20180005 Ver 1_401 Application_20171217

Kimley>>> Horn
December 21, 2017 $ PAID
Ms. Tasha Alexander
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
2 0 1 80 0 0 5
� D
2 8 2017
DEQ -WATER RESOURCE:
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources D a V
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit v D
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604 DEC 2 8 2017
40 Dg ATE RESOURCES
RE: Nationwide Permit 29 Application — The Station at Raleigh F RP RMITTIN
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Alexander and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, LCD Acquisitions, LLC, Kimley-Hom is submitting the attached application for
authorization under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 for the above referenced project in Wake County.
LCD Acquisitions, LLC is proposing to develop the approximately 19.0 -acre Station at Raleigh Site
within a two -parcel property assemblage (the "Site") primarily used for event parking associated with
Carter -Finley Stadium and the North Carolina State Fairgrounds. The northern and northeastern
portions of the Site are forested and undeveloped.
The proposed multifamily residential development will consist of multifamily residential buildings,
parking lots, internal feeder roads and sidewalks, stormwater control measures (SCMs), open space
areas, and landscaping. The project area was delineated by Kimley-Horn staff in March 2017 and a
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (JD) was issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) in May 2017. Documentation is currently pending (Action ID: SAW -2017-00623). The NC
Division of Water Resources (NCDW R) issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the Site on March 28,
2017 (NBRRO #17-088).
One perennial stream (S1) is located within the Site, beginning offsite to the east and crossing
through the northern forested portion of the Site. Stream S1 will be permanently impacted in two
locations by the construction of a new road crossing to provide access into the property from
Westchase Boulevard, and a second City of Raleigh -required stub road in the northeastern corner of
the property necessary to provide access to the adjacent property parcel. The proposed crossings will
impact a total of 280 LF of stream between the two crossings (134 LF Site 1, 146 LF Site 2) due to
culvert installation, and an additional 10 LF of outlet protection will be keyed into the stream banks
downstream of Site 1 to stabilize the culvert outlet and prevent downstream receiving water impacts.
To allow for construction access during culvert construction, 53 LF of temporary disturbance are also
proposed as part of this application.

Kimley»>Horn
Page 2
Impact Site 1 is the primary entrance and exit road into the property, carrying traffic from Westchase
Boulevard and Trinity Road. Riprap stabilization will be utilized for outlet protection at Site 1 and will
be keyed into the bank during installation so no permanent loss of waters will result. Site 2 is a
secondary parallel road that terminates as a stub road in the northeastern corner of the property. This
road is a required connection by the City of Raleigh as a condition of site plan approval due to the
project's location within a planned urban development district (a "block layout" district). The road
alignment continues from the Station at Raleigh development to northern property boundary, and
provides clear and logical connections from the adjacent property to the interior road network being
constructed by the proposed project. The secondary road terminates at a stub street at a high ground
area at the property boundary, and ample high ground is available on the adjacent property to
construct any City of Raleigh -required road corridors on the adjacent parcel independent of the
Station at Raleigh project without additional environmental impacts.
Temporary impacts to S1 will also occur at Site 1 and Site 2 due to temporary dewatering activities
needed to facilitate construction access in the stream bed for the culvert construction/installation at
the crossings. All temporary disturbance areas will be returned to pre -construction contours after
completion of the project.
Unavoidable impacts to the protected riparian buffer associated with stream S1 (UT to Richlands
Creek) will result from the proposed construction of a main north -south connector road between
Westchase Boulevard to the north and Trinity Road to the south (Site 1). A second road crossing will
result from the proposed project in the northeastern corner of the Site due to the project's location
within a City of Raleigh urban development block district (Site 2). A third impact site will result from
the construction of a stormwater management pond outfall through the buffer (Site 3). All riprap
protection associated with Site 3 will stop at or before the stream top of bank to prevent additional
stream impacts to S1. Impacts associated with the road crossings at Site 1 and Site 2 impact less
than 150 LF and 1/3rd of an acre of riparian buffer and are considered "Allowable". Impacts associated
with the new drainage conveyance carrying stormwater from a constructed BMP at Site 3 is
considered "Allowable" since the BMP provides nutrient treatment and attenuates flow.
To offset for the unavoidable stream impacts proposed, mitigation has been secured with the NC
Division of Mitigation Services' (NCDMS) In -Lieu Fee (ILF) payment program. Mitigation has been
proposed for impacts to S1 at a 2:1 ratio. The NCDMS ILF Acceptance Letter documenting approval
for up to 280 LF of stream impact mitigation is included as part of this PCN application package.

Kimley»>Horn
Page 3
To assist in your review of this NWP application, the following information has been included:
• PCN Application Form 0 NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter
• Signed Agent Authorization Form • NCDMS ILF Acceptance Letter
• Figures
Proposed Impact Map
• Preliminary JD Request Resubmittal
• NCSHPO No Effect Documentation
• Plan Sheets
• NCDWR 401 Application Fee of $570
If you need any additional information to assist in your review of this NWP application, feel free to
contact me at 919-678-4155 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
�7�
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Cc: Mark Jensen — LCD Acquisitions, LLC

