Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020761_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection_20171011:. ROY COOPER r Governor MICHAEL S. BEGAN .Secretary Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN Environtnentttl Quality Director October 11, 2017 Mr Justin Shell Town of North Wilkesboro P O Box 218 North Wilkesboro, NC 28659 RECEIVEDINMENWR OCT 16 2017 SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Water Quality Town of North Wilkesboro Permitting Section NPDES# NCO020761 Wilkes County Dear Mr. Shell: On September 26, 2017 a Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) was performed by Jim Gonsiewski Mr. Justin Shell and Mr Scott Perry were present for the inspection The purpose of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the Town's pretreatment program, which includes reviewing the files, POTW plant performance, industry monitoring data, and adherence to the enforcement response plan (ERP) Background This is a 2.0 MGD permitted facility The City has two (2) Significant Industrial Users, and both are categorically regulated per CFR 433. POTW Interview There are no plant problems related to pretreatment issues and there are no NPDES permit limit or monitoring violations recorded from January 2017 through July 2017 Additionally, the facility is well operated Pretreatment Program Elements Review The Headworks Analysis (HWA) was approved on September 24, 2013 The next HWA is due July 31, 2018. The Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was approved on July 27, 2012 The next IWS is due on October 31, 2017 The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on April 30, 2012. The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was approved on November 24, 2003. Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) was approved on April 6, 2015 No ng Compares---i-,- State ompa s. -i,.. -State of North Carolma I Environmental Quality 450 W Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 1 Winston Salem, North Carolina 27105-7400 336-776-9800 I STMP File Review The Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) is being conducted at the proper locations and frequencies Industrial User Permit (IUP) File Review A review of the file for Gardner Glass Products (#0001) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and compliant. A review of the file for Johnston Casuals, Inc. (#0002) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized, and compliant. The slug control plans for Gardner Glass Products (#0001) and Johnston Casuals, Inc. (#0002) were in good order Action Items No action items were noted The pretreatment program is considered satisfactory. Mr. Shell implements the pretreatment program in an excellent manner. If you have any questions please contact Jim Gonsiewski or me at (336) 776-9800 Sincerely, ��%S�herri V. Knight, PE Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ — WSRO cc: PERCS Unit — Monti Hassan Central Files WSRO Files 1 2. 3 4. 5. 6. ' NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT YraterResnurct=s ...NIROh•^'IYTA!. U4.T.i T Control Authority (POTW) Name:-- 6 tx,` A C?F U -0 C,*V\� VQ Pti � Vcs E Q rC-) Control Authority Representative(s)-:37ZA S + r in 5 V\Q l Title(s).''z `Lct "�� v� �C3 O C'`aGi C� ��ir``� r� nC,t Last Inspection Date: Inspection Type (Check One): ❑ PCI ❑ Audit Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ❑ YES ❑ NO Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ❑ NO Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ICIS CODING Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY I N I Q 1 0 1 0 1,-3, 10 11 1 6V 7 Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)? 8. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP? 9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 11. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? � 12. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? () 13 Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule? 14. Number of SIUs on Schedules? 15. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)? f 16. Number of CIUs in SNC? POTW INTERVIEW 17 Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? 18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased Sludge Production, Etc )? If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed9 19 Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pui 20, Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division9 21. Are Any Permits or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which Ones9 ❑ YES JSa NO ❑ YES JW NO Limits Reporting - dished: ❑ YES JJ1 NO LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW: 22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies9 CE -YES ❑ NO 23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? 2 -'VES ❑ NO 24 Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? g -YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? g-I'fS ❑ NO 25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? [ S ❑ NO Division Inspector, please verify yourself. 26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations /Z 27. Should any Pollutants of Concernbe Eli min ed from or Added to LTMP`/5 ❑ YES O If yes, which ones? Eliminated: `4 'a Added: 1 �, 28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in' their files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Pro am Info• Program Element Last Submittal Date Ip file? Last Approval Date In file Date Next Due, If Applicable Headworks Analysis A (o f Y,1 (3 es ❑ No G'[ -fes E]No `7 -V Industrial Waste Survey S) No ❑ Yes 07 ❑''Yes [:1No 1 l- Q Yes E]No 7 3i Sewer Use Ordinance SUO 1 I 9 -`res ❑ No D'Yes ❑ No Enforcement Response Plan RP t(/ e� ❑ No I 11 3 ' 19 -yes ❑ No to Permit Issue Dates Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) 1 ')r— Yes ❑ No % es ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION) 29. User Name 1`4 " e S 2 �,n ���i 'IF 30. IUP Number D C) (i `' 31. Does File Contain Current Permits es El © es 1:1 N— No ❑ Yes 07 32. Permit Expiration Date `l f '3 i,° -a.0 11 33. Categorical Standard Applied (I E 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A 34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior es ❑ No El ��lo ❑ Yes ❑ No to Permit Issue Dates 1 ')r— 35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year? ® Yes ❑ No es El No El Yes ❑ No 36 a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan9 a. es ❑No a. ❑Yes DX'o a. ❑Yes []No b If No, is One Needed9 (See Inspection Form from POTW) b ❑Yes ❑No b. []Yes o b. []Yes No 37 For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic :Wes❑No❑NIA ❑Yes❑No ❑Yes❑No❑N/A Organic Management Plan (TOMP)9 38 a Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division? a QYds ❑No a. es ❑No a []Yes []No b. All Issues Resolved? b ❑Yes❑No /A b ❑Yes❑N.MN< b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete D.Yes ❑ No es ❑No ElYes ❑ No its Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow? 40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-CustodyForms? Yes [I No []'es El No ❑Yes E] No 41 During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its ❑Yes❑NoQN//A 1 ❑Yes❑No[PWA 11 ❑Yes❑No❑NIA 1 Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow 11 41b During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports ❑Yes❑No � ❑Yes❑NoQ�VA ❑Yes❑No❑N/A on time 11 42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does 0Yes0No5R ❑Yes❑NoE7A_ 11 ❑Yes❑No❑N/A file includeprocess/dilution flows as Re uired b IUP? 42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, toes file include ❑Yes❑NoQ A ❑Yes❑No ❑Yes❑No❑N/A production rates and/or flows as Required by IUPC 43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify Iqo [- es-8Hio ❑ Yes ❑ No All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sam lin 9 43b During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify ❑Yes opN/A ❑Yes❑NoMM/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A All Re ortin Non -Com Nance from SIU Sampling? 44 a Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self- a.0Yes❑Nopji'1A a.❑Yes❑No /A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A Monitoring Violations? b Did Industry Resample and submit results to PCTW Within 30 Days b ❑Yes❑NoRDF/A b ❑Yes❑NoUXA b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware c ❑Yes❑No[;aPd7A of SIU limit violations m the POTW's sampling of the SILT? c ❑Yes❑Nolte c ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNCL LEI Yes No ❑ Yes E1,Ko 11 ❑ Yes ❑ No 47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken ❑Yes❑No A ❑Yes❑NopN/A❑Yes❑No❑N/A as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)? 48 Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices? ❑Yes❑No[, X/A ❑Yes❑Na� /A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection? ❑Yes❑Nop /A ❑Yes❑Nopi/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 50 a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders9 a.❑Yes❑Nogpl/A a.❑Yes❑NoQN/A/ a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b Is SIU lri Compliance. with Order? b ❑Yes❑No A b ❑Yes❑No❑3dfA b ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 51 Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes t No ❑Yes ❑ Requested Information For Your I NC DWR Pretreatmrnt C'.mmnhnnra TncnPetinn (P( Tl Pnrm TTnrintPA TIPrPmha ')f11A Pang I FILE REVIEW COMMENTS: T INDUSTRY INSPECTION ICIS CODING: Main Program Penmt Number MM/DD/YY 1. Industry Inspected: 2. Industry Address: 3. Type of Industry/Product: 4. Industry Contact: Phone: 5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO 6 Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly9 Comments: A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO Industrial Inspection Comments - OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS: Comments: Requirements. Recommendations: NOD: ❑ YES ❑ NO NOV: ❑ YES ❑ NO QNCR: ❑ YES ❑ NO POTW Ratins: Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory a p PCI COMPLETED BY:DATE: i 0� r c l r