20040047 Ver 6_401 Application_20171201

SEGS
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
Ph: 910.452.2711
Email: office(asegi.us
Date: 30 November 2017
To: Ms. Karen Higgins
Of: DWR 401 & Buffers Unit Raleigh
Attached you will find:
❑ Proposal ❑ Sketch(es)
❑ JD Package ❑ Report(s)
Transmittal Letter
SEGi Project #: 04.200.01
USACE AID: SAW47
�ii
1�3 0
oEr. o i 2017
® Permit Application ❑ Signed Wetland Map ❑ Photo(s)
❑ Plans ❑ Information Request ❑ Other
Copies
Dated
Description
4
07/07/17
Village at Mott's Landing IP Modification & a Check for $575.00
*If noted items are NOT attached, please contact our office.
These are being delivered:
® For your Review/Comment ❑ For your Records ❑ Returned for Correction(s)
❑ Corrected and Returned ❑ For your Signature ❑ As Requested
❑ Other:
Via: ❑ Hand Delivery ® Fed -Ex ❑ UPS ❑ Regular Mail ❑ Other
Notes:
Karen, should you have any questions or concerns, please call meat 910.443.5330.
Signature and (Typed) Name: David A. S 1yster
Date: 1 30/17

Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28412
910.452.2711 (office) • 910.452.2899 (fax)
Transmittal Letter
Date: 12/8/2017
To: Karen Higgens
Of: DWQ 401 & Buffer Unit
Attached you will find:*
DEC 1 12017
❑ Proposal ❑ Sketch(es) ❑ Permit ® Wetland Map ❑ Photo(s)
❑ JD Package ❑ Report(s) ❑ Plans ❑ Information Request It Other
Copies Regulator Description
1 Karen Higgens The Village at Mott's Landing Application Check
" *If noted items are NOT attached, please contact our office.
These are being delivered:
® For your Review/Comment
❑ Corrected and Returned
❑ Other:
❑ For your Records ❑ Returned for Correction(s)
® For your Signature ❑ As Requested
By: ® Hand Delivery ❑ Fed -Ex ❑ UPS ❑ Regular Mail ❑ Other
Notes:
Signature and (Typed) Name: Joanne E. Meisenhelder
Date: 12/8/2017

V JLP
Motts Landing Individual Permit Modification (2016)
Application for Department of the army Permit OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require 5 hours or less. This Includes the
time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments
regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters
Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 222024302; and the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a current valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT RETURN your forms to either of those
addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404,33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section
103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the
Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies. Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit
application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to (his application (see sample drawings and
instructions) and be submitted to the Dis(rict Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not complete in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 SHOULD BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE DATE RECEIVED -- , 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO DE FILLED BY APPLICANT) 1
5. APPLICANTS NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
AFTEW Properties, LLC .
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS
2020 Churchill Drive, Wilmington, NC 28403
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Fax: [phone]
b. Business 910.763.2629
Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (David A. Syster)
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
5315 South College Road, Suite E, Wilmington, NC 28412
10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. WIAREA CODE
a. Residence 910.443.5330(c)
b. Business 910.452.2711 (o)
11. Statement of Authorization
1 hereby authorize, Southern Environmental Group, Inc. — David A. Syster to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, ul n request, supplemental infor tion In support of this permit application.
�11�
ATE
APPLICANTSS .NATURE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (if applicable)
The Village at Motts Landing
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
Molts Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
i
Wilmington, New Hanover NC
COUNTY STATE
SEG Project #: 04
114. PROJECT STREET
Corner of River and
NA
Kc
dso 12017
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTION, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
See Attachment 1 —The Village at Mott's Landing Supplemental Documentation to the Individual Permit Modification Request
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE: From UNCW, head south on South College Road through Monkey Junction. Take a right onto Sanders Road. At
the intersection of Sanders Road and River Road, take right. Take next left into The Village at Motts Landing. See Attachment l for vicinity
maps.
ENG FORM 4345, JUL 97
EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE
Proponent: CECW-OR

Motts Landing Individual Permit Modification (2016)
18. Nature of the Activity: (Description of Project, include all features)
The project will include the removal of hydric soil from several jurisdictional wetland areas, within the Mott's Landing Subdivision. Clean earthen
fill will then be placed into the areas, to facilitate the construction of road crossings, single family dwellings and driveway access. Please refer
Attachment 1 for site specific impact acreages and locations. To ensure disturbance of wetlands does not occur outside the requested areas, sediment
and erosion control measures will be installed prior to the commencement of land altering activities.
19. Project Purpose: (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The purpose of the project is to construct a residential housing community, with associated amenities, in New Hanover County, North Carolina, and
make a reasonable return on the investment. Work has already begun on Phase I of this project. An IT was issued in 2005 and modified in 2006, for
the remaining phases, though only a small amount of impacts (i.e. 0.16 acre) took place during that time, and then the recession hit, which halted
work and the IP expired. Another was secured in 2012 and later modified in 2013. Please refer to Attachment 1 for permitting details.
Work, authorized by this IT modification, is expected to begin as soon as USACE and DWQ authorizations have been secured.
USE BLOCKS 20.22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO DE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
The fill is necessary to facilitate the construction of several roads, building pads and driveways. Please see Attachment I for details of the impacts.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Clean earthen fill material will be used for this project.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled: (see instructions)
With this application, the Applicant is requesting to fill approximately 0.80 acre of US Section 404 wetlands and 125 linear feet of warm water
stream. These impacts shall be treated cumulatively with previous impacts associated with The Village at Motts Landing subdivision. In total, 2.19
acres of wetland are proposed for the entire project. A backhoe will be utilized to dig out the hydric soil and replace it with clean earthen fill.
23. is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes X No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
Impacts to wetlands have taken place within Phase I (0.33 Ac). However, the impacts being sought with this modification request have not taken
place.
24. Addresses of Adjoining Properly Owners , Leases, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Water body (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental
list
Please refer to Attachment 1 — Supplemental Information for details.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in this Application.
A Division of Water Quality 401 Certification is being requested concurrently with this application. Stormwater infrastructure has been installed
within some of the areas, where impacts are proposed. The Sediment and Erosion Control Permit has been issued. The plan meets the New Hanover
County Conservation Overlay District requirements.
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is complete
an accurate. 1 further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant.
41&——:
i David A. Syster (SEGO July 7. 2017
'
gnrtuce of Apkt Name of Agent Date
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement
in block 11 has filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully
falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme , or disguises a material fact or make any false fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses
any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned no
more than five years or both.
Please see Attachment 1 — Supplemental Information for details of the project.

Attachment I
The Village at Mott's Landing
Supplemental Documentation to the Individual Permit Modification
Requested By:
AFTEW Properties, LLC
Dr. Arnold Sobol
2020 South Churchill Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
Prepared By:
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
910.452.2711
Date:
6 June 2016
Revised 10 May 2017

T
Table of Contents
Section Title Page
I. Purpose and Need................................................................................ 1
if. Location Existing Conditions................................................................... 1
III. Project History ..................................................................................... 1
IV. Project Description................................................................................ 2
V. Avoidance and Minimization.................................................................... 2
VI. Alternatives....................................................................................... 3
A. No Action.................................................................................. 3
B. Construction Techniques Alternatives ................................................ 4
C. Alternate Site Location................................................................... 5
D. Preferred Location........................................................................ 5
VII. Sequence of Events............................................................................... 5
VIII. Compensatory Mitigation....................................................................... 5
IX. Adjacent Property Owners ....................................... ......... ...... 6
... .............
X. Other Authorizations.............................................................................. 7
XI. Summary ............................................................................:............. 7
Appendices
A. USACE Jurisdictional Determination Issued 28 February 2011 .......................... i
B. Google Earth.2015 Aerial Photograph........................................................ ii
C. NC EEP Receipt for Wetland Restoration Credit.......... "'
D. Motts Landing Wetland Impact Plan and Impact Summary Worksheet ................. iv
E. Bridges and.Culverts Estimates................................................................ v
F. NC DOT Culvert and Retaining Wall Correspondence and Guidance ................... vi
G. Lower Cape. Fear Mitigation Bank Reservation Letter ..................................... vii
H. Motts Landing Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan .................................... viii
I. Adjacent Property Owner Map................................................................ ix
J. Previous Project Layouts........................................................................ x
IC6Za1

The Village at Motts Lancling 2016 IP Modification Supplemental information SE -GI
I. Purpose and Need
The purpose of this project is to complete construction of the Village at Mott's Landing residential subdivision,
which includes the installation of infrastructure (roads, utilities, etc.), as well as the construction of single family
structures and driveway accesses. The project is necessary to meet the demand for residential housing in southern
New Hanover County. As originally designed many of the lots contained town houses or small single family
homes. Based on current market conditions and the success of the sole builder who has built on all existing lots it
is necessary to re -configure the remaining lots to accommodate the current housing market and builder needs.
II. Location and Existing Conditions
The proposed project is located at the corner of Sanders Road and River Road, within The Village at Mott's
Landing subdivision, in New Hanover County, North Carolina (34.1276°N, -77.9136°W). To access the site from
South College Road, through Monkey Junction, take a right onto Sanders Road and enter the site across from the
Bellamy School entrance. Alternatively, proceed to River Road, and take a right. Take next right into The Village
at Mott's Landing.
The subject parcel is comprised of approximately 261.89 acres. According to the wetland boundary survey,
approximately 64.0 acres of wetlands and 2,025 linear feet of streams exist within the project boundaries (see
Appendix A — JD issued 27 June 2011). Currently, work has begun in Phases I and II. Infrastructure has been
installed and numerous dwellings have been constructed. The remainder of the site has remained relatively
undisturbed (see Appendix B — 2015 Google Earth Aerial).
III. Project History
A Department of the Army (DoA) Individual Permit (IP) and associated Division of Water Resources (DWR)
Major Certification (MC) were issued for the entire project in 2005, but the permits expired prior to all of the
impacts taking place. Wetland impacts that took place under the 2005 IP, equalled 0.16 acre. The Applicant
applied for and obtained a new IP and MC in 2006. Modifciation to both those permits was issued in February
2012 and later modified again in 2013. The 2013 modificaiton authorized the impact of 1.23 acre of wetlands.
Including the impacts that took place in 2006 (0.16 acre), the project has received DoA and DWR authorizations to
permanently impact 1.39 acres of 404 wetlands. The project numbers, assigned by the regulatory agencies, include
those listed below:
Issuing Agency
Document
Project Number
Date Issued
Expiration Date
Authorized
Impacts (AC)
USACE
Individual Permit
2001-01165
02/15/05
12/31/08
1.51
USACE
Individual Permit Mod
2001-01165
04/03/06
12/31/08
1.533
USACE
Individual Permit
2009-01847
06/11/12
12/31/17
1.11
USACE
Individual Permit Mod
2009-1847
2/22/13
12/31/17
1.23
DWR
401 Water Quality Certification
941084
5/25/04
Concurrent with 404
1.51
DWR
401 Water Quality Certification
9410848
3/14/06
Concurrent with 404
1.533
DWR
401 Water Quality Certification
2004-0047 0
04/04/12
Concurrent with 404
1.11
DWR
401 Water Quality Cert Mod
2004-0047 v4
1/16/13
Concurrent with 404
1.23
DCM
CAMA Consistency
CD12-071
03/30/12
Concurrent with 404
USACE
Signed Wetland Survey
2009-01847
06/27/11
06/27/16
Table/. Project numbers associated with the project. (Note: copies o(these authorizations were not furnished. as the USACE and DWR should have them in
their files).

Tke Village at Motts Landing 2016 Ir Modification Supplemental information 5E-Gi
Wetland impacts that were authorized in 2005 and 2006 were offset by the Applicant's payment to the NC EEP,
for 3.25 acres of non -riparian wetland restoration credit (see Appendix C) and preservation of the remaining
wetlands, located within Phase I of the project. However, with the reissuance of the 2012 IP and DWR MC,
preservation was removed from the compensatory mitigaiton requirements of the 2005 permits. The wetland
restoration credit was carried over to cover the impacts authorized under the 2012 permits. Please refer to Table 2,
on Page 3, for details of the mitigation for this project.
IV. Project Description
The Applicant anticipates impacting additional 0.80 acre of Section 404 jurisdictional wetlands (0.47 acre
riparian and 0.33 acre non -riparian) and 125 linear feet of warm water stream. The impacts are necessary to
facilitate the development of lots, road crossing and associated energy dissipaters, and driveway accesses. A single
temporary wetland impact (0.06 AC) is necessary to install a stormwater pipe, which will run north along the
western property boundary, at lot 271 to a proposed stormwater pond. Cumulatively, the project will permanently
impact 2.19 acres of Section 404 wetlands and 125 linear feet of warm water stream. Please refer to Appendix D
— Wetland Impact Map and Impact Summary Worksheet, for details of the proposed and cumulative impacts.
Please note that no additional lots have been proposed with this request. As originally designed and permitted a
number of lots were designed as Townhouse lots. In order to meet the current housing market demands these lots
have been modified (increased in size) to allow for the construction of single family homes and duplexes. This has
resulted in additional impacts to a number of lots. There have also been some changes to the roadway system in
terms of stream and ditch crossings which resulted in increased impacts to these areas.
Lots once located to the east of lot 49 (See Appendix I) have been relocated and shown as lots 69-72. These lots
were relocated due to the loss of access to Highway 421 (Carolina Beach Rd.). Originally this access was required
by the county and granted by NCDOT. However, after the intersection of the Highway 421 and Sanders Road was
re -designed, this access point was eliminated by NCDOT. See Appendix J for previous permitted plan.
Heavy machinery, such as a bulldozer, grader, back hoe, and track hoe, will be utilized during the construction
process. The machinery will be used to clear the land, stabilize the soil, establish grade and to transport and
deposit the fill material within the project boundaries. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed
prior to commencement of land disturbing activities.
Coastal wetlands are not anticipated to be impacted by this project, and the project is located outside any Areas of
Environmental Concern (AECs). A CAMA Consistency Determination is being prepared concurrently with this
permit application. The Division of Coastal Management's (DCM's) consistency determination will be submitted
to the USACE and DWR upon receipt.
Threatened and endangered species and archaeological concerns were addressed within the recently issued DoA
and DWR permits, as well as the DCM's CAMA Consistency Determination. No changes have occurred since the
issuance of those authorizations.
V. Avoidance and Minimization
It was the Applicant's desire to avoid and/or minimize impacts to wetlands and the stream to the greatest extent
practicable. During the design process, roads were situated to cross wetlands perpendicularly to the features.
Available uplands, on the northern portion of the project were left to open space. This area is very close to Motts
Creek and provides buildable area for 5 single family lots. Leaving these areas to open space avoided
approximately 0.32 acre of wetland impact. See Appendix D, Sheet 3.
The Applicant removed or reduced the size of energy dissipaters from road crossings, where water is not conveyed
through a drainage Swale. This reduced impacts by 0.012 acre. Other alternatives were explored, but were deemed
impracticable or infeasible. They are discussed in the next section
OA

