20171527 Ver 1_PJD_Person_County_Transportation_Corridor_20171127

Burdette, Jennifer a
From: Anna Reusche <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 9:43 AM
To: [e-mail]; Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Cc: Burdette, Jennifer a; Stuart C. Gilbert
Subject: [External] Person County (Email lof 2) - Transportation Corridor PJD
Attachments: PJD_Person_County_Transportation_Corridor_COMPILED r.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Good morning,
Timmons Group is pleased to present the attached pre jurisdictional determination request for the transportation corridor
associated with the proposed Person County Mega -Site. Six (6) properties along the corridor were identified as having
potentially jurisdictional streams/wetlands. Notification of those property owners and permission to access their property
is still pending. We anticipate having those approvals shortly.
In addition to the PJD attached, the next email will include the draft individual permit application to be reviewed and
discussed at an on-site pre -application meeting. We respectively request that we go ahead and identify a date for the
confirmation meeting and pre -application meeting, if possible, at this time.
Please don't hesitate to call me on my cell with any questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Anna Reusche, PWS
Environmental Project Manager
TIMMONS GROUP I www.timmons.com
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
Office: 919.866.4500 1 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
anna.reuschektimmons.com
Your Vision Achieved Through Ours
To send me files greater than 20MB click here.

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Mr. Ross Sullivan
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 210
Raleigh, NC 27607
November 20, 2017
Re: Stream and Wetland Delineation Confirmation
Person County Mega -Site Transportation Corridor
Person County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Sullivan,
P 919.866.4951
F 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
Timmons Group is seeking confirmation of a wetland and stream delineation to identify
Waters of the U.S. located within the proposed transportation corridor associated with the overall
development of the Person County Mega -Site (see Figure 1: Vicinity Map). The corridor includes
areas along the existing roadway approximately 0.4 miles north and south of the intersection of US
Highway 501 and Shiloh Church Road. The corridor continues along Shiloh Church Road and/or
Edwin Robertson Road until terminating at the Mega -Site. The corridor also includes the intersection
of Chub Lake Road and Country Club Road. Waters along the corridor drain to Castle Creek,
Fishing Creek and Marlowe Creek, respectively. This project is located within the Roanoke
Watershed (HUC 03010104) (see Figure 2: Hydrologic Unit Code Map).
The Site was delineated based upon the methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual; the Regional Supplement to the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Supplement (Version 2.0)
and subsequently issued USACE regulatory guidance regarding the identification of jurisdictional
stream channels through the recognition of field indicators of an ordinary high water mark within
drainage features. Additionally, stream delineation techniques were used based on methodology
outlined in the 2010 North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Stream Determination Manual;
Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (Version
4.11). Using this methodology, preliminary delineation mapping was produced and is included as
Figure 4: Preliminary Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map.
During our delineation, a total of approximately 632 linear feet (LF) of perennial (R3) stream
and 835 LF of intermittent (R4) stream were identified onsite. In addition, one palustrine forested
wetland was identified in the floodplain of Marlowe Creek. Representative field data sheets were
completed along each reach in order to document the presence or absence of all stream
parameters. These data stations are included as Appendix A: Field Data Stations.
Timmons Group would appreciate your review of the enclosed maps and attachments, and
confirmation of the Person County Transportation Corridor Waters of the U.S. delineation. Please
feel free to contact me at [phone], or anna.reusche(a-)timmons.com if you have any questions
or would like to schedule a Site visit to confirm the jurisdictional boundaries.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

Sincerely,
Timmons Group
Anna Reusche
Environmental Project Manager
Enclosures
MAPS
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Hydrologic Unit Code Map
Figure 3 Environmental Inventory Maps
Figure 4 Parcel Map
Figure 5 NRCS Soil Survey
Figure 6 Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map
ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A Field Data Sheets
Appendix B Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Appendix C USACE Jurisdictional Determination Request
Appendix D Agent Authorization Forms

MAPS

Path: R:\805\39329 Person County MegaSite\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\39329-VIC.mxd
Feet r
PERSON COUNTY MEGA -SITE T I M M O N S GROUP
PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 39329 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): ROXBORO
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 114.2 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 36.489123 WATERSHED(S): LOWER DAN
LONGITUDE: -78.952700 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03010104
mited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIM MONS GROUP.

