20171427 Ver 1_Utility_Drawing_20171205

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Willis, Thomas C
Sent:Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:44 AM
To:Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Cc:Ward, Garcy
Subject:RE: \[External\] Bridge #34 Bertie Co.
Attachments:Utility_Drawing.pdf
Kyle,
Attached is the utility drawing. They are not boring the waterline, just relocating a small
section adjacent to the guardrail (in the existing road shoulder). They are boring the
telephone line on the north side, but the bore pits are located well outside any
jurisdictional wetlands, which is why I didn't include them in the original submittal.
There is no CAMA jurisdiction on this project.

Thanks
Clay

-----Original Message-----
From: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 11:54 AM
To: Willis, Thomas C; Williams, Paul C
Cc: Ward, Garcy
Subject: RE: \[External\] Bridge #34 Bertie Co.

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all
suspicious email as an attachment to [e-mail].

Clay,

Once they give you a location of the bore pits I will need that information on a plan
sheet and a cross sectional view of the pipe location. This will cover DOT or other
contractors if anyone is doing any dredging in the creek in the future.

Kyle Barnes
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Washington Field Office
910-251-4584

We at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch are committed to improving
service to our customers. We would appreciate your feedback on how we are
performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at:

http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
<http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0>
1

Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.

-----Original Message-----
From: Willis, Thomas C \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 12:39 PM
To: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>;
Williams, Paul C <[e-mail]>
Cc: Ward, Garcy <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] RE: \[External\] Bridge #34 Bertie Co.

They were not going to originally have to relocate the waterline, but I called to double
check today, and it turns out, they are relocating the waterline. I've asked them to show
me the bore points. They are supposed to go from high ground to high ground, so there
will not be any impacts from the relocation. Once I get the confirmed bore points, I will
let you know for sure.

Clay

-----Original Message-----
From: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:42 AM
To: Willis, Thomas C; Williams, Paul C
Cc: Ward, Garcy; Daisey, Greg
Subject: \[External\] Bridge #34 Bertie Co.

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all
suspicious email as an attachment to [e-mail].

Clay,

Garcy and I stopped by the Bridge #34 site yesterday to take a look. I noticed there is an
existing waterline on the downstream side of the bridge that doesn't show on the plans.
The plans indicate a guardrail to be installed in the close proximity of that line. Will
there be any relocation of that existing line?

Kyle Barnes
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Washington Field Office
910-251-4584

We at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch are committed to improving
service to our customers. We would appreciate your feedback on how we are
performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at:

Blockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
<Blockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0>
2

Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third parties.

3