20171242 Ver 1_401 Application_20171017

-,1*4TLAS
IRONMENTAL
2 0 1 7 1 2 4 2
September 26, 2017
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources,
Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. David Shaeffer Attn: Mr. Alan Johnson
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28262 Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: South Fork - Mooresville, LLC ("SFM, LLC') - NW 32 Permit Request
David/Alan:
Please see enclosed the NW 32 request. The Corps settlement agreement negotiations
have resulted in the acceptance of mitigation ratios of 0.1:1 for temporal impacts on
1621 linear feet of stream and 1.75:1 for the 377 linear feet of piped stream impact. A
copy of the DMS acceptance letter is included for your reference.
The stream and buffer preservation area is 1.80 acres. This preservation area was
limited on the right side (looking upstream) due to the close proximity of the property
line. The minimum width on the right side is 0 linear feet and the maximum width on
the right side is 34 linear feet. The minimum width on the left side is 9 linear feet and
the maximum width on the right side is 74 linear feet. The width of the buffer on the
left side was limited by existing stormwater devices and existing stormwater easements.
Impact requests include 0.01 acre of wetland and 1,998 linear feet of stream of which
1,621 linear feet have been restored and will be monitored for five years. Included in
this package for your review are the PCN, an agent authorization form, a USGS
quadrangle location map, a USGS topography map, a two foot topography map, an 8
digit HUC map, the pre -restoration impact map, the DMS stream credit purchase
acceptance letter, the stream restoration as -built report, the stream/buffer protection
mechanism, and the stream/buffer preservation map.
Thank you for your attention to this request. Please let me know if you need any
additional information.
Best regards, p
0 9
Jennifer L Robertson CTO 2017 j
[e-mail] DEQ -WA ER RE RCES
4019& RUFFERE`��
A TLASEnvironmental, Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

O�O� WA TF9pG
y r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit F7 Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 32 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
South Fork Mooresville LLC
2b.
County:
Iredell
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mooresville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no.
not a DOT project
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
South Fork Mooresville LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
2264/1218, 2327/1847
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Kathryn Godley, Manager, South Fork -Mooresville LLC
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 1140
3e.
City, state, zip:
Cornelius, NC 28031
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-577-9021
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
same as above
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
same as above
4d.
Street address:
same as above
4e. City, state, zip:
same as above
4f.
Telephone no.:
same as above
4g. Fax no.:
same as above
4h.
Email address:
same as above
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Jennifer L Robertson
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
712 English Tudor Lane
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28211
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-512-1206
5f.
Fax no.:
n/a
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
4668362455
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Ftitude: 35.623875 Longitude: - -80.808079
1 c.
Property size:
40.51 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
South Fork Withrow Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
South Yadkin Basin
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The site consists of an industrial building, an empty lot, parking lots, a stormwater pond, some forested area,
and a stream corridor
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.2 Acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,998 linear feet
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Permit unauthorized activities, conduct stream restoration activities,
settlement agreement
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Restoration of 1621 LF of stream and
permitting of 377 LF of impacted stream, typical construction equipment was used
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary Final
®
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Jennifer Robertson
Agency/Consultant Company: WNR
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
2007; permit and JD on file and has been previously submitted
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NW 39 in 2007
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on
the site, then complete this question
for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b.
2c.
2d. 2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested Corps (404, 10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 - Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes Corps
0.01
W2 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No -
W3 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No -
W4 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No -
W5 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No -
W6 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No -
2g. Total wetland impacts:
0.01
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to S Fork
Withrow Creek
PER
Corps
3
377
S2 T
Fill
UT to S Fork
PER
Corps
3
163
Withrow Creek
S3 T
Other (Type In)
UT to S Fork
Withrow Creek
PER
Corps
3
624
S4 T
Flooding
UT to S Fork
Withrow Creek
PER
Corps
3
637
S5 T
Other (Type In)
UT to S Fork
Withrow Creek
PER
Corps
3
197
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts:
1998
3i. Comments: See attached impact map, S3 = indirect impacts from sediment, S5 = indirect impacts from sediment
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts:
4g. Comments: there is no longer a jurisdictional open water on site, there is an off-line stormwater pond
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for impact
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6d.
Stream name
6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
mitigation impact impact
required? (square (square
feet) feet
131 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The stream restoration was designed to replace or exceed the amount of aquatic resources that was originally impacted along
the restored section of 1621 LF and to obtain a substantial aquatic resource uplift to accommodate for temporal losses of the
resource.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Downstream waters were protected during construction by pumping around stream sections that were under construction and
by limiting exposed soil.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity none
Quantity none
Quantity none
3c. Comments: none
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
823 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
none square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4h. Comments: 377 LF at 1.75:1 = 660 credits and 1621 LF at 0.1:1= 163 Credits
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
not applicable
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
none
none
3 (2 for Catawba)
none
Zone 2
none
none
1.5
none
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
none
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
not applicable
6h. Comments: no comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24% %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Aqua -swirl system to dry detention pond, Town of Mooresville approved plan
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Mooresville
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Mooresville
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
® Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments: n/a
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
® Yes ❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): resolution of a
NOV
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
n/a
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
n/a
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCHPO GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
70 Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodmaps GIS layer
Jennifer L Robertson
�K+
09/12/2017
Applicant/Agents Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

TMARONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams - Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, or right to purchase holder of the
property identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation
approval and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or WQP.
Project Name:
._toY- 4 745'044
Property Owner of Record:
5't'ul-4 v0- - fYl a a' -&s V, Via= -
Contact Name:
Address:
Address:r.�
Phone/Fax Number:
�� _ Jr �'� ~ 9 e z /
Email Address:
k4 J -A 6Vle y ,�ry /Dry --/y
Project Address:
Project Address:
Tax PIN:
Signature:
Date:
A 7'ZAS Environmental Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206/ 828-712-9205
[e-mail]
www.atlasenvi.com

La
egend
] Project Parcels
USGS Quadrangles
Iredell County
Lake Norman South
USGS Quadrangle Map
Cleveland
Enochville
2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 km

1
USGS Toographic Map
r
t l T Z.— r• +• r � � y..l
91 1
mk
LmmWmmmft
IL r
—Nr 16
vp
y i
' rr' f 1 i1
• I y %
IL
lk%
� f i
Ilk
ai
1
a 1 %q`
i•-� � ��-i-''`� ^,ice i4. 5 ° '
Legend`—
Q Project Parcels "'` �,� ,�' - `•, f C 1''
USGS Topo �z r'�'"{'ter--- 100 0 100 200 300 400 m r
a
o Streetse •_.`''.•-,-.i -- j �' "�-•,R Ar

HUC 8 Watersheds
South Yadkin
Legend
Q Project Parcels
Iredell County 2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 km
Q HUC 8

South Fork Business Park Impact Map
Updated December 5, 2016
8: Indirect Impacts 197 LF ss
7: Stream Impact 637 LF
16: Indirect Impacts 624 LF A s3
5: Rip -Rap 163 LF
4: Stream Fill 350 LF
fl _
3: Wetland Fill 0.01 AC
2: Stream Fill 27 LF
1: Permitted Fill 149 LF
c
Key
N PO
Permitted
Impacted: fill
Impacted: rip -rap ]_MEImpacted: pond/damImpacted: wetland 1
Impacted: indirect -'
Current Inr)act Mari Scale: 1:250
S2
S,
W,
S,
2008

A41kgahon Services
ENVIR 6N MENTAL QUALI TY
September 19, 2017
Kathryn Godley
South Fork Mooresville, LLC
PO Box 1140
Cornelius, NC 28031
Project: South Fork Mooresville
Rn COOI'FR
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: 3/18/2018
County: Iredell
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by
an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
Yadkin 03040102 Warm Stream 823
Upon receipt of payment. DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
erely,
r
Ja s B Stanfill
Ass anagement Supervisor
cc: Jennifer Robertson, agent
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 i 217 W Jones Street Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

South Fork Business Park
Stream Restoration As -Built Report
September 19, 2017
";e
Prepared For:
South Fork — Mooresville, LLC
PO Box 1140
Cornelius NC, 28031
1
Prepared By:
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, NC 28211
-"0
�A
VIRONMENTAL

Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................................3
Restoration and Construction Techniques
.......................................................................................................3
Morphological...................................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion.........................................................................................................................................................4
Photographs......................................................................................................................................................
5
Stream Photographs - September 12017 ........................................................................................................8
NCSAM Evaluations........................................................................................................................................19
As -Built - Pattern and Structure Locations
.....................................................................................................30
As -Built - Profile..............................................................................................................................................33
As -Built - Cross-Sections.................................................................................................................................38
K

Introduction
Impacts to the unnamed tributary to South Fork Withrow Creek, class C water, were results of both
direct and indirