20130398 Ver 2_401 Application_20171206

. � �
����I�
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions ��l`1 � �
, (��� �,4
,�.
\I �� �.
SAW — 2017 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]: �_�
Prepare file folder �
Assign Action ID Number in ORM �
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Oakdale Road Widening Project
2. WorkType: Private � Institutional � Government�
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and 83e]:
The purpose of this project is Oakdale Road widening.
Commercial �
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: City of Charlotte, POC: Ms. Leslie Bing
5. Agent/ Consultant [PCN Form AS -or ORM Consultant ID Number]: G�egg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number�s) [PCN Form BSb]: SAW 2013-00714
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B16]:
Oakdale Road, Charlotte, NC
35.287755°, -80.892419°
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: N/A
9. Project Location -County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location - Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Cha�lotte
11. Project Information - Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Gum B�anch
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologit Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Catawba 03050101
Authorization:
Regulatory Action Type:
Section 10 � Section 404 � Section 10 & 404 �
BStandard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 14
❑ Regional General Permit #
� Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
� No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
��I.:l, -1-� /Illi

Cnrso��,rn Wrn.aun Sexwces, Inc.
550 E.Weslinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28Z73
704-527-117T (office)
704-52Y1133 (fex)
November 27, 2017
Ms. Crystal Amschler
U.S. Army Corps af Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NG 28801
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWQ — Wetlands and Storm Water Branch
512 N Salisbury St
9th Floor Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27603
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 14
and Water Quality Certification No. 4088
Oakdale Road Widening Project (SAW 2013-00714, DWQ# 13-Q398)
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2017-0505
Dear Ms. Higgins and Ms. Amschler,
The Oakdale Road Widening Project is located along Oakdale Road and side streets between
Old Plank Road and 500 feet north of Dale Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figures 1 and
2, attached). Oakdale Road is a minor thoroughfare located in northwest Charlotte
approximately five miles from the central business district. The purpose of this project is to
upgrade Oakdale Road to a complete urban "Avenue Type" street with intermittent landscaped
medians and median divided left turn lanes. The project will reduce speeds and improve public
safety along Oakdale Road. On behalf of City of Charlotte, RS&H Engineering has
sub-contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting
services for this project. An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment A).
CWS is submitting a Pre-Construction Notification pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 14
(Attachment B) for proposed impacts to 144 linear feet of permanent stream impacts and 51
linearfeet of temporary stream impacts.
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA
W W W.0 WS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwlde Permit No. 74
November27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017•0505
Applicant Name: City of Charlotte, POC: Ms. Leslie Bing
Mailing Address: Engineering and Property Management, 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte,
NC 28202
Street Address of Project: Oakdale Road, Charlotte, NC
Waterway: UT to Gum Branch
Basin: Catawba (HUC' 03050101)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.287755°, -80.892419°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Mountain Island Lake, NC (2017)
Project History
The site was originally delineated On February 4, 2013 and a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination was requested along with the Nationwide Permit No. 14 application. On May 29,
2013 the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the 404 Verification for 129 If of permanent
impacts and 47 If of temporary impacts (SAW 2013-00714; Attachment C). The permit expired
March 18, 2017. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued the
Water Quality Certification on June 11, 2013 (DWQ# 13-0398; Attachment D). This PCN is a
request for reauthorization of a of a previously permitted project. Minor revisions to the
proposed grading limits and rip rap aprons have been made since the permits were previously
approved.
Current Land Use
The project corridor is approximately 26 acres in extent and is comprised of road right-of-way
along Oakdale Road and portions of adjacent single family residential and commercial
properties with maintained lawns and asphalt parking lots. Dominant vegetation within the
project area consists of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), boxelder (Acernegundo), multiflora rose
(Rosa multiflora), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum),
sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica), and Canada goldenrod (Solidago altissima).
According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation
Service (USDA-NRCS) Soil Surveys of Mecklenburg CountyZ (Figures 4 and 5, attached),
on-site soils consist of Cecil sandy clay loam (2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded [CeB2]),
Enon sandy loam, (2 to 8 percent slopes [EnB]), Pacolet sandy clay loam (2 to 8 percent slopes
[PeB2]), and Pacolet sandy clay loam (8 to 15 percent slopes [PeC2]). None of the on-site soils,
are listed on the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg County3 and the National
Hydric Soils List" as hydric or containing hydric inclusions.
'"HUC" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
� United Slates Department o( Agriculture, 2013. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
' United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999. Norih Carolina Hydric Soils List,
USDA-NRCS North Carolina State O(fce, Raleigh.
° United States Department of Agricullure— Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2015. 2015 National Hydric Soils List by
Slate.
Page 2 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
National Wetlands Inventory
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Wetlands are an important source of biodiversity and provide a multitude of ecological services.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is a
program which provides wetland data and analysis to the public. A review of the NWI GIS layer
does not depict any potential wetland features within the project limits (Figure 6, attached).
Jurisdictional Delineation
On February 4, 2013, CWS scientists Thomas Blackwell, Professional Wetland Scientist PWS,
and Gregg Antemann, PWS, delineated on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including
wetlands. On October 18, 2017, the site was re-delineated by CWS scientists Sean Martin,
Senior Scientist, and Aliisa Harjuniemi, Wetland Professional in Training, in order to update the
delineation.
Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field), classified, and mapped with a sub-foot
Trimble Geo7X GPS unit using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Routine On-Site
Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Delineation
Manual,5 the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Form Instructional Guidebook,s with further technical
guidance from the 2012 Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement.'
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) guidance. These classifications include sampling with a
D-shaped dip net, photograph documentation, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at
which stream channel changes classification) within each on-site stream channel. NCDEQ
Stream Classification Forms representative of jurisdictional stream channels are attached
(SCP1 and SCP2, Attachment E). A Wetland Determination Data Form representative of
on-site non-jurisdictional upland areas is attached as DP1 (Attachment F). Locations of
collected data points for stream classification points and the Wetland Determination Data Forms
are depicted on Figure 7(attached).
Results
The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there are two jurisdictional stream
channels (Streams A and B) located within the project area (Figure 7, attached). The on-site
jurisdictional waters drain to Gum Branch. Gum Branch is part of the Santee River Basin (HUC
03050101) and is classified as "Water Supply IV (WS-IV) Waters" by the NCDEQ. According to
the NCDEQ, WS-IV Waters are defined as: "Waters used as sources of water supply for
drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes where a WS-I, II, or III classification is not
feasible. These waters are also protected for Class C uses. WS-IV waters are generally in
moderately to highly developed watersheds or Protected Area."e
' Environmental Laborelory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delinealion Manual", Technical Repod K87-7, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
s USACE Junsdictional Determination Form Instmctional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating
Procedures for conducling an approved jurisdiclional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD.
USACE Headquarters, Washington, DC.
' US Arm Cor s of En ineers, A ril 2012 Re ional Su lement to the Cor s of En ineers Wetland �elineation Manual: Eastem
Y P 9� P 9� PP P 9
Mountains and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
a NCDEq. "Surtace Water Classifcalions:' http:l/porlal.ncdencorglweb/wq/ps/csu/classifcations.
Page 3 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project November 27, 2017
Nationwide Permit No. 14 CWS Project No. 2017-0505
On-Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total approximately 0.03 acres, including 437 linear feet
ofjurisdictional stream channel. Photographs 1-4 are representative of the on-site jurisdictional
features (Attachment G). On-Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of On-Site .
Jurisdictional �urisdiction
Stream USACE/EPA Rapanos
Classificatione
Stream A � RPW
Stream B �pW
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
JCDEQ Stream
Classiflcation Photograph(s)
Score
33 1,2
34 � 4
includin Wetlands
Linear Feet Acreage
(�� (ac.)
Stream Total:
334 0.023
103 0.007
437 If 0.03 ac.
A letter was forv✓arded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on
February 25, 2013 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or
archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. CWS also consulted the
SHPO online GIS service10 a Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission's
webpage" and found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits.
In a response letter dated March 12, 2013, the SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
project as proposed." A copy of the SHPO response letter is attached (Attachment H).
Protected Species
CWS scientists pertormed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) Data Explorer'Z on October 26, 2017 to determine the presence of any federally-listed,
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat located within the project area.
Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally-protected species within the
project limits. Within a mile of the project area, there is one element occurrence record for the
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). A copy of the NCNHP report is attached
(Attachment I). There is no suitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter within the project area.
Purpose and Need for the Project
Oakdale Road is a minor thoroughfare located in northwest Charlotte approximately five miles
from the central business district. The purpose of this project is to upgrade Oakdale Road to a
complete urban "Avenue Type" street with intermittent landscaped medians and median divided
left turn lanes. The project is necessary to reduce speeds and improve public safety along
Oakdale Road.
' qassifcations of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relativety Permanent Waters (RPWs), and
Non-Relatively Permanenl Waters (Non-RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams ihat typically have
year-round flow, and seasonal streams that have continuous tlow at least seasonally. Two classifcations ofjurisdictional wetlands
are used to describe proximity and connection to TN Ws. These Gassificalions include either adjacent or directly abutting.
Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible
connection. Abutting wellands have a direct surtace waler connection traceable to a TNW.
10 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Offce, htip://gisncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed October 26, 2017.
" http://landmarkscommission.org/designated-historic-landmarks/
" North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, https://ncnhdenatureserve.org/. Accessed October 26, 2017.
Page 4 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
November 27, 2077
CWS Project No. 2017•0505
As a part of the upgrade of Oakdale Road the drainage system for the road will also be
upgraded to convey the 25-year storm event per City of Charlotte design standards. The
existing 60" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) under Oakdale Road at 1320 Oakdale Road will
be replaced with a 72" RCP. Riprap aprons will be installed upstream and downstream of the
culvert for energy dissipation entering and exiting the pipe.
In addition, the existing 48-inch RCP that parallels Peachtree Road, west of Oakdale Road, will
be replaced with a 54-inch RCP of the same length and a riprap apron will be installed at the
outlet.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
possible. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances
to downstream waters. All work will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality
Certification No. 4088.
Piping of jurisdictional stream channel has been limited to 69 linear feet, the minimum
necessary to facilitate the road shoulder and embankment. Headwalls will be used to limit
culvert lengths to the maximum extent practicable. Riprap apron lengths have also been
minimized to the greatest extent practicable while still meeting Charlotte Department of
Transportation standards.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Unavoidable impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. under Nationwide Permit Number 14
total 170 linear feet of impacts to RPW Stream A and 25 linear feet of impacts to Seasonal RPW
Stream B.
Impacts to RPW Stream A include 124 linear feet of permanent impacts and approximately 46
linear feet of temporary impacts. Impacts to RPW Stream B include approximately 20 linear feet
of permanent impacts and 5 linear feet of temporary impacts. No single crossing exceeds 150
linear feet of permanent impact to a jurisdictional water of the U.S.
Permanent impacts to RPW Stream A are the result of 69 linear feet of pipe extension and 55
linear feet of riprap apron to be installed upstream and downstream of the new pipe for energy
dissipation purposes (Figure 8, attached). The existing 60-inch RCP under Oakdale Road at
1320 Oakdale Road will be replaced with 54 linear feet of 72-inch RCP. Junction boxes will be
installed upstream and downstream of this pipe, and an additional 30 linear feet of 72-inch RCP
will be installed at the upstream and downstream ends of the pipe system (Figure 8, attached).
The new pipe system will be 115 linear feet in length with a net permanent impact length of 69
linear feet (Figure 8, attached). Additionally, a 15-linear foot riprap apron will be installed at the
upstream end of the pipe system, and a 40-linear foot riprap apron will be installed at the
downstream end. These riprap aprons are necessary to dissipate the energy of the water
entering and exiting the culvert and to protect the stream bed from erosion.
Smaller side systems will be tying to the new 72-inch diameter pipes at the proposed new
junction boxes. Because of this, City of Charlotte requests a waiver from the General Condition
Page 5 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project November 27, 2017
Nationwide Permit No. 14 CWS Project No. 2017•0505
No. 3.6.1 as the proposed new pipe system will not be buried (Figure 8, attached). The current
system has not been buried.
There are two proposed side connections at each of these junction boxes ranging in size from
15-inch to 24-inch diameter pipes. These side systems will have inverts that are significantly
higher than the inverts of the boxes, with drops ranging from three to eight feet. If the proposed
72-inch diameter pipe were to be buried in order to create a natural bottom, there would be
significant erosion of the natural bottom within the junction boxes during every storm event
because of these side system drops. This would create an unstable bottom, and would result in
scour, turbidity, and the deposition of the eroded sediment load in the channel downstream. As
this would create a permanently unstable condition within the pipe, it was determined that the
most environmentally sensitive option would be the one that is currently proposed in the plans
(see Figure 8, attached).
Permanent impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream B total approximately 15 linear feet and consist of
riprap apron and grading (Figure 9 attached). The existing 48-inch RCP will be replaced with a
54-inch RCP of the same length. The pipe to be replaced outfalls from the closed system into
the beginning of the Stream A, and it is not carrying a stream like a culvert. Therefore, the pipe
replacement doesn't need to be buried. The stream channel will be regraded for 45 linear feet
downstream of the pipe to eliminate the existing unstable headcut. The existing 25-foot long,
serviceable riprap apron will be replaced with a 30-foot-long riprap apron. This will result in a
five linear feet net permanent impact due riprap and 15 linear feet net permanent impact due
grading.
Temporary impacts to RPW Stream A total 46 linear feet and are the result of the sediment
traps. Temporary impacts to RPW Stream B total fve linear feet and are the result of sediment
traps. Details of the temporary erosion control measures are attached (Construction Detail
Sheets EC1 and EC2, Attachment J). Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. resulting from
this project are summarized in Table 2, below.
iable 2. Proposed Impacts to On-Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., including Wetlands
Jurisdictional Impact NWP Temporary/ Impact Impact
Feature No. No. Type of Impact permanent I ac
S1 14 Culvert Extension Permanent 69 0.004
Stream A S2 14 Riprap Permanent 55 0.003
S3 14 Sediment traps Temporary 26 0.001
S4 14 Sediment traps Temporary 20 0.001
S5 14 Riprap Permanent 5 0.0003
Stream B S6 14 Channel Grading Permanent 15 0.001
S7 14 Sediment traps Temporary 5 0.0003
Total Stream Impacts: 7951f 0.017 ac.
Stream Impacts (Temporary): 51 If 0.002 ac.
Stream Impacts (Permanent): 144 If 0.009 ac.
Page 6 of 7

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Nationwide Permit No. 14
Compensatory Mitigation
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been limited to less than 150 linear
feet per stream crossing. Therefore, no mitigation is proposed for these impacts.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Gregg Antemann at 704-408-1683 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
� e �--
� � � �
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
�� " _ - ._.
�,,/, 'r�. �
Aliisa Harjuniemi, WPIT
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Figure 4: USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County
Figure 5: USDA-NRCS Historic Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County
Figure 6: National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7: Jurisdictional Boundaries
Figure 8: Proposed Impacts (S1-S4)
Figure 9: Proposed Impacts (S5-S7)
Attachment A- Agent Authorization Form
Attachment B- Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to NWP No. 14
Attachment C- 404 General Permit Verification
Attachment D- 401 Water Quality Certification
Attachment E- NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1-SCP2)
Attachment F- USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP1)
Attachment G - Photopage (Photographs 1-4)
Attachment H - SHPO Response
Attachment I- NCNHP Data Review Report
Attachment J- Construction Detail Sheets
Page 7 of 7

:� � ��'
\�D i� /:, /�,
r
-a. � /, ; � . �. n �
� 5::� ,�. , ��
; � �` i�
�
�"� � �
:�.�,w��i '�� I•�+I i
�
�;
���� � � . � �'
�,ff .'_ __ " ,.
��'� �
G
d. . �> q.
J';, v ii� �i.(b
- � . .� Vak II
-^ .' � 411II; GM!
, Caur� I I
6 ti.', i., �
I I
J 5 �a.r' �. ,. . I II
y1y� � i,;,,.� �
,� [[ FlolnelsNesl �
�.��. f Ib;�hnal Pa�k I I
!
; S ' I.
�� �
'�ki
��,_ o :uncylhlllls �1
� °r r,ollCourx, � �
/� i.i u
o tiunn.
l; y�, 1, `` �i
F M1l�.nri
. �. . i G �d F(a�rnrelF'm4.
5i� R�n:�,n
i��� �c LD'I:U,� i
`:
6/ ' N
,; �
,,y �eoo4 1 ..
eh ��
`o
.��
�v! Rd `f/4b ��'�,
,N,�o r;,
N.
•'c+
'� )
�r
9 �
' �ir:lll\l'P� Z P ��j`G'0" � � �
.. ' a r �'� i�
� � I,� —"—
�� u o, r .
�_„'"-` i
c .p"" o � ' ,: n ..
n �j � �� o-
L' eJ ��
" ' 1`�
re �'� �
I 1 11. '. inni q f/
I li n.,li`:��iV � /� �y0�. .�
� ,, oos )�� ���,�, �.
,
�, ,�
� .i' ��eF. �
�� ''i . `l'4 I '4.
i
��� �
/ �.
�
� . . rk"s'eu9aeFd / '.,�_�,�o � Legend
_ — f G&be
�}� ,.
�O O Project Limits (26.4 ac.)
W.'.- � J�.hl _ �: ��
I, - �`
?, 5,000 2,500 0 5,000 Feet
RCFERENCE �AGKGROUIJOVICINII'YMAPPROVI�ED�VESRI,DATED20V �
�i
�r j
]A�B DATE:
1 inch = 5,000 feet 10/26/2017 Vicinity Map FIGUftENO.
��2017-0505 onnwNev: AVH �
Oakdale Road Widening Project �
vaucnNrNo cHecKeoev GCA C A R � L I N A Charlotte, North Carolina
wEr�allo seavices Nationwide Permit No. 14
G\UsersWlilsaHarji.inieml\DeskloplCuqen�Pm�ed510aleantlOakaalebakdalcNrcGiS�Fig1 Vicinilymxd

��l� � � ��,�,��„�� ,, � i� ..'` �
: , i' � ' � �' � � 1))la �+' , �' ,
������ � - �r1, �;� n � ,a,..°
1� ����,__ _1 �1,�I,'�� ' �� I �
� 7�/��'� a � �� � � , ,
SR. �- " ��') �- �7i ,e � . -- r�i .Y ��.it'.. . � � .,_,� _
i � I qE.' ,
-..� �� � `, � � �
'���t'���V�,,�' � � � o ��lr��-� I`�� ��c�," �� ��� �.
� � � '� �l i �: , >`� `,'` --
�.,,, , i 1,� � � �r ��
<� �, � f i � � p�,
"� �� �� , '- � � , � - � -
� � ,,.,,�� �". /"� j �=
�I � ' Oakdale Road � /�! ,� �� �
� � � � � 1
T `�\, r�
I y ' �' f _ \ ���;. .� '
p0 'C � _ 1 l �r.
.�_.V_11�-L.rlcazi .r e . �� � � ��1 �� � �'.
l
� ' I� :
\�
,�� DaleAvenue ""An ���
��.� _ � I � r � 1
y�T= i � �d' . �
� I 1\ RI. ,�� I . .
I I1t, Ja �'r�1 �_ II y i.,.
V r
��� . C� � _ � —�� i � \
�J
�V ��. . �� ��� �� �'•� � i , �� � ��� � ,'.� � i ��K � iA� i �.. �.
. �\ � . i�_ � , , I� i � � \.
���� ����.=��� �I i . i I � i 1 � � 1 P_ .
� �i '� tv� - . ,_ '� . � , .
� � ,_ rv_ii_ . . \ .._ . .
b; 1..1 �� , �� .
' `
�. � r ,t - � V:qIJL.J.I
f
�� °" � \- �1, � � rq�.dmy � .
S '� . � ' ' ��'i
� - _ _ � MJL�•1!5 IlFRI
I ,� �� � . . r. � �.
. 9 `' — . s n�` '
� � �::s � '
,T
,� � .
L,: : � � ) �t -;: � -� � ;�,
�„ � �. I , �, `'i',
� i�,�l' � ���l; ,>�. . . , .� �� - ' : ,
� ��..� � �
'�`' � f �''1 \.
,�.��
� y.�,..� t—+�.�.�� 1 ',� .
_ IxfHplfSf:�_JT f � I o ..
• � � " V A ' ���
`'� Legend
� Project Limits (26.4 ac.)
� " .. � � 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet �
REFFRENCL'.].SMIIJUfETOPOGRAPHICUSG$QUAORANGLEMOUNTAINISLl�NOLAKE,NC(201J� . .
y
SCFlLE OATE'
i inch = z,000 feet 10/26/2017 � USGS Site Location Map F�cuRe No.
CN5PROJECT NO' ❑R�WNBY�. w
2017-0505 AVH � Oakdale Road Widening Project �
nraucnNr r�o cnecKeo er. GCA G A R O L I N A Charlotte, North Carolina
WETLAND seavices Nationwide Permit No. 14
CdUsersWllisaHarjuniemi�Deskto0��irren! ProJects\Dale antl Oaktlalel0akdaloV�rcG151�ig2a_USGS.mao

=�,uvewuin��anueie�nrwi5V�y3 qerialmxtl

C1Userz+AliisaHarjuniemM1oeshtop�CwrenlProjecls\�aleaneOakdalaqakdale�nrcGlS`AigA CurtenlSoilmxtl

C.lusersWlllsaNa�unlemil�esklop�Gurtenl Pro�¢cis\pale ana Ookaalebakaalelh¢Glsuigs_HlsloficiSoJsmxa

Ln
O`
Mt�y Rd
5I 5
� o°I
Cora Sc
r
0
c
N
r
�
PUSfih �j
a
a
`c
i
PU�`6.Hh o �
`
G Y �� a �w.
� Mearn Rtl Q
� o
\ o %
o�
C R� neck Rd
Rd
N
Grass Rid
` 0 9e Dr
c�
4
m �
y�'��O � o,. ��0 9 �"as
� �9 y Cl
2r ��n e c a
ey�' �`c�a
e
puten Rd
o �e
� ` '/
' aueHx Legend
�
� Project Limits (23.8 ac.)
Roads
' Pu�"X '; National Wetland Inventory
�'e@�, ' � Freshwater Emergent Wetland
� Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
t Freshwater Pond
� s`� "�
REFERENCE. NATIONAL WC-TlA N� IN VHJI ORV OATA PROIV�ED BY WNITED STAfES
FlSHANDVJ�LDLIFESERVICEFORNORI'HC�ROLIN.4,DATE02015 BACKGROIINDIAYER�S) �,00� rjQQ 0 1,OOOFeet
PROVIDE� BV MECKLENBURG COIINTY �IS DEPARTMENT DAiEO E015
1 inch = 1,000 feet
PROJECT NO�.
2017-0505
ICANT NO.
^ � o
10/26/2017 � FicuaeNo.
National Wetland Inventory
oY 6AVH Oakdale Road Widening Project
oee GCA CAROSER�NA Charlotte,NorthCarolina
Nationwide Permit No. 14
Cw:erswi��.ariaw�,�e�,��oes�nop�s��rem aroje�i:�oaie am oaraare�oaxaaiewmciswps_nivm.�nxa

