20090105 Ver 1_401 Application_20090209

?11111!
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
February 12, 2009
S&EC Project # 5786.W2
To: NC Division of Water Quality n t 0 t O
401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
Attn: Lia Gilleski
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 p r
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Debbie Edwards Fra n /
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. c'? )9
11010 Raven Ridge Road ??TCAN??AN`W
A[EA,,?1ALiti
Raleigh, NC 27614 pSTp81,f1,yATERB%CFl
Re: Searstone-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM P A I
Cary, Wake County, NC
On behalf of the property owner Sears Farm LLC (Attn: William Sears), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written authorization from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality for activities proposed to impact Neuse River Riparian Buffers. Please contact
me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Searstone
Project Type Riparian Buffer Authorization
Owner / Applicant Sears Farm, LLc
County Wake
Nearest Town Ca
Waterbod Name Turkey Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Neuse/03-04-02
Index Number 27-33-2
Class C; NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY (Jurisdictional Watersl
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres): 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Total Riparian Buffer Impact (Square feet): 1,267
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification Application Form
Agent Authorization
USGS Vicinity Map & Wake County Soil Survey
PCN Submittal checklist
DWQ Buffer Determination letter (NBRRO 01-161)
Searstone Courtesy Notification for Isolated Wetlands
Overall Site Plan & Impact Exhibit
Existing Conditions Map
Grading and Drainage Plans
Pond 1, 2, 3 & 4 Details & Level Spreader Details
Level Spreader Supplemental Forms, Checklists, Operations and Maintenance Agreements and Photos
Preliminary Pond 1, 2, 3 & 4 Design and Calculations
$2,000.00 Application Fee (Riparian Buffer Express Review Fee)
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
FEB ? 2009
o <
DENR - WATER ULIALITY
W-,TLANDS AND STOMIMATER BRANCH
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no. O Ot - 0 10
5
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
? Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit A I ,,
?
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: N/A or General Permit (GP) number: N/A -------
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Searstone
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Cary
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Sears Farm, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Deed Book 11163; Page 1451
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
William Sears
3d. Street address: 1142 Executive Circle, Suite D
3e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27511
3f. Telephone no.: 919-467-5703
3g. Fax no.: 919-467-2512
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Owner-please send correspondence to both owner
and Agent
4b. Name: William Sears
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Sears Farm, LLC
4d. Street address: 1142 Executive Circle, Suite D
4e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27511
4f. Telephone no.: 919-467-5703
4g. Fax no.: 919-467-2512
4h. Email address: N/A
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Debbie Edwards
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c. Street address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27614
5e. Telephone no.: 919-846-5900
5f. Fax no.: 919-846-9467
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0744623322
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.7914 Longitude: - 78.8403
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: +/- 74.75 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Turkey Creek 27-33-2
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse 03-04-02
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: Currently the site is heavily wooded with some old residential structures. The general land use in the vicinity
of the project is mostly residential and some commercial.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.356 acres of isolated wetlands and a 1.351 acre isolated, man-made (exempt) pond
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 2,150 linear feet (Turkey Creek)
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to make utility connections (sanitary sewer) in order to construct a retirement
community and commercial development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project will consist of the construction of a retirement community (multi-family & single family) and commercial
development. Heavy equipment typically used for grading, excavating, concrete pouring etc. will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Name (if known): Kevin Martin Consultants, PA Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
AID#200121035 & email from Monte Matthews dated 09/16/05; NBRRO 01-161 and email from Eric Kulz dated 09/22/05
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Courtesy Notification submitted to the USACE and the NCDWQ on March 22, 2006 (Isolated wetlands under notification
thresholds)
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - or
(PER)
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T required?
B1 ®P ? T Non-electric
utilities (perp) Turkey Creek ? Yes
® No 480 407
B2 ® P ? T Non-electric
utilities (perp) Turkey Creek ? Yes
® No 0 380
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 480 787
6i. Comments: Impact proposed are an "allowable" use according to 15A NCAC 02B .0233(6)
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
A detailed wetland delineation and Neuse Buffer evaluation was conducted on the property in order to design a plan that
would avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers to the maximum extent practicable. As such, the
only impacts to wetlands are to "isolated" wetlands and are under 0.10 acre, therefore notification for these impacts to the
NCDWQ was not required. The only other proposed impacts, which are unavoidable, are to the riparian buffers. These
proposed impacts are perpendicular, non-electric utility impacts which are unavoidable because the existing manholes
are within the riparian buffer. In order to connect to the existing sanitary sewer these proposed connections are
necessary.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Per the engineer, the sewer connection will be made and the existing grade will be re-established quickly. The
disturbed area will be protected by silt fence and every effort will be made to provide vegetation cover within the
impact area shortly after the pipe is installed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: According to 15A NCAC 02B .0233(6), impacts proposed are an allowable use and do not require
compensatory mitigation.
Page 7 of 10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
®Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 56.64%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This project will require a stormwater
management review by the Town of Cary but for the purposes of this submittal, a stormwater management plan is not
required, only a plan that meets the diffuse flow requirements.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply E] HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in-fill,
most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. The
Searstone project is a small mixed use development within a highly development watershed. The Town of Cary is
requiring stormwater treatment and in addition is requiring their additional 50' Urban Transitional Buffer. We anticipate
that the DWQ will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will connect to the Town of Cary Sanitary Sewer System. The Town of Cary will ensure that the capacity of
their treatment facility will not be exceeded.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ? No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ? No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Debbie Edwards February 12,
F-h 2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agen s Signature
' Date
(Agent
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 10 of 10
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
All Blanks To Be Filled In By lThe Current Landowner or Municipal Official
Name: ?F tu' FGiy y\ 1 l? L
Address: I 1 4 2 Z?- e CC? ??(? I ? C_.Xx . ?? t ti h- J

