20090096 Ver 1_401 Application_20090109

EAID
Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
09-0 096
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
for
GLENCOE MILL
BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA - ALAMANCE COUNTY
Submitted to:
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
and
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Prepared for:
Glencoe Mill, LLC
PO Box 12929
Raleigh, North Carolina 27526
Prepared by:
Scott Mitchell, PE, LSS
Robin Eddy
DATE OF SUBMITTAL: January 16, 2009
PROJECT NO.: 4208
+y^°
low
JAN 2 8 2009
i7ch1R V1?AT?R.CUALITY n1Gli
PO Box 341 Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-468 Fax: [phone] www.MitcheliEnvironmental.com
Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
Januart• 15, 2009
Mr. James Shern Ms. Cyndi Karoly
US Army Corps of Engineers DWQ - 401 WQC Unit
3331 Heritage Trade Dr, Suite 105 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Glencoe Mill (Ala?nance County - Cape Fear River Basin)
Pre-Construction Notification Application
Dear Mr. Shern and Ms. Karoly:
Attached is a complete PCN application package for the Glencoe Mill Project. The 6.27 acre site is located on
River Road. It is just North West of the Haw River off of N. NC HNvy 62 north of Burlington in Alamance
County. The site is a historic mill with its' supporting buildings. The project will renovate the entire site into a
mixed commercial business, residential and historic interest site.
There is a small jurisdictional stream on the east side of the property that flows into the Head Race of the Haw
River. This intermittent stream flows from north of the property, through a culvert under River Road and in a
drainage area through the site. Due to the abandonment of the mill and lack of care the overall site is in poor
condition. The stream especially is in disarray with large pieces of trash. old mill debris, asbestos. erosion
problems and other issues. The current condition of the stream has little to no viable aquatic habitat. A
municipal sewer line also crosses the stream with a large man hole directly on the stream. Stream Quality
Assessment worksheets and site photos have been included in this package.
The one impact for the proposed site is the stream being piped. There is a proposed parking lot where the
stream is located currently. The stream will be piped from the property line, on the south side of River Road to
the Head Race approximately 260 feet away. Proposed permanent impacts for this project include 225 linear
feet of streams. No mitigation is being proposed though we do have an NC EEP acceptance letter. This accepts
credits for 225 linear feet.
Please feel free to call me if you have an) questions or concerns regarding the attached PCN application or if
you need anv additional information. Thank vou.
Sincereh,
l? f
Robin Eddy
PO Box 341 Fugna.1-Marina. _'tiorth Carolina 2 526
Office: 919-537-4682 Fax: [phone]
09-0096
a ? „0, J IAN 2 S Z?CG

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Congfv tion Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information 11141111
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: X ? Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Co rps? ? Yes X? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all
X? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express that apply):
? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the
record because written approval is
not required? For the record

Certification:
? Yes only for DWQ 401

X? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes X ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program
proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the
acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee
program.
? Yes X? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal
counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ? Yes X? No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes X? No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Glencoe Mill
2b. County: Alamance County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Burlington, NC
2d. Subdivision name: n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Glencoe Mill LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Book 72, Pages 330 & 331
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable):
3d. Street address: PO Box 12929
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 276f6 a.? to'D 5
3f. Telephone no.: 919-755-2250
3g. Fax no.: 919-755-2251
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name (if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Scott Mitchell or Robin Eddy
5b. Business name (if applicable): Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
5c. Street address: PO Box 341
5d. City, state, zip: Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
5e. Telephone no.: 919-557-4682
5f. Fax no.: 919-557-4683
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 8877301022, 8876398194, 8876396517
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.138239 Longitude: -79.427934
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 2.69 Ac + 0.86 Ac. + 2.73 Ac (6.28 Total Acres) acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Haw River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is an abandoned historic mill. The buildings are unsafe and there is lots of trash and debris on the site.
The surrounding area is rural residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
225 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To build a multi-purpose site with commercial, business, residential and historical interest.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The stream on site will be piped and outlet to the Haw River. The project will construct parking lots and
infrastructure as well as renovating the existing buildings. Equipment used to install infrastructure includes bull
dozers, track-hoe excavators, pans, rollers, pavers, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
? Yes X? No ? Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
f
? Preliminary ? Final
o
determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes X? No
? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes X? No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands X? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0
2h. Comments: n/a
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)

