Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR4440 (5)pµ SL4TF o STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA D c? ?q 0? N 0 O 0 l rip ?sq?R Q(? QUA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION `i? MICHAEL F EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY October 14, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO David Baker, US Army Corps of Engineers Marella Buncick, US Fish and Wildlife Service Chris Militshcher, US Environmental Protection Agency Charles Nicholson, Tennessee Valley Authority Marla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission Brian Wrenn, NCDENR-DWQ/Wetlands Renee Gledhill-Earley, NC Dept of Cultural Resources - SHPO Ryan Sherby, Southwestern RPO FROM Steven L Brown, P E Probe elo mnnen d n ro en a a ysi Branch SUBJECT Con u r n o!int 2 t g M es TIP r ? e t in e - 4 SR 3 4 1 4 eed e oad) Fro SR a n o n t existi averment in Swain County Sta e roject umbers C and 14 87019, WBS No 35597, NCDOT Division 14 A Section 404/NEPA Merger Project Team Meeting was held on September 3, 2008 at 1 00 PM in the Swain Center Auditorium at Southwestern Community College in Bryson City An optional field review was held on the project before the meeting at 10 00 AM The purpose of the meeting (Concurrence Point 2A) was to review the project alternatives, stream crossings and impacts An information packet containing directions to Southwestern Community College, a Meeting Agenda, Vicinity and Project Location maps, Environmental Features maps and Half- Size Preliminary design plans was mailed to team members prior to the meeting Additional information was provided in summary tables for the alternates, stream crossings and constraints was also included in the packet In attendance were the following David Baker - USACE Mike Little - Roadway Design Marella Buncick - USFWS Paul Rochester - Roadway Design Chris Militscher - USEPA Jody Kuhne - Geotechmcal Engineering Unit Brian Wrenn - NCDENR, DWQ Andrew Nottingham - Hydraulics Unit Charles Nicholson -Tennessee Valley Authority Jamie Wilson - Division 14 Marla Chambers - NC Wildlife Resources Comm Paul White - Division 14 Powell Wheeler - NC Wildlife Resources Comm Brian Burch - Division 14 Amanda Bushon - NC Wildlife Resources Comm Mark Davis - Division 14 MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE 919-733-3141 LOCATION NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE WWW DOH DOT STATE NC US RALEIGH NC RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 TIP Project Number-+17-4.440 SR 1364 and SR 1114 Improvements (Needmore Road) Froe-, Sl 1369 (Telkco Road) in Macon County to existing pavement in Swain County Stdte roject Numbers 14C 056010 and 14C 087019, WBS Number 35594, NCDOT Division 14 n ",Concurrence Point 2A Meeting Minutes Carla Dagnin%_Proj Dev and Env Analysis - NEU Jennifer Harrod - Prof Dev and Env Analysis - NEU Erin,Cheely - Prof Dev and Env Analysis - NEU Logan Williams - Prof Dev and Env Analysis - NEU Lance Fontaine - Prof Dev and Env Analysis - NEU The following was discussed at this meeting Page 2 of 5 Ann Burroughs - Prod Dev and Env Analysis - NEU Jason Dilday - Prof Dev and Env Analysis - NEU Shane Peterson - Prod Dev and Env Analysis - HEU Linwood Stone - Project Dev and Env Analysis Eugene Tarascio - Project Dev and Env Analysis Steve Brown - Project Dev and Env Analysis 1. Purpose of the Meeting • To reach consensus on feasible project alternatives, review stream crossings and impacts of each for the subject project 2. Protect Description • SR 1364 and SR 1114 (Needmore Road) is an unpaved secondary road located along the Little Tennessee River in Macon and Swain Counties • Project limits are from 1369 (Tellico Road) in Macon County to existing pavement in Swain County Total 3. NEPA and Merger Pr( • A Concurrence Point concurrence reached team member Two Concurrence Poi #t 2 D t le to lte rii tIY!* CarndA f onward) meetings were held for the project The first meeting was held in Raleigh on September 20, 2005 in the Board Room of the Transportation Building The second concurrence meeting was held in Bryson City at Southwestern Community College's Swain Center (SCC) on December 13, 2005 The second meeting was held in conjunction with a field review meeting Team member concurrence was reached on December 13, 2005 The project Alternatives carried forward at Concurrence Point 2 were A No Build Alternative - This alternative only maintains the existing gravel/dirt road Maintenance includes the cost of adding gravel Information on flooding is also needed B No Pave with Selective Improvements Alternative - Selective improvements include drainage, buffer, and maintenance issues Since these improvements are subject to interpretation, an itemized list (including cost) is needed for the next concurrence meeting C Pave in Place -18 feet Maximum Alternative - This alternative only paves the existing roadway width of Needmore Road Although the existing roadway width generally vanes from 14 to 19 feet, the maximum pavement width will be no wider than 18 feet D Pave in Place - Improve where you can Alternative - The improvements for this alternative include paving the existing variable roadway width as well as improving the road and shoulders without impacting hot rock or placing fill into the Little Tennessee River Stream and sensitive area impacts would be minimized TIP Project Number R-4440 SR 1364 and SRI] 14 Improvements (Needmore Road) From SR 1369 (Tellico Road) in Macon County to existing pavement in Swain County State Project Numbers 14C 056010 and 14C 087019, WBS Number 35594, NCDOT Division 14 Concurrence Point 2A Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 E Division 14 Secondary Road Standards with Design Exceptions Alternative - This alternative combines Division 14 Secondary Road Standards with design exceptions Division 14 Secondary Road Standards include a minimum roadway width of 18 feet with shoulder widths of 4 feet and 6 feet Therefore, the total typical section width for this alternative is 28 feet The design exceptions can reduce the shoulder widths as well as the roadway width below 18 feet, however, the roadway width will not be reduced to 14 feet 4. Current Schedule • State Environmental Assessment • State FONSI (if appropriate) • Right of Way Acquisition • Construction January 2009 June 2010 N/A Section A, B, & D - June 2011 Section C - Post-Year 5. Concurrence Point 2A - Alignment/Alternatives Review and Stream Crossings !Jn ary of project constraints • NCDOT present the ac age, a end d r iewe the s • USFWS note t t o V Te wa t cal habitat for the Lrttlewing ar u el t to i t e ac ag • NCWRC st e tat e lea ag la f e ee ore Tract was still being developed e s a ut status NCDOT reviewed the alternatives for the project and then opened the meeting for questions/comments NCWRC expressed a desire to remove all "modified" alternatives from consideration (which included minimum 9-foot travel lanes and shoulder improvements) because of impacts to Little Tennessee River and only have pave in place alternatives that do not widen the existing roadway Also, NCWRC expressed the belief that there was no need for shoulders and maximum widths for any of the alternatives, especially if speed limits were posted • NCDOT responded that any paving of Needmore Road would require some widening to adhere to the minimum travel lanes and shoulder widths as set forth in the applicable design standards It was also stated that speed limits were not posted on gravel roads because of changing roadway conditions NCDOT suggested modifying Alternative E, with all the widening away from the river, with only a cut section into the rock and reducing the shoulder section where needed USFWS expressed concerns about how, freshly exposed acidic rock faces and runoff from them would be handled during construction, especially given the extremely sensitive nature of the area • NCDOT responded that the acidic levels of the rock on this project were very low With the levels present, runoff from them would not be considered a "hot runoff' TIP Project Number R-4440 SR 1364 and SR 1114 Improvements (Needmore Road) From SR 1369 (Tellico Road) in Macon County to existing pavement in Swain County State Project Numbers 14C 056010 and 14C 087019, WBS Number 35594, NCDOT Division 14 Concurrence Point 2A Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 Leaching from freshly exposed surfaces are not likely to pose a long term problem, because the surfaces oxidize very quickly Any runoff from the surfaces could easily be neutralized by lining ditches with limestone or spraying a limestone slurry on the exposed rock faces • NCDOT also proposed pre-drilling any before blasting, so would have a nearly vertical (1/4 1) rock wall/face, which would reduce exposed surface areas to weathering (verses a sloped cut section) USFWS also expressed concerns about how acidic rock debris from the construction would be kept out of the river, especially with the potential for floods • NCDOT responded that non-explosive methods could be used to control debris material from going into the river Material generated would be transported to a single waste area for treatment outside or above the potential flood zone Also, if exposure of the fresh surfaces on debris material during construction was a concern, the material could be covered so as to shield these surfaces from the weather • EPA asked if with no back • NCDOT allow des ivision standards from the river would • EPA stated that there could be very specific design criteria to control acidic runoff and that this should be looked at as an alternative, since filling in the river will not be permitted • NCWRC stated that they wanted Alternatives C and D (Pave-in-Place alternatives with no widening of the roadway) included as alternatives to carry forward • DWQ asked why was all this work being considered for such a minor project and also noted that while safety was emphasized as the main reason for the project, safety was not part of the purpose and need for the project • NCDOT responded that Needmore Road is projected to carry increased traffic in the future, due to tourism and the fact that it is being used as an alternate cut- through route to avoid NC 28 An increase in traffic on this road will increase the likelihood of accidents on this road, due to the narrow roadway and severe curves at points along the project USFWS stated that with the Appalachian elk toe having drastic declines in areas of the Little Tennessee River, they were especially concerned about preserving their habitat on this project To this end USFWS asked if a soil binder or alternative surfacing method could be used on one or more alternatives to lower the maintenance rather than having paving as only option • NCDOT responded that soil binders/alternative surfacing method would be added to Alternative B However, it should be noted here that NCDOT is generally required by law to pave eligible unpaved secondary roads TIP Project Number R-4440 SR 1364 and SR 1114 Improvements (Needmore Road) From SR 1369 (Tellico Road) in Macon County to existing pavement in Swain County State Project Numbers 14C 056010 and 14C 087019, WBS Number 35594, NCDOT Division 14 Concurrence Point 2A Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 • After further discussions on the alternatives, the Merger Team reached concurrence on CP 2A. The Team decided to not carry forward Alternative C Modified or Alternative D. This left the following alternatives to carry forward: • Alternative A • Alternative B • Alternative C • Alternative D Modified • Alternative E 6. No Build No Pave with Selective Improvements including binder matenal/alternative surfacing Pave-m-Place - 18 foot maximum roadway width Pave-in-Place - 18 foot minimum roadway width Division 14 Secondary Road Standards with Design Exceptions with widening to the rock side only, impact to hot rock side and no fill into the Little Other Issues • EPA asked if th b d e Tevic C e o d ?be id e as part of this project • NCDOT would be replaced and 11 as s ar e pr ct t bp-dpn y ndgeyintenance widened • EPA stated 0 bridge provement should be included in the planning document for this project • NCDOT responded that information for any planned badge improvement would be noted in the environmental document • EPA stated it should be noted in the documents that there are invasive species within the project limits (kudzu in particular) • NCDOT responded any invasive species with in the project limits would be noted in the document cc Mike Little, P E, NCDOT Roadway Design Paul Rochester, P E, NCDOT Roadway Design Andrew Nottingham, P E, NCDOT Hydraulics Jody Kuhne, L G , P E , Geotechnical Engineering Unit Jamie Wilson, NCDOT Division 14 Mark Davis, NCDOT Division 14