20180084 Ver 1_401 Application_20180112

December 8, 2017
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Providing Sound Environmental Solutions
RE: Cove Creek Stream Restoration Project
Nationwide 27/ GC 3885 Application
Zionville, NC (Watauga County)
Ms. Higgins,
2 0 1 8 0 0 8,
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
ph/fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Enclosed find 4 copies of the referenced project permii/PCN application. Also enclosed
please find a $570.00 check specific to the major water quality certification permit
application fee.
If you have any questions give me a call at 423.727.4476.
Sincerely,
Josselyn Lucas

o�oF w n rFq pc
Use Only:
-1lE.�L 2 2018 s action I no.
W project no.
401EQ-WATER RES Fo Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
&BUFFER R
Pre -Construction Notification Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
I ❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Cove Creek Stream Restoration
2b. County:
Watauga
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Zionville
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
1. Winebarger John C. & Susie; 2. Winebarger, Darrell V.; 3. Winebarger, J. C & Susie
G.; Winebarger, 4. Winebarger John C. & Susie; 5. Ward, Coleen E.; 6. Oliver
Dewayn K. & Lottie; 7. Oliver, Dewayn K. & Lottie; 8. Ward, Colleen E.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
1. Book 929 Page 048; 2. BY WILL; 3. Book 388 Page 308; 4. Book 929 Page 048; 5.
Book 392 Page 561; 6. Book 599 Page 037, 7. Book 124 Page 432; 8. Book 392 Page
561
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
Off of Old US Highway 421
3e. City, state, zip:
Zionville, NC 28698
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: See Memorandum of Understanding and Agent
Authorizations - attached.
4b. Name:
Resource Institute, Inc.
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
c/o:
4d. Street address:
2714 Henning Drive
4e. City, state, zip:
Winston Salem, NC 27106
4f. Telephone no.:
336-750-0522
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Adam Williams
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc
5c. Street address:
5902 Highway 421 S
5d. City, state, zip:
Mountain City, TN 37683
5e. Telephone no.:
423-727-4476
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1983377142000;1983279141000;1983361668000;
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1983364721000;1983360326000;1983360326000;
1983355975000;1983360326000
Latitude: 36.292800 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Longitude: -81.771044
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
36.7 cumulative acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Cove Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Watauga (HUC 06010103)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The properties are located approximately 3 miles southwast of the town of Zionville, NC in westerm Watauga County.
The properties are located along Old US Highway 421. Dominant landuses in the general vicinity of the Subject Property
include residential (suburban) and agricultural (crop/pasture). The sub -watershed draining to the project site includes
farms and residential developments. The project site occurs approximately 4.5 miles upstream of Cove Creek's
confluence with the Watauga River. The proposed Cove Creek Restoration Project Site is located along the riparian
corridor of Cove Creek (river left & right), which traverses mulitple properties from north to south (approx). The Subject
Properties contain houses and crop land. Streambanks at the project site are highly eroded and vertical in areas.
Streambank vegetation is generally grassy with medium trees and some herbs.The topography at the site is gently
sloping in the project area with elevations ranging from —2,775 - 2,785 ft. above mean sea level, becoming steeper to the
east away from the project site exending up to 3,075 ft. above mean sea level.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
--2,313 In ft of Cove Creek on Subject Properties
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The goal of this project is to enhance and restore 2,313 In ft of Cove Creek. Streambank sloping and benching will occur
throughout the reach to restore floodplain connectivity and decrease erosive incisement of the channel. Riffle -pool
sequencing, natural channel structures, and a forested riparian buffer will also be restored along the reach.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The restoration work proposed at the site will implement Natural channel design measures including streambank sloping
and creation of a stable bankfull bench, j -hook, cross vane, wing deflectors, root wad structures, and riparian corridor
planting. Streambank sloping/benching, construction of j -hook structure and wing deflectors, and reforestation of the
buffer will occur along river left of all properties along the creek, and along river right in the uppermost extent of the
project on the Winebarger property. Streambank sloping/benching will occur on the majority of river left areas on all
properties. Equipment likely to be used for this proposed construction include track -hoes, skidsteers, and dump trucks for
hauling equipment, building materials, and fill material.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary[I Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P [--IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0 impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Stream
Restoration
Cove Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
—35
(bkfull)
—2,313
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
F1 INT
[:1 DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
[:11 NT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P [:IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
--2,313
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
linear feet
of impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0 impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
0 impacts
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
61 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
0 impacts
61. Comments:
Page 6of12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed work and associated impacts are intended to restore instream structure and floodplain connectivity at Cove
Creek along the stream reach while minimizing impacts to aquatic resources. Design measures which minimize impacts
include j -hook, toe wood, wind deflectors, and cross -vane structures intended to enhance stream diversity and decrease site
sedimentation. Streambanks will then be planted with appropriate native species (see re-veg detail). Disturbed buffer areas
will be immediately seeded upon completion (temporary - annual ryegrass), matted (coconut coir matting), and stabilized at
the close of each construction day. Following construction, the banks of the restored channel will be seeded with a native
floodplain mix (permanent seed). Live stakes and matting staples will be used to secure the coconut matting in these high -
stress areas. Riparian buffer will be planted with a variety of native 1 -gallon trees following construction.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All heavy equipment will be kept out of the stream channel during project construction except where absolutely necessary to
install in -stream structures. Any entering of the channel or immediate riparian area will be done with new equipment, no
hydraulic leaks tolerated. Disturbance of channel bottom, banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the minimum
necessary to allow for bank stablization sufficient to restore the hydraulic capacity of the stream channel.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
0 impacts
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed project is not adjacent to a protected riparian buffer as
identified within the NC Riparian Buffer Protections Rules. The proposed project
❑ Yes ® No
occurs within the Watauga River Basin, which is not listed in the NCDENR Riparian
Buffer Rules. Therefore, a diffuse flow plan is not included in this application.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This project will not result in any increase
of imperivous surface at the project site.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Watauga County
❑ Phase If
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We do not anticipate the proposed stream restoration will result in additional development nearby which could impact
nearby downstream water quality. Proposed measures will reduce sediment export from the Subject Property to
downstream waters.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS - Conducted a review of the project and found that suitable roosting habitat may be present on site for the
federally threatened northern long-eared bat. However, the project location is exempt under the 4(d) rule (effective as of
February 16, 2016). The USFWS found no other federally protected species in the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA — Office of Habitat Protection Division
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Historic Preservation Office - Determined that there are four previously recorded archaeological sites at or in close
proximity to the project area. The National Register eligibility of these sites has not been evaluated. Determined that the
project as proposed will not have any effect on any historic structures. Recommends that a comprehensive survey be be
conducted by an experienced archaeologist to identify and evaluate the significance of archaeological remains that may
be damanged or destroyed by the proposed project. An experienced archaeologist will be contacted to conduct the
recommended survey and contact the staff archaeologist at NCDCR prior to the initiation of fieldwork.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? 71p
Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: This proposed project Is located in the Floodway of Cove Creek.
The proposed project Is anticipated to cause no Increase in flood elevation. A No -Rise Certification will be submitted by
BFEC, Inc. to the Watauga County floodplain administrator.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program, Panel
1983 (effective date 12/3/2009), Map No. 3710198300J. Site is highlighted on the DFRIM Panel attached to this permit
application.
Adam Williams, Agent
Date
Agent Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR WNCI STREAM PROJECTS
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO. N/A PARCEL ID: 1983461773000;
1983355975000
STREET ADDRESS: 3846 Old US Highway 421 Zionville, NC 28698
Property Owner:
Oliver, Dewayn K & Lottie
Property Owners Street Address (if different than above):
The property owners above have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Resource
Institute, Inc. that authorizes the activities proposed on the subject property (see attached). As
an authorized representative of Resource Institute, I do hereby authorize
Adam Williams , of Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc.
(Contractor/Agent) (Consulting Firm)
to act on my behalf of Resource Institute and take all actions necessary for the processing,
issuance and acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
Resource Institute Address:
2631 Reynolda Road, Winston Salem, NC 27106 Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge. I _
Authorized Signature:
Date: / / / 0 /-2o