The Village at Motts Landing 2016 IF Modification Supplemental information 5F—G1
VI. Alternatives
The Applicant investigated other potential means of developing the subject parcel, and has been unable to find a
practicable alternative that would achieve the proposed goal and stated purpose. They are as follows:
A. "No Action" Alternative
The No Action Alternative (leaving the proposed impact areas undeveloped) would not be feasible for several
reasons:
As it relates to lot impacts:
When originally designed VAML contained lots which would accommodate an average size house
footprint in 2005 for most builders. In 2012 when the project was re -permitted most lots were adjusted to
accommodate the building footprints of the sole builder to date as that is what the housing market has and
continues to support. These homes have a larger footprint and therefore required an adjustment to the lot
size resulting in additional wetland impacts in some cases. The current modification is being proposed to
adjust the remaining lots within the subdivision to accommodate the sole builder's required footprint. As
the subdivision has reached a stabilizing point in terms of house style and price point any drastic change in
style or price point will have a negative economic impact on the builder, the applicant and the value of the
existing homes. These lots are currently being sold at one hundred to one hundred fifty thousand dollars
each. The loss of 14 lots at the lower cost end would result in the loss of $1.4 million which in turn would
make the project economically unfeasible.
Alternative cost Analysis
Market Construction
Alternative ROI Value Cost** Gain/(Loss)*** Costs* Mitigation*
Project as designed &
1
submitted
7.34%
$4,140,000
$3,836,266
$303,734
$2,170,300
$140,400
2
Project reduced by 14 lots
-29.63%
$2,880,000
$3,733,466
$(853,466)
$2,112,900
$95,000
ROI - Return on Investment
* These costs are included within the "Cost **" column but were broken out for clarity.
***Gain/(Loss) - Represents the estimated dollar value of the finished project by taking the "Market Value" and subtracting the
"Cost". Numbers in parenthesis (XXXX) represent a loss or negative value.
If the Applicant were to eliminate a number of lots from the proposed plan it would add additional cost to
the remaining lots as the infrastructure cost is distributed over the entire number of remaining lots. For
example; the cost to install roads, sewer, water and the amenity centers is spread out over the remaining
lots. By eliminating lots it will increase the lot cost above what the market will allow and what they will
appraise at. Additionally, if the Applicant were to offer these lots, or a portion of these lots, to a second
builder with a different house plan (that would avoid impacts) the existing builder would no longer build in
those phases of the subdivision. This in turn would yield a much greater loss as all lots within the
remaining phases would not be purchased by the existing builder.
While in the process of making these changes a number of design alternatives were reviewed and a number
of impacts were removed from lots by adjusting the lot lines, elimination of lot fill outside of building
footprints and adjustment of the road alignments. See Appendix J — Previous design drawings. Many of
these changes were done at the request or after collaboration with Ms. Emily Hughes, Mr. John Policarpo
(both formerly with the USACE Wilmington Regulatory Office) and Mr. Chad Coburn (NC DWR).
During previous meetings with the USACE and DWR, it was suggested that the remaining wetlands within
several lots would be managed (i.e. mowed or manipulated) and possibly degraded by future lot owners.

The Village at Motts Landing 2016 IF Modification Supplemental information SF—Gi
Therefore, these areas would need to be accounted for in the impact acreage. This includes Impacts I (Lots
65 & 66), XIII (Lots 329 & 330), XX (Lot 348), XXI (Lot 342), and XXII, XXIII (Lot 343) and.XXV (Lot
293).
B. Construction Techniques Alternatives
As it pertains to Impact XXVI & XXVII (Lot 377-A driveway access): The Applicant has explored
several construction methods, such as bridging, installing a bottomless culvert and incorporating retaining
walls, in order to avoid and/or minimize the impact.
Bridging: The Applicant received an estimate from Rivenbark Construction Company to construct a
bridge across the wetland feature (see Appendix E). The cost of the bridge would prohibit the
Applicant from making any profit from the sale of the lot. In addition, the bridge would have to meet
DOT standards, per New Hanover County Building Code, which would cause the structure to protrude
into the lot a considerable distance, rending the lot unbuildable. Therefore, this alternative is not
economically feasible or practicable.
Bottomless Culvert 1: The Applicant received an estimate from Contech Engineered Solutions for a
bottomless culver that would span the entire width of the wetland feature (see Appendix E). The cost
of the structure, in conjunction with the contractor's fees for additional material and labor, would cost
more than the Applicant could reasonably expect to receive for the lot, which renders the alternative as
not economically practicable.
Bottomless Culvert 2: This culvert would span a portion of the feature (see Appendix E). However,
as with Bottomless Culvert 1, the estimate received from Contech Engineered Solutions, in
conjunction with the contractor's fees for additional material and labor, would cost more than the
Applicant could reasonably expect to receive for the lot, which renders the alternative as not
economically practicable.
As it pertains to the stream crossing (Impact XI, IX & XXVIV): It was the Applicant's intention to
utilize retaining walls, along the stream crossing, in order to minimize impacts. Unfortunately, the NC
Department of Transportation (NC DOT) would not approve this measure (see Appendix F). Therefore,
this option is not a viable alternative.
As it pertains to lot till: As discussed previously during permit review meetings (attended by Emily
Hughes and Kyle Dahl), the remaining wetlands (i.e. those wetlands situated within lot boundaries) are
anticipated to be managed by future home owners, and will likely either indirectly or directly remove a
portion of their functional value. Construction techniques are not available to remove this concern and
losing the 14 lots would render the project economically infeasible. Therefore, this is not a practicable
alternative.
As it pertains to driveway accesses on Lots 262 — 264 (Impacts XII, XXIV): The proposed road
crossing and driveways will cut off all but approximately 2,800 square feet of the upper reach of the
feature. Stormwater will be collected via pipe and swales, which is anticipated to minimize hydrology
within that area, leaving it unviable. Removing the lots from the site development plan would not be
economically feasible.
As it pertains to road crossings (Impacts VII, VIII, XVIII, XIX): The Applicant incorporated
headwalls into the road crossings, but use of the measures was denied by the NC DOT (see Appendix F).
Therefore, this is not a practicable alternative.
4

The Village at Motts Landing 201 6 IP Modification Supplemental information 5F—Gi
C. Alternate Site(s)
i. Permittee Owned Site: Although the Applicant owns land across River Road, utilizing this property
would not be feasible for several reasons:
As it pertains to lot impacts: The property is not large enough to accommodate 14 single family
dwellings. The land is already designed to accommodate future development and the placement of
these 14 lots on that parcel would result in the loss of additional lots. For these reasons, the land
west of River Road would not be a feasible alternate site for the proposed development.
ii. Purchase of Alternate Site:
Due to the fact that the Applicant owns the land the project is located upon and begun significant
development of this parcel, it would not be economically feasible to purchase another property to facilitate
the development. Therefore, this alternative is not practicable.
D. Preferred Location
The proposed impacts are the preferred alternative, as they provide the location specific impacts necessary to
meet the purpose and need of the project.
The Applicant has removed impacts associated with road construction and limited the proposed impacts to
specific needs within current development areas. For those proposed impacts that remain, the economic
validity lies within the developer's ability to provide homes which are currently selling in the local market.
For example, if the Applicant is unable to provide duplex and single family dwellings, which there is currently
a market for in the area and which the Applicant has had success in selling, the viability of the project is at
risk. The Applicant also currently has a buyer for the subject lots and could lose the sale of these lots if the
wetland impacts are not authorized.
VII. Sequence of events
The Applicant has secured stormwater and S&EC permits, thus work is to commence as soon as USACE and
DWR approvals of the modification request have been issued. The work will consist of clearing the land,
removing the hydric soils from the impact areas, and stabilizing the soil and establishing grade. Work is
anticipated to begin once the USACE, DWR and DCM authorizations have been issued and the proposed wetland
restoration credit payment fulfilled. The Applicant intends to perform the permittee responsible wetland and
stream restoration concurrently with the installation of the Glen Ellen Drive.
VIII. Compensatory Mitigation
The following table summarizes the mitigation that has taken place, to date, for this project:
Permit
Impact Area AC
Mitigation
Status
2005 IP
1.51 AC (NR)
2:1 (3.02 AC) Payment to the NCEEP (3.25 AC)
Not fulfilled
Preservation of the remaining 81 AC of Wetlands
Not Fulfilled
2006 IP MOD (Added 0.013 AC)
1.523 AC
2:1 (3.05 AC) Payment to the NCEEP
Fulfilled
Preservation of the remaining 81 AC of Wetlands
Removed
2012 IP
1 11 AC
Covered by previous payment (removed preservation
mechanism from the 81.0 AC of remaining wetlands)
Fulfilled
2013 IP MOD
1.39 AC
2:1 (0.25 AC) Payment to NC EEP
Fulfilled
i ante z mitigation 3umntary
A. Proposed Mitigation: A combination of mitigation mechanisms (i.e. permittee responsible mitigation and
payment for wetland and warm water stream restoration credit, through a private mitigation bank) will be used
i,1

The Village at Motts Landing 2016 IF Modification jupplemental information 5E-Gi
to replace the permanent loss of 0.80 acre of wetlands and 125 linear feet of warm water stream, proposed
within this permit application.
To date, the Applicant has impacted 0.33 acre of wetlands, but has secured 3.25 acre of wetland restoration
credit through the NC EEP (see Appendix Q. Thus, the Applicant and SEGi believe the completed impacts
and those previously authorized wetland impacts (i.e. 1.39 AC) have been offset by the previously purchased
wetland restoration credits. Therefore, those wetland impacts being proposed within this permit application
(i.e. 0.47 acre of non -riparian and 0.33 acre of riparian impacts) will be offset with payment to the Lower Cape
Fear Mitigation Bank (LCFMB) and permittee responsible mitigation. Please refer to Appendix H, for details
of the permittee responsible mitigation plan.
The table below summarizes the proposed mitigation for the additional impacts proposed with this permit
application:
Type of Impact
Impact Acreage
Permittee Responsible
LCFMB Credit (AC) LCFMB Stream Credit (LF)
Riparian
0.47 AC
0.04 AC
0.90 AC -
Non -riparian
0.33 AC
-
0.70 AC -
Warm Water Stream
125 LF
25 LF
- 100 LF
Total
0.80 AC & 125 LF
1 0.04 AC (R) & 25 LF
1.6 AC 100 LF
Table 3 Proposed mitigation summary
SEGi and the Applicant believe that the proposed mitigation is sufficient to offset the impacts being requested with
this request to modify the USACE IP and DWR MC.
IX. Adjacent Property Owners
The following table includes all the properties that abut the project limits. Please refer to Appendix 1, for a map of
the adjacent properties.
Map Key ID
Owner's Name
New Hanover County Parcel ID
1
Sycamore Grove HOA
R07600-006-271-000
2
Williamson, Jerry and Laura
R07600-006-233-000
3
First Troy
R07600-006-266-000
4
Sycamore Grove HOA
R07600-006-270-000
5
Fritz, Brian and Morgan
R07600-006-325-000
6
First Troy Spec.
R07600-006-326-000
7
First Troy Spec.
R07600-006-327-000
8
First Troy Spec.
R07600-006-332-000
9
Goodrich, Harvey and Blair
R07600-006-333-000
10
First Troy Spec.
R07600-006-125-000
11
Hurley, Michael and Margot
R07600-006-174-000
12
Hurley, Michael and Margot
R07600-006-015-000
13
Middleton, Vanessa Brown Alford
R07600-006-175-000
14
Middleton, Alford and Vanessa
R07600-006-067-000
15
AFTEW Properties
R07600-006-013-000
16
AFTEW Properties
R07600-006-014-000
17
Carenbauer, William L.
R07600-006-011-024
18
Weddle, Glenn C.
R07600-006-011-023
19
Carenbauer, William L.
R07600-006-011-022

The Village at Motts Landing 2016 iP Modification Supplemental information 5E- ji
20
Carenbauer, William L.
R07600-006-011-021
21
Blanton, Haynes and Carol
R07600-006-011-020
22
Kaiser, Gerard and Joan
R07600-006-011-019
23
Brinson, Addison Jr.
R07600-006-011-018
24
Yarborough, Lenora
R07600-006-011-017
25
Varnum, Glenn and Nellie
R07600-006-011-016
26
Peterson, David and Sandra
R07600-006-011-015
27
Horne, Benjamin et al.
R07600-006-011-014
28
Mathews, Donald et al.
R07600-006-011-013
29
Mathews, Cliff Jr.
807600-006-011-012
30
Mathews, Sandra and Cliff W. Sr.
R07600-006-011-011
31
AFTEW Properties
R07600-006-011-025
32
Schenk, Donald and Sally
R07600-006-011-010
33
Home, Benjamin
R07600-006-011-009
34
Home, Benjamin
R07600-006-011-008
35
Home, Benjamin
R07600-006-011-007
36
Home, Benjamin
R07600-006-011-006
37
Blanton, Haynes II and Mandi
R07600-006-011-005
38
Ranieri, Richard and Rosalind
R07600-006-01 1 -00 1
39
Barnhill, Carolyn W. Living Trust
R07600-006-011-004
40
JJ&K Properties Inc.
807600-006-008-000
41
AFTEW Properties
R07600-006-008-001
42
Bowens Chapel AME Zion Church
R07600-006-007-001
43
State Employees Credit Union
R07600-006-006-000
44
Sanders, Carlotta Hrs.
R07600-006-005-000
45
Sanders, Sarah H.
R07600-006-004-000
46
Sanders, Carlotta Hrs.
R07600-006-003-000
47
Wade, Carolyn
R07600-006-002-000
48
Canty, Katie Mae and Graham et al.
R07600-006-001-001
49
ATFEW Properties
R07600-006-010-000
50
ATFEW Properties
807600-006-181-000
51
Keinath, Christine D, et al.
R07600-009-160-000
52
Fritz, Ricky and Laura
R07600-009-159-000
53
Lake Brewster HOA
R07600-009-115-000
54
Carolina Power and Light
R07600-006-079-000
55
Village at Mott's Landing HOA
R07600-004-005-000
56
Cape Fear Public Utility Assoc.
R07600-006-086-000
Table 4. The Village at Mott 's Landing Adjacent Property Owners as of May 2016 Please note that New Hanover County's GIS system does not provide the
inailing address for property owners.