O�O� WA rF;9
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
DEC 2 8 2017 UU
D - AT ES UR ES
401 & B FF R PERMITTING
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
The Station at Raleigh
2b. County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
LCD Acquisitions, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mark Jensen
3d. Street address:
315 Oconee Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Athens, GA 30601
3f.
Telephone no.:
706-715-6951
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
DEC 2 8 2017 UU
D - AT ES UR ES
401 & B FF R PERMITTING
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn
5c. Street address:
421 Fayetteville St, Suite 600
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC, 27601
5e. Telephone no.:
919-678-4155
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0784565495, 0784569220
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.799976 Longitude: - 78.710875
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
18.99 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Richland Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Land use within the project parcels consists of a cleared grass and gravel lot used for event parking during stadium and
NC State Fairground events. The northern portion of the project area is forested and crossed by a perennial stream. A
single family house is located in the middle of the project area, but the structure is abandoned. Land use in the vicinity of
the project is generally urbanized, and developed for industrial, commercial, and institutional uses. The developments in
the vicinity are interspersed with pockets of undeveloped forested land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
515 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project would construct a mixed-use development located south of US-64 Business in Knightdale.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project involves the construction of a multifamily residential development, including the residential
buildings, various ammenities, interior roadways, and walking paths. Typical site development and structural construction
equipment will be utilized including dump trucks, graders, bulldozers, cranes, asphalt pavers, excavators, and concrete
trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Preliminary JD was submitted to the USACE and
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
confirmed in May 2017, but documentation is pending
(USACE AID SAW-2017-00623). NCDWR issued a Buffer
Determination for the Site on March 28, 2017 (NBRRO
#17-088)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Name (if known): Ross Sullivan
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE - May 2017, NCDWR - March 28, 2017
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Na
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project will be constructed as a single development. The stub road in the northeastern corner of the Site is a required
roadway extension by the City of Raleigh as a condition of site plan approval due to the Site's location within a planned
urban development district. The road alignment continues from the Station at Raleigh development to northern property
boundary, providing clear and logical connections to the interior road network and residential/parking areas. The road
terminates with a stub street at high ground at the property boundary, and ample high ground is available on the adjacent
property to construct any City of Raleigh -required road corridors independent of the proposed project and without
additional environmental impacts. Any development undertaken by others at any point in the future is entirely beyond the
control of LCD Acquisitions, LLC and would be subject to independent permitting with the USACE for any jurisdictional
impacts proposed.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland
Type of jurisdiction
impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
number —
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Permanent
(P) or
Temporary
W11 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments: No wetlands will be impacted as a result of the proposed project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
impact
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
number -
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear feet)
Permanent
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
(P) or
Temporary
(T)
Site 1 — S1
Road Crossing/Culvert
Stream S1 - UT®PER
to Richland
Corps
8
134
® P ❑ T
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 1 —S1
Stream S1 - UT
® PER
® Corps
® P ❑ T
Outlet Protection
to Richland
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
8
10
Creek
Site 1 —S1
Temporary
Stream S1 - UT
® PER
® Corps
El P ®T
Dewatering/Construction
to Richland
INT
DWQ
8
8
Access
Creek
Site 2 — S1
Road Crossing/Culvert
Stream S1 - UT®PER
to Richland
Corps
8
146
® P ❑ T
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 2 — S1
Temporary
Stream S1 - UT
® PER
® Corps
❑ P ® T
Dewatering/Construction
to Richland
[I INT
El DWQ
8
45
Access
Creek
290 LF
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
Permanent,
53 LF
Temporary
3i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to stream S1 will result from the proposed project. S1 will be permanently impacted as a
result of two perpendicular road crossings associated with the project. Site 1 is the primary entrance and exit road into the
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

property carrying traffic from Westchase Boulevard and Trinity Road, and also includes impacts associated with outlet
protection at the downstream end of the culvert. Riprap will be utilized for outlet protection and will be keyed into the bank
during installation so no permanent loss of waters will result from the outlet protection. Site 2 is a secondary road that
terminates as a stub road in the northeastern corner of the property, and is a required road connection by the City of Raleigh
as a condition of site plan approval due to the project's location within a planned urban development district (a "block layout"
district). The road alignment continues from the Station at Raleigh development to northern property boundary, providing clear
and logical connections to the interior road network and residential/parking areas. The road terminates with a stub street at
high ground at the property boundary, and ample high ground is available on the adjacent property to construct any City of
Raleigh -required road corridors independent of the proposed project by adjacent land owners and without additional
environmental impacts. Temporary impacts to S1 will also occur due to temporary dewatering activities needed to facilitate
construction access in the stream bed for the culvert construction/installation. All temporary disturbance areas will be returned
to pre -construction contours after completion of the project.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
number —
Permanent
(P) or
Temporary
T
01 ❑P❑
T
02 ❑ P ❑
T
03 ❑ P ❑
T
04 El P ❑
T
4E Total open water impacts
0 acres
4g. Comments: No open water impacts will result from the proposed project.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com tete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
5g. Comments: No ponds or lakes will be constructed as a result of the proposed construction.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
N/A
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑Tai -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer
impact
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
number —
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Permanent
required?
(P) or
Temporary
T
Site 1
Road
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
❑ Yes
8,468
5,524
® P ❑ T
Crossing
Creek
® No
Site 2
Road
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
❑ Yes
7,009
3,410
® P El
Crossing
Creek
® No
Site 3
Drainage
Conveyance
Stream S1 - UT to Richland
❑ Yes
283
1,221
® P ❑ T
(Treated)
Creek
® No
6h. Total buffer impacts
15,760
10,155
6i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to the protected riparian buffer associated with stream S1 (UT to Richlands Creek) will
result from the proposed construction of a main north -south connector road between Westchase Boulevard to the north and
Trinity Road to the south. This main north -south connector road will serve as the entrance and exit route into the development.
A second road crossing will result from the proposed project in the northeastern corner of the Site due to the project's location
within a City of Raleigh urban development block district. The secondary road is also oriented in a north -south direction from
Trinity Road in the south to the property line in the north. A third impact site will result from the construction of a stormwater
management pond outfall below Site 2. All riprap protection at Site 3 will stop at or before top of bank to prevent stream
impacts to S1.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to the streams and buffers within the project corridor were minimized to the extent practical. Stream impacts were
minimized by aligning the road crossing to be as close to perpendicular crossing over S1 as possible at the crossing locations.
Headwalls have also been utilized in the design to allow narrower fill slopes and minimize the culvert length and impacts to
S1. Stream S1 crosses the entire property along the northern boundary, preventing any access to Westchase Boulevard
without a stream impact. The stream crossings were selected to utilize perpendicular crossings with minimal buffer impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to streams and buffers within the corridor will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction process
by avoiding stream and buffer features whenever possible. Where feasible, staging and construction access routes will be
located in upland areas throughout the corridor. Silt fencing, sediment basins, and other Stormwater Control Measures
(SCMs) will be used throughout the construction process to minimize impacts to downstream receiving waters and minimize
runoff from the construction sites.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: n/a
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter fromin-lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
560 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
n/a square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
n/a acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
n/a acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
n/a acres
4h. Comments: Stream impacts associated with culvert installation at Site 1 and Site 2 will be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio using
NCDMS's ILF program. Outlet stabilization associated with Site 1 does not require mitigation since the proposed permanent
impact will not result in a loss of waters due to the riprap being keyed into the banks.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
S. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
0
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
n/a
6h. Comments: The three proposed buffer impact areas are all considered "allowable" under the NCDWR Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses. Site 1 and Site 2 are both perpendicular road crossings impacting less than 150 LF
of riparian buffer and less than 1/31 of an acre of riparian buffer, which is "allowable". Site 3 is a new drainage
conveyance through the riparian buffer, but is carving a treated stormwater outfall with attenuated flow from a BMP
located outside of the riparian buffer, which is also considered "allowable".
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
55%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: N/A
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater BMPs and infrastructure have been designed to meet the City of Raleigh's stormwater requirements.
Stormwater will be captured and treated by two ponds, which outfall to stream S1.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Development within this site will serve existing and currently projected growth in this urban, developed area of the City.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer connection approval will be obtained from the City of Raleigh prior to site construction.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrence Database (updated October 2017) indicates no known
occurrences any federally listed threatened or endangered species within 1.0 mile of the project area. Suitable habitat is
not present within the study area for Michaux's sumac due to the open field being used for parking and regularly
maintained through mowing, and field edges are overgrown with vine shrub species. Habitat is not present for red -
cockaded woodpecker due to the lack of mature pines and historic development within this area resulting in successional
forests. Suitable habitat is also not present for dwarf wedgemussel due to the low -flow, encised, and rocky nature of
stream S1.
Incidental take of Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is prohibited if it occurs within a hibernaculum, or if it results from tree
removal activities within 0.25 mile of a known hibernaculum or the activity jeopardizes a known maternity roost tree or
trees within a 150 -foot radius of the maternity roost tree. Per the NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrence
Database (updated October 2017), there are no known occurrences of NLEB, hibernaculums, or roost trees within 1.0
mile of the project area.
Due to the lack of known occurrences within the study area and the lack of suitable habitat within the study area, the
proposed project is not anticipated to have any effect on any federally listed threatened or endangered species.
S. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper (Accessed December 21, 2017)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (Accessed June 21, 2017) was reviewed
and no National Register sites or National Register Study List sites are present within the project area. A single structre
within the project area is listed in the database as "Survyed" in 1989, but is not listed on the NR or NR SL. The structure
in the project area is the Medlin House (WA0945), and a family cemetary is located along the eastern property boundary.
Due to the presence of the surveyed structure and the location within the central area of Raleigh resulting in over 40
known propertiestsites within a 1.0 -mile radius of the project, Kimley-Horn conducted an Environmental Review with the
NCSHPO in advance of this permit application. Attached is the Kimley-Horn project review request outling the findings of
the historical properties investigation, as well as the concurrence letter from NCSHPO (dated August 22, 2017) confirming
that the proposed development will have No Effect on historic or archaeological sites.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Floodplain Mapper, FRIM Panel 3720078400J
Effective 05/02/2006 (Accessed December 21, 2017).
Jason Hartshorn
12/21/2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
1' I

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: J, WES L` EY AOC ,� AS
Address: `iS S PPS: /.38.1r o it, PAPK WAY 134/14 0IN& ids "cr.%F - aal ATHENS, 6A 3ac
Phone: ('G� j 413
Project Name/Description: Station at Raleigh Site (Parcel PIN #: 0784569220, 0784565495, and
0784563392)
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Tasha Alexander
Field Office: Raleigh ReguIa'tory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
LCD Acquisitions, LLC hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act in
my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Determinations, and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting process or
revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, a duly authorized optionee of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the 2c day of A. G lf , _.0 f
Property Optio*e)s Name Property Optionee's Signature
Cc: Karen Higgins '
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

FIGURES

Kentucky
I Tennessee
Virginia
North
arolina
ak Boo a d
q` Harden Rd O`
C
GCaldwe// Ori Horton S�-
m
Z
a
0� )
a
r
o°
0
E
m
r
Beryt Rd
P o� Legend
Project Study Area
C'
Raleigh
�° Wake County
w
eSlc 0 2,000 4,000
��d
Brewster Dr Feet
GRANVILLE
I
ORANGEI ,� DURHAM FRANKLIN
CHATHAM
'1.f/_lR
NASHI
l Project Location
South
Carolina JOHNSTON
Georgia LEE
0 40 80 Atlantic Ocean HARNETT 0 6 12
mmmr= Miles son= Miles
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Kimle>>> Horn Station at Raleigh Site
Y Raleigh, NC
December 2017

SUN I
lit
a ,. JAB
`.ri4�OJ r
.. r~. � fid` • �� • i-� ! r _ —
e.
r lU
,v
• •. .,•�.
�� • •�•
,• i " � •� • _ .,s` ..fix,-:'- -0
� .F
14
adio Tower
eir
Legend
•
f
0 500 1,000 2,000 yt r� • •� ,� ' Project Study Area
Feet . � •� � ��� , � "` _. •
t R7 7-7777=
Fig 2: USGS Topographic Map (Raleigh West Quad)
Kimle o Horn Station at Raleigh Site
Y Raleigh, NC
December 2017

