20180080 Ver 1_B-4662-SAW-2013-01572-NCDOT_SR2308_Fowler-Henry Baker Rd_BR196_20180118

FILE
FILE .
I -=01*2:5223!4 *fbi=-,7.4-
ORM ID NUMBER: SAW- 2013- //5751
From Date:
Combined with: SAW-
Converted From: SAW-
Related to: SAW-
Remarks:
To Date:
4/' ·
U.RMY CORPS OF ENGINE
WILMINGTON DISTRICT FILE COPY
County: Franklin U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-BUNN WEST
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Action Id. SAW-2013-01572
Property Owner:
Address:
Telephone Number:
NC Department of Transportation
Phil Harris
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleiah, NC, 27699-1598
919.707.6129 (Amy James)
Size (acres)N/A Nearest Town Zebulon
Nearest Waterway Moccasin Creek River Basin Contentnea. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3020203 Coordinates Latitude: 35.899423
Longitude: -78.332207
Location description: TIP No. B-4662; Bridge No. 196 over Moccasin Creek, on SR 2308, Fowler/Henry Baker Road,
north of Zebulon.
Indicate Which of the Followine Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area.
We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part 331). If y6u wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 0 f the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 2
..
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters ofthe US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Eric Alsmeyer at 919-554-4884 x23 or
[e-mail].
C. Basis For Determination: The project area contains stream channels of Moccasin Creek, with indicators of
ordinary high water marks, and abutting wetlands. Moccasin Creek is a tributary of Contentnea Creek, and the Neuse River.
The Neuse River is a Section 10 Navigable Water.
D. Remarks: This JD was confirmed by desktop review. The drawing on the attached Figure 3, "B-4662, Wake &
Fmaklin Counties", received on 7/3/2013, generally depicts the jurisdictional waters of the US within the subject study area.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:=:S-
Date: August 26,2013 Expiration Date: August 26, 2018
The Wilmington Districtis committedto providingthe highest levelofsupport to the public. To help us ensurewe continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http://per2.nwn.usace.armv.mil/survev.html to
complete the survey online.
Attached is:
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
C PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
PERMIT DENIAL
C APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
»46{flist-«442 NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESSANDREQUEST FOR APPEAL "3
Applicant: NC Department of Transportation File Number: SAW-2013-01572 Date: August 26, 2013
Phil Harris
See Section below
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II o f
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
ofthe date ofthis notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps ofEngineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
A
B
C
D
E
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMA
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Signature of appellant or agent.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
T ION:
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:Telephone number:
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Eric Alsmeyer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 9/2-670 1 3
2wl 7/2130/8
4#%
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Amy James, NCDOT
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-R (9,6162°4
PEDor_g-9661-€R nog--fowle,lew,%41 N.%811LD;vS- 1544.)013.bis-71.
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) ANb BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
TIP: 8-4662 Description: Replacement of bridge no. 196 on SR 2308
(Fowler/Henry Baker Rd.)
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake/Franklin Cjty: Zebulon
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.899423° N, Long. -78.332207° W
Name of nearest waterbody: Moccasin Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 240 linear feet: 30-50 width (ft) and/or
Cowardin Class:
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 0.93 acres.
Cowardin Class:
acres.
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: --
Non-Tidal: -
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):ErOffice (Desk) Determination. Date: %»»/3
E Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
1
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorjzation on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
2
Signature and date
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
92 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: NC DOT.
9 Data sheets prepared/5ubmitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Moffice concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
El Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
El Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
m Corps navigable waters' study:
0 U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
C USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
Ob U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 : Bunn
West
El USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
El National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
El State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
gl FEMA/FIRM maps:
I 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:(National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
0 Photographs: El Aerial (Name & Date):Wake sid 08,2005.
or £ Other (Name & Date):
El Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
El Other information (please specify): NCDWQ Wetland Rating Sheet.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
L/fg<1 ?/3 /,3
3
Signa re and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
Site
number
Moccasin
Creek
WA
WB
WC
Latitude
35.899423°N
35.899178°N
35.899588°N
35.898457°N
Longitude
-78.332207°W
-78.332215°W
-78.332300°W
-78.333322°W
4
Cowardin
Class
RU82
P F01 C
PFOl C
PFOlA
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resource in
review area
240 feet
0.5 acre(s)
0.03 acre(s)
0.4 acre(s)
Class of aquatic
resource
Non-section 10,
non-wetland
Non-section 10,
wetland
Non-section 10,
wetland
Non-section 10,
wetland
, f.
