20060221 Ver 1_Complete File_20081107

O�0F W ATFgQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
I— North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
D ~C Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
November 7, 2008
DWQ EXP No. 06-0221
Johnston County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Scott Saylor
North Carolina Railroad Company
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Subject Property: Selma, NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICA TION
Dear Mr. Saylor:
On February 24, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued your 401 Water Quality
Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer Protection Rules as
required to construct thoroughfare road and subdivision at the subject property. Within the
approval letter that you received, there are conditions that read:
1. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in
writing at the letterhead address within ten (10) days of the commencement of
construction.
2. Certificate of Completion
"Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the 401
Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form
and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project. Please send photographs upstream and downstream of each
culvert site to document correct installation along with the Certificate of Completion
form." Please return the attached Certificate of Completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during
construction and post construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of your project or
have completed your project, you are required to notify this office in writing by January 1, 2009.
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit t
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetiands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
None hCarolina
Nattrmally

North Carolina Railroad Company
Page 2 of 2
November 7, 2008
If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started, you are in violation of the
Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of the conditions that are in the Water Quality
Certification issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott Gilleski at (919)
733-9502 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sinc ely,
t,
Cyndi B. Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/Img
Enclosures: Certificate of Completion
cc: File Copy
Matt Matthews, DWQ Branch Manager
Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience Corp., 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
Filename: 060221 SelmaNCSiding&StorageYard(Johnston)EXP+NOT.doc

rD60 W AT ?),?

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 24, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0221
Johnston County
Mr. Scott Saylor
North Carolina Railroad Company
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Subject Property: Selma, NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
UT to Moccasin Creek [030412, 27-53-(0.5), C NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Saylor:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.32 acres of wetland, 18 linear feet of stream, and 3,015 SF of protected
riparian buffer (1,184 SF of zone 1 and 1,831 SF of zone 2) for the purpose of constructing the
thoroughfare road and subdivision at the subject property, as described within your application dated
February 20, 2006, and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on February 21, 2006.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide
Permit(s) NW 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as
your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213
.0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment
Control, and Non-discharge regulations. This approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to
conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404
Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwctlands
None hCarolina
?tura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Selma, NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
Page 2 of4
February 24, 2006
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
404 Wetland 0.32 acres PCN page 8 of 13
Stream 18 linear feet PCN page 9 of 13
Neuse Buffers 3,015 (SF) PCN page 12 of 13
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
C. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor
within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC
213.0233 and GC 3404.
5. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
Selma, NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
Page 3 of -I
February 24, 2006
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the
stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below
the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow
low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in
dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the
above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed
to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
6. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at http://h2o.etir.state.nc.us/.su/Forins Documents.htm.;
7. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in
writing at the letterhead address within ten (10) days of the commencement of
construction.
8. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please
send photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation
along with the Certificate of Completion form.
Selma, NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
Page 4 of4
February 24, 2006
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse Riparian Buffer Protection Rule as described within 15A NCAC 213 .0233. If you
have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
AWK/cvdw
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
E.
i" Klime , P.
cc: Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience Corp., 1101 Haynes St., Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 060221 SelmaNCSidingExt+StomgeYd(Johnston)EXP+401 NBR
?pF WATF9o Michael F. Easley, Governor
?? G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
1/J North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DillF
'°- - Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Elizabeth Scherrer
Scott Saylor
Subject: Selma, NC Siding Ext. & Storage Yd
Fax #: [phone]
954.7099
Date: February 24, 2006
Number of pages including cover sheet: 11
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at
919-715-3473.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting nit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
Internet: http://www.newaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
FFR 2 12006
DEtrR - r i?Trlt QUALITY
1'"EtUJXS,'J%DSTG 1'•'f11'ATERERAI,'CIt
Office Use Only' Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 111? G2 06 0929
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 Verified
If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
IL Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Scott Saylor North Carolina Railroad Company
Mailing Address: 2809 Highwoods Boulevard Suite 100
Ralei.gh NC 27604-1000
Telephone Number: 919-954-7601 Fax Number: 919-954-7099
E-mail Address: ssaylor w ncrr.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Elizabeth Scherrer
Company Affiliation: EcoScience Corporation
Mailing Address: 1101 Haynes Street Suite 101
Raleigh NC 27604
Telephone Number: 919-828-3433 Fax Number: 919-828-3518
E-mail Address: scherrerRecosciencenc.com
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 10
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than II by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Selma NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A. NCRR project.
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A. Railway right-of-way.
4. Location
County: Johnston Nearest Town: Selma & Pine Level
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A. Not in a subdivision.
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Corridor beiins in
southeast Selma south of Anderson Road (SR 1927) 1600 feet northeast of Interstate 95, and
continues for 2.2 miles along Selina - Pine Level Road (SR 1927) to Peedin Avenue (SR
2309) in Pine Level.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.516896 °N -078.251702 °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A. Property is a 10,795-foot length of railroad siding.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Moccasin Creek 27-5340.5) (C NSW)
8. River Basin: Neuse (NEU12)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at litip://li2o.enr.stite.iic.us/,i(iiiiin/t-n.ips/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site conditions are generally disturbed except for small
pockets of woods. Western end of corridor begins at a track convergence in an industrial
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 10
area near the Selina train station. East of I-95 land use consists of agricultural and sparse
residential areas. Last 1/3 mile of the corridor is within Pine Level limits.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: At the
western end of the project corridor, turnouts and signals will be reconfigured. Track shifts
will continue for 1300 feet east of 1-95. Beginning 400 feet east of I-95 and extending for
4700 feet 3 new storage tracks will be constructed north of the existing railroad line. 24"
culverts will be installed approximately every 400 feet with drop inlets between the existing
tracks and headwall construction south of the rail bed. Existing culverts along this section
will be abandoned and grout filled Beginning approximately 5000 feet east of I-95 a new
main track will be constructed south of the existing track beginning at this point and extend
to the eastern end of the project corridor. The existing culvert leading under the rail bed into
Wetland 1 will be abandoned and grout filled with a new culvert to be installed 20 feet east
of the wetland The two existing 72-inch culverts at Stream 1 will be extended south
approximately 18 feet to accommodate the new rail bed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: This rail corridor provides a vital rail link to
eastern North Carolina and the NC State Port at Morehead City. Several major industries in
this portion of the state depend upon rail freight service to meet their operational needs. In
addition this portion of the NCRR Corridor includes intercity rail passenger service
connecting Richmond VA and points north to Raleigh Charlotte and other southeastern
destinations The additional rail traffic ou this corridor has imposed a need for locations
where trains may safely pass Currently there are no sidings of sufficient length between
Raleigh and Selma a distance of 35 miles at which to pass freight trains which are often
10,000 feet long This project will provide the ability to store trains at the yard in Selma and
to safely pass trains at locations between Raleigh and Selma.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A. No prior permits or determinations.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Updatcd 111112005
Page 7 of 10
N/A No future project plans
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intennittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forns should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Wetland 1 will be impacted by fill
associated with installation of a new main track south of the existing track. Stream l will be
impacted by an 18-foot extension of a 72" RCP and a 72" CMP south of the existing pipes to
accommodate the new track.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
cP.nnrately list imnaets clue to hnth structure and flooding-

Wetland Impact
Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact of Wetland
Type
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within

100-year
F(yes/n)
es/no) Distance to

Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of

Impact
(acres)
Wetland 1 fill forested no 640 0.31
Stream 1 culvert extension stream yes 0 0.01

I
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.32
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.1 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Updated I1/1/2005
Page 8 of 10
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
InternPerennial t?
uttent. Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Stream 1 UT to Moccasin
Creek culvert extension perennial 15 feet 18 0.006

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 18 0.006
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name p Wateplicablle) e)
(if ap
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
None None None None None

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.006
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.32
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.326
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 18
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A. None exist on the propery
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A. No pond construction is proposed.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 10
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stonnwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Construction of the new track
to the north of the existing track would require shifting, of the existing; Pine Level - Selma Road,
resultingg},reatly increased construction and operational costs. In addition, no net decrease in
wetland impacts would be anticipated by placing, the new track to the north.
Construction of a retaining_ wall to avoid the large on -site wetland would need to be 600 feet
long and is cost-prohibitive.
The developer feels that the most efficient and practicable design solution is proposed.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp://Ii2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlancis/strm,,ide.litml.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 10
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much infornation as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreagedinear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate slieet if more space is needed.
N/A Mitigation is proposed through NC EEP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at littp://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): None
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): None
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.32 acre
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
Updatad 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 10
n;sr7r-a
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 1184 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1831 1.5
Total 3015
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicu
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
\I.
\II.
from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A. Since the project impacts less than
40 feet of jurisdictional stream it is exempt from the Neuse River buffer rules.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
storrnwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The project corridor is 10,795 feet long; with a
200-foot rig?lht-of-wav (49.6 acres). There will be a net increase in iin ervious surface of 1.25
acres This is an increase of 7.4 percent over the existing 16.9 acres. Impervious surface will
increase from 34.1 percent to 36.6 percent.
Sedimentation and erosion control plans have been submitted and approved. An approval was
received from Debbie Barbee of NCDENR on November 30, 2005.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A No wastewater will be generated.
ul,datcd 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 10
.
lIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: N/A
No future development is anticipated as a result of this project.
1V. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

,?2 -?-a ' 0(;o
Elizabeth Scherrer, EcoScience Corporation (Agent)
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 10
f _ t
1101 IIaenes Street Suitc 101 Raleigh, \C 27004 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
EcoScience
06 0 2 2
February 17, 2006
Ms. Cyndi B. Karoly
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Section 401/404 Permit - Selma. NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard 06-280
Dear Ms. Karoly,
Please find enclosed a permit package for a requested Section 404 Permit and Express 401 Water
Quality Certification. We are requesting the permits under Nationwide Permit 14 and Water
Quality Certification #3404.
The project involves expansion and improvements along the North Carolina Railroad Company's
railroad bed between Selma and Pine Level, North Carolina. The project consists of construction
of a storage yard between the existing tracks and the addition of a new main track to the south of
the existing tracks.
Jurisdictional area impacts are limited to a single wetland pocket near Pine Level, involving fill
of 0.31 acre; and a single perennial stream crossing near Pine Level, involving a culvert
extension of 18 linear feet and 0.01 acre.
Thank you for your attention and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions
or concerns.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience Corporation
Attachments:
PCN Form, Permit Materials
FFN 7
Addendum to the Pre-Construction Notification and "Buffer Rules" Application Required for
Projects Submitted Under the
"Express Review Program"
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Version 4.0
September 2, 2004
Email Address: [e-mail]
Purpose: To provide a detailed explanation of the information required by the Division of Water Quality
in order to expedite the review of applications for 401 General Water Quality Certifications, Isolated
Wetland Permits, Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plans and Riparian Buffer Approvals (Please Note: do
not leave any questions unanswered or use terms such as "N/A" without an explanation).
Fees:
401 Water Quality Certifications: Major (>/= 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $2,000.00
?Minor (< 150' stream or < 1 acre wetlands) $1,000.00
Riparian Buffer Approval: (exclusively or "in addition" to) $2,000.00
Isolated Wetland Permit: General $1,000.00
Wetland & Stream Mitigation Plan: Major w/buffers (>/= 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $4,000.00
Major w/o buffers (>/= 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $3,000.00
Minor/buffers only $2,000.00
Please read the entire document before attempting to determine the proper fee. Fees are additive for
particular projects.
Things to keep in mind when filling out the application:
A specific answer must be provided for each question. For instance, if a numerical answer is requested
then a numerical answer must be provided along with the supporting information necessary for DWQ staff
to verify that the number is accurate. Likewise, if explanations are presented to justify certain responses,
the explanations must be completely supported by documentation. DWQ staff cannot assume that
unsupported or undocumented information is accurate. "N/A" is not an acceptable answer for any
question since the DWQ Staff reviewing the application must have an opportunity to determine whether or
not any requested information is pertinent.
All forms, guidance, worksheets, applications, etc. used must be the current versions as posted on our
web site at http: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. There will soon be a web site specifically for the
express review program. Please note that it will be the applicant's or applicant's consultant's
responsibility to verify that the current versions are used. The versions posted on our web site will be
considered to be the current versions.
You are a very important part of the success of this program, if you have suggestions or clarifications
please send your comments to the Wetlands/401 Unit of the DWQ (via email at
401 [e-mail]),
Filling Out the Pre-Construction Notification Application:
The Corps of Engineers (USACE)/DWQ official, joint Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
must be used as a basis for the expedited review process. The completed application should be
presented first and the supporting information tabbed and collated in the same order. Using a custom
format is not recommended. The open squares () are checklist items. The following items correspond to
the numbering system on the Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN):
USE CHECK BOXES TO TRACK PROJECT INFORMATION
SECTION I. PROCESSING
B 1 & 2.The USACE determines which Nationwide, Regional, or General Permit is
required. If you have verified with the USACE which permit they intend to use for
your project or if you already have written approval from the USACE, please
indicate by adding "verified" or "verified, attached", respectively, in the blank next
to the Permit number requested.
Attach the USACE Approval if you have it.
l 3. It is not anticipated that the expedited process will be requested for this situation.
4. If you propose to impact 150 feet or more of perennial stream or 1 acre or more
of wetland and onsite mitigation is not proposed, it is recommended that you
either locate an acceptable private bank with available credits (with
documentation to show that the bank can and shall provide the credits needed)
or obtain approval from the EEP for the entire amount of stream and or wetland
as DWQ will make the final determination as to whether or not mitigation applies.
Please note that the USACE may have different mitigation requirements and
thresholds.
5. State whether your project will require a CAMA Minor, Major or General Permit
and give the status of the permit.
SECTION II - APPLICATION INFORMATION
1. 15 NCAC 2H.502(o reads as follows: "Who Must Sign Applications. The application
shall be considered a "valid application" only if the application bears the signature of a
responsible officer of the company, municipal official, partner or owner. This signature
certifies that the applicant has title to the property, has been authorized by the owner to
apply for certification or is a public entity and has the power of eminent domain. Said
official in signing the application shall also certify that all information contained therein
or in support thereof is true and correct to the best of his knowledge."
Please indicate how the applicant meets the above definition and provide
supporting documentation.
C Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax
number and email address.
2. t If the application is not signed by the applicant, please attach the agent authorization.
The applicant must sign the agent authorization letter. The applicant's name and
/ position must also be spelled out as many signatures are difficult to read.
3. ?I Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax number and
email address.
SECTION III - PROJECT INFORMATION
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the
information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the
types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
3
Maps and Plans:
li?"' The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map- Please cleanly
delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the
features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the
quadrangle name. You can go to the USGS web site (http://mac.usgs.gov/maplists/) to
verify the most recent version.
The most recent version of the NRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within
the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman Lake Watershed and the
Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) - Please cleanly delineate the
site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is
recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the page or map number
from which the copy of the map was made. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil
survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS County Office
(http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/).
Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the
property and project on the map. Please indicate north and scale. Please include
applicable rcad names or State Road numbers.
The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide
full sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
td Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet must be scaled and
include all jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features,
State regulated buffers, topographic contours with elevations, approximate extent
and nature of forest, field, landscaped, or other cover. Any existing structures and
impervious area must be shown. Existing utility lines and easements must be
shown. Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features must be shown. North
arrow and the scale must be shown. Please note that the impact boundaries on the
maps should correspond to the flagged impact boundaries in the field.
0/ Proposed conditions - These sheets must be scaled and show all existing
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State
regulated buffers must be underlain on the site plan(s). The plans must show all
built-out structures and impervious cover. The plans must include the final grading
contours with elevations. The plans must indicate all utilities and easements. It is
likely that several versions of the final built-out site plans will be necessary. The
following is a list of layers:
Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must be included. The plans should include
the locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the collection system and
drainage ways. All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations.
Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and
policies. In certain cases, final stormwater management plans must also be
provided, but that will be addressed later in this document.
E/ Plats - The plans must show the location and layout of all sub-divided parcels with
lot identifications. Platted parcels must be developable without further impacts to
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State
regulated buffers.
CZ' Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland,
stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on
the site plans. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will
be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated.
Wetland Impacts (on the site plan):
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and
/ any clearing must be specified.
V" All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars. Construction
detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
V/ Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
P? When surface drainage features or groundwater recharge areas that feed or would
reasonably feed wetlands that are not to be filled are made impervious, it may be
necessary to direct some stormwater runoff to those areas in order to maintain hydrology.
You must identify these areas and address them. Supporting explanations and discharge
information must be provided to show that the wetland would not be eroded or receive
too much or too little hydrology. In many cases this could help satisfy part of a
stormwater management plan.
Flooding
Draining
Stream Impacts:
V Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks
of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be
impacted.
Culverting:
The inlet and the outlet of the culvert should be aligned with the stream as much as
possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and stream bed elevations should be indicated.
Vd Any widening of the stream must be shown with elevations.
CI The extent of and plan details for all dissipation or grade control devices should be shown
with pertinent elevations.
S/ For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a longitudinal cross section that
shows the stream bed invert at the inlet and outlet, the existing stream bank elevations
and the invert of the inlet and outlet of the pipe(s) must be provided.
f? For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a vertical cross section must be
provided that shows the stream cross section at the inlet and outlet overlain with the
culvert and fill cross section.
f For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that
shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross
section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the
/ edge of each footer to each stream bank.
l? For bottomless culverts or other spans, a plan view must be provided that shows the
location of the spans and the stream banks.
f? For longer culverts or culverts that will pass beneath substantial impervious cover, it will
be necessary to provide adequate plan detail to show that discharge velocity/energy will
be adequately dissipated.
5
Aquatic life passage through culverts is typically achieved by placing the invert of the
culvert below the existing bed of the stream per the USACE or North Carolina Wildlife
Resource Commission guidelines. Other methods such as baffles may also be used.
Please be aware that such placement may require the use of grade/velocity control
measures up or down stream of culverts on steeper streams to prevent head-cuts or
stream bed erosion. The culvert placement relative to the stream bed can be indicated
on the longitudinal profile. Grade and velocity control measures must be indicated on the
plan view and typical designs should be provided.
t/ Multiple culverts, wide culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills,
off-setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to
maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the
culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section
including the stream flood-prone area.
Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated
with the dam foot print, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of
stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated.
Stream Relocations:
Stream relocations must be conducted as specified in General Certification numbers
3402 and 3404 (available on the Wetlands Unit web site). Stream relocation plans must
include:
E?f Morphological measurements (see Appendix B of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina available on the Wetlands Unit web site) - not all of the
measurements are applicable in every instance.
Typical stream cross sections - Typically, a riffle cross section and a pool cross section
that includes the entire flood prone area. The bankfull and flood prove area elevations
should be indicated. Similarly, a riffle cross section of the reference stream(s) should be
provided.
9 Plan view - Provide scaled plans that show the location of the proposed (preferably with
stationing) and the existing stream. In most instances, the bankfull contours and flood
prone area contours, in stream structures, bank revetments/stabilization, channel plugs,
planting plan, vegetation conditions, stormwater outlets, grade controls, bridges, culverts,
sewer lines, roads, fencing, and easement lines should also be provided.
Longitudinal Stream Profile - A scaled profile that indicates the thalweg, bankfull, and top
of bank elevations should be provided for the design and reference streams. In many
cases, it will also be necessary to show the existing land elevations for the design
stream.
Planting Plan - A planting and/or vegetation management plan should also be provided
that makes use of appropriate native vegetation. The plan should indicate the extent,
/ density, and species of plants to be provided.
? In-stream structure, bank revetment/stabilization, and stormwater outlet typicals -
Detailed, typical plans should be provided for all in stream structures, bank revetments or
stabilization, and stormwater outlets. The typicals should include materials and
/ specifications as well as relative lengths, positions, and angles.
Sediment transport analysis - A sediment transport analysis should be provided based
on the current, relevant, accepted practices. The sediment transport analysis should be
/ relevant to the stream bed load type and should predict bed load transport equilibrium.
C7 Permanent conservation easement or similar means of protection must also be provided.
6
Other Information:
V7 1. The project should always be referred to by this name in all correspondence as well
as the DWQ # once it is provided.
V/ 2. This only applies to DOT projects, which are not expected to utilize the Express
Review Program.
3. This should be the size of the project as identified by the USACE for 404 Permits or
by the Division of Water Quality for Buffer Approvals and Isolated Wetland Permits.
l7J 4. Please provide the name (as depicted on the USGS topographic map and DWQ
Stream Classification Lists) of the nearest water body(ies) to which your project is a
tributary to (e.g. "Neuse River (Falls Lake below normal pool elevation)"). (Do not
simple state "stream", "river", "ocean", "sound" or "lake".) Please provide the "stream
index number" of the named water body or water body section (e.g. "27-(1)"). Also,
please provide the full water quality classification (e.g. "WS-IV NSW CA") of the water
body. This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
/ http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.htm1.
5. Please state which river basin and sub-basin that your project is in (e.g. "Neuse River
Basin, NEU01"). This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.htm1.
6. Conditions should also be indicated on the existing site plan where applicable.
/ Photos (including aerial photos) can be helpful in describing the existing conditions.
7. You must provide an attachment that explicitly describes what the proposed project
/ will entail from the planning stage to final construction.
V 8. This can be a simple explanation, but it is critically important because the purpose
dictates how the no practical alternatives are reviewed.
SECTION IV - PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
Please include copies of all 401 Water Quality Certifications, Isolated Wetland
Permits, Buffer Approvals, USACE Permits, CAMA Permits for the site as well as a
copy of the final approved, site plan.
SECTION V - FUTURE PROJECT PLANS
For projects utilizing the express review process, all impacts both present and
potential future must be indicated. For instance, the location or configuration of
platted lots sometimes suggests that future impacts will be necessary to build,
access, or otherwise develop such lots. Failure to account for such potential impacts
could delay or disqualify a project from the rapid review process. If you believe that
the lot can be developed without impacts, but you anticipate that your assertion may
be questioned, it is recommended that you provide a potential building foot print
and/or grading plan to show that future impacts could be avoided.
SECTION VI - PROPOSED IMPACTS TO WATER OF THE US
CY 1. It is recommended that the individual impacts be described if there are special things
to note about the impacts. Typically the most important thing is to have detailed
accurate site plans as described above. Please make sure they are clearly labeled.
V/ Please include all proposed temporary impacts.
l Also, a current, signed delineation map from the USACE should be provided (if
available) and a map locating the stream origins signed by the appropriate DWQ
Staff must be provided if applicable.
U 2. Each impact to a wetland must be clearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The
type of impact must be clearly stated. If the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please list
any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. If there is any doubt,
it is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams. Please follow current DWQ
policy with respect to whether a stream is perennial or not. It is recommended that
you assume that a stream is perennial (unless you are positive that it is not) so if
mitigation is required then the appropriate amount of mitigation would be anticipated
or requested from the EEP or private bank. If the EEP or private bank has pre-
approved too short of an amount of stream or if inadequate mitigation is proposed,
then that situation will result in delays.
tJ 3. Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a feature is a modified natural channel
or a ditch, especially in the eastern part of the State. Soils, drainage features,
topography, and similar factors, all are important for making that determination.
i/ 4. Other items to address not specifically requested in the application include
downstream sediment starvation, thermal pollution, low flow releases from dams, and
aquatic life passage. Other important considerations are buffer reestablishment or
mitigation around ponds on buffered streams. The site plan should include the
precise elevation contour of the normal pool as well as the dam foot-print. Mitigation
is required for wetland flooding of an acre or greater and for stream fill (if over the
150 foot threshold) under the dam foot-print and any outlet stabilization.
SECTION VII - AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization are critical aspects of an application particularly if you desire the application
to be processed expeditiously. The following is a check-list of avoidance and minimization questions that
DWQ Staff often look for in applications.
W Are there any stream crossings at angles less than 75° or greater than 105°?
Are there any stream crossings that cross two streams above or at the confluence of those
streams?
L? Are there any stream, wetland, water, and/or buffer impacts other than perpendicular road
/ crossing near the edges of the property?
Y" Can the stream be relocated as a natural channel design as opposed to culverted or
otherwise filled?
R"" Is any single stream crossed more than once?
Can property access routes be moved or reduced to avoid stream, wetland, water, and
buffer impacts?
Y] Can a building, parking lot, etc. be realigned to avoid impacts?
0"" Can the site layout be reconfigured to avoid impacts?
Can headwalls or steeper side slopes be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
Can a retaining wall be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
M Can cul de sacs be used in place of a crossing?
M Can lots be reshaped or have shared driveways to avoid impacts?
If based solely on the practicable physical possibility, the answer is "yes" to any of the above questions
then you must have to provide substantial and convincing justification as to why the impacts are
necessary. If the impacts are required by a local government or other agency, the claim must be
supported with appropriate written documentation from the local government or other agency. Most
projects typically involve the need to justify avoidance and minimization. If this information is not readily
available, then the express review process may not be the appropriate venue to use. Providing
alternative plans (such as plans that avoid the impact, minimize the impact and the preferred plan, similar
to those used in environmental assessments) and explanations as to why the preferred plan is needed
and why the alternative plans won't work are many times helpful in the no practical alternatives review.
SECTION VIII - MITIGATION
Mitigation for the Express Review Program, final mitigation plans must be presented up front. The final
plans (except for plans that propose payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund, private mitigation banks, or similar banking instruments) must contain detailed
plans, specifications, calculations and other supporting data that show that the appropriate mitigation will
be achieved at the ratios required. The design plans must be developed to at least the "90%" level.
Monitoring plans must be final and specific. Any means of permanent protection, such as a permanent
conservation easement must be provided. If you elect to use the EEP or a private mitigation bank, it is
recommended that you request the maximum possible mitigation amount that DWQ may require so that
you will not have to get further approval from them on short notice. The EEP and private banks are not
part of the expedited review process and cannot be expected to meet any such deadlines. There will be
no conditional expedited approvals that require final plans at a later date. It is not recommended that
innovative mitigation techniques or greater than 10% preservation be requested as part of an expedited
process.
SECTION IX
If your project requires the preparation of an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA and an
approval letter has not been issued by the State Clearinghouse, then you cannot apply under the
expedited review process. I t is your responsibility to find out if such documentation is required.
SECTION X
There are many aspects of the Buffer Rules that must be addressed in every application, if applicable.
The first and most important thing to keep in mind is that allowable activities that require written Approval
from DWQ triggers a review of the entire project for compliance with the Buffer Rules.
Diffuse Flow & Stormwater Management:
C? The most common issues that arise involve the requirement for diffuse flow of stormwater
through riparian buffers. Basically one of three things must be indicated in regards to all
"new" stormwater that is collected and subsequently discharged. First, provisions for
diffuse flow through the protected buffer must be made. This usually involves the use of
level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ guidance on level spreader design,
which is available on our web site. Please keep in mind that it does not matter how far a
discharge point is from a buffer. The stormwater must be flowing in a diffuse manner at
whatever point it eventually reaches the buffer. If the stormwater will not be flowing in a
diffuse manner through the protected buffer at the point it reaches the buffer, then one of
the following options may be allowed:
CZ You may provide a nitrogen removing measure such as a forested filter strip,
grassed swale, stormwater wetland, etc. The measure employed should be
designed according to the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual or other DWQ Guidance available at http:
//h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.htmi. After the nitrogen is treated, the
stormwater can be directly conveyed through the buffer with written DWQ approval.
You may discharge the stormwater to an existing man-made conveyance that
currently conveys stormwater through the protected buffer (assuming the
conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Rules) as long as that
conveyance does not need to be altered to convey the flow. Please remember that
there are no other choices. The following checklist is intended to help insure that
your application will not be deemed incomplete as a result of improper stormwater
design.
Stormwater Management (for Buffer Rules compliance only - Also, see Section XI):
Uy All stormwater out-falls must be clearly shown and labeled on the site plan for projects in
Buffered watersheds. List each out-fall as labeled:
V Option 1: Level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ Guidance, and
devices that merely control velocity but do not provide diffuse flow such as rip rap
dissipators are not proposed. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site
plan and provide a DWQ worksheet available at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html:
Option 2: Nitrogen removing measures designed to DWQ Standards are
proposed for discharges for which diffuse flow through a protected Buffer cannot be
met. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site plan and provide a DWQ
worksheet available at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html:
4!' Option 3: The stormwater will be discharged to an existing man-made (not
including modified natural channels) conveyance that carries the stormwater
through the Buffer. The conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Buffer
Rules. List each out-fall as labeled:
V/ All stormwater out-fall must meet one of the options above. (Note: if you cannot check this
box your application will likely not be accepted into the express review process.)
Site Plans:
C?1 All applications on properties with DWQ protected buffers must clearly depict the buffers
and any impacts to the buffers on the site plans. The impact maps should clearly depict
both zones of the protected buffers and the proposed impact areas (provided in square
feet).
Surface Water & Buffer Delineations:
Any surface waters subject to DWQ protected buffers must be field located and accurately
depicted on the site plans and impact maps. The width, dimensions and pattern of the
surface water must be delineated. The surface water location must not be taken simply
from a USGS map, soil survey or local municipality's map. The buffers must be measured
from the surface water as required within the applicable buffer protection rule (e.g., all
buffers along streams subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule must be measured from the "top-of-
bank" of the stream and not the centerline of the stream). All streams must be surveyed or
located by GPS and shown precisely on the site plans.
Impact Table:
B Please provide additional impact tables that clearly state the area of impact for each
corresponding impact site.
10
Variances:
V/ Projects that require a Minor, Major and/or "General" Variance will not be eligible for the
use of the Express Review Program.
Mitigation:
Yd As opposed to applications that are submitted under our regular process, final mitigation
plans must be presented up front (see requirements for Section VIII above). The mitigation
plans must comply with the applicable buffer mitigation rule.
SECTION XI - STORMWATER
Please provide the following information in regards to potential stormwater requirements:
The total acreage of the site. 41-G (acres)
The total built-out impervious acreage / S • I ':?_ (acres)
C( The total area that will be disturbed (acres)
ur If the total area exceeds 20% imperviousness, the development on the site is uniform in
density, and you claim that the total impervious area is less than 30%, you must provide a
complete, detailed breakdown of the assumed built-out conditions. The breakdown must
be detailed enough to show that all potential impervious areas are accounted for.
P/ If there are concentrated areas of development such as multi-family, commercial, cluster,
club houses, etc. that exceed 30% imperviousness and the total imperviousness for the site
does not exceed 30%, a stormwater management plan will likely be required for those
areas that exceed 30% imperviousness.
Stormwater management plans must be complete with a final design and an executed
Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There will be no conditional stormwater approvals
for the express review process that allow for approval of the final plans at a later date.
Worksheets must be provided that are available at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.htmi.
SECTION XII - SEWAGE DISPOSAL
Response must be clear and detailed. Any disposal method that suggests further impacts
may be required other than those shown must be clearly addressed on the site plans.
SECTION XIII
V Answering yes to either of these responses automatically precludes you from the express
review process.
SECTION XIV - SIGNATURE
tX The name, position and/or title of the applicant must be in type or long hand script here with
the signature. It should be the same person as described in Part II.
If you have any questions about these requirements, please email the Express Review Program at
[e-mail] and include your question and phone number and the appropriate staff will
respond as soon as possible.
-17-2006 10:17 FROM:DWO-WETLANDS 9197336893
?pF WNA,
4G
0
a

T0:98283518 P:2/2
Michael F. Easley, GONICMU
William G. Ross Jr.. Scc:retary
North Carolina (apartment of Environment and Natural Rescumcs
Alan W, Klimek, P.S. Director
Division of wattr Quality
February 17, 2006 Johnston County
EXPRESS 1kF,V1EW ACCEPTANCE LETTER (Revised)
North Carolina Railroad Company
tlttn-. Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 kiighwoods Blvd, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Dear Mr. Saylor:
Subject Property: Set= NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
Om February 7, 2006, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received an email request from
FcoScicnee Corporation, regarding a project kmown as the " SclzltmaNC Siding Extension and Storage Yard" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the
Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1) The application fee of 51,000 [for 401 Water Quality Certification services, made payable to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality];
2) hive (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application;
3) One (1) copy of the Addendum;
4) Five (5) copies of all site plan information pertaining to this project (please refer to the Addendum
ligp://b2o.enr.state.naps/newetlands/apparld5.pdf);
Tbank you for your attention to this matter. Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee arc received. If the impacts are greater than
indicated on the initial interest form and/or the services are different, you may be required to remit an additional
fee,
1f you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Amy Chapman at
919-733-9502 or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 91971.5-3473.
Sincerely,
di B. aroly
C13.KJase
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
EcoScience Corporation; Attn: Elizabeth Scherrer, 1101 Haynes Street, Ste 101, Raleigh, NC 27504
401 Ovarlghl/ Express Rcvlcw Permitting Unit
1650 Marl Servlca Cenisr, Ralelgh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crobtreo douloWd, Sule 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27804
Phone: [phone]! FAX [phone] / Inlcrnet htlpl/h2o.enr.?tatc nc.v5/ncwcrlands
NonthC:arolina
Aatumlly
An Equal Opporlunlti/A6irmattva Action Employor- 50% Rocycled'1M Post Consumer Paper
02-17-'06 11:33 FROM-DENR-EEP 9197152219 T-860 P01
-t os stem
PROGRAM
February 17, 2006
Gerald, R. McCrain
EcoScience Corporation (1 2
by
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101 U
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project: Selma RR Siding County: Johnston

U-929
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP, Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03020201
Upon receipt of paymcnt, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone I at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact David Robinson at [phone].
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jean Manuele, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
Sincerely,
t-4 Willi Gilmore, PE
Direct r
RUtorlptg... EGt,GGR.G -. 'Prot" Oar State
M
MiN4
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1652 / 919-715.0476 / www.ncoop.net
NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
C O M P A N Y
February 1, 2006
RE: Agent Authorization for
The preparation and submittal of permits with regard to
NCRR Raleigh to Selma Projects
To Whom It May Concern:
By copy of this letter, let it be known that Elizabeth Scherrer of EcoScience Corporation, 1101
Haynes Street, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina is hereby authorized by the North Carolina
Railroad Company to act as the Agent in the preparation and submittal of permit applications
and certifications with regard to the above-mentioned projects.
Sincerely,
Scott Saylor,
President-NCRR
Cc: Enrico Roque, HNTB North Carolina, PC
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1000
919 - 954 - 7601 phone / 919 - 954 - 7099 fax
Crump er.,
Sic. . l r ; # 1?1 i Rest • 1
t krea r Crosz
Idj
e4 rn + {
3ia
?sly v y ?• 'boa
Airport/ 9? 3
°
•
IT*
..L-rr? *y ? s9 .3J • / 4 • ? ? ? \ N I _ 1732'1 l f ?/ •
EM-
% or
•? / / .i. 9.. r - /?.. j I •Clfi .'t- -
• '• ?? ,.? B `. r,• / ?_\-1 ° 71091
\ >o
74 •1`75 ? ..: -... ?- •?`' ?, c _- _ .. ?, (/??
C
nilYr Pir_? 4te
,Subst.ilon ;. c '?!'e?• Project
Location
• n?
91
r, m
Cracker
Cems
.01
>e ; a ice's Z.l+;
4
Corn N,-- _7
? /? - ? •, ? ?.. 731 ? ,•s ? ^ 1• nth \ i.%? ;.
• a__ /•:?';?,? !_7 .Pine Level i
f \ ..? r: l '.?•>? /? (PM 1721
1 ? ? .?, ,.? yr, ?•.,, ? . y ?,\,
rI37S? r _ _ ! Look .? { J. Pi&0.evell
Alie
2000 0 2000 4000 Feet _ -._ _ .. - /- `???' ,0• ,?. =? l' L? -.,?p?? ` J?sc
i-' Gds Cho k s etn . J
Source: Selma (1998), Kenly West (1978), Four Oaks Northeast (1997), i -moo ?. %? ?'` ?a 1"' j . • ` am 40
and Princeton (1974)USGS Quadrangles
N(')R 111 C AM M iNA PROJECT: TITLE: N Scale: Date: FIGURE
? R AI LIZ(--)A1) NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMP
,I ,. , 1" = 2000' FEB 2005
SIDING
N JOHNSTON OAND UNTY?GE PROJECT LOCATION
Drawn By-. ESC Project No:
HNTBJ Johnston County, North Carolina
ES 06-280

,? • la 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet
y ?F
-? e n h
ton Cou Ortho oto
Source: 2001 Johnston County P
GoA •''il .r it , Johnston County 1994 Soil Survey, maps 7 8, 8
,? R3; .t"., +?; ? +.:?: ?' Yom, ??- i _ y. ?•A.3;,•
GOA
'e1
n I
Ly
?y nt
Project
aa.
Corridor
l ? ? - ? ?^ 7 ^ a a.
GoA r
.; _ GoA
d
3
F NoA ?Z .
i - GoA
Symbol Series Hydric Status Gr Ge6
'
Bb Bibb sandy loam, frequently flooded Hydric= ,wr'• ! _ eb
GeB Gilead sandy loam, 2-6% slopes Upland
GOA Goldsboro sandy loam, 0-2% slopes Hydric inclusions
Gr Grantham silt loam Hydric+
Ly Lynchburg sandy loam Hydric inclusions
NoA Norfolk loam sand, 0-2% slopes Upland GoA
NuA Norfolk-Urban land complex, 0-3% slopes Upland :f ;0
4 -?
Ra Rains sandy loam Hydric F '+; ? * ? •, '1 ? ,x?':.??
t
Ud Udorthents, loam Upland
41
^i, !IZ 1'I 1 C;.ARC)I.IIVA PROJECT: TITLE: _ FIGURE
I ? AI LROA I ? i NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPAN v N Scale: Date:
< ° ,r r A ` r SIDING EXTENSION AND STORAGE NRCS SOILS-=. I 1" = 1000 FEB 200
IN JOHNSTON COUNTY '-?
Drawn By. ESC Project No:
N
LAND USEma , T.
HNTB sC
Johnston County, North Carolina z c
< i ES 06-28
?l = Q?ED
CD F-
Z J
Q
W d Y
j Q
p co
a ¢ U)
O
0 of L)
a m v EXIST. RNV
m I= PINE LEVEL - SELMA RD.
n
u1
0
PROP. SECOND MAIN 5785 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
5790
......................
CONST.NEW 5785
MAIN TRACK
E -
_. .?_.. _
-------------
0.01 ACRES WEST PINE ST.
ACE
40'X 36" CMP IN DITCH _
F- UNDER ROADWAY EXIST. RNV
p
ni
[I° L1,`
m
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT? 1,184 FT2
n ._ C:D
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT. 1,831 FT2
PLAN VIEW, SITE 2 NUIiTHCAP, LINA
LEGEND RAILROAD
C O M P A N y
WETLAND IMPACT _.._.._.._.._.._. _ OMITS OF CONSTRUCTION HNTB NORTH CAROLINA. P. C.
-- •-•-•-•- STREAM CENTERLINE . SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 200
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT O BUFFER REQUIRED Ra343I eEi gh, North Caro I i na 27609
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT NO BUFFER REQUIRED
50 100'
I
SHEET2 OF4
LENGTH OF IMPACTED STREAM/WETLAND: 596 FT.
PROPOSED ELEVATION CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA = 19.30 ± SQ. FT.
VOLUME OF CUT: 426.03 CU.YD.
160

155 ----------------
`-
_ ---- ------------------- / ---

150

LW
145 =; ;
J rt
,

i?
140
40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW
L 5N01-CFH CAROLINA
RAILROAD

AT WETLAND SITE 1 .
° " `' A Y
HNTB 343 E NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.
E. SIX FORKS ROAD. 51 2
00
ai
R
ei gFi, North Carolina 27609
0 10' 20'
SHEET30F4
Jan-31-2008 11:28am From-
T-081 P.002/OOT F-2T3
DATA FORM
ROUTINI= WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
7Appllcant/Owner: Date: County: r: G, f3 v State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sits? Yes o Community ID: 5
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atyplcal Situation)? Yes Trans©Ct ID;
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(if needed explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
rni?vlt ro c air ?(r 1r?i?n? " IrdLc?g1,ot
T4 Ferment Pignt Sc^_cl°s r [3 um , lnatca:ot
0
,
1.
2. M llh G fl rZud .
10

MrM 5tWY4
a.
sk?to _Pn. !
11.
An P, 794f J7 1;!
6. fu rol tint;: r'QL= 13
0. ' 14 t 16.
7. rwwl??krr a,Tgntt:4' - 15.
a. l6.
Po. cent of Dom;nara epacias that are 03L. FAGW Cr FAC )
lexcludin? FACA -?
l
Remark:
-HYDROLOGY
Rocordod Data (Descrtbo to Rtmerks): Wetland h- drelogy MCWors:
- 5xeam, Lako, or Tidy Gauge Primary Indicaloro:
.-.. Ajl ,al Phctooraphs undated
O her
_ No Recorded Data Avalahlo _ Salurated In Upper 12 Lnchos
-? eler Marks
priit Unes
SCdim©nl DU-posits
Field obscrvatlons: Dra!napo Palterns In WeJands
Secgft8ary tnctcacors {2 cr more reS?.dradj:
otpth of Surfaca Wotan (Im) ? aad Root Charva;s In Upper 12lnchas
? Water,-Sla nod Leaves
Oopth to Free Water in PIL _• . (ln) _ Local Soh Survey Dala
_ FAG-Nautral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (nt ^ Other (Ey,-la;A In Remarks)
Remarks;
B2 Ipper lix 9 6fsnk and Examp!a Dala Farrt:e
Jan-31-2008 11:29am From-
T-081 P•003/007 F-273
S--0-1 riV,?
Gntl C
Map Uhl Name
(Series and Phase). oralnaga Class:
Field Observations
Taxnnor!y (Subgroup): Conntrn Mapped Type? Yos No
ProRL Lk scrlptior,:
Daplh N.atfix Color
I!n _h J j? rMnn!eii Mnl?rl_
MONO Colors Mottle Abundanca/ Texture, Concretl?ns,
(Muns-11 Molsll ;SFr{ antra4t filr ro et
-rn Wr
Itydl;C $Oll Li4ca!ors:
orstlaas
Zco
_ Hstosol
Hstlc Eplpedan ,
n
_ Koh Organic Contont in -Wfaca Layer to Sandy SOUS
.w Suifldlc Odor _ Organic Streaking in Gandy Sods ,
A ulo Moisture Raglrne .-Llslad on Lccal Ffjdrlc ;ions List
_ Reducing Cond"dons Listed on Natlonal Ffydrla Sops List
_ 0Isyed or Lovr-Ororm Colors r Other (Explain In Rernarla)
Rarnarks:
WL-I LAND O1=t 1_FiMI
N
Hydrophytic Vogatatlon Presert? an No (Circle) (Circle)
Wouand hlydraioQy prestru? a Nc ,
Hydric Solis Present? os No is this Eamplrng Paint Within a Wetland? C_% No
Romarku:
Apprcveacyliuustu, Z:VU
Appendix B Blankantl Ex&T, is Dela Forms 55
j
02-17-'06 11;33 FROM-DENR-EEP 9197152219 T-860 P01
FI
ow stem
PROGRAM
February 17, 200 P ' 0 2 2 .
Gerald, R. McCrain
EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project: Selma RR Siding County: Johnston

U-929
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. It we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Perrait/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone I Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.
Ri arian Non Ri arian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998,
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact David Robinson at [phone].
Sincerely,
ilmore, PE
Willi ?` r6
Dirtc r
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jean Manuele, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
R?stor ... ... Prot" Oar State
!? ,A'r
FCDFNR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1652 / 919-715.0476 / evww.ncesp,net
-` NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
C O M P A N Y
February 1, 2006
RE: Agent Authorization for
The preparation and submittal of permits with regard to
NCRR Raleigh to Selma Projects
To Whom It May Concern:
By copy of this letter, let it be known that Elizabeth Scherrer of EcoScience Corporation, 1101
Haynes Street, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina is hereby authorized by the North Carolina
Railroad Company to act as the Agent in the preparation and submittal of permit applications
and certifications with regard to the above-mentioned projects.
Sincerely,
Scott Saylor,
President-NCRR
Cc: Enrico Roque, HNTB North Carolina, PC
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1000
919 - 954 - 7601 phone / 919 - 954 - 7099 fax
R r ° h Crun*lers
711 `? _2 3 apt 1 : _ , ?,rw n I Cross
17
'Yartrorl i r1- T` / I
/ ` • .?a Myrtle /
Airport
• rJ
10 +
cem
/ ' % 1
I( ra_Ivr Pais l
m -
=n •./ / , ,'Corn
t '°b l
Substation It e. - a `?• 6/? Project f; C!m ri
:1 1 `,
Location
?D : cat
• _'' - - L R?? Crocker • . i\ ) ^'
4it
C CD
a 14' CD
Park u - T'8
;.4 wal;
;? A• =? t?
70
• / I _'`??..??,, r. :, ' • • '. Pine Lev?L-
/ i,- , - r. • . o WM 172) !
21
` Lookout I l rit'itC? - C(1 ? • 9 \?
75 5 f ti .-/ / Tew^ra q ?+ \\ .? ?•. 69L ypry.yLp -? • - t 1
"
2000 0 2000 4000 Feet cad ce. .a0 `Cem
I - •.
Source: Selma (1998), Kenly West (1978), Four Oaks Northeast (1997), 1 t3M1 ao
and Princeton (1974)USGS Quadrangles
PROJECT: TITLE: N Scale: Date: FIGURE
c, J:I'1 1 ( '..AI:C)LWA
RAILROAD NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMP
.r + Y SIDING EXTENSION AND STORAGE 1" = 2000' FEB 2005
IN JOHNSTON COUNTY PROJECT LOCATION Drawn By. ESC Project No:
HNTR] Johnston County, North Carolina
ES 06-250 L
a4 t r' +Ra E t ?_ 1000 ~ 0 1000 2000 Feet
?+Y a GoA Source: 2001 Johnston County Orthophoto
Johnston County 1994 Soil Survey, maps 7 & 8
•? 4 :-
ODA
is
" + J. ? ?? rw .(1r
Project Ra
Y
Corridor -• R ,.^.~_;
^ ? GOA _ 3
GoA
4
NoA
- ~- - .
k GOA
K r '\
Symbol Series Hydric Status Ges
Bb Bibb sandy loam, frequently flooded Hydric 4 =
GeB Gilead sandy loam, 2-6% slopes Upland •..? M Y =?' 'sue
GOA Goldsboro sandy loam, 0-2% slopes Hydric inclusions
Gr Grantham silt loam Hydric
Ly Lynchburg sandy loam Hydric inclusions t'
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0-2% slopes Upland GOA 1 ?)'!`Nu '
NuA Norfolk-Urban land complex, 0-3% slopes Upland
Ra Rains sandy loam Hydric
Ud Udorthents, loamy Upland `'
:c?kCII('.AkOLINA PROJECT: TITLE: N Scale: Date: FIGURE
,RAILROAD I' NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPAMI NRCS SOILS
?r ^ SIDING EXTENSION AND STORAGE 1" = 1000 FEB 200,
IN JOHNSTON COUNTY pre,,,,,, By: ESC Project No:
HNTB Johnston County, North Carolina LAND USE
ES 06-2841
Z ~
Z J
LU =
W U)
0 Y
j Q Z)
p co
o ¢ cn
0
cl:
o . m . U EXIST. R/W
_--
n PINE LEVEL - SELMA RD.
PROP SECOND MAIN 5785 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
5790
.------- - - - - - -
5785
CONST. NEW
MAIN TRACK o \
._..-..-.._----.-..----n ----- ------------.
- -'.-- .._..- - ----------------------- .._..- - - - - --- . . ---°- _.._........... rn 1 0.01 ACRES WEST PINE ST.
N -...
I- 40'X 35" CMP IN DITCH ., _....W. -_ ..,- .... _..
UNDER ROADWAY EXIST. RM/
Q
in
Q7
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT 1,184 FT2 r" u `-
r
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,831 FTz Col)
PLAN VIEW, SITE 2 ?-? NC)IZI'HcmA ,(-) TNA
LEGEND T) n ILP OAD
® WETLAND IMPACT _.._..-.._.._.-_._ LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION t YY??
_ -•-•-•-•-•-•- STREAM CENTERLINE b HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P. C.
a FCRKS ROAD. SUITE 200
ZONE 7 BUFFER IMPACT © BUFFER REQUIRED 343 Ra I e i E. gFh,SI XNorth Carp 1 i na 27609
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT NO BUFFER REQUIRED
50, 100'
I
SHEET20F4
LENGTH OF IMPACTED STREAM/WETLAND: 596 FT.
PROPOSED ELEVATION CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA = 19.30 ± SQ. FT.
VOLUME OF CUT: 426.03 CU.YD.
160

155 ----------------
---- ---

150
rT?
ry r, ? '
I
'
145 `. t
-

;;c o

140
40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW

LJ NOKrH CACWUNA
RAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 1 ` " Y
HNTB NORT TH CAROLINA, -C
NORTH
??
.
,.
SIX FORKS ROAD. SUI
343 E TE 200
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
0 10' 20'
SHEET 3 OF 4
Jan-31-2006 ll:2Bam From-
Project/Site: Date: 0/0/ j
Applicant/Owner. County: 6D2 t,'_
Investigator: Cl 13 C;7 State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sits? Yes o Community ID:w;0J
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Tr2r>~oct ID.
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
_(If needed, explain on reverse.)
DATA FORM
ROt1TWE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(19B7 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
r11r? t r
a
Sf(r2ud '
4. zrou,.,1401
7R -J
tint.: f'
vr?: cw
__t_ -V
B,
Percent of aominant Epoclas that are Oat. FACW or FAo
Sonar",:
T-081 P.002100T F-2T3
f?aminnM Pigrt S nrr,a try(?tym r1 ?
11.
? z.
13
1 a.
15.
HYDROLOGY
Rozordod Data (Ocscdbe In pcmerP#
. Y Stream, lako, or Tidy Gauga
Aarial Phctopraphs
other
No Rccordod Dsla Ava:lahfo
FWd obscrvatl:no:
(tn}
eepth or Surface Waton.
Ooplh to Frei Water In P:l: _, _ (In}
Depth to Saturated Soil: -Cn)
Remarks:
B2
Welland f-fydrelogy Indicators:
Primary Indlcalcrb:
_,hunda'ed
_? Saturated In Upper 12 Vic hos
? aler Wrks
pri;l unes
?'Scd[rnsN Deposits
-Dra'.napo Palterne In Wetlands
Secgftdary lndlca;ors (2 or more regUred):
?? ,adz©d Root Chama:s In Lppar 12 Lichas
Watcr-Stainod Leaves
_ Local Solt Survey Dala
_ PAC-Ncuuaf Test
Other (Explain In Remarks)
ppperf,x 6 61snk and exzmp;a Data Fcnr.a
Z
P
VEGETATION
Jan-31-2006 11:29am From-
'oil C
T-081 P•003/007 F-273
Map L h% Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Obsarvat;ans
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yos No
Proltls Ne rrlption:
Capth W-,ItIxCobr
WQWL,Colors MoileAnundancal Texture, Concretions,
rWunn.nnMnlstl_ (Muns-11Ma1311 ';,^nfantnst B!r - n et.

kydrlc SoA hdEcators:
'?Ca
cre0ans
_ t-tstosol
Hstic Eptpadan ,
n
_ t igh Organic Contort In Surface Layer to Sandy Solis
.w 5u411d(c Odor - Orgarlc Streaking !a Sandy Solis ,
u10 Malsture Rag'me Listed on Lattal hydria Sells List
U
H
_ Raducing Cont:A,fans st
ydr)c Solis
Listed on WIlonal
Gleyad or LorrChrorra Colors y. Other (Explayt In Rema(tts)
Remarks:
WI TLAND MiTEHMINAIIV N
(Ckcle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? o No (Chala)
/Blland llydrnloQy Present? rev N12
tiydrlc Sells resent? os No Is this 5amp7ng Point Within a Wetland? No
Remarks:
,ppravea ay nuuz?rj,",Vv 14
Popanalx B Blank ana Examp;a Dela Farms 55
Stream Crossing (Site 2) near Pine Level, North Carolina

02-17-'06 11;33 FROM-DENR-EEP 9197152219 T-860 P01
µ
--t as stem
14
PROGRAM
February 17, 2006
Gerald. R. McCrain
EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project: Selma RR Siding County: Johnston
J
U-929
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved,
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0.32
0 0
0 0 0
0
0
030202 20201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5;1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit, The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998,
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact David Robinson at [phone],
Sincerely,
IZv Willi to Gilmore, PE
Direc r
cc; Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jean Manuele, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
Prot" Otw St-a&
WEE
?-l
7
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1652 / 919-715.0476 / www.ncoep,net
NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD
- C O M P A N Y
February 1, 2006
RE: Agent Authorization for
The preparation and submittal of permits with regard to
NCRR Raleigh to Selma Projects
To Whom It May Concern:
By copy of this letter, let it be known that Elizabeth Scherrer of EcoScience Corporation, 1101
Haynes Street, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina is hereby authorized by the North Carolina
Railroad Company to act as the Agent in the preparation and submittal of permit applications
and certifications with regard to the above-mentioned projects.
Sincerely,
Scott Saylor, fa
President-NCRR
Cc: Enrico Roque, HNTB North Carolina, PC
I?
z
0
U
W
2809 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1000
919 - 954 - 7601 phone / 919 - 954 - 7099 flax
G "c aYh ?l w ` n
r\
yF ` C <? • >'} M i IOOt Rest y Ll•o 4 1@I5
ti ?" .i3 ? llw ? 6
Myrtle /
¢ r a ?? / Ap007 \ / \
p, fI t A )///.
•?r' ` / 1,
r
/1J
-
Olk
74 x :•175 _ ..
•ra llj`ParM .: Car1l •(^- /
Substation a n. p•_Yej, Project hh r '?, .
Location _ O ` ce+'rA f
lot
r 1 9 Cracker ' `\ ''? G r 1
4t
Cerns??? ,frt?
•I ! +A 17 In ^? ;
4' Wa is p 1-..N
Cam
T
& Pine Leve1
f 7 1'i? i:..? y. .f. ?•? -?Y o (SM172) .. _
/'rte' _ ?? ?; r •'? ,1R ? ? \ ? ?\ r
Lookout 1-41 Ptlke4..E"YEI1 ,r• 9 , \,
/ Teww 91 I .. 16
9,E sir .\ \ 3
f
2000 0 2000 4000 Feet
Gila C
Source: Selma (1998), Kenly West (1978), Four Oaks Northeast (1997), I ?a , "e, cr•,• ?a ) t I eM. ,o
and Princeton (1974)USGS Quadrangles C. 111 C'AROI INA PROJECT: TITLE: N Scale: Date: FIGURE
; , Al L RCA I NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPAN
t-? M P A N Y SIDING EXTENSION AND STORAGE ON 1" = 2000' FEB 2005
H14TB IN JOHNSTON COUNTY Dram Br Esc Project No:
Johnston County, North Carolina
ES 06-280
�NOR 1'1 1 [ kkkO .INA
RAI LR( ---}A1)
C U H Y A N k'
HNTB
PROJECT:
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPAN
SIDING EXTENSION AND STORAGE
IN JOHNSTON COUNTY
Johnston County, North Carolina
TITLE:
NRCS SOILS
LAND USE
Scale: Date:
N
1" = 1000 FEB 200
Drawn By: ESC Project No:
ES 06-28
0 1000 2000 Feet
l -
Source: 2001 Johnston County Orthophotohoto
Johnston County 1994 Soil Survey, maps 7 & 8
a
�
M'
Ly
a
GoA c ,
a
Project
-
Corridor Ra
? GoA
_ GoA
.
•
I
., Ra
NoAc
'...,
GoA
_
— —
3
Symbol
Series Hydric Status
A
GeB
,
Bb
Bb
Bibb sandy loam, frequently flooded Hydric~'"
i :''?"` ¢y %1 .
GeB
Gilead sandy loam, 2-6% slopes Uplands
* ` `
GOA
Goldsboro sandy loam, 0-2% slopes Hydric inclusions'
f
Gr
Grantham silt loam Hydric
! r
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam Hydric inclusions
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0-2% slopes Upland
�`_
CdA NuA
NuA
Norfolk -Urban land complex, 0-3% slopes Upland
Ra
Rains sandy loam Hydric`
Ud
Udorthents, loamy Upland
�NOR 1'1 1 [ kkkO .INA
RAI LR( ---}A1)
C U H Y A N k'
HNTB
PROJECT:
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPAN
SIDING EXTENSION AND STORAGE
IN JOHNSTON COUNTY
Johnston County, North Carolina
TITLE:
NRCS SOILS
LAND USE
Scale: Date:
N
1" = 1000 FEB 200
Drawn By: ESC Project No:
ES 06-28

Z ?
W d Y
j Q
p CO
a
co
0
C6 m v EXIST. RAN
t PINE LEVEL - SELMA RD.
0
0
PROP. SECOND MAIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
5785
5790
---------- .._ ._. _-.-.._ - ---- --------
CONST. NEW 5785
MAIN TRACK b \\\\' _
----- - - - ------ ------- - --
m
0.01 ACRES WEST PINE ST.
N
40'X 36" CMP IN DITCH
o UNDER ROADWAY EXIST. R/W
p _T L `!
- T
r;
. i
c
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,184 FT2 1T1 ???•
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT: 1,831 FT 2
PLAN VIEW, SITE 2 NC)PJ'HCr?lZOLINA
LEGEND ---'- 17TTLiP1A 1N 7? ?? 7?
1? L YY
C O ?i
- ---? WETLAND IMPACT _..-.--.._..-----._ UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
-•-•-•-•-•-•- STREAM CENTERLINE b? Y?{B HNTEI NORTH CAROLINA, P, C,
u 343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 200
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT O BUFFER REQUIRED Ra I e i gh, North Caro I i na 27609
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT NO BUFFER REQUIRED 0 50' 100'
SHEET 2 OF 4
LENGTH OF IMPACTED STREAMANETLAND: 596 FT.
PROPOSED ELEVATION CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA = 19.30 ± SQ. FT.
VOLUME OF CUT: 426.03 CU.YD.
160

155 --------------
``-
--- ---
150

145 T,

` ? ?

C
140
40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION VIEW

LIA NOKI'H ( AP OLINA
RAILROAD
AT WETLAND SITE 1 -
` °
`' " " Y
-- T
HNT
B NORTH CAROLINA, -C
,.
343 E. SIX FORKS ROAD SUITE 2
Ra I Raeigr,, North Caroli.na 27609
0 10' 20'
SHEET 3 OF 4
Jan-31-2006 11:28am From-
t.+)1 Date: alolf 0'r
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner: L Gr 13 County , I/
Investigator: State;
Do Normal Circumstances exist on ft sit©? Yes fflo-) Community ID: 5J
Is the sit© significantly disturbed (Atyplcal Situation)? Yes t Tr2n:oot IQ;
Is the area a potential Prob!am Area? Yes Plot ID:
- (if needed, explain on reverse.
QATA FORM
ROUTIN5 WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COS Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ar t, Indtcglor
? 4
sk?ut)
Vc'c --
V, W,
vr?t: cwt
tl.
Percent of dominant Spacias that are 061. FACW or FAo
R=ark:::
T-081 P.002100T F-2T3
)?omin?llt PI?rtt Sc^_[i;°s ??y(atun cic3?or
A,
10
it.
? z.
13.
14.
15.
16. _
HYDROLOGY
Recordod Data (Describe In Rcmarks):
- Sveam, Lako, or Tida Gauge
-Aariaf Photographs
Other
No Facordcd Data AvaSablo
Depth of Surface Water- (In)
Doplh to Free Water In PiC (In.)
Field obscivaticns:
Dcplh to 5alurated Soil: (in.)
fiamarks;
E32
Wetland Nydrelcgy Indtca:ors:
Primarylndkalorb:
lnunda:ed
? 5aturatad In Upper 12 hcheS
Z? pri;t Unes
Sedlmenl Dcposlts
oreriaga Pzlterm In Wetlands
Sec teary Indicators (2 or more regrired):
©d Root Chama:s In Upper 12 Lwhas
WaterStainod Lcavos
_ Local 801 Survey Data
_ FAC-NOuvaf Test
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Appendix B Sla li and "exzmp:a Data Fcnr,e
V
VEGETATION
Jan-31-2006 11:29am From-
T-081 P.003/007 F-273

a fin C
Map L h% Name
(Sedan and Phase):
Drainage Glass:
Fiald ObsCrvatlora
T=nomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yos No
Profile Descrtptiar,:
Depth matrix Color
Nattlc Coim Mottle A"noancal Texture, Concretlans,
1
!
l
T
i?g?. ,{?gr?r? r!JLm;nllF?n1't1_ r?ir•
iVn_n
r__ _____
,
(?unsAllMatstt $;,'p?antr?st ,

Fydr10 Solt L•idlcators:
ZccncrsJona
'
_Hsta9?i
Hstk: Ep?padan ,
_ Fagh Organic Con:ont in Surface Layer In Sandy 50{19 r
Sulildlc Odor
,
_ Organic Streaking In Sandy S0113
_„Aqu10 MCI-- turn Roglme
_ Reducing ConCltt?ns ^ Limed on Local hydrlc :cells List
- Llstad on National Hydrlc Solis List
_ Wayed or LorrCnrorra Colors Qther (E?a n kt Ren aria)
Remarks:
WETLAND DE?rEHMINAI IVN
Hydrophytio Vopnisllon Pros ant? o? No (Circle) (Cxcle)
Wetand hydrology Present? f1Na ?
xydric Solis Present? a No is Ihls Sampling Paint Wlthln a Wetland? (._-?) No
Remarks:
"YRf +YGU Vy C74 VJ/'W -4
Appendix a Blank and Exempla beta Forms B3
Stream Crossing (Site 2) near Pine Level, North Carolina

Selma NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard project in Johnston County
Subject: Selma NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard project in Johnston County
From: Amy Chapman <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:56:32 -0500
To: [e-mail]
I've just had this initial interest form forwarded to my attention. Could you please give me a contact
name for the North Carolina Railroad Company? We need this so it can be entered into our database. I
appreciate it.
-Amy
Amy Chapman
Environmental Specialist III
NC Division of Water Quality
401 /Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: amy.chapmangncmai1.net
of 1 2/22/2006 8:52 AM
o?o? WArF9QG
p 'C
February 17, 2006
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER (Revised)
North Carolina Railroad Company
Attn: Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Highwoods Blvd, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Dear Mr. Saylor:
Subject Property: Selma NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
Alan W. Klimck, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Johnston County
On February 7, 2006, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received an email request from
EcoScience Corporation, regarding a project known as the " Selma NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the
Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1) The application fee of $1,000 [for 401 Water Quality Certification services, made payable to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality];
2) Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application;
3) One (1) copy of the Addendum;
4) Five (5) copies of all site plan information pertaining to this project (please refer to the Addendum
littp:Hli2o.cnr.state.ne.us/ncivetiands/appad(15.pdi);
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee are received. If the impacts are greater than
indicated on the initial interest form and/or the services are different, you may be required to remit an additional
fee.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Amy Chapman at
919-733-9502 or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473.
Sincerel ,
di B. aroly
CBK/asc
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
EcoScience Corporation; Attn: Elizabeth Scherrer, 1101 Haynes Street, Ste 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] / Internet: htt v://h2o.enr.state. nc.us/ncwetl ands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
None Carolina
Xturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50%a Recycled/100% Post Consumer Paper
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE FEB-14-2006 TUE 08:54
NAME DP7Q-4?ETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE = 98283518
PAGES : 2/2
START TIME : FEB-14 0853
ELAPSED TIME : 00'22"
1'IODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
G 7 4r? Mk?v F. Fisl^y. civ+timr
J. 4-
I?;yry lAr.,?Jr (i;y,rrnev ?f tcntvurN w-0 N?niN F.c:wra
.?
4
14
Division of Water Quallty
Department of Environmental and Natw al Resources
401 Oversight/Express ltevicvv, Program Development and
Transportation 11crfnitting Units
Street Addretr: 2321 C blxeo liuvlevnnl, Awte ?57
Kalcigh, NC 27604-22C>J
bfailing Address: 1650 hlml SMIC0 Cmlcr
R.dd&h, NC 27699.1650
Contact Informatioul Phu=4: 919-73'-17-16
Fax k: 919-733-6391
Fay 4"' "1? •)?)?
To:
Company:
_ y-°?-- .- Date.
From:
Number of I)ages Including cover sheet:
Notes or special Instructions;
?V
U••n?w.t uarz V.dnr. rv?v.L.W Sr w.. ?..wro Nnnrn _.--
l!'0"•'Ii N,-'I N+r.L1:kr1 K r+r-1t1J
! ICr,t r.-. P- Srek 1113.n? +rth ACmLNt'6
.-f.tt.-1Yi.•
F'SCne. ula-,JJ-I'In;•'nH ?l 'tiiJJb"?!' L"smet ASi.e.T%4 -
N??t?[ac, ?rw
iI.cvil riy..hwn.lv?A';FnnrOw rhaA. IVpt'rn t.Y41:,.-ran'"1.'1'l
O?O? \ NA
T ?9?G
p `C
February 13, 2006
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Johnston County
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
North Carolina Railroad Company
Attn: Mr. Scott Saylor
2809 Highwoods Blvd, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Dear Mr. Saylor:
Subject Property: Selma NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard
On February 7, 2006, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received an email request from
EcoScience Corporation, regarding a project known as the " Selma NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the
Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1) The application fee of $3,000 [for 401 Water Quality Certification and Riparian Buffer Approval services,
made payable to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality];
2) Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application;
3) One (1) copy of the Addendum;
4) Five (5) copies of all site plan information pertaining to this project (please refer to the Addendum
http://li2o.cnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/appad(15 pdf);
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee are received. If the impacts are greater than
indicated on the initial interest form and/or the services are different, you may be required to remit an additional
fee.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Amy Chapman at
919-733-9502 or Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473.
Sincerely,
Cyndi B. Karoly
CBK/asc
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
EcoScience Corporation; Attn: Elizabeth Scherrer, 1101 Haynes Street, Ste 101, Raleigh, NC 27604
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htti)://li2o.enr.statc.nc.us/ncwetl,-inds
N"oa,?`ct, Carolina
Alattrrallif
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Express permitting - NC Railroad Company
Subject: Express permitting - NC Railroad Company
From: "Elizabeth Scherrer" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:57:16 -0500
To: <amy. chapman@ncmail. net>
Dear Ms. Chapman,
The contact person for the North Carolina Railroad Company is Scott Saylor.
Thanks for your attention and please let me know if there is anything else I can help with.
Elizabeth Scherrer
Elizabeth Scherrer
EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
http://www.ecosciencene.com
1 of 1 2/13/2006 10:46 AM
INITIAL INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
WITHIN THE 401 OVERSITE/EXPRESS PERMITTING UNIT
1 _'. L f September 1, 2004
F'r3 1 ?UL3
`?= tB
Version 3
;?. J It;
'o0GO221
Applicant Name: North Carolina Railroad Company
Applicant Address: 2809 Hi ghwoods Boulevard, Suite 100

Raleigh, NC 27604-1000
Applicant's phone number: 919-954-7601

Fax number: 919-954-7099
Applicant's email address:
Consultant Name (if applicable): EcoScience Corporation
Consultant address (if applicable): 1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Consultant's phone number: 919-828-3433
Fax number: 919-828-3518
Consultant's email address: mccrainC(Decosciencenc.com
Type of action requested under the Express Review Program (check all that apply):
© 401 Water Quality Certification
? Stream Origin Determination
? Isolated Wetland Permit # of Determinations Requested
Riparian Buffer Approval ? intermittent/Perennial Determination
? Stormwater Management Plan # of Determinations Requested
? Mitigation Plan
© Stream © Wetland ? Buffers (check all appropriate)
Name of Project: Selma, NC Siding Extension and Storage Yard County: Johnston
Total project acreage: 49.6 within ROW (acres) -Total built out impervious area: 18.15 (acres)
Nearest named stream (from USGS topo map): Moccasin Creek (C NSW) 27-5340.5)
Please provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
At the western end of the oroiect corridor. turnouts and sianals will be reconfiaured. Track shifts will continue for 1300
feet east of 1-95. Beginning 400 feet east of 1-95 and extending for 4700 feet, 3 new storage tracks will be constructed
north of the existing railroad line. 24" culverts will be installed approximately every 400 feet, with drop inlets between
the existing tracks and headwall construction south of the rail bed. Existing culverts along this section will be
abandoned and grout filled. Beginning approximately 5000 feet east of 1-95, a new main track will be constructed
south of the existing track beginning at this point and extend to the eastern end of the project corridor. The existing
culvert leading under the rail bed into Wetland 1 will be abandoned and grout filled, with a new culvert to be installed
20 feet east of the wetland. The two existing 72-inch culverts at Stream 1 will be extended south approximately 18
feet to accommodate the new rail bed.
Please attach a map of site location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey.
Location of project site - please include reference to the county, nearest name town and highway number:
Entire project is in Johnston County. Corridor begins in southeast Selma south of Anderson Road (SR 1927) 1600
feet northeast of Interstate 95, and continues for 2.2 miles along Selma - Pine Level Road (SR 1927) to Peedin
Avenue (SR 2309) in Pine Level.
Proposed impacts:
Acres of 404 wetlands: 0.31
Acres of isolated wetlands: 0
Linear feet of streams: 18
Linear feet of isolated streams: 0
Square feet of protected stream buffers: 3015
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two years? If so, please list
which ones. No
Has any DWQ staff visited the site? No , if yes, please provide DWQ staff name,
date of visit:
and
Which other environmental permits from other agencies will be needed for this project? Please list the permits and
issuing agencies below:
USACE_Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14
Approval of sedimentation and erosion control plans received from Debbie Barbee of NCDENR on 11-30-05.
Does this project require approval under the State Environmental Policy Act or National Environmental Policy Act?
No
Is this project an After-the-fact application or has this project received a previous Notice of Violation from DWQ?
No
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management Commission? No
Are you aware of any local controversy concerning this project? If so, please describe the controversy and any
measures that have been taken with respect to public involvement.
No
This form must be submitted via email (c/o 401exoress(aMcmail.net), faxed (919-733-6893) or hand-delivered to the Parkview Building, 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604. Applicants who are selected to participate in the Express Review Program will be notified via email or fax
within 2 days. Successful applicants will then be instructed regarding detailed procedures for full application (Please Note: Submittals of the review
packages on Friday after 12:00 pm will be stamped as received on the next business day).
Please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-715-3473 if you have any questions regarding this form.
2
1000 0 1000 2000,Feet
Source: 2001 Johnston County Orthophoto
i r GcA \ t,
Symbol Series Hydric Status GeE
..t
Bb Bibb sandy loam, frequently flooded Hydric
GeB Gilead sandy loam, 2-6% slopes Upland
GOA
Goldsboro sandy loam, 0-229/o slopes
Hydric Inclusions
Gr
Grantham silt loam
Hydric
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam
Hydric inclusions
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0-2% slopes
Upland
NuA
Norfolk -Urban land complex, 0-3% slopes Upland
Ra
Rains sandy loam
Hydric
Ud
Udorthents, loamy
Upland
PROJECT: TITLE:
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPAN_ NRCS SOILS
SIDING EXTENSION AND STORAGE
IN JOHNSTON COUNTY
LAND USE
Johnston County, North Carolina
Scale: Date: FIGURE
N
1,, = 1000 FEB MEE
Drawn By: ESC Project No: 2
1 ES1 06-281 L

y r .f , .?• Idol

$83 _ d
Rest r

e
t?'
?l .te
\Bur31
a s Id
m.
myrtle .
Air

D0/1 \
%
'
,» •. -r .
? ., /• ?
? ? C%? _ ? ,. ? _ ? {fir ?.: ' ?..'
r

.`

PROJECT: TITLE: Scale: Date:
N
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPAN
SIDING EXTENSION AND STORAGE PROJECT LOCATION 1" = 2000' FEB 2005
IN JOHNSTON COUNTY Drawn By: ESC Project No:
Johnston County, North Carolina
ES 06-280
Job(Code-Property)
s&s01(o_h-100-Johnston County)
Invoice
020706
Description
Express permitting fee
Amount
1,000.00
1,000.00
liM,
Frr?
~ ,
COND AtN PRO .SE ,
r... .r _
w w w ..w r~ ~ . - rM rW rr ..w w_ rr r + r' r• rr r.r rr ~ w. rr nw rr r. r
~ .02/ 0.16". ~ O t- O.iB'. rn a
~ O ~ d. CO d. ~ a
O o~ ' MIN ~ PROP.
~ ~ • ~ EXi TiNG °
cu vERT CU VERT ~
N 5719+ 4.~~ o n - o o e~
o ~ 57 3 26.59 24" C P ~ 5727 6,69 * n 5731 6.89 ~ ~
24 CMP a o 24 C P z4 c P a
~ 300 v,C.
~o r • O,Q38
N PRO MAIN ~ t` n M ~ P 0, MAIN
~ ~
m
ITALICS PRO .?_nd ~lAl 0
. ~r
. ~ ~ ~ o a
~ ~ ~ co M N ps Q7 tD ~ ' M ~
C71 ~ ~ ' r- ~ ,d. 'd' ~ n n ~ ~ ~ ~ r
~ r
Q1 t
~ Q
~ N
n Hh ~ 4.
~ * N a =
~d ~ N ~ .
n ~ YN n W
~ U ~
W Q 4 N 1 a
Z ~ a , ~ N H PREP, SECOND MAI
J ~ a EXIST, Riw
` O ~ N H ~p .
a Z r........ ,.r.
~ r~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rrr .rr.r .nr., wr_.+ r.~~. ~.+....r.•..__.. rr.r. r V 0
Q ° jjt ~fr .
0 / ~~+r~~~~/// Ti~..i ~.~.Kr~rM7Y ~r Q Orr rr wrwrw ^.or~-.w rrwrrw+. n.rw wrrr.r+..r. r~+~w..rr O ~R^ J ~ ~~'y) i~i/r+r+rwr .w wrrw.nrrwrr ~r• O
w r rw _.w.+~ r r r r rw O r r r, r r~ ..~*1r may. rrrr+_~ ^rrr..nr rrr rrrrw~.wr.+.rrwrw_rrrr~.r_ww_r. rr~..~.r~~~ ~IJ \i. {{LL, II ~ uY FILLEo DUT FILLEO DROP INLET AND GR a
ANo cRa a DROP INl ~ DROP INLET a r~
t r..~,.r._.._-_ L.O.C. STORAOE3 lol m a`
I l ~ STORAGE STORAGEZ ~
14` N a T A
o ~
' a N
W
I END w ENO z ENO
Z ENo w~rL W ,+^-rww ..r +rwrr~+rr .r r r+rw+rr " L +r f J r+.r.+w +~rQ..r•rr~r. wrr «.wrr~lrw~rr Wrrw
.J WALL. rr....rr,..r ..wrr. rr___+..rrwrr+rw.r.r r.~rrwwr rr.r.. r.rrrrr _r._nr_wr_.r..rr.r_ ....rrr,r r..r.rwrr arww~ r rr.rw«rrr rwr•w• r~r r.wq rrr~ -.-pr~r ~-+r.r++~ w rr.nrrrw+r.r• •~rrr+.r•
rr..wrrr.•.rr~rr CONSTRUCT NEW z ~ VTR R E MA[N z UPG AQ to ~ U
~ STORAGE TRACKS o ~ ANO STORAGEI a r ~ a 1° o
~~aox. LOCATION ~ a ~ N ~ Y CONTRACTOR) N ~ iBY CONTRACTOR) + ~ ;U ~
OH ELECTRIC Q L~GRADE MAIN . . d. Q. V ~ gi M . U ~ r~
m & STORAGEI • N : /
. U N- o~ Y CONTRACTORI t8 f°d' NN 1 N ~ ~ ~ awe .n..
~+.n rrrr «..r r ¦ w EXIST. R/W
ExIST, Riw
EXISTING TRACKS
Ra K CONSTRUCTION n
NEWT C
HiFT D IU.BE S E TRACK
N OF SHIFTED TRACK ° L~CATIO • REV BY GATE OESCRipTION
OCAT~ON
T ACKS TO RETIRE R
ITLE
T ~ TLAND iMPAC S E
e
NITS OF CONSTRUCTION
~ IG No. A!. I~AP I,E ROST
UPGRADE TRACK owN~ 3996QQA H1Q9rH112 HDR D434 awNlNc ca~ArlY
wN No, Raw~NG NllI~~ER JLF 1Q7r1-4973
IP RAP SLOPE PR4TECTIQN R
9 ° OFER~ pPERATIhlG OIVISIaN ATE Q QJ MJS AUGUST 22 2
PRQPOSEO PAVING QFPICE OF THE CFjIEF EHCNEER - OE :NCNEER - OESICN ANO CaNSTRIICTION -ATLANTA GA. '
CAOD FILE= p~~nsrr~OaQUGasalmo\ena_dsanllroclc~plprtrk03n.don 5HE T T~-QQ~ Q~ E

P OP.2rrd N lTA[!
19Q
180
PROP. ECQND AIN
rr rr r. .r rr w r r.. w . r« ~ «w rr -r ~ r r ~ .r
- - f+) 0.07% - ~o/ ~ r . c~o.zr.
15 ~ ° E TING Q .
170 ~ ROP, MAI n ULVERT O ~
M Q ~ B • ~
Q1 r O .
O * ~ p R ~ O
. 5743*z ,6~ ~ ~ o ~ O
w 5 34.15.0 0° EX TING 5739.26 69 24 CM ~ ° s+y ~ W tt~ O
r 0.0 8 N ~ 33 ' V.C. ~ t
c~ ~ ~ ¢
PRO. M N ~ a.~aa
160 PR .MAIN ~
N t0 M
t0 ~a ° ~ o ~ ° ~ oo ~ ~
573 +00 ~ " ~ 574 +00 ~ M
5736+60
EXISTING PIPE
TO BE ABANDONED
W ~ AND GROUT FILLED r.
? ~ W
PROP. SECOND MNN z, 1 ~
. Z wxE ttve~-sEUr~ ea ~ J PINE I~YE1. -5EW~ R4 ~
SRrga Z
a EXIST. Riw ExIST. Raw ~ .._..rrr........_.....~1 ~..i._. __................._..._._....~.w......~. w...., a...r .r........._.q ...r...r.._........ .C
r.r ~r rr~r r~ ~ rw Hwy M...~ v
O
O O
M --DROP WLET ~ 18" RCP -DROP INLET STORAGE3 0 5243*4.4,~. .~.rr~r.. ~y .1 rn.ww.~rr rrwr r~..rr~rl..r~~~r.rra~~r/•.~I~~~r~rr~rra. rlf~ rrlr w r~.rrra. Ar rrrrr~r r..~.rMrrr.rrrsrtirr.. rwrw~
o R ~a EXISTING CULVERT ° D OP WLET
p + • • ~ , i 1 To s~ aeaNaoNE~ n
~ II L
14' 1 STORAGE2 n n
d 14' ORAGEt w7 o ,
a
~ , N
E~
z L.0 _C. END END w~` ~W~}}
J ~ rrr-.rr r,.r r.rr...r rr r.w ..r r.rr rr~r,N~r~ru.~rr,r~ by r raDr rN. ~~rr.rr rr.,rrwrrw.r ~.rr~rr
o ~+r..Aw \.~r rr.r+rW rr r~.rwr. rrr..rr ri., r
_ UPGRADE TO CONSTRUCT NEW ~ o ~ _ .O,C.
~ 5734.15.00 'd' MAIN TRACK STORAGE TRACKS ~ a o O ~ Or U N ~ Fr
~ 24" CMP n t8Y CONTRACTOR) ~8Y CONTRACTOR) ~ v a
M ~
REMOVE TURNOUT n~
AND INSTALL TRACK ?a- vni n~i ~ ~N
PANEL ~ EXIST. R/W ~ - -
~ EXIST, Raw
L~GEN~TRACTOR) ~
EX15TING TRACKS
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
- - - - - - - - ' TR,4CK TO BE SHlPTEO
LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK SCALE:
REV 8Y DATa: D£SCRIFTION
• - - - - - - - - - TRACKS TO RETIRE OCATION
WETLAND IMPACTS i TITLE
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION o
URGRADE TRACK NORTH CAROLINA RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION EAST CAROLINA I
OWNWG CDI~(PI~IY GN PID Na, ~ AL I~AP LE POST HoR o.3~ ~~96ooA H1D9-H1i~
WN IL£ Na. RAWING NUidBi+R
~l.F 107-1-973
PROPOSED PAVING HDR ENGINEERING. INCe OPERA OFFICE Of THE CHIEF ENCtl1EER - OE OPFRATWG DIV190N NIC RTE
GtNEER - OESiGN AND CONSTRl1CTiQN - ATf_tWTA, CA MJS AUGUST 22 2005
Ca00 F1LE; p~lnsrr~DDQQDDselma\eng..dsgn\treckiplprlrk04a,dgn
SHEET TA-004 aF

354'v~c. ~r
x j t ~ ~
N P a. ~r~ ~ N
W
co N ~ N ~ ~
• M N n ~ ~ n rh M ti ~ ~ ~ ~ , t7 ~ ~ ~ ~ D
N, • . t'l ~ N ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ t71 ~ ~
PR .SECCNO MAIN ^ ~ ~ t` ~ ~ ~
• W ti f J p159 f"1 ~T6/.
w .w.r ww w ••r r rr w rr. ..w r. rr . r .r....r ww _r r ..w r r.. _r r rr - rr _r r ~ ti. w_ rw~ _r ~ rr rr r, rr
,
Z (•l !3/, d o
a
Q N ~ ~ o '
MAIN ~ • a ~ PR ~ o as
EXIST NG n ~ N E IST. GRO NO « r
o CULV RT ~ o a z D O N * r-
~ o cn o 747*26 69 cv 7Si Z6. 9 ~ D 755*26 69 v m . ~ °
co 4 ' CMP r 2 ~ o n - 'M N~ N tnW
n•r M Vt * + *
Nw + 4~ 0~ ~ tr1 ~ i 0 00 V.C. . ~ E•-
zs v.c. ~ . ~ n 't` "hN r
• n N N = N • y
r * O.D50 ~ z as , i ¢ w R0. MAI
. w s•- r s~ O o © 'd" 00 ~ ~ ~ N
N a~ co sl' Lq N I N p op ~`'y~ h .
N ~ tf} . N a ~ N N N
. N ~ N N h h ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ N ~ I.. s- r .
rr e-+ r
NAIK ALlCS PROP.
N
n
r R NTRACTOR TO x~ ~ SECOND MAIN-4 CO Curve
N t « ONSTRUCT ROADBED 5757 X8.29 C w Pi STA. ~ w
M ' a ~ SH FT TRACK N 4 17 59.34 tRT AND I o Delta da
Lt. ~ cn o~ • 1° 30' 00.00" > ~ m a
Curve • STORAGE 3r2 -n z~ m oo v u~ T 143.40 ~ ~ w wN
PI STA. • 5752~73.i3 v1 r.. ~ • ° ~ 4~~ {RT} d 28s.ss M o ~
delta 5 4135.D ~ r ~ ~ ~N ~ o~ « r 3 819.83 ~ rn R
CULVERT TO BE • 7° 29' 40,71 U ~ EXIST, D
ANDONED AND T ~ 38.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ rr ~ ~ ~ ao ~ . n t>~ ~ w n ~ FRT. n 40 MPH ~ w o
„ z NSTRUCT NEW I LED L 75,9fi ~ CO GROUT F L n ~ ~ n n o o z f ~ I~ ~ . ~ t~ + tT~ O
w ~ ACKS R • 7fi .49 ~ u~N z AGE TR '4 STOR z SGR. 45 MPH z ~ P a u~ an 1 0 ~ , d ~ ~a
PRQP. SECOND MAIN • ~ • CONTRACTOR} M ~ {BY s~uu~ d d d c~ - r~ tkv ~ I-- z ~ ~ ~
~ ~ PtkE iEVFZ ~ d ~ N N ~ ~ ~
IIl N ~ ~ r^ N ExIST. RlW Q ~,,,,y' M... rG
l R/.1 ~ r..+.w..rr..r ~r~ ~ . ~ M M/ fIA
wr_~~. rr rrwww_r r .1ii.rr rr..rr wrr wrr~r rrrar..r.~rw....... w.r ry. w.r... V 0
Q rr+..+r rw..rr..a.+r.-•••r~•r~r~~wrw..~rw~~r~r• rw~wr~r~n.r r" U ~ •Mr.. r•r. rrrr.wr~ rw..r.. ~
a rrwr~~.r ry Fw www~..r r • ~ ..rrr~ +•~,.w ..rr.». wir.r»~
a ..r..+.wr_rrrwN_...rwrrrr rw.wrr~w_..r_r.rwi~rrwwr....__~r_r_r~..~o•w.rrw.iw•rr~.rrrr. Q rr~rr rrr.r.r•«.,.rr w_ r r-~'~"~.w,yr~.. o - 5757*50.00 `~r--~--• o
~ 4" CMP L.O,C. ~ v Z ~ p~ h
ROP INLET • AGE3 ' n o STOR RT II ~ , . -;"'+rr • ~rn,rArr
r~ TORAGEZ b 14 • S ~rrrrw_r+w..r r•~.~ G rrr ~..rr
~ xi T. s . a •~r~M 4P INLET wrur..++,• MM.~..rrrrrrtrr
14 . sTORacE~
¢ 14' O ~ ~ O lil
~ 5755 575526.6 ND END z E
I.) N Q7 w END o Z4 L.D.C. WALL ¢ END w CMP WALL. o>IN ~w w
ND UPGRADE TO ` z W 24 . ~~...~wr.r.r• .M r•.r1. ~.rrrrr. w.rrr w..,urr~rrww }~'rrr rrrw rw~,~ rrr ...rrwww.+ - - N V11 ~V
..V~ r_r rrrr r~ rrrr r_w___w._r _r~_ __ww_ .w+rww ALIA r...rrr~r..__r.rrrr r_....rrw.w rr ~ r- ~ ~Ikl~-~AC-K m NT A~ CO o o z © to G~ «
r~rrrwrw~rwrr..~r rw~rr_r W ~ + ~ /fir Z . a ~ y, LL, +n 4. • o r` a STRUCT ROADBED ~ o ~ CON . o ~o n ~ ~
~ a a ~ m ~ TACK ~ 4 AND SHIFT R rn w
~ M ~ n ~ U N N ~ u7 ~ h NN =f ~ h t 4 Ins cno
Q N ~ * IrS ; ~ ~ XIST. CULVERT TO BE I- ~ a E
~ v d r n d~ J ~ d n ~ ~Q i-N N ~n AaANooNEO ANo
• f-, t1;7 ~ J I~ NN ~ 11'1 V Q N Q N r F~ ~ ~ ~ N
n ,_..o OU F LE ¢ . . ExisT. RIW ~ a
O V1 LL O N 1 ~M WQ F»F-
EXIST. R/W Z W w ~ ~ RING UPGRADE ~ GRADE C7 C9 D Q fn , O
t7 ¢ INSTALL 16 CROSSING
W ~ a o ? PAN 7-58 w cn r PER NS L
I TRACKS m EXIST NG ~ oo c-¢ ul Y CONTRACTOR tB
arn~ LL f/1 rn
ACK CONSTRUCTION ~'j . f
- - NEW TR
_ _ _ _ _ T E 5HIF?EO TRACK G 6
REV BY OATS QESCRIPTION
ACK ° N OF SHIFTED TR • LOCATIO OCATION
---~-----w-•- KS TO RETIRE TRAC i
TITLE
IMPACTS WETLAND
v OF CONSTRUCTION
.~.._-.rr_.-_... LIMITS
u.E F05T cN to Nc. H149-H112 3996DOA H R D434
PGRADE TRACK U o~ D owl~INC cOUPa~Y
WN II.E Na. _ RAwiNC I~Uf~IBER 107 1 4973 JLF
LOPE PROTECTION RIP RAP S D o OPI
OPI:RAT~JG OIYISION ~ ATE T 2 2005 MJS AUGUS 2 ,
D PAVING OFFICE OF TliE CwIEF ENCwEER - PRDPOSE ' ENCWEER - OESIGN AND CONSTRUCTi4N - ATLANT/~ CA AaD FII.E~ :~nsrrU}p00005eimaleng..dsgnltratklp~prtrk0~a.dg~ SHEET I A-00~ ~F C P

700 V.C.
~ r - 0.098
180 c PRO. nd MAIN 180
J
o W W
~ N N O ~ d' ~
2 °Q co ~ ~ ~
O O ~ O) ~ ~ ~ coo h N ~ ~ ~ co ~ ~ o ~ N
W
~ ~
170 0
~ 17 0
-J/J 4% - J
W O ~ ~ N N ~I;
~ ~ ~ , v'~ ~ O O~ ~0
~ ~ ~ ~
36" CMP °O % ~ 1.24%
- PR . SECO + ~ 0 . SECON MAIN
- ~
- 1 0
160 _ ,
~ + ~ 7 uD O W N N~p
N N O I~ ~ ~ ~
f~0 f~0 (~O f~0 f~0 ~O ~I$ (fl (0 (0 M ~ ~ , _ ~ ~ \ OD EXIST GROUND ~ ~ co ~ ~
7~ V.C..
v
~ ~ -
PR .MAIN o ~
~ N V + ~ o r
~ ~
150 to N 150
N
ti
PRO .2nd MAl ITALICS h N
5765 00 577 00 00
TURNOUT TO BE REMOVED Q
AND TRACK REPAIRED
(BY NS)
N Curve =SECOND MAIN-5
~ PI STA. = 5766+08.73
+ ~ Delta = 4° 48' 50.07" (LT)
0
~O ± ~ ^ z T = 361.26 0.~
r c~ _ ~
`n ^ ~ ¢ V a`~o L = 722.09 ~ i. Y i- CONTRACTOR TO R = 8,594.42
F a ~ o c~ w CONSTRUCT ROADBED e = 1.0"
W v~ N ~ ~ a4 Q ~ s ~ AND SHIFT TRACK FRT. = 40 MPH o Q
J Z ~ c ~ ~ ~ H t~i ,^n EXIST. R/W PSGR. = 45 MPH m ~ EXIST. RIW w
~ ~ z_
2 d 1 ~ ~ i N ~ O I- si+.rs~ < F- ~ ~ J
W + i O Z m NQ
- $ N ~o°~ k------- Q to N g" ~ N - -
V PROP. SECOND MAIN o U ~ ~
p ~ W M c p Q' r N Q Q o Z o F- F- ~ ~ Q o
5765 o ~ ~ o H ~
N ~ F- p o U to Z ~ +
Q REMOVE TRACK 5770 w 577 N p
(BY CONTRACTOR) - - - -
~ MAIN
w HEAD - - - -
Z WALL - Q
J ~ c7 h h 14'T.C. ~
~ LO.C. ~ w
~ ~ ao curve -=1N741Ft=7••--------------------- ~ ----•--------CLm2--=MAIN-B------------------------ ~ UNDER ROADWAY~+, + + + --------------.a - - - - z ~ ~ J o CONSTRUCT NEW ~
co PI STA. = 5761+gg.37 ~n <o PI STA = 5767+48.77
fOn Delta = 1" 13' 25.23" (R~ `n° `r° Delta = 1° 11' 24.00" (LT) ~ MAIN TRACK LIMITS OF = o~ U
m BY CONTRACTOR CONSTRUCTION N ~ ~ I- + + Q
D = 0° 30' 00.00" D = 0° 30' 00.00" ~ ~ ~
Ia- ¢ T = 122.37 a Q T = 119.00 h m /
L = 244.73 - EXIST. R/W V ~ R = 11,459.19 ~ y R = 11,459.19
Q / ~5 EXIST. RNV ~ Q Qo~
LEGEND e = ~.o" e = to" N ~ ~ a to ~~P
V1 ~ U cn
EXISTING TRACKS FRT. = 40 MPH FRT. = 40 MPH PSGR. = 45 MPH PSGR. = 45 MPH
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
TRACK TO BE SHIFTED IOO
LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK S C A L E o
REV BY DATE DESCRIPTION
TRACKS TO RETIRE LOCATION
~ EL
WETLAND IMPACTS AN TITLE
D ND M AIN AND T RA E YARD
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ~
TRA K PLAN AND PR FILE 0
UPGRADE TRACK NORTH CAROLIN I
OWNING COMPANY DGN PID No. VAL MAP MILE POST H D R D434 399600A H 109-H 112
RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION HDR ENGINEERING, INC. EAST CAR PROPOSED PAVING R LI NA DWN FILE No. DRAIMNG NUMBER
JLF 107-1-4973 OPERATING DIVISION TB-20 -26 R2 5
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGIN CHK MJS DATE :CHIEF ENGINEER -DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION -ATLANTA, cA. AUGUST 22, 2005
CADD FILE: $FILE$ S H E E 1T A- 0 0 6 ~ F

85 V.C.
r = OJ59 5 0' V.C.
170
~ 7~ PRO. 2 d MAIN
~ N co co W PR .2nd MA! ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cp ~ 00 O ~I O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo N O W ~ J ~ LO ~o, ~
W i~ ~ ~ co op o0 ~ ~
+ tcj
v ~ ~ N
~ Op J -I.
~ ~ ~ ~ N ~
I: ROP.SEC ND MAIN 1 0 6 ~ ~ ~
160
• .458°°
l + 0.189/ -
- -
-Jras~~i +~u.~a~~ ------fi - - ' ~ ~ 1 1 i~-~ - ~ 1
-F9'h ~~o + 0.19°/ 1 ^
' ~ _ _ • ~ - ~ ~ 1
~ / I 1 / ~ 1
rn ~ ~
~ XIST. GR ND UND ~ ; ' ~ of M , • ~ ~.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 150
150 ~
1~ 1 , O 1, ~ ~
s~~s+ o.oo c0 ~ Oi
36" S EEL PIPE 36" CMP I~ , ~ 550 V C. +
850' V. ~ CMP ~ ~ ~
N r = 0.0 9 ~
PRO. AIN N
r PRO. IN r O N O M O 0 N tt t0 O N t0
~ tp M O a~D a~0 O N I~ 1~ I~ I~ °0 ao O
N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 14 ~ ~ r ~
140 ~ ~ ~
5786+01.0 57 +13.60
72" RCP 72" CMP
PROP.2 d MAIN l ALICS
00 785 5
5775 00 5780 00
c~
Z J J /
.Q
' 2 N ~ a Y
.cAU
~a~ Q ~ ~ m
. Z N
Q N EXIST. RNV w
a a O Z ? EXIST. RIW m ~ ~~0 z J
U U ~ m -r„~_ Z
+ ~ • ~ I ?I I - II?I Q
Z 1 PME ~ER.I9D LMA R0. O m Q n ~ ~ ~H IIII ~
P!~ LEVEL - SEIYA RD. I I ~ , ~ sxrs~ ? I I I N.~IaN ST.
o ? ` - 0 - ~ I I I 1 SR.f921 ~ ~ I 1 ~ - ---~~T----- o
® o
o o +
PROP. SECOND MAIN 0 LIMITS OF rn t ~ .~.L..r 0~0
cJ~ DROP INLET 57HO ~ 7 , , CONSTRUCTION ~ ~ , ,7 n MP ~
~j n SIDI G 2 RCP , 2 C I Q
~ - r , cn
- - 24" FiP----'---------------- w
F - - ~ HEADWALL $ 14'T.C. HEAD . ~ W 2 WALL ~ H x Cho---- ---F~---=+-- MAIN z ~ _ 7 -
~ BORE HOLE • s 3 EXTEND CULVERT ~ ~ , CONST. NEW II
u a COUPLING BAND) _ HEAD MAIN TRACK b a
' Q.~~yVLHEAD WALL v u 0~ ---------v I-- W ~ -----------------------0
1 - ~ p P Q - --r--- - SS ~
i P 8' SANITARY SEWER
c=i ~ CONSTRUCTION EXIST. CULVERT TO BE ~ a ~ 3 ; J F- € ABANDONED AND $ O ~ ° ; ~ J ~ 0/H CABLE II M P II WEST PINE ST.
~ 0.31 ACRES GROUT FILLED ~ ~ W ' ------a'~~ ~ ` . STORM EWER ~ /
EXIST. R/W °r' v ~ ' X 6" CMP IN DITCH J EXIST. RlW 40 3 EXTEND CULVERT
~ 10" SANITARY SEWER WAY ~ CONCRETE COLLAR UNDER ROAD ~ ( )
~ ~ M INSTALL 16' CROSSING to be Protected by Utility 0 1 TO CMP WIEND WALL i
LEGEND PER NS PLAN 756 0 0 1
EXISTING TRACKS (BY CONTRACTOR) I
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION

TRACK TO BE SHIFTED
LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK SCALE e
REV BY DATE DESCRIPTION
TRACKS TO RETIRE LOCATION !'tom'
EL ~ ,
. TITLE
WETLAND IMPACTS D AR EY T A AI ND E R
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ~ FILE PR AND PLAN AK TR
A
UPGRADE TRACK NORTH CAROLIN RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION EAST CAR HDR ENGINEERING, INC. DGN PID No. VAL MAP MILE POST H 109-H 112
OWNING COMPANY HDR D434 399600A
I DWN FILE No. DRAWING NUMBER I NA B RL T JLF 107-1-4973
- R2 26 B-20 5 T OPERATING DIVISION CHK DATE
PROPOSED PAVING OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGIN MJS AUGUST 22, 2005 .CHIEF ENGINEER -DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION -ATLANTA, GA.
CADD FILE: $FILE$ S H E E ~T A- 0 0 7 O F

PROP ~lAlN CS . nd AU
r • n.05~ ~
~ PR . ~iad M ~ ~
c~ rr
W ~ N (Q can ~'f I W ~1 ~ ~
~ - ~ ~'f tp ~L7 ~0 ~4 ~
• ~ cy ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ M
o, 4 O ~ cn ca to cs, M . cn co w m ~ co
W rn PR P OND ~ D .S N
r~ r r ~ J
• ~ o ~rx rt h
c ~ o.~se / tD ! '
.fi4% 10.461 r- 1 r . M ~ ~ 2 N
/ ~
1 N ~ ~ © d„
00 ~ O t~ rr O ~
, PR P. MAIN _ o ~ r~ q r, N OC} N 1n Ir 1 . e ~
Cn ~ 1 O Q ~ ~ O ~ N i~l tD t ~ ~ r- V tD d' to ~ ~ ~ ca c~ ~ t0 ~ a
/ ~ 'w1 ~ •
i 1 M ` - M ' t!l W M
1 / ~ ~ M / ~ w M
~ ~ ~ rn
~ n ~ ~ 35 V.C, N N
c~ EXi T GRDUND a sQ
n '
~ PR .MAIN N N
+ ~ +
r ~ .
01 • n N ~ ,
t~ * C7 ~ 'p N
Curve • :urve • TURNOUT-4 - M o N
Pl STA. • 1 STA. • 5796*69.03 * ~ o to
Delto • )alto • 2 47 44.99 tLT) x w t u r O a d U }N
o • J • f° 29 59.84 0 a o z ~
• ¢ T - z rn ~ =at'co 93.22 co J
w ~ z ~ ~ Q1 f8fi.39 z a O ~ r~
z c~ R ! • 3 819.83 aw o acn n o
J U1 FRT. ~ ~ , ' ~ ~ Z N ~ fn N ~ Z O ~y RT, 40 MPH . o
z I v i, ~ n ~ v o M ~
~ •PSGR. • • ~ XIS'T, ~/w a ~ E SGR. • 45 MPH ~ O c ~ ~ ~ 0~ !n m ~ • ~D= a N„ ~ w EXIST. R1W .
p M. FY ..nw a..v w.+ ~w w a..n .~.r~11 ~
n ~ ~ r-mNp • CONTRACTOR TO GRADE v
~ I ~ CdNTRA( p APPRO LOCATION CONTRACTOR TO GRADE o~ ~ 2 J
• ! wA RUNE M PAD FOF o n ~ c~ PAD FOR 5lGNAL PER m PAD FOR SIGNAL PER ~ aN ~7r ~
~ IGN~ o ~,r~x sr. NS S N NS SiGIVAL PLAN NS SIGNAL PLAN ~ d
.ww_r rir~,1 rr^rl ~r~~
err ..+..r I.~w.. w..~. rill fw~. M~ w+.i r w.. ~w u..r.A .w~~. s-.. •r._ r+.~r rr+r ~ w~ ter. F.+ ~ 11 ~/H ELEC,
IT F ONSTRUCTION rn LIM S 0 C PROP, SECOND MaN ~ I
1 ? LiMlTS OF ~
• ~ "i Ic sTRUCrION
~ I SIDING . rn IrtW wwrrw~rl rwr wrr• wM wwr~/- -N~. 11 Afr I `rM• =
IrM,-N-w,rwrN~ rN~~w Fr w.rr •
w wr_r¦_+~r_..yM.rn rrr- ..rMrrr ww.r_Ol.rww~+r_~_r_rrwrwr..w _r rr-~___.r r_rw~+. www~r_...rwr•w~•-~.w• -..r.rw.r_w~ rrn..+-rrwrwr-w e f00 a
i ~ MAIN a a - ~ ~ If I
14 T,C. ,3D CONST, NEW MAIN 14 T.C. I ~ ~ 24 CI~P • ~ ~
C z (8Y COT a c ~ ! - . rr- - rr • r
U O . I-» 66 ,
M.rr.i..~rr~ "~r ..w~. w...r•. F~wwwl .Il~w .w.~IR wr r_r rr•r_. F.nr
r~r.r..rr^r w~4 ~ r ~ _ w r r rr. r r ~y -_.r.. ~.wr~ wry 8" SAWITARY SEWER PROX. 4OCATION II APPROX. L4CATIflN ~ + rr~ en SAI~TARr s wER ~ - ~
I rx sr'°'p N w~sr ~ ~ SAN. sEwER sAN. sEwER w~ ~ ~~sr prN~ sr. ~ ' APPRO
IS sr. ~ C ~ A6LE
I~ ~.~r_, ~.i. ,..r
EXlsr. Raw ~ d ~ ~ ONTRACTOR TO GRADE C T AXIS. , R1W I
~ PAD FOR SIGNAL HOUSE ~ ~
r N I ~ PER NS S(GNAI. PLAN ~
~ x CONTRACTOR TO GRADE I U APPROx. LOCATION
E STING TRACKS PAD FOR SIGNAL. PER ~ a ~ O- 6" WATER UNE
NS SIGNAL PLAN
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION r
T i
- - w- r - -~w TRACK TO 8E SHIFTED •
0 LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK
a R£v 8r DATE DESCRIPTIQN
TI ocatlaN
TRACKS TO RE RE
1
WETLAND IMPACTS rln E
,_.._____wrrwr_r.~ ~.fMITS OF CONSTRUCTION y
UPGRADE TRACK
OWNING COldPANY GN IO Flo. AL iiAP ILE PD5T _ HDR D434 39~6aaA H109 H112
RiP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
WN Ili± Nc, RAWWG NUA~BER JLF , 107-1-4973
4 c PROPOSED PAVING OPERATING alvlslDN H>S aTE
OFFICE OF THE CF~EF ENCWEER srRucrDN - aT aNr ca M,lS AUGUST Z2 2DOS IEF ENCWEER -DESIGN AND CON { L a ~
CARD FILE p~ln5rrlgDDDDOselrnc\eng_dsgnllracklplprtrkDBa.dgn
SHEET TA-008 OF

w ~ r ~ W
~k~Sr Raw ~ ~ h ?
~ x ~ ilk J
°o o ` O7 . ti ~c ° . x o f ~
w . ACTOR TO GRADE a
CONTR vW TRACTOR TO GRADE ~ cn ~ CON ER
~ ~ N M Obi Nn ON cn PAD FOR SIGNAL, P ~ a.. 1 a FOR SIGNA(r HOUSE
~O ~N ~ in Yc~C PAD p,N a. NS S(GNAL PL o ~
rnrn c~~n °'o S 51GNAL PLAN EXIST. R!w PER N a _ ....n h.,,.t .
w o
°.'M rna WETLAND LIMIT YutO-i ~ ~~~N eo~ n ~ 24" RCP o ~ ~Q ~
N ~ + ~
jN4t j~N at- N 4 ~ ~fn ~D ~ N N as s~
us• Q ~ h d;
OI~-N OI~-a U r'
N f!1 C7 i N - Z • 1 .w~+
2? Z i_ J
(nap Vi - to - _ w r•.rgr .^.wr..n•rr~ r wrr+rw rrrr.ww~.+wrwwwr~ rrF r_..rw 4
r,r wr'..wrrrrw L
r r..www.rr~.rr `...rr•rw~ rr~r rrrr ~ " ~/q rrr+.r r.~rrr~ywrr~wrr ""wr ` •rn r rlr wrw.www._rrrw rrw'••w
rr~ r W
~ CO STRU IA.C. Z
L(~slTS of
CONSTRUCTION ~ © ~ ¢ _
L.O.C. a U z
a ~
~ ~
NOTES . 0
8E INSTALLED SHALL ow
N ALL EROSIaN CONTROL MEASURES ~~d
PRIOR TO OR CONCU D-DI5TUR8 a CONTRACTOR TO GRADE - I TUR8ING ACTIVITIES, AP~~ox. Lo DS EXIST. R1W o~ wIRELIN~
~ ~ ~r
0 DANCE CES SHALL. 8
Q1 PAD FOR S(GNAL PER EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONYROi. DEVICES SHA WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS . r r ~
• NS SIGNAL PLAN
T IMENT TRAP Q RM INLE SED
FOR SILT FENCE A~II S~tT NCE STORM INLET
0 ~ETAII,$..SEE~SfI~E7 G0-Oat ~ ~ STUB POLE & ANCHOR CUY
FOR CHECK DAM ~ETAtLS SEE SHEET GD 02 ~D 02
cv ~ / ~ m
`2` / REFER TO SIGNAL PLAN FOR GRADWG OF SIGN W~W~L,. _ I ~ CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY ! AL HOUSE L4CS o m M M ~ F SIGNALS AND S GN ~ , O r ~ ~ u~
cv m t
OSITIVE ORA(NAGE m ARY TO MAINTAIN P * N ESS
y ~ ~
p, ~c •secv~ Aa ~ . ~ a ~ ~ ~r~ ~ ~ r ~ r, rr
~ ~ . ~ ~ Q .
. ~ ~ oc ¢ Q a Pty lEY~ ~UG1 W H•
+ spa r EXIST. Rf w. w........r ..w...._...~..~-.-rr~...-. v M GN wN W
2 N ` m ~I- M N M CAN N ~ ~ ~..w .rw_w .r•r.r r...rr rr"'wr w..w y ~r"r 2
O W ~ trf! ~ 1 _ N t~ ~ DROP INLET ~ _ _ ~ r rr+- wrrw._.
p~ N = p /~~n ~ sa ~ ~ ~ SHIFT TRACK - r _r_rr . r-. a
PR r _ .r...._w.._ _...w r.
~ ~ ~ F- t•• N ~ ~ ~ N , wMr
O t~. / / ~ ~j C7 ~p N e N r ••r r w+w ws~~ O
i. w c ~ ~ 24" CP Oh ~ Q r~r+ .
m ~~a ir• 'r rwrr r r ~ ~~r~ r
57 _ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~
r
h
r N w _ r wr
r
RucTION N N ~ COHST
` ~ / F CE AT ~ o ~ SILT EN , a. ` N W
TS AHD ~ ~ ~i.E o S Gl ~ r to In ~
APPROX. L (=j I OH ELECT TION ' APPROX. ocArlQl~ 4UTFALLS o . ~ r a wa ON EI.EC RIC ~ ~ Q ~ Q
' F- W Fr I
n'`~ 4 NON U
N N E.. ..w ~
.w ~ xlsT. Raw d E a ~
a
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION 1 Q .
TRACK TO BE SHIFTk.U
LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK SCALE: ~Ev eY oaT~ o~sc~~PT~a~c
OCATlQN
TRACKS TO RETIRE ~
TIr~E
WETLAND IMPACTS
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ~
io r~. u sa~P 1; PasT _ cN ~ gDOQq Ni09 Hii2 39
UPGRADE TRACK NORTH CAROLI CHECK DAMS HDR ENGINEERiNGq iNc. EAST CARO -F g-~J SILT FENCE OFfiCE Gf THE CHEF EHCiNE DR D .34 H awr~NC cor~P~wr
N ~.E No. ~awwC Nu~RBER ~ F iQ7wi 4973 _ JL -
OFEHATIHG OtYIS~ON F{K ATE 005 ~ AuGUST 22 z M5
CHEF E~C~NEER .DESIGN ANO CONSTRUCTION r ATLIWT~4 CA
~lnsrr1000000selma\enq_dsgnlirack~erosign0ic.dgn T GP-{~~) OF caoo FILE S E E

o~
rn
d' d' o
~ rn
~f11~.. E" n
~ N V1 ~
n if Y f/1
a N a a ~ ~ PRaP• SECOND MAIN ~ ~
W
z ~ v~i °z c ,1 EXIST. RIW ~
a 7 Z
Z u
a V
~ r _ _ - I i II{ Ip
o ,AND' GRO T DROP INLET o
o ~ •L.O.C. o DROP INt,ET o
lol 0
°0 14' ~ ~ ~
rn M
n
n u7 ~
¢
H
L r.r
W
w z ~ ~ t0
~ ~ APPgOX. LOCATION ~ a S o AND STORAGEI ~ a ~ a SILT FENCE AT INLETS o~ o ~
_ ~ a ~ off ELECTRIC UPGRADE MAIN N ~ tBY CONTRACTOR) N ~ f8Y COrvtTRACTOR? N AND OUTFACES H CK DAM z ~C E
~ ~ & STORAGEI ~ N 3gr.LjD OUTFAEL.LS INLETS U r. U ~ . T F NCE AT INLETS SIL E M - r-
N. I~ ~ AND ouTFALLS ~ ~ a
tBY CONTRACTOR! ttl N .N ~
r.. ..r,
EXIST. R/W EXIST, Rlw
NOTES
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL 8E IN ACCORDANCE
FOR SILT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP 5736.60
DETAILS SEE SHEES GD-001 EXISTING PIPE r
s
FOR CHECK DAM DETAILS SEE SHEET GD-002 TO 8E ABANDONED
CONTRACTOR' TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY T~ MAI AIN POSI'~ 6~~ITAG~~'LED
PROP. SECOND MNN 1
Pryer ~yE~~ A A0. s~.I~zr
~ EXIST. R/W EXIST. R!w
w z
z - u~ J
J ~
Z Z a
a - XISTING CULVER
~ ROP WL o o DROP INLET
W . • o ~ • I I TO 8E ABANDONEQ ~ v
Q ~YI ~ I I ILL 1 ~ o a
O
O ~4~ - w.wr~~r rr¦+rw~..MMwr/rl w.unwr~.rrr KanMlrw~ ...r~fwr••wr~NwurMwlw rur~ww.r.r.n..r rn. o M 1~ 1M 1•~I F•1 rI1 r 1~1 M1 r r M•1
~ - n
n ~r h
n
N •
p ~ z.a,c. N
N UPGRADE fO• SI ENCE A7 ENCE AT o m a r. ~y W
W 5734.15.00 ~ STORAGE TRAC ma MAIN TRACK ~ AND ~ e Z
Z 24" CMP n ~g Y CON ~ ACTOR) ~BY CONTRACTOR) Nc~.~ OUTFALLS~ . ~ U 1L(.$ t'7 ~
~ z ~ SILT FENCE AT INL~TS
= REMOVE TURNOUT r-Q ANp OUTFACES ~ ~ h ~h T u7 l~I ~ ~ U
AND INSTALL TRACK 'n N w r.r w.~ w.~ r.rr w.+~r wr wrt ~
Q PANEL ~ EXIST. R/W r ExIST. RIW d
~ (BY CONTRACTOR) a
LEGEND
EXISTWG TRACKS 'f1~

• NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
TRACK TO BE SHIFTED SCALE:
REV BY QATE QESCRtPTION
LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK OCATION
• - - - - - - - - - TRACKS TO RETIRE
ITLE
WETLAND IMPACTS
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
UPGRADE TRACK NORTH CAROLI CHECK DAMS HDR ENGINEERING9 INC. EAST CARO 4 s-~ SILT FENCE o~ice of rr~ cry ~r+c~r GN 10 Nn. At, MAP LE P05't {}PINING COMPANY HOP? D~3~ 399600A H109-H112
wN ICI; No. RAWINC HUldBER
JLF 107.1-4973
GPERATWG pIVIS10N T WK A E
MJS AUGUST 22 2005 CHIf~' ENGINEER - DESIGN AJPd CONSTRUCTION • ATf.pNTA, Ca ~
CpiiD Fit,E~ p~lnsrrlOOOOOOsalmaleng_dsgnllr~cklerosiartO2e.dgn H
5 EET GP o02 OF

SC W
W
F M F-ZZW
4 ~ ¢aa~ CA [J} F.,
S~ N~ GD o0 ~ ~ U
N ~l" ¢ ~ ~ W N © to ~ t]. ~ ~ N
Y p~.. + + ~ u7 ~ o t`
. aN ~ ~ ~ ~ !x
F Z t1? tt7 + Q) r ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ N ~ n w o o
. ~ u~ ~
SILT FENCE AT ~ ~ PrNe crti?~t s~ , H Q 4 F..
~ INLETS AND PlXE IEYQ~~~A A6 ; c~ ~ N y ~ n r. N ~ W
~ EXIST. R1W OUTFACES _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ' m N ~ N XIST. R/W ~
Z
Z J . r., _ CHAV
.r...,.r..~...~..r r.r..y ~ pB~- p a
a _ _ ~
SILT FENCE AT ~ ~~r„ 5757*50.00
~ INLETS AND o
~ L.O.C. • • ,o' ~ yry - OUTFACES ° .a ~ L...
SEC-MAIN ~a~ 95"x67" CMP ' I r ~~~.w~ f O
o - IST. SDG. w w w a...A w ..r ~I..M f.. 1
~ ~!~~1 r ..r w w r. r l~.1 w ~...w I.r w ~ j~ • r ry .
n
v n I , GHECK D ~ Q
~n ~ Q
a - - - t- ~ ~ Q; N
e
o sILT FENCE w SILT FENCE INLETS o
W t0 100 N d~ I m ~ m ~ o z AND OUTFAE ~ ~ ~ r ~
Z N i17 • U ~ N to ~ _
t r tno
J ~ ~ ~ SILT FENCE AT n tt ~ ~ a n ~Q,~ ~ tD U
~ ~ n Er ~ ¢
~ ~ N ~~TFT~SL. ~ N . c ~n ¢ ~ y EXIST, R/W ¢ ~ ~ ~
d ~ ~ - - EXIST. R/W ~ o N a o u~i a . W Q c a D= 40 X 3fi CMP IN DITCH M ~
NOTES o ~
¢ ~ N R ROADWAY U DE a; a
• AI.L EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SH PR(OR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LANG-O(STURBWG AC REMOVE TURNOUT ANO REPLACE EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE 1 WITH TRACK PANEL WITH NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS ICES SHALL DE lNSTAI.EED z ~ o o w~
~a ~alNC acrlvlTlEs,
aN~
IALL BE IN ACCQRDANCE
r
FOR SILT FENCE ANO SILT FENCE STORM INLET 5EDIM ~ETNLS SEE SHEET GD-001 :T SEDIMENT TRAP ~ ~
a~
~ ^ FOR CHECK DAM DETAILS SEE SHEET GD-002 . m
o
`r CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY TO MAi vi ~ ' TO AINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE ' M ~ cD ^
00 .r ~ ~ w
~p N tQ tl'f N Z ~ n
EXIST. R/W ~ ~ M
W ~ _ EX~ST• RAW - ~,._..w........, ~ ~
z o s. ~ a o~ m n cn Q ~
~ ~
z IA uI Y Vf
a - - - 0
l ~ ' ~ ~ ~ o
a cn N ~ ~ ~ o ( C.0 .
I ~ i ~w
o - - - - - - - ~ M
..w+.+~
l~ - .p--,~ o~ M cHecK o~ d
~
cn
w
N _ ~ ~ w
NDER ROADWAY W N C~iECK DAM z
~ ,q SILT FE CE ~ ,q ~ !L ECK DAM ao ao o~ CHECK DAM v
~ ~ ~--CHECK DAM ~ n n ~ ¢
V I~- Fes- F¢- Fa- ~t ~ ~ ~ ~
wry ~ ...i w.. i...o
Q d ~5 EXIST. Raw ~ IMPACTED WETLAND ~ r- 4
~ ~ EXIST. R/W v N ~ ~ N ~ ~ AREA O.~I~ ACRES
N U ~ ~ U U1
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS ~ O
i! ~
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION ~ ! I
TRACK TO BE SHlFTEO SCALE:
REV 6Y DA7E QESCRIPTIQN
•-_•---__-r-- LOCATION OF SHfFTEO TRACK OCATION
TRACKS TO RETIRE
TITLE
WETLANID IMPACTS wr
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
1
UPGRADE TRACK NORTH CAROLIN ~ CHECK DAMS HDR ENCiN~ERiNG9 iNC. EAST CAROU a .SILT FENCE OFFICE Of THE CHIEF ENCNEER - CN ID Na. AL 11AP E PAST r X34 399600A H1a9-H11Z awHpVG Ca~lPax HDR 0
` wrt q.E Na. _ RAwING H11f~8ER
JLF 107 1 497
w w51ar~ OP AT G D< }.{K ATE
MJS AUGUST 22 2005 EF ENGWEER -DESIGN ANa CQNSTRl1C71Dh ATLANTA, GA. ~
CARD fILE~ p~~asrrlaQQODaselma~eng_d5gnltrack~a~osion03o.dy~rl G~_ sHEE o of

c~
z
>c a J
1~
rte..aN ~N
Y ~ U U ~
z a o m m ~ /
N
J ~ ~ t0 VI N EXIST, Rlw
z '1 EXIST. R/W m ~ ~ Cp w
Q U ....I
R ~V P/NE fEV R~~i1+A A0. H ~ ~f `T' ~
~ F - ~ - REMOVE EXIS a , ~ rr r
o _ ~ _ ~ i ~ cFV~ ~ s~ur~ ~a 11 11 a ~ru 2-95 x57 CMP s~.ma END WALL r 1r r H.uwH ~
SR.I~~I ~
r o
~ i ~ ~
~ ~ OUTFACES"' / v
0
5~ ~ 57 Ca! Q}
. - _r - .rte- ~.r ~...w _ -rw~~.... w..i ....w~w•`.- n YJ
N _ - MAIN - HE K DAM
e . 8 ~ ~ ~ ~
w . .
z N - r- ~ W
......`w`-1-.• bti z
CHECK DAM o ~ a ' - _ v SILT FENCE IMPACTED WETLAND m r i ~ ,t~ ~ ~
~ a s Y w~R l ~ c~a w~sr rrN~ sr
F' EXJST. CULVERT TO BE ABANDONED gREA 0.40 ACRES u°~ ~ ~w., 'l_,r.,.~.~, ~ . TO.-~ x ~ --~~ff~ ca
g _,AND FILLED WITH SLURRY _ _ OR Lk~~ ~-.."--w r * ~T L
1 tl EXIST. R1W 40 X 36 CMP !N DIT ~
EXIST. R/W _ ~fI ~ M F"' TEN CULVERT
uNOER RoAOwA~ t0 s TaR SEWER ,a ~ SILT FENCE ( ONG TE COLLARS
NOTES o TOR SEW T CMP
ALL EROSfON CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHMLL 8E INSTALLED
PRfOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTURB(NG ACTNITIES.
EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE M 0 v~ ~ - N pQ ~
WITH NORTH CAROLMA REGULATIONS O tt7 r.. N
X 0 ~ W
FOR 51LT FENCE AND SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP N 0 4 U F f o
DETNLS SEE SHEET GD-001 ~ . ~ ~ r Q ~ Qi ~ q
z ~ o ~ ~ Q z a N
FOR CHECK DAbI DETAILS SEE SHEET GD-002 ~3 aw Ntn z ~ o ¢ ~ ~ ~
CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DITCH AS NECESSARY TO MNNTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE n ' ° n r, l~ ~ Z p M r'n .
I o t0 O ~ fY N c oQ •
~ ' _ ~ 00 m w EXIST. R/W
EXIST. R/W ' ttt~w rt...t ti..~r ri. t~ '1 `t{f ~ w «t r~.r .¦•.e r m N Q !
J ~~~~o~E~ ~ CONTRAC 00 T T GR E o a CONTRAC OR 0 AD ~ CONTRACTOR TO GRADE as z
i~ ~ - J ~ c~ PAD FOR SIGNAL PER
PAD FQR PAD FOR SIGNAL PER ~ _ ~ I ~ ~r ~r, ; ~ NS SIGNAL PLAN
' 1 NS SIGN o '1 I L.O.C. ~ NS SIGNAL PLAN G ..-..._......-....L I a
0.EC.
>N C N TRUGTION ! ~
~ I F ~ I ~ L SO
o I o 1 tC C7 C i1i I
0 til ~ -Mr w-~. ~
0
r..---~ ' yy+ r ~ r:. ~ r
~ CHEC J ~
d f-
J APPROX. LOCAi n sr. ~
1~sr'rrK ST~~R~~OCATION SMl. SEWER wa7' HvE sT. rn ~ ~wPRo ~ Olt! EC. --~1 ~ ~
x SILT FENCE ~ II ~ v - - U---- - - n ~ f GAaLE rl .../MM V
Mme/ MMq U.,11,.1 Y~.~ /NFh rA L CONTRACTOR TO GRADE EXIS• . Rf W
~ ~ y~ I EXIST. R/W pq~,~ CHECK OAM ~ ~ CHECK DAM g~ f I z I
~ PAD FOR SIGNAL HOUSE cK oAM cn I
PER NS 5lGNAL PLAN
~ ~ a h APPRQX. LOCATION
~ d 6" WATER I.M~
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS ~ O
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTlO~~!
TRACK TO BE SHIFTED SCALE:
REY BY OATS QESGRlPTION
LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK OCATiON
• - - - - - - - - - TRACKS TO RETIRE
TITLE
WETLAND IMPACTS
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
UPGRADE TRACK NORTH CAROLIN CHECK CAMS HDR ENGINEERINGo IiVG. EAST CAROLI e .SILT FENCE CN l0 No. AL i~aP 4E POST ~3~ 399600A H109~H~12 OWNING COMPANY HDR D
` WN !~E Na, RAWWG NUMBER
r JLF ~07'~'~97~
aP RaTrNC OlvlslOt~ :ax ATE
OFFICE OF THE CFflEF ENGINEER MJS AUGUST 22, 2005 EF ENGINEER • DFSICN AHQ CONSTRUCTION ATI.IWTI~ GA.
CAOp FII,E~ ps\rurr~000000selmaleng_dsgnllraeklerasion0~a.dgn SH T GP-QQ4 0~ EE

JOHNSTON COUNTY
M IN
e N
m
~m
. _ ~ 4B•j / ~m
e:i a
~ / ~
` ~
--5-- ~
1 ~
M IN
. ~ m N
B m
m

~ ~ m
B
M
z
a f C f"1 m
m ~ ~ Cl - 3' EROSIO STONE
N
5779+ o.o
1 0 1 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0- 0 1 0 10 1 0 1 0
S C A L E e P-10', ERTICALTAL ftEV 8Y OATE OESCRWTION
I~ORF~'L,I~ ~AT~~ SELMA, NC
ir`E PROPOSED SECOND MAIN ANO STORAGE YARD
0
DRAINAGE PIPE PROFILES
NORTH CAROLINA ,OLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
"HER 10 N0' 0434 a- ~"P 399600A E PosT . H109-H112
~ROLINA BUSINESS UNIT H LLE Nm RAWWG NUI.~ER JLF 107-1-4973 TB-2005-26
HDR ENGINEERINGo INCo EAST CAROLW 0 0 RATWC OIVI90N
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF QlCNEER - QlCNEER -DESIGN Ni0 CONSTRUCTION - ATLMlT~,GA M.IS ATE AUGUST ZZ~ ZOOS
C/DO FIIEi P~WSRR\OOOOOOSELMA\Enq_psgn\track~drslVkOt.plg SHEET ~xs_~~7 OF

JOHNSTON COUNTY
STEEL POST 8' MAX. STEEL POST
WIRE FENCING WIRE FENCING
z FIL?ER FA9RIC
~ W
FABRIC FILTER a ~ m ~ n Q
o LL ~~O
n
1 I- t I- 1=1 ! I~ I I I I -I I I-I I -I I I I I 1- I I I -I I I ~ ~
~Ilr- _ I IiJIFIC-IIH~~ I-IFJII~IEI~f-111=11 I - ~ GENERAL NOTES:
N ~ ~rr ANCHOR SKIRT 6` MINIMUM 1. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND TRAP RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS
i~~~i~~ii~n ii~i 'T' i ~i~=~i~i-i~,~~-T~~ T i it i ~iri aF WhIEN THE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO 1/2 THE DESIGN OEP'fH OF THE TRAP.
~ ~ ~ ~ 11=1 I ~~~~r~- ~ ~ ~ I~~~=1I I-~~ I IN UEU Of BURYING SHIRT, 6" OF
~II~~ ~5 WASHED STONE MAY 8E USEO :0 2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL @E DEPOSITED IN A SUITABLE AREA AND IN SUCH
OVER TURt~IDOWN. A MANNER THAT IY WILL NOT ERODE.
3. THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT BY THE
FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY OR HIS AGENT ANO REPAIRS MADE AS NECESSARY.
~ STEEL POST 4. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT
EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION ARE MINIMIZED.
WIRE FENCING
i GENERAL NOTES: 5. THE SEDIMENT TRAP SHALL BE REMOVED ANO THE AREA STABILIZED WHEN THE
~ FILTER FABRIC ' DRAINAGE BASIN HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
o ~ ~ 5 WASHED STONE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL 8E A MINIMUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND ~ SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM1b' OF 6 UNE WIRES WITH 12" STAY SPACING. 6. SILT FENCE INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STD. NO. 30.06
n ~ ~ vOQ~ 2. WOVEN FILTER FABRIC BE USED WHERE SILT FENCE i5 TO REMAIN 7. IF HARDWARE CLOTH IS USED, THEN INCREASE WASHED STONE TO 2D" MINIMUM HEIGHT.
a ~ / FOP. A PERIOD OF MORE THPN 30 DAYS.
N 3. STEEL POSTS SHALL BE 5'-0" IN HEIGHT AND 9E Of THE
~ SELF-FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
4. WIRE FENCING SHALL BE AT LEA57 X10 GAGE WITH A MINIMUM OF
o LINE WIf~eS WITH 72" 57r1Y SF~,CIiJG.
ANCHOR SKIRT
6' MINIMUM 5. TURN SILT FENCE UP SLOPE AT ENDS.
6. WIRE MESH SHALL 8E MIN. 13 GAGE WITH MAXIMUM 72" OPENINGS. ~5 WASHED STONE
7. WIRE AND WASHED STONE WILL 8E REQUIRED ANO NOTES ON PLAPIS WHEN:
A. AT TOE OF SLOPES GREATER THAN 10 FEET VERTICAL (2:1 SLOPE)
. '
8. AT DENUDED LIMITS WHERE AN UNDISTURBED BUFFER IS 50 FEET
OR 1E55 AWAY SILT FENCE \
B. ORANGE SAFETY FENCE IS REQUIRED AT BACK aF SILT FENCE
(WITHIN 5 FT.} WHEN GRADING IS ADJACENT TO SWIM SUFFERS
(REFER TO SWIM BUFFER GUIDELINES). 9lT FENCE ~
8. REFER TO STANUARO SECTION ES-EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL
FOR MAINTENANCE REGLIIREA~IENTS
A ~ ~ ~ A
nom- /s woo stnn¢ i4
`•h
STORAGE ~s °'i'
~ FILTER FABRIC SKIRT SEA J ~q ~
IN 6" OF ~5 STONE c;.;,~; •~:•`•0:: y~ i1
3._4.
~
CATCH \
9ASIN ~ / 1
SECTION A-A
PLAN VIEW
SILT FENCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
SCALEe
acv er ontE oESCRwr~oN
OCATION SELMA, NC
~Q~~~j/~`;~~ PROPOSED SECOND MAIN AND STORAGE YARD
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
NORTH CAROLINA ;OL(NA RAILROAD COMPANY
o HDR ENGINEERINGo INCa EAST CAROLIN OP OFFICE Of THE QiIEF ENCRIEER - OWNING CDMPPNY HDR 1D "O' 0434 M''~ 399600A E Posr H109-H112
~ROLINA BUSINESS UNIT ,~~F °-E 107-1-4973 ~WWG NUTABER
OPERATING OIV190N TB-2005-26
ENCWEER - DESIGN ANU CONSTRUCTION - ATLANT0. GA MJ5 ATE AUGUST Z2, ZOOS
CIAO FILE p~\nsrA000000seMo\eng_dsgn\troek~Ero:ian DetaOs.dgn SHEET Ci~-00~ OF

JOHNSTON COUNTY
L = THE DISTANCE SUCH THAT POINTS NOTE: ~orE
A AND B ARE OF EQUAL ELEVATION
1 . THE DR 'HE DRAINAGE AREA SNALL NOT EXCEED TWO ACRES.
J
. q ~ B 2. T WO OIL 'WO Ott MORE CHECK DAMS IN 5ERIES SHALL BE USED FOR DRAINAGE
AREAS ` ~ ~ v SHOULQ ,REAS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE. MAXIMUM 'SPACING BETWEEN DAMS
HOULQ BE SUCH THAT THE TDE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM IS AT THE
SAME E 3 . A GEOT SPACE BETWEEN CHECK DAMS STONE PREVEN THE GR ACCOR REQUIR Sl16GRA ADJACE FEET B a 4 . S TONE ~ MECHANI AME ELEVATION AS THE TOP OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM.
GEOTEXTILE SHOULD BE USED AS A SEPARATOR BETWEEN THE GRADED
TONE AND THE SQIL BASE AND ABUTMENTS. THE GEOTEXTILE WILL
REVENT THE MIGRAT[ON OF SOIL PARTICLES FROM THE SUBGRADE INTO
HE GRADED STONE. THE GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE SELECTED/SPECIFIED IN
CCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M288-96 SECTION 7.3. SEPARATION
OUIREMENTS, TABLE 3. GEOTEXTILES SHALL BE "SET" INTO THE
JBGRADE SOILS. THE ~GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY
)JACENT TO THE SUBGRAOE WITHOUT ANY VOIDS AND EXTEND FIVE
.ET BEYOND THE DOWNSTREAM TOE OF THE DAM TO PREVENT SCOUR.
BONE CHECK DAMS SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED OF C1 AGGREGATE.
:CHANICAL OR HAND PLACEMENT SHALL BE REOIJIRED TO
INSURE JSURE COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ENTIRE WIDTH OF DITCH OR SWALE AND
GEOTEXTILE N THAT CE
1AT CENTER OF DAM IS LpWER THAN EDGES.
S.PERIODI :R IODIC INSPECTION AND REQUIRED MAINTENANCE MUST BE PROVIDED.
• SEDIMEN :DIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES A DEPTH OF ONE-HALF
IE ORIGINAL DAM HEIGHT OR BEFORE. IF THE AREA IS TO BE MOWE D
SECTION PERPENDICULAR TO CHANNEL CENTERLINE THE ORI CHECK D OCCURRE PERMANE SEEQED ~ Mai' ~ ~ 2~ ~
ECK DAMS SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE FINAL STABILIZATION HAS
CURRED. OTHERWISE CHECK DAMS MAY REMAIN IN PLACE
RMANENTLY. AFTER REMOVAL. THE AREA BENEATH THE DAM SHALL BE
EQED AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY.
2 ' ~ 'yq~-
Q
FLOW N
SECTION PARALLEL TO CHANNEL CENTERLINE
STONE CHECK DA SCALE:NTS
DAM
SCALE;
NEV BY DATE DESCRIPTION
IIIORF~LI~' °c"'~" SE~.MA, NC
~(~U~~-/~~/~ '~`E PROPOSED SECOND MAIN AND STORAGE YARD
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
NORTH CAROLINA R LINA RAILROAD COMPANY
w~ HDR ENGINEERING. INCe EAST CAROLINA wnwc ca~w,wr HDR ~o 0434 N"~' 399640A ~~E P°sT H109-H112
OLINA BUSINESS UNIT JLF N°• 107-1-4973 SWING NUMBER
OPERAT aFVICE aP r?~E cr~EF EHCweEB - oEs OPERATING T B- 2 0 0 5- 2 6
:MEEK - ~ESICN M~ CONSTRUCTION - ATLIWT/~ GA MJ5 "iE AUGUST 22, 2005
CMO F0.,E~ p~\nsrr\DOOOOOselma\eng~dsgn\track\Erosion Oela7s.dgn SHEET GO-002 OF

JOHiVS T ON COUNTY
SEE 5ECTI0 •Y OR ~ ° 9 S
SPkCING ANO COUNT
SEE SECTION Y-Y FOR DIMENSION 4~ BILL QF 114ATERIAL~ :RIAL~
~ COMMON GONGRETE ALT. BRTCK ALT. ~
IZE LEN TH QUAHTIIY E LEND H auarrinr c
A #8 •4 6 38.8 38.8 T-7 B 47.7
B $'5 3'-41~" i6 88.3 88.3 S~-4L¢« 18 5fi.3
C Yr5 2r_8„ 14 38.fl 38.fl -0- -0- •0• y
33. B 8'-6 4 38.8 m
g k5 3 -0 0 62. 32. 3 -0 10 31.3
~ ~ F NS 4 -8" 20 9 .8 3 .8 4-8 i~ 48.7 - °z
HEI .STEEL TaTAL WEIGHT LBS, e 8 222.8 LL
0.8$ o
b.92 0.36 `a
FRANdE ANO ORATES ~ ~ CONCRETE IN IFWL.L$ (p1BIp YAR63} b.92 x BRICK III VYALL9 CUBIC YAflDS) -0- -0- 1.36 x v
K CONCRE I p8
0 8RI D C ETE TO A CUB 0 4 1.05 - p r~i
4 2.41 ~ Q
3 D. i4 W ~
~ BRICK CUBIC YAHOS IM WAI.UFOOT aF HEI6HT -0~ -0- Q.51
L85. 4F REIMf. 6TEEL IN WALLlFODT OF HEIGHT 94.8 W 14.8 47.fi W
H
"C° VERtICAI. B S i
E` & F° HOgIZIXd'fAL BAR9
~ ~ sr~r~HT eA~.s PLAN QF BASE
~ PLAN ~ r ^A° & "D" 9A9H BARS
GENERAL NOTES:
~ CHAMFERALL EXP~SEO CONCRETE CORNERS 1"
~n TR~A~'FIC ~EAftI~NG DROP INLIET 2~ ,~I~ I., ~I;~-,, R=~K
,2~ w+oius CONCRETE SHALL BE PORTLAND TYPE III OR TYPE (UA CONFORMING
Td THE REQUIREMENTS ~FASTM C 150 PER SECTION 5C-3, PAGE SC-1
FAR CAST IRON QOUB~E FRAME I~ND GRATES BASIS BQE~~ s" r~4nrus OF THE STANDARQ SPECIFICATIONS
9~n BENa CONCRETE M(X SHALL BECLASS A45-A HAVING A 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH OF 4000psi PER SECTION SC-5, PAGE SC-6 OF THE STANDARD
4~ 8'
a" coNC. ~ I I 5PECIFICATIONS
s" BfiICK•~-,-•-,
REINF~RCtNG BAFt 5HALL MEETTHE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
1t~-4" ~ 4~~6n G~iRNER BARS SG3, PAGE SC-3 ~F THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
FRAME AfVG ORIITE8 ~ppEh FRAUE AND GRATES
MICF1p1 4 f .
MEASUREMENTAND PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE PER SECTION
8~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~-op `e ~ ,•e~ v u SG20, PAGE SG~24 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
u
2~ v FRAME AND GRATE ARE 3EPaRATE CONTRACT ITEMS
2„
, l?~ 2u m , 2n "C" 8AR F" ~ gn
8 ~ °F'~ BAR9 N 2~ a~ B°-~ ~ @ 18" CTS.
6~ 8° GT9
c "E° eAAe . 0
2a "B" BARB . ~
' l~ ~ " V r4,~
+ 4a ~o . 4rt iAn BA j ~ t~~
12 CTS. Q T - - N~„ ~ p ~ ~ ' NOTES
2° ~ • ~ 'Q• ~ . m @ 1-~ CT5": : f/ • ; 0 • . . v ' it • 2" -~q 2„ -HE?RIZQNTAL AND VERTICAL QIHEiVBIdNS MAY BE ADJUSTED AS THE
FTELD CONDITIONS AND/OR ALTERNATE DESIGN REQUIRE.
• .CI` Q' .CI' .Sj'.~ ti' -MAXIPAUM HEIGHT Ff}R THIS STRItCTURE IS '(4'-0".
N} C~~12~ S. ~ " M n BAR p~~ ~ -MAKE ALL AD.IUSTMENT5 AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
I gr•prc ~ _ I I,,.~ • ~ Sr_6'° S T
rT r~ -DEPTH OF STEEL GRATE WILL REQIURE DEEPER SEAT ALONG SHORT WALLS.
1FAX. PIPE DIAMETER I$ 18" R.C.P. FdA7C. PIPE DIAMETER IS 36" R.C.P.
SECTIgN X-X SECTIBN Y-Y
~QNCR~TE
TF~RFFI~ BEARING DRIP I9VLE~
FOR CAST IRON D(lJB~E F~Ah~E AND uRATES
SCALEo IILY Rr WtL OCSbeofi0a
NOR~OL.I~ SELr~~ NC
SO(S]"/-~/~~/~ PROPOSED SECONp MAIN ANO STQRAGE YARD
DRAINAGE DETAILS
NORTH CAROLIN HER EPJG I N~ER 1 NGa I ~Co EAST CaRO~i O~~Ci 0! SNC d+4~ [MdICLi1 ~ROLINA RAILROAD COMPAt~lY
HOR 0434 3996DOA H109-Hif2
;AROLINA BUSINESS UNIT ~t~ ~o~-s-493 TB-2005-26
u [ra~tta • otsa~ ~w corsr~,ctaea • ~ruwraca MJS AUGUST 22, 20Q5
cRao raa~ rvcsaa.nooooosEUU.~~.o~y~.a~~or~ rni~..a~ S~{~~T GO-003 0~'

JOHNSTON COUNTY
GENERAL NOTES:
CHAMFER ALL CORNERS 1" OR HAVE A RADIUS OF 1".
PLACE 2 #6 "Y" BARS IN THE TOP OF ALL ENDWALL FOR PIPE CULVERTS 42"
SLaPE AS INDICATED ON PLANS AND OVER WITH A MINIMUM OF 3" CQVERAND A LENGTH OF 6" LESS THAN
ENDWALL LENGTH.
• CONSTRUCT 80TTOM SLAB WITH FORMS.
9"~ u'~ . DO NOT INTERPRET WALL THICKNESS (T} SHOWN FOR THE THICKNESS
4" s' r ~ T- A~ 1 ACCEPTABLE, BUT tS USED IN COMPUTfNG ENDWALL QUANTITIES.
~ ~ WHEN THE C~NTRAGT~R ELECTS TO USEACONSTRUCTION JQINTATTHE BOTTOM
QFTHE PIPE, PLACE BAR "X" DOWELS IN THE BASE AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
SPACE BARS APPROXfMATELY ON 12" CENTERS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED
`v G.S. ~ BYTHE ENGINEER.
1 :1 PIPE
WHEN THE CONTRACTOR ELECTS TO USEACONSTRUCTION JOINTATTHE BOTTOM
_ + n SLOPE
OFTHE PlPEAND PDURTHE BASE SEPARATELY LEAVE THE POUR ROUGH.
c7 3t' REINFORCING BAR SHALL MEETTHE REQUIREMEM'S OF SECTION SC-3, PAGE
.n..~ .r.r~. SC-3 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
PLAN PRE-CAST STRUCTURES MEETING THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS AND TNaSE
OF SECT(aN SC OF THE GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE.
~ ME4SUREMENTAND PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE PER SECTfON SC-20, PAGE
~ ~ ° G M G SG24 ~F THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
s
FOOTINQ
DOWELS IN ENOWALL 4UITH C. 5. PTRE
(IF Ct}NST. JOINT IS USED}
PIPE 3INQLE PIPE QOUBLE PIPE
END ELEV~tTTQN LOC. DTA. !b" 18`+ 24`~ SQa 36~~ 42~~ 48" 15r' 'IB« 24~r 30~~ 38'~ 4$~~ 4$R
BARS N~rr non trXtr nxn uXr~ oXir ~ ~~Xir ~r~, nxrr rrK~r u~u rt~~r u~rr r~~e~ rrxrr Y~.
'j j I I I I C QTY. ~ 2 3 3 4 4 5 ~ 2 ~ 3 4 4 5
~i i_,., I ~ ( I I IU QTY'. - - - - - - 2 - 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Q QTY. Z 2 3 3 4 4 5 2 2 3 9 4 4 8
TQTAL LBS. 9 9 14 t4 19 53 62 12 12 i6 18 23 73 95
aPTYONAL GQNSTRUCTI4N JOINT
DIMEN8ION5 AND CONCRETE GlllANTITIE5
#4-BARS USIN4 CORRUQATEO 5TEEL PIPE
ELEVATIQN SINaLE PIPE DOU6LE PIPE

d H B Ci L YI73 M L YD3
f6n 3~•q.n 1'-1~" 2~-B~~ 5~-O~r b.7 1~-11'~ 6'•11' 1.Q
19" 3~-7'r 1~-10" 2`-11 5+-10~~ 1.Q 2r-3a 8`•1" 1.2
12"
24" 4r-1~~ E~•1" 3~-8" 7r-4" 1.4 3r, Q" 1Q'-4" 1.9
~~°L~' 30" 4'-7° 2'-4M 4~-5n 8'-10° 2.(1 3J-9" 12'-7" 2.T
oowE~ ~~N~R~'~~ ENDt~~kL~ ~~R ~I~t~L BAR-"x" ANA DOUBLE RIPE CULVERTS
SB" b~-1" ^'-7'O 6`-2" iQ`-4" 2.8 4~-E~! i4'-10` 3.8
42`~ 5'-7" 2`-iD" 5`-11" 11`-10' 3.6 S'-3" 17'-1" 5.0
15°f THRU ~8" PIPE - 94° SKEW E~ 48" 6'-1" 3'-i" 6'-8" 13'-4" 4.8 B'-~" 19'-a1° 7.5
CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS
CONCRETE SHALL BE PORTLAND TYPE III OR TYPE IIIA CONFORMING
TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C 150 PER SECTION SC-3, PAGE SC-1
OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
~UNCREI"E MlX SHALL BE CLASS A45-A HAVING A28 DAY COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH OF 4000psi PER SECTION SG5, PAGE SG6 OF THE STANDARD SC~L Ea ~tv Cr Dui OCSCwPtCN
SPECIFICATIONS
- IIIORI~O~I~ SELM~? NC
~~(~'j`/~/~,~~ PROPOSED SECOND MAltd ANA STORAG€ YARD
a DRAINAGE DETAILS
NORTH CAROLI FOR EPdGIWE~ERlWGa 9~Ca ~~T CARO ov?,ec ar r,~ atr twrs~c ;AROLINA RAil.R0A0 COMPANY
HOR 0434 ~ 399600A H109-H112
CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIt ~~F 1°'' 107-t-4973 TB-2005-26
~+cr t~cca . ocsr~.uo eosraun~oxi ..iuwr~oa A4JS AUGUST 22, 2005
uo° °sk' r""say`°°°°°°sE~a"`E~q-°sff"a°~`°`o~'°~ °°`°~s-cg' 5HEET GO-009 06~

~oHn~s~roN cou~Tv
20'-2" TWO PIPES SEE STD. # 838.45 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
3b`-4" 'T'HREE PIPES
jQ~r
c~? 2-V1 @ 1 J-6'r N 2-G2 0R G3 j air
3~Z'~ ~ - '"m STR . FACE 2-nQ~r 2rr 2n
~ j` g.g-~ 2•V1 ~ 9" FILL FACE
L FACE co I 2" FILL FACE 2~~
t
FILL FACE
ti,, ~ ~ 1-Vi STR. FACE
SEE ~ @iI~I~NCJrWALL u}~+~ @ 9er ~ ~ nVu~ 1r.si~
a DETAIL N~ ~ s„PIPE NQT „ „
H2 4'-11" - ~ ~ , ~O' t
/ SHOYUN - H
H3 2'-'10" c' ° ~ ~.Ga ~
a C° 'l~' I I ~ 'l`7' i ~ j 3„ DIA. DRAINS INS Vi @ 1'-6'~ / 8~r 1'-6" nZr~ T4
H BARS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ s,~ AaovE @ .WINQ WALL ~ T _
~.::~y-. • . _ FLOW LINE c
m ~ r ~

CV ~ 74 a
rr = CONST. JT. ~ 2•B32-81 2•N1 8t' 75 @ 6" ~Di gj~
Z2 3'-5" 7 f0 4-Vi @ 9"
23 2~-10rr r 4-N1 FILL FACE SECTION - BB ~ECTI~N - AA
m .«._J
ELEVATION BILL 4F AOATERIAL F08 ENOWALL
TWO PIPE5 10'-ir' 72 OR T3 TOP B07TOM 4„ REINF, STEEL 2 PIPES 3 PIPES
rr~r? ~A~~ 2,-s„ THREE PiPE9 16'-2~' _ T5 @ B" TOP & 60 11 er BAR SIZE LENGTH NQ. ~ETGNi N0. {NCH('
DP & 60TTOM B1 #4 5'-6" 8 29 i2 44
~ ~ 8 SPA. R 9"
"ter GARS IN IN T u`~ M B3 #4 7'-0" 4 y9 $ 8~
T ~ _ ~ I TOP OF FOaTIN4 OaTIN4 + °J ~ PIPE NOT
w SHOWN
o r ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 11:1 ~ ° G2 #7 Y9'-10" 2 81 -
SLOPE ~ Ct3 ,~7 30`-0" - - 2 123
r _ _ Hi #4 7`-2" i0 48 10 4B
H2 #`4 5r-6" 2 7 2 7
X13 ~4 3~-5" 4 9 4 9
I ~h~`~ I ~ ~ ( PIPES ~ ~ ! ~ 5~r
TAPER DETAIL N1 ,~s a~-tiu is ~a. 22 so
1'-1" 4-~ r~8~ 'q ~ iQ'-2"~THREE~-N1
fl PIPES ! T4 Z3 N2 ~4 3'-5" 8 1$ 8 16
N BARS ~a, 7" I I ~ e SPA. @ 9+' r'NR BARS
9 SPA. ~ 9" FILL FACE T2 ~4 24'-8" C3 9S
~ IN BbTTON OF FOOTiN~ ~,.s~~,r 5 - N2 ~ S-V2, 2-V9, 2-V4 Z-VS j3 16r-1" 12 i45
~`8;• , 3'-3" p~N FLE as
2 SPA. @. 2 -6 STR
FACE 2-H1, 1-H3 ~ T4 ~4 B~-8~~ 6 22 $ 27
~ 8PA. @ 1~-3" Cd 1~-3" FILL 4 SPA. @ 1~-Qrr T5 ~4 2~-B~~ $0 134 122 204
FACE 3-N1, 1-H REIhIFt~RGED GQNCRETE ENDI~ALL ~N1, 1-H2, i-H3 ~ V2 9TEi. FACE
H~ 2-V2, 1-V3, 1-V4, 1-V5 V1 #4 7'-3" 12 58 i8 87
~ V2 ~4 5'-10" 10 39 10 39
V3 ~4 5'-0" 6 20 8 2p
FC?R DQU6LE AND TRIPLE 72!' PIPE 9Q° SKEW
H1 lf~ ~`4 3~•2k $ 13 6 13
r~ ch Z2 #5 4`-Q" 6 26 $ 25
T4 Z Z3 ~4 3'-4" 8 13 6 13
5-N1 4-N2
e SPA. & 9" REINF, STEEL L85, ~ 783 14'19
WING ELEVATION corr.lc.s, cu, ms io.~ i3.s
~ CONCRETE SHALL BE PQRTLANU TYPE III OR TYKE tilA CONFORMI'rlr
TO THE REQUIREMENTS OFASTM C 150 PER SECTION SG3, PAGE SG1 SCALE:
OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
~cr st o+~u asaiat~
CONCRETE M!X SHALL BE CLASS A45-A HAVING A 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH OF 4000psi PER SECTION SGS, PAGE SC-6 OF THE STANDARD /VORF~~BC SELMA NC
SPECIFICATIONS ~ ~Q(~T,~/,~R/V PROPOSED SECOND MAI(~ AND STORAGE YARp
REINFORCING BAR SHALL MEETTHE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION NORTH ~AROLI SC-3, PAGE SG3 OF THE STANDARQ SPECIFICATIONS DRAINAGE DETAILS
AROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT SHALL 8E MADE PER SECTION ~pR ~~G 1 NEER I NGo B PIS, EI~ST CAROL
SC-20; PAGE SG24 OF THE STANDARQ SPECIFICATIONS CAROLrfv,4 BUS[NESS UNiT ~R X0434 399600A H109-Hi12
JLF 107-1-4973 TB-2005-26
ar~cc m r~ e~ce t~w+cc +rnnL\i'lrnir, ~,.4., f1.,+.,:i...7..., nH n_/nnnc ~.~~.nn nn• ice iNONct~ ~ ascr.wo caarRUCt~w, •,ut~rra,aa, MJS AUGUST 22, 2005
crag rec~ a:v~s~awooooose~w~~a-a~~aoa~~a~ a~~.e~ SHEEi' GD-DOS OF

JOHNSTOiV COUNTY
Z
~ CONC. COU.AR
N
4 X a OUTLET WIOITCH OUTLET W/D DITCH
A G CLILSS'B` NIP RAP CLASS L HIP FU1P ~ C70NS~' fl~ ~ S.Y~STONSIP RAP
'~I TONS 5.Y. TONS ^°"z•
i2" 2 5 5 2 b Y 4 2 1 4
1~ 16 2 7 7 3 7 1 6 3 2 6
iB 3 10 9 4 10 2 T 4 P 8
ti 24 6 14 16 7 i6 3 ti 7 4 12
12" MfN. 1Z"MIN. DCISTING 72" PROPOSED T1"
CONC. PIPE PROP. CMP - - - - - - - - 80' 8 21 21 11 22 5 16 11 7 17
3 11 28 24 15 30 'r 22 18 10 23
O 3 $2" i5 37 33 20 38 10 28 22 13 30
,pg" 4g ' 2B 50 28 i 7 38
" 80 33 62 36 91 47
- - - - - - - - gp" - T3 40 75 - 44 28 58
- 8T 48 89 ~ 54 32 87
7g" 102 b7 1~4 B4 3B 78
NO?E: 4 7C D
z FOR Cd1L.CULA7I0N PUflPDSES
~ Z4"MIN. 24"MIN. OLA99 '8` RIP RFP a 100 LB3./FTa
N r ~ CLA33 I AIP RAP' = 1D6 L93.fFT3
•S 2xo
ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION B B p 1
a~ i ~ x. f
PLAN
CONCRETE PIPE COLLAR
p ELOPE 1Ye:1 OR FLATTEEi
FOR 72" CULVERT EXTENSTION
~ 2
GENERAL NOTES
T ~ P~wa
USE PIPE COLLAR FOR EXTENDINGF~CISTING CONCRETE FILTER FABRIC
PIPE CULVERTS WITH CMP CULVERTS AT LOCATIONS SHOWN SFGTT_QI~ A-A ~ r
ORAS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
PIPE t}UTLET WITH DxTCH
MFJ~SUREMENTAND PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE PER SECTION pip qqp TQ TOP OF PIPE (1fAX. H ~ D t T) FILTER ,FABRIC.
1g„ ~Lggg I R1p pqp, UVI.ESS OTHERWISE SF[OWN ON PUW& SECTTOM BBB
SC-20, PAGE SG24 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ~2ry ~u+ag ~B~ RIP MP' ua~ss a~awtsE s~wt o~ Pis PIPE OUTLET 4VITNQUT DITCH
CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE FOR RIP RAP A'P PIPE {}UTLETS
CONCRETE SHALL BE PORTLAND TYPE III OR TYPE O(A CONFORMING
TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C 150 PER SECTION SC-3, PAGE SG9
OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE CLASS A45-A HAVING A 28 E3AY COMPRESSfVE
STRENGTH OF 4000psi PER SECTION SG5, PAGE SG6 OF THE STANDARD
SPECfFICATIONS
SCALEa ~tv er ante asaearQa
~~~~-~?~aq~ ' ° PROPQSE~ SECOND MAtN AND STORAGE vaRo
a aRarvacE oEraGs
NORTH CAROLIN 9ipR E~GIP~EERINGe B~Ca ~~Y ~~OLI oFr~ ar rxt air t~ta+ ROLINA RAILROAD COMPAtdY
HDR 0434 p'1°"~ 399600A H109-H112
AROLINA BUSINESS UPdiT ~tF 107-1-4973 TB-2005-26
r t~ca+ • asa~.w casr~+c~ ' aT~N1i~.61y ~JS AUGUST 22, 2005
uoc rn,c~ p:.?,s+x~oooooose~u~~_os~~ao~~a ce~a~.a~ SHEET GD-OOb OF

JOHNSTON COl1NTY
SELMAp 1VORTH T H CAf~OLII V A r ~ M1
D
SIDING EXTENSION AN AUGUST 2 GENERAL INFORMATION AND STORAGE YARD F ~ ~
r
z~ X005 9
'ATION INDEX OF DRAWINGS:
OWNER: NORT \ ~ 2809 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY COVER SHEET
2809 HIGHWOODS BLVD,SUITE 100
~ RALE ,~l ~ ~ DESIGNED BY: HDR RALEIGH, NC 21604-1000 6N-00/ GENERAL NOTES
v -I • T5-00/ TO TS-002 TYPICAL SECTIONS
HDR ENG/NEERlNG, lNC TA-001 TO TA-00& TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
l28 ~ ~ CHAR no4~ ~xorECr rocaTTOrr ~ coNSrRUCr~oN l28 SOUTH TRYON' ST, SUITE 1400 7"A-009 TO TA-0/2 STORAGE TR,4CK PROFILES
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 5004 GP-00/ TO GP-004 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN
(704J 338-b700 OXS-00/ TO QXS-008 DRAINAGE PIPE PROFILES
GD-00/ TD GD-002 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
s~?;xc SUPERVISION BY: NOR SELM ~x liom~tiz X200 ATLA NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY G~'003 TO GD-006 DRAINAGE DETAILS
1200 PEACHTREE STREET XS-00/ TO XS-05! CROSS SECTIONS
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30309 P~ NS RAIL SECTIONS PLAN 2-4 NS NoB TURNIXIT fSGJ
PLAN 2-6 NS NolO TURNOUT lSGI
PLAN 2-7 NS NaJO TURNOUT (RBMJ
PLAM 2-lam NS No.20 TURNOUT
y PLAN 3-7 NS l6'-&" SWITCH p
PLAK 3-7A NS l6'-6" SWITCH (YARD) ~
PLAN 3-32 NS LOW SWITCH STAND
~LEV PLAN 5-3 NS DERAILS
PLAN 6-3. SHEET l NS GRADE CROSSING SIGN
PLAN 6-3, SHEET 2 NS GRADE CROSSING SIGN
PLAN 7-3 ~ NS TRACK SPIKING PATTERN
~ ~
PLAN T-4 NS RA/L ANCHORING PATTERN
~ ~o L J PLAN 7-5B NS ASPHALT CROSSING WITH
EXISTfR T CK RUBBER FLANGEWAY
SIGNAL PLAN NS WAYS/DE SIGNAL DETAILS
i ~ ~r
r SCALE: REV BY GATE OESCWPSIDN
acAT~oN SELMA, NC
SO~~H~RN 71TLE PROPOSED SECOND MAIN AND STORAGE YARD
COVER SHEET
LOCATION MAP
NORTH CAROLIN AROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
ownwc cou aar HD~ 1D Dc34 "~"P 399600A E POST H109-H112
CAROLINA BUSINESS UNIT WN JLF '~E 107-1-4973 RAWWG NUMBER
HDR Et~GINEERINGP iNC. EAST CAROL OFFICE OF THE CHIEF EHGWEE OPERA7WG 01VISION ATE T B- 2 0 0 5- 2 6
FIEF EHGWEER - OE9CN ANO CONSTRUCTION - ATlAHT0.CA MSS AUGUST ZZ, ZOOS ~'V
CA00 FILE p~\nsrr\OOOOOOselma\eng_dsgn\kack\Cv-OOl.dgn SHEET CV-~~~ OF

OP. nd MAIN ' PR z
14'
l~IN.
TORAG 3 PROP. STOF PROP. S E ~ PROp. MAIN FRQF. STORAGE Z EXIST. STORAGE 1
?p' 14+ 14' 14
N T/R PROP, MWN
T/R STORAGE 3 SIR STORAGE ? ' PRO. T/R STORAGE 1 a
~ fr
^ r~ir. r _ - r ~
f R.+ w w r rr+ r ~ a as a 0 ,r ° ` ~a ~ /
f ' ~1 w w w w.. ~ r. r w ~w.i w w+w w r w r w w w M pK Qa wr i r 1 as a ° a s ° 0 n rr ~ ( ~
1 ~ 1q ~ oa ° as a a a a a v a aaa a s a o a 4 a D A°° n n a p° ° a n ° n o a
as a 0 ad a a a vaaaaaaaaa°apaaa a0aaa J a s ..;~.R.~-~ a aaa a o a a a a° a a a ° ° ° ~ q 4 a n ° ° ° ° ~ ° ° 1 n° a°° ° ~ ~
; a a ~ ~ / 401 401 a o as a aava a as a ao pa o a a o a s a ~ a ~ i~
• ` o ~ ~
~ ~ t ~
suRFACE Ex>STING ~ 1 ~
sTORAC~ ~ A5 s1~Owx ~
7't~4AX, 7'tluAx.y ~ ~ ,
~ f
~ ~
PROPOSED 5U88ALLA5T ~ ~ ~~..~.~_-.~r
TWO ~ TRACKS DlTIQNAL TWO AD
PROP. Znd 6dAlN ,
14'
MINI.
PRaP. uAIN P~~, sroRAC~ 7 PROP. sTORACE ~
PROF. STORAGE 3 PROP. STORA
' 2O` 14'
w T/R PROP f~A1N
TIR STORAGE 1
. ~ ~ TiR STORAGE 3 T/R STORAGE 2
.wii rr~ w~ / `
/ ~ ~ L~Aw.r rr r
r w ~ur r~ es ~
/ ~~r .r. ..wi.wr w.r r. .r .r .r. a f r w as as ea° a atl ~w ~ .....w i ° ~ S
/ ` aaa a a e ° °°aaa o a o eea / J ~ ti eaa a s ae a°° a a a s a s ° e
/ a0e o eeoe a aaa eaa ea ° o aqa a° as aaa ° °a°°° n Q 0 1 C „1
/ e a t a s a o a a a a a a s a a ~ 40=1 40'1 a o °a a a aaa aaa i° °a a a° °a a 0 0° °
a oo a ~ / a
~ f 1
\ ~
~ ~
~ 1
` "
PROPOSES Sl1$BAL~ SEO Sl1BBALlAST
ACKS
READ TH E DITIONAl. TR READ HE
p
e REV BY DATE DESCR1PTIpN
OCATION
i
TITLE
GN IA No, AC I~AP IlE PD51
. c 3~ 3996ooA H~o9-H11~ awHwc couP~xY HDR Q 4
wN ILE No. _ _ ~ wwc NUI~aER JLF 107 1 , 973
~ ° a OPERATING p1Y1570N HK ATE MJS AUGUST Z2 2~~5
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER - ESICN AIVD CON5TRUCTION • ATLANTIS GA ~ .F ENGINEER D
CAL10 FILE p~lnsrrlOOOOOOselma\cng,.dsgnttrocl~lTYP 5cC.dga ~ N SNFET TS oo_ of
~
b 0

JoHNSTON couNTY
190
190
z C
180
180
' J 01
~°v a n PROP.SE ND ALAI .
4 m ~n !-J OA2 % _ - - _ - -
PROP. MAIN
~7~
160
160 PROP.2 MAIN /T CS
570 +00 570 *OQ
569 +00
~ fX~Sr R/w ~ ~
~ x ~ ~ \ z X N ` J
--E- TO RALEIGH o ~ . X ~
O CV ~ Of * ~ V1 O C~ COPITRACTOR TO GRADE ~ CONTRACTOR TO GRADE ~
PAO FOR SIGNAL HOUSE a P~ FOR SIGNAL PER ~ a= _ r ~ NS 51GNAL PLAN
0~~1 O•Ni t~i ~ tff ~ u~7 Y t~0 O PER NS 5(GNAL PLAN EXIST_R/W °o,
• u7 Vl Q ~ ~'O C N F
r ~ TO BE UPGRADED ~ ~ o
~z WITH NEW TURNOUT d-~
and vN ~ Sk F- rn~ c9 • N ~
~ ~ a ~ ETLANO UM a w a
~ ~ LIM TS OF PROP. SECOND IJAIN o 0 0 °
NF"~ LIMITS OF Z~ a
Z CONSTRUCTION ~ 9 - i o c7~ucnoN 5700 ° ~U ~ ~.o.c. 5705
OS
N 9 0]N -
4 ~ . - ~ -UPGRADE TO - - t-- - Z
r-, -eyt--- - ~ REPLACE E •-H
PLACE EXIST. •10 T.0 MAIN TRACK ~ ~ `a F
WITH NEW ITH NEW LH •10 T.O. t8Y CONT
(BY NS) o ~ ° Z REPLACE EXIST. •8 T.O ~ v
~ REMOVE •15 TURNOUT Gurve -SECOND MNN-1
Z AND INSTALL NEW •20 pISTA - 5696.00.09 EPLACE EXIST. •1d T.0 N WITH NEW LH •8 T.O.
~ TURNOUT AND SHIFT Delta - 2° 52`56.60" (RT) WITH NEW RH •10 T.O. (BY NS) ~ 0
N EXISTING TRACK D t• Z9' 59.84"
~ (BY NS) T 96.10 APPROX. L0
~ ~ CONTRACTOR TO GRADE n EXIST. R/W OH WIRELINE
n' CONTRACTOR TO GRADE R ~•~3 819.83
PAD FOR SIGNAL PER NS SIGNAL PLAN FRT. 40 MPH PAO FOR SIGNAL PER
r ~ NS 51GNAL PLAN ~
a, PSGR. 45 MPN ~ ~ N O
~ ~ 5 U7 8 P LO E i ANCHOR GUY~~
LEGEND
EXISTING TRACKS
NEW TRACK CQNSTRUCTION 1Q0 ( ` _ _ _ . , - TRACK TO BE SHIFTED
Q 100 2 0 FEET
LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK SCALE: REV 8Y DATE DESCRIPTION
OCATION
. , _ _ _ _ _ _ . - TRACKS TO RETIRE /~~,~~Q`,,/~ SELMA, NC
~O( f'~"~~~/~ T`E PROPOSED SECOND MAIN AND STORAGE YARD
WETLAND IMPACTS
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ~ TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
~ROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
UPGRADE TRACK NORTH CAROLIN RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION HDR ENGINEERINGq INC. EAST CAROLI PROPOSED PAVING OFFICE OF THE CFUEF ENGWEER awNUac ca avr HDR ~o NO. D434 "~Pp 399600A E P05T H109-Hi12
;AROLINA BUSINESS UNIT W" JLF '~E "o. 107_1-4973 wwc Nu~R
OPERAiINC DIVSION K MSS ATE AUGUST ZZ, ZOOS TB-2005-26
EF ENGWEER ~ UES~CN ANO C0HSTRUC7f0N - ATLANT+ti CA
CA~O FILE p~\nsrr\OOOOOOsekna\eng_degn\t~aek\plprtrkOta.dgn SHEET rla-~0~ ~F ~^y~`b~
ry
b~

~ ~ ~ CO Gl
~ p N ~4 ~3 ~ u7 ui ~ u'1 D'1 ~ h,
X90 ~ c ~
4aa v . V.C. rv .
. r•D 99
r~OD4 ~4
PR0.2rrd AIN PRO, nd ,~A11~ rid acv
ti
, ti ~
~g o~ ~ ~ M ~ M r~ ~ ti m
~ rn • M ~ ~ a~ ~ ~
~ 4 ~ w ~
~v ~`iW n N a ~8~ ~ ~ . ~r
~w P P.sEca a Nair
z ~ ~ ~ 0. W ~ 4
c
t• OJ60% f•1 DA38`
m ~n W l-) 20% J 0J60 0.08%
c*~ oaoa,
a
PROP. aN
~7~ 0
~o 5715 94.2
m 24" MP
m
z ~n
J d
a
N ~ PRO 2nd ~tAl !T'AI~Cs
160 '
a
a ca ~ as ~ ~ ~ ~ m
~t ~t ~
~ r• n h f r r..
570 +00 571 +00 ~ ~
M ~ i ~4 /
Curve ~ SECONO MAIN-3
N ~ P! STA. • 5718;23,91
F / m a~ w M M R o 1t. (RT
x Delta 4 37 25,2 y ~ r; r e t
D ¦ 1 45 00.00 N Qs ~
`W°- / m ~ a~y~•~~_ I d' + N T • i32.i8 co ~ ~ 6 4.21
TOR TO ~o r L 2 CONTRAC
0 J r ~ R ¦ 3,274.17 ONSTRUCT ROADBE C ~ . r` . r u~ t,
FT TRACK a e 1.0 AND SHI
M LL^'7 a w ~ rev •s~ur~ ~ FRT, 40 MPH
~~a w ~ ~ z cn r PSGR. • 45 MPH EXIST. R/w ~ DROP INLET rJ
~ ~ ~n ~ EXIST. R/W - . - - - - ~ -~---.---N ~...,.r..._.....,... ~ r .wr....r.....•.. ~ .a..~ V Z
N 1 N N
o o = 0 24' GRADE CROSS `n , ~ ~ ~z. ^'n ,chi a ~ 1`{ ~ O r r • r ri.w • . r......r ~i
O w r r w arra w• aar w •a r ar t~ • ~ . .~r~ i~.na - w ~r 1~
o ~n a ~ UPGRADE N ~ d ~ ~ a d E.. PROP. P OP L.O.C. R N PGRAO To ~ U E o
0 0 PER NS PLAN 58 / cn ~ ~ r N N SEC. MNN M ~ j~ Zq" Cp fBY CONTRAC f m N N C. MAIN r • r STORAGEI
sTORACE3 w r • r 1~
rw • a ,r..• . g ~ STQRAG62
57 5 N ~U • ~ ~a - - - M~ - w ~~r ry 4~ S aGE1 0
i w w w~ r M ar.r , rr O 1.../
N - - ---------~o~--------- - ~ ~ ; z 1 / Curve SECOND MAIN-2 a1 ~ h • r wir W rr wr •wl r.r ~ ~ e ~ STORAGE 3w1 ~ r ¢ Curv
~ ~ IdP AOE TO _ n r ENO ~ ~ N . m ~ ~ PI STA, ~ 5716+40.56
• r •.r r w.wr w aaa- w_ w rrr r w .r r r r r r rw w r • N a+.r • Warr w.wl r an N IuIA~V w
N• M N + a~ Q (Q ~ a 1 tl ~ M D 7 30 00
~ k:, ` /p~' ~ PI STA. • 5711.76.93 v ~
= W~ ~ CROS OVER TO BE REMOVED Oelta - 2° 52' 02.07" (lT) w + o ~ o ~ ~ aaaaox. ~Q~CATION a f Ian ~8Y ) ~ , 47.800 00.00' ~ off e~ cr r ¢ - ¢ co ~ J ~ T ~ 38.31 zacA~coN srua paL~ ~ a o>' ~ ~ ~ ~
X. r ~ A GUY ~ Y IacHaR r• . ~ r ¢ L • 76.55 Irr~~ . r ~
R 764,49 ~ 4r h~. HWFr Q
~ sa.zws~_ ^ / oa ~o L 95.57 ~ . ~ d 4 NON r cn r ~ rw ~
p - ~ ~ R 1.910.08 N ~
r EXIST. RIW a~~w a.
TION / ~Q r / EXIST. R/W ~ FRT. 40 ~ MPH ~~w Q = Z ~ xNM ca
~ a'' ~ a w a aaa w ~ ~ t~
/ / PSGR. - 45 I~H ~ ~F oa ~ o ¢ O
r v ~ a . a N~ pp
CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE TURNOUT o,'i~ z LEGEND AND INSTALL TRACK PANEL W a aF-am Or ~ U1 Nr~
aNN
EXISTING TRACKS
NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION
. M
- - - - - - - - - TRACK TO BE SHIFTED 1 O
•~------r-- LOCATION OF SHIFTED TRACK SCALE 7 ~v er DATA D~sCRIPrIOr~
ocATlarr
TRACKS TO RETIRE
Trt~~
WETLAND IFAPACTS
UMfTS OF CaNSTRUCTION ~
UPGRADE TRACK NORTH CAP.OLINA P. ~ ~ GN ID No. AL t~AP E POST
ownw RIP RAP SCOPE PROTECTION EAST CAROLINA 4 399600A H109-H11~, p~wr HDR D ~4 Dwrru~c cols
wN ILE No. RA4YIhtG NU>~lBER
JLF 1a7-~-4973
~RATWG OIYISION ~qt arE l~~s AucusT 2z, 2005
PROPOSED PAVING HQR ENGINEERINGo INCe ER,, OFFICE OF THE CWEF ENGINEER - OE GWEf~t - OESiGN AND COhS'fRUCTION -ATLANTA, GA
CARD FILE p~\nsrr\004000selmo\eng_dsgnltrocklplprtrkOZa.dgn SyE T TA-00~ E