20170170 Ver 1_More Info Received_20171025

Goss, Stephanie
From: Dalton Cook ,-< dalton @spa ng lerenvi ronmenta l.com >
Sent: Tuesday, October 24',_2017_2:57PlVl
To: Goss, Stephanie'
Subject: [External] FW: Brook Meadow 401/ 404 Permit Udate
Attachments: 005 - 16151_c3.1.pdf
a h��,_
- '_ .
",'''',`
,Qdgnajea,ironoutside bft�el rianizatibn.,Do"not.tiick,linksOr-open,attachmbiits'un eis,y86,ri
an'd+c' binte"n't are safe. spidpus email ias. ap,atta'dhment tore ortsoam@;nc Ov-._
From: Marty,Bizzell [mailio:lYl'arty.Bi'zzell@bnkin'c.com]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 120172:33PM
To: Dalton Cbok,<[e-mail]>
Cc: Christopher. R Weir <chrisweir@el'mstreetbldrs.com>
Subject: RE: -Brook Meadow 401/ 404 Permit Udate
,
Dalton:
Please see responses bel I ow as well as. attached revised grading, plan sheet per your comments'.
Thanks;
Marty D. Bizzell, PE, CPESC
Principal Engineer
BASS, NIXON -& KENNEDY, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS -
6310 Chapel -Hill Road,,Su ite 250
Raleigh, -NC 2760.7 www.bnkin6.com
(p) 919-851-4422 (f) 919-851-8968
"Serving the Triangle and surrounding areas since 1969.
From: Dalton Cook, [mailto:[e-mail]'m]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 1,:08 PM
To: Marty Bizzell.
Cc: Christopher,R Weir
Subject: R.E'Brook Meadow 401/404 Permit Udate
Thank you Marty., One question and one comment.
Did the impact map change at all from the last version you sent me? Yes. I see -that the amount of stream
:impact is still 148 linbar feet. Did you reduce the amount of rip rap in the stream? That was,ihe only,hang-up

the State's 401 office had. Yes, the amount of rip -rap originally shown has been reduced. The previous plan
did not measure the stream along the actual stream channel including the meanders with the impact
area. This has been corrected and the total LF of stream impact is 148 LF.
On the Grading and Drainage Plan please remove the note on the stream on the western edge of the property
indicating that it is wetland. Please add a note on the floodplain of the stream on the northern boundary
indicating that it is wetlands. Notations have been revised accordingly.
Thanks,
ArCl
IDY
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Dalton Cook
Environmental Project Scientist
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
www.SpanglerEnvironmental.com
Raleigh Office 919-875-4288
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
This e-mail transmission (and any attachments thereto) is confidential and privileged. It is intended only for viewing by the
entity to which it is addressed. This document and attachments may contain information subject to attorney work -product
doctrines or attorney-client privilege. If you are not the addressee, your disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
contents of this message for any purpose is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender by return e-mail.
From: Marty Bizzell [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 12:54 PM
To: Dalton Cook <[e-mail]>
Cc: Christopher R Weir <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Brook Meadow 401/ 404 Permit Udate
Dalton
Please see attached revised impact map as well as revised grading plan as requested.
Please let me know should you have any questions or comments.
Thanks,
Marty D. Bizzell, PE, CPESC
Principal Engineer

e
a
BASS NIXON & KENNEDY, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
6310 Chapel Hill Road, Suite 250
Raleigh, -NC 27607 www.-bhkinc,.com .
(p) 919-851-4422 (f) 919-851-8968
"Serving the Triangle and surrounding areas since 1969."
From: Marty Bizzell
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 9:59 AM
To: 'Dalton Cook'
Cc: Christopher R Weir
Subject: RE:'Brook Meadow 401/ 404 Permit Udate "
Dalton:'
Plans will be forwarded to you asap today. ' .
Please let me know if you have an questions'once,,you receive.
Thanks,
Marty D. Bizzell, PE; CPESC:
-Principal Engineer
BASS, NIXON & KENNEDY, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
6310 Chapel Hill Road, Suite 250
Raleigh,' NC 27607 www.bnkinc.com
(p) 919-851-4422 (f) 919-851-8968
"Serving the Triangle and surrounding.oreas since 1969."
From: Dalton Cook [mailto:dalton@spanglerenvironmental:com]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 9:16 AM
To: Christopher R Weir,
-Cc: Marty Bizzell
Subject: RE: Brook Meadow 401/ 404" Permit Udate
Chris;
I have not received the revised plans from Marty,yet. Both agencies have "reviewed everything in the permit applications .
and provided their minimal comments. I've spoken with the representatives of each agency reviewing our application
several times and both are eager to move this permit application along. By law the.State's 401 office has 60 days to
review and the Corps' has 30 day to review once "the application is considered complete. The application will be
3

