20000846 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090204

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: c2A -200q
Date of Report: I 2-A .1 zw
Date of Field Review:
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Evaluator's Name(s): l i
Report for Monitoring Year: -L ot))
Evaluator's Name(s):
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: located SE & SW of intersection of Painter Blvd & Ballinger Rd in Greensboro 1 e n n 4
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20000846
Project Name: Horsepen Creek (Fedex - PTAA)
County(ies): Guilford
Basin & subbasin: Cape Fear 03030002
Nearest Stream:
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream:
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 17 acres
Stream: 2689 linear feet
Buffer: 0 sq feet
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
(.er 3 man- Z+ 3?
Project History
Event Event Date
Report Receipt: As-Built 7/18/2006
Report Review - Streams 2/6/2007
Report Review - Wetlands 2/6/2007
Consultant Change 2/7/2007
Site Visit - Streams 5/3/2007
Site Visit - Wetlands 5/3/2007
Report Review - Streams 1/24/2008
Report Receipt: Monitoring 1/24/2008
Report Review - Wetlands 2/15/2008
Site Visit - Wetlands 2/19/2008
Site Visit - Streams 2/19/2008
Report Receipt: Monitoring 1/21/2009
Report Review - Streams 2/2/2009
Mitigation
-- - - I, "`Add significant project-related events: reports, i
A t
impacts
L pacts (f known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20000846-1 17 acres Wetland Restoration
20000846-2 2689 linear feet Stream
4
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
'Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
unsuccessful
i
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project'Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 17 acres Wetland Restoration
Description: Horsepen Creek wetlands
Location within project: Areas 1, 2, 3
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
inundation or saturation >= 12.5% GS C 128 a L )
M
it
i
t i
di
t Y
N
on
or
ng repor
n
ca
es success es
o
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on mitigation plan? Yes No
based on wetland type? Yes No
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Drift lines
Drainage patterns in wetlands
Sediment deposits
Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
I 1?.-?-? G 12- . -Jl a -' N KU Kemu. *-2- 0 f 1' -" ? ? .
SOILS - Approved Success Criter' na
Are soils hydric or becoming hydr ? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
3201290/260 TPA at year 3/4/5 Species Story TPA/"lo cover
i
I

!C,rfr.C?h
Monitoring report indicates success?
(?4 No
i
Average TPA for entire site (per rep
ort): 1
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, locations , and % cover): U
List any remaining vege tion issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
??l? Q l IDS ?- S h_ Z
44
Component ID: 20000846-1
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
N AM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
na Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: s essf partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
I
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 2 of 2