S
Kimley>>> Horn
I �' I
CSI
,.
f%
Stream S 1 1
begins in
study area
at culvert
outlet ,
14
Ina
I
(J
Legend
^- Streams
0 100 200 400
Feet Project Study Area
w
Fig 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
Station at Raleigh Site
Raleigh, NC
December 2017

Symbol
Map Unit Name
Hy
AgC
Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
No
AgC2
Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
No
ApD
jAppling sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
No
MeA
Mantachie sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
No
UdD
Udorthents loamy, 0 to 15 percent slopes
No
Kimley>>)Horn
5
Legend
rq Project Study Area
0 250 500
Feet
Fig 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map (Wake County 1970)
Station at Raleigh Site
Raleigh, NC
December 2017

I
W
41
0
1 25 50 100
0
r
I� N
_ � I
F
F
Buffer is Existing NCDOT Right -of -Way \
Roadway Facility
M
l
/ &"tit N
` \
OU V-1
Ca
Al
134 LF Permanent Stream Impar
10 LF Outlet Protection
8 LF Temporary Stream Impact
8,468 sf BZ1 Impact
5,524 sf BZ2 Impact p
Legend
�^^•- Streams NRB Buffer Zone 1 Limits of Disturbance
Permanent Stream Impact 0 Buffer Zone 1 Impacts Project Study Area
y Temporary Stream Impact NRB Buffer Zone 2
T7 -
raj Buffer Zone 2 Impacts
Kimley>>> Horn
ov Z
m
me
C: cn
nm
m
N�
Figure 6a: Proposed Impacts
Station at Raleigh Site
Raleigh, NC
December 2017

jl
..Q,
L,
25 50 100
�,
U
;, JV
�•
ff sir • ��.' • �.I�i�� _��/���►�
�/ ., i:.; � � �►1, 1,IVAN
":�
'�/ X1'1 �•U'f ��� l.•1'i► fly,+„�.+ �
��, fy. �` . ►i�`• t! , ,.►: � f of
jl
..Q,
L,
25 50 100
�,
U

PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
htty://www.saw.usace.army_mil/Missions/ReaulatoryPermitProaram/Contact/CountyLocator.asl)x,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number. [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number. [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILNUNGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

A.
B.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 4110 Trinity Road
City, State: Raleigh, NC
County: Wake County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
0784569220,0784565495
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jason Hartshorn, PWS - Kimley-Horn
Mailing Address: 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
Telephone Number: 919-678-4155
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Mark Jensen, LCD Aquisitions
Mailing Address:
315 Oconee Street
Athens, GA 30601
Telephone Number. 706-715-6951
Electronic Mail Address: Mark.Jensen @LandmarkProperties. co
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION 1,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Jason Hartshorn
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner
12/21/2017
Date
Signature
0 Authorized Agent'
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
rocess.
of I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
✓❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
F1I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
F] I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 18.99 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓ Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.800033
-78.710785
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
✓❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM://www.saw.usace.army.miUMissions/Rep-ulatoKy-Permit-
Profram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
FYI
Vicinity Map
F4
Aerial Photograph
21
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
0 Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
zNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
ROther Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/reedocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.vdf
8 Please see ba://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/ReMLIatorv-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and onthe Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Jason Hartshorn, PWS (Kimley-Horn) on behalf of LCD Acquisitions, LLC
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake County City. Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.800033 ON; Long. 78.710785
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Richlands Creek
ow.
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
5' linear feet: 8'-15' width (ft) and/or NSA acres.
Cowardln Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Perennial (S1)
Wetlands: 0.0 acres.
Cowardin Class: NSA
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non -Tidal: N/A
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Kimsey -Horn
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
app nt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
LI
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Raleigh west (1:24k)
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Wake County (1970)
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ✓❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NC oneMap orthoirnagery or
❑ Other (Name & Date): Site photos taken on March 8, 2017
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
0
Signature and date of
12/21/17
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount of
Class of aquatic
number
Latitude
Longitude
Class
aquatic
resource
resource in
review area
non -section 10 —
S1
35.802049
-78.711147
Riverine
534 linear feet
non -tidal

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: J, WI ES L F X ACV € A S
Address: `15 EPPS' 6810 (,,,C 12ARK WAY, i3yiL oxNcio, 41.rrr a0l. AW Ns, 6-A3ok
Phone: (' ^i>0 � 5 413 -- / q /0
Project Name/Description: Station at Raleigh Site (Parcel PIN #: 0784569220, 0784565495, and
0784563392)
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Tasha Alexander
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
LCD Acquisitions, LLC hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act in
my/our behalf as my/our agent jgLely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Determinations, and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting process or
revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, a duty authorized optionee of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Arany Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the a p day of�A
Property Optio*cJs Name Property Optionee's Signature
Cc: Karen Higgins '
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

Kentucky
f
Tennessee,c
Virginia
North
ra olina
Brewster
0
E
m
Beryl Rd
Legend
1,
[� Project Study Area
Raleigh
Wake County
0 2,000 4,000
111111111111117- :1 Feetfl
GRANVILLE
ORANGE. DURHAM FRANKLIN
I
CHATHAM
WAKE
NASHI
— / 1 Project Location I
South i
Carolina JOHNSTON
Georgia LEE ;
0 40 80 Atlantic Ocean HARNETT 6 12
moor= Miles
�� ;% �., � Mips
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Kimley>>> Horn Station at RaleiRaleigh NIC
9,
December 2017

4b limits
0 e ` `+' s
� `"`4. mow, • =
450
4 • �,
u�
.a -
ti
1 _ A
A
ilk
pt
1•.. til �i'J <� � ' �'} `��� '�. P ' � ,t , y,�. i
4 •� • .'1
•ado o
rte.. � .� �-.�-• ;-,Z • , /yr �
IL... �,
Legend
0 500 1,000 2,000 ' '4 ,� ' Project Study Area
Feet �� • s ' . "..`._.. -
• •� '� Y ..
Fig 2: USGS Topographic Map (Raleigh West Quad)
Kimley>))Horn Station at Raleigh NIC
9,
December 2017