Phone: `I ('I

C1
Project Name/ Description: S&EC Project # ?J 1. J
Date: l /2--8/C 1
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current landowner or municipal official hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental
Consultants, PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon
request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The
"6 r day of JAW J/ kq:) 2 U d t'( .
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Signature
cc: Ms. Debbie Edwards
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Charlotte C)Ilice:
_2'6 LePhiliip Court. Suite C
Conord. NC 28025
Mow: 1704) 720-9405
Fa N: 1704 1 720-9406
C. yy.`mM" "Iti" f )tl iti
\17-1; 1.,a\v10%de h,1w
("huue: 1 i Ohl j4(4-y? ?a
1',1\; (? ?6) x=1(1°\ ? ? ?
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

;..
;? Mrcr
j1 MyB2
A
CrB? ' ?? / v a

,
CrB2 :
4
F
rC •? TM
M
°
B2 ID
4, .
?i
Cr y

e
MyrD
a
,,

F«

4

x
(,?Ht
t l
rr

..
-

Fa
AfA
`
------ '" Co A Myh

Cru2 CrC2

"
o
Grc -_" AfA

AfA
CrB WsC2 '
CrC2
C
ycw- s.
u Cn A v `«
Cm MYD
CrC Cn Y MYC2 MyC
WsE r. -
CrC2
"CrE CrE •P WsC2
C
CrB2 I WsC2
U
QC2
- ` Q WsB2 r-- MyB S'
myB
M2 WSG2
1

rra

GrB u, Cr f
frC2 \ -,G f + 1 n

r ^
G4u ,! Crt, CrC2 y
C2L' W1H.
C -,

MyC
rr?
AfA A':+
t
sCZ
''" CrHA Cre. C Wy /WsE
m yC2 MyC

WsB2 l
,

J
.I 2r
wsc2

c
a

r
,.

