20060677 Ver 1_Complete File_20060606

O?O? W A T ?RQG

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 1, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0677
Wake and Johnston County
Mr. Scott Saylor
North Carolina Railroad Company
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Subject Property: Auburn, NC Sidings
White Oak Creek [03020201, 27-43-11, C NSW]
Little Creek [03020201, 27-43-12, C NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Saylor:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.61 acres of wetland, 319 linear feet of stream, and 20,365 SF of protected
riparian buffer (14,397 SF of Zone 1 and 5,968 SF of Zone 2) for the purpose of constructing the above-
referenced, as described within your application dated April 21, 2006, and received by the N.C. Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) on April 24, 2006 and additional information received on May 25 and 30, 2006.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide
Permit(s) NW14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as
your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment
Control, and Non-discharge regulations. This approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to
conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404
Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h).
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached Water Quality
Certification (General Certification) and the following Additional Conditions:
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htik';!!h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands
NNOcn tttCaro?'
'qtU
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Auburn, NC Sidings
Page 2 of 5
June 1, 2006
The Additional Conditions of this Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved and Compensatory Mitigation
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions
of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are approved
including incidental impacts.
Under the requirements of this General Certification and Authorization Certificate (15A NCAC 2B
.0242), you are required to mitigate for these impacts. The restoration component of your mitigation
plan was propos6d within your application materials as described in the table below. We understand
that you wish to make a payment to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this
mitigation requirement. DWQ has received a letter from EEP verifying acceptance of these impacts into
their mitigation program. The attached impact and mitigation summary may be used to make payment
to the EEP. The check should be made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office.
The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into a
restoration fund. For accounting purposes, the following compensatory mitigation may be
requested of the Stream and Buffer Restoration Funds to meet the conditions of the 404 Permit at
the discretion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:
Impact Type Amount nits Mitigation Referenc
404 Wetland 0.61 acres 0.61 ac. PCN page 8 of 13
Stream 319 linear feet 319 linear feet PCN page 9 of 13
Buffers Zone 1 14,397 SF 43,191 SF PCN page 12 of 13
Buffers Zone 2 5,968 SF 8,952 SF PCN page 12 of 13
Total Buffers 20,365 SF 52,143 SF
Until the EEP receives and clears your check, no impacts specified in this Water Quality Certification
and Authorization Certificate shall occur. You have one (1) month from the date of this approval to
make this payment.
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind, shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
Auburn, NC Sidings
Page 3 of 5
June 1, 2006
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or
similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer,
wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233
and GC 3404.
5. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are
not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be
designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-
established or, if new pipes are installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the stream up
or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions,
pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow
passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including
temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-
equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be maintained if
requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must
be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is necessary, it
shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to
adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Auburn, NC Sidings
Page 4 of 5
June 1, 2006
6. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO 10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an NPDES
General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the
project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing construction
activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this permit
[applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance with permit
conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting
requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
httn://h2v.enr.state.nc.us/,su/Fornis Documents.htm.;
7. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at
the letterhead address within ten (10) days of the commencement of construction.
8. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands
Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please send photographs
upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation along with the
Certificate of Completion form.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
Auburn, NC Sidings
Page 5 of 5
June 1, 2006
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse Riparian Buffer Protection Rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you
have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-733-1786.
Si rely
1
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cvdw
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
NC EEP-Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
cc: Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience Corp., 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
NCEEP
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 060677AubumSidings(Johnston)EXP+401NBR EEP
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse Buffer Authorization
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, North Carolina Railroad Company has permission as
outlined below to impact 319 linear feet of streams, 0.61 acres of wetlands, and 20,365 square
feet of protected riparian buffer for the purpose(s) of constructing the proposed Auburn, NC
Sidings project in Wake and Johnston Counties. All activities associated with these authorized
impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached transmittal letter. THIS
CERTIFICATION AND BUFFER AUTHORIZATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE
ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS-NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM (NC EEP)
DWQ Project No:
LOCATION:
COUNTY
BASIN/ SUB BASIN/ INDEX
EXP 06-0677
Auburn, NC
Wake and Johnston
03-02-02/ [27-43-11 and 27-43-12]
As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0500, and the conditions of this Certification and Neuse Buffer
Authorization, you are required to compensate for the above impacts through the restoration,
creation, enhancement or preservation of surface waters and riparian buffers as outlined below
prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments; linear foot requirements must be
rounded up to the nearest foot according to 15A NCAC 2R.0503(b).
Impacts Mitigation
3191f stream 319 if of streams
0.61 acres wetlands 0.61 acres of wetlands * may be required b USACE
14,397 SF Zone 1 43,191 SF Zone 1 Buffers
5,968 SF Zone 2 8,952 SF Zone 2 Buffers
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] Internet: hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/110% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally
Auburn Sidings
Page 2 of 2
June 1, 2006
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is
through the payment of a fee to the NC EEP per 15A NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option,
please sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at the address below.
An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form.
PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE
NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM
ENHANCMENT PROGRAM.
Signature:
Date:
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
Filename: 060677Auburn Sidings (Johnston)EXP EEP
WAT?R?G
O Y
NC Railroad Company
Attn: Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, Y.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 17, 2006
DWQ EXP# 06-0677v2
Wake and Johnston County
Subject Property: Auburn, NC Sidings
This letter is in response to the July 14, 2006 correspondence by Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience, Inc.,
requesting approval to use a plunge pool structure at Stream 2 of the subject project. The Division of
Water Quality understands that this will result in additional impacts and that this is necessary in order to
satisfy the requirements of the NC Division of Land Quality. DWQ will approve the use of this structure.
However, a modification to the 401 Water Quality Certification and Riparian Buffer Authorization issued
on June 1, 2006 will be necessary.
This letter only addresses the ability to use plunge pool structures and does not approve any activity
within the buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters
of the State. If you have any questions, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.715.3473.
Sincerely,
Cyndi B. Karoly, Manager
401 / Express Review Oversite Unit
CBK/cvdw
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Field Office
Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience, Inc., 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
File Copy
Central Files
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hup h',, cm suite m: u, ne\?Cdand.
None hCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 5011,, Recycled/1W, Post Consumer Paper
O?O? I NA T ?RQG
NC Railroad Company
Attn: Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 17, 2006
DWQ EXP# 06-0677v2
Wake and Johnston County
Subject Property: Auburn, NC Sidings
This letter is in response to the July 14, 2006 correspondence by Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience, Inc.,
requesting approval to use a plunge pool structure at Stream 2 of the subject project. The Division of
Water Quality understands that this will result in additional impacts and that this is necessary in order to
satisfy the requirements of the NC Division of Land Quality. DWQ will approve the use of this structure.
However, a modification to the 401 Water Quality Certification and Riparian Buffer Authorization issued
on June 1, 2006 will be necessary.
This letter only addresses the ability to use plunge pool structures and does not approve any activity
within the buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters
of the State. If you have any questions, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.715.3473.
Sincerely,
Cyndi B. Karoly, Manager
401 / Express Review Oversite Unit
CBK/cvdw
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Field Office
Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience, Inc., 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
File Copy
Central Files
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http: h '-o cm state nc Lis;ncsvctland:
One
NhCarolma
Natumlly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 50°6, Recycled/1W,,, Post Consumer Paper
W A T ?RQG
July 13, 2006
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
NC Railroad Company
Attn: Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Project Name: Auburn, NC Sidings
Wake + Johnson County
On July 12, 2006, the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a request
from Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience Inc., regarding a project known as "Auburn, NC Sidings" for acceptance into
the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the Express Review
Program once the following items are received:
1) The application fee of $2000.00 [for a Modification to the 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse
Riparian Buffer Authorization services], made payable to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality;
2) Five (5) completed copies of the PCN Application and all supporting information
3) One (1) copy of the Addendum to the PCN Application form.
Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed application package
and required fee are received. If the services required exceed those indicated on the initial interest form, you may
be required to remit an additional fee.
Please arrange the site visit through Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473.
Sincerely,
Cyndi B. Karoly
CBK/cvdw
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience, Inc., 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX[phone] Internet:hitp h-'o.cnr.statc.nc.u5nc?tictlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
N r hCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
i
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval (s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 Verified
If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information U[2@90WINI
1. Owner/Applicant Information APR 2 4 2006
Name: Scott Saylor, North Carolina Railroad Compoauy1,
Mailing Address: 2809 Highwoods Boulevard, Suite 100 *ETL4N6?A?VDSTOR= AITY
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
,Q
Telephone Number: 919-954-7601 Fax Number: 919-954-7099
E-mail Address: ssaylor(a ncrr.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Elizabeth Scherrer
Company Affiliation: EcoScience Corporation
Mailing Address: 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
?alei;?h; NEB
Telephone Number: 919-828-3433 Fax Number: 919-828-3518
E-mail Address: scherrer a ecosciencenc.com
DWQ No. EX
Form Version March 05
O 6 - O to,)*-)
t;pdated IP1/2005
Page 5 of 10
111. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers frill-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Auburn, NC Sidings
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A. NCRR project.
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A. Railway right-of-way.
4. Location
County: Wake and Johnston Nearest Town: Clayton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A. Not in a subdivision.
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Corridor extends along
the Norfolk Southern track roughly parallel to US Highway 70 in Wake and Johnston
Counties It begins at Auburn Knightdale Road (SR 2555) approximately 4.8 miles
northwest of the Clayton N.C. city limits and extends to the southeast approximately 3.7
miles The project's southeastern end is approximately 1.3 miles northwest of the Clayton
city limits or 0.8 mile west of Shotwell Road (SR 1553).
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): (see attached sheet) °N (see attached sheet)°W
6. Property size (acres): N/A Property is a 19,377-foot length of railroad siding with a 200-
foot-wide right-of-way.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: White Oak Creek (Austin Pond) 27-43-11 (C
NSW); Little Creels 27-43-12 (C NSW)
8. River Basin: Neuse (NEU2)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:/,/h2o.enr.state. nc.Us/admin/maps/.)
Updated 11/1%2005
Page 6 of 10
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site conditions are generally disturbed, but forested pockets
of various sized occur throughout the corridor, especially at wetland and stream sites. Land
use consists of scattered residential development agriculture, a few commercial or industrial
establishments and small to moderately-sized woodlots. None of the project corridor occurs
within municipality limits.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: From the
western end of the project corridor (at Auburn Knightdale Road) a new siding will be
installed on the south side of the existing track for a distance of 8,824 feet (to the intersection
of the rail bed with Guy Road). Beginning approximately 689 feet east of Guy Road, a new
main track will be built on the north side of the existing track and extend east for
proximately 8,730 feet. Another new siding will be built on the south side of the rail bed,
beginning approximately 6,500 feet west of Guy Road and extending approximately 3,719
feet to the end of the project limits. Existing undersized stone or pipe culverts will be
abandoned and grout filled; new adjacent pipes will be installed by the jack and bore method.
Where possible existing stone culverts will be inserted with steel pipes that extend under the
new rail bed or existing concrete or steel culverts will be extended. Most of the new culverts
will be finished with headwalls. Parallel culverts will be installed under three farm road
crossings east of Guy Road. New turnout signals will be added where needed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: This rail corridor provides a vital rail link to
eastern North Carolina and the NC State Port at Morehead City. Several major industries in
this portion of the state depend upon rail freight service to meet their operational needs In
addition this portion of the NCRR Corridor includes intercity rail passenger service
connecting Richmond VA and points north to Raleigh, Charlotte and other southeastern
destinations. The additional rail traffic on this corridor has imposed a need for locations
where trains may safely pass. Currently there are no sidings of sufficient length between
Raleigh and Selma a distance of 35 miles at which to pass freight trains, which are often
10,000 feet long. This project will provide the ability to safely pass trains at locations
between Raleigh and Selma.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date pen-nits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A. No prior permits or determinations.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 10
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A No future project plans.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: See attached sheet.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
cenarately list impacts due to hoth structure and floodint?.
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,

herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodpl
ain
(yes/ 0) Distance to
Nearest

Stream (linear
feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)
Wetland 1 fill; new culvert installation forested no 0 0.005
Wetland 2 fill; new culvert installation forested no 0 0.038
Wetland 3 fill; culvert extension forested es 0 0.029
Wetland 4 fill; new culvert installation scrub-shrub no 0 0.019
Wetland 5 fill; riprap; new culvert
installation scrub-shrub yes 0 0.051
Wetland 6 fill; new culvert installation scrub-shrub no 1980 0.056
Wetland 7 fill forested 110 670 0.109
Wetland 8 fill; culvert extension forested no 0 0.213
Wetland 9 fill; culvert extension forested no 1850 0.064
Wetland 10 fill; new culvert installation forested no 1750 0.079
Wetland 11 fill, culvert extension scrub-shrub no 1880 0.009
Wetland 12 fill; culvert extension forested no 1150 0.008
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.61
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.0 acres
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 10
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
mu-,t he. included. To calculate acreage. multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average Stream
Width Before
Impact Impact
Length
linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Stream 1 UT to White Oak Creek culvert replacement perennial 3 feet 80 0.01
Stream 2 UT to White Oak Creek culvert extension perennial 8 feet 48 0.02
Stream 3 UT to White Oak Creek culvert replacement intermittent 3 feet 68 0.00
Stream 4 UT to White Oak Creek culvert replacement perennial 20 feet 87 0.06
Stream 5 UT to Little Creek culvert extension perennial 8 feet 36 0.01

Total Stream Impact b length and acreage) 319 0.10
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill excavation- dredving_ flooding. drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
None None None None None
I

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.10
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.61
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
E
J
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) I
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 319
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If constriction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 10
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A. No pond construction is proposed.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The North Carolina Railroad
Company needs to construct rail sidings long enough to accommodate trains at least 5,000 feet in
length, and also allow stopping distance on the siding. Each siding must be located where it will
not obstruct a paved roadway crossing, which would impede automotive traffic and emergency
vehicles. These considerations restrict the placement of the project, particularly in the semi-
developed area of Auburn.
Widening, of the rail bed will result in unavoidable stream and wetland impacts. Crossings will
be constructed using culvert extensions, where possible. Many existing culverts are either
undersized or are built of stone and cannot be extended. In these cases new culverts will be
installed using the jack and bore method to minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas.
Construction of the new sidings and main track to either side of the existing rail bed would not
result in lesser impacts to wetlands or streams.
The developer feels that the most efficient and practicable design solution is proposed, as well
as the least damaging.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 10
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
lhttp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.lltml.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A Mitigation is proposed through NC EEP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.statc.nc.us/wrp/index.ii.tni. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 319 linear feet
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 20,365 square feet
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.40 acre
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.21 acre
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) fiends or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 10
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1, Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 14,397 3 (2 for Catawba) 43,191
2 5,968 1.5 8,952
Total I 20,365 I 1 52,143
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Payment will be made to the EEP.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The project corridor is 19,377 feet long with a
200-foot rieht-of-wav (89.0 acres). There will be a net increasein_impervious surface of 6.35
acres. Impervious surface will increase from 14.6 percent to 21.7 percent.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 10
Sedimentation and erosion control plans have been submitted to the NCDENR Division of
Land Resources Approval of the plans are on hold pendingLNCDWQ approval of impacts to
Neuse River buffers A cony of a letter from the Division of Land Resources is attached.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A No wastewater will be generated.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: N/A
No future development is anticipated as a result of this project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
(9rta?oi?7 5?twv c;
Elizabeth Scherrer EcoScience Corporation (Agent)
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 10
NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
C O M P A N Y
February 1, 2006
E_ yc p o to - o 1. 1'1
RE: Agent Authorization for
The preparation and submittal of permits with regard to
NCRR Raleigh to Selma Projects
To Whom It May Concern:
D
?n
? U?gPR??ZO U
'zaNask ?'qr ?6
By copy of this letter, let it be known that Elizabeth Scherrer of EcoScience Corporation, 1101
Haynes Street, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina is hereby authorized by the North Carolina
Railroad Company to act as the Agent in the preparation and submittal of permit applications
and certifications with regard to the above-mentioned projects.
Sincerely,
Scott Saylor,
President-NCR
Cc: Enrico Roque, HNTB North Carolina, PC
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1000
919 - 954 - 7601 phone / 919 - 954 - 7099 fax
PROJECT: TITLE: N Scale: Date: FIGURE
NOR 1'I I ('.AkCN INA
It A I L I tOA I) NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
., AUBURN SIDINGS 1" = 2000' MAR 200 HNTB
Wake and Johnston Counties, North Carolina PROJECT LOCATION Drawn By: ESC Project No:
ES 06-290
I
y til ami �htdE
Ut Apburt
70
,
yam''— •� ' l ��� 1.
• 1 i •� • Tow r l
2000 0 2000 4000 Feet
i
YSource: Garner (1993), and Clayton (1993) USGS quadrangles /J/' ' '
_ NOK'I'l 1 (:AIMI.INA PROJECT: TITLE: N Scale: Date: FIGURE
RAI LP,0AD NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
u ,,, ,. ,, ., , 1"=2000' MAR 200
AUBURN SIDINGS PROJECT LOCATION
HNTB Drawn By: ESC Project No:
Wake and Johnston Counties, North Carolina
ES 06-290
Y..,•.I _ •77
��
Q.
u `,\
`w
Proect locatlon
�T
f w
,
�� �• I �-..r' r '��''.�: a� 1
,WIt
tl
� LLL
IN
jail
TO rrtM� f
I . Ptrk 1:
.eters .y.�_• y
STATE AGR1Ctl tR l
p i S �. • �� rt FNTA7A11I %V _
It (;AR01, A�3 AT Y(1 urIt
Na
j3 A

! ' l,cr1cv F xl,tc 1 I i ``If ?a w RII
\e to 4 ll G n\
?` k.r1 \ l I prC 7qa: 1Xn82 ??? ai'"M ql k0? 17P
V 7. ( \F?/`? 1 APC
?i ( h v t? ??? , y p ?(„l l FB I APB fA
N ?' ?? TT.1 t
1 1 8?? ?? h6'? a?< ?? ?? IJc6 7 C _ y V
I, Au6Z ^94? ,('.e9 .v, Mt. 0 lNC Vi( / i
\ > 1 I / v ?• Lc0 T
1 JV@) ^ wmE ? CuF `1 ( ()
Stream 2 ur nr , r V 4
^F? ?! ?.?• Y a?? ?, ?i• LGC 1 ?.-?
perennial p B2 I Y .t Ar32 1 I ??
?`' r '1?t2 of P ri c ?. G Wm62 'rim 32 D2 E
,pt:32
` I
I1 i'^, ' c9; ! ?i a.. ' -?1' ?D'll? JuS f 1? ?GB mC2 3y62 Du61 1. m
` r. \ 61e r 7 r? 'IrrT ,y/ !. arm. ?, I r ?? w--??,r + ,
Aubwn 1 , 11? ( a J ?? / , ,' TI Ci. y ?i? sE / L?^NmF e'm03 m i'
111 \? B...C. r
61a A 32?
t t'.11A ?t A
uB 1,F
1, ( j ut_ ?Pl I ?:I 1 yf" 1vm62 P pf i?? /? . 1 v:
?i J (?I 8t. L;. J 6 F ayf b\ J )
1?\ 1 I ltvm y cU 9 0 ;jv / oE) I \
t`Il?l I IF? / h L?\??fiF C? ?? I'` I. JmC ?Lcg?`\` j JI'
(Nrr ! D.C? LoC
perennial '+t- ''. , CtC°f t ,\ri f ( No Stream4 3F,?j g ^Gu3 FPCJJ(?} 1 ?? }' Lr pY .. I I luBZ 1
f 1 't
„?tt ( perennial f
AP \ ? ,I / , 1 ?g1C'` 1NrC g ?v; 1 1
If- - ? ?. ` ? nI. , [),C '?A
ApA? nC 1 ?ce+ _ lYtiB1 ?'I / E' )q, ?. q ` ! N'mD2
B`L i r,`?\. ????_?^'?';/ n'm6% 3 ?• /!I ''. fi Yim6.. V - _AO8-I
Dub .? /? l 1 - /'' ?I n 'rVmB. 3 ?.. /v V - u AL7
! PCy
J ?.?' '? ( vln'- I WmE ? Y'mC. APB A
K
?? }? j r ?J? r.1 Ali r - Nc6 ?J `r? y VmfS I oa° ' J.: WmC2 + `', ( 4?-'.
' ?\ I Stream 3 ! 3, a1 ? i wmbr 1 J
int - n 8t +A6ri L!+ - Wm62 I(' ` A
interm /
v.?6 4pc2 ?uK2 ( it ,rrC J
Cry J/ F a e
p lT r , ' NhE I d r l (AC ApC2 y
1\ I ' AP i- 2 `\ J 4 t? r I' V
`wmA l 1
`
1"a}??•'I , ?r?3' I \ r,`? i a: ,, ?, . qe 1 t ` :..-? Jr11 _.. ?•?.
I
l g .??T r Hr J A J l? l P1oR ?!/?' 8 ?? ECG c9 w B J r 'l \
P \ ?V Nm
?? V?ti'd ,A,?•?'??1 (? ?` f/rLv.B Lou `*mC2
?;? • "?• 1 ?1 r 1
p" i1i1 1 1 iti1e? 1cuF? '.?cr`'il SOC. ;.y1IR2 nV I' /'? ??i?1'•
?: X11 A962 A682? 2 r S I .j
?? 1 ????!11 ?l nL IM.??MnB..! 40E° ??\•?? ?l?ii;l? 9q! n !- Lo(-,
R2 ti1k 1 'NmCt, 00lv?! AGC2 4 JVud{?_ 1 _map 80
J?/ 7 +r l
h , >>
P Aob ' WAD
2 v I / rr>ap94 a it
V 4? 4pf g
map 79 \', C?'C Nnr (, !NC 4?1 _ ,1 J1YmF.^ F T ?_?y? C{ h,\ I ' Y,o
- c• it tio? ?-? I? C 1? ?? ?/'- } Y? `
L I aB ?I 1 PiaB\?2 Nob ^? \1 vle8 1y": C? i
i 2 r o' T<i+ \
\ I AP A! r\` r \ J ?T' WGa %? Y aC` ../ 1y 3Y0B ,`t1 Yk 1a 1
map 87 i
icy ??,); A vor Nc9 V \\ ?'
?? 111 ! t t? o APB Ps
r?? LoGri ioCt 1 \ ,I \ L ?? `WmD2 \i' 1 t'? 40r 4
I_,.
!. ?lYmC2 1 "?_ ?' Ra ti ?N.a
N'aB Nat$ `' w1 'h NpB D62
.? f1i ,, Ap62 • ?l ,?o l ? \. ? I , ••? d o WOR? ?? ???? ? ? ?;. ? {? Y:sC /^? ry / ?r. ?voG? ? ? ?? „? N/ ?, ?1 1
r I ( Y7r.C , C ` e$ `\` ?'N,:B vr6
to A
N
Little Creek hea iwate a`aPO ! ':' r \ )A
i r'. 1 j 1v ae :?? ? ? ? !1 ? ???9 ?`Ps I• i. ^ ?J '' NoEVv
;ARE
1l, )n, ti ( (" Ym( fac :, ro 1 x ~?t 1?_` pa / /' k Pd \
a ticD2 /° ?, oI 1 Wa8 P Psi 'JOB '?, ''Yrr6
R
Y / re Yv82 ?.? J ?t ,
A LABj ? ?J?,
V J l k 8
y l [1
o8`: r A F? i ?, / j
q ` -
, Il?' I i•+.? ' . .,-9b Nor.
1 AM
8 ;. A F f .z v/ ... r lr. a' r 1 hoc: ?'\ ! ?? \.- •.
lmf A r...'< !?° o' ) Ma ?? N ?'' . gAoE vraD l }" f? j! 14 ?)No61 -oP
j !vo t. ? a 1 #Fj,.
MR
Mlrt'31 C
! ifR I r n YImD2 ` r `u ( 1\ Nob i, ?? / 1voF t
1cBt
C'I`' 111 '1 Any W:nf.? ab II y ` rte.` 1't /
Nob Nc s 1 J Fa r Ft •+J V,B r'
A:i C,
\ rh.mD?! It !` Z. : i.? ?^ ! r +j ?¢` , P.32 'N- J PS VIC[
` ! . ?,1''B '-ter t {. ;+
a_` I4F o"J FI X? Lr R 3.
L` ?''?i9 A'rC2 NeP, R9 a 'N l 4 °G 'k6
1 ?t 1\ An I I WmB ?'Ne T I f ' \ k r<_ rrc? r I-- r
`q
?.' w ?dLoC?? \ .? I ?HO?. ! r % r i ???,TSt I1 r1 1 FuA
r .vJ J:R?V r` ?. - J {y i? ., 3 ??._r' .{ -,4NeA ???? yp?,? '• ?.?'.° .vaE?' ?,? (? ra ` t I '?? '? :?,
Lill
"? tr
( r 3n 1 I . J 1 V,o l Ii !?L f fl9 tcF Aa8 (v \
ma 1
1 `ct ?; r . ,? map 13: t
AL D
1Jci,_?3 yts'154/ %P
N No Scale FIGURE
PROJECT: TITLE: Scale:
RAILROAD NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY Date:
WAKE AND JOHNSTON COUNTY March Zoos
- , " P a \ } RVEYS Dwn By:
AUBURN SIDINGS SCS SOIL Su
HNTB Source: Wake County (1970) SCS Soil Surv?; ?.?
Wake and Johnston Counties, North Carolina Johnston County 1
PROJGC- TIT[ F N scale oats: FIGURE
NORTH CAROLINA SIDINGS OAD COMPANY JURISDICTIONAL AREAS 1" = 2000' MAR 200
Drawn By: ESC Project No: 3
HNTB Wake and Johnsotn Counties, North Carolina
ES 06-290
- -- —1---f`•1\ &-1-1. /-,t, - r. A / I � - I . -, V. �B
, , . -77,F( -,r I I—
TP-1 C — ,
A 0C
t.E 'AP A113
hr,
og,
N
�z
w
N
Olt
C�e 3
A032 1 4— LCL wrnE
W
or•
Stream 2 .44; E 2
perennial A-
AV82
r im t
A�5 U2 :)2
v.m—
DE3
W FZ
AD
win
Aubvm
A
Mt FA r D-1 ll
Apt) B
14 Imn B
%qw B
lr X-2
A,
Stream i
:perennial
J1 h Stream 4, -7 LoC
N -f�4
C)c , , , ) /, I �� A,82 oc N�
r, perennial Ir f I— I f ,
(y L&
re 0
APB;
Affffff
E)US frPB2 B WmD2
l W —� 0.nK
Vin -2
IV
"Ir
V, kPC2
-1� N �CB )-' -, /n l — 0i6ce
E�
Ap:-
L
iv -1h
Stream 3
intermittent
'
P� W"MG ^t"APB E
C
WmR2
b
AIB i.
L
-r WC, —2
wfinc? y !% - __ 1. 4
LwE N 7
MOB
-7
API
k Me
r FQ
PC? A982
-7
Q map 80,
Cq. L
AJ:C2
A
A,a LOD
I\Dc
Ell
Ac WoB LNmap 87 S' t,41�4z
NOR
lf'4 0
tr
ts.-
'Id J z3 No
N
O.D Apb I
N%02
r WrnU2
NCEI
U� Ikb
.4cA ',:t -- -
WaB NO P 't;., t
A-,ia2 ro,
140
L
? \wac
0
Little Creek headwa
ARE
(,.Gc
7-15
Ar,
cc
/1rrr2 AP
V 11 r—r2 Y
Apfll�
LI/
LDB(
8LO
N 6 1,,
AfA -VI
AQ
32
ZVI
'A -1 c?
;Xitis y
I Y� 4N " J tl PS
N01UH C.,VROLINIA
RAILROAD
C () M P lk N Y
PROJECT:
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
AUBURN SIDINGS
Wake and Johnston Counties, North Carolina
I I .V --A, -- \ �7sli
W.R PIE-_
RAJ Ly
0 1� 0 I
S sapf
�
NCB2 / " 11:�
:i `XB
re :a I.E S
1
-13b Ge.
Ma
NnA
NoA
N0Cs r,4 N
Rn 2; 1 1
I I
z r6 4? NOB V/l a . 6
o NOD
Ps
l L:�uA V 63 3b
I aBz,�-�
TITLE:
WAKE AND JOHNSTON COUNTY
SCS SOIL SURVEYS
Source: Wake County (1970) SCS Soil Survey (scale: 1:15840)
Johnston County (1994) SCS Soil Survey (scale: 1:24000)
X�7L. I A 3
map 13
No Scale
Date:
March 2006
Dwn By:
ES
ESC Project No.: 06-290
FIGURE
2

v-
4J
1 Stream 1
+u "" I Wetlands 1& 2 Stream 2
Wetland 3 v
i Z
w f
'r'at° .

?
s

Vi J
44
+
i Stream3
. Wetland 4
r
F

r ?
J ; : Stroarn A y?ri' Wetland 6
Wetland 5+C
f
"rte " ?
r e

Feature 5 *{ + P

Feature 6

' (Little Creek H eadwaters)
? ?. _
4 n t •t o-

a ? 1 M f a!, r ?9r. w r?i'?,;, 1+5? ;•??L??
r? F
N Wetlands
N Streams Source: 2001 Johnston County Orthophoto
Wake County 1999 Orthophotos
2000 0 2000 4000 Feet
C Awt
HNTB_
PRCJLC-
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
AUBURN SIDINGS
Wake and Johnsotn Counties, North Carolina

t) :i: ?° f fLu Feature 9 f y

I

Wetland 9 I
A ?

...: •_ t (land 10

Wetland
We
tland 11

Wetland 12

%
fY' ,
1
t f p.
.f #P ;
TITLE: N Scale Pato
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS 1"=2000' MAR 200
Drawn By: ESC Project No:
ES 06-290
STREAM
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT: 2,253 FT 2
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 934 FT2
STREAM IMPACT: 48 LF & 1,047 FT2
RIGHT-OF-WAY
3
0
U
LIMITS OF
4680+00 4685+00 CONSTRUCTION
_.._
---------------------------
-------------
--

- -

91°15'52"

ul

N - -.._.._.__-.._.._.._.._.---- -

ZONE=2 ..-
U ._..-. --------
--- e.._.._
Q1 ..- n
-
BUFFER -- ---- m
ONE 1 + + co
OFFER DITCH
3
W
w
cm)
RIGHT-OF-WAY WETLAND 3
0.01 ACRES w
STREAM 2
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 410 FT'

PLAN VIEW, STREAM 2 & WETLAND 3 = ° NOiiTI?(AR(-)LINA
LEGEND ?ILIZQAD
- ---- 1 C O AT P A N Y
F7T/Tl? WETLAND IMPACT UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION F
6 ???? HNTB NORTH CAROLINA )P. C,
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD
SUITE 260
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT C .
Raleigh. North Caro I i na 27609
-__... _ _..
-- STREAM LINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0
L 50' 100,
I
SHEET 2 OF 21

STREAM 3
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT: 3,615 FT'
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,535 FT 2
STREAM IMPACT: 68 LF & 208 FT 2
STREAM 4
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT: 3,271 FT z
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,208 FT 2
STREAM IMPACT: 87 LF & 2,787 FT 2
STREAM 4
-- DITCH 4
RIGHT-OF-WAY r I
i
4 .
.,4700+00
I [1 4,705+00
89°59'28"
- -- --
-------------------- --------------- ---
n Q,
-------------------
o.._......_.._.._.._.
n - m _ -
?
_ __ _________________
DITCH DITCH aD RIGHT-OF-WAY
!o m \ !,.
WETLAND 4 - 4
0.02 ACRES
WETLA5
STREAM 3 ¢ 0.01 ACRES
Vl
-j
WETLAND 4
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 700 FT'
PLAN VIEW, STREAMS 3 & 4, WETLANDS 4 & 5
LEGEND
F/_?'r,'/,I WETLANDIMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
v
L7??. ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT STREAM LINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50, 100•
LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
WETLAND 5
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 80 FT'
- RAILROAD
C O M 1' A N Y
HNTB 34HNT 3 BE. SORT ORKS ROAD NS J I P.C.
200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
3OF21
RIGHT-OF-WAY
6
v
v
4720+0p 2 +00 473
89°59'2'
--.._..----..---.._.._..---------..----.._..................... .._.._.._._.._.._.._.._.._.._..- --_----- -_----.._..-----------. - --..-- ---- ---- - ---.._._.
N
LIMITS OF
_ - - - E' CONSTRUCTION
N N
WETLAND 6 Co
6 0.06ACRES
RIGHT-OF-WAY
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 2,678 FT'
PLAN VIEW, WETLAND 6 N<?IZ TH7CTn?ROL?N,q
LEGEND - • z RAIL.-oAi:)
_...»,R. C O M P A N Y
J? 7 ??-?--
lL/ _L_Z , WETLAND IMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ???? HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P, C.
343 SI
ZONE. 1 BUFFER IMPACT a R.1 E. . X FORKS ROAD. SU 1 TE 200
STREAMLINE ei gri North Carolina 27609
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHI-OF-WAY 0 50' 100,
?? SHEET 4 OF 21
STREAM 5
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT: 2,378 FT 2
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,073 FT 2
STREAM IMPACT': 36 LF & 281 FT 2
RIGHT-OF-WAY
,...
STREAM 5 8 DITCH
LIMITS OF WETLAND 8
CONSTRUCTION 0.22 ACRES
6
477 + - - - ---- JIM ME im - -.._.._.._.---.._.._.._.._.._..--- -
b
0
8
RIGHT-OF-WAY
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 9,297 FT'
PLAN VIEW, STREAM 5 & WETLAND 8 NO1iTHCA1iOLINA
LEGEND •+ 'RAILROAD
C O M P A N Y
WETLAND IMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION b ???? 3 Ral 3T iE SII RX TFORKS RROLI OADN SUIE 200
egh, North Carolina 27609
® ZONE IBUFFER IMPACT STREAMLINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50, 100,
SHEET 6 OF 21
RIGHT-OF-WAY
--- DITCH
/ f- - DITCH
0 WETACRES LAND 9 -LIMITS OF WETLAND 10 10
CONSTRUCTION 0.08 ACRES
4 f o
_.._.._.. _-
89°27'35' --- 1 _ ............................. - - ?- - - --- - - - ----- - - --- -
90°51'27 -
9
10
RIGHT-OF-WAY
WETLAND 9 WETLAND 10
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 2,808 FT' AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 3,456 FT'
PLAN VIEW, WETLANDS 9 & 10 7NORI'HCAROLINA
L c o
N Y
LEGEND C0IILrvL r A A N v
WETLANDIMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ???? R. I HNTeiB gh, North th CC_ olAROLINA 2 P.7609C,
¦W¦ 343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
lna
F-? ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT STREAM LINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50, 100,
_ SHEET 7 OF 21
RIGHT-OF-WAY
11 WETLAND 11
0.01 ACRES LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
4810 + 93°27'14
+
-- --- --- -------- .. ......................
i.

i?
.
C;
O
11
RIGHT-OF-WAY
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 355 FT'
PLAN VIEW
WETLAND 11 NolrrH cnIi111.irvn

LEGEND ,
.1
=\ RAILROAD
-- C o 1v1 P A N Y
FIZZ= WETLAND IMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION y
b ???? 34T e, SII RX TFORKA ROADN SU E 200

ZONE I BUFF Ra l e i ell, Nor"tn Caro I i na 27609
I\\ ER IMPACT S7 REAM LINE
ZONE a BUFFER IMPACT' RIGHI.OF-WAY 0 50, 100,
? ? - °? - SHEET80F21
RIGHT-OF-WAY
12 LIMITS OF
WETLAND 12 CONSTRUCTION
_ 0.01 ACRES
------------------- ._..---- .. _.--..-..-.
------- .._.._.._.._..---- ...._.. - 4835+00
48.3)4
---------------- ------------ ------------- --
12
RIGHT-OF-WAY
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 313 FT'
PLAN VIEW, WETLAND 12'°NO1?T'-"?`'ROL"NA
LEGEND RAILROAD
TP7 '7Z WE.TLANUIMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION L ? ?? Ra I HNTBgr NorNORTH CAROLINA, P, C,
G??"'--- -343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 200
ei aro na
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPAI;T STREAM LINE C i 27609
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50' 100,
SHEET a OF 21
- - - - ------ PROPOSED ELEVATION '
r

335
330 ----?--; ,

325

320

315
40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW k;- . NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 2 ` 'C.MVANY
MNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
Raleigh, North Carol lna 27609
0 10, 2.0'
1
I
OF 21
- -- --- --- PROPOSED ELEVATION
320

310

300

290

d

280
270
40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW r. NC1?TH`"?Z°L`NA
- RAIL,IZOAD
AT WETLAND SITE 4 C 0 M P A N Y
343 E NORTH CAROLINA, P, 2
????343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
O 20' 40'
- -- SHEET 13 OF 21
---- - -- - PROPOSED ELEVATION
32.0.
I?

310

300

290

280
1
270
40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW *:" ^ NORTH C:AIZOLINA
RAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 5 - C O M P A N Y
HNTB 343 E NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.

???? ROAD. SUITE ZOO
343 E. SIX FORKS
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
0 20' 40'
- - --- SHEET 14 OF 21
- -- - ---- PROPOSED ELEVATION
365
360

-- ,,,--
------------
---
355
350
345
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW NORTH CAROLINA

AT WETLAND SITE 7 .? :!RAILROAD
` =\1C 0„ P A N V
NORTH CAROLINA,
??? 343E
E 2
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
0 10, 20'
-` - SHEET 16 OF 21
---- -- PROPOSED ELEVATION
365
360

;

355

350
345
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW , ,NC)P-THCAOA
AT WETLAND SITE 8 CllM1°ANY
MNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 20U
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
0 10' 20'
- ---- SHEET 17 OF 21
--- - - PROPOSED ELEVATION
365
I

f? I

360 Yom'

--------------
355
350
345
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW -:t NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 9 L'----? C Q M P A N V
HNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
Raleigh, North C-1;- 27609
0 10, 20'
- SHEET 18 OF 21
- -- PROPOSED ELEVATION
365
360

355 Y

350
345
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW r 4, N011-TH CAROLINA
.;; iRAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 10 ''jC 0 M Y A N V
??? 34
HNTB 3E NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
0 10' 20'
?'-° SHEET 19 OF 21
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Man Shaer. 0

PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4669+65 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 45 Deg Sta. 4669+65
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 332.09 ft DRAINAGE AREA 27.70 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW LIR EL= 332.09 ft EL = 332.09 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 314.13 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 32.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 314.13 ft
0100 DISCHARGE 51.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 315.06 ft
So = 1.0 %
INV. EL 311,33 ft INV. EL 310.04 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 130.0 fl OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 161 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 329.21 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Cliart 1.2 INV in = 311.33 INV out = 310.04
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV UPS) -
36 RCP 10 22.00 2.80 1.15 0.82 2.45 0.2 1.48 2.24 2.24 0.30 1.29 1.25 313.78 2.11 15.43 ft IC

36 RCP 25 32.00 2.80 1.41 0.93 2.80 0.2 1.83 2.41 2.41 0.64 1.29 1.76 314.13 4.53 15,08 ft - IC

36 RCP 100 51.00 2.80 1.80 1.24 3.73 0.2 2.40 2.70 2.70 1.61 1.29 3.03 315.06 7.2 2 14.15 ft - IC

36 RCP overtop 160,66
F -

2.80

3.16

5.76

17.29

0.2

2.70

2.85

3.16

16.01

1.29

17.88

329,21

22.73
I

0.00 ft - OC
NOTES: ` TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS --- -
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA = 4672+50
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 329.21
'31iOULDER EL at O1 STA= 329.21
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 2.80
100 YR HW = 3.73
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
Hail
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plori Shw)L 0
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05
SHEET
OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, INC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4683+22 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4683+22
SIZE 54 In
TYPE RCP CL EL = 320.05 ft DRAINAGE AREA 150.00 Sq Mi
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW UR EL= 320.05 ft EL = 320.05 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 303.51 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 130.00 cis
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 302.02 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 210.00 cfs
54
L RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 305.16 ft
So = 0.8
INV. EL 296.76 ft INV. EL 296.00 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 94.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 416 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 320.05 ft
54 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Apportdix A): HWYD from HDS-5, Chart 1,2 INV in = 296.76 INV out = 296.00
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) " `
54 RCP 10 94.00 6.75 2.44 0.96 4.33 0.2 2.85 3.67 3,67 0.83 0.76 3.75 301.09 5.91 18.96 ft - IC

54 RCP 25 130.00 6.75 2.86 1.17 5.26 0.2 3.45 3.97 3.97 1.59 0.76 4.81 302.02 8.17 18.03 It - IC

54 RCP 100 210.00 6.75 3.59 1.87 8.40 0.2 4.05 4.28 4.28 4.16 0.76 7.67 305.16 13.20 14.89 ft - IC

54 RCP overtop 416.03 6.75 4.91 5.18 23.29 0.2 4.05 4.28 4.91 16.32 0.76 20.46 320.05 26.16 0.00 ft - IC
NOTES: ' TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
?
--
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING Sl:A 4683+22
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVE-RTOPP'ING E:L = 320.05
SHOULDER EL it OT STA= 320.05
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: _ PROVIDE AND INSTALL
54 in RCP Class IV DESIGN HW = 5.26
100 YR HW = 8.40
OUTLET PROTECTION. TONS CLASS 1 RIP RAP, 24" THICK w! 90 SY FF ZONE 3 (FIG. 8.06.6.1) )
HDR
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Shect: D
PIPE DATA SHEET ,
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4700+12 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 50 Deg Sta. 4700+12
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 314.71 ft DRAINAGE AREA 15.30 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL= 314.71 ft EL = 314.71 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 287.00 fl DESIGN DISCHARGE 21.00 cts
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 284.85 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 34.00 cfs
36 RCP
0100 HW ELEVATION 285.37 fl
So = 1.5 %
INV. EL 282.50 ft INV. EL 280.00 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 168.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 214 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 314.71 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 282.50 INV out = 280.00
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE NO (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps)
36 RCP 10 15.00 -• 4.50 0.79 0.63 1.89 0.2 1.20 2.10 2.10 0.16 2.50 -0,24 284.39 2.12 30.32 ft - IC

36 RCP 25 21.00 -- 4.50 0.95 0.78 2.35 0.2 1.44 2.22 2.22 0.31 2.50 0.02 284.85 2.97 29.86 ft - IC

36 RCP 100 34.00 4.50 1.23 0.96 2.87 0.2 1.89 2.45 2.45 0.80 2.50 0.75 285.37 4.81 29.34 ft • IC

36 RCP overtop 213.57 4.50 312 9.62 28,85 0.2 2.70 2.85 3.12 31.59 2.50 32.22 314.72 30.21 -0.01 It - OC
NOTES: TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS -
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING ST.A 4700+12
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 314.71
SHOULDER EL at 01 SI'A= 314.71
°, "` INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class IV w/ Method B Inst
allation DESIGN HW = 2.35
100 YR HW = 2.87
OUTLET PROTECTION STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
HEIR
RALEIGH. NORI'H CAROLINA
Flan Shoot. 0

PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4704+26 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4704+26
SIZE 66 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 321.04 ft DRAINAGE AREA 443.00 Gq Mi
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW LIR EL= 321.04 it EL = 321.04 H DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL :7771_

HW. CONT. EL. \
287.33 ft
DESIGN DISCHARGE
320.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 284.42 ft
0100 DISCHARGE 510.00 cfs
Doubly 66 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 286.46 fl
So= 2.0 %
INV. EL 279.08 ft INV. EL 276.20 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 144.0 It OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 1713 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 321.04 ft
DOUI)IE 66 in RCP _
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 279.08 INV out = 276.20
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (Cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D12 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) -
66 RCP 10 115.00 - 8.25 3.74 0,88 4.83 0.2 2.93 4.22 4.22 0.58 2.88 1.92 283.91 4.64 37.13 ft - IC

66 RCP 25 160.00 8.25 4.36 0.97 5.34 0.2 3.55 4.52 4.52 1.12 2.88 2.77 284.42 0 73 36.62 ft - IC
1 1 1
66 RCP 100 255.00 8.25 5.37 1.34 7.38 0.2 4.68 5.09 5.37 2.85 2.88 5.34 286.46 10.73 34.58 ft - IC

66 RCP overtop 856.65 8.25 9.06 7.63 41.98 0.2 4.95 5.23 9.06 32.17 2.88 38.36 321.06 36.06 -0.02 It - IC
NOTES " TW BASED ON SINGLE ,:SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA =- 4704+31
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVER*l OPT71NG EL '- 321.04
SHOULDER EL at OT STA= 321.04
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL 66 in RCP Class IV w/ Method B Installation DESIGN HW = 5.34
100 YR HW = 7.38
OUTLET PROTECTION 173 TONS CLASS 2 RIP RAP, 36" THICK w/ 218 SY FF ( ZONE 7 (FIG. 8 06.6.1) ]
HEIR
RALEIGH, NORI H CAROLINA
I'Inn Shoet: 0
mm ume: t r Apr-QU
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4724+84 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4724+84
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 341.65 ft DRAINAGE AREA 13.10 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL = 341.65 It EL = 341.65 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 332.23 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 13.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION $29.49 it
0100 DISCHARGE 21.00 cfs
36 RCP
0100 HW ELEVATION 330.09 ft
So = 0.8 %
INV. EL 327.73 fi INV. EL 327.22 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 65.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 142 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 341.65 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 327.73 INV out = 327.22
SIZE RE Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps)
36 RCP F 9.10 4.50 0.71 0.48 1.45 0.2 0.93 1.96 1.96 0.04 0.51 1.50 329.23 1.29 12.42 It - OC

36 RCP 25 13.00 4,50 0.87 0.59 1.76 0.2 1.11 F2O 2.06 0.08 0.51 1.63 329.49 1.84 12.16 it - IC

36 RCP 100 21.00 4.50 1.13 0.79 2.36 0.2 1.44 2.22 2.22 0.22 0.51 1.93 330.09 2 97 11.56 ft - IC

36 RCP overtop 141.58 4.50 2.98 4.64 13.92 0.2 2.70 2.85 2.98 9.95 0.51 12.42 341.65 20.03 0.00 ft - IC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGLE: SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA = 4724+84
COMMENTS INDICATE-- HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 341.65
SHOULDER EL at 01 STA= 341
65
INLET HEADWATER CONIROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY .

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 1.76
100 YR HW = 2.36
OUTLET PROTECTION. STANDARD DERAIL IS GOOD
FIDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plon Shea(: 0
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12115/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4768+22 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4768+22
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 360.12 ft DRAINAGE AREA 36.10 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW LIR EL = 360.12 ft EL = 360.12 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 358.08 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 19.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 355.80 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 29.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 356.49 ft
So= 1.4 %
INV. EL 353.58 ft INV. EL 352.90 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500, Year
IN L= 47.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 86 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 360.12 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appandix A): HWi/D trom HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV In = 353.58 IN V out = 352.90
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMEN T'S
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps)
36 RCP 10 13.00 4.50 0.87 0.58 1.75 0.2 1.11 2.06 2.06 0.08 0.68 1.45 355.33 1.84 4.79 ft - IC

36 RCP 25 19.00 4.50 1.07 0.74 2.22 0.2 1.36 2.18 2.18 0.17 0.68 1.67 355.80 2.09 4.32 ft - IC

36 RCP 100 29.00 4.50 1.34 0.97 2.91 0.2 1.73 2.36 2.36 0.39 0.68 2.07 356.49 4.10 3.63 It - IC

36 RCP ovortop 86.21 4.50 2.34 2.18 6.54 D.2 2.70 2.85 2.85 3.44 0 360.12
L 2.20 0.00 ft - 1C
NOTES: TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS '^
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION, OVERTOPPING STA == 4768+22
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVER -1 OPPING EL = 360.12
SHOOLOER EL at 0I' S-rA= 360.12
INLET HEADWATER CONTROI.S FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN HW = 2.22
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDE AND INSTALL 36 in RCP Class 111 100 YR HW = 2.91
OUTLET PROTECTION- STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
14DR
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
I'Inn shoot 0
rnnt bare lr-nprub
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12115/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn. NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4778+00 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4778+00
SIZE 36 In
TYPE RCP CL EL = 360.07 ft DRAINAGE AREA 17.90 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW R/L EL= 360.07 it EL = 360.07 It DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 354.19 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 15.00 cis
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 351.59 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 25.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 352.35 ft
So = 1.1
INV. EL 349.04 ft INV. EL 349.69 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
OUT L= 61.0 It IN
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 118 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 360.07 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A):. HWi10 from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 349.69 INV out = 349.04
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) IAW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H L5o HW ELEV (fps) *"
36 RCP 10 11.00 4.50 0.79 0.53 1.60 0.2 1.02 2.01 2.01 0.06 0.65 1.42 351.29 1.5r, 8.78 ft - IC

36 RCP 25 15.00 - 4.50 0.94 0.63 1.90 0.2 1.20 2.10 2.10 0.11 0.65 1.56 351.59 2 12 8.48 ft - IC

36 RCP 100 25.00 4.50 1.24 0.89 2.66 0.2 1.59 2.29 2.29 0.31 0.65 1.95 352.35 3 54 7.72 ft - IC

L36 RCP overtop 118.30 4.50 2.73 3.46 10.38 0.2 2.70 2.85 2.85 6.84 0.65 9.04 360.07 16 74 0.00 ft - IC
NOTES: * TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
" HW BELOW INVFRT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA 4778+00
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL =? 360.07
S HOULDER El-at OT STAB 360.07
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 1.90
100 YR HW = 2.66
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL 13 GOOD
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Sheer. 0
Nnnl Uale: ' I / Hpr M
PIPE DA TA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4793+75 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4793+ 75
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 366.97 ft DRAINAGE AREA 16.00 Acre,
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL= 366.97 ft EL = 366.97 It DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 362.84 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 14.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 360.22 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 23.00 cfs
36 RCP
0100 HW ELEVATION 360.83 ft
So= 0.6 %
INV. EL 358.34 ft INV. EL 358.05 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 45.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 105 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 3497 fl
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 358.34 I NV out = 358.05
E FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
F
) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW

wM Ke do do+D12 ho
I H LSO HW
•t
ELEV
(fps)
3
E
RCP
10
10.
00

4.50

0.75

0.52

1.56

0.2

0.97

1.99

1.99

0.05

0.29

1.74

360.08

1.41

6.89 ft - OC

36 RCP 25 14.00 4.50 0.9D 0.62 1.86 0.2 116 2.08 2.08 0.09 0.29 1.88 360.22 1.98 6.75 It - OC

36 RCP 100 23.00 4.50 1.18 0.83 2.49 0.2 1.51 2.26 2.26 0.24 0.29 2.21 360.83 3.25 6.14 ft - IC

36 RCP overtop 104.82 4.50 2.57 2.88 8.63 0.2 2.70 2.85 2.85 5.04 0.29 7.60 366.97 14.83 0.00 ft - IC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA = 4793+75
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 366.97
SHOULDER EL at OT S'FA= 366
97
OUTLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY .

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: _ PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 1.88
100 YR HW = 2.49
OUTLET PROTECTION: S I ANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
Plarl Sheet: 0
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
-- I'TlW U113tw 11 Ap p M3
PIPE DA TA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4802+30 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4802+30
SIZE 36 In
TYPE RCP CL EL 360.31 ft DRAINAGE AREA 2.8.40 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w1 Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW LIR EL= 360,31 ft EL = 360.31 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 357.40 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 33.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 355.74 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 52.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 356.68 ft
So = 1.0 %
INV. EL 352.90 ft INV. EL 352.45 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 600+ Year
IN L= 44.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 104 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 359,78 It
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 352.90 INV out = 352.45
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET C DINT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps)
36 RCP 10 23.00 4.50 1.18 0.83 2.49 0.2 1.51 2.26 2.26 0.24 0.45 2.05 355.39 3.25 4.39 ft - IC

36 RCP 25 33.00 4.50 1.43 0.95 2.84 0.2 1.86 2.43 2.43 0.50 0.45 2.48 355.74 4.67 4.04 ft - IC

36 RCP 100 52.00 4.50 1.81 1.26 3.78 0.2 2.43 2.72 2.72 1.23 0.45 3,50 356.68 7.36 3.10 ft - IC

36 RCP overtop 103.61 4.50 2.56 2.83 8.48 0.2 2.70 2.85 2.85 4 90 0.45 7.30 361.38 14.66 -1.60 ft - IC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGLE-. SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION, OVERTOPPING STA - 4805+80
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 359.76
SHOULDER EL at OT STA7= 359.78
." «" INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 2.84
100 YR HW = 3.78
OUTLET PROTECTION. STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Shout: 0
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NO COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4814+01 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4814+01
SIZE 18 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 360.61 ft DRAINAGE AREA 8.00 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW R/L EL = 360.61 ft EL = 360.61 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD RATIONAL
HW. CONT. EL. 355.27 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 6.70 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 354.55 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 7.90 cfs
18 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 354.71 ft
So = 0.6 %
INV. EL 352.75 ft INV. EL 353.02 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
OUT L= 44.0 ft IN
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 26 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 360.61 ft
18 in RCP
Inlct Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-S, Chart 1.2 INV in = 353.02 1NV out = 352.75
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE NO (cfs) HW HW * HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo In
ELEV
(fps)
•'
*
18 RCP 10 6.00 2.25 0.56 0.96 1.44 0.2 0.94 1.22 1.22 0.34 0.27 1.29 354.46 3.40 6,15 ft - IC

18 RCP 25 6.70 2.25 0.60 1.02 1.53 0.2 1.00 1.25 1.25 0.42 0.27 1.40 354.55 3 79 6.06 ft - IC

18 RCP 100 7.90 2.25 0.65 1.13 1.69 0.2 1.11 1.30 1.30 0.58 0,27 1.62 354.71 4.47 5.90 ft - IC

18 RCP overtop 26.35 2.25 1.27 5,07 7.60 0.2 1.35 1.43 1.43 6.48 0.27 7.64 360.66 14.91 -0.05 ft - OC
NOTES: TW BASED ON SINGI.I-: Sf;CTION ANALYSIS
* HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA - 4814+01
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 360.61
S HOULDER EL at OT STA= 360.61
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: _ PROVIDE AND INSTALL
18 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 1.53
100 YR HW = 1.69
OUTLET PROTECTION STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
HDR
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Shoot: 0

PIPE DATA SHEET nFn
DATE 12115/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4830+31 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4830+31
SIZE 18 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 356.18 ft DRAINAGE AREA 7.80 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL= 356.18 ft EL = 356.18 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD RATIONAL
HW. CONT. EL. 348.82 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 6.50 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 348.07 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 7.70 cfs
18 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 348,23 ft
So = 0.7 %
INV. EL 346.57 ft INV. EL 346,09 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 65.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 31 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 356.18 ft
18 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HVdi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 346.57 INV out = 346.09
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D12 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) ." "
18 RCP 10 5.90 2.25 0.55 0.95 1.43 0.2 0.93 1.22 1.22 0.38 0.48 1.12 348.00 3.34 8.18 ft - IC

18 RCP 25 6.50 2.25 0.59 1.00 1.50 0.2 0.99 1.24 1.24 0.46 0.48 1.23 348.07 3.68 8.11 ft - IC

18 RCP 100 7.70 2.25 0.65 1.11 1.66 0.2 1.09 1.30 1.30 0.65 0.48 1.46 348.23 4.3G 7.95 ft - IC

18 RCP overtop 37.21 2.25 1.53 9.37 14.05 0.2 1.35 1.43 1.53 15.15 0.48 16.20 362.77 21,06 -6.59 ft - OC
NOTES: ' TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVER fOPPING STA = 4830+31
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVL-R LOPPING EL = 356.16
,SHOULDER ELM 01 STA= 356.16
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDE AND INSTALL
18 in RCP
Class 111 DESIGN HW = 1.50
100 YR HW = 1.66
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
Section 111.5. Site Coordinates
Wetland System Northing Eastin
Wetland 1 706776.6625 2134021.2430
Wetland 2 706704.2296 2134110.2104
Wetland 3 706563.5554 2135427.8366
Wetland 4 706108.8612 2137063.2594
Wetland 5 705938.0717 2137347.3497
Wetland 6 704998.5784 2139194.1409
Wetland 7 702736.5530 2142055.7930
Wetland 8 702006.4015 2143625.4983
Wetland 9 701399.3458 2144989.0546
Wetland 10 701101.5838 2145615.8508
Wetland 11 700560.6248 2146840.9555
Wetland 12 699983.6961 2148298.4993

Stream System Northing Eastin
Stream 1 706755.3918 2134053.4056
Stream 2 706573.1127 2135418.8078
Stream 3 706300.0782 2136938.5833
Stream 4 706017.8217 2137396.5399

e
.,_..... r .. .... --... _.....?.... ?"' 111
..I :, r.

+
T
_
I
j{y ) n ? Q

(jo r!
'J w++
a
_ . f . 3
' C Sri. e'.r.
HYDROLOGY
.._._ a Can+.i?-?
$.,cam +*< v m .1. K
..Way.
I

t
W o (

-va

i

Soil.":

M T T YV l Y '

USACE AID#
DWQ#
J?
Site# S I (TA/TD)
m i t STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. Evaluator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek 6. River basin: Ne
7. Approximate drainage area: 13.6 ac 8. Stream order: 1"
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.6915°N, 78.5495°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Auburn-Knightdale Rd., north of Us f Iwy 70, south of SR 1004
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg ppt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 45°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 1)% Residential % Commercial % Industrial 25% Agricultural
35% Forested 30% Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 2 - 4' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): P - 5'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 47 Comments:- upstream of culvert has had substrate, low flow, moderate
clari , freaquent meander, 0-2% slopes, downstream of culvert has sand/gravel substrate low flow, water depth of 6 inches moderate
clarity, occasional bends, and 0 to 2% slopes
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CHARACTERISTICS
1 Presence of flow persistent pools in stream
no flow or saturation= 0; strong flow = max points)
" 2 Evidence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration = 0: no alteration = max noints)
ECOREGION POINT RANGE, SCORE
Co;tstal Piedmont Mountain
0-5 0-4 0-5 2
0-6 0-5 0-5 4
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
"
extensive discharges = 0; no dischar Tes = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 2

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
no discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands, eta = max points)
?e 6 Presence of adjacent tloodplain 0- 4 0- 4 0
2 1
no flood lain = 0 extensive flood lain = max points) -
Entrenchment / floodplain access
7
(deeply entrenched= 0• frequent flooding = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-2 1
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
(no wetlands = 0' large ad
acent wetlands = max p
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points)

l0 Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive'de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
l 1 Size &'diversity of channel bed substrate
,1*
0-4
0-5
2
fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max-Points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0
5 4

(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) - 0- 0-5 2

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
severe erosion = 0• no erosion, stable banks = max points

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5

3
E- no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = max points)
U'
IS Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial impact =0• no evidence = rnax points)

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
3
F? no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
3
C. little or no habitat = 0, frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0
5
0
5
3
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points - -
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 o-4 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
0
r
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max oitits
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points

O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0--4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0- 5 3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 47
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3-9-06 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6915
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5495
Total Points: 31 Other: STREAM 1
Stream is at least intermittent County: Wake
if? 19 or perennial if>_ 30 e. g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
2. Sinuosity ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
7. Braided channel ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
9a. Natural levees ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
10. Headcuts ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
11. Grade controls ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ®
Yes = 3
?
Ivian-rnaue atones are nor rates, see ulscussrons in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 7 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
16. Leaflitter ? 1.5 ® 1 ? 0.5 ? 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No= 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 7)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ? 3 ® 2 ? 1 ? 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
22. Crayfish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
24. Fish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
25. Amphibians ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 ?; FACW = 0.75 ?;
Other= 0 OBL = 1.5 ?; SAV = 2.0 ?;
I lelll5 LU anu L I wcus Uri ore presence or uplana punts, item ty tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetiana plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
low flow, moderate clarity
USACE AID#
DWQ4
Site #.S2 (TB/TC)
LM STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. Evaluator's name: M. "Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06 4. Time of evaluation: 9 am
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 146 ac 8. Stream order:2°d
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100' 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.6907°N, 78.5442°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Auburn-Knightdale Rd., north of Us Hwy 70, south of SR1004
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg pot.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 45°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2.8 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20% Residential % Commercial
40% Forested
22. Bankfull width:
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
% Industrial 20% Agricultural
20% Cleared / Logged % Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4' - 5'
Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief' description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 50 Comments: gas sheen noted on water surface
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECO" ION POIN T RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS
E
SCORE
Coastal Piedmont ilXountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
1 no flow or saturation = 0• strop flow = max oints 0-5 0-4 0-5 4

2 Evidence of post human alteration
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5 3

3 Riparian zone
0-6
'0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges - max points " 0-5 0-4 0 4 1
5 Groundwater discharge

no discharge = 0• s prin s, seeps, wetlands. etc. = max points) 0-3 0-4 0-4 3

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
-
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints 4
0 0-4 0-2 1
>
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
" (deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-2 0
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands

no wetlands= 0• large adjacent wetlands = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)

10 Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
11 fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) ? ?* 0-4 0-5 3
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening

?•
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max oints) 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
H
13 Presence of major bank failures
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max-points)

0-5

0-5

0-5

2
Root depth and density on banks

H l4 no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw shout = max points 0-3 0-4 0__ 5 3

5 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points) - 5 0- 4 0-5 3

6 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
1 no riffles/ri les or pools= 0; Nvelkdevelo ed = max points) 0-3 0-5 0 6 3

17 Habitat complexity

little or no habitat= p; fi•e went varied habitats = max points)
0?-6
0-6 _
0-6
4

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
no shading ve etation = 0• continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0
4
0
5

no evidence= 0; common numerous types= max points) - - 0-5 0
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
O no evidence - 0; common, numerous types - max points)

CJ'
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
? no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- S 3
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter o on first page) 50
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/06 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6907
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5442
Total Points: 37 Other: STREAM 2
Stream is at least intermittent County: Wake
ifz 19 or perennial if? 30 e. g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1e. Continuous bed and bank ? 0 ? 1 ? 2 ® 3
2. Sinuosity ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
7. Braided channel ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
9a. Natural levees ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
10. Headcuts ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
11. Grade controls ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ?
Yes = 3
ivian-mace uncnes are not ratea, see aiscussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
16. Leaflitter ? 1.5 ® 1 ? 0.5 ? 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = 10)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
22. Crayfish ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
24. Fish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
25. Amphibians ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 ?; FACW = 0.75 ?;
Other= 0 OBL = 1.5 ?; SAV = 2.0 ?;
items 4u ano ci rocus on the presence or upiana plants, item ZV rocuses on the presence or aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
medium flow, poor-moderate clarity
USACE AID# DWQ #
i
Site # S3 (TE)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 43 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100'

2. Evaluator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
4. Time of evaluation: 10 am
6. River basin: NcUSC
8. Stream order: I"
10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.6902°N, 78.5390°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Auburn-Kniehtdale Rd., north of Us Hwy 70, south of SRI 004
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above ava temps, below avg ppt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 557
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0.3 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential % Commercial % Industrial 30% Agricultural
40% Forested
22. Bankfull width: V to 5'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
20% Cleared / Logged % Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): V- 2'
Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, eta Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 54 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
' ' CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE I
- 'Coastal ; Pieilrnobt ;. - Mapntair? SCORE
1 ' Presence of flaw /.persistent pools in stream Z
no flow or saturation= 0• strong flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5
2 Evidence of past human alteration n

extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = tnax points) 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 4
3 Riparian zone

no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

extensive discharges = 0; no dischar es = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
Groundwater discharge

no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc.=max points) 0-3 - 0-4 0-4 2

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain

no flood lam 0; extensive flood lain = max pints 0-4 0-4 0-2 1
Entrenchment /floodplain access
7 deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points 0-5 0-4 0-2 2

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
9 Channel sinuosity
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
10, Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate *

tine homogenous = 0; late diverse sizes = max points) NA 0-4 0-5 3
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening

dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max p 0-5 0-4 0-5 2

13 Presence of major bank failures

severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) 0-5 0-5- 0-5 3
Root depth and density on banks

E,y 14
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hoot = max. oints 0-3 0-4 0 - 5 3

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 3

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
no `riffles6-i les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points) 0 - 3 0-5 0-6 3
17 Habitat complexity

.
little or no habitat = 0; fi•e uent varied habitats = max points 0-6 0-6 0-6 4
Canopy coverage over streambed
18 no shadin ve g etation = 0• continuous canopy = max points 0-5 0-5 0 - 5 4
w
19 Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
4
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)

no evidence - 0• common numerous types = max points) 0-4 0-5 0-5 0

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence - 0; common, numerous types = max points)

O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence= 0, common numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0- 5
0-5
3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total ;points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 54
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/06 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6902
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5390
Total Points: 29.5 Other: STREAM 3
Stream is at least intermittent County: Wake
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30 e. g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15.5) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
2. Sinuosity ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
7. Braided channel ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
9a. Natural levees ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
10. Headcuts ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
11. Grade controls ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
13. Second or greater order chanrel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ®
Yes = 3 ?
- Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 7 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
16. Leaflitter ? 1.5 ® 1 ? 0.5 ? 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No= 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = 7)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ? 3 ® 2 ? 1 ? 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
22. Crayfish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
24. Fish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
25. Amphibians ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 ?; FACW = 0.75 ?;
Other= 0 OBL = 1.5 ?; SAV = 2.0 ?;
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
low flow, moderate clarity
USACE AID#
DWQ # Site # S4 (TF/TF/TI-I/TI)
r r STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. Evaluator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06 4. Time of evaluation: I I am
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 440 ac 8. Stream order:2"d
9. Length of reach evaluated: l00' 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.6893°N, 78.5368°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Auburn-Knightdale Rd., north of Us I-IM 70, south of SRI 004
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg ppt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 65°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 4.7 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential 05% Commercial % Industrial 30% Agricultural
40% Forested 15% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 8' to 35' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): P- 10'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 62
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POIN T
RANG'
# CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal Piedmont ,
SCORE
Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-S
4
extensive alteration = O; no alteration= max points)
Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 4
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max ousts)
d Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0--4 2
= max points
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges
5 ,
Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0-4 0-4 3
*s no discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0- 4 0-2 2
O; extensive flood lain = max points)
no flood lain =
,
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0 5 0- 4 0- 2 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; fire cent flooding = max points)

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 1
acent wetlands = max points)
no wetlands = 0• large ad
9 Channel' sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive-deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max ousts
I 1 Size &diversity of channel bed substrate NA 4, 0-4 0-5 3
fine, homogenous = 0' large, diverse sizes = max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
?. (deeply, incised - 0; stable bed & banks -max points)

1? Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
,
7 severe erosion = O'no erosion, stable banks = max points)
G4 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
Q 14
? no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max pints)
n 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0- 5 4
-substantial im act =0; no evidence =coax points)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 4
16 no riffles/ripples or pools =0• well-develo ed = max points)
17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 4
E? little or no habitat = 0; fit-e cent, varied habitats = max points)
Cr 18 Canopy coverage over streambed
U_;
0_5
0-5
4
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max )pints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 1
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points
r

21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
a

O 22 Presence of fish
0--4
U-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types - max points)_

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
U-5
4
(no evidence =- 0: abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
'TOTAL SCORE (also enter oil first page) 62
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/06 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6893 I
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5368 1
Total Points: 42 Other: STREAM 4
Stream is at least intermittent County: Wake
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30 e. g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 24) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank ? o ? 1 ? 2 ® 3
2. Sinuosity ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ? 0 ? 1 ? 2 ® 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ? 0 ? 1 ? 2 ® 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
7. Braided channel ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
9a. Natural levees ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
10. Headcuts ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
11. Grade controls ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existinq
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ?
Yes = 3
man-maae ancnes are not ratea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 8.5 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
16. Leaflitter ® 1.5 ? 1 ? 0.5 ? 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No= 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.5)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
22. Crayfish ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
24. Fish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
25. Amphibians ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 ?; FACW = 0.75 ?;
Other= 0 OBL = 1.5 ?; SAV = 2.0 ?;
items zu ana z i tutus on the presence or upiana plants, item zy rocuses on the presence or aquatic or weaana plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
medium flow, poor-moderate clarity
USACE AID# DW # Site # S5 - Little Creek Headwaters i
1 t STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
A%P
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. Evaluator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06
5. Name of stream: Headwaters to Little Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 440
4. 'Dime of evaluation: 1 I
6. River basin:
8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.6800°N, 78.5216°W 12. Subdivision name (ifany):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Guy Rd., north of Us Hwy 70
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg ppt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 65°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential 05% Commercial % Industrial 10% Agricultural
50% Forested 25% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 0 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 0
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows ti•om a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 39 Comments: no clear defined channel, appears channel may be been cut
off when original railroad was installed, only linear ditch was located in area; appears to be depressional wetland
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

' ECOREGI N POIN T RANGE
: CHARACTERISTICS SCORE
. Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
-0-5
0-4
0-5
0
(no flow or saturation = 0• strop flow = max points)

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
° 0-5
0-5
l
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone p_ 6 0- 4 0- 5 3
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0
5
0
4
0-4
2
4 extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) - -

5 Groundwater discharge
0 - 3
0-4
0-4
4
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc, = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
4
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood plain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
4
(deeply entrenched = 0; fre uent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 4
acent wetlands= max p
no wetlands= 0• large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 0
extensive channelization - 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 0
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
0
fine homogenous - o• large, diverse sizes = max oints

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening

y
0-5
0 ?4
0-S
0
in = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
(deeply
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 0
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable batiks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
F+ no visible roots - 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
, 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
tl` 5
0-4
0-5
4
substantial impact =o• no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = max points)

1? Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0--6
0
little or no habitat = 0; fi•e uent varied habitats = max points

1g Canopy coverage over streambed

p
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
oints
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = ?nax
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0 --4 0
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (sec page 4) 0-4 0- 5 0-5 0
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points

21 Presence of amphibians 0 4 0--4 0-4 3
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints

22 Presence of fish
0-4
n-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use

6
0--6

0- 5

0-5

3
evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 39
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina` Division of Water Quality - Sream Identification Form;' Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/2006 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6800°N
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5216°W
Total Points: 11
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if z 30 County: Wake Co. Other: Little Creek headwaters
e.g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 2) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
ia. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
7 Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS map or
other documented evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 0
a man-made ancnes are not rates; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3.5 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or water in channel --dry or
rowing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) D 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal= 5.5 )
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
SAV = 2.0, other = 0
d items zu ana 21 tocus on the presence of upiana plants, item za focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: "If + Vl(?
Evaluator: 641b1W
Total Points: '/
Stream is at least intermittent VO
if t 19 or perennial if t 30
Project: "Um S icti
Site: ka*V1 _ '
County:
Longitude:
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 B Natural levees 0 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
N -4 u /
?/
Yes = 3
" Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Y (s = 1.5
r' Rinlnnv /Ri ihtntal = `V 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Othe -- 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upiano piams, item za rucuses un the prLmmutr ui aquauu ui wCUanu pianw. -
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =_ A'li '0 0 ' trOhrg
1e. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9 B Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Nif = 0 )
4-/
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
6. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = •?
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water In channel -- d or growing season ® 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris C-V 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No - Yes - 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal
20 . Fibrous roots In channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants In channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. Eq ? 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC .5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
° Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: -0 D Project: /4-kbt cr/i Sid; `15 ?:atitude:
Evaluator: C,,U d4-j Site: 7 Longitude:
Total Points: Wc- Other
Stream Is at least Intermittent Q County: e.g. Quad Name:
b ?w 1 liV
if z 19 or perennial if 2 30 L
.' f
A. Geomorphology Subtotal Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 B Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 3
11. Grade controls 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin4 '
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
° Man-made ditches are not rated; see ddiscussions in manual
R I-vrtrnlnnv /qi ihtntni = `/ 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 O
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Ye (= 1.5
(: Rinlnnv fgiihtntal = 7 1
-i-05. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 1 1.5
26, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OB = 1.5 V = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item z9 tocuses on the presence or aquatic or weaana plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: r & Project: /'i KvC41 rf ,? YWID!1atitude:
Evaluator: C'V &W Site: Fe?+-utlla Longitude:
Total Points: ,/? LAJ4ke2 Other
Stream is at least intermitte" 1 ? County: e. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if Z 30 6 ki? ?2 g'
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strang
la. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 -3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 M
10. Headcuts 0 1 2
11. Grade controls 0 0.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing -
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
a
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 M
23. Bivalves 0 1 2

24. Fish
0
0.5
1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Hems 20 and 2i focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: C)G Project: 191A,(Y Arn S1C_4I S Latitude:
Evaluator: Site: ,?rQ Longitude:
Total Points: ther
Stream is at /east lntemliff t County: ?a t4& -
if 2 19 or perennial if 2 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1B. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 e Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing "
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
man-mane oncnes are not ratea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Suhtntnl = 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 _
1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
_ 0 0.5 1 1.5
i9 T. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
RCmS cu aiiu c 1 wcus on the presence or upiano plants, item za rocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch;
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
I

r 1%
Mar-17-2006 01;36pm From-
HCDENR
T-243 P.007/010 F-759
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural (Resources
Raleigh Regional Office Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
March 10, 2006
Scott Saylor
North Carolina Railroad Co.
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
RE: Auburn Siding Track
Wake County
Neuse #1/03-04-02
Dear Mr. Saylor:
This office has received an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for the subject
project as required by the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973.
We have performed a preliminary review of your plan and have noted apparent buffer
encroaclunents subject to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection and Maintenance Rule (1 SA
NCAC 2B.0233). This rule applies to all perennial and intermittent streams, lakes, ponds, and
estuaries in the River Basin with existing vegetation on the adjacent land or "riparian area." In
riparian areas with existing vegetation in the first 30 feet directly adjacent to the stream, the rule
prohibits land disturbance or new development within the first 30 feet of land next to the water
(the remaining 20 feet of the total buffer must be revegetated upon completion of any proposed
land-disturbing activity). In riparian areas with existing vegetation that is less than 30 feet wide,
the rule prohibits land disturbance or new development within the area that contains existing
vegetation (but not the entire 50 foot riparian area). Encroachments on the protected buffers
require written approval by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
In light of the apparent buffer encroachments shown in your plan, we cannot consider
your application complete until we receive a copy of your DWQ approval or statement of
exemption from the rule. Therefore, we cannot initiate our 30-day statutory review time period
until your application is complete. For more information about this riparian area rule, please
contact the DWQ's Wetland/401 Unit at 919/733-1786 or DWQ in our regional office at
919/791-4200. By copy of this letter we are notifying them that your project will need their
attention.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628 one
Phone: [phone] / FAX: 919.571,4718 / Intemet: www,enr.state.nc.us/ENR/ NarthCuolina
An Equal Oppoaunlty/Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper Na&&4
P,
Mar-17-2006 01:36pm From- T-243 P.008/010 F-759
Scott Saylor
March 10, 2006
Page 2
Upon receipt of your DWQ paperwork and any necessary plan revisions related to DWQ
review or our enclosed checklist, we will process your application for plan approval as soon as
possible. If you have ny questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact us. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Jo L. Holley, Jr., P.E.
gional Engineer
JLH/clm Land Quality Section
cc: Regional Supervisor, DWQ
Enrico A.Roque, PE., HNTB North Carolina, PC
f
lbr-17-2006 01:36pm From- T-243 P.009/010 F-759
Alf
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Project Name: Auh-urn-Siding Track
County: Wake (Date: 2/27/2006
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN CHECKLIST
To expedite the review process, a cursory review of your submitted Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plait has been made and has shown the need for additional information as specified below, To
meet our review schedule, any additional information should be received by this Regional Office no
later than 2/16/2006 . Failure to meet this schedule may (result in disapproval ofyour plan.
Please note that this cursory review notes only obvious omissions in the application and does not
infer that all possible application deficiencies have been noted.
L0CA170N OFPROlECT.'
Including roads, streets, watercourses, and
other major landmarks or features
_J_ Show site on USES Quad & Soils Map
GLNP-R,t,t. SFFE FEATURES:
Legend; north arrow, plan scale, erosion
control measures, etc.
Property lines and boundaries of total tract
)Existing and proposed contours
2 Limit and acreage of disturbed area
- Planned & existing buildings and elevations
Planned & existing road locations and elev.
Geologic features; such as streams, lake,
dams, wetlands, springs, rock outcrops, etc_
Resemmts & adjoining property uses
Profdcs; streets, utilities, lateral ditches, etc.
3 Stockpile locations, material ]ay-down &
contractor staging areas.
BORROWAND/OR WASTEARF.A.S':
3 If the same person conducts the land -disturbing
activity, that borrow/waste activityshall constitute part
of the land-disturbing activity, unless the borrowhvaste
activity is permitted and /or regulated under the Mining
Act of 1971, or is a landfill regulated by the Division of
Solid Waste Management. If the land-disturbing
activity and the related borrow/waste activity are not
conducted by the same financially responsible party,
they shall be considered separate land-disturbing
activities.
SITE DRALYA GE FZ4 TURFS:
Drainage features; existing and planned
(including of site areas that drain through the
project)
Size of sub-watershed (Ac m)
Culverts & sewers: size and location
Soils information(Type, special characteristics,
etc.)
Name and classification of receiving watercourse
or name of municipal operator (where
stormwater is discharged)
DESIGN CALCUL47701VS:
Pre & Post-construction runoff calculations for
each oullra from site (at each discharge location)
4__ Culverts and storm sewers
Open channels; existing & planned (include
temp linings)
-4- Energy dissipators, (include stone size and
dimensions)
6 Sediment basins/traps & level sproaders(include
dimensions & Spillway designs)
1628 Mail SWIM Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Phone: [phone]/ FAX; 919.571.4718 / Intemet: wwmenrrstate,,,. NR/
An Equal opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/ 1046 Post Consumer Paper
ne
o Carolina
rr- & W1k
Mar-17-2006 01:36pm From- T-243 P-010/010 F-759
a?
kk WAR &%%h, OR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
FINANCIAL Ap,$pONsmILnT1o{{ATMAsnp (fiWo):
Completed, notarized FR/O Form
- Accurate application fee
Certificate of assumed name, if owner is
a partnership
VEGETATIVE STABl MTION:
Methods of soil preparation
Seed types and rates (temporary & permanent)
-Lime & fertilizer type and rates
Mulch W tack rates
OMER INFORMATION:
7 Location of measures, temporary & permanent
8 Construction details of temporary & permanent
measures
9 Maintenance requirements of all measures
Contact persons for maintenance of measures
NAJQR4TIVEAND CONST'RUCTIONSE12UENCE:
Nature and purpose of the project
10 Construction sequence as it relates to erosion
control, including provisions for installation of critical
measure, prior to the initiation of the land-disturbing
activity: all maintenance measures; and removal of
measures after areas they %av; have been permanently
stabilized.
OTHER INFORMATION:
Item #1: Show location of project on soils & quad mans Pinpoint & jest Neuse buffer
crossin sItem #2 Show location of all land disturbing activity. Also include any areas listed
under Item #3 of this checklist- new plan with li 1 fee & E&S control easures is
required if limits of disturbance increases fam?heplan csarrently_under review. Item #3: Provide
the to ati n o anX borrow or waste sito. to soil piles & malen'al la, .y down or contractor stagint;
areas. Item 9: Provide supporting-calculations for all storm drains & onllgI protection
dissapatorsZ dgy'ces, Item #5• Provide supporting calculations for any,proposed ditches or
swales & that the receivin channels will =ainr in a abile condition Item #6: Pr vid
supporting calculations thg proposed E&S corttrol measures will &Mal the he nepesgarv sediment
containm n stillin ca bill Item #7 Provide construction en cos for all N?ess
es to
'ect. Pro 'de adeguate E& trot meawr r n areas liste #3 of this
checldist,_..Install silt fence along toe of all fill slopes. Install silt fence ovM around top of all
culvert outl dissa . Show any sediment traps. Pro ' ilt fence or ther n e
sary
E&S control measumugund all„borc.& iack areas, Item _#8, Provide details {include on plan
d 'n s f r sediment Mp, onsttu n entrance arc fil re-inforced sit f nce outlet. Item
#9: Provi a maantm;3ulee for all E&S control devices item#10• _ Install applicable E&S.corttrol
mews prior, to onset of my land disturbing activities _Vegettation to be established on slopes
-orother are s within 21 lendar da f completion of any phase of adin a comities. Provide
se ce for tin of e?ti 'n culvert in lation of new 1 s stabilization of r ltin
bare soil a relat o E&S r&plwl issues Provide all COE & DWO certifications for mpacta to
reams wetlands Provide mean f crossing di ch teeams.
HOLD PLAN INCOMPLETE ETE REUSE BUFFER & WETLANDS ISSUES TO BE
RESOLVED BY DWO & COE - -
REVMWER: - Joe Dunr
0F WATF9 Michael P. Easley, Governor
o
?
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
6 North Carolina Department of 1?nvironment and Natural Resources

Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #:
Fax #:
919-733-0203
919-733-6893
Fax To: Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience
Scott Saylor
Subject: Auburn, NC Sidings
Number of pages including cover sheet: 4
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: [phone]
954-7099
J>,tn 2 l 2?(0
Date:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at
919-715-3473.
??o?c
Ntt?Cazo ma
iVwura?l?
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Pax [phone]
Internet: http: 'l12n cnr stat _ nc uti%nc% etlan(Is
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
4
r1t I*-
Ecosystem
PROGRAM
May 1, 2006
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience
1 101 Haynes Sweet, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project: NC Railroad Company, Auburn Sidings
ncv(?) 2c?oe,,G G 7-)
County: Wake/Johnston
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.40 0.21 0 0 0 319 14,397 5,968
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone I at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankof f at [phone].
t.incerely, ?Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
MAY 3 0 2006
®7A
RmtoriKg... Enka"... Protects' Our Stag WE7?? ?y S I ER QUALi [ Y RUBR
CH
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
( V EEP In-Lieu Fee Coordinator
Please note that this is a corrected version of the letter I originally sent out. The
Buffer 1 Zone contains 14,397 not 43,397 as indicated in a previous acceptance
letter. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
Sincerely,
Chris Mankoff
EEP In-Lieu Fee Coordinator
NO- 1101 Ilavnes Street Suite 101 Raleigh, NC 27004 Telephone: [phone] Pax: 919.428.3518
EcoScience

May 23, 2006
Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele
N.C. Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Section 401/404 Permit -- Auburn, NC Sidings
Dear Ms. Van Der Wiele,
06-290
Please find enclosed supplements to the Section 401 Permit package submitted to you office on May 1.
Included are updated computational drawings and longitudinal cross-sections (Sheets DXS 001 - DXS
007) for each of the stream crossings.
With the recent additional surveying, the invert elevations of new pipes at some of the stream crossings
were adjusted. The pipe extension at Stream 2 (Station 4683+22.4) has been redesigned as a jack and
bore replacement, and an updated plan view drawing has been enclosed (Sheet TA-002).
Stormwater drawings that illustrate provisions for nitrogen removal and energy dissipation are included in
the original permit package and half-size copies are provided in this package. The frill-sized drawings
GP-001 through GP-007 illustrate the BMPs. No stone will be installed on the side slopes (except in
1.5:1 slope areas).
Ditches will be cut into the cut and fill area. Existing ditches will be relocated only by the width of the
additional track. Each ditch will have a five-foot base width, for diffuse flow (less than 2 ft/s) for areas
less than six acres. As illustrated in the typical sections, ditches extend to the channel and do not daylight
beyond the buffers.
Culverts that are presently perched will be replaced with new pipes that allow for continuous stream flow
and aquatic life passage.
We hope that the additional materials and these comments will expedite the permit process for this
project. If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience Corporation
Attachments: Section 401 Express Permit supplemental materials
J@(r-Z'RflVg
Q
MAY 2 5 2006
DENk - ?hiATER
T ?SNVpST ^?1TY
BRANCH
HDa
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Sheet. e
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15105 SHEET OF
TIP Pro)ect No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESI GNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4669+65 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 45 Deg
Sta.4G69+65
SIZE 36 in
TYPE STEEL CL EL = 332.09 It DRAINAGE AREA 27.70 Acres
ENTRANCE Mitered to Slope SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW UR EL= 332,09 ft EL= 332.09 It DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 314.13 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 32.00 cis
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 314.49 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 51.00 cis
35 STEEL
0100 HW ELEVATION 315.95 ft
So = 2.6 %
INV. EL 311.33 ft INV. EL 307.90 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 130.0 It OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 164 cis
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 329.21 ft
361n CSP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWI/D from HDS-5, Chart 2.2 INV In = 311.33 INV out = 307.90
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET O NT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps)
36 STEEL 10 22.00 2.80 1.15 0.83 2.49 0.7 1.48 2.24 2.24 0.73 3.43 •0.46 31:3.82 3.11 15.39 It - IC

36 STEEL 25 32.00 2.80 1.41 1.05 3.16 0.2 1.83 2.41 2.41 1.40 3.43 0.38 314.49 14.72 ft - IC
F
36 STEEL 100 51.00 - 2.80 1.80 1.54 4.62 0.2 2.40 2.70 2.70 3.54 3.43 2.82 315,95 7.22 13.26 it - IC

36 STEEL overtop 163.92 2.80 3.19 9.04 27.11 0.2 2.70 2.85 3.19 36.60 3.43 36.37 347.70 23.19 -18.49 it - QC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA= 4672+50
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 329
21
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY
1000j
???'
n u '((( .
SHOULDER ELatOTSTA= 329.21

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL

36 in ???
lll..

n^
Y 2006
2 5
'W(

DESIGN HW = 3.16
100 YR H
--,t,A W = 4.62
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
£?? O(, _ -)? WETwo AND STORMWATER BRANCH
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Sheet 0
Print Date: 19-May-09
DATE 12/15/05

TIP Project No:
Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER
Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake
DES SHEET OF
IGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4683+22

SKEW
90 Deg PLAN SUMMARY DATA

SIZE
60 In Sta. 4683+22
TYPE
ENTRANCE STEEL CL EL =
Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER 320.05 ft DRAINAGE AREA 160.00 Sq Mi

DIR OF FLOW
L/R EL= 320.05 H SHOULDER
EL- 320.05 ft
DESIGN FREQUENCY
25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 303.00 it
7 DESIGN DISCHARGE 130.00 cis
( DESIGN HW ELEVATION 300.36 ft
- Q100 DISCHARGE 210.00 cfs
6o STEEL
Q100 HW ELEVATION 302,42 ft
So= 4.8
INV. EL 295.50 ft INV. EL 290.50 It OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 104.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 526 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 320.05 it

Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A):
HWi/D from HDS-6, Chart 1.2 60 In RCP
INV In 295.50
INV out = 290
60
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET C NT OU TLET CONTROL HW .
Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfa) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 he H LSo HW ELEV (fps) •"
GO STEEL 10 94.00 7.50 2.44 0.89 4.45 0.2 2.72 3.86 3.86 0.54 5.00 -0.60 299,95 4.79 20.10 It - IC

60 STEEL 25 130.00 7.50 2.86 0.97 4.86 0.2 3,28 4.14 4.14 1.04 5.00 0.18 300.36 6,62 19.69 It - IC

60 STEEL 100 210.00 7.50 3.59 1.38 6.92 0.2 4.37 4.68 4.68 2.70 5.00 2.39 302.42 10.70 17.63 ft - IC

60 STEEL overtop 526.20 - 7.50 5.45 4,91 24.55 0.2 4.50 4.75 5.45 16.88 5.00 17.43 320.05 26.80 0.00 It - IC
OTES: ' TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION.

COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION OVERTOPPING STA = 4683+22
. OVERTOPPING EL = 320.05
"" INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY SHOULDER ELatOT STA= 320.05
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
PROVIDE AND INSTALL
60 in DESIGN HW = 4.86
100 YR HW = 6.92
OUTLET PROTECTION: 144 TONS CLASS 2 R IP RAP sa• rNirtc wr Paz sv cc r ?neic , ,? o ., .
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Sheet: 0
Print Date: 19•May-08
DATE 12116106

TIP Project No:
Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER
Auburn, NO C
OUNTY: Wake
DES SHEET
IGNED BY: MMD C OF
HECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4700+12

SKEW
50 Deg PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SIZE 36 In Sta. 4700+12
TYPE
ENTRANCE STEEL CL EL =
Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER 314.71 It DRAINAGE AREA 15.30 Acres

DIR OF FLOW
UR EL= 314.71 ft SHOULDER
EL = 314.71 it
DESIGN FREQUENCY
25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT, EL. 206.00 it
DESIGN DISCHARGE 21.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 283.86 It
Q100 DISCHARGE 34.00 cfs
36 STEEL
Q100 HW ELEVATION 284.38 It
So
= 0.9
%
INV. EL 281.50 ft INV. EL 280.00 it OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Yoar
IN L= 168.0 It OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 214 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 314.71 ft
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HtNiID from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 1NV in = 281.50 36 in RCP INV out = 280
00
SIZE FREQ Q NA7 ALLOW 7W INLETCONT OUTLET CONTROL I-lW Vo .
COMMENTS
(In) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+Dl2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) •• •
36 STEEL 10 15.00 4.50 0.79 0,63 1.90 0.2 1.20 2.10 2.10 0.16 1.50 0.76 263.40 2.12 31.31 It - IC

36 STEEL 25 21.00 4.50 0.95 0.79 2.36 0.2 1.44 2.22 2.22 0.31 1.50 1.02 283.86 2.97 30.85 ft - IC

36 STEEL 100 34.00 4.50 1.23 0.96 2,88 0.2 1.89 2.45 2.45 0.80 1.50 1.75 284.38 4.81 30.33 It - IC
36 STEEL overtop 213.57 4.50 3.12 9.62 28.86 0.2 2.70 2.85 3.12 31.59 1.50 33.22 314.72 30,21 -0.01 ft - OC
NOTES: ' TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION.

COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION OVERTOPPING STA= 4700+12
. OVERTOPPING EL = 3'14.71
"'" INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY SHOULDER ELatOTSTA= 314.71
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 In DESIGN HW = 2.36
100 YR HW = 2.88
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS Gnnn
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Sheet: 0

PP D A print Data: 1e-May-06
DATE 12!15/06
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern
STATE PROJECT NUMBER SHEET
Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY
M OF
:
MD C HECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4704+26
SKEW 90 Deg PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SIZE 66 In Sta. 4704+26
TYPE
ENTRANCE STEEL CL EL =
Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER 321.04 ft DRAINAGE AREA 443.00 Sq MI

DIR OF FLOW
UR EL= 321
04 ft SHOULDER

HYD, METHD .
HWY-RURAL EL- 321.04 it DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HW. CONT. EL. 286.25 ft
DESIGN DISCHARGE 320.00 cis

( DESIGN HW ELEVATION 283,34 it
Double 68 STEEL Q100 DISCHARGE 510.00 cis
Q100 HW ELEVATION 285.38 it
So = 2.1
INV, EL 278.00 ft INV. EL 276.00 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 144.0 it OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 1737 cis
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 321.04 it

Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A):
HWI/D from HDS-6
Chart 1
2 Double 661n RCP

SIZE
FREQ AT LLOW 1 W ,
.
INLET CONT INV in = 278.00 INV out = 275,00

(in) TYPE
(yr) (cfs) HW HW OUTLET CON
HW/D HW K
d TROL HW Vo COMMENTS
e
o do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) ""•
66 STEEL 10 115.00 - 8.25 3.74 0.88 4.82 0,2 2.93 4.22 4.22 0.58 3.00 1.80 282.82 4.84 38.22 it - IC

66 STEEL 25 160.00 8.25 4.36 0.97 5.34 0.2 3.55 4.52 4.52 1.12 3
00 2
65 283
34 6
73
. . . . 37.70 it - IC

66 STEEL 100 255.00 8.25 5.37 1.34 7.38 0.2 4.68 5.09 5.37 2.85 3.00 5.22 285.38 10.73 35.66 ft - IC
66 STEEL overtop 868.59 - 8.25 9.12 7,63 43.04 0.2 4.95 5.23 9.12 33.08 3.00 39.19 321.04 36.56 0.00 ft - IC
NOTES: ` TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION.
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION OVERTOPPING STA = 4704+31
. OVERTOPPING EL= 321.04
.... INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY SHOULDER EL at OT STA= 321.04
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL 66 in DESIGN HW = 5.34
100 YR HW - 7.38
OUTLET PROTECTION: 173 TONS CLASS 2 RIP RAP, 38" THICK W/ 218 SY FF I ZONE 7 (FIG. 8.06.8,1) ]
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Sheol: 0
PIPE DATA SHEET Print Dale: 19-May-06
DATE 12/15/05
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern
STATE PROJECT NUMBER
Aubum, NC COUNTY: Wake SHEET
DESIGNED BY
M OF
:
MD C HECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4776+00
SKEW 90 Deg PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SIZE 30 In Sta. 4778+ 00
TYPE
ENTRANCE STEEL CL EL =
Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER 360.07 ft DRAINAGE AREA
17.90 Acres
DIR OF FLOW RIL
EL = 360
07 ft SHOULDER

HYD. METHD .
HWY-RURAL EL = 360.07 it DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HW. CONT, EL, 353.44 ft
DESIGN DISCHARGE 16.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 351.81 ft
30 STEEL 0100 DISCHARGE 25.00 cfs
Q100 HW ELEVATION 352
28 ft
So= 1.1 .
INV. EL 349,04 ft INV. EL 349.69 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
OUT L= 61.0 ft IN
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 118 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 360.07 It
InlotControl Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWIID from HDS•6, Chart 1.2 INV In = 349
69
SIZE

(In) TYPE
FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW
(
r)
f .
INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL
HW INV out = 349.04

V
CO
y
(c
s) HW HW +
HWID HW Ke do do+Dl2
ho H LSo HW ELEV o
MM
•••
(fps) ENTS
30 STEEL 10 11.00 3.75 0.79 0.69 1.73 0.2 1.08 1.79 1.79 0.13 0.65 1
27 351
42 24
2
.
. . 8.65 It - IC

30 STEEL 25 15.00 3.75 0.94 0.85 2.12 0.2 1.28 1.89 1.89 0,24 0.65 1
48 351
81 3
06
. . . 8.26 it - IC

30 STEEL 100 25.00 3.75 1.24 1.04 2.59 0.2 1.72 2.11 2.11 0.68 0,65 2.13 352.26 5.09 7,79 It - IC

30 STEEL overtop 118.30 - 3,75 2.73 7.52 18.80 0.2 2.25 2.30 2,73 15.11 HO-65177.2700 368.49 24.10 •8.42 it - IC
NOTES: ` TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION.
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION OVERTOPPING STA = 4718+00
. OVERTOPPING EL = 380.07
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY SHOULDER EL at OT STA= 360.07
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL 30 in DESIGN HW = 2,12
100 YR HW = 2.59
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
a
n
N
•1
0
N
e
340
330
320
310
to
?o
d
N
Z
J
2
U
D
EX TOP OF RAIL c
d azz L
h 300'V,C.
..r -?, ...... r ro v r-OD55
X.GROUN - c
_ h _

NO. TURNO(If LIMfr
? N

INV.. 11 .33
NV. 30 .70
cp ^? v r? P t0 N y
p
B
N h
^
c
1 ry
n t m
M'E
M IQ
+
Ati7 +nn
-?- TO RALEIGH
J
0.005 ACRES v
N
m
I ID
i 0
1 I c "0 3t .33
?u•
# A_3q
o (L
4669.64.95
EXISTING CULVERT TO BE
ABANDONED AND GROUT FILLED
?-- JACK 8 BORE 161'
36" STEEL PIPE
CONSTRUCT HEADWALLS
--_--.?--
P XD
co
N
BOX CULVERT f` n E
w
ab7orort- ®;__ P ,w
r
INV.. 734
0,,, 1NV - 333 TT INV. 331.72 7W5 I I A- •X36' 0 r - 310.
- 8'-8" X 6" SIGNAL PADS
STA 4673 15
OFFSET 16' LT
OFFSET 16' RT
52 RE9AR B
06.687.34
"34.552.76
Y.• 325.99
_-__-.--.--}_
4675.00 p
-----------------
uB° V- A SIDING+--
?.` _ NOTE. -__-
FM A-01 NOT FODND A-06 A ., a
4-09 10' X B' SIGNAL HOUSE
O
D H ?? NY 332 02 0.038 ACRE BaK- _2E
"- - -
"Nw•33s. 3.7pv6t=--°'"Fto STA 4670.65
f
to OFFSET 20' LT --------
340
330
320
310
O
tn
a
G
w
w
2
2
U
3
PT.• ST1R7I"R - ..- ..-??- ?.--?-- --?
S7454- T EgG,i7i4420??--?.?--?-
N 706 0
E 2.1.54 ELEY. • 3526.14
ELEY.• 328'49 a CURVE • SIDINGI R. R.5P?OPLAR RASE
PI STATION • 4672.05.of78
I • 2. 54. 08,11" (LT)
4669.72.00 0 • 1. 30' 00.00-
8'-8" X -1SIGNAL PAD JACK 8 BORE R 3.819.83'
STA 4668.15 161' 36' STEEL PIPE LC 143.48' n IUI
Ilww(
OFFSET 16' RT AND CONSTRUCT 2 HEADWALLS SE •0 L9
SPEED •401PH FREIGHT
LEGEND SPEED •45MPH PASSENGER MAY 2 5 2006
-EXISTING rRacus 10 10 2 0 FEET
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION DENR - WATER QUA'.-!- - - - - - - - - TRACK TO DE SHIFTED LQ _ 0 to 11 SCALE:
RLY B WEIlgNDSAID Sidig TFJZ 6RW.;m
DATE
1' OFSCRIPTlWf
---- ----- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATION
® RIP RAP SCOPE PROTECTION NORFOLK
a? SOUTHERN TITLE AUBURN AUBURN , NC
SIDING
® PROPOSED PAVING
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
--- EXISTING R/W OWIAV COW '0 N' AL NAP 1LF POs
RJB D233 398600A Ti90.5 - H94
WETLAND IMPACTS HDR ENGI NEER I NG, INC. EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT 'RAW FILE Nu. 107-1-6362 o2ANhl16 AIMBFR
OPERATING O1Y 151 ON CNXSMC OATF JANUARY Im, 2006 TB-2005-40
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF FNGIl?ER - OCS FSIGNaxp CONSTRUCTION - ATLANTA, GA.
CAOO FILE' P.\NSRR\AuCXNn\AU8PLPR01.UOn SHEET TA-001
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
a
h
m
n
M
°a
N
N
h
' 330 m " M 4wvri 330
r•0 rn
VE.
g o kL
094% flO91% -
u7
320
"' - .- ---- --- 320
7
---- --------
E .,GRWND --------
P
r• -Or P
3J0 Q
7, $ 3!0
;I INV.. 96.76 W`
11
v N
P 7 "'t h N N O Q O ?O D r. ^ od N p p q"I ^ N
N N N N N N ^I
N N N N N N ° 0 °6 W ro q7 m m e
300 468 M ?M 469+00 300
+00 468 +00
EXISTING CULVERT TO BE
ABANDONED AND GROUT FILLED
--r--.+?•-a-?..-??.. -- ?.-r.--r r-.?N r.r•-r --.??--i.? ..?.--??--=sue.. ????--r`--??--?`y ?? ?,r?p
JACK 8 BORE 104' ° w Co PT' •
53 RE6AR40 0 G 6D" STEEL PIPE `rn PT-• 54 REBA9 N 201 06685
P7.• O r ?0 N 70635 65312 EL£Y.• 317.47
N 706•ggp71 21 CONSTRUCT HEADWALLS V M6 76 E 2• 317.22 a
E 2.135• O x cAV ELEV. • 2
ECEV.• 321.27
A 468 5-00 rn j 46? EXAUB10 t
P 40ft Q, I6 •72, I - 1F
- - -- - -- SIGIN(32A
2 gEALMI NFJ,GMk A.27 N ?_• vl
Q iNN.• 96Zg -AtiSEi g1LE ^-?- SIDING2B? j
-.-
() _ .... •?-'?? O ?' CN+LLItlR m N ?? _ 'A _ -ELRD
__?....-_.- .`• . 'A-21 6 O1 CUrSTER OF
yES rL4'Et
- _ -?, 029 -
ACRES uL7E
4-22 - ?,? - - ?.- Q - r ••-•'?,"'Lw1 gN I?? - .. - r `'?
----------- --- ??- 0-25 A.24A 23 W CURVE `4 SIDING2A £ 2 359172?g -"-+....
PI STATION • 4686.69.00 ELEV. • 320.02 -1
R I • 2• 51' 16..71" CRT) R-Ri2-PINEIN BASE
[1\`ilir D • 1. 25" 56.•75" CURVE SIDING28
R • 4,000.00' PI STATION • 4691.99.16
LI • 62.00' 1 • 16. 15' 34.97' CRT)
L2 • 35,00' 0 • 2. 04' 10.00"
jQDG Of • 0. 26' 38..55" 1-I•1-2 • 35..00'
MA 5 r DC • 9936' 46.09' R1•D2,- 0- 6' 46.09"
L 1-29' 768-81
?R GJP"T SE • 1.0 LC 785.70'
gyp1. A? SPEED •40MPH FREIGHT SE -1.0,
LEGEND gosj(50m SPEED •45MPH PASSENGER SSPEED PEED -40MPH FREIGHT
PASSENGER
EXISTING TRACKS 1 0 19 f 10 2 PO FEET
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
--------- TRACK TO BE SHIFTED SCALE
REV 8r DATE DESCRIPTION
---- ----- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION NORFOLK LOCATIDN AUBURN , NC
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING SOUTHERN ""E AUBURN SIDING
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
EXISTING RAN/ OWNING CDWANr °GN RJB iD - D233 VAL'39660GA -FILE P°STH90.5 H94
WETLAND IMPACTS HDR ENG I NEER I NG. INC. EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT °'NRAw 'LE NO' 107-1-6362 "IAU A7NBER ---F OPERATING DIV151 C'ONS TB-2005-40
OFFICE GF THE CHIEF ENGINEER • DESIGN AND raucnaY • ATLANTA, GA. CH16SMC TE JANUARY 10, 2006
CADDFILE•PIN NSMAudvn\AUSPLPR02Ogn SHEET TA-002
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
330
r • 0/28
a
0
h
0
h
320
310
TOP Olr RAIL

W
300

Y
o {I
r
m
N
i
A
T
a
r
w
?1 IM1 ? `AIM I "?IN1 ? hl?
4
CURVE • EXAUBIO
PI STATION • 4691.98.01
1 • 23. 43' 13.61" (RT)
D • 2. 00' 36.00"
R • 2,850.68'
LC 1.180„12' --?'r- e(:w
-?'•- as
Mr^??r 5p593}\9
? t?b 56 ?\5 55
a ? E?Ev
m ) 4695.00
F-EXAUSIO v
m m 4

- SIDING28
J __-

0% cr
o W N

a
Lo
r1_
? - -
N N
r
r
/'"r \05 ?\ O?g9
E

nD
MIR, } \,E
6 E? Sy1?.
a 50. CURVE SIDING28
I ?` I ( PI STATION • 4691.99 .15
U1! i` I 16- 15' 34.97" (RT)
MAY 2 5 2006 D • 2.04' 10.00"
R 2.768.81'
LI•L2 35..00'
DENR WATER QUALITY Of-D2 0. 36' 46•,09"
'
?.4NOSTORMWATERBRANCH LC 785.10
SE •I.0
SPEED •40MPH FREIGHT
EXISTING TRACKS SPEED •45MPH PASSENGER
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
--------- TRACK TO RE SHIFTED
---- ----- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
- - EXISTING RAW
*00000000000001 WETLAND IMPACTS
hIh I Mlh
330
== -1320
INV., 2179.,88A I r-INV., 271,08
INV.. 82.53 , I I Lh1
MIh f MIS I NIA I N ?N,1 I ?1h
4704.05 8 4704.11
EXISTING CULVERTS
_ TO BE ABANDONED
~--•??.?_ Sa AND GROUT FILLED
vv S4
0.EEf 1 R?6 a g5
i ? Eyjij84?8
4700.24
?j ?gy?g0 EXISTING PIPE TO BE
ABANDONED AND GROUT FILLED 6W
i
SIDING2C-/ n (A -
---------------
--m_o_ _ a e
m ? A z'
V w ? 11
i
ED ? ` NOE
o Y2A
co
N
e5 4
P ,
4
( 4A

CURVE • SIDING2C Ev
PI STATION • 4697.11.34 tawE
I • 2. 29' 32..64` (RT) °
2 0,019 ACRES
D • 1. 25 56..75' JACK 8 BORE E 168' 168'-
R • 4,000.00'
36" STEEL PIPE
L2 • 62 00' CONSTRUCT HEADWALLS cn
DI • 0. 36' 46-09-
D2 • 0. 26' 38.55"
LC • 174.00'
SE •1.0'
SPEED •40MPH FREIGHT
SPEED •45MPH PASSENGER
1 0 10 2 PO FEET
SCALE:
I
NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
ONNIM COWANY
HDR ENGINEERING, INC. EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OPERATING DIY IS ION
OFFICE OF TW CHIEF ENGINEER • DESIGN AND COASTRUCTION - ATLANTA, GA.
0.051 ACRE
A
9\ 9
4 05 215 ?E \6 ?Np I
L.19.08 spy 91
caE?? 7.3"1 pitl` 4704.26 $ 4704.36
JACK 8 BORE 143'-
66 DOUBLE STEEL PIPES
CONSTRUCT 2 DUAL HEADWALLS
310
300
o
n
n
0
I 415.Dz
W
00 a i
2
J
I RIP RAP SLOPE
PROTECTION
0.35 ACRES
?7Q4?70
AUBURN SIDING
TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
' f05 90.5 - H94
F_.SRAW RJB 'D Ab. 0233 AL 39DGo0A
FILE N0. 107-1-6362 DRAMING AMBER
MC C ATE JANUARY 10, 2006 TB-Z®m5-4D
CADD FILE, P,\NSRR\AUDUrn\AUBPtPR03.dgn SHEET TA-003

340 $
340

P >7
G W
330 EX.r OF RA L
"-
-

3jo
5
30
?" - -
EX.GROIJ
__ - g nave
320 r - - -OZ% 320
4 .
m aci O ip P O M ?n O Of v
N N ,
h M ,n uI ro b r` m m ai Oi O O N N P N

N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
°'l
N
M
N
?
N
M
h
"?
M
M
^'?
h
^?
M yi
h ^l
M v
M
M LO
„?
M to
„? c
0
M
310
V 471C +00 7 M ^?
4715 M
+00 h M h M h M "? M
310

`p5 612?q 60 0?6
. "N,
9 9)
O 64 Q,03
D°
E? 6? Q` t0 ?,5? 3j?
t?
P
4710.00 g
4715-CO
d
to
W

N ^- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - --° - -°- -- - - - - ----------------- ----------------------------•----•------- ------- ---------------------------------
-
W
N
2
J

--------------

LEGEND 5i1 soy ?e MR V
EXISTING TRACKS °Z?3"1122 I 0 Igo 200 FEET aFrw
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION .[ ' _ .

SCALE :
LILJ"
- -- - - - - -- TRACK TO BE SHIFTED REV BY BATE pEStprvngo
---- ----- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION NORFOLK t°cAtIBH AUBURN , NC
NO RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
47?
SOUTHERN
TITLE
AUBURN SIDING

®
PROPOSED PAVING R
TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
-- - - EXISTING RIW
WETLAND IMP
CTS
EAST omim LB mr
CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT OGN RJB 10 N0' 0233 l 11M86BOA ILE POSrjgo.5 H94
A HDR ENGI NEERI NG, I NC. D'w RAW ILE AID- 107-1-6362 ILRAWIM NAwl"
OP HATING DIVISION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER - RESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION - ATLANTA, GA.
C"" SMC oA>E TB-2005-
JANUARY 10, 2006 40
CAW FILE- P•1NSRRXAU&trn\AU&-LPR04.Cpn SHEET TA-004
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
360
.350
J60
r .
1 1350

340
3jo

T.
EX-61 "
I

- I NV- 327?,73- -\

'0
1-

0) ?5
Q0
cy; g
_
q
472C +00
47 +00

472000
-----------
4724-69
.1 IN
W, Ex S GAP I PE
v\ NOONED OR
'i, -, rATN., GROUT FILLED
.-00
-------------------------
ILA ----------
--------------------------
CUL VERT tNV.. 32a?,
J11TCH it- 322.10-
Ln
4 7 31-J +'0 0
340
r - -OD88
.3-30
-7 77,7,1!",".?-
"'In
4730-W
fA ?-S I D ING3A (A (A
cl,
Ll

SIDI
7 L

0
056 ACRE 4724-83.90
JACK a BORE
.
S 65.0' - 36" STEEL PIPE
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS 9 Igo 2PO FEET
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTM ... 11111
m = m m =
- - - - - - - - - TRACK TO BE SHIFTED SCALE: ---
------------ - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
NORFOLK
nm RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTOW v -9011MERN
K,'Z-ZX,,Z11,1ZZZ,1 4 PROPOSED PAVING
Fm

EXISTING NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY

P0000000000000
i WETLAND IMPACTS
HDRENGINEERING, INC. owim C&W,0"
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OPERArING DIVISION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGIAIEER - DESIGN AND CONSTMICF10N - ATLANFA. GA.
c?
9.0 to
--c7RVE --s-ZG3A
PI STATION - 4730-27.81
I - 2- 12' 52..30- (RT)
0 - 1- 20" 53-40"
R . 4.250 go-
L 1 62 .. 06 1D)&@&8
L2 40-.00:
DI 0- 25 04.,52-Mj
D2 0- 41' 04-58"
LC 164.26'
SE . I.. AWAY 2 5
SPEED -40MPH FREIGHT 006
SPEED -45MPH P WATER Q ,
ARUMM, STC?4A??, :7-?
ft4A(Cjj
AUBURN , NC

AUBURN SIDING
rfir'LE TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
VAL
or'v RJB Plo Ab' D233 'J98600A '?490-5 - H94
-------F
wmRAW F"'E ft- 107-1-6362 IAU r4WMH
57'-SMC JANUARY 10, 200-6-r" TE3-2005-40
CADO FILE- P,\NSftR%AuburnXAU&lLPR05 d9n SHEET TA-OOS

1370
370
M
440 Vr..
r • 049

360 $ M
- 360
- -
G W -^^ -- --- ---- ---
_ --- • vbsr. -nvBe --- _
-
350 l IjDZ caOBB' EX.c D
_ - - N N . 350

M
nwj
7 tn
M
23 KG G W
ro r - A70
250 V.C. M
390 r- Oea
340

?
N Q
N In ?
M "'? ?
N ?
"i ?
M ?
C t4
P >'1
?n ? Q)
Qn ? ?
ri M P P ?D 41 O po '.0 to P
Ln
M RI
M ul
" u1
M I? h Ln N a u1 wl c
? b
? ,? " 'n tn m Ln Of p ?F
?
4735
+00 P M M M M M M
4740 M
+0 0 ?7 k
j M M ? ? M M h M co
M
4745 +00
a
N
n
M
0
DI
r
z
m.
V
w
LA
CURVE • EXAUBII
e
PI STATION • 4734.45.26 pe
A
1 • 18. 22" 42.24' CRT)
'
"
D • 2• 00
00••00
* ?SpOtiM1Rp7
R
LC • 2,864.93
• 918.92'
rrr ?- .-r-" y
•?'_ Q?
, ______?.----_? --,__ ?_------
.. ?
----
? ? r
z

SIDING3C
? EXAUB I I -740M
473500

8
•'"? I-SIDING38 r.
W
?4 J
9
a e't`
-•?r?r CURVE'- SIOING313
PI STATION • 4734.33.98
I - H- 44' 39.46" (RT)
D • 2. 04' 30.•00"
R • 2,761.39'
LI•L2 - 40.00'
01•D2 • 0. 41' 04.,58"
LC - 596.52'
SE •1"
SPEED -40MPH FREIGHT
SPEED •45MPH PASSENGER
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
- - - - - - - - - TRACK TO RE SHIFTED
------------- UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
-- EXISTING R/W
WETLAND IMPACTS

CURVE • SIDING3C
PI STATION • 4738.38.11
I • 2. 12' 52.29" CRT)
D • 1. 20' 53.40
R • 4,250.00'
LI • 40.00'
L2 • 62.00'
DI • 0. 41' 04.58"
D2 • 0. 25' 04.52"
LC • 164.26'
SE • I -
PQ
4
s
all
ON
tb P5^ -
d? y?? ? ?tyBO `Oa0
??iti'S? e`e
--+---. ,_,-f _„s-------- --
d
y
00 Z
--------------
-4742.42
JACK & BORE
48.0' - 36" STEEL PIPE
SPEED -40MPH FREIGHT
SPEED •45MPH PASSENGER I Igo 2 PO FEET
SCALE:
HDRENGINEERING, INC.
p- , ?3w NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
OwNIAG COAPAW
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OPERITNG DIVISION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER - DFS7GN AND CONSTRUCTION • ATLANTA, GA.
0
':,? "I ---
by80g•
Q?,1p9;Pp ?h
M
AY 2 5 2006
DEIVR
Qijkl!
gR4PlC,
AUBURN , NC
TITLE _ AUBURN SIDING
TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
RJB 1D 0233 VAL ?398600A IlE POs i90.5 - H94
pBf RAW FILE lib. 107-1-6362 IAG AWWR
LHRSMC C DATE JANUARY 10. 2006 TB-2005-40
CARD FILE- P'\HSMAuUu n%AUBPLPR06 dgn SHEET TA-006
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES

0
m
M
e
0
n
wAVr n 1^1 IA In rP1AI

i n nlN L_ v( V V1 nv v I utv
_
8 n
370 7W V.C.
370

-767
10
h

360 --- --- -- - -- -- - __ ?._-- Y,, ,
- -- --=- 360

550'
r--0 e I
in
a '^
350
350

? cy _.. -
^
,

N

N N

?, nI N

7 Q p q ^
)

b

R

h
'?

`

Of
R

t?
O

of
Q

C
N

M

O
ui

m

t`

m

^.

Ia
^O, h "1 M 7
?0 v1
to Q
b u1
U la
?a O
?n h b :c coo b b n N
340 4750 +00 r h M
{
, i
,
M
00
4 , 5
476
+00
340
8
h P' -
2
J
V
----- -----t;
((BY
LEGEND
Q n
rn •A? ? ? a
F-
z
CNAIN.L 9
ps
- - .qV -
0 ?A7' S
bSti1hA06
(Ea Q1 a0 `6. Sb 69 p0
p•0'M1
01,1p ` • Q\b
?y
EXISTING TRACKS
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
- - - - - - - - - TRACK TO BE SHIFTED
------------- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
-- - - -- EXISTING RIW
WETLAND IMPACTS
CUT AND SHIFT TRACK
STA. 4154.00.0
(345' MAINLINE, 210' SID
/--MAINI
Curve - MAIM
PIStation - 4753.30.86
1. 4. 18' 26.22" (LT)
D • P 03' 41.43"
R • 5.397.67'
Ll - L2 • 155.00'
D1 • 0" 49-21-56"
02 2. 18' 28„82'
Q?0°"`, : SE - 405.6.2.5..
• ?•'``_6
e°`hsNb SPEED •SOMPH FREIGHT
SPEED •60MPH PASSENGER m
ti
a
M
LC
\ A \ Ir
r
?-SIDING4- - - ,:
'a vI o
m 6 1
6' CHAIN LINK
-Ktr ?? - -
(D
CURVE - SIDING4
PI STATION • 4753.59.33
I • 4. 49' 03..57" tLT)
D • 1. 05' 53-96-
R • 5.216.75'
LI 175.00'
L2 • 100.00'
DI • 0. 57' 39.,66"
D2 1. 30' 50.78"
LC 438.64'
SE -2.5'
SPEED •40MPH FREIGHT
SPEED -45MPH PASSENGER
H 0"""R
HDR ENGI NEERI NG, INC.
RELOCATE FENCE
CURVE • MAINZ
PI STATION • 476000.17
1 • 11. 53' 52.97" (LT)
D • 1. 55' 00.00"
co R • 2,989.48'
to L3 • 250.00'
N D3 • 2. 23' 44,.61"
a LC • 619•.68'
H=0. SE -2.5'-
ox 17 SPEED •50MPH FREIGHT
0 SPEED •60MPH PASSENGES-"
fn J+
Q? r1?r

0.109 ACRES -
- D
?RTAW 46' GRADE Cti05W#G (EPFLEX)
'
? x
STA 4756+73 TO 4757+15
-
PER NS PLAN 7-5B ?- z
IBY CONTRACTOR) m

Q MAIN2 a
a+
INSTALL 5'X5" CASE
EXAUBI2 WITH MOUNTED SIGNALS
STA. 4761.00
INSTALL 40' GRADE CROSSING (EPFLEX)
STA. PER NS PLAN 7-5B +? INSTALL SIGNAE/
?..e (BY CONTRACTOR) 4 STA. 4761
CURVE • EXAUB12
b 40°'y6o?+A ?f • STATION 21- 43 • 4758-80.69
18Y OTHERS) ti ?•s? o? ti?..SQ D I. 55 48..00
SCALE:
R • 2 ?'68.83'
RELOCATE FLASHER v PeS ?` @kQ0 126.00'
I O PROTECTION (BY NS) O 2 PO FEE LLL777711 1 D
T MAY 2 5 2006
.? NORFOLK
160WHERN
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
pWtAG GAIT
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OPERATIA6 OIVISION
OFFICE OF THE CN;F ENGINEER - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION - ATLANTA. GA.
TITLE AUBURN SIDING
TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
RJB ID A"' 0233 vAi MAP?8600A LE FOS?90.5 - H94
RAW FILE Ab. 107-1-5362 "IAC Nmm?
DATE JANUARY 10, 2006 TB-2005-40
SMC
F-1
CARD FILE• P'NASAR%AUdvn\AU8PLPR07..d9n SHEET TA-007
COUNTIEc-
CZ
N
m
n

0
h'
III A V 1- 0
t ?nn?. a

P _

70YV.C.
3
v
370

J50 V.C. n $ m

G
r-D62
$ o
p N
$

360
- - - - - - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - - )ODJX r-1004' 360
_ - - - - - - - - - -- - - -
d!9C -l7
---
?
----
fX.GRW
c?v e o INV. 3 4..66 INV 354

350 .

il

*
$
r, .
J,17
l
350

? ?
9 o

L v A O N ? ?! N

° W

$ M "I ? ry O b ?
° ; N N ?o m ? N 'b
o P D ^'? cp
340
4761 +00
4770
+00 ?,
477 ?
+00
340

c3 4168.22
0,109 ACRES $
EH"P
g4 5
4768.04 8 4768.1 JACK 8 BORE
47' - 36" STEEL PIPE

c?
E
es?o? iv65
A EXISTING PIPES TO BE
BANDONED AND CONSTRUCT 2 HEADNALLS 8 s 4772.13 TO 4772.33 I17' LT..I

' 8 GROUT FILLED y2B59s?9 NEW 18" CMP. L•20'
LE ?
In t INSTALL 2-16' GRADE CROSSINGS (EPFLEX)

N STA 4772+15 TO 4772+J1
i - PER
}N CAN 7 SB
--
---_--•-..-'a--.•-• --..-_ -----_•-__-•----.-_...,_.-_. -°- - - -- - -
--'- °-
-_-_•-__-__-
d
(VV?II r Ixv... u 3 -' °?--
O
1w.. .353 es 2'? v
4765-00
---------

-..-_.----------- d

2
ZZ
a'
MA I N2
m
?
ry E
T
5 8
351 ? x5
( Z J QZ

cp Q

A?•355'
1 Atbtt 5? zz17
?
E ?
1AO
d
h`
1
n
+
Pa ?
'
V/
Mqv
2
? 206
LEGEND PENR
EXISTING TRACKS 1 kA?Q
0 10 2 0 FEET ftsrr

NEW TRACK CONSTR
CT T'';T?
ION
U ftNc
'"h
- - - - - - - - - SCALE :
TRACK TO BE SHIFTED
Y BT DATE DESCRIPTION
---- ---- LIMITS of CONSTRUCTION .?. ??
NORFOLK LDG"°"

?
i AUBURN , NC
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION _
? r a?O?FRN WILE AUBURN SIDING
PROPOSED PAVING TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
- --- EXISTING R/W

wfrcA?ro IMPACTS
HDR ENGI NEERI NG
INC OWING COWANT
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT RJB 70 N0' D233 VAL MAP3986OOA 'LE POSrH90.5 - H94
DRAWIND NUMBER
'awRAW FILE Ab-
07-
-
,
.
OPERATINC DIVISION 1
1
6362
TB-2005-4
DarE
cffN 0
OFFI CE OF THE CHIEF EMINEER - DESIGN ARD COA6TRUCTION - ATLANTA, GA. smc
JANUARY 10, 2006
JOHNSTON COUNTIES
CADD FILET P+IA1SRR\AUbum1AU8'LPRO8.QOn SHEET TA-008
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
360
370
360
V,c.
W
,6321
360
-=-4_-.... r_-_Ll ........ 1: ___Ll__ -
X,Gf:. JNd NV. 31
370
360
aD'V.C.
a
n
0
N
N
h
350
0
n
>n
0
Q
a
Z
x
U
I
I PV. 349.69
m 1350
cy) ca CC)
-?
O tpryp O O O $ O O N , N ni ?1 v p` N h :o t?p tb :? ?ti rN.' Iq?
ko b bbl ko e'1 r0 ib1 h M h a W ,n b ?D ko t0 ?0 t0 co co b
4780+00 478 +00
1 4785.88 TO 4786.0
4778.00 REMOVE 12" CAP (!t LT) a -
INSTALL COLLAR AND 1 INSTALL NEW 12" CMP (36" 1 eL4?
EXTEND 25' OF 30" RCP ' ecw 1136 Ay Al
0pP 6 q42'52
PE 69 i 1?\ AAA' g8
..??.---?.-..--_ 1655.6)62,\ • )
*0•2 0„220 ACR - - - - - -- - - a 2,? )
pN- ?
4 - - - - - - - - - -
------------
P..9 n
363-34
IN . 367 ?
J m
n
._.-.--.--.•-..----__-__-__-.. - - -_--•-------_-_-_..-•---•---•--.-----..--•--•--. _ __-__--_-__-----_._.- ..--..-...?••--_--__-__ •-_ -----------
L
tr
' c y i y INSTALL 2-16' GRADE CROSSINGS (EPFLEX)
?; qy N STA 4785.92 TO 4786.08 x
L9.19 Cbi e h PER NS PLAN 7-58 15
6 c a )4µ?5?LE6 2 b (BY CONTRACTOR)
E ? ,?s4. er`?.
p1 0? o, q66 aQ p1EO N ?? - - - - _
6
ELV4 )5 b ??
ro?
\ 15t39n °Z D ???W
?8a 10\\ aA 560 9? L5 G'/
6 2J aE? L
EL?•LO???p9 E
? e?E09f?y1,?
LEGEND MAY 2 5 2006
Exlsrrxc TRACKS 1 0 10 2 PO FEET wt DENR ATER QU; 7-y
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION fill 111119 AND Df WgTERRRA CH
- - - -- - - - - TRACK TO BE SHIFTED SCALE
REV 8Y DATE DESCRIPTION
---- ----- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ? F NORFOUC LOCATION AUBURN , NC
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING a" SOUTHERN TITLE AUBURN SIDING
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
-- EXISTING RIW Fm - DANING Ca~r OWV RJB 'O N'• D233 VAL 1398600A ILE PosTH90.5 H94
WETLAND IMPACTS HDR ENGINEER] NG, I NC. EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT mHRAW FILE NY. 107-1-6362 LKWIA6 MARLIN
OPERATING DIVISION tHx TB-2005-40
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENDII$ER - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION • ATLANTA. GA. SMC DATE JANUARY 10, 2006
CADO FILE= P•\HSRR\AutLun\AUHPLPR09 dj7n SHEET TA-009
J60
I
370
360
350
m
co
0
4
N
W
z
2
U
Fl
a
h
M 350
W N
^? M
480220
ING 24" CIP
DULLED --------
55? Nq.E
t?.. -[p5 O
IA co
a
a
INY .357. 1 z
J
AY \/\ Z
8 LIIS
------------------ _
E?ESNi + Pt - _ ?,
t? 0 1? tta 0°qq 19
???? w ? I°\\p5 4802.30
1?( E??,F9s,E'aEp° JACK 8 BORE
MAY J?It iN??SECt6 44' - 36" STEEL PIPE,
Or 1 e c?' AND CONSTRUCT 2 HEADWALLS
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS
a NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
- • - - - - - - - TRACK TO BE SHIFTED
m
------------- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION ??
® PROPOSED PAVING
o I -• - - - EXISTING RIW i i?
H WETLAND IMPACTS HDR ENGI NEERI NG, CNC.
h
100E
V'A
10 Igo 2&*KT
SCALE:
REV er DATE DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
NORFOLK AUBURN , NC
SOLIMERN TITLE AUBURN SIDING
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
ONNIAI, COWANT °GA1 RJB t0 ""• D233 ?' 398600A ILEPDSrR90.5 H94
-
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT ;;RAW 107-1-6362 rxrAle,NG HG18ER
OPERATING DIVISION LAD,. DATE TB-2005-40
OFFICE OF THE GRIEF ENGINEER - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION • ATLANTA, GA. SMC JANUARY 10, CAM FILE, P+INSRR%AuDurn%AUWLPRlO.dgn SHEET TA-010
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
360
370
----I----'---- --7="_
EX. 19 ND - -
r.
360
7 7-1
T_T ---
800'V.C.I I Rl I I ---INV. 3158•,34

cy)
?

N INV. 352.90
Q {0?
I
tb
b t
a N
L L

If1 O
j N
P V C N

7 ?0

i"1 t9

M

i M

M N P r. q? M a!

R Oi
z
c
o
h t
D

M t
0

?

?
o
a

M
oa m
e
o
a Q
vi
a N
? N
a
No R
a O

o N

a O °i O
a
+QO ?M n?a nn M M ? M M
STA. 4793.7
EXTEND 36" C?P, 15'
AND CONSTRUCT HEADWALL 'E p2
\?j j5? 5666
e?`lot 5 s9 sQo'-
6
as t2
0.-079 ACRES
.t°t 9 p.P P'
0.064 ACRES
Ixv. 3se.3e °i 4
%
A't
479-rrM 4800-M
------ --------------------- ------------------------------------------------------
/ ENV.. 35e.05
8Pik
O 6C I9?.96j5
?B a) 994 PN ??\\DS 55695
41. °\.3e9°Z 89 6y4V.
N Z \A, j6t }9°5e51,,1n 4'
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
r • O.OBI
r.
360
350
340
370

4805+00
INH. 353.
?0? o o' 00 0 ? o? 'ul ?R
o ,$ ? o O o
h ? h "l M "? M ? M ? M
481 +00 4815+ 0
rz
Ln
M
7
0?1

O
m
m
v
a
W
Z
V
r
3
4814.01
INSERT 49' - 18" STEEL PIPE
INTO EXISTING 20"X20" STB.
caP GROUT FILL AROUND VOIDS
Aar a AND CONSTRUCT HEADWALL
4
5 ?9 q8? q9
370
360
350
0
O
h M
340
Ulu ?J -
'.11 E
REMOVE 8 RELOCATE 3_r-__
NET AND POLES
30' Al FENCING )5
P ------ --_.---- t?- _-
l
- - - ------------ - - - - -°- - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - - \
O 0 Cp NO'
` g14? 9?\9
?S .'op. 0 t E g\
N 2 t4 35
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS
a NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
'o -- - - - - - - - TRACK TO BE SHIFTED
o,
„?, ------------- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
"g---- EXISTING R/W
WETLAND IMPACTS HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
h
1 0 Igo 2 PO FEET
SCALE: ; ?W
-? NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
OOHING CGWAW
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OPEIUTIAG IY ISION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER • DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION • ATLANTA. CA_
/ 0,.009 ACRES
2\
4R/5Q0
55
? pf
MAY 2 5 2006
?Ilq?c ? " S1?•kvu
AUBURN , NC
t
W
Z
2
U
I
TIRE AUBURN SIDING
TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
OGN RJB "'0"" 0233 VAL'J9B60DA ,LE P05TH90.5 - H94
RAW FILE AO. 107-1-6362 DRA/,M NiYBFR
u""SMC GATE JANUARY 19, 2006 TB-Z???-4m
CARD FILER PlX:4A IAuDurn\AUBPLPRII.dyn SHEET TA-01 1
0
n
m
a
WAKE & J OHNSTON COU NTIE

370
370
$ N
N ? 4 b
P til in
In
i In
I
n
$ F , $
360 )arz r-IOSO
'° 360
--- -- --- -_
' -
q I NV. 351 -83 -- - ---- ---- - - - -
--
- -
--

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

350
$ ? 350

41 INV. 46.57

QQ

n h

h

M o ? o o N o
m a
Ln o?
b m
ut ot
a
o-o h m m ? ? ? "l ?
m ? y rl 01 Q

A

h

h

M

M

"?

M

^l ;
''I

M

M ?

"t b

M Ln

"t
b
M ?

^ w ?
h
+?

340

48

+00

4821

+00 ? M M M In

483q
M
+00
ti
>'1

340

CURVE MAIN3
P1 STATION • 4828.66.52
1 14. 49'' 47.34" (LT)
2 D 0. 59' 50..00"
ape
gOt
f
I ut a
y h
q

c.w R 5.745.61'
L) •L2 • 124.00'
'
`
fa4µc
$
l
- 9
59 va
4820.39.00 f31.5' LT) e
B?S
'
^ N14D;q.bp.t1 -12 M 704820.59.00 (31.3' LT) eA6A9j5
:,.. S N NEW 18 CMP, L-20* e? 2.o ` b?'tg
6? ~-'•-?? a n N DI-D2 • 0. 37
05.77
LC 1,487.11'
SE • 1.0"
SPEED •50LIPH FREIGHT
SPEED •60UPH PASSENGER

...+--"-? t fvi
"+c
posn55sa?'
?t .•
'•- aA '

""' -
° wC0 - CUT AND SN1fT TRACK
0.008 AC
R1E, euE p.t3

1
A-N
d

04 SST.
- - STA. 4$28.00.00
4 NOYEN WIFE

P'

2

MAIN3 --
EN WIRE i

v 4825-00 ?
v

$

" r (D y' 1 a
N
O

SIDINGS EXAUBI3

o?
w

~
' ??
,`, %S

%
t 5. 0

,
+ ..-????""••r• m Is (?gNBpSf
?
p?
, ,?
, -__-_
' -? ------ ___--__.-_.
- - `°-iE1i45
Pt?ES F£? ??--_--°-•- __-/
--?Y'..1 -----
,,....r
-?~-
+1-?
INSTALL 2-16'' GRADE CROSSINGS CEPF )
STA 4820.44 TO 4820.60 ~---"-"--'--- --------------•?--?'-'??
CURVE • EXAUBI3 -??
4830.31
17
PER NS P LAN 7-5B PI STATION • 4828.24
06 '
" ?
i?
ki
(BY CONTRACTOR) CURVE SIDINGS ..
I • 16. 03' 58.88" (LT)
D • 0. 59' 24
00" INSERT 65
18
STEEL P
IPE
INTO EXISTING 24"X24" STB, i
V u D
P! STATION 4828.74,.04 . GROUT f1Ll AROUND VOIDS
1*' CLT)
5.
6
6 R 5.787.52'
LC • 1,622.86 AND CONSTRUCT 2 HEADWALLS MAY 2 5 200

LEGEND D • 1
00
00
00
R • 5,729-65* 6
EXISTING TRACKS LI •L2 • 62.00"
DI •D2 • 0. 18" 35•.99"
190
0 2 PO FEET DENR- TTERQUAL1
S
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION 64'
SE • 1,544; WATEp
- ------- - TRACK TO BE SHIFTED 0
SPEED •40MPH FREIGHT SCALE
SPEED •45MPH PASSENGER ogre oESCRIrrlax
- --- ---- - LIMITS of CONSTRWTJON „ F NORFO"C Tu Urf O
AUBURN , NC
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION Off, SOLIMERN TITHE AUBURN SIDING
® PROPOSED PAVING
TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
---- - EXISTING R/W
ET
P
EAS Owim cawmr -
T CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT DUN RJB 'D 'A'• D233 VAC ""8600A ' $190.5 H94
W
LAND IM
ACTS HDRENGINEERING, INC. DNNRAw )LEAN. 107-1-6362 DRAwINOAMBER
oPERATIAO DIVISION
OFFICE OF TIC CHIEF EAVINEER - DESION AND CONSTRUCTION - Aft"TA, CA. TB-2005-
CIiKSMC DATE JANUARY 10. 2006 40
:S

CARD FILE- P,%NSRlnAydunIADHPLPRI? dgn SHEET TA-012
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
0
P
A

0
0
0
h
0
n
j 46&1.00
a
r
U 66 `?-
A 6
- - - - - - ?- - ?? - r IMPACTED WETLAND AREA
NOTES., 0429 ACRES
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTURBNNG ACTIVITIES.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
FOR SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
DETAILS SEE SHEET GD-001
FOR CHECK DAM DETAILS SEE SHEET GO-002
REFER TO SIGNAL PLAN FOR GRADING OF SIGNALS AND SIGNAL HOUSE LOCS
CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN POSITNE DRAINAGE
-- I _--_- ------ -----
T i
33 9Z
' i IHY, 177.2? INV. 311 72
I FL - d
? ?? 1 1, 772 tl2
NY 335x2
IMPACTED WETLAND AREA
0.038 ACRES
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
------------ - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
- - - EXISTING R/W
WETLAND IMPACTS
CHECK DAMS
o a a- ; SILT FENCE
- - - - - - - - - DRAINAGE DITCH
a
f fINV . 296 76
4685.00
{ - ;A 9

I 4690,00
IMPACTED WETLAND AREA
Dan ACRES
)11 7]
eo-, gRvERT
46T54b
Q
%0
0
c
N
Z
J
v
r,
N
C
n
e
N
2
2
U
3

0 Igo 2 PO FEET
SCALE:
NORFOLK
-'= Room- SOUTHERN
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
OIdII CD9 5
HDR ENGINEERING, INC. EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
tm ING Drvlslox
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EACIIWER - OESICN AND CONSTRUCTION - ATLANTA. GA.
MAY 2 5 ?096
?DENR WA74R Q ?kL:
craa??va??a?r??
AUBURN, NC
TITLE
AUBURN SIDING
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
DDN RJB PID AR7' 8233 "'398600A ILE POSTH90.5 - H94
w" RAW FILE Au. 107-1-6362 DIMING N(AI6ER
SSMC DATE JANUARY 10, 2006 TB-2D05-4m
CADO FILES P•1NSRMAubr nlAUB er IwLOI Ggn SHEET GP-001
WAVY P_ _ lr)WKICTr)KI nnl IKI-I-TCS
O
N
N
O
n
a
t
N
W
_z
J
I
U
I

Z
i
M
N
9
a
N
U
O
a
0
a
P
M
0
0
h
NOTES:
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRO? TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTUR81NG ACTIVITIES
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
FOR SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
DETAILS SEE SHEET GD-OOL
FOR CHECK DAM DETAILS SEE SHEET GD-002
REFER TO SIGNAL PLAN FOR GRADING OF SIGNALS AND LJGNVHqdLACL_
---WNTRA0Mff 'Rd`GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE
4595.00

rr?.S_ tirirr?rrr ??
K
K
DnCH
O
N
A
n
a
GO
W
J
2
V
I

009 TED WEiLAVD
ACRES AREA ka

- _
MEN
3+. .... .... ....
w
4105 Q?
CW'EDD IM
Tr v
- I, d

?IC?? l
ry?e.rr r ?.

n0 b
•
•
6
IMPACTED WETLAND AREA
0.051 , ??..
j
?
in .... +..
RIP RAP SLOPE
0.28 ACRES
? 1, , .., : •.
SAY 2

I 0
0 2 0 FEET ?NR
,
?
k'

SCALE. q
u
4Tf'e ? r `

LEGEND

EXISTING TRACKS
W
NE
TRACK CONSTRUCTION
-••-------•• - LLMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
- - - EXISTING R/W
WETLAND IMPACTS
CHECK DAMS
o-
- SILT FENCE
$
a -- ?
- - - - - - - - - DRAINAGE DITCH
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.

• vV V1? 1 iL.
cam rILE• PxW5RIlAt.0urn\AUAero5raa0z agn SHEET GP-002
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIE%

T.
A
x
r
x
m
N
a
D
•a
J•
47?
MAY ? 5 ?or-
"'i'?9SR
ANDST-
C3
C.
a
` 4720-00
Q
4
M
N
w 37
z
J ?u
IMPACTED WETLAND AREA-
0.056 ACRES
a
N
O
M
0
N
ro
h
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS

NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
---- •--- - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
--- - EXISTING RIW
WETLAND IMPACTS
CHECK DAYS
R-- 9- SILT FENCE
?-- t
- - - - - - - - - DRAINAGE DITCH
HDR EN GI NEER I NG, I NC.
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
DrNING cowmr
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OPERATING DIVISION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER - DESIGN AND CONSTROCTIWN - ATLANTA. GA.
NOTES:
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRK1R TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
FOR SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
DETAILS SEE SHEET GO-W
FOR CHECK DAM DETAILS SEE SHEET GO-002
REFER TO SIGNAL PLAN FOR GRADING OF SIGNALS AND SIGNAL HOUSE LOCS
CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE
'y1 .:t3

47JO.00

! 0 Igo 2 PO FEET
SCALE:
NORFOLK
?••? SOL"HERN
AUBURN , NC
O
n
v
n
a
Q
N
_z
J
z
U
0
n
n
Q
c
w
2
V
u
TITLE -
AUBURN SIDING
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
RJB 'D 'b' 0233 AE VAPM8600a ILE FaS M.5 - H94
DANRAw FILE x°•107-1-6362 DRAW. AMBER
°OfSMO DATE JANUARY 10, 2006 TB-2005-48
CARD FILE, P,lN5RR\AuburnlADAeroslon-03..dgn SHEET GP-003
0
N
+
n
a
N
W'
Z
J
L1
I
o
n
e
n
e
c
N
W
Z
S
U
D
a

0
N
0
NOTES:
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRIOR TO OR COWURREHT WITH LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
£ROS,ON AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
FOR SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
DETAILS SEE SHEET GO-OW
FOR CHECK DAM DETAILS SEE SHEET GD-002
REFER TO SIGNAL PLAN FOR GRADING OF SIGNALS AND SIGNAL HOUSE LOCS
CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE
EXISTING TRACKS
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
------- - - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
--- - - EXISTING RIW
WETLAND IMPACTS
CHECK DAMS
o e e-; SILT FENCE
- - - - - - - - - DRAINAGE DITCH
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
?SAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
?,9ti

N ?
C
ij
?h
A ?$
D I`
..r??-
Q
1 0 1 0 2 O FEET
SCALE:
NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
OWNING COMPANY
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OPERA TJ IV IS ION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EAVINEER • DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION • ATLANTA. GA-
MAY 2 5 2006

n
+
h
n
n
a
4
N
W
Z
J
U
3
n
Z
r_
2
rn
N
.a
Y
a
J
}
U
O
DENR -WATER UUAL11Y
WEMANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
AUBURN , NC
TITLE
AUBURN SIDING
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Fxx- RJ6 ""a- 0233 YAL 11APJ90600a ILE'fi90.5 - H94
1:m-RAW ILE N*°!07-1-6362 AWING AWSW
"ASMC DATE JANUARY 10, 2006 TB-2005-40
CARD FILE# P=1NSRR'..u,,txlrn\AiIB-Oros7on-O4 Qgn SHEET
GP-004
III A l/T- A 1/11 rk If ,rr%k i nn1 14117-Tr
IMPACTED WETLAND AREA
0064 ACRES IMPACTED WETLAND AREA-
0,079 ACRES
M
INV.
- - sse.?? \p3 \\
m v -
r
N tc _ I
w
2 -
J y
S ^ IxV .75e.05 y
V t
g
NOTES:
ALL EROSKW CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
FOR SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
} DETAILS SEE SHEET GDS
} FOR CHECK DAM DETAILS SEE SHEET W-002
1 REFER TO SIGNAL PLAN FOR GRADING OF SIGNALS AND SIGNAL HOUSE LOOS
l CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE
g_v?-E N 1 -•
• R'4• WOVEN WIRE % %•qj ,`?
t \ \ A?Z _ /ORCH
3
C.
N
m
^
a
c
N
w
i
x
U
9
4
O
0
0
0
N
h
E7!:I ?? y \ - IMPACTED WETLAMO AREA
25
?1"OZW ACRES
AND P"
rrnr?? lx "Jul 11vv 1 V14 UVUIV i 1C
IRV.
y
.S

?Q
N
H
c, a M
Q?
A
--?--.?--?--??--?--?- ESL
O
Q
N
z
J
S
U
0
A
m
n
a
d
r
N
z
x
U
3

V,'
LEGEND MAY
EXISTING TRACKS
j -
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION DENh
"•IWy?
------------ - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION I p Igo 2 PO FEET AFk s;uWAtkpc
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION

® PROPOSED PAVING SCALE
RLY 8Y W/F LrFSCRlP710R
--- - - EXISTING R/W -_4
NORFOLK LOCATION

WETLAND IMPACTS
?? AUBURN , NC
-
SOUTHERN
? TITLE
CHECK DAYS ? AUBURN
I?

s---o---?-
SI
T FE
C
NORTH C
RO GRADING
CONTROL PLAN
EROSION
-- !
N
L
E A
LINA RAILROAD COMPANY

- - - - - - - - -
DRAINAGE DITCH
MDR ENGINEERING
IN osNIM6 COWWr
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT RJB
AIN 'o h"- 0233 u AIAPM8600a ILE Posrygo.!
rltc ?
R

.
C.
Raw .
107-1-6362 AIAG MWE
D
__ ____
GAOU FILE' P' lN5RR%Auturn1AU&arcs !on-05.agn
SHEET GP-COS
WAKE & JOHNSTON COUNTIES
El
0
N
+
n
a
N
W
Z
X
v
2 J
M
V?
h
Q: -!Pt
} m$ I
NOTES:
r ?ti, rrr`rr??
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LANO-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
0
m
o
m
a
d
N
W
Z
J
2
U
F-
1
e
0
0
N
N
a
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS

NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
------------ - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
® PROPOSED PAVING
- - - EXISTING R/W
WETLAND IMPACTS
CHECK DAMS
e--e---+s--- SILT
ENCE
F
- - - - - - - - - DRAINAGE DITCH
O
m
Go
a
N
h "yo
R
HDRENGINEERENG, INC.
• P:
IMPACTED WETLAND AREA E4?`ce°
0.008 ACRES N9tE. P?S"",
61tis + r
?.r+?lrrr+..+r?'+ -? p. 134 ? A
Rom
/ A-N• _ m
4 VOW" 4
?• N IA D
_ A
+
`rrrrr ,..a?rr??rr err ??.r r?? r? ~+ .
10 10 2 PO FEET
SCALE:
NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
ONWIAG COIA°AHT
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OPERATING DIVISION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EhGIA¢ER • DESIGN AND C1WMICTIOH - ATLANTA. GA.
MCA . ,limn
DENt.
WETIAND,q WvG
0
n
m
a
4
r
N
W
Z
J
2
U
F
A
AUBURN SIDING
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Dav RJ8 1D A'' 0233 AL 1OP398600A 1LE POSrH90.5 - H94
DANRAW FILEAb.107-1-6362
--d ORMINGAMR Z005 40
°1KSMC DATE JANUARY 10, 2006
rADO FILE P+INSRR?Aw?vin1AU11erasIon- O6.COn SHEET GP-006
. 344 14 \ + ??
FOR SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
DETAILS SEE SHEET GD-M
FOR CHECK DAL( DETAILS SEE SHEET GO-002
REFER TO SIGNAL PLAN FOR GRADING OF SIGNALS AND SIGNAL HOUSE LOCS
WAVC' A lr)UKlQTnnl nni IAITTT-
•._+?? ?.a vv+uw+vlW vVVI?IIL
0
in
fn
a
c
N
W
z
U
F1
a
0
N
P
N
a tt r
y -
m 34
S a
U
13
c I
-- - ---------
PMED RDAp WELLS
,n 'MITOR,
to
NOTES.
ALL EROSM CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES..
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
FOR SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
DETAILS SEE SHEET OD-001
FOR CHECK DAM DETAILS SEE SHEET GO-"
?r" a .TCa3e REFER TO SIGNAL PLAN FOR GRADING OF SIGNALS AND SIGNAL hWSE UXS
? Kpp SK£
CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE
4 "N WIRE
rte. • -

LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS

NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
---- ---- - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTKIN 190 Igo 2 PO FEET
9 qoF?,,
® RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION 111111119 u` • ;

® PROPOSED PAYING SCALE
afv or dEre
-- - - EXISTING NORFOLK LOC.TIar
WETLAND IMPACTS
""£
SOLIMERN
CHECK DAMS A
GRADING &
!
:+--a---e -- t SILT FENCE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY

- - - - - - - - -
DRAINAGE DITCH
awlA c cawAw
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT mr RJB Pro

No. D233
HDR ENGINEERING, INC. Raw xf
MD' 107-1-6362
0
n
n
Q
n
e
c
ti
N
W
z
x
U
r
I
.S
LAW r+cs. r•rrgrrtrt,wDUrmaurierasrorz07a?+ SHFFT ;p-nn-7
WAKE A ND J OHNSTO N COUNTIE

i9 c

STEEL PE

, \

30

OP OF

ANK \

i
\ 46 3+2 2*0
CHANN L PROFI - q \\ 9! 13
15 52" SK
W

_ \ - _ OP f BANK
5 TH IE7
A q
!09'

32J /
r \

/ r r 36' EEL P/P \ 46 69+ 72- 0
r \ 31 ° ' 8' SK EW
- -
CHAN) '
P EL
26 %
TOP OF
BANK

s REA M
CH
NEL P F
ILE

I r o 12 0 fl o I ? o 91 0 8 70 0 5 40 3 20 1 0 1 0 2 0 30 4 5 0 6 0 7 8 90 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 0
r1

p , : 20' HORIZONTAL
SCALE :1' 10' VERTICAL
RE9 Br DATE OESCRIPTIOH
MAY 2 5 2006 NORFOLK LUCArIDN AUBURN, NC
F?
3w
SOUTHERN TITLE AUBURN SIDING
4

0
4lIN
DRAINAGE PIPE AND GRADE CROSSING PROFILES
"UR
MWATFA
dH NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
's' 0233 AL luv 399600A PILE PDSr H90.5-H94
HDR ENGINEER] NG, INC. EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT /w. 107-1-6362 DRARIRD AMBER
&
OPERATING DIVISION TB-2005-40
A
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENDINEER • DESIGN AND COISTROCrION - ATLANTA, OA. C"X JANUARY 10, 2006
CARD FILEP+%HSRR%ALburntCralnpge DrOflleS.dgn SHEET DXS-001
=S
WAKE A ND J OHNSTON COUNTIE

3 Or l

3or

?qr

qqq
"
v
I

ro
OF -

'
_
;;; - - - - _
- TOP OF
- - BANK
28 E ANNEL ROflLE - - - - -
F F C P OFILE
I
!bB'
r
S R A 3

1
0 470
A 4 D+ 1
1} c es
r- IA
,4 3
1 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 + 80 7 0 50 4 3 0 20 1 0 ( 0 i 3 4 50 61 0 70 80 9 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 0
SCALE:; o' HOVER TCA
D REV er DATE
DESMIPTIar
LounDN
NORFOLK AUBURN, NC
MAY 2
2006
?-- SOUTHERN TITLE
AUBURN SIDING
'07m
® DRAINAGE PIPE AND GRADE CROSSING PROFILES
nFti. -R x`.a"'

? _: ??.
wwi NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
]R
tt"' RJB ID ""' 0233 VAt "'P 399600A rzE PosT H90.5 H94
FI
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT 0**
LE A;T. 107-1-6362 lAP AuwaER
RAW
1I °R tNGi NEEETi NG, i NC.
DPERAT, rvi Tav TB-2005-48 CIAK OFFICE OF THE CHIEF £ACINEER • DESIGN AND CYSTRICTIDN - ATLANTA. GA.? DATE JANUARY 10. 2006
.S
CARD FILEP,IIISRRIAuDurMdraTragd prot,Ies dgn SHEET DXS-002
WAKE A ND JOHNSTO N COUNTIE
J e
34

i / 36ST L

3
3 C
N
- ,
48 Z

,

6s' 47 4
2
+8 3- 9
- - --- 89 059 2" SKE W

/
31 ol

FER T
REGAT NS SP
SECTIO ,FOR G
GA 3 G D

,
,

,
,

704 +26 00
` z 704 +36 00
N i 66STEE L PIPES
I
8
9059
'28j
" S
E W
lk

TOP OF 8AN ' - -
CHAN EL PRO I LE 210 %
- - - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
1 0 12 0 11 0 I ) o 9 0 80 7 0 60 50 4 3 0 20 1 0 10 20 30 4 50 60 7 80 i I 0 11 0 l o 1 0

SCALE J: , 200; HOVER ICAI
5 (. REY 8r DATE OESCRI%ION
LOCATION
NORFOLK AUBURN, NC
a
SOUTHERN TITLE
AUBURN SIDING
qrm

DRAINAGE PIPE AND GRADE CROSSING PROFILES
'°?ow ®
]R
"
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
RJB 10 An. 0233 vAL OAP 399600A ILE POST H90.5-H94
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT RAW
a„ FILE"o 107-1-6362 m?"Iw w-wmR
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
OPERATIAC DIVISION TB-2005-40
OFFICE Of THE CHIEF ENGINEER • DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION - ATLANTA, GA. 11, SMC DATE JANUARY 10, 2006
.S
CARD FILEP"%N5RRXAUDUrnXGroinpDe proftte5.dgn SHEET DXS-003
a
N
N
e
8
N
I
' s STEE

47 8+ 2 2.0 3
az 7 -- ---

. 36S7 E

150 120 1110 [Do
A._i
W L 44.4' k > ! ?ir.??rATc t
HDRENGINEERING, INC.

i

o3/ 7
110 0 110
SCALE :F : ?0' VERTICAL
NORFOUC
?jwSOUMEAVN
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT
OP A IAG DrvI ION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EACINEER • DESIGN AND CONSIRUCTIOx • ATLANTA, GA.
WAKE AND JOHNSTON COUNTIES

?/A !/?
1 4 1 7 `+ 42 a O
nn nr Annrr r- vr
100 1110 120 1$0
AUBURN, NC
AUBURN SIDING
DRP,tNAGE PIPE AND GRADE CROSSING PROFILES
E&RA 0233"AL' 399600A ILE Ao7 H90.5-H94
W FItE No. 107-1-6362 419" l hP"'sEa
0
, DATE JANUARY 10, 2006 TB-20m5-40
CADO Fit FP,INSRRIAudvn\drQlnoge profffe dgn CLICCT nve_nni
WAKE A ND JOHNSTON COUNTIE

3 cMP
P I 36'c P

1
890 47
P7j 3+
5" 503
SKE
W

!5'
I

f

47 851 9-9 7

30 P 30'
ST E M 5
0 47
' 78+
" 0.1 4
. - - 92 36 28 SKE W
L NEL P OFILE 25 NO DE
C
H
ED

NEL DE

H
T
CHANN THOUG WETLAN 5

-- -- - 47 -' 2+2 3-0 3

1 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 90 8 70 6 0 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 0 2 30 4 5 0 70 80 9 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 0
SCALE i• : 20• HORIZONTAL
:1• = 10' VERTICAL
RLY 8Y DATE DESCRfP7rON
'ij`' NORFOLK LOCATION
AUBURN, NC
SOUTE/ERN ' L AUBURN SIDING
1I#01*04"A QiT9RMriAl?r NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY DRAINAGE PIPE AND GRADE CROSSING PROFILES
DGN RJ13 fPD ND• D233 YAL "AP 399600A ILE POSY H90.5-H94
HDR ENG1 NEERI NG, INC. EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT RAW '? N0 107-1-6362 DRASING AMBER
OPEWING DIVISION rxx DATE TB-2005-40
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER - DESIGN Alp CONSTRUCTION - ATLANTA. GA. SMC JANUARY 10, 2006
.S
CAM FffXPl1NSRRXAuWrrnCralnogs prcflle ,dqn SHEET DXS-OOS
WAKE A ND J OHNSTON COUNTIF
f

I r

l8' EEC
P
? ?

--

4

! 2 ?

0

4

% I\

-

---

----

----

-

8

0
+
F

1

7
-
91 c 49 ' 30 I
SK
W
65
t

1

- - - - ---- ---- ---- - _

18'ST EL ' 20 X 20'

V;j

---

----

---

----

---

- h ?
-

---
----

--
----
---

----

---
0.557. 93 27' 14 " SK W

r
W 4
EI I
/ P
N -

48

2t

Oa0
W 7 90` 5 1 ' 27 " SK W

1 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 90 8 70 60 50 4 3 2 1 0 T 1 0 2 30 4 5 6 0 70 SO 90 l f 0 I1 0 1 0 1 0 1
SCALEJ: = 2010' • HatYERrtCAttzaar?
II11 ,
11 1 ?TBON DATE DESCRIPTION
VC'l w 1 ?F NORFOLK AUBURN, NC '
?Y SOL"H "RN rrrtE AUBURN SIDING
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY DRAINAGE PIPE AND GRADE CROSSING PROFILES
DENR 4VAI aGN RJB ID No: X233
r.IC wr 399600A ItE aDSr H90.5-H94
V&-rL4 AM STOR4WA?{ EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT ;; FILE JORAWIAU NLYBER
HDR ENGI NEERI NG. I NC. OPERA T ING 0IVISION RAW
rVA 107-1-6362 TD-2005-40
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER • DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION • ATLANTA. GA. CM9 SMC r£ JANUARY 10, 2006 _ 1
CARD FILEP,IASRR%AudrrnldraTncge paflle .dqn CL1CC'T nVO-nnc
WAKE AND JOHNSTON COUNTIE;

36' Cal

? a
r
349 4 8 3 8 + 7 5
3
1 .
-- ---- --- --
-
- -
89
10'
33 "
SK
W

1 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 90 SO 70 6 0 5 0 40 30 2 10 1 0 20 30 4 5 60 7 SO 9j; 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 0
_? rl?
L 20: HORIZONTAL
SCALE
•

''/, k
?;;"

/1?'?'h :1
: 10
VERTICAL
-

REY BY OA7E

DESCRIP71ON

--?-? NORFOLK LDCA7f0N
AUBURN, NC
DrIN+
???u1t ?? O GC?"
I? TITLE
AUBURN SIDING
DRAINAGE PIPE AND GRADE CROSSING PROFILES
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY

HDR ENGI NEERI NG, I NC.
EAST CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT °GN RJB I° "A''
Dm RAW FILE "°• 0233 ""L R'IP 399600A uE POST H90.5-H94
107-1-6362 DR"IRG AMBER
f
OPERA7,AG DIYI ION
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EAGINEER • DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION - ATLANTA, CA. CHA DATE
smc TB-2005-40
JANUARY 10, 2006
?OF W ATFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
0) 7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
J ?
Q .r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 27, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 06-0677
Wake and Johnston County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC Railroad Commission
Attn: Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Subject Property: Auburn, NC Sidings: Rail Bed Expansion
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Saylor:
On April 24, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (the "Division") received your Pre-Construction
Notification Application dated April 21, 2006. The Division has determined that the information is
insufficient to complete our review. The Division will require additional information in order to process
your application to impact protected streams, buffers, and wetlands on the subject property.
Please provide the additional information requested below in order to prevent denial of your
application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506:
1. The existing culverts along the project length are perched, resulting in extreme segmentation of the
streams. This project proposes to replace the existing culverts, however, insufficient detail was
provided regarding provisions for aquatic life passage as required by Condition 11 of GC 3404
(NW 14). Please provide cross-sectional details for each stream crossing location.
2. The project must comply with the diffuse flow and nitrogen removal provisions of the Neuse River
Basin Rules [15A NCAC 02B .0232 through.0240]. That is, all new sections of this project that
are outside of the footprint of the existing railroad must be designed in accordance with these
requirements.
Please respond within five (5) days of the date of this letter by sending five (5) copies of the above
information in writing. This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts
to wetlands, waters or protected buffers.
Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the
DWQ.
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncvvetlands
NOne Cato a
a mra,
An Equal OpportunitylAffirrnative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NCRR Commission Auburn, NC Sidings
Page 2 of 2
April 27, 2006
Please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly at [phone] if you have
any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
4
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/cvdw
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience Corp., 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
F WA Fg Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q
G
Au Willi
G
R
J
S
ecretary
am
.
oss
r.,
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 26, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 06-0677
Wake and Johnston County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC Railroad Commission
Attn: Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Subject Property: Auburn, NC Sidings: Rail Bed Expansion
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Saylor:
On April 24, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (the "Division") received your Pre-Construction
Notification Application dated April 21, 2006. The Division has determined that the information is
insufficient to complete our review. The Division will require additional information in order to process
your application to impact protected streams, buffers, and wetlands on the subject property. Please
provide the additional information requested below in order to prevent denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506:
1. The existing culverts along the project length are perched, resulting in extreme segmentation of the
streams. This project proposes to replace the existing culverts, however, insufficient detail was
provided regarding provisions for aquatic life passage as required by Condition 11 of GC 3404
(NW 14). Please provide cross-sectional details for each stream crossing location.
Please respond within three (3) days of the date of this letter by sending five (5) copies of the above
information in writing. This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts
to wetlands, waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your
application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at (919)
715-3473 or Cyndi Karoly at [phone] if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a
meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
C l1X1J::;kA' 7- C)111W
Cyn I Karoly,
01 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/cvdw
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience Corp., 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htta://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
One
Carona
?tura?y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Ex_p t) Lo - oto I I
1101 lIavnes Street Suite 101 101eigh, NC 27004 Telephone: [phone] Fax: 919.828.351 8
EcoScience
April 21, 2006
Ms. Cynthia Van Der Weile
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Section 401/404 Permit - Auburn, NC Sidings 06-290
Dear Ms. Van Der Weile,
Please find enclosed a permit package for a requested Section 404 Permit and Express 401 Water
Quality Certification. We are requesting the permits under Nationwide Permit 14 and Water
Quality Certification #3404.
The project involves expansion and improvements along the North Carolina Railroad Company's
railroad bed in Wake and Johnston Counties, North Carolina. The project consists of
construction of two storage yards to the south of the existing track, and the addition of a new
main track to the north of the existing track.
Jurisdictional area impacts consist of impacts to five jurisdictional streams, totaling 319 linear
feet; and impacts to 12 riparian and non-riparian wetlands, totaling 0.61 acre.
Thank you for your attention and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions
or concerns.
Sincerely,
l
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience Corporation
CC?goWE p
APR 2 4 2006
UENK - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Attachments:
PCN Form, Permit Materials
rr? FVVATFRMichael F. Easley, Governor
?William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Cp ? 1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>
0 C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #:
Fax #:
919-733-0203
919-733-6893
Fax To: Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience
Scott Saylor
Subject: Auburn, NC Sidings
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: [phone]
954-7099
Date: April 27, 2006
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions, please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at
19-715-34
N oc Carolina
St=1&
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
Internet: http:,";li2o.enr.suitC.nc_u0 10wUlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
_.t-?'c?? .2r(-,G-C'? U-7 ?
EcoScience
April 24, 2006
1101 Ilavues street Suite 101 Raleigh, NC 27604 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele
N.C. Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite. 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Section 401/404 Permit - Auburn, NC Sidings
Dear Ms. Van Der Wiele,
QGC?COWF p
D
APR 2 4 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
06-290
Please find enclosed a copy of the EEP approval for the permit package I delivered to your office
on Friday. Please note tha. the amounts of mitigation granted do not match those in the permit
package, since mitigation was granted before our meeting last Thursday. I will re-apply to EEP
for mitigation today. Given the mitigation ratios that EEP guarantees, I believe that obtaining
the added mitigation credits will not be a problem.
Thank you for your attention and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions
or concerns.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience Corporation
Attachments:
EEP mitigation letter
04-07-'06 11:00 FROM-DENR EEP 9197152001 T-736 P01 U-187
1.,
•, oR, ?J! I s stem
,ems :n
PROGRAM
April 7, 2006
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
I uJ ! Z cj o Co C) Cc- ?
o ??r, 06
PP`?? -` ?u?E ems"
W??•;??MW
Project: NC Railroad Company, Auburn Sidings County: Wake/Johnston
''he purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to serui
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone I Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
_Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.19 0.43 0 0 0 283 12,019 4,895
03020201
Upon receipt ofpayment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D• Gilmore, PP
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Vnit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
" Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
R&tOr&tg... 1? .. Pro", Ow ftA&
FCDA
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-16521919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
04-07-'06 11;00 FROM-DENR EEP
9197152001
'r-1 I L os stem
,C M en
PROGRAM
Q?@1121oe9 5
APR 2 4 2008
April 7, 2006 DENR • WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project: NC Railroad Company, Auburn Sidings County: Wake/Johnston
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC PEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter, If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time Panne, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC E1;P. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
-Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.19 0.43 0 0 0 283 12,019 4,895
03020201
Upon receipt ofpayment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone]-
Sincerely,
<Z?A_ IN
. C?FNWI
William D, Gilmore, PE
Director
cc, Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
R.P. tort tg... .. Prot", our Stn&
T-736 P01
U-187
Ou ) Q N 2_oo (l,o L, 1 1
FDA
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
04-07-'06 11:00 FROM-DENR EEP
9197152001
y-
E ow stem
a e,l l
PROGRAM
April 7, 2006
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
T-736 P01
nn ,U , 4 zcc(ou l,1 I
U-187
r..?f
APR 2 4 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Project: NC Railroad Company, Auburn Sidings County. Wake/Johnston
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC tEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the Issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Peet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq.1=t.) (Sq. Ft.)
U arian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.19 0.43 0 0 0 283 12,019 4,895
03020201
Upon receipt ofpayment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum, of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone]-
Sincerely,
William b, Gilmore, PIE
Director
cc: Cyndi Kcaroly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DW Q-Raleigh
File
X&torr fg... .. Pro" our ft-a&
FCDVA
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27899-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
04-07-'06 11;00 FROM-DENS EEP
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
9197152001
4 ow stem
PROGRAM
April 7, 2006
Project: NC Railroad Company, Auburn Sidings
T-736 P01
j7(.v# 20 C;I- C U
§,Z,gV§
Q
APR 2 4 2006
DENR - WHY ER UUALI I Y
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
County: Wake/Johnston
U-187
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC REP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frarne, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit
(Sq. Ft.)
(Sq. Ft.)
_Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.19 0.43 0 0 0 283 12,019 4,895
03020201
Upon receipt ofpayment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D, Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
'.Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
Rjestori,?q ... E .. Pro" Oust ftna
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1919-715-0478 / www.nceep,net
04-07-'06 11:00 FROM-DENR EEP 9197152001 T-736 P01 U-187
os stem
PROGRAM
April 7, 2006
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project: NC Railroad Company, Auburn Sidings
c.( G (, -7 ?
V@i%
• 4 2006
vVE11 ANOS slog
County: Wake/Johnston
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit1401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC F-F-P. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 2 zone 2
Unit (Sq.1~t.) (Sq. Ft.)
Ri arian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Warm
Neuse 0.19 0.43 0 0 ::n 283 12,019 4,895
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum, of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U_ S. Army Corps of P-ngineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone]-
Sincerely,
. loll
William D, Gilmore, PE
Director
cc, Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 'Chit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
" Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
RP.StOYI.l1?5... .. Prot" our -ma&
C ENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-9652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
04-07-'06 11:00 FROM-DENS EEP 9197152001 T-736 P01 U-187
os stem
eTI
PROGRAM
April 7, 2006
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project: NC Railroad Company, Auburn Sidings
1) ZCC, -7
vgo''A%
PPR
,NP,t6?QP?R RCN
g54P?
County: Wake/Johnston
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC PEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time franne, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.19 0.43 0 0 0 283 12,019 4,895
03020201
Upon receipt ofpayment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone I at a 3:1 ratio and zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc, Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
"Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
R.P.st0r&tg... E .. Pro ft", ow ft-
F North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
C O M P A N Y
February 1, 2006 E-),/ P O (o _ 0 (o ,)1
RE: Agent Authorization for
The preparation and submittal of permits with regard to
NCRR Raleigh to Selma Projects
To Whom It May Concern:
By copy of this letter, let it be known that Elizabeth Scherrer of EcoScience Corporation, 1101
Haynes Street, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina is hereby authorized by the North Carolina
Railroad Company to act as the Agent in the preparation and submittal of permit applications
and certifications with regard to the above-mentioned projects. U[R/;zq ?f?
Sincerely,
Scott Saylor,
President-NCR
Cc: Enrico Roque, HNTB North Carolina, PC
APR 2 4 ?UQ6
VENN. WATT: .I t
twos 4rvo srn?ATEh ssA?vr ?,
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1000
919 - 954 - 7601 phone / 919 - 954 - 7099 fax
�.. 'Ifi'tl htda%e � 7
9
?.`:
Auburn
UtApbarm
,1
I� (moo' \
L 70 •"
- 00-/
Project location u' it
,
d i a, Ia i
Il lr`' �z 1N w•ti • • �\:`�,•j' /r/`�-J :. _y �•.\ r ••1 ('oUsC (. 4,,
�• a. • . • )�.. �.�+. !��..� '`f � • � ,,� "� .; '. � LIon) • • .4To
m%�'
•.
id
'� / `\ • f irk
�L 1
1. �1' \ \\, �(��,,, 1 I ,� _ � ;� ` ,o � f'�g�`" � '�• C??1.-r,�_�\\i. _ p`' ems`
/ )/r . 1 I I\ _ �!`� •• �p STATE AGMrM l (� _
( /�-/1'� , �,;��. .< �. 1.. ; l /, � � , •� . �S_ ��I - �.. � 1l� �. �' ,t• `.� 1'. , I'�� I,[•�l` NAI . TATI(TN 11�
• .,/ � � � �1.�'K � � , 'r� ' • yea:.
Tow�jr ""d�w ''vw �
\ . J!! 1 V '%/ G �': AROt, AWAT _ Yf/ ltirrY
2000 0 2000 4000 Feet ..• � cR
Source: Garner (1993), and Clayton (1993) USGS QuadranglesM
NOR ['I I (...AROI INA
PROJECT: TITLE: N Scale: Data: FIGURE
5 RAILROAI ) NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
' " '' '' AUBURN SIDINGS 1" = 2000' MAR 200
T
PROJECT LOCATION Drawn By: ESC Project No:
HNBWake and Johnston Counties, North Carolina
ES 06-290

'+OrC2- t ,/ ..../^ / i \� ;I l{ i<GO .1 .Lwt..� �` , "'�
1 J ^'_ B'rAp62�''-�- tt
/11V
B \\, 'AP r1 APB'i�-
x�C.J i •� / /TI / t I , :fA \• -
�- �
!L -132 ` iV \ { � // , � ! i a \ n -al ,3�.• \'�• \ _ -- t
t • W� \ I . !/ Nc3, 11 , Auo o; Ce3 N (1 .Yo v."o'
Stream2 �P > Lcn 1 4 I �` /3)
rennial Ac 32 \ t✓ t '// ry�� \ -c I WmE CeF 1
Ao62 jct32 f l 1 ` /' `.'-=1 i S In^� y1 / / LCC 1 F} VJr _ \
ALS\o fiu6 g , i P 1 •.j' 1 P� s� \�C \ l \ ':VmC G�� / ! i
` / ` - � C,; 1 J Wmfil
\f�$ / ( � t ` � ��\• � J 1 / •_ ���\oB�l r / qt R -�\i.A. AI �J �J�B .� � \ :aGB `i �/ •, I/f Y.n,^�' ]u62
D� B
1 Auburn �.• i b7alr , Ap3�1 1, 1� V .r i c�/ :i ��/; J 1., \' A'm C7. ���' ,�{ I/ /./ /� r : . . '
Mt A 6D`' i
`. \ \ `.11 J _ % / B Pe[ 1 �;P•. J4�y���.0 P�/ f/mac C� ✓ r� ` t
;pC.SC�o❑l \mooD \'�IYmKZ '-�'Gi9 'a� rL / D i f_•� 'r - i 1 tt ( { v i / iJ..
/1• � - ' l— —�',' �.t lit \ 1 Ij 1 j/ ;�,.'-'�P+e�..'>�� � � � ^� \ � �/'� I 1 �- _ 'kir/s � ��+ �f J �i cp r � �.\ �` r 1 J
Stream 1 "" ti. N•e t1 / U2 r.,c c �'`Y 1` I t lYote = 11 L � . [
�� .� jJ ko¢2 \��
Per -L`\' 'Sty ream ?'cn�-!' "Gu G/'rye} r /� :�Lup�. - f 1aYBZ
perennial efti I ''� / y `.� y� ( , 1 ` LOG
\ \ a
APg2 /�� / " r 1
- '_s•�_YVm62
Qu6 (b \ r !1PU2 / '^
1t f \ �\` �-- • /// /It tVm@2 4 / '�` ,AoFS I \\\\ WmD2
-�
/q A
Nc6 L_ V �Vmf? 1 : / WmC2 4��
\ Stream % �1 ��•t �` `� t//� +�mC /I \ on`�i
i 'intermittent �Clv�
�WC9 !;-\ _'�/_j�__���_�-�;� WmB2N'm62, /ASB t gPC2 Apt (` 'y,mCJ/:' % f\h1 -�• J h'.z ���� v r
I'` % r - \• \ _' "' �+ t1 -1/--� `�J/ APB I jam) t � , j
rYc. ` G _ ! _a2�k' ' j 4 "' �/ ' r/} E t \ f App A
( lIL
/ / ��r1.tImC1 �:t� h l �j r 'r �+`�/
' L.:.' �•,. r \�°i. �� �A'm -� /A 62 \ ASK. C -• j/� VmC
NfIR G s
•
WnC2
Aw
Ap32 Was
Ally
/ •1 \ AP8 \ \. �/ �� Lo8 cO/B ,� A��/OR
\t J >_ LoD VMF2 _
—��4DC ` WmC i '.Mt / % ��i A
,\-�A&
AnR7
/ Lo% t` �i Ao62 Ag62
�m i
ma-
. o` �\?v\` \,� ri l�r,J°� �( J.a{ ApC2 4 �•[od% �_..J.
Ti� / t �/l,l, l ��
YVo APC �: / r O DC Ap6 ' 81T 62 map °•
ADG �ItF.• r
�
NOR
�(t t�' �4" ''� tiVtnfs 2 `y -s' . _ � - . •%��s�.oC "J 'D [' �I •1� ` � �a '' - _ ' ,� { . = s c�`�� _
',� \ yyt1 , ��'� / y `�% �/ WInC2 �. • -�..—_---''/t�� t �./ ���''"1 k _ .= , Ps � „� �� � _ `W/BD2 f / =`-� ' a �` � £ � -+
. 1
ad °B
Kc �'rti u PaoA ung °C -� l '
W N NoA Jk6
A .'.
vYmC1 \ e � �� �2 - % � ,-, �
Na
� y k'Ne Little Creek headwate
' I\
'�•+� (
hon / o H` • $ \` Ps' :� a �Cff, /. ; :'$ Mob J
r !S + r vnr6 11, q / 1: 2 1 I�� VYaB os Jab (~^3
i ...
V i ! 4 LCC _ PB NCR
r / 5, ,, SdrJ� ):'
Ann AT:t A �It{� % )��� LV /.a •' rc YaB2r '�_ r r
MOB
WmA (�'� ! if? . /,�' l Wa`t� 1 0 $ I Mau
\i/t y�c :YlR.72 Fz L NoP r 1'rrA.
N' '
' ` ` r 1. ob l
Wmf_ t+ ! / 1
r6
'�\ ` rlaG
'AmD? JVe6 1 I �f MOB tt^\ i
��.'�� T < (✓ I�� 'l��i �ytc P 42` NoB pal
�IC2 !' / r `� / ViEA ` FC8'� tll `k6 AW4A
•' , / of
( .\\ r� Lo(, ; �\ � I ( � \+v? � / � i I ' / s'I ^ � -, G� ' � �• Ra 1't .\� � t �' `�'6 `y
_.' \{X off,\ t\. •` . I „'� r V'/ -n "� i ! �/ /
� g�!' ,3i'r 41rr� 11.•)`l ..,.! 1'1�= YSa �\ \� �A
V C
• 11 :VaB
I //
, � / t � r� ar/fig %'`'�/ % '! c: f / / ( 1 � , �•r, r� r� V �'' cA,. Nab r WcD
l/ \\,\
3-,�>��� �/ fps rtt(/ /�v J f s €•: .c �t
_-'3if t `i1r�1{,ifJ'' .:r/ kl �. - \� ' '\•...: [Mrd ��: :`{f ...lf.%1. _�-�'r1PB _
NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
1-1 C O tit P A N Y
NNTB
PROJECT:
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
AUBURN SIDINGS
Wake and Johnston Counties, North Carolina
TITLE:
WAKE AND JOHNSTON COUNTY
SCS SOIL SURVEYS
Source: Wake County (1970) SCS Soil Survey (scale: 1:15840)
Johnston County (1994) SCS Soil Survey (scale: 1:24000)
WE b INCE
Li
INNS
G, uS
c ` _
`�' moi
6 �
FIGURE
Scale:
No Scale
Date:
March 2006
Dwn By:
ES
ESC Project No.:
os-2so
FIGURE

STREAM 2
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT: 2,253 FT 2
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 934 FT2
STREAM IMPACT: 48 LF & 1,047 FT2
RIGHT-OF-WAY
3
v
U
LIMITS OF
4680+00 4685+00 CONSTRUCTION
--- - - -

91°15'52"
N -.._.._..._.._.._. - ----- -----

----

BUFFER
-----------
..........
W

w
co

u

- m

m
--.._._..._ C.
ONE 1 o m - o
-
B UFFER -- DITCH
3
w ?
w +- -.
?
C

RIGHT-OF-WAY I

IW

IW
_
w
n
WETLAND3 ?°

STREAM 2 0.01 ACRES
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 410 FT'
PLAN VIEW
STREAM 2 & WETLAND NORTH CAROLINA
LEGEND ,
3 ?• `; 1 -AILB-CIAD
v- C O hl. P A N Y
WE'FLANDIMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ???? HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.

\\ .
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT
g 343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 200
Raleigh. North Caro I i na 27609
, STRFJUA LINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50' 100,
SHEET 2 OF 21
STREAM 3 STREAM 4
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT: 3,615 FT z ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT; 3,271 FT'
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,535 FT' ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,206 FT1
STREAM IMPACT: 68 LF & 208 FT' STREAM IMPACT: 87 LF & 2,787 FT'
STREAM 4
DITCH V4
RIGHT-OF-WAY
-------------- -------
-------------------
4
I
`•.4700+00 5
89°59'28" 4705+00
---
.._.._.._.._.. _.. _.. _.._.._.. _.. _.. _.. _.._.l -
------------------
..--G, LIMITS OF
F n -
10 CONSTRUCTION
_
O !
DITCH _ _ _ _ w - r7 DITCH J _ .._..._.._ ._.._-.
Ir I,? L I + RIGHT-OF-WAY
4
02 ACRES
r
5
WETLAND 5
STREAM 3 ¢ 0.01 ACRES
J
WETLAND 4 WETLAND 5
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 700 FT' AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 80 FP
PLAN VIEW, STREAMS 3 & 4, WETLANDS 4 & 5 NORTHCAIZ°L`NA
LEGEND RAILROAD
P. C.
T WETLAND IMPACT ----.- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ???? R34al 3 i E gh , NOR North C Caro I AROL i INA, 2 7609
"'--L-? HN E. SIX H C ROAD. SUITE 2.
4, ena
ZONE IBUFFER IMPACT STREAMLINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0L 50' 100,
-?- ._.? rSHEET 3 OF 21
RIGHT-OF-WAY
6
v
O
4720+00 r
?? 473
I 89°59'2'
-- y-
-------4 - -
? N
LIMITS OF r?
--'?r---.._.._._
CONSTRUCTION
r
.._.-_.. _..._.-_.._-._'-_.. -............. ie.._..
} }
WETLAND 6
6 °o
0.06 ACRES n
RIGHT-OF-WAY
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 2,678 FT'
PLAN VIEW, WETLAND 6 .. NORTH CAROLINA
LEGEND : ?,,`e, RAILROAD
-C O AT P A N Y
WETLAND IMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ???? HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P° C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 260
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT STREAM LINE " R. e i Ari, North Caro I i na 27609
?A ?'• - --_-_ .. -. -
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50, 100,
SHEET 4 OF 21
STREAM 5
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT: 2,378 FT
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,073 FT 2
STREAM IMPACT: 36 LF & 281 FT'
RIGHT-OF-WAY
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 9,297 FT'
PLAN VIEW, STREAM 5 & WETLAND 8
LEGEND
=,7= WETLAND IMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
L.?.1. ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT STREAM LINE
-__?- ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY
8
0 50, 100,
0
0
NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
_ C O M P A N Y
??? HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P, C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
Raleigh. North Carol Ana 27609
SHEET 6
RIGHT-OF-WAY
- DITCH
DITCH
/ 0.08 ACRES VVETLAND 9 LIMITS OF - WETLAND 10 /I 10
0.08 ACRES
CONSTRUCTION /
47q';400 ° +00
.._--_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. _.. _-. _... _.. _-._.. _.. _.. .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. .... .............................................. 89°27'35' -- --L----- ._ .-. -
90°51'27" ` -
9
10
RIGHT-OF-WAY
WETLAND 9 WETLAND 10
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 2,808 FT' AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 3,456 FT'
PLAN VIEW' WETLANDS 9 & 10 RAI N-A cA>zocrN.q
LEGEND LROAD
WErLANDIMPACT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ???? HNTB NORTH CAROLINA. P. C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAp, SUITE 200
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPA(:T Ra l e i 8h, North Caro I , na 27 GO
STREAMLINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50, 100'
SHEET 7 OF 21
RIGHT-OF-WAY
11 WETLAND 11
0.01 ACRES LIMITS OF
-..--------.._.._.._ _.._.._.._..-.._.._..-..--.-- - - CONSTRUCTION b
4810 + 93°27'14' +
--------.._._..---- -.._.-..------ ---.----.._..----.._._.._..-..-..------- - ------ - -..---..- -.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..
- - ._.._.._.._.._..-.._..--------
i
i
.r
CU
O
11
RIGHT-OF-WAY _
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 355 FT'
PLAN VIEW, WETLAND 11.?_'N0A.rHCAri0L.IIVn
LEGEND a,-+=,?_ RAIl-R-OAD
-'?-? C u M P A N Y
WETLAND IMPACT .......... .._...... _ LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 6J ???? 343 E SORTFORK" RROLI OADN SUIE 200
?--?-?--? • . ¦ Ra I e i h• Nor tr' Caro 1 i ne 27609
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT STREAM LINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50' 100,
SHEET 8 OF 21
RIGHT-OF-WAY
12 LIMITS OF
WETLAND 12 CONSTRUCTION
- -.._. _.._.._
0.01 ACRES
25+00
.. _. ..._ _..___._.._.._.._.._..-
,
._.._._.
_.. --- -- 4835+00
483 + Q
------------------ --------- --------------------------------------------- ------------------------
12
RIGHT-OF-WAY
AREA OF IMPACTED WETLAND: 313 FT'
PLAN VIEW
WETLAND 12 _:- NORT1-IC,ARoLRNA
LEGEND , , `r RAILROAD
C O hl P A N Y
WETLANUIMPACL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION HNT
????
B
NORTH CAROLINA, P. C,
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD
SUITE 200

ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT B
,a
RaI
i h
e , N-ar-o 1 i n
th C 2 7609
5LREAM LINE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50' 100,
??? -- - - SHEET 9 OF 21
-- -- PROPOSED ELEVATION
340
330
320
310
300
100 80

60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW 4 N?1?z13CARC)L1NA
AT WETLAND SITE 1 RAILROAD
C O M P A N Y
HNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
0 20' 40'
10 OF 21
- PROPOSED ELEVATION
320
310
300
290
280
270
40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW '., INOIKTHCAPC)LINA
`` RAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 5 , C O M P A N Y
HNTB
3 E NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.
3. SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 200
:iNTB 34
R.a,Eleigh, North Carolina 27609
0 20' 40'
SHEET 14 OF 2
----------- PROPOSED ELEVATION
20 10 0 10 20 30
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW
AT WETLAND SITE 6
40
0 10' 20'
t
50 60 70
RA ILROAD
..?.,
MNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P, C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
15 OF 2-
- ----- PROPOSED ELEVATION
365
360 ?eL
;

355
350
345
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 8 -"° C 0 M P A N Y

34
HNTB
3 E NORTH CAROLINA, P, C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD. SUITE 200
R
al,
lgh, North orth Carolina 27609
0 10, 20'
-'--`-- SHEET 17 OF 21
- -- -- PROPOSED ELEVATION
365
360

355
i

350
345
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW - ^- NORTH CAROLINA
.
--
RAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 10 , C 0 M P A N Y
MNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINAP. C.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD, 'Z, ITE 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
0 10' 20'
v SHEET 19 OF 21
-_ PROPOSED ELEVATION
365
360
355
350,
60 50 40 30 20
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW
AT WETLAND SITE 11

10 0 10 20 30
NORTH C:AIZOL.INA
'° RAILROAD
C U M P A N Y
MNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P, C.
343 E. .SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
0 10, 20'
HEET 20
- -- -- - PROPOSED ELEVATION
360
1 I
i
355 x
i ?
350
A/m,
-----
345
340
40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW NORTHCAROLINA
AT WETLAND SITE 12 1R11 . PA A I
:INTB RHNTB NORTH CAROLINA. P. C.
343 E. SIX F ROAD. SUITE 200
aleigh. NorthKS
ORCarolina 27609
0 1 20'
-,_ A? SHEET 21 OF 21,
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
111111 Sheet D
_
PIPE DA TA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project Na Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4669+65 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 45 Deg Sta. 4669+65
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 332.09 ft DRAINAGE AREA 27.70 Acre's
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW L1R EL = 332.09 ft EL = 332.09 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL 314.13 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 32.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 314.13 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 51.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 315.06 ft
So = 1.0 %
INV. EL 311.33 ft INV. EL 310.04 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 130.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 161 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 329.21 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1,2 INV in = 311.33 I NV out = 310.04
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CON7 OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HWD HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) -
36 RCP 10 22.00 2.80 1.15 0.82 2.45 0.2 1.48 2.24 2.24 0.30 1.29 1.25 313.78 3.11 15.43 ft - IC

36 RCP 25 32.00 2.80 1.41 0.93 2.80 0.2 1.83 2.41 2.41 0.64 1.29 1.76 31413 4.53 15.08 ft - IC

36 RCP 100 51.00 280 1.80 1.24 3.73 0.2 2.40 2.70 2.70 1.61 1.29 3.03 315.06 7.22 14.15 ft - IC

36 RCP overtop 160.66 2.80 3.16 5.76 17.29 0.2 2.70 2.85 3.16 16.01 1.29 17.88 329.21 22_.73 0.00 It • OC
NOTES: ` TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA -= 4672+50
' ** COMMENTS INDICAI E HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 329.21
SHOULDER EL at O'r S'I'A= 329.21
° ** INLET HEADWATC14 CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN HW = 2.80
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDE AND INSTALL 36 in RCP Class III 100 YR HW = 3.73
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
HEIR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
I'Inn Shaei: 0
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12115/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJEC'T' NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4663+22 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4683+22
SIZE 54 in
TYPE
ENTRANCE RCP CL EL =
Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER 320.05 It
SHOULDER DRAINAGE AREA 150.00 Sq Mi
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL= 320,05 ft EL = 320.05 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 303.51 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 130.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 302.02 It
Q100 DISCHARGE 210.00 cfs
54 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 305.16 ft
So = 0.8 %
INV. EL 296.76 ft INV. EL 296.00 It OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 5001- Year
IN L= 94.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 416 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 320.05 ft
54 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWUD from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 296.76 IN V out = 296.00
" FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
, TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do d o+D/2 ho H LSo fiW ELEV (fp<)
RCP 10 94.00 6."15 2.44 0.96 4.33 0.2 2.85 3.67 3.67 0.83 0.76 3.75 301.09 5.91 18.96 ft - IC
F
RCP 25 130.00 6.75 2.86 1.17 5.26 0.2 3.45 3.97 3.97 1.59 0.76 4.81 302.02 8.17 18.03 ft - IC

RCP 100 210.00 6.75 3.59 1.87 8.40 0.2 4.05 4.26 4.28 4.16 0.76 7.67 305.16 13.20 14.89 ft - IC

54 RCP overtop 416.03 635 4.91 5.18 23.29 0.2 4.05 4.28 4.91 16.32 0.76 20.46 320.05 26.16 0.00 ft - IC
NOTES, ' TW BASED ON SINGLE.: SECTION ANALYSIS _ - --"--"
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA 4683+22
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVER LOPPING EL = 320,05
:iFi0UL17 -R EL al O F S1'&= 320.05
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: ` T PROVIDE AND INSTALL.
54 in RCP Class IV DESIGN HW = 5.26
100 YR HW = 8.40
OUTLET PROTECTION: TONS CLASS 1 RIP RAP, 24" THICK w! 90 SY FF ZONE 3 (FIG. 8.06.13.1) 1
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Shnec 0
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4700+12 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 50 Deg Sta. 4700+12
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 314.71 ft DRAINAGE AREA 15.30 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW LIR EL= 314.71 ft EL = 314.71 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 287,00 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 21.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 264.85 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 34.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 285.37 ft
So = 1.5 %
INV. EL 282.50 ft INV. EL 280.00 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L- 168.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 214 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 314.71 It
36 in RCP
hllet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HD5-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 282.50 INV out = 280.00
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE NO (Cfs) HW HW HW/D NW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) ..«
36 RCP 10 15.00 4,50 0.79 0.63 1.89 0.2 1.20 2.10 2.10 0.16 2.50 -0.24 284.39 2.12 30.32 ft - IC

36 RCP 25 21.00 4,50 0.95 0.78 2.35 0.2 1.44 2.22 2.22 0.31 2.50 0.02 284.85 2.97 29.86 ft - IC

36 RCP 100 34.00 4.50 1.23 0.96 2.87 0,2 1.89 2.45 2.45 0.80 2.50 0.75 285.37 4.81 29.34 ft - IC

36 RCP overtop 213.57 4.50 3.12 9.62 28.85 0.2 2.70 2.85 3.12 31.59 2.50 32.22 314.72 30.21 -0.01 It - OC
NOTES: TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANAI..YSIS
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA - 4700+12
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL _ 314.71
SHOULDER EL )101 S I A= 314.71
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN HW = 2.35
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL 36 in RCP Class IV w/ Method B Inst allation 100 YR HW = 2.87
OUTLET PROTECTION- STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
HDR
RALEIGH, NOR I'H CAROLINA
FTY1 Shoe;
'"(If? 1./[lil:. 11^/!pFUi`
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15105 SHEET OF
TIP Project No Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY. JRR
STATION 4704+26 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4704+26
SIZE 66 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 321.04 ft DRAINAGE AREA 443.00 Sq Mi
ENTRANCE Groove End wl Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW LIR EL= 321.04 H EL = 321.04 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
777
HW. CONT. EL. 287.33 ft
7 DESIGN DISCHARGE 320.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 284.42 ft
0100 DISCHARGE 510.00 cfs
Double 66 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 286.46 ft
So = 2.0 %
INV. EL 279.08 It INV. EL 276.20 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 144.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 1713 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD _ OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 321.04 ft
DOUI* 66 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 279.08 I NV out = 276.20
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HWID HW Ke do do+D12 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) "' "
66 RCP 10 115.00 8.25 3,74 0.88 4.83 0.2 2.93 4.22 4.22 0.58 2.88 1.92 283.91 4,13-1. 37.13 ft - IC

66 RCP 25 160.00 8.25 4.36 0.97 5.34 0.2 3.55 4.52 4.52 1.12 2.88 2.77 284.42 6 73 36.62 ft - IC

66 RCP 100 255.00 825 5.37 1.34 7.38 0.2 4.68 5.09 5.37 2.85 2.88 5.34 286.46 10.73 34.58 It - IC

66 RCP overlap 856.65 8.25 9.06 7.63 41.98 0.2 4.95 5.23 9.06 32.17 2.88 38.36 321.06 36.06 -0.02 ft - IC
NOTES- ' TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING ST^. -= 4704+31
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OWR I OPPING El _= 321.04
S HOULDER EL at OT STA= 321.04
INLET HCADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN HW = 5
34
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS. PROVIDE AND INSTALL 66 in RCP Class IV wl Method B Installation .
100 YR HW = 7.38
OUTLET PROTECTION. 173 TONS CLASS 2 RIP RAP, 36" THICK w/ 218 SY FF (ZONE 7 (FIG. 8 06.13.1) )
Plan Sheet: 0
HEIR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
rvint Data: i / •Apr-W .
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12!15/05
SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4724+84 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 9D Deg Sta. 4724+ 84
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 341.65 ft DRAINAGEAREA 13
10 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER .
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL= 341.65 ft EL = 341.65 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 332.23 fl DESIGN DISCHARGE 13.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 329.49 it
Q100 DISCHARGE 21.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 330.09 ft
So = 0.8 %
INV. EL 327.73 ft INV. EL 327.22 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY :300+ Year
IN L= 65.0 It OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 142 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 341.65 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV In = 327.73 INV out = 327.22
SIZE Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (cfs) HW HW ` HW/D HW Ke do d o+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps)
36 RCP 9.10 4.50 0.71 0.48 1.45 0.2 0.93 1.96 1.96 0.04 0.51 1.50 329.23 1.29 12.42 ft - OC
F
36 RCP 13.00 4.50 0.87 0.59 1.76 0.2 1.11 2.06 2.06 0.08 0.51 1.63 329.49 1.fl4 12.16 ft - IC

36 RCP 1O 21.00 4.50 1.13 0.79 2.36 0.2 1,44 2.22 2.22 0.22 0.51 1.93 330.09 2.97 11.56 It - IC

36 RCP overtop 141.58 4.50 2.98 4.64 13.92 0.2 2.70 r28 2.98 9.95 0.51 12.42 341.65 20.03 0.00 It - IC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION, OVERTOPPING STA = 4724+84
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 341.65

" SHOULDER EL at 01 STA= 341
65
« '" INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY .

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 1.76
100 YR HW = 2.36
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
HEIR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Shec:L 0
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 1211510.5 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4768+22 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4768+22
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 360.12 ft DRAINAGE AREA 36.10 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL= 360.12 ft EL = 360.12 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 358.08 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 19.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 355.80 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 29.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 356.49 ft
So= 1.4 %
INV. EL 353.58 ft INV. EL 352.90 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 47.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 86 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 360.12 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nnmoyraph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5. Chart 1.2 INV In = 353.58 INV out = 352.90
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS T
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D12 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) "" "
36 RCP 10 13.00 4.50 0.87 0.58 1.75 0.2 1.11 2.06 2.06 0.08 0.68 1.45 355.33 1.84 4.79 ft - IC

36 RCP 25 19.00 4.50 1.07 0.74 2.22 0.2 1.36 2.18 2.18 0.17 0.68 1.67 355.80 2.69 4.32 ft - IC

F36 RCP 100 29.00 4.50 1.34 0.97 2.91 0.2 1.73 2.36 2.36 0.39 0.68 2.07 356.49 4.10 3.63 ft - IC

RCP overtop 86.21 4.50 2.34 2.18 6.54 0.7 2.70 2.85 2.85 3.44 0.68 5.61 360.12 12.20 0.00 ft - IC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGI_Ei SECTION ANALYSIS "' -
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION, OVERTOPPING STA - 4768+22
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL - 360.12
S HOULDER EL at 0I' STA= 360.12
INLET HEADWATER CONTROI.S FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN HW = 2.22
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS' PROVIDE AND INSTALL 36 in RCP Class IH 100 YR HW = 2.91
OUTLET PROTECTION STANDARD DETAIL. IS GOOD
I'lon shout 0
HEIR
RALEIGH. NOttTH CAROLINA
Purl lime. 17-Apr.(Xc
PIPE DA TA SHEET
DATE 12115/05

TIP Project No:
Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake SHEET
DESIGNED BY: MMD CH OF
ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4778+00 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4778+ 00
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 360.07 It DRAINAGE AREA 17,90 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
OIR OF FLOW R/L EL = 360.07 It EL = 360.07 It DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 354.19 It DESIGN DISCHARGE 15.00 CIS
DESIGN NW ELEVATION 351.59 it
Q100 DISCHARGE 25.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 352.35 ft
So = 1.1 %
INV. EL 349.04 ft INV. EL 349.69 f1 OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
OUT L= 61.0 ft IN
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 118 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 360.07 ft
36 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A):. HWi/D from HDS-S, Chart 1.2. INV in = 349.69 INV out = 349.04
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE F (cfs) HW HW HW/ Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fl)s)
36 RCP 11.00 4.50 0.79 0.53 1.60 0.2 1.02 2.01 2.01 0.06 0.65 1.42. 351.29 1.56 8.78 It - IC

36 RCP 25 15.00 4,50 0.94 0.63 1.90 0.2 1.20 2.10 2.10 0.11 0.65 1.56 351.59 ;' 12 8.48 ft - IC

31, RCP 100 25.00 4.50 1.24 0.89 2.66 0.2 1.59 2.29 2.29 0.31 0.65 1,95 352.35 1 54 7.72 ft - IC

36 RCP overtop 118.30 4.50 2.73 3.46 10.38 0.2 2.70 2.85 2.85 6.84 0.65 9.04 360.07 16.74 0.00 It - IC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA= 4778+00
" COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 360.07
SHOULDER EL at 01 S'T'A= 360.07
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: -----PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 1.90
100 YR HW = 2.66
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL 13 GOOD
plan Shoct. 0
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
went umo: I f-Ar*06
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Aubum, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CH ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4793+75 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg
Sta. 4793+75
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 366.97 ft DRAINAGE AREA 16.00 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW LIR EL= 366.97 ft EL = 366.97 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 362.84 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 14.00 efs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 360.22 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 23.00 cis
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 360.83 ft
So = 0.6 %
INV. EL 358.34 ft INV. EL 358.05 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 45.0 It OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 105 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 3497 fi

in RCP
36
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 358,34 INV out = 358.05
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL I IW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cis) HW HW ` HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (Fps)
36 RCP 10 10.00 4.50 0.75 0,52 1.56 0.2 0.97 1.99 1,99 0.05 0.29 1.74 360.08 1.41 6.89 ft - OC

36 RCP 25 14.00 4.50 0.90 0.62 1.86 0.2 1.16 2.08 2.08 0.09 0.29 1.88 360.22 1.98 6.75 It - OC

36 RCP 100 23.00 4.50 1.18 0.83 2.49 0.2 1.51 2.26 2.26 0.24 029 2.21 360.83 21.25 6.14 fl - IC

36 RCP overtop 104.82 4.50 2.57 2.88 8.63 0.2 2.70 2.85 2.85 5.04 0.29 7.60 366.97 14.83 O.DD ft - IC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVER TOPPING STA :- 4793+75
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVEIRI OPPING EL = 366.97
SHOULDER EL at OT S'FA= 366
97
OUTLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY .

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL 36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 1.88
100 YR HW = 2.49
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
Plan Sheet 0
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
PUato: '17 API 06
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12/15/05

TIP Project No:
Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake SHEET
DESIGNED BY: MMD CH OF
ECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4802+30 v PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4802+30
SIZE 36 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 360.31 ft DRAINAGE AREA 28.40 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End wl Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL = 360.31 ft EL = 360.31 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD HWY-RURAL
HW. CONT. EL. 357.40 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 33.00 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 355.74 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 52.00 cfs
36 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 356.68 ft
So= 1.0 %
INV. EL 352.90 ft INV. EL 352.45 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 44.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 104 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 359.78 ft

36 in RCP _
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 352.90 INV out = 352.45
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET C ONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ko do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps)
36 RCP 10 23.00 4.50 1.18 0.83 2.49 0.2 1.51 2.26 2.26 0.24 0.45 2.05 355,39 3,25 4.39 It - IC

36 RCP 25 33.00 4,50 1,43 0.95 2.84 0.2 1.86 2.43 2.43 0.50 0.45 2.48 355.74 4.67 4.04 ft - IC

36 RCP 100 52.00 4.50 1.81 1.26 3.78 0.2 2.43 2.72 2.72 1.23 0.45 3,50 356.68 7.36 3.10 ft - IC

36 RCP over-P 103.61 4.50 2.56 2.83 8.48 0.2 2.70 2.85 2.85 4.90 0.45 7.30 361.38 14.66 -1.60 ft - IC
NOTES: " TW BASED ON SINGLE SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA - 4805+80
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 359.78
S HOULDER EL at 0'1'S'I'A = 359.78
"" ." INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL
36 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 2.84
100 YR HW = 3.78
OUTLET PROTECTION: STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Plan Sheet; 0
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12115/05 SHEET OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4814+01 PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg S1a.4814+01
SIZE 18 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 360.61 ft DRAINAGE AREA 8.00 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW RIL EL= 360.61 ft EL = 360.61 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD RATIONAL
HW, CONT. EL. 355.27 it DESIGN DISCHARGE 6,70 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 354.55 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 7.90 cfs
18 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 354.71 ft
So = 0.6 %
INV. EL 352.75 ft INV. EL 353.02 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
OUT L= 44.0 ft IN
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 26 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 360.61 It
181n RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWilD from HDS-5, Chart 1,2 INV in = 353.02 INV out = 352.75
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do d o+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps)
18 RCP 10 6.00 2.25 0.56 0.96 1.44 0.2 0.94 1.22 1.22 0.34 0.27 1.29 354.46 3.40 6.15 ft - IC

18 RCP 25 6.70 2.25 0.60 1.02 1.53 0.2 1.00 1.25 1.25 0.42 0.27 1.40 354.55 3 79 6.06 ft - IC

18 RCP 100 7.90 2.25 0.65 1.13 1.69 0.2 1.11 1.30 1.30 0.58 0,27 1,62 354.71 4.47 5.90 ft - IC

18 RCP overtop

26.35
L

2.25

1.27

T5

7.60

0.2

1.35

1.43

1.43

6.48

0.27

7.64

360.66

14.91

-0.05 ft - OC
NOTES: TW BASED ON SINGLE. Sf.;CTION ANALYSIS
" HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA: 4814+•01
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL - 360,61
S HOULDER EL at OT S1'A= 360.61
INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUENCY

SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATIONS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL
18 in RCP
Class III DESIGN HW = 1.53
100 YR HW = 1.69
OUTLET PROTECTION STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
HDR
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
flan Shoot 0
PIPE DATA SHEET
DATE 12115/05
SHEET
OF
TIP Project No: Norfolk Southern STATE PROJECT NUMBER Auburn, NC COUNTY: Wake DESIGNED BY: MMD CHECKED BY: JRR
STATION 4830+31
PLAN SUMMARY DATA
SKEW 90 Deg Sta. 4830+31
SIZE 18 in
TYPE RCP CL EL = 356.18 ft DRAINAGEAREA 7,80 Acres
ENTRANCE Groove End w/ Headwall SHOULDER SHOULDER
DIR OF FLOW L/R EL= 356.18 ft EL = 356.18 ft DESIGN FREQUENCY 25 Year
HYD. METHD RATIONAL
HW. CONT. EL. 348.82 ft DESIGN DISCHARGE 6.50 cfs
DESIGN HW ELEVATION 348.07 ft
Q100 DISCHARGE 7.70 cfs
18 RCP
Q100 HW ELEVATION 348.23 ft
So = 0.7 %
INV. EL 346.57 ft INV. EL 346,09 ft OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY 500+ Year
IN L= 65.0 ft OUT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE 37 cfs
SECTION LOOKING STATION AHEAD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION 356.18 it
18 in RCP
Inlet Control Nomograph Equations (Appendix A): HWi/D from HDS-5, Chart 1.2 INV in = 346.57 INV out = 346.09
SIZE FREQ Q NAT ALLOW TW INLET CONT OUTLET CONTROL HW Vo COMMENTS
(in) TYPE (yr) (cfs) HW HW HW/D HW Ke do do+D/2 ho H LSo HW ELEV (fps) "
18 RCP 10 5.90 2.25 0.55 0.95 1.43 0.2 0.93 1.22 1.22 0.38 0.48 1.12 348.00 3,34 8.18 ft - IC

18 RCP 25 6.50 2.25 0.59 1.00 1.50 0.2 0.99 1.24 1.24 0.46 0.48 1.23 348.07 3,68 8.11 ft - IC

18 RCP 100 7.70 2.25 0.65 1.11 1.66 0.2 1.09 1.30 1.30 0.65 0.48 1.46 348.23 4.36 7.95 ft - IC

18 RCP overtop 37.21 22 5 1.53 9.37 14.05 0.2 1.35 1.43 1.53 15.15 0.48 16.20 362.77 21.06 -6.59 ft - 0C
NOTES: ' TW BASED ON SfNGI F SECTION ANALYSIS
HW BELOW INVERT IN ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING STA = 4830+31
COMMENTS INDICATE HEADWATER DEPTH BELOW SHOULDER ELEVATION. OVERTOPPING EL = 356.18
SHOULDER EL at 01 91A= 356.18
•••' INLET HEADWATER CONTROLS FOR DESIGN FREQUFNCY
DESIGN HW = 1.50
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDE AND INSTALL 18 in RCP Class III 100 YR HW = 1.66
OUTLET PROTECTION. STANDARD DETAIL IS GOOD
Section 111.5. Site Coordinates
Wetland System Northing Eastin
Wetland 1 706776.6625 2134021.2430
Wetland 2 706704.2296 2134110.2104
Wetland 3 706563.5554 2135427.8366
Wetland 4 706108.8612 2137063.2594
Wetland 5 705938.0717 2137347.3497
Wetland 6 704998.5784 2139194.1409
Wetland 7 702736.5530 2142055.7930
Wetland 8 702006.4015 2143625.4983
Wetland 9 701399.3458 2144989.0546
Wetland 10 701101.5838 2145615.8508
Wetland 11 700560.6248 2146840.9555
Wetland 12 699983.6961 2148298.4993

Stream System Northing Eastin
Stream 1 706755.3918 2134053.4056
Stream 2 706573.1127 2135418.8078
Stream 3 706300.0782 2136938.5833
Stream 4 706017.8217 2137396.5399

DATA FCI*.!,
a

Z _

ti?i I* 1I0 N

I v"? ?? µ
' +w "
...... v. ._ ,...
J 3
11 l 1 .

i
P&ROLOGY
.....,.r .cclei Dam -
::'.per
!f?

n ..
`c
...?- y9. '. ? Cam..

r
S, 0 t!
t °-
?
- - - --- - ------ -
.. _.. , .?_.... m ..._
r `
l
S
4
r

USACE AID#
DWQ # Site # S I (TA/TD)
i i STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ' 1
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. Evaluator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06 4. Time of evaluation: 8 am
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 13.6 ac 8. Stream order: I`
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.6915°N, 78.5495°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Auburn-Kniahtdale Rd., north of Us Hwy 70, south of'SR10 04
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks

15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg ppt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunnv 45°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: I )% Residential
35% Forested
22. Bankfull width: 2 - 4'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
% Commercial % Industrial 25% Agricultural
30% Cleared / Logged % Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): P - 5'
Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. Ifa characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate Corm used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 47 Comments: upstream of culvert has had substrate, low flow, moderate
clarity, feaquent meander, 0-2% slopes: downstream of culvert has sand/gravel substrate, low flow, water depth of 6 inches moderate
clarity, occasional bends, and 0 to 2% slopes
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECCOREGION POIN T RANGE
CIi
?RACTERIS`IICS
r SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
2 Evidence of past human alteration

extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5 4

3 Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar yes =max points)' 0-5 , 0 -4 0-4 2
Groundwater discharge
no dischar e = 0; s rin s seeps, wetlands, etc, = max points) 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 - 1
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(deeply entrenched = 0; fi-e cent flooding = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-2 1
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8 no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment Input o-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate `
1
fine homo enous= 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) NA* 0-4 0-5 2
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
(deep I incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
?y+ 13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 2
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points
Root depth and density on banks
14
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throe hoot=max points 0-3 0-4 0-5 3

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact -0; no evidence = max points) 0 -5 0-4 0-5 3

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
3
no riftles/ri les or pools = 0• wel]-developed = max points)
`4?'
1 Habitat complexity
o-6
0-6
d 6
3
little or no habitat= 0; fi•e uent varied habitats = max points) ,

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0- 5
0-5
0-5
3
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA*' 0-4 0-4 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0 -
5
0
? no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) ,
(
2l Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0--4
0
Q' no evidence = 0; common, numerous Ly es = max p.oints
a
C?
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = max Dints)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 47
* "These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3-9-06 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6915 1
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5495 1
Total Points: 31 Other: STREAM 1
Stream is at least intermittent County: Wake
if>_ 19 or perennial if? 30 e. g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a. Continuous bed and bank ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
2. Sinuosity ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
7. Braided channel ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
98. Natural levees ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
10. Headcuts ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
11. Grade controls ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ®
Yes = 3 ?
ivian-rnaue ununes are not rateu; see uiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 7 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
16. Leaflitter ? 1.5 ® 1 ? 0.5 ? 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No= 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Biolow (Subtotal = 7)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ? 3 ® 2 ? 1 ? 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
22. Crayfish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
24. Fish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
25. Amphibians ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 ?; FACW = 0.75 ?;
Other = 0 OBL = 1.5 ?; SAV = 2.0 ?;
items zu ana L1 tocus on the presence of upiana plants, item za tocuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
low flow, moderate clarity
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # S2 (TB/fC)
t STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. Evaluator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06 4. Time of evaluation: 9 am
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 146 ac 8. Stream order:2"d
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100' 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if'known): 35.6907°N, 78.5442°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Auburn-Knightdale Rd., north of Us Hwv 70, south of S R I 004
14. Proposed channel work (ifany): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg ppt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 45°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2.8 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20% Residential % Commercial % Industrial 20% Agricultural
40% Forested 20% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 8' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4' - 5'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 50 Comments: gas sheen noted on water surface
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

#
CHARACTERIS
ICS ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
T SCORE

--= Coastal Piedmont
Mountni,?
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
1
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
Evidence of past human alteration
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 0-6 0-5 0- 5 3
3 Riparian zone 0-6 o-4 0-5 3
(no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer,- max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max oinfs 0-5 0-4 0- 4
Groundwater discharge
no dischar e = 0• springs, sees wetlands, etc. = max points) 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain

no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain= max oinfs) 0-4 0-4 0.-2 I
Entrenchment / floodplain access
7
dee Iv entrenched = 0; f-e cent flooding = m_ ax points) 0-5 0-4 0-2 0
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = maxi points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max oinfs

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
?`?*
0-4
0-5
3
fine homo enous O large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0
5 0
4

(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints - - 0-5 1
13 Presence of major bank failures
0 5
0-5
0-5
2
severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throuchout = max 10ints

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 3
no riffles/ri ales or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 4
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy -- max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 4
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
0
l no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
no evidence= 0• common, numerous types = max points)

22
Presence of fish

0-4

0 4 _

0-4

0
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0 -- 5 3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 50
* These characteristics arc not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/06 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6907 I
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5442 1
Total Points: 37 Other: STREAM 2
Stream is at least intermittent County: Wake
if? 19 or perennial if>_ 30 e. g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank ? 0 ? 1 ? 2 ® 3
2. Sinuosity ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
7. Braided channel ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
9a. Natural levees ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
10. Headcuts ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
11. Grade controls ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ?
Yes = 3
man-made ditcnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 8 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
16. Leaflitter ? 1.5 ® 1 ? 0.5 ? 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = 10)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
22. Crayfish ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
24. Fish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
25. Amphibians ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 ?; FACW = 0.75 ?;
Other= 0 OBL = 1.5 ?; SAV = 2.0 ?;
- Items zu and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
medium flow, poor-moderate clarity
USACE AID#
DWQ4
Site 4 s3 (TE)
t STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. F;valuator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06 4. "I'imC of evaluation: 10 am
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek 6. River basin: Ncusc
7. Approximate drainage area: 43 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100'
8. Stream order: I"
10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if'known): 35.6902°N, 78.5390°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Auburn-Kniahtdale Rd.. north of Us Hwv 70. south of SR1004
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg ppt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 55°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0.3 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential % Commercial % Industrial 30% Agricultural
40% Forested 20% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 1' to 5' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): P - 2'
24. Channel slope down center of'stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>I0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the strewn flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 54 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -- version 06/03. To Continent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

# - --
CHARACTERISTICS' ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream

(no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
2 Evidence of past human alteration

extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points 0-6 0-5 0-5 4
3 Riparian zone
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0-6 0-4 0-5 3
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges

extensive. discharges - 0; no discharges = max points) 0-5 0-4 0--4 3

5 Groundwater discharge

no discharge = 0; s rip s, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0-3 0-4 0-4
2
wUw
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max points) 0-4 0- 4 0-2 1
Entrenchment / floodplaiu access
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max oints 0 -;5 0-4 0-2 2
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0 -`6 0-4 0-2 0
no wetlands = 0; lar c ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive deposition= 0• little orno sediment = max oints
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
11 fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points NA* 0 - 4 0 S 3
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening

(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
y
13 Presence of major bank failures
severe erosion= 0; no erosion stable batiks = max points) 0-5 0 - 5 0-5 3
Root depth and density on banks

H 14
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points 0-3 0-4 0-5 3

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes

no riffles/ripples les or ools = 0- well-develo ed = max oints 0_ 3 0- 5 0- 6 3
.?
17 Habitat complexity
0 ?i
0-6
0-6
4
little or no habitat = 0; fi•e uent varied habitats = max points
Canopy coverage over strcambed
18
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max points) 0-5 0-5 0-5 4
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0 4 0- 4 4
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0
4 0

no evidence - 0; common numerous types = max points) - - 5 0-5 0
V 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
O no evidence - 0; common, numerous types = max points)
© 22 Presence offish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use
( 0-6 0-5 0-5 3
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 54
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/06 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6902
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5390
Total Points: 29.5 Other: STREAM 3
Stream is at least intermittent County: Wake
if? 19 or perennial ifz 30 e. g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15.5) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
2. Sinuosity ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
7. Braided channel ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
9a. Natural levees ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
10. Headcuts ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
11. Grade controls ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
13. Second or greater order chanrel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ®
Yes = 3 ?
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
16. Leaflitter ? 1.5 ® 1 ? 0.5 ? 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No= 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7 )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ? 3 ® 2 ? 1 ? 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
22. Crayfish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
24. Fish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
25. Amphibians ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 ?; FACW = 0.75 ?;
Other= 0 OBL = 1.5 ?; SAV = 2.0 ?;
° Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
low flow, moderate clarity
USACE AID#
DWQ#
................
Site # S4 (TF/TF/TH/TI)
ANNUMMOOMMMMaL
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. Evaluator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06 4. Time of evaluation: I I am
5. Name of stream: UT to White Oak Creek 6. Rivcr basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 440 ac 8. Stream ordcr:2,d
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100' 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.6893°N, 78.5368°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation flnote nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Auburn-Knightdale Rd., north of Us Hwy 70, south of SR1004
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg p pt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 65°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 4.7 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential 05% Commercial % Industrial 30% Agricultural
40% Forested
22. Bankfull width: 8'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
15% Cleared / Logged % Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): P- 10'
Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 62
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
GION POINT
ECORE RANGE
. SCORE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain
^1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 4
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max
points) Evidence of past human alteration 0_ 6 0- 5 0- 5 4
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5 4
(no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max Dints)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
4 extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3
nodischar e = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain 0- 4 0= 4 0- 2 2
6 no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints =

Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 2
dee 1 entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)
$ Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 1
acent wetlands = max points)
no wetlands = 0' large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0- 3 2
extensive channelization =0• natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input
p 0-5 0-4 0-4 3
osition= Oi little or no sediment = max points)
extensive de

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate * 0-4 0-5
3
u: fine homo enous = O'_large, diverse sizes= max points
12 Evidence. of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
y
. (deeply incised = 0? stable bed & banks = max points)
- 13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5 2
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
14 no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0 - 5 4
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points).
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 4
16 no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = max points)
17 Habitat complexity 0-6 o-6 0-6 4
little or no habitat = 0• frejuent varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 4
18 no shading vegetation= 0; continuous canopy = max points)
Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 4
19 (deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0- 5
1
?E 20 no evidence =0• common numerous types = max points)
?
Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
O? 21 no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points

22 Presence of fish
o-4
0-4
0-4
0
n4 evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0 5
4
23 no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max oh is)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 62
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/06 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6893
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5368
Total Points: 42 Other: STREAM 4
Stream is at least intermittent County: Wake
if>_ 19 or perennial if? 30 e.g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 24) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank ? 0 ? 1 ? 2 ® 3
2. Sinuosity ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence ? 0 ? 1 ? 2 ® 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting ? 0 ? 1 ? 2 ® 3
5. Active/relic floodplain ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
6. Depositional bars or benches ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
7. Braided channel ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
9a. Natural levees ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
10. Headcuts ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
11. Grade controls ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0 ?
Yes = 3
- man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 8.5 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hours since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season ? 0 ? 1 ® 2 ? 3
16. Leaflitter ® 1.5 ? 1 ? 0.5 ? 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No= 0 ? Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.5)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel ® 3 ? 2 ? 1 ? 0
22. Crayfish ? 0 ® 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
23. Bivalves ® 0 ? 1 ? 2 ? 3
24. Fish ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
25. Amphibians ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ? 0 ? 0.5 ® 1 ? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton ? 0 ® 1 ? 2 ? 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ® 0 ? 0.5 ? 1 ? 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5 ?; FACW = 0.75 ?;
Other= 0 OBL = 1.5 ?; SAV = 2.0 ?;
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
medium flow, poor-moderate clarity
USACL-'-' AID# DWQ # Site # S5 - Little Creek Headwaters
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCRR 2. Evaluator's name: M. Thomas - EcoScience Corp.
3. Date of evaluation: 03/09/06 4.Time of evaluation: 1 I am
5. Name of stream: Headwaters to Little Creek 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 440 ac 8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50' 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known): 35.6800°N, 78.5216°W 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): located east
of Guy Rd., north of Us Hwy 70
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Addition of RR tracks
15. Recent weather conditions: above avg temps, below avg ppt.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: sunny 65°F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10% Residential 05% Commercial % Industrial 10% Agricultural
50% Forested 25% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 0 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 0
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 39 Comments: no clear defined channel, appears channel may be been cut
off when original railroad was installed, only linear ditch was located in area, appears to be depressional wetland
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGI d N POIN T RANGE
E
} ?: # a RARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont ? ountai„ SCOR

1 Presence of flaw / persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
0 -4
0 - 5
0
no Clow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points)
t
3 Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
4
no discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
4
'- no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max oints)
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0-4 0-2 4
(deeply entrenched= 0, frequent flooding = max points)
S Presence of adjacent wetlands
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 ' 4
acent wetlands = max oints
no wetlands = 0•large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0_ 5 0-4 0-3 0
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment Input 0-5 0-4 0-4 0
extensive deposition- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size Sc diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 0
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, e diverse sizes = max points)
l2 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0- 5 0-4 0 5 0
(deeply incised o* 0;, stable bed & banks = max oints)
r Presence of major bank failures
ti 13 0 -5 0-5 0-5 0
severe erasion = 0' no erosion stable banks= max oints
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 3
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
5

0-4

0_5

4
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max oints

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
(
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0• well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6.
0
E-?. little or no habitat = 0; f,e went varied habitats = max points

18 Canopy coverage over strcambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 4
O; continuous canopy = max points)
no shading vegetation =
19 .
Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 0
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0--4
0-5
0--5
0
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points
L` 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 3
G' no evidence = 0•common, numerous types = max points)

C7;
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4,
0-4
0
r«+ no evidence = 0;,common, numerous types = max points)

23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6`
0-5
0-5
3

s)
no cvidcnce = 4 abundant evidence = max point
Tots+l'Points Possible 100 100 100 '
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 39
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Sream.Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/2006 Project: NCRR Latitude: 35.6800°N
Evaluator: ESC - M. Thomas Site: Auburn Station Longitude: 78.5216°W
Total Points: 11
Stream is at least intermittent
If >_ 19 or perennial if z 30 County: Wake Co. Other: Little Creek headwaters
e.g. Quad Name: Garner
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 2) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
98. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drains eway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS map or
other documented evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 0
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 3.5
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or water in channel --dry or
growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal= 5.5
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus 0 0.5 1 1.5
b. Wetland plants in streambed
29 FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5

SAV = 2.0, other = 0
b items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: uaih S idi d4atitude:
Evaluator: Site: Longitude:
Total Points: County: Other
Stream Is at least Intermittent 1 vYt,
if?: 19 or perennial if Z 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal Absent Welk Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 8 Natural levees 0 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
r NRCS map or other documented
evidence. Nu /
CO
O? Yes = 3
- Man-made ditches are not ratea; see alsscusslons m manual
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Y is = 1.5
r, MI-1-v MithfMni = (0
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other= 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of uplana plants, item ZU tocuses on ine presence or aquatic ur wet1dnU Ninius. -
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Ot-
4/164141h4zl?
T .4 • . -A
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: 6ttir'n S Latitude:
Evaluator: GUp?J SiteLAle- Cv-eel(_ ??I-eel s??s r-ur0 6
Total Points: Other
Stream Is at least Intermittent County: e.g. Quad Name:
If t 19 or perennial if a 30 16, d
A. Geomor holo Subtotal :#b '3t i11 t ?It, !'t r tID Strong
1B. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 60 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel CO 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9 B Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
Nc/t= 0 )
4-?
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season ® 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No - Yes- 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = -k--) v
--i-015. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC .5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ?-, Project: I''(,,LVttr/1 Sid;'ZS?Catitude:
Evaluator: C'U dtj Site: F ?z, e 7 Longitude:
Total Points: WIC-K1? Other
Stream is at least Intermittent Q County: b ?A
if z 19 or perennial if a 30 1 vV l e.g. Quad Name:
if
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 0 Natural levees 0 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin '
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
° Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R I-Ivriminnv (.Riihtntal =
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 O
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Ye = 1.5
C: Rinlnnv (Suhtntal = / 1
_0. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 1 1.5
26, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OB = 1.5 V = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: r Project: t+fA U(Ar r i c? Ir,1-f/L _'llLatitude:
Evaluator: C"o &W Site: .F u V-e Longitude:
Total Points: ,/1 KJi4?- Other
Stream is at least intermittenM I 0 County?C e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 19 or perennial if 2 30
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing -
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
a
No = 0
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: 14tAj j"Kit S'fclielin s Latitude:
Evaluator: Gt' Site: Longitude:
Total Points: /tin s7?'t
ether
Stream /s at least inter,County: c?t??
if t 19 or perennial if' . 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 e Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing "
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
,vian-maua uncnes are nut iateu, see uiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Suhtotal = 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloov (Suhtntal = 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21". Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 _
0.5 _
1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 _
0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 = .Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
I-I IJ LV a11V G 1 IVVUS VII me prosence ui upiana prams, item to rocuses on me presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.). Sketch:
Isar-17-2006 01:36pm From- T-243 P.009/010 F-759
A kv *-nm
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Project Name: Auburn-Siding Track
County: Wake Date: 2/27/2006
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN CHECKLIST
To expedite the review process, a cursory review of your submitted Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan has been made and has shown the need for additional information as specified below. To
meet our review schedule, any additional information should be received by this Regional Office no
later than 2/16/2006 . Failure to meet this schedule may result in disapproval ofyourplan.
Please note that this cursory review notes only obvious omissions in the application and does not
infer that all possible application deficiencies have been noted.
LOCATION OFPROJECT.
Including roads, streets, watercourses, and
other major landmarks or features
Show site on USES Quad & Soils Map
conducted by the same financially responsible party,
they shall be considered separate land-disturbing
activities.
GE V, L SITE FEATURES:
Legend; north arrow, plan scale, erosion
control measures, etc.
Property lines and boundaries of total tract
Existing and proposed contours
2 Limit and acreage of disturbed area
Planned & existing buildings and elevations
Planned & existing road locations and elev.
Geologic features; such as streams, lalres,
dams, wetlands, springs, rock outcrops, etc.
Easarumts & adjoining property uses
ProMes; streets, utilities, lateral ditches, etc.
3 Stockpile locations, material lay-down &
contractor staging areas.
BORROW,IND/OR WASTEARE.9S:
3 If the same person wnducts the land -disturbing
activity, that borrow/waste activity shall constitute part
of the land-disturbing activity, unless the borrow/waste
activity is permitted and /or regulated under the Mining
Act of 1971, or is a landfill regulated by the Division of
Solid Waste Management, If the land-disturbing
activity and the related borrow/waste activity are not
SITE DRA 17VA GE M TURFS;
Drainage features; existing and planned
(including off sits areas that drain through the
project)
Size of sub-waterabed (Acres)
Culverts & sewers: size and looation
Soils information(Type, special characteristics,
etc.)
Name and classification of receiving watercourse
or name of municipal operator (where
stormwater is discharged)
DESION CALCULA77ONS:
Pre & Post-construction runoff calculations for
each outlet from site (at each discharge location)
4 Culverts and storm sewers
5 Open channels; existing & planned (include
temp linings)
-4- Energy dissipwors, (include stone size and
dimensions)
6 Sediment basins/traps & level sproadem(include
dimensions & spillway designs)
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Phone: [phone]/ FAX; 919.571.4718 / Intemet. www.encstate,-; anus R/
An Equal Oppodunily /Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper
ne
o fihCarolina
&i4iiik
Mar-17-2006 01:36pm From- T-243 P.010/010 F-759
t?
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Mlahael F. Easley, Governor William Q Ross, Jr., Secretary
FINANCIAL RNSA0NSIBILITP10WAEZjnp (FN/O):
Completed, notarized FR/O Form
- Accurate application fee
Certificate of assumed nama, if owner is
a partnership
VEGETAME STABMMTION:
Methods of soil preparation
Seed types and rates (temporary & permammtt)
Lime & fertilizer type and rates
Mulch and tack rates
OTUER INFORMATION:
7 Location of measures, temporary & permanent
8 Construction details of temporary & permanent
mcusures
9 Meimcnomce requirements of all measures
- Contact persons for maintenance of measures
NAR,RVnEAND CONSTRUCTIONSEQUENCE:
- Nature and purpose of the project
10 Construction sequence ss it relates to erosion
crrrrtrol, including provisions for installation of critical
measures prior to the initiation of the land-disturbing
activity: all maintenance measures; and removal of
measures after areas they %-rve have been permanently
stabilized.
OTBER INFORMATION:
Item #1 ow location f project on oil uad Maps. Pinpoint act . ' ease buffer
ct ossinus• Item #2 Show location of all land disturbing activity Also include any areas listed
under Item #3 of this the-oklig A new plan with applicable fee & E&S control measures is
required if limits of disturbance increases from the-plan currently under review Item #3: Provide
the location of any borrow or waste sites toy oil piles & majeriall- down or contractor stagingr
areas, Item #4: Fr 'de su o in calculations for all storm drains & o le r action
(dissapators )jdevices. Item #5, Provide supporting-calculations for arty vroposed ditches or
swales & that the receiving channels will remain in a .stabile condition-Item #6: Prpvide
supporting calculations t proposed E& c n 1 measures will 1 the ces sediment
contain n stilling cap bility, Item 97• Provide construction entrances for all flcresses to
'act. Provide uate E&
am o it trot measures r n areas liste #3 of this
checklist---Install silt fence along tae of all fill slopes Install silt fence ovM aroun top of all
culvert outlets & dissapatnrs. Show any sediment t;ape Provide sift fence or other necessary
E&S contr 1 rheas re and all b r jack areas Item #S• Provide detail include on 1
drawings f r sediment =p,, construction entrance, arc filters re inforced silt fence outlet Item
#9: Provide mainten ce for all S control devices Item#l0• Install applicable E&S control
measures prior to onset of my-land disturbing activities Vegetation to be established on slopes
-or .other areas. within 21 calendar da of completion of anyphase of adin a 'vities. Provide
calmee for grating of exiting culverts installation of new culverts & stabilization of resulting
bare soils a related to E&S control issues. Provide all COE & DWO certifications for impacts to
reams wetlands Provide mean f crossin di ch teaams.
HOLD PL INCOMPLETE NE E BUFFER & TLANDS IS
SUES
TO BE
RE LVE17 BY DWO & COE
REVIEWER: - Joe Dunr
1'ar-17-2006 01:36pm From-
A4 MCDEN>
T-243 P.00T/010 F-T59
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
March 10, 2006
Scott Saylor
North Carolina Railroad Co.
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
RE: Auburn Siding Track
Wake County
Neuse #1/03-04-02
Dear Mr. Saylor:
This office has received an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for the subject
project as required by the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973.
We have performed a preliminary review of your plan and have noted apparent buffer
encroachments subject to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection and Maintenance Rule (1 5A
NCAC 2B.0233). This rule applies to all perennial and intermittent streams, lakes, ponds, and
estuaries in the River Basin with existing vegetation on the adjacent land or "riparian area." In
riparian areas with existing vegetation in the first 30 feet directly adjacent to the stream, the rule
prohibits land disturbance or new development within the first 30 feet of land next to the water
(the remaining 20 feet of the total buffer must be revegetated upon completion of any proposed
land-disturbing activity). In riparian areas with existing vegetation that is less than 30 feet wide,
the rule prohibits land disturbance or new development within the area that contains existing
vegetation (brit not the entire 50 foot riparian area). Encroachments on the protected buffers
require written approval by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
In light of the apparent buffer encroachments shown in your plan, we cannot consider
your application complete until we receive a copy of your DWQ approval or statement of
exemption from the rule. Therefore, we cannot initiate our 30-day statutory review time period
until your application is complete. For more information about this riparian area rule, please
contact the DWQ's Wetland/401 Unit at 919/733-1786 or DWQ in our regional office at
919/791-4200. By copy of this letter we are notifying them that your project will need their
attention.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628 'one
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Intemet: www,enr.state.nc.us/ENR/ Noikarolina
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Actlon Employer -50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper Na`M4
Mar-IT-2006 01:36pm From- T-243 P.008/010 F-T59 .
Scott Saylor
March 10, 2006
Page 2
Upon receipt of your DWQ paperwork and any necessary plan revisions related to DWQ
review or our enclosed checklist, we will process your application for plan approval as soon as
possible. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact us. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Quality Section
JLH/clm
cc: Regional Supervisor, DWQ
Enrico A.Roque, PE., HNTB North Carolina, -PC
Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. M??, Ite
m 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 13 Agent
Print your name and address on the reverse x
? Addressee
so that we can return the card to you. B. Racalved by nted Name) C?. /Date of Deliver)
Attach this card to the back of the maliplece, ',q -r L S. 7 N6Z7 -64
or on the front If space permits.
D. address ? Yes
Article Addressed to: S, enter delivery e ? No
NC Railroad Commission
Attn; Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Hi
h
d
Bl
d
g
woo
s
v
. Suite 100
Raleigh,NC 27604-1000

s
DWQ# 06-0677-Wake APR 2 7 2006
eO-
fReturn ess Mall
Registered Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
Article Number
mansfer from service label) 7005 1160 0000 9954 9574
TED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division 01' Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, SUite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
671M - First-Class Mail
Srj cvv
? 1L
Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired.
III Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
III Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,
or on the front If space permits.
A. Sign t
X
8. Received by Prl Nan
ti
D. Is d a
If YE , e
It*
d
3. Service Ret',
/f _ ? Agent
?U-t?c%J ? Addressee
9) C. Date of Deliver)
V
. Article Addressed to:
NC Railroad Commission
Attn: Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Highwoods Blvd. Suite 100
Raleigh,NC 27604-1000
DWQ# 06-0677-Wake
? Insured Mali -494
}q?m hem 1? ? Yes
w. ? No
CO
Express Mail
for Merchandise
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 13 Yes
'.
Article Number
(Rapsfer ft m rom service label) 7005 1,160 0000 9954 9666
(iFans
e r...... QQ11 r ? ... nnnn n .° o .... o .....
INITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DFNR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree [3oulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS
Permit No. G-10
or.,
Job(Code-Property) Invoice Description Amount
Y• s&s01(o_h-100-Johnston County) 041706 Express permitting fee -Auburn sidings 4,000.00
4,000.00
.? r