20160225 Ver 1_401 Application_20171217

viol
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
December 1, 2017 D
Ms. Karen Higgins 11
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality r 0 5 W17
Division of Water Resources, 401 &Buffer Permitting Unit
4018 BUFF R P RMITT
512 SalisburyStreet
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 27
and Water Quality Certification No. 3885
Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank — South Fork Site
Chatham County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Please find four copies of our PCN package for the subject project and a check for the application fee.
We have included the following supporting data
• Vicinity, USGS Topographical, Existing Conditions, Soils Maps,
• impact figure,
• PCN form,
• photolog,
• agency correspondence,
• agent Authorization,
• USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination, and
• A copy of the draft plan set.
The goals of the project are to
• Return the network of streams to a stable form,
• Improve aquatic habitat in project streams,
• Raise local groundwater elevations and allow for more frequent overbank flows, and reduce
shear stress on channels during larger flow events,
• Create and improve riparian habitats, and
• Permanently protect the site from harmful land uses.
The same information has been provided to the USACE Raleigh Field Office. If you have any questions,
please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Charlie Neaves
Environmental Scientist

1 �
Hydrologic Unit (8 -Digit)
South Fork Site
O
I oyu^k�c 'bey, Other Cane Creekd Bank Sites
C ha{e,I RKkje
Goff Club
I
6
S
I 7 _Gree mf
L
tiler City`
Blood
G�peM--- -._
INV SierCity MeedoyC
0
768 R Country �eO4 4 Club
4• p
f.
V
Topography
WILDLANDS 0 2.5 Miles
ENGINEERING I I I I I
tand""n Creek
Vicinity Map
South Fork Mitigation Plan
Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Cape Fear River Basin 03030002
Alamance and Chatham Counties, NC
v
i �
I
v
974 If
CANE CREEK MOUNTAINS
I
May Leek
�edk
i
I
I
� �
1
Cane Gteek
Srtaa Camp
—I
a`I
pl
Q
Q
r
Y
G�
+
I
v
�
i
�
1
Pine Hill Branch Site
n
At-Ah.iANCE
1
CHATHAM
Bethel Branch Site
�ff;F
eew
G
`�r r
aQ, F�
elljerrelis
South Fork Site
G�8-1
l
C ha{e,I RKkje
Goff Club
I
6
S
I 7 _Gree mf
L
tiler City`
Blood
G�peM--- -._
INV SierCity MeedoyC
0
768 R Country �eO4 4 Club
4• p
f.
V
Topography
WILDLANDS 0 2.5 Miles
ENGINEERING I I I I I
tand""n Creek
Vicinity Map
South Fork Mitigation Plan
Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Cape Fear River Basin 03030002
Alamance and Chatham Counties, NC

■■ Conservation Easement
71�1� 1 rf ��-•�+ 1
Project Boundary
ri irul I fi},f�}l �. ri rii-ori i rla '
_ _ _ 4�r r' j• { rr � _
,
10. Vii` k, -
600 f t + J l
1ti ■I.I Irj.. �•—
�'•' �f"fi.rl rlrl li'�� i'i�lrlrlai I�r
t r
0 175 350 Feet USGS Topographic Map
WILD LANDS P South Fork Mitigation Plan
ENGINEERING Cane Creek Umbrella Site Mitigation Bank
Cape Fear Basin 03030002
Chatham County, NC

Site Map
WILD LANDS 0 175 350 Feet South Fork Mitigation Plan
ENGINEERING I I I Cane Creek Umbrella Site Mitigation Bank
Cape Fear River Basin 03030002
Chatham County, NC

t
Soils Map
0 175 350 Feet
WI LDLAND S South Fork Mitigation Plan
ENGINEERING l I I Cane Creek Umbrella Site Mitigation Bank
Cape Fear River Basin 03030002
Chatham County, NC

Impact Figure

r
Project Boundary
Proposed Conservation Easement
e
Perennial Streams
v i UT
..$'J �. � _ —-•..:., Lug."___�:
Intermittent Streams
Jim
AM
A Stream
• . try . s `4tTM
Existing Wetlands\ R
f Detention Basln BMP
- - t.
Wetland Im
pacts Wetland 0
x.✓ ,
Internal Crossing
k$ 50' Easement Break
With Ford Crossing
Temporary•
Reach Breaks etland P - y
4,
o Wetland M �.
SF4A - R3
Temporary Crossing
J
/ Wetland K
Wetland L
SPSC BMP
wetland N / eQ
Wetland 1
SMA - R2
Wetland •,ya
\1 _„
Wetland F
s � .
Wetland CII�I�!
I
lit i
Wetland B \ t '
�etland A ^
Wetland D
30' internal Easement z Sc4q '
Crossing with Culvert RI a
� Q -
ca
UTI - RZ a\;
2013 Aerial Photography

O�O� W A T E9�G
t I >5
-
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: No. 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
_T_❑
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank South Fork Site
2b.
County:
Chatham
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Snow Camp
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
James Michael Lindley
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
1.) DB 1701 PN 1135
2.) DB 1369 PN 0239
3.) DB 1369 PN 0239
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC (Wildlands Engineering, Inc.) contact:
Jeff Keaton
3d.
Street address:
1430 South Mint St., Suite 104
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-332-7754
3g.
Fax no.:
704-332-3306
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent X Other, specify: Bank Sponsor
4b.
Name:
Jeff Keaton
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
4d.
Street address:
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27609
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-851-9986
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Charlie Neaves
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27609
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-851-9986 x114
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 14

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1.) 1077
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
2.) 1078
3.) 86079 (parcel ID's)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.82608 Longitude: -79.380596
1 c. Property size:
18 acres (easement area)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
South Fork Cane Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -V; NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear 03030002
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is in a rural watershed in northwestern Chatham County, NC. Land surrounding the project area is used
for cattle grazing and row crop production. Forested buffers are present along some of the project stream reaches. Cattle
access to stream reaches have caused bank erosion, incision, and instability.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.41
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
6713
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to provide stream mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Mitigation will include stream restoration, enhancement I, and enhancement II to approximately 6713 linear feet of
existing perennial and intermittent streams.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Stream restoration will involve excavation of a new channel that is designed to be functional and stable. Stream
dimension, pattern, and profile have been designed to provide a cross-sectional area sized for frequent overbank flows, a
stable bed with variable bed forms using in -stream structures, well -vegetated bank slopes, a well-connected floodplain,
and improvements to aquatic habitat and water quality. Enhancement I reaches will include a combination of localized
channel reconstruction similar to restoration reaches and bank stabilization/repairs. Enhancement II reaches are
relatively stable, and the existing channel will be left in place. Bank stabilization and repair will be performed where
necessary. All project reaches will be placed in a conservation easement to protect the project in perpetuity. The entire
easement will be fenced to exclude livestock, and native trees, shrubs, and herbaceaous plants will be planted on the
streambanks and floodplain. Excavators will be used for channel construction and grading, and off road dump trucks will
be used for hauling soil.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
X Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
Agency/Consultant Company: Wildlands Engineering,
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Inc.
Name (if known): Win Taylor
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was issued by Andrew Williams of the USACE on May 3, 2017. A copy of the
issued Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (Action Id. SAW -2016-02364) is enclosed with submittal.
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 14

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
X Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Tem orar T
W1 X P ❑ T
Fill - Stream
Riparian Riverine
El Yes
X Corps
0.001
Restoration
X No
X DWQ
W2 X P ❑ T
Fill - Stream
Riparian Riverine
El Yes
X Corps
0.016
Restoration
X No
X DWQ
W3 X P El T
Fill - Stream
Riparian Riverine
Ri
El Yes
X Corps
0.005
Restoration
X No
X DWQ
W4 X P ❑ T
Fill - Stream
Restoration
Riparian Riverine
X Yes
El No
X Corps
X DWQ
0.014
W5 X P [:1 T
Fill - Stream
Restoration
Riparian Riverine
X Yes
El No
X Corps
X DWQ
0.005
W6 X P ❑ T
Fill - Stream
Restoration
Riparian Riverine
X Yes
El No
X Corps
X DWQ
0.014
W7 X P ❑ T
Fill - Stream
Restoration
Riparian Riverine
X Yes
El No
X Corps
X DWQ
0.019
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.074
2h. Comments: Wetland impact numbers correspond with labeled wetlands on the impact figure as such: W1 = C, W2 = D, W3
= D, W4 = E, W5 = J W6 = P, W7 = P.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization
S F4A-R1 (103+04
103+37)
X PER
❑ INT
X Corpsto
X DWQ
24
33
S2 ❑ P X T
Channel Grading
SF4A-R1 (103+56
to 103+73)
X PER
❑ INT
X Corps
X DWQ
24
17
S3 X P ❑ T
Fill — Restoration
SF4A-R2
X PER
❑ INT
X Corps
X DWQ
24
1805
S4 X P ❑ T
Fill — Restoration
SF4A (intermittent
❑ PER
X Corps
17
278
side channel)
X INT
X DWQ
S5 ❑ P X T
Grading
Channel Gradin
SF4A-R3 (120+74
to 120+90)
X PER
❑ INT
X Corps
X DWQ
15
16
S6 ❑ P X T
Temporary
Crossing, Bank
SF4A-R3 (122+03
X PER
X Corps
15
38
Stabilization
to 122+41)
❑ INT
X DWQ
Page 5of14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S7 ❑PXT
Bank Stabilization
S F4A-R3 (123+07
X PER
X Corpsto
15
23
123+30)
[:1 INT
X DWQ
S8 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization
SF4A-R3 (124+60
X PER
X Corps
15
22
to 124+82)
❑ INT
X DWQ
S9 ❑ P X T
Channel Grading
SF4A-R3 (127+25
X PER
X Corps
15
14
to 127+39)
❑ INT
X DWQ
S10 X P ❑ T
Fill — Restoration
SF4A-R4
X PER
❑ INT
X Corps
X DWQ
14
756
S11 ❑PXT
Bank Stabilization
UT1-R1 (201+51
El PER
X Corps
6
17
to 201+68)
X INT
X DWQ
S12 ❑PXT
Bank Stabilization
UT1-R1 (201+96
[:1 PER
X Corps
6
8
to 202+04)
X INT
X DWQ
S13 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization
UT1-R1 (203+19
❑ PER
X Corps
6
26
to 203+45
X INT
X DWQ
S14 ❑ P X T
Channel Grading
UT1-R1 (203+58
X PER
X Corps
6
21
to 203+79)
❑ INT
X DWQ
UT1-R2 (203+79
❑PER
X Corps
S15 X P ❑ T
Fill — Restoration
to end int.
X INT
X DWQ
6
83
channel)
UT1-R2 (start per.
X PER
X Corps
S16 X P ❑ T
Fill — Restoration
Channel to
❑INT
X DWQ
61
169
confluence)
S17 ❑PXT
Bank Stabilization,
In -Stream
UT2 (300+97 to
❑ PER
X Corps
1
6
Structure
301+03)
X INT
X DWQ
S18 X P ❑ T
Fill —
UT2
❑ PER
X Corps
1
264
Enhancement I
X INT
X DWQ
S19 ❑PXT
Bank Stabilization,
In -Stream
UT2 (304+12 to
❑ PER
X Corps
1
6
Structure
304+18)
X INT
X DWQ
S20 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization,
In -Stream
UT2 (304+28 to
❑ PER
X Corps
1
6
Structure
304+34)
X INT
X DWQ
S21 ❑PXT
Bank Stabilization,
In -Stream
UT2 (304+63 to
❑ PER
X Corps
1
6
Structure
304+69) .
X INT
X DWQ
S22 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization,
In -Stream
UT2 (305+75 to
❑ PER
X Corps
1
6
Structure
305+81)
X INT
X DWQ
S23 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization,
In -Stream
UT2 (306+16 to
X PER
X Corps
1
6
Structure
306+22)
❑ INT
X DWQ
S24 X P ❑ T
Fill —
UT2
X PER
X Corps
1
336
Enhancement I
❑ INT
X DWQ
S25 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization
UT3 (401+83 to
❑ PER
X Corps
3
8
401+91)
X INT
X DWQ
S26 ❑PXT
Bank Stabilization
UT4-R1 (500+53
1-1PERX
Corps
4
12
to 500+65)
X INT
X DWQ
S27 ❑PXT
Bank Stabilization
UT4-R1 (501+22
El PER
X Corps
4
5
to 501+27
X INT
X DWQ
S28 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization
UT4-R1 (501+35
❑ PER
X Corps
4
8
to 501+43)
X INT
X DWQ
S29 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization
UT4-R1 (502+14
❑ PER
X Corps
4
27
to 502+41)
X INT
X DWQ
Page 6 of 14

S30 ❑ P X T
Channel Grading
UT3-R1 (502+85
❑ PER
X Corps
4
8
to 502+93
X INT
X DWQ
-1T
UT4-R2 (502+93
El PER
X Corps
S31 X P F
Fill — Restoration
to end int.
X INT
X DWQ
4
102
channel)
UT4-R2 (start
X PER
X Corps
S32 X P [:1T
Fill — Restoration
perennial channel
❑INT
X DWQ
4
370
to confluence)
S33 ❑ P X T
Bank Stabilization,
In -Stream
UT5 (605+31 to
❑ PER
X Corps
3
24
Structure
605+55)
X INT
X DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
4526
3i. Comments: Proposed stationing is provided to help locate structure and bank stabilization impacts on the draft plan set.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 7 of 14

