20090092 Ver 1_Application_20090127

Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no 2 0 9 2
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction ' ication (PCN) Form
A Applicant Information
1 Processing
la Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
X Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number or General Permit (GP) number 31
1 c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? XYes No
1d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
X401 Water Quality Certification - Regular X Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express X Ripanan Buffer Authorization
1 e Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
? Yes X No For the record only for Corps Permit

? Yes X No
if Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program ? Yes XNo
1 g Is the project located in any of NC's twenty'coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below X Yes ? No
1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes X No
2 Project Information
2a Name of project Craven 119
2b County Craven
2c Nearest municipality / town Cove City
2d Subdivision name N/A
2e NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no 2B 202521
3 Owner Information N/A
3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed
3b Deed Book and Page No
3c Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
3d Street address
3e City, state, zip
3f Telephone no
3g Fax no
3h Email address
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
4 Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a Applicant is XAgent ? Other, specify
4b Name Jay B Johnson
4c Business name
(if applicable) North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d Street address P O Box 1587
4e City, state, zip Greenville, NC 27835
4f Telephone no 252-830-3490
4g Fax no 252-830-3341
4h Email address tbjohnson@ncdot gov
5 Agent(Consuitant Information (if applicable) NIA
5a Name
5b Business name
(if applicable)
5c Street address
5d City, state, zip
5e Telephone no
5f Fax no
5g Email address
Page 2 of 11
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
la Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) Craven 119
Latitude N 35 159618 Degrees Longitude
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) - W 77 339749 Degrees
(DD DDDDDD) (-DD DDDDDD)
1 c Property size NIA acres
2. Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to Grape Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water C,Sw,NSW
2c River basin Neuse
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Agricultural
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
NIA
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
60'
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Bridge to Pipe Replacement
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The Existing Timber Bridge will be replaced with 2@95x67"x40' CAAP with Headwalls Excavators,Dump Trucks,and
Crane Trucks
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/

? Yes XNo ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made? N/A
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company
Name (if known) Other NCDOT and NCDWQ
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes XNo ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b if yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ? Yes XNo
6b If yes, explain
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
XWetlands XStreams - tributaries X Buffers
XOpen Waters ? Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0
2h Comments
3. Stream Impacts
if there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (1) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 X P ? T X PER
? INT ? Corps
X DWQ 20' 45'
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? PEI T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts Acres
31 Comments
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individual) list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c

Type of impact 4d

Waterbody type 4e

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f Total open water impacts 00
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Constniction N/A
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a

Pond ID 5b

Proposed use or purpose 5c
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e
Upland
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total 00
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 5of11
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a XNeuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
Pipe
B1 X P ? T Installat Grape Creek ? Yes 2,400 1
600
ion X No ,
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h Total buffer impacts 2,400 1,600
61 Comments
Page 6 of 11
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
No 404 Wetlands are Filled Grape Creek is not an Anadromous Fish Location
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Slopes will be Vegetated instead of Rip Rap for Slope Stabilization and Protection
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State? ? Yes XNo
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ? DWQ ? Corps

2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank N/A
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program NIA
4a Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested acres
4f Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested acres
49 Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan N/A
Elf using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a descnpbon of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ N/A
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes X No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required

Zone 6c
Reason for impact 6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 15
6f Total buffer mitigation required- I
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified XYes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
? Yes XNo
Comments Existing Side Ditches are not Relocated
2 Stormwater Management Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 05%
2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes XNo
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why Existing Roadside Ditches Will not be
Relocated
2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
? Cerhfied Local Government
2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review NIA
3a In which local governments junsdiction is this protect? NIA
? Phase 11
3b Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply) ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review N/A
? Coastal counties

