20171293 Ver 1_Meeting Note_20171017

Meeting Notes
Date: October 17, 2017
Type of Site: Bank Stream Site
Prepared By: Mac Haupt
Sponsor/Provider: Resource Environmental Solutions
Meeting Type: Preliminary Site Review
County: Yadkin
Action ID: SAW -2017-01466
Basin and HUC: Yadkin - 03040101
Project Name: Green Mesa- RES Yadkin 01
Coordinates: 36.2132 1 °N -80.7182 °W
Attendees:
USACE-Kim Browning
NCDWR-Mac Haupt
NCWRC- Andrea Leslie, Olivia
RES -Brad, Cara, David
Notes, Sketch, etc.:
Kim's Office Review:
*Concern regarding break in buffer along reach FF1-D and FF4; The way the easement is drawn the buffer won't be
wide enough in some areas.
*FF1-B and FF3-B appear to flow into a pond, question regarding benefit of project.
*Difference in Ell, EIII, and P?? Proposed: R 1:1, E1 1.5:1, Ell 2.5:1, EIII 5:1, P 10:1
My Field Review:
FF1-A: Ell- my map had 2.5:1 here
FF1-B: EIII- did not have a note on my map, go with 5:1 with justification
FF1-C: Ell -bottom part either no credit or move channel, constraints of road and power line, moving better for system
FF1-D: R- powerline constraint, restoration ok, they will try and have more of a perpendicular crossing. The channel is
incised with a single tree buffer with plenty of floodplain to work with.
FF2: P- DWR could go with 7.5:1 here but would rather see the upper portion (above crossing at top) to be fenced
out. RES should try to get this reach if possible.
FF3-A: Ell- should be combined with FF3B, 7.5:1, planting on right bank, a lot of privet at bottom
FF3-B: EIII- combine with FF3A- make it all 7.5:1
FF4: R- not too bad to rock outcrop, Kim commented on buffer width given current alignment with power line
FFS: EIII- planting edge of right buffer, 7.5-8:1 at least, exotic removal
Action Items:
Page 1

Notes, Sketch, etc.:
Page 2