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then
complete the chart below.
If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then
you MUST fill out Section D
of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse
❑Tar -Pamlico E] Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 8 of 14

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. .
Stream restoration and enhancement I activities will introduce fill material to existing reaches, but are designed to have
an overall positive impact. Stream impacts will be avoided or minimized to project reaches that exhibit less instability and
incision. These reaches are generally proposed for enhancement II which will primarily involve riparian buffer
improvement, cattle exclusion, and localized bank stabilization. Stream alignments for restoration reaches were designed
to avoid existing wetlands as much as possible and minimize grading impacts. Unavoidable impacts to wetlands are due
to floodplain grading or conversion of wetland to stream channel.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Priority I restoration and enhancement I will involve constructing offline channel sections which will minimize
sedimentation to aquatic systems during construction. Newly constructed channel banks will be stabilized using
biodegradable coir fiber matting, seeded, and planted with native riparian species. During construction culverts and mud
mats will be utilized for temporary crossings. Construction practices will follow guidelines'from the NC Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
F1 Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
.3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 9of14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 10 of 14

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: The planted, protected floodplain will serve to diffuse overland flow.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This
project involves the restoration and
enhancement of on-site jurisdictional streams and wetlands. No increase in impervious surface will result from the
construction of this project.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The stream mitigation project will not cause an increase in development nor will it negatively impact downstream water
quality. The project area will be protected in perpetuity from future development through a conservation easement.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
X Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
X Raleigh ❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Wildlands utilized the USFWS and NC Natural Heritage program databases to search for federally listed threatened and
endangered plant and animal species in Chatham County, NC. The Cape Fear Shiner, Red Cockaded Woodpecker, and
the Harperella are federally listed endangered species in Chatham County. The USFWS commented that the project is
not likely to adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species or their critical habitat.
Correspondence with the USFWS is enclosed in this submittal.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes X No
The NC Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) was contacted for comment related to fish and wildlife issues
associated with the proposed mitigation project. The NCWRC did not respond with any specific fish and wildlife related
concerns, but recommended the use of fish and wildlife friendly construction materials. Correspondence with NCWRC is
included in this submittal.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office was contacted regarding
presence of historic and archaeological resources within the project area. Correspondence with the NC State Historic
Preservation office is included in this submittal.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
X Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The downstream end of the project (South Fork 4A Reach 4) is within the FEMA flood fringe. Wildlands is coordinating
with the local Floodplain Administrator and the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program to ensure that all regulatory
requirements are met. It is likely that a floodplain development permit will be required. Correspondence with the
Chatham County Floodplain Administrator is included in this submittal.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Chatham County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 8784
'�/� �
12/1/17
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Charlie Neaves
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 13 of 14

�fi iw �� 't{e. i`►�1°". �r'
-
j
� ;, est •< � � �; � .� �g �. � 1 . -
aid
�`�.,n � a•+ � �.. _ - .'-ate � � `� `� ��M ' _� ' tic. '->:
!B{'n'
t, . _ 1 ':P is ~.i>•'�_ -a, i _
i C :•+# ay. 11 1 .■N\ie1; '� i jk.s ,'y t W wm s k•
,�' }y'
t4x, v
r
R .pfd ;.- .
��
+
11
tltltl"'
.
x
...-
/
4 r«
�i
y
h

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
April 1, 2o16
Shannon Deaton
North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission
Division of Inland Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Subject: Cane Creek Mitigation Bank
Alamance and Chatham Counties, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Deaton,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that
might emerge with respect to fish and wildlife issues associated with the proposed
Cane Creek Mitigation Bank. The stream mitigation bank includes three sites: Pine Hill
Branch, Bethel Branch, and South Fork. A USGS map and aerial maps showing the
approximate project areas are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the
Crutchfield Crossroads and Silk Hope, 7.5 -Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangles.
The Cane Creek Mitigation Bank is being developed to provide in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable stream channel impacts. Several sections of channel have been identified
as significantly degraded. The project will include stream restoration, enhancement,
and preservation. The site has historically been disturbed due to agricultural use,
primarily for livestock production.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to
contact us with any questions that you may have concerning this project.
Sincerely,
Ruby M. Davis
Environmental Scientist
Attachment:
USGS Topographic Map
Aerial Map
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203 - (P) 704-332-7754 (F) 704-332-3306

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
June 28, 2016
Ms. Ruby Davis
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: Request for Environmental Information for the Cane Creek Mitigation Bank, Chatham and
Alamance Counties, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Davis,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
proposed project description. Comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the Clean
Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. proposes to complete a stream restoration project to provide in-kind
mitigation for unavoidable stream channel impacts. The proposed project, referred to as the Cane Creek
Mitigation Bank, has three sites: Pine Hill Branch, Bethel Branch and South Fork. The Pine Hill Branch
site is located southeast of the intersection of Clark and Holman Mill Roads, southeast of Snow Camp.
There are records for the state -significantly rare, Carolina ladle crayfish (Cambarus davidi), in an
unnamed tributary of the Pine Hill Branch site. The Bethel Branch site is located northeast of the
intersection of Moon Lindley and RE Wright Roads, north of Siler City. The South Fork site is located
southwest of the intersection of Moon Lindley and Johnny Lindley Roads, north of Siler City. The
proposed work will involve stream restoration, enhancement and preservation. The site has historically
been disturbed as a result of agricultural use. The project site includes unnamed tributaries to South Fork
Cane Creek in the Cape Fear River basin.
Stream restoration projects often improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Establishing native, forested
buffers in riparian areas will help protect water quality, improve aquatic and terrestrial habitats and
provide a travel corridor for wildlife species. The NCWRC recommends the use of biodegradable and
wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products
should have loose -weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the
vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing and similar products that have been reinforced with plastic or
metal mesh should be avoided as they impede the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt
and sediment loads can have detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning
habitat, suffocation of eggs and clogging of gills. Any invasive plant species that are found onsite should
be removed.
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]

Page 2
June 28, 2016
Scoping — Cane Creek Mitigation Bank
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If I can be of further assistance,
please contact me at [phone] or gabriela.garrison(a ncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
April 1, 2016
Dale Suiter
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
PO Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636
Subject: Cane Creek Mitigation Bank
Alamance and Chatham Counties, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Suiter,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to endangered species, migratory birds or other trust resources associated
with the proposed Cane Creek Mitigation Bank. The stream mitigation bank includes three
sites: Pine Hill Branch, Bethel Branch, and South Fork. A USGS map and aerial maps showing
the approximate project areas are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the
Crutchfield Crossroads and Silk Hope, 7.5 -Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangles.
The Cane Creek Mitigation Bank is being developed to provide in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable stream channel impacts. Several sections of channel have been identified as
significantly degraded. The project will include stream restoration, enhancement, and
preservation. The site has historically been disturbed due to agricultural use, primarily for
livestock production.
According to your website (http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/reports/species-by-current-range-
county?), there are no federally -listed species in Alamance County. The Cape Fear shiner, Red -
cockaded woodpecker and the Harperella are the federally listed endangered species for
Chatham County. Due to the recent listing of the Northern long-eared bat and the forested
nature of the site, we are requesting a specific review and any known information regarding this
species, along with the federally listed species.
If we have not heard from you in 3o days we will assume that you do not have any comments
regarding associated laws and that you do not have any information relevant to this projects at
the current time.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact
us with any questions that you may have concerning this project.
Sincerely,
Ruby M. Davis
Environmental Scientist
Attachment:
USGS Topographic Map and Aerial MapAerial Map
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 Charlotte, NC 28203 ° (P) 704-332-7754 ° (F) 704-332-3306

P�ME11T OF>y United States Department of the Interior
a FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
CM s Asa Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 22, 2016
Ruby Davis
Wildlands Engineering Inc
1430 S. Mint St., Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Re: Cane Creek Mitigation Bank — Alamance & Chatham Counties, NC
Dear Mrs. Davis:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally -protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
tederally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
' The teen "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above-referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down-gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Emily Wells of this office
at [phone] ext. 25.
Sincerely,
Pete min
Field Supervisor
3

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
4
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

W
w
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
April 1, 2016
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Cane Creek Mitigation Bank
Alamance and Chatham Counties, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with the Cane Creek
Mitigation Bank, a stream mitigation bank located on three sites: Pine Hill Branch, Bethel
Branch, and South Fork. A USGS site map and aerial maps with approximate project areas are
enclosed.
The Cane Creek Mitigation Bank is being developed to provide in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable stream channel impacts. Several sections of channel have been identified as
significantly degraded. The project will include stream restoration, enhancement, and
preservation. The site has historically been disturbed due to agricultural use, primarily for
livestock production.
We ask that you review this site based on the attached information to determine the presence
of any historic properties.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact
us with any questions that you may have concerning the project.
Sincerely,
Ruby M. Davis
Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 Charlotte, NC 28203 (P) 704-332-7754 (F) 704-332-3306

A STATE ¢
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
July 1, 2016
Ruby Davis
Wildlands Engineering
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Re: Cane Creek Mitigation Bank, Alamance and Chatham Counties, ER 16-1133
Dear Ms. Davis:
Thank you for your email of June 24, 2016, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review(a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
6f, Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

From: Nicole Macaluso
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 12:11 PM
To: 'Brian Burkhart' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jeff Keaton <4keaton@wild landseng.com>
Subject: Cane Creek - South Fork Site
Brian,
We are in the process of preparing an umbrella mitigation bank in the Cape Fear River basin. The first
site to be developed under the Can Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank is the South Fork Site, located in
Chatham County near the intersection of Moon Lindley Road and Johnny Lindley Road. The project
includes restoration and enhancement of perennial and intermittent streams along four unnamed
tributaries to South Fork Cane Creek, as well as riparian buffer restoration. This project will achieve
numerous ecological and water quality improvements including reduction in nutrients and sediment
input as well as creation of in -stream and terrestrial habitat and reduction of stream channel velocities.
We currently have several similar projects through private mitigation banks as well as through the NC
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). These projects are in various phases of completion in Chatham
and surrounding counties.
As part of the project, we will be obtain a conservation easement around the project limits. The project
area is located on FIRM panel 8784 (shown in Figure 4). The downstream project limits are within the
flood fringe of South Fork, however, the unnamed tributaries that we will be working on are not
currently modeled and do not appear sketched on the FIRM panel as they extend only to the outer limits
of the South Fork floodplain boundary.
I have prepared a technical memo which includes our analysis and calculations regarding the effects of
the proposed stream enhancement and restoration project on nearby South Fork, to which the main
project reach drains downstream. The figures and construction plans were too large to attach to this
email, so I have uploaded them to a dropbox folder here,
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xh6u8V9sg3wui76/AABRDSv8EKLuB1g2QONgaAV5a?dl=0.
Upon your review of the technical letter, construction plans, and supplemental calculations, please
respond with your concurrence that our analysis satisfies the requirements of the county. If you need
any additional information, please let me know.
If floodplain development permits are applicable to this site, please provide the latest copy of the FDP
form and fee information. Thank you.
Nicole Macaluso, PE, CFM I Water Resources Engineer
0:919.851.9986 x104 M: 919.274.7738
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 W. Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609

From: Nicole Macaluso [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 3:05 PM
To: Brian Burkhart <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jeff Keaton <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cane Creek - South Fork Site
Brian,
Just following up on my earlier email. When you've had an opportunity to review, please respond with
your written concurrence. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss. Thank
you.
Nicole
From: Brian Burkhart [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 8:58 AM
To: Nicole Macaluso <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jeff Keaton <Ikeaton@wild landseng.com>; Rachael Thorn <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cane Creek - South Fork Site
Good morning Nicole. Sorry for the delay.
I concur that a detailed hydrologic analysis will not be required for the work proposed. It's difficult for
me to tell what work, if any, is proposed within the flood hazard. If any is proposed, you will need to
submit for a floodplain permit.
As far as additional permits, will you be obtaining all others, particularly erosion control, from the State
or the County?
Brian Burkhart, P.E.
Environmental Quality Director
Chatham County
919-545-7875
In keeping with the NC Public Records Law, e-mails, including attachments, may be released to others
upon request for inspection and copying.
From: Nicole Macaluso [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:40 PM
To: Brian Burkhart <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jeff Keaton <[e-mail]>; Rachael Thorn <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cane Creek - South Fork Site
Hi Brian. I appreciate your time to review. Within the South Fork mapped floodplain, the proposed
work on SF4A includes some slight channel realignment and the addition of grade control structures and
bank revetments to stabilize the stream banks and provide in -stream habitat. I have attached the
portion of construction plans shown with the current mapped floodplain boundary overlaid in
red. Note: This boundary is flood fringe extending up an unnamed tributary to South Fork (labeled SF4A

in our plans). South Fork mainstem is mapped and modeled with the boundary extending up the
unnamed tributary shown on our plans.
To clarify, is a County floodplain permit required for work on any stream, or only along the FEMA
regulated streams? Yes, we will also be submitting an erosion control permit through Land Quality. As
well, we are preparing to submit the 401 and 404 permits for the project within the next couple weeks.
Nicole
From: Brian Burkhart[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 3:04 PM
To: Nicole Macaluso <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jeff Keaton <jkeaton@wi►dlandseng.com>; Rachael Thorn <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Cane Creek - South Fork Site
OK, thanks for the updated plan. The Floodplain Development Permit is required for any work proposed
within the SFHA. Looks like you will need to get one based on the proposed plan even though the impact
is expected to be negligible.
As part of that process, you should secure all other permits first, then apply for the floodplain permit
and submit copies of those permits along with your submittal.
The permit application is here: http://www.chathamnc.org/home/showdocument?id=15052
There is a $150 fee associated with the permit application.
Please let me know if you have additional questions.
Brian Burkhart, P.E.
Environmental Quality Director
Chatham County
919-545-7875
In keeping with the NC Public Records Law, e-mails, including attachments, may be released to others
upon request for inspection and copying.

--w
Agent Authorization

Landowner Authorization Form
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed Book: Page: County: Chk-C�+�Km
t3�-9 Uzi
t'16 i «?, 5
Street Address: U,*�
Property Owner (please print):
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above property, do hereby authorize the NC
Division of Mitigation Services, the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and
the US Army Corps of Engineers, their employees, agents or assigns to have reasonable access to
the above referenced property for the evaluation of the property as a potential stream, wetland
and/or riparian buffer mitigation project, including conducting stream and/or wetland
determinations and delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required permit(s) or
certification(s).
Property Owners(s) Address: k -".-N -j L- - -t V-- I<n l ZNow c e—, v , a2'L"S`-eg
Property Owner Telephone Number:
Me hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge.
perty Owner Author Led Signature)
(Property Owner Authorized Signature)
a 1: 6'
(Date)
(Date)

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): March 30, 2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Win Taylor
497 Bramson Court, Suite 104
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office, C,4.V-c, ("en'k_ A -LY01- &4 -hl fV0_
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The South Fork Site is located off of Johnny Lindley Road northwest of the Town
of Pittsborro in northwestern Chatham County, NC (Figures 1 and 2). The South
Fork Site is in the planning and design phase for the development of a stream
and wetland mitigation bank. To date, a draft mitigation plan is being developed
and Wildlands is currently in the process of finalizing easement boundaries. The
project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 6,300
linear feet of stream.
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Chatham City: Snow Camp
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.826080 Long. 79.380596
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork Cane Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 6,715 linear feet: 5 - 15 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: Unconsolidated Bottom - Streambed
Stream Flow: Perennial & Intermittent
Wetlands: 0.412 acres.
Cowardin Class: Palustrine Emergent & Forested Wetlands
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: N/A
Non -Tidal: N/A

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
�] Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
2

to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: Wildlands Engineering.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant. Wildlands Engineering
[ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5 Minute
Cruthchfields Crossroads Quadrangles.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
Chatham County Soils.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2013.
or ® Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
3/30/2017
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Table x. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters
Jurisdictional Feature
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
Estimated Amount of Aquatic
Class of Aquatic
Resource in Review Area
Resource
SF4A
35.825092
-79.380120
Riverine-Streambed
3,783
Perennial Non -Wetland
Water
SF4A
35.825036
-79.380126
Riverine-Streambed
279
Intermittent Non -
Wetland Water
UT2—Reach 2
-79.381899
Riverine-Streambed
469
Intermittent Non -
Wetland
Wetland Water
UTi — Reach 2
35.822286
-79.381722
Rive rine-Streambed
169
Perennial Non -Wetland
Water
UT2 —Reach 2
35.823064
-79.384223
Riverine-Streambed
596
Intermittent Non -
Wetland Water
UT2—Reach 2
82 26
35• 3 3
-79 3 82661
Riverine-Streambed
408
Perennial Non -Wetland
Water
UT3
8
35.8243:18
-79 380320
Riverine-Streambed
x94
Intermittent Non -
Wetland Water
UT4— Reach 2
35.826287
-79.382302
Riverine-Streambed
389
Intermittent Non -
Wetland Water
UT4—Reach 2
35.826977
-79.381740
Riverine-Streambed
370
Perennial Non -Wetland
Water
UT5
35.829000
-79.380775
Rive rine-Stream bed
58
Intermittent Non -
Wetland Water
Wetland A
35.822932
-79.384926
Palustrine-Emergent
0.008
Non -Section 20 —
Wetland
Wetland B
35.822928
-79.384746
Palustrine-Emergent
0.006
Non -Section 20 —
Wetland
Wetland C
35.823002
-79.384643
Palustrine-Emergent
0.001
Non -Section 20 —
Wetland
Wetland D
35.823057
-79.384358
Palustrine-Emergent
0.027
Non -Section 20—
Wetland
Wetland E
35.823708
-79.382651
Palustrine Forested
0.024
Non -Section 20—
Wetland
Wetland F
35.824172
-79.380911
Palustrine Forested
0.009
Non -Section 10—
Wetland

Jurisdictional Feature
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
Estimated Amount of Aquatic
Class of Aquatic
Resource in Review Area
Resource
Wetland J
35.825694
-79.380016
Palustrine-Emergent
0.005
Non-Section 3.o—
Wetland
Wetland K
35.825845
-79.379770
Palustrine-Emergent
0.038
Non-Section 10 —
Wetland
Wetland L
35.826288
-79.38o58i
Palustrine-Emergent
0.014
Non-Section io —
Wetland
Wetland M
35.82703.2
-79.383.073
Palustrine Forested
0.021
Non-Section io —
Wetland
Wetland N
35•$25925
-79.382345
Palustrine Forested
0.018
Non-Section 10 —
Wetland
Wetland O
35.828453
-79.381000
Palustrine Forested
0.153
Non-Section 20 —
Wetland
Wetland P
35.828038
-79.382006
Palustrine Forested
0.099
Non-Section 10—
Wetland

t 's ;- a
I South Fork Proposed Easement A 9*,�_;
Delineated Wetlands P20. �UT!)` • t J Kr s _4 w
Perennial Non -Wetland aters
Intermittent ' h�pP.Y' Wetland O (DPZl�
.. y'.
it i s
r i•'
:}YAleEland M (DP18) '
cy'
Upland(DP17) sF
) Wetland L (DP16)
ti 1
'Wetland N (DP19) etland K (DP15)
Upland (DP14)
s Wetland J (DP13)
SF4A Intermittent` i
r
Upland (DP11j
r Upland (DP9)--
" J UT3
IfigEY �Y
;� Wcilr,d F (DP7)
iN
e
Wetland J�1 Rl
Wetland B (I)P2),
Wetland C (DP4)
Upland (DP3)
UTI Q
i
f
,r UT1 - R1

V
1
V
A
4
Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - South Fork Site
Cape Fear River Basin 03030002
Chatham County, North Carolina
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
DRAFT PLANS FOR IRT
MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW
October 2017
M°
Stream
Latitude _
Longitude
SF4A
N 350 49' 19.54"
W 790
f
�
1
W 790
22'56.82"
UT2
N 350 49'22.49"
z
23'05.78"
UT3
� f
1
W 790
1 I
4 j
UT4
N 350 49'33.15"
N
22'57.50"
EC1
N 350 49'31.84"
W 790
22'45.64"
EC2
N 350 49'43.24"
W 790
PROJECT LOCATION
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
DRAFT PLANS FOR IRT
MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW
October 2017
Sheet Index
Title Sheet 0.1
Project Overview 0.2
General Notes and Symbols 0.3
Stream Plan and Profile 1.1-1.26
Planting Tables 2.0
Planting Plan 2.1
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Not Included
Fencing Plan Not Included
Details 5.1-5.9
Project Directory
Surveying:
Kee Mapping & Surveying, PA
111 Central Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Brad Kee, PLS
828-645-8275
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
License No. F-0831
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jeff Keaton, PE, Project Manager
Greg Turner, PE, Project Engineer
919-851-9986
USACE Action ID No. 2016-00219
A
z0 s
W 2
aW
Z
Z
.]Z 3z�E
�W m LL
Cn
O
w
cd
cn
i 0O
U
�z
4
41
O
U
Cd
4 U
N
0)
U
Q)
r.
Cz
V"
z
i
E m m
2
Stream Origins
Stream
Latitude _
Longitude
SF4A
N 350 49' 19.54"
W 790
22'49.44"
UT1
N 350 49'17.52"
W 790
22'56.82"
UT2
N 350 49'22.49"
W 790
23'05.78"
UT3
N 350 49'26.97'
W 790
22'47.87"
UT4
N 350 49'33.15"
W 790
22'57.50"
EC1
N 350 49'31.84"
W 790
22'45.64"
EC2
N 350 49'43.24"
W 790
22'45.65"
Sheet Index
Title Sheet 0.1
Project Overview 0.2
General Notes and Symbols 0.3
Stream Plan and Profile 1.1-1.26
Planting Tables 2.0
Planting Plan 2.1
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Not Included
Fencing Plan Not Included
Details 5.1-5.9
Project Directory
Surveying:
Kee Mapping & Surveying, PA
111 Central Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Brad Kee, PLS
828-645-8275
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
License No. F-0831
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jeff Keaton, PE, Project Manager
Greg Turner, PE, Project Engineer
919-851-9986
USACE Action ID No. 2016-00219
A
z0 s
W 2
aW
Z
Z
.]Z 3z�E
�W m LL
Cn
O
w
cd
cn
i 0O
U
�z
4
41
O
U
Cd
4 U
N
0)
U
Q)
r.
Cz
V"
z
i
E m m
2

General Notes
(To be included with final plans.)
Existing Features
— — — — —
Existing Property Boundary
-------------540------------
Existing 5' Major Contour
-----------------------------
Existing 1' Minor Contour
— — — — — —
Existing Thalweg
Proposed Log Vane
Existing Edge of Pavement
Proposed Construction Entrance
x x
Existing Fence
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement
Existing Wetlands
See Detail 2, Sheet 5.3
Existing Treeli?RExisting Tree
R
Y
Construction Sequence
(To be included with final plans.)
Proposed Boulder Sill With Boulder Toe Protection Proposed Culvert
See Detail 4, Sheet 5.2 See Detail 1, Sheet 5.9
QProposed Log J -Hook
See Detail 1, Sheet 5.3
41
x
0
w
0
r �
x �
U
oj
C)
z
:1
U
Cu
z
U
7-a
U
Q)
U
Proposed Features
Erosion Control Features
CE
— CE — CE
Proposed Conservation Easement
N�
Proposed Log Vane
Proposed Construction Entrance
—TCE—Ta—TCE—TCE—
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement
See Detail 2, Sheet 5.3
�9
See Detail 3, Sheet 5.6
10+00
—
—� —
Proposed Stream Alignment
Proposed Pump Around
— • • • •—
• • • •— • • • •— • • • •—
Proposed Bankfull
See Detail 4, Sheet 5.6
Proposed Rock Cascade with Pools
40
Proposed 5' Major Contour
See Detail 3, Sheet 5.3
Proposed Silt Fence
Proposed 1' Minor Contour
-------"� —
See Detail 1, Sheet 5.7
a-ry
Proposed Native Material Constructed Riffle
See Detail 1, Sheet 5.1
Proposed Brush Toe
®
Proposed Silt Fence Gravel Outlet
See Details 1 and 2, Sheet 5.4
See Detail 2, Sheet 5.7
R -w
Proposed Woody Riffle
i
Proposed Temporary Stream Crossing - Timber Mat
See Detail 2, Sheet 5.1
See Detail 3, Sheet 5.7
R AE
Proposed Angled Log Riffle
See Detail 3, Sheet 5.1
Proposed Boulder Toe
See Detail 1, Sheet 5.5
snr
Proposed Tree Protection Fencing
See Detail 4, Sheet 5.7
CR -CH
Proposed Chunky Riffle
See Detail 4, Sheet 5.1
Proposed Haul Road
Proposed Rock Floodplain Outlet
r
u
Proposed Lunker Log
See Detail 2, Sheet 5.5
See Detail 1, Sheet 5.2
®
Proposed Stockpile/Staging Area
Proposed Angled Log Sill
Proposed Permanent Ford Crossing
See Detail 3, Sheet 5.5
See Detail 2, Sheet 5.2
LOD
Proposed Limits Of Disturbance
ot1
Proposed Boulder Sill
See Detail 3, Sheet 5.2
Proposed Channel Plug
See Detail 4, Sheet 5.5
Proposed Boulder Sill With Boulder Toe Protection Proposed Culvert
See Detail 4, Sheet 5.2 See Detail 1, Sheet 5.9
QProposed Log J -Hook
See Detail 1, Sheet 5.3
41
x
0
w
0
r �
x �
U
oj
C)
z
:1
U
Cu
z
U
7-a
U
Q)
U

v
f
F
570
565
IIIIIIIIIi=II�m
560
555 1
I 1 1 1
11
100+00
100+50
101+00
BANKFULL WIDTH = 17.0'
TOP OF
TOP OF
BANK
5.1.
6.8'
5.1'—
BANK
.... •_ ....
...._ ....+ ...._ ....
...._ .
PROPOSED
3.Z
Dm, ax=1.9'
SA
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
SF4A
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
RIFFLE
STA: 103+73 TO 120+74
SCALE: 1" = 3'
EXISTING GROUND
101+50 102+00 102+50
BANKFULL WIDTH = 22.0'
..._
12.0' . .... 4.0' ....6.0...
Dmax = 3.0'
4:1 .Z1
PROPOSED
GRADE 8.0'
SF4A
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
SHALLOW POOL
STA: 103+73 TO 120+74
SCALE: 1" = 3'
TOP OF
BANK
POSED
IKFULL
103+00
PROPOSED BANKFULL
11 a En w ¢ u
¢ w LL
J-
:9.6% -0.6%
-0.9%
PROPOSED GRADE
570
565
�1
P
-10
560
I + 555
103+50 104+00 104+20
BANKFULL WIDTH = 22.0'
.•. 18.0' 2.0'- 2.0'
"llo
��> t 111 lit
CR -CH -/-
BEGIN SF4A -
REACH 1(ENHANCEMENT II) .� " •L�� q
STA. 100+62
IpOxo" --\-�` END UTl -_'_ I _•
p= -___ - ___ --------------- - ___ - REACH
^�---------
" �- `� _� �j 2 RESTORATION).
_ �f C STA.206+04 -
`S
I_________
_ ----- ---- `` SF4A `(CR -Cl
-
------------
---------------+DO -
--_ _ _
_'>�•��_ _ " --_-- ..:-c=`-�=____ _ _�=wee?_ _�r�-.-rt�-T �- �'_! _}
�W'r5 END SF4A
L> REACH 1 (ENHANCEMENT II)
BEGIN SF4A
REACH 2 (RESTORATION)
STA. 103+73
�J. �
___
33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 ------33� 3J 3J 33 33 35 30 3J 30=
PROPOSED
GRADE It 3.0'
SF4A
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION
L
/,
POOL WITH STRUCTURE
STA: 103+73 TO 120+74
SCALE: V = 3'
5
0
N
° du
0' 2' 4' 6' ?,
IvE""Q
0' 20' 40' 60' d
I�AiroHrnEl i m 3 s

'MATCH LINE -STA 121+80 — --�i\ -4. — — -'
\`SSS.\
N
W
O
I
1
I
i
1
y
I
I
I
I
/
/
1
/
/
/
/
I
+
0
C-) ' 1
z
z o
i
r / { z
+ /
I
/
I r
III v� 1 i I I
y Ii m
I
o
I II I I
I i II I
li it
i 'I 11 II
i
ti
0
MAT S�
0
o � o
E �
A
V
O -
'/)045 R�"'°°'
Job Number: U05-054Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - South Fork Site
Protect Engineer: GAT GAT
D.—Ey: CLM Chatham County, North Carolina
checked By: ANAWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Raleigh, NC 27609
1. SF4A Reach 3 U 312 W Millbrook Road, Ste 225
Stream Plan and Profile ��fo� Tel; 919,8519986
Firm License No. F-0831

565
561
202+30
202+50
203+00
203+50
204+00
565
561
204+20
BANKFULL WIDTH = 12.0'
BtD.
LL WIDTH =9.0' BANKFULL WIDTH = 12.0' 1.5' -
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK
2.7' 3.6' ._..2.7 ... 6.8_. ..._ 1.8' 3.4.... 9.45'
3.1 ax-l.O' 3.1 PROPOSED PROPOSED
BANKFULL Dmax=1.7' 1 BANKFULL Dmax=2.
PROPOSED 4'1 1 4,5.1
GRADE
UTl
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
RIFFLE
STA: 203+79 TO 206+04
SCALE: 1" = 2'
PROPOSED
GRADE 4.3
UT1
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
SHALLOW POOL
STA: 203+79 TO 206+04
SCALE: 1" = 2'
/ UTA
o/ J - ___ _--- __m_
---------------
-------------------
O
END UTI
REACH 1 (ENHANCEMENT 11) CR -NM �•
BEGIN
UTI
REACH 2 (RESTORATION)
STA. 203+79
/
/
PROPOSED
GRADE
UTI
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
POOL WITH STRUCTURE
STA: 203+79 TO 206+04
SCALE: 1" = 2'
_______________________
`r
---- -___ '565------'-- \`�
1.8'
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
0' 1' 2' 3'
N -,.Q
0' 10' 20' 30'
(HORIZON—)
i�
1�
gOoJC'�~0�
6D
� U
A
11MM
ldof
PROPOSED BANKFULL
N
II
o v1
O �
aw
—t
aw a,w
w
~ J G
w
PROPOSED GRADE
I
EXISTING
GROUND
202+50
203+00
203+50
204+00
565
561
204+20
BANKFULL WIDTH = 12.0'
BtD.
LL WIDTH =9.0' BANKFULL WIDTH = 12.0' 1.5' -
TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK
2.7' 3.6' ._..2.7 ... 6.8_. ..._ 1.8' 3.4.... 9.45'
3.1 ax-l.O' 3.1 PROPOSED PROPOSED
BANKFULL Dmax=1.7' 1 BANKFULL Dmax=2.
PROPOSED 4'1 1 4,5.1
GRADE
UTl
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
RIFFLE
STA: 203+79 TO 206+04
SCALE: 1" = 2'
PROPOSED
GRADE 4.3
UT1
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
SHALLOW POOL
STA: 203+79 TO 206+04
SCALE: 1" = 2'
/ UTA
o/ J - ___ _--- __m_
---------------
-------------------
O
END UTI
REACH 1 (ENHANCEMENT 11) CR -NM �•
BEGIN
UTI
REACH 2 (RESTORATION)
STA. 203+79
/
/
PROPOSED
GRADE
UTI
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
POOL WITH STRUCTURE
STA: 203+79 TO 206+04
SCALE: 1" = 2'
_______________________
`r
---- -___ '565------'-- \`�
1.8'
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
0' 1' 2' 3'
N -,.Q
0' 10' 20' 30'
(HORIZON—)
i�
1�
gOoJC'�~0�
6D
� U
A
11MM
ldof

J
595
590
300+00
------------------
-------------------------
300+00
----"--- -
300+50 301+00 301+50 302+00
BANKFULL WIDTH= 6.0'
BANKFULL WIDTH = 4.8' BANKFULL WIDTH= 6.0' 1.0'
TOP OF 1.5' 1.8' 1.5' TOP OF 2.8' 1.2' 2.0' TOP OF
BANK �jI"� Iy BANK 4.0''
....-1....1- .... BANK
3;- Dmax=0.5' 1. .... .. •••. ,
3'• PROPOSED 3 Dmax = 0.8' ,1
PROPOSEDE BANKFULL PROPOSED
S 1 25. PROPOSED q:11.0'ti- PROPOSED
GRADBANKFULL PROPOSED
2.6' GRADE
BANKFULL
UT2 UT2 1.5'
TYPICAL SECTION: TYPICAL SECTION: UT2
RIFFLE SHALLOW POOL TYPICALSECTION:
STA: 301+39 TO 303+77 AND 307+00 TO 310+23 STA: 301+39 TO 303+77 AND 307+00 TO 310+23 POOL WITH STRUCTURE
SCALE: 1" = 2' SCALE: 1" = 2' STA: 301+39 TO 303+77 AND 307+00 TO 310+23
SCALE: 1" = 2'
300+00 — _ - -
`�6p0 `
-309
i
/ --
BEGIN APPLYING
TYPICAL SECTION
STA. 301+39 - -
�yJ
o: UT2
BEGIN UT2
(ENHANCEMENT I)
STA. 301+02-----------------
1
59S
---- ---
Lr),
r1
595
590
302+15
I
N
0' 1' 2' 3'
1-0
0' 10' 20' 30'
Ivva�zovrny
N
0
\
m
1D
+
K;
w
r
N
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
+
o
+ o
STA = 302+14
ELEV = 591.25
\
w
-
�
I
EXISTINGGROUND
—
q3o
PROPOSED GRADE
STA =301+63
STA =302+06]
ELEV =
592.11
ELEV = 591.77
STA = 301+56
STA = 301+83STA = 302+10
ELEV = 592.11
ELEV = 591.62 ELEV = 591.25
590
300+00
------------------
-------------------------
300+00
----"--- -
300+50 301+00 301+50 302+00
BANKFULL WIDTH= 6.0'
BANKFULL WIDTH = 4.8' BANKFULL WIDTH= 6.0' 1.0'
TOP OF 1.5' 1.8' 1.5' TOP OF 2.8' 1.2' 2.0' TOP OF
BANK �jI"� Iy BANK 4.0''
....-1....1- .... BANK
3;- Dmax=0.5' 1. .... .. •••. ,
3'• PROPOSED 3 Dmax = 0.8' ,1
PROPOSEDE BANKFULL PROPOSED
S 1 25. PROPOSED q:11.0'ti- PROPOSED
GRADBANKFULL PROPOSED
2.6' GRADE
BANKFULL
UT2 UT2 1.5'
TYPICAL SECTION: TYPICAL SECTION: UT2
RIFFLE SHALLOW POOL TYPICALSECTION:
STA: 301+39 TO 303+77 AND 307+00 TO 310+23 STA: 301+39 TO 303+77 AND 307+00 TO 310+23 POOL WITH STRUCTURE
SCALE: 1" = 2' SCALE: 1" = 2' STA: 301+39 TO 303+77 AND 307+00 TO 310+23
SCALE: 1" = 2'
300+00 — _ - -
`�6p0 `
-309
i
/ --
BEGIN APPLYING
TYPICAL SECTION
STA. 301+39 - -
�yJ
o: UT2
BEGIN UT2
(ENHANCEMENT I)
STA. 301+02-----------------
1
59S
---- ---
Lr),
r1
595
590
302+15
I
N
0' 1' 2' 3'
1-0
0' 10' 20' 30'
Ivva�zovrny
N
0

565
560
556
308+50
309+00
i 30' INTERNAL CROSSING
/ UT2
STA. 308+62
C 14
v PROPOSED CULVERT
0
309+50
30'INTERNAL CROSSING
f i UT2 i
/ STA.308+92
,`• -___565___ `��\
565---`• •� •`• _ '`� \ �•• ,111 `\
------------
-------------
--------------------------
� Z
310+00
565
560
556
310+23
i%
/i
i/jf1 i1•�. / ,�
• 1 ;I.
0
v7
Q
m
%Z v$m4
Q s°ry~=
'BANtKFULLWIDTH =4.8'Z aW2.ei TOP OF BANK15'18' 1.5'W ��E
ax = 0.5'
3�1 3�1 PROPOSED m
PROPOSED BANKFULL
GRADE UT2
TYPICAL SECTION:
RIFFLE
STA: 301+02 TO 310+23
SCALE: 1" = 2'
t� P
BANKFULLWIDTH = 6.0'\�`1�QQ� Qr
TOP OF BANK 2.8' 1.2' 2.0'
..3.s:Dmax
j =0.8' S.1 PROPOSED Q�
1 BANKFULL G
PROPOSED 2.6'
GRADE
UT2
TYPICAL SECTION:
SHALLOW POOL -F•+
STA: 301+02 TO 310+23
SCALE: 1" = 2'
BANKFULL WIDTH= 6.0' w
1.0'
TOP OFBANK - 4:0: 1.0'
0
4:I Dmax=1.0' y PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED 1.5'
GRADE U
UT2 05 O
TYPICALSECIION: }+ yy
POOL WITH STRUCTURE i.••I
STA: 301+02 TO 310+23
SCALE: 1" = 2' 0 N�Cy
P ti O
r i
-----------------------------------
f-
u
END UT2
(ENHANCEMENT I) CC3
STA. 310+23
0' 1' 2' 3'
0' lo' 20'
\ ��.\ IwxlroeTul
STA =308+62 ,� N
I so0V
ELEV = 565.10
1
¢ w
a
+ m
d
II
N O�
¢J
o�
s Sip
N
o �
W
T II
M
R
a
+
m
�
N
\
F¢-
N w
m
II
m
V O1
II
•2.095
N
�
\
` \ \
w
ro
n
+
_
`\
M
m
mo
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
o
+
\ ' •
`
'
m II
STA
= 310+18
EXISTING
GROUND PROPOSED GRADE
\
¢ ,>„
o oELEV
= 557.07
�•
II
STA = 310+16
\
F¢- >
ELEV = 557.07
N
STA =310+14
"�•I�
_
ELEV = 559.13
_...
m '^
m
{
u
¢
u +
w �
ry
4'1 0
m
�
e
m
u
u +
m
\
1
4.Oo
¢
w
¢ w
o
I
n u
N w
+ v
m �
1
1
+
c
1
1
o N o
n u -u
� ;
N
n
W
w
\
309+00
i 30' INTERNAL CROSSING
/ UT2
STA. 308+62
C 14
v PROPOSED CULVERT
0
309+50
30'INTERNAL CROSSING
f i UT2 i
/ STA.308+92
,`• -___565___ `��\
565---`• •� •`• _ '`� \ �•• ,111 `\
------------
-------------
--------------------------
� Z
310+00
565
560
556
310+23
i%
/i
i/jf1 i1•�. / ,�
• 1 ;I.
0
v7
Q
m
%Z v$m4
Q s°ry~=
'BANtKFULLWIDTH =4.8'Z aW2.ei TOP OF BANK15'18' 1.5'W ��E
ax = 0.5'
3�1 3�1 PROPOSED m
PROPOSED BANKFULL
GRADE UT2
TYPICAL SECTION:
RIFFLE
STA: 301+02 TO 310+23
SCALE: 1" = 2'
t� P
BANKFULLWIDTH = 6.0'\�`1�QQ� Qr
TOP OF BANK 2.8' 1.2' 2.0'
..3.s:Dmax
j =0.8' S.1 PROPOSED Q�
1 BANKFULL G
PROPOSED 2.6'
GRADE
UT2
TYPICAL SECTION:
SHALLOW POOL -F•+
STA: 301+02 TO 310+23
SCALE: 1" = 2'
BANKFULL WIDTH= 6.0' w
1.0'
TOP OFBANK - 4:0: 1.0'
0
4:I Dmax=1.0' y PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED 1.5'
GRADE U
UT2 05 O
TYPICALSECIION: }+ yy
POOL WITH STRUCTURE i.••I
STA: 301+02 TO 310+23
SCALE: 1" = 2' 0 N�Cy
P ti O
r i
-----------------------------------
f-
u
END UT2
(ENHANCEMENT I) CC3
STA. 310+23
0' 1' 2' 3'
0' lo' 20'
\ ��.\ IwxlroeTul
I so0V
amm
d