r=
of, 24
_ _cnz
(3 '
o
N
Nu ,
ri
03020102
-1
LU
U
�r�tn�r
ender n
I'•. E
U
Z
i=itij�rlrl F~
..
� x
W E
VY
'i 0
w �
O �
S Er
03010101-
?
O
Reek ingharri
y
H
J
kesdale 9109I,9109ft
0301
ALL' T
w0
O ?
�
•
w:rh O
.
Summerfield
rL x 1.
ID
O
Z z
2
K
a o �
00
yak Ftir1 p L ,F._
Occaneec hl
U
N
rcIJao _
U
LUUj
a
03010105
=
o
W
Site Marker 03030002
rT
r.
a
mg 2
Z
g
`yenryr
■ ■ ■ ■ a Burlington
03010102 Ch e City
V
L0
w
r ,
I aanshnrn
- fiIII;L rcrtl,:tll
Hydrologic Unit Code.;
A
C c
v
N
d
-
JOB NUMBER
Miles 7�
G'ufli 3i�i
SH EET
SHEET
NO.
,i
r l art 11i • .I I I?
. I -It I I B, ,
v
�) 111 Pivot
03010106
a
o�
w
03010103
_
IfDATE
J
h
g w
11/1412017
DRAWN BY
03010104
:
L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
/'
..
C l n M l -a _
{
jo rr
L. MAJOR
CHECKED BY
lj
Reservoir
A.REUSCHE
ILL
ti
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIASCALE
1 " = 7 MILES
=
NORTH [;.Ah';JLI '-:
Barr Latae Sta
�
Eden
tacreatioriAre,
Sappony 5dtsa
.`i
r~fyca Lake
03010106
e °�y
03010102
03010103
DLU
Q
Yarn-e;' i11a 03010104 —
r=
_ _cnz
(3 '
o
s'1
ri
03020102
-1
LU
U
ender n
U
Z
i=itij�rlrl F~
� x
�
S Er
s
?
O
Reek ingharri
y
H
J
kesdale 9109I,9109ft
�+
O ?
�
Summerfield
03020101
Z z
2
z
00
yak Ftir1 p L ,F._
Occaneec hl
U
N
Legend
Saponi Sdtsa
LUUj
a
W
Site Marker 03030002
03020201 Butner _
a
('
■ ■ ■ ■ a Burlington
F'fe l_ ar-I
.11
■ Lower Dan (03010104)
I aanshnrn
- fiIII;L rcrtl,:tll
Hydrologic Unit Code.;
0 3.5 7 14
-
JOB NUMBER
Miles 7�
G'ufli 3i�i
SH EET
SHEET
NO.
,i

x
E
W
N
M
07
M
+J
L
x
W
a�
L
0
VJ
c
0
E
E
0
U
U)
0
i
cn
co
a�
c
0
U
c
0
U)
L
^0
LL
0)
N
M
07
M
Ln
O
co
L
co
d