v o " �> " . ' t� " � J � o �..�,1
`� �� �'. � c ' �'� , � � � b
o �;� � ���� � �, - � � �_,,,_ ,� �
,
, � e �,
��� ��� � ��� �.��.� �- � o �- , � � :� � r� �
j,, ., r ; �
� po w U n .� .� ❑ Go _ . :' ' � `� " .. I
� �
� � � . . � �. � ' —� ��� � (� �C� ,. Ci
, ..� �� �� a� � `� �� � g10� ' ,� �%
g ; �_ , �- � �:s ,�,
�, �� • � e -, � �
_- �./— d� � . �� C� � v t.
�� _ , � � � �� � � _ _� ����'' � � � ,s � . � — a a���
_ _ -�pJ�' __. � o� `. - � ^n�.j �: j , �` p .
— – �� � �' � v � � ,� V
' �,, � � � � O fS r o° o
--�� � � r� J �7 , �o° � � �
_/�60 : � q � � L3 �ti �. `�, �
.� � / �Q � 47GJ��l l�'��" �1 �� G
� J C �o ' ° � ' –=G ,�/-' _ v r C?r��, Q �• �
/ �� ��� �% �� -- ��� c"� — �, V
� �' �=, � r ' RPW Stream A �, � r–' G,, � b
�S liQ ��" V'" � o - 3341f 0 Lj _ o�,
o G� , , � �, , �� � �� v
,., o � � - � ; �_ sc � �-` a �� o � � __ �. � � � i
v � �
���` � � ' �"< �;� �r' �4�� ,�'J �-- �> �� ,�
; i � o 0
� ��� �
o ; Q ls p � ,,,
� � ���_ � r� d �o
�— �•�� '� � i � � �% � �� � � o
, o� � �
� � ;� ' o �J � � o o a;
`\ � � � � �4 �� � � �'j � � � `'
�;� \ �� 90 RPW Stream B �S ,, I
` �
` r I 103 If �� ' Q �
'� \ � - �` � o � (l
`,, � � �I � 1 O � /� o i
� � . I o A� `1 i,j ��
il G � � ���;'� Q� — �
C [ / 6 �'p �)
�
C
� O �y S ', � v
� o � �
l � \ ( \
�—� �� a ���� �,o
� �. � �.
�-U> 1 � C /�/ \ .
/7 � Y�� i
\.
�
_ . � fi �,� l�.,i _ _ � p � �.�
�
,� s % v
C� � �. �, fl ,' cc� (� � � O
G �= 8 �� � Q o�� V�° "
� ,oc�o� � � � q � �
� G . ...ti� � � LI
� t � a ��'�
�� �, � �� �g �'� � � � , � i
,; ��;� � _ �� ;: � �,o � .
� a , � � �:� �- ❑
�% (, � ; � �
j � � i �', '.' -,Q C _
:
, e� g � ��. c
, C L �Q � ���
O' �❑ i
� '� C� � . _ ;� �i
<`^� �y � � ° � � �� � a __– �^ �
�.., , , �� �y J ,✓� p ��.� . �
^`,�J r---__._. . . . v �/,�9 �;v �J d �
� . _ _ . 81 .. ,-'\
, 0 ,� / �
'✓ ) )� � o
�
� _ . �- ,�I �i,,./ ' p
°,i,� �`.> . . � q>�� _ n - 82
0
�. � �O � � �� � � �
� ,�
� � � ` � . �r .�
�� O — �o d� o�� "I�' � � �
'` �
a 'o
- - ,. - o °
Q ' � �•� 8`�0 n� � 1�
� c-
❑ ��.__ � j _ -�o - ,
,.
; _� � - -_ a -
� n � ��
i
�
i
��� . � � . C� %1� � � � � � � �� � � �
'f J � � � O 1� _ . � �.C(,'l'il(�
✓ ❑
� �- : �. �
� � r � � 1 = o , � > � � Project �imits (26.4 acJ
� : e � –
: Yi.� _ " a /,
� RFW Stream
; '
V' ' .' \ J('1`� �'a �� °'� � Buildings
�_�\\ � ^
C> ��� ' ; ° ' Parcels i
� �
JBo "I � t"ti o � Roads
_ d � � �� p f
�� �,�
I,, 1 • � o •�� Data Point
/ �
C% •scr Stream Classification Point
' Countour lnterval: 2-ft o C �
— f �-► Photo Location and Direction
ftEFERENCE' BACKGROUNOGISLAYER(S)PROVIpEDBYMECKLENBURGCWNTYGIS - �-
OEPARtMENT. OATEO 2018. �
NOTE.JURISDICTIONAIWATER50FiHEU.S.WEREDELINEATED�FL4GGEDIN 1 �
THEFIELD7.CLASSIFIEO.AN�MAPPEOUSINGFSUB-FOOTGPSUNITBYCWS.INC.. � ! j�o� � '-�OO �OO O '1OO F'Cl;t
ONFEBPU0.V4.YOtJnNDOCiOBERt8.10t].JURISDICTIONALFEAiURESHaVE . � .
NOi BEEN VERIFIED BV THE USnCE.
O
H
PIGURE NO. �]C q
Jurisdictional Boundaries SCA`� 1":300� DATE �O-GV-17
Cw5 PROJECT N0� DRAWN OY AVH
7 Oakdalc Roatl R'idcninM1 Prnjcc[ 2017-0505
Charb[te. North Cnrulina C A R O L I N A APP�ICPNTNO CHECKEpBV�.
nA[iofl��'IdC 1�c�Olif Vo.l� N'ETLAND SERVICE6 GCA
C llrers�v\Llsillmmnim�i�fhek�nV�<urteni I'm�ttlz Dnk unil OuA.lohJ)nkdale.4re<ilifl4�'1 11) laprc.mvl

OdiCN LL
JLa i 9
... .1:.._ ...:.. i.�i� ._��i. ._ �. .. .. :{�a.. ..._... i..+_.
E
� O� iln �Z� �� � S3
)�� I'1�)I'.1�� � � �d
S
�eto("%,' f�(�I'
tnl�ri�,rai�,u�,,��r�um �
o :„ a
t �,��ri��r.q, cf,����n,irr;in, re` ` ?
_ 3 � m„^
Q� 'w�
]:� .l: � y�
O a � i i"
Z? :m=e
.._ p� Yp°u`&
l,'�
�`:a �
p� r
vo+ �
[ I
[A: . .
- i
__-�.-�._ . - _ __._.,_. _..,,__._,v ._. ..._.__�� _
,- ._. ._- - - -,----__ _-_ _._.�_ ,_ .-_ -_� __vw� ��-� -�______.__. _ v�.,_ �_� �Y,,
- . � �" �' "-� . �'- - SE[ SHEFT 13 f q � -
— _ � I � I e �_� ) �
— _ _ � g � � -�i ' �� j �W�
-�� - _ ,� I � ��� I i f�`aus�q��
,.. , _ .
� �
� � � � _ [ I � � SENSITIVE MATERIAL � °��� �
I -- � 1� _ I �� ; i �' ' - " y - - � � ` l� DallotDuplicata '�j������ ,�
__ I R0� � "� eIf 5 I' ,!,/+ �IIF�
I � �,I � � �
� I�` � w �( SEE SHEET IJ FOR r
� Q� �� � � � 6 � S PROP.IMPROVEMENTS { :
�a _ I` I�I p¢�"��� _ I I I � '_ TOOAKDALEftOADIL4) � 1
11pq' MFM W M �OAO 10;[ Y6 RCo. �MML4YL CwIN< <
� �,�„,/p� m, .e,�,.���� S2_-RPWStreamA '��-_
\
PNWL Pp0 A4�'b W[ (wwi(l MM � � I 4��� .
; � w^� ��«> �^ � - 40 If permaneM impacts i I � � ' _ _ _ � �
� (riprap apron) � � � � " � � r�� a � � � � `� �_ �S2 - RPW Stream A
W� - 15 If e manent im acts
� �. �. u' I g � �. I p r p � i
�. � a ,:� .�>
�� � o�.,, � �: � �� �(riprap apron) � j � �
�@'l � � bu � o , �
@ �r'`� � �� � -� � � � � � � � ���o: �X � mo < � �I ` � ',� - _
� L.-J — F''' �I. . -€�-' ��- u � � � ='�,� ; (
,. , � r' s
y � .«. �� �
— _�: I } P k'- � iI . z,T� wro uwv � � t > d �
� ��I JA � 1 I ` � I. �� � � � I �
� c � y � I I •��) , �� � I aQ J . � )((' �
\9 .i�FS.OY — � tz �fr'.p — � � � ` � 3 � ' t� � �!q �c ��r �5 ''—^`-�3—, w^_'w � ` } g., 1 ._
_ — ii-.� �} ��� ).� 'n 4S-x> u.—S ��. e.i. le�� ^` g� 3 V^�' `l sa6: f fl� f"1 �i p
��� �� �'+� � i I�
/—. � d_s . � a I � � �1 ., , - �i {.-� � %
;� . - y� � �}I � 4 , � �� . = � - � .. �_- . -. -- I �: -
�,—�:—�.=;,--n -n >s —�.. -„ 1. _ l , 1 ��. ' � c.
� � =� J . ¢ o
ttWN�NV. CNW41` 0.
54 - RPW Stream A — _ _ _� I I I � 'i' _ , � - - - � � A, n.,� Hm= ` � � + �
- 20 1f total temporary � - _" r �� . �: �°`o"'�¢�`� � � `= -
wor. w eo m � ` ' I � � � .,',-.�� � %� ""x i.rym• <maw'.�s :erv..� �j ,`-. _ O :.
impacts (sediment traps) � I � � � % � � .�'�� . � ° � \ S3 - �RPW Stream A � � ` �
S1 - RPW Stream A j
.�
"'"°'°""� �"•,"'� I y`S1 RPW Stream A S o"`
o�� ""�- 35 If permanent � �' � � �: � I �' ' 34 If ermanent "' �6 If total temporary ; � ° � � �
w;,a � impads (72" RCP) i' I�'- P . impacts (sediment traps) � z � ���
„���,;;„ � i I I' - I a limpacts (72" RCP) -'�� f �. � w s-
I I �' ^S 't €V � .n
I � ^ I � �
I � �� ' I cZ�- }^ s�� � '� ..
; O_ C
,x s � ; I �, �� �� , f �tir `�" _ _ �
� - � �: - �, �
i � sEEs���Fr�3 , Figure 8 � c �'c
\
� ' � � � -- i �v� �

LJ
UATUY 6!
- noao
)9g
� _ _ . _.. _ oa.. r.vwa�r �
_ _ - ��i_
,.,.: — � �1
�;�,�,, --, ,
� -
;a�.
.��_.,e� �.�,��__�— --- ---- —1—
a
� � --
se � — �
, � m.� �
- -- , - - �
----- --- �
e. � �,a � _ ,�,� ���.r � � -- —�—
/ �r — _ _ _ _ _ . . .
i I ��— P3ax
-ii�it.�:r _ _ 1—_I_'
rnor. �e
nmor ro e�o u
m-rs n sz.n m
r:< _
oure -n�ex
M-m�.0 i
NY WI�)dt.b
EV� � � —� — � —� I
_ I
� o
ol
]C��00 10+5� 41+p0 ]U50 11i00 23�`0
1 �I �
�I �
�
� � ,i �
� /f
�' j
r �
� /L/`
.., ( `
�� � � � �� � o��, �,.��� �� � � I
S7 - RPW Stream B ,�;e�';,,,° ��,...� I.
� I I �' - 5 If additional °� �>��`e � ` . � " �
0 0 a.Wrv:L wo
\ ..� _
V�� � � � 4emporary impacts p ���a �,,
� (sediment traps) � � � � �
' .� P�. ,,,�.� ,� �. �: �
I I r 1 �.. n, :o.�. � s�9f „_ .
� � 1 )�I / /��P �,�� ��.� w�� � �.� R� �,,, , .�_r� � �
� N\ � `1\ �.. / uie�Ra ' `�wwiia`c wia' - ��.o-i I I I
I N� i i \ — -� ; __ — r"' ,�...� ...,. — `y ��..o.-,.q.,--. _ a ' ..�
� � � .� � °� �— `"���r T I �� �e,
i f; � , � , � � __-___,—__._ __.�,_.�. ._._._ I,� : �..
� € I — . — /' v�.aa � UNESDI_ �— _ — —q�`�° � ` I �a
I Is �( " � � ;� � �, - - � , I - , - - - - j �,,. . .�.
I — �� II�I I I�� �� i; � ��-- -_—, � I _I — �--rf � i
% �:
" I I � � I � t ��� I —MMT[ Itt If -I �`PflF. :Yt V N I I I � � \i I 1 I
I yl� � J I I I`�iPPtllaME IIS MM e' i s_� � a�. H' IfG' b P�_P �1 '.WI
�, ,o .� i i � � i ��, �� E�� r i
�. J�� I I II I EC W.RIx4 ICGPI I I . CB 3b�)/% 6�0
I p a � � I � � SS & S6 - RPW Stream B
� �i. `91 � I� � I I � � - 25 If of existing nprap to be replaced wdh 30 If rip rap
I ���u° 5 If net ermanent im acts due ri ra a ron and
P p p P p
NI o
, ��� u� i
I I �^I .ce�""� �II ,°;ngrading(SS)
� �; i � ���� I � - 15 If net permanent impacts due grading (S6)
I� ry����� ��� � � �� �__ � �
I k � g� ��
�'_.�It—�� -- � =— _
-- - � - _1- _�I,
_�_ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ .v _ — _ _ M' _ _
. .. _ __ . __ _.i _ ll . . _ __ ___ - _ __-
-- _ 1 � �F_ac���Et ra. -, ���..� � F .,
,- e� w:
i � ��
,.c,:>� ,
.�� �,�,.,
� ��i�� �
: G�� ��
Existing:
192 linear fcet uf �tR" RC I'
2; lf of riprap
Proposed:
19? linear feet of'S4" I2CY
30 linear feet of riprap
i < SENSITIVE MATERIAL
/ Do NM Duplieate
��� SEE SHEET W FOR
� ��� PROP.IMPROVEMENTS
� \�: TOOAKDALEROAD(L4�
� \' � �
� `� !Illlifll I
' I l',�" ,�. �� �' -
�, ,
_ —
I�� w �
P
,�
s'
.���
a�'��ss, ki'si
�q �
OJbi9! t
yj��YllktC
`�W"`.,":
igure 9 M�= o I> c

November 27, 2017
Oakdale Road Widening Project CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Attachments
ATTACHMENT A:
Agent Authorization Form

