20171223 Ver 1_401 Application_20170917

amec ,%
foster
wheeler
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 27703
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: Ms. Karen Higgins DATE: September 27, 2017
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting
Branch 0 1 7 1 2 2 3
512 North Salisbury Street PROJECT NO.: 6252-17-0318
Raleigh, NC 27604 PROJ. NAME: Continental Automotive Morganton Plant
Expansion
SUBJECT: NWP 39 PCN Application
WE TRANSMIT TO YOU: M HEREWITH UNDER SEPARATE COVER
SUBJECT: ACTION: SENT BY:
®DRAWINGS ❑FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑MAIL
❑SPECIFICATIONS ®FOR YOUR COMMENT OR APPROVAL ❑CERTIFIED MAIL
❑CALCULATIONS ❑RETURNED FOR CORRECTION: RESUBMIT ❑EXPRESS
❑REPORT ❑APPROVED AS NOTED []COURIER
❑COST ESTIMATE ❑AS REQUESTED ®HAND DELIVERED
❑AS NOTED ❑FACSIMILE:
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
4 9/27/2017 Nationwide Permit #39 PCN Application
.SFP 4 6 2017
CC:
includtn2 transmittal
d
.
P ' 7 2017
eOn4 a"WA _ R SOIJRCcc I
- JiL��J �-1 ��Y�Z, It►_�
h5sh Witherspoon
Senior Ecologist
Direct Phone: [phone]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible
for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal
Service. Thank you.
If transmission is not received in good order, please call Josh Witherspoon at [phone]
Documents Form Reviser! 10/ l8/OJ

c� Office Use Only:
'- Corps action ID no.
c DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
Q
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Section 404 Permit
or General Permit (GP) number:
❑ Section 10 Permit
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
© 401 Water Quality Certification -- Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No
❑ Yes
❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
© Yes
❑ No
or in -lieu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
❑Yes
Q No
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
Q No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Automotive Morganton Plant Expansion
_Continental
2b. County: L Burke _ - -- -
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Morganton
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: ! N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Continental Automotive, Inc. - ,a
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Deed Book 911, Page 2089
3c- Responsible Party (for LLC if UU
applicable): ` N L 7 2017
,
3d. Street address:_ _ 1830 MacMillan Park Drive__
3e. City, state, zip: Fort Mill, SC 29707
3f. Telephone no.:
L 36 Fax no.:
3h. Email address -
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Q Other, specify: Continental Automotive employees
4b. Name:
David Jones - Plant Manager / Jim Egner - Environmental Manager
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.
4d. Street address:
1103 Jamestown Road
4e. City, state, zip:
Morganton, NC 28655
4f. Telephone no.:
828-584-5672
4g. Fax no.:
--_—�_
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Josh Witherspoon
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Amec Foster Wheelerr
5c. Street address:
4021 Stirrup Creek Drive, Suite 100
5d. City, state, zip:
Durham, NC 27703
5e. Telephone no.:
919-381-1402
5f. Fax no.:
919-381-9901
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1782463981
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.71632385 Longitude: 81,74948120
1c. Property size:
39.810 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Silver Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Catawba (HUC 03050101)
_
3. Project Description y
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing project site consists the existing Continental Morganton Plant building, parking and paved areas, maintained lawn areas, and
undeveloped forested land. The area surrounding the site includes 1-40, commercial and industrial development, and undeveloped land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3400
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the the proposed project is a 95 X 730 foot extension along the west wall of the existing plant. See attachment A for additional details.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Typical contruction equipment including excavators, dump trucks. etc may be used. See Attachment A for and construction drawings for details.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ect includi all rior hases in the st?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: NCDWR stream determination made August 2017
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
NCDWR determined the existing drainage feature along the west side of the proposed plant expansion was an intermittent stream during a site
inspection in August 2017. Documentation from NCDWR has not been provided. The USACE has not make a jurisdicitonal determination to date.