Tke Village at Motts Landing 2016 iP Modification jupplemental information 5F—Gi
X. Additional Authorizations
The proposed project will require the following environmental permits:
Type
Agency
Date Issued or Applied For
401 Water Quality Certification
NC DWR
Applying for concurrently with IP
CAMA Consistency
NC DCM
Applying for concurrently with IP
State Stormwater Permit
NC DWR
Issued 4 April 2012
S&EC Permit
NC DLR
Issued 12 .lune 2012
Table S. Other state and local environmental authorizations
XI. Summary
The Applicant is proposing to permanently impact an additional 0.80 acre of Section 404 wetlands and 125 linear
feet of warm water stream, as well as the temporary impact of 0.06 acre of wetlands, which are necessary to
facilitate the construction of infrastructure, dwellings and driveways, within Phases II and III of the Village at
Motts Landing. In conjunction with the avoidance and minimization efforts (i.e. relocating Mott's Forest Road and
removing non-essential sediment and erosion control measures), the Applicant intends to offset the proposed
permanent wetland impacts with permittee responsible mitigation, in the form of riparian wetland and stream
restoration, and payment to the Lower Cape Fear Mitigation Bank, for 1.6 acre of wetland restoration credit and
100 linear feet of warm water stream restoration credit. The Applicant and SEGi believe the project, as proposed,
is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative.
8

Tke Village at Motts Landing 2016 Ir Modification 5" PPlemental information 5E-Gi
Appendix A
Motts Landing USACE Jurisdictional Determination
Issued 28 February 2011

F, L
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2009-01847 County: New Hanover U.S.G.S. Quad: Wilmington
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: AFTEW Properties LLC
C/o Dr. Arnold Sobol
Address: 2020 Churchill Drive S.
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Telephone No.: [phone]
Property description:
Size (acres) --162 ac.
Nearest Waterway Motts Creek
USGS HUC 03030005
Agent: Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
C/o David Scibetta
5315 College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
Nearest Town Wilmington
River Basin Cape Fear
Coordinates N 34.1248, W -77.9109
Location description The project area is the greater portion of the subdivision known as the Village at Motts Landing,
located on both east and west sides of River Road north of Sanders Road, west of Carolina Beach Road, Wilmington, New
Hanover County, North Carolina. Parcel IDs R07600-006-012-000 and R07500-004-006-000.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have this
property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional
determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described proiect area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC S 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our present
workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely delineation,
you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetland on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified
by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
X The waters of the U.S. includine wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corns Regulatory Official identified below on 6/27/2011. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subiect to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination
and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Emily Hughes at 910-251-4635.
C. Basis For Determination
This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and is adjacent to Mott Creek.
a Navigable Water of the U.S. This determination is based on information submitted by SEG. Inc. and a site visit by Emily
Hughes on 3/17/2011.
D. Remarks
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Emily Hughes, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1398
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 8/27/2011.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Offich
Date June 27, 2011
Action Id. SAW -2009-01847
Date June 27.2016
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://rep-ulatorv.usacesurvey.com/ to complete the survey
online.
Copy furnished:

Tke Village at Motts Landing 2016 Ir Modification Supplemental information SEGi
Appendix B
Google Earth 2015 Aerial Photograph

•.111W n— _L-eves-Gn
!
'Ob
A
`� nampion-PI.-I
CAa
All,
r
—Sal"
R ,
f
r. 1",r_._,. .
�
CPinsta-D�
Jj

The Village at Motts Landing 2016 IF Modification Supplemental Information 5E-Gi
Appendix C
NC EEP Receipt for Wetland Restoration Credit

tem
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
Arnold Sobol
AFTEW Properties, LLC
2020 South Churchill Drive
Wilmington, NC 27403-5308
Project: Village at Motts Landing Subdivision
April 20, 2006
DWQ #: 040047
COE #: 200101165
County: New Hanover
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) has received a check in the amount of $42,649.75, check
number 1187, as payment for the compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or US
Army Corps of Engineers 404 and/or Division of Coastal Management CAMA permit(s) issued for the above referenced
project This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements accepted by NC EEP for this
project have been satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other conditions of the cerdfication/permit(s)
not accepted by NC EEP and any other state, federal or local government
including any additional mitigation conditions
permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NC EEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NC EEP is responsible and agrees to provide the
compensatory mitigation requirements as indicated in the table below. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with
the Memorandum of Understanding between the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the US Army
Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
Wetlands (credits) Stream (credits)
Non Coastal ColdCool
Ripiart Riparian Marsh1;
n 3.05 0 0 0
Buffer
Warm (sq. ft.)
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at (9 19) 716-1921.
Sincerely,
9 . ��411 4 . U��
D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wedands/401 Unit
Doug Huggett, Division of Coastal Management
Jennifer Frye, USACE - Wilmington
Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Regional Office - Wilmington �_A
File StU.t� W
RA
,
staYc`r�... . Pro" Our
. ram, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-04761 www.nceep.net
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement t?rog
Cataloging
River Basia
Unit
Cape Fear
03030005
Wetlands (credits) Stream (credits)
Non Coastal ColdCool
Ripiart Riparian Marsh1;
n 3.05 0 0 0
Buffer
Warm (sq. ft.)
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at (9 19) 716-1921.
Sincerely,
9 . ��411 4 . U��
D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wedands/401 Unit
Doug Huggett, Division of Coastal Management
Jennifer Frye, USACE - Wilmington
Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Regional Office - Wilmington �_A
File StU.t� W
RA
,
staYc`r�... . Pro" Our
. ram, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-04761 www.nceep.net
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement t?rog

&1Sffnvifn —Is or.f—,J•,Jornmenr_ hart (or Jrfcllz-0 _ °
AF-IIEW PROPERTIES LLC 118,
PH. 910-763-M9
FAX [phone]
2020 SOUTH CHURCHILL
WRp -11111
{MMINC'TON, NC 2a403-530853aa
` r� f !1 DATE
PAY � C V1
TO THE fJ� F
ORDER O�yp�Rv �n
BW V ,J
BRANCH BANKING ANGTBUST C0 3PANY
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA I
SM b
FO
11300118W, 1:053 10 1 i 21:5194301 234n8 r
VN VOICE
April 3, 2006
DWQ#: 040047
W. Arnold Sobol
COE#- n/a
AFTEW Properties, LLC
2020 South Churchill Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
Project: Village at Mous Landing Subdivision County: New Hanover
You have elected to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements of the Section 401/404 permit issued for the above
reference project through payment of a fee to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. In accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0500, your fee has been calculated as follows (Please note: payment of wetlands is calculated in increments of
0.25 acres). If you have any questions concerning this payment, please call Carol Shaw at 919-733-5205.
Riparian Wetlands
0 acres x $ 26,246.00
$
Non -Riparian Wetlands
3.25 acres x $ 13,123.00 =
$ 42,649.75
Saltwater Wetland
0 acres x $131,230.00 =
$
Stream
0 linear feet x $ 219.00 =
$
Buffer — Zone 1
0 square feet x $ .46 __
$
Buffer — Zone 2
0 square feet x $ .96 —
—
$
TOTAL
$ 42,649.75
Please mail a check made payable to
North CarOH na Ecosystem Enhancement Program
for the total amount due to the address below.
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
I652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
PIease note that a payment made to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded.
YOU MUST BE IN POSSESSION OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT FROM THE NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY PERMIT AND/OR THE 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION.
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jennifer Frye, USACE-Wilmington
Noelle Lutheran, DWQ Regional Office -Wilmington
Doug Huggett, DCM-Morehead City
File

T,e Village at Motts Landing 2016 IF Modification Supplemental information 5E-Cjl
Appendix D
Wetland Impact Map, Profiles and Summary Worksheet

\ SCALE : 1"= 200' 1
0 200 400 600N.
1
C4
NC GRID (NAD 83)
R � 1
ED
� � 1
1
1 I cqR ,
1 I \ \ 1& D \ 1'/V \
pl�e�lLOT
I O
EQUESTRIAN
ESTATES \ `
1 y MB 18 PG 66 1 \ O
1 �
I � III
1
1
1
I
-------------
--------------
----------------
*404
---- --'404 WETLAND DELINEATION"- AS-
DESIGNATED AND SIGNED BY THE U.B:
ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS ON `'_ •' •' •' •' •�
--------------FEBRUARY 28, 2011 (USACE ACTION ID
No.SAW-2009-01847)
304 305 _ \ ..:...:.:... .
1 ` 306
I 307 - .� IMPT AREAXXV]
308 341:9... .0008 A
31� \
----I---- / 311
--- ---- GA312
313 �• .' 314
KF \ <�- ----__
I_303 3021 301 300
299
298 .:.:.:\Common,
•..•.•.-.-. - \ 297 �\?/322 Area ,
r ...:..... / ` X296 323
f:IMPACTAREA� 324 ` �.":IMPACX F 336: SF. %)0.005 / �F ,,0
/I CT ARE
�i 29 539 0.01 ..:
1 I LOT5 `� 1
EQUESTRIAN ESTATES 1
iMB 18 PG 66
60'EASEMENT
1 LOT, IN FAVOR OF 4— W '
EQUESTRIAN ESTATES I
MB 18 PG 66 AFTEW ww�s C,Ap ft 1
I ,
AME ZION CHURCH
1 LATS
EQUESTRIAN ESTATESMR 18 PG r6
T
LOT
I /O .•..�
1 I 1 EQUESTRIAN ESTA1AT-L"'
i '•"•"'' �1
I 1 MB 18 PG fib ...
ti ,
I — —I
I _ D
LOT 13
EQUESTRIAN EST'MB 18 PG::::'404WETLANDDI_LTNEATIQN"-AbES1GNATEDAND SIGNED BY7+3EN:SARMYCORPOF:ENGINEPRSON.'.':..'
— FEBRUARY 4 2U1IVSACE-AC.RDN•ID::':': •:•:•:•
NO; SAW-20o� at9ar}..:.:-:: ":: :::::' 1 : 1
EQUESTRIAN
EQ SI STATES
MS ' v
— 1
344
50
345 �� J-- I I•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:•.•1� 1 N
A T
EA XXIX I I / :::::::::":::"::... 51 I:.`�48 CREDITNION � 1 v
255 SF / Q1006 AC
::::-:•:•:•:::" 52
EQUESTRIAN ESTATES
Common Area; MB 18 Pr 66 I I 1 47 1
WET DETENTION' 1 1 1
BASIN / �� 531, 46
1
56 55 54 ► 45 _ —
1.1 � 1
XXII#,..:.:..') LOT I9 :•: G0%3R 44
UESTRIAN ESTATES
AC',I MB 18 PG 66
1....L. K ` \ 1
,Common,klGea - -�• �� 543
9 1
CT: AREA XXI 325 I i'WETDETENTION`��1:1 IMPACT ARE XX \ I 1 ,i :) 4z 1
4 SF O Q09_ AC \ -:: �y 326 I EISA-(XI BAs[N , • 5 SF / � C 1 1 f1 1
` 292 �l 1,732 F:Q:@4 AC I I1� �...� 64 63 61 41 11
\, 343 62 J,\,
40
–�–_ � !-. .-./ 142 � — .-! � gli \� � I 1 .L •.•.-. .•. \ / __– _.�OT1 � 1
1
9yy
N
Sq RAS
MOTIS VILLAGE Qq
BELLAMY PARKEWAY, a�
SNSBJIB] cg
M017S VILLAGE RD
LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS
PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED
IMPACTS
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
SHEET 1 OF 4
FOR
AFTEW PROPERTIES LLC
THE VILLAGE AT MOTTS LANDING
FEDERAL POINT TOWNSHIP NEW HANOVER COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE : 1"= 200' DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 2017
iPORT CITY
LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE No. P-1493
1144 SHIPYARD BLVD.
WILMINGTON, NC 28412
910-791-0080
PROJECT No. 16-0465
MATCH LINE SHEET 1
MATCH LINE SHEET 2