Legend
w
IN
■ NONEProject Study Limits - 114.2 Acres
Person County Tax Parcels
aP .. S
000
G' S.,.
-�:ai
q, ( ANN -
t..
it d -
WA
Chub Lake Ra = - � � l 90
Hifi,- x. '� '°�',.; '•i2;
4 87
5
86
7 I
Etlwin�Ro
78
81 80
79
82
83
84
13
12
10 74
9
Slhiloh�Chur�h Roa �
�n�Rd
13
77 � 76 73
. 72
b� 75
14
18
A
17
L
N
�r Q o
1, iG' Qi L1J
= Ra Q W
p LLILLI U
LL.�
a LL
U o� z
o o O
` a< o
;ryfiill►Ri/ _ c a
C/LL-
audlHa/
a za �X F -U
c, ® Q O U- W
y a4ae� v
�
o p
ap�a o LO L z
- I
ao O
e•�" c3D1 �� O 00
W � �
C �+
01
ow
N
�Y+Y 40
_ �
t 39 F
LU
20
38 V p
Q
r 31 G1
37 42
O
> DATE
19 21 28 36tp`' oC 11/15/2017
Shi/oh�Ch - 28
032 DRAWN BY
35 44
ss L. MAJOR
�} 23 24 25 26 45
70 21 67 27 29 30 33 34 46 DESIGNED BY
�; 47 L. MAJOR
71
sa sh/,. r 48 _R CHECKED BY
law•
65 hJrChur�h�Rd 59 0
' 49 A. REUSCHE
S .. 62 60 58 m
SCALE
J 66 fi1 50 =
1 �� 800
C 55 51
. 52 d
Z
J
' lie d
LU U i
= J
i r UJ
O
! rr,ijr W
1 F. LL
�� Vii'• i �� '� -
NOTES:
1. PROJECT
STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE.
2. TAX PARCELS SOURCED FROM PERSON COUNTY.
IDENT
ML OWNER NAME
1
0909-00 8 164.000 ETREE LLC
2
0909-00545744.000 ETREE LLC
3
0909-00-72285.000 WAGSTAFF LINDSAY III & JOHN H
4
0909-00-64-9762.000 PHELPS CHRISTOPHER R & AMANDA
5
0909-00-77-2118.000 ETREE LLC
6
0909-00-97-1367.000 ETREE LLC
7
0919-00-06-0747.000 LEWIS L MICHAEL
8
0919-00-07-2534.000 ROBERTSON CROWDER JR TRST ETAL
9
0919-00-17-5232.000 ROBERTSON CROWDER & WALTER TRS
10
0919-00-27-0380.000 MITCHELL DEBORAH DORA
11
0919-00-27-2672.000 CAVALIER DEBORAH M
12
0919-00-27-4165.000 OAKLEY & SON INC
13
0919-00-39-7577.000 MONAGHAN DANIEL P & LAURA W
14
0919-00-48-2565.000 MONAGHAN DANIEL & LAURA WHAREY
15
0919-00-37-4182.000 NELSON LINDA & SHELLY LARIMER
16
0919-0037-0347.000 1 BLACK HARRY C ESTATE / LUTZ DEBORAH BLACK
17
0919-00-46-0994.000 IBURKS MARGARET H & OTHERS
18
0010-0050-1023.000 BERRYHILL EUGENE C JR & JOSEPH
19
0919-00-79-2607.000 BAILEY BARBARA A
20
0010-00-80-3287.000 BERRYHILL JOSEPH & EUGENE C
21
0919-00-99-6117.000 BAILEY BARBARA A
22
0020-00-00-5578.000 WILKINS JESSE JR/WILKINS JAMES
23
0929-00-18-3511.000 WILKINS ROBERT D & DEBORAH T
24
0929-00-18-5486.000 NELSON JAMES D
25
0929-00-18-6594.000 SNEAD TAMMY C/MICHAEL W PARHAM
26
0929-00-18-8478.000 SNEAD TAMMY C/MICHAEL W PARHAM
27
0929-00-28-0436.000 HOLT WILLIAM D
28
0929-00-37-8671.000 CARVER BUMPASS & CARVER INC
29
0929-00-28-4440.000 BROWN GARY BENJAMIN & KRIST B
30
0929-00-38-0386.000 SHILOH PRIMITIVE BAPTIST CHURC
31
0929-00-39-7544.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEEE
32
0929-00-38-5677.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEE
33
0929-00-38-8714.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEE
34
0929-00-48-1619.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEE
35
0929-00-49-2134.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEE
36
0929-00-49-3442.000 MORTON LINWOOD STANLEY & NENA
37
0929-00-49-3596.000 MORTON LINWOOD STANLEY & NENA
38
0929-00-49-4750.000 BOWES KENNETH C
39
0020-00-40-6512.000 EAKER DAVID
40
0020-00-50-0358.000 DAVIS LARRY DEAN
41
0020-00-40-9169.000 WILKINS ANTHONY C & JANET L
42
0929-00-69-5238.000 PEED DOYLE & PEED DURWOOD
43
0929-00-49-8423.000 PRICE BILLY L & ANN T
5
44