'7 CrE u.
'
\ m oyc
C r
E
?
d t,
SITE
3
<
v j

- :.
...
Ctf? I wa y t
fit.. My6'2
c r H
7
a u ?
.
41 MfD2 WsE
Cr s CrC ra .? Cr62
C. U ?L W y ° e t -' • ° Au rr ' `mYC
x .

C2 ° Gr
C
a a * ?; ?» j, ; ° Illyc
lin "°{yly13
y
r
r r s rC?. f x+ ? J= J.?.

Y
Ws62 a
• CrB2 Cr82 Wy °V` Wt8 D
Cm r M
r ?' '-• r
?

* _
j
C
,
.
GrC CrE
. Cr02 My8
'
GrC? c
t3 x ?`• ,' l M{y a MyC
0L x r
`GrC lxy CrE WsC2, , 5

.
n C , !ku.
W
?
r
x
r rC ?
L3 wtHt f
I? sC2
_- SC
G
M
< rd CtB2
WaQ2

?
M
YD?
' t
r0 s 4
4
b t
! "fit
CrB2 -,. ` y?r CrCr '? WsC2 4 C y4 t
,14 ' r
'"iapi
?
?
m f WSE sn
/ a'
a
2'
M f6 Njf 62
-f
W E
i= .WsB3 a CV2%? 5c'.°
M C
{

co,
Pro ect No. Scale:
57V6
W
"
'
.
2 1
= 1320 FIG. 2 - SOIL SURVEY MAP

Project Mgr. Drawn By: SEARSTONE WAKE COUNTY 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.
DE M/0 WAKE CO SOIL 9
27614
h,
UNTY, NC SURVEY 0
50
919-846
Date: 09/04/08
1
Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
401 Oversight/Express Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
Er The application fee (Checks may be made out to "N.C. Division of Water Quality"
- $240.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts
- $570.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts
- Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance Letter)
Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application and supporting
documentation (instead of providing 5 copies of the full size plans you may provide two
copies of full size plans along with three copies of 11 X 17 plans)
Stormwater Management Plan (if applicable - see PCN Form Help File Section E)
1) Please provide three (3) copies of the stormwater management plans along with all
supporting information pertaining to this project including the following:
C=? a. Entire site development/layout plans delineating all drainage areas;
Lc?.^ b. Design calculation sheets for all proposed BMP(s) sized for both on-site and
off-site drainage;
PV c. BMP supplements for each proposed BMP and Required Items Check List
(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm) along with all required
items;
d. A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each stormwater
management facility;
e. Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include
(i) Erosion and sediment control plans;
(ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed BMPs;
(iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all
BMPs and associated components - inlet and outlet structures,
forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations.
If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the
following along with site plans and PCN form:
1) Three (3) copies of the details for on-site diffuse flow provisions, (refer to
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp_forms.htm).
E DWQ Stream Determination Forms for streams on property and DWQ determination
letter for wetlands or streams (if applicable). b on v-L
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and
detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is
a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
Maps and Plans:
The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map - Please cleanly draw or
delineate the site boundaries on the topographic map.
The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map -
(required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman
Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -
Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures
any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Copies of the
Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
current soil survey and/or soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS
County Office (http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/). GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property
and project on the map. Please indicate north arrow and scale. Please include applicable
road names or State Road numbers.
[The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide full
sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
gel5re-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Topographic contours with elevations
• Any existing structures and impervious areas
• Existing utility lines and easements
• Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features
• North arrow and the scale (1":50' scale is recommended).
E?015roposed conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) - lots must be
developable without further impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands
streams, water features, and State regulated buffers Building envelopes must be
provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot
• All built-out structures and impervious cover
• Final grading contours with elevations
• All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream,
wetland, or water features - if applicable)
• Impacted areas - these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN
form.
[aJ 6rainage Plans - Final drainage plans must include the following:
• Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and
drainage ways
• All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to
wetlands must be at a non-erosive velocity, generally less than 2 ft/sec during the peak
flow from the 10-yr storm)
• Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and policies
• In certain cases (see Section E of PCN form), final stormwater management plans must
also be provided (see Stormwater Management Plan Checklist)
E?15 oposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream,
water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at
a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts
that will be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated. Please provide cross sectional
details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts <_48
inches, and 1-foot for culverts > 48 inches).
Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
Wetland Impacts:
? Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing
vegetation and any clearing must be specified.
? All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars.
Construction detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
? Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
? Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be
maintained.
_NV Stream Impacts:
? Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as
the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of
the stream to be impacted.
? The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as
much as possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should
be indicated. Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on
the impact map(s).
? For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be
provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank,
the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the
minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank.
Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of
subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location. The report must
comply with the Division of Highways - Guidelines for Drainage Studies and
Hydraulic Design, prepared by A.L. Hankins, Jr., State Hydraulics Engineer -
1999.
? Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off-
setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order
to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross
section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream
stream cross section including the stream flood-prone area.
? Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill
associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank
stabilization. The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and
enumerated.
State of North Env ronment
Department l Resources
and Natural
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Mr. Todd Preuninger
S&EC,Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
A74 0;71
'?"10 ?? ?k
NCDENR
NORTH C^ROuNA DePARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAuuRAL ResouRCEs
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 13, 2001
Subject: Neuse River Basin .
Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 01-161
Highhouse Rd/Davis Dr Tract
S&EC Project #00-5786
Wake County
Dear Mr. Preuninger:
JUN 190 +
V
On May 11, 2001, I conducted a site visit of the features involved in the above referenced
project. It was determined as a result of the site visit that the channels present on the property were
not subject to the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection
and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:02B.0233 (NCAC
0233).The channels are unnamed tributaries of Turkey Creek.
This office has assigned the reference number of NBRRO 01-161 to this project. Thank you
for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have any
additional questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 571-4700 ext. 237.
Sincer y,
04 ?z A-
Charles Brown
Environmental Specialist
cc: John Dorney, DWQ
\neusbuf let\nbr0I 161.1et
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
r
fail is ZUT rooimealel Cori d"-A Iue-
11010 RW Cn Ridge Rod. Raleigh. North C-Uoa 77614
/ J
Phone: t919j 646-5900 Faye (9191646-9467
ro3ecL R .Davis C i:00-: (? /
sue'/ { ? ' ?
Date: Ocober 26. 2000
p" ?r AppcomdamUce
PlOnDift 0* i Na Snbjea : HOwem, if impacted then
s3?c now... a. else b modem mis alp b.?.d on O01• 6e?"0rk' 7 appmpriaw stonawaw BW s must be empioyed•
ww?rrsd 4000 kme wed aw od¦w OmMO wl Wwswaoa• - ,
App ba..fka..w. ervQed +wl Upoaook awpo and pound UudLb e-
rd?ew w.ss an b be weal. gW bseppwmd and t4SRON
PwmMwd bran U.B. Anor OMPS S[ '
LA j
Rol
Waters of the US
s,V.04
m

M ? w
N o4
Svby-L
I1
LXGLM&
/1./' - WATTS OF THa 0.6. SUIJ&Cr TO TU NU= Rnl[RS1 tL S17FMS l<<. t.kmkkm
* w.wwtkw.0ewety1MUSAcawdDwQf
r•%.-.?' UAMIKAL WATERS OIr TU ILi•.141Y U &UW= TO Tffi MM XMM !S 11
eoFra>es tww k wMrd y Mr acAts ..t oWQ(
- WATM Or TB[ U. NOT aOE Y= TO TRt TRUSS KrM SS M.
ti wmw (wwt be rwaird by we Uw al
-WITLLMI."kmm..&ya.11 al
-MA&CINALWaTTAMS lout be ewbrsd y Oc USAC EI
® . MIC FLAG MOTUCG TTM STARMG POW OF THE IRUSS wrFM ((mast be
c &Ar%,4 by do OSACZ *W DWQJ
0 - MW FUG DL40WO Tffi STARTING POWT Or TIM MIVS[ IsUMM$ food be
esSRssssd by &* USAa sot DWQI
- Tu ro
'VT
/'•r? - p/1rNL.DV AC Rn. T. TP.• •P.••

t
MapVUE
0 164 329 493 658
Seale 1n Feel
01 0

t7
14:27
OCT 26. 2000
' Q O M
?l.
1. r1 ' ? o
O
sf
O
ego ? 4msO

T

sus
a

l0Jq
C?>
343
O (I-I
CARY, N. C.
SUM DURHAM SOUTH 15' OUADRANOL$

o 35078-G7-TF-024
PHOTOINSPECTED 1988
;973
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA 8235 IY SE-SERIES Y842
Pro)W is
Dawes Sale:
Ina2OW
Fi
1
USGS Q
d
Project
Mgr; KM Date:
901MN gure
-
ua
Highhouse RODevls Dr.
El
d d' Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

11010 Raven Ridge Rd.O Raleigh, NC 27614
am Tod
Ambrosl
Cary, Wake County, NC [phone] 0 [phone]
Web Page: www
SandEC
com
.
.
?3DDl S?? mil
Sale:
1' =13N
Mgr.: KM 11026100
Figure 2 - Soil Survey
F{ighhouse Rd./Davis Dr.
Elam Todd d'Ambrosi
Cary, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
w11010 Raven Ridge Rd.* Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] - [phone]
Web Page; www.SandEC.com

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Monte Matthews, USACE
Eric Kulz, DWQ
FROM: Kevin Martin Yj'LJam-UP_XkA V44
RE: Searstone
The purpose of this memo is to provide you with a courtesy
notification and site plan for your files for the above named project.
DWQ previously indicated that no approval was necessary from them for
the proposed plan (see attached plan and 9/23/05 email from Eric Kulz).
The Corps previously approved a wetland delineation on 7/9/01 (Action
ID #200121035) and determined that the pond and tributary to Turkey
Creek were isolated features (see attached.email from Monte Matthews
dated 9/16/05).
The isolated pond will be converted to a stormwater device and site
amenity. Less that 150' of the isolated tributary and less that 0.1-acre of
isolated wetland will be impacted. Therefore written approval is not
required from DWQ or the Corps for the project as proposed.
Enclosures: Site Plan and Impact Maps
USGS Vicinity
Corps Notification of Jurisdiction Determination
DWQ Buffer Letter
Wake County Soil Survey
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State of North Enrvro ment
Department o
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Mr. Todd Preuninger
S&EC,Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N.QURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 13, 2001
-`r ? JUN 19 X01 :?
Subject: Neuse River Basin .
Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 01-161
Highhouse Rd/Davis Dr Tract
S&EC Project #00-5786
Wake County
Dear Mr. Preuninger:
On May 11, 2001, I conducted a site visit of the features involved in the above referenced
project. It was determined as a result of the site visit that the channels present on the property were
not subject to the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection
and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:02B.0233 (NCAC
0233).The channels are unnamed tributaries of Turkey Creek.
This office has assigned the reference number of NBRRO 01-161 to this project. Thank you
for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have any
additional questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 5714700 ext. 237.
Sincer y,
a4 G, 'z
Charles Brown
Environmental Specialist
cc: John Dorney, DWQ
\neusbufletlnbr01161.1et
1628 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
? tell M 1lhvtroaTneahl Ooasultsa Iac.
11010 Raven Ridge Road. Raidgh. Borth CamUm 27614
now [phone] Faz (919) $46-9467
i 00-: SEA
mject.• tRW-I M Rd !Davis Dr SA-EC bVig-a
Date: fiber 26.2004
?om
samc=*wvw oM rll;bt b =dW&b dP bawd an coati 51kh k.
nrr el ddtaeadme Ord ary wb: addtdaemt idbrtaal(oa
App.60 ow wra mapped vda<1oMSOI. maps and piamd tc.Wr t.
it thew area. we io be UOed. ftr -" be append and
MdmrabrtbsU.B.At?caepsa[ ?

Waters of the US ---
11'g \ 1 \ \ 1\\ \ i`11
Hof
A t ?AA? t ?yY//.?_0
Not Subject : Hoa?tver, if impaaod thea
appropriate storummAer BMPes must be employed
r / ) J
???lii swr !.

CO
i
ZUIC/ ?!%7S (/
N of
LscErm;
^_O'- NATUS OF THt O.s. SUBJECT TO THS POM R[VERSO it S11RM (Le, imknidaear t .
w..ar, awl be NeStmod by •e USACE and VWQ(
e-%. 4A MAMrAL /ATSRS Or M VA, YAY M suw= TO TVs llZfAt t[VLR SS a ```1 r
IVIMM load be amaraw by at OSAGS sat vwQi
,??? ti -WAMS Of TIM M NOT SUSYSCT TOM MOST` IN= So R
-6 wrrrss low be mArm d by 16 vsAtxj
$0 -.YETIAMS (.W >Kee.e,,,,.dyd. Ma` MapV.UE
-MARGO(ALTMLAMM [mad be ?Anwd by the USACZJ ® - S&KC ILAC DENOTTNC Tics MUM POW OF THE NEOSE wPTEiLS (mad k 0
164 329 493 658
cftarvw by rc OSACL "d DwQI
O - saic PIAC W OMO THE STARTING PODrr OP TAE NEOSL)<ilrnks (m*d be Seale in feet
C"Anrd by go USACE MA DwQ(
'r T - TR TO

0
14:27
OCT 26. 2000

Project is scale:
00-5786 Isms 1
Fi
US
S

Protect
Mgr.: KM
I a:
1tU25JG0 -
gure
Quad
G
hhouse RdJDavls Dr.
9
'
Elam Todd d
Ambrosl
Cary, Wake County, NC
CARY, N. C.
86/4 DURHAM SOUTH IY OuADRANOLB
35078-G7-TF-024
PHOTOINS!"CUED 1988
1973
PHOTOREVI
EVISED 1987
O
DMA 5255 IV SE-SERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.0 Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] 0 [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Sl3plD) Slu m?'j
Mgr.:
t: Sale:
1' = w 1327
I"

