20081734 Ver 1_More Info Received_20090123

.

!\/t [1 VS Vl \;V C! t e V'

~D rs0~n\V1f~ Pi
is \~ ~ ~ ,: ~;. ~ ~....~, . 'J
,~" n..___, '; '..'...,.,...j lL;
, ! I

JAN2 3 2009 .'

January 14, 2009

Cindy Karoly
NCDENR~DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604

Regarding: Diamond Falls Estates - DWQ Project # 08~ 1734
Anderson Creek RD, Franklin, Macon County, North Carolina

[)E:~t~ .. WAI tR QuA1JIY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATI:R BRANCH

Dear Ms. Karoly,

Marshwater Company has completed the DWQ's request for more information
regarding the Diamond Falls Estates project Located in Macon County, NC.
Upon further review the permit has been changed from a NWP 27 to a NWP 29.
This change has been recognized by the USACE. The changes desired by the
developer are to reduce the number of ponds from two to one. Pond #1 from the
previous PCN has been deleted from the original proposal. The pond previously
referred to as pond #2 will be noted as pond #1 from here on out. The changes
are reflected in a revised PCN which Marshwater Company has been included in
this package. There are no expected impacts to streams due to fill slopes or bank
stabilization within the Diamond Falls Estates. Additionally, individual septic
drain fields will be designed for each lot as they are sold. No impacts to streams
or wetlands are expected during septic installation.

Marshwater Company is pleased to be a part of this delicate issue. Regulatory
permitting is necessary for environmental stability of the future. Marshwater
Company will work diligently to ensure a viable resolution. Please call with any
questions or concerns.

Sinceyely,
1///
/
/,' ,/
,.. \.... '.--
R(mmeDiIbeck
Marshwater Company
[phone]

Windows Live Hotmail Print Message

Page 1 of 1

Diamond Falls Estate USACE application
From: Beckwith, Loretta A SAW (Loretta,[e-mail])
Sent: Tue 1/06/09 10:28 AM
To: [e-mail]

Ronnie,

As we just discussed, you will apply for a Nationwide Permit NWP 29 for the project for Diamond Falls Estate
project.

Also, please tet me know the following:

1. Who delineated the property?

2, Do you have this information (delineation maps, data sheets, jd sheets, etc.)?

3. There are two bridges on the property from the previous owner that were constructed before your client
purchased the property approximately 2 years ago, correct?

4. None of the streams have culverts in them, correct?

5, Your client would like to proposed reduced-impacts - please send me text to describe this. rlllet you know
if t have any questions,

Thank you,

Lori Beckwith
U,S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Asheville Regulatory Field Office

http://bl130w.blu130.mail.live.com/mail/PrintShell.aspx?type=message&cpids=3d738513-... 1/16/2009

Office Use Only:

Fonn Version May 2002

USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/ A",)

I. Processing

1. Ch~ all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
B Section 404 Permit 0 Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
o Section 10 Permit 0 Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
g401 Water Quality Certification

2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) ReqUested:lJ.J--~o ^ L1): J e- ~ q

3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: 0

4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: 0

II.

5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page

4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of

Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: 0

A I. tI ti t' fD)~@[gD\~7~ 1m
pp lcan norma Ion ~~ ~

JAN 2 3 2009

1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: C <\ v 0 \ ,/ ^ L a v L
Mailing Address: (/3 )\\" s~ h~v ^
r, \/l' JJL
r-v............f--. '''\)

0k:+<- K ~
l. b 7.3L/

DcNR. WAl thQUALllY
VlET1AI4DS ANn 5TORM~il\TER BRANCl'1

Telephone Number: Z ).:;$ - 3 '-11 - 110 () Fax Number: S l "6 - :3 <t 1- / I 0.3
E-mail Address:(.<<~D.i^{?D.....^-..o.\J:;A.l!.S EsT e...T~ s. C <:> "^

2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be ched ifthe Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: 0 ^ ^ '.e l-=:>; \ b t! C
Company Affiliation: ;\J "'" v
Mailing Address: 1. .J. IS 0 x ,1 <z V
r........A K l:,,) }J L... ~ i> 7 C;~

Telephone Number: 770 - 5' c; 0 - 36/ J Fax Number:
E-mail Address: /\J\. ~ v s k. '^ ) ~ t~ y'" (:J k n T- AA.. A.. : l. L ':) -^"-

Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information

Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns. rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow, The specific footprints of aU buildings.
impervious surtaces, or other facilities must be included. I f possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings. or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion..
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires infonnation to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch tOrmat;
however. DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible. the applicant will be infonned that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided,

1. Name of project: '

2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):

3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):

4, Location
County: Nearest Town:
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): \
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): "
f I' " -

'If' ""

. ~ ,~

.p '!

c~ ...- t

i" .

, ,
, !' ,,' ~~"

, ~' "~ t \-,'~

r'"'.,,,,;"'

5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lal/Long): . _
(Note - If project is linear. such as a road or utility tine, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody,)

6. Property size (acres):

7, Nearest body of water (~1ream!river/soundloceanllake):

- ~

8. River Basin: ~, ,.,~ \
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. 'fhe
River Basin map is available at tmp://h2o.cnr.state,nc,usladmin/maps/.)

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and ~eneralland use in the vicinity of the project
atthe time of this application: . i' . " ,

Page 6 of 12

10, Describe the ovcrallproject in detail. including thctype of equipment to be used:
" .
i -\'~ ".. .'

, ..

,f
J
.
,

II. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: ' ,',

,i~

IV. Prior Projed History'

If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including. all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. include
the USACE Action lD Number. DWQ Project Number. application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certitications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts. along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCOOT project,
list and describe pennits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P, project, along with
construction schedules.

V. Future Project Plans

Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work.
and provide justitication for the exclusion ofthis work trom the current application,

.... <

~ ,j'<
I

.' (} " ('

~.~~,~

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waten oftbe United States/Waten of the State

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine. delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water. and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impact'i in Section vn below. All proposed impacts. permanent
and temporary. must be listed herein. and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters. and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map. whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
eval uation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation. list and describe the impact in Section VIII below, If additional space is needed for
listing or description. please attach a separate sheet.

Page 7 of 12

I

2. Individually list wetland impacts below:

Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact IOO-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type ofWetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Fo^-l -#1, t= \ '0 oj : ^ '" 0.0\'6 ;'J rj '35' ~ I
, ,. -
e /' I':) ....L.f 0,-,-..>
~/

...

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts, Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc, For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding,
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov,
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e,g" freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only),

***

List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed: O. () 1 '3 0-.- (_ v"-<-

L
~ ,.:) 4. C v~ '('

3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:

Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
fo,.,j 41. .t= '- oJ : ^ &. 79' u, o~ c \0""" h,..~ 1.5' I...~ rM: -t+~...,-r
../

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts, Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included,
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps, If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
WWW,USgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e,g" www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com. etc.),

*

Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:

-;/,J r'" -r
l l -r.~_. ~_ f

Page 8 of 12

4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:

Open Water Impact Area of Name of Water body Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type ofImpact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.

5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): 0 uplands ~tream
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, e cavatio
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):

~lands
installation of

Proposed use or purp~se of pond (e.g:! livestock waterin , irrigation, ~esthetiR'_ troP! ,pond. '
local stonnwater reqUIrement, etc.): v' 0...... T (> /\. ~ "- J LJ. I d I . F-e...
~ ~ b: 1"'- T
Size of watershed draining to pond: 7' ~ &( u~ Expected pond surface area: Lj~ 0 D Ft-~

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)

Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
infonnation related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techni ues to be followed durin construction to reduce impacts.
V'~_ .:> c....~ k "'0 ~
.:5"t;,.

tt.

VIII. Mitigation

DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.

Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse etTects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values. preferable in the same watershed.

If mitigation is required for this project. a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o .cor-state. nc. u sl newet lands! stmlg ide, hlml.