560
556
502+15
502+50
503+00
503+50
504+00
BANKFULL WIDTH = 6.3'
BANKFULL WIDTH = 5.1' BANKFULL WIDTH= 6.3' 0.8'
TOP OF BANK 1.8' 1.5' 1.8' TOP OF BANK 3.15' 0.9' 2.25' TOP OF BANK 4.4'1'
Dmax = 0.6' Dmax = 0.9' Dmax = 1. PROPOSED
3;1 3:1 PROPOSED 3.5; 5:1 PROPOSED q: •y
PROPOSED BANKFULL 1 2 BANKFULL 1 �' BANKFULL
GRADE PROPOSED 2.7' PROPOSED
UT4 GRADE GRADE 1.5'
REACH 2 -TYPICAL
SECTION: RIFFLE
STA: 502+93 TO 507+53
SCALE: 1" = 2'
END UT4
REACH 1(ENHANCEMENT II)
BEGIN UT4 -
REACH 2 (RESTORATION)
STA. 502+93
-------------
----------
-------------
SHALLOW
-------- --
UT4
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION
SHALLOW POOL
STA: 502+93 TO 507+53
SCALE: 1" = 2'
UT4
i.
--S6o__
UT4
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
SCALE: 1" = 2'
560
556
504+40
-------------------------- - ,. -
565 ' -- -
---------------- - -
-
® li
---- --------
STA
= 503+08
---
--=-
- --
__- 560-'
STA =502+85
STA =502+93
ELEV
= 559.91
PROPOSED BANKfU
LL
STA = 504+02
ELEV = 559.52
ELEV =
560.07
STA = 503+18
o
ELEV =
557.99
\
ELEV = 559.91
N
o
STA = 503+30
ELEV = 559.66 ¢
w n
N
m
ry
ry
STA =504+35
ELEV = 557.79
STA =503+43
w N
.�
+
N
o
ELEV = 559.46
o
li
m O1
+ r
+
N
O �
�--
-
1
'2.5%
I
.
-2.6/
1,
EXISTING GROUND
\\
�
�\
�
I
(I
•IC
-_
_
_.
\
/
•
\�
STA = 503+15
i \ I
\ /
STA = 503+67 1
1
1
I
•3,Sp
ELEV.= 559.60
\
\\ _ /
ELEV = 558.47 11
I
II
I-
=503+11
\
STA =503+60
I
-STA
ELEV = 559.60
PROPOSED GRADE
ELEV = 558.47 I
I
STA = 503+38
k,\
I
I
ELEV = 559.25
/ STA =503+95
1�
STA =504+27
STA -503+30
ELEV = 557.99
I
�`i
ELEV = 557.4:
ELEV = 559.25
502+50
503+00
503+50
504+00
BANKFULL WIDTH = 6.3'
BANKFULL WIDTH = 5.1' BANKFULL WIDTH= 6.3' 0.8'
TOP OF BANK 1.8' 1.5' 1.8' TOP OF BANK 3.15' 0.9' 2.25' TOP OF BANK 4.4'1'
Dmax = 0.6' Dmax = 0.9' Dmax = 1. PROPOSED
3;1 3:1 PROPOSED 3.5; 5:1 PROPOSED q: •y
PROPOSED BANKFULL 1 2 BANKFULL 1 �' BANKFULL
GRADE PROPOSED 2.7' PROPOSED
UT4 GRADE GRADE 1.5'
REACH 2 -TYPICAL
SECTION: RIFFLE
STA: 502+93 TO 507+53
SCALE: 1" = 2'
END UT4
REACH 1(ENHANCEMENT II)
BEGIN UT4 -
REACH 2 (RESTORATION)
STA. 502+93
-------------
----------
-------------
SHALLOW
-------- --
UT4
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION
SHALLOW POOL
STA: 502+93 TO 507+53
SCALE: 1" = 2'
UT4
i.
--S6o__
UT4
REACH 2 - TYPICAL SECTION:
SCALE: 1" = 2'
560
556
504+40
-------------------------- - ,. -
565 ' -- -
---------------- - -
-
® li
---- --------
--
---
--=-
- --
__- 560-'
------------ �o�
- _" Ln
_,_ _ _ ' 504+00' ' •�
`J ' ♦ �� �/�' CR -CH
---------------------------------
\-- -
--------------------
------560------ --
Q)
++
.r
Cn
0
w
0
0
I ;.y
05
U
r�
i 0
0toZ
O�
41
0
V
a
ci
x V
Q)
Q)
1I
A -I
0' 1' 2' 3'
Iv[micA4
0' 10' 20' 30'
I�oAaornAu

m
0
0
O
O
O
0
O
U
O
0
N
10.18.201' "�` °m
JobNumber: WSaI%H5 Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - South Fork Site
1°b
Project EnFinaer. GAT
onwn By: C Chatham County, North Carolina �o oar
O 'r
checked By: ANA W I L D L A N D S
�' ♦Z` Q� •rl EN GINEERIN'G
1 '//'//��)) EC2 �G� I _ 312 W. Millbrook Road, Ste 225
•f.�� Stream Plan and Profile TI�f Rale i91 8 27609
J Plan Profile 1 Tel: [phone]
Sheet Firm License No. F-0831
/
/
/
/
X
� �
2
Gl
L1
I
I
O
0
/
/
/
/
/
I
0
N
10.18.201' "�` °m
JobNumber: WSaI%H5 Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - South Fork Site
1°b
Project EnFinaer. GAT
onwn By: C Chatham County, North Carolina �o oar
O 'r
checked By: ANA W I L D L A N D S
�' ♦Z` Q� •rl EN GINEERIN'G
1 '//'//��)) EC2 �G� I _ 312 W. Millbrook Road, Ste 225
•f.�� Stream Plan and Profile TI�f Rale i91 8 27609
J Plan Profile 1 Tel: [phone]
Sheet Firm License No. F-0831

I
yfFL
1
I
I
l
cE_ ��CE
EC2
3J �
W
V' J
/ J
V \
v
3J \ T
Z
O
;z
a7
l
i
�s
a m
a
1If
j d
d
H f
� S
N
O
O
O N
C'
m
M
M
O0 3
K
d W
W M
d
S
N
—
S
S
N d
R
N
W i
u
d
K
i
Ur F
-O
><
>
yfFL
1
I
I
l
cE_ ��CE
EC2
3J �
W
V' J
/ J
V \
v
3J \ T
Z
O
;z
a7
�s
a m
a
j d
d
H f
� S
N
O
O
O N
C'
m
M
M
O0 3
K
d W
W M
d
S
N
—
S
S
N d
R
N
W i
u
d
K
N
Ur F
-O
><
>
O
O
d
�
d
N
a
oae: 10.181017
lob N°mb- 0054X145
Projea Engineer GAT
D—
CLM
2.1
Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank - South Fork Site
Chatham County, North Carolina
Planting Plan
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
312 W. Millbrook Road, Ste 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Tel: [phone]
Firm License No. F-0831

HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATI(
POINT PER PROFI
FLOW
GFF GRr1FIIF
SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
FLOW
NOTE:
IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY
ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
L� B
Plan View
2 z
0
mom
LL38
r
41L OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
)INF PER PROFILE
EXTEND RIFFLE MATERIAL
REFER TO TYPICAL
0.3' UP BANK SECTION FOR THALWEG
OFFSET
CLASS 1 STONE OR SALVAGED ONSITE
55° TO 65" (TYP)
BOULDERS MIN 0.5'x V x 1.5'
RIFFLE ELEVATION
GREATER (TYP)
3" MAX
FLOW
PER PROFILE
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,
EXTEND RIFFLE MATERIAL 0.3' UP BANK
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
Section B-13'
Native Material Constructed Riffle
\,11,J Not to Scale
i
-
ul TOP OF BANK BURY INTO BANK 3' MIN. (TYP)
o
NORMAL WATER SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
THALWEG FLOW SURFACE MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,.
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
0.3'
T MIN.
(TYP) NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC BANKFULL
Profile View
A -A'
Log Section B -B'
NOTES:
1. MINIMUM LOG DIAMETER 12" OR
GREATER ON SF4A, OR USE FOOTER.
MINIMUM LOG DIAMETER 12" ON ALL
OTHER REACHES.
2. MINIMUM THREE LOGS PER STRUCTURE.
3. IFNECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE
ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH
QUARRY ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.
PLACE LOG SILL AT END OF RIFFLE WHERE
THERE IS A DROP OVER DOWNSTREAM) /+
POOL. SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 5.2.
Plan View
0 Angled Log Riffle
5.1 Not to Scale
KaG
pe=w
wow
w35
3" TO 6" DIAMETER
EBRIS WORKED MICRO POOL HABITAT
FEE SUBSTRATE BEHIND LARGER WOODY DEBRIS
Ll -ow
SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
Plan View
WOODY DEBRIS
Profile A -A'
EXTEND RIFFLE MATERIAL
0.3' UP BANK 3" TO 6" BRUSHY MATERIAL
TOE OF SLOPE WORKED INTO R CKY
TOP OF BANK (TYP) (TYP) SUBSTRATE
SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL LOG EXPOSED 1" TO 3" ABOVE
MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC, FINISHED RIFFLE ELEVATION
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
2
Woody Riffle
5.1 Not to Scale
NOTES: y
t. CHUNKY MATERIAL ELEVATION SHALL 4=` Riffle
BE 0' TO 3" ABOVE RIFFLE MATERIAL 52Not to Scale
BASED ON ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.
2. IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY
ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.
NOTES:
t. WOOD SHALL COMPRISE 20% TO 50%
OF THE RIFFLE SURFACE AREA.
2. WOODY MATERIAL SHOULD NOT
PROTRUDE GREATER THAN 3" ABOVE
RIFFLE BED.
3. IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY
ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.
4. WOOD SHOULD BE PLACED
PREDOMINANTLY PERPENDICULAR TO
CHANNEL
SEE PLAN/PROFILE FOR LENGTH
B'
Plan View
TAIL OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION POINT
PER PROFILE
�-1
w
Q
It
U
yl
CHUNKY MATERIAL:
CLASS 1 STONE OR SALVAGED ONSITE
55° TO 65" (TYP)
BOULDERS MIN 0.5'x V x 1.5'
12" DIAMETER OR
GREATER (TYP)
3" MAX
FLOW
SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
SALVAGED ONSITE
0
• COBBLE/GRAVEL MATERIAL
Profile A -A' SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
HEAD OF RIFFLE
EXCAVATE SMALL POOLS
ELEVATION POINT
0.3' IN DEPTH DOWNSTREAM
FLOWPER PROFILE
OF IMBEDDED LOGS
r
EXTEND RIFFLE MATERIAL
F
0.3' UP BANK TOE OF SLOPE
(TYP)
RIFFLE ELEVATION
TOP OF BANK (TYP) PER PROFILE
THALWEG 0.1-0.2' DEEPER
THAN REST OF RIFFLE TO
PROVIDE LOW FLOW PATH
CHUNKY MATERIAL'
PLACE TO MAINTAIN
THALWEG WITHIN
Section B -B' CENTRAL 2/3 OF
CHANNEL
NOTES: y
t. CHUNKY MATERIAL ELEVATION SHALL 4=` Riffle
BE 0' TO 3" ABOVE RIFFLE MATERIAL 52Not to Scale
BASED ON ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.
2. IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY
ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.
NOTES:
t. WOOD SHALL COMPRISE 20% TO 50%
OF THE RIFFLE SURFACE AREA.
2. WOODY MATERIAL SHOULD NOT
PROTRUDE GREATER THAN 3" ABOVE
RIFFLE BED.
3. IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY
ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.
4. WOOD SHOULD BE PLACED
PREDOMINANTLY PERPENDICULAR TO
CHANNEL
SEE PLAN/PROFILE FOR LENGTH
B'
Plan View
TAIL OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION POINT
PER PROFILE
�-1
w
Q
It
U
yl