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR WNCI STREAM PROJECTS
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO. N/A PARCEL ID: 1983377142000;
1983279141000;
1983361668000;
1983364721000
STREET ADDRESS: 4066 Old US Hwy 421 N, Zionville, NC 28698
Property Owner:
Winebarger John C. & Susie
Property Owners Street Address (if different than above):
The property owners above have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Resource
Institute, Inc. that authorizes the activities proposed on the subject property (see attached). As
an authorized representative of Resource Institute, I do hereby authorize
Adam Williams , of Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc.
(Contractor/Agent) (Consulting Firm)
to act on my behalf of Resource.. -Institute and;tAke all actions necessary for the processing,
.1,M.
issuance and acceptance of this'permiVor c..ertification and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
Resource Institute Address:
2631 Reynolda Road, Winston Salem, NC 27106 Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature:
Date: g /1 0 1 ���

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR WNCI STREAM PROJECTS
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO. N/A PARCEL ID: 1983360326000;
1983360326000
STREET ADDRESS: Off SR1233 Vilas, NC 28692
Property Owner:
Ward, Colleen E.
Property Owners Street Address (if different than above):
PO Box 136 Zionville, NC 28698
The property owners above have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Resource
Institute, Inc. that authorizes the activities proposed on the subject property (see attached). As
an authorized representative of Resource Institute, I do hereby authorize
Adam Williams , of Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc.
(Contractor/Agent) (Consulting Firm)
to act on my behalf of Resource Institute and take all actions necessary for the processing,
issuance and acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
Resource Institute Address:
2631 Reynolda Rd, Winston Salem, NC 27106 Telephone: _336.750.0522
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature:
Date: 09/06/2017

-L
(Unavailable) mL{toPO
08 V 47 22 4:• W
036 16 53 4: N
(ELK MILLS,
036 16 15 7" N
081.47 224:'�V
/I J—,—iI.hI.I
S1 IFRW001) (NC) 1>l'AURAN(il-I'
\\'INS I ON-SAIT10 HOONL INC)
10P06RAI'llK SLRIL•S (BALDWIN GAP)
061 45' 0790' W
036 18'5342' N
(ELK PARK)
Produced by MyTopo Terram Navigator
Topography based on USGS 1 X24.000
Maps
North American 1903 Datum (NAD03)
UNKNOWN Pro)ection
To place on the predicted North American
1927 move the pto)eceen Imes 14M N and
15M E
Declination
GN 0.45'W
MN 6.81° W
0
I VALLC UrTU1,1o)
SCALE 1:24000
MILE
0 1000
YARDS
U 1
KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM 1929
(ZIONVILLE)
035 16'1571"N
D61 45' 07 90"VV
(BOONE)
SH RWOOD (NC'). NC
1938
081'47'00.00" W 081'46'30,00" W 081'46'00 00" W 081' 45'30.00" W
-
TTNO r
o
BM U b1 2907 ti
o
..
_ - .•
bo
t.
Z—
,. z
`SM
bo
^
t r' i t. LHT 3436.x.
8MJ 123 2825 $tt7Kei` ell.o_o
2901 ,y
C')
.' 7/,
• {
+�lk r y/ e t l 11
yCove Creek Project Site
o
U
44yA#1
U
5M K 123 -
p
2)67
.p MastC,.,•�
'i
Q FiM T t+.' f
-
L751. �� .ti' it a Y P t
r ,a r.1 City
2
, .. n
1p
Oj C
z
p
O
O
• i li ,4' � t
\
•
d
O
O
0/`4
I�
o
I
x o �`
I^
o
1 0
•-
�
•Atrtalltha .`
R,.
Z
' -L !"SON CHAIII..
• '.�c.6 tit \
Z
.;�� 'r!
,�' ��
chi
'•
o'O
i�
;1. �oVE CME EK "'. • Cri ht C 2(=.M To
I I I I I I
081 ` 47' 00.00" W 081 ` 46' 30.00" W 081 ° 46' 00.00" W 081'45'30.00" W
(ELK PARK)
Produced by MyTopo Terram Navigator
Topography based on USGS 1 X24.000
Maps
North American 1903 Datum (NAD03)
UNKNOWN Pro)ection
To place on the predicted North American
1927 move the pto)eceen Imes 14M N and
15M E
Declination
GN 0.45'W
MN 6.81° W
0
I VALLC UrTU1,1o)
SCALE 1:24000
MILE
0 1000
YARDS
U 1
KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM 1929
(ZIONVILLE)
035 16'1571"N
D61 45' 07 90"VV
(BOONE)
SH RWOOD (NC'). NC
1938

x rw
i as
_ F
ie;
IA
`.A�tr6Yf�e�• �'' �.n `dam .• _ , r,

Upstream view near project midpoint
Photosheet 3
J

%.,, �r �'�.'-w k ,.` a�'•� ''b �' �-:� �x�� 'Srs •'� - % j'� -��, ref i� %5t'� r%�(. r +,•« z�!.�§: •..
t Yr i�r Y� 4
'If
y
I

FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESOFIPDONS AND INDE%MAP
NOTES TO USERS
s.w.we _ e. m..ee. tiw.ti
�o�� •vee raun�-J
.� M.a. nu mn or Abdaale ora. adiw M1NAWN
sra*eNKwalRms
®con Abp cY�n D1MrNise—.W Area
SCALE
r �R�aaoPi
I Deal -D00fwe L8,000
0 ZSO SOO 1.000
FM
Mahne
0 TS /50 300
PANEL LOCATOR
HAIpNALFDNID INSUIIANCE PROGRAM rmyMM
NORTH CAROUNA
�Tw —1983
O Nun euwu
C
O
O
L.L
C6
C
O
IQ
Z
3'lIOa1983001
rnem
-'
1/3/009
w11M1 N Base Med Devalion(BFE)
WIN BEE 81D......
SPECNLFUNp
WIARO AREnS
® Requlalpry Fbodvay
.s 0.1%AnnwlCane RoadNmA,Artae
M 1%Aeeual Rwd rMM1 Average
Doh Leee l01, e
N,,fl FN,FOne SAart MRe_ —
FlDee CandNlow 1%Annual
OINEAAREABOF
M.R. Flood ""'
ARNA M1Red W R.dR1kdu..l
RDOG NAZARD
Sw Nales
OIXFR
AREAS
A DetanninedmEe Oulademe
I 02%Annua1CNan,e Roodpain.
Channel, Cuherl, or Stoml Sorer
»» Aaredited or Prenuanaly AaredNed
GENEML
lerte. Dias, or Fbnd.4
SIROORIRES
........... leve, Dlke,orFlwdwall
NorT C -11W Gelded, Sury Well, meM
w NeUwalGwdeUC Sung Den,A maA
�'p.
Cmdactor ESL NCiMP Suney Mntll mark
Sl I ee wiN 1%Rnnual CAanix
rarer Suraa Reallon (BFE)
C)----- Owalel T.R_
------- Cptlhl iransaGBasNiw
- PMIIe Bawling
- ---- N41"ph-let,2
DINER
EEymllss
Umilof SWdy
mn.nuri,., w,,,
NOTES TO USERS
s.w.we _ e. m..ee. tiw.ti
�o�� •vee raun�-J
.� M.a. nu mn or Abdaale ora. adiw M1NAWN
sra*eNKwalRms
®con Abp cY�n D1MrNise—.W Area
SCALE
r �R�aaoPi
I Deal -D00fwe L8,000
0 ZSO SOO 1.000
FM
Mahne
0 TS /50 300
PANEL LOCATOR
HAIpNALFDNID INSUIIANCE PROGRAM rmyMM
NORTH CAROUNA
�Tw —1983
O Nun euwu
C
O
O
L.L
C6
C
O
IQ
Z
3'lIOa1983001
rnem
-'
1/3/009