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized representative for the linear project identified herein, do
authorize representative of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to
enter upon the property, easement and/or right-of-way herein described for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S.
subject to Federal jurisdictional under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
I, Ms. Leslie Bing, representing City of Charlotte, hereby certify that I have authorized Gregg
Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary
to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands determination /
permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
,��� , ��
� Applic nYs si�nature �
z`��
Date
�uu•-yr e lV'�"�-----
� � Q �
signature
10-26-2017
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT B:
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide
Permit No. 14

o2ap vaarFqo`
y T
> �
o <
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
Offce Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version t4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: I '� Section 404 Permit O Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has lhe NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? L] Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular � Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Express �7 Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certifcation:
❑ Yes � No �!9 Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NCs twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Oakdale Road Widening Project
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed�
p Yes �I No
� Yes � No
O Yes � No
� � Keziah, Kimberly; Woodmen of the World; Dellinger, Jack and Alma; Thuemmel, Linda and
3b. Deed Book and Page No. I8579-413; 7997-807; 1239-77; 8381-18
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if IN/A
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Oakdale Road, Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC 28216
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: � Agent 0 Other, specify: Local Government
4b. Name: Ms. Leslie Bing
4c. Business name City of Charlotte Engineering and Property Management
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 600 E. Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: N/A
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.: 704-408-1683
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Multiple - Linear Transportation Project
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.287755° Longitude: -80.892419°
1 c. Property size: 26.4 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body ofwaterto proposed project: Gum Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS- IV
2c. River basin: Catawba (HUC 03050101)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project corridor is approximately 26.4 acres in extent and is comprised of road right-of-way along Oakdale Road and
portions of adjaeent single family residential and commercial properties with maintained lawns and asphalt parking lots.
Dominant vegetation within the project area consists of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), boxelder (Acernegundo), multiflora rose
(Rosa multiflora), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and Canada goldenrod
(Solidago altissima).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acre of jurisdictional wetland areas
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 437 If perennial stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Oakdale Road is a minor thoroughfare located in northwest Charlotte approximately five miles from the central business
district. The purpose of this project is to upgrade Oakdale Road to a complete urban "Avenue Type" street with intermittent
landscaped medians and median divided left turn lanes. The project is necessary to reduce speeds and improve public
safety along Oakdale Road.
As a part of the upgrade of Oakdale Road the drainage system for the road will also be upgraded to convey the 25-year
storm event per City of Charlotte design standards. The existing 60" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) under Oakdale Road
at 1320 Oakdale Road will be replaced with a 72" RCP. Riprap aprons will be installed upstream and downstream of the
culvert for energy dissipation entering and exiting the pipe.
In addition, the existing 48-inch RCP that parallels Peachtree Road, west of Oakdale Road, will be replaced with a 54-inch
RCP of the same length and a riprap apron will be installed at the outlet.
Page3of14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Unavoidable impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. under Nationwide Permit Number 14 total 170 linear feet of impacts
to RPW Stream A and 25 linear feet of impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream B.
Impacts to RPW Stream A include 124 linear feet of permanent impacts and approximately 46 linear feet of temporary
impacts. Impacts to RPW Stream B include approximately 20 linear feet of permanent impacts and 5 linear feet of temporary
impacts. No single crossing exceeds 150 linear feet of permanent impact to a jurisdictional water of the U.S.
Permanent impacts to RPW Stream A are the result of 69 linear feet of pipe extension and 55 linear feet of riprap apron to
be installed upstream and downstream of the new pipe for energy dissipation purposes (Figure 8, attached). The existing
60-inch RCP under Oakdale Road at 1320 Oakdale Road will be replaced with 54 linear feet of 72-inch RCP. Junction
boxes will be installed upstream and downstream of this pipe, and an additional 30 linear feet of 72-inch RCP will be installed
at the upstream and downstream ends of the pipe system (Figure 8, attached). The new pipe system will be 115 linear feet
in length with a net permanent impact length of 69 linear feet (Figure 8, attached). Additionally, a 15-linear foot riprap apron
will be installed at the upstream end of the pipe system, and a 40-linear foot riprap apron will be installed at the downstream
end. These riprap aprons are necessary to dissipate the energy of the water entering and exiting the culvert and to protect
the stream bed from erosion.
Smaller side systems will be tying to the new 72-inch diameter pipes at the proposed new junction boxes. Because of this,
City of Charlotte requests a waiver from the General Condition No. 3.6.1 as the proposed new pipe system will not be buried
(Figure 8, attached). The current system has not been buried.
There are two proposed side connections at each of these junction boxes ranging in size from 15-inch to 24-inch diameter
pipes. These side systems will have inverts that are significantly higher than the inverts of the boxes, with drops ranging
from three to eight feet. If the proposed 72-inch diameter pipe were to be buried in order to create a natural bottom, there
would be significant erosion of the natural bottom within the junction boxes during every storm event because of these side
system drops. This would create an unstable bottom, and would result in scour, turbidity, and the deposition of the eroded
sediment load in the channel downstream. As this would create a permanently unstable condition within the pipe, it was
determined that the most environmentally sensitive option would be the one that is currently proposed in the plans (see
Figure 8, attached).
Permanent impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream B total approximately 15 linear feet and consist of riprap apron and grading
(Figure 9 attached). The existing 48-inch RCP will be replaced with a 54-inch RCP of the same length. The pipe to be
replaced outfalls from the closed system into the beginning of the Stream A, and it is not carrying a stream like a culvert.
Therefore, the pipe replacement doesn't need to be buried. The stream channel will be regraded for 45 linear feet
downstream of the pipe to eliminate the existing unstable headcut. The existing 25-foot long, serviceable riprap apron will
be replaced with a 30-foot-long riprap apron. This will result in a five linear feet net permanent impact due riprap and 15
linear feet net permanent impact due grading.
Temporary impacts to RPW Stream A total 46 linear feet and are the result of the sediment traps. Temporary impacts to
RPW Stream B total five linear feet and are the result of sediment traps. Details of the temporary erosion control measures
are attached (Construction Detail Sheets EC1 and EC2, Attachment J).
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the �--i
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / �� Yes � No � Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: Features have been verified but a
determination has not been issued.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type rp1 Preliminar � Final
of determination was made? � y
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Wetland Services
Name (if known): (CWS)
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The site was originally delineated On February 4, 2013 and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was requested along
with the Nationwide Permit No. 14 application. On May 29, 2013 the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the 404
Verification for 129 If of permanent impacts and 47 If of temporary impacts (SAW 2013-00714; Attachment C). The permit
expired March 18, 2017. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued the Water Quality
Certification on June 11, 2013 (DWQ# 13-0398; Attachment D). This PCN is a request for reauthorization of a of a previously
permitted project. Minor revisions to the proposed grading limits and rip rap aprons have been made since the permits were
previously approved.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for �
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes 0 No � Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
On May 29, 2013 the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued the 404 Verification for 129 If of permanent impacts and 47 If of
temporary impacts (SAW 2013-00714; Attachment C). The permit expired March 18, 2017. North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) issued the Water Quality Certification on June 11, 2013 (DWQ# 13-0398; Attachment D). This
PCN is a request for reauthorization of a of a previously permitted project. Minor revisions to the proposed grading limits and rip
rap aprons have been made since the permits were previously approved.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? � Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page5of14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands �' Streams — tributaries � Buffers � Open Waters � Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Area
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Tem ora (T)
W1 �
CI
W2 �
W3 �
u
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 39•
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER)'or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 P Culvert Extension Stream A PER 404 3-5 69
S2 P Rip Rap Apron Stream A PER 404 3-5 55
S3 T Sediment traps Stream A PER 404 3-5 26
S4 T Sediment traps Stream A PER 404 3-5 20
S5 P Riprap Apron Stream B PER 404 4-6 5
S6 P Channel Grading Stream B PER 404 4-6 15
S7 T Sediment traps Stream B PER 404 � 4-6 5
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 195 If
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3i. Comments:
144 If of permanent impacts and 51 If of temporary impacts
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atiantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Tempora (T)
01 �' ;Choose One ;Choose
t;
02 �? ;Choose One� �Choose
��
03 � zChoose One� �Choose
��
04 � ,Ghoose One� ;Choose
s'i
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 ;Choose One
P2 EChoose`:One�
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? � Yes � No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? � Neuse Q Tar-Pamlico � Catawba �'. Randleman [J Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number- mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square (square
Tempora (T) feet) feet)
B1 � Ye� s�No',
ii
g2 � Yel s/No;
B3 � Ye� s/No',
r3
g4 � Yes/No�
65 � Ye! s/No,'
��
66 n �'ei. s/No',
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent possible. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. All work will be constructed
in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No. 4088.
Piping of jurisdictional stream channel has been limited to 69 linear feet, the minimum necessary to facilitate the road
shoulder and embankment. Headwalls will be used to limit culvert lengths to the maximum extent practicable. Riprap
apron lengths have also been minimized to the greatest extent practicable while still meeting Charlotte Department of
Transportation standards.
Proposed Stream B outfall is located in the same location as existing, only five new linear feet of rip rap is being used to
supplement currently serviceable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction
activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permits 14
and Water Quality Certificate No. 4088. All work will be constructed in dry and all temporary fill will be removed following
the work. �
2. Com ensato Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for �; Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): �p DWQ � Corps
� Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program
� Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: rChoor se One� Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: ;Choo� se One Quantity:
Quantity:
Type:,Choo es One
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Makin a Pa mentto In-lieu Fee Program
Page9of14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose Qne
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires � Yes �! No
buffer mitigation? �
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified p� Yes � No
within one of the NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
�❑ Yes � No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this pro'ect require a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? � Yes �I No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Linear Transportation project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): 0� USMP
0� Water Supply Watershed
0; Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes �i No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
�� Coastal counties
�� HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (p ORW
(check all that apply):
❑'� Session Law 2006-246
��� Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been p� Yes � No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? 0 Yes � No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes C. No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ,� Yes C No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) !� Yes � No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, �`j Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? � Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes ❑x No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional future development as there is an existing road.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or p� Yes �: No
habitat? '�
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act �, Yes �: No
impacts?
I1
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. �
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CWS scientists pertormed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on
October 26, 2017 to determine the presence of any federally-listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical
habitat located within the project area. Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally-protected species
within the project limits. Within a mile of the project area, there is one element occurrence record for the Carolina
heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). A copy of the NCNHP report is attached (Attachment I). There is no suitable habitat
for Carolina heelsplitter within the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? 0; Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation p Yes �j No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 25, 2013 to determine
the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project.
CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service a Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission's webpage
and found no historical structures, buildings, sites, or districts within the project limits. In a response letter dated March
12, 2013, the SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore,
we have no comment on the project as proposed." A copy of the SHPO response letter is attached (Attachment H).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain? � Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requiret�e�t :
There will be no fill in the FEMA floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. FEMA FIRM No. 3710453600J
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

���� e.
��.z�.��
Mr. Gregg Antemann
Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent�s
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name signature is valid only if an authorization letter Date
from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

November 27, 2017
Oakdale Road Widening Project CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Attachments _. _ - ------ �- �
ATTACHMENT C:
404 General Permit Verification

�J.S. IsRIVi'�I COI21�� OI' EP1GgId�i�',RS
WII,MING`l'ON llISTRIC"I'
Action ID. 2013-00714 County: Meddenbur� USGS Qnad: Mount�in lsland Lalce
G�NERAL P�RMIT (12I:GiONAL AIVD NATIONWIDL) VERIPICATION
Property Owner / Authorizcd AgcnC Cily of Charlotte I'sneinccring & Propertv Mnnagemm�t
Atd�: Leslie Bin�
Address: G00 �asf I�ourtli Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telcphone No.: 704-336-72i7
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, Low��, etc.): This site is located on
Oalcd•ile Ro�d in Ch�rlotte NLecldenbur2 Connty, NC.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit luthm'izes imn�ets associ.�ted with etdvert
rePl�cement/extension aud rip r�n Placement for the Oakdale Ro�d Widening Yrolect Sec tlic taUle
Uelow fm' •i mm�e detailed descriplim� of impacts.
Applicable Law: � Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Sec[ion 10 (Rivers and I-Iarbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authori�ation: Regional General Pennit Nmuber:
. Nationwide Permit Nmnber: 14 .
Yuur worlc is authorized by the above referenecd permit provided it is accomplisLed in strict accordanee with
tLe attaehed condilions and your submitted plans. Any violation ot the attached conditions m� deviation from
your submit[ed plans may snbject tlie permiltee to a stop worlc m�der, a restoratim� m'der and/or appropriatc
legal actim�.
This verification will remaui valid imtil the expira[ion date identified below unless the nationwide autlrorization
is modified, suspended a� revoked. If, prior to tlie expiration date identified below, the natimnvide permit
authorization is reissued arid/or mod�ed, this verification will remaui valid until the expn'atiou date ideotified
below, provided it complies witl� all requirements of tlie modified nationwide peiinit. If the nationwide pern�it
authorizatiou expn�cs or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that tlie activity would no longer comply with
tl�e tenns and conditions of the naCiouwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under consiniction) or
are under contract to cmnmeuce i� reliance upon the natio�wide permit, will remain authm�ized provided the activiry
is completed wilhui twelve mon[hs of the date of the nationwide permiYs expiration, modification or revocation,
unlcss discretionary authm�iLy has been exercised ou a case-by-case basis to modify, suspei�d or rewke the
autl�otization.
Ac[ivities siibject to Section 404 (as u�dicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Qualiry
Certification. You s6ould contact Clie NC Division of Water Q�aliry (telephone [phone]) to detemiine
Section 401 requn�enlents. You may also visit thcir websi[e at htt �p.//Portal.ncdenr.or weblwa/��/ws/webscape
For activities occurring withui the iwenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Acl (CAMA), prior to Ueguming work you must contact tl�c N.C. Division of CoastTl Management.