0929-00-49-7138.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
45
0929-00-49-6084.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
46
0929-00-48-6920.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
J
47
0929-00-48-5776.000 CARVER BUMPASS & CARVER INC
48
0929-00-48-5613.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
49
0929-00-48-4479.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
50
0929-00-47-3604.000 BRIGGS BILLY MICHAEL & NANCY T
j
51
0929-00-47-2481.000 THORNBURG DORINE
52
0929-00-47-2292.000 THORNBURG DORINE
J
53
0929-00-65-3785.000 WINSTEAD MARY E MERRITT TRUSTE
j
54
0929-00-35-9952.000 WINSTEAD MARY E MERRITT TRUSTE
55
0929-00-27-9451.000 FOX RICHARD EARL & TERESA H
j
56
0929-00-37-8142.000 CLAYTON DAVID G & FRANCES H
57
0929-00-37-8672.000 FOX RICHARD & TERESA H
J
58
0929-00-38-9120.000 FOX RICHARD EARL & TERESA H
)
59
0929-00-48-0229.000 DAY WALTER RALEIGH III & OTHER
3
60
0929-00-27-6974.000 ROGERS VAN MARTIN & DOROTHY I
j
61
0929-00-28-4021.000 WILSON DONNIE EARL & MARY E
62
0929-00-27-2988.000 KNOTT JAMES E II & WENDY H
:
63
0929-00-16-5247.000 WINSTEAD J MERRITT
64
0929-00-08-9284.000 HARPER BRIAN K & MAYNELL J
65
0929-00-08-7228.000 WILKINS JAMES BRADSHER
66
0929-00-07-5748.000 EASTWOOD HOWARD L & DONNA W
!
67
0929-00-08-4452.000 WILKINS JAMES B
68
0919-00-88-9976.000 POWERS JESSE KEITH & TAMMERA D
)
69
0919-00-74-6411.000 HALLS AGRI BUSINESS LLC
70
0919-00-89-2185.000 WOODSDALE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
71
0919-00-78-1369.000 PULLIAM JAMES A & HOLLY P
72
0919-00-26-9992.000 SMITH EVELYN W UE
73
0919-00-26-8592.000 SMITH EVELYN W UE
74
0919-00-27-8015.000 WALKER ROBERT L & OTHERS
j
75
0919-00-26-4509.000 RAMSEY ALBERT& SALLEY EST
76
0919-00-26-4915.000 OAKLEY & SON INC
77
0919-00-16-8883.000 ANDRADE MICHAEL A & LINDA C
78
0919-00-16-1760.000 ROBERTSON MAURICE
J
79
0919-00-16-2454.000 RANSOM DELORIS B
80
0919-00-06-6444.000 RANSOM DELORIS & REVERDY C
i
81
0919-00-06-2415.000 BRINSON DORIS FAYE
82
0909-00-96-9253.000 BRINSON DORIS FAYE
83
0909-00-95-5975.000 JAMES JOHN J & JULIA A
84
0909-00-95-3567.000 J & J INVESTMENTS & SALES INC
85
0909-00-93-7908.000 PARKER DANITA BROOKS
86
0909-00-84-0761.000 WILLIAMS HESTER MRS & OTHERS
)
87
0909-00-85-3692.000 WARREN JUDY EST
88
0909-00-40-4723.000 WAGSTAFF LINDSAY T JR & JOHN H
89
0908-17-11-6694.000 RILEY DOLORES W
90
0908-17-31-1220.000 WARREN R TCOMPANY INC
3
aP .. S
000
G' S.,.
-�:ai
q, ( ANN -
t..
it d -
WA
Chub Lake Ra = - � � l 90
Hifi,- x. '� '°�',.; '•i2;
4 87
5
86
7 I
Etlwin�Ro
78
81 80
79
82
83
84
13
12
10 74
9
Slhiloh�Chur�h Roa �
�n�Rd
13
77 � 76 73
. 72
b� 75
14
18
A
17
L
N
�r Q o
1, iG' Qi L1J
= Ra Q W
p LLILLI U
LL.�
a LL
U o� z
o o O
` a< o
;ryfiill►Ri/ _ c a
C/LL-
audlHa/
a za �X F -U
c, ® Q O U- W
y a4ae� v
�
o p
ap�a o LO L z
- I
ao O
e•�" c3D1 �� O 00
W � �
C �+
01
ow
N
�Y+Y 40
_ �
t 39 F
LU
20
38 V p
Q
r 31 G1
37 42
O
> DATE
19 21 28 36tp`' oC 11/15/2017
Shi/oh�Ch - 28
032 DRAWN BY
35 44
ss L. MAJOR
�} 23 24 25 26 45
70 21 67 27 29 30 33 34 46 DESIGNED BY
�; 47 L. MAJOR
71
sa sh/,. r 48 _R CHECKED BY
law•
65 hJrChur�h�Rd 59 0
' 49 A. REUSCHE
S .. 62 60 58 m
SCALE
J 66 fi1 50 =
1 �� 800
C 55 51
. 52 d
Z
J
' lie d
LU U i
= J
i r UJ
O
! rr,ijr W
1 F. LL
�� Vii'• i �� '� -