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
January 19, 2017
Emily Morris
Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc.
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
Re: Cove Creek Restoration, Zionville, Watauga County, ER 17-0056
Dear Ms. Morris:
Thank you for your letter of January 4, 2017, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
There are four previously recorded archaeological sites at or in close proximity to the project area. The
National Register eligibility of these sites has not been evaluated. The project area has never been
systematically surveyed to determine the location or significance of archaeological resources. Based on the
topographic and hydrological situation and the density of archaeological sites in Cove Creek valley, there is
a high probability for the presence of prehistoric or historic archaeological sites.
We recommend that a comprehensive survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist to identify and
evaluate the significance of archaeological remains that may be damaged or destroyed by the proposed
project. The archaeological survey need only be conducted in those portions of the project area where
ground disturbance is proposed. Potential effects on unknown resources must be assessed prior to the
initiation of construction activities.
Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as well as two copies of the appropriate site
forms, should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are available and well in advance
of any construction activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at www.archaeology.ncdcr.gov/ncarch/resource/consultants.htm. The archaeologists listed,
or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey. Prior to
initiation of fieldwork the archaeologist should consult with Western Office staff archaeologist, Linda Hall,
at 828/296-7230 or linda.hallAncdcr�.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewAncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
60V Ramona M. Bartos

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
February 2, 2017
Emily Morris
Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc.
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, Tennessee 37683
Dear Ms. Morris:
Subject: Cove Creek Stream Restoration Project; Watauga County, North Carolina
Log No. 4-2-17-176
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence dated January 4, 2016 wherein you request our technical assistance regarding
potential occurrences of federally protected species in the proposed project vicinity. The Service
submits the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, you are seeking a NWT 27 for proposed impacts to 2,313
linear feet of Cove Creek near West Jefferson, North Carolina. The proposed project would
incorporate natural stream channel design methodologies and instream structures including j -
hooks, root wads, and riparian planting.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present on site for the
federally threatened northern long-eared bat. However, the final 4(d) rule (effective as of
February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared bat associated with activities
that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site, and greater than 150 feet from
a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). Based on the
information provided, the project (which may require tree clearing) would occur at a location
where any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule.
The Service has record of no other federally protected species in the project area. Please be
aware that in accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of the appropriate federal agency or
its designated representative to review its activities or programs and to identify any such

activities or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. If it is
determined that the proposed activity may adversely affect any species federally listed as
endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be initiated.
We offer the following recommendations in the interest of protecting fish, wildlife, and other
natural resources.
Stream Channel and Bank Reconstruction/Restoration Activities
A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and
associated bed load (sediment) while maintaining channel features and neither degrading
(accelerating the erosion of banks and scour of the channel bed) nor aggrading (accelerating the
deposition of sediment within the channel). The majority of property damage associated with
flood events in areas that contain, or are adjacent to, streams often can be tied to human -caused
alterations within the stream corridor, such as the removal of streambank vegetation,
channelization, and/or dredging of the stream and the placement of fill within floodplains. To
avoid future damage and associated costs, it is critical that proposals to repair storm -damaged
property within stream corridors emphasize the restoration of natural, stable stream conditions.
Accordingly, we recommend the following:
1. Where possible, work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work
area by implementing stream diversions, barriers, and/or pump -around systems.
2. Reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas would be stabilized
with seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion -control matting prior to
the end of each workday. No erosion -control matting or blankets should contain
synthetic (netting) materials. Matting should be secured in place with staples; stakes; or,
wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to temporary seed
establishment, additional measures should be implemented to protect water quality along
slopes and overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be covered with plastic or
other geotextile material).
3. We recommend planting deep -rooting woody vegetation along riparian areas where any
channel work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced at intervals no
greater than 10 feet along stream banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths should be as
wide as practical but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream channel.
Invasive Exotic Species
Without active management, including the revegetation of disturbed areas with native species,
project corridors may become corridors for the movement of invasive exotic plant species.
Exotic species are a major contributor to species depletion and extinction, second only to habitat
loss. Exotics are a factor contributing to the endangered or threatened status of more than
40 percent of the animals and plants on the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants.' It is estimated that at least 4,000 exotic plant species and 2,300 exotic animal
species are now established in the United States, costing more than $130 billion a year to
1D.S. Wilcove, D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in
the United States. Bioscience 48:607-615.

control.' Additionally, the U.S. Government has many programs and laws in place to combat
invasive species (see www.invasivespecies.gov). Specifically, Section 2(a)(3) of Executive Order
13112 - Invasive Species (February 3, 1999) directs federal agencies to "not authorize, fund, or
carry out actions that it believes are likely to cause or promote the introduction or spread of
invasive species in the United States or elsewhere." Despite their short-term erosion -control
benefits, many exotic species used in soil stabilization seed mixes are persistent once they are
established, thereby preventing the reestablishment of native vegetation. Many of these exotic
plants' are also aggressive invaders of nearby natural areas, where they are capable of displacing
already -established native species. Therefore, we strongly recommend that only species native
to the natural communities within the project area be used in association with all aspects of this
project.
The Service supports the restoration objectives of this project. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 225, if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-17-176.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet A. Mizzi
Field Supervisor
'D. Pimentel, L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous
species in the United States. BioScience 50:53-65.
'Lists of invasive exotic plants can be found at http://www.tneppc.org/and http://www.invasive.org/eastern/srs/
(exotic wildlife links) on the Internet.
3

usDA
arm— 4w NRCS
unw" Slrtts owports"."t of ft"ruluare
iodrufl! R✓K#nar� C Crisrr,`,r,�::,-.'...'t: � �r
Trip Report
on technical guidance provided by
NRCS specialists in NC
TO: Individual/Office receiving assistance: Dewayne Oliver
FROM: Person (s) Providing Assistance: Jim Errante, CR Specialist
County: Watauga
Date (s) of assistance: 6/29/16
NOTE: You must complete/
save/send this utilizing Adobe
Acrobat Standard/Professional,
not Adobe REA PER.
Purpose of trip: Cultural resources surveyfor planned channel bed stabilization and streambank protection (EQIP).
List of Findings:
A preliminary literature search revealed several prehistoric sites recorded in closevicinity.
A cultural resources survey of the planned APE included both visual and subsurface investigations of all areas expected to be
disturbed by NRCS assistance. No evidence of CR's was discovered. Shovel testing revealed very silty, stream laid soils. No evidence
previously recorded sites was discovered. Evidence of stream relocation is visible and would have significantly disturbed soils inside
the APE.
Recommendations:
Continue with planned assistance. Should any prehistoric or historic cultural resource(s) or human remains be uncovered during
NRCS assisted activities, all work must cease in the area of the discovery. Steps should then betaken to secure and preserve the
discovery and the Cultural Resources Specialist should be contacted ASAP.
Agreed -to -items:
im Errante /5/16
TYPED SIGNATURE DATE PREPARED
C'd to:
pe in names of persons who will receive a cop
should include Your Supervisor, NRCS State
onservationist, and the Supervisory DC
David Tucker