5. Project History
_
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans_
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary —
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams – tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
w
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 P
Fill
UT to Silver Creek
INT
Corps
3
297
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 (
Choose one
Choose one
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
297
3i. Comments:
Proposed underdrains to be placed in the drainage feature will result in 297 linear feet of intermittent stream impact.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then Individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1 -
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
_
4g. Comments:
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
58.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
59. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
Si. Expected pond surface area (acres).
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑X Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
Bi -
Yes/No
B2 -
!
Yes/No
83 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i: Comments: Project site is not located on the Catawba River mainstem or on any mainsteam lakes in the Catawba River Basin.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project was designed to avoid impacts to the intermittent stream channel to the maximum extent practicable. Due to the location of the stream
feature and site design constraints, additional avoidance and minimization is not practicable. Impacts to wetlands have been completely avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Double silt fence has been installed along both sides of the stream feature. All areas at final grade will covered with seed or sodded within 7 days of
construction completion. Water trucks will be used as needed during construction for dust control.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):X❑
DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
297 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
41'. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: The project is not on the Catawba River mainstem or on any of the mainstem lakes of the Catawba River Basin.
Page 7 o€10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes Q No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.99%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The proposed project is considered tow density based on the City of Morganton Code of Ordinances tow Density definition.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenfs jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
E]Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs applyHSession
ORW
(check all that apply):
Law 2006-246
❑Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? I
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
I. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
© No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
©No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWG Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
i
The existing facility is served by a sanitary sewer system. The proposed plant expansion will connect to the extisting sanitary sewer system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in cr no:r an area with federally protected species or Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes []X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaQ website and the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Natural Heritage Database
Search Interactive website.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
htip:l,'www. habitat.noaa.flov/protection/efhlhabitatm apner.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, fed,;ral or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation Yes No
El
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
N.C. Dept. of Cultural Resources, State Historic Presorvation Office (SHPO) interactive website (HPOWEB).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
Q Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
j A minimal amount o(fdl material will be placed within the outer limits of the 100-year floodplain fringe. No structures will be constructed within the
100-year floodplain. The proposed fill material has been approved by the City of Morganton floodplain manager.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodmaps. FEMA'FIRM number 371017a200J, dated Septe bar 5.2007.
t }VCA .jcrije�j
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/ nt's Signature
(Agent's signature Is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
17

USACE Pre -Construction Notification — NWP 39
Continental Automotive
Continental Automotive Morganton Plant Expansion
Morganton, Burke County, NC
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A
NCDMS ILF Mitigation Acceptance Letter
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 USGS Topographic map
Figure 3 NRCS Soils Map
Figure 4 USFWS National Wetland Inventory Map
Plant Expansion Design Drawings

Continental Automotive Morganton Plant Expansion
Attachment A
The Continental Automotive Morganton Plant is located at 1103 Jamestown Road in Morganton,
North Carolina. The project site is located southeast of the intersection of Jamestown Road and
Interstate 40 in Burke County. The proposed plant expansion includes a 95 X 730 foot addition
along the west wall of the existing plant in the location of the existing scissor dock and access
road. The proposed drainage pattern of the existing facility will be preserved during site
construction, with the site continuing to drain from north to south. Stormwater will be routed
through the current stormwater network while the upgrades to the network are installed, which
are part of the plant expansion.
A linear drainage feature is present along the southwest side of the existing parking area. This
feature currently drains stormwater from the plant site, but also drains groundwater which
originates from under the existing plant and enters the feature through the ground seepage at the
culvert headwall located at the head of the feature. Ms. Amy Annino from the N.C. Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) determined the drainage feature to be an intermittent stream channel
on August 14, 2017.
The plant expansion will require permanent impacts to this intermittent stream channel due to
project design requirements and site constraints. The stream impacts will include placing
underdrains in the stream and the placement of fill with drainage stone over the underdrains to
allow completion of grading and construction of the plant expansion. The under drains will consist
of a 2 x 2 inch stone with perforated pipe wrapped in filter fabric. The underdrain construction will
result in 297 linear feet of permanent impact to the intermittent stream. Completion of the plant
construction activities are currently on hold until the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 39 for the
impact.
