20090023 Ver 1_Application_20090108

T

.?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTN Mr David Baker
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir
?
#4Rt
IAN 8 4
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
090023
Subject Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13 & 33 for the proposed
replacement of Bridge No 72 over Mud Creek on SR 1137 (Crail Farm Rd /
Middleton Rd) in Henderson County, Federal Aid Project No BRZ-1137(3),
Division 14, TIP No B-4545
$240 00 debit from WBS 33759 1 1
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No
72 over Mud Creek on SR 1137 with a 32-foot X 10-foot, 3-sided precast (arched
bottomless) concrete culvert There will be 0 005 acre of temporary surface water impacts
and 64 linear feet of permanent surface water impacts from bank stabilization No
mitigation is warranted for these impacts
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), permit drawings, and
design plans for the above-referenced project The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion
(PCE) was completed on January 16, 2008, and distributed shortly thereafter Additional
copies are available upon request
This project calls for a letting date of September 15, 2009 and a review date of July 28,
2009
MAILING ADDRESS
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
January 5, 2009
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
WEBSITE WWW NCDOT ORG
LOCATION
2728 CAPITAL BLVD
SUITE 240
RALEIGH NC 27604
±t.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Websrte at
http //www ncdot org/doh/preconstruct/pe/ If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call Bill Barrett at [phone]
Sincerely,
Gregory J Thorpe, PhD
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
w/attachment
Mr Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (2 Copies)
Ms Marella Buncick, USFWS
Ms Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Mr Harold Draper, TVA
w/o attachment (see permit website for attachments)
Dr David Chang, P E, Hydraulics
Mr Victor Barbour, P E , Project Services Unit
Mr Greg Perfetti, P E , Structure Design
Mr Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr J B Setzer, P E, Division Engineer
Mr Mark Davis, DEO
Mr Jay Bennett, P.E , Roadway Design
Mr Mated Alghandour, P E , Programming and TIP
Mr Art McMillan, P E , Highway Design
Mr Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Greg Blakeney, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
2
Office Use Only: Form Vernon March 05
20090023
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(it any particular item is not applicable to this protect, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" )
1. Processing
1 Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2 Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested NW-13 & NW -33
3 If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here ?
4 If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here ?
5 If your protect is located to any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here ?
II. Applicant Information
1 Owner/Applicant Information
Name Gregory J Thorpe, Ph D , Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address 1598 Mail Service Center
Telephone Number [phone] Fax Number. [phone]
E-mail Address wabarrettna ncdot gov
2 Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant )
Name.
Company Affiliation
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
E-mail Address
Fax Number
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format,
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided
1 Name of project Replacement of Bridge No 72 over Mud Creek on SR 1137 (Crail Farm
RD / Middleton Rd)
2 T I P Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only) B-4545
3 Property Identification Number (Tax PIN) N/A
4 Location
County Henderson Nearest Town Hendersonville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number) N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc) from US 64 in
Hendersonville, take US 25 south to SR 1127, take SR 1127 south to SR 1137, take SR 1137
to crossing of Mud Creek (site)
5 Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody )
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum) -82 48 ON 35 28 °W
6. Property size (acres) N/A
7 Name of nearest receiving body of water Mud Creek, Class C Water
8 River Basin French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated mayor river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http //h2o enr state nc us/admm/maps/.)
9 Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application Bridge No 72 is a two-span, one-lane bridge that was
Page 2 of 9
constructed in 1963 The bridge is 31 feet long and approximately 16 feet wide The existin
g
deck is 12 feet above the creek bed The existing roadway at the site is gravel and will
reamin a gravel surface at the completion of the project The area to the south of Mud Creek
is Rich Cove Forest, the area to the northeast is Laurel Rock Acres golf course and the area
to the northwest is pasture/agnculture
10 Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
Bridge No 72 will be removed and replaced with a pre-cast arched bottomless culvert The
Standard bridge demolition techniques and equipment will be utilized The entire bridge is
constructed of timber with steel girders Therefore the bridge will be removed without
dropping any components into Waters of the U S
11 Explain the purpose of the proposed work The purpose of this project is to replace Bridge
No 72 with a precast arched bottomless culvert NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records
indicate Bridge No 72 has a sufficiency rating of 53 6 out of a possible 100 for a new
structure The bridge has a higher than expected sufficiency rating and structural appraisal
from the addition of an interior support bent The bridge is considered f inctinally obsolete
due to deck geometry of 3 out of 9 according the FHWA standards The superstructure and
substructure of Bridge No 72 have timber elements that are 43 years old which have an
increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by reasonable maintenance
activities
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Protect Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable) If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T I P project, along with
construction schedules N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this prolect9 If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application
N/A
Page 3 of 9
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the protect Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e g , culvert installation should be listed separately from
nprap dissipater pads) Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet
1 Provide a written description of the proposed impacts There will be 0 005 acre of
temporary impacts associated with the installation of the culvert, and 64 linear feet of
permanent stream impacts from the placement of nprap along the bank downstream of the
culvert
2 Individually list wetland impacts Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
s arately list impacts due to both structure and flooding
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e g , forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3 List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts Be sure to identify temporary
impacts Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e g , cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc ), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560
Page 4 of 9
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Inter
suttent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
I Mud Creek permanent P 59 64 0 019
1 Mud Creek temporary P 58 35 0 005