Figure 2 - Soil Survey

M Date:
Highhouse Rd./Davis Dr.
El
T
dd d'
am
o
Ambrosi
K
Cary, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
1V11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] ¦ [phone]
Web Page; www.SandEC.com
1025100
i
BUILDINGS
A - APARTMENTS
B - CONDOMINIUMS
C - COMMERCIAL/RETAIL
D - ASSISTED LIIENG HOUSE ROAD -
F - CONSERVATORY HIGH
AREA 4
^\ C ? ISOLATED UNBUFFERED/
WETLAND WETLAND CHANNEL
,I
I
? I
!+ ii
+ j!#{I
1 ?} A E A
vJ ? i
?+ t ®
i
Q ? ! I f r...
q' rI n o[? I
' O O O O
C
® - B
c e AREA 3
C ?? --•
AREA N
i ! ISOLATED
C 0
? j O POND 0
li A A 1
C 0
B
i 0 0
' U
C
' 0 F 0
? T
+
C A A /
_h I O 1 !
j
7 -? ® A
/? J+1 f!/,
i
1j
® PROJECT N0. SRF-05000
FILENAME: SRF-05000-e1 SEARSTONE
SCALE: i .+-.300' WTILAM IMPACT
° In DATE`
11-15-05 OVERALPLAN
a (l OF
X
i
j
'RESTON FOREST
t
WETLAND ENCROACHMENT
AREA 1 = 0.02 AC, 1,064 SF
AREA 2 = 0.01 AC, 743 SF
AREA 3 = 0.01 AC, 734 SF
AREA 4 = 0.04 AC, 1,768 SF
TOTAL = .09 AC, 4,309 SF
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300 6C
I inch = 300 ft.
owl%
THE JOHN R. MCADAMS
COMPANY, INC.
ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
[phone]
PROJECT NO. SRF-0'55000
FILENAME: SEARSTONE MTHE JOHN R. McADAMS
SRF-05000-Ci
N ®
S9 .1 COMPANY, INC.
> SCALE: 1„_40„ VVETL T1?If7 ACT ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
a) RESCH TRIANGLE PAK, NC
2 co DATE: )1-15-05 AREA 1 P.O. BOX 1 0055 ZIP 97709-4005
a (2 OF 5) [phone]
/ PROPOSED
B
CONDOMINIUMS
J
f i i
00 0? J Co PLANTER PLANTER 1
PLANTER N r \ \ HTSCAPE 1
HARDSCAPIk
\ \ \ 1 \
1 '
\ \
.........
11 ' ? l / ? I ! \ \ \ \\\ \ \
/ // / I \ \ \ \ \ PLANTERt
PROPOSED EDGE/ ENCROACHMENT WETLAND
\\ \ \ \ \? \
,OF PONp 7 / 0.01 AC, 743 SF \ \ \
OFOPOPOSED ND EDS \ \ \ \ \
ISOLATED \ . \ \
/ POND \ \
EXISTING
OF POND EDGE \
GRAPHIC SCALE
40• o zo 40 80
I inch = 40 ft. / j
PROJECT N0. SRF-05000
FILENAME: SRF-05000-e1
® SEARSTONE ATHE JOHN R. McADAMS
a COMPANY, INC.
d SCALE: ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS
? ,"=40° WETLAND IMPACT
In DATE: ADL? ?f RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
11-15-05 L„<VA2 P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005
(8 OF 5) [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200121035 County: Wake
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property
Owner William Sears
Address 1651 High House Road
Cary, NC 27513
Telephone Number 919467-5703
Authorized
Agent Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Attn: Todd Preunin er
Address_ 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number 919-846-5900
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): The property is
located in the southeast quadrant & the intersection of Davis Drive and High House Road, in Cary, Wake
County, North Carolina.
Basis for Determination: The site contains wetlands and stream channels with indicators of ordinary
high water marks, located adjacent to and including Turkey Creek, above headwaters, in the Neuse River
Basin.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
There are waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, on the above described property which we strongly suggest
should be delineated and surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will
make a final jurisdictional determination on your property.
Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your wetlands
cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to obtain a consultant to obtain a more timely
delineation of the wetlands. Once the consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff will
review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval by the
Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property without an approved survey.
X The waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of the Corps
jurisdiction have been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to
the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the
date of this notification.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the
Army Permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A
permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you
have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
Amanda D. Jones at telephone number (919) 876 - 8441 extension 30
Project Manager Signature__(o,
Date July 9, 2001
Date July 9, 2006
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM.
Kevin Martin

From: Matthews, Monte K SAW [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 1:22 PM
To: Kevin Martin
Subject: RE: Site meetings on 9/15
Kevin,
Jean and I stopped by and checked the connection for jurisdiction on the
lower part of the Sears Tract. Jean felt that there was not enough drainage
connection for the jurisdictional component. Therefore the pond, stream
channel, and wetlands above this will be considered isolated.
Monte
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Martin [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:30 AM
To: Matthews, Monte K SAW
Subject: Site meetings on 9/15
Monte I will meet you at Hwy 55 and Green Hope School rd at 930am on 9/15
(see attached map) and we will look at an isolated pond (shown as pond 2 on
the attached map) and any part of our delineation you care to see. I will
bring site maps , etc. for your files. Next we will go to the southeast
quadrant of High House Rd and Davis Dr. to look at a previous delineation
that has been confirmed, but wetlands verses stream were not verified to
decide if proposed road impacts are to a stream or to a wetland. The
previous JD was verified by Amanda Jones on 7/9/01 (Action ID# 200121035).
Thanks Kevin Martin
Kevin Martin
From: Eric Kulz [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 6:18 AM
To: Kevin Martin
Subject: Re: site meetings
eric.kulz.vcf
Kevin:
That sounds fine. It is on my calendar. Try to send me a topo and soil
survey of the site. I already have maps for the Edwards Mill road site.
Eric
Kevin Martin wrote:
>Eric I agree with you assessment of the High House and Davis dr site, 10/4
>at 330pm is fine for the Evans rd and Cary parkway site. I believe you and I
>are scheduled that same day at 10 am for a large site at Edwards Mill rd and
>wade ave/trinity rd. Kevin
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Kulz [mailto:[e-mail]]
>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 1:51 PM
>To: Kevin Martin
>Subject: Re: site meetings
>Kevin:
>No. 2 first. If the feature in question was determined by DWQ, through
>on-site inspection, to not be buffered (even though it appears on the
>soil survey), it still could be either a jurisdictional feature (stream,
>as called by COE, or a wetland) or an ephemeral feature. Since COE did
>not take jurisdiction, at most the feature is an isolated wetland (if it
>was an isolated stream, we would have buffered it). I don't really see
>where we, need to look at it..
>As far as >there, so Evans
on Parkway,
my kway,home1 one about afternoon. minutes from
I am in
>class til 6:00 at NC State all next week. How about Tuesday Octobrt 4
>at 3:30?
>Eric
>Kevin Martin wrote:
>>Eric I have 2 other sites we need to look at one is at the corner of
>Evans
»road and Cary Parkway, it is 3t,o4e:feat:ure.;right beside the highway we
>>need a buffer call on. The second we may not need to meet onY give me your
»opinion. The site is at the southeast quadrant of High House and Davis
>>Drive, we have had buffer calls made at the site and the features in
1
>>question were not buffered even though they do appear on the soils map. The
>>Corps recently called these areas isolated, so from a permitting.standpoint
>>if we go over o.l acre we will need a DWQ permit. My question is since we
>>already have a determination that the feature is not buffered is it safe to
>>assume that from your standpoint it is a wetland and not a stream? If so we
>>do not need to met, if not we need to meet and decide which it is. However
>>if we decide it is a stream it may look strange that we say it is not
>>buffered! Thanks Kevin
>>This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only
>for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This
>electronic communication may not have passed through our standard
>review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included
>herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be used for
>final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the
>consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
>addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
>communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete
>the original communication from your system. Thank you.
>
>This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named
addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic communication may
not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and
recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be
used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's
original signature and seal. If you are not the named addressee (s), any use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have
received this electronic communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail
and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you.
2
35p
1- U
• 400 ?
? O . /U 3 10 II _ O I 35C
© 42 • • 0 8 i 350 ?....
1 - ? III // I 0 O, I
it 1 \
34?
X00 h .II 0 I ?.'.
?J 18
48 1
' o 0
3'0 S 0
n? •, 1 Ill/ / , `?
0
T 0 ?9 O 343
3s /yj '4010 I Q
LPL J /// 1 J 1??. el?'? / n 1 11 11 \

Project #:
00-5786 Scale:
1" = 2000'
Fi
1
USGS Q
d
Project
Mgr.: KM Date:
10/25100 gure
-
ua
Highhouse RdJDavis Dr.
'
Elam Todd d
Ambrosi
Cary, Wake County, NC

CARY, N. C.
SEJ4 DURHAM SOUTH 15' QUADRANGLE
35078-G7-TF-024
PHOTOINSPECTED 1988
1973
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA 5255 IV SE-SERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.ll Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] 0 [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Project #: Scale:
00.5786 1" =1320'
Mgr.: KM 1 10125100
Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Highhouse Rd./Davis Dr.
Elam Todd d'Ambrosi
Cary, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.. Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com