4a Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply)
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review NIA
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page;9 of 11
° PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
lb If you answered `yes" to the above, does the protect require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter ) ? Yes ? No
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violabon(s)
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
NIA
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
? Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North carolina Wildlife resources Commission
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation (l Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Flood Mapping
Jay B Johnson January 20,
(344mv tA&A,--
2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name A ica is Signature
' Date
(Agent
s signature i v lid onl a uthor¢ation letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 11
_ a
Bridge I & A Form 10 (86) F PROMPT ACTION Bridge No 240£ t ?
Revised 313012000
NOTICE County ?cIAVEN!
_
North Carolina
Department of Transportation Bridge Inspection & Analysis Route
"?
Division of Highways
Bridge Maintenance Unit NHS, 0
BrOge Inspection
Team Leader `BG'LITTE TON, JR., _ _ r Date ' Ir2151200$ Y`
Assisted By PCJ?tPQC,6C F _._ _
MEMORANDUM TO BRAD PRICE?? ???-?
Badge Maintenance Supervisor
A condition inspection of the subject bridge was made 92%412{}Q8 It is recommended that
the conditions listed below be given prompt attention An electronic notice of this memorandum Is furnished
for your use Please send an electronic notice of the action taken as a result of these recommendations to
the State Bridge Maintenance Engineer and one to your Superintendent Retain one copy for your files
CODE PROMPT ACTION PHOTOGRAPH
TF 2 DECK BOARD #2 OUT FROM EBT 1
?
IS BROKEN THRU AT BAY 1 DUE TO - -
NAILERS DECAYED AND/OR
MISSING OVER BEAMS 1 & 2. .-

t

..... ._ 1
.r
.
N

REPAIRS By Bridge Maintenance Supervisor Date
COMPLETE Action
Taken :

L
VIIILL NOT CO RECOMMENDED By Division Bridge Maintenance Engineer
WORK AT THIS TIME
Date
Distribution Bridge Maintenance Supervisor Original and 2 Copies
-
Division Bridge Maintenance Engineer 1 60
py
Dmsion Engineer 1 Co
Central Bridge Maintenance Office 1 Copy
BRIDGE INSPECTOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
Bndge 2$0119 CountyGRA??NEN> Date 'i2-64$
These Repairs Should Be Made Within Twelve Months From The Date Of This Inspection.
Function Description of Unit Quanity Remarks Est
Code Function cost
552 COMPLETE CLEAN SF 400 THE BEAMS ARE CORRODED WITH PAINT PEELING
& PAINTING OF & MISSING
STRUCTURAL STEEL '
580 MAINT OF TIMBER MH 200 THE BULKHEADS @ END BENTS 1 & 2 HAVE BOARDS
SUBSTRUCTURE WITH 100%a DECAY WITH FILL LEAKAGE.
(I - ''^T ACTION)
THE BULKHEADS ARE DECAYED WITH GAPS
ALLOWING FILL LEAKAGE.
THE WINGWALL BOARDS ARE DECAYED ANDIOR
MISSING AT END BENTS 1 & 2 ALLOWING EROSION OF
FILL
THE RT END OF END BENT 1 CAP IS DECAYED.
DEBRIS ON TOP OF CAPS.
P-0 @ END BENT 1 IS DECAYED. P-2 @ END BENT 2
IS DECAYED. P-4 @ END BENT 2 HAS NUMEROUS
VERTICAL FACIAL CRACKS TO 1!4" WIDE &
DELAMINATION, FULL HEIGHT.
581 REPAIRS @ TIMBER MH 200 DECK BOARD #2 FROM END BENT 1 IS BROKEN THRU
BRIDGE FLOORS AT BAY 1 @! NW CORNER (PROMPT ACT'-ON)
NAILER DECAYED OVER B-1 @ END BENT 9 (PIA)
NAILER DECAYED OVER B,2 @ END BENTS 1 & 2 (PIA)
NAILER DECAYED OVER B-5 @ END BENT 1 (PIA)
NAILER DECAYED OVER B-7 @ END BENT 1 (PIA)
NAIILER DECAYED OVER B-8 @ END BENTS 1 & 2 WIA)
NAILER DECAYED OVER B-9 @ END BENT 2 (PIA)
NAILER DECAYED OVER B-10 @ THREE (3) LOCATIONS
ALONG FULL LENGTH. (PROMPT ACTION)
(PIA) = PROS "0T ACTION
578 GENERAL MAINT OF MH 50 BEAM #10 HAS REDUCED FLANGE WITH SECTION
SUPERSTRUCTURE LOSS & PITTING ALONG FULL LENGTH
Revised 614197
State of North Carolina
Dept of Transportation
Division of Highways
Team Leader BG LITTLETON, JR.
Assisted By PDI
Item No. I Grade"
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
Bridge Inspecion & Analysis
10 5 (STEEL BEAMS)
BEAM #10 IS CORRODED WITH FLANGE REDUCED TO 1/16" & PITTED AREA IS 7 1/2'
BACK FROM END BENT 2 (PHOTO)
B-10 IS PITTED TO 1116" ALONG BOTTOM FLANGE OTHER BEAMS ARE SIMILAR
(PHOTO)
PAINT IS PEELING WITH SURFACE CORROSION AT WEBS THRU OUT (PHOTO)
16 6 (DRAINAGE)
DRAINAGE THRU DECK BOARD GAPS
52 6 (PAINT)
THE PAINT IS PEELING WITH SURFACE CORROSION NOTED AT THE WEBS &
FLANGES OF STEEL BEAM #8 ALL OTHERS ARE SIMILAR (PHOTO)
35a 5 (TIMBER CAPS)
FILL LEAKAGE THRU BULKHEAD & GAPS IN DECK BOARDS IS CAUSING BUILD UP ON
END BENT 1 CAP IN BAY 5 SIMILAR AT ALL BAYS AT END BENTS 1 & 2 (PHOTO)
THE RT END OF END BENT 1 CAP IS DECAYED TO 6" WIDE X 6" HIGH X 7" LONG INTO
END (PHOTO)
35b 5 (TIMBER PILES)
P-4 @ END BENT 1 IS DECAYED TO 1" DEEP X 360 DEGREES FROM THE GL UP 24"
HIGH (PHOTO)
P-2 @ END BENT 2 IS DECAYED WITH SECTION MISSING ON THE SOUTH FACE TO
12" WIDE X 20" HIGH X 1" DEEP (PHOTO)
P-4 @ END BENT 2 HAVE NUMEROUS VERTICAL CRACKS TO 114" WITH
DELAMINATION, FULL HEIGHT (PHOTO)
900? a Nvf,