:I 323 \ . .......; 56
1 f'iMPAc"f�1REA 2 �/� t..:.;.;.;.� ` -1 J
10.005 / 32a : iMpAC `XXII;...::��._� EQMB�I8PG66ATE5 _ COVR 44 1
3 CT AR :;::628;�`F to,
. } AC ! I �:;::_.r. 1 \, \ - ENp`N = ' `11 1�
... .:•�/ 29 ! 539 0.01. :.:;::::::: 'Cpmmon,fA�ea;:;:I- / K – 59 1 MATCH LINE SHEET 1
AREA XXT 325 I DETENTI0�1 �:i: IMPACT ARE . i ::: 42
qoa 326 I .. I i- _ _ 1• t: ��' , \, MATCH LINE SHEET 2
4 S 0: " . � :AC: -� _ <- eAstN 5 SFS .01 C s ; \ 1
292 :... B 1,732 f-0.-O4"AC Iii � 1 1 64 63 1 61 � 41 1
34364
8 I f a I. \ - - �, 62 1 1
�,
291 - I - t� t .. - I
.. 40
342 349 Ij: gat \2 . :jcoo`�
290 I C ORD COURT 327 _ IEa; I —O §I. I :.1 p►1'1 1
_ ti X13
289 287 1 328 34� i1 1 350 I� 1j, n �� 1 f :-:.;...; _�; 67 68 \ O '�1 38
1
- 340 \ \- - §' O 1 82 SP �� I 65 66 11 N 37 _ �1
329 JfW-ACT AREA XVII it Z 8 / 0.0 C 691` -n 1� °
288 Via'... 286 \ 5 \ \ 351 �: 'I 1;•;.;.... i : O �\ N °
/322 I - - \ �O 50• . _ ..... 701, m 1 36 1
••`'•, - - - \-:•.•.•.•.•.-.-. � 339
50' BUFF I M::•'• • �.
285
.> % iYo_ S � \ \open 3p�fe / �I 1 - - _ { t 71 1 RKE
p l x SRR ' MOTIS VILLAGE
1. ySOREaAY , : , C : iM ACT EA XV DITCH 338 \ �— IMPACt ARA fI : 2 1 34
23 ♦ IMPACT AREA XIX *LO 65+6 , 69-72 WERE MOVEDI \ O 1�/1 n. 1 BELLAMY PAWA
:- :- :La'YQ;SF 8 0.009 .\ ACT AREA I - ::883611-1 0.1 war �4
82 / 0.003 A 352 555 SF / 0.01 AC NEE6 DCFT ORMW TER POND A , C= ---
337
33 d'
G H 324 I REDUNG E LEN OF MOTTS 1� 1'' A50.1187
- 1 I FOREST ROA . 11
.= IMPACT*AREA:7VF•:;:;:,:,:.:-'-:� ..�:: ::. �pen�sPnce I 353 -- - 1 MOTfSVILLAGERD
:• -:. �. I �{-1 g — mauvorfeuwn 1 PONONo. 1 111 \ 31
7.547:SFJ-0... AG;:.:::;:.:::;:.:::::::: /-- �k3
336 __ c5
_......
f1
�• - ---
--��' :::O 1 a- r
I 325 I 354 ;� I " �' `1111 1�1 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE
:.::::::::::::.: 281 / .._ ____ __-_____.-30�241 l ::' .; I �. mowav�E.umir - J 1 :.:;:- • • •:•�. t1 29
\ :-\ 280 1326 a c SA'.: so' > \ 355 1:. 240 I I I `
;:;:�_� Q �C Rt I 1rj\2 , 243 244 , 245 246 11 1 NC GRID (NAD 83)
271 IM ACT EA �- "`off; ;:;:;: ;, I -:•:-:- 11 28
272 1327 cC x �''" in Q +-1 `� ;. i \' _..... 1`, m"m
3 SF / .009 Com'::-::: a u v :334 Q o ,ul 0 \ 356 1 I �Pe��.. j 239 \\ 1
- to �`'- 1J X333 M I `.'; :::... - - _ 494 WAR . 1 1 27 1
\ 273 279 A� . Q \ \ \ J :7 " . \ _ - _ - --! J�\ 247 /. WNEAi70N.'-AS,
Q \ 238 \ \ . �FWGNATEDAND.
\I, 274 275 278 I, '-' ' vcn aln�`, /i „= KE MEADOW COUkr l::5....BYTHEVS� \, \ 26
1,32a �. :W .I a.� moo Ci ARE .III \\ Y
-�:•:- 332, 6 .d:0 6'b 237 _
z76 329 :-' I ? / YY :'f" 1'' 1 PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS
j �. n, K � � 248 TE9RU RY:2%N1l ::� 1
27 \ 277 1::1. 't ;:I 236 , I 252 251 ; 250 \ :(05ACE ACtION [D Nri:.
\ !� ��� �-- ---" I I I 249—
�: ' 1 -
269 �.-::?�• /. i 1 ! i
TMPAC"r Y 235
68 t� / I 62 S i 0 � 11,
257 234 \\ 253
_ \ ACT AREA;X; z5a :=:= :. ��. \\ - - PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED
258 \ " . \ / `\
._�
� s 256 _
'82: SF 02 A£= 233 �kj� ��\ 255 •�: -:-: : \�. \\ �. IMPACTS
267 • 259\ \ :� " ;\ : �� G %IMPAC AREA
\\ 1
t _ _ _ _ �- \ i \ W/VO�(4�9 S J :Q'O� A 90....89. 87 . 7..73 i \` \ 1
\ 1 260 \ \ ! `RmONo;.7;�`\ 232 \ Cyq IMPACT AREA XV \ 1
66 ; POND No. - - / .003 AC _ \ -,
\ \ `h. . ,:.` : :� \ 231 MAjOry - _ i�46_ �= _ - \�75 I \
\ N 261 \ l is �l 11� 230 , R I \ 1
4PAC'T Alf +A Xi:\ 1. 1 _ - - - 22 -
' --- _- = 6 LAND IMP
62 rr i ,, j3581 SF,/,0.48 AC T=IaNRACA$�fi9 _a/I ` 9 22B in ® is �`' ,1 11 WET ACT MAP
►'
\ f
265 1-:Q�Q1- l B
96 92 91 1 77 \ SHEET 2 OF 4
MPACT23
:AR i4'7fI 1 63 a;•'23
78 1 FOR
\:" �-
V 842,SF:I;; 07 AC \O .....j ;.;. ;.... u ..:... .
.-.•.•.'.. .
f ,_ ..... . so, ... ACfi AREA: _ . : 95 / / �l - ,1 \
�. ' '' - - : ' - :. 95II1; , :.: ,; 1o'TEdI�ORaRY :::: -:.l1 2� 3 1 \ AFTEW PROPERTIES LLC
f: \ .. I :::::....
•:: .. ."..... •'- .... I I 47 I 1 56 //
'/BUFFER I PAr.T A . XXIX O 1 THE VILLAGE AT MOTTS LANDING
POND No. 4 �. BUFFFItFROM::::::::::::.:: 0':BUFFERfROM : I I I 55 54
CALF ' "_ bO' 93 1 3;SF.' •:.0 ERALPOINTTOWNSHIP NEW HANOVER COUNTY
EXFSi.TCH ::•:-:-:-:•:•:•:-::: E>ST; 41iTGH;•:•, 53 I 1 �� 2 N 1 80 NORTH CAROLINA
46 II 1 '.1 48 49 50 51 52 I 10 - 20 94 q::::: :::::::::1 00 O 111 81 *ALE : 1"= 200' DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 2017
i.
~`arRrioti:N • 1`\ ,\ _ --ARKS %' ` > 1 ', N 1i 2 I PORT CITY
\ ` t:, v \ \� _ _ _ _ MEL P - 64 /':':':'::'::.::
-..4 -mf 1f5 Ata�CDR... ,.;.;.;.;.;.; 42 43 44 45 _ t4 CAR _ - _ - -- ............. 1 �I 1 LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
Qe2oli"[OSpCF _ �i MOU -_ - - 1 1 65 / 1' 70 1 83 FIRM LICENSE No. P-1493
SIS+. _ I 66 y- :-:: 'ry• 17
MATCH LINE SHEET 2 _ ::�.:.:.:.:.:.: ,=aia4il:: 40 41 = _-_ -_ "- – – – ' 1 �ELLTRACT ° 1 1144 SHIPYARD BLVD.
.... . . . ...... - - 67 1 0 , I 84 11 Amn WILMINGTON, NC 28412
..... -. -. - = - - - 69 i 910-791-0080
MATCH LINE SHEET 3 ::;:::::::::::::::: �- RK_E _ – \` \\ 84 :;�::;: ACGESSEASEMENi I, 1
39 T CARME` PA -" 31 \ 1 30 29 \\, 9n1`� 71 70 _ _ _ 85 / M(1PBpOK2 SPAGE 85
86 :I::... I 1
38 MOVN - -32 1 1 O 73 - 83 \;•;•_• 86 \ PROJECT No. 16-0465
i%'11 A1'1 34 33 l� Q::: �i 16 II
37 / 1� Nltl 1 1 28 \t 30 74 \ .. PAm�Eu«EAn 1
372 1\u 1 \ l�Gi �/ AREA °� f::::::::::.1
i I /a�:/ c ... ........::'� I-14
I':::::::::::1 1

�- Mu" 66 65 y:: : ' :.: ' ' -- O1 0a
MATCH LINE SHEET 2:::9-01sni1: 40 4l-- _-_ -== 6711 I :::::a:':L>RACT `,o
MATCH LINE SHEET 3 :-:•:• - • . - . p E \, \, 84 :.c.:.. AcGESSElSEPAGNT
E I,
RME1. — 30 \ \ , \ 71 — 86 ..1....: IUIP BQOK SS PAGE
38 t4OVN'[ CA_ _ — 32 �31 11 11 \�\ �O \ \ 73 — 8�7j
3 :-� ::::.� 192
134 1 34 33 1 1 \\ 3 I I 16
87 16
l f
1 28 O \ 74 i \\1 / vAssrvE TcN I::
372 u' \,
77 88
J' iMPACX:A`�kXX1iIi::• •::: L :::. 377 1', 11 376 27 \\ 75 `\ 76 i 13 1111\,:
. ::::f;001:$� ):8:b AC =. 1 11 c 11 O (� \\
373 1 �,� ( to \ _—== / I 1 ,�•:• -
Y.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::.:...:.:.:::.:. 36 35 ;� ; 375 \ \ \ \�` i �- PO �� 89 12
.............::::: ' ' /. 1 \ 26 O 90-R 11 hIl
/ �:::...:::...::: \ \\ 25 G.� 180 181 182 (%tri �,—
\ : ::�Mpi1 ARBA 1', �J \ \ �,� 179 '/' '•'-' �_ `�� 91 R — L� I I
.:.......:...:::.:::.:.:......... 24 VS /'•.%• • • •� 2 — I
'• •............. i 419 S>F:/*fli63: ►G� \� '/ 374 \ 5 \ 178 7< :: :
�•.-.... - M -
.. \ ...........:.� I / 23 / O- i 177 183", \ 174 A 1 117
........ ` ::::::::. 377-A 176 ' Y � o� �aoo 184 , , \\ j�s 9
.. a T.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::.> 22 / ii 175 -
/ .. .
i ::::::::::::::::.. i 173 `\ \ ��o' — ":::::::::::::::%;•:•:. o� 185 �
�..� i� \ /�:•:•:••:•'- 186 /
::: \ //\ 172 1 ' aoo%•.•.-......:.. GF l�J
1 / 171
o::......... /
. W.1TED AND
•:-:-:-:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:-:•:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:•:-:-:•:•:•:-:•:-:-:•:-:-:•:-:-:-:•:-:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:•:-:- ESIG SIGNED B$7NE'U:S::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:�'�' / /
1 1.............. 187
.... f �' • -_ _ _ _ y. �•...........< l \ r ......... ARMp CORP-0FENGINEER5ON::::::::::: ' ' ' /
94
•:•:•:•:•:•::•:•:•:•:•... — — — �+ 20 �� //......................R.....11:(U..........:.:.:.:..:...1
::::::::::::: �I 170 co............ No:SAW2A49oi847I.:.::.:......... . .. 188 �.
18
c 95
NC GRID (NAD 83) .: /...... 92
, — ��\� \ �, 19 I, I 169 r� :."T - .Co`. •'� 189 / %/
:.::: :::............................ -:: \\ \ 17
Q4W1MpUELtIiFAiION'+IS16 \ 200 199 - 1 1 /, /� 96
14
18
DESIGNATED hNb S[GNED:BY-THE US:::::::: \ —_ _ _ _ - - - - — - I I 1 I 190
:::::ARNKCORROFkNGINEERSAN:':'::......' 15 ��-- .I 168 201 1' 1194 193 192 // Q \,
::.: f FE$RjHIRY28 2oli(USACEIICfiONID:::: '/ ," ; _ _ _ _ _ Lr �,- 198 197 196 195 1 I I — _ /' Q 97 lof
No:5AN1-I009Aiill::-:'.-'-' :::•'•''' i' ----_— 1` / \ t1== --- 191 / 0
..............j......... // �=-- 150 II I ` -=t- // 98 \
I1:.:.:.:..........
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. 167 20z • - --_ --- OAO
::: �_ 14 // �� \ \147 148 149 11 - --- HERON R— 107
\ I HITE - ( 99\ /
�:�'..� ^•:�•:':•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:r _, /� /� 146 \ \ 151 I. II 166;/rte _ __ W _ __ �_---;\,,\ Q' � 7 �
-- I .I 203 _-- 1 �' V �. \\--
;.;:•:..�\.:/� 13 I` I/145 — — --i� / 204 209 I 1 210 211 /� ,~ 100
�:: - ..... •: •::::::::1� \ I � I L � 152 I I I 165 / 205 206 207 208 1 1 212 // Cl ; i � �-
f::•:•::::: \ ( I I 101 ,
I' N--- --� 11 1 I ;' // 130�. ��� .�,
1:::::::::::.::::::::::::::: \ \ 12 11, 1 144 / 213 / ; / y ��
153 / I / O /2�
-: -:. 164 220 219 - / , \ Fy Y 102 ,
:�\ \ \ 143 �` 1 — _ _ I 218 214
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS \\ \ / ll \ �•9\�� '` ; L 103 ,
; .^ \ JC 128
,// 142 154 I I 1 217 ?' j/ �� 0� i.
104-R
x\ I; 221 �- , ,// 127 .QO
141 I 1 162 1 - _ 216
\ 10 215
0 : • \:; I \ �O �� 140 / Q� I 161 222
,\ � 9 '9 �� / \ 11 ���--��—_\,BFj, \ ,;' ,i �. �` 125
PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED :::-:-: :::::::.::.::::.:�� \� �\ O �� 139 138,` G11 l60 , 223 zza
IMPACTS :':-:': ::: \\ 124
g 59
<
WETLAND IMPACT MAP f /. 7 ,�\`. ��� 137 l5s
SHEET 3 OF 4 ::� 1::::.:::� \` ----,' 157 ,h1" 123
FOR �.�-� .. 6 ��\\ -- ,-� //i i ti'S~
/ O \ \\ /
AFTEW PROPERTIES LLC ' S \ 156 \�\===,r==____
S\
THE VILLAGE AT MOTT LANDING��
FEDERAL POINT TOWNSHIP NEW HANOVER COUNTY �'• 4
N
NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE : 1"= 200' DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 2017 3
S MOTTS VILLA /
BEUAMY PARKS PORT QTY
TY
24 /
WAY LAND SURVEYING, PLLC :�.
FIRM LICENSE No. P-1493 �;•-� / / �,', SCALE 1"= 200'
5{11181 1144 SHIPYARD BLVD. �' '
�.. / 0 200 400 600
WILMINGTON NC 28412
MOTTSVILAGERD •:
S9 910-791-0080
PROJECT No. 16-0465
LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE
,:.:�/��
—,' .