_
T I
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 99 0 024
5 Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U S ) Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6 List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U S resulting from the nrotect
Stream Impact (acres) 0 024
Wetland Impact (acres) 0
Open Water Impact (acres) 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U S (acres) 0 024
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) 99
7 Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property9 ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet) Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE
8 Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application
Pond to be created in (check all that apply) ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e g, dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc )
Page 5 of 9
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e g, livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc )
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond
Size of watershed draining to pond
Expected pond surface area
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts A bottomless culvert will be
utilized at the site to avoid and minimize nnpacts to the stream substrate The standard Best
Management Practices (BMPs) and the BMPS for Bridge Removal will be ahered to
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H 0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to reducing the size of the project, establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams, and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http //h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands/strmgide html
1 Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to site location (attach directions
Page 6 of 9
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e g, deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed
The installation of an arched, bottomless culvert and the placement of nrrap along the
stream banks are not considered to be loss of Waters of the U S therefore NCDOT proposes
no mitigation for the 65 linear feet of permanent stream impacts There are no Water Supply
(WS-I or WS-II), HOW or ORW being impacted
2 Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http //h2o enr state nc us/wrp/index htm If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet)
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres)
Amount of Non-npanan wetland mitigation requested (acres)
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres)
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2 If yes, does the protect require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation
Yes ® No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project The applicant must also provide
Page 7 of 9
justification for these impacts in Section VII above All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B 0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B 0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B 0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B 0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )'? Yes ? No
2 If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers
Zone* I Impact Multiplier I I Required
I 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 15
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel, Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1
3 If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i e,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund) Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B 0242 or 0244, or 0260
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level The roadway grade of the new structure will be
approximately the same as the existmg_grade The roadway will not be paved and will remain a
gavel surface. As such, additional unpervious surface will not be added
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 8 of 9
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes E] No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality9 Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http //h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands If no, please provide a short narrative description
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e g, draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
On January 11, 2008, NCDOT biologist re-evaluated the project area based on the design plans
which included the actual footprint of the project The project footprint contains no habitat for
any of the protected species listed for Henderson County The biological Conclusion for all
species is No Effect
CC I
a>n 5. Zoc/
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided )
Page 9 of 9