E0id 2,98 ON
n. a
Cti
£1•SI 6802/2T/TQ

Li-i N
0
w

N

Ile
O Y

11
N
i
W
O

n

, m
O n
o M
N
t- ?O 00
c" v
01 W N O
O
m I w
li g t
;n 2 I-
Z z o a r z v
> M
?
I
? NO
N ,I` W o o I- oo'?U
0
?Wl= tj w
a r U MQ
°
W d m t Q p U LECE r)
D
V

+• = tY

O Z t

V
t a

O I (,)

OC (Y
X
M U Z (D
2 DO
V n W 0 o 1
.,
Q vzi I
I ti
3 Q
w o
M 7-Z
N? > c) U t-
n°. N V)
? C
?
Q
dZp fl-
o z

LLJ
W W
W
(r cV TWO N V) :t? >_ N ?p
bL?iti1 UQ Z jW j mN
N
N
m
N Lu

O OU
a t+- m r jU 2
,? v
V N t a) t
t c? m W w
cr
O v °Q N
Y ? Q U
0
c0 Z
N u
O -
Lit O
UD {..
w or
U ov)
uL
.
W
?J
wn?w
odrZO

00

W `"o t ?
?
?
?? O W

as QU
o<:2 a
Z

W LL
m M w?9IS

?

? b
W C5 U_
v a

C,4 0.
N t to U M

cr
lO a
0 w 4
.

O t
`n a " to J O

yF-F-
Q U t? 1`?l

Z Q
N
mm U S
° Z(nZ N n Q K
w
W a s iru> (3 in
"'

b W? of
M co °m co

W

Q
o m aa ?
(L-0
O Q cn
< tn Li
4 ?
a.
4

m? 20?
U Ln Ld ,1 Q mm ? 4
i
I a

A HN
(If co
Z) Ln
--- pp Z
a O(\j ?
+

U

pn t O
??OO
Z

U q
p

LL

O ?
+ Y

? tiZO'jQ
LL
t cr_ - MOOZa
d
o N O w
ZN
O v d
o t
to w l.t. w OI ~ qO Z N
0
? b IL
M
O MQLn
?
w aJ
?°
° '
w
a -
z
W
1Au?o MdN Q"zmx
o t
i
w i5 ?Z
a Kl ON t
a
-
w tt tow "
aNF-3N t
7 a
w
I Q " N W M U M
tnt-3N d1 U
j0
>_ °D ¢C) N
a I
a o
W _
?a?t- °z
t-
J X lp
a? a ^,
? a d o a
agca
U N N - N
co m +? W +) V CO `" W
CO
C7
( W °? O O
O?? ? N t7
I,j
X
n U
W 41
b
°
N 1--
Y