Plan View
TOP OF COVER LOG TO
BE PLACED 0.3' ABOVE
DOWNSTREAM RIFFLE
J
COVER LOG
1'
FOOTER LOG
BURIED 6" BELOW
MAX POOL DEPTH Section A -A'
Lunker Lo
5.2 Not to Scale
G (MIN
ETER)
SILL ELEVP
R LOG (MIN PER PROFILE
\METER)
TRANSPLANT/
BRUSH TOE FLON
BACKFILL (ON-SITE NATIV
MATERIALS OR NO. 57 STONI
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL MATERIAL
SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
EXTEND FILTER FILTER FABRIC
FABRIC 5' MIN.
UPSTREAM
Plan View Profile A -A'
TOP OF BANK
SILL ELEVATION HEADER ROCK
PER PROFILE
FOOTER ROCK
1.5' MIN
1 EMBED 5'
INTO
Section B -B' BANK (TYP)
Boulder Sill
NOTES: 52 Not to Scale
1. REFER TO TABLE FOR SILL MATERIAL SIZING.
2. FOOTERS NOT NECESSARY IF ROCK 15 CLASS 2 OR
GREATER (TRIBUTARIES ONLY).
CD__]c=K= I 1��
BOULDER SIZE TABLE
REACH MIN. BOULDER
DIMENSIONS (FT)
SF4A REACH 2 2.5 x 2.0 x 1.0
SF4A REACH 2.5x 2.0x 1.0
UT2 1.5x 1.5x 1.0
UT4 REACH 2 1.5 x 1.5 x 1.0 71
NOTE: BOULDERS SHALL BE RELATIVELY
FLAT ON THE LONG DIMENSION SIDES.
BACKFILL (ON-SITE NATIVE
MATERIALS OR NO. 57
STONE) TO DEPTH OF
FOOTER LOG
ZE TOE WITH ANY OF SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
LLOWING OPTIONS: FLOW EXCAVATED
STONE, SOD OR
FOE. 4 -WOVEN STREAMBED
- ^ SCOUR POOL
FILTER FABRIC -
Profile View
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
Plan View
CHANNEL
BOTTOM WIDTH
12' - 15" DIAMETER
HEADERLOG I EMBEDLOG
12" - 15" DIAMETER IF-- 4' (MIN.)
FOOTER LOG
SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE (TVP)
Section A - A'- FACING DOWNSTREAM
Angled Log Sill
52 Not to Scale
IL TO BE
PER DIRECTION
INEER
MEND FILTER FABRIC
UPSTREAM S' MIN. FOOTER
(ON -SI -
TYPE 2
FILTER FABRIC
Section A -A
CHANNELBED
SALTAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX
HEADER ROCK
mop
�i►V zOi Vii
BOULDERSEMBED
BELOW CHANNEL BED
A
zp �O1omo
a= .
2 s��
14 Az 2"E
►-I W 3 LL
m
e
E
Profile B -B'
NOTE:
1. BOULDERS TO BE MINIMUM 2x2xl. u O Q
\ Boulder
T+ T7 2. DIMENSION TO BE DETERMINED ON SITE
��T t V
Boulder Sill Y V itl L l Boulder 1 Toe Protection AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. , ^
5.2 Not to Scale 3. FOR STREAM BEDS WITH COARSE u J
SUBSTRATE, PROVIDE FOOTER ROCKS. _
E m m
jj
o y

PLACE HEADER BOULDERS
WITH V TO T CLEAR SPACE
BETWEEN ROCKS
SCOUR
POOL
FLOW
B' `\ EXCAVATE POOL
PER PROFILE
r A
INVERT ELEVATION I \ \
PER PROFILE A
30
PLACE HEADER BOULDER _/
TO PREVENT LOG FROM SHIFTING plan View
NOTE:
HEADER BOULDER MAY BE ELIMINATED AT
DISCRETION OF ENGINEER.
S,
HEADER LOG
TOP OF BANK
FLOW
3=_5%
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL FOOTERLOG
BED MATERIAL Section B -B'
Lo -Hook
\,L3j Not to Scale
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
r
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
OFFSET HEADER LOG
TOE OF
SLOPE
C) ZS' TO O.S' UPSTREAM
OF FOOTER LOG
HEADER LOG
NONWOVEN
FOOTER LOG
FILTER FABRIC
FILTER
FABRIC
EXTEND 55'
MIN.
Section A -A'
Plan View
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL MATERIAL
12" SALVAGED
ONSITE COBBLE HEADER LOG
NONWOVEN STREAM BED
FILTER FABRIC Q3 FOOTER LOG
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE HEADER LOG
_ FOOTER LOG
Y,5%
OF OF
STABILIZE VANE SLOPE
WITH ONE BOULDER
ON EACH SIDE
WATE POOL
PER PROFILE
2 Lo Vane
5.3 Not to Scale
WIDTH VARIES SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC, HEADER BOULDER
PER PLANS CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
DEPTH PER PLANS FOOTER BOULDER
I
WIDTH
PER
PLANS z
f
HEADER BOULDER z \ STREAMBED
NONWOVEN FOOTER BOULDER -
7
FILTERFABRIC
r
MIN 2' — NONWOVEN
LENGTH - FILTER FABRIC RLENVARIESLENGTH VARIES PER PLANS
PER
Section A -A' PLANS Section 13-13' PPER
LANS
mock Cascade with Pools
5.3 Not to Scale
NOTE:
STABILIZATION BOULDER TO BE
USED ON SMA ONLY, AND MAY BE
REMOVED PER ENGINEER'S
DISCRETION.
A
ZLL
O
�N~-
.aW z
�°oz
Z mm�m
AZ E
rIw 3 E
m
(tS 4
oz
Sly./
"'I r
t�Ur-1
4
x U
a�
i-1
A
a I161a HE
T,
/Q1
H

DENSELY PACK BRUSH,
WOODY DEBRI:
IN BETWEEN E
DENSELY PACK BRUSH,
WOODY ..�.,..,,... ....,.
IN BET,
ROL MATTING
RPENDICULAR TO FLOW
S PARALLEL TO FLOW
SH MATERIAL
'.E INSTALLED
ELEV. 0.5' ABOVE
:H WITH BANK
DOWNSTREAM
RIFFLE INVERT
�N CONTROL MATTING
3'
WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS
BACKFILL
6" EROSION CONTROL MATTING
DENSELY PACKED BRUSH,
WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL
BASE LOG
4"-6" DIAMETER
ELEV. 6" BELOW
POOL DEPTH
,)Brush Toe - SF4A
5.4 Not to Scale
0
ELEV. 0.3' ABOVE
DOWNSTREAM
RIFFLE INVERT
ELEV. (
PO(
. ' —BACKFILL
`NAnVE SOIL
Section A -A'
TOE OF SLOPE
BASE LOG /
6-12" DIAMETER
NOTES:
1. OVEREXCAVATE 3' MIN. OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).
2. INSTALL BASE LOGS PARALLELTO FLOW ATTOE OF SLOPE. DIAMETER 6"-12".
3. INSTALL BASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW AT INTERVALS ALONG
BANK , REST ING ON TOP OF PARALLEL BASE LOGS. BASE LOGS SHALL
BE 6"-12" DIAMETER.
4. INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS, WHICH SHALL CONSIST OF
SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED ON SITE AND SOILTO FILL ANY VOID
SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.
S. BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL AND IS INSTALLED
POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.
6. INSTALL MATTING OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.
7. INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER ACCORDING TO TYPICAL
SECTION DIMENSIONS.
8. SEED, MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND BANK STABILIZATION
PER PLANS.
9. SOD MAT MAY BE PLACED ON TOP OF BRUSH IF AVAILABLE.
QBrush Toe - UT1-UT4
5.4 Not to Scale
Section A -A'
NOTES:
1. OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).
2. INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS, WHICH SHALL CONSIST OF
SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED ON SITE AND SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID
SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.
3. BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL AND 15 INSTALLED
POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.
4. INSTALL MATTING OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.
S. INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER ACCORDING TO TYPICAL
SECTION DIMENSIONS.
6. SEED, MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND BANK STABILIZATION
PER PLANS.
7. SOD MAT MAY BE PLACED ON TOP OF BRUSH IF AVAILABLE. -
'
44�vq
F
M
Q)
Q

Plan View
EXISTING r
ERODED EROSION
BANKCONTROL
HEAD.ERE. MATTING
ROCKS)
EXCAVATE EXISTING
BANK TO
, &'ENIn
OULDERS, AS1
FOOTER ROCK
Section A -A'
Boulder Toe
55 Not to Scale
�Aj
SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZETO ABC,
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX. w
aN
iz
za
LA'
Plan View
wi
SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,
CLASS A AND CLASS B MIX.
FLOW
LENGTH VARIES
SEE PLAN SHEETS
Section A -A'
SALVAGED ONSITE COBBLE/GRAVEL
MATERIAL SIMILAR IN SIZE TO ABC,
. VS
X x
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
Section B -B'
(1 Rock Floodplain Outlet
\,1-5,/Not to Scale
C H A N N E L
EO
OS
Q
Q
Q
10'MIN 10'MIN FLOW A i_'i.�i'i iii\i\\\�\/i\ j\\�\ A'
ABANDONED
CLASS A/B STONEr r
�; CHANNEL /\\
\ WATER DIVERSION WATER DIVERSION
CHANNEL _ CHANNEL Plan View
~ FILTER FABRIC
NOTES:
1. FORD CROSSING SHALL BE INSTALLED
PERPENDICULAR TO CHANNEL BANKS.
2. MAINTAIN DIVERSION CHANNEL TO INSURE
RUNOFF DOES NOT ENTER CHANNEL.
Permanent Ford Crossing
5s Not to Scale
EROSION CONTROL MAT COMPACTED SELECT
MATERIAL CHANNEL BACKFILL
SIDE SLOPE PER
YPICAL SECTION i' ' '\\ \� /\/\\\•
Section A -A'
4 Channel Plug
55 Not to Scale
NOTE:
IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY
ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.
P4
C
Q)
4_1
U)
�-1
0
w
0
i
T
Q

SPACING PER
PLANTING PLAN
ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED TO
Section View
DIBBLE BAR
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A
BLADE WITH ATRIANGULAR
CROSS-SECTION, AND SHALL BE 12
INCHES LONG, 41NCHES WIDE AND
1 INCH THICK AT CENTER.
ROOTING PRUNING
AN APPORIATE LENGTH TO
PREVENT J -ROOTING.
NOTES:
1. ALLSOILS WITHIN THE BUFFER
PLANTING AREA SHALL BE DISKED, AS
REQUIRED, PRIOR TO PLANTING.
2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PROPERLY
HANDLED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO
INSURE SURVIVAL.
TOP OF BANK
LINEAR SPACING
8' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
4' SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS PLUGS
4' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
O © © O Plan View SRA
r\hyho \\o\\/\\!\�\ !/QG�/r\\" /i\!\!\f\i o� !%� %•%•%%I/. // h\4 %/•o �i v� - �%!-oa0'� -/ver`/ '!
EROSION
i\\�h�G\\ri\: P�!i�i�ii\\!i �i`\�i`\ri�fi`O%r�6\\/i`\/i`\!i; \`i/O//OfrQ/l;v�\\//O//O//Qi/\ ,,`lOf••�/Oi•.;�yy0/O!\; :`i\\: �i�i`'=�i\\l\\i\\i ;`i\`iii\\ y�i�i\`i\\i\;'
!\4��\\\\\\\�\�\p\�j\�/\rf\�/��j\�/\�\�/!j ghhGhGOGgh pO ii Go hhf/O; hd/hh//h/i✓i lie h/i 0!ih✓/OOGp,
DETAIL•
INSERT THE DIBBLE, OR REMOVE THE DIBBLE, OR INSERT THE DIBBLE, OR PUSH THE DIBBLE, OR PULL BACK
N THE HANDLE TO REMOVE THE DIBBLE '
• 1• • I • • 11 t• •SHOVEL,• I
FIRM
INTO • • PLUG
I I •' JUNCUS
ATNORMAL
I • 1 IHOLE.•1PUSH THE •''1 • I
PULL • 1 1 BLADESOIL E LIM INATINGDAMAGING
TO OPEN THE PLANTING CORRECT PLANTING DEPTH TWIST AND PUSH THE AROUND THE ROOT.
I• NOT '•CK THE (THE ROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE HANDLEFORWARD TO TOE OF SLOPE
SHOVEL BACK AND . . OF
AS THIS • . HOLD SEEDLING• ••
PLANTING y\yo
COMPACTED, INHIBITING ROOTSTO STRAIGHTEN OUT
I OR
ROOTS
•• r
.)Bare Root Planting
5.6 Not to Scale
M.-I
S0.
dry
NOTES:
1. PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENTTO
ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS.
2. LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL
POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS
STABILIZED. PROVIDE FREQUENT CHECKS OF
THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE.
3. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDFFION WHICH
WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF
MUDONTO STREETS. PERIODIC TOP DRESSING
WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.
4. ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY
MUST BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY.
5. USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE
AGGREGATE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
6. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE.
(31 Construction Entrance
5.6 Not to Scale
HOSE
LIVE STAKE AT
TOPOFBANK
TOP OF BANK
r2"NStreambank Planting
5.6 Not to Scale
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
"J" TYPE SEAMS.
(SEE INSET "A")
Plan View
6' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES _
6' SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS PLUGS
Plan View
BUDS( IJT'1-LTT4
POINTED
UPWARD
r
1/2" TO 2"
k
DIAMETER 0
W
G
m
BASE CUT a
AT 45°
Ow
N Q
Live Stake Detail
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PLAN VIEW DETAILS BY REACH
SHOWN ABOVE
2. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPER STORAGE, HANDLING AND
INSTALLATION.
3. FORM PILOT HOLE IN HARD SOIL OR STONY CONDITIONS TO PREVENT
DAMAGE TO LIVE STAKES.
4. LIVE STAKES TO BE PLANTED IN AREAS AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER,
S. INSTALL DORMANT PRIOR TO LEAF OUT. DEPICTED CONDITION WITH
LEAVES NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF STAKES AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.
SEWN -IN SPOUT DEWATERING BAG
T. HIGH STRENGTH
I STRAPPING EXISTING TERRAIN STREAM BED
DEWATL RING FOR HOLDING HOSE
•y BAG IN PLACE
15' WATER FLOW
FROM PUMP FILTER FABRIC
FLEXIBLE 8" of CLASS B RIPRAP
DISCHARGE HOSE 15'to 20'
Inset"A" NOTE:
Dewatering Bag 1. PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET TO
STREAMBED.
3' MIN TOP WIDTH
SAND BA
(24'
X12 " X 6")
OR STONE.
IMPERVIOUS
SHEETING
FLOW
RVIOUS DIKE Inset "B"
NSET"B") Impervious Dike
STABILIZED OUTLET
CLASS B RIPRAP AND
TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC
SET "C")
Pump Around System
5.6 Not to Scale
10' MIN.
FILTER FABRIC
Inset"C"
Stabilized Outlet
STABILIZE OUTLET USING CLASS B
RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE
FIELD BYTHE ENGINEER.
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM
/-PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
/ WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.
4
r
L O
i -•I
U
O O
�z
�-I O
�Ur-1
;••1 Co
-0
054
U
Q)
Q)
i -i
U
I
V)
VARIES
Fj111RWIDTH
.11. KFIJUL
RESTORED
\//\�
/ f
�\ff\//\//\ .\f\f/\ff\h\f/\fff\
/, / f
/ / /\f\/\f\\/\•f\
/\If\//\////\�j•\i\.\\'�j;la7\\/�/
\\' \ ` �//:1\b\!f\/f/�l��l,✓S . I �i I i Z...".. off
DIBBLE BAR
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A
BLADE WITH ATRIANGULAR
CROSS-SECTION, AND SHALL BE 12
INCHES LONG, 41NCHES WIDE AND
1 INCH THICK AT CENTER.
ROOTING PRUNING
AN APPORIATE LENGTH TO
PREVENT J -ROOTING.
NOTES:
1. ALLSOILS WITHIN THE BUFFER
PLANTING AREA SHALL BE DISKED, AS
REQUIRED, PRIOR TO PLANTING.
2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PROPERLY
HANDLED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO
INSURE SURVIVAL.
TOP OF BANK
LINEAR SPACING
8' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
4' SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS PLUGS
4' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
O © © O Plan View SRA
r\hyho \\o\\/\\!\�\ !/QG�/r\\" /i\!\!\f\i o� !%� %•%•%%I/. // h\4 %/•o �i v� - �%!-oa0'� -/ver`/ '!
EROSION
i\\�h�G\\ri\: P�!i�i�ii\\!i �i`\�i`\ri�fi`O%r�6\\/i`\/i`\!i; \`i/O//OfrQ/l;v�\\//O//O//Qi/\ ,,`lOf••�/Oi•.;�yy0/O!\; :`i\\: �i�i`'=�i\\l\\i\\i ;`i\`iii\\ y�i�i\`i\\i\;'
!\4��\\\\\\\�\�\p\�j\�/\rf\�/��j\�/\�\�/!j ghhGhGOGgh pO ii Go hhf/O; hd/hh//h/i✓i lie h/i 0!ih✓/OOGp,
DETAIL•
INSERT THE DIBBLE, OR REMOVE THE DIBBLE, OR INSERT THE DIBBLE, OR PUSH THE DIBBLE, OR PULL BACK
N THE HANDLE TO REMOVE THE DIBBLE '
• 1• • I • • 11 t• •SHOVEL,• I
FIRM
INTO • • PLUG
I I •' JUNCUS
ATNORMAL
I • 1 IHOLE.•1PUSH THE •''1 • I
PULL • 1 1 BLADESOIL E LIM INATINGDAMAGING
TO OPEN THE PLANTING CORRECT PLANTING DEPTH TWIST AND PUSH THE AROUND THE ROOT.
I• NOT '•CK THE (THE ROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE HANDLEFORWARD TO TOE OF SLOPE
SHOVEL BACK AND . . OF
AS THIS • . HOLD SEEDLING• ••
PLANTING y\yo
COMPACTED, INHIBITING ROOTSTO STRAIGHTEN OUT
I OR
ROOTS
•• r
.)Bare Root Planting
5.6 Not to Scale
M.-I
S0.
dry
NOTES:
1. PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENTTO
ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS.
2. LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL
POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS
STABILIZED. PROVIDE FREQUENT CHECKS OF
THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE.
3. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDFFION WHICH
WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF
MUDONTO STREETS. PERIODIC TOP DRESSING
WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.
4. ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY
MUST BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY.
5. USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE
AGGREGATE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
6. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE.
(31 Construction Entrance
5.6 Not to Scale
HOSE
LIVE STAKE AT
TOPOFBANK
TOP OF BANK
r2"NStreambank Planting
5.6 Not to Scale
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
"J" TYPE SEAMS.
(SEE INSET "A")
Plan View
6' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES _
6' SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS PLUGS
Plan View
BUDS( IJT'1-LTT4
POINTED
UPWARD
r
1/2" TO 2"
k
DIAMETER 0
W
G
m
BASE CUT a
AT 45°
Ow
N Q
Live Stake Detail
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PLAN VIEW DETAILS BY REACH
SHOWN ABOVE
2. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPER STORAGE, HANDLING AND
INSTALLATION.
3. FORM PILOT HOLE IN HARD SOIL OR STONY CONDITIONS TO PREVENT
DAMAGE TO LIVE STAKES.
4. LIVE STAKES TO BE PLANTED IN AREAS AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER,
S. INSTALL DORMANT PRIOR TO LEAF OUT. DEPICTED CONDITION WITH
LEAVES NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF STAKES AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.
SEWN -IN SPOUT DEWATERING BAG
T. HIGH STRENGTH
I STRAPPING EXISTING TERRAIN STREAM BED
DEWATL RING FOR HOLDING HOSE
•y BAG IN PLACE
15' WATER FLOW
FROM PUMP FILTER FABRIC
FLEXIBLE 8" of CLASS B RIPRAP
DISCHARGE HOSE 15'to 20'
Inset"A" NOTE:
Dewatering Bag 1. PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET TO
STREAMBED.
3' MIN TOP WIDTH
SAND BA
(24'
X12 " X 6")
OR STONE.
IMPERVIOUS
SHEETING
FLOW
RVIOUS DIKE Inset "B"
NSET"B") Impervious Dike
STABILIZED OUTLET
CLASS B RIPRAP AND
TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC
SET "C")
Pump Around System
5.6 Not to Scale
10' MIN.
FILTER FABRIC
Inset"C"
Stabilized Outlet
STABILIZE OUTLET USING CLASS B
RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE
FIELD BYTHE ENGINEER.
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM
/-PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
/ WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.
4
r
L O
i -•I
U
O O
�z
�-I O
�Ur-1
;••1 Co
-0
054
U
Q)
Q)
i -i
U
I
V)