1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much infonnation as possible, including. but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if otfsite). affected stream and river basin. type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement. creation. or preservation). a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g.. deed restrictions, conservation easement.. etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
, ,

. ....../1'.. ,;,"t, "'"

t" C,' ,r "~"1:''''''

t ..- "".. ~ ~ ,- ...... f". ._.......

" _..~, ....) "e'"

.,

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Resromtion
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional infonnation regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hup://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslwrplindcx.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): .
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): '.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): .

Page 10 of 12

I

IX. EnvironOleJtt:d Documentation (required by DWQ)

Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(fe.derallstate) land?
Yes 0 No 0

If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPAlSEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required. call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes 0 No 0

If yes, has the document review been finalized. by the State Clearinghouse? (f so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA fmal approval letter,
Yes 0 No 0 '

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)

It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to detennine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VlI above. AU proposed impacts must be listed herein.
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site pLan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicants discretion.

Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identitied within ISA NCAC 28 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 28 ,0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identity )?
Yes 0 No 0 If you amwered "yes", provide the following infonnation:

Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. IT buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.

Zone. Impact Multiplier Required
(SQuare feet} Mitigation
I 3
2 1.5
Total

*

Zone: I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near !lank or channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feel from the edge of Zone I.

Page II of 12

I

If buffer mitigation is required. please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement. Riparian Butler Restoration I Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or ,0260.

XI. Stonnw.ter (required by DWQ)

Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site,
Discuss storm water controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
t (,.,,1 I .r ."

"'....

..j.
'" ."". ,....

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)

Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
\~as~water.generated from the pro~sed projec~. or available capacity of the subject facitit~.

. ,-' - "1 " . ..~

XII(. Violations (required by DWQ)

Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (}5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes 0 No 0

(s this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes 0 No 0

XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):

It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permit<;. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
worle schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species. accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control),

,/ (

~Q~~ {-I'f-cfj

ApplicaatlAg t.s Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Page 12 of 12

I

~. ~!\r~lj@~
----m~~~1 -~
\l~ J~N 't 3 20G9

\J.UN-Ifl n.WC\'\
{)E.tlR .. ~",\ \:K~INi>.iCR Blv'-o'
~OSt>.~OSi~

~4:?
t?-
<c~
"

t---4
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5COO 06000 7000 FEET
I--i I--i ...... I . I
.5 0 1 KllOMflER
t--1 I--t t--I I--t I--t

L
!

-,

....:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATIJRAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE AND FOREST SERVICE

~

MACON COUNT'!

SOIL LEGEND

Map symbols and N111l8$ are alllhabe11Ca1 Man symbols a's leners or a combinatJOn of fe:ters and a n""'oo<. Tile I<Slll!t'<!f is capiraJizoo and is 11"3 flfSl feller oflhe series (or
hg"'" ~"I '" dandica1lOnl na"'''. The second letter is Iowereaw The It1ird ';Itter i. capilal'zed and deroles the slCj)03 phase. The nu~ 2 at 1110 eN of a map ul1lt sl""boI
denotes a moderately ~eo pI1a.e.

SYMBOl

NAME

ArA

Arl<.:JqU<lIoaJTl, 0 10 2 ~Cllnl .'ooes, "eQue'1t1y ''oOd60

SYMBOL

NAME

SeA
BkB2
81o,C2
ere
B<D
BsC
BsO
BsE
BsF
Il<JD
auF

BOlmo'e sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slOpes. trequer.tly l\:!oded
Braddocl< clay loam. 210 8 percent slopes. 010ded
Br.1ddocl< day loam, 8 10 15 percent SlOpes erOOad
Braddock.Urban land compklx. 210 15 perce", slope.
Braddock-Urtlan bnd co~x, 15 1030 oorOJnl SlOpes
Brasstowo.Junaluska CO<1\p.... 810 15 por<:eot sIopas
BrasS1own-JunaJuska CQI'llplex, 1510 30 peralnl slooos
BrasslOwn-Junaluska comple., 30 10 50 percent slopes
8<3SS1Own-Junalusl<a complex, 50 10 95 percent slopes
Il<Jrton-Cr.1l19oy-Rod<oulC'op rompl3., windSW>!Pl, 15 to 30 percent slcpos, stony
Burton-Craoof3y-Rod< oux:rop complex, ,,;r"(iswept, 30 10 95 percent slopes, stony