? ?
>
f-
b?z a Q, ?N ?c
r ?4r
> J_
N ?p m Q a
?
?
Q V
CZ ty O U Q '
?? V1?

-
``? - O +
O W O }
2
f? J F.
L, LL
___.---
0 t
t X
° ? } L, I LL
L
C)
Z M
z
j
Z
I Q U 2=
'a v to v Ln to
cV
dL ?tT m
?
l4 O
x 4
Q p
d
` N Z?Q V)zQW
k
p
EU` } 00 NO00 O00
Q ?QO Q00
w
Q
N NQ
J
= J
W _
Lt7 W Q
O
? Q
O W ? ?!
?
y U' 3 V
2 2 Q (/)
O
?? `? tt n tt `D tt N
Q, to
t

?R10 o
NRD 83 `
o
LO c?
x= U D]
m p
RJ J
In
O t? 2
a d
J 2
a W2
m ? W
ti
",n n n"
w o 4 en f to F F N kn to
W
r'
I I- x z g
vi Sri
~ N o
o ? o
W ??
W a
O o O W p=
W I.r? ?4
O ?
? ?
° N '- "'
?a (am", UWJ
C? u aua'-'ava?--v
Q d
0
-<
U
' W 00
-0
= D t=
W ? ?
W a 47 N ?
ti
a .
L
. C, ?
O a
-
27 -
o W--? ?
m
th U
QOUN
S Ir V
W O F? W
~ ?2OW :2
o
NN-N-N-N-N?
m
o
jmmC
o?
J4.W1
co O q 13f
M
xo
mm