/?-I\1 /rI `t B
\ iB, ( 26 25
\ 64
\ O 7B0 `
\ 280
%
\ ,I
A6 \
(611 /
JACKSON COUNTY
SITE
Q
25 Y

1280 \ Oakshire Ln
\ n
1281\
°?
l
\ F B-4545 PROJECT

127,6

i
' MIddleto
I
?
1136 1137
t
i
Tenerlffe
Mtn '
-- 1299 i

-?;II?\.. a5a

VICINITY MAP
N. C DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HENDERSON COUNTY
PROJECT: 33759.1.1 (B-4545)
STREAM IMPACTS BRIDGE NO 72 OVER MUD CREEK
VICINITY MAP ON SR 1137 (CRAIL FARM RD/
MIDDLETON RD.)
SHEET I OF I 11/17/08
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
1 DANIEL RAVENEL JR 68 Broad St Charleston, SC 29401
2 THE BROCK ARMS LIVING TRUST 662 Middleton Rd Flat Rook, NC 28731
3 FRED G SHEALY TTEE 709 5th Ave. West Hendersonville, NC 28739
4 PAUL M. GOODEN 3010 Peanut Plant Rd. Elizabethtown, NC 28337
LENNA S GOODEN

0
O W
W A ?
C) F p , ?' U

V)
0 ll?

0:
Z
.,
+ a4
z m
W
-1- z o
O M c+Ua C
O z H A
O U
® A

?
z
r
`

U ?, C7 v?
O E-
z
go ®

v ?
L C
> >
} o
v L
Z ?
_U
L
v
CL
a? D
I- }
w
O > L
_
F-
0 (A
LL u)
LL-
m m Q
mO J.0
w° L -
O U
Nw a> ± '-
J
Y =? c? Y L - O
F
Z Q
5 +- Z
Q
0 - CIO O C

i i Ln
LCL CD r-
-
+- oo
if
0) F-
c + +
N O (n (n
o ? -j LU W
L c
> >
t o
v L
Z cD

Ern
m °o
z
w
i
a
?
a
F
Z to Q N

N
C C U CL Q
ct
H M N '
CL
EH cn Cl Z m
u U x z

y O
' O O O a
Q' M
E t5 C Z Z U n
o

N u? c

E coo v
co "

0 `;' T
a o m O
3
w w
v
t5
E CD
z
? a
H E °
° o
o
N
m
s
m a
m E °
o o
0
N y
a

V
rn
D
IL 1O m

W C
N

a C
f0
U
«
C
,
c
m C
N N
)
g U
~
W d c v
>

g
W
W y
E C cc to
(D LrL
C M
C
C
N
LL
m
a
r
>
m
d T o
.-
x :3
U

2 x
co
2 M d
N
m m. E
N a
o
m
°v
co
of o
m E
Co 12
0
LLL
rn
t
O
r
e

m O ?
J
i Z
O

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No B4545
State Project No 8.2953001
W B S No 33759.1.1
Federal Project No BRZ-1137(3)
A Project Description
The purpose of tins project is to replace Henderson County Bridge No 72 on
SR 1137 (Crail Farm Road) over Mud Creek The replacement structure will
consist of a precast arched bottomless culvert, 32-foot wide by 10-foot high The
culvert size is based on preliminary design information and is set by hydraulic
requirements This structure will be of sufficient length to provide two 9-foot
lanes with 7-foot shoulders on each side The roadway grade of the new structure
will be approximately the same as the existing grade The roadway will not be
paved and will remain a gravel surface
The approach roadway will extend approximately 180 feet from the northwest end
of the new culvert and 20 feet from the southeast end of the new culvert The
approaches will be widened to include a 22-foot gravel roadway width providing
two 9-foot lanes, 2-foot shoulders will be provided on each side (7-foot shoulders
where guardrail is included) The roadway will be designed as a Rural Local
Route with a 35 mile per hour design speed
Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction (see Figure 1)
B Purpose and Need
Bridge No 72 is a two-span, one-lane bridge that was constructed in 1963 The
existing bridge is 31 feet long and approximately 16 feet wide The existing deck
is 12 feet above the creek bed
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate Bridge No. 72 has a
sufficiency rating of 53 6 out of a possible 100 for anew structure The existing
structure has a higher than expected sufficiency rating and structural appraisal
from the addition of an interior support bent. The bridge is considered
functionally obsolete due to deck geometry of 3 out of 9 according to Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) standards and therefore eligible for FHWA's
Bridge Replacement Program
The superstructure and substructure of Bridge No 72 have timber elements that
are forty-three years old. Timber components have a typical life expectancy
between 40 to 50 years due to the natural deterioration rate of wood
Rehabilitation of a timber structure is generally practical only when a few
elements are damaged or prematurely deteriorated However, past a certain
degree of deterioration, most timber elements become impractical to maintain and
upon eligibility are programmed for replacement Timber components of bridge
No 72 are experiencing an increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer
be addressed by reasonable maintenance activities, therefore the bridge is
approaching the end of its useful life
C Proposed Improvements
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the
project
Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing)
a Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c Modernizing gore treatments
d Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e Adding shoulder drains
f Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g Providing driveway pipes
h Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
1 Slide Stabilization
1 Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2 Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a Installing ramp metering devices
b Installing lights
c Adding or upgrading guardrail
d Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e Installing or replacing unpact attenuators
f Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h Making minor roadway realignment
1 Channehzing traffic
J Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazards and flattening slopes
k Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1 Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
3 Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings
' a Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
• repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
0 Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4 Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities
5 Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas
6 Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of
right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts
7 Approvals for changes in access control
8 Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic
9 Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users
10 Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for protected bus traffic.
11 Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predommantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12 Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No protect development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13 Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remedratron
guidelines
D Special Project Information
The estimated costs, based on 2008 prices, are as follows
Structure $ 234,000
Roadway Approaches $ 69,350
Detour Structure and Approaches -0-
Structure Removal $ 8,250
Misc & Mob $ 49,600
En & Contingencies $ 75,000
Total Construction Cost $ 436,200
Ri ht-of-wa Costs $ 6,250
Utilities $ 98,400
Total Project Cost $540,8
50
Estimated Traffic:
Current - 200 vpd
Year 2030 - 300 vpd
TTST - 1%
