Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRiverbend Background Soil Dataset Evaluation - December 2016F)R Technical Memorandum Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 Project: Riverbend Steam Station To: Kim Witt and Melonie Martin From: Jacob Ruffing Subject: Quantification of Valid Background Soil Samples for Statistical Calculations The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the basis for evaluation of soil samples proposed for use in determining site -specific background concentrations using statistical methods. The soil samples evaluated herein were principally collected during Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) fieldwork conducted between March and July 2015. The locations of soil samples evaluated for use in background statistical calculations are shown on Figure 1. Viability of samples for use in statistical calculations was evaluated using the following criteria: • Soil sample is collected from a location that is not impacted by coal combustion residuals or coal - associated materials; • Soil sample is collected from a location that is not impacted by other potential anthropogenic sources of constituents; • Soil sample is collected from the unsaturated zone, above the maximum groundwater elevation measured in shallow wells during seven well gauging events conducted between July 2015 and September 2016; and • Soil sample collected from a location not impacted by periodic flooding. A total of 69 soil samples were collected at Riverbend during CSA activities. Of these 69 samples, 28 samples satisfy the four criteria listed above and are considered viable samples for use in statistical calculations. These samples were collected from the following locations on -site: BG-1 D, BG-2D, BG-3D, GWA-2D, GWA-3D, GWA-5D, GWA-6D, GWA-7D, GWABD, GWA-9D, GWA-10S, GWA-20D, GWA-21 D, GWA-22D, GWA-23D, MW-7BR, MW-15D, OB-1, and OB-2. Note that viable samples collected from borings near the waste boundary or down -gradient of ash management areas were collected at least one foot above the maximum measured groundwater elevation and are assumed to have not been impacted by groundwater migrating from ash sources. Soil sampling data used in this evaluation, including the range of groundwater elevations for shallow wells in each well cluster and analytical results per well are provided in Table 1. Note that laboratory reporting limit for antimony, arsenic, boron (one sample), cobalt, selenium, and thallium exceeded the North Carolina Protection of Groundwater (POG) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals, as revised in October 2016. Revised laboratory reports that will provide the non -detect values and method detection limits are in the process of being obtained from the lab.