Road to NC 50 57,300 57,300 57,300 64,800 42,000 42,000 42,000 Southeast Extension from NC 50 to I-40 / US 70 B ass 51,800 51,800 51,800 58,200 49,300 49,300 49,300 from I-40 / US 70 B ass to SR 2700 White Oak Road 45,900 43,900 44,300 64,800 42,900 41,000 41,400 from SR 2700 White Oak Road to US 70 54,000 46,700 50,200 64,800 51,500 44,500 47,900 from US 70 to SR 2542 Rock Quarr Road 64,000 66,400 56,100 64,800 62,500 64,800 54,800 from SR 2542 Rock Quarr Road to SR 2555 Auburn Kni htdale Road 69,400 67,200 63,700 73,700 69,400 67,300 63,800 from SR 2555 Auburn Kni htdale Road to SR 1007 Poole Road 72,200 75,800 69,800 75,500 72,000 75,600 69,600 from SR 1007 Poole Road to US 64/264 91,900 95,300 89,100 94,000 91,400 94,800 88,600 DSA 1-2,13-14 ■ DSA 3-4, 15-16 ■ DSA 5, 17 ■ DSA 6-7 ■ DSA 8-9 DSA 10-11 DSA 12 ioo,000 - 90,000 - 80,000 - I 70,000 - - 60,000 - - - - - 50,000 - - - - � - - - � - - - 40,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 30,000 .. . . . ..- . . . . - - . . . - - 20,000 - - - - � - - - - - . . _ . _ 10,000 - - - - � - - - - . . _ . _ 0 - .. _,. �. .. _. �. ... _. ,.. .. _. from NC 55 to from SR 1152 from SR 1386 from US 401 to from SR 1006 from NC SO to I- from I-40 / US from (SR 2700) from US 70 to from SR 2542 from SR 2555 from SR 1007 SR 1152 (Holly (Holly Springs (Bells Lake SR 1006 (Old (Old Stage 40 / U5 70 70 Bypass to White Oak SR 2542 (Rock (Rock Quarry (Auburn (Poole Road) to Springs Road) Road) to SR Road) to US 401 Stage Road) Road) to NC 50 Bypass (SR 2700) White Road to US 70 Quarry Road) Road� to SR Knightdale US 64/264 1386 (Bells Lake Oak Road 2555 (Auburn Road) to SR Road) Knightdale 1007(Poole Road) Road) 10/15/2013 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension 2035 Traffic Forecast Volume Comparison Date: April 2014 N W E S DSA 1 (Orange) 2035 AADT XX,XXX DSA 6(Red) 2035 AADT XX,XXX DSA 8(Purple) 2035 AADT OInterchanges Legend Highway Network i � � ____ �� Counties DSA Corridors Orange Corridor Green Corridor Lilac Corridor Red Corridor Blue Corridor Purple Corridor O O.V �.� �.� �.� � \ � NORTH CAROLINA HNTB, North Carolina, PC *For representative purposes, only DSA 1(Orange), DSA 6(Red), :�_ , Turnpike Authority 343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200 I I MileS and DSA 8(Purple) to Green mainline volumes are shown. � Raleigh, NC 27609 Complete 540 - SE Extension Traffic Forecast HNTB North Cawlina, P.C. Page 3 of 3 Southeast Extension Y-Line Crossings Forecast io/is/zois - ---� — .-,- - - - - — -- — - - - - Old NC 55 UNDERPASS NC 55 - N of Felder Ave 20300 25600 43300 21900 33800 11,000 14,000 77.000 15,000 - - 70% 65 % SB 4°/ 1% 77.300 20.000 33,900 17,100 26.500 Main St. 1301 Sunset Lake Rd OVERPASS Sunset Lake Rd - W of Family 8700 73200 23900 8500 17600 - - - 5,400 - - 10 % 65 % SB 2% 1% 70,200 13200 23,900 8,500 77.500 � Circle Rd � 1301 Sunset Lake Rd OVERPASS Sunset Lake Rd - E of g400 72500 28000 8300 19500 5,800 6,900 8.900 6,600 - - 70 % 65 % 5B 2% 1% 7.900 10.200 22,900 6,800 75.900 Ste henson Rd SR 1302 1389 Plerce-Olive Rd OVERPASS P�erce-Olive Rd - N of Op6mist 3200 4300 13400 4300 13400 1,500 2,000 2,700 2,900 - - 10 % 60 % SB 2% 1% 3,300 3,600 9.400 3.600 9,400 Farm Rd SR 1390 1387 Wesl Lake Rd OVERPASS West �ake Rd - N of �angston 6100 7200 15000 7200 15000 4,900 6,800 7.600 7,600 2011 7,300 10 % 55 % 58 5% 1% 7.300 8,000 16,800 8,000 16.800 Cir SR 4758) � 1405 Rhodes Rd OVERPA55 Rhodes Rd - N of Deerbom Dr g00 1100 2200 1200 2700 - - - - 2011 1.000 71 % 60 % SB 7% 1% 1.000 1,100 2,200 1200 2200 M (SR 1568 � 1578 Deer Meadow Rd OVERPASS Soulhern Wake Freeway 2000 2100 2600 2000 2600 - - - - - - 10% 60% SB 2% 1% 7100` 1,100 1,400 1,100 1.400 � 1404 Johnson Pond Rd OVERPASS S of Ten-Ten Rd (SR 1010) 7000 8400 12900 6300 9100 2.600 2,300 2,400 2,600 - - 10% 65% SB 2% 1% 2,500 2,800 4,300 2.100 3.100 7371 Lake Wheeler Rd UNDERPASS N of Optimist Farm Rd 5200 6700 12700 5300 9000 5,300 6,200 6.600 6.500 - - 70% 65% SB 2% 1% 7.000 8,200 14.800 6.500 11.000 SR 1390 1390 Optimist Farm Rd ovERPASs E of Pierce Olive Rd (SR 1369) 5500 8500 74900 5000 10200 3.400 6.700 6,400 6.100 - - 70% 65 % EB 2/ 1/ 7,200 9,400 16.500 5,500 71.300 1404 Johnson Pond Rd OVERPASS S of Hilitop Needmore Rd pg00 3100 15300 1700 9200 2.800 3,200 3,600 3.500 - - 10 % 65 % SB 2% 1% 3,800 3,900 19,200 2.100 11.500 SR 1404 2751 HiVtop Rd OVERPASS N of NC 42 7900 9900 17300 6100 10500 3.400 3,700 4,200 3,900 - - 10% 65 % SB 2% 1% 4,200 4,800 8,400 3.000 5.100 � � 2750 Norman Blalock Ad OVERPASS W of Bridgemont Ln (SR 5309) - - - - - - - - - 2013 1,200 10% 65% WB 3% 2% 1.100 7,100 1.800 7,100 1,800 m � = � 2739 Barber Bridge Rd OVERPASS N of NC 42 - - - - - 650 720 700 690 - - 10 % 65 % SB 2% 1% 700 800 1,300 800 1,300 � ° 2736 Rock Service Station Rd OVERPASS N of NC 42 2000 2700 8400 1800 5800 3,100 2�,800 2,800 2,800 - - 10 % 65 % SB 3% 1% 2,700 3,300 10.300 2200 7,100 N 2738 Mal Weathers Rd OVERPASS S of Southem Meadows Dr _ _ _ - 560 640 710 790 - - 10% 65% SB 2% 1% 800 900 1.500 900 1,500 (SR 5902) 2727 Sauls Rd OVERPASS S of Pagan Rd (SR 2737) 1900 2200 4500 1700 4800 1,700 1,600 1,700 1,700 - - 10% 65% SB 5% 1% 1,700 1,900 3.900 1,500 4.200 1010 Ten-TenRd UNDERPASS WofUS407 17600 20600 27100 73600 19400 - 15,000 75,000 15.000 2072 15,600 9% 55% EB 3% 2% 75,000 15,600 20.500 10,300 74,700 2771 Buffaloe Rd OVERPASS S of Vandora Springs Rd 3200 3400 7700 3300 6700 3.200 2,700 3.100 3,300 - - 71 % 65 % EB 3% 1% 3.200 3,300 7.500 3,200 5.900 (SR 2713) � 2712 