20021794 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20080623

..

@ ~w~uJ-- r-eLb~o\-ecl@

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

Date of Office Review: It - 2 '?J,f] FD8" Evaluator's Name(s): --rl-h'l \ "
Date of Report: \ \ \ 2[0'1 (r-eC' \ d urL1-D~) Report for Monitoring ~ D"7 ( Lf;- 5 )

Date of Field Review: --U2:z.! 0<:\ Evaluator's Name(s): -;l--liu
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: miSer: LASACL (~l\ is:) ') EPA ( ~m ) I,AJi\rt~trr{.UJ\s..)1
Weather Conditions (today & recent). LP ,
Directions to Site: 5 mi E of Snow Hill, adj to T to Contentnea Creek; from Raleigh: Rte 70 to Goldsboro; @ Goldsboro, take rte
13 N toward Snow Hill; p s Snow Hill & c~ntentn a River; rt (E) on NC 903; rt (S) on Lily Pad Rd, site is -1/3
~: M .. l +- It. rCLlA.
I. Office Review Information:
I

I Project Number: 20021794
1 Project Name: Neu-Con: Alexander Wetland Mitigation P
Event
i County(ies) Greene
: Report Receipt: Mitigation Plan
I Basin & subbasi~~ O::Q'20203 Site Visit - Wetlands
i Nearest Stream: Contentnea Creek Report Receipt: Monitoring
i Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: , " Credit Release
I Mitigator Type: EEPIWRP ( .J -tL\~-.J.D\l~ ll~ Report Review - Wetlands
DOT Status: DOT tyU'-\t~ bOxI\L ~ . CXxt~"'L.lct\ (Xl
mr\1 q --\\1.n.\ g;,p....'";>IX)l? I ~ ,0 @ ~
Total Mitiaation on Site
Wetland: 21,55 acres
Stream:
Buffer:

Proiect History

Event Date
9/26/2002
12/3/2002
1/23/2006
6/15/2006
3/7/2007
.~\ 1V'D~

2-Cc6

,
:1

'I

Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
i Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No

: Mitigation required on site: 1 *Add significant project-related events: reports,
: Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.

_ During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
_ On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit

II. Summary of Results:

I

I Mitigation Component
1
I
,20021794-1 18.5 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Restoration

Monitoring Success Success
Year (report) (field) Resolved i

20021794-2 0.9 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Creation
20021794-3 2.15 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Preservatio

6
Go
(p

~
~

Version 1,0 (August 22, 2007)

Page 1 of 2

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

MITIGATION SUCCESS: 8
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: ~uccessf partially successful
i List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:

Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):

Version 1.0 (August 22,2007)

...

unsuccessful

Page 2 of 2

,

,.

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table ".k~
NC Division of Water Quality (:\ (l..C.. ~
Component: 18.5 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Restoration -\' (). Component ID: 20021794-1
Description: t-JCX\---n'J.erlv\..Q u.:d- ~ ~
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:

r
I HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
l water table w/in 12" of soil surface for at least 7% of GS (17

.g~st~h{=~
Morutoring report indicates success ~ No
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on mitigation plan? Yes No
based on wetland type? Yes No
; List any remaining ,hydrology issue~ t,o address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.): i
~\. mDn+V'U-\ ~~ \J\~\~-\o J (~~CL~ +c\a.olLood o..~~ '
.~ C~~'.~ re~CJL.c\un.nC) 2C:{)1 dn:x.~~u-Cre_.\eA.fd'\U~ '6O/~)
:~U'b_ @l - t) OJ I) J- sk... t..U~ ~\-- Ln ~nnq_L ~ COx\U.. c\f ~ --t.DrLl cu..rnmer
--;-. -tbv" Gle~ eLL\- ~ aJ2JL w-e...\J,~ ~ .;::::u..C(;~..:~:~L> CD~ \JI'-- o..Q.9- ~
I SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: 6 - - - -
. Are soils hydric or becoming hydric?
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any re~aining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
i rJ; A \l-Y r-e~') J w ~ (LA 0 t?

Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in upper 12 inches
Drift lines
_ Drainage patterns in wetlands
_ Sediment deposits
Water marks

Yes No

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
320 3-year old TPA @ end of Year 3; 260 5-year old TPA @ StOry TPA/% cover
end of Year 5; up to 20% of community composition may be : :\-eC1 ~d.0mi.n~ ~CLa.O
volunteers (RM, sweet gum, loblolly, etc,) - remedial aqtioQ ~l' ".---:' !.
may be requ if vols > 20% deemed a problem"~~\ oe::; '\ ~~V\:- ~(~ ULU.~. ~(\SL\ lj0 Clr\J.C9- .
. Monitoring report indicates success? Ye No ~'\.Ci cak-.- Q~J,_o.J\.C~lS, ~~
Average TPA for entire site (per repo : 3,5 ,Ch..Q.D-tn,LL'\-- cx::t..k.-~,Q)..LQJ\C~ <<Dc VlCU-.4Lt\
Observational field data agrees? Yes No ~0...Q6.. ~piU..lY:)-\G--Xocliwn a.\~*cIA.u.t-n
based on community composition? Yes No . k::::lo-.clt rM 'l nr-. ,- ~ ':::>~o... ~ \0 M-\ cd-
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No . .'~~~.I ) ~.
tr:::.:'J ~ ~pe..lo- &--.Jy "::, ::'~'. lo,~ L C)i' 6.-. .
Vegetation planted on site? ~ No l()....l..l/\..L oa..k..-- ~LL"::> LCLu..r'lfDLl.D->
Date of last planting: lJ.3iGWIAJ o~- ~c..L0:. p~U-Q ~
L,,!gc:tatio~ growing successfully? ~ No \1 0 l.un-~ ._~ C.Pu...v-kd U{ \?A

! Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation: ~~ ~~- UCb\..llclo.rvt\o~ c.:A~-
i \Z,ffi - ~u..r\. ~~YJ ,
i Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas: ~CSuY\.csu-- ~ ~~4:-~'\J...Ls.
I Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover): ttCk..orct:-CCiA.L-'fL~' D~~
i A.Ce.h - ~\ (\.Ll') ~, ,
i.,. List any remaining vegetation.is...sues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):~, ,6, ~
}re,pcw--\- 8o\e~ mo..ffi.-\ -tA-ti0 ~ 0-tJtm ~~~-?oeA-\'IQ m

r~~~~~o~~~dC0~ U\CbV\~
-ve~aw~~ibSrt het-bO[. ~LC.. Url~ CLl~ vo--Q', oYI ~. ~ ~
()'\DY\.\1--, re.pOr+-', JU..n~ c~ ~~ Qo~~~0LfJPko-l
(.W-LL~ t.~~) ,
=~ ~ ~C-. l r-6Lju.:fro+ r'Ylisc. ~) CN\ LrnR~ ~

-..

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria ~aluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
~ /' Coastal
P< . Riverine
Monitoring report indicat success? Yes No _ Riparian
I
, Observational fiel ata agrees? Yes No _ Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWA nalysis results to this report _ Non-riparian (drier)

List any re aining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):

MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:

Additional comments (e,g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):

- During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.

- Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.

- Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:

Q~ Ui~\'
(YprcAo~~~LD luDuiCjCX' (-h-cre~) ~ ~ l ~2 comQ v.:l pt:k:D
~A ~ ~UL. ~ ~~ U=:> ~~ do~
LLfD~ '6U-cce2>s, <-~n\'l.l~ <61-t:L W~, c&!2 .~ l~ ':5u.cce~~

@ ~ +'ncU- o..u.1D ~ + rplo\- 4 ().JU LY\ I ~
C)\-~-~\)'{) Cuu..D- -4- ~ -\0 ~ ~-f5-txnl.nc) tJ-eAL\. tudLQ.
~Q)'LOd<- ~ ~~hL ~l lncu~ tI'- ~hlD C~

Version 1,0 (August 22, 2007)

Page 2 of 6

Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in upper 12 inches

Monitoring report indicates success Yes No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? Yes No _ Drainage patterns in wetlands
i based on mitigation plan? Yes No _ Sediment deposits
~_ .___ b~~~d.on wetland type? Yes . No . _ Water marks

. List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

Component: 0.9 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Creation Component ID: 20021794-2
Description: r:?k "" '" \;-..r-- ::h ~ ~
location within project: ~~ x-e ~ Q::.; on rg ~ (J

III. Success Criteria Evaluation: a..JU_ <J-.l.:;o..JL~ d-o~+e\Jl.A..
-- -- ----~---- ---

HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
~0-2>~.~

SOilS - Approved Success Criteria:
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
list indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
~.. O->:~ re.~. ~

Dominant Plant Species
Species StOry TPA/% cover

Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No

Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:

i Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):

List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e,g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)

Page 3 of 6

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques:

NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No _ Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No _ Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report _ Non-riparian (drier)

List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):

. MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful'
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:

Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):

- During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.

- Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.

- Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)

Page 4 of 6

..

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

Component: 2.15 acres Wetland (Non-riparian, wetter) Preservation
Description:
Location within project:

III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
,-_.. ..-- -- ----- - --- ---

I HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
qf~

Component 10: 20021794-3

Monitoring report indicates success Yes No
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on mitigation plan? Yes No
based on wetland type? Yes No

! List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):
i

Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in upper 12 inches
Drift lines
_ Drainage patterns in wetlands
_ Sediment deposits
Water marks

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: ~
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e,g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):

VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:

w/A-

Dominant Plant Species
Species StOry TPA/% cover

I Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
i Average TPA for entire site (per report):
I Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No

Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:

Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):

I List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):

Version 1.0 (August 22,2007)

Page 5 of 6

~

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality

NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No _ Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No _ Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report, _ Non-riparian (drier)

List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc,):

: MITIGATION SUCCESS:
I Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:

Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):

- During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. ObseNe preseNation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.

- Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field obseNations.

- Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)

Page 6 of 6