20171451 Ver 1_401 Application_20171113

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID: 56808742160000
STREET ADDRESS: _949 S. Lentz Harness Shop Road, Mount Pleasant, NC 28124^
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
of NC DACS Division Soil and Water Conservation
(Contractor I Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above): -101 Little Bear Creek Road,
Mount Pleasant, NC 28124
Telephone: _980-521-0498_
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
� �;/7/z�
Authorized Signature
Date: lle:� 7
Authorized SigrAture
Date: �da' eZ0/2

O/��pFry�WjA TF�9OG
olqii�-'c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1 f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Eddie Moose Stream Restoration
2b.
County:
Cabarrus
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mount Pleasant
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Edward Stephen Moose
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
101 Little Bear Creek Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Mount Pleasant, NC 28124
3f.
Telephone no.:
980-521-0498
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Cindy M. Safrit, PE
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
NC DACS Division of Soil and Water Conservation
4d. Street address:
P.O. Box 845
4e. City, state, zip:
Mocksvill, NC 27028
4f. Telephone no.:
704-754-0566
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Cindy M. Safrit, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
NC DACS Division of Soil and Water Conservation
5c. Street address:
P.O. Box 845/ 134 Water Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Mocksville, NC 27028
5e. Telephone no.:
704-754-0566
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
56808742160000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.4081 Longitude: - 80.377672
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
99.13 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Little Bear Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin: map is available at
Yadkin -Pee Dee
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Creek through the property has eroding banks, portions of it are entrenched and portions has a torturous meander
pattern. The land on either side of the channel is agriculture, row crops.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,175 ft
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project purposed is to stabilize eroding banks and provide a stable channel pattern, profile and dimensions
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The upper 253 ft will consist of installing a bankfull bench, coir matting, seeding with native vegetation and planting a 25ft
buffer on each side of the channel. This work can be completed with a bob cat and mini excavator. There is an existing
ford stream crossing that will be utilized to access northern portion of the channel. The stream goes dry several months
out of the year, therefore a rip rap toe is proposed to stabilize side slopes when water has receded.
The lower 257 feet below the existing stream crossing will be graded to a stable pattern, profile and dimension. Two J -
Hooks will be installed, one where the channel departs from the existing channel and one where it returns back to the
existing channel. I anticipate finding rock in the proposed channel to be used in the riffle section. If not then rip rap will
be brought in to construct a riffle section.
Soil removed to form the existing channel will be used to fill in the old channel. Elevation of fill will be between bankfull
elevation and flood prone elevation, not to exceed flood prone elevation (2 x max depth). This will allow the entire area to
act as a floodplain.
The stream is currently dry, if we can get permits and construct while dry, soil can be moved directly from the constructed
channel into the old channel, and stabilized daily.
If construction takes place during flow, the proposed channel will be constructed and stabilized with coir matting. At that
time the flow will be diverted into the new channel. Then fill will be placed in the existing channel.
I anticipate two excavators with hydraulic thumbs and a bob cat will be used to construct the project.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Wetland determination has been performed but
® Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
not by Corp or State. Kristin May soil scientist with NRCS
has performed wetland determination. She is certified in
wetland determination. The entire stream is jurisdictional
length was determined by survey data.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Kristin (NRCS)
Name (if known): Kristin May(wetland)/Cindy Safrit (Stream)
Cindy (NCDACS- Soil and Water)Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Wetland determination conducted 11/2/2017 and is attached.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary M
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Stabilization of
Banks
Little Bear Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
17-20
253
S2 ® P ❑ T
Restoration
Little Bear Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
11
257
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
510
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The existing conditions of the bed and bank material were taken into consideration during the planning and design of this
project. Areas where the channel was fundamentally stable only a bankfull bench installation has been planned.
In areas where the channel has eroding banks and shape bends, a restoration has been planned to implement correct
pattern, profile and dimensions.
All areas worked on will have a 25 ft buffer on each side planted with native vegetation.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
If we can go to construction soon, the channel is dry. We will only disturb what can be stabilized daily.
Upper section (installation of bankfull bench on 253 ft) should only take one to two days to construct and stabilize.
Lower section (restoration) should be completed in 7 to 10 working days. Anticipated weather will be monitored daily.
Design engineer will be onsite daily to ensure areas are stabilized at the end of each day.
I would like to request a permit as quickly as possible, construction in a dry channel would be favorable to minimizing
impacts from construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
[:] Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: It is in Ag Field,
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/statellocal) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ® No
Comments: Funds are through AgCost Share program and are a reimbersment to
the landowner for installing BMP on their farm. Such projects do not go through the
State Clearing House
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Submitted to Bryan Tompkins waiting on response
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NC DWQ Basin Planning Maps Fish Com (See attached map)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Cindy M. Safrit
W.)/
10/20/2017
i
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Ap icant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 11

35° 24'55'N
35° 23 50" N
3 Soil Map—Cabarrus County, North Carolina a
(Eddie Moose Stream Restoration) N
M
93
555900 556100 5-96900 556500 556700 566900 567100 567300
3 3
Map Scale: 1:10500 t prinhad on A patrait (&5" x 11") sheet
Meters
N 0 130 300 600 9W
eet
0 500 low 20M 300
///AAA Map projecIon: Web Merotrx Corner 000rd ztes: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/24/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
35" 24' W N
35" 23 50"N

•
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Solis
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Sod Map Unit Lines
0
Sod Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
V
Blowout
®
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
0
Closed Depression
X
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
d
Lava flow
Marsh or swamp
+
Mine or Quarry
O
Miscellaneous Water
O
Perennial Water
V
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Sport
®,
Severely Eroded Spot
0
Sinkhole
ar-t
Slide or Slip
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Sodic Spot
USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Soil Map—Cabarrus County, North Carolina
(Eddie Moose Stream Restoration)
MAP INFORMATION
iI
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
4
Stony Spot
1:24,000.
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
d
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
,•
Special Line Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Transportation
measurements.
ar-t
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
,.y
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Major Roads
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Local Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Background
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
.
Aerial Photography
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 19, 2016
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 14, 2015—Feb 8,
2017
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10/24/2017
Page 2 of 3