S1 X[-] P ? T Underground UT
to Haw River [_1 PER X[:] Corps
3
225
piping X[:] INT X[:] DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 225
3i. Comments: n/a
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts 0
4g. Comments: n/a
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: n/a
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes X? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): n/a
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): n/a
5k. Method of construction: n/a
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: n/a
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The current condition of the stream being impacted is very poor. We recorded that there have been extensive
human alterations, major bank failures and evidence of chemical contamination. We found asbestos next to the
stream. Large portions of the stream were littered with trash and debris, large and small from the mill and old
buildings on site. There is little to no useable habitat complexity and has poor water flow and groundwater
discharge. The stream also currently flows next to a sewer man hole. By piping it the stream quality should
improve. It will be piped from the culvert beside the road to the Haw River which is less than 300 feet away.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
An erosion control plan
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes X? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. X? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 225 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: X? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h.
util
we Comments: Note: We have a NC EEP acceptance letter approving 225 linear feet of impact. We will not be
izing this form of mitigation as we feel it is not necessary. The current quality of the stream is very poor and thus
are not offering any mitigation
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes X? No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
n/a
6h. Comments: n/a
Page 7of10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes X? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments: It is in not within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection zones.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 60.29%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X? Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management plan is incomplete at this time.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes X? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes X? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information I
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This site will utilize local municipal sewer system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or El Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ?Yes No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
I
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? 1, ? Yes Z No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
httpi//www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS/esa is the website to visit according to PCN Form Instructions. The site was
not listed as an Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ©Yes ? No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://www.hpo.dcr. state. nc.us Glencoe Mill Village Historic District (Faucette Township) 2/16/1979 is listed in the
national register of historic places as of 10/22/2008. This site is an upfit of the existing historic development.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? ®Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: This site is an upfit of an existing development.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? vvww.ncfloodmap.com
1
t 1
T? Applicant/Agent's $i9nature Date`
Applicant/Agent's s printed Name pp
(Agent's signature is valid only f an authorization letter from the applicant
is wrovided. i
Page 10 of 10
_ ??ti ?=- geserti?oir h
CIS 44
1
??. - n•is. ? ?'-. / 1 lwi
Y
.? L. J
• G
40P t,
tel.-. k' O
\ I''. L w
.
u
? ? `?, Z C ,-• ? o II <
Np. ,
c ?u
=1 _? ?I \ ?? ? J h W I I I I I? w
00 u
cl?
It-
C'.
?o
jT:
•o - 'r. - N
z
.J
Z Z
I
w
Na
w
N
N Z
(n Q
c U w
<om
c a
Z Z J
Q >
>c7<
QZrn
?j < O
C.
< W N
>o
:D <
O co
m
- J 0-
?
U
01
_ J Q
w 330
_ O
O
c?
U ?
< 00 Z
07
W C
c/; J U
F w w
O
O w
U- O
O
W
Z ID
Z C)
I~
u.
. w_
�� _
`
E -
�._ . .
., .:
e
f-
k r �
�r L
�.
.3 r:
.. �A
""F �'uN
� Y�d
h.
.. ..:ESI ,... s,: ....
.....
"'"'-,. � � . s._ r.,^,. .°.X'ra4
°�', w. � ... ..r .-
d

m
to
ti
V ?
? k
? cu
44
H
Q
k
ko
6.4
kD =
(-n -Q
V Q
`C
00 4C
W
Q
0
Q
r o
s ,
m °
O rv
? rn
3
a
n
0
3

