20171410 Ver 1_401 Application_20171102

A!�LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
October 30, 2017
TO: Ms. Jennifer Burdette
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: Mason Pointe Subdivision; Harnett County, NC
401 WQC Application
Action ID# SAW -2016-02092
Dear Emily:
2 0 1 7 1 4' 0
R EC r:1 V1Fa
NOV -2 2017
11ENR-LAN11) 00'Awry
STpft KAT'E'R Pfi&411 TING
Enclosed is a 401 Water Quality Certification application for your review. It is submitted on
behalf of Smith Douglas Homes for the construction of a single-family residential development
named Mason Pointe, located off of Christian Light Road near Fuquay Varina, NC. In order to
provide access throughout the site and construct a stormwater pond, impacts to 0.1 acre of 404
wetlands are needed.
Enclosed are the PCN form, site maps, and site plan. Please let me know if you have any
questions or need additional information in order to issue the NWP. Thank you for your
assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
cc: Mr. Michael Stewart, Stewart -Proctor, PLLC
Mr. Chad Turlington, NC DWR
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 • Wilmington, NC 28403

O�0 WA T �R�G
h Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 & 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Mason Pointe Subdivision
2b.
County:
Harnett County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Fuquay Varina
2d.
Subdivision name:
Mason Pointe Subdivision
R EC E B IF
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
NOV -2 2017
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Nancy Thompson Mason & Michael K Mason
77
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
7606 Woods Lane; Unit 13
3e.
City, state, zip:
Cornelius, NC 28031
3f.
Telephone no.:
336-249-9429
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Applicant has property under contract.
4b.
Name:
Mr. Morgan Bryan
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Smith Douglas Homes
4d.
Street address:
2520 Reliance Avenue
4e.
City, state, zip:
Apex, NC 27539
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-369-1842
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
mbrvan(@smithdouglas.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Kim Williams
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Land Management Group, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0644-39-1115.000; 0645-30-2317.000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.533833 N, Longitude: -78.854289 W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
60.8 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Hector Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; HQW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The eastern part of the site is undeveloped and forested. The western side is currently agricultural fields. Adjacent land
use is mostly agricultural, with some residential and forested land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
— 2 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a single-family residential subdivision within the tract. One wetland impact
is needed to provide access to uplands throughout site. Another linear wetland impact (4' width) is needed to construct a
stormwater pond.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes the construction of a single-family residential subdivision. This project will have 65 lots, roads (50' wide
ROW), utilities, and stormwater facilities. Utility lines will be located within the corridor. The roadways will be cleared of
vegetation and fill material will be brought to the site to level the area of disturbance. Utilities will be installed. Track hoe,
loader, dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Sage Ecological Services
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Ms. Emily Greer of the USACE issued the JD on May 24, 2017 (Action ID# SAW -2016-02092).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Road Crossing
Non -Riparian
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.08
W2 ®P ❑ T
Stormwater
Non -Riparian
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.02
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.10
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts N/A
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts N/A
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 0P [:IT
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) N/A
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
131 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Direct Impacts: The project engineer attempted to avoid wetlands within the site while developing the site plan. However,
several wetland fingers extend into the property and it was not possible to avoid all impacts and still maintain an economically
viable project. One wetland impacts (# 1) is needed for a road crossing. Without this impact, several lots would be lost, which
is not economically feasible. The other wetland impact (#2) is needed to install a stormwater pond. The pond has been located
here because it is at a topographical low spot. The impact is to a narrow (4') channel. Treated stormwater will then be
released back into the wetland drain to ensure hydrologic flow is maintained.
Indirect impacts: The majority of wetlands on site will be avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fencing will be used during construction to reduce sediment from eroding into jurisdictional areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
Because impacts have been minimized to 0.1 acre, no
mitigation is proposed.
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank N/A
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program N/A
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan N/A
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ N/A
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan N/A
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
18%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Project engineer is currently developing a stormwater plan for the project. A stormwater permit will be obtained prior to any
site work.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Harnett County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review N/A
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review N/A
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent undeveloped properties.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated by this project will be treated through the local municipality.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program website was used to determine the presence of federally -listed species. No federally listed
species are known to occur on or within a one mile radius of the site. Approximately half of the site is agricultural fields.
Forested areas support mostly hardwood species such as oaks and hickory. Some loblolly pines exist in the southeastern part
of the site, but these areas also contain an understory and shrub layer of hardwoods. Therefore, the site does not appear to
provide suitable habitat for the red -cockaded woodpecker. The site is located within the "White Nose Syndrome Zone" of the
northern long-eared bat. The project will clear approximately 20 acres of wooded area. No blasting or other percussive
activities will occur during site development. Furthermore, there are no existing bridges that could provide appropriate habitat
for the bat. No impacts to federally -listed species are anticipated to occur from this project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
F__
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper GIS program was used to determine the presence of Essential Fish
Habitat. No EFH is known to occur within or near the site.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of
cultural or historic resources. No cultural or historical resources were noted within or adjacent to the site. A surveyed site
(Oak Ridge School) is noted just north of the site, but is listed as 'Gone'.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
website was used to determine the boundaries of the 100 -year floodplain.
Kim Williams
10/3012017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Date
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc. to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for the Mason Pointe Subdivision; Harnett Co, NC project. All questions in regards to this
project should be directed to Land Management Group, Inc.
Sincerely,
✓.:
App afit
A,4
Print Name
Date

(wwun Wick
;law Palk
Fu 1,14;-v `iiia
4
'.taiYx � •; K,,
VVill 'w "III
Angier
P. n Fk*ck
w patio. Sources: Esri, HERE, Del-orme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),
TomTom, N3apmylndia, © OperrStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community
('Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map
SCALE 1 " = 2 miles
Mason Pointe S/D LMG
LAND MANAGEMEYT GROUP w
Harnett County, NC 4 Figure 1
www.lmgroup.net Vicinity Map
October 2017 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 03-17-198 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS Harnett County GIS mosaic
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Mason Pointe S/D LMG
LAND MAMAC"M GROUP M
Harnett County, NC fnnronmmmlC.—lrunw 9
Fi ure 2
www.lmgroua.net USGS Topographic Map
October 2017 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 03-17-198 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Legend
D0: Dorovan muck
WaB: Wando fine sand
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Harnett County Soil Survey
SCALE 1" = 800'
Mason Pointe S/D LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT CROUPHarnett County, NC E -1m -.1 C -.11u1
, -w
Figure 3
www.lmgroup.net Soils Map
October 2017 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 03-17-198 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

C,
Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2012 NC OneMap Aerial Photography
6mmmor—�
SCALE 1" = 500'
Mason Pointe S/D LMG
ND NIANAr;t MLN I i,ROt P
Harnett County, NC4 •1"° Figure 4
www.lmgroup.net Aerial Photograph
October 2017 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 03-17-198 Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

NDIMTENPORy AREA (AC.)
Ad.
(CFS)
OS5T 0111(hl Ol
PROVIDED
REQUIRED
PROVIDED
L x W x u
_LnIG,-II
_SESB N1 W/BAFFLES 9.93
2.90
32.6
14,168 SF
14,365 SF
17,874 CF
38.631 CF
169'x85 x4.5'
13'
'
2 5.45
SB W BAFFLES
3.10
18.2
7 04 SF
.9
7 938 F
S
9 972 CF
�
0 520 CF
2 ,
126'x63 x4.5'
'x4.5'
0
A
SB 2 AFF
i#/3 W B LES
3.10
1 9 2
8,347 SF
8450 SF
1
10,044 CF
21 948 C F
730'x65
'
10:
1480
14
W BAFFLES .06
SB N W/BAFFLES
2.85
4 .1
6
20 061 SF
20 301 SF
25 308 CF
7 CF
55 575
1 1'x4.5'
201 x 0
14
#4 W/BAFFLES 0-54
0.54
1.77
770 SF
1,056 SF
1,944 CF
2,052 CF
44',24'x4.5'
10'
ST #5 W/BAFFLES 0.41
0 41
1 34
585 SF
836 SF
1,476 CF
1,536 CF
38'x22'x4.5'
10'
JSE DIMENSIONS FOR WET PONDS.
30O
RSEINLET
INLET KIOSK
` / 1
/
`ROTEcno Lo=AT1oN
2
3
ALL BASIN'S TO HAVE POROUS BAFFLES.
00
a 3
PROP SED a
SKIMMER #1
I
I R/W ( UBLIC) L-
SIZE
SKIMMER.-
025 LENGTH SLOPE
N/F
I
I I s
-
Caicuutte Skimmer Size
ae i cubic Feat ,.'a' C. F:
-
-
54mmw Sx a
251.1,
Calculate Skimmer
B d ..cubic
sin
Feer F9721Cu F1
PIN. 0645-20-8981
Sk S"
2.61 h
Dye D ,Cats
and remove the debris. Also check the orifice inside the skimmer to see if it is
Oar. a0
1.2 Hcske)
Dy D
31 Days
J -
O.P Y11e 3
PIPE A
i
II
O�rce _ ameY.
2.4 Pc(I l
48
1.04
378.00 377.50
Jr�Rce ., amen
1 9 :-,Nee)
SKIMMER #2A
HIGHWAY METHOD
H CK 713.48
SKIMMER #j
_
calculateSkimmer size
9 0'
USE MANNINGS E0.
B 3'
C k la[ Ski er Sfze
P= .035
6e Ylnro �n Cudc Fest
IC u,N.G.. Ft Skpnmer S-
2S Inch
a- dme.CUDic Feel 2'.308 w Fi
SX Se 3D lncn
D- D,-
•..
3 Dag o;floe 1_-9
� n[ce � ame.-
zn(esl
1.9 t,cryesl
O Y D. 3 Oats
"...•. ,...
b R 14 Perles
� mce .. amele. 2 B H.crles,
INLET
I PROTECTION
TEMPORARY
TURNAROUND AND
10EASEMENT
---
501. 17
EXISTING
30' POWER
EASEMENT
12
DEVICE #1
(SEE SHEET 10
OETArt.)
11
HIGHWAY METHOD
H CK 713.48
0 . = 0.87 ACRES
/
DAM i(TYP.)
'
9 0'
USE MANNINGS E0.
B 3'
I
P= .035
HORSESHOE
l E = 3 :1
SDE
_
CHANNEL SLOPE = a 59.
2n
//
DEPTH = 0.25' V25 = 3.70 FPS
PROTEC ON
P IR11
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
T=YDS 62.4(0.25).045 = 0.7 PSF
INLET
I PROTECTION
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
A PRE-CONS'RUCTION
I ICD
(SEE SHEET 10 FOR
DETAIL)
I
n
i 8
S00' 43' 25 15'W
5
o U
-1120 PERMANENT
I
W J
I03
CONST. AND
INV PIPE 0 5TA. 11+94 l-6
63
N/F I
I
I a
TRACY G. TANT j--
FAMILY LIMITED
NST. AND
ES T
Ila
PARTNERSHIP
\
DB. 1458, PG.
(one-haff inch or greater) rainfall event and repair immediately. Remove
D_
PB. 2000. 666 9
PIN: 0645-31-7168
I
4
64
7/
DEVICE #2A21(SEE
�' %
Y \
ORSESHOE \�
t0A FOR59S
20' P BLIC
A.
pR AGE
50DEAL)
L)
A
NTENANCECE
PUBL1)
I
1„? ASEMENT
HORSESHOE
30O
RSEINLET
INLET KIOSK
` / 1
/
`ROTEcno Lo=AT1oN
2
3
00
a 3
PROP SED a
Repair the baffles if they are damaged Re -anchor the baffles if water is flowing
I
I R/W ( UBLIC) L-
SIZE
2
025 LENGTH SLOPE
N/F
I
I I s
JEN'ELL H JOHNSON
2O 19DB.
7E. PG. 730
I
1
PIN. 0645-20-8981
LENGTH
WIDTH
and remove the debris. Also check the orifice inside the skimmer to see if it is
25',100'x6' 2'-3" BLAST
GRAVEL C STRUCTION EN ANCE
FT
SEE SHEE 11 FOR DETAIL
PIPE A
i
II
3.10
6.75
48
1.04
12
DEVICE #1
(SEE SHEET 10
OETArt.)
11
HIGHWAY METHOD
D.A. = 5.59 ACRES
1125 _ 18.3 CFS
USE MANNINGS EO.
B= 3'
9 0'
3: 1 3 1 n = .035
SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
CHANNEL SLOPE = 3.5%
DEPTH = 0.72' V25 = 4.94 FPS
P = 3 USE COLBOUND INC. ENKAMAT II LINER
T=YDS 62.4(0.72).035 = 1.5 PSF
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
LENGTH = 500'
N/F
JEWELL H JOHNSON
HIGHWAY METHOD
N/F
GARY h MARTHA ADKINS
0 . = 0.87 ACRES
/
025 = 2.85 CFS
9 0'
USE MANNINGS E0.
B 3'
1 t3
P= .035
-
l E = 3 :1
SDE
_
CHANNEL SLOPE = a 59.
WET EN
DETTION
DEPTH = 0.25' V25 = 3.70 FPS
D = 3'
USE TEMPORARY MATTING
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
T=YDS 62.4(0.25).045 = 0.7 PSF
INLET
I PROTECTION
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
A PRE-CONS'RUCTION
LENGTH = 110'
HIGHWAY METHOD
D.A. = 5.59 ACRES
1125 _ 18.3 CFS
USE MANNINGS EO.
B= 3'
9 0'
3: 1 3 1 n = .035
SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
CHANNEL SLOPE = 3.5%
DEPTH = 0.72' V25 = 4.94 FPS
P = 3 USE COLBOUND INC. ENKAMAT II LINER
T=YDS 62.4(0.72).035 = 1.5 PSF
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
LENGTH = 500'
N/F
JEWELL H JOHNSON
HIGHWAYMETHOD
N/F
GARY h MARTHA ADKINS
D.A. = 4.78 ACRES
/
025 = 15.7 CFS
USE MANNINGS E0.
9 0'
B = 3'
PB, 2003. PG, 1253
115
-
SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
rJ sOORSESHO
CHANNEL SLOPE = 2.0%
WET EN
DETTION
DEPTH = 0.77' V25 = 3.86 FPS
b ='3'
USE COLBOUND INC. ENKAMAT II LINER
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
T=YDS 62.4(0.77).02 = 0.96 PSF
INLET
I PROTECTION
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
A PRE-CONS'RUCTION
LENGTH = 370'
HIGHWAY METHOD
D.A. = 5.59 ACRES
1125 _ 18.3 CFS
USE MANNINGS EO.
B= 3'
9 0'
3: 1 3 1 n = .035
SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
CHANNEL SLOPE = 3.5%
DEPTH = 0.72' V25 = 4.94 FPS
P = 3 USE COLBOUND INC. ENKAMAT II LINER
T=YDS 62.4(0.72).035 = 1.5 PSF
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
LENGTH = 500'
N/F
JEWELL H JOHNSON
TO
N/F
GARY h MARTHA ADKINS
DB. 2007E. PG. 270
TO
TO
DS 1157, PG. 760
PIN G844-49-3876
Off/
PB, 2003. PG, 1253
0
PROTECnO"
/4
PIN D644-48-2210
rJ sOORSESHO
25'x100 x6' 2"-3" BLAST
WET EN
DETTION
25
Ec '
HORSESHOE I
PROPOSED
I 1
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
DEEN VICE 02
INLET
I PROTECTION
CEMETERY
AREA FOR
RELOCATION
A PRE-CONS'RUCTION
(SEE SHEET 11 FOR DETAIL)
(SEE SHEET 10 FOR
DETAIL)
I
OF EXISTING
GRAVE STE
S00' 43' 25 15'W
See'
a3' 17 21'W
-1120 PERMANENT
SCHEDULE ENKA MAT
921 27
CONST. AND
INV PIPE 0 5TA. 11+94 l-6
63
MAINTENANCE ESM'TLC'
PERMANENT
58
+INTENANCE
22
NST. AND
ES T
HORSESHOE
INLE423
46
��
#PROTECTION
(one-haff inch or greater) rainfall event and repair immediately. Remove
16 I z 1
7PROPO
WET OETEE
64
7/
DEVICE #2A21(SEE
�' %
Y \
ORSESHOE \�
t0A FOR59S
6 THE GAS MAINS AND SERVICES MUS'
50DEAL)
L)
ET
INLPROTECn
PUBL1)
FENCES SO THE FENCE POS- DO NO' DAMAGE AND
0.25 AC. CEMETERY- _ 31 \
AND FOUR GRAVE 29 ��I� \
STONES AS SHOWN \
ON ALTA SURVEY BY EXISTING POWER 32 Y
GATEMAN CIVIL UNDERGROUNDTO TED \
NJ SURVEY COMPANY \
RAYMOND J JOHNSON N/F TORN RELOCATED THROUGH SUBDIVISION \
PIN. 0645-20-6610 DENNIS M. MCLAU N/F PER DUKE ENERGY 33
PIN. Ofi45-20-5462 DENNIS M. MCLAURIN L'/ -IRI
DB. 944, PG 723 APPROVAL STI
PIN' 0645-20-5300 F60' PV Xi A/
CHANNEL DESIGN D-9
HIGHWAY METHOD
D.A. = 3.08 ACRES
025 = 10.1 CFS
USE MANNINGS E0.
8 = 3'
3't 9 11 035
SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
CHANNEL SLOPE 2 1 07,
DEPTH = 0.73' V25 = 2.67 FPS
b 3 USE TEMPORARY MATTING
T=YDS 62.4(0 73) 01 = 0.5 PSF
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
-- LENGTH = 240'
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1 CONTACT NCDENR LAND QUALITY DIVISION AT 1919! 7911200 TO SCHEDULE A
PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING
2 INSTALL SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. DIVERSION DITCHES.' TEMPORARY SEDIMENT
TRAP. CHECK DAMS AND SKIMMER BASINS SKIMMER BASINS TO BE GRADED AS WET PONDS
3 CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES NO ONE CALL
CENTER AT (80016321949.
INSTALL NPDES RAIN GAUGE STATION AND SECURE STATION FROM TAMPERING
5 BEGIN PROPOSED GRADING
6 CONSTRUCT PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PIPES AS GRADED AREAS ARE BROUGHT UP TO
FINISHED GRADE
7 STABILIZE SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT UP 10 FINISH GRADE WITH VEGETATION. PAVING. ETC
REFER TO NPDES CHART FOR STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS
8 IF IT is DETERMINED DURING CONSTRUCTION THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES ARE NEEDED ANDIOR
1 HE APPROVED PLAN IS INSUFFICIENT. THEN A REVISED PLAN MUST BE SUBMTTED TO AND
APPROVED By NCDENR
9 INSPECT AND MAINTAIN THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SO THEY CONTINUE TO FUNCTION
PROPERLY SILT FENCING SHALL BE INSPECTED AND CLEANED OF SEDIMENT AFTER EACH
RAINFALL ALL DEWATERING SHALL BE DONE THROUGH A SEDIMENTATION BAG
10 COMPLETE FINAL GRADING OF ROADWAY AREAS AND STABILIZE WITH GRAVEL AND PAVEMENT
11 COMPLETE FINAL GRADING OF ALL SLOPES AND PERMANENTLY VEGETATE.
12 ONCE ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED. CONVERT BASIN'S INTO WET DETENTION PONDS
11 IF RITF IS APPROVFD REMOVE SILT FENCE ETC
60
/
61
Q'
62
54
40
39
41
HORSESHOE
INLET
PROTECTION
38
Wetland Impact #2:
0.02 acre
TURNAROUND AND
10' EASEMENT
CHECK
I DAM (TYP.)
57
1
2p• PU
+� 4qJsuc 0
NAN
� SAr'r
56
55
20 PERMANENT
CONST. AND
MAINTENANCE ESM'T
IT'
OFTEN
DEVICE 03
SHEET IDA
DETAIL)
f v 0 PUBLIC
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
TO
END OF CUL-DE-SAC STA. 13+30 L-1
5TA. 13+40 RIGHT SIDE L-2
STA. 14+46 LEFT SIDE L-4
TO
TO
6' \ HORSESHOE
INLE.
1 1 I
Off/
PUBLIC OR NAGE
AND URGES
W EASEMENT
0
PROTECnO"
/4
SNS
rJ sOORSESHO
2 PROVIDE STABILZA-ION
n1/
25
Ec '
HORSESHOE I
PROPOSED
I 1
/
ORSESMFROE Q
ET RkOTF.CTION �O J
77
INLET
I PROTECTION
CEMETERY
AREA FOR
RELOCATION
A PRE-CONS'RUCTION
/
/
Wetland Impact #1:
I
OF EXISTING
GRAVE STE
W I
II
0.08 acre
PERMANENT DITCH PROTECTION
SCHEDULE ENKA MAT
STA. iD+GO LEFT SDE L-6
o / U
��
INV PIPE 0 5TA. 11+94 l-6
63
I �
OR A
WASH S'ANON WILL BE
TO
INV. PIPE J STA. 1]+05 L-9
REQUIRED
N/F
FRANKLIN h MICHAEL
46
��
(one-haff inch or greater) rainfall event and repair immediately. Remove
16 I z 1
27 �p
MASON
64
7/
AND REPLACED IF
�' %
Y \
ORSESHOE \�
65 /
/
6 THE GAS MAINS AND SERVICES MUS'
BE LOCATED PRIOR "O THE INS'ALLA-ION
5
ET
INLPROTECn
X
FENCES SO THE FENCE POS- DO NO' DAMAGE AND
GAS LINES
30O
RSEINLET
�
` / 1
/
28
PROTECTION
\A\
Y
0.25 AC. CEMETERY- _ 31 \
AND FOUR GRAVE 29 ��I� \
STONES AS SHOWN \
ON ALTA SURVEY BY EXISTING POWER 32 Y
GATEMAN CIVIL UNDERGROUNDTO TED \
NJ SURVEY COMPANY \
RAYMOND J JOHNSON N/F TORN RELOCATED THROUGH SUBDIVISION \
PIN. 0645-20-6610 DENNIS M. MCLAU N/F PER DUKE ENERGY 33
PIN. Ofi45-20-5462 DENNIS M. MCLAURIN L'/ -IRI
DB. 944, PG 723 APPROVAL STI
PIN' 0645-20-5300 F60' PV Xi A/
CHANNEL DESIGN D-9
HIGHWAY METHOD
D.A. = 3.08 ACRES
025 = 10.1 CFS
USE MANNINGS E0.
8 = 3'
3't 9 11 035
SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
CHANNEL SLOPE 2 1 07,
DEPTH = 0.73' V25 = 2.67 FPS
b 3 USE TEMPORARY MATTING
T=YDS 62.4(0 73) 01 = 0.5 PSF
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
-- LENGTH = 240'
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1 CONTACT NCDENR LAND QUALITY DIVISION AT 1919! 7911200 TO SCHEDULE A
PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING
2 INSTALL SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. DIVERSION DITCHES.' TEMPORARY SEDIMENT
TRAP. CHECK DAMS AND SKIMMER BASINS SKIMMER BASINS TO BE GRADED AS WET PONDS
3 CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES NO ONE CALL
CENTER AT (80016321949.
INSTALL NPDES RAIN GAUGE STATION AND SECURE STATION FROM TAMPERING
5 BEGIN PROPOSED GRADING
6 CONSTRUCT PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PIPES AS GRADED AREAS ARE BROUGHT UP TO
FINISHED GRADE
7 STABILIZE SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT UP 10 FINISH GRADE WITH VEGETATION. PAVING. ETC
REFER TO NPDES CHART FOR STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS
8 IF IT is DETERMINED DURING CONSTRUCTION THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES ARE NEEDED ANDIOR
1 HE APPROVED PLAN IS INSUFFICIENT. THEN A REVISED PLAN MUST BE SUBMTTED TO AND
APPROVED By NCDENR
9 INSPECT AND MAINTAIN THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SO THEY CONTINUE TO FUNCTION
PROPERLY SILT FENCING SHALL BE INSPECTED AND CLEANED OF SEDIMENT AFTER EACH
RAINFALL ALL DEWATERING SHALL BE DONE THROUGH A SEDIMENTATION BAG
10 COMPLETE FINAL GRADING OF ROADWAY AREAS AND STABILIZE WITH GRAVEL AND PAVEMENT
11 COMPLETE FINAL GRADING OF ALL SLOPES AND PERMANENTLY VEGETATE.
12 ONCE ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED. CONVERT BASIN'S INTO WET DETENTION PONDS
11 IF RITF IS APPROVFD REMOVE SILT FENCE ETC
60
/
61
Q'
62
54
40
39
41
HORSESHOE
INLET
PROTECTION
38
Wetland Impact #2:
0.02 acre
TURNAROUND AND
10' EASEMENT
CHECK
I DAM (TYP.)
57
1
2p• PU
+� 4qJsuc 0
NAN
� SAr'r
56
55
20 PERMANENT
CONST. AND
MAINTENANCE ESM'T
IT'
OFTEN
DEVICE 03
SHEET IDA
DETAIL)
f v 0 PUBLIC
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
BENNV ,&NLINDA W000 B(_/C /?/w T ROAD 34
DB. 1182, PG 193
PIN. 0645-10-5069 S'R. 7412
1 1
35 I 1 37 43
