20171341 Ver 1_401 Application_20171018

W A TF9
O� QG Office Use Only:
+ + 2 0 1 7 1 3 4 1 Corps action ID no.
o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form U(; l 1 g 2017
A. Applicant Information qpE$- A ERRE
1. Processing
Ml7TIN
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes Q No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Brandy Branch Stream Restoration
2b. County:
Henderson County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Mills River
2d. Subdivision name:
MILLS RIVER VILLAGE
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
FLEISCHMAN, HENRY W MORALEZ, JAMES D. JOHNSON, DEBRA DIANNE
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Book 1579 Page 716 Book 1674 Page 225 Book 1543 Page 330
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
314 KINGFISHER LN 294 KINGFISHER LN 282 KINGFISHER LN
3e. City, state, zip:
MILLS RIVER, NC 28759 MILLS RIVER, NC 28759 MILLS RIVER, NC 28759
3f. Telephone no.:
828-xxx-xxxx 828-xxx-xxxx 828-489-2143
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Gregory D Jennings
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Jennings Environmental
5c. Street address:
1209 Blackburn Road
5d. City, state, zip:
Apex, NC 27502
5e. Telephone no.:
919-600-4790
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9631949982 9641041923 9641051140 9641042922
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.38771 Longitude: -82.556956
1c. Property size:
1.89 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Brandy Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -I11
2c. River basin:
French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The area is currently maintained as lawn with most woody riparian vegetation removed from the banks for Brandy Branch. The streambanks are
vertical and bare with many areas of mass wasting. The stream flows in to Mals River approximately 285' downstream of the beginning of the project
area. Brandy Branch receives backwater form Mills River in this area during high flow events
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 460
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project will stabilize eroding banks of Brandy Branch, plant woody buffer and provide more stable riffle sections to improve aquatic habitat.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A boulder toe with vegetated geoli is will be installed on the outside of the meander bends utilizing a trackhoe excavator. Constructed riffles will also tx
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
39
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
Brandy Branch
PER
DWQ
8
149
S2 0
Choose one
-
"
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
'
S5 -
Choose one
-
"
S6 -
Choose one
-
'
3h. Total stream and tributary Impacts
149
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary
O1 _
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other.
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact
Reason for impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary
feet)
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justiflcation and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Disturbed area will be limited to areas directly adjacent to existing eroding streambanks and adjacent to area of constructed riffle. Disturbance of
existing vegetation in other areas will be minimized.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
During construction, the equipment will access stream from areas where slopes are lowest. Areas of bank stabilization will only be disturbed
immediately prior to beginning construction of the rock toe and installation of geolifts. Each area of installation of rock toe and geolift will be completed
prior to beginning the next section.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to ln4ieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
0 Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
There is no increase in impervious surface. Streambank stabilization will reduce erosion and install permanent native riparian buffer vegetation.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
Mills River, Henderson County
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
0Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
ORW
HSession Law 2006-246
[]Other
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
©Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes
® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Standards,
❑Yes
® No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
[--]Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NIA
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
®Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC) Regulatory Review.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH View Tool
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? 7-0
Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
It Is in a FEMA -designated floodplain, however this community does not participate in the Flood insurance program. Therefore, not floodplain permit is
required.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
fris.nc.gov
Z6 -7
Applica gent's Signature
(Agent's signatur valid only if an authorization
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
letter from Ifie applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
MILLS RIVER VILLAGE L023 & 9641041923
LOT NO. PT 22 PHII-A BMSLD-2700 PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: 294 KINGFISHER LN
MILLS RIVER, NC 28759
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
MORALEZ, JAMES D.
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
RACHEL E. SMITH . Of HENDERSON COUNTY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Authorized Signature
Date: Date:

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
MILLS RIVER VILLAGE L024
LOT NO. PHII-A BMSLD-2700
PARCEL ID: 9631949982
STREET ADDRESS: 314 KINGFISHER LN
MILLS RIVER, NC 28759
Please print: FLEISCHMAN, HENRY W
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
RACHEL E. SMITH , of HENDERSON COUNTY SOIL $ WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: Date:

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
MILLS RIVER VILLAGE L022
LOT NO. PHII-A BMSLD-2610 PARCEL ID: 9641042922
STREET ADDRESS: 282 KINGFISHER LN
MILLS RIVER, NC 28759
Please print: JOHNSON, DEBRA DIANNE
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
RACHEL E. SMITH , of HENDERSON COUNTY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: Date:

BRADY BRANCH STREAM RESTORATION
294 AND 314 KINGFISHER LANE, MILLS RIVER, NC - HENDERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT DIRECTORY
LAND OWNER
ENGINEER JENNINGS ENVIRONMENTAL
GREG JENNINGS, PHD, PE
919.600.4790
[e-mail]
SHEETINDEX
TITLE SHEET
1.0
PROPOSED PLAN
2.0
CROSS-SECTIONS
3.0
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
4.0
ROCK TOE WITH SOIL GEOLIFTS
5.0
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
6.0
CONCEPT PLAN FOR
PERMITTING AND REVIEW AUGUST 25, 2017
i
�r :
OCT 1 8 201
Z Q
OZ
J C
0� of �
OUzi.—
w�°w
= O z d
Uzco
O
Z
Q wQ
of w 0 J
CD>zD_
a� w
Q J CO
a
J
w
w
_ (n
iw
F-
H
<
e

+00

BRADY BRANCH RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION (TYP.)
FLOODPLAIN
PROPOSED 700 GRAM COIR EROSION
CONTROL MATTING, SEE DETAIL
WIDTH VARIES PER PLAN
7.0 FT
PROPOSED BKF WSE 0.8'
PROPOSED CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT
FLOODPLAIN.
- FLOODPLAIN
BRADY BRANCH POOL CROSS-SECTION (TYP.)
WIDTH VARIES PER PLAN
9.0 FT
*-%—PROPOSED BKF WSE — — — — — -- r— —
1.8'
POINT BAR I
PROPOSED CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT
- FLOODPLAIN
3:1
Z Z
O—
� J (7
OUZO
w�0w
=0p°
UZcf)U)
Z
Ww0g
m>_z(3-
w 'o
b co
J �
J
I0
1!-.
i ("')
U)
z
O
w
U)
U)
O
U

POOL RIFFLE POOL
Q
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
DETAILED PLAN
POOL RIFFLE POOL
PROPOSED BANKFULL WSE
RIFFLE SLOPE
GLIDE VARIES PER PROFILE P.C.
_L --
BASE FLOW WSE
M.P.—
EXISTING EARTH --Z
OR FILL MATERIAL
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
DETAILED PROFILE - SECTION A - A'
M.P.
EXTEND RIFFLE MATERIAL
INTO GLIDE MIN. 3.0'
NOT TO SCALE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
NOTES
1. THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE IS A RIVER RESTORATION DESIGN FEATURE THAT
INCORPORATES COARSE MATERIAL IN THE CHANNEL BOTTOM THAT WILL NOT BE
MOBILIZED UNDER BANKFULL FLOW CONDITIONS. REPLACING (OR ADDING TO) THE
NATIVE CHANNEL BED MATERIAL WITH LARGER DIAMETER ROCK CREATES A RIFFLE
THAT FUNCTIONS AS A RIGID GRADE CONTROL. LARGER ROCK MATERIAL
ENHANCES FLOW DIVERSITY AND TURBULENCE UNDER BASE FLOW CONDITIONS,
WHICH PROMOTES AQUATIC HABITAT AND RE -AERATION OF STREAM FLOW
BENEFITING WATER QUALITY. THE D50, Das, D90 OR D100 PARTICLES OF THE
CONSTRUCTED MAY BE DESIGNED TO RESIST TBKF WHILING ALLOWING SMALLER
SUBSTRATE PARTICLES TO BE MOBILIZED AND REPLACED BY UPSTREAM SEDIMENT
SEDIMENT SUPPLY.
2. ALL CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE QUARRIED STONE UNLESS NATIVE
MATERIAL OF SIMILAR SIZE IS AVAILABLE ONSITE AND MEETS THE CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE SIZE SPECIFICATIONS. THE ENGINEER MUST APPROVE THE USE OF ALL
ONSITE NATIVE MATERIAL.
3. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF 40% NC DOT CLASS A ROCK,
40% NC DOT CLASS B ROCK AND 20% ASTM #57 OR CRUSH AND RUN. THE ROCK
SIZES SHALL BE BLENDED TOGETHER ONSITE WITH ADDITIONAL EARTH UNTIL WELL
GRADED. THE ENGINEER MUST APPROVE THE GRADATION AND BLEND OF ALL
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MATERIAL.
4. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM COARSE MATERIAL
DEPTH OF 1.0 FT.
5. FOR INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVER EXCAVATE THE RIFFLE A
MINIMUM OF 1.0 FT, INSTALL 700 GRAM COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
KEY MATTING INTO THE RIFFLE TRENCH AND BACKFILL WITH THE SPECIFIED
COARSE RIFFLE MATERIAL TO THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED
PROFILE.
6. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 3.0 FT U/S OF THE
P.T. INTO THE GLIDE AND D/S TO THE P.C.
7. P.T., P.C. AND M.P. ELEVATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED PLAN AND
PROFILE SHEETS.
ELEVATION POINT DESCRIPTION
POINT
POINT DESCRIPTION
P.C.
POINT OF CURVATURE, TAIL OF RIFFLE
M.P.
MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH
P.T.
POINT OF TANGENCY, HEAD OF RIFFLE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
COIR 700 GRAM
KEY MATTING INTO
COARSE MATERIAL
„
.T.
RIFFLE MATERIAL
MINIMUM DEPTH = 1.0'
NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
DETAILED XS - SECTION B - B'
SELECT RIFFLE MATERIAL
40% NC DOT CLASS A
40% NC DOT CLASS B
20% ASTM #57
NOT TO SCALE
117
w
J
LL
LL
It

7
A x x
x x
BANKFULL STAGE x x x x x % x x -A Y. A A % ,L %
x %
x x x x
SOILGEOLIFTS� - -
LIVE CUTTINGS
HIGH DENSITY LIVE STAKING
x
A
x x
TRANSITION
INTO RIVERER BANK
NKK
%
X /
Y.
% % X BOULDER TOE
% yl PROTECTION
% % yi X LAYER OF LIVE
to Y, v BRANCHES (TYP.)
BOULDER TOE PROTECTION WITH SOIL LIFTS NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED PLAN
ANCHOR GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LIVE STAKES SPACING = 2.0 FT O.C.
IN 6" DEEP TRENCH
LIFT SETBACK = 2.0 FT
SOIL BACKFILL (TYP
LAYER OF LIVE BRANCHES
AND TOPSOIL (TYP.)
DIAMETER VARIES
11 ��UFT HEIGHT= 1.0 FT (TYP 112- TO r")
LIVE BRANCw
2 X2 X18
WOOD STAKE (TYP.)
=
��
700 GRAM COIR EROSION
CONTROL MATTING
a
r
9
SELECT GRAVEL BACK
FILL FOR FIRST SOIL LIFT
J
I -HEADER BOULDER BASE FLOW WSE
UNDISTURBED GROUND
OR PREVIOUS FILL
-BOULDER SETBACK = 1.0 FT
f
FOOTER BOULDER
EXCAVATION
LIMITS
/
I
ALL VOIDS ARE TO BE FILLED
/ , " / / / / / / /
WITH SELECT BACK FILL
5 `T BOULDER TOE BEDDING COURSE
50% NC DOT CLASS A
50% NC DOT CLASS B
BOULDER TOE PROTECTION WITH SOIL LIFTS NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED CROSS-SECTION A - A'
BOULDER TOE PROTECTION WITH SOIL GEOLIFTS
NOTES
1. A 1.5 FT THICK BEDDING COURSE CONSISTING OF WELL GRADED 50% NC DOT CLASS A ROCK AND
50% NC DOT CLASS B ROCK SHALL BE INSTALLED BELOW THE BOULDER FOUNDATION UP TO THE
ELEVATION OF THE STREAM BED.
2. FOOTER BOULDERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING STREAM BED
SUCH THAT A 6 FT - 8 FT WIDTH FOUNDATION IS CREATED. BOULDERS MAY BE MINED AND
REUSED ONSITE. FOOTER BOULDERS SHALL BE 3.0'X 3.0'X 5.0'+/- 0.5'.
3. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ATOP THE FOOTER BOULDERS. ALL BOULDERS SHALL
FIT TIGHTLY TOGETHER. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 1.0 FT SETBACK FROM
THE FRONT EDGE OF THE FOOTER BOULDERS. BOULDERS MAY BE MINED AND REUSED ONSITE.
HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE 3.0'X 3.0'X 5.0'+/- 0.5'.
4. GRAVEL LEVELING BASE SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE THE HIGHEST ELEVATION OF THE
FOUNDATION BOULDERS BEFORE THE SOIL LIFTS ARE INSTALLED.
5. THE SOIL BACKFILL USED FOR LIFTS AND TOPSOIL USED FOR LAYERING WITH THE LIVE
BRANCHES SHALL BE FREE OF ANY LARGE ROOTS OR WOODY DEBRIS AND SHALL GENERALLY BE
FREE FROM ANY GRAVEL OR COBBLE MATERIAL.
6. SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED SUCH THAT FUTURE SETTLING WILL BE KEPT TO A
MINIMUM; YET, NOT SUCH THAT THE UNDERLYING BRUSH IS DISPLACED OR DAMAGED.
7. THE TOP OF THE BACKFILL FOR THE FIRST LIFT SHALL BE SLOPED AT APPROXIMATELY 5% AWAY
FROM THE STREAM.
8. PLACE A LAYER OF TOPSOIL AND LIVE BRANCHES ON TOP OF EACH SOIL LIFT SUCH THAT
APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES TO 1 FOOT OF EACH LIVE BRANCH WILL BE EXPOSED AND THE
REMAINDER (2' TO 4') OF EACH LIVE BRANCH WILL BE COVERED BY THE NEXT SOIL LIFT.
9. LIVE BRANCHES SHALL BE OF THE SPECIES SPECIFIED FOR LIVE STAKES OR APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER.
10. PLACE A LAYER OF 6.5 FEET WIDE GEOCOIR DEKOWE 700 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, OR
EQUIVALENT, ON TOP OF THE TOPSOIL AND LIVE BRANCHES SUCH THAT 2.5 FEET OF THE
BLANKET WILL BE BURIED BELOW THE NEXT SOIL LIFT. ALLOW THE REMAINING 4.5 FEET OF
BLANKET TO HANG OVER THE PRECEDING SOIL LIFT OR COIR FIBER LOGS.
11. PLACE A LAYER OF 6.5 FEET WIDE NON -WOVEN COIR MATTING OVER THE EROSION CONTROL
BLANKET TO THE SAME LIMITS.
12. SOIL CAN BE COMPACTED BY STACKING A PIECE OF 2 X 6 SAWN LUMBER EDGEWAYS UP TO THE
LIFT HEIGHT SPECIFIED IN THE STRUCTURE TABLE AND SECURING WITH WOODEN STAKES TO
PROVIDE A RIGID BACKSTOP FOR COMPACTING SOIL LIFT.
13. PLACE SOIL BACKFILL UP TO THE LIFT HEIGHT SPECIFIED OF NO GREATER THAN 1.0 FT BEING
CAREFUL NOT TO PUSH/PULL OR TEAR THE FABRIC PREVIOUSLY PLACED.
14. THE TOP OF THE SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE FLAT WITHIN THE LIFT SETBACK DISTANCE SPECIFIED
IN THE STRUCTURE TABLE. BEYOND THE LIFT SETBACK DISTANCE, THE SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE
SLOPED AT AN APPROXIMATE 5% SLOPE AWAY FROM THE STREAM.
15. TOP DRESS THE SOIL LIFT WITH TOPSOIL FROM THE FACE OF THE SOIL LIFT BACK INTO THE
FLOODPLAIN AT LEAST 4FT.
16. REMOVE THE SAWN LUMBER AND WOODEN STAKES FROM THE FACE OF THE SOIL LIFT AND WRAP
THE FACE AND TOP OF THE SOIL LIFT USING THE WOVEN AND NON -WOVEN COIR MATTING
HANGING OVER THE PREVIOUS LIFT/COIR FIBER LOGS.
17. THE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC SHALL BE PULLED AS TIGHT AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT TEARING OR
EXCESSIVELY DISTORTING THE FABRIC.
18. SECURE THE EROSION CONTROL AND NON -WOVEN MATTING IN PLACE BY STAKING THE END OF
THE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC WITH WOODEN STAKES ON 1.5 -FOOT CENTERS.
19. BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEXT SOIL LIFT BY REPEATING THE PREVIOUS NOTES STARTING
WITH NOTE 11.
20. THE OVERALL SLOPE CREATED BY THE LIVE BRUSH LAYERING SHALL MATCH THE PROPOSED
CROSS SECTION SHAPE FOR THE OUTER BANK OF THE THE TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION FOR
EACH REACH.
21. THE COIR BLANKETS AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC USED FOR THE UPPER MOST SOIL LIFT WILL BE
SECURED WITHIN A 6 INCH DEEP TRENCH AS SHOWN IN DETAIL. TRENCH AS SHOWN IN THE
DETAIL.
22. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON
THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE
GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
23. RE -DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED
FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL
TO CONSTRUCTION.
Z Z
O-
� Z
OVD;,-
V) C)w
�
=00Oa
U Z U)
Z
W Q
cl� J
m�0 zD-
}
Of W c
J co
J
mg
ll-.
ild�l
I-
W
W
co
W
J
H
H-

EROSION CONTROL MATTING
DETAILED PLAN
6" MIN. HORIZONTAL
OVERLAP
6" MIN. VERTICAL
OVERLAP 2'
(TVPI
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NOTES
1.
EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS USED TO PROTECT RECENTLY
A
CONSTRUCTED STREAM BANKS FROM EROSION. THE MATTING WILL
0 ❑ ❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
2.
BEFORE INSTALLING COIR FIBER BLANKET, RAKE SOIL LEVEL AND ADD
a p
❑
O
700 GRAM COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE PLACED
>Q-
2.5' (TYP)
4.
SECURE COIR MATTING IN PLACE BY STAKING AND OVERLAPPING AT
THE SEEMS WITH A SHINGLE -TYPE METHOD SUCH THAT THE
1O
N
O
❑
O O
1 ❑ ❑ ❑
lod
❑ ❑ ❑
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NOTES
1.
EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS USED TO PROTECT RECENTLY
A
CONSTRUCTED STREAM BANKS FROM EROSION. THE MATTING WILL
REMAIN INTACT WHILE THE BANK AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION MATURES,
PROVIDING CRITICAL BANK PROTECTION.
2.
BEFORE INSTALLING COIR FIBER BLANKET, RAKE SOIL LEVEL AND ADD
SEED, FERTILIZER, LIME AND MULCH.
3.
700 GRAM COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE PLACED
ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE NEW CHANNEL FROM THE TOE OF SLOPE
OUT TO A MINIMUM OF 3 FT BEYOND THE BANKFULL ELEVATION.
4.
SECURE COIR MATTING IN PLACE BY STAKING AND OVERLAPPING AT
THE SEEMS WITH A SHINGLE -TYPE METHOD SUCH THAT THE
OVERLAPPING PIECE IS IN THE SAME DIRECTION AND AS THE STREAM
FLOW. ADDITIONAL STAKING SHALL BE APPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR
AT NO ADDITIONAL COST IF THE MATTING SEPARATES FROM THE SOIL
MORE THAN ONE INCH UNDER A REASONABLE PULL.
NOT TO SCALE
SUPPLEMENT WOODEN STAKES
WITH 12" ECO -STAKES
'-700 GRAM COIR FIBER MATTING
700 GRAM COIR
MATTING --\\
3'
BANKFULL
KEY INTO EARTH
MIN 0.5'
'--2' LONG 2" x 2" WOOD STAKES
6" MIN. HORIZONTAL w/ 3" GALVANIZED ROOFING NAIL
OVERLAP Z LONG 2" x 2" WOOD STAKES AT THE TOP TO SECURE MATTING
w/ 3" GALVANIZED ROOFING NAIL
AT THE TOP TO SECURE MATTING
EROSION CONTROL MATTING NOT TO SCALE EROSION CONTROL MATTING NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED STAKING PLAN DETAILED CROSS-SECTION A - A'
0
F_
w
w
U)
w
J
H
H
d
Q

191
280
S MILLS 91V£R R�
2
O
o w Mitts River Bridge
a
O �
0
a
p v �
R
u t WES&?>
JEFFRESSRD Jones Cern O
Oak Hill
Court `
CLEMENT DR
191
o
ti a, f
CO RD 1416
i}
O�
2 j
s a
o >;
-D7 -Do -OJ
SCALE 1:24 000
10.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
0.5 0 1
MILES
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.
A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.19
32'30" :%1
r'� NORTH��_��- ,,,111
L .!L,CAROLINf r
QUA DRANCLE LOCSTIOA
I Enka
1 2 3 2 Asheville
3 Oteen
4 5 4 Dunsmore M01.
5 Fruitland
6 Pisgah Forest
6 7 8 7 Horse Shoe
8 Hendersonville
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES
BRANDY BRANCH STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
USGS SKYLAND, NC 2016
1:24,000 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
HENDERSON COUNTY N
SOIL & WATER Legend
11111111111111111110 ,00800 0 1,000 2,000 STREAM_BRANDY_BR
Name
. i.
-Constructed Riffle
Feet
-Rock Toe w/ Lifts

To Toxaw�
silt loam
DeB Delanco
(dillard) loam, 2
to 7 percent slopes
FROM NRCS SOIL SURVEY: This data set is a digital soil survey and generally
is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by
compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by
revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information. This data
set consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data.
The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed,
field verified inventory of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a
repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is
optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the
mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to
significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to
attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which
gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.
Prepared using official NRCS Toolkit Software
All
DeB Delanco
j (dillard);loam12
to 7 percent slopes
COne Map. NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, INC 911
Board
BRANDY BRANCH STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
Soils Map
HENDERSON COUNTY N
Legend
SOIL & WATER CLASS NRCS Soil Survey
— wS-III MUSYM
30 15 0 30 60 STREAM_BRANDY_BR DeB
Name Ro
. �.
-Constructed Riffle To
. Feet " w
---RockToew/Lifts 10/11/2017

LNISN
app., *f
yILDA L'N'- - -�._-..
CLEMENTO�
�''y F
� b w,
G r _
O O
ir
AilFil! G� � •� .
Q' q
9�
' � • Z m oma' ��°°:�o ti tiF
t� Oyes m kl14
92
USDA N'RCS-NG',CE
BRANDY BRANCH STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
VICINITY MAP
HENDERSON COUNTY N
SOIL & WATER Legend
RD—CLASS
— BOULEVARD
540270 0 540 1,08p 0 SITE — COLLECTOR
INTERSTATE
Feet Streets LOCAL ROAD
• • • , •
4 n/4 4 1-4 THOROUGHFARE 7

r
a
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
httpv//www.fws.goy/nc-es/es/counlyfr.html
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN 1000 -2018 -SLI -0001
Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-00003
Project Name: Brandy Branch Stream Restoration
October 03, 2017
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website:
htips://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cniylist/nc_counties.html. The AFO website list includes
"species of concern" species that could potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and
endangered species in the future. Also available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
httos://www.fws.aov/asheville/htmis/Droiect review/Recommendations.html
Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/ llant/plant_survey.html
Northern long-eared bat Guidance
haps://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/proj ect_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html
Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
htWs://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/Maxent/Maxent.html
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of

10/03/2017 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-00003
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be
requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at hUps•//www fws gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/assessment_guidance html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at:
htip://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/­­pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
hUps://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-servicesZj2erinits/eagles ). Wind energy projects should
follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenugyl) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
1

10/03/2017 Event Code 04EN1000-2018-E-00003
http://www.fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
htW://www.towerkill.com; and
hU://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentB]rdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
■ Migratory Birds
■ Wetlands

1;); i3; 2017 Event Code 0wE+`v1i)+)i)-2018 E-0000:?,
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

0 10/03/2017 Event Code: 04EN 1000-2018-E-00003 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2018-SLI-0001
Event Code:
04EN 1000-2018-E-00003
Project Name:
Brandy Branch Stream Restoration
Project Type:
STREAM / WATERBODY / CANALS / LEVEES / DIKES
Project Description:
The project is located on Brandy Branch, a tributary to Mills River. It
includes approximately 170 linear feet of streambank stabilization,
constructed riffle installation, and riparian buffer enhancement in a
residential area. The area is currently maintained as lawn with very little
wooded buffer. The banks are vertical and eroding. The stream is
continuing to migrate laterally causing erosion to the adjacent
landowners. There is a high input of alluvial sediment to Mills River, a
water supply watershed from Brandy Branch.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps:
https•//www google com/maps/dace/35 387690597729595N82 55702486331631 W
Counties: Henderson, NC

�7w,nt C,)dn POFWOOO-0013-E-00003
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on
this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species
that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list
because a project could affect downstream species. See the "Critical habitats" section below for
those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's
jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hhttps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2657
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecl2/species/6329
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https•//ecos.fws.goy/ecp/species/9045
Clams
NAME STATUS
Appalachian Elktoe Alasmidonta raveneliana Endangered
There is final designated critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
Species profile: haps•//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5039

Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-00003
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Bunched Arrowhead Sagittaria fasciculata Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1720
Mountain Sweet Pitcher -plant Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws,gov/ecp/species/4283
Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.goy/ecp/species/1890
Swamp Pink Helonias bullata Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hhnps://ecos.fws.gov/ecl2/sl2ecies/4333
White Irisette Sisyrinchium dichotomum Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/eci2/sl2ecies/8097
Critical habitats
There are no critical habitats within your project area under this office's jurisdiction.
4

vent Code: 04F_N1000-2018-E-00003
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actr.
Any activity that results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless authorized
by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servicer. There are no provisions for allowing the take of
migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured. Any person or organization who plans
or conducts activities that may result in the take of migratory birds is responsible for complying
with the appropriate regulations and implementing appropriate conservation measures, as
described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
MIGRATORY BIRD INFORMATION WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN THIS SPECIES LIST WAS
GENERATED. PLEASE CONTACT THE FIELD OFFICE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.

Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-00003
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
■ PF 1A