yu
�1
N
�RRa MOTTS VILIAG �o
BELLAMYPARKE
J`4
w SANbE R A
c3
zd ,rn"� � 5R 1161
w �1�,�pp MOTTS V[LLAGE RD
S�
LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE
NC GRID (NAD 83)
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS
PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED
IMPACTS
►w _ : ter• : _ 1•
PDE = PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT
114 LF 48"RCP SD
REINFORCED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE
DETA/L AREA FROW511EET3OF9
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
SHEET 4 OF 4
FOR
AFTEW PROPERTIES LLC
THE VILLAGE AT MOTTS LANDING
FEDERAL POINT TOWNSHIP NEW HANOVER COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE : 1"= 200' DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 2017
rPORT CITY
LAND SURVEYING, PLLD
FIRM LICENSE No. P-1493
1144 SHIPYARD BLVD.
WILMINGTON, NC 28412
910-791-0080
PROJECT No, 16-0465
]C
U \
O \
J \
o \
0
a
open space
a >
Axa
+ Ln ` / x 67
�
O x< CD
o ,
G..^ NCDOT STD, ENDWALL No. 5.1
w \ \i 48" INV 5.0 CQ:¢/
STD. END
No. 5
48" INV 5.0 \\\ /� , SLOPE GRADE
IMPACT AREA X
PDE 982 SF / 0.02 AC i
,
,
331
I
'
-------------------------------J
NDWAL.L, PIPE + RIPRAP�
IM ACT\AREA XI
358 SF / .0.08 AC
ujuj
0
a I/
I
I
X
I
ao
\
W O
ce \
L
�.
y
a�
330
NCDOT
]C
U \
O \
J \
o \
0
a
open space
a >
Axa
+ Ln ` / x 67
�
O x< CD
o ,
G..^ NCDOT STD, ENDWALL No. 5.1
w \ \i 48" INV 5.0 CQ:¢/
STD. END
No. 5
48" INV 5.0 \\\ /� , SLOPE GRADE
IMPACT AREA X
PDE 982 SF / 0.02 AC i
,
,
331
I
'
-------------------------------J
NDWAL.L, PIPE + RIPRAP�
IM ACT\AREA XI
358 SF / .0.08 AC
ujuj
0
a I/
M K
En
v
NCWTSTD. -------------------------- �/
NDWALL No. 5A -
VW/22'x22'x2' E.D.
r �i ___________________�_ ----------
48" INV 4,0
�' — — — EXIST. SOIL DRIVE i
� _-----
1,739 S.F.
0.04 Acres
w \ EXIST. SOIL DRIVE
EXIST. 48' RCP TO BE REMOVED
EXIST, 48" RCP . TO BE-REMOy ED AND RESTORED
TO BE REMOVED I
LYT LE± <-- -
'OF STREAM 11 � _ 1
Sf0 BE RESTORED 7
}�
POND No. 3
DETAIL AREA
NOT TO SCALE
So
I
I
I
I
/
M K
En
v
NCWTSTD. -------------------------- �/
NDWALL No. 5A -
VW/22'x22'x2' E.D.
r �i ___________________�_ ----------
48" INV 4,0
�' — — — EXIST. SOIL DRIVE i
� _-----
1,739 S.F.
0.04 Acres
w \ EXIST. SOIL DRIVE
EXIST. 48' RCP TO BE REMOVED
EXIST, 48" RCP . TO BE-REMOy ED AND RESTORED
TO BE REMOVED I
LYT LE± <-- -
'OF STREAM 11 � _ 1
Sf0 BE RESTORED 7
}�
POND No. 3
DETAIL AREA
NOT TO SCALE
So

20
15
10
5
III
STREAM IMPACTS
IMPACT #
PERMANENT
IMPACT AREA
M+N
125 LF
1
STREAM IMPACT M+N
CROSS SECTION
HORIZ. 1" = 50'
VERT. 1" = 5'
NO
15
10
WETLAND IMPACT
XVI AND XVII
CROSS SECTION
HORIZ. 1" = 50'
VERT. 1 " = 5'
20
UN
i[el
WETLAND IMPACT
XVIII AND XIX
CROSS SECTION
HORIZ. 1" = 50'
VERT. 1" = 5'
W Z
O Q
H Z
WW
U0 1 d
U c
a�
O
A� x
w
Ha
E- -<4 C\2z
�wwz
E-
�z
E-1
Cn >t 12L4
DATE 05-06-16
DESIGN PGT
DRAWN MLV
0 TRIPP ENGINEERING, P.C. Ta�T 1
419 Chestnut Street
Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 11
Phone [phone] SHEET 1 OF 2
Fax [phone]
0w14TM P .P.c. 14026

We
H61
10
WETLAND IMPACT
VII AND VIII
CROSS SECTION
HORIZ. 1" = 50'
VERT. 1" = 5'
20
15
Wd
WETLAND IMPACT
M AND VI
CROSS SECTION
HORIZ. 1" = 50'
VERT. 1 " = 5'
0 TWP ENGINEERING, P.C.
419 Chestnut Street
Wilmington, North Carolina 28401
Phone [phone]
Fax[phone]
cm,
1NPP 000lEER . P.C.
0
v� Z
O Q
E� Z
OnW
cr) 9
U
a�
Q U
A� x
F-1 a
E',:� C\2z
�wwz
E-
�z
E-1
U) >
DATE 05-06-16
DESIGN PbT
DRAWN MLV
W2
SHEET 2 OF 2

Appendix D Page 4 of 4
Wetland Impact Summary
2016 USACE and DWR Permit Modification Wetland and Stream Impact Summary Worksheet
New Proposed Wetland
Impacts
New Proposed Stream Impact
Impact ID
Purpose & Need
SF
AC
Resource Type
(Riparian or Non-
Ri arian
Impact ID
Purpose & Need LF
I
Lot Fill
1,882
0.043
NR
M & N
Road Crossing 125
II
Lot Fill
5,836
0.134
NR
Total 125
Previous Completed Impacts Under 2005 IP (AC)
Total 0.16 AC
F Previously Authorized Impacts Under 2013 IP (AC)
Riparian 0.58
Non-Ripariani 0.81
Totall 1.23
Proposed Impacts with this Permit Mod (AC & LF)
Riparian 0.47
Non -Riparian 0.33
Stream 125
Total 0.80
Cumulative Impacts (AC & LF)
Previously Impacted 2005 (NR) 0.16
2013 Permit Wetlands 1.23
Proposed Wetlands 0.80
Proposed Stream 125
Total Stream Impact 125
Total Wetland Impactl 2.19
Proposed Mitigation (2:1)
Riparian Wetland Credit 0.86 AC
Non -Riparian Wetland Credit 0.66 AC
Permittee Responsilbe Wetland Restoration 0.04 AC
Permittee Responsible Stream Restoration 25 LF
Stream Restoration Credit 100 LF
III Lot Fill 697 0.016 NR
IV Road Crossing 146 0.003 NR
V Road Crossing 449 0.010 NR
VI Road Crossing 404 0.009 NR
VII Road Crossing 362 0.008 NR
VIII Road Crossing 268 0.006 R
IX Road Crossing 2,371 0.054 R
X Lot Fill 982 0.023 R
XI Road Crossing 3,581 0.082 R
XII Road and Lot Fill 2,842 0.065 R
XIII Lot Fill 1,192 0.027 R
XIV Road Crossing 396 0.009 NR
XV ('T) Utility Crossing 2,675 0.061 R
>M Read Sfessing 120 0.003 NR
XV1t I Read Sressing 121 0.003 NR
XVIII Road Crossing 540 0.012 R
XIX Road Crossing 555 0.013 R
XX Lot Fill 635 0.015 NR
XXI Lot Fill 1,732 0.040 NR
XXII Lot Fill 539 0.012 NR
XXIII I Lot Fill 628 0.014 NR
XXIV Lot Fill 400 0.009 NR
XXV Lot Fill 236 0.005 NR
XXVI Driveway Access 1,419 0.033 R
XXVII Driveway Access 1,001 0.023 R
XXVIII Road Crossing 117 0.003 NR
XXVIV I Road Crossing 618 0.014 R
M & N Road Crossing 5,162 0.119 R
Total Proposed Impactsl 34,990 1 0.80
T = Temporary Impact

The Village at Motts Landing 201 6 IF Modification 5UPPlemental information 5FIG i
Appendix E
Bridge and Culvert Estimates

01/2 5/2016 16:38 9107634742 PAGE 01/02
_ FW:RfIf.�N171A'.11PRe+KrstOQWt47 ffr,l�l
From: Tripp Engineering <trippeng@ec,rr,com>-��
To: Arnold 5obol-horns clobos231(Zaol,com>; Amold Sobol-office <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Bridge Quote Request a Quote
Date: Thu, Jan 28.2016 12:10 pm al
l lei
Attachments: 2016 Corporate Brochure.pdf (9486K), Cerdfrcation_ him (253)
v
See below, quote for bridge.
From: Titus Edwards hailto:titus[aRybc.corn]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 10;09 AM
To: ri=na@ec,rr,com
Subject: RE: Bridge Quote Request a Quote
Hello Phil!
Good to hear from you again, hope you have been doing well, You and I met years ago when I came up
to meet on the RiverSea project and then later we discussed Shallotte River Village project.
Regarding The Village At Motts Landing...... for an H520 pile -supported (piling bents every 15' like
RiverSea) timber bridge, 22' wide (yields 20' clear driving width) x 120' long, up to 8' of height (deck to
grade height)..... you are going to be around $300k out the door (design, engineering, construction,
driven timber piling, poly/acrylic timber abutments, poly/acrylic timber guard rail, etc. all included),
*This pricing assumes driven timber piling up to 16' in the ground — potential for additional charges if
soft soils required deeper in the ground piling.
This pricing includes all of our return York Bridge Services that brings us back to the completed bridge
some 6 months later to apply protective coatings to the entire bridge and deck, as well as to perform
initial maintenance on the bridge. As you can see in our new brochure, our new bridges are more than
just a timber bridge, but a combination of acrylic/polymer finishes with pressure treated heavy
timbers.
What kind of schedule is the project on? Thanks Phil!
Titus Edwards, lead Senior Bridge Consultant
YORK $RIDGE CONCEPTS, INC.TM°
Tifus_evbC. Com
www.YBC.com
[phone] x 105 (office)
[phone] (cell)
2420 Brunello Trice Lutz, FL 33558
This email and any Flles transmitted whd It are confidential and intended solely for the use of the Individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
received t tis email In error please notify the system manager. This mCssap,,a contains confidential Informotion and is intended only for the Individual named. If you are
not the named addressee you should not dissem;nate, distribute, or copy thlS email, Please notify the sender I.mmedlately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by
mistake and delete this e-mail from your System. If you are not the intendrd reclplent you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action In
relonce on the contents of this in`ormation is strictly prohibited,
htlpsAmail.051-Com/webmttil-std/ert-us/PrintMessap 113

C :1► NTECHg
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS
Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
9025 Centre Pointe Drive. Suite 400
West Chester, OH 45069
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.ContechES.com
February 17, 2016
Project: 207952 VAML Lot 377A, Wilmington NC (DYOB REFERENCE #207952)
As requested, the following is a CON/SPAN® O -Series Bridge System ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE for the above
referenced project. This ESTIMATE is intended for preliminary estimating purposes only and should not be interpreted as
a final QUOTATION. The information presented is based on the DYOB referenced above.
Contech will fabricate and deliver the following described CON/SPAN® O -Series Bridge components and appurtenances:
DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIED MATERIALS:
• CON/SPAN O -Series 01055 structure
■ 16 L.F. of 1 Cell 01055 55'-0" Span x 8'-11 1/8" Rise CON/SPAN® O -Series Precast Concrete units
■ (4 FT. Typical Lay Length)
■ Two (2) precast headwalls
■ Four (4) precast wingwalls with mounting hardware
■ Joint sealant material
■ Masonite shims
■ Filter fabric and perforated drain tile
■ On-site consultation during installation
*ESTIMATE - $146,400 Delivered
These costs do not include the foundation, or installation costs. As part of the construction process, the contractor is to
perform the items listed below in accordance with the installation drawings:
■ Construct cast -in-place foundations
■ Unload and set structure utilizing crane
■ Grout the unit legs and wingwalls into the keyway
■ Apply all joint sealing material
■ Excavate and backfill the structure
Please contact me at *Sender Phone* should you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you for your
interest in the CON/SPAN® Bridge System.
Respectfully, *Estimate assumes production facility is within 100 miles of the jobsite.
This estimate was prepared using a number of assumptions for design
loads, earth cover, freight and other considerations. Contact your local
*Signature* Contech representative to request a formal quotation.

UPSTREAM
BRIDGE PLAN
DOWNSTREAM
The design and inrormahon shown on this drawing is provided as a service to the poled owner, engineer end s NTECH' --- `e 0�7S a.e
conlredor by cometh Engineered SoUions LLC ('Cometh'). Neither this drawing. nor any pert thereof, they be VAML Lot 377A zms5z zmrzole
used, repoduoed or modified in any manner ari the error written consem of Contech. Failure to comply Is acne CON SPAN•
at IN deesoarndakand Untecheaphisidiad.imaamhebintyorraapen•ibiifiyfor aachwe CON/SPAN O -Series 01055 55'-0" Span x 8'-11 1/8" Rise a�oyoe Dvoe
ENGINEERED SOLUilONS LLC �i-SERIES-
if disaepanded between the suppned intormetlon upon which the drawing is based and adual fiaN caMitions are—C--hEs.wm C�NTFCN cv.�o rncnovEo
ncaunteretl as site work progressed. Chess discrepancies must be reported to Contecn immediately (or 8025 Canbe Potts Dr., Slits 40D, WastCraubr, OH <50Sg 1 Cell - 16' Long a Dvoe Dvoe
av i-tionofthededi n. contact ecce natal for DYOEt Wilmington, North Carolina e�an
g pts no aY designs based on missing, Incomplete ar inaccurate 500-33&1122 5738157000 - 5738957993 FAX opAw�"c
�romration atppnM W omen.