I /.IP .:Legend P { 1,13} . )) %4 , At
11 Study Area
/i.
.
,
4 **/
.*Al |5*21 Wetlands 0, hy'*253 4, 3/',
t1a
fA
Di d 1, 7 '01* 3
5& & 96*.05/
i
. 4«ffy,10'R .flf;tf; # *1 : I Wt,
.'4111 .
44 .*.
V"
r
4j t
7 1».
4,0 4
.1 * 1 1*,Ii 1 1
4 7419/ 3<1 42- 4 I * 21 fll'--1 li.3
6€,
f 5,
3 I F,'t1-* i 4
/4.-.
4 . 2'
*'R , St VY 4 1 r
1 l , 1 &1 2 "
4ls.ul 1
, - TJI, ' 'Uf kJi'#9 I i:,4
1 .
Bt. '
.*
WB Moccasm Creek
3 .
i 1 t 1 1·
i '4*< 4 i
:
-'
19.
ific'i -1 ;t '' 4 ... 4i
%*R
6 1 ,
t +3*
4 *1- + 1
-
-, 4,/t.
t. .
I ./ 1 1,/8
11 .1
1 ** 17,
4 4% -15
*tr.
fY4'14 3
r
4 fa
E L
1.Y*
.-4 a< i
I
f
t 9 WA
W.,45/
St.
j
t
-t::t-'e ....1 2*7"
4 f
I I 11. 11 4 ./
./4 1
+4:1.#324 i ,
t af «64*. -'«*is,%2'', t*ggR, - I
"·*11%#7 74>. ..,1
\NC *-&*3561/Faa
t 34*Figure 3 N
8-4662
R
t
Wake &
4
Franklin Counties
Y ,« +41 Lt b 1/" *rt,ff 804 1/3/*1& gkw- 2013.0/5-71h.»f
Z
,, t :r iff'*200 400 Feet
1
.
1 £* 42 .fr .,
Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Hi Eric,
.
James, Amy E [[e-mail]]
Wednesday, July 03, 2013 3:45 PM
Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW
8-4662 Prelim JD request
8-4662 Prelim JD reg.pdf
20 G -5/5-71
Po 00*,f? 0./0675rtd{*A 51*5€,BY.
Please find attached a preliminary JD request for 8-4662 on the Wake/Franklin County line
(Moccasin Creek). If you would like to schedule a field visit, please let me know.
Thanks and have a great fourth,
Amy
Amy James
Biologist, Project Management
NCDOT, Natural Environment Section
Direct 919.707-6129
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
1
41
1 r < * , j- osovi
' f...'# ..i» \ j pear ,1 - 4*: -- -_1_11 / j 4, t f f,2- /-$2 jet .-11 <%1#9344#,Ati
- 4 , -
, , .7
\\\6// r' .
r---1
,§21 a
0*k< 4-4* 4 .AL R
.
f
M-1
r,2
Hopkins
D-DeD L,¢*SWI- 4/M
- 3. 1 «)/ 1//1
*1 -1 .\
1_*
.*,Jie!fl.county1*0/te tee.4t % 1."A.-
/
.
... j
-* E.ai;Ii »n. Cburrt RJ 1 0
*/2-06441
f-
: ,V'4<
Z•bu*on '**8
CluE}
* 11
4.» Coun,fy it
91 -4
©1
- .A
21! A
0,90)75@8 GlaZA, 63(Di 09= 4 .00@i
*1590'*L 11)01)Y#*, 110}G@9·a*p, 60*IL %2*00, 050,61759 601555* @,9*Baa,3. 8434 05115**a 611- ONk»50)8303>79*11 3070 20(1ZM»0
'furd iDW,gli*9** ' -
/4
1-2->Nifs*
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
WAKE COUNT
REPLACE BRIDGE No. 196 0\ SR 2308
OVER MOCCASIN CREEK
B-4662
Figure 1
..
{*Sky :
9-1,··21
;. Ii. %- . - -1{5 =\& A"ft )-7.
Study Area
5
U
, f \J f
VM
»41
..0.es / r»- /£ «' - <<».A
8-4662
Wake & Franklin Counties
Replace bridge no. 196 on SR 2308
over Moccasin Creek
Bunn West Quadrangle
FIGURE 2
32*f*&:/51--*£%1
,<=&17- .*IULJO Prepared by W NCDOT*1' '=d»Sl+*C-· Project Development &
Wural Environment Unit
mir 4 'J. '*f *.
Legend
1 i./10 ak /6 rr7 Study Area
z.%2%:1 -,0 *1.'r"1, 4 '1 -.' .4 *
8£ I
1
4,
.f Al vy
}''
'
l
·=t'r..
I 414,
#1
1
-
4 14
4 0 1 M 1/
i <,4 1
t * 9, 4 /aa
1
. f 24 1 j
.A''It 4 C f
%% T f ., '41.'* 91' 1 A j t
5.l
4''1f
.,,
l
4
' r.., _r 45,
1 -
, '. h 4 3
"tw t't 1 I
' .'14 0 f t
1 Fi P I ¥ 14rt
-rf >1 94 't; 4 1
.
f4.j
.
|,
*./
*/
1 t r
r 4 t'u · 1 ' ' 7141 f +L
f'
'bl. h'll
:,4,1/ .*.7,4%- Pt"...6, 1.1 ,F t K31 r
l
Moccasin Creek 1 <0 ' ff 1 1 - WB 1 1.
3
l 4
1
.,f , , t. 1' .LA i .A 4 .3:tf:.it -'»
f f
f '1{ 4.11:$ t! 1 4 1 4 + f +4
»»* 1: ,
4" -' 1 yllj *1 f. Wi <2,[211-
j
4
I .1 .
WA ..: 194-«-3.:Yl,«St
4
l ··t,Yuf 4,% .71
f,4,f 11 4 #135 f 4, A
Y WC
.Gi.Figure 3 N
.
.
8-4662
¥4:»-'13 Wake &
Franklin Counties'»Mt.
t* a,L,*r..4 ' 1
4
A,*w.)08451/n
+ 2.4 K
,0 200 400 Feet
*\a
'2,*.U 1. A +- <,/t 'b 1 1 1
*
WETLAND DETERATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mounta nd Piedmont
ProjecVSite:8-4662 City/County: Wake Sampling Date:4/26/2013
WA&WB
ApplicanVOwner: NCDOT State: b[Q Sampling Point: -wetland
Investigator(s)A. James, D. Riffev. J. Dildav Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):floodglain Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 2 Lat: 35.899141 Long: -78.332218 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:Wehadkee silt loam NM dassification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes M No O (lf no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation El, Soil EL or Hydrology 0, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present?Yes M No O
Are Vegetation O, Soil ¤,or Hydrology 0, naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes 9 No
Hydric Soil Present?Yes E No
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes M No
Remarks: Riverine Swamp Forest NCWAM wetland type
0
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
O Surface Water (Al)(9 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
9 High WaterTable (A2)O Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
fil Saturation (AS)O Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
D Water Marks (81)O Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
O Sediment Deposits (82)O Thin Muck Surface (CD
O Drift Deposits (83)O Other (Explain in Remarks)
O Algal Mat or Crust (84)
O Iron Deposits (85)
O Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Water-Stained Leaves (89)
O Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?Yes D No tl Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?Yes M No 0 Depth (inches): 5
Saturation Present?Yes 01 No Il Depth (inches): Q
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Yes M No O
Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (86)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
1(1 Drainage Patterns (810)
¤ Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
fl Crayfish Burrows (C8)
O Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Stunted or Stressed Plants ([)1)
81 Geomorphic Position (D2)
O Shallow Aquitard ([)3)
0 Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (05)
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes 11 No Il
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Interim Version
r:r:':t =:z:ontific namelants
1. Acer rubrum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total covec
Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30)(301
1. Alnus serrulata 5
2. Clethra alnifolia 251
3. Comus amomum 1
4. Vibumum nudum 5
5. Acer rubrum 5
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Microsteqium vimineum
2. Saururus cemuus
3. Peltandra viminica
4. Juncus effusus
5. Woodwardia areolata
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Absolute Dominant
% Cover Soecies?