Thompson Rd OVERPASS S of Timber Dr (SR 2812) 7300 1300 1700 1300 1700 - - - - - - 10 % 65 % SB 2% 7% 1.300 t.300 1.700 7,300 1.700 t° 2770 Aversboro Rd OVERPASS S of Timber Dr (SR 2812) 6600 7500 12700 8000 13500 5,900 6,200 6,700 6,900 2009 8,600 70% 60% SB 3% 1% 7,300 8,700 73,200 8,300 14.000 2707 Bryan Rd OVERPASS S of Tallowwood Dr / S of _ _ _ _ _ - 940 - - 70 % 65 % 5B 2% t% 1.000 t.700 1,800 7,700 1.800 Southem Wake Freewa 2547 White Oak Rd OVERPASS S of Bryan Rtl (SR 2707) 10400 72100 27700 11300 25800 - - - - - - 72 % 65 % SB 2% 7% 10.400 12.100 27,700 11,300 25.800 n 2722 Old McCullers Rd UN�CRPASS Southern Wake Freeway 7200 1600 4400 1600 4400 - - - - - - 10% 65% SB 2% 1% 1700" 7,200 1,900 1200 1.900 M 2723 Fanny Brown Rd OVERPA55 S of Ten-Ten Rd (SR 1010) 8000 8400 12800 6600 12900 4.100 4,100 4.900 4.400 - - 10°/ 65 % SB 2% 1% 4700 4,900 7.500 3,900 7.500 - 2725 Holland Church Rd OVERPASS S of Ten-Ten Rd (SR 1010) 1800 2000 3800 2000 3800 - - - - 2009 3.300 10/ 70% SB 6% 1% 3.300 3,500 6.500 3.500 6.500 � 2727 Sauls Rd OVERPASS S of Contender Dr (SR 5396) 4400 4800 9000 5000 12100 - - - - 2011 3,400 10 % 65 % SB 5% 1% 3,400 3,600 6,800 3,800 9200 u' � 2731 Jordan Rd OVERPASS S of Ten-Ten Rd (SR 1010) 8000 8400 72800 6600 12900 2,100 2,100 2,300 1,900 - - 10% 65% SB 2% 7% 2,000 2,200 4,800 2,200 4.800 � � n ao 2703 New BethelChurch Rd OVERPASs E ofl-40 4200 6100 11100 3200 7100 - - - 300 - - 10% 65% EB 2% 1io 400 500 900 300 600 - Waterfield Dr UN�ERPASS E of 5 Greenfield Parkway zg00 3300 6500 3500 6500 - - - - - - 10% 65% EB 3% 1% 3,000 3,300 6,500 3,500 6.500 � SR 4142 e 2555 Raynor Rd UNDERPass S of US 70 8usiness 10000 73600 23200 12200 21500 5,500 5,300 5.800 5.700 - - 12 % 65 % SB 2% 1% 5.900 7,200 72,300 6,500 71.400 n � - E of Auburn-Knightdale Rd 1004 E.GarnerRd UNDERPASS 3000 4100 23600 3500 21700 5.300 5,000 4.600 3,500 2009 3.400 16% 75% EB 2% tio 3J00 3,700 21,800 3,200 19,900 y (Sfl 2555) N R W � � 2558 Guy Rd OVERPASS S of US 70 Business 8900 11700 21900 12100 24200 7.300 7.100 7.800 6,600 2010 7,500 8% 55 % 58 2% 1% 7.500 8,700 17200 9,500 19.000 a � E of Rock Quarry Rd 1004 E.GarnerRd UNDERPASS SR2542 6400 8100 26200 8100 27600 9,100 7,600 7700 5.900 2012 6.000 75% 75% EB 3% 1% 6,400 6,000 19.400 6.000 20.400 2552 Battle Bridge Rd OVERPASS E of Auburn-Knightdale Rd 1500 2600 6700 2400 8300 540 980 1.300 7.300 2011 1.700 75% 55% EB 12/ 4/ 1.100 7,500 3,900 1.400 4.800 SR 2555 ' 2070 No-Build AADT for Deer Meadow Rd determined using ITE Trip Generation rates. The 2070 No-Build AADT forecast was then grown at model rates. " Oid McCullers Rd AADT (near the underpass location) calculated as 25 % of Old McCuliers Rd forecasted AADT at in[ersection with US 407. HNTB North Carolina, PC Page 1 of 1