G)
rD
n
O
rD
I
N
N
0
0
Ln
10,10-2008 15:20 FAX [phone] Hedgehog Holdings
OC: IC,2CCB 02:51P MI-C--'ELL ENV:P,0NYENTAL
Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
eLL. tit.ANKS IT) KF. F111 M IN By CUKkEN7 LA-NDO1tiNEK
Name (nip-occe MA'I L-L-C
;Address: -T6 I
RaU NG..._.1-15?to
Pru;ccl '`'amciUe.<orihtion. .. C;lcncoc Mil:
Date
The D,:Partmen: of the Arm.%
(_'S Arml, Corps of F.ncinrL?rs
Ralcl-h RegU13ton i 1;t1d Office
3 = ±l I lcrita,!c Vrade Dswc, Suite 10`
Wake Forest, NC 2751+7
TM
Field C1flice: RalcIA
Re: Wetlands R,aat,:d Consullino et` Pertnittin fu,
To Whom It Concern
10001
page 2
I, the ::triQnt p7uptrty owner. hcr?h%,lcsignatc and !:uthurizr Mitchell Lnvirunm?:nlal. P..,V. Lo act on
m- behalf as my A?cnl In the proc.cssing of permit applications, to furnish capon miucsl ,,uppicniental
information in ,;ttppurl of applications. ctc:., ffotn this day forward. This the day of
ouv keA, , A&0 8 .
I hl? nottllcaLwn -,L1PCrC,:dC.S Un_. pr.-vto1.1_ COUCsrondcnc: Cunce:nin? the zwtmt for thi" prltlCt'l.
G- L-C o
PRINT t vmtr'. Name L'r9 htlY@-
?, .
QA4t'tit.W't
NCDJ:NR - Dvvis;ur, of ` aTer Oualit,,
401 Wetlands
I O' (O Kid "ervicc Crnier
Raleigh. NNC 27;699-]659
1) o Box Sal FuqunY Varina, North Carolina 27526
01IL'c: 97y-5-57-46,'2 l•Uv 919-557--;6,1'3
OCT 10,2008 02:56P HEDGEHOG HOLDTN 919 755 2251 page 1
1--
T V`il
?Wai l? ell
PROGRAM
October 23, 2008
Glencoe Mill, LLC
P.O. Box 12929
Raleigh, NC 27526 Expiration of Acceptance: July 23, 2009
Project: Glencoe Mill County: Alamance
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must also Pommy Ah all other state, federal or local
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/LAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impact Cape Fear 03030002 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 0
Credits Cape Fear 03030002 0 0 450 0 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone] or Kelly Williams at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Willi . Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Andy Williams, USACE-Rateigh
Sue Homewood, NCDWQ-Winston-Salem
Robin Eddy, agent
File
tOdA;J... E ... Prot" Ott, ' St&
10?
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0478 i www.nceep,net
84.80' !2 / {
,
--
/r ?i
/ O 9ya O ® fa / r / o o /
z
of
l ' 0 ?_ r d / ?• A /
M 5 7, ® O
O
9L-},b s- 1 1
? 1
S'N
l J ( a:
1+ z
m9c>mm
in 0
10 // / g• 4`0' ?/ /`C' J`?? r?r? Z::i
>wm
s OFaT'z7 W Z - - - o$ - w r { 2 o
7 77.48• // O w D O
/ mm mtnL-1 v r- M
? p\ of oe U A? ZpfnO
Sd zz zZr, m35m O(nm mmp g:K 0
r3? ?? 5a O° "f nA OHO nZf $zm'OZ rm cZ'7<o Imo
1nOD v o
Orr D =??r 2b \
`' D '? DY ?_ $w Zoo Zar Dx mDOO O".C /
OO MC mr in< 0 0 m
1nD d
mm W, ?NA
? p0 h?ry
U? y0 X C .^ fv
a^D mQ ZOrn o0 tnA >- 0 ?
?' vgz r'm ci ??rn Hof = a S D b ?y_
.. > ONA X0 M, OZm Z'mN m Z 1,y
sz 0-0 m OD m? vOm ?? w m\ 0 V
m (A
g vO-i?2 Oo m0 Ov> m m? (pw,?? L \ '1? O
-? OZ AM Z D D-D1D N Z 0
MW, DO rO ON f'1D'-i 1? fC+l 'n y W 1?/y
OA
m? cD OZm OCK V Ii'*•1 11/? V
A
A gSC Z
ZOD Op 00 ?C Ovz Gf 1?1 y? 1\?f
0 -n '? N N11 N O r %[I 11 3 z O Inrl `"'1 lyi
cn? oD Zm r41"!? Ohm .'n E A ` `
NN ?? ?O Z = g y
;Gz Am N? Gov ??? x n a y ??.1
?9 2, OO ??1D ?Om 0 `M-a
1410m?? w K p ?."y
OA yO my 17?? noo 0 l
0 v ? o `y
r y1', ,L?J1
c Ot >m 21
2m ZO ED< ZCO <D mT1 N "S
P> D m m {D Owz 0, 'r
H? rnr - ??y
z O, W, -mz POpo 0?1 ?u E A O?,.• J
Zm< vm v rKS `"j'j O
m<
co
g ?7
Z
a > 0-4
P
GAfD AOq?K' ATS ???
C:\Land Projects 2006\GLE NCOE\dwg\GLE N COE CMS.dwg, 12/10/2008 11:01:46 AM
c
i 50-0)
k
C 1?d Projects 200 NCOE\dwg\GLE E CMS.dwg, 12/ 008 11:00:56
Ul Ito PO O