DISTURBED AREA = 11.4 AC I
ST# jI�I
\ \ MIST#5 44
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
TO
END OF CUL-DE-SAC STA. 13+30 L-1
5TA. 13+40 RIGHT SIDE L-2
STA. 14+46 LEFT SIDE L-4
TO
TO
5 O �
/
TO
T O
��G
S
HOURS PRIOR '0 ANY WORK
SNS
rJ sOORSESHO
2 PROVIDE STABILZA-ION
INLET PRO
FOR SITE PER NPDES CHAR- OR SOONER
TO
TO
INV. PIPE E STA 13+35 L-]
PIPE A STA.
STA 13+29 RIGHT SIDE
TO
3 THIS PROJEC-
MAY REQUIRE
A PRE-CONS'RUCTION
CONFERENCE BEFORE "HE GRADING PERMI
42
\\ 50
kl�\\T
IS ISSUED
BENNV ,&NLINDA W000 B(_/C /?/w T ROAD 34
DB. 1182, PG 193
PIN. 0645-10-5069 S'R. 7412
1 1
35 I 1 37 43
DISTURBED AREA = 11.4 AC I
ST# jI�I
\ \ MIST#5 44
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
TO
END OF CUL-DE-SAC STA. 13+30 L-1
5TA. 13+40 RIGHT SIDE L-2
STA. 14+46 LEFT SIDE L-4
TO
TO
INV PIPE B STA. 11+80 L-2
IHV. PIPE K STA. 19+05 L-4
ST A 13,51 RIGHT SIDE L -4
I L-
5 TA. 10+6D RIGHT SDE 5
TO
T O
1 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL
U-ILI-IES48
HOURS PRIOR '0 ANY WORK
INV. PIPE G STA. 1+
3 {6 L-5
BEGIN PERM MAT STA. 84 L-6
STA. 12+99 RIGHT SIDE
2 PROVIDE STABILZA-ION
INV. PIPE E STA. 11+94 L-6
L
FOR SITE PER NPDES CHAR- OR SOONER
TO
TO
INV. PIPE E STA 13+35 L-]
PIPE A STA.
STA 13+29 RIGHT SIDE
TO
3 THIS PROJEC-
MAY REQUIRE
A PRE-CONS'RUCTION
CONFERENCE BEFORE "HE GRADING PERMI
STA. 16+48 LEFT SIDE L-9
TO
IS ISSUED
PERMANENT DITCH PROTECTION
SCHEDULE ENKA MAT
STA. iD+GO LEFT SDE L-6
TO
INV PIPE 0 5TA. 11+94 l-6
4 STREETS AROUND
PROJEC- SHALL BE KEP- CLEAN A' ALL -IMES
OR A
WASH S'ANON WILL BE
TO
INV. PIPE J STA. 1]+05 L-9
REQUIRED
N/F
FRANKLIN h MICHAEL
46
��
(one-haff inch or greater) rainfall event and repair immediately. Remove
o
F Z
z
Q
MASON
5 SIL- FENCE
SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY 5 MONTHS
AND REPLACED IF
NECESSARY
Z
]
O U
6 THE GAS MAINS AND SERVICES MUS'
BE LOCATED PRIOR "O THE INS'ALLA-ION
OF "HE SIL'
so that the sediment underneath it can be excavated. Excavate the sediment from
FENCES SO THE FENCE POS- DO NO' DAMAGE AND
GAS LINES
(SEE SHEET
STORM SEWER -
PIPE CHART
2
growing in the bottom of the basin does not hold down the skimmer.o
a 3
Repair the baffles if they are damaged Re -anchor the baffles if water is flowing
DISSIPATOR DESIGN
PIPE
SIZE
DRAIN
025 LENGTH SLOPE
INVERT INVERT
SIZE
AREA
CFS
FEET
%
IN OUT
LENGTH
WIDTH
and remove the debris. Also check the orifice inside the skimmer to see if it is
Ac
clogged. If so remove the debris.
FT
FT
PIPE A
18"RCP
3.10
6.75
48
1.04
378.00 377.50
9.0
4.5
PIPE B
18"RCP
2.36
4.73
52
3.85
377.30 375.30
9.0
4.5
PIPE C
18"RCP
1.87
3.51
44
1.36
389.00 388.40
9.0
4.5
PIPE D
18"RCP
1.45
2.97
60
5.83
377.00 373.50
9.0
4.5
PIPE E
18'•RCP
1.78
3.78
44
0.91
382.40 382.00
9.0
4.5
PIPE F
18"RCP
3.55
7.02
60
0.67
385.00 384.50
9.0
4.5
PIPE G
18"RCP
1.16
2.56
44
0.91
384.60 384.20
9.0
4.5
PIPE H
18"RCP
1.18
2.70
60
0.67
385.70 385-30
9.0
4.5
PIPE I
18"RCP
0.75
2.03
60
0.67
385.40 385.00
9.0
4.5
PIPE J
18"RCP
212
4.46
44
0.68
368.10 367.80
9.0
4.5
PIPE K
18"RCP
2.03
4.59
44
0.68
375.30 375.00
9.0
4.5
PIPE L
18"RCP
1.15
2.57
44
0.68
385.80 385.50
9.0
4.5
D50 LINING
THICKNESS
6" 18" CLASS B
6" 18" CLASS B
6"18" CLASS B
6" 18" CLASS B
6" 18" CLASS B
6" 18" CLASS B
6" 18' CLASS 8
6" 18' CLASS B
6" 18" CLASS B
6" 18" CLASS B
6" 18" CLASS B
6" 18" CLASS B
t
49
48
53
52
STA 11+84 LEFT SIDE L-1
TO
END OF CUL-DE-SAC STA. 13+30 L-1
5TA. 13+40 RIGHT SIDE L-2
STA. 14+46 LEFT SIDE L-4
TO
TO
INV PIPE B STA. 11+80 L-2
IHV. PIPE K STA. 19+05 L-4
ST A 13,51 RIGHT SIDE L -4
I L-
5 TA. 10+6D RIGHT SDE 5
TO
T O
V. PIP K TA.
N E 5 19+OS L-4
INV. PIPE L STA. 1 +
0 22 L-5
RIGHT IEE L-5
STA t2+]5 GH 5
RIGHT E L-6
STA.10+35 IGH SD
T 0
TO
INV. PIPE G STA. 1+
3 {6 L-5
BEGIN PERM MAT STA. 84 L-6
STA. 12+99 RIGHT SIDE
TO
INV. PIPE E STA. 11+94 L-6
L
-7
STA 13+96 LEFT SIDE L-7
STA. 12+E8 RIGHT SIDE L-9
TO
TO
INV. PIPE E STA 13+35 L-]
PIPE A STA.
STA 13+29 RIGHT SIDE
TO
BEGIN STA 1 +5
BEGIN PERM MAT STA. 11+52 L-8
-9
STA 16+66 LEFT SIDE L-9
TO
BEGIN PERM AT STA. L-9
STA. 16+48 LEFT SIDE L-9
TO
L6 g
INV. PIPE J STA. I7+05 L-9
PERMANENT DITCH PROTECTION
SCHEDULE ENKA MAT
STA. iD+GO LEFT SDE L-6
TO
INV PIPE 0 5TA. 11+94 l-6
STA, 11+84 RIGHT SIDE L-6
STA. 11+52 RIGHT SIDE L -B
TO
TO
INV. PIPED 5TA. 11+9{ L-6
INV PIPE P 5TA. I1+20 L-8
STA. 16+88 LEFT SEE L-2
TO
INV. PIPE J STA. 1]+05 L-9
z I -
N/F
FRANKLIN h MICHAEL
CHANNEL DESIGN 0-4
HIGHWAY METHOD
D.A. = 2-01 ACRES
j 025 = 6.59 CFS
j USE MANNINGS EO
j B = 3'
3: I = 035
SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
CHANNEL SLOPE = 5.59,
DEPTH = 0.42 V25 = 3.69 FPS
b = 3' USE COLBOUND INC. ENKAMAT II LINER
T= YDS 62.4(0.42).055 = 1.4 PSF
T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF
T -
SEAL E
�9- 22024
3-20-17
LENG H 230
CHANNEL DESIGN D-7
do
HIGHWAY METHOD
R D.A. = 2.19 ACRES O O
025718 CFS L p
USE MANNINGS E0. l� W J _
90' B . U �Nrn
m 3 - 3 I SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
m CHANNEL SLOPE = 6.57 ! W C
G DEPTH = 0.3T V25 = 4.69 FPS W= x
+ b = 3' USE COLBOUND INC. ENKAMAT II LINER. Y O o
T=YDS 62.4(0.37).065 = 1 5 PSF
i T (ENKA MAT) = 2.0 PSF w z U
LENGTH = 130' ^ O a t
CHANNEL DESIGN D-8 p
HIGHWAY METHOD U UZ
D . = 3.12 ACRES Z
;ARV \ 025 = 10-2 CFS I C, t
DB USE MANNINGS EO W I"T0'�
e - 3' W
ct
PIN, 3: I 9.0' 3: t = .035 L ? 01
_ SIDE SLOPE = 3:1 �( U
CHANNEL SLOPE = 3.0% W C
DEPTH = 0.55 V25 = 3.97 FPS d,
b = 3' USE COLBOUND INC ENKAMAT II LINER', t
T=YDS 62.4(0.55) 03 = 1.0 PSF O-
T (ENKA MAT) = 20 PSF --
LENGTH = aoo' _
5 MPORARY CIO
I-
d
'rm
tO
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
Inspect temporary diversions once a week and after every rainfall. Immediately
remove sediment from the flow area and repair the diversion ridge. Carefully
N/F
Inspect baffles least once a week and after each rainfall. Make any require
repairs immediately.
COat
- __JDAM
0 a
HORSESHOE
-u- SILT FENCE
PIN: 0644-28-0752
tm Tao
Nj
check outlets and make timely repairs as needed When the area protected is
7606 WOODS LN
4
INLET/
E
47
n
permanently stabilized. remove the ridge and the channel to blend with the
v O
PRO7ECTIDN `V^
ON
nural ground level and appropriately stabilize it.
at
V I
I�
SKIMMER BASIN MAINTENANCE NOTES
a
\Z
'
Inspect skimmer sediment basins at least weekly and after each significant
w
z I -
N/F
FRANKLIN h MICHAEL
46
��
(one-haff inch or greater) rainfall event and repair immediately. Remove
o
F Z
z
Q
MASON