Cashll3fS fl'avelty lIne sandy loam. 30 to 50 percent ~
Casho," fl'oveliy tine sandy loam. 50 to 95 peroent ~
CaL'l!I<a.Sylco co1l'ple'. 50 to 95 percent slopes
Chandler fl'avelfy liro sandy loam. 15 to 30 pe'OJnI slopes
Chandler fl'avelty hne sandy loam, 30 10 50 perrom ~
Chandler gravelly I'M sandy loam. 50 10 95 perron! s~
Cfoooah <;!Iannef)' IoBr'l. 30 10 50 perOJnl slopes
CllOOah Chamery loan, 50 10 95 percent '&lopes
Cheslnut-Edneyllll'" romplo., "ind$l\'9Pt. 810 15 perceot s~. S:<lny
ChestN.,ll-Edneyvlle complex, wndswepI, 1510 30 percent slopes, slMy
Cheslnul.EdnelMtkl complex, wndswep!. 30 10 50 pelC8l'lI slopes, stony
Cl<wtlland,ChestnlJl-Rod< outcrop OO<'I1ple., wndswepl, 1510 30 percerll slopes
Cieveland.Chestnlt-Aock outcrop oo""ple., wfldGwopt, 30 10 50 pe~l slopes
Ckweland-Cheslrot.Rocl< outcrop cornpJo, , w'fldsW<Jpf. 50 10 95 porcenl SlOpes
CullasajB vorl' cobb/y fine sandy loam, 1510 30 percer( slopes, e.uOlOOiy bouldefy
Cuil.1sa;a very cotJbly fine sandy 100'1'l, 30 to 50 perear( slopos, ".tremely boulde'V
ClJl.1saia-T~ romple., 151030 percoot slopes. stony
Cullas1lj3' T uckasegee oomple., 30 to 50 percent slopes. stony
Cullasaja-Tucl<.~ complex. 50 10 !l5percent ./CPOs, SlO!1y

FaC
FaO
FeE
FaF

Fam," 'In8 sanoy Ia.1m, 810 15 per~l ~
Famin ',.... sandy loam, 1510 30 pecror( slopes
Fom'" flra sandy loam, 30 to 50 percen( slop;ls
Fa.....n Ir-e sandV loam, 5010 95 pen:Ant 5Iopes

CaE
CaF
CcF
CdO
CdE
CdF
ChE
ChF
Cnc
Cno
CoE
CpO
CpE
CpF
CsO
CsE
CuD
CuE
CuF

DoS
o.a
DsB
DsC

Oe~WOO<l gravelly lone sandy loam, 0 10 5 perrort sloQeS, IreqIMnty l\:!odtld
Q;lard loam, 1105 perron! slopes, rarejy t100ded
Q;lsboro loam. 210 8 peroem.lopes
Oinsbo'O loam, 810 15 OOlQlflt slopes

HaB2
H.1C2
HaD2
HmA

Hayesville clay loam, 2to 8 percent slopes, eroded
Hayesvlile Clay loam. 6 10 15 perCOI'IC slopes, ,,'odoo
H3y<lSv.1e clay 1o.1m, 1510 30 pefOeOl Slopes. <lfIlCI3d
HerrpM Ieam, 010 3 pootoanl slopes, r3feCy ~oodOO