1. MAX. WITH WIRE
(IS - MAX. WITHOUT WIRE)
FILTER FABRIC
w
TOP AND BOTTOM SHALL BE 10 GAUGE MIN.
�� Jj��
L.IRES
WIRE MI.DUE AND SHALL BE 12 j GAGE MIN.
FILTER FABRIC
NOTES:
COMPACTED FILL EXISTING GROUND
1. USE WIRE A MINIUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND WITH
A MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF WIRES WITH 12" STAY
SPACING.
2. USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" IN WIDTH 00 )
AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRES AS
DIRECT ED By THE ENGINEER. IIIII a n
3. PROVIDES' STEEL POST OF THE SELF -FASTENER EXTEND FABRIC �� 4" I"
0
ANGLE STEEL TYPE. INTO TRENCH o
Fry
Temporary Silt Fence
5.7 Not to Scale
elm
i
4" WOODEN BOARD ON OUTSIDE
EDGE OF MATTO PREVENT RUNOFF
TIMBER MATS 1
\ h.-. 5' --1 /WATER DIVERSION CHANNEL
NOTE:
1. CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS AT NORMAL BASEFLOW.
2. MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS. DO NOT EXCAVATE
CHANNEL BOTTOM.
3. INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW.
4. MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE CONSTRUCTION ROAD DOES NOT
ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
S. STABILIZE AN ACCESS RAMP OF CLASS B STONE TO THE EDGE OF THE TIMBER MAT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP ANGLE ACCORDING TO
EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
7. MATS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT NO GAPS EXIST BETWEEN BOARDS.
8. SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT 45' ANGLE TO THE ROAD WITH STONE OUTLET AT
EACH CORNER OF THE TEMPORARY CROSSING TO FILTER ANY SEDIMENT AND
DEBRIS FROM HAUL ROAD FROM ENTERING THE STREAM.
Temporary Stream Crossing - Timber Mat
s.7 Not to Scale
TOP OF SILT FENCE
MUST BE AT LEAST V
ABOVE THE TOP OF
STEEL FENCE POST THE WASHED STONE
FILTER OF 1" DIA. WIRE FENCE
WASHED STONE HARDWARE CLOTH
FILTER OF 1" DIA.
WASHEDSTONE
FILTER FABRIC
SILT FENCE ON GROUND
77SEND OF FILTER FABRIC BURY WIRE FENCE
AND HARDWARE CLOTH
Plan View Section View STEEL FENCE POST
SET MAX T APART
INSTALLATION
REFER TO THE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. DURING INSTALLATION OF THE SILT BARRIER
OR SILT FENCE, INSPECT THE INSTALLATION TO DETERMINE IF OUTLETS ARE NEEDED ACCORDING TO THE
CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BARRIER AND FENCE. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR
PROBLEMS WITH THE LOCATION, EXTENT, OR METHOD OF INSTALLATION, CONTACT THE ENGINEER,
ARCHITECT, OR RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ON THE SITE FOR ASSISTANCE. EROSION CONTROL PERSONNEL
HAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND MAY HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY INSTALLED OUTLETS AS AN
AID TO INSTALLATION.
IF THE SILT FENCE OUTLET IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE FIRST TIME, IT WILL HAVE TO BE REBUILT
DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION ON THE GROUND BEFORE COMPLETING INSTALLATION OF THE SILT
FENCE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION:
INSTALL THE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT (S) IN THE BARRIER OR FENCE WHERE WATER WILL POND.
INSTALLTHE OUTLET WHERE IT ISACCE5SIBLE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL.
ALLOW AT LEAST:
OF FILTER FABRIC
FENCE
BURY WIRE FENCE, FILTER FABRIC,
Front View AND HARDWARE CLOTH IN TRENCH
FOR A SILT BARRIER:FOR
A SILT FENCE:
SUPPORT LOG
FILTER FABRIC
12" 0 MIN.
CLASS B
FROM EROSION BY OUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET; PLACE
STONE
NOTE:
1. CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS AT NORMAL BASEFLOW.
2. MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS. DO NOT EXCAVATE
CHANNEL BOTTOM.
3. INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW.
4. MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE CONSTRUCTION ROAD DOES NOT
ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
S. STABILIZE AN ACCESS RAMP OF CLASS B STONE TO THE EDGE OF THE TIMBER MAT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP ANGLE ACCORDING TO
EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
7. MATS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT NO GAPS EXIST BETWEEN BOARDS.
8. SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT 45' ANGLE TO THE ROAD WITH STONE OUTLET AT
EACH CORNER OF THE TEMPORARY CROSSING TO FILTER ANY SEDIMENT AND
DEBRIS FROM HAUL ROAD FROM ENTERING THE STREAM.
Temporary Stream Crossing - Timber Mat
s.7 Not to Scale
TOP OF SILT FENCE
MUST BE AT LEAST V
ABOVE THE TOP OF
STEEL FENCE POST THE WASHED STONE
FILTER OF 1" DIA. WIRE FENCE
WASHED STONE HARDWARE CLOTH
FILTER OF 1" DIA.
WASHEDSTONE
FILTER FABRIC
SILT FENCE ON GROUND
77SEND OF FILTER FABRIC BURY WIRE FENCE
AND HARDWARE CLOTH
Plan View Section View STEEL FENCE POST
SET MAX T APART
INSTALLATION
REFER TO THE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. DURING INSTALLATION OF THE SILT BARRIER
OR SILT FENCE, INSPECT THE INSTALLATION TO DETERMINE IF OUTLETS ARE NEEDED ACCORDING TO THE
CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BARRIER AND FENCE. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR
PROBLEMS WITH THE LOCATION, EXTENT, OR METHOD OF INSTALLATION, CONTACT THE ENGINEER,
ARCHITECT, OR RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ON THE SITE FOR ASSISTANCE. EROSION CONTROL PERSONNEL
HAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND MAY HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY INSTALLED OUTLETS AS AN
AID TO INSTALLATION.
IF THE SILT FENCE OUTLET IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE FIRST TIME, IT WILL HAVE TO BE REBUILT
DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION ON THE GROUND BEFORE COMPLETING INSTALLATION OF THE SILT
FENCE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION:
INSTALL THE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT (S) IN THE BARRIER OR FENCE WHERE WATER WILL POND.
INSTALLTHE OUTLET WHERE IT ISACCE5SIBLE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL.
ALLOW AT LEAST:
OF FILTER FABRIC
FENCE
BURY WIRE FENCE, FILTER FABRIC,
Front View AND HARDWARE CLOTH IN TRENCH
FOR A SILT BARRIER:FOR
A SILT FENCE:
JUST BELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER, PLACE A LAYER OF
JUSTBELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER, PLACE A LAYER
FILTER FABRIC ON THE GROUND TO PROTECT THE SOIL
OF FILTER FABRIC ON THE GROUND TO PROTECT THE
FROM EROSION BY OUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET; PLACE
SOIL FROM EROSION BY OUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET;
61NCHES OF THE UPPER EDGE IN THE TRENCH. STAKE THE
PLACE 6 INCHES OF THE UPPER EDGE IN THE TRENCH.
REMAINING EDGES OF THE FABRIC TO HOLD IT IN PLACE.
STAKE THE OTHER EDGES OF THE FABRIC TO HOLD IT IN
TENSILE YIELD
PLACE.
ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILL GO, PLACE
10 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND THE TOE OF FILL SLOPES.
STEEL FENCE POSTS FOR STRENGTH. THE POSTS MUST BE
ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILL GO, PLACE
A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET APART AND DRIVEN INTO SOLID
ADDITIONAL STEEL FENCE POSTS FOR STRENGTH. THE
GROUND AT LEAST 18 INCHES.
POSTS MUST BE A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET APART AND
BETWEEN THE OUTLET AND THE BARRIER.
DRIVEN INTO SOLID GROUND AT LEAST 181NCHES.
PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH (WELDED GALVANIZED SCREEN
WITH SQUARE I/4 -1/2 -INCH HOLES) ON THE UPHILL SIDE
PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH (WELDED GALVANIZED
OF THE POSTS TO HOLD THE WASHED STONE IN PLACE.
SCREEN WITH SQUARE 1/4 -1/2-INCH HOLES) ON THE
PUT 6 INCHES OF THE BOTTOM OF THE CLOTH IN THE
UPHILL SIDE OF THE POSTS TO HOLD THE WASHED
TRENCH AND FASTEN IT TO THE POSTS WITH LENGTH50F
STONE IN PLACE. PUT 61NCHES OF THE BOTTOM OF
WIRE.
THE CLOTH IN THE TRENCH AND FASTEN IT TO THE
POSTS WITH LENGTHS OF WIRE.
DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET: FORA SILT BARRIER, WHEN THE TRENCH 15 DUG TO BURY THE
BOTTOM OF THE FABRIC BECAUSE THE BARRIER WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET; FOR A SILT FENCE,
WHEN THE WIRE FENCE IS IN PLACE BECAUSE THE FILTER FABRIC WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET.
REFER TO THE ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE OUTLET IN THE PLAN.
CLEAR STUMPS AND ROOTS FROM THE LOCATION Temporary Silt Fence Gravel Outlet
THE OUTLET. CLEAR ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR THE .7�Scale
EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL.
SAF
BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARE CLOTH AND THE
15 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND SINGLE -STORY BUILDINGS.
UPPER EDGE OF THE FILTER FABRIC BELOW THE OUTLET
BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARE CLOTH, THE
MATERIAL
IN THE TRENCH AND COMPACTTHE FILL.
UPPER EDGE OF THE FILTER FABRIC BELOW THE
25 FEET FOR FORK LIFTS BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND MULTIPLE -STORY BUILDINGS.
N/A
OUTLET, AND THE WIRE FENCE IN THE TRENCH AND
TENSILE YIELD
PLACE A FILTER OF 1 -INCH DIAMETER WASHED STONE ON
COMPACTTHE FILL.
10 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND THE TOE OF FILL SLOPES.
THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE OUTLET. PILE THE STONE UP TO
AVE. 2900 LBS. PER 4'WIDE
ELONGATION AT BREAK (%)
THE TOP OFTHE HARDWARE CLOTH AND OVER THE JOINT
PLACE A FILTEROF I -INCH DIAMETER WASHED STONE
PLACE THE OUTLET SOTHAT WATER FLOWING THROUGH IT WILL NOT CREATE AN EROSION HAZARD
BETWEEN THE OUTLET AND THE BARRIER.
ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE OUTLET. PILE THE STONE
BELOW: AVOID STEEP SLOPES BELOW THE OUTLET AND AREAS WITHOUT PROTECTIVE VEGETATION. USE
UPTO THE TOP OF THE HARDWARE CLOTH AND OVER
SLOPE DRAINS IF NECESSARY.
THE JOINT BETWEEN THE OUTLET AND THE SILT FENCE.
DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET: FORA SILT BARRIER, WHEN THE TRENCH 15 DUG TO BURY THE
BOTTOM OF THE FABRIC BECAUSE THE BARRIER WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET; FOR A SILT FENCE,
WHEN THE WIRE FENCE IS IN PLACE BECAUSE THE FILTER FABRIC WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET.
REFER TO THE ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE OUTLET IN THE PLAN.
CLEAR STUMPS AND ROOTS FROM THE LOCATION Temporary Silt Fence Gravel Outlet
THE OUTLET. CLEAR ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR THE .7�Scale
EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL.
SAF
6' MAX. WITH WIRE -�
ATTACH SAFETY FENCE
TO METAL POSTS USING
METAL WIRE TIES
ORANGE SAFETY FFNCF
,N MINIMU.MU M OF
OR OS
DRIVEN MINIMUM
❑ E] El 1:1❑ 1:10 1:1 El ❑ El 1:1 E)
18" GROUND ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
)
Li
Q in
Tree Protection Fencg
\,!Ll Not to Scale
u
4' MIN.
18" MIN.
-S
o
1 O
i -I
rCCi
V
Mry��
O SC)
z
4 ry
0
t� V
�-I
ID
V
Y,
cu
CU
Q
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
PHYSICAL PROPERTY
TESTS -
REQUIREMENTS
MATERIAL
N/A
POLYETHYLENE
RECOMMENDED COLOR
N/A
"INTERNATIONAL ORANGE"
TENSILE YIELD
ASTM D638
AVE. 2000 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH
ASTM D638
AVE. 2900 LBS. PER 4'WIDE
ELONGATION AT BREAK (%)
ASTM D638
GREATER THAN 1000%
CHEMICAL RESISTANCE
N/A
INERT TO MOST CHEMICALS AND ACIDS
6' MAX. WITH WIRE -�
ATTACH SAFETY FENCE
TO METAL POSTS USING
METAL WIRE TIES
ORANGE SAFETY FFNCF
,N MINIMU.MU M OF
OR OS
DRIVEN MINIMUM
❑ E] El 1:1❑ 1:10 1:1 El ❑ El 1:1 E)
18" GROUND ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
)
Li
Q in
Tree Protection Fencg
\,!Ll Not to Scale
u
4' MIN.
18" MIN.
-S
o
1 O
i -I
rCCi
V
Mry��
O SC)
z
4 ry
0
t� V
�-I
ID
V
Y,
cu
CU
Q

TOPOFBANK
MATTING (TYP)
♦Y��
TOE OF SLOPE
h
Section View
.6' - DA"
11"
Typical Stake
NOTE:
1. PER SPECIFICATIONS, ALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING
SHALL BE COMPOSED OF NATURAL FIBERS.
Erosion Control Matting
5.8 Not to Scale
(1 Water Quality Wetland/Pond
L8Not to Scale
(To be included with final plans.)
2 Step Pool Stormwater Conveyance
5.8 Not to Scale
(Tobe included with final plans.)
A
'ZO aemo
�W ��tiLL
2 �ZOt�
aZ �p�E
W
tv1�0��0��0�
LO
N
O
w
O
O
i -I
CZ
U
G
i— O
4
ca
4- A
o
�U
M
��
x U
a�
a�
V
Q)
r,
It
U
V MIN. OVERLAP IN
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION
AT MAT ENDS
STAKE (TYP)
TOP OF BANK
Z ly
7`
A
J. J. �•
h
„
TOE OF SLOPE J
Plan View
TOPOFBANK
MATTING (TYP)
♦Y��
TOE OF SLOPE
h
Section View
.6' - DA"
11"
Typical Stake
NOTE:
1. PER SPECIFICATIONS, ALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING
SHALL BE COMPOSED OF NATURAL FIBERS.
Erosion Control Matting
5.8 Not to Scale
(1 Water Quality Wetland/Pond
L8Not to Scale
(To be included with final plans.)
2 Step Pool Stormwater Conveyance
5.8 Not to Scale
(Tobe included with final plans.)
A
'ZO aemo
�W ��tiLL
2 �ZOt�
aZ �p�E
W
tv1�0��0��0�
LO
N
O
w
O
O
i -I
CZ
U
G
i— O
4
ca
4- A
o
�U
M
��
x U
a�
a�
V
Q)
r,
It
U

COIR
Permanent Culvert Crossing
59 Not to Scale
(Tobe included with final plans.)
MIX OF NATIVE GRASS
Profile
NATIVE SOIL
DENSE MIX OF NATIVE
5 AND FORB SEED
NATIVE SOIL
Section A -A'
Proposed Vegetated Swale
-9 Not to Scale
(To be included with final plans.)
NOTES
1. SWALESTO BE INSTALLED PER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS.
2. LEAVE EXISTING BOTTOM WIDTH AND DEPTH AND GRADE SIDES
SLOPES BACK TO A MINIMUM OF 2.5:1.
3. REGRADE SOIL, APPLY TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEED MIX,
AND THEN INSTALL COIR MATTING,
4. MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE FOR VEGETATED SWALE IS 8%.
S. IF LONGITUDINAL SLOPE IS GREATERTHAN S%, INSTALL CHECK
DAMS WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 50'. MINIMUM OF TWO
CHECK DAMS.
6. CHECK DAMS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" TALL WITH A MINIMUM
6" OF FREE BOARD AND HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 2'.
7. CHECK DAMS SHOULD BE CAPPED WITH SOD MATS.
w
It
MAX 2.5:1
41
Ci
1�1 \41
W
O
W
W
A
y
y
y
A'
W
W
W
W
EARTHEN CHECK DAMV'
(OPTIONAL)
W
�
W
MINv 4.0'
�Y
�J/
L
W
�
W
� W
�
W
ILI W
Plan View
Proposed Vegetated Swale
-9 Not to Scale
(To be included with final plans.)
NOTES
1. SWALESTO BE INSTALLED PER PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS.
2. LEAVE EXISTING BOTTOM WIDTH AND DEPTH AND GRADE SIDES
SLOPES BACK TO A MINIMUM OF 2.5:1.
3. REGRADE SOIL, APPLY TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEED MIX,
AND THEN INSTALL COIR MATTING,
4. MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE FOR VEGETATED SWALE IS 8%.
S. IF LONGITUDINAL SLOPE IS GREATERTHAN S%, INSTALL CHECK
DAMS WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 50'. MINIMUM OF TWO
CHECK DAMS.
6. CHECK DAMS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" TALL WITH A MINIMUM
6" OF FREE BOARD AND HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 2'.
7. CHECK DAMS SHOULD BE CAPPED WITH SOD MATS.
w
It