>
0 X
3 0
°

LLJ
W W ti (
L
O

IN
o
a a a a
? u' P
d W q, vv
77
??? ZQ a a a a

Bridge TO Pipe Replacement, Craven 119, SR
1237,I3eat Swamp Road over Grape Creek Craven
County with 2@ 95"x67"x40' CARP
Erosion Control Schedule
• Install erosion/sediment control measures according to plans.
• Grading of slopes; 1.5: 1= stabilize with Class B riprap
• Seed all disturbed areas as soon as final grading is completed.
• Clean out and/or rework all temporary sediment control measures after
significant rainfall event (or as otherwise needed). These measures should be
maintained until a permanent vegetative cover is established and project is
complete
Pipe Installation Schedule
• Install erosion/sediment control devices per plans.
• Remove material while limiting, as much as possible, material and sediment
from entering the stream and/or escaping from the project.
• Prepare pipe foundation while taking care to limit material and sediment from
entering the stream and/or escaping from the protect. Where possible new
grade should be below the existing streambed. Bedding material will be washed
stone.
• Place new pipe and compact fill.
• Install slope protection on outlet and inlet ends of pipe (Class B Granite riprap)
• Establish permanent vegetation as soon as possible
• Remove sediment control devices after project has stabilized and permanent
vegetative cover is established.
Bridge I&A Form 1(82)H FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
State of North Carolina
Dept of Transportation Brifte Inspecion & Analysis
Division of Highways
Team Leader BG LITTLETON, JR.
Assisted By PDI
Item No Grade
35c 4 (TIMBER BULKHEADSIWINGS)
BULKHEAD BOARD #5 BELOW END BENT 1 CAP IS DECAYED TO 100% WITH FILL
LEAKAGE FROM P-1 TO 3' RT OF P-3 (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
BULKHEAD BOARD #2 UP FROM GL IS 100% DECAYED WITH FILL LEAKAGE AT END
BENT 1 FROM P-3 RT 3' (PROMPT ACTION)
THREE (3) BULKHEAD BOARDS ARE 100% DECAYED & MISSING AT THE RT
EXTERIOR SIDE OF EB 1, SW CORNER WITH FILL LEAKAGE (PROMPT ACTION)
(PHOTO)
BULKHEAD BOARD #4 UNDER END BENT 2 CAP IS 100% DECAYED WITH FILL
LEAKAGE FROM 2' LT OF P-2 TO 3' LT OF P-4 (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
BULKHEAD BOARDS #2 & #5 ABOVE GL AT END BENT 2 ARE 100% DECAYED WITH
FILL LEAKAGE BETWEEN P-3 & P-4 (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
THE RT EXTERIOR BULKHEAD AT END BENT 2 HAS SEVERAL BOARDS WITH 100%
DECAY ALLOWING FILL LEAKAGE AT THE SE CORNER (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
THE NE WINGWALL BOARDS ARE DECAYED (PHOTO)
THE NE EXTERIOR BULKHEAD BOARDS ARE DECAYED (PHOTO)
THE NW EXTERIOR BULKHEAD & WINGWALL HAVE DECAYED BOARDS WITH GAPS
ALLOWING FILL LEAKAGE (PHOTO)
THE TOP WINGWALL BOARD IS MISSING AT SW CORNER (PHOTO)
THE SE WINGWALL AT END BENT 2 HAS DECAYED BOARDS WITH BOARDS MISSING
(PHOTO)
50 6 (APPROACH RDWY)
WEST APPROACH IS SOIL EAST IS SIMILAR (PHOTO)
54 6 (RESPONSE TO LIVE LOAD)
THERE IS A MODERATE AMOUNT OF FLEXING IN THE TIMBER DECK DUE TO
DECAYED NAILERS
61 YES (PROMPT ACTION)
ISSUED FOR DECK, NAILERS & BULKHEADS
62 YES (PRESENT POSTING)
SV-11, TTST-17 TONS
ACME Mapper 2 0 - 2 0 km NxNE of Great Dover Swamp NC Page 1 of 1

N

,..

r
k

? '?8

? A Y f1w
L+
s
} t
µs
? t? a
p
.
w
L
qj p
- a t t ?q
c t w U 1JV? f?
? y?t
{[f^?" 1
Y
l ,w
n k
t $ ?}Lsli}t $V1%}q'1?i SCI t A
t A? F

5 " x r ' , 1 r

49

?
? ^ ye dl
Y t
1 Al?? ? ? i 4L4 h^ YeX ?
? ?ZU p : _t 'a xb

x
i'w. ,. q - . Y?? v Y

? kt «
r
l ° y f " ' rT?
`°it4

3 Y
r ?f x _ t
,e x ? ., ?
x x
? e 'v c
.n.
try ? Y?'i v r
? ? ¢ ?
.. i}
-
r
„ ?
, r F?Y t ?x

ate

Map data 02MB Tete Atlas - s arms of Usp
http Hmapper acme coml 12/512008
cc State Bridge Maintenance Engineer
Bridge Maintenance Superintendent
File
Bridge I & A Form 10 (86) F PROMPT ACTION Bridge No, h ,,240T'1?9, '
Revised 611311997
NOTICE CONTINUED County cRa?vEni ` ;.'`
Department of Transportation Bridge Inspection &. Analysis Route SR 1237
Division of Highways
Bridge Maintenance Unit
Bridge Inspection
CODE PROMPT ACTION PHOTOGRAPH
7' 1 THE TIMBER BULKHEADS AT END
TBH 44 BENTS=14 2 HAVE BOARDS WITH
100% DECAY WITH VOIDS ALLOWING,
?
?