pus"'
�" 6ARCS
Wiled 540es Oeperiment 0 * j"cv1twre
Siatur vi kr+;�.,..�re-; C cr,s,•r e•sa,t 1'*r=: n-,:•
Trip Report
on technical guidance provided by
NRCS specialists in NC
TO: Individual/Office receiving assistance: John Winebarger
FROM: Person (s) Providing Assistance: Jim Errante, CR Specialist
County: Watauga
Date (s) of assistance: 6/29/16
NOTE: You must complete/
save/send this utilizing Adobe
Acrobat Standard/ Profess ions/,
notAdobe READER.
Purpose of trip: Cultural resources survey for planned channel bed stabilization and streambank protection (EQIP).
List of Findings:
A preliminary literature search revealed several prehistoric sites recorded in close vicinity.
A cultural resources survey of the planned APE included both visual and subsurface investigations of all areas expected to be
disturbed by NRCS assistance. No evidence of CR's was discovered. Shovel testing revealed very silty, stream laid soils. No evidence
previously recorded sites was discovered. Evidence of stream relocation is visible and would have significantly disturbed soils inside
the APE.
Recommendations:
Continue with planned assistance. Should any prehistoric or historic cultural resource(s) or human remains be uncovered during
NRCS assisted activities, all work must cease in the area of the discovery. Steps should then be taken to secure and preserve the
discovery and the Cultural Resources Specialist should be contacted ASAP.
Agreed -to -items:
im Errante /5/16
TYPEDSIGNATURE DATE PREPARED
c'd to:
pe in names of persons who will receive a copy
should include Your Supervisor, NRCS State
onservationist, and the Supervisory DC
David Tucker

WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA STREAM INITIATIVE a"$k
OLIVER-WINEBARGER
COVE CREEK STREAM RESTORATION �i
SHEETINDEX
•-CKIVDAI wlnrCC.
1. STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA (LONGITUDINAL PROFILE,
CROSS-SECTIONS, ETC) PRESENTED HEREIN COLLECTED
BY BFEC/BFED.
2. CONTOUR DATA PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS
TAKEN FROM NCDOT LIDAR DATA (2' AND 10
CONTOURS).
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
NTS
COVER
1
OVERALL SITE PLAN
2
SITE PLAN 1 STA 0+00 TO 15+00
3
SITE PLAN 2 STA 15+00 TO 23+32
4
LONG PROFILE AND TYPICAL SECTION
5
CROSS SECTIONS 1-5
6
CROSS SECTIONS 6-8
7
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS (Reveg., Bedform, Sloping)
8
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS (Toewood, Rock Cross -Vane)
9
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS (J -Hooks)
10
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS (Wing Defelector)
11
Item
lQuantity Unit
Live Stake
26213 SF
Planting: ContainerTree & Shrub
20810 SF
J -Hook (Arm Length 42')
15 EA
Cross Vane (Arm Length 42')
8 EA
Double Wing Deflector (Length 30-40')
1 EA
Single Wing Deflector (Length 30-40')
6 EA
Bank Sloping and Stabilization
4575 LF
Toe Wood
376 LF
Grading (cut volume, unadjusted)
3600 CY
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES:
1, ONCE SITE CONSTRUCTION WITHIN AN AREA HAS CEASED ALL
DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY SEEDED
(TEMPORARY & PERMANENT SEED), MATTED (COIR BLANKET),
AND STABILIZED. SEE SHEET 8.
2. LIVESTAKES AND BIODEGRADABLE MATTING STAKES WILL BE
USED TO SECURE THE MATTING
3. BROADCAST SEEDING RATES ARE SPECIFIED ON SHEET 8.
4. NATIVE SHRUB AND TREE SPECIES WILL BE PLANTED
THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AREA AT A RATE OF 400+
STEMS/ACRE, SECURING NEAR BANK AREAS AND PROVIDING
FUTURE SHADING OF THE CHANNEL (SEE SHEET 8).
5. PRECAUTIONS WILL BE TAKEN TO KEEP HEAVY EQUIPMENT
OUT OF THE STREAM CHANNEL EXCEPT WHERE ABSOLUTELY
NECESSARY TO INSTALL STREAM ENHANCEMENT MEASURES.
PROJECT SITE
r►
LOCATION MAP
NTS \11111111111,,,1'
CA
SEAL
'
/_ 04287
IN
C
L
l
Tjf /1111111111111\\\`\
Ro TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, lU ME Sheet
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE I /
RESOURCEVo� NRCS NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE 7
1N, STTTUTE REGULATIONS.

THIS PLAN DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, LINES, APPURTENANCES, ETC., AND
THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PIPES, VALVES, ETC. AS SHOWN ARE IN AN
APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE DWNER OR THE
ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOG177ON OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, LINES,
PIPES, ETC. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL
LIMIAGES WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE
ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND U77LITIES, PIPES AND VALVES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL N077FY THE
ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED FACIU77ES TO DETERMINE IF AN ITEM WILL
NEED TO BE RELOCATED.
THE ENGINEER HAS MADE NO EXAMINA77ON TO DETERWINE WHETHER ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC MATERIALS
ARE PRESENT OR CONTAINED IN, UNDER, OR ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR ITS WATERS, OR IF ANY
HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC MATERIALS HAVE CONTAMINATED THIS OR OTHER PROPERTIES OR ITS WATERS IN
ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. NO SUB—SURFACE EXAMINATION OF ANY TYPE HAS BEEN MADE BY THE l
ENGINEER, AND ACCORDINGLY, NO OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR INFERRED ON ALL SUCH MATTERS.
FURTHER, NO OPINION IS RENDERED AS TO ANY WOLA71ON OF ANY ENWRONMVVTAL LAWS OR
REGULATIONS, E77HER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL RELATED TO THE WFORM IM SHOWN ON THIS PLAN _ ^
AND THE ENGINEER IS IN NO WAY LIABLE FOR ANY VIOLATION OF SUCH EIVYNWWENTAL LAWS SHOULD /\I
SUCH EXIST.
PIN:
1
pme
WINEBARGER PARCEL
PIN: 1983-27-9141-000
PARCEL
WARD PARCEL
PIN: 1983-36-0326-000
/ 14+00
1!
`\ I 'I6+00
IIIi�i�!
W x�URC►= WARD PARCEL
I pIN: 1983-36-0326-000
N R
Jill ALE 1" 166__
WINBARGER PARCEL
PIN: 1983-36-4721-000
t►
LEGEND
>
]-HOOK
All
CROSS VANE;
l�-
/ WING DEFLECTOR /
�.� TOE WOOD
STREAM THALWEG )�
BANKFULL
2'CONTOUR
I ,f
10' CONTOUR
\ OLIVER PARCEL
CSL LI 1,
PIN: 1983-46-1773-000
1e+
� d
1 (l�
\ �►. Mrrrrwr
err r.�4 r. •.n
I C , +0o /
PIN: 1983-35-5975-000
►I
t
TREE
DITCH
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
TO THE BEST OF MY f WLEDGE, JUDGMENT
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
( ✓—V =�G NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE
l/ A IF REGULATIONS.
SITE PLAN 811112017 81
8!11/2017
Sheet Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
2 '% WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA STREAM INITIATIVE M1l 5802 Highway 421 South
I COVE CREEK STREAM RESTORATION �wNBY
JKL Mountain City, TN 37683
/ WATAUGA COUNTY, BOONE, NC CHECKED BY ph/fax: [phone]
AWAM UCEWO FLIM www.bfec.org
EXISTING STRUCTURE /
®
ROAD
SLOPING, PLANTING,
INVASIVE REMOVAL
\1\
PROPERTY LINE
TREE
DITCH
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
TO THE BEST OF MY f WLEDGE, JUDGMENT
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
( ✓—V =�G NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE
l/ A IF REGULATIONS.
SITE PLAN 811112017 81
8!11/2017
Sheet Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
2 '% WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA STREAM INITIATIVE M1l 5802 Highway 421 South
I COVE CREEK STREAM RESTORATION �wNBY
JKL Mountain City, TN 37683
/ WATAUGA COUNTY, BOONE, NC CHECKED BY ph/fax: [phone]
AWAM UCEWO FLIM www.bfec.org