Soil Map--Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Eddie Moose Stream Restoration
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/24/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BaB
Badin channery silt loam, 2 to
75.3
31.1%'
8 percent slopes
BaD
Badin channery silt loam, 8 to
50.1
20.7%
15 percent slopes
1.6
BaF
Badin channery silt loam, 15 to
0.7%
45 percent slopes
ChA Chewada sandy loam, 0 to 2
34.8
14.4%
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
EnB Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8
0.2
0.1%
percent slopes
EnD Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15
12.6
5.2%
percent slopes
47.3
GoC
Goldston very channery silt
19.5%
loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes
KkB
Kirksey sift loam, 1 to 6
11.2
4.6%
percent slopes
Misenheimer channery silt
9.2
MsA
3.8%
loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
242.3
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/24/2017
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration City/County: Mount Pleasant Cabarrus Co. Sampling Date: 11/22017
Applicant/Owner. Eddie Moose -Owner, Cindy M. Safrit-Applicant State: NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): K. May, C. Safrit, C. Brooks Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Stream Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P. MLRA 136 Let: 35.4081 Long: -80.377672 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
hTUKVLUKaT
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that awly)
Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
—Surface
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Moss
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (84) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D7)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (134)
_Aquatic Fauna (613)
_
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
—
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5.5
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 5.5
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Amry Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot sine: ) % Cover
1. Pinus taede 50
2. Platanus occidentalis 5
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Samplinv Point:
Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
No FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of
Multiply by:
OBL species
55 =Total Cover
x 1 =
0
50% of total cover.
28
20% of total cover.
11
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
x3=
150
1.
Ligustrum sinense
x4=
20 Yes
FACU
2.
x5=
0
Column Totals:
92
3.
276 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.00
4.
5.
�-
6.
7.
8.
9.
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover.
10
20% of total cover.
4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Solidago gigantea
10 Yes
FACW
2.
Persicadaa pensylvanke
6 Yes
FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
16 =Total Cover
50% of total cover
8
200/6 of total cover.
4
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1 •
Loniceralapm►loa
1 No
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
^
1 =Total Cover
50% of total cover.
1
20% of total cover.
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
21
x2=
42
FAC species
50
x3=
150
FACU species
21
x4=
84
UPL species
0
x5=
0
Column Totals:
92
(A)
276 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.00
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Samplina Point
Profits Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/3 100
2-12 10YR 4/4 100
'Type: Cxoncentration, D=Depletion, RM --Reduced Matrix. MS -Mas
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Buck Histic (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Dark Surface (S7)
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Maft.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147,148)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
MLRA 136)
+Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147,148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive layer (if observed): - -
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
F%7i5 d&6 s1leef 1'5 re bed m J5,5 kr v 4&t4 6111,5 O, Aecl mool
�e#j,or) t 5,,p-e"e4 Ve,5)-o o 2: d ra ;nc l tAcCe �" n12CS F -r (d _reid;c&6-6
Ver -51-00 6-0) ao 1&
% od %ca1U� ceSerlb• No h lercyi't sl�l scut ell - Sv=� �l
,J, Aldr-;G so; P
ac,kc% %ri de r e66h))? Gr-ecL I,wi`�✓e fl•� �i,'2e k ws j f toe cl ✓te d fv
1 P
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Worksheet 5-10. Summary form of annual streambank erosion estimates for various study reaches.
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabarrus
Graph Used: Colorado data Stream Type: Total Bank Length (ft): 510
Observers: CMSafrit/DMCartner Valle T Date: 10/20/2017
2
3
4
5
6
Station (ft)
BEHI rating
5-8)
(adjective)
NBS rating
(Worksheet
5-9)
(adjective)
Bank
erosion rate
(Figure 5-38
or 549)
(ft/yr)
Length of
bank (ft)
Study bank
height (ft)
rErosion(Worksheet
Wive)
1. 0 to 253
High
Extreme
1.32
505
4
2671.68
2. 268 to 371
Moderate
Moderate
0.25
206
5.3
272.95
371 0
3. 506
High
Extreme
1.32
135
3.3
588.06
4. 506 to 525
High
Extreme
1.32
19
4A
110.35
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
is.
Sum erosion subtotals in Column (7) for each BEHUNBS combination
Total erosion
( , ►Yh
3643.04
Convert erosion in ft3/yr to yds3tyr {divide Total erosion (ft3/yr) by 27}
on
Total tal erosion
seroi
134.92741
Convert erosion in yds3/yr to tons/yr {multiply Total erosion (yds3tyr) by
1.3}
Total erosion
(tones
175.40563
Calculate erosion per unit length of channel {divide Total erosion (tons/yr)
by total length of stream (ft) surveyed}
Total erosion
(tom
0.3439326
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-81

Worksheet 5-8. Form to calculate Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) variables and an overall BEHI rating
(Rosgen, 1996, 2001a). Use Figure 5-19 with BEHI variables to determine BEHI score.
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabarrus County
Station: 0+00 to 2+53 X -Ing upstream Observers: CMSafrit / DMCartner
Date: 1012012011 Stream Tvae: E 511 Vallev Tvoe: Vlll
BEHI Score
Studv Bank Height / Bankfull Height ( C ) (Fig. 549)
StudyBankfull
I Study
Bank
4
Height
2.77 (A)/(B ) =
1.44
5.8
Height =
(�►)
ft =
B
(C)
(A(E
Root Depth / Study Bank Height ( E )
Root
I Study
Depth
0.5
Hank
4
(D)/(A=
2
ft =
(0
Hei ht e =
(A(E
)8.1
Weighted Root Density ( G )
Root
Density 20% (F) x (E) 1EJ1:E as °o = �
_Bank Material A ustment•- --
Bedrock (Overall Very Low BEHI)
Boulders (Overall Low BEHQ
Cobble (Subtract 10 points if uniform medium to large cobble)
Gravel or Composite Matrix (Add 5-10 points depending on
percentage of bank material that is composed of sand)
Sand (Add 10 points)
Silt/Clay (no adjustment)
Low I Low I Moderate I H
Extreme
5-9.5 1 10-19.5 1 20-29.5 1 30-39.5 1 40-45 46-50
Bank Sketch
1
Q
0 1
Horizontal distance (ft)
Bank Angle ( H )
Bank
Angie 80 6
as D rees =
JH
Surface Protection (I )
Surface
Protection 70% 2.8
as ° _ (l)
Bank Material
StraatMcatlon Adjustrnent
Add 5-10 points, depending on
position of unstable layers in
relation to bankfull stage
Adjective Rating
and
Total Score
Y
�a
---- BInkfuil______------
32.5
Root
p
i Bank
w Angle
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-56

