NC0039594_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection_20171108

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
November 8, 2017
Mr. Tim Hedrick
Pretreatment Coordinator
Town of Maiden
19 North Main Avenue
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
13E'lVE:&Di C0EQ/DWR
NOV 14 2017
Water Quality
Permitting Section
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NCO039594
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Hedrick:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the
Town of Maiden's Industrial Pretreatment Program on October 31, 2017, by Mr Wes Bell of this Office.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell
at [phone], or via email at [e-mail].
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Deborah Gore, PERCS Unit
MSC -1617 Central -Basement
,/:
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality) Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 16 10 East Center Avenue, Suite 310 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Tim Hedrick, Shuford Wise
3. Title(s): WWTP Superintendent/Pretreatment Coordinator, WWTP Backup ORC
4. Last Inspection Date: 2/23/17 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec Type Inspector Fac. Type
N NCO039594 10/31/17 P S 1
(DTIA) (TYPI) (1NSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
1
SNS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users CIUs)?
1
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of S1Us Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods Total Number of SIUs in SNC
0
11
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POT* INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18 Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens, Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC foi
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC foi
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
® YES ❑ NO; Daily effluent pH
minimum violations in January and
June 2017 (1 per month).
❑ YES ®NO
Limits: NA
Reporting: NA
blished: NA
None
❑ YES ® NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMT? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
their files. complete with suonortina documents and copv of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info -
Program Element
Last Submittal Received
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis A
6/3/15
® Yes ❑ No
8/3/15
® Yes ❑ No
4/1/20
Industrial Waste Survey IWS)
1/13/14
® Yes ❑ No
3/18/14
® Yes ❑ No
11/1/18
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
6/26/14
® Yes ❑ No
6/27/14
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan RP
9/24/08
® Yes ❑ No
11/19/08
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
5/7/10
® Yes ❑ No
8/3/10
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. GKN Driveline 2.
3.
30. IUP Number
001
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/21
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I E..40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
1
® Yes ❑ No
11
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35 Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year? I
® Yes ❑ No 11
❑ Yes ❑ No 11
❑ Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes []No
a. []Yes []No
a. ❑Yes []No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. []Yes []No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes []No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
®Yes❑No❑N/A
E
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
11
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38 a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ❑Yes []No
a. []Yes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b ❑Yes❑No®N/A
b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ❑No
IF
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
11
its Sampling as Required b IUP, including flow?
40 Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes ❑ No 11
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
41 a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
❑Yes®No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
file includeprocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
42b. For categorical lUs with Production based limits, does file include❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
production rates and/or flows as Required b IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑No®NA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b ❑Yes❑No®N/A
b ❑Yes❑NopN/A
b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
c ❑YWWWMN/A
c ❑Yes❑NopN/A
c ❑Yes❑NopN/A
violations from the POTW sample event?
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ® No
11 ❑ Yes ❑ No
11 ❑ Yes ❑ No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP OVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
I ❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penal Collection?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
11
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
bnYes❑No®N/A
b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes ®No
❑Yes ❑ No
No
Requested Information For You?
17esE,
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
23. The POTW is in the process of revising (and submitting) the STMT to reduce the silver detection level (from 0.005 mg/L to 0.001 mg/L).
28. The SUO was adopted on 9/15/14.
35. POTW performed the SIU inspection on 11/29/16.
36. The POTW must ensure the Slug/Spill Control Plan and TOMP (if applicable) are kept current and include all pertinent information.
37. The SIU performed the TTO sampling on 12/28/16 and has previously submitted a TOMP (7/1/14 revision date). The POTW will require
the SIU to perform TTO monitoring prior to the end of 2017.
39. POTW contracted Water Tech Labs and R&A Labs for analyses.
40. SIU contracted Pace Analytical Services for analyses.
41b. The SIU submitted the flow records past the required deadline (by the 151i of each month) on two occasions during first half of 2017. The
POTW had verbal communications with the SIU regarding late submittal of reports. The SIU had changed personnel responsible for 1UP
compliance.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: The POTW must ensure of the following: all SIU chain of custody forms are properly maintained; ERP is properly
followed for late submittal of reports; Slug/Spill Plans and TOMP are kept current; and all composite samples (SIU and POTW
sampling events) are properly preserved throughout the 24 -hr. period as required in 40 CFR 136.3, Table H.
Overall, the POTW is properly implementing the Pretreatment Program.
NOD: ❑ YES ®NO
NOV: [--]YES ®NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Ratina:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory- ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: ' DATE: November 8, 2017
Wes Bell, Mooresville Regional Office
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3