Tt,
IM 1 t i
,K
fn
71
iIna
!T
v
ti
AV Legend
^��•- Streams
0 100 200 400
Feet rJI Project Study Area
Fig 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
Kimle >>> Horn Station at Raleigh Site
Y Raleigh, NC
December 2017
Stream S1
begins in
study area
at culvert
= ,
outlet
v
.
t �
/7�
•
1
I IN to
71
iIna
!T
v
ti
AV Legend
^��•- Streams
0 100 200 400
Feet rJI Project Study Area
Fig 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
Kimle >>> Horn Station at Raleigh Site
Y Raleigh, NC
December 2017

Fig 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map (Wake County 1970)
Kimle >>> Horn Station at Raleigh Site
Y Raleigh, NC
December 2017
Hydric
Symbol
Map Unit Name
AgC
Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
No
Legend
AgC2
Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
No
Project Study Area
ApD
Appling sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
No
MeA
Mantachie sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
No 0 250 500
U
UdD
Udorthents loamy, 0 to 15 percent slopes
No Feet
Fig 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map (Wake County 1970)
Kimle >>> Horn Station at Raleigh Site
Y Raleigh, NC
December 2017

'
dF f �" F a ♦� "t - �'w"a �' tt s `"Li'
„.�� . �: "� � �'� .� .E #� ,RFs � � � 'r qhs. t! }'`•i 3 ? • , 'x
y � j
w �
r, s
y
INA
-
v -o
Photo 1 — View of stream S 1 at culvert outlet near project study area's eastern boundary.
Photo 2 — View looking west along S 1 from culvert outlet displayed in Photo 1.
Station at Raleigh Site
City of Raleigh, Wake County, NC Page 1 of 2 Kirrrley >Iia r3
>

r
� f
71.
12
N
kii�`�
Viii ■ ir'i ��' �.. -. � f.�'�I',;C°_ � 3A�� "�'�:�1. ..
Photo 3 — Representative view of S 1 within project study area.
Photo 4 — Representative view of upland field that covers much of the project study area.
Station at Raleigh Site
City of Raleigh, Wake County, NC Page 2 of 2 Kimley Morn

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 3/8/2017
Project/Site: Station at Raleigh
Stream S1
Latitude: 35.802049
Evaluator: R. Sullivan, Kimley-Horn
County: Wake County
Longitude: -78.711147
Total Points: 36
Stream Determination (cir
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
Raleigh West
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if >_ 30
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 20
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
,a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alonq thalwe
0
1
2
3
1
3. in -Channel structure: ex. rl a -poo , s ep-poo ,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1.5
Yes = 3
26. Wetland plants in streambed
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0 0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0 0.5
1
1.5
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Feature S1 is a perennial stream that is mapped on both the USGS Topographic map and the NRCS
Soil Survey. The feature had strong geomorphology and hydrology. S1 had moderate flow with clear
water over a rocky/gravelly substrate. Iron oxidizing bacteria and algae was observed in patches
throughout the reach. S1 begins at culvert outlet near site's eastern boundary and drains west through
the norther portions of the site. S1 is deeply incised with sections of bank failing.

NCDWR BUFFER
DETERMINATION

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
March 28, 2017
J. Wesley Rogers
LCD Acquisitions, LLC
455 Epps Bridge Parkway, Building 100, Suite 201
Athens, Ga 30606
ROY COOPER
Govemor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO #17-088
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B.0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local buffer
ordinances apply)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
(governmental and/or interjurisdictional
projects)
Project Name: Station at Raleigh Site
Address/Location: 4110 Trinity Road, Raleigh, NC
Stream(s): Richlands Creek
Determination Date: March 28, 2017 Staff: Gary Kreiser
Stream E/l/P* Not Subject Subject Start@ Stop@ Soil USGS
SurveyTo 0
Sl X X X
*E/!/P = Ephemeral/lntermittendPerennia!
Explanation: The stream(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of Wake
County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each
stream that is checked "Not Subject' has been determined to not be at least intermittent or is not present. Streams
that are checked "Subject' have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be at least
an intermittent stream. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps
referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

Station at Raleigh Site
Wake County
March 28, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via
delivery service (UPS, FedE.r, etc.): Karen Higgins, DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 N. Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determi tion, please feel free to contact Gary Kreiser at [phone].
Sin rely,
moi»
Danny Smit
Supervisor, ater Quality Regional Operations Center
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Ross Sullivan, Kimley-Horn, 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601

#17-088 Station at Raleigh Site
STATE o
�Jn y
.egend:
� 1
Approximate Site boundary:
q�nu
r
51: Subject
Map provided by NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for ref-
erence only ::

#17-088 Station at Raleigh Site
1
i.
S1: Subject
d�a4aiFo Map provided by NCDEQ
Legend:
Division of Water Resources
:: Locations are approximate
Approximate Site boundary: F and are provided for ref-
erence only
�aO,M,,,d,•

NCDMS
ILF APPROVAL
LETTER

Mitigation Services
ENV IRONMENTAL QUALITY
December 21, 2017
Mark Jensen
LCD Aquisitions, LLC
315 Oconee Street
Athens, GA 30601
Project: The Station at Raleigh
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. RIEGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/21/2018
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin �— Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
8 d' 't HUC
Neuse
03020201 Warm Stream 280
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Jason Hartshorn, agent
Sincer ly,
FOR air.es. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality j Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

NCDNCR - SHPO
NO EFFECT
DETERMINATION

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona nt. Bartos, Administrator
Govemor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi 11.1 lamilton
August 22, 2017
Jason Hartshorn
Kimley-Horn
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
Office of Archives and I listory
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
jason.hart shom@kim ley-horn.com
Re: Multi -family development project, Trinity Road, Raleigh, Wake County, ER 17-1365
Dear Mr. Hartshorn:
Thank you for your letter of July 05, 2017, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the
project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, please
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or renee.gledhill-
earley-Ancdcrgov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above -referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
amona M. Bartos
Location: 109 Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service (:enter, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: ()19) 807-6570/807-6599

Kimley»>Horn
June 30, 2017
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street, Room 258
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Trinity Road Site - Project Review Request
Proposed Multi -Family Development on Trinity Road
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
On behalf of our client, LCD Acquisitions, LLC, Kimley-Horn is submitting this Project Review
Request for the Trinity Road Site, a proposed multi -family development project located on Trinity
Road in Wake County. The project area (Site) lies east of Carter -Finley Stadium and north of the
North Carolina State Fairgrounds in Raleigh, and is used for event parking during Stadium and
Fairgrounds events. Kimley-Horn is requesting your review of the project in advance of a federal
Section 404/401 Nationwide Permit #39 that will likely be required for the development of the Trinity
Road Site. The federal permit will likely be applied for under the Clean Water Act for unavoidable
impacts to stream features within the project area, and Kimley-Horn is requesting this review due to
the presence of a previously surveyed structure in the project area. Figures and updated site photos
have been included with this request, as well as a copy of the NC SHPO's previous documentation on
the structure.
LCD Acquisitions, LLC is proposing to construct a multi -family development project within a larger
urbanized area adjacent to Carter -Finley Stadium and the North Carolina State Fairgrounds. The 19 -
acre Site consists of primarily cleared and frequently maintained land used for parking during stadium
and fairground events. Approximately 13.5 acres of the Site are cleared and maintained. The
remaining 5.5 acres of the Site are forested, and a stream runs through the northern portion of the
property draining offsite.
During an initial Site review on March 8, 2017 and a subsequent review on June 20, 2017, three
structures were identified within the Site. The main structure within the property is an abandoned
residence approximately located in the center of the property. This structure has been previously
identified and surveyed in 1989, but is not listed on the National Register (NR) or NR Study List (SL).
The structure appears in the NCSHPO database as the Medlin House and is designated as site
WA0945. In addition to the Medlin House, a collapsed shed was located behind the house, and a
family cemetary is located along the eastern property line northeast of the house. Within the northern
forested portion of the Site, a relic concrete foundation was also identified, observed with mature
trees growing inside the foundartion and against the remnant foundation walls.
A review of the NCSHPO HPOWEB GIS database was conducted on June 21, 2017. No NR or SL
locations were identified within the Site, but the Medlin House (WA0945) is shown within the Site.
Two NR sites are located within a 1.0 -mile radius of the Site, the J.S. Dorton Arena (WA0012) and
the NC State Fair Commercial and Educational Buildings (WA0202). These locations are associated
with the NC State Fairgrounds, and are approximately 1,500 feet south of the Site. Due to the
project's location within the central area of Raleigh, a total of 41 other known properties are within a

Kimley»>Horn
Page 2
1.0 -mile radius of the Site. These properties include three determined eligible (DOE) locations and
one DOE historic district, nine building foundations, and 29 surveyed areas, landmarks, and/or sites.
A review of the 1989 survey report of the Medlin House indicates that the house was originally built in
the 1930s as a single-family home and has been through multiple additions and improvements over
the years. The report further states that the chimneys have been replaced and the front porch is a
relatively recent addition/replacement. The house is currently abandoned and is in a state of
substantial disrepair compared to the 1989 photos. All lower doors and windows have been boarded
up, exposed windows were found to be broken, and significant water damage was observed in many
areas around the structure. The front porch has collapsed, and multiple holes were observed in the
siding and walls of the structure. The grounds are heavily disturbed and are frequently used for
parking during stadium and fairground events, subjecting the grounds to heavy traffic and frequent
maintenance. The family cemetery was found enclosed by a fence, but has not been recently
maintained. Three possible grave markers were visible, but the area is overgrown with vegetation so
it was unclear during the site investigation how many grave sites are located within the cemetery.
The proposed project would construct a multi -family development with associated parking, roads, and
stormwater facilities. The proposed project would disturb the entire Site footprint. The Medlin House
would be demolished as part of the project, and LCD Acquisitions, LLC is currently coordinating with
an archaeological subconsultant to further investigate and document the gravesites, and investigate
development and/or relocation options with respect to the cemetery grounds and proposed land use.
While the Medlin House was built in the 1930s, the history of improvements and additions to the
structure coupled with the current use of the property for parking mean that this property does not
represent a substantial historical resource for this area. Additionally, the state of substantial disrepair
of the house and the two other structures on the property further subtract from any potential historical
value. As previously discussed, the known cemetery site will be further evaluated before any
disturbance is proposed. Based on these factors, it is anticipated that the demolition of the structures
and proposed development will fit within the urban landscape of the surrounding area of Raleigh.
Should you have any questions regarding this project review request, or if you need any additional
information to complete this review, feel free to contact me at 919-678-4155 or email me at
[e-mail].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
'� z , ; � /Z; �
Jason Hartshorn
Environmental Scientist

FIGURES

District Dr
, � .ate"..
Carter Finley Stadium Rd Westchase g��d
"000
Al
'�Trinity,Rd Y
Moore Or
E
L7,
dti Aerrs+ IrR { �4 4MW4
k
AL
jA, , A
Project Location -4
Pin e4 u�
G- ~
a o
�F
Kimley>»Horn
Harden Rd
N
D
Legend
�U Streams (DWQ)
Project Study Area
i Raleigh
Wake County
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Trinity Road Site
Raleigh, Wake County, NC

s
Iii..
IL
it ,.
r
JL
.�
�. ',l *_%
. .
16
�1
e
its
.L 1
F
�e
a
T
r y �.
IL
ti
Legend
Project Study Area
0 250 500 750 1,000 Feet
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Kimley>>> Horn Trinity Road Site
Raleigh, Wake County, NC