Worksheet 5-9. Various field methods of estimating Near -Bank Stress (NBS) risk ratings to calculate erosion
rate.
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-66
Estimating Near -Bank Stress (NBS)
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabarrus
Station: 0+00 to 2+53 both sides Stream Type: E 611
Valley Type: Vill
Observers: CMSafrWDMCartner
Date: 1012011017
Methods for estimating Near -Bank Strom (NIBS)
(1) Channel pattern, transverse bar or split channel/central bar creating NBS...........
Level I Reconaissance
(2) Ratio
of radius of curvature to bankfull width R. Wbw ................................................
Level 11 General prediction
(3) Ratio
--------- -
of pool slope 10 average water surface slope (Sp/ S) ....... ......
Level 11 General prediction
(4) Ratio of pool slope to riffle slope (Sp /Sf)-. .......... ...................... :7 ... 7-7 * ----------
Level 11 General prediction
(5) Ratio
of near -bank rnwdrnurn depth to bankfull mean depth (Onb/dbkf) .......................
Level III Detailed prediction
(6) Ratio of near -bank shear straw to bankfull shear stress .......................
Level III Detailed prediction
(T) Velocity profiles I Isovels I Velocity gradient. .........
Level IV Validation
Transverse and/or central be ort and/or discontinuous ................................... NBS = High I Very Fig
Extensive deposition (continuous, cross-channel) .......................................... ............... NBS = Extreme
Chute cutoffs, down -vale meander mh ration, coneIng flow ......................................NBS = Extreme
Radius of
BankfUll
Near -Bank
(2)
Curvature
Rc (ft)
Width wbw
Ratio R,
WW
Stress
NBS
Dominant
Near -Bank Stress
Extreme
(3)
Pool Slope
Pool
S
Average
Slope 8
Ratio SP / S
Near -Bank
Stress
(NBS)
1
Near -Bank
(4)
Pool Slope
3,
Riffle Slope
Slff
Ratio S,1 Strew
S, NBS
Near -Bank
Near43 ank
(5)
Max Depth
dnb (ft)
Mean Depth
dbu (ft)
Ratio dnb :
Strew
dw NBS
Near -Bank
Near-Bank
Shear
Bankfull
Shear
Near -Bank
(6)
Max Depth
dnb(ft)
Near -Bank
Slope Sb
Stress Tb( Mean Depth
lbtfj2) dw (ft)
Average
Slope
L0001SI
Stre"Tbitt
IbIfe)
Ratio-Clb
Two
Stress
(NBS)
2.7
0.0015
0.26 2.22
0.16
1.66
Extreme
>
Near -Bank
m
(7}
Velocity Gradient (ft /sec
Ift)
Stress
NBS
Convertin values to a Near -Bank Stress (NBS) rating
Near -Bank Sti,999 (NBS)
Method number
(1) (2) (3) (4)
(5) (6) (7)
ratinas
Very Low
NIA > 3.00 < 0.20 < 0.40
< 1.00 < 0.80 < 0.50
LOW
NIA 2.21-3.00 0-20- 0-40 0.41- 0.60
1,00-1.50 0.80-1-05 0.50-1-00
Moderate
NIA 2.01-2.20 0.41-0.60 0.61-0-80
1.51-1,80 1.06-1.14 1.01-1.60
High
See 1.81-2.00 0.61-0.80 0.81-1-00
1-81-2-50 1.15-1.19 1.61-2-00
Very High
(1) 1.50-1.80 0.81 -1.00 1.01 -1.20
2.51-3.00 1.20-1.60 2-01-2.40
Extreme
Above < 1.50 > 1.00 > 1.20
> 3.00 > 1-60 > 240
Overall Near -Bank Strew (NBS) rating
I Extreme
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-66

Worksheet 54. Form to calculate Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) variables and an overall BEHI rating
(Rosgen, 1996, 2001a). Use Figure 549 with BEHI variables to determine BEHI score.
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabarrus County
Station: 2+68 X -Ing downstream to 3+71 Observers: CMSafrit / DMCartner
Date: 1012012011 Stream Type: Valley Type: VIII
BEHI Score
Study Bank Height / Bankfull Height ( C ) (Fig. 5-19)
Study
Bankfull
Bank
5.3
Height
2.84 (A) / (B)=
1.87
7.6
Height ft =
(i°►)
(it) =
B
(C)II
1 (A
moot DBDtn / Study tsanK Meiant 1 t 1
Root
Study
Depth
5.3
Bank
5.3
(D)/(A)=
1
0
I
ft =
(D)
Height =
1 (A
(E)II
Welantea Koot Density 1 u i
Root
Density 25%, (F) x (E) = 25 6.5
as u = F (G)II I
Bank Material Ad ustment:
Bedrock (overall Very Low BEHI)
Boulders (Overall Low BEHI)
Cobble (Subtract 10 points if uniform medium to large cobble)
Gravel or Composite Matrix (Add 5-10 points depending on
percentage of bank material that is composed of sand)
Sand (Add 10 pants)
Slit/Clay (no adjustment)
ery Lowj Low I Moderate I High I very Hig
5-9.5 1 10-19.5 1 20-29.5 130-39.5 1 40-45
Bank Sketch
1
0+
0
Horizontal distance (ft)
Bank Angle (H )
Bank
Angle8JH 7
as Degrees =
irface Protection (I )
Surface
Protection 20% 7
(,]I I
Bank Material
3tratMcation Adjustrnent
Add 5-10 points, depending on
position of unstable layers in
relation to bankk#U stage
Extreme Adjective Rating
and
46-50 Total Score
Copyright® 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-56

Worksheet 5-9. Various field methods of estimating Near -Bank Stress (NBS) risk ratings to calculate erosion
rate.
Estimating Near -Bank Stress ( NBS
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabarrus
Station: 2+68to 3+71 both sides Stream Type: Valley Type: Vill
Observers: CMSaMWMCartner Date: 1012011017
Methods for estimating Near -Bank Stress (NBS)
(1) Channel pattern, transverse bar or split channellcentral bar creating NBS........... Level I Reconaiwance
------- ------
(2) Ratio of radius of curvature to bankfull width R�/Wbw) ..................... ...... Level 11 General prediction
(3) Ratio of pool Mope to average water surface slope ( Sp S ............. ......................... Level 11 General prediction
(4) Ratio of pool slope to riffle slope (Sp/ S,#) ....... .......... ............. ...... ................. Level 11 General prediction
(5) Ratio of near -bank maximum depth to bankfull mean depth dnb I dbkf ....................... Level III Detailed prediction
(6) Ratio of near -bank shear strew to bankfull shear stress (T,bftbv) ............................ Level III Detailed prediction
(7) Velocity profiles I lsovels / Velocity gradient ......... ............................................. Level IV I Validation
fransverse and/or central bars -short and/or discontinuous .......... .. ...................... NBS = High I Very High
> (1) Extensive deposition (continuous, cross-channel) .......... ..............................................NBS = Extreme
Chute cutoffs, down -valla meander mk ration, convey Ing flow ......................................NBS = Extreme
Radius of Bankfull Near -Bank
Curvature Width Wbw Ratio R, Stress
(2) R. (ft) WbW NBS
Near -Bank
Pool Slope Average Stress Dominant
(3) S, Slope 8 Ratio SP / S (NBS) Near -Bank Stress
1 5
Near -Bank
(4) Pool Slope KFffte Slope Ratio SP tress
S
SP S, Sn, (N S)
Near -Bank Near -Bank
Max Depth Mean Depth Ratio dnb I Stress
(6) dnb (ft) dw (ft) dw NBS
2.84 1.86 11.63 Moderate
Near-Mnk Bankfull
Near -Bank Shear Shear Near -Bank
(6) Max Depth Near -Bank Stress -rnb mean Depth Average Stress T,, Ratio T,, Stress
d,lb (ft) Slope Snb 113fle) dw (ft) slope S IbIfe) T NBS
Near -Bank
Velocity Gradient ( It I sec Stress
(7) NBS
Convertin values to a Near -Bank Strwm (NBS) rating
Hear -Bank Sbwm (NBS) Method number
ratin 1 2) (3) (4) j (5)- - (7)
Very Low NIA > 3-00 < 0.20 < 0.40 < 1.00 < 0.80 < 0.50
LOW N/A 2.21-3.00 0.20-0.40 0.41-0.60 1.00-1-50 0.80-1-05 0-50-1-00
Moderate NIA 2.01-2.20 0.41-0.60 0.61-0-80 1.51-1.80 1.06-1.14 1.01-1.60
High See 1.81-2.00 0.61-0.80 0.81-1-00 1.81-2.60 1.15-1.19 1.61-2.00
Very High (1) 1.50-1.80 0.81 -1-00 1.01-1.20 2.51-3.00 1.20-1.60 2.01-2.40
Extreme Above < 1.50 > 1.00 > 1.20 > 3.00 > 1.60 >2.40
Overall Near -Bank Stress s (NES) rating I
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-66