WW
., ":
* KLw W E
ir _ - •� �
V
r' ih� 4 11
S
IN+ �=��, •x � � � '*�'+� } � { 'sem I
f .,�' N II - _ e : "ti,,_ f{Y� Ate• _ IQ' -n m . P -e,.
- ,� N' 7n •e
,
IN
h.
J�•
��
• Y
-
>
Y .
ice, . �: � ...-..,.
VVk
DD
J r7• l
Ar
- - T� -
r'
,
�• i !' " 1 '.rte _,—_. - _ _ �' ? .1 — _ 'Tic - q'y em's'
p A�
� - A � 'fir`
qpm
r
•
,
dr
.�
fes:
n
moi? :i.Pi� g M ylr 1 YS Tr°'T _ 'v•% • - - "
G -
•'amu - Yp 9 � ,a r'_.r _ I•
•e.
y • I .. � � !_ iNy' �' ::911 � L- i' � -., _ _ .. _ ... _ - - .�' A�Y ! '
i .. •Y9.E::t7
_
drys ^J e
.00
Lf
mob. ' •�'q'�--' 1 wul nX
'+fir
I
yy -HrY -
YI
Y'
e+ WPI
-
S7 W'�9 � L ..
N i.
� � .®
I
-SI
�,.•� Y'1 �'
HrrI
u
c.
r
1 - -
•
r
F
•
,
�_- �,
.. �y, • r• F1'
jr
e x
e91' .. - r .
:e
I
�F -
a 3k
-
:F' � C - NII •
5
1.-
• - � � ! +� � T : 'i .NSI -
�'
-
,
If MLO�I'�' S I
yam. �- "yal' i b a - �a
my: r'I t i ° -
.I
wkF
y •S i 1 - yµ-�� .= r 5' S �_• .r 9A��{ i�6Aryy� i�'9y�
I yYl. Fri p f'.➢ . I -� i _ 1 1�Ll 0. !4 9` B
, .. PI 1
r
N
I ,
Lg
ia
_
•s
I
.
,
jaiTim
L�
IL
GeB
„ 1 `
W EI � Rif - � L/
- - - y-
,r
Y 4
� -
9'
i-
6 ' �
tee• s - . - •'' - . r-,=" _ _ J ?__ �'�. 'E.I.i I
11^^
VJ
N kU
N Lo
Q
W '
a �
0
L
QW
W
U
M O
O
O
a Q""
c
a
za �X
F--
LnU
QU LL
LU
a�U c00
Q
��LJ
z
Ln
N
i
W
00
N
W
LU
e~
7
O
x
�
O
Q
LU
=
�
Q
a
O
>
a�
DATE
1
11/14/2017
DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
J
DESIGNED BY
L. MA JOR
_
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
!SCALE
1 — 850/
-OB
w 'l1I , .•9 �1 rY f
Vim.
1 �' :11
,, •�, Y � � � Via._ _ � _ - ����1 '�` � - —
r
F
1
TAD
Ta IJ
16
I
I,010 Ui
:lid I � H - �� - �, N� Store d
d - �-� F. �• Q
_ Y z r
TsE
_ -
1r T.
I
a
-1 I " . 1. .. .➢ Jr"� . irk" -0 Y
9.4
'` ! _ y _ U)
6
1�• � - �=� '• '� I _
L 96
i a F 7 m ti� n; a Vl
• � -" :•.1'i• .1. . G_ �• 'ate _ �1• - AG e- -h' ^ -. G, - _ Z \ (��
x -
- i
or
st).
Z Z
'f� a
I Ln
Tal
LL Go
I Ie
N i +"13 LU
` �+
_ 1L... a
lTtr i A V Ii
a
fp p 1
�.101
y 4
s.
tiff F3Y, `.• -
; LL
W E I Y
Ui
• ,R N
f _� 1
�-:I��Ile
•
.. e -B
I
"
O
G a
G, 1A 2
4 F
GOB -_
al=
y r Ir• Project Limits are approximate. -°
;r
! Web soil survey from NRCS.
.. '% •_..a,L.. a ..-•mIM
r .114
..11^ 1 1• �.. C
• 5
_ y
a
•
ui i is � - �• eAM
�y1 d
-
we
-+
rn
N P„� aA- k
-
Legend
M
JOB NO
.
MLO 0 850 1,700 3,400 39329
00
i •,- - ; it + Q ems' �.J� Project Study Limits - 114.2 Acres
# r Feet
]". SHEET NO.
I..-
ter.. I - ly 1 - _ _ 1 r iil '.y e6 7.3:
... 'xl .-J moi- -
fil
r• °.
rl err
-
f -
v
N'
N
�fY:.Ia1�� �Vi� 6. ,...--..� L I •'r—ii �� �•4'N•i'" rr�-. � 4 -- •.. 'x .. CL •it+-.