'41
' % x.:T..
E 19 m
air
r,
#X
'41
' % x.:T..
E 19 m

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Southeast Red Lot Hazen&Sawyer Ramada Raleigh
ti
� Wrliram'Moore+Dr � � ,..
Finley
td Ride �t eProgressEnergy yo-` y � �V
A
Stad+um Southeast
Mlt+aie Lrot °a •
;, 1 NC State Equ�i�
VMri nary service
at ® •
North
Carolina�Slate
s University
+< �,
- nrutv,RdWestCampS
f fl `VVrtkM � _
f
+M r_
Centennial
Biomedical �
"u� x! t ,I 1 L1 um Carniius Port CityJa a
„State,F,a• '
G_NCunds,, 'Gate 9 # %
""'Gov,James E a
tiolshouser Buddi119
• • photo • project vicinity."1 1 House' /45) is located 1 center of photograph
(Google Ea1 Imagery
it I fr r'
A.IP
f �•jr : 4 .
� s
Olt
• .� ,�j
�+1

JPMU

�rq M • • • ■�Y �� it !sx. Ott;
t V s
•
ir
P�� i �.} � : t r• . t fix. ysa � ►

Trinity Road Site page 4 of 9 Kimley»)Horn
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina

0

"T
I ro vv,,,®w

—
� IIS
r � r
t_
T� �r
Photo 13 — View of front porch. Shutters and trim appear to be missing or removed since 1989 survey
report.
VIF
i
v
�r
Photo 14 — View of roof from east side of house. Roof is in poor condition with water damage visible
along the sides of the house and roof.
TrinityRoad Site Page 7 of 9 Kimley>) Horn
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina

�` y . of �'' a I .' M• �:
wA -W'++. °' � v max. �a- =4r<. -•' � -
y
rNO
y v
r- 5 fly, i
rFlow

�i. i� r � iII .,.. r +s fy�.� r. � :7.'�' sA•
� Henan
A Y �" —
d
r
. '1�+:.cm,lti `,i' 4�. �4.—iF!.'ic.��a'�.el� is _�"'' ` C'. ".' .l°i � •`-� � _
� • • 1 � � • / � � 1 • 1 1 • 1 � 1 • 1 1 • I • ` 1 1 •
� y
J
i
w
e '•wF
,r
• • 18 Three grave markers were visible1 the cemetery.
Trinity Road Site Page 9of9 Kinney )Hof
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina

1989 WA0945 SURVEY REPORT

House
N. aide Old Trinity Rd. (SR 1850\ 0.3 A W. of SK 1884
(Blue Ridge Rd)
Raleigh
Although this five bay, frame I-h0se with two story ell may date to
the turn of the century or earlier, most of its early features have been
replaced. Though the houses has 4/4 meoh windows and portions of a rook
foundation, the interior brick chimneys have been replaced, as has the
front porch (with a two mtcv`y "Mount Vernon" type). it is unclear whether,
or not the exposed rafter ends are npigYDel to the house or were added
later. The dwelling SYto among large oak trees, behind the State
fairgrounds and next to Carter -Finley Stadium.

County-
3
ounty
NORTH CAROLINA HISTORIC STRUCTURES SHORT DATA SHEET
READ and USE the Instruction manual to complete this form. Fill It out as completely and consistently as possible. PLEASE NOTE: not all variables are provided for
each question and reference to the Instruction manual will be necessary. In all cases:
0 or 00 denotes an undetermined or not applicable response
,+� .Y 9 or 99 denotes a variable other than those provided.
SURVEY SITE NUMBER /j,)a 7(To be filled In by S & P Branch unless otherwise. specified)
1. SITE NAME: II 114 I t� I `> 121 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i l l l l l I I I I I
3. ABBREVIATED LOCATION DESCRIPTION OR STREET ADDRESS: 5 17 A el 0 1 A T !r i 7 -1-h
16101 1) It, 1611,1)1 101k-, 131 •IMIt." I lid h IP I ISM I/ ILIG I'ZI I(d&a
4. NEAREST TOWN/COMMUNITY: 1 ki a i l 1-0-1/* lot IAI I I I I I I I
5. COUNTY: / , �,✓ 8� DATE RECORDED IN FIELD: MONTH 1012 1 DAY YEAR W
7. FIELD RECORDER:
10. OWNER NAME:
11. OWNER ADDRESS: TELE:
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllll
IIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllli�lll .
13. USE: Original Primary Other:
Present Primary lol1 I m Other.
Resld: Farm Resid: Non -Farm Farm Bldg: Indep of Resld School Office Bank Gen'I Retail Store Industrial Courthse
0101 0102 0201 0301 0401 0402 0501, 0801-0614 0901
Post Office Church Clubhse/Lodge Museum Cemetery Site Aban: Unocc Mobile Home Ad)ac FHA Home Ad)ac Other Occ Strt Ad)ac
0902 1001 1501 1701 1802 2001 2002 2003 2004
15. CONDITION: Excellent Good Fair Deteriorated Ruin. Unexposed
1 2 3 4 5 6
18. THREATS TO STRUCTURE: U Other:
None/Prop Stable Abusive Alterations Neglect/DeterlorationNandalism Road Construction Impoundments Private Dev't Urban Dev't, Gov't Activity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ARCHITECTURAL DATA
21. STYLE DEVELOPMENT: Exterior L�j interior High/Academic National/Popular Reglonal/Vernac Vlg Vernacular
1 2 3 4
23. GENERAL STYLE GROUPS: Exterior. First �f��T Second ' 1 Third
Interior. First LL.� Second W Third
Geo Goo/Fed Fed Fed/Gk Rev Gk Rev - ltalianate Goth Rev 19.20c TradNem Q Anne
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 09 11
Neo -Class Rev Col Rey Misc Vlct Std Commercial/Industrial Beaux-Arts Tudor Rev Bungalow Art Deco Coastal Plain Cottage
12 13 15 16 21 22 25 26 33
24. PLAN (Primary • Domestic Buildings): Other:
One Rm 'Hall & Parlor Other 2 Rm "Quaker" 3 Rm Side Hall Cntr Hall Cntr Hail/Quaker Var Irregular T -Hall
01 02 03 04 06 07 08 14 15
25. PLAN (Non -Domestic Buildings): U Typical Notable
1. 2
26. HEIGHT: L Other:
1 Story 1 Story/Habitable Attic 112 Story
1 A. 2
4 or more, Not a Skyscraper Skyscraper
7 8
2 Story 2 Story/Habitable Attic 2+h Story 3 Story
3 B 4 5
27. FACADE WIDTH (Main Block): LTJ 1 Bay 2 Bay
1 2
28. DEPTH: LL 1 Room/Single Pile 2 Room/Double Pile
1 2
29. WINGS AND ADDITIONS: Primary U - Secondary Qj Othi
Rear Shed Rear Ell Sides Front Addit Stories
1 2 3 4 5
2/85
3 Bay 4 Bay
3 4
3 or More Rooms
3
3 Story/Habitable Attic 31i Story
C 6
5 Bay 6 or More Bay
5 6
Orig Strt Incorp Into New Rear Other Front EII Front Shed
6 7 8 1 A

30. CONSTRUCTION: Primary LL_L- Secondary LI I Other:
Mortise & Tenon Platform Frame/Cut Nails Load -Bearing Masonry
03 05 07
Frame Cnst, Type Unknown Masonry Walls, Type Cnst Unknown
12 13
31. ROOF CONFIGURATION: Primary bzLJ Secondary Other.
Gable Sides Gable Front Ped Gable Triple A "X" Gable
01 02 03 • 04 05
IF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS ARE PRESENT, CODE AS SECONDARY:
Belfry Steeple Cupola/Lantern Belvedere
23 24 - 25 28
33. EXTERIOR WALL MATERIALS (Original): Primary Secondary LII
Plain W'bd Molded/beaded W'bd Brick/Common Bond Brlck/Flemish Bond
01 02 06 07
34. EXTERIOR WALL MATERIALS (Replacement): 021 Other:
Steel Frame
08
Log
14.21
Parapet Gable High Hip
07 09
Clock Tower
27
Other:
Brick Veneer
10
Aluminum Asphalt Asbestos Vinyl Brick Veneer W'bd
1 2 3 4 5 6
35. PRINCIPAL PORCH INTEGRITY: Ll OTHER
Original Altered Not Original
1 2 3
36. PORCH TYPEL<.l Other:
Engaged Attached Recessed
1 2 3
40. PORCH DETAILS: A. U B. LJ C. LJ Other:_
Chamfered Posts Turned Posts Sawn Work/Turned Ornament
1 2 3
42. CHIMNEY INTEGRITY: A. I --�I B. U Other:
Original Partlally Rebuilt
1 7
,
43. CHIMNEY PLACEMENT. A. LJ B. Other:
Interior Interior End Interior End/Exposed Face
1 2 3 .
HISTORICAL DATA
Stoop
4
Reinforced Conc
11
Low Hip Flat Front
10 19 3(
Widow's Walk Tower/Tu
28 29
Stuccoed Board & Batten Brlck/Stretcher Bc
13-16 33 35
Ger Siding Similar/In Kind Material
7 8
Reconstruction
5
Stone Ven
A
Removed/Fail
6
Classical Flush Sheathing on Facade Enclosed End Bay(s) Porte Coche
6 7
51. DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: Estimated: U Actual: LII
Date: Pre -1780 1781-1800 1801-1825 1826-1865 1866.1885
1 2 3 4 5
Replaced
3
Exterior End Exterior Front/Rear
4 5
1886.1915 1916.1930 1931-1945
B 7 8
55. PERSONS OR EVENTS OF SIGNIFICANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUILDING: (CODE LAST NAME FIRST)
Removed/Falk
4
A. Type: (J_ J Date: L_J Name/Event: I
Interior Re.
6
Post 194
9
B. Type: Date: LJ Name/Event: ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Type: Trad Builder/Craftsman Architect Contractor Attributed Builder Orig Owner Significant Later Owner Historically Slgnif Persoi
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
Hist Signif Event Author of Pattern 0
ern Book La cape Design Developer Architect for Later Major Aemod/Renov/Over-Buildin(
O
08 11 12
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
60. SETTING: U Rural, Undist Rural, Bit up Small Town Urban, Pop. Over 12,500
1 2 3 4
61. QUAD MAP USED: QUAD NAME
62. UTM DATA: Zone: U Northing: LSI q l is l gill 1jyl 101 Easting: 171 MI. I (019 P) I Zone: 16 17 18
1 2 3
63. DIRECTION BUILDING FACES: (�J N S E
W NE NW SE
SW
1 2 3
4 5 6 7
8
65. FREE COMMENTS: I IJ --14 I {IraIE)I�I
1-/I—if Is I - —P1 IWI1411
A 4/1
151a[1 II I "U" Ifl:/I�' I
rJl
I P071
14.4 1
I.0-1AI I Imi $I • I lel /,I/;,h ,I Ir7I/ I SI _'Ir'
I I ��I=�I 'I IAIe-1F71"�1
1 iIT
I iI A I�.i I'm I.
I/ I I I I I I
I I i l l• I i l l l
t l l
l i
l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I i l l l l l
l l l f l l l l l
l l l
l l l l l l l l l l l

NEI
19RM
%. A k g:
WA
V