FILL LEAKAGE BETWEEN PILES V thy' _???
.
Y: ?
XT' EXTERIOR PORTIONS OF WAL LSz

rd?,

`
BO
J4RD#S,BELO,W END+BENTG11)GAP
WITH 160% DEGAYI
VOID
ALLOWING° '
,
,
FILL LEAKAGEz,UTHERS,ARE,<
SIMILAR AT END;BENT 1
BULKMEADi
?
,
- - -
s t
,
, ?

a a r s
s /

CODE PROMPT ACTION! PHOTOGRAPH

BOARD #4 BELOW END BENT 2,CAP .
' WITH 100% DEQAY/VOID'ALLO.WING;
i FILL
LEAKAGE. QTHER3'ARE
g ,
S A I d R
SIMILAR-AT END BENT 2,,BULKHEAb
a n0. 3 n .• M1x '
_ 2

+
_
' n n f i of ; g
x
f 3
3:i
,:
. V .
V
Y _x aF r 5 ra^'n '2 t i t .`. „t au ym J-5 h 4 JJ`t fC

I
ti t v Yx J.z
"? -- -
-
? fl??Q a a
e
a>
??a 4e1?
I o ?
n A m
r
m
aw ? s ? A
4
v ? ? z
pll g m
Yt ? "°a z ? in r
m -I
C y n
N IE h°fE
z ('i'? SNOUI. DEq P." \
-TI
V) t- _ _ EDGE OF PgyEMENT
m EDGE OF PAVEMENT
v rn
n
o ?
~ ? n /./?
D m VJ
m r O
OZ n
m r I r
g ?1
m C
r --4
A _
-`?i BBD gg 3 ? z
A ? FJ TI 4.J ? ` ? E N r Vf I N ' ? fl5 ? ? Z
o D $ b e l$ ?? m m a p m o .? y ~
m .1
3 m z
V rr-i. D 3] n Q
p y r m %
- t n o ? A
y N ? O
e m N A N y ti
X Z T .?{
N C r °
r
• ? T D
.mv ?r1
A
? r
• e O ?IC N
0 to II
O?n
9 F-
m -m
=m
m ? ° n $ O
o mg moo
x? o x m n a
x A v' ?"' m co 5z
-?-I pp z C 1 p y -I C=
D O N O V) ( m <1
Q nm 4 o O b ®?* © 9 O n-1
Tl m r
D
> m O p p K b A n m a fm~" Cp'1 o S C)
p I- z an -. m s m g N Z
m c C-) - n m a A K a A m v p
0
K- m
N I' Z A z ti m z o m ni ~
? ~ C rn ? m m v c N °m
Z Co a
rn
m Q
n
m
D
as
PROPOSED BRIDCF_ 10 PIPE REPLACEMENT
CRAVEN 119
SR 12-7h'EATN SWAMP ROAD OVER GRAPE t rtEEK
PROJECT NUMBER 2h 2025 1 !
COUNTY CRAVEN
DATE 01-20-09
CRAVEN 119 EXISTING TIMBER BRIDGE 2X' )LONG

W
m
z
=U
DOWNSTREAM PROFILE
PROPOSED 20 95" x 67" x 40' CARP
WITH HEADWALLS
TOP OF AWS (CROWN OF ROADWAY) --?
----- ------ ---- ------
-' UNDERCL ARANCE ---?; <r
Co
18
0
W N?NL?-? in
N
z
ca
Q
z
Ll.J
SR 1237
--- -------
I
18?
Lu
DRAWING IS NOT TO SC,klE
L 18,
cc State Bridge Maintenance Engineer
Bridge Maintenance Superintendent
File
Bridge I & A Form 10 (86) F PROMP T ACTION Bridge No' 24490 11
Revised 611311997
NOTICE CONTINUED county cRaVE[V'r'°°
r 7? ? . F
Department of Transportation Bridge Insp ection & Analysis Route
SR 1237
't

Division of Highways I
,
r
Bridge Maintenance Unit
tinage inspection
CODE PROMPT ACTION PHOTOGRAPH
7N,1'11'1111 (7} TIMBER NAIL.ERS ARE DECAYED
1
ANDIOR MISSING SECTIONS OVER
;STEE&EfEAMS #1, 2, 5, 7, .8, 9 & 1't)_ a
4
,! ;
n

DECAYED & MISSING. POR710,14S

,v t
r
VARY IN LENGTH= FROM,24" 7h047'
LONG`.

r NAILER OVER BEAM=1' @&EBT END:

? -
r , t ?`: -• A 1, -
M t ?
` i'S`t ? ? • ?
i
' y
a ,
? `?fM * ?, d
£ e? of `„ x ,
x ?
r
?
r f `y<
'{F, 14 ? irk„ ,r
- - nt x
`

CODE PROMPT ACTION PHOTOGRAPH
n
k

s n n ,+ t

` } E
NAILER
-OVER BEAM 10 @sMl®- t 9? r'a (Y "Y - ?' ? F ?';..i ? 1? iaSVi?K -Ss?