-- 3>77
N
x +
r �
�\ Z- o O
00
r \ /
00 a
/00 o
� SXR
00
O ' Cross vane o bedrock
ti•
.i• It�
• BIg Scour
.'y
• r
�X 9+02
Ingle wing deflector at mid—channel bar;
strutted riffle start O single wing O
`- de ctor
� lk�
/ _6 , 1 channel a create smooth bend
\ \ Ig cut at 11+57
iA 11+5
Poplar tree
s 112+00
D wl sect _
ea/p�Bl�gaecut a ave to Ion 1
II
1
r'
-- 4+00
i Big cut here
1 \
Tie toewood to tree
I,fJ
L I lit"
LEGEND
)-HOOK
'9 CROSS VANE
WING DEFLECTOR
a— TOE WOOD
STREAM THALWEG
P 3+ 8 BANKFULL
XS 6 5
2'CONTOUR
10'CONTOUR
\ EXISTING STRUCTURE
ROAD
SLOPING, PLANTING,
INVASIVE REMOVAL
PROPERTY LINE
TREE
DITCH
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
ev'
0.
, ofEsg, O
RESOURCE =S.L / '"Z �"��'•!� .
I t t r e roots
G �
O PHIC SCALE 1
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE -SO O HO
NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE 1 �• �� PJ E�,.'��,�..
REGULATIONS. k `J&.��
--
DA TF. k1111111k
Sheet SITE PLAN STA 0+00 TO 15+00 B"1/2017 oipwy
Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
DRAWN BY, _..
3/ ./ JKL
5902 ou Highway 421 South
I Wt=STERN NORTH CAROL1fJA STRt=fLb11�WTlAT1Vt Mountain City, TN 37883
WATAUGA COUNTY, BOONE, NC CHECKED BY ph/far: 423.727.4476
AW ucDff*FL = www.biec.org
_"" .

\\ \ \
\ Big cut here
Tie toewood to tree
Double wiUefl rT—C-H _U E
t d tree rooWJ X �
t � I
i
+00
T�P• 4
lweg shaping at 16+00
X
_ P40
x> o FU -FL
INS7'ITUrL
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
Sheet SITE PLAN STA 15+00 TO 23+32
COVE CREEK STREAM STABILIZATION
41
1 WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA STREAM INITIATIVE
I WATAUGA COUNTY, BOONE, NC
I., C�11
e
1
LEGEND
J -HOOK
'9 CROSS VANE
WING DEFLECTOR
�. TOE WOOD
STREAM THALWEG
(j BANKFULL
tvl 2' CONTOUR
10'CONTOUR
r' EXISTING STRUCTURE
® ROAD
SLOPING, PLANTING,
LL�L INVASIVE REMOVAL
E7 PROPERTY LINE
TREE
DITCH
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
\i
vane ti to bedrock
�hift channel to create /
smooth bend, take trees J
�1 +00
0� X _g STA. 1+8
arm river , \ •��,`��-P� F E S Si���{�
23-+ 00 - � �A �1,�
4
+132
.N 'INEE
DATE.-
811112017
ATE:81111207' . Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
DRAWN BY ' 5802 Highway 421 South
JKL
Mountain City, TN 37883
CHECKED eY r,. ,Y ph/fax: [phone]
AW +r•�°"4+' UGENSENP-1089 www.btec.org

Longitudinal Profile
+ + +
00 00 00 00 00 00 00
e "Ox e
Station
Typical Cross Section
1010 --- 1 enc Maximum
xistingGround
M 1005 - -- - Wb
M Db
s� 1000 '
rt
° 995 - - -
990 --
J I X�O X�O
Station
SC's, L '
0 '
l � �
/N
LIICItiG��'%,
AND THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGEBELIIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLET
RI:S RCE
JA iuuU����RCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE jN$'r'I`I'jJ"j"1
I EGULATIONS
N
00 00 00 00 113,(bx x Ox x �x
LEGEND
WATER THALWEG
SURFACE
Oliver-Winebarger
2790-
M
Drainage Area -8128 ac / 12.7 mi'
<
278
0
1. Stream Type
C3
C3
N/A
277
58.3
276
53.2/64.6
00
30.2
Ox
00 00 00 00 00 00 00
e "Ox e
Station
Typical Cross Section
1010 --- 1 enc Maximum
xistingGround
M 1005 - -- - Wb
M Db
s� 1000 '
rt
° 995 - - -
990 --
J I X�O X�O
Station
SC's, L '
0 '
l � �
/N
LIICItiG��'%,
AND THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGEBELIIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLET
RI:S RCE
JA iuuU����RCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE jN$'r'I`I'jJ"j"1
I EGULATIONS
N
00 00 00 00 113,(bx x Ox x �x
LEGEND
WATER THALWEG
SURFACE
Oliver-Winebarger
Morphological Table
Drainage Area -8128 ac / 12.7 mi'
Existing
Proposed
Proposed Ranges
1. Stream Type
C3
C3
N/A
2. Bankfull Area - Sq Ft
58.3
59.6
53.2/64.6
3. Bankfull Width - Ft
30.2
31.6
25.1/42.4
4. Avg Bankfull Depth - Ft
2
1.9
1.S/2.2
_
S. Maximum depth - Ft
3
3
2.1/3.8
_ _
6. Width/Depth Ratio - Range
15.8
17
11.7/27.8
7. Floodprone With - Ft
171.2
172.3
59.0/131.1
8. Entrenchment Ratio
5.8
5.8
1.9/10.3
9. Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1/1
10. Sinuosity
1.3
1.3
N/A
11. Avg Water Surface Slope - Ft/Ft
0.008
0.008
N/A
12. Riffle Slope - Ft/Ft
0.02
0.02
0/.11
13. Riffle Length (Range) - Ft
110.8
110.8
6.8/386.6
14. Max depth pool - Ft
4.4
4.4
3.7/5.3
15. Pool to Pool Spacing (Range) - Ft
207
207
86.9/441.71
16. Pool Length (Range) - Ft
90.4
90.4
55.2/129.2
17. Inner Berm Area - Scl Ft
N/A
N/A
N/A
18. Inner Berm Width - Ft
N/A
N/A
N/A
19. Av Inner Berm Depth -Ft
N/A
N/A
N/A
20. Inner Berm maximum depth - Ft
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sheet
5/ 11