complete once I give them the revised plans they have asked for. That said, I think once we can get the revised plans to
them it should not take very long.
Sincerely,
lagglizTelk-ulzuVwx
Cook
Environmental Project Scientist
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
www.SpanglerEnvironmental.com
Raleigh Office 919-875-4288
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
This e-mail transmission (and any attachments thereto) is confidential and privileged. It is intended only for viewing by the
entity to which it is addressed. This document and attachments may contain information subject to attorney work -product
doctrines or attorney-client privilege. If you are not the addressee, your disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
contents of this message for any purpose is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender by return e-mail.
From: Christopher R Weir[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 5:52 PM
To: Dalton Cook <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Marty Bizzell' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Brook Meadow 401/ 404 Permit Udate
Importance: High
Did you get the revised plans form Marty today?
What is the time frame for the agencies to turn them around once you submit?
Thank you,
Christopher R Weir
CGB,CGP
Elm Street Builders
Managing Partner
919-810-9163 Cell

E
elm %O,.p street
BU I LDE RS
From: Dalton Cook [ma ilto:dalton@'spanglerenviron mental.comj -
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:12 PM
To: [e-mail]
'Subject: RE: Brook Meadow 401/ 404 Permit Udate
Chris,
I originally submitted the permit applications to both agencies in late September. Both agencies provided comments on.
changes they wanted to see on the site plan and impact map which I provided to the engineer.. The engineer, Marty
Bizzell, just wrote nae this morning to say he should have the revised plans to me shortly. .1 will resubmit the plans as
soon as he gets them to me. I will keep you informed as the process moves along and. please, let me know if you have
any questions..
Thank you,
Environmental Project._Scientist
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
www.SpanglerEnvironmental.com
Raleigh Office 919-875-4288
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
This e-mail transmission (and any attachments thereto) is confidential and privileged. It is intended only for viewing by the
entity to which it is addressed. This document and attachments may, contain information subject to attorney work -product
doctrines or attorney-client privilege. If you are not the -addressee, your disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
contents.of this message for any purpose is prohibited_. If you have received. this message in- error, please. notify the
sender by return e-mail.
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 201712:27 PM
To: Dalton Cook <daIto n@spant lerenvironme'nta'l.com>
Subject: Brook Meadow 401% 404 Permit Udate
Dalton,
5
i
J

Can you provide an update on the 401/404 permits for Brook Meadow. 6290 Ten Ten Rd.
Thanks
Thank you,
Chris Weir
Elm Street Builders, Partner

Y
'Goss, Stephanie
From: Dalton Cook <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 09; 2017 11:30 AM
To: Goss, Stephanie
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Brook_ Meadows Project
................ ..;;,:- �..,�.,...,,
CAlii ICiN: This;emaiLorigirik6d.from�outs de of,;the-organization. Do �not;elick links'or open attachments.unless you venfyal at the
�,xy , t•'',v>:
attachment and contebt,are°safe ,Send all suspicious email as an attach I 1111 to,:report spam@n`c:gov
I just spoke to the client who is trying to'get-this project moving along. "He was going to get on the' engineer to get the.
plans to me so I hope in the next day or two.
From: Goss, Stephanie [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 11:22 AIVI
To: Dalton Cook<dalto'n@spang'lerenvironmental,.com>
Subject: RE: jExternal] RE:,Brook Meadows Project
Dalton.'
When do you think I will the response will be. The statutory date is 10/22,
Stephanie L. Goss
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division of Nater Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
8800 Barrett Drive ;
Raleigh, NC 276o9
919 -791 -4256-
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records 'La`v and may be di, cRosed.to third parties
From:, Dalton Cook [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October,09, 2'017 11:04 AM �''
To: Goss, Stephanie <[e-mail]>; J,im Spangler <[e-mail]>'
Subject: [External] RE: Brook Meadows Project ;
.:..-_ ;.. ,,��;;,r,
CAUTt %t� This email origiriated,from,outside of the,,organizati&K.kkDo not click links or; open attachments.unless: u wer�fy fhatahe===>
at, ach`rridnt and content,a ,#safe:"Sdtid all,suspicioas;email�as an attachment to re orts''arim .ric: ov: G
Hi Stephanie,
Sorry for the delayed response. The engineer forlthis;'project is reworking the impact map and site plan after the
Jurisdictional Determination site visit with -the Corps'!a couple weeks ago. I will, be sending in new maps and a response
to your last e-mail when they are completed.
Thank you,

Environmental Project Scientist
Spangler.Environmental, Inc:
www.S anglerEriviton a tal.6m,
Raleigh Office 919-875-4288
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh; NC 27609
This e-mail transmission (and any attachments thereto) is confidential and privileged. ]t is intended only for viewing by.the."
entity to which it is addressed. This document and attachments may contain informatiori.subject to, attorney work -product
doctrines or attorney-client privilege. If,you are not the addressee; your disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
contents of this message for any purpose is prohibited. If you have received this message in error,.rplease notify the
sender by return e-mail. '
From: Goss Stephanie [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday; October'09', 2017 10:54 AM
To: Jim Spangler!<[e-mail]> Dalton Cook <dalton@spanglerenvira'nmental.com>
Subject: RE: Brook Meadows Project
To whom it may concern;,;
Can you please respond to the question below as I.have not,'received a response from my a -mail sent Ion 9/27/171 I will
have -,to -put this project on hold unless I receive'clarification regarding the jd.
Stephanie Z. Goss .
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division, of %Vater, Resources
Raleigh Regional. Office '
3800 BarrettDrive
Raleigh, NC 27'009.
91091-4256
E-mail correspondence to -and from this address may be subject to the.
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third.parties
From: Goss,.Stephanie
Sent: Wednesday, September. 27, 2017 8:27 AM
To: "Jim Spangler',<[e-mail]> 'Dalton Cook' <daIto [e-mail]>
Subject: Brook Meadows Project
Jim,
I have begun the process of reviewing the project at Brook Meadows and'I have a few questions:
2

• Have you verified the. use'of NWP 29 with the Corp?
• Have you'done a jurisdictional determination with the corp.?
• Last, can you please explain the necessity of the approximate 50 feet of.rip rap below the culvert at the road
crossing?
Thank youl
Stephanie L. Goss
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-791-4256
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may .be subiect to the
North Carolina Public Records I.aw and maybe disclosed to third parties

- Pre, Construction Notification (PCN) Form r.
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1.a. Type(s) of approval sought,from the Corps:,
0 Section 404 Per'rimit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.:Specify Nationwide Permit (,NWP) number: z9; or. General Permit ((PP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
N.Yes N No
10. Type(§) of approval sought,from the DWQ (check all that apply): '
. N 401 Water Quality'Certification— Regular ❑ Non-404,Jurisdictional General`Permit
. ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express N Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for;the record
because written approval; is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
! 401 Certification:
❑Yes N No '.';
For the, record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
bank or in -lieu '�program proposed for
1f. Is payment into a mitigation fee
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance better from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program. +
❑ Yes N No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty'coastal counties. If yes, answer 1'h'
below. "
❑ Yes ❑X No
1'h. Is the project located within''a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes N No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Brook Meadow,
2b. County:
Wake County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Lisa K.' Scrdggs & Donald S. Scruggs
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
DB. 8602 RG. 643
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:.�`
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10 .
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Owner
4b.
Name:
Mr. Chris R. Weir
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Elm Street Builders, LLC
4d.
Street address:
6354 Six Forks Rd. #201, Raleigh, NC 27615
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-810-9163
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
Christopher R Weir <[e-mail]>
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
James A. Spangler
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Spangler Environmental Inc.
5c.
Street address:
4338 Bland Road
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-875-4288
5f.
Fax no.:
919-875-4287
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0770817900
1b. Situ•coordinates (in decimal degrees):.
Latitude: 35.679612. Longitude:" -7,8,735797
1c. Property size:
.16.76 acres
2. , Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of"water to proposed project:'.
UT to Swift Creek
2b. 'Water Quality Classification �bf nearest receiving water:
NSW:
2c. River basin:
Neuse ,
3. Project Description'' ,f
3a. jDe§cribe the existing conditions on the. site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The majority of the site is undeveloped and wooded with one'resideiniial.home and two!;barmtype'structures. The general land use in the nearby
vicinity is mainly residential and old 'agriculture fields with one gas station across the street
3b. List the totalr estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the 'property:, 0:396
3c. !List the total estimated linear feet of all existing stream's (intermittent, an'd perennial) on the property: 1,023
3d. !Explain the purpose of the~proposed project: �, I
The purpose of this project is to construct a public road crossing a stream for a residential subdivision on the subject property.
3e. D'escribe'the overall project in"detail , including the type of"equiprrentjtojbe used:
The project is a residential subdivision that will involve grading/earth'moving and utility work using grading and excavating equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations -by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
pro'ect' (including all prior phases in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No El Unknown
!
Comments:
4b. IIf[the Corps, made'the jurisdictional determination, what type
,of determination was made?
0 (Preliminary ❑Final .
;; b
4c. If yes, who"delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name *(if known): Dalton Cook
Agency/Consultant Company: Spangler EnvironmentaPlnc.
Other: i
4d. (Byes, list the dates of the!torps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Corps jurisdictional determination was conducted on September 19, 2017.
The State buffer determination was conducted on October; 3, 2017.
5. ,Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including'all prior phases) inthe•past?
El Yes ®No E] Unknown .
5b.'If yes, explain in detail according to °help file" instructions.
J
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes. ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of, .10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January -2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed, below for your project (check all.that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams _"tributaries X❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters' ❑ _Pond,Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area- impacted.-.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
i Temporary T
2b.
Type of.impact
2c.
Type of wetland
: , 20. ,
Forested
-2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or"
DWQ (401; other) .
Area of
impact
(acres) .
W1 --
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W2
Choose one
Choose,on,e
Yes/No
-„
W3
'Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one -
Yes/No.
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h: Comments-
omments:3.
3.,,'
,' Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream,sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact'
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?'
3e.
Type of
'jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
Width ' .
„(feet),
:3g.
Impact
length:
(linear.
feet)'
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Swift Creek
PER
DW,Q-
'3
148
S2
Choose one
S3 -
Choose" one.
S4
Choose one:
'
S5
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributaryimpacts
148
3i. Comments:,'.
This culvert installation is for the purpose of constructing a public road to access the residential single family homes.' .
rt,iv corm — version i.,+ January zuuu .

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic 06ean,`'or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a:
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tempora T
4b.
Name'of.waterbody
(if applicable)'
4c.
i
Type of impact
,'
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one .'
Choose
02 -
Choose,one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose' 01 _
Choose
4f. Total, open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. !
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d. 5e.
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated ;
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
! j
P2
Choose one
i
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
' I
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If•yes,'perrnit,ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area' (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:'
I ;
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) ,
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all bufferimp'acts
below. If an 'impacts require mitigation, t en you MUST fill out Section D of this form. "
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
FxNeuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or.
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2•
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Road Crossing
UT to Swift Creek
No
6,36,7'
2;992
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6,367
2,992
6i. Comments: These impacts are associated with the construction of the public road to access the single family residential homes.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The stream crossing was designed to intersect the stream at a 90 degree angle to minimize impacts. It was deemed impossible to avoid these
impacts because the stream bisects the property completely.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control BMPs will be implemented during the construction process to control runoff and other discharges from these activities
into jurisdictional waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
E] Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an 'impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires'
Yes OX 'No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
-impact
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet) '
(square feet)
Zone T'
3 (2 for Catawba),
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permitteexesponsible riparian buffer restoration,,payment'into an approved in-lieu`•fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E:
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.1 Diffuse Flow Plan
la:
Does the project include or is it:adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified,'
❑x Yes ❑ No
within one :of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? "
lb.
If yes•, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain Why.
❑X Yes' ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
30%
2b.
Does this projecf require a Stormwater Mana ement' Plan?
Z Yes ❑ No '
2c.
If.this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES requite a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e:
Who will be responsible for the review of the.Stormwater.Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
wake county
❑ Phase II
0 NSW
3b.
Which of the,followirig locally-implemented stormwater management programs
El USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water.Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of-approval been❑Yes
0 No
attached.
5. DWQ 401 Unit'Stormwater Review .
5a.
Does the "Stormwater: Management Plan meet the appropriate; requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all- of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? :,'t:�
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8. of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a-. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds'or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?.
1 b. if you, answered "yes" to"the above, does the project.require preparation. of an,'
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or,Statei
El Yes
El No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy AcQNEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered ',`yes" to; the, above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House?` (Ifso, attach a'copy"of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter:).
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules, (15A NCAC,'2H .1300), DWQ Surface,Water or We Standards,
❑ Yes
ZNo
or Riparian Buffer Rules (1'5A NCAC 2B '.0200)? .
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? .'
El Yes
❑X No;
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
i
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
i
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
" additional development, which could impact,jnearby downstream water quality?
E] Yes
❑X No
3b. If you answered "yes" .to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
I
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly; detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The property will be serviced by municipal sanitary sewer.
i
Page 9..of'10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

a
=gored Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this,project occur iri or near ani area with federally protected species or •.
Q Yes
® No
habitat?:
�
5b..Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
®Yes
F1No
impacts?
,
Raleigh
5c. if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources'did,you use to determine whether your site would impact;Endangered Species or Designated Critical'
Habitat?
The Natural Heritage Progrim element', occurrence data set
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)"
6a. Will this project occur"in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Q Yes
® No
6b. What data sourcesldid;'you use to determine whether your, site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat database
7. Historic or Prehist6ric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
i 7a. Will. this project occur in ror near an,area that the state, federal or tribal ;
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation (� Yes
®No
status (e.g., Nptionai Histi ric Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina historv;'and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources' dld'you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? -
NC Office of State Archaeology
8. Flood, Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in.a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?.. QYes
® No
Sb. If yes, explain how- project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Road Pian Maps
- A o
9*10
d
James A. Spangler „
( 10-20-20 7
Agent's Tinted Name - -gent'signature
i Date
(Aq s si va;: only if an authorization
letter from the apblicant is provIded.j

1
€ I I
r
I
..._.._._.._._.._____.._..__---------------- ._.___.._._.._.._.._.._..________.___----- ______. _.._......... ....... _._.._.._ -------------__
_.._.._.____. ._-__._.._..___._
\
____ _
r` '
G _
\
F ,
• \ \ � y\ ___' ;iii-� L '�� -�
-
\;. .
1
- ------
,
jim
I �R$a
: 5
,I
;/�
r
8 1
i
i
,
v,
-_arc.• j
a
,
,
,
•� ➢� , , r .I �\\'' l ` ; x=30._.._ . ..... �'�._.
------
1,41-Hm -
i
/
�m
>wmom xis ,
aG:?=E '. .''yam` % -- '_ __ gvR➢,� ��
o
,� h N'••- �o:gym �i� � _ x - �\\ - .._.._ g�§E ➢ !
\ ,
s a
( i•' o�ump xa i 556-4 �� /B5 :. /' _ I
'�n36�� \ -
. _._..--- .._
SHEET ®p MEADOW
;:,E 9�wm BASS NIXON & KENNEDY, INC.
BROOK: MEADOVV �xoGHADING AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS [0-0 al C.
CLUSTER' SUBDIVISION DRAINAGE PLAN 6)10CHAPEL HILL ROAD, SURE 250, RALEIGH, NC 27607
i, PIN: 07 0-91-7900 TELEPHONE (919) 851i422oR(9091954-1879 W:(9191851d968
L
u7 t7 wus covrm commsms
7 - o onn vsscxlmox a CERTIFICATION NUMBERS: NCBELS(C-0110(; NCBOLA(L-0267(
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BID SOLICITATION

BUFFER IMACT A
8 d
o�
LuAla
0 cc
o3 0 Lu
5. LL
39l ,00 •�1 `I OVffEP .fit ; - \ T:T \- 393 i m
CI
9
Aro aO' RCPIR,
7 3gz T
, 39 \\\ INv
` \moor .,06 '\�
9,3.
9 $
\IB
0 OP " RCP S\ \
393 PRINv J01.10. •.` \ - (>
\ z
N
1114 ZWW
e
Zoo
.A_
ro �•._. A - I t �- AM
� `a Y
s
m um
IAI
ed mp
t PROP MAIL�.�.� t.. QORa�
(KIOSK (OOT 3,9 •\\' \ m0^j
.1 - (STANDARD. I
INSEE DETAIL( �..`._.` �••. `- t
THS\�I\\S\ DETAIL,
L )
7�Ay?>.
MnnAuw CmN - M%0 SED\ N to ConM.uNun\W
WALE IN FtET ,.
0 o A w
207'1
ZONE 2
IuvACT INNER
IMPACT WTER
ARE♦ 0F
IMPACT
30' 0! NEUSE
20' Cf REOSE
STREAM IMPACT
STREAM IMPACT
WETLAND IM°♦CT
DFS IGNATICN TYPE IMPACT
BUFFEfl I50. Ei.I
BUFFER 150. Fi.l
150. FT.1
(LIN. FT.1
ISO. FT.1
♦ BUFFER IPACi
6.361
3.992
953
HB
NA
MnnAuw CmN - M%0 SED\ N to ConM.uNun\W
WALE IN FtET ,.
0 o A w