S Yes
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
an
Ym
hIn
NQ
No
2 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 41 20% of total cover: 1521
30
25
15
5
X=a
Yes
NQ
NQ
No
Indicator
Status
FAC
OBL
FAQ
FACW
OBL
fQ
&El = Total Cover
50% of total cover: fiQ 20% of total cover: 1&
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Lonicera lanonica 15 Yes FAC
2. Camps& radicans Z Yes FAC
53. Smilax rotundifolia - Ni FAC
4.
5.
2Z = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13.5 20% of total cover: 5.4
Remarks: (If observed, list morpbological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
FAC
OBL
QBL
FACW
FACW
Sampling Point: WA&WB wetland
Dominando•Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW spedes
FAC species -
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals: -(A)
Prevalence ind
Multiolv by:
X1 =
x2 =
x3 =
x4 =
x5 =
(B)
ex = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytjc Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
0 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
O Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetationl (Explain)
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7
Z (A)
(B)
100 (A/B)
11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes M NO 0
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version
a
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth neelito document the indicator or confirm the absence of indll
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches)Color (moist) %Color (moist) % Typel Loc Texture
0-6 7.5YR 3/1 .100 sandv loam
6-12+10YR 5/1 100 loamv sand
'Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
O Histosol (Al) O Dark Surface (57)
O Histic Epjpedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (MLRA 147, 148)
O Black Histic (A3)O Thin Dark Surface (59) (MLRA 147, 148)
O Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)O Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
O Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 2 cm Muck (Alo) (LRR N)O Redox Dark Surface (F6)
O Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)O Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
O Thick Dark Surface (A12)O Redox Depressions (FB)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, MLRA ¤ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA
147,148)136)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
O Sandy Redox (55)O Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
O Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
g Point: WA&WB wetland
rs.)
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
O Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
O Pjedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
0 Red Parent Material (TF2)
Il Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydric Solls Present?
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Yes e No 0
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Interim Version
I
WETLAND DETEFiATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountnd Piedmont
ProjecVSite:8-4662 City/County:Wake Sampling Date:4/26/2013
ApplicanUOwner:NCDOT State: NG Sampling Point:WC wetland
Investigator(s):A. James. J. Dildav. D. Riffev Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope (%):
Subregion (IRR or MLRA): 2 Lat: 35.898567 Long: -78.333244 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:Wehadkee silt loam NWI classification:
Are climalic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes DO No O (lf no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0. Soil 0, or Hydrology [1 significantly disturbed?Are 'Normal Circumstances' present?Yes ® No O
Are Vegetation 0, Soil 0, or Hydrology El, naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes S No O
Hydric Soil Present?Yes M No O isligenaaMra
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes %1 No .Il
Remarks:Bottomland Hardwood Forest NCWAM wetland type
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
C Surface Water (Al)O Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
9 High Water Table (A2)O Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
99 Saturation (A3)O Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
I Water Marks (Bl)O Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
0 Sediment Deposits (82)0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
E] Drift Deposits (83)O Other (Explain in Remarks)
¤ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
O Iron Deposits (85)
O Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
S Water-Stained Leaves (89)
0 Aquatic Fauna (813)
Field Observations
Surface Water Prese
Water Table Present
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fri
Describe Recorded D
Remarks:
nt?Yes 0 No gl Depth (inches):
? Yes Dil No O Depth (inches): 11
Yes M No 0 Depth (inches): 1nge)
ata (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Yes 51 No 0
Secondarv Indicators minimum of two reauired)
O Surface Soil Cracks (86)
O Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
021 Drainage Patterns (810)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
¤ Crayfish Burrows ((8)
0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
0 Geomorphic Position ([)2)
0 Shallow Aquitard (03)
O Microtopographic Relief ([)4)
gl FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes 81 No 0
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Interim Version
VEGETATION - Use scientific namesants
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30*30) %Cover Species? Status
1. Liriodendron tulinifera 1 Yes EAc
2. Acer rubrum Yes FAQ
3. Liquidambar stvraciflua 251 j FAQ
4.
5.
--
6.
7
8.
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Liriodendron tulinifera
2. Acer rubrum
3. Ilex onaca
4. Liauidambar stvracillua
5. Viburnum Jentatum
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30x301
1. Microsteqium vimineum
2. Woodwardia areolata
3. Athvrium filix-femina
4. Cinna arundinacea
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
11Q =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 22
2Q
12
Z
Z
m
Yes
NQ
No
No
FAC
FAC
FAC
LAG
FAC
2 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 9.8
30
25
2Ii
20
faQ
FACW
LAG
FACW
1QQ =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5Q 20% of total cover: 2Q
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Lonkera farionica 1& Yes EE
2. Smilax rotundifolia lit Yes FAC
3.-- -- -- -
4. ------- -- --- -
5.
2Q = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Sampling Point WC wetland
Dominanclrnst Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
1.Q (A)
12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 1QQ (AIB)That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:Multiolv bv.
x1 -OBL species
FACW spedes x2 =
FAC species x3 =
FACU species x4 =
UPL species x5 =
Column Totals: -(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
0 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
O Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetationl (Explain)
11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall. -
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes M No 0
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version
lee' to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indlm
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth nee
Depth Matrix
(inches)Color (moist) % Color (moist)
0-5 7,5YR 3/2 100
5-12+7.5YR 4/1 80 5YR 5/8
Redox Features
% Type1
2Q c
Loc2 Texture
- Mam
M loam
1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
0 Histosol (Al)0 Dark Surface (57)
O Histic Epipedon (A2)O Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (MLRA 147, 148)
O Black Histic (A3)O Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
O Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)O Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
O Stratified Layers (AS)Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)1 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
O Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)O Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
0 Thick Dark Surface (A'12)0 Redox Depressions (FS)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, MLRA ¤ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA
147,148)136)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) 0 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
El Sandy Redox (55)0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
El Stripped Matrix (56)
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type: -
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
g Point: WC wetland
rs.)
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indlcatorsfor Problematic Hydric Soils:
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
O Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fl 9)
(MLRA 136, 147)
O Red Parent Material 072)
Il Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydric Soils Present?
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematjc.
Yes M No 0
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Interim Version
4 WETLAND DETERATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountand Piedmont
Project/Site:84662 City/County:Wake Sampling Date:4/26/2013
ApplicanVOwner: NCDOT State: h[Q Sampling Point:WA-WC ugland
Investigator(s)A. James. D. Riffev. J. Dildav Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): E Lat: 35.899489 Long: -78.332423 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:Wehadkee silt loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yes 69 No ¤(lf no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil 0, or Hydrology 0, significantly disturbed?Are "Normal Circumstances" present?Yes &1 No O
Are Vegetation O, Soil .O, or Hydrology [1 naturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?Yes 0 No Il
Hydric Soil Present?Yes []No -Is the Sampled Area99 within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes' 0 No E
Remarks:
*
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
I Surface Water (Al)O Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
O High Water Table (AZ) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
O Saturation (A3)O Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
O Water Marks (Bl)D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
O Sediment Deposjts (82)El Thin Muck Surface ((7)
O Drift Deposits (83) ¤Other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (84)
O Iron Deposits (85)
O Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery ([37)
O Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
O Aquatic Fauna (813)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Presen
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(indudes capillary fring
Describe Recorded Da
Remarks:
t? Yes O No 11 Depth (inches)
Yes 0 No Bl Depth (inches):
Yes 0 No M Depth (inches):e)
ta (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Yes 0 No lil
Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
O Surrace Soil Cracks (86)
O Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
0 Drainage Patterns (810)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
O Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
O Crayfish Burrows (C8)
O Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
O Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
j Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Shallow Aquitard (D3)
0 Microtopographic Relief (D4)
0 FAC-Neutral Test (05)
Wetland Hydrology Present?Yes 0 No M
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Interim Version
VEGETATION - Use scientific nameadhlants
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30x36) %Cover
Absolute
1. Liquidambar styraciflua E
2. Quercus falcata 21
3. Llriodendron tulinifera 21
4. Quercus niara 11
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sanlina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30x301
1. Ulmus alata
2. Quercus nicira
3. Clethra alnifolia
4. Vaccinium corvmbosum
5. Quercus falcata
6. Liquidambar stvraciflua
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30x301
1. Quercus niara
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3. Lonicera ianonica
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Dominant
Species?