SPAN
CROSS SECTION
The design and information shown on this drawing is provided as a service to the prolan owner, engineer and
contractor W Contech Engineered Solutions LLC('Cantech"l. Neither this drawing, nor any part thereol, may be
C' NTECH'
coN ��`
VAML Lot 377A
7.7 a� ao n.,E
2B]9sz zn]rzots
used, reproduced or modeled in any manner mahout the prior written wnsenl of Contech, FeINre to mmply ie done
at the users own dale and Contech eapmesly diadaims am liskility or reaponaibaity, for such use,
ENGINEERED S0LIm0N5 LLC
�' _'
U—SERIES-
CON/SPAN O -Series 0/+1055 5C5'-0" Span x 8'-11 1/8" Rise
scr.Eo w'H
DvoB Dvoe
I! diacrepanciae between the e,ppli,d information upon which the drawing is based and actual Geld conditions are
encountered as site work progresses, these discrepancies must be reported to Contech immediately for
evaluation of the design. Contech accepts no liability for designs based on missing, or inaccurate
Infonnallen supplied by other.
—ComtechES.Cpm
ggyS Centre Pomba W., Sdb400. Weal Chasse. ON 45"
ONrECH
DYOB
DanWiuc
1 fell — 16' Long
Wilmington, North Carolina
Ec'm ­DVOB
500.33511 �2 513-645-70gg 513-645]993 FAX
`�`"° 2 c 5

UPSTREAM END ELEVATION
The assign and information shown on tion Brewing Is provided eit a service to the protect owner, engineer and
contractor Ey Contech Engineered Solutions LLC -Contech"). Neither lois drawing, nor any part !hereof, may
� � NTECHa
60 QI�A N
VAML Lot 377A
� r„ n„E
207952 2/172076
ne
used, reproduced or mpaHietl in any manner without the prior written conxnt of Codech. Failure to compry ts done
che users awn nsk and Contach expressly disclaims am, liability or reaponsinitity for such use.
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC
irY.Y e7r/"N r
O—SERIES_
CON/SPAN O -Series 01055 55'-0” Span x 8'-11 1/8" Rise
rv�
G DYOB
�.
DYOB
I7 diacrcpencies Delween Me supplied informationupon which the drawing is Eased and actual field conditions are
encountered as site work progresses, these discrepancies must be reported to Contech immediately for
va4aw.ContechES.com
9025 Cenba paints Dr., Suite 400, West Chad.. OH 45M,
CorvrF
DYOB
1 Cell - 16' Long
�xDV08
aDVOB
ncvsluat— of the design. Contech accepts no liability for designs Eased on mining, incomplete or inaccurate
formalion suppled Ey dhen.
Wilmington, North Carolina
800-338.1122 513845-70D0 513845-7993 FAX
3 OF5

DOWNSTREAM END ELEVATION
The design dna information enown on b drawing is provided as a x rs c to the protea owner, reoineer and
contractor by n Engineered S LLC (t Neither erf nor any vert maybe
CONTEC H
co SPAN.
VRML Lot 377A
`���'I na'E
zo7ssz I'll 7,-1.
oed o, nnara the wch').
comps
extl, reproduxd or modHlM In any m rrcer wi11wN Me prior wrnlen mnaenl of contecn. Failure ro comply K done
en C -t
t the Deer. own nal, ane Comethe.preeely dlaoblms any liability or responsibility for such see.
ENGINEERED SOW'nONS LLC
�•/ , Y
U -SERIES_
CON/SPAN O -Series 01055 55'-0" Span x 8'-11 1/8" Rise
ovoe
a Dvoe
If discrepancies between Me ,ppged information upon which the drawing is based and actual geld conditions ere
encountered as site work progresses, these discrepancies must be reported to Contech immediately for
in-evaluation of the design. Contechaboaptsnoliability for designs baked onmissing,Incomplateorinaavrate
formation supplied by others.
w'w'w'-ContechES.-int
9025 Centre Points Dr., Bulls 000, ~Che itia, 0!105089
Coin -
DYOB
.>G
1 Cell - 16' Long
Wilmington, North Carolina
DVOB
s DV08
8M0. !122 513$45-]000 513-645-7993 FAX
4 oc 5

REINFORCING BAR (TYP.)
If e a
a
A 4 /a
C.I.P. CONCRETE
/FO�R�C�I.
IN PRECAST CROSS MEMBER
ONCRETE PASSAGE BETWEEN
CELLS .
FOUNDATION WIDTH
SECTION
(NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
PRECAST WINGWALL
REINFORCING
BAR (TYP.) 10
U / GROUT
EXPRESS FOUNDATIONS
INSIDE FACE OF "O"
SERIES LEG OF
PRECAST BRIDGE UNIT
PRECAST
CONCRETE
,Ya"x51$"TAPERED
�- KEYWAY (TYP.)
4" THICK GRANULAR
SUBFOOTING
A6 BARS CONTINUOUS
TOP 8 BOTTOM
X6 LAP SPLICE BARS IN TOP 8 BOTTOM
EITHER SIDE OF JOINT FOR
LONGITUDINAL BARS
elm
STRUCTURE LIMITS
¢STRUCTURE
Z>
S
—
O
Y �
YCLRn
x
`
y
w
J
ri
Z
iH
A'RECMA.ST
O
m
'nJ
V
Z
R(TVP.)
CONCRETE (TYP.)
n
J
n
REINFORCING BAR (TYP.)
If e a
a
A 4 /a
C.I.P. CONCRETE
/FO�R�C�I.
IN PRECAST CROSS MEMBER
ONCRETE PASSAGE BETWEEN
CELLS .
FOUNDATION WIDTH
SECTION
(NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
PRECAST WINGWALL
REINFORCING
BAR (TYP.) 10
U / GROUT
EXPRESS FOUNDATIONS
INSIDE FACE OF "O"
SERIES LEG OF
PRECAST BRIDGE UNIT
PRECAST
CONCRETE
,Ya"x51$"TAPERED
�- KEYWAY (TYP.)
4" THICK GRANULAR
SUBFOOTING
A6 BARS CONTINUOUS
TOP 8 BOTTOM
X6 LAP SPLICE BARS IN TOP 8 BOTTOM
EITHER SIDE OF JOINT FOR
LONGITUDINAL BARS
elm
STRUCTURE LIMITS
¢STRUCTURE
—
JOINT
TY1TYP TI
_ I - (TVP.
iH
A'RECMA.ST
�E�
CROSS
CAST -IN-PLACE
R(TVP.)
CONCRETE (TYP.)
PRECAST
FOUNDATION
4" THICK GRANULAR
SUBFOOTING 4/7
SAMPLE PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN
SECTION B (NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
(NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
EXPRESS FOUNDATIONS
The design and Information shown on this drawing is provided as a service to the Project owner, engineer antl """T uo INTE
mrd, rapn d Contech Engineered 1, an Solutions LLC ("Contech"). ter, er Mir tlf C,m nor any pad thereof. may be Chi NTEC He CON SPAN. VAML Lot 377A zoTasz vnrzo,B
used, reprotluced or modified In any manner wktgN the prior water, canthis of Contech. Feilurc to comply ts done C oEscrcp. pa4W�
a11he user, own nniind Contech e.presaty, disclaim anyiiaenityor responsiblldy for such ,sa ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC ;1�"--SERIES_ CON/SPAN O -Series 0/1055 55'-0" Span x 8'-11 1/8" Rise OYOS DYOB
cie, h
If discrepaneWeen the supplied information upon which n
the swing Is based and ,duel fiekl conditions are —.ContechES.com 1 hell - 16' Long — DY.. —DVOB
}' encountered es me work progresses. these dlscrepandea must be reported to Contech immediately far SIRS Cwtba Pointe Dr., SUhe 400, West Chester, OH 45069 DYOB
re-evaluation of the design. Contech accepts no liability for designs based on missing, Incomplete or inaccurate 800.3361112 513645-]000 513.645 i993F4T IMPWInIG Wilmington, North Carolina
$
,to.
ro manor supplied by other 5 5

C=::NTECH'
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS
Contech Engineered Solutions LLC
9025 Centre Pointe Drive, Suite 400
West Chester, OH 45069
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.ContechES.com
February 17, 2016
Project: 207951 VAML Lot 377A, Wilmington NC (DYOB REFERENCE #207951)
As requested, the following is a CON/SPAN® O -Series Bridge System ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE for the above
referenced project. This ESTIMATE is intended for preliminary estimating purposes only and should not be interpreted as
a final QUOTATION. The information presented is based on the DYOB referenced above.
Contech will fabricate and deliver the following described CON/SPAN® O -Series Bridge components and appurtenances:
DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIED MATERIALS:
• CON/SPAN O -Series 0530 structure
■ 18 L.F. of 1 Cell 0530 30'-0" Span x 6-5 3/8" Rise CON/SPAN® O -Series Precast Concrete units
■ (6 FT. Typical Lay Length)
■ Two (2) precast headwalls
■ Four (4) precast wingwalls with mounting hardware
■ Joint sealant material
■ Masonite shims
■ Filter fabric and perforated drain the
■ On-site consultation during installation
*ESTIMATE - $74,800 Delivered
These costs do not include the foundation, or installation costs. As part of the construction process, the contractor is to
perform the items listed below in accordance with the installation drawings:
■ Construct cast -in-place foundations
■ Unload and set structure utilizing crane
■ Grout the unit legs and wingwalls into the keyway
■ Apply all joint sealing material
■ Excavate and backfill the structure
Please contact me at *Sender Phone* should you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you for your
interest in the CON/SPAN® Bridge System.
Respectfully, *Estimate assumes production facility is within 100 miles of the jobsite.
This estimate was prepared using a number of assumptions for design
loads, earth cover, freight and other considerations. Contact your local
*Signature* Contech representative to request a formal quotation.

UPSTREAM
BRIDGE PLAN
DOWNSTREAM
The design aM ,hl—tion shown on this drawing m prawdau as a service mine poled owner, ergmeer anp
contract r by Cometh Engineered Sowions LLC ('Contech"). Neither this drawing, nor any part thereof, maybe
(
MONTECH'
C�N
VAML Lot 377A
� _� ^� ^• _
207951 2mrz016
wed. m; aced ormodlnedinany manner withommeplorwritten consent ofcomech. Faueretocon,piywdone
e4pi�N
s� p
at the ours own riska�M Contech eapm,* iiscilany facility or responsibility for such uu.
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC
0 -SERIES
CON/SPAN O -Series 0530 30'-0" Span x 6'-5 3/8" Rise
Dvoe
Dvoe
If disuapanchm between the supplied information upon which the drawing Is based and aOwl rad conditions are
paw-CointechES.com
C TF
1 Cell - 18' Long
�eovoe
"��Dvoe
encountered as site work progresses, these discrepancies must be reported to Contech immediately for
9075 CSNe PaMM Dr., SWb 400, Vital Chinese, ON 45069
DYOEI
evaluation of the design, Contech accepts iw liability for designs based on missing, incompk(e or inaccurate
600-33&1122 513.645.70DO 51&6457993 FAX
RAVA
Wilmington, North Carolina
9
cEr rm
Inbrmeti0 wppliedbyothers.
5

CROSS SECTION
owner. engineer are
The design and information mown on Ihis dnwi(- 1. mprovked as a service to the no,
contractor by Gontech Engineered Salullons LLC ('Gontech"). Neither MIs drawing, nor eny pert thereof, may be
NTECH
+�N ��
VAML Lot 377A
E�,�o �� pe.e
207951 2/172016
used, reproduced or modified in any manner wahmat the prim written consent of Contech. Failure to comply is done
j at the users own nak and Comech expressly dlsctaims any aamnty or re+popstality for each use.
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC
�; -SERIES_
CON/SPAN O -Series 0530 300'-0" Span x 6'-5 3/8" Rise
,En
sc DYOB
cow
" DVOB
if discrep+notsa between the supplied information upon which the drawing Is based end actual field conditions are
—CMtabh E3.wm
1 Cell — 18' Long
DVOB
" DVOB
it+s site work progresses, thea. discrepancies must be reported to Comech immediately for
of me design. Contech aaepts no liability for designs baud on missing, incomplete or Inaccurate
9025 Candle points d., Brats 400, V/es(Chnges, 0195089
80433&1172 513815-7000 5138aS7993 FAX
DY09
�nAVNNG
Wilmington, North Carolina
`�`"°
Inevaluation
finnifemwpplied by others.
2 01 5

UPSTREAM END ELEVATION
The design and mrormah- Snow, on this drawing la promded s a —ios to the pmj,ct owner, engineer and
wntmGor by Contecn Engineered Solutions LLC ('Contact,'). Neither this drawing, nor any part thereof, may be
CO NTEC H
L+QN si�A1V.
VAML Lot 377A
o.�cr w cors
zo7ssl 2/17/2016
used, reprodu«a or modrcma to any manner without the prior wnhen con,ent or Cometh. Fanufe to comply is done
at the user, own neat am Contact, e,pm"dacisms amy lial.iiry or responsibility for sum use.
CON/SPAN O 0530 30'-0" Span 6'-5 3/8" Rise
,
�` ovDB
"Droll
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC
0 -SERIES.
-Series x
If discrepanclea between the supplied Information uponwhim the drawln0 is based and actual fele condition. are
www.C-techES.cdm
cor�rFr.N
1 Cell - 18' Lon g
W�DVOB
,countered as site work progresses, these de,(.pancles must be reported to Contain immediately for
9025 Cb. Pointe Dr„ Suite 400, West Chester, 01145088
DVOB
valuation of the design. Contact, accepts no liability for design, based on missing, incomplete or Inaccurate
800 338MS1171 SI7000 513.645-7%3 FAX
MnwluG
L %9
Wilmington, North Carolina
[n r�
information wpplied by others,
3 or 5

DOWNSTREAM END ELEVATION
owner, engineer and
The assign and mermanon at,own on this craw(- le pch"). it a mince a me nor
contractor Contech Engineered! Solutions lLC tten this arawing, nor any part thereof, may be
C ' NTEC H
rJ Q^A w.
C�N
VAML Lot 377A
—J079W 1e p".e
207951 2/172076
co
used, reproduced or modalea in any manner without Ina prior written consent of Contech. Failure to comply is done
d Edwin t the riot
at the users own dakand contact, e.preasly maaaima am liability or—portabilityror such use.
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC
`�r� Y•
O -SERIES_
CON/SPAN O -Series 0530 30'-0" Span x 61-5 3/8" Rise
s ueo
� DYoa
v.�ry
" DYOB
It discrepancies between Me supplied information upon which the drawing is based end actual held conditions are
ncountered as site work progresses, them discrepancies must be reported to Contech immediately for
veluatlon of the design. Contech accepts na liability for designs based on missirg, incomplete or inaccurate
inrc- "on supplied by ott,en.
—Cont-hES.-.
9025 Certslle Paa., sults a00, West Classes, OH 95069
ccw*e
DYOB
onnvnru;
1 Cell - 18'Long
9
Wilmington, North Carolina
o
� DYOB
wEo
"oDVOB
800-33&1171 513.645-7000 513.64&7993 FM
s��
4 5