2'-Y' BLAST
51
sediment and restore the basin to its original dimensions when sediment
accumulates to one-half the height of the first baffle. Pull the skimmer to one side
Z
]
O U
DB 2984, P0. 156
PIN. 0644-29-1073
25',100'x6'
GRAVEL CONSTRUCITON ENTRANCE
11 FOR DETAIL)
\ \
��
so that the sediment underneath it can be excavated. Excavate the sediment from
o
z
(SEE SHEET
the entire basin, not just around the skimmer or the first cell. Make sure vegetation
2
growing in the bottom of the basin does not hold down the skimmer.o
a 3
Repair the baffles if they are damaged Re -anchor the baffles if water is flowing
underneath or around them.
If the skimmer is clogged with trash and there is water in the basin, usually jerking
up and down and dislodge thbris and
on the ropewill make the skimmer bob e de
restore flow. If this does not work, pull the skimmer over to the side of the basin
and remove the debris. Also check the orifice inside the skimmer to see if it is
clogged. If so remove the debris.
If the the skimmer arm of barrel pipe is clogged, the orifice can be removed and
the obstruction cleared with plumbers snake or by flushing with water. Be sure
O
ARE
and replace the orifice before repositioning the skimmer.
K
Check the fabric lined spillway for damage and make any required repairs with
V)
PIN
fabric that spans the full width of the spillway. Check the embankment, spillways.
and outlet for erosion damage, and inspect the embankment for piping and
mdebris
settlement. Make all necessary repairs immediately. Remove all trash and other
from the skimmer and pool areas.
POROUS BAFFLES NOTES
Q
Z
NOTE.
1. PROJECT IS LOCATED IN WS -IV AND 24
IMPERVIOUS TO BE ALLOWED -
2. THIS PROJECT IS BEING DESIGNED
UNDER THE "COMPATIBILITY DESIGN
CONCEPT".
3. HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION TO
MAINTAIN ALL OPEN SPACE. DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS AND BUFFERS.
4. PROPOSES SIGN EASEMENTS TO BE
MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION AND BE LOCATED AT
LEAST 10' FROM ANY ROW.
5. PROPOSED KIOSK EASEMENTS TO BE
MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION.
FOR REVIEW ONLY -
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PLAN IS SUBJECT TO REVISIONS DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL PROCESS
CHECK 36
(TYP.)
N/F
Inspect baffles least once a week and after each rainfall. Make any require
repairs immediately.
COat
- __JDAM
0 a
HORSESHOE
-u- SILT FENCE
PIN: 0644-28-0752
tm Tao
® TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
Be sure to maintain access to the baffles. Should the fabric of a baffle collapse.
7606 WOODS LN
4
INLET/
E
47
STORM SEWER PIPE
tear. decompose. or become ineffective. replace it promptly.
v O
PRO7ECTIDN `V^
45 ,
Remove sediment deposits when it reaches half full, to provide adequate
V I
\
storage volume for the next rain and to reduce pressure on the baffles.
a
\Z
'
Take care to avoid damaging the baffles during cleanout. and replace if damaged
w
z I -
N/F
FRANKLIN h MICHAEL
46
��
during cleanout operations. Sediment depth should never exceed half the
designed storage depth.
F Z
z
Q
MASON
2'-Y' BLAST
��
After the contributing drainage area has been properly stabilized. remove all
bring the to
Z
]
O U
DB 2984, P0. 156
PIN. 0644-29-1073
25',100'x6'
GRAVEL CONSTRUCITON ENTRANCE
11 FOR DETAIL)
\ \
��
baffle materials and unstable sediment deposits. area grade, and
stabilize it.
o
z
(SEE SHEET
2
NOTE.
1. PROJECT IS LOCATED IN WS -IV AND 24
IMPERVIOUS TO BE ALLOWED -
2. THIS PROJECT IS BEING DESIGNED
UNDER THE "COMPATIBILITY DESIGN
CONCEPT".
3. HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION TO
MAINTAIN ALL OPEN SPACE. DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS AND BUFFERS.
4. PROPOSES SIGN EASEMENTS TO BE
MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION AND BE LOCATED AT
LEAST 10' FROM ANY ROW.
5. PROPOSED KIOSK EASEMENTS TO BE
MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION.
FOR REVIEW ONLY -
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PLAN IS SUBJECT TO REVISIONS DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL PROCESS
v
RIP RAP ENERGY DISSIPATOR
-i-TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
N/F
56p SKIMMER/RISER BASIN
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
STEWART ARNOLD
GRAPHIC SCALE RB 2015, PG 343
Z 11�
-u- SILT FENCE
PIN: 0644-28-0752
tm Tao
® TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
7606 WOODS LN
...� TEMPORARY MATTING
�M - ENKA MAT
�6& CHECK DAM
E
IN FEET
( )
SCALE: 1" = 200'
STORM SEWER PIPE
NOTE.
1. PROJECT IS LOCATED IN WS -IV AND 24
IMPERVIOUS TO BE ALLOWED -
2. THIS PROJECT IS BEING DESIGNED
UNDER THE "COMPATIBILITY DESIGN
CONCEPT".
3. HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION TO
MAINTAIN ALL OPEN SPACE. DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS AND BUFFERS.
4. PROPOSES SIGN EASEMENTS TO BE
MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION AND BE LOCATED AT
LEAST 10' FROM ANY ROW.
5. PROPOSED KIOSK EASEMENTS TO BE
MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION.
FOR REVIEW ONLY -
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PLAN IS SUBJECT TO REVISIONS DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL PROCESS
O �
-i-TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
APPLICANT:
SMITH DOUGLAS HOMES
WETLAND AREA. 1.36 AC
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
2520 RELIANCE AVE.
APEX, NC 27502
Z 11�
-u- SILT FENCE
OWNER:
MICHAEL KEMP MASON
WETLAND IMPACT AREA:010 AC.
- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
7606 WOODS LN
�6& CHECK DAM
CORNELIUS, NC 28031
- RIP RAP
NOTE.
1. PROJECT IS LOCATED IN WS -IV AND 24
IMPERVIOUS TO BE ALLOWED -
2. THIS PROJECT IS BEING DESIGNED
UNDER THE "COMPATIBILITY DESIGN
CONCEPT".
3. HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION TO
MAINTAIN ALL OPEN SPACE. DRAINAGE
EASEMENTS AND BUFFERS.
4. PROPOSES SIGN EASEMENTS TO BE
MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION AND BE LOCATED AT
LEAST 10' FROM ANY ROW.
5. PROPOSED KIOSK EASEMENTS TO BE
MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION.
FOR REVIEW ONLY -
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PLAN IS SUBJECT TO REVISIONS DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL PROCESS
DRAWING
SHEET
C-4
O �
Cl)
O
Z 11�
O w
V)
5Q
DRAWING
SHEET
C-4

I KIOSK
1� LOC�DQN25
HORSESHOE
INLET
PROTECTION
26
Wetland Impact #1: 0.08 acre
MASON POINTE SUBDIVISION PREPARED FOR:
SMITH DOUGLAS HOMES
2520 RELIANCE AVE.
HARI4IT m1N1Y�,+I��C,1�H CAFaM APEX, NC 27502
RRAV 1 1rlCfC DATE : 10-27-17
PROJECT ENGINEER:
STEWART PROCTOR MIKE L. STEWART
PROJECT CADD DESIGNER:
SP Design Consultants JOHN A. TEEL
319 Chaponoke Road PROJECT SURVEYOR:
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] PROJECT SURVEYOR
67
GRAPHIC SCALE
50' 0 25' 50'
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft.
NC DWQ MAPS:
AREA IMPACT MAP
FIGURE#:1

TYP
57
20' PERMANENT
CONST. AND
MAINTENANCE ESM'T
Wetland Impact #2: 0.02 acre
MASON POINTE SUBDIVISION PREPARED FOR:
SMITH DOUGLAS HOMES
2520 RELIANCE AVE.
Hg=1T COUNTY ,I��l1,�H CAF M APEX, NC 27502
AVAC+1rlCfC DATE : 10-27-17
PROJECT ENGINEER:
STEWART PROCTOR MIKE L. STEWART
PROJECT CADD DESIGNER:
SP Design Consultants JOHN A. TEEL
319 Choponoke Road PROJECT SURVEYOR:
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Phone [phone] Fox [phone] PROJECT SURVEYOR
GRAPHIC SCALE
50' 0 25' 50
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft.
NC DWQ MAPS:
AREA IMPACT MAP
FIGURE#:2

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2016-02092 County: Harnett U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-FUOUAY-VARINA
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant:,,FaF'rartklin idd''Mictiael Kemp Mason
Address: �O-°Boit20 2
t�rth Carolina 27293
Telephone Number: 36 149.'429„'
Size (acres)
63.$
Nearest Town
Fuauav-Varina
Nearest Waterway
Hector Creek
River Basin
Cave Fear
USGS RUC
03030004
Coordinates
Latitude: 35.5340367021902
Longitude: -78.8554542521892
Location description:
The site is located at 7616
Christian Light R nd NCSR 1412 in Fuguity-Varina. Harnett County.
NC. The site contains aericultural
fields and three forested wetlands totaling
1.96 acres See attached Figure 3
Indicate Which of the Followin¢ Apnly:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The wetlands have been delineated, and
the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction
determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of
computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made
on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on
the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the
Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD,
which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the
permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective
presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is not sufficiently
accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters of the U.S. on your
property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to
obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once
Page 1 of 2

SAW -2016-02922
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five
years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Emily Greer at (910) 2514567 or
Emi1v.C.GreerCa.usace. rmy.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland
Delineation Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement to the 1987
Wetland Delineation Manual.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This del ineationldetermination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. if you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CER Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by_`NA .
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
GREER.EMILY.C.1385325300,m�
Date: May 24.2017 Expiration Date: NA

SAW -2016-02092
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http:,`/co[psmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p-=136:4:0.
Copy Furnished:
Sage Ecological Services
Sean Clark
3707 Lwift Drive
Raleigh. NC. 27605
Electronically Provided

SAW- 2092
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Franklin and Michael Kemp
File Number: SAW -2016-02092 Date: May 24, 2017
Mason
Attached is: Figure 3 See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
D
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at htt _www.usace.arm).mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Rei,ulatgryPrograrnandPermits_asnx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW -201"2992
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Emily Greer
CESAD-PDO
69 Darlington Ave
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Wilmington, NC 28403
60 Forsyth Street, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice ofanv site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature ofappellant oragent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Emily Greer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: May 24, 2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Sean Clark, 3707 Swift Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27605.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, Mason, Franklin & Michael / Mason Heirs
Property—Sean Clark -Sage Enviro_Harnett / JD, SAW -2016-02092
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: see map.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Harnett City: Fuquay-Varina
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.5340367021902° Long.: -78.8554542521892`
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Hector Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 13 December 2016
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated
Cowardin
amount of
Class of aquatic
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Class
a q vatic
resource
resource in
review area
A01-A47Non-section
35.53tsrN
78.85421`w
RPiF06
0.46 AC
10 —
non -wetland
A 100-A 146 &
Non -section 10—
8100-8140
35.53368°N
78.85398•W
RP1F06
1.04 AC
wetland
200-235Non-section
35.536a7°N
78.85415'W
RPiF06
0.46 AC
10 —
wetland

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terns and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "play be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: maps
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.

® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24k, Fuquay-Varina, NC
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Web Soil Surveyi-
®Nationalwetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS Online Wetland Mapper
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site photos dated 16 August 2016
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):

This preliminary JD finds that there `may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
GREER.EMILY.0 'fid
1385325300 _ Cn-CF °UYAY
o�rr-uas=u3oo
IVIr Ml) M 11= NO "W
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
Sean Clark= ' 3'
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is Impracticable)

Map Location
CHATHAM
IEE JOHNSTON
HARNETT
HOKE CUMBERLAND SAMPSON
A47 tie to A11
Nonjurisdicbonal Ditch in high ground (must by oonl4rmed by USACE)
Jurisdictional Wetlands (must be confirmed by USACE) (1-96 acres)
Project Study Area
Wetland and Stream Sketch Figure S
Mason Heirs Poperty N
Sage Project #2016.34
Fuquay-Varina, NC
Sage Ecological Services
September 6, 2016 Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537
0 110 220 440 660 880
Feet