Amec Foster Wheeler evaluated this feature on September 6, 2017, using the North Carolina
Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) per the methodology outlined in the NCSAM Draft User
Manual, effective March, 2013. The NCSAM evaluation resulted in this stream feature receiving
a rating of Low. Continental Automotive proposes to provide mitigation for impacts to this low
quality intermittent stream at a 1:1 ratio. Amec Foster Wheeler confirmed this proposed mitigation
ration with William Elliott of the US Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office. Continental
Automotive proposes to secure mitigation credits from the N.C. Division of Mitigation Services.

Mittgntim Services
EUVIR®MMEMTAL 044LITY
September 26, 2017
David Jones
Continental Automotive Systems, Inc
1103 Jamestown Road
Morganton, NC 28655
Project: Continental Automotive Morganton Plant Expansion
ROY COOPER
MICHAI-:L S. REGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: 3/26/2018
County: Burke
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by
an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
8-diglt HUC)
Catawba 03050101 Warm Stream 297
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Josh Witherspoon, agent
Sincerely,
Jam s. B' Stanfill
Ass Management Supervisor
State of North Carolina Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street. Suite 3000
9I9 707 8976 T

MITCHELL
MCD(
HU
CALDWELL
-------------------------------------- I
Glen Alpine
1"YJ
BURKE
wl�If
Project Area
CATAWBA
-Y
RUTHERFORD
---------------------------------------------
— -- — -- — -- --
-
CLEVELAND LINCOLN
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Continental Automotive Morganton Plant Expansion
Legend 0 1.5 3 6
amec Project Area Miles Morganton
foster Counties 1 in = 3 miles Burke County, NC
wheeler
AMEC FW PROJECT NO: 6252-17-0318 FIGURE NO:

MITCHELL!
CALDWELL
•,� ... ►Ux paY.n,
\ Q BURKE
MCDOWELL
CATAWBA
RUTHERFORD
_ ---- LINCOLN
M
Legend
,114 IJ Project Area
anleC � parcel
arcel
wheeler
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet
0
Figure 2 - USGS Topographic Map
Continental Automotive Morganton Plant Expansion
Morganton
Burke County, NC
______f
AMEC FW PROJECT NO: 6252-17-0318 FIGURE NO: 2

�F
LL
O
O
�o
<z<
O
LEGEND
�o
a
w
z_
�QL'''/�
X
w
2
o
�F
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
•,—(
HWA REVISION
a
E
.•moi £
°a
_....— CHAIN LINK CONSTRUCTION FENCING
(
I
f
in, SF
I
n y I m
—1048-
-6001,
048-670L 1050
_1050- — -
-1048_ —
1
1 I
q I /
I %
3.:
o
y N \ I ,)./
A1' ' ' \I I LL
lza
W \�
Z 1
PROPERTY LINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SILT FENCE
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
INLET PROTECTION
1 I - It, .; an PROP. UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR
_.` 1 1I \11 RELOCATED GENERATOR REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL
N 1 Y I ..' - - _..5 I I I 1. .<a0J' anw.
LOCATIONANDDRAWINGS
AND
REQUSPECIFICATIONS
FOR EXACT
PHASE 3 DENUDED AREA I UTILITY PROTECTION NOTE
TOTAL DENUDED: 252 AC ALL UTILITIES ON THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL
NOTIFY THE UTILITY PROTECTION CENTER NORTH CAROLINA 811 FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS IN
Q ADVANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THIS PROJECT. THIS NUMBER WAS ESTABLISHED TO PROVIDE
ACCURATE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING BELOWGROUND UTILITIES (I.E. CABLES, ELECTRIC WIRES, GAS
& WATER LINES). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BECOMING FAMILIAR WITH ALL
UTILITY REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ON THE PLANS AND IN THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS &
SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
n 3.3ao
T1VM 3dg3tlNiO�
b
1 I
Ali A
a\,I -�3 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF RELOCATED GENERATOR.
REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS. OWNER AND ARCHITECT TO APPROVE
0 '; CHAIN LINK CONSTRUCTION FENCING yL j FIELD STAKED LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
K ' { W/ ACCESS GATE. w 3 w THE GENERATOR RELOCATION MUST BE
MIN. FENCE PANELS WITH WEIGHTED' - m a � 6o COORDINATED TO LIMIT CONTINENTAL'S
(SAND BAGS) BASES. GATES SHALL BE IXPOSURE TO A SINGLE DAY WITHOUT
O 1 DOUBLE 8' SECTIONS, S - GENERATOR BACKUP. THE EXISTING EXHAUST
(0 ) COORDINATE WITH FUTURE EXTENSION IS NOT REQUIRED IN THE NEW
(1)GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERATOR LOCATION. REWORK THE MUFFLER
TO PROVIDE A 1 _
W U BEYONDM MUFFLER.
RT TURN-DOWN"EXHAUST PIPE
1.
_►�� 1 \d I I I Le na ----- ----- — o oti
�+ W x/ \/ \��/ \/ \�CONTRA�R PAS ARE - - cvQL
a
BUILDING READY AREA PAD PER
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE '.
LL 3X
GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT RUARY 1B 2017 BLE, INC. DATED !+
tEe3 3I IlI \ \ $ PROP FIFE: 1048.Q
_p.Z in T.W 104750 b�
P W
RETAINING WALL END.
t► (WILL BE EXTENDED NORTH
BY THE FUTURE GC IN PHASE 2. -
LEAVE LEADING END SO o 441-.F. 24" RCP
Z THAT R CAN BE EXTENDED)—
de
T.W. 1057.50 3 I-- - G
\T.W , _ S.W 1047.70 149 LF-36'HDPE
g $ J, `yI_ 11 � �N� 1 41,5 .� •- � �}l> .. -= RETAININ WALL r=: �T �
-T W
30 LF 30' RCP 1 o58.so _ — _ -- � •gD�
Le W 104700 127 L F 38' HDPE — #ZOF.—
-10 QUO I •.Ilia. \ _ - \\'., i _ /� .UBOs_ -
Oop %/N -
�7
02C�" 11, �.� 1 0. zw wpm
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. AS AREAS ARE DEMOLISHED, CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING AREAS TO
FINAL GRADE AS SHOWN.
2. FOR AREAS WITHIN THE FUTURE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, THE FILL SHALL
BE PLACED PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS.
3. AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY AS BROUGHT TO FINAL
GRADE
NOTE
ALL DISTURBED AREAS (EVEN IF NOT SHOWN) SHALL BE PERMANENTLY
STABILIZED.
P% 4
I
( ' �•� pec
1 CHAIN LINK CONSTRUCTION FENCING ' \�• - o`
W/ ACCESS GATE + 1�
I V MIN. FENCE PANELS WITH WEIGHTED'
(SAND BAGS) BASES. GATES SHALL BE
DOUBLE 6' SECTIONS.
COORDINATE WITH FUTURE I �\
I GENERAL CONTRACTOR c 1
e 11/•
+ EXISTING FEMA 100 -YEAR \�I
/ ^ ' `',._ \+ FLOODPLAIN /J
.'I II III /CONTRACTOR STAGING AREA ) $
- SILT FENCE
(TYP.) 3 l
� I
R.'=o I CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE BUILDING -READY
AREA PAD PER RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
Fa'. -7t GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY BLE, INC. DATED -
'SQ
PROP FFE: 104425 __
2:1 SLOPE WI PERM. MATTING'
Y'^.105730':-.a.rx'-t-__:.6r �-__ ---.- -i-.zal t.r.-ati HDPEIQA 'lyOL
y _ 48 LF. - 38" HOPE
�B W ,0470q Z`O�yJ1 N T.W. 105550 ST.W.1066.b0 1
'1049.00
-041LL .CId ,047.00.L'& _ .� BW 1018.75 - - _
�]
-\.. 205 L.F.-38'HDPE ;•% /, .
INLET PROTECTION ` \ 4, \" BEGIN RETAINING WALL % / I p �`D
_-- mP.) •7� '� - V �J - .$ 215LOPE W/PERM. MATTING'
M.911:.Pc.ao N
a o Iv ao
GRAPHIC SCALE
G S & P
vesign services
For The Built
Environment
0
GS&P/NC, P.C.
www.greshamsmith.com
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE: C-2058
Revision
O
O
0 05.25.17
<z<
O
I --I
I --i
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
w
z_
�QL'''/�
X
w
2
o
�F
C)
U
g 09.12.17
HWA REVISION
a
E
.•moi £
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE: C-2058
PHASE 3 EROSION CONTROL &
GRADING PLAN
P1 -C303
PROJECT:42429.00
DATE: MAY 25, 2017
LME IS 3 INCHES WHEN PRINTED FULL SIZE
FULL SHEET SIZE' 24'X38'
Revision
No. Date
Description
0 05.25.17
PHASE 1 DEMOLITION
1 06.12.17
BID ADDENDUM
2 08.20.17
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
3 07.07.17
AGENCY COMMENTS
4 07.12.17
AGENCY COMMENTS
5 07.17.17
ISSUED FOR CONST.
g 09.12.17
HWA REVISION
PHASE 3 EROSION CONTROL &
GRADING PLAN
P1 -C303
PROJECT:42429.00
DATE: MAY 25, 2017
LME IS 3 INCHES WHEN PRINTED FULL SIZE
FULL SHEET SIZE' 24'X38'

30' 0 30' 60'
GRAPHIC SCALE
O
Z
4
1
O p
M I O p DO
C I
o p C.0
I EXISTING 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
V
PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT
I
O
CO -14
END INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT
(TOTAL 297 LF IMPACT)
X c, BUILDING EXPANSION
\\—PROPOSEDm
\\'— t END OF EXISTING STORM SYSTEM /
BEGIN INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT
1
•, � i hi:..O
-\�\[ TURF ACCESS DRIVE
N O
oe
-------------,Z-- - - -------------
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL /
0c9 \` ��, ,�/ LO Off
do
O O
M .ME.OEo90 N0
,
0
t. /
DI -2 C u
1
PROPOSED RIP RAP TO BE FLUSH
WITH EXISTING GRADE WITH NO
IMPEDANCE TO WATER FLOW.
�0/
1
G S & P
Design Services
For The Built
Environment
Atlanta
Birmingham
Cincinnati
Columbus
Dallas
Fort Lauderdale
Jackson
Knoxville
Louisville
Memphis
Nashville
Richmond
Tampa
0
GRESHAM
SMITH AND
PARTNERS
101 South Fifth Street
Suite 1400
Louisville, KY 40202
502.627.8900
F ---
z
W
Z
O
WOO
z
Z2i�
ZOQx
Q 0 W
O
2
IMAPACT EXHIBIT
Project 42429.00
w-4 �.-.• v.•. ' �•i •
: 1:
t .
Y, t
'i .� R
1
O p
M I O p DO
C I
o p C.0
I EXISTING 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
V
PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT
I
O
CO -14
END INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT
(TOTAL 297 LF IMPACT)
X c, BUILDING EXPANSION
\\—PROPOSEDm
\\'— t END OF EXISTING STORM SYSTEM /
BEGIN INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT
1
•, � i hi:..O
-\�\[ TURF ACCESS DRIVE
N O
oe
-------------,Z-- - - -------------
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL /
0c9 \` ��, ,�/ LO Off
do
O O
M .ME.OEo90 N0
,
0
t. /
DI -2 C u
1
PROPOSED RIP RAP TO BE FLUSH
WITH EXISTING GRADE WITH NO
IMPEDANCE TO WATER FLOW.
�0/
1
G S & P
Design Services
For The Built
Environment
Atlanta
Birmingham
Cincinnati
Columbus
Dallas
Fort Lauderdale
Jackson
Knoxville
Louisville
Memphis
Nashville
Richmond
Tampa
0
GRESHAM
SMITH AND
PARTNERS
101 South Fifth Street
Suite 1400
Louisville, KY 40202
502.627.8900
F ---
z
W
Z
O
WOO
z
Z2i�
ZOQx
Q 0 W
O
2
IMAPACT EXHIBIT
Project 42429.00

30' 0 30' 60'
GRAPHIC SCALE
O
z
n
1046.97 _
1050
104;
PROPOSE
RETAINING
104(
PR
GR
103!
1030
-0+25 0+00
8
u-11ou I -*uu
1050
1045
1040
1035
1030
1 +50 1 +'75
TYPICAL SECTION PROFILE
DI -2
RIM:1038.80
INV IN:1033.35 36" HDPE (N)
INV OUT:1033.35 36" HDPE (SE)
END OF EXISTING STORM SYSTEM
BEGIN INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION
It
Q
" - - - - - 147.
097
SCALE H:1 "=40'; V:1 "=4'
— — — -- - �-= -- f -- - t�
_ --- _ _
Cj
1044 31 TURF ACCESS DRIVE DI -2
- - _ - -. - 205 L.F - 36" HDPE
DI -3 V -�
- - DI -3 p
-'to o
RIM:1043.85 �� -- _.- - -
INV IN:1034.59 36" HDPE (N) -"
z- INV IN:1040.00 12" HDPE (NE)
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
INV OUT:1034.59 36" HDPE (S) i
I{i EXISTING 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
CP�
POSED RIP RAP TO BE FLUSH
H EXISTING GRADE WITH NO
EDANCE TO WATER FLOW.
END INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT -
I (TOTAL 297 LF IMPACT)
i
0
G S & P
Design Services
For The Built
Environment
■
Atlanta
Birmingham
Cincinnati
Columbus
Dallas
Fort Lauderdale
Jackson
Knoxville
Louisville
Memphis
Nashville
Richmond
Tampa
E
GRESHAM
SMITH AND
PARTNERS
101 South Fifth Street
Suite 1400
Louisville, KY 40202
502.627.8900
H
z
PROPOSED
�w
>�z
BUILDING'S
EDGE
z2z
�
zOQ
QX
O<wLIJ
O
WALL
l3,
0
a
a
0
v
0
3
DPOSED
m
3
a
EXISTING
N
N
s
ADE
3
GROUND
v Project 42429.00
N
a
II/
Y
PROPOSED 36"
HDPE
1030
-0+25 0+00
8
u-11ou I -*uu
1050
1045
1040
1035
1030
1 +50 1 +'75
TYPICAL SECTION PROFILE
DI -2
RIM:1038.80
INV IN:1033.35 36" HDPE (N)
INV OUT:1033.35 36" HDPE (SE)
END OF EXISTING STORM SYSTEM
BEGIN INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION
It
Q
" - - - - - 147.
097
SCALE H:1 "=40'; V:1 "=4'
— — — -- - �-= -- f -- - t�
_ --- _ _
Cj
1044 31 TURF ACCESS DRIVE DI -2
- - _ - -. - 205 L.F - 36" HDPE
DI -3 V -�
- - DI -3 p
-'to o
RIM:1043.85 �� -- _.- - -
INV IN:1034.59 36" HDPE (N) -"
z- INV IN:1040.00 12" HDPE (NE)
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
INV OUT:1034.59 36" HDPE (S) i
I{i EXISTING 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
CP�
POSED RIP RAP TO BE FLUSH
H EXISTING GRADE WITH NO
EDANCE TO WATER FLOW.
END INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT -
I (TOTAL 297 LF IMPACT)
i
0
G S & P
Design Services
For The Built
Environment
■
Atlanta
Birmingham
Cincinnati
Columbus
Dallas
Fort Lauderdale
Jackson
Knoxville
Louisville
Memphis
Nashville
Richmond
Tampa
E
GRESHAM
SMITH AND
PARTNERS
101 South Fifth Street
Suite 1400
Louisville, KY 40202
502.627.8900
H
z
�w
>�z
WOO
z2z
�
zOQ
QX
O<wLIJ
O
a
0
a
a
0
v
0
3
m
3
a
N
N
s
1.2
W
3
9
o IMAPACT EXHIBIT
v Project 42429.00
N
a