"1'his Deyartinenl of the Army verification does nol rclieve the permittee of tlte responsibility to obtaui �ny otlier
requu'ed Pcdcral, State or Iocal approvals/pennits.
If there are any questions regarding this verif cation, any of the conditions of tlie Pennit, or llro Corps of
Sngineers regulatory program, please con[act� Amanda Fuermneler at 828-271-7980.
Corps Regulatory O1Ticial _ Amanda Fuemmcler _. Date: Mav �9, 2013*
I;xpiretion Datc of VeriGcatio��: Marcl� 18, 201i
*llate reflects 45 days from tl�e date a complcic application was received.
Tl�e Wihnington District is com���itted to providing the higltesC ]eve] of support to the poblic. "fo help us ensw'e we
continue to do so, please complete tl�e Customcr Satisfaction Sm�vey located at our website at
httu://uer2.nwu,�sace_ar�.p�iUsmveY.html to compLetc the survey online.
lleterminatime of Sw�isdicYimi:
A. � Based on preliminary information, tliere appcar to be waters of the US includii�g wetlands wititii thc above
describcd project area. This p��elimuiary detenninaliou is nol an appezlable action under the Regulatory
Pro�ram Adminishativc Appeal Process ( Refereuce 33 CPR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of tlie United States withui lhe aUove described project area subject to the
pennit requirements of Section 10 of tl�e 12ivers and Harbors Act and Seciion 404 of tlie Clean Water Act.
U�iless the�'e is a change in tlie law or our publishcd regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
period ��ot to exceed five years fi�om fhe date of tl�is notiticatio��. �
C. ❑ Therc arc waters of tl�e US within the above described project area subject to the petn�it rcquu'emenls of
SecCion A04 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless tliere is a cl�ange ui the law or ovr
published regulatio��s, this dctcrmi��ation may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years fi�om Oie da�e
oftliis notification.
D. ❑ Thc jnrisdictional areas within the abovc described projecC area ]�ave bcen identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional deCermuiation issned . Actioii ID _
Copy Furnished:
Carolina Wetland Seivices, Inc., Atti�: Tliomas 131ackwell, 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd., Cl�arlotte, NC
28273

Pennil Nwnber:
Permit "1'ype:
Name of County
Na�ne of Peru�itCee:
Date of Tssaance:
Project Manager:
2013-00714
NW 14 / OaLcdale Road Widening Project
Mecldenbarg
City of Charlotte L;ngineering & Properly Managcmeirt
Atln: Leslie Bing
May 29, 2013
Amanda Puemmelec
Upon completion of ihe activity authorized by this l�ermit and any miYigaiion required by Ylie
permit, sign this certification and retum it to tl�e followiug address:
U.S. Army Carj�s of �ngineers
Attention: CESAW-RG-A
151 Patton Avemie, Roon� 208
Asl�eville, NorCh Carolina 28801-5006
Please note that your �ermitted aciivily is subject Lo a compliai�ce inspcction by an U.S. Auny
Corps of Eugineers representativc. If you fail to comply with tl�is pennit you are subject to
permit suspension, modification, or ievocatiou.
I hereby certify that ihe work authorized by tlie above rcferenced permit has been completeci in
accordance with tl�e terins aud conditions of the said pemiit, and required mitigation was
completed in accordauce with tl�e permit conditious.
Signature of Permiitee Date

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT D:
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
401 Water Quality Certification

• a'
Y
� ''
North Carolina �epartment of Environmeni and Natural Resources
pivision of Water Quality John F. Skvarla, III
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder Secretary
Governor Acting Director
June 11, 2013
DWQ�R 13-0398
Mecldenburg County
Ms. Leslie �3ing
GDO East Fourth St.
Charlotte. NC 28?_02
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Oakdale Road Widenirig
Dear Ms. Bing:
You have our approval, in accordance with the general certification and those conditions listed below,
for the purpose proposed in your application dated April ?_, 2013, and subsequent information submitted on
June 4, 2013, and received by the Division of Water Quality (the Division) on April 15, 2013, and June 10,
2013, respectively: After reviewing your application, we have deterinined that this project is covered by Water
Quality General Cerfification Number 3883 ancl 3885, which can be viewed on our web site at
http //portal ncdenr orq/weblwq/swp/ws/401. The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Numbers 3 and 27once they are issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please nofe that you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those
required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification and conditions below:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
2. Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact
Stream
Wetland
3.
�
Amaunt Approved
47 linear k
Amount Approved
Permanent Impact
129 linear ft.
This approval is only valid for 4he purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a new
certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
Ali wetlands, str'eams, siirface waters, and riparian buffers located on the project site where impacts are not
allowed shall be clearly marlced (example- orange fabric fencing) prior to any land disturbing activities.
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 20115
Phone: (70M1) 663-1699\Fax: (70A) 653-5040\ Customer Service: 1-677-623-6748
IntemeC http:/lportaLncdenr.orglweblwq
AnFqualOpportunitylAffinnativeActionF_mployer-50% Recycledl10% PosiConsumerPaper
Noi tliCarolina
��l�lll"�d"l,f

5. Culverts placed in streams/wetlands shall be installed "in the dry". Immediately upon completion of the
installation, water flow shall be retumed to its natural course. �xisting stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) mus4 be maintained (or restored via
constructed benches) above and below locations of each culvert. If any of the existing pipes are or
become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a
perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correcily.
6. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the
streambed, unless approved by DWQ.
7. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential receiviny
streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment acaimulations, scouring or erosion of the
stream banks.
8. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC DWQ. Please send photographs of the upstream and
downstream sides of each culvert site to document correct installation, along with the Certificate of
Completion form.
9. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (City of Chariotte) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as not to
contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compiiance with section 303(d)
of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ determines
that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use)
or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance,
DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with
such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the
certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be provided
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute 150B by filing a
written petition to the Office of Administrative Hearing (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be
obtained from the OAH at: http llwww ncoah com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's at 919-431-3000. Within
sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the office of OAH. A petition is
considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received during
OAH's normal office hours (Monday through Friday betwee� the hours of S:OOam and 5:OOpm, except for
official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to (919-431-3100) provided the original and one copy of the document is received
by the OAH within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the OAH is:
If sending via US Postal Service: I(send'mg via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714 Raleigh, NC 27609-6285

One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Mr. Lacy Presnell, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resourcas
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review of DWQ under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen
Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-807-G360.
� eiy
r �
�`
for7homas A. Reeder
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
MRO, Land Quality
Gregg Antemann, CWS
DWQ# 13-0398

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT E:
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP1-SCP2)

Date: r��l�-lj-
Evaluator: �}y('r {� �/�/"1
Total Points:
Stream is af leasf infermiltent iZ t
if219ornerennialil>_30` � _
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_
1a Conlinuity of channel bed and banl<
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In-channel structure: ex. ri(fle-pool, :
ripple-pool sequence
4. Parfide size of sUeam substrale
5. Active/relicl floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposils
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or grealer order channel
artificial ditches are not rated; see discuss
��,�s,a�� a.ii
ProjecUSite:��.,J(�lc �( �.x �I Latitude: J 5 � 9�rp� 'S �
CountY: ��LCI���.,�,_r� Longitude:—`�U.�j I.)Z�,S
Stream Determination (circlesm� Other S'j� �c� /�
Ephemeral Intermiltent erennra e.�. QuadName: y��,� 1
>ent Weak
0 1
0 (1
0 1
0 1
0 1
1
0
a ;
0 0.5
0 �5
No=O
2
2
�
3
3
0
0
Yes=3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification
oate: lU-IY,-1 ?
Evaluator: ��V I f �L � � �
Total Points: �
Stream is at least intermitlent ��'
i1219o�perennialil>_30' � .
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = � S S )
1e� Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along ihalweg
3. In-channel structure: ex. riftle-pool, step-pool,
riPPle-pool sequence _
4. Pariicle size ot stream subs�rate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Deposilional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9: Grade conirol
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in man
�ersion 4.11
ProjecUSite: �,i ��J�� ��
cou�,ty: �C�kl�„�x�
Stream Determination �
Ephemeral Intermitten�
�
�
Weak
1
1
1
1
1
�
0.5
0.5
��i�,(l�,� � Latitude: � � J �''. ) �j •
. �.
Lonc�itude: -�y(�, ��L,Y
o e Othcr .J'�-IC�^ �'�
nmal e.g. Quad Name:.. S C 10 �Z
2
�
l=-�
2
2
2
2
2
1
Yes = 3
Strong
�
3
3
Q
�
�
��]
�
B. H drolo Subtotal = �.
12. Presence of Baseflow � � � 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 � 3
14. Leaf lilter 1.5 1 0.5 0
75. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 ��5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 � ��5
17. Soil-based evidence of high waler table? No = 0 Yes 3
C. Biolo Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in siream6ed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in sireain6ed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversily and abundance) 0 2 3
21. Aqualic Mollusks 0 �_ 2 3
22. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfsh 0•5 � �.5
24. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae �0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Welland planls in sheambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Olher = 0
'perennlal slreams may also be idenlified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505
ATTACHMENT F:
USACE Wetland Determination Data Form (DP1)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecllSite: Oakdale Road Widening Ciry/County: Mecklneburg Sampling Date: 10-18-17
ApplicanUOwner. City of Charlotte, POC: Ms. Leslie Bing State: NC Sampling PoinC DP1
Investigator(s): AVH & SAM Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, comex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2-8
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)�. LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35292753 Long: -80.891707 DaWm: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil sandy clay loam, 2-8% slopes (Ce82) NWI classifcation: N/A
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this 6me of year? Yes X No_ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetalion _, Soii _, or Hydrology _signifcantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No_
Are Vegelation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _naluralty problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non-jurisdictional upiand areas
uvnon� nr_v
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secontlarv Indicators (minimum of iwo reouired)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required� check all that apolvl Sudace Soil Cracks (B6)
Surtace Water (At) True Aquafic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfde Odor (Ci) Drainage Paltems (870)
Saturafion (A3) Oxidized Rhimspheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (Bi) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayflsh Burrows (CB)
DriH Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturafion Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Cmst (B4) _Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (BS) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
WaterStained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Tesl (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Presenl? Yes No X Depih (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No X
(includes capillary (ringe)
Describe Recorded Data (sUeam gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspecfions), ii available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Easlem Mountains and Piedmon� — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stretum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Quercus phellos 10 Yes FAC
2. Liriodendron fulipifere 10 Yes FACU
3. Cornusfloiida 10 Yes FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 15
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plol size: 15 )
1. Ulmus alata
2. Juniperus virginiana
3.
4.
5.
6. _
7.
30 =Total Cover
20°/ of lotal cover: 6
20 Yes FACU
20 Yes FACU
8.
9.
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of tolal cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Festuca sp. �5
2. Lonicera japonica 10
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
S.
9.
10.
11.
8
Yes
No FACU
85 =Total Cover
50% of tolal cover: 43 20°� of lotal cover:
Woodv Vine StraWm (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4. _
:�
=Total Cover
50% of lotal cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separale sheet.)
16.7 % of dominant vegelation is FAC or welter.
17
Sampling Poinl: DP1
Daminance Test worksheet:
Num6erof Dominanf Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Tolal Number of Dominant
Species Across All Sirata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7°h (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1- Rapid Tesl for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is 53.0�
4 - Morphological Adaptalions� (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheeQ
Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation� (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
presenl, unless disWrbed or problematic.
Definitlons of Four Vegetation StraW:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breasl height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and grealer ihan or equal l0 3.28 ft
(t m) tall.
Herb-All her6aceous (non-woody) planis, regardless
of size, and woody planis less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mounlains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DPi
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence oi indicators.)
Deplh Malrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc� TexWre Remarks
p-12 7.5YR 6l6 100 _ _ _ LoamylClayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. �Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Hislosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Hislic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 146) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfde (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _Piedmonl Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratifed Layers (A5) _ Depleted Mahix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (lRR N) Redox Dark Surtace (F6) _Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) Redox Depressions (FS) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed MaUix (S4) MLRA 136)
Sandy Redox (S5) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 'Indica�ors of hydmphytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 748) unless disWrbed or problema�ic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Rock
Depth(inches): 12 HydricSoilPresent? Yes_ No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Eastem Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Indicators for hydric soils are not presenl.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont—Version 20

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Attachments
ATTACHMENT G:
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2077-0505
Photopage (Photographs 1-4)

Oakdale Road Widening Project November 27, 2017
Nationwide Permit No. 14 CWS Project No. 20'17-0505
PF�otograph 1. View of RPW Slrea,m A, fsicing upstream.
Photograph 2 View of RPW Stream A, faoing i.ipstream.
Photopage 7 of 2

Oakdale Road Widening Project November 27, 2017
Nationwide Permit No. 14 CWS Project No. 2017-0505
Photograph 3. View of RPW Stream B, (ar,ing downstream.
Photograph 4. View of RPW Stream 13, Yacing upsiream.
Photopage 2 of 2

Oakdale Road Widening Project
Atlachments
ATTACHMENT H:
SHPO Response
November 27, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0505

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Histoiic Pieservation OfGce
Ramonn Nf. RniroS, Adminisnaroc
Ppt AdcCrory, Govemor
Susm� W. ICIu[t�� Secrernrp
Kc��in Cheeq•, Deputy Secrem�,
Maich 12, 2013
ICelly Hates
Cuolina Wetland Sctvices
550 L,ast Wcstiughouse Boulevatd
Chailotte, NC 28273
Officc of Ai'chives und 1-Iielo�y
Division aF liisla�icvl Rveoumes
David Heook, Diacmi
Re: Onlcdale Road Widening Pioject, Cl�atlotte, CWS 2013-3093, Mecldenbucg Couuty,l;R 13-0�432
lleai Ms. Huies:
Thanlc you foi letter of Febivaiy 25, 2013, concemiiZg the above pioject.
We have conducted a ievic�o of the pioject and aie awace of no lustoiic cesoucces wliich would be affected by
the pioject. Therefoie, we have no comment on the project as pioposed.
The above convnents aLe made puxsuant to Sectiou 106 aE the National Histoiic Pieseivation AcC and d�e
Advisory Council ou Histoiic Pleservation's Regulations foi Compliance with Section 106 cociified at 36 CPR
Pait 800.
Thanlc you foi yout coopeiation and considecation. If you have questions concecuiug the aUove comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-L�ailey, envuomnentnl ieview cooidinatot, at 919-807-6579. In all fiihiLe
coimmitucation conceining this pcoject, please cite the above-ieEerenced tcacicnig numbec.
SinceLely,
(�.��. �z_���"�-�� ��
%`Ramona M. Battos
V
Locution: 109 P_nsL Jones Shceq Ralcig6 NC 27601 M�iliug Addeces: 4G V Mn� 5cicice Cenmq Rnleigh NC 2)699-0677 TelepLone/Aaxd (979) Bl17-6570/N(17-G599

Oakdale Road Widening Project
November 27, 2017
Attachments CWS Project Ido. 2017-0505
ATTACHMENT I:
NCNHP Data Review Report

y , ���o�
w �
� '� �'
� �W a.x.o^•
�
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Govemor Ray Cooper
Oclober 26, 2017
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
RE: Oakdale Road Widening Project ; 2017-0505
DearAliisa Harjuniemi:
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
NCNHDE-4596
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should nol be substiluled for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In lhe event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
updale ourrecords.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of lhese records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the projecl area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of nalural areas and conservation/managed area within a one-mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in lhis report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, projecl
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written nolification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Herilage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally-lisled species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
con[act Rodney A. Butler at rodn y b.�tl�rna�dcr aov or 919707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Neritage Program
MAILWGAODRESS: Telephone: (919)7D7-8107 LOCATION�
7651 Mail SeMce Center wunv.ncnhp.org 121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 Raieigh, NC 27803

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Oakdale Road Widening Project
Project No. 2017-0505
October 26, 2017
NCNHDE-4596
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Group Observation
Date
Freshwater 450 Lasmigona decorata Carolina Heelsplitter 1918-Pre
Bivalve
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County
Element
Occurrence
Rank
X
Hi?
Accuracy Federal State Global State
Status Status Rank Rank
3-Medium Endangered Endangered G1
5-Very
Low
OwnerType
Local Government
--- Endangered G3
S1
S2
Defnitions and an explanation of status designations and wtles can 6e found at htt //n nhd nat o al te Uhel . Data query generatetl on October 26, 2017�, source� NCNHP, o3 July 20t7. Please resubmit your
information request if more rhan one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continualiy added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-4596: Oakdale Road Widening Project
October 26. 2017 0 o.zs os � m�
� Project Boundary
0 04 08 tbkm
� BufieredProjectBoundary
L Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
$ou�rm Ea•i NERE. Oelamw ��Y.erniap m enwn� G fim. GEBCA. USGS
�ao vas. uauw. c«�c.� icn�. wa..n- n�. om..,��. s.��.. e,� aw�
I.IETI. F.s�� CM1m+ 1 � Ncn��. ain M�o I.1mrm�nds C OpenSyen'Map
�cn,n0u.wa. s0 ine ^u5::sur COmmu�mv

November 27, 2017
Oakdale Road W�dening Project CWS Project No. 2017-0505
---- —�—�---
__._ _
Attachments � --- - ----
ATTACHMENT J:
Construction Detail Sheets

ttWEN FlLRA
SfEEL POSf
= i1LTQt FPBPoL
C� �y
� �,y
a' w.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. WOVETI i1L7ER FPBfi1G BE USm NHERE SILT FENCE IS TO REMNN FOR A PERI00 OF
MORE 7VNN 30 CAYS.
2 SfEFL P0515 SHnLL. BE 5'-0' IN H�GFR aND BE OF THE SFli-fASfENER ANGLE SiEF1
7YPE MhIN�FN4NCE NOTFS:
3. NRN SILT FQiCE UP SLAFE AT ENOS. 1, (RTEft BaRRIERS SIiM1LL BE INSPECfED BY TME FWNCNLLY H6PONSIBLE PNiIY
4. ORANGE SAFEfY iEl10E IS REWIRED AT BACN OF SL7 FENCE WHQI GRPDING IS OR NIS PCEM IMNmL1TELY AFfQt EACH RWNFqLL. ANp AT LFAS� �NLY DIIRING
ANACEM TO SNIM BUFFERS, SRiEU15 OR WEfIPNDS (REFER TO SWIM BIIFFEF P�ONCm RAINFALL ANY flEPNRS NEFDFD SHALL BE N40E INMEDNIELY.
GUIOEl1NE5). THE COLOR ORlWCE IS R6QiVm FOR VISUW. IDENTIFlCATION OF 2, SHOIILD THE AIBRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOft TO TME END
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSI7WE PRFAS. OF TME IXPEC7ED USaBLE L1FE nN0 THE EPARIER SfILL IS NECESSPRY. THE
FABRIC SWVl BE RFPIACE� PROMPRY.
5. DRNNPCE RREA GN NOT BE GRFAIER TWN 1/4 ACRE PER I00 Ff OF FENCE
3. SmINEM DEPOSIIS SHOULD BE ftQ10VFD Y1HEN DEi051I5 PFPLH PPPRO%. MALF
6. SIAPE lENG7H5 GN NOT IXCEED CRRQtN SHOWN IN TABLE 6.67A NORiH GROUWI THE H�ClR OF 7HE 84RftiEA PNY SmINEM p�05175 ftEWJNWG IN PIACE
EROSION AND SmiA1ENi COMROL PfANMNC PND D61CN MPNUAL �R TME SILT FENCE IS REMOVED SHAL. BE DRESSED TO CONFORN TO THE
IXISTNG GRADE. VREPMm AND SEEDED.
7. 00 NOT INSfqLL SE�IMENT FENCE PLROSS SiREFMS, ORCHES, WATERWAYS Oft O1MER
ARFAS OF CONCEMM7ED GLOW.
• CITY OF CHARL07TE
�� LAND DEVCLOPMfiNT STANDARDS
� INCLWES CHARLOTTE ET7
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
TO
�
GENERAL NOTES:
1. UNIF�RMLY GRPDE A SHRLLON
DEPRESSION APPROACHING THE
INLET.
2. DRIVE 5-F00T STEEL POSTS 2
FEET 1NT0 THE GRDUND
SURR�UNDING THE iNLET. SPACE
P�STS EVENLY AR�UND THE
PERIME7ER OF THE INLET, P
MPXIMUM OF 4 FEET APPRT.
3, SURR�UND THE POSTS �AITH HIRE
MESH HARDNPRE CL�TH. SECURE
THE 1lIRE MESH TO THE STEEL
POSTS AT THE TOP, HIDDLE, RND
BOTTOM. PLACING A 2-FOOT FLRP
OF THE NIRE MESH UNDER 7HE
GRAVEL FOR ANCHORING IS
RECOMMENDED.
4. PLALE LLEAN GRAVEL MC D�T f15
�R N57 S70NE> ON A 2�1 SL�PE
V1ITH P HEIGHT OF 16 INCHES
HROUNU THE NIRE, AND SMODTH TO
PN EVEN GRPDE.
5, ONCE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINA�E
AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZE➢,
REMOVE ALCIIMULATED SEDIMENT,
HND ESTAHLISH FINRL GRADING
ELEVPTIDNS.
6. C�MPpCT THE AREA PROPERLY AND
STABILIZED IT NITH
GR�UNDCOVER,
NCDOT �5 OR
WASHED 5
�- 4 MAX' -�
r��ei' �s'�.....�!,_:.-s.i y.�„"n --'_: � ,
.':4, ~ '�
�;: ~��'������ }�i:
;� � � �'� � �'���•� �
�rv�as�va�Mr 3 1
,.s:.x� �r-r."�"�'.
99-CAUCE HARDWARE CLOTH
(}' MESH OPENINGS)
1
2'
16' MIN.
NOT
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL
�� LAND DfiVEIAPb'IENT STANDARDS INLET PROTECTION
� INCLUDES CkNRI.OTT6 ETI
�.: 1 r re-
GENERAL NOTES:
1. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVFD AND TRAP
RESTORED TO RS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS
WHEN THE SE�IMENT H0.5 ACCUMULATED
ro i/z n�e oEs�cN oEaTx oF n{E rrsna.
2. REMOVED SEDIMENi SNALL BE DEPOSRED
IN A SURABLE AREA PND IN SUCH A
MANNER iliAT R WILL NOT EFiODE
S. THE STRUCNRE SHALL BE INSPECTEU BY
THE FlWWCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY OR
HIS ACENT AFfER EACH STORM EVEM
ANO REPAIRS MAOE 15 NECESSPRY.
4. CON5RtUCTION OPER4TIONS SNALL BE CARRIED
OUT IN SUCH A MANNFR TFiHT EROSION AND
WATER POILUTION ARE MINIMRED.
5. TME SEDIMENf TRAP S/iHLL BE REMOVED PND
THE AREA STABNZED Y/HEN THE DRAINAGE
BASIN H/S BEEN PROPERLY STABNZED.
6. ON LARCER DRAINAGE AREAS RIP RAP MAV
BE REQUIRED UNDER 7HE WASHED STONE.
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
iNCLUDES CNARLOTT6 ETJ
�°� � 1 C
� � �.
A� / L,
�� E
1� v
�°� J
� /
c %�
� �
ED 57pNf /
(
SiORAGE
� ._... ��
�
� \
� � � \
/ � \���
PLAN VIEW / I `
q nrslio "'
y sTONE qa�
� � �� �
13' MM.
CATCH
Br�SIN
J'-0'
SECTION A-A
NOT
STONE INLET PROTECTION
GENTLE SLOPES STFEP SLOPES
700 Ibs/acre tall fescue
SEEDING 30 Ibs/acre Sericea lespedeza
MIXTURE 80 16s/ac�e of tall fescue (unscarified ofte� August 15)
10 Ibs/acre Kobe lespedeza
FALL: August 25 - October FALL: August 25 - October 15
Late win[er. February 15 - April 15 Late winter. Februory 15 - April 15
SEEDING To eztend spring seeding into June, add To ezlend spring seeding into June, add
DATES 15 Ibs/acre hulled Bermudagrass 15 Ibs/acre hulled Bermuda9rass
Overseeding of Kobe lespedeza over fall-seeded Overseeding of Kobe lespedeza over fall-seeded
tall fescue is very effective. tall fescue is very effective.
SEEDING Apply lime and fertilizer per soil tests, or 4000 Apply lime and fertilizer per soil tests, or 4000
AMENDMENTS Ibs/acre limestone and 1000 Ibs/acre 10-10-10 Ibs/acre limestone and 1000 Ibs/acre 10-10-10
fertilizer. fertilizer.
NOTE 1
Ground Cover-- protective cover must be established on all disturbed areas within 21 calendor days after
Iand disturbing activity is completed or has temporarily ceased.
NOTE 2
Graded slopes and fills--protective cover must be established on all graded slopes und fill� within 21 calendar days after
a phase of grading is completed or has tempororily ceased.
��• CITY OF CHARLOTTE S E E D I N G S C H E D U L E
LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
�$ irrctwes cuaxt.orra �ra
30.08
Y
-o m
>+ O
O
V � C N W
�� m ��'1�
; �yN'
r
� � � o N ^
�� 3 � e LL
� o
�2NQz �^mo�
� Z � � L p
O n� O V N
� � � q A
St'. O� 4 N O
�� �
�
,�.t�� CARp��y�
�?� �FESS /��1'��.
` t '
� � S� °
t 036ied �,, 3
�v �INE�!
�� uiuin{h��0
�
e
�
�
�
0 0 �
0 � W P r
' � Y �
�q
o°z ��7� � w xu
� 0 4@ o a Y a
ow 'e
��
� �
,�,� O �
z o ,�
QN �.a
3 v a � �
a� ��w
zA
�o , o0
�x o
O� W
F '"'� �D
i W o W

E%CELSIOfl
WATiLE DETAIL
SLOYC`
\
ISOMETRIG 4IEW
OF PAVENEHi
2'(yqx.) . ._2' UPSLOPE
�TME lIA7UAAL GAWYD
�� �/'. ,`; ,� . `� �� i I
NAiTItiG--�II,� �d'.�ORiISLOPE
CHOSS SECTfON srruce
VEE DITCH
2 IN. 2' UPGIOPE �pyp -_
SihKE 1UTUflAL GAQUND
�� ,L,
I < = '
�� <.' �:' �
t,s
6WRI�a 'Ll ���:`\� r� OOrMSLOVE
CflOS6 SECTION '�T�E
TflAPEZ0I0AL DITCH
TEAIPOPPRY SEDIMQR TRAP
D61GN CRRQtN
URAIt14GE
r1RG < 1 AC.
(PCRE$)
MIN.
�+cn+ ro xn
WIDiH
runo
5600
MIN. (CU. Ff. �
YOLUME PER AC.
REONRm DISTURBm)
a35
sursrnce (so. vr.
�� PQI CFS
RE�VIRFD ��p�
N��:
1. REFER TO NC6CP�M
SECTON g6.60 FOR
ADDRIONAL DESIGN
SPECIflCATIONS
REG4RDING TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT TRAPS.
2. REFER TO CLDS
$TPNDARO �50.19 FOR
fl4FFLE SPACINC
.����
' ,sy
__ ���'
fIi/ �
� � ��' ,�,1�\;�
-.i"��.!�%\�`���
1 �•
' ;����1�'1�:�� •�5Q n: �;,.
���� ���.`��: \��,��, .,r� �
` `���\. r�+
:�i'\'�'�1����.\[i�.;� s����
�'\1j�1{���1\1���1�4���,1\ � �'_.;�:`�L'
�
;\1.��i{ 1�.11�1�.� ��\\.` \\:�%.:l�i'1�-i'•,`,,t"e:' i5:s
��I
!%1iES:
USE tlINIWY 14 IH. OfA4FiFA GLELSIOq MTiIE.
USf 2 Ff. MJODFlI SVJ�II AZTN A 2[N. HY Y IN. tNYIWLL
CAO:S SECTIdY.
lr,a,y uyru� enrnels� to n xeic�rt ix oire/ so r�w a�u nor
xaSN MOU V MTTiL At9 SCff.A� �STCM SlOPEB PNO IV OIRGCTEO.
IM9TALL A YINiN]I Of 2 UPSLOPE STMES N:0 � DOM6L01'E
LT�U(EL Ai HI ANSIE TO RT_OGE IUTTtE TO 90Trp1 OF U1TGI.
➢AOv70E 6t/PLE6 YADE CF 0.125 IN. OI�TEI BTEEL 9rtAE
TCHt�D INTO A Il SW�VE KOT L[53 TlUt! 14' I!i LUX:7l1.
7�T0.tt STI➢lF5 MFPOyIWTELY flEFY t tiM:M FLOf Cel
PATN 82uC9 Of 1NTTLE ht0 AT CALN UU TO 6EP1PC IT TO iNE :Atl.
7RSi�LLt WtttxO IN ACffApAi�[E wliN GEGiIGI IB71 Of TN'c
SiNNtAO SVECIFIGTIWS.
':.�: }..
:'��i;, �`r'�:>:{ti:
'v��,a,£1' -�{i`;; ,r
`slTAYFS • SV➢lG9
IYSET A IN9ET B
TOP VIEW
T= 1�5' MIN.
?>
5' MAX
�
- nlJ�;�
-FlLTER
FABRIC
OVERFlLL 6' FOR
$Erne%ie%n
EMERGENCY
BY-PASS 6'
BEL�H
SETTLEO TOP
OF ➢HM
�-NFTIIRHL GR�UN➢
NOT TO SCALE
• CI'1'Y OF CHARLOTTE
�� LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
� INCLUDES CHARLOTf6 EfJ
30.01
�
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
GENERAL NOTES
1. DISTIlRBEO ARFq: B.] ACRES (INCLUDES FLL IMPROVENINIS WIiHIN PROPOSm TEMPORARY CONSfRUCIION �
EASpAENiS AND D(ISTING PERNANENf EASEMENiS/ftIGH(-OF-WAY)
2. SOIL 7YPE5: ClAYE7 SIL75
SILTY CIAYS WfM ftOCK FRACMENi$
SNJDY CIAYEY SILTS
yWDY SILT$
3. PiL P(7ACTICES SFMLL BE IN ACCOR�ANCE WRH 1HE CUIDELINES, CRY OF CINRLOTTE AND STANDARDS ANO
PRACTICES OF THE SfATE OF NORiH CAItOUNA AS SEf FORTH IN THE 'EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL PWNNING
AND DESIGN lNWUAL
4. THE fUMRACTOR SIWIL 6E RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER INSiNLfATION, MA1P(IENPNCE AND REMOYAL OF ALL
ERO51 URES
!S DESICNAiEO aN iMESE PLANS.
ON CO ME0.S
MROL
5. THE FROSION CONTROL PIANS DFPICT EROSION COMROL MFASUR6 FOR 7HE ENT7RE PROJECT. THESE �EVIC6 SFNLL
OE PIACm IN ACCOftDANLE WIfH THE CONSrNUCTION SCHEDULE OUILINED HEREIN AS ACNAL CONSfRUCTON %'IIHIN
THE WORK AREA PROGRESSES. REFER N TR/FFlC COMROL PIANS i0R DEfAJLEO SEQUENCE OF CONSIitUCTION.
6. TME EROSION COMROL MEASURES SPECIFlED ON TM6E PLANS ARE IMENDE� TO REPR6ENi THE MWIMUI!
REQUIREMENiS FOft THIS PR0.IECT. ADDRIO'ML 7EMPORARY NElSUPES AND/OR AWUSTMFM OF THOSE SHOWN 614V BE
REQUIRED JS FlELD CONDffIONS �ICTATE INCWDING BUT NOT L1NffED T0: TEMPoRAftY PIPWC. PDDITIONAL SmMEH�
FENCE AND/OR INCI�ENfAL STONE
7. THE COMPACTOR IS AD'ASED TO IXERCISE DUE DNCENCE AND CPRE IN THE PfACEMFNT OF FROSION COM20L
MEASURES PDJACENT TO PNO/OR AFFEGTINC PRNATE PROPERTY. ME0.5UR6 SNALL BE PIACED TO PERMR URIVEM/AY
ACCE55 AND TO PROVI�E PE�ESTRW! SAFEIY AT ALL TIMES.
8. �URING CONSR2UCfI0N, THE CONIi2ACTOR ShWLL MAKE EVERY EFFORf TO �IRECT AND/OR DIVERf POTENPpL
SEDIMQJT-IPDEN Rl1NOFF TO Efi0510N CONR20L DEVICES IN PWCE AS IAND DISNRBINC ACTMTY PROCEEDS.
9. EROSION CONTROL MFASURFS SMALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND PFfER RAINFALL EVEMS. SEDIMEM SHALL BE
PFRIDDICALLY REMOVED AND PROPERIY DISPOSED OF AS REQUIRED. DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND/OR RFPIACED
15 NECESS4RY TO ENSURE TH4T THEY PERFDRM AS IMENDED.
f0. EROSION CON7Ii0L PLW SHEEfS ARE IMQ:�FD FOR THE IMPLE4IENTA710N OF EROSION COMROL NE0.SURE5 ONLY.
REFER TO ROAOWAY PlANS FOR ACiLlP1 �EfAILS Of ROADWAY CONSTRUCiION.
il.PJl EROSION AND SEOIMFM COMROL PPACfICES V/RL BE CHECKED FOR STPBILM AND OPEAATON EVERf Y/EIX AND
iOLLOWWG EVERY RUNOFF-PRODUCING RWNGALL ANY NEEDFD REPAIRS WILL BE NAOE IMNml4TEl7 TO �WMP1N ALL
PRACTICES AS Or51GNm.
12. PREFABRICATION SILT FENCE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. USE CfIY OF CNARLOTfE lANO �EVELOPMEM $fPNR40.D 30.Ofi0.
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
1. ENGINEER TO OBRJN PIAN PPPROVAI AND OTHER APP4CABLE PERMIIS AS REOUIRED.
2. HOtD PRE-CANSIFiUCTION CONFEPENCE AS DICTATW PftIOR TO BEGINNWC CONSR2UCIION.
3. IAND DIS7UFBING ACTVR�6 CONSISf OF CONSTFtUCTION OF CURB AND GUITER. SIOEY/ALK AND PAVEMENT. TRPFFlG IS
TXEN SHIFfm OMO THE NEW SECTON 0.ND CONSRiUCiION IS COMPLEfm ON THE OTHER SIDE. FlNAL WORK WILL
CON515T OF PIACQAINf OF FlN4l. PAVEAiENi LIFf, CONCREfE MEDI4N5, ETC.
THE EROSION COMROf. AI:ASUR6 TO BE MPLEMEMED ARE 15 FOLlOWS:
7. PIACE SE�IMENT CONTROL FENCE ALONG THE PROPOSED l0E OF flLL AT THE LOCATIONS INDICATED ON PLANS.
2. PWCE INLEf PROTECTION MFPSUR6 AS SOON 15 EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSiRUCTED TO PREVENT SEOIMEN( INCRE55.
3. IEMPORARILY �RCH OR DIVERT RUNOFF TO PROTECTED LOCATIONS UMIL ALL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE
4. SEED FLL DQ�UDED l�iFlS IN ACCORDANCE Wf1T1 THE SEFDING SCHEDULE GROUND STABNIATION MUSf OCCUR WITHIN
7 DAYS ON PERIMEfQt ARE45 MIO SLOPES GRFATER 7FIAN J:I, AND CROUND STABIUZATION MUST OCCUR WfMIN 14
DATS ON OTHQt MFlS.
5. ANY BPSIN OU7LEf SR2UCTUR6 WITH DRAINAGE ARFIS EOUPL TO OR GRFAiER THAN 7 ACRE MUST WIiHDRA1Y WATER
FRON iHE SURFACE
6. ANY ARFAS USED FOR STAGING OR SiOCKPNNG OUTSIDE 7HE PERMIiTED LINfIS OF THE PROJECT WILL REOUIRE AN
EROSION COMROL PUN.
7. REMOVE TEMPORHRY F�2051ON CONTROL DEVICES AfTER THE PRQIECT H!5 BEEN PERMANENiLY STABILJZED.
UTILLZE RN ENERGY '�
D[SSIPATER IN PUMPING
CLEPN VATER
CL1iSS H RIPR4IP I TON
�ISCHARCE HOSE
<- ctow
IMPERVIOUS
DIKE
���oW B e '_- .
SPECIRL STILLING BASIN-�
CSEE NCDOT STD. 1630.06)
f�4g
ENSURE TO fWCHOR ALL
PUMPS AND PIPES SECURELY.
IMPERVIOUS �IKE •
WrtH OVER FLOW PIPE
SEE SECTION A-A
INrAKE
�
� MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. CHECK ALL EROSION COMftOL MEPSURES WEEKLY AND AFiER FACH RAINFPIL
2 RE610YE SEDINEM FRON BEFIINO SEDIMEM FENCE WHEN THE ACCUMULVED MATERIPl IS 0.50 GEEf DEEP. RESET
AN�/OR kEPIACE FENCE AS RE�UIRED 7NROUGH0IJ� CON5IRUCTION.
3. SEED NERLY GRAOm ARElS AS FMIY AS PoSSIBIE R6EED, /S NECES4VcY. ANY REMAINING OR NEWLY OISiURBm
AftEAS 15 WORK PROCR65E5 TNft0UGH0UT 7�1E ENiIRE CONSiftUCiION PEF210D.
VEGETATNE PIAN
n wzm o
1. ALL �ISR)RBED ARFAS YfILL DE S� B B1' PERMANEMLY VEGEfATING WITN SEED M'D MULCH AS RECOMMEN�E
8Y 7ME SEEDING SCHEDl1LE M1ND SPECIFlG4TION5 DUE TO THE RESTWJMS ON THE LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR
DURATIDN OF IXPOSEO DISiURBm ARFAS.
2. 70 PRONOTE A DENSE VECEfA7NE COVER W ARFAS WNERE RUNOFF CONCFMRFhS OR IN ARE0.5 WHERE VEGEfAT70N
5 W1RD TO E5fABlJSH A 6NTTING FOR EROSION CONRiOL WILL BE USm. TNE MATiING TO BE USED WILL BE A
MATfING THAT CONSISTS OG 70X SfRAW AND COCONUT AND BE BACKED (OR APPROVED EQUAL). THE Ai4TTING FOR
EROSION COMROL N7LL BE CONSiftUCfEU AS PPAT OF TNE PROPOSEO IMPROVEMEMS AND SHALL AI50 SEfNE FOR
VEGEfATNE STABRl7ATON PURPOSES.
BYPASS PUMPING
1. INSiALL SPECIAL S�IWNG fl451N(S) OR STA31lRm OUREf IF PUMPING CLEAN WATER.
2. INSfPiL UPSfRFAM PUMP AND TEMPORPIZT FLIXIBLE HOSE
S. PIACE UPSfRFAM IMPEAVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FDR SIFiFAM �NETi510N.
4. PIACE DOYlNSTRFAN WPERVIOUS �IKE AI1D PUMPING APPARANS. �EIYATER ENiW1PPED AREA ARFA TO BE
DEWATERm SHP1L BE EOUAL 10 ONE W.YS WORK.
5. PERfORM SIREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCOROANCE WITH THE PfANS.
6. IXCAVATE ANY ACCUMUlAIED SILT AND DEWATER BEiORE REMOVAL OF IMPFRVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS
DIKES. PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY FLIXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTRFMI IMPERVIOUS DIXES FlftSTJ
7. !LLL GRADING AND S�PBILIZATION MUST OE CAMPLEfED IN ONE OAY WITHIN THE PUMP AROUND AREAS BE7WEEN TME
IMPEfM0U5 DIKES. THE IMPERYIOUS DIKE LOCATIONS A$ SHOWN ON TMIS SHEEf ONLY SHOW THE VPPER AND LOWFR
IXiENT OF WORK FOR FACH STRFAM SEGMENT. TNE COMRACTOR IS RESPONSIBIE (OR �EfERMININC THE IOCATION
OF THE IMPQMOUS DIKE(S) FOR FACH DAYS WORK
8. REMOVE SPECWL STIWNG�H45IN(5) AN� BACKiILL SiABILIZE D15NRBED AREA WIiH SEED AND NULCH.
NOTES:
1. AlL IXCAVAiION SVW1 BE PERFORMEU IN ONLY ORt OR ISOLATED SECTIONS OF CHANNEL
2. IMPERVIOf15 DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOIATE WORK FROM SR2FAM FLOW WHEN NECESSARY.
3. ALL GRADED AREAS SFIl�LL BE S�ABILI2ED WIiHIN 24 HOURS.
4. MPINTENANCE OF STREu1 FLOW OPERnTONS SHPLL BE INp�ENfAL TO iHE WORK. iH15 INCLUDES POLYEfHYLENE
SHEETINC. DNERSION PIPES. PUN75 AND HOSES.
5. PUA1P5 AND HOSES SFWl BE OF SUFFIqENT SIZE TO DEWAiER THE WORK ARrA
� F�=W
TOP OF BANK
6' MIN HEIGMT FROb1
STREfUA BOTfOM ��
�� � � POLYEfMYLENE FABRIC ON
42' CMP FFCE (8 ML THICK)
:. \ � STRFAM
18' FLOW
MIN� ��� 5lWDBAGS
NTS
SR2EAIA BOTTOM
INSfALL SPNDBACS IN PIPE INYERT h FABRIC WHILE PU6IPINC
. PItOUND DURINC CONSiFtUC�ION IN STREAM.
REMOVE SANDB4C5 k FABRIC TO ALLOYI FLOV7 THROUGH
PIPE WHEN NOT PUMPING AROUND.
SECTION A-A
/ �
.T MIN HEIGHT FROM
STREl+M BOTT�M CLASS B RIPRAP
WORK PREA � FLON M
STREAM BOT70M N'f5
BYPASS PUMPING FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
SECTI❑N B-B
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
ti
O
` � m
V � m N M
� c .�.
� � 3 S � �
3 a w$�e
�'� � od�u
m .. r
.� 2
� �
0 0
� O x � m2ie
�' " O�� �ym
q �
o `
� 2s , m`';
� � � rc'4�
q
� o Y N�^
4S�' O� `� N :
a=id � n
¢
�
�
� g
�3 Z
o•n�•CAR°'•� ,
� �N 0��
�c�°QoEESS/o,�9 �
E 4 SEAL� -
036188
,,��p'�CWEATK ���`'�:
uuu u�•
�
� O
W O
� O
� 0
o�zF
W V
dq� '4
xa
C �"
O
� N
w V
�W
0
s w � u
p 6 Y O
�
d
a
�i Q�y�1
QpOz
QO
o�
�
W
�D
oU
W