c
0
E
E
0
U
U)
0
i
cn
co
a�
c
c
0
U

c
0
E
E
0
U
U)
0
i
cn
co
a�
c
c
0
U

21101-3
21E1-1
21101-2
_.r:'
1%
Ve
PMO
Lin
3L
Fl.
.4e p
-4,P
IF:P7
i
21101-3
21E1-1
21101-2
_.r:'
1%
Ve
PMO
Lin
3L
Fl.
.4e p
-4,P

APPENDIX A
FIELD DATA SHEETS

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Person County Mega -Site
Transportation Corridor
Date: 11/7/2017
Project/Site: Stream C (Castle Creek)
Latitude: 36.4925
Evaluator: A. Reusche, Timmons Group
County: Person County
Longitude: -78.9449
Total Points: 35.5
Stream Determination circle one)
Other ROXBORO
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent lPerennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alongthalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
-
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1 1
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: No benthic species observed, but are assumed present based on good instream habitat.
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Person County Mega -Site
Transportation Corridor
Date: 11/7/2017
Project/Site: Stream D
Latitude: 36.4911
Evaluator: A. Reusche, Timmons Group
County: Person County
Longitude: -78.9472
Total Points: 20
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other ROXBORO
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =7.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alongthalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
-
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Person County Mega -Site
Transportation Corridor
Date: 11/7/2017
Project/Site: Stream E
Latitude: 36.4911
Evaluator: A. Reusche, Timmons Group
County: Person County
Longitude: -78.9472
Total Points: 20
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other ROXBORO
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =7.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alongthalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
-
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Person County Mega -Site
Transportation Corridor
Date: 11/7/2017
Project/Site: Stream F
Latitude: 36.4901
Evaluator: A. Reusche, Timmons Group
County: Person County
Longitude: -78.9521
Total Points: 32.5
Stream Determination circle one)
Other ROXBORO
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent JPerennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 16.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alongthalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
-
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Sketch:
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1 1
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: No benthic species observed, but are assumed present based on good instream habitat.
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Person County Mega -Site
Transportation Corridor
Date: 11/7/2017
Project/Site: Stream G
Latitude: 36.4895
Evaluator: A. Reusche, Timmons Group
County: Person County
Longitude: -78.9505
Total Points: 32.5
Stream Determination circle one)
Other ROXBORO
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent JPerennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 16.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alongthalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
-
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Sketch:
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1 1
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: No benthic species observed, but are assumed present based on good instream habitat.
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Person County Mega -Site
Transportation Corridor
Date: 11/7/2017
Project/Site: Stream H
Latitude: 36.4821
Evaluator: A. Reusche, Timmons Group
County: Person County
Longitude: -78.9827
Total Points: 16.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other ROXBORO
Stream is at least intermittent
E hemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 6 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alongthalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
-
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Person County Mega -Site
Transportation Corridor
Date: 11/7/2017
Project/Site: Stream J (Fishing Br.)
Latitude: 36.4834
Evaluator: A. Reusche, Timmons Group
County: Person County
Longitude: -78.9786
Total Points: 25
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other ROXBORO
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alongthalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
-
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high watertable?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Appears to be flowing from farm pond located upslope adjacent to farm road.
Stream does not continue to
Mainstem of Castle Creek.
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Person County Mega -Site, Transportation Corridor City/County: Person County Sampling Date: 11 /7/2017
Applicant/Owner: PCBIC State: NC Sampling Point: 1 -UP
Investigator(s): A. Reusche, Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 36.4831 Long: -78.9808
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils NWI classification: NA
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _�✓ No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil= or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation= Soil =, or Hydrology,= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Slope (%):
Datum:
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No = Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= N= within a Wetland? Yes = No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes.= No
Remarks:
Upland point taken in between wetland and Marlowe Creek, in area of raised levee.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
1__I Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
1__I Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_F_1 Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches):
❑ ❑
n
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: I -UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Diospyros virginiana
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4.
5
6.
Absolute
% Cover
40
30
15
85
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Y FAC
Y FACU
N FAC
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 55 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
15
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species x 2 -
1. Diospyros virginiana
20
Y FAC
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
10
Y FACU
FAC species x 3 =
3_ Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
Y FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
40
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover: 8
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 Ligustrum sinense
40
v FACU
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 153.01
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6• be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
40 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum 30 Y FAC (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2• Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3• approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7• Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodenron radicans 20 Y FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
20
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Present? Yes n No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 1 -UP
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC Texture Remarks
0-12+ 10YR 5/4 100 CL Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No E
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Person County Mega -Site, Transportation Corridor City/County: Person County Sampling Date: 11 /7/2017
Applicant/Owner: PCBIC State: NC Sampling Point: I -WET
Investigator(s): A. Reusche, Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.4831 Long: -78.9808 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _�✓ No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil= or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation= Soil =, or Hydrology,= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No = Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= N= within a Wetland? Yes = No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. ✓= No
Remarks:
Wetland I is located in the floodplain of Marlowe Creek. System is separated from creek by large berm.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
1__I Moss Trim Lines (B16)
✓❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
✓❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
,Q Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑✓ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_F_1 Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
5.
6.
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Quercus phellos 20 Y FAC
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FAC';
4.
5.
Sampling Point: I -WET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Quercus phellos
40
Y
FAC
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30
Y
FAC'_
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Y
FACU
A Acer rubrum
10
N
FAC
5.
6.
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Quercus phellos 20 Y FAC
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FAC';
4.
5.
Sampling Point: I -WET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
6. Prevalence Index = B/A =
30 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 Ligustrum sinense 20 v FACU ❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 153.01
2 ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6• be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
20 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum 50 Y FAC (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2• Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3• approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7• Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 20 Y FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
20
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Present? Yes n No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: I -WET
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC Texture Remarks
0-12+ 10YR 5/3 40 10YR 5/6 60 C PL SL Sandy Loam (redox present)
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY JURIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW -2016-02542
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Person City: Roxboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.4915 Long.: -78.9466
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Castle Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)

I ) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Vicinity. Aerial, Environmental Inventory Map, HUG Map, USGS, i Soil Survey, and Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
0 USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Olive Hill and Roxboro
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Person County (1995)
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
■❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): Site Photos (11/6/17)
■❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: SAW -2017-01877 (waterline, Project Site)
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review areas (acreage
and linear feet)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e. wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority tow is
the aquatic resource "may be"
subject (i.e Section 404 or
Section 10/404)
C
36.4925
-78.9449
62
non -wetland water
Section 404
D
36.4911
-78.9472
60
non -wetland water
Section 404
E
36.4911
-78.9472
640
non -wetland water
Section 404
F
36.4901
-78.9521
340
non -wetland water
Section 404
G
36.4895
-78.9505
230
non -wetland water
Section 404
H
36.4821
-78.9827
229
non -wetland water
Section 404
1
36.4831
-78.9808
0.25
wetland
Section 404
J
36.4834
-78.9786
135
non -wetland water
Section 404
Marlowe
Creek
36.4834
-78.97861
1751
non -wetland waterl
Section 404

APPENDIX C
PRELIMINARY JURIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM

urisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoI3 PerinitPro2ram/Contact/CouniyLocator.awx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Nuinber: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: See attached parcel m
City, State:
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Anna Reusche. Timmons Grou
Mailing Address: 5410 Trinity Road
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
✓❑
Raleigh NC 27529
C: 919-816-7745
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: See attached parcel map
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GTS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION' 4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Anna Reusche
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agent'
11/20/17
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my pen -nit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ i intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ T believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT[USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there arc multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
W1I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑v Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 114 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
36.4779
Longitude: -78.9941
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l lxl7 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).'
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
LJ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usacc.2,M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Detennination Form'
Vicinity Map
❑ Aerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑v Soi I Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LiDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑v NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_Apn A Prelim JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information maybe shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

APPENDIX D
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM