20081863 Ver 1_401 Application_20081208

ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, buildings
Mr. Thomas Brown
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Subject:
PCN Application
Dear Mr. Brown:
08-1863
RAID
Attached is a PCN application for waste removal at a former Manufactured Gas Plant
(MGP) in Wilson, North Carolina. This work is being conducted for the City of
Wilson. The site is situated in an urban/residential area just west of Ward Boulevard
and north of Seaboard Coastline Railroad. An excavator will be used to remove
contaminated soil and sediment from the floodplain and streambed. The
contaminated material will be hauled off-site by dump trucks and general fill material
will be used to return the floodplain to existing elevations. Fill material, similar to the
existing substrate, will be used to restore the streambed to existing grade.
Excavation of the streambed will occur under dry conditions, as a pump-around
system will be installed in the work area.
One perennial stream will be temporarily impacted by these activities. Upon
completion of waste removal, the stream will be restored to existing conditions. A
floodplain bench will be excavated on the south side of the stream and the stream
banks will be planted and matted to prevent erosion. In addition, a cross vane will be
installed at the downstream end of the reach to provide grade control and bank
protection. If you have any questions feel free to give me a call. Thank you for
reviewing this application.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Ben Furr Y
Environmental Scientist
Copies:
NCDWQ
Imagine the result
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina,
Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh
North Carolina 27607
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
TR - Natural Resources
Date:
December 16, 2008
Contact:
Ben Furr
Phone:
919-854-1282 x. 143
Email:
Ben.furr@arcadis-
us.com
Our ref:
N0000282.0004
ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, buildings
Transmittal Letter
To: Copies:
Division of Water Quality USACE
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
From: Date:
Ben Furr - ARCADIS December 16, 2008
Subject: ARCADIS Project No.:
PCN Application N0000282.0004
We are sending you:
® Attached
? Shop Drawings
? Prints
® Other: P(N Annlirrntinn
? Under Separate Cover Via the Following Items:
? Plans ? Specifications ? Change Order
? Samples ? Copy of Letter ? Reports
ARCADIS
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh
North Carolina 27607
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
UIR@[ROW21
IEC 2 2 2008
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Copies Date Drawing No. Rev. Description Action*
1 12/16/08 1 PCN Application for cleanup of former Manufactured
Gas Plant in Wilson, NC FA

Action*
? A Approved
? AN Approved As Noted
? AS As Requested
? Other:
? CR Correct and Resubmit
? F File
® FA For Approval
? Resubmit Copies
? Return Copies
? Review and Comment
Mailing Method
? U.S. Postal Service 151 Class
® Certified/Registered Mail
? Other:
? Courier/Hand Delivery ? FedEx Priority Overnight ? FedEx 2-Day Delivery
? United Parcel Service (UPS) ? FedEx Standard Overnight ? FedEx Economy
comments: Please review and let me know if you have any questions. You can reach me at 919-630-1680. Thank
g Walwilson siteldwq_pcwans ftal.doc Page:
1/1
b
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 0 8 - 8 8
ku any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
SPAID
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit 38 and
Water Quality Certification No. 3696
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
k[g@r=0Wr=3
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: City of Wilson Attn: Scott Bissette DEC 2 2 2008
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 10
Wilson, NC 27894 DERR-WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Telephone Number: 252-399-2238 Fax Number: 252-399-2201
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ben Furr
Company Affiliation: ARCADIS
Mailing Address: 801 Corporate Center Drive Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number: 919-854-1282 x. 143 Fax Number: 919-854-5448
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
III. Project Information
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to, surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: City of Wilson- Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Waste Removal
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 3722-53-5956.000
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh, take US 64
east to US 264 east. Take exit to 301 north Turn left onto Ward Blvd (NC 58/US 264),
bear left onto Raleigh Rd. Take a left onto Whitehead Ave Take a left onto College St
Take a left onto Pine St. to arrive at Project Site A Vicinity Map is attached (Figure 1)
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.734048°N 77.901820°W
6. Property size (acres): parcel area = 26.2 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Toisnot Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is situated in an urban/residential area. Abandoned MGP
buildings have been demolished but concrete pads remain City of Wilson Fire Training
Facility is located to the north water reservoir for city to the south Ward Blvd and Seaboard
Coastline Railroad to the east and cemetery to the west The stream has been straightened
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13
and is incised but beginning to build bankfull benches within entrenched channel Dense
shrubby vegetation is present on stream banks but quickly transitions to grasses within 10 to
15 feet from top of bank. Floodplain is dominated by grasses (see attached photos).
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: MGP waste
(mostly tar) will be removed from the site. An excavator will be used to remove
contaminated soil and sediment from the floodplain and streambed The contaminated
material will be hauled off-site by dump trucks. General fill material will be used to return
the floodplain to existing elevations. Fill material similar to existing substrate will be used to
restore streambed to existing grade. Excavation of the streambed will occur under dry
conditions. Water will be pumped around work area and discharged into the existing culvert
under Ward Blvd. See the attached Erosion Control Plan Sheet for additional details
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this work is to remove the tar and
other waste products from the site in an effort to eliminate potential hazards to human health
and the environment.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. ARCADIS met Martin Richmond (NCDWO) on-site on November 13,
2008 to discuss potential buffer impacts associated with this project Mr. Richmond identified
the stream reach within the project site as perennial and therefore subject to the Neuse River
Buffer Rules. However, Mr. Richmond also stated that this project would have an "exempt"
status due to the rule that allows "Removal of previous fill or debris provided that diffuse flow is
maintained and any vegetation removed is restored" (15A NCAC 02B 0233) Due to the
exempt status, this project does not require buffer mitigation At Mr. Richmond's request any
portion of the 50 ft. buffer that is disturbed during construction will be replanted with native
riparian vegetation The planting _plan is attached A jurisdictional determination has not been
issued for this site.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The streambed of S 1 will be excavated
to remove tar and other MGP waste and then restored to existing grade using fill material
similar to existing substrate. All work within the streambed will be conducted in the dry.
The water will be pumped around the work area and discharged into the existing culvert
under Ward Blvd. Figure 3 depicts the proposed stream impacts.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both stnictnre nnrd flnnrlina
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included_ To calculate ncreave mnltinly 1pncrtli X ,:,;rl+l, +I,.- 4;-A- 1- A2 ZKo
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
S1 UT to Toisnot
Swamp Temporary P 10 feet 430 0.10
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) I 430 I 0.10
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation- dredging- floodino dminaue hnikheadc Ptv..
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U_S_ resultinor from the nrniPnr-
Stream Impact (acres): 0.10 J
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.10
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 430
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Temporary impacts to S1
cannot be avoided because the only way to remove the waste is to excavate the streambed
Impacts will be minimized by installing a pump-around system during construction so that work
will be conducted under dry conditions. The pump-around system will also ensure that no
contaminant is carried downstream during excavation activities.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13
Impacts will be temporary as the streambed will be restored to existing grade after waste is
removed. In addition, a floodplain bench will be excavated during construction to increase
the width of the active floodplain, and boulder cross-vanes (detail attached) will be installed
to provide grade control. Erosion control matting and live stakes will be installed to provide
bank protection. Native vegetation will be replanted in any portion of the 50 ft. stream buffer
that is disturbed during excavation (planting plan is attached). No further miti ag tion
measures are proposed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 13
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 12,900 3 (2 for Catawba) Exempt
2 8,600 1.5 Exempt
Total 21,500 Exempt
/-one t extends out su teet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. This project is considered exempt per the
rule that allows "Removal of previous fill or debris provided that diffuse flow is maintained
and any vegetation removed is restored" (15A NCAC 02B 0233)Therefore buffer
mitigation is not required for this project. Figure 2 depicts Neuse River Buffers as they Lapply
to S1.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Existing impervious surface within the work
zone consists of 0.77 acre which is approximately 3% of total area within the parcel The
proposed project should decrease the amount of impervious surface at the site as some of the
paved areas will not be repaved upon project completion Silt fence block and gravel inlet
protection, and a pump-around system will be used to protect surface waters during excavation
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
There will be no wastewater generated from this project
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: No
additional development is anticipated as a result of this project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The project is anticipated to begin in January 2009. There are no foreseeable constraints that
would affect the project schedule.
l/•
plicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13
tCGq£EN�` i� 1329
_-_y �- \ �� _ . � , ` � �� � � � •��`; FIs? � �� �, -
Ch
iubstation s�¢6 � /'/ • l7ow � i � � �', 4i� � l� l,� ! i
a WILSON
1W I L S 4 N �� " r I r 1326
c r-' r- iif! ttl - � �_-•- i/ � ��ee • + � `` l • � \�: �J`
,�• •� G1 _� .1 W8t8/_/�a l?2J' •Jr �� 5 % rxl r1��
.. Fire �. ♦ �� �. t�lwt118ti SdY-) y f; i ' S !1 c ` 1�g71 t ��
%� �i�^ •w� ���. �� oia110t r 1 i xr; 1
- - � - �'\ •C. ``mss' F � Y
Jam-' \\ �� r i --_�- ', �: � .+++lll---� - �/ •,i� Y
h •i
Project Site '• eR+
+ 't t •' �� TI � r i t
r t ` •`' f� a iib r iter } 1 �•
•
Ar
Fl
•� } viler �..
l ti , ' ,• r �� 4 .. t
� � r / .r 1 •� � � L--. it r 1
/ �• / Da den 1 s { I / r' y
x F -
A '
Legend
l i r
Work Zone ` s� - L >, .•' \�. '
Parcel Boundary—
\ R esT Haven !
Prepared By Prepared Fot USGS Tographic Map Figure N
City of Wilson g 1.24,000
Former Wilson Manufactured Gas Plant, W E
ARCADIS Ci[yofWilson Wilson County,North h Carolina � Miles
Oulc6s:
USGSQuadrangleMaps (Wilsonand MnsteadC..ds) S 0 0.1250.25 0.5

F (s„
�� `�l �Il' • moi"! �" .. 4., \r� � .
hn
0�4
X�` L' sir A..1 a �k'• { /y✓
Ot
Mir
Tr
10
Legend
Work Zone
Parcel Boundary
Perennial
•`*F"� ri F ti � ��r `� st, 3�f�` �� .!� rµ �jra'�� t
•C tik �� �. T'' ro ''r d'kH�'. '�. y h' 11. � � �
S "�' r •vim- �. • ! �•p--
II
ji4
p •L � i

SHEET NUMBER 5
WILSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
45'00'

M
W
? & C7
LL.
°
•
g iV
S = N
! Z
a
La M
y
a ce
i
r
0.
;
V?
N ?

CL Z

{y; .............
- -
-
??

?._. -
.

??a
?3 c
Q
3

M
K

=W
O a r ar e
12 a
Jn yy/?$ ao2?(G? ??od??
C m C ydjN?y?a?U16
ell
? ?C? ? H•fY.: H•j ?i v1? 'H
S d
t
W G
0
N
V ??YY
6
a
?q h
s
i
ff
? a
a
wo WrAN O I
s
N
?- s
w
_ „• - ? 9il ?? ? ? 01 0
J o0
c `, J g
W CV
I 14ri1t I? \ o og^ z O
?, u 8 a U
? $$ 8 z
I I 1•)1?? I ?\\ //5 Vl ? /FN 7?
I I ??{ I •I / 0 LJ
L'j
I I In w a ,
cn Z
' ? T#Y?d I ? ? / ?\? ? <
O¢ Q 'b o
w
??lo z zo .
?' r ?+ U7 W
L'i CL
d°
\ ? 1 0 w - ~ I
f-- -i ?. Io: j z
Z cg)
1 \ I I \ 5 \?? `?• I I \\
00 ov \ ?V AV I ?? y3'Sw v .? ?? II A Q
??,` ?? i? F'O? v, Oro a
vvv v???.: ?O
\ AV AvvpvvvvA# w m d v V
i
c
62
yg r-
ft-a
/ \\\d\\ A -A r,... I. - I \`\ - - ??,5 Utz I
\ \ \\\ r ?? ` .\. JIB
J
L'i
\ \ \Ra v ?v v\vv? t V\ ?xv 41
1
d
v \ S
ADO] \ \\\\\\\ \ \ ` W 07.. 1 ".
0 3
a? \\ °o
?? d v v v \v v 1 - I ? I ? \ . ? ?
A".--
\;v\v
XV1,
\ 3 \\ \ \ \ \
o -' \ \
\ `\ \
LLJ
w
¢o z i
\ Z Cwv\wvv\?A\vawcic I V \V / \ \
d? z v\v vvvV??v \ p ss
U O - w ` \ \ \ /
(n N ' U p f'- Z\
?d ''' \ U ?¢¢ `` ` \\ LLJOZ _
Z ` ` !'/ / 3n3 csz
10
CL X
aaz
R> C,
F- ?00
v, ? 4i 11
-2 §?a a '? II 3W w o _
8- N911 igg 2
86? 55, 8H
25 5
-.zo Q s
d??a saes ?§ sg??s $aa?s m? <?t? $Gs a w
- - _?- - _
r n ? .n u r ? m N n .e .n .o r _ - ?.. r
a .-v_w nn .ni3o e ?
7n'I-11 :aoI -ADI 6.p'7nm-d.u\nvwmv\IoAuon uotswi\*0 Q7-\wsi,m\eua\:n awou\u-
s
'nom simaveooz@
a..Ip : wou Ixn
1-1.1. a1.1.11 1a-0
-t : - BOOZ aa0 *0 '41 : aw!1\•IDO (Vaal S%I) 1011tl : W-A pony
USACE AID# DWQ # Site #_a (indicate on attached map) -
E STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
"%?.. .#`f ., - •.'!!-i :ilri. s .C .. v r.i .ifs.:';
P40 4
J }.:
•?: , •'f ' _'•rry wit
t.
.4
L
i
1-Applicant s tiat (`ef / _ .?'??, •1!!."_ _??E?a#uati?rs:nai?._
- -F _
. '7
3. ?Ddte bfe?xlttotfi . :b =:."?. _ ??ne:of '!?vti. !• ?. • ,.'r-:- -
<z<
rS 5
S. "Name of stre?ii?, -f ? ?' -. ?1er_ .. ui?./,? -?--?-"?' ,?•:
7., roximate ` "e*eh ?' Q- Lt_ BrSeantard~:" :`>
9.•L ofreaol?;l Ail o` refer in. d iniatoe
k> :.. .. U:
11. Site coord nAt vain ?t
33
Latitude (ex- 34.8 `, ' ^j':: ` T l # • ^ iudea F9?bk<1 !;
ethod location ToPo "$h :? ?3e?i ' -'}iotalLrT- ` 6lktibi`'?" ?(tLei '
13: ocation o to'=ia?ler-euai note toads aac s to,ir) " : _
. It `
A. I AA'
A ceA • 'WA
14. Proposed ctireevugrlG(if'anyj. ACA-O.V<5A- 8..
15. Recent weather conditions: .'0 f- o" ?'L . . / .. I p. .:. ?° .
t ?
16. Site eonditionsat tinie_d Visit
17. Identify any spec-' =water ay classifteafions leiiorv?i, _ _Seefion k( ?. trt l`1 !stets s enhat' Ftstieries:I I tiitat
out Waters' ^©htstahd* Rasntirce Water 1cic;trient Sensi hue haters _ ??ler Supplyt~Wateished
18. Is there a pond Qr foe fucated upstream. of the evaluation ant?. Yt Q TQes, es r}t ? rlte water surface area:
19. Does channel>apear. ofiJSGS quad•crap? Y_N+? 2Di0es eliadnei 2ti}ieaY on3L7A Sia SuFVeX? X Np'_
21. Estimated watershed land ttse: ..% Resideritiat °(b'Goxpmercrat: a.'bi'q;(ndtetal°!o Agrieulturat
°f°,For steel %.Glea W'L-Ogged J °?at?tl er +?11t \? f
a?3
22. Bankfull wiiitt ?;3BanCIhtratR.},f?xpsafik)
24. Channel stope clt xit s ?am? 1 Felt Q ta? 2°/ t i'r 2 t ' t t# {q tb rS% S tQ% =r•-;
i ?S - .}?.:;•::p, 1.1 s'" sy:ri5{E? ?' :r - ..t ;.}.:.
25. Channel sinsity+-"trght:.?acEaston5te;rdsFrECi?yentitiattdere??tit3s sidjchef
i t#i" ti} `oo ` a hee ca ;
Instructions ,.. t ?a#v.trl€s..lo faecT.:Qziyaf;?:: #?a<y.-dete%ir4iltirtj??f tlst :.tatrat, eodrgiau; off
fi=
4
location,'terratxr,:;vbtosattrlY?ssifnT(icui;; lyveecitarei?Is#ic"ttiuta?4lki!ea?g? tsi joints
{ioti?a liQOir : t vV th¢°
to each charadtaW__ ?W the # `sl +p i for . e ` ecore on ' :Page- -pi tiftlhs^ bi '.4 s
characteristics idOiMt#Y-na,=tl ?voPk a es s nil 3 t= ;iflut :?> s9l i ? ? t+Yet t? d8 v2tu8tfnrh?, . f .,`;'
of eel u `` 3;
atcjl u sat tt:"tEtst c cuons•uter:tk s C" nF_' `del a o't1€t.:
characteristic oa-6
comriaent sectiolk ;
a ale otii i e ? -40 Oeroaff
WhdMeA-dfi
into a forest 'itttidtota1 *464 tlC#is.) r'e-cohtii. -0 i tcva[ti w'
reach. The tot$3,?reto.sec 't':rfit. ee ttnd`is t3'
x
highest quality: _ ;` .``{E'=.t..:. r•; `; :?tF' :,"
Total Score (fir ixuce[?crse): 'Comma tsj i;-_ GAn (7?! 4?
+ 17:
r: .1?? •_- :.
Ell .l r ..
. r ;
f i..
J.%
Evaluators Si ii
This channel ev Xit'a t ttn is itlt ed' to tEire o t l ofessfon is hi . .
ased.: u=;asa fd:-sec ramloii:ei!io?m?a?
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineprs to Makre a:,prellmin• •.. stream
arY assessment of
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 003. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
2
* Thee thataateflstics are not assessed in coastal streams.
.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Farm; Version 3.1
CI ?i l5nn
Date: Project:M67 V1o„5k OMbyo ? Latitude: 3So ' 0/7" Al
Evaluator. fv? Site: Longitude: -77°
Total Points: Q Other r
&ream Is at least rhtennMent3 0 County: l' S 6 Y? e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 19 or plat if a 30
nn t\k\ rNQi. may; ??'? ?f
A r''_nmm?rr%hninnv IC.,t,+.,+?t - ' ?i . 1 xr tit1!?PHtCt ,x i,.... EaIC =S, < : >':'' L' fe :: f^' >'S >< EIiU:: '
1a. Continuous bed and bank tT 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 i 2 3
5. Active/relic floodpiain tI 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Repent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees 0 1 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 3
11. Grade controls 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0. 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
Q tJ-1-1nnu rC? ih+n+ol - q_ J? 1
U.- Groundwater flow/discharge 0. 1 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1.5. 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric solls (redoAmorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes =1.5
r Rfnlnnv I-PlIM MI = I Q 1 G 1
20. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous. algae; periphyton 0 . 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; 0th r = 0
Items zu and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item zu focuses on ine presence or aquauc or weuano prams.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
JO,,`m??+. 61?.J 4904 } IA
C? 0.rt rid
- .i? r/ ho n
J ?en ? oS
01
SI
?o
b
q
r
Oi
`dam
6.5 Planting Plan
The purpose of a planting plan is to reestablish vegetative community patterns across the
landscape. The plan consists of 1) acquisition of available plant species, 2) implementation of
proposed Site preparation, and 3) planting of selected species.
Species selected for planting will be dependent upon availability of local seedling sources.
Areas that have been compacted during excavation (i.e. haul roads or staging/stockpile areas),
and are within the planting zone, will be loosened by ripping or plowing. The top six inches of
soil will be scarified in the planting zone to promote water retention and infiltration.
Bare-root seedlings of tree species (small stream swamp community) will be planted in
disturbed areas within, the buffer at a density of approximately 680 stems per acre on 8-foot
centers. Shrub species in the stream-side assemblage will be planted along the stream banks
at a density of 2720 stems per acre on 4-foot centers. Table 8 depicts the total number of
stems and species distribution within each vegetation association. Planting will be performed
between January 1 and March 15 to allow plants to stabilize during the dormant period and set
root during the spring season.
Table 8. Plantina Plan
Vegetation
Association
Small Stream Swamp Stream-side
Assemblage

Species Density
(stems/ac)
% of total Density
(stems/ac)
% of total
Swamp chestnut oak 102 15 -- --
Laurel oak 102 15 -- --
Cherrybark oak 102 15 -- --
Willow oak 102 15 -- --
Water oak 102 15 -- --
Green ash 102 15 -- --
Sycamore 68 10 -- --
Silky dogwood -- -- 816 30
Black willow -- -- 816 30
Buttonbush -- -- 544 20
Elderberry -- -- 544 20
Total 680 100 2720 100
WOW
N
WS
O r

° 6 O Z
0Ui
°0

Z 0
LL 6 F
O
a
Y
W
r.

K
IY S S
M ? O
Y?
sm

Y N
<6W 14 6
< W
SO?Y1a °?
y~ mU J
`a O
6=t
t
Ixn c.=i ..} oeo
g N O

tMcc_iw

F E
ly W
J
i <
m M
Z

yy
?1 w
mw
ZL Z 0 0M
YZxW IU WW
= NN H
emu Oa
I J ¢
J J J W
OWU N -3
LW Z L O
0 mOW1m
NN1-N1-
I,. ui 00
OmMFLL
a m m
a
? LJ N K W
?
IWO
' 1- NMFJ m
C O a Wmz O Q
W O < O O
N c aW coM W J
LL°m
W pWNOO W U. J
[<mN ?j JS W
M ORm WF H J
a
i tFFO MH d'-cm,
M
[i s
W W
6¢uo¢OO 1-O
CW wlz7 ><H so O¢ Om
IIZOM JZ<NWW W<
yy) 1-I MM 6z /7 LL
z
YN¢ 0.
Oj
N a yy1
W 9' 0 N
W WM.J/M Tc N<O
> MW jW U, M,
w L O C. U
WLL F m > 0..- W _o
;G C HMW¢m <
x OI- FC1J J>O
p W YF¢ZO(? dUJAM
<O UM WK)MUl< x O LLOLL~J
O.UIcm 0 0xY 00
N J L w ~ >u, ? a F Z O m
a< LIOLL WNZ YI~+ OWOOiW
> 0= M O F-Zf-00
W M ~,Wy >a°y1sx Pdj?=iwo
WS< W>1?1H?Tyy1 O C LMW O
» as 1Ct??lYH 0° NMF<~ 3
1 \ 6m'N W
//.Q11 N
WO¢?(J
Oi-<15
g
J a
A.
V L F-
YO
<3
m
f O
_u5 H
¢ ,!
z
lp
Q
arIr~t3• 6
1A i
I.- z
?Y=-ru H
°FIS¢ h
??ug= C
t¢•x$zo _
OOp¢MW Z
LuJa ;
IL
L C ~ W 3 a'?.'11o¢
OF?-O V
m S,L M= C
W G
HW°<~ Q
v?Ni-?`< v
S ?
W J
z OS U.
>? 1
OJ WC d
ufo }
aWa?? O
'm
/
!= OVl`-W?
W
i0

¢
w Is
UW
low Is
10 JL NIIW
m
¢ W ? >W ?Fy?
?
O

^ O
? C
O«
I ? ~
' MM ?O w
rJ. °Js =y°?aWOJW
J
Y
0 W
JJtlI S
OW
Ham
Jso F°
N

? Y F
? W¢ i N 2 0
?
? N ?SOO?aio
O
m WM
Y
?F
V
`
mM?b
?
N 1Y
y
??
aO
FOWW
? O ?1
Z
H
r•a3
?

014
r

' %•. � � -S}` �4 ., � � .. yam. - (.t }( Ps �� +,.F,.
IF J�j
i.A eow
,l !, - � � a 4 .. � .-\�• - �"" Tom` �,�/-"; J.. we_
SIA
.-� T r
%:.■+.rr� «n«�^ 'xy4..+'�:::.'tw - • t c :es, { /� � t T ,, V.�, � / 'ft�'�,K,+, � it%A/'a• ;•
IN
f
6 �y. I` f � •YKr'
• - • + �} ,r!;�` '"�i�`••� �: � /'r i r �! r j • �� tic, '
J �r�/"�'i• . 1 ` l.',� • �� `i 1 fir
_ ,. ,yy.i�r,,,>..., s ,�•, .fit ,r a�;,.., �„ '-
-*�
•i I
.r h