EdB
EdC
EdO
€dE
&:F
fee
EeD
EvS
EvC
EvO
EvE
EvF
E.C
ExD

Edneyvlle .Ches1nlJ1 co~.. 2 10 8 porOJnl slopes. stony
Ed'",yvtlle.ChwJlUI ~x, 810 15 peralnl slope., Slany
Edooyville.Cheslnut oomple., 1510 JO p;l~nl slopes. litany
EdneyviU,,-Che\;lnut complo.., 30 10 50 perC<lnt &lopes, stOllV
Edneyvile-CheslolA complex, 50 to 95 percont sklpoHl, .lO!1y
ECneyvile-CheS1nJA.Urtlallland Q)",pklx, 210 t5 P\l<CI3nt sklpes
Edneyvilkl-Cheslrlul-lJrtlan land co~.. 15 to JO percenl Sl<:pcs
Evard-COW.,. CO~, 2 fa 8 percent sfopots
Evard-oo...oo COrrplel, 8 to 15 pelC<ll'lI elopes
EV3rd-COWoo COIT'plex, 151o 30 percom slopes
EVa<<:!.Cowoo complex, 30 10 50 perC<lnt sloo6s
EVald-Cow.ltl complex, 50 10 95 percont .Iopes
Evard-Ccwee-Umao land con-p4e.. 810 15 perceel "ooes
Evard.Cowee"Urtlao land romplex, 15 to 30 pe'cent slopes

NkA

NI<wa.. I"a sar"(iy loam, 0 10 2 pert>lr\1 slopes. 1r6<JJOOlfy l100ded

ONE

Ocol\il iJttw Charvlef)' 1a3m, Wlndsw.3ll1. JO 10 50 percent slopes

p...,c
P-ND
PwE
PwF

Plott line sar"(iy 1o.1m. B ro 15 perO'lrt 6lllp\)S, stony
Pklll tine sandy loam. 151030 perOJnl slopes, S1Of1y
PlOIlllOe sandy loam, 30 to 50 porOOnt sio(le$, S1O<1y
PIon l>ne sand'; loam. !)Q to 95 petOi!nt s~s, slooy

~A
RhF
Rl<F
RsA

Reddles ' roe SOW1dy kl..", 0 III 3 perwm slopes, lreqoontiy f'oodeo
Rock O~1CfOp-Cata9<a OOtnplax, 30 to 95 peral''t slooes
Rod< outcrop-Clevet~nd COtrllk!x. ...h1SYo"!-'1. 30 to 95 poroenl slcpes
Ro6man ',ne sardy loam, 0 10 2 peroertt slopes, tr_lly tloodoad

5.1ur.:lot- gra,-..tiy loam, 8 10 15 poR:em s:opes, Stonv
SatJrocl< 11'3vvly loam. 151D 30 peroont .slopes. stony
Saurocl< .ravely loam, 30 to 50 perQlr1t51opcs, '>loll)'
Saunook loam. 210 8 ~ slopes
Saunoc. loar.t, 8 10 15 percenl slopes
Soco-StecxJah complex, 1510 30 peroertl slopes
Soco-SIe<:oah complex, 30 10 50 P9I'l:lJftI slopes
Soco-Slecoah COl!llltll, 50 to 9S pefCllnt slopes
Splvey.Sall".eeIlah oompiax, 8 to 15 perront slop<ls, SlOI'y
Spivey.San:OOttah complex. 15 to 30 pert>lr\t slopes, lS'.ony
Spi""y.Santeetlah complex, 30 10 50 perc.lnl $lopes, stony
Staller h"e sardy loom, I to 5 percoot slopes, raroly !boded
Sjo1co-Catasl<a <<'<'lple.. 30 lo 50 p.'l<OOOl slopes
S~1va-WMeside c:orrplax. 010 3 per09n1 Slopes

To.awayca'1'l, 0 10 2 percent slcpes, lrllqtJClntiy lIooOOd
Tnman! Q'avel y loam. 30 to 50 perronl slopes. stony
Trimont g'aW<ll,y loam, 50 10 95 pert>lr\1 slopes, stony
Tud<.is~-Culb&1ja complex. 810 15 perront slopes, SlCny
T ~sll998.Wtul.!slde complex. 21O 8 p.J<Cl:!t1( >;lopes
TlJd<a~<?e-WMeside compiax, 8 ro 15 pen::enl8lap&.>