Dual - 3%
Accidents: Traffic Engineering has evaluated a recent three-year period and there
were no accidents occurring in the vicinity of the project
Design Exceptions: Roadway Design Engineers are proposing a 35mph-lane
width and vertical curve design this project
Bridge Demolition: The superstructure of Bridge No 72 is constructed with a
double 2"x 10' timber floor, on a continuous steel girder floor-beam system The
substructure consists of timber abutments with End Bent No 1 on a concrete sill,
and the interior bent is composed of a timber cap, timber posts and a timber sill
Both the superstructure and substructure will be removed without dropping
components into the Waters of the United States during construction
Alternatives Discussion:
No Build - The no build alternative would result in eventually closing the
road as the existing bridge completely deteriorates
Rehabilitation - The bridge was constructed in 1963 and the timber
materials within the bridge are reaching the end of their useful life
Rehabilitation would require replacing the tunber components winch
would constitute effectively replacing the bridge
4
Offsite Detour - Bridge No 72 will be replaced on the existing
alignment Traffic will be detoured offsrte (see Figure 1) during the
construction period NCDOT Guidelines for Evaluation of Offsrte Detours
for Bridge Replacement Projects considers multiple project variables
beginning with the additional time traveled by the average road user
resulting from the offsrte detour The offsrte detour for this project would
include SR 1136 (gravel), SR 1123, and SR 1127 The majority of traffic
on the road is through traffic The detour for the average road user would
result in 6 5 minutes additional travel time (2 9 miles additional travel)
Up to a 10-month duration of construction is expected on this project.
Based on the Guidelines, the criteria above indicate that on the basis of
delay alone the detour is acceptable Henderson County Emergency
Services along with Henderson County Schools Transportation have also
indicated that the detour is acceptable NCDOT Division 14 has indicated
the condition of all roads, bridges and intersections on the offsrte detour
are acceptable without improvement and concurs with the use of the
detour
Onsite Detour - An onsite detour was not evaluated due to the presence
of an acceptable offsrte detour
Staged Construction - Staged construction was not considered because
of the availability of an acceptable offsrte detour
New Alignment - Given that the alignment for SR 1137 is acceptable, a
new alignment was not considered as an alternative
Structure Type The current structure is a bridge built in the 1960's The
reason for building a bridge was not because a culvert would not work but
because the design, materials and labor were not practical m the time
when this structure was built A culvert has been determined adequate
from a hydraulics standpoint There are no special resources such as trout
or mussels present Because a culvert is less than half the cost, twice the
life expectancy, and virtually no maintenance in comparison to a bridge, a
culvert is the preferred structure type
Other Agency Comments:
The N.C. Wildlife Resource Commission in standardized letters provided a
request that they prefer any replacement structure to be a spanning structure Mud
Creek is listed as Class C waters on the 303(d) list of unpaired waters The
NCWRC also stated that an effort should be made to prevent further degradation
of the stream and avoid impacts to the tributary approximately 30 feet
downstream of the existing bridge, as well as other waters in the project study
area
Response: At a smaller stream crossing, it is more econonucal to replace bridges
with culverts Culverts cost less than bridges, require less maintenance throughout
their service life than bridges, and last longer than bridges Therefore, where
appropriate NCDOT prefers to use culverts to replace bridges As there are no
protected resources at ilus site, the proposed culvert will be designed according to
current NCDOT design practices The culvert will bottomless to facilitate fish
passage, and placement to minimize channel widening and realignment
E
There are no surface waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water
Supplies (WS-I or WS-II), or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) located
within 1 mi of Bridge No 72 over Mud Creek Mud Creek is included in North
Carolina's 303(d) list of impaired water bodies The cause of impairment is
turbidity resulting from agriculture and urban runoff/storm sewers
The Tennessee Valley Authority stated in Scoping Meeting comments that an
approval under Section 26a of the TVA Act would likely be needed for the
project.
Response: NCDOT will provided TVA with a copy of the signed document
NCDOT will further coordinate with TVA to determine if permits will be
warranted for this project
Public Involvement:
A letter was sent by the Location & Surveys Unit to all property owners affected
directly by this project Property owners were invited to comment Comments
were received from property owners in the area Their desire is to have a design
that will maintain the character of the area and will have muumum to no impacts
on the human and natural environments
Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II
actions
ECOLOGICAL
(1)
(2)
Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource?
Does the protect involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur9
YES NO

X

6

(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? a
X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
Permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures

to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? ?
X
(5) Will the project require the use of U S Forest Service lands?
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
Impacted by proposed construction activities? X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water
Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? X
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? X
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (UST's) or hazardous matenals sites? X
PERMITS AND COORDINATION YES NO
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)? X
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
Resources? X
(12) Will a U S Coast Guard permit be required? ?
X
(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing
Regulatory floodway? X
(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
Changes? X

SOCIAL, ECONOMIC. AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO
(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area? X
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or
Business? X
7
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or

low-income population? ?
X
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the

Amount of right of way acquisition considered minor?
X ?
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control9
?
X
(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property? X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,

therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? a
X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic

Volumes? ?
X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? X
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
Environmental grounds concerning the project? X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws

relating to the environmental aspects of the project? ?
X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
Eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic X
Places?
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are ?
Important to history or pre-history? X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
Historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U S Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
Recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act ?
of 1965, as amended? X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for ?
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? X
F Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway
Administration, and the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office met on
October 30, 2007 to discuss the effect of the Flat Rock Historic District, which is
listed on the National Register of Historic Places It was determined that the
construction for this project has "No Effect" on the Flat Rock Historic District, as
shown on the attached concurrence form for the assessment of effects FHWA
has made a De Minimus determination based on SHPO's concurrence of no
historic properties being affected by the project
(Left Blank Intentionally)
9
G CE Approval
TIP Project No B4545
State Project No 8.2953001
W B S No 33759.1.1
Federal Project No BRZ-1137(3)
Project Description
The purpose of this project is to replace Henderson County Bridge No 72 on
SR 1137 (Crail Farm Road) over Mud Creek The replacement structure will
consist of a precast arched bottomless culvert, 32-foot wide by 10-foot high The
culvert size is based on preliminary design information and is set by hydraulic
requirements This structure will be of sufficient length to provide two 9-foot
lanes with 7-foot shoulders on each side The roadway grade of the new structure
will be approximately the same as the existing grade The roadway will not be
paved and will remain a gravel surface
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification
TYPE II(A)
X TYPE U(B)
Approved.
at Br i de miec l7evelnnment F
/ /6 X-18
Date
Date
For Type II(B)
/49 o-Z
Date
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Project

& Environmental Analysis Branch
ect
ect
& Environmental Analysis Branch
10
W'" Federal Highway Administration
PROJECT COMMITMENTS:
Henderson County
Bridge No. 72 on SR 1137
over Mud Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1137(3)
W.B.S. No. 33759.1.1
State Project No. 8.2953001
T.I.P. No. B4545
All standard procedures and measures, including NCDOT's Best Management Practices
for Protection of Surface Waters, Guidelines for Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal, will be implemented, as applicable, to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts The following special commitments have been agreed to by
NCDOT-
Division 14 Construction:
In order to allow Emergency Management Services (EMS) time to prepare for road
closure, the NCDOT Resident Engineer will notify the Director of the Henderson County
EMS at (828) 6974728 of the bridge removal 30 days prior to road closure
In order to allow Henderson County Schools to prepare for road closure, the NCDOT
Resident Engineer will notify the Transportation Director at [phone] of the bridge
removal 30 days prior to road closure.
Structure Design Unit:
Approval under Section 26a of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Act will be
determined A copy of the approved Programmatic Categorical Exclusion document will
be provided to TVA and the Structural Design Unit shall further coordinate with TVA if
permits are required.

Greensheet Page 1 of 1
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Document
January, 2008
a
i
/L1138 i V
spyi
2145
2144
2143
215
1283

d, '"'?-n49
2150
^
1
!137 1138
150 ? ,
J
115 1151 12
oil
/
1281 I'
113 114 0`a 1269 1264 J ,
? of
1
-
bttn 12631 1
Ta6e
1143 i 1
$ S J /
j
1 2 1137 `O 1 2 J'
1274 ,
?
2i
288 ?
1 8 '0 4A u I
I ? 127 2105 /I
?
/ 1141 1277
'
1279 1275
126f ,
1127
1137 2139 a/

?osanr 1245 / 1282 .1 1261 '
ametery 1127 1278
^ 1280 5p, /ate
1138 * / 1281 1137 1285
1276 '
{ Is 2101 1136 Air, -
1127 PTant 1123
n? 2102 /
? 2149
2123 _
11 6
s
2118
2124
2117 $ 2113 /
' \n5
2122 /
re
it a/ ??ne Ch
STUDIED DETOUR ROUTE
Sy
C NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
'
4 TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
HENDERSON COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 72 ON SR 1137
OVER MUD CREEK
B-4545
Figure 1
37

36
Tamwft Mtn
\
10 1299 1285
b? 1137
2137 4 as
1123
i0 2100 1123
`
8 2136

123 V `

r

1124 I

a
Federal Aid #BR7-1137(3) TIP #B4545 County Henderson
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description Replace Bndge No 72 on SR 1137 over Mud Creek
to On 10/30/2007, representatives of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Admunstratron (FHWA)
[ North Carolina State Histonc Preservation Office (BPO)
? Other
Reviewed the subject project and agreed
There are no effects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
? There are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
? There is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on
the reverse.
? There is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
Signed:
"mjrvj?? 10 yo zoO
Representa 0 , N OT Date
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date
Representative, HPO Date
tv- • U7-
State Historic Preservation Officer Date
Federal Aid #BRZ-1137(3) ?7P #B-4545 County. Henderson
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect Indicate if property is
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).
Flat RDcIL H i4mic 'Dis4-ticf CNk? - nD e 4iJ
as P10 ,,,,s s6wn ?oJ3o f zoo:?

Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).
Initialed. NCDOT FHWA HPO at
b?+ 5e...1? d r 5 ffPv GCn L4t??•.•.c.? f• t i10 n • s tfr , ? ?. _? t t',T.'"?S
ell

at

$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$DGN$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$USERNAME$$$$ 09/06/9°
TONTIMCT TIP PROJECT: B-4545
0 0 0
N A N N ~, A
0 O U N ? .
n ° T N
m o o Z° 9
Z° H y O `- N IO l^
o p o o z 1 to
H z
Z: co) o
N S \? c
copi
° ° ° 0 S (?11 m 14?i a
y moo D ?L o b m o N
Ila
II II II II II II m C'
C.) C4 p z 0 w
c N A°° O O a m °RR v a \ A ?n
r v 2e 3Q a rD r
c°
Z w. - - I
-i r m Vt
y0 m r Cz
F ?
m
G) O
= O
o g
> C ?__ ? C Cln
p H _ RD Z I? 0-4
n II I* C
W o / .? !V n w
r?
?V ®?
H SO
3 b N
m N N
?' a ?' ? A m y 1 T i ? ? ? b
a g 1 w 1 C ?I C/? I-4
14
1 ?
b ? ? a i ? i ? p0 ? C 7C ? ??
?? a !?y 8 i r 1 ?? x
a0 oG z'?1? SDI col)
1z to n
131 y ? ? .?
V
0
p o
y b
?cl z C
z
I'll A
x
b b O
?a
Ohl
o s $' a Cn
xx ?M A
?y ?z m
" ?R
F?

m

r tti?(i\ `
n \
r
l
I
L1 r?
?\
??-
y
\
O
M1\
t
C"
^ O
fl
? ,?\ •\
't??
r c .,? ?O

^rW. w?aw+llu raro?J-
m
?m Cm
sr-
Z M z
?O? DOS \
?m r,)m
LA (A M Ej)
Z ?
m E3 \ s
0 D-0 \ '\\
mo m?
m= ?-4
D D N
nm?
z
D cr- /

In'
V
O

.
rTj
rn ?n '
- I'
?- ? cIS
(3
\\
III
r
} fl
S
2

I !I F
,

i'•
z F
0
-
p {

? + 7
c
°^
S' m
N
ri
` O
l
z
i
I
t !i I

\

?s? ? __ I 7
S
I I
v
I
- x
l?9i
'
11
/ i I ? 111
r
? dpl RA y / W
a
- III
I ?
I j
"zil

?L^ 4? ? \
y Z ? ? 4^i
_

c

o m -
°

o
n ,
,_
4

mr 0
1 1 -U?
?nl
A ,r
y+ J
(11 - n
- m I \ NZO \?-'\
i r ? \ \\\.? ? ?_ M?INLEINFPJILY( J 'J-.+'''-z"?'?'r?,rlt?z.?'
•y?.11?lf•?LIr',J?L)^Lr^4-,'l?\ _' _. _ _ - _ _L _ ?_ r _ _ _ - ._ - - -- _.
\ \ `MLf N _ _ _ -
YO RA
57 55 41 W 141
S'?? ?
5,11 8- 3? 4 19
12
y O 48 WSW 258W
c s0
I W
x im,c "a, ao J p e
3 ? p ^? ti + x
O m? t ++ I d
r
m
N `
4 LA n _V
All u 7
nn U U tn
n r,?
C
ort7 i O
< Or V ja ?pil+ I C 11 ;
.DI
`?rm ??a00 t 1, I `l
• n mr ? +
"y41a
P °, ? 7 a^ ?' Ill '3
On
N ?no?-I I ? 1
'F ? IT1 r? o? ? j
a ??m I i `t
-'?' uunuuN ?
f mf r$11o 1
r
a
+ f
a ? 41 t
?r-..? O f I
/5 f
? f
]N _? oo oe
t? ? - v _ _ u. 8? hS ZS
?i+ ? Mgt _--
WQSi
_ It o 11
m-n
r r ?rt .J r
t Z r ?r r 41
?i 11(A n LA U,
4
i Nm n y f'
N n n? vp
r m
? Ap wr Nrn ?
C 0 11 p
1 O0
"t S
POr l +3fB?

T>
c
l ?` ? nsa
f f I l ] t3
( ?/ t ? I?r / j , `ter J t
PF r
rY
. /t 4
R Y
m
I)
m
m
(.TI
O
I
F-
0
n
F
m
1

X
v
S
x
z> b
(
(j?
?z "r € = gy m
0 0

z
M U) @
Si r
0

N N ? ? _N N N ? ? NI N N N N o NI N
I / I N
I
I
I

I I
I

I

14
°

N I
I I I
I
I D.
N
I I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I

N
° I

1 I
I

I I ?
I

I
A
N
i I
I I I
ni I
1 I ?I I
A I
cnl
Z L
?? N 9
I W
N
. A
p l N \ (/1
0

0 0
rn
j? o
\
0*) LO 1 J I N
Co

1 O 0/
N
N
0
(? I p? ?II

0
'
L ` pp I wl 9
N p, °

, F0 I
o I o
O O I c O
N
IN
O
I
^'
I
?
?
to N
I O ^-' ° + of O +o +
° ?- O I (7 ap 1
I Ul I o
I o 00 o C SOD
I 0-4 <
< o
O I o

N o
t O o O o
N
o
t ? i ?° < o
I o
o o
I I

I / I

o ? cn1 ? I I
Op ` I

N NI ? I ti
I O f I ?, cn
p
p

I 0
N
o
N I N
o I ) I ? g
A
N I

I
I
I
I I

I
A
N
I I
N
N
O I I °
s? gn I I °

N
N zt-
3 30
I I

I
I
N
N
z ? I I N
A A
? I I I s,
ro o
o a ? m

oz
I
?
w m
r
N xy I I I a? a i

v I I I c O
o ' I
J I I
N
14

N

ro

o

N

%

N

N

'

N

N

N

'
I

I N

N
N
X

J

=
°,
u
i
20-NOV-2008 14 43
r \roadwoyy\ roff\b-4545_rdy-tsh dgn
$$$$USERNAM?$$$$
C0

? V' ? N tNJ?
1 ^
' m
x

n
' O
i N N y
o O o 0

0
"' S S

'
II II II
11 u II
0. C4
A
C 0 0
°
M
a
C.) {
x •
O m
O
O
og b
? y
w
N
II II '?
O o
A
0 0
3 ?
n I
.9
N
a m
O a
Z N
Z
H O
o
z
m c
m n
0
m C
v
O ?
m
y
W
fR
x
m
v
v
P.D_
?'Fr 4 Rr
y?

H
Rf
(C ? t
c ° ' b

? N K E e

b

p
E d o =G?a
Z V+ q
;K
Y

v

2 V
m
F
? h

b
y ?
'4 O
. x
x
e ?'°n w
r•
o I ?
?y
I
Im I
Im I
1V4
Inl
IPI
IYrI
IDI
I?I
I I
I?I
I I
I I
I I
N
Z
5
n
O
m
v
TIP PROJECT.- B-4545
CO)
?. y
~r
O ?
y

C03 b
+ V
O
d
y
V1
o ?
Z
O i •
s
F R
l IC
O
t?
Raj O
_x
V
N
O
V
? b^b
C7 O
h
w
V
0
h

24
cn z
o
C)
C)

m
a
(? a
a

a

V1
V

i .
.1 1 .