DIRECTION
OF F�LOW
, �'
ill , i
•� �' �
. _.
or
rrrrrr�'r�•rrr�'�-r�� r�7'���'rr�-r����Y'r�'
�������������������������������� ��������������������������������
��������������������������������y�������������������������������
♦����������1����1����♦ ♦����������
/��������������4 ������`���������♦
♦������������������������♦ ♦������
/�����������������������♦ �,�����♦
����������������������������������������1�����������������������
������ii!%%���i�i��0� �i�� �%����%!%i0�%�!�����ii �
♦���������������������������������
%�������������������������������������������������������������������
�Oi�'��������������o��p���o�������a�����p•��Op��
� '�L��' t.'� .�������Oi������♦
:w .ww�.w�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�_wr.�.�
. � -
� �
ANCHORS ON
� CENTERS
ANCHORS
CINCH STAKE*"
(wooden 2'x1" nominol)
t.s' .�s'
Z� 6'
I
�'B^ (TMP)
COIR FIBER
MATfING BACKFILL
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
\ �,
EXTEND MATTING ,,.—I,
TO NWSEL I_ 6^
NOTES:
ANCHORS ON
IN ARFAS TO BE MATTED, ALL SEEDING, SOIL 1' CENTERS
AMENDMENTS, AND SOIL PREPARATION MUST BE IN TRENCH
COMPLEfED IN ACCOR�ANCE W�TH THE PROJECT MATTING SHALL BE
SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR ' PLACED IN TRENCH
FIBER MATTING. AND BACKFlLLED
� STREAM BED �yPICAL CROSS SECTION
COIR FIBER MATTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
VARIABLE WIDTH "
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
VAR I ES VAR I ES
8' — 9' 8' — 9
2� 21
10:1 ,
ENTIRE CHANNEL TO BE LINED
WITH COIR FIBER MATfING
CHANNEL TYPICAL SECTION
STA 1 1+57 TO 12+97
NOT TO SCALE
GRDUND
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE I
IXISTING PAVEMENT
1�" MILUNG AND
RESURFACING (MIN.)
8' ASPHALT PATCH �
(MIN.) OR AS SHOWN —
IN PAVEMENT
SCHEDULE
100% DENSfTY
95% DENSIfY
1
5' MIN
IXI5TING PAVEMENT
'� TRENCH TO BE BACKFlLLED WITH
APPROVED SURABLE MAIERIAL
�--AS-DIRECTED-BY-THE-ENGINEER
PIPE (DIAMETER VARIES)
PAVEMENT R.EPAIR WITH MILLING
NO DEGRADATION FEE
SEE SHEET A-1 FOR EXTENTS N0T TO SCALE
OF MILLING & RESURFACING
AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT.
NOTFS:
1. COMRACTION JOINiS SHALL BE SPACE� A7 10-FOOi INTERVALS. JOItJ� SPACMG MAY BE ALTERED BY THE ENGINEER
TO PREVEM UNCONTROLLED CR4CKING.
2. COMRACTION JOIMS MAY BE INSTALLED BY 7HE USE OF TEMPLATES OR FORMED BY OTHER APPROVED MEfFiODS.
WHERE SUCH JOINTS ARE NOT FORMED HY TEMPLA7E5, A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1 1/2' SHALL BE OBTAINED.
3. ALL IXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 90-F00T INTERVALS, AND ADJACENi TO ALL RIGID OBJECTS.
4. CONCREfE COMPRESSNE STRENGTH SHALL BE 3600 P.5.1. IN 28 �AYS.
5. TOP 6" Of SUBGR4DE BENEATH hIE CURB SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 7007 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSIN.
6. DEfAIL MAY BE USED FOR PftNATE DRIYES, PARKING LOTS, AND INTERIOR CIRCULATION DRIVE.
6' CON0. CURB
DRNEWAY WIDTH —{—fi--I 1/8" RA�IUS
I I
JPR�ES� 3' RnDIUS �� j Vq
R�es
—II I I
'� I�I�� � � 6" CONC. �RIVEWAY �— I I I—�
-R—
i� 7iF
6" CONC. CURB @ DRIVEWAY
NOT TO SCALE
�
ru p m
yz `mN W
�� � �'0'W R
3 d�Nd
�§ � oHo
� � m n
,a e>Vx
��'e �=LL
� y w o °
m m o
�]�m'�'oo
�
k o u � V ^
�`
��s �w o
.e � n
N
�
SEAL
26457
F
�e
�
w�
�oo
N
aa�
W�d
xwU
�No
z�
�
W
Aa
W
z
�
�
�. � �. Q
�,� o0
SENSITIVE R7ATERIAL S T O 9P � A A
Do P1ot Duplicate °� M'"'� � � ° �

ZONE 1: STREAMBANK VEGETATION (1.410 SF)
ZONE 2: BENCH VEGETATION (1.330 SF)
COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SPACING QUANTIIY SIZE
VIRGINIA SWEETSPIRE ITEA VIRGINICA 6' OC 60 LIVE STAKE
TEMPORARY SEEDING FOR WARM AND COOL SEASONS (ALL ZONESZ
EARLY SUMMER SEASON LATE FALL SEASON
SEEDING MAY 1st - AUGUST 75th
DATES REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS OCTOBER 25th - DECEMBER 30th
NOT FULLY ADEQUATE
SEEDING 40 LBS/ACRE OF' GERMAN MILLET 40 LBS/ACRE RYE (GRAIN)
MIXTURE OR BROWN TOP MILLEf g0 LBS/ACRE TALL FESCUE
80 LBS/ACRE OF TALL FESCUE
SEEDING APPLY LIMESTONE AND FERTILIZER PER SOIL TESTS,
AMENDMENTS OR 2000 LBS/ACRE LIMESTONE AND 750 LBS/ACRE
10-10-10 FERTILIZER
LIVE STAKE
$Q�IV2E �iUT �
BUDS (FACUlG UPWMD)
WE CUffING
(1/2'-2� DIAAIEIER)
2 - 3 Feet
ANGLE CUf 30'-4S �
LIVE STAKES
PLANTING DETAIL
BANK STABILIZATION WITH LNE STAKES
NOiE:
LIVE SfAKES 5{1ALL BE SPACED APPRO%IMATELY 3 FEET &
.6 FEEf ON CENfER
LIYE 5fAl(ES SW1LL BE DRNEN UNfIL APPROXIMATELY 3/4
OF LIYE SfAKE IS WIiHIN GROUND
IED
ZONE 1& ZONE 2: PERMANENT SEEDING
NOTE: APPLICATION RATE 40 BULK LBS/ACRE �
1. IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN ZONE 1 SHOULD BE RAKED/ROUGHENED (A
MINIMUM OF 5"), AMENDED WITH FERTILIZER, SEEDED (PERMANENT AND
TEMPORARY), STRAWED, AND THEN COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (IF APPLICABLE) PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS.
ONCE THE MATiING IS DOWN, INSTALL THE LIVE STAKES AND OTHER
PLANT MATERIAL.
2. THE INSTALLED VEGETATION MUST RECEIVE AT LEAST 1 INCH OF WATER A
WEEK EITHER THROUGH NATURAL OR SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCES.
3. SURVIVAL RATES OF 85% SHALL BE MEf FOR ALL PLANTED MATERIALS.
PLANT MATERIAL SURVIVAL IS BASED ON INSPECTION AFTER THE FIRST
GROWING SEASON (LATE SUMMER/EARLY FALL). NEW GROWTH WILL BE
INDICATOR FOR A LIVING PLANT.
4. BALL AND BURLAP/LARGE CONTAINER PLANTS SHALL FOLLOW PLANTING
DETAIL CLDSM 40.01. PLANTING SHOULD TAKE PLACE NOV. 1 S- APRIL 15.
,
5. OC = ON CENTER i
STREAMBANI� REFORESTATION T'YPICAL
ZONE 1 - S1'REAMBANK VEGETATION
ZONE 2 - BENCH VEGETATION
ZONE1 ZONE2 ZONE1
IFT. I I E I'. I
s�•xenn
N.T.S
a
= o m
0
.�ia mN �
��o� �'on
3 � m ron�e
j § m �N^2
G� p � � o=i�
> � �oLL`
2� W mo.�.a
�.�1� m �oo¢
Oe= o'vN
�r "�° n
G`
0
�OS m O
b � w
N
Q
SEAL
26957
F
z
W
�� O
w
A,�� F
N
°a°a'"' Nd
�az Fa
W W �
�Nr.� W
�-' O
za �
�
�,�� Q
vrns nu o0
SENSITIVE MATERIAL S T�O 9P � A � A
Do Not Dupllcate "m° N°°' °"�" �� � Q