REINFORCING BAR (TVP.)
7
( O
3"CLR.
ry
E..�
QPRECAST WINGWALL
J
�5
REINFORCING 0 U_
BAR (TVP.)
EXPRESS FOUNDATIONS
INSIDE FACE OF "O"
SERIES LEG OF
PRECAST BRIDGE UNIT
PRECAST
CONCRETE
iI 734" x 5n' TAPERED
II KEYWAY(TYP.)
4" THICK GRANULAR
SUBFOOTING
08 BARS CONTINUOUS
TOP 8 BOTTOM
06 LAP SPLICE BARS IN TOP 8 BOTTOM
EITHER SIDE OF JOINT FOR
LONGITUDINAL BARS
1'-0"
(TVP )
II� STRUCTURE LIMITS
T,STRUCTURE — —
Y,"JOINT
(TVP.)
^ PRECAST CROSS CAST -IN-PLACE
rill v / GROUT MEMBER(TYR) CONCRETE(TYP.)
PRECAST
_ FOUNDATION
4" THICK GRANULAR
SUBFOOTING
SAMPLE PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN
SECTION B (NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
(NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
EXPRESS FOUNDATIONS
f€
o The design and information shown on this drawing is ywrovtded as a service to the project owner, engineer end gohcr w. rvo nsT[
contractor M Contech Engineered Solutions LLC('Contech'I. Neither mh tlrawing, nor any pert thereof, may be C �NTECHe CON SPAN. VAML LOt 377A 2m9st 2117n01S
used, reproduced or modified in any manner 4written hout the prior consent of Contech. Failure to comply Is done
at the uaera own hes end Contech expmsely decasme any hal:nty orreepm-foilty for such use. ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC a -SERIES_ CON/SPAN O -Series 0530 30'-0" Span x 6'-5 3/8" Rise DYO13 ^ DYOB
If dlaorep—re. between the supplied,nic—bon upon which the drawing is based and..... Oak conditions are—.ContechES.com Cell – 8' Long DYOB 4�DVOB
4 encountered as site work progresses, these discrepancies must be reported to Contech immediately for 9D25 Cams. Points Dr., Sults 400. West Chaster, OH 45088 DYOB
i n-evstuallon of thed,sign. Contech accepts nc liability for designsbasedon missing, incomplete or inaccurate 800.33&1122 513-645-1000 51318 7993 FAX DRAINNG Wilmington, North Carolina en ND
8 Informal- wWl.d by omen,
5 5
Z
°
OC.I.P.
CONCRETE
BLOCKOUT IN PRECAST CROSS MEMBER
FOR CIP CONCRETE PASSAGE BETWEEN
CELLS
ZFOUNDATION
WIDTH
SECTION A
(NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
ry
E..�
QPRECAST WINGWALL
J
�5
REINFORCING 0 U_
BAR (TVP.)
EXPRESS FOUNDATIONS
INSIDE FACE OF "O"
SERIES LEG OF
PRECAST BRIDGE UNIT
PRECAST
CONCRETE
iI 734" x 5n' TAPERED
II KEYWAY(TYP.)
4" THICK GRANULAR
SUBFOOTING
08 BARS CONTINUOUS
TOP 8 BOTTOM
06 LAP SPLICE BARS IN TOP 8 BOTTOM
EITHER SIDE OF JOINT FOR
LONGITUDINAL BARS
1'-0"
(TVP )
II� STRUCTURE LIMITS
T,STRUCTURE — —
Y,"JOINT
(TVP.)
^ PRECAST CROSS CAST -IN-PLACE
rill v / GROUT MEMBER(TYR) CONCRETE(TYP.)
PRECAST
_ FOUNDATION
4" THICK GRANULAR
SUBFOOTING
SAMPLE PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN
SECTION B (NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
(NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC)
EXPRESS FOUNDATIONS
f€
o The design and information shown on this drawing is ywrovtded as a service to the project owner, engineer end gohcr w. rvo nsT[
contractor M Contech Engineered Solutions LLC('Contech'I. Neither mh tlrawing, nor any pert thereof, may be C �NTECHe CON SPAN. VAML LOt 377A 2m9st 2117n01S
used, reproduced or modified in any manner 4written hout the prior consent of Contech. Failure to comply Is done
at the uaera own hes end Contech expmsely decasme any hal:nty orreepm-foilty for such use. ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC a -SERIES_ CON/SPAN O -Series 0530 30'-0" Span x 6'-5 3/8" Rise DYO13 ^ DYOB
If dlaorep—re. between the supplied,nic—bon upon which the drawing is based and..... Oak conditions are—.ContechES.com Cell – 8' Long DYOB 4�DVOB
4 encountered as site work progresses, these discrepancies must be reported to Contech immediately for 9D25 Cams. Points Dr., Sults 400. West Chaster, OH 45088 DYOB
i n-evstuallon of thed,sign. Contech accepts nc liability for designsbasedon missing, incomplete or inaccurate 800.33&1122 513-645-1000 51318 7993 FAX DRAINNG Wilmington, North Carolina en ND
8 Informal- wWl.d by omen,
5 5

The Village at Motts Landing 2016 Ir Modification Supplemental information 5F—(S1
Appendix F
Lower Cape Fear Mitigation Bank Reservation Letters

LOWER CAPE FEAR UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
STATEMENT OF CREDIT AVAILIBILITY
July 3, 2014
TO: Dana Lutheran FROM: Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
SEGi c/o Land Management Group, Inc.
5315 South College Rd 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28412 Wilmington, NC 28403
Project: Motts Landing—Wilmington, NC
Dear Dana:
Pursuant to your recent credit request, the Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank (LCFUMB) is providing
confirmation of acceptance to supply wetland mitigation credits for impacts to non -riparian wetlands
associated with the Motts Landing project (Wilmington, NC). This acceptance is conditional upon receipt of
payment as outlined below. Please refer to the table below depicting the type and quantity of credits
requested and reserved for your project.
Mitigation Type
i
Stream
I Non- Riparian Wetland
i
Riparian Wetland
Credits Requested
0
Credits Reserved
0
0.5
0.0
Based upon receipt of your email request transmitted on July 2 (2014), LCFUMB will reserve 0.5 non -riparian
wetland credits for a period of up to 90 days from the date of this letter. Note that requests to reserve
credits beyond 90 days may require a deposit of up to 5% of the credit transfer fee.
Upon request for receipt of credit transfer, LCFUMB will issue an invoice in the amount of $25,156.50.
Upon receipt of payment, LCFUMB will provide an executed Transfer of Credit Certificate. Note that all
payments must be made with certified funds. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the credit
types and amounts requested are consistent with the compensatory mitigation requirements of the permit(s)
issued. LCFUMB and/or its agents are not responsible for determining the applicant's mitigation
requirements. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at
[phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Land nagement Group, Inc. (agent for LCFUMB)
C ristian Preziosi
Section Manager

The village at Motu Landing 201 6 IP Modification jupplemental information 5F—Gi
Appendix G
NC DOT Culvert and Retaining Wall Correspondence and Guidance
Vii

The Village at Motts Landing
New Hanover County
2"d Submittal Review Comments
Instead of SDMH #3, please use a curb inlet in the curbline.
Using retaining walls to keep the pipes short should not be allowed. If/when we need to replace
the pipes, replacing the walls would be an unnecessary burden on Division of Highways funds.
See attachments.
- On the pond outlet structure chart, no elevation is given for each orifice.
- When calculating the spread, the roadway cross slope should be 0.02 ft./ft. The typical section
on C8 shows %" per foot of fall. Please revise.
- When calculating the spread in the sags, the steepest longitudinal slope that should be used is
0.003 ft./ft. Please revise.
- There are no boxes located in the sag stations calculated from the vertical curve information
provided on both Glen Ellen Rd. and Jacob Mott Dr. Boxes should be located in the exact sag
location on each side of the road.
- The crossline pipe near 9+65 on Glen Ellen Road looks like it will be completely buried below the
natural ground. How will this pipe function using the elevations shown? Not acceptable as
currently designed.
- The cul-de-sac detail shows 22' from the back of curb to the back of curb, but the cul-de-sac
cross section shows 26' from back to back. Which is correct?
- On C11, the Invert Elevation A for 4 to 4A is incorrect in the table.
- For the HGL calculations, the inlet water surface is shown below the actual bottom of the box.
This is not possible. The pond elevation is not the controlling elevation for every box.
Grade direction arrows shown on the plan view do not match the profile at the beginning of
King David Court.
- According to the profile, the twin 48" pipes are not buried 20% below the stream elevation.
Pipes in the stream should also be analyzed as buried.

Culverts
A culvert is a conduit that conveys flow through the embankment. Culvert shapes may
include circular, rectangular, elliptical, pipe -arch, and arches. They range in size from
large multiple barrel culverts to single 18" pipes.
1. The minimum pipe size for cross pipe drainage is 18".
2. Culverts in a riverine environment must be designed for hydraulic conveyance
needs in accordance with Division of Highways criteria. Use of oversized
structures to circumvent environmental permit responsibility creates excessive
cost for Division of Highways in perpetual inspection/maintenance and future
replacement needs. Therefore, drainage structures that greatly exceed hydraulic
requirements for highway purposes will not be accepted for future maintenance
unless to refilse would create "considerable and real hardship" for the applicant.
Environmental permitting under a Nationwide Permit to avoid Individual Permit
does not constitute "considerable or real hardships." An example of a
"considerable and real hardship" would be the presence of "Threatened or
Endangered Species" as determined by USFW. Specific locations for use of
oversized structures should be coordinated with Division of Highways personnel
prior to design and construction of the subdivision.
3. Headwalls are generally used on the inlet end of culverts 36 -inch and larger.
Maximum height of headwalls shall be one foot above pipe structure. Neither
Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) nor Modular Block walls are considered
appropriate for culvert headwall applications.
4. Allowable headwater elevation is established based on designers' evaluation of
natural flow depths, potential flooding of upstream structures and land use, as
well as proposed roadway elevations. Culverts should be analyzed for both inlet
control and outlet control conditions. Where inlet control governs conveyance,
headwater depth is also limited to the ratio of headwater depth divided by pipe
diameter (rise for arches) equal to 1.2 or 1.5 feet below the shoulder point (at the
sag in vertical alignment), whichever results in the lower headwater depth.
Where outlet control governs conveyance, the allowable Head (H) should be
limited to 2 feet maximum and provide 1.5 feet freeboard below the shoulder
point.
5. The slope of a culvert should approximate that of the natural channel. The invert
elevation should be slightly below the natural bed ranging from 0.1 +/- feet for
small pipes to 1.0 +/- feet for large structures. The normal burial depth for pipes
less than or equal to 48" is 20% of the diameter. Pipes larger than 48" are buried
1.0 foot. Where fish passage is a primary consideration, the invert should be a
minimum of 1.0 feet below the natural bed. Baffles may be placed in the invert to
promote retention of bed material and formation of a low flow channel. If non -
erodible rock is found along the entire culvert length at a depth less than 5 feet, a
bottomless structure may be constructed on footings which can minimize
disturbance of the natural channel bed. NCDOT's Geotechnical Unit must review
subsurface investigation reports provided by applicant to confirm acceptable
foundation material prior to final selection of a "bottomless" culvert alternate.
19

Culverts must be long enough to accommodate the proposed typical roadway
section and a 2:1 fill slope, or flatter, from shoulder point to the crown of
structure or roof slab (not headwall).
7. Culverts must be designed to provide for minimum HL -93 live load.
8. Culverts shall be rated in accordance with the AASHTO Manual for Bridge
Evaluation and the current edition of the Stricture Design Unit Design Manual.
All design load ratings and legal load ratings shall be greater than 1.0.
Roadway Dams
1. In those cases, where no other feasible alternatives exist_. the utilization of a dam
for a roadway may be considered.
2. Where it is determined that a dans will be utilized as a roadway, the following
criteria must be met:
a. When applicable, the dam must have certification from the N. C.
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development pursuant
to the "Dam Safety Law of 1967," (as amended by the General Assembly
of 1977).
b. All pertinent data regarding the design of the embankment as an
impoundment structure must be presented to the Division of Highways for
review.
C. The top cross section dimension must be the roadway width required
(from shoulder point to shoulder point) for the facility plus a minimum of
4 feet.
d. Guardrail will be provided on the impoundment side of the roadway and
installed in accordance with North Carolina Roadway Standard Drawings.
For safety the District Engineer may require guardrail on both sides of the
roadway.
e. Spillway will be designed to provide 2 feet of freeboard at the shoulder for
an estimated 50 -year design frequency outflow as a minimum.
f. A means of draining the lake completely will be provided.
3. Design acceptance or approval by the Division of Highways is limited to the use
of the dam as a roadway and is in no way intended as approval of the
embankment as an impoundment structure.
4. Responsibility incurred by the Division of Highways when a section of roadway
crossing a dam is accepted as a part of the state maintenance system is limited to
maintenance of the roadway for highway purposes from shoulder point to
shoulder point only. Responsibility for the impoundment, any damage that may
result there from, and maintenance of the dam or appurtenances as may be
required to preserve its integrity as a water impoundment structure, shall remain
with the owner of the impoundment. Any such maintenance work will be subject
to the provisions of G.S. 136-93.
20

T,e Village at Motts Landing 201 6 IF Modification 5uPPlemental Information 5DSi
Appendix H
Motts Landing Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
viii

50utkem Environmental GrOUP) Inc.
55
15 jouth College Koad, juite E- • Wilmington, North Carolina 28-+12
910.452.2711 • rax: 1110.452.2899 • [e-mail]
www.secrws
The Village at Motts Landing
Mitigation Plan
Requested By:
AFTEW Properties, LLC
2020 South Churchill Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
Prepared By:
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
910.452.2711
6 June 2016

The Village at Motts Landing Mitigation Plan 9F G
Table of Contents
Section
Title
Page
1.
Introduction
3
2.
Wetland Impact Description
3
3.
Proposed Mitigation
3
A.
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4
B.
LCFMB Wetland Restoration Credit
4
C.
LCFMB Warm Water Stream Restoration Credit
4
4.
Summary
5
Table of Appendix
Number Title Page
A Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan and Profile Drawings i
2

Tire Village at Motts Landing Mitigation Flan 5E -6i
1. Introduction
AFTEW Properties, LLC (herein referred to as the "Applicant") has undertaken development activities within The
Village at Motts Landing Subdivision, which is located off Sanders and River Roads, in New Hanover County,
North Carolina. Previously issued permits, by the USACE and DWR, authorized the impact of 1.39 acres of Section
404 wetlands. Prior to the completion of the construction, the recession began and construction nearly halted. Since
that time, the Applicant has revised the site plan to meet the demands of the housing market (i.e. single family to
multi -family and back again). Based on this occurrence, a modification to the existing Individual Permit is
necessary.
The Applicant has retained Southern Environmental Group, Inc. to prepare a suitable mitigation plan to off -set all
unavoidable wetland impacts associated with the revised subdivision plan.
2. Wetland Impact Description
To facilitate the completion of the proposed subdivision, 0.80 acres of Section 404 wetlands, as well as 125 linear
feet of warm water stream will be impacted (see Appendix D for details of the impact areas). The areas, where
impacts are proposed, are classified as bottomland hardwood forest and pocosin wetlands.
3. Proposed Mitigation
The mitigation proposed below includes two mechanisms; permittee responsible restoration of riparian wetlands and
warm water stream and payment to the Lower Cape Fear Mitigation Bank (LCFMB).
A. Permittee Responsible Restoration
i. Construction Sequence
The first method of proposed mitigation includes the restoration of 0.04 acre of bottomland headwater
forest and 25 linear feet of warm water stream, which were filled prior to the Clean Water Act.
The first step, in restoring the wetland and stream, involves removing the existing soil road and culverts,
returning the area to its original grade and contour. If necessary, hydric soils from the areas where the new
road is to be constructed will be used to ensure good hydric material exist across the entire restoration area.
While the restoration work is taking place, the stream will be temporarily blocked upstream of the work, for
a period not to exceed eight hours. The short duration of blockage is not anticipated to cause flooding issues
up stream, as the feature exhibits good storage capacity in the flood plain.
The existing soil road will only be removed during a dry period and shall not be removed within 2 days of a
rain event that is anticipated to produce more than ''/2" of rain fall, within a 24 hour period. Stabilization of
the impact area will take place immediately after the fill has been removed. This will entail (1) lining the
stream banks and floodplain with coir matting, (2) seeding the area with a wetland seed mix and (3) planting
native wetland trees and herbaceous vegetation, such as those denoted in the table below:
Common Name
Scientific Name
Sweetbay magnolia*
Magnolia virginiana
Willow oak*
Quercus phellos
Winged elm*
Ulmus alata
Fedder bush
Leonia lucida
Common ferns
A minimum of 360 trees per acre will be planted, with no one species accounting for more than 20 percent
of the total. Please refer to the attached zoom and profile drawing of the proposed wetland and stream
mitigation area.

Tire Village at Motts Landing Mitigation Plan 5F—Gi
ii. Monitoring and Success Criteria
To ensure the successful restoration of this site, long term monitoring will be required. The key in attaining
the desired wetland restoration is to assure every measure will be taken to provide the conditions necessary
for wetland hydrology to develop in order to establish the desired vegetation. Vegetative counts will be
conducted for a five year period. Findings of the monitoring will be submitted to the USACE and DWR by
31 May of annually until the site has been deemed successful.
The success criteria of this mitigation site will be based on the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Manual. The mitigation site will be deemed successful once it meets the three wetland parameters outlined
in the manual and as further described in this section. The site can be deemed successful by meeting the
success criteria for two (2) consecutive years.
a. Vegetation
Vegetative data will be gathered, which includes survival data of the planted specimens and the presence
of nuisance species. Species diversity and composition will be noted. For success criteria to be met, we
would expect a survival rate of 320 planted trees per acre after 2 years, and 260 trees per acre after 5
years. No one species should account for more than 20% of the composition. Any area that does not meet
these requirements will be spot -planted.
b. Hydrology
Hydrologic monitoring will not be conducted. It is anticipated, based on the location of the restoration
area, that hydrology will exist once the soil road is removed.
c. Soils
It is anticipated that hydric soils are present under the soil road. Therefore, once the road is removed, the
soils will be unveiled and will be able to support the growth of the planted hydrophytic vegetation, as well
as naturally occurring vegetation. In the event hydric soils are not present or not sufficient, hydric soils,
from the area where the proposed road is to be constructed, will be applied. Soil monitoring is not
proposed as part of this mitigation plan.
B. LCFMB Wetland Restoration Credit
The Applicant proposes to make payment to the LCFMB for 0.86 acre of riparian wetland restoration credit and
0.66 acre of non -riparian wetland restoration credit. The payment will be made prior to the new impacts,
proposed within the permit application, taking place.
C. LCFUMB Warm Water Stream Restoration Credit
The Applicant proposed to make payment to the LCFMB for 100 linear feet of warm water stream wetland
restoration credit. The payment will be made prior to the new impacts, proposed within the permit application,
taking place.
According to the current In -Lieu Fee Schedule, the Applicant will be paying $178,039.90, to offset the proposed
impacts. However, by the time the permit is issued, the fee schedule is anticipated to increase by at least 2% and no
more than 4%, which would increase the cost to $181,600.70 and $185,161.50 respectively. The table on this and
the following page reflects the anticipated cost of the proposed mitigation.
Type of
Impact
Impact AC/LF to be
Mitigated
LCFMB Credits
(]:I &2:])
Fee Schedule
Anticipated Cost (] :l)
Anticipated Cost (2:1)
R
0.43
0.50/0.90
$71,201.00
$35,600.50
$64,080.90
NR
0.33
0.40/0.70
$51,370.00
$20,548.00
$35,959.00

Tke Villaye at Motts Landinj Mitigation Plan SF Cji
Stream
100
100
$390.00
$39,000.00
$78,000.00
Total
$95,148.50
$178,039.90
4. Summary
In summary, the Applicant proposes to impact 0.47 acre of riparian wetland, 0.33 acre on non riparian wetland and
125 linear feet of warm water stream, in order to facilitate the construction of roads, infrastructure, dwellings and
driveway accesses within The Village at Motts Landing subdivision. The loss of function of the wetlands and
stream will be offset by performing permittee responsible mitigation, in the form of restoring 0.04 acre of riparian
wetland and 25 linear feet of warm water stream, as well as making payment to the LCFMB for 0.86 acre of
riparian wetland restoration credit, 0.66 acre of non -riparian wetland restoration credit and 100 linear feet of
stream restoration credit. It is the Applicant's and SEGPs opinion that the proposed mitigation is sufficient to offset
the temporal and spatial losses of function of the wetlands and stream resulting from the development.
6�

The Village at Motts Landing Mitigation Plan 9F Cii
Appendix A
Permittee Responsible Restoration Plan and Profile Drawings

PROPOSED
WETLAND IMPACTS
O&��
PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED
IMPACTS
WETLAND RESTORATION AREA
PDE = PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT
114LF48'RCP SD
REINFORCED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE
DETA/L AREA FROYSHEET3OF3
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
SHEET 4 OF 4
FOR
AFTEW PROPERTIES LLC
THE VILLAGE AT MOTTS LANDING
FEDERAL POINT TOWNSHIP NEW HANOVER COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: NONE DATE: MAY 17, 2016
PDRT CITY
LAND SURVKIIND, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE No. P-1493
1144 SHIPYARD BLVD.
WILMINGTON, NC 28412
910-791.0080
PROJECT No. 16-0465
i' open space
�I a
'-JC
`\
\\\ c \ / 4K
\\ Z n NCDOT STD. ENDWALLNo. s.1un 5.0
EN DW LL No. 5
Iw510 ��` �, / / i' SLOPE GRADE
IMPACT AREA X
---- --- ' -�---- -
PDE 982 SF / 0.02 AC
-- 331
GLEN ELLEN DRIVE \
1,739 S.F.
0.04 Acres
EXIST. SOIL DRIVE
48' RCP TO BE REMOVED
RCPJ.rEXIST'
REMOVED AND RESTORED
J/ 25' LFf
�! OF STREAM POND No. 3
it TO BE RESTORED
r
C �\
O
0A
vn
DETAIL AREA
NOT TO SCALE
s
r
I
eBUR�
°
aMVNlli BI
_
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
NC GRID (NAD 83)
PROPOSED
WETLAND IMPACTS
O&��
PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED
IMPACTS
WETLAND RESTORATION AREA
PDE = PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT
114LF48'RCP SD
REINFORCED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE
DETA/L AREA FROYSHEET3OF3
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
SHEET 4 OF 4
FOR
AFTEW PROPERTIES LLC
THE VILLAGE AT MOTTS LANDING
FEDERAL POINT TOWNSHIP NEW HANOVER COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: NONE DATE: MAY 17, 2016
PDRT CITY
LAND SURVKIIND, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE No. P-1493
1144 SHIPYARD BLVD.
WILMINGTON, NC 28412
910-791.0080
PROJECT No. 16-0465
i' open space
�I a
'-JC
`\
\\\ c \ / 4K
\\ Z n NCDOT STD. ENDWALLNo. s.1un 5.0
EN DW LL No. 5
Iw510 ��` �, / / i' SLOPE GRADE
IMPACT AREA X
---- --- ' -�---- -
PDE 982 SF / 0.02 AC
-- 331
GLEN ELLEN DRIVE \
1,739 S.F.
0.04 Acres
EXIST. SOIL DRIVE
48' RCP TO BE REMOVED
RCPJ.rEXIST'
REMOVED AND RESTORED
J/ 25' LFf
�! OF STREAM POND No. 3
it TO BE RESTORED
r
C �\
O
0A
vn
DETAIL AREA
NOT TO SCALE
s
r
I

Wetland Line
The Village at Motts Landing
Stream and Wetland Restoration Profile Drawing
Stream
Channel
Existing Grade ^3' Existing Grade
_�z �z 44
1 Proposed Grade Proposed Grade
2 — 48" RCP to be removed
We
Line
3
,
,
,
1

Tke Village at Motts Landing 2016 IF Modification 5uPPlemental information 5F—Gi
Appendix I
Adjacent Property Owner Map
ix

village at Motts Landing Adjacent rroRertg Owners Maic- i
Wit, c
AP
AL
ut
+ "41
l
32 �
If moi• --
i
41
-....-..._�._.�� ice.

The Village at Motts Landing 2016 IP Modification Supplemental Information 5F—Cji
Appendix J
Previous Project Layouts

U
S .._ �J�' sd a•M�
el.
Twp
87GIIiEgiQiG, P.0 wsnaxu n�ec1' MeC6aetaul 94ea1 Mfflll
Cero�. �•�I THE VILLAGE ® MOTTS LANDING—PHASE II
4=1"7r, -C
NOM CAWLNA
1. 1

0""r
1{'r. -
��
�wa�Oaim
OUT PARCEL
31.71 ACRES Vl
Fr
0""r
1{'r. -
-�� �4 c• ►v Iq
a� ��a _ _ .�►.�Y kw
�/��
- , a ,cs
DATE PRINTED (ON
SEP 2 1 2012
6) 4�Lo
LO_GATI� OtJ MAP � q
0A Lgo She ate. 0.
r p
� v
'--- •a T
VO 19
a,A
��
�wa�Oaim
+�ZIkill
II
-�� �4 c• ►v Iq
a� ��a _ _ .�►.�Y kw
�/��
- , a ,cs
DATE PRINTED (ON
SEP 2 1 2012
6) 4�Lo
LO_GATI� OtJ MAP � q
0A Lgo She ate. 0.
r p
� v
'--- •a T
VO 19
a,A
��
�wa�Oaim
•mss,:: ,
�,. W,

62
w" *' - J_ — �41�
MITIGATION a6 SF 3 q 55
MITIG 3 �_
[ON ..:MTI T
31 SA
RIEQ STED 3 F 44
2 ITIG
DN-.:
400 SF MATCH LINE SHEET 2
0 le :653 4f
ED MATCH LINE SHEET I
TED N 0171GATIOR
R 'Qu E TE 1,*REQUESTED,\
290 82 40
ORD
BURT 319 349
0
341
woo 32350
Zea` 321 --- 1882 NC PR
OF M
284 322 REQU
F
ATION 1; ILOTS 066, 6�-n-4A@Wr, �WTS
REQUESTED RE-LOCATED ME to PLACEMENT 34 BRIM P
ReQUE$T NEEDED FdR STD�HVATER POND
324 352 _ ------ -- _­AE&0fff-jK LOGTH OF KITTSAII! 3(- 33
337 FOREST ROAD. I
----------- 1 :
32
396 SF 7- 353 ns I.Lhk RD
::MITIGATION 336 0 At f
REQUESTED 325 354 1
I _. LOCATION
281 z 335 241 P NOT TO SCALE
326 240 4 ACT RXINrAl 'AS
355 1 DE TED Mo. si6KED o THE
280 M
T
Tj
impact 242 4 NC GRID (NAD 83)
Remove ------- 334 ­­­ 1 2441 243% 2 CM OF ON I
3W 239 FqMJARY &,-N� (USAGE MN 1j, 26
279 Mini' iz 243
77 ........ '�'4 27
SF 333 230 247
------- MEADOW
ATI
278 COURT�l
�L_f_ 357 237 (1.330 SFRS NO IR \ -A \•�­
76 DUETORE.A11014WNT 25
8 PDREST RD, 9EGUMT ADDITIONAL WETLAND
say» NG 1 277 Remove impact 236 'Mt '0Rn0KF0R­_­ MITIGATION REQUESTED
IDA ��i I
- ___­ — ", ­ i I I I % +7
de 3311 2w 133 SF) 4
,.I
REQ ES 0
234 697 SF
Remove impact 254 146 MITIGATION I MrT IOM
233
L 255 aREA VITHE PREVIOUS WETLAND
A
LF Q E A MITIGATION APPROVED
23tN­ L WITH REFERENCE NUMBER
ff-D 7_1%
2" 2=28 REQUESTED
440 SF 91 24 76 - WETLAND MITIGATION
N
77 SHEET 2 OF 2
...... W.
MITIGA Rlsobu 23 FOR
7a
f t 2W MIT ATION 06 At- I I:VV PROPERTIES LLC
,e MRE 47 so\ 93 THE VILLAGE AT HMS LANDING
UESTED 55 FMAL POINT WWOF ww MCM CW,
V%ssr ­- 54 8D
Ty ARW P 53' 1!
51
T" NORTH CARUNA
46 w t 52
, % 48 1 49 at Y= 2W WDI 13,2D15
7__
DE,,GotED AND
34 %� t. 1 ­ . \ 64 L ----- - M 82
O*t rf uw­ t PARKS
kLi_s� 42 43 fA:7 ----- -- t7
.i 1 0 'a, 41, 41 46 MOUNT LAM—.-- q
.1100 ? i \ 85 i3
tcw� _QM7) - I w . "I
0 1
awy
87 �u. Tw 84 "1 MHSSDK I&
89 k
72 1
VA SEAL
a6 MN Nos —t 85 J, VDA" 2Y9 Glogi Q 7k
.. .... 71 7D 1 16
73 POW FA 9W7%. o.,
34 200 00 a
Nr i 87
T7 gas --\I 14