XS 1 @ STA 1+01
m 280
CD
< 279 MBK
r --r
O 278
277 {
00
Ox
Station
28
27
O
27
27
e 00
XS 3 @ STA 5+25
m 27
< 27
Q_
0 27
:3 27
e
Station
XS5@STA 11+57
S
Station
e
No
RESOURCE
I V S'I'tTi1TE
280
< 279
O 278
277
e
m
CD 2
0
L+ 2
O
�:3 2
XS2 @ STA 3+15
o"
Station
XS 4 @ STA 9+02
R m
my 0�
�Q
O O O U
Station
z
Legend
� Existing '
conditions
Proposed
conditions
S CA
o�
ti
v
N
z
O
am
W
x
cc
cc
w
Jp.
S/0 --
U
_ SCA -;
0
r0
Sheet
O THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT, ` G.EEF 0\��
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE �i
RCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE , ������„PI LK�N ��`�`` 6111

�,,�pt7m►rq►►//
CROSS SECTIONS 5-8
r
MIL:
envzon
�4r=.t. Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions_
r
COVE CREEK STREAM STABILIZATION
,'j
..•...
c�
O0
CL -0
OX �D
0.
U)
�
CL
O (D
Ui O'
O
cn
Mountain City, TN 37883
�,,�pt7m►rq►►//
CROSS SECTIONS 5-8
MIL:
envzon
�4r=.t. Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions_
m Me
COVE CREEK STREAM STABILIZATION
,'j
..•...
K
NN N N
vv J J
ox 0) v w tD
_ Q10 O O
N N N N
x
00
rP
V7
D
N
+
00
UOiJOna1-�
NN N N N
CROSS SECTIONS 5-8
MIL:
envzon
�4r=.t. Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions_
\ ?
COVE CREEK STREAM STABILIZATION
5W2
5902 Highway42f South
ICD
WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA STREAM INITIATIVE
AL
H0V
Mountain City, TN 37883
WATAUGA COUNTY, BOONS, NC
cNE� er:
° s:' ph/fax: [phone]
UCENSE*P-7088 www .bfec.ora

.10E
NOTE:
PLANTING WIDTH WILL VARY BASED ON LANDOWNER
COMPLIANCE AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
SYMBOL—DESCRIPTION
NATIVE SOD MATTING AND/OR EROSION CONTROL FABRIC ARE
SYMBOL
DESCRIPTION
NATIVE TREE AND SHRUB
(1 Scm) 4"(Illcm)
TO BE PLACED ON NEAR BANK AND DISTURBED AREAS WHEN
(BAREROOT OR 1-3 GALLON
6" — —
AVAILABLE.
1. SEED IMMEDIATELY WITH TEMPORARY RYEGRASS.
CONTAINERS) SPECIES TO BE
PLANTED AT A DENSITY
2. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, AREA TO BE SEEDED WITH A
SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE 400
2.5cm)
PERMANENT GRASS/HERB MIXTURE. MATTING AND FABRIC
ARE TO BE STAKED DOWN WITH LARGE STAPLES AND/OR
NATIVE/WOODY STAKES.
ff�
l --_ . _
TREES/ACRE AT MATURITY
-FLOODPLAIN SPECIES INCLUDE
BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
J V{
�ylr
3. LIVESTAKE SPECIES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED T0:
Cornus amomum, Physocarpus opuli/olius, Salix serecia,
1•
Acer rubrum, Amelanchierarborea, Betula nigra, Ilex
spp., lugiands nigra,
Sambucus canadensis.
wnao
l.iriodendron tulipi/era, Malus
coronaria, Physocarpus
W
opulilohus, Quercus rubra, etc.
TYPICAL CHANNEL RE -VEGETATION PLAN VIEW DETAIL
12"(30cm)
6' C F1
I 1 6
WA rER SURFACt
11 5C111
(1 Scm) 4"(Illcm)
6" — —
115L'un)
(5I
2.5cm)
t
i `
J V{
�ylr
�
1•
�
CRITICAL POWU
A. Overlaps and Seam
B. Projected Water Lir
C. Channel Bottom/Si
Slope Vertices
B
NOTE:
*IN LOOSE SOIL -
CONDITIONS, THE USE OF
STAPLE OR STAKE
LENGTHS GREATER THAN
6" (15 CM) MAY BE
NECESSARY TO PROPERLY
SECURE THE BLANKETS.
WA rER SURFACt
STREAM BED i/thY
`
i `
J V{
�ylr
�
1•
wnao
ro
W
J
- EAL '
-
- s �
- -
Sheet
0
w
TD0110f ABlR
OBW *Wr Rlu TRMIsT
S
VEWIM7
Station
NOTE:
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE IMMEDIATELY SOWED WITH A
TEMPORARY GRASS MIXTURE.
1. FOLLOWING SITE CONSTRUCTION A NATTVE/PERMANENT GRASS
MIXTURE WILL BE APPLIED WHEN AVAILABLE.
TYPICAL CHANNEL RE -VEGETATION
CROSS-SECTION DETAIL
SLOPE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS: C-70OBN
1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED.
2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" (15 CM) DEEP X 6" (15 CM) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30CM)
OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP—SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY
12" (30 CM) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND
FOLD REMAINING 12" (30 CM) PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW
OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET.
3. ROLL THE BLANKETS IN DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS
MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES
IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE.
WHEN USING THE DOT SYSTEM, STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE
STAPLE PATTERN.
4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2" — 5" (5 CM — 12.5 CM) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. 5.
CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (7.5 CM) OVERLAP.
STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH.
5. PLACE CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS END—OVER—END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH A 4"-6" OVERLAP. USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4" APART AND
4" ON CENTER TO SECURE BLANKETS .
6 FULL LENGTH EDGE OF BLANKETS AT TOP OF SIDE SLOPES MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12"(30CM)
APART INA 6"(15CM) DEEP X 6"(15CM) WIDE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING.
7. ADJACENT BLANKETS MUST BE OVERLAPPED APPROXIMATELY 2"-5" (5-12.5CM) (DEPENDING ON BLANKETS TYPE) AND STAPLED.
IkEISOUIRICE
I `: STTT_Lrt'}N RC S
:
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE:
This consists primarily of two components, stream stabilization
structures (J -Hooks, Cross vanes, etc.) and planting of the stream
banks and riparian areas. In the event that the stream structures
shift, wash away, settle, or otherwise physically cannot function as
designed, contact the area NRCS Agent. If the new plantings
experience a mort
ality rate of greater than 25%, the dead/dying
plants will need to be replaced.
PERMANENT SEED MIX:
APPLY AT 15 LBS PER ACRE OF DISTURBANCE (per specifications of
seed supplier):
ERNST CONSERVATION SEED MIX ERNMX-178 (FLOODPLAIN MIX)
WHICH INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING SPECIES:
Fox Sedge, Partridge Pea, Dear Tongue, Little Bluestem, Virginia Wild
Rye, Riverbank Wild Rye, Swamp Sunflower, Ox Eye Sunflower, Arrow
Wood, Big Bluestem, Silky Dogwood, Switchgrass, Indiangrass,
Staghorn Sumac, Showy Tick Trefoil, Purple Bergamot, Black Eyed
Susan, Joe Pye Weed, Soft
Rush, Giant Ironweed, Tall White Beard
Tongue, Spotted Joe Pye Weed, Bone Set, and Blue False Indigo.
TEMPORARY SEED MIX AND SPECIFICATIONS:
Common Name Scientific Name Rate per Acre Optimal Planting Dates
Rye grain Secale cereale 30 lbs Aug 15 -May 15
Browntop millet Urochloa ramosa 10 lbs May 15 -Aug 15
d
U
Seedbed Preparation: `
Disturbed soils within riparian areas will be amended to provide an optimum
environment for seed germination and seedling growth. Surface soils will be loose
enough for water infiltration and root penetration. Lime will be added to the soil t -
ensure a pH level between 5.5 - 7. Fertilizer (18-46-0) will be added to nutrient
deficient areas. All riparian areas will be raked to loosen compacted soil prior to i
seeding.
FELE
R�
POOL GJ\
\ Rl1N I POOL I
cv�/
PLAN VIEW
IGUDE
/ RUN POOL I'M POOL
BANKF``�--�-
WA rER SURFACt
STREAM BED i/thY
PROFILE VIEW i
TYPICAL BEDFORM GRADING DETAIL ♦
TUT -Hr -BEST OF h1Y t(IVbWLEDIiE)UDGM�Nr
LLI Co
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET A,PPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE
2>
C
� z
O Q yZE
j°
2 � Qm
2
O � Qj
O
iU
Qcc
ll.. �,
111111111►1 O_\
8111 '
W
J
- EAL '
-
- s �
- -
Sheet

LeIpLoIIi
SURFAC
NOT
POOL STEP OMITTED FOR CLARITY
FI OW
A -A
CROSS-SECTION
SURFACE ROCK (TYP)
d. • V .
3%-796 r
t
NON WOVEN)_-
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
/ FLOW
FOOTER ROCK(S)J�c . POOL -- - -
y:.
arn aocw srnnw `\-FOOTER ROCK (TYP)
wilruxp Mpgp.OGv, MIJ.
B -B
PROFILE
ROCK CROSS -VANE STRUCTURE
ROCK (TYP)
MATERIAL NOTES:
1. ROCK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 1'-2' THICK, 2'-3' WIDE, AND 3'-5'
LONG.
2. ROCK SHALL BE NATIVE STONE HARVESTED LOCALLY OR FROM
EXISTING STREAM.
3. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR NEARLY SO AT THE
ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT. THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT
SHOULD BE SOLID. IF ROCKS ARE NOT PERFECTLY FLAT, THE
THICKER END SHOULD BE PLACED DOWNSTREAM.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG IN A MANNER THAT THE FOOTER
ROCKS, CROSS HEADER ROCKS AND A MIN OF 1/3 OF THE WING
HEADER ROCKS ARE BURIED BENEATH THE BED SURFACE
ELEVATION.
2, ROCKS ARE PRECISELY PLACED WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB,
3. FOOTER ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED FIRST WITH HEADER ROCKS
PLACED ON TOP PRIOR TO BACKFILLING THE TRENCH.
4. IN THE CENTER (CROSS) PORTION THE HEADER ROCKS SHALL BE
PLACED SO THAT THE TOP OF THE HEAD ROCK IS AT AN
ELEVATION EQUAL TO THE PROPOSED BED ELEVATION,
5. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED IN THE TRENCH WITH
APPROX. 2 FT. OF OVERLAP.
6. ROCK FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE BACK FILLED AROUND THE FABRI(
7. THE HEADER ROCKS ON THE WING PORTION SHALL BE PLACED S(
THAT THEY SLOPE UP FROM THE BED ELEVATION AT THE CROSS
PORTION, TO A BANKFULL ELEVATION AND MEET THE BANK AT A
20°-30° ANGLE.
8. SURFACE AND FOOTER ROCKS AT BOTH ENDS SHALL BE TIED IN
SECURELY TO THE BANK TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF
WATER DIVERSION.
Wbkf -� PROPOSFU ti4NK HFNCH
ROOT WAD
1121BKF
FOOTER LOG
A -A
CROSS-SECTION FILLER LOGS, TOPS, LIMBS,
BRUSH, AGGREGATE, SOIL
20°-30°
1
FOOTER LOG (TYP)---'
FLOW
ROOT WAD
TOE WOOD BANK STABILIZATION
NOTES:
1. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG ALONG THE TOE OF THE BANK
TO A DEPTH OF THE DIAMETER OF THE FOOTER LOG.
2. A PRUNED FOOTFR LOG SHALL. BE PLACED AT THE TOE
OF THE CHANNEL AND THE ROOT WAD SHALL BE
PLACED DIRECTLY ABOVE IT.
3. THE VELOCITY VECTORS OF THE STREAM IN THE
CHANNEL ARE ALIGNED WITH THE TRUNKS
LONGITUDINAL AXIS AND WILL INTERSECT THE ROOT
MASS AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE.
4. A BOULDER MAY BE PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE,
ON TOP OF, AND ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE BETWEEN
THE ROOTMASS AND THE BANK TO PROVIDE EROSION
CONTROL.
5. ROOTWAD LOGS SHALL BEAT LEAST 15' IN LENGTH AND
HAVE A MINIMUM DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH)
OF 12".
6. SHALLOW -ROOTED RATHER THAN DEEP-ROOTED TREE SPECIES
WITH RATIOS OF ROOT FAN DIAMETERS TO BOLE DIAMETERS
OF 4.0 OR GREATER ARE PREFERRED, AVOID NARROW BASED,
FAN DIAMETER RATIOS LESS THAN 3.0.
a
{
� r„trr�ivrn�q
♦ .f
�OFESS/6 4 %
tea. , Q -v, , .s•.
4)F ,
W
O
N
J
W m
Q f
C
ti W
co
W
Zcc
r O
NGG .
iJ
�•� PILVO, sheet
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT.:
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE I 111 11
RESOURCE NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE y
INSTITUTE REGULATIONSKcs.