INV=5127.8 wl G WA -L c°n

STORM' MA NHOLE
=
V
52 .1

r-

r
? o
0
p
00 0 ?S
Q ? l
l
cn ?
- -- - -
M2
<x ?
?
J i m; II N ( p
C Pi

INV=528.7
S
TI
RM

INV=535.0 '
01Y
D
E
i - - m -
l
I
-0
1

j I V= 3 .0 ?STOM

EX.INV= 41 .2
v1 stn
O ?(Jl
N
4

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: t Project: Latitude:
Evaluator: Site: Longitude: -7? ?,
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: G1 Y?r? G ?;I C
if? 19 or perennial if? 30 e_g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 1ti- ) Absent Weak 1 Moderate Strong
-
F-1--a-
. Continuous bed and bank

L 0 1 -

2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
r 1 In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 _ 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 j
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 3
i 7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 2 3
10. Headcuts
L--- --- - -- - - 0 ` 1
- - - 2
- 3
- -
11 Grade controls 0 1 7 1.5

-
12 Natural valley or drainageway
--
0
1 0.5
I-
1 : _
t-
1.5
_
13. Second or greater order channel on existing --
-
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No = 0 ;; Yes = 3
evidence.
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in ma nual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = to )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
16 Leaflitter
17 Sediment on plants or debris
18 Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
`19._Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
- 0-- - 1 --
=2 , - -
0 1
1.5
0 -- 0.5 - +
0-
No 0
3
2 3
0.5 0
- - - 1.5
1 1.5 ---
_...- k .--_--
Yes J =
C. Biology (Subtotal = 1 J 5 )
20b. Fibrous roots in channel - 2 l 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3
T
J 2 0
22. Crayfish
-- -.0 0.5 1 j 1.5 u'
r 23. Bivalves -
_- ;
0
1 ?
2
3
24 Fish _
t i 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 i
0.5 1
1 1.5
1,5
27. Filamentous algae, periphyton 0 _T 1 2
-- -- - -
1 28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1
- -
`29 Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 'Item-s-20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)

lovIE ,1??11_'lt$? ?l4a -
..
- ?tt?C•t

i 20>> J

?- l :?..• :F c:f ?. ?? ?(] t?tl, ?Vll KF V?.S CY. ?'` ? t 1 ?G'

•au rdirliaces i! t?.no"fl - i•, - -._,.
- l 1. tell. ?{ :. ,,,??; .? 1 `' b .. '
FL. .`f _?J?:. i'v1s:
JT r arly
? -?

>
_
34.

Lo?
ttude'e1

^ ` r is

j "j JL
s
h'lcthod iocauo-i determined (eircier (jPS i. pa Uai?o iA :riai; Photo/ill ptnct txiS (Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) locatior t
14. Proposed channel work Of any):---
(5.
Recent weather conditions: /''
16, Site condition, at time oil visit:- -j .
17. ldcntify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal
-` Waters -Essential Fisheriws Habitat
--Trout Waters --Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed -___(1-I v)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point' YES I? If yes, estimate the water surface area:_
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map:' NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? Ya NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential lb°ro Commercial _°•o Industrial 10 % Agricultural
Forested % Cleared / Logged Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 3 y-? 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): I of ?.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: %_Fiat (0 to 2%) ____Gentle (2 to 4%) __ _Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (">10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight v' Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous vBraided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (front reverse):-_97 _____ Comments:
4.+Auawr' Pate
This e1wimel evaluation forth is intended to be used only as is guide to assist land owner
s arid ensironmental proiessls?nal in
„atitz r? t I Siaia a ecluiF?rI by ihti I aatted hats 4 rugs ( of r;- of Engineers to make . r€')imi ?s5
- p aarY r4Qm?n {,I sir<:rrft
ueldFCtf l'1c hLtzs sa.fJC§' Pc.Snlttn.g f3'FlzaG the lcimpletto?a i 'ftc5 ..<.tt9 is 1'..Fh E
cftl3rnL
t> ._:.._i :1 ;( €stF+yiB ~I

5
ttio bwCR- ii; mtiL 3ui wn d
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
•' .: 1
tcktc+3?tL'tr diS_lia.CS t}; IiG fAiStadlat? ='i'ta:K j'fG.L,.S1
__
__ _
_
_ --- `- ---
------ __
._
Groundwater discharge 4
(no disebarue 0_ springs, seeps, Wetlands, etc. = ma.? 3<'iI]4
`A*
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
4
0-2

y
(no floodpiain = 0; extensive floodplain_ riialints

- --

-- 1
Entrenchment I floodplain access Q - 5 0 - ?
4 1 i - 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands (
0
g
' 0-6 0- -4 t -L
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points
- ?
9 Channel sinuosity ! 0--5 0- 4 0-3 f
(extensive ebannelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
i 0 Sediment input
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment max poiu,Ls) -
J.-- {
- !
- --t? 0-4

1 I = Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
`?
0 -
4 i
0 5 ,
Aftne, homogenous = O; large, diverse sizes = max points) 1
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-
4
0-
.
;
>41 deepl incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints) ?

t 3 Presence of major bank failures

0 5

0 0-5
--
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
.1 i
14 Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0-
4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw bout = max points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
5
0
0-
4
0-5 ; ..-,
15 substantial impact =0; no evidence = max aiuts -
!
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0 - 3
0-
5
0-6

! -
no riffles/ri tes or pools = 0; well-tlevtlo x max points) ?
! 17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0- 6 0-6
'
little or no habitat = 0, frequent, varied habitats = max points)

is Canopy coverage over streambed
0--5
1 t
0-
5 c
0-5

,
w . ono shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) ; t _-_- -

19 Substrate embeddeduess
NA'? r
0- I
4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
-
---
--
--?
? 4
_

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (sec page 4) 0-4 ?
0-
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points;
-.,,
---
-

`i Presence of amphibians

= m&
o!
t
A
= 0
d ^

0 4 0- 4 }
i 0 _ 4
_)
K p
.
y >cs
; crnunen, numerous
(no evi
ence
Presence of fish 0-4
.?
C (no evidence = 0; corinton, numerous types = inax_oint?)
-
- T
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0- 5 0--5
r _ m?
(n6 evidence0; ahysndant evidence = ax point
?.,
#
Total Points Pomible 100 l00 ? 100
_ i }

9M 229 (6.6) XVJ N90 ?Tg (6L6) 7N01Id
L09/-Z ON 'u 1@11)d -J?
I
/_0q '-)IS `'IS 1406aoH 'M 9 Oy d
??tr ut uj Sli \J)
NOuonl:J1SNO0 ?303 ION - Ned .l2idNlWll3bd
\ I
?\ I
I
I
i
\ I
/ I
/
/

/
k

F14?' R N
L.. r
.
x.

/x;11
\ z
U ?
l w V,
ON `uolbuilin8
-11IN ?100NAIO
b
1 \ q?, v?
s
i
I 1 x 1 1 ??? i?? I
\ \II'li 1111 ??& ? -----
i it 1 ? ? ? ? 1'I
I I 1 1 a rr?
l I b J .t ? _
Ww3
LLOU
I Off=
a
I = 0
a ?
I
I
? ? mot, \ I 11
? •a\ 1
LI
-? I corn v4,u"iai
? I 1 nm IoWp
M2 N
I i I it s
? 1t o ?
I I t ? ?„°-,F-
II ?^ I I 9 wow
l i 66 OHM
4 1I I
I
I
I ( I
I
I ? NWNln In ylN
Ii1 \? tl ? ZxwF o??
? '1 I S,,z, o
it 1 I
12
1
1. ?? I i V?IN?f NNNNN ,
.4
N0.0"
I ry
NN*,OmNM
{ , N
v f l I -11 ?d? I
1', I }'1 II I' \\ n F o
1 I (m offin°
Il fpz, 9 0 0
sll.? So?B000
h Jt l.. LI I c Ucv X00
m m
n I I I aaa?i
I I
a? III i \\
d
I/1h I ' II
I I
/ II ? I I
1 'd I I I
I
I
I ,I
I
I '?? I I
I I
I?I
i
I?
NN
WI.
t]*
?m
0
e?
O?
a
w
w
? w
3a z
?a.
0 n
O 0
3
o
? z

t7 ?

1' °
0

D N
QQ
G
CL
[G
j
?
z n
V Q 2 Q

0:9 s
I
U
U_
x
a
C7
it!
E$
Q w vi
=
F- O0
p z
LL
_
?U
?D
w
CY)
? m

=J
(D
LL_ OWN F?
NZ0 LLJZ
O?LL,
cn Ji
m
Z ?Q? ?pz cC)C) C)
O
cn II ??
0P0
4ED
000
L, O
>
D(EC) w H J
w0 ao
R
w
LL. UULn QC?w
< ?h=- L17 II II II II
(3
i LC) of
C) 0o?

g?z

o°J >
J
°?

U)
cr_ F_ o
a-
?I II ?oV)
LJ owQ
Lli LL_ °zg
=) °z?
o
W N c~i)?
?
g
(nLi- z
a- z
wV)
<<
X
m m
O a- O O m
o X 0
O Z J 00 00
?_- /_y /_ Vy c
cnc? cy a- L
a_ct m C) 0m
m 00
mm