Worksheet 5-8. Form to calculate Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) variables and an overall BEHI rating
(Rosgen, 1996, 2001a). Use Figure 5-19 with BEHI variables to determine BEHI score.
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabarrus County
Station: 3+71 to 5+06 right side Observers: CMSafrit / DMCartner
Date: 1012012011 Stream TVDe: Vallev TvDe: Vlll
BEHI Score
Study Bank He(aht ! Bankfull He(aht ( C ) (Fig. 5-19)
Study
Bank Material Adjustment:
Bankfu11
Bank
3.3
Height 2.84 (A) / (B) =
1.1QE
1.2
Hei ht ft =
(A)
ft = B
4.2
--I
Root Depth I Study Bank "e(aht ( E )
Root
Bank Material Adjustment:
Study
Bedrock (Overall Very Low BEHI)
Depth
1.5
Bank
3.3
(D) /(A) =
0.45
4.2
tt =
(D)
Height ft =(Al
(E)
Gravel or Composite Matrix (Add 5-10 points depending on
Weiahted Root Density ( G )
Root
Density - F 10% (F) x (E)
as (G)
Bank Angle ( H )
Bank
Angle 95 8.3
as Degrees = H)l
urface Protection ( I )
Surface
Protection 15% 8
(I)
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-56
Bank Material Adjustment:
Bedrock (Overall Very Low BEHI)
Bank Material
Boulders (Overall Low BEHI)
Ad uStment
Cobble (Subtract 10 points if uniform medium to large cobble)
Gravel or Composite Matrix (Add 5-10 points depending on
Stratification Adjustment
percentage of bank material tot is composed of sand)
Add 5-10 prints, depending on
I
Sand (Add 10 points)
position of unstable layers in
relation to bankfull stage
SilVCiay (no adjustment)
i
,
Very Low
Low Moderate High Very High
I Extreme
Adjective Rating
�- High
and
'
5 — 9.5
10 —19.5 20 — 29.5 30 — 39.5 40 — 451
46 — 50
Total Score
31.2
Bank Sketch
----- ---�
;"'. Root
(D)
1 ---
I
ZqYZ
Q
:'. I�
ZK
m
e Angle
�
-------------
m
%t
Y�
co
>
--
- }=-
;: Start
0
Bank
-
0
1
Horizontal distance (ft)
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-56

Worksheet 5-9. Various field methods of estimating Near -Bank Stress (NBS) risk ratings to calculate erosion
rate.
Estimating Near -Bank Stress NBS
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabarrus
Station: 3+71 to 5+06 Right Side Stream Type: Valley Type: Vlll
Observers: CMSafrWDMCartner Date: 10/20/1017
Methods for estimating Near -Bank Stress (NBS)
(1) Channel pattern, transverse bar or split channeUcenbal bar creating NBS........... Level I Reconaissance
(2) Ratio of radius of curvature to bankfull width ( Rc / Wbw )................................................ Level II ` General prediction
(3) Ratio of pool slope to average water surface slope ( Sp / S )... .......... ................ Level II General prediction
(4) Ratio of pod slope to riffle slope (Sp / S,$) ......... ......... ......... ................ Level II General prediction
(5) Ratio of near -bank maximum depth to bankfuil mean depth ( dib / dbkf) .................. Level 111 Detailed prediction
(6) Ratio of rear -bank shear stress to bankfuii shear stress (t,b / ,cbw)............................ Level III Detailed prediction
(1) Velocity profiles / Isovels / Velocity gradient .............. ...................... .................. Level IV Validation
Transverse and/or central ars-short and/or discontinuous ............. ................... _NBS = High / Very Alas
m
>
(1)
Extensive deposition (continuous, cross-channel).........................................................NBS =Extreme
Chute cutoffs, down -valley meander mil ration, cone Ing flow......................................NBS = Extreme
Radius of
Bankfull
Near -Bank
(2)
Curvature
Width Wba
Ratio Re/
Stress
Rc (ft)
(ft)
WbW
NBS
29.9
29
1.03
Extreme
Near -Bank
_
(3)
Pool Slope
S
Average
Slope S
Ratio S / S
Stress
(NBS)
Dominant
Near -Bank Stress
J
2
Near -Bank
(4)
Pool Slope
Riffle Slope
Ratio Sp /
Sys
S
S,;r
S,
NBS
Near -Bank
Near -Bank
(5)
Max Depth
Mean Depth
Ratio d„ b /
Stressr1b
(ft)
dw (ft)
db,
NBS
-We-WORW
Bankfull
Near -Bank
Shear
Shear
Near -Bank
(6)
Max Depth
Near -Bank
Stress Tb (
Mean Depth
Average
Stress sb (
Ratio s„b /
Stress
drb (ft)
I Slope Snb
Ibme
dw (ft)
Slope S
lb/fts
Tru
NBS
Near -Bank
> (7) Velocity Gradient ( ft /sec Stress
� /ft NBS
Co erting values to a Near -Bank Stress (NOS) ratio
Near -Bank Stress (NBS)
Method number
ratios
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Very Low
NIA > 3.00 < 0.20 < 0.40 < 1.00 < 0.80 < 0.50
LOW
N / A 2.21- 3.00 0.20 - 0.40 0.41- 0.60 1.00-1-50 0.80-1.05 0.50-1.00
Moderate
N r A 2.01-2.20 0.41-0.60 0.61-0.80 1.51-1-80 1.06-1.14 1.01-1.60
High
See 1.81-2.00 0.61- 0.80 0.81-1.00 1.81-2.50 1.15-1.19 1.61-2.00
Very High
(1) 1.50-1.80 0.81 -1.00 1.01-1-20 2.51-3.00 1.20-1.60 2.01-2.40
Extreme
Above < 1.50 > 1.00 > 1.20 > 3.00 > 1.60 > 2.40
Overall Near -Bank Stress (NBS) rating
Esme
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-66

Worksheet 54. Form to calculate Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) variables and an overall BEHI rating
(Rosgen, 1996, 2001a). Use Figure 5-19 with BEHI variables to determine BEHI score.
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabanvs County
Station: 5+06 to 5+25 Right side Only Observers: CMSafrit / DMCartner
Date: 1012012011 Stream Tvpe: Vallev TVDe: Vill
BEHI Score
Studv Bank Height/ Bankfull Heiuht (C) (Fig. 5-19)
Study
Bankfull
Root
Bank
4.4
Height
2.84 (A) / (B) =
1.55
6
I
Height (to =
(A)
ft =
B
(C)II
A
Root DePtn 1 Study Bank height ( E )
Root
Study
Root
Depth
2
Bank
4.4
(D) / (A)
sf
ft =
(D)
Height ft =
A
(E)
L'i=- , iI T� : •.• 9�.'Ti� i,l[r11
Root
Density 10% (F) x (E) = 4.5 9.5
F (G)
Bank Material Ad
1ustment:
SWrock (Overall Very Low BEHI) � —
Boulders (overall Low BEHi)
Cobble (Subtract 10 points if uniform medium to large cobble)
Gravel or Composite Matrix (Add 5-10 points depending on
Percentage of bank material that is composed of sand)
Sand (Add 10 points)
slwclay (no adjustment)
cry Low Low Moderate I High Very High I Extreme
Bank Angle ( H )
Bank
Angle EJ
10
as Tees =
Surface Protection ( I )
_
Surface
Protection 15%_ 8
(1)
Bank Material
stratification Adjustment
Add 5-10 points, depending on
position of unstable layers in
relation to bankfull stage
Adjective Rating
and
6 — 9.5 1 10 —19.6 1 20 — 29.5 1 30 — 39Total Score 37.7
Bank Sketch
1
0
0 1
Horizontal distance (it)
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-56
Root
}
sf
Y
ABa.,n.1ke
Anyg�
sqi)
}c ------------
-
J
z
u. m
3C
I
--
start
of
i
Bank
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-56