Igs
Yes
Yes
No
22 - Total Cover
50% of total cover: l.fi 20% of total cover: 521
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:30x30)
1. Smilax rotundifolia %1 Yes FAC
2. Toxicodendron radicans .5 J FAC
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1%5 20% of total cover: Z
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
15
1Q
Z
RQ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: &5 20% of total cover: 1&
15
10
1Q
Z
5
5
S = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2Ei 20% of total cover: 10:4
Yes
Ma=
998
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
NQ
No
FACU
FAC
FAC
EEWL
FACU
FAC
4
FAC
FAC
EE
Indicator
Status
FAC
FACU
Em
FAC
Sampling Point: WA-WC uvland
Dominancrest Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species -
FACU species -
UPL species
Column Totals: -(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(A)
1.Q (B)
B.Q (AJB)
Multiplv bv:
x1 =
x2 =
x3 =
x4 =
X5 =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is>50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetationl (Explain>
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
(B)
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present7
Yes E No 0
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version
6
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth neevlll
Depth Matrix '
(inches)Color (moist) %Color (moist)
0-12+10YR 4/3 100
to document the indicator or confirm the absence of inal/
Redox Features
% Typel Loc Texture
loamv sand.
g Point: WA-WC upland
rs.)
'Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
¤ Histosol (Al)O Dark Surface (57)
O Histjc Epipedon (A2)Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (MLRA 147, 148)
¤ Black Hisuc (A3)1 Thin Dark Surface (59) (MLRA 147, 148)
O Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
O Stratified Layers (AS)Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)O Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
¤ Thick Dark Surface (A12)O Redox Depressions (FB)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N, MLRA n Iron-Manganese Masses (F'12) (LRR N, MLRA
147,148)LJ 136)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)0 Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
O Sandy Redox (S5)O Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
0 Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydric Soils Present?
Remarks
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
0 Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
O Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
0 Red Parent Material (TF2)
Il Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Yes []No M
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Interim Version
Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW
From:
Sent:
To:
CC:
Subject:
Signed By:
.
Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW
Wednesday, March 06,2013 1:50 PM
'Harold Bain'
[e-mail]; Pete Stafford; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
RE: NCDOT Central Bridge Group - Division 5 component (UNCLASSIFIED)
[e-mail]
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hal: Confirm: Tentative JD meeting dates: April 9th and/or 10th, 2013, pending review of mapping including the
delineated jurisdictional
features (Otherwise will do as Desktop JD's, as appropriate).
Please reply or call if you have any questions or if 1 may serve you in any other way.
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
http.//perl,nwp.usace.army.mil/survey.html to complete the survey online (Paper copies available upon request).
3Er:c
Eric Alsmeyer
Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, NC 27587
Tel: [phone], x23
Fax: [phone]
Regulatory Homepage: http.//www.saw,usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulator¥PermitProgram.aspx
(If you need information that is not yet available on our new website, please let me know)
From: Harold Bain [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:16 PM
To: Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW
Cc: [e-mail]; Pete Stafford; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: NCDOT Central Bridge Group - Division 5 component
Good afternoon Eric,
Thank you for taking the time this morning to briefly discuss four NCDOT proposed bridge
replacement projects located in NCDOT Division 5 (B-4831 Wake County, B-5328 Franklin County,
B-4828 Vance County, and B-5323 Granville County).
Amy James (NCDOT-NES) is the project manager for B-4831 and B-5328.
Deanna Riffey (NCDOT-NES) is the project manager for B-4828. And,
Greg Price (NCDOT-NES) is the project manager for B-5323.
All four bridge project study areas contain jurisdictional features (stream, lake and/or wetland).
As we discussed, I will be sending vicinity and project study area mapping including the delineated
1
jurisdictional
features as soon as this information is available (within the next week to 10 days).
We discussed field review dates of April 9th and 10th, 2013. Specific locations to be determined
after your review of the project mapping. Please let me know if this is correct.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Have a great week.
HAL BAIN
Senicr Envirnnmentri P.clect Sc'enf'ist
RK&K
900 Ridgefield Dr., Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.878.9560 P
919.790.8382 F
www.rkk.com
"RK&K" and "RK&K Engineers" are registered trade names of Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, a
Maryland limited liability partnership. This message contains confidential information
intended only for the person or persons named above. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete the message. Thank
you.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
2