SbC
SbO
SbE
Sdl
See
SoD
SoE
Sol"
SrC
SiD
StE
S18
SxE
SyA

ToA
TIE
TrF
TsC
TMl
T....C

U<l
UiB

~n:s la3my
llOortMr1-.s-U>l>... lald oompla., 0 to 5 peroent slopes, rarely flooeec

we<:.
WeD
WeE
'lieF

Wayah SB"ldy loam, w,od'''''''''I, 8 10 15 palO""l sIq>es, SIony
Wayah sa"dy loam, wirtdsw<!pt. 15to 30 p<JfCOnl ."pes, Slony
Wayah sa"<1y loam. windswept. 30 10 50 pe<<:e<ll sIopas, stony
Wayah sa"'dy loam. windswapl. 5010 95 l'Q<llllf'1 slopes, stoll)'

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

1 J, I / ~I I 1./ S Latitude: /7 t-- \ \ t::. ...,\ "
Date: \ ~; :) ?S Project: \ ) : ,~) ..). \,
/ A....-v,_ " .." ,'./\. i -''''.. .j \ ) ,)
I
, l))^c\ -~ I '1 .~ I .~ i') I
Evaluator: )\j\,^.., sL.. J -t. Site: -. < i v'~... .A\. Longitude: 6? I.) I !) i, / t> I
l...... ~ 1""(. ,.r-" .. ,/ >. .:./~... . '\)
Total Points: j\)\ Other ~ l )
Stream is at least intermittent d.. 0 .-, 5' County: ) <"
if "2 19 or perennialif "2 30 . , , / .. ~.. ( ') /' e.g. Quad Name: k " : A .):)~J .)(; :A;/

/ '. Moderate
A Geomorphology (Subtotal = 0.l , ) ) Absent Weak Strong
13. Continuous bed and bank 10) 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 / 1) 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 (J ) 2 3
4, Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 '1 ) 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain -0) 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches Q (1 ) 2 3
7, Braided channel ( 0) 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 (2 ') 3
93 Natural levees ('0) 1 2 3
10, Headcuts '0) 1 2 3
11, Grade controls r 0) 0.5 1 1,5
12, Natural valley or drainageway 0 (0.5) 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existino / )
USGS or NRCS map or other documented (No = 0 Yes = 3
evidence. ' v/
3

Man-made ditches are not rated; see diSCUSSions In manual

C

B. HvdroloClv (Subtotal = ,'J ) ...,...,
14, Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 1,3)
15, Water in channel and> 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 /~) 3
Water in channel - dry or orowino season
16, leaflilter 1.5 1 i 0,5 ) 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 (0.5) 1 1,5
18, Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ( 0 ) ~_.''''-' 0.5 1 1,5
19, Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? (No = 0 ') Yes = 1.5

C. Biology (Subtotal = ), cJ...J ) ,-
20b, Fibrous roots in channel 3 t' 2) 1 0
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3 i 2 ) 1 0
22. Crayfish ',0 ) 0.5 1 1.5
23, Bivalves ... 0) 1 2 3
24, Fish 0) 0,5 1 1.5
25, Amphibians 0 (0,5 ) 1 1.5
26, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 \J) 1.5
27, Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 (1) 2 3
28, Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus, 0 .- _--.....0.5 (1 ) 1.5
29 b, Wetland plants in streambed FAC = O,5/c FACW = 0,75;) OBl = 1.5 SAV = 2,0; Other = 0
0

(~ "' c:

Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants,

Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)

Sketch:

<:
.)( e.

\)\
\ ...,.",;'\().';

Photos: Intermittent Stream (74 linear feet) proposed for impact upon Pond #1 construction.

:; )
/
/

-----

. ,

j~~ .
J ;
.:.t~

d
c:~
~l

. ~ I dI~
. .b~_

\j\ ~
E . ~l~-ii
I- . ~ ~l ~ ~~
. . J ij 1,.;
'ft. ~ ~ \'}

J; J~ ff U
Z. . ~i ~ I t 1 ~
-i

t d
r ~~ 1*6i. tl~
. l~ ~~~~ ,~
lJ;- ~ ~
~~ -1
i ~ U"la
:l~ ~ ~

~
'C
. .

.
,
." I

. ~!..
{ i~

{J\G\

(t'
" i .

. ') ~
. ~ij P t
U ~

~"
& .
. '. J.'..
'. t)
z....
j