'-?
%?, isL
? t 7T aJ i
PORTION r ?? .m ?Y x, s Z* w.x
'i

i NaTE,,,PHOTOS OF REMAINING
DECAY EQrNA1LERS ARE SIMILAR:

Bndge MA Form 1(82)H FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
State of Forth Carolina
Dept of Transportation Bridge Inspecion & Analysis
Division of Highways
Team Leader BG LITTLETON, JR
Assisted By PDI T
Item No Grade
2b 4 (TIMBER DECK & NAILERS)
DECK BOARD #2 OVER END BENT 1 BROKEN THRU IN BAY #1 DUE TO DECAYED &
MISSING NAILERS OVER BEAMS 1 & 2 (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-1 DECAYED & MISSING FROM END OVER EB 1 OUT 30" (PROMPT
ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-2 DECAYED & MISSING FROM END OVER EB 1 OUT 30" (PROMPT
ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-2 DECAYED & MISSING FROM END OVER EB 2 BACK 25" LONG
(PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-5 DECAYED & MISSING FROM END OVER EB 1 OUT 30" (PROMPT
ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-7 DECAYED WITH PORTIONS MISSING FROM END OVER EB 1 OUT
70" (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-8 DECAYED WITH PORTIONS MISSING FROM END OVER EB 1 OUT
30" (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-8 DECAYED WITH PORTIONS MISSING FROM END OVER EB 2 BACK
72" LONG (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-9 DECAYED & MISSING FROM END OVER EB 2 BACK 24" LONG
(PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-10 DECAYED & MISSING FROM END OVER EB 1 OUT 30" (PROMPT
ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER BA 0 IS DECAYED 24" LONG BEGINNING 52" OUT FROM EB 1 WITH
PORTIONS MISSING (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
NAILER OVER B-10 IS DECAYED 62" LONG BEGINNING 96" OUT FROM EB 1 WITH
PORTIONS MISSING (PROMPT ACTION) (PHOTO)
DECK BOARDS 1 & 2 HAVE GRADER DAMAGE AT THE NW CORNER (PHOTO)
DECK BOARDS ARE WEATHERED WITH GAPS FEW HAVE BEEN REPLACED
(PHOTO)
PORTIONS OF NAILERS HAVE BEEN REPLACED AT RANDOM SECTIONS
3b 7 (TIMBER RAILS)
NEW
4 7 (WHEELGUARDS)
NEW
z
a Q
j CL- m
cr-
ISM
o
(? o
z
A U ?
[T] Z ?
z ------
Cr_
O O p
? LL-
Q g - N ?
I
U- LQ
Z `tr C' ;?_ ? 4 I?
W p O W
o ;g w~o
?? W
---- - -
Z J 3 J O
Q? N Z O Q d n
J IZ. L ? S
N J O In U W C?
W ? ??? W vWiw O Z <c
W c "? W W W O
?p W U J? ?? ?° W a
O z zCC Z ?N ?p W
? O j U Qom. j s Z? 2? LL-
?
RE Craven 119 txt
From Travis Wilson [travis wilson@ncwildlife org]
sent Thursday, December 18, 2008 11 17 AM
To Sutton, Michael W
Subject RE Craven 119
WRC does not request a moratorium for this project
Travis W Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program NC Wildlife
Resources Commission
1142 I-85 service Rd
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone [phone] ext 226
Fax* 919-528-9839
Travis Wilson@ncwildlife org
-----Original Message-----
From Sutton, Michael W [mailto msutton@ncdot gov]
Sent Friday, December 12, 2008 4 07 PM
To Wilson, Travis, Johnson, Jay B
subject Craven 119
Travis Division 2 plans on replacing craven 119 with 2@95"x67" Pipes we would
like to know if Grape creek has a moratorium A quad map is attached
for your use Thanks mike
Page 1