MATERIAL NOTES:
1. ROCK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 1'-2' THICK, 2'-3'
WIDE, AND 3'-5' LONG.
2. ROCK SHALL BE NATIVE STONE HARVESTED LOCALLY OR FROM
EXISTING STREAM.
3. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR NEARLY SO AT THE
ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT. THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT
SHOULD BE SOLID. IF ROCKS ARE NOT PERFECTLY FLAT, THE
THICKER END SHOULD BE PLACED DOWNSTREAM.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOWER ROCK (HEAD ROCK) FOOTER WILL FIRST BE PLACED
FOLLOWED BY THE HEAD ROCK TO SET THE INITIAL STRUCTURE
ELEVATION.
2. THE SUBSEQUENT ROCK (MOVING UPSTREAM) AND ASSOCIATED
FOOTERS WILL THEN BE SET SIGHTING THE PROPOSED 20-30° BANK
DEFLECTION LINE.
3. ROCK PLACEMENT FOLLOWS MOVING UPSTREAM ATA 2-7% SLOPE
UNTIL A BANKFULL ELEVATION IS REACHED AT THE END OF THE
STRUCTURE WING.
4. A ROCK SILL WILL THEN BE CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE
STRUCTURE ANGLE TO PREVENT THE FORMATION OF A CUTOFF
CHANNEL.
5. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG UPSTREAM ON THE BANKSIDE OF THE
WING WHERE NON -WOVEN GEOTEX 1LE FABRIC WILL BE PLACED
WITH APPROX. 2' OF OVERLAP
6. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE MATERIALS AND RE -VEGETATE.
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
ROCK ]-HOOK VANE STRUCTURE
TPlE STONE AND COBBLE
SURFACE ROCK
,'i -CUT-OFF SILL (TYP)
GAPS 1/4 TO 1/3 ROCA
B
DIAMETER IN HOOK
NON -WOVEN--'
RUN
GLIDE
TER ROCK (TYP)
FABRIC
rd a 1
SUPPORT LOG
I CUT-OFF SILL
3. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR
NEARLY SO AT THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT.
Q
PLAN
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
TPlE STONE AND COBBLE
SURFACE ROCK
FOOTER ROCK(S)
BURIED 15-2
2%-7%
NON -WOVEN--'
i
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
rd a 1
CROSS-SECTION
ROCK (TYP)
B -B
PROFILE
MATERIAL NOTES:
1. ROCK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 1'-2' THICK, 2'-3'
BURIED 15-2
WIDE, AND 3'-5' LONG.
2. ROCK SHALL BE NATIVE STONE HARVESTED
Q
LOCALLY OR FROM EXISTING STREAM.
SUPPORT LOG
3. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR
NEARLY SO AT THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT.
THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT SHOULD BE
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
rBUTTRESS ROCK BURIED
SOLID. IF ROCKS ARE NOT PERFECTLY FLAT, THE
FABRIC LAID OVER WOODY
FLUSH WITH BANK ON LARGE
d
THICKER END SHOULD BE PLACED
DEBRIS ON INSIDE OF LOG. O
LATERAL ROOT
DOWNSTREAM.
FASTEN WITH ROOFING NAILS.
4. LOGS SHALL 12" MINIMUM DIAMETER.
_
5. ROOT WADS SHALL BE S' MINIMUM DIAMETER.
�
Ro
t/3 20a_3�
� J
CONSTRUC77ON NOTES:
I. THE LOWER FOOTER ROCK WILL FIRST BE
)
PLACED FOLLOWED BY THE VANE LOG TO SET
B
B
THE INITIAL STRUCTURE ELEVATION.
FOOTER ROCK (TYP)
2. SET THE SUPPORT LOG AND VANE LOG
l'r
UPSTREAM AT A 2-7% SLOPE UNTIL A BANKFULL
ELEVATION IS REACHED AT THE END OF THE
RUN
'`GLIDE
VANE LOG.
3. ENSURE THE ROOT WADS OF VANE AND
SUPPORT LOGS ARE IN GOOD CONTACT WITH
BURIED B-10' 1 3 ROCK
EACH OTHER AND THE ROOTS AS INTERLOCKED
HOOK
AS POSSIBLE.
/
4, SECURE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO VANE LOG WITH
ROOFING NAILS.
S. CONSTRUCT THE ROCK HOOK BEGINNING FROM
CUT-OFF SILL
THE TOP OF THE VANE LOG.
Q
6. A ROCK CUT OFF SILL WILL THEN BE
CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE ROCK
HOOK TO PREVENT THE FORMATION OF A
PLAN
CUTOFF CHANNEL.
CUT-OFF SILL (TYP)
7. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG UPSTREAM ON THE
/
BANK51DE OF THE WING WHERE NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WILL BE PLACED WITH
/
APPROX. T OF OVERLAP. ATTACH FABIRC TO
VANE LOG WITH ROOFING NAILS.
B. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE MATERIALS AND
slow. LANE LOf,
ilk,
RE -VEGETATE.
%lb, -
�r
CUT-OFF SILL
NON -WOVEN FOOTER ROCK (TYP)
GEOTEX77LE FABRIC SURFACE ROCK
TER ROCKS) A -A
CROSS-SECTION
now
• of e.
2%7%
to
Irkr �
pow
P O
BURIED 8-10' ` V Q �9,
FOOTER ROCK b
>�
PROFILE -'
ROCK/LOG J -HOOK VANE STRUCTURE
./ EEr-'
Pli' Sheet
TO THE BEST OF MY ,�, JUDGMENT, 1 1
RJ SO UKCE po AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE / O/
INSI'H UTPbmj NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE
N RCS � aFri n arrnrvc

CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. A TRENCH SHAT L BF DUG IN A MANNER
FOOTER ROCKS ARE BURIED BENEATH TF
SURFACE ELEVATION.
2. ROCKS ARE PRECISELY PLACED WITH A I
THUMB.
3. FOOTER ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED FIRST WITH
HEAD ROCKS PLACED ON TOP PRIOR TO
BACKFILLING THE TRENCH,
4. IN THE CENTER (FLAT) PORTION THE HEADER
ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT 771E TOP OF
THE HEAD ROCK IS AT AN ELEVATION 0.2' GREATER
THAN THE PROPOSED BED ELEVATION,
S. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED IN THE
DOWNSTREAM PART OF THE TRENCH WITH
APPROX. 1 FT. OF OVERLAP.
n
PLAN
HEAD ROCK
1/3 OF ROCK WIDTH FOR (0.2' ABOVE CREEK BED)
HEAD ROCK SETBACK BANKFULL---_
6. ROCK FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE BACK FILLED CREEK BED-\
AROUND THE FABRIC. \\
7. THE HEAD ROCKS ON THE WING PORTIONS SHALL
BE PLACED SO THAT THEY SLOPE UP FROM 0.2'
ABOVE THE BED ELEVATION TO A BANKFULL
ELEVATION EQUAL TO 1/2 OF THE 94NKFULL
ELEVATION AND MEET THE BANK AT A 20"-30" FOOTER Ri
ANGLE.
8. HEAD AND FOOTER ROCKS AT BOTH ENDS SHALL
BE TIED IN SECURELY TO THE BANK TO ELIMINATE
THE POSSIBILITY OF WATER DIVERSION.
1/2 BANKFULL`BACKFILL WITH RIVER COBBLE
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SECTION A -A
TIE END OF WING INTOTOP OF HEAD ROCK IN FLAT
0%
BANK AT 1/2 DBKF \
SECTION 0.2' ABOVE CREEK BED HEAD ROCK
\ ^ 4%-10% 4%-10`Yo
Y
`CREEK BED FOOTER ROCK
SECTION B -B
WING DEFLECTOR STRUCTURE
MATERIAL NOTES:
1. ROCK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 1'-2' THICK, 3'-5' WIDE, AND 5'-7'
LONG,
2. ROCK SHALL BE NATIVE STONE HARVESTED LOCALLY OR FROM
EXISTING STREAM.
3. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR NEARLY SO AT THE
ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT. THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT SHOULD
BE SOLID. IF ROCKS ARE NOT PERFECTLY FLAT, THE THICKER END
SHOULD BE PLACED DOWNSTREAM.
ANKFULL DEPTH -
VER COBBLE
No
USOUR( ,
i:NIS-1,11IFF ;
�2i:5212D,
111- R L� 3� s
TO THE BEST OF Y KN WLEDGE, 35DGMENT,Sheet
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE /
C
Q,�z<
uj
Z. ¢
Q
w C:
Q
Z
i_
Q
W � c`
00 1 0 1 1111 tZ)Q
ttr rtr
CC
v
C/)C:
O� Ot ESS/Oy��j
cr, i
s Oss
/
� 1
04
0
01
TO THE BEST OF Y KN WLEDGE, 35DGMENT,Sheet
AND BELIEF THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS AND LOCAL AND STATE /