Worksheet 5-9. Various field methods of estimating Near -Bank Stress (NBS) risk ratings to calculate erosion
rate.
Estimating Near -Bank Stress ( NBS )
Stream: Eddie Moose Stream Restoration Location: Cabarrus
Station: 5+06 to 5+35 Right Side Stream Type: Valley Type: Vlll
Observers: CMSafrit1DMCartner Date: 10/20/1011
Methods for estimating Near -Bank Stress (NBS)
(1) Channel pattern, transverse bar or split channeUcentral bar creating NBS........... Level I Reconaissance
(2) Ratio of radius of curvature to bankfull width Wye ) ................................................ Level 11 General prediction
(3) Ratio of pool slope to average water surface slope ( Sp / S )....................................... Level 11 General prediction
(4) Ratio of pod slope to riffle slope ( Sp / Srfr)...................... ..... ...... ..................... Level If General prediction
--.__
(6) Ratio of near -bank maximum depth to bankfull mean depth ( drib / dbid) .................. Level 111 Detailed prediction
(6) Ratio of near -bank shear stress to bankfull shear stress (Tr b / Tw ).... ......... ............... Level III Detailed prediction
........
(7) Vekxtity profiles / Isovels / Velocity gradient ......... ......... ..... _........... Level IV Validation
Transverse and/or central bars -short and/or discontinuous ............. ...................... NBS= High /VeryHigh
>
(1)
Extensive deposition (continuous, cross-channel).........................................................NBS = Extreme
Chute cutoffs, down -valla meander m' ration, conve ing flow......................................NBS = Extreme
Radius of
Bankfull
(2)
Curvature
R. (ft)
Width Wbw
(it)
Ratio R, /
Wukr
gExtreme
19.5
29
0.67
(3)
Pool Slope
SP
Average
Slope S
Near -Bank
Stress
Ratio S IS (NBS)
i
Dominant
Near -Bank Stress
- 2
Near -Bank
l4)
Pool Slope
s
Riffle Slope
Sri
Ratio Sp / Stress
S,„ NBS
Near -Bank
Near -Bank
(5)
Max Depth
dnb (ft)
Mean Depth
dw (ft)
Ratio dnb / Stress
dbkr NBS
(6)
Near -Bank
Max Depth
dnb (ft)
Near -Bank
Slope Snb
ar n
Shear
Stress Tnb ( Mean Depth
me) d0e (ft)
Average
Slope S
Ban ll
Shear
Stress Tbm (
bf
Ratio Tnb /
Tan
Near -Bank
Stress
NBS
Near -Bank
m
J
(7)
Velocity Gradient ( It /sec
/ft
Stress
NBS
Converting values to a Near -Bank Stress (NBS) ratio
Near -Bank Stress (NBS)
Method number
ratio
1 2 3 4 5 6
Very Low
N r A > 3.00 < 0.20 < 0.40 < 1.00 < 0.80 < 0.50
LOW
N r A 2.21- 3.00 0.20 - 0.40 0.41 - 0.60 1.00-1.50 0-80-1.05 0.50-1.00
Moderate
N / A 2.01- 2.20 0.41 - 0.60 0.61- 0.80 1.51-1.80 1.06-1.14 1.01-1.60
High
See 1.81-2.00 0.61-0.80 0.81-1.00 1.81-2.50 1.15-1-19 1.61-2.00
Very High
(1) 1.50-1.80 0.81-1.00 1.01-1.20 2.51-3.00 1.20-1.60 Z01 -Z40
Extreme
Above < 1.50 > 1.00 > 1.20 > 3.00 > 1.60 > 2.40
Overall Near -Bank Stress (NBS) rating
T Extreme
Copyright 0 2006 Wildland Hydrology WARSSS page 5-66

Chapter 5
Study Bank Height / Bankfull Height (C)
3.5
0) t 3--
.Z.9
Y t 2.5
cc
2
rn
1
0 2' 4 9 6 9 8 9 T10
BEHI rating J lu I
Weighted Root Density (G)
100-
0
00 0
Oo
60--
c
0 d 40--
20
0 20
0 I
0 2 S 4 6 �x 8f 9mm 10
f
f BEHI rating m
1
Y 0.9
0.8
0.7
t r 0.6
a M 0.5
t 0.4
0 0.3
0 0.2
0.1
0
0
z
The Prediction Level Assessment (PLA)
Root Depth / Study Bank Height (E)
2 4 6 o 84 9 10
BEHI rating
Bank Angle (H)
120 j
100
y 1
m 80 I s
M 60 i
o 40
20 —
0
0 m 2 0 4 K 6 x 8 9T 10
Z F 0 fO
? m
BEHI rating
Surface Protection (1)
100 ,
80
m 60
L 40
20 _1
0 i I
0 2 4 0 6 x 8m gm 10
Q
BEHI rating
Figure 5-19. Streambank erodibility criteria showing conversion of measured ratios and bank variables to a BEHI rating
(Rosgen, 1996, 2001 a). Use Worksheet 5-8 variables to determine BEHI score.
5-57

10
0.01
The Prediction Level Assessment (PLA)
Prediction of Annual Streambank Erosion Rates
using Colorado USDA Forest Service (1989) data for streams found in
sedimentary and/or metamorphic geology
Very Low Low Moderate High Very High Extreme
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Near -Bank Stress (NBS)
Figure 5-38. Relationship of BEHI and NBS to predict annual streambank erosion rates from Colorado data
(1989) for streams found in sedimentary and/or metamorphic geology (Rosgen, 1996, 2001 a).
5-79
EXTREME
i3EHI
-
.-
BER = 0.0642e0.°.
... N55
%Y
,r
j`
y'
HIGH & VERY
HIGH BEHI
BER = 0.109e°•4111i11as)
MODERATE BEHI
BER = 0.0556e"."""est
LOW BEHI
BER = 0.0082e°•749""s�
Very Low Low Moderate High Very High Extreme
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Near -Bank Stress (NBS)
Figure 5-38. Relationship of BEHI and NBS to predict annual streambank erosion rates from Colorado data
(1989) for streams found in sedimentary and/or metamorphic geology (Rosgen, 1996, 2001 a).
5-79

I- Whoa - P- S.W- 7— oHaV - I WgTM 0 ar.­OwaloY U%a­
Cb.mn
,; htto' -111 —
I" — b" V- C W DEQ. C"O.—
L3 P- , P­
S.f— Weer CL_&__
13-17-31-5.1
Utd, B- Creek
From ­­ to B.9 Rea, Creek
C
Aq.31,1974
Ya,*,, P ­Dae
because
S- of North DOT, Earp, HERE, G- . 1-.
I�I)Ffl �

US Amy Corps
L of Engineers NC Counties Designated Critical Habitat for Heelsplitter
VWrriwm Dmtrict
Regulatory Division
- Critical Habitat - Heelsplitter
Waxhaw Creek
Miles
n i�F of 5 7S 1o
1

IPaC
IPaC resource list
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources)
under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below.
The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by
activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires
gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities)
information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined
project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands)
for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Project information
NAME
Eddie Moose
LOCATION
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
J
DESCRIPTION
On little bear Creek. Stream Restoration on 257 liner feet of stream. Will start as soon as permits are obtained.
Stream channel is dry at this present time. Small scale project.
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
t_ [phone]
19 [phone]
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, INC 28801-1082
http://www.fws.izov/nc-es/­es/counWr.html

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species
are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g.,
placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or
eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be
found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project -specific information is
often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed
or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by
any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official
species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the
following:
1. Log in to IPaC.
2. Go to your My Projects list.
3. Click PROJECT HOME for this project.
4. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species! are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for
listing. See the listing status page for more information.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
httos://ecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/9045
Clams
NAME STATUS
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
httos://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acts.

Any activity that results in the xdk�(kR..lxdxdSS,. hla�nn,. pursiue,.butx.shaat.uvound..ilL.trap,..ca�lkure..�r..coil.est,.or..tsz.attetnpt.tsz.engage.itx.any.su
tondia_cO of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service2. There are no provisions for allowing
the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result
in the take of migratory birds is responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations and implementing appropriate conservation
measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.eov/birds/manaeement/manaized-dies/
birds -of -conservation -concern. hp p
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http:///www.fws.goy/birds/management/{Zject-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation -measures. hhpp
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.goy/migratorybirds/pdf/management/natmonwidestandardconservatmonmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern that might be affected by activities in this location. The list does not contain
every bird you may find in this location, nor is it guaranteed that all of the birds on the list will be found on or near this location. To get a better
idea of the specific locations where certain species have been reported and their level of occurrence, please refer to resources such as the E ird
data mapping tool (year-round bird sightings by birders and the general public) and Breeding Bird Survey (relative abundance maps for breeding
birds). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, special attention should be given to the birds on the list below.
To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, visit the E -bird Explore Data Tool.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Breeds Aug 20 to Jul 20
httr)s://ecos.fw5.2ov/ecp/species/2974
Eastern Whip -poor -will Caprimulgus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to jul 31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information
can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds.
Probability of Presence( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in your project's counties during a particular week of the year. (A year is
represented as 12 4 -week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to
establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is
also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided
by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of
presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for
the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative
probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 =1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0
and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.

To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote when the bird breeds in the Bird Conservation Region(s) in which your project lies. If there are no yellow bars shown for a
bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the counties of
your project area. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information.
probability of presence breeding season survey effort - no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Cerulean Warbler ---- ---- ---- --- I ---- - -- __--__
Eastern Whip -Poor -will__ --
Kentucky Warbler - - - - ---- I ----- -- I - -_ --- - _ _,.__ _ _ _ __ -_ - _ ---_-- ----
Prairie Warbler - - - - - - - - I I __- I I _____ _ _-- - - - - ----
Prothonotary Warbler - - - - - - - - I ■■- I _ I 1 -- _- __-- _ - - - - - - - - ----
Red-headed Woodpecker 11 JJJJ ( I I �' T I I I- I I I F I I' I I 1 1 I I Jill 11-1
Rusty Blackbird Jill OU - ---- - - I I I JJJJ JJJJ
Wood Thrush - - - - - - - - --- __ I I I_ _ ___ -- I -- -
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Such measures are
particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. To see when birds are most likely to occur in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Special attention should be made to look for nests and avoid nest destruction during the breeding season. The best information about when birds
are breeding can be found in Birds of North America (BNA) Online under the "Breeding Phenology" section of each species profile. Note that accessing this information
may require a subscription. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure
or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that might be affected by activities in your project location. These birds
are of priority concern because it has been determined that without additional conservation actions, they are likely to become candidates for listing under the
Endaneered Species Act (ESA).
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection
of survey banding and citizen science datasets. The AKN list represents all birds reported to be occurring at some level throughout the year in the counties in which
your project lies. That list is then narrowed to only the Birds of Conservation Concern for your project area.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list only includes species of particular priority concern, and is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area.
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, special attention should be made to avoid and minimize impacts to birds of priority concern.
To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E -bird Explore Data Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived
from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available.
How do I know If a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources:
The The Cornell Lab of ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology
Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird entry on your migratory bird species list indicates a breeding season, it is probable the bird breeds in your project's counties at some
point within the time -frame specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

• Facilities
Wildlife refuges
Any activity proposed on National Wildlife Refuge lands must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact
the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGES AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other
State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN WETLANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources.
The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is
inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification
established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and
the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or
classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect
wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal
waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go
undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory.
There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to
establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or
adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary
jurisdictions that may affect such activities.

l� !v!jV 1 3 2017
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
Qom. Western Piedmont Technlcal Services
P.O. Box 843, MocksvRle, NC 27028 PHONE. [phone]
.y Co.
J
�O
Eddie Moose Stream Restoration
Vicinity Maps
Cabarrus County
REVISIONS
o�C
\�` Q,•'��S $/•'•`/ /151
L
0 0
884
FOR PN1' ftTING
PROJECT F 1 SCALE, NTS
DRAWN BY. CM SofH*
DATE, 10/22/2017
CHECKED BY,
DATE.
SHEET NO. 1 OF 8
FRAX* Ei Eddie Noose

257' Stream Restoration
Streams has torturous
Meanders not shown on
USGS, There stream
length Is longer than it /
appears on USGS. ,
I,
Lj
SLATt STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
.�.�,. Western Piedmont Technical Services
P.D. Box 843, Mocksv0.le, NC 27028 PHONE- 704-734-0366
r�
-w e
1
53' Bank Stabilization
(000
R TTI
F `CAIp i
7
Eddie Moose Stream Restoration
USGS Topographic Map
Cabarrus County
0-_
4%
t�a
PROJECT M. SCALE- 1' - 300'
DRAWN BY, CM Safrit
DATE, 10/22/2017
CHECKED BY,
DATE,
SHEET NO. 2 OF 8
FILENAME- Eddie Moose

Know what's b@IOW.
Call before you dig.
CROPS
Survey Point
Elev: 500
OZ -
9Q, QQ,
-.0 o
0/ o
CROPS
Survey Point
Elev: 496,93\
Survey Point
Elev: 496,31 \
50 0 50 100 150
Scate: 1" = 50'
STATE OF NORTH CAR❑LINA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
@ate. Western Piedmont Technical Services
P.D. Box 845, MocksvNle, MC 27028 PHONE, 704-754-0366
CROPS
-�—
[Existing Rock Ford Crossing
so
o�
u vey Point
/v, 500.20
14 ESurvey Point
Elev: 500,06
WOODED AREA
Ln
CD
\\�-
Eddie Moose Stream Restoration
Pre -Existing Conditions
Cabar us County
rREVISIONS
CROPS
Legend
Left and Right Edge of
Jurisdictional Stream
Existing Centerline "Thalweg"
Existing Major Contours
Existing Minor 1f Contours
Existing Land Use
Power Pole
Left and Right Edge of
Jurisdictional Stream
253 ft Above Crossing
257 ft Below Crossing
FOR PERMITTING
'CARO
3R9
GIN�
PRO.ECT N. SCALE. P=50'
DRAWN BY. CM Safrit
DATE. 10/17/2017
CHECKED BY.
DATE,
SHEET NO. 3 OF 8
FILENAME, Eddie Moose

Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Existing Channel is a Rosgen
Classified E, Due to fluctuat
flow. A cobble lined toe will I
installed then a bankfuR ber
F Survey Point
Elev: 500
O h �
� Qhs
9- 4'
o�
J -Hook
Used to seal of f
and keep flow diverted �@
f rom old channel until
vegetation can take over
Area Between Proposed bank full
and exiting right bank will be
filled to flood prone elevation. C
Survey Point
De v: 496,93
Survey Point
Elev: 496,31 \
50 0 50 100 150
LM I
Scale: 1" = 50'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
a Western Plednont Technlcat Services
P.O. Boz 843, Mocksvilte, NC 27028 PHONES 704-734-0565
20°
El u vey Point
v 500,20
Existing Ch nnel
Head of Rif e
_j
Bed -Rock Controlled
Survey Point
Elev: 500,06
Legend
Existing Left & Right Edge of vv
�--�
Existing Centerline
"Thalweg"
CHECKED BY,
Proposed
Centerline "Thalweg"
FILENAMEi EdcNe Moose
Proposed
Edge of
Water
Proposed
Bankf ull
Bench
Proposed
Boulder
J -Hook
Power Pole
J -Hook
Used to bring in side
0' trilo, in a non-erosive
runner. May not be needed,
To be determined
A by on site engineer during
s� construction,
Eddie Moose trear�
Si e Plan
Cabar us County
Re -located stream
will tie into existing
stream at pool
Restoration
To the best of My
knowledge, judgment
and belief, these plans
Meet applicabte
NRCS standards, and local and
state regulations
FOR PERMITTING
Dlkv-AtM Ess03
///I
NN i 5���
PROJECT M SCALE- C•50'
DRAWN BY, CM Safrit
DATE, 10/17/2017
CHECKED BY,
DATE
SHEET NO 4 OF 8
FILENAMEi EdcNe Moose

MorpiKo-togical Characteristics
f or construction
Below Stream Crossing
1.86
Reference Reach
Eddie Moose
Cross Sectional Area
Basin Creek
Channel Below Crossing
Stream Type
C4
C4
Drainage Area
7.20 sgmi
5.1 sgmi
Bankfull Width
33.2 FT
29.90 FT
Bankfull Width
Range 29.5 - 36.9
Range 27.8 - 32.00
Bankfull Max
3.10 FT
2.84 FT
Depth
Range 3.00 - 3.20
Range 2.40 - 3.27
Width at
329 FT
130 FT
Flood Prone
Range 329 - 329
Range 130 - 130
Bankfull
68.40 SOFT
55.18 SOFT
Cross-Sectlonal
Range 64,90 - 71.90
Range 52.73 - 57.64
Area
10,34
in?a
Width/Depth
16.42
16,42
Ratio
Range 13.41 - 19.42
Range 13.41 - 19.42
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
BELOW STREAM CROSSING
3'1 Or �®29.9 ft Bankfull Widtht�Pr ��' Bankfull
For Matting
and Vegeation
Requirements
See Detail Sheets
Norral Flow
4 ft
Proposed Bankfull Channel Dimensions
Bankfull Width
- 29.9
Mean Depth -
1.86
Max Depth -
2.84
Cross Sectional Area
- 55.18 sgft
Width/Depth -
16.42
Cross Section data derived from
reference reach Basin Creek C4
1-3' Bankfult
Thalweg
al
or F1
a
Y der •1-3' Bankfull
f `o-
3,1 or
For Matting
and Vegeation
Requirements
See Detail Sheets
Eddie Moose Stream Restoration
Morphological Characteristics
Cabarrus County
2.7
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
ABOVE STREAM CROSSING
-90 24 ft Bankfull Width- �
11-15' Normal Flow Channel- W
Proposed Bankfull Channel Dimensions
Width - 24
Mean Depth - 2.32
Max Depth - 2.77
Cross Sectional Area - 55,79 sgft
Wldth/Depth - 10.34
Cross Section data derived from
reference reach
Raccoon Creek E5
r f\at4cer
Bankfutl Bench -11110- 3ti1
Banks lined with
rip rap and balast stone
with geotextile underlayment
from edge of water
to bankfull bench
to provide bank stabifttion
when water levels
f luctuate
orp o ogical Characteristics
for construction
Above Stream Crossing
N3 BY DATE D .%CFaP 01
Reference Reach
Eddie Moose
DATE. 10/17/201
Raccoon Creek
Channel Below Crossing
Stream Type
E5
E5/4
Drainage Area
2,90 sgml
5,1 sgml
Bankfull Width
15.65 FT
Range 15,40 - 15.90
24 FT
Range 24 - 24
Bankfutl Max
FT
2,77 FT
Depth
Range -
Range 2,77 - 2.77
Width at
100+ FT
130 FT
Flood Prone
Range 100+ - 100+
Range 130 - 130
Bankfutl
23,75 SOFT
55.79 SOFT
Cross -Sectional
Range 23.74- 23,76
Range 53,98 - 57.f�`d1
Area
Width/Depth
10,34
in?a
Ratio
Range 10.00 - 10.67
Range 10,C0
11C A 7/
MLA
031984
REVISIONS
PRDJECT Ih
SCALE, NTS
N3 BY DATE D .%CFaP 01
1
DRAWN BY, CH SafMt
DATE. 10/17/201
2
3
CHECKED BY.
DATE,
4
SHEET H0. 5 11F 9
FILENAME, Edd a Moo"
5
m.r �-
I1111���

GAPS BETWEEN
NOSE ROCKS
FLOW
n
PLAN VIEW
Rock J -Hook
Dimensions for
Construction
J -Hook Elev. @ 1 Elev, @ 2 Elev. @ 3 Arm Length Arm 1 Slope
1 593.2 592 591.8
18 5
2 593.2 592 591.8
18 5
be increased,
decreased
ROCK CROSS VANE
DESIGN DETAILS ARE CREDITED TO
DR. DAVE ROSGEN WITH
WILDLAND HYDROLOGY
Q F
FLOW T
CUT-OFF SILL
CUT-OFF SILLS ARE INSTALLED
JUST BELOW THE SURFACE OF
THE BANKFULL BENCH AND
SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF
2' DEEP X 2' WIDE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
s r� Eddie Moose Stream
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION Rock J- H o o k
Western Piedmont Technical Services
P.D. Box 845, MocksvOle, NC 27028 PHONE. 701_734-0366 Cabarrus County
BANK FULL
2 -',7
pow
D= 3H or cobble stremma O a 0 v ❑ n n O a d o Q p 0 PML O
D 6H for sand and 1Rt bed streams 0000000
NON-WEVEN GE❑TEXTILE WILL BE
TOP OF FOOTER ROCK BURIED BENEATH THE F❑❑TER ROCKS
AND CUT -EFF SILLS,
WILL BE FLUSH WITH IT SHALL ENFOLD THE ROCKS
STREAM BED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE TO PREVENT FLOW
FROM UNDERMINING THE STRUCTURES
Restoration
Detail
PROFILE VIEW
J -Hook
and Log
Vane Notes
1. Ine quarulty
of Log Vanes
and J—Hooks may
be increased,
decreased
or eliminated
entirely as directed by
Engineer on site.
2. Hardwood
tree species
with a minimum trunk
diameter of 12" and
15 to 20
feet of trunk
length shall be used.
Other
approved
by the engineer
that will allow proper
construction as
shown in
the detail.
NON WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE
3. The structure may be constructed with boulders, logs and/or a
combination of both. A geotextile fabric is required to prevent
scour under the structure. Filter fabric shall be securely
fastened to the log using galvanized roofing nails approximately
8" 0. C.
4. The angle of departure from the streambank varies between
20 to 30 degrees. The vane portion of the structure occupies
one—third of the bonkfull width. The hook occupies the center.
The slope varies from 2 to 7 percent to allow for flexibility
to make the vane as long as needed to intercept the bed
of the channel at one—third.
5. Gaps one—fourth to one—third rock diameter shall be provided
the hook section. F O ^ ^ E
DRQ 0,984
REVISIONS
PROJECT 4h SCALE, NTS
NG n DATE MR
I
DRAVN BY. CH Sa" DATE. 10/20/2017
2
3
CHECKED BY. DATE•
4
! T NO. 6 (IF 6 FILENA E. Eddie Noose
3

Side Trench
Toe Anchor
6'
EROMON CONTROL BLANKET DEMLS
EO 700 OTSM OT equo,w aIM
Top Trench 14 Rolls (131' x 6.5' rolls)
8 rolls for above x—ing Blanket Overlap
6 rolls for below x—ing Top over Bottom
Backfill trench with
compacted soil.
\\ Blodegradeable fasteners such
\.. Y /as Eco -Stakes or Blo-Stakes
W
Blanket Overlap
Upstream over Downstream
f— 4' —)
NOTES:
1. The top edge of the blanket shall be anchored in a 6 -inch deep by 6 -inch wide trench
approx. 2 feet back from the top of the slope. The trench shall be backfilled and
compacted after the blanket is fastened in the trench with fasteners (on 12 -inch spacing).
2. The blanket shall be placed with a minimum 4 -inch overlap from one section of blanket to
the next section.
3. The blanket shall be overlapped with the upstream section overlapping the downstream
section. All overlaps must be secured with fasteners on 12 -inch spacing.
4. The terminal end of the blanket must be anchored in a 6 -inch deep trench and secured and
backfilled as noted above.
5. The fasteners shall be installed in a staggered pattern on 3 -ft. spacing along the row and
2 -ft. spacing between rows.
�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
�*.�. Western Piedmont Technical Servlces
w..
P.O. Box 843, Nocksvllle, NC 27028 PHONEE, 704-734-0366
EDDIE MOOSE STREAM PROJECT
Matting and Planting Detail
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Uwe Shako and Plaffinga
For Steam SNHheron
Planting
Planting
Planting
Planting
Planting
Zone
Zone
Zone
Zone
Zone
C
B
A
B
C
Zona A
Grasses,
Blackwell Swltchgrass
—Note seed down to
normal water levetwww
Shrubs,
Silky Willow
Silky Dogwood
Zone
grasses,
Blackwell Swltchgrass
Virginia Wlldrye
Shrubs
,
Wax Myrtle
Elderberry
Graystern Dogwood
Splcebush
Silky Dogwood
Winterberry
Trees'
Tulip Poplar
River Birch
Black Gum
Sycamore
Zona C
Grasses,
Shelter, Cave -In -rock,
and/or
Carthage Switchgrass
Virginia Wildrye
Shrubs,
Winterberry
Sllky Dogwood
Splcebush
White Ash
Red Oak
Willow Oak
Elm
Hickory
NOTES:
1. The Live Stakes shall be 1 to 3 inches in diameter and 18 to 36 inches in length. Live
stakes must be harvested and installed while dormant.
2. Tops of the stakes shall be cut flat and the base shapened (at an angle). The stakes shall
be driven into the ground to a minimum depth of 3 inches above the ground (or to refusal)
with a wooden or rubber mallet.
3. Live stakes are to be installed on a 3 -ft x 3 -ft spacing in three rows with a staggered
spacing.
The site will require approximately 1250 live stakes or bare root seedlings.
Seed at 12 lbs PLS per acre (See Spec Sheet foreding and mulcg) T
([may ([�j� 11 11I ��t
Buffer of 25 ft to be planted on both sides o channe . ��`:� . p �i�
Once beyond livestake plantings any native tree, shrub o�p�•FES �!o ���
or grass that can handle site conditions is acceptable _ �•� z4- *.7
;a SEAL _
Above crossing is to be planted with native grasses. 031984 _—
Left buffer area will be planted with native trees
suitable for the area.
Below Crossing will be planted
with livestakes and grasses
PROJECT M SCALE, NTS
DRAWN BY. CN Safrn
DATE, 10/17/2017
CHECKED BY.
DATE,
SHEET NO. 7 OF 0
FILENAME, Edde Noose

mars beim
ail before wou
El
1 1 1 11 1
T■
• i
Legend
Existing Centerline "Thalweg"
Existing Top pf Bank
® BEHI - High
Near Bank Stress - Extreme
BEHI - Moderate
Near Bank Stress - Moderate
FOR PERMITTING
,..E, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Eddie Moose trear� Restoration
DEPARTMENTDIVVION OF SOIL ANDD WTURE ATERCCONSERVAONSUMER ON SERVICES Western Piedmont TeBEHI / Near Ba Shear S- r e s s M a P
chnlcal services
P.O. Box 945, NocksvlUe, NC 27028 PpIM 704-734-0566
it Cuba us County
PROJECT a SCALE. 11-M,
CAR.. O
DATO Wm/ew
i
:��oQ;•�ES Sj�•�iy��
DATE,
SHEET NO, 0 OF 8
FVLENANE- Edam Noose
031x84
To the bast of
kno.ledge, Judgmenmyt
M.
and belief,
meetions
appl cable
/
MRCS standards, and local and
state regulations
,..E, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Eddie Moose trear� Restoration
DEPARTMENTDIVVION OF SOIL ANDD WTURE ATERCCONSERVAONSUMER ON SERVICES Western Piedmont TeBEHI / Near Ba Shear S- r e s s M a P
chnlcal services
P.O. Box 945, NocksvlUe, NC 27028 PpIM 704-734-0566
it Cuba us County
PROJECT a SCALE. 11-M,
DRAWN BYt CH So"
DATO Wm/ew
CHECKED BY,
DATE,
SHEET NO, 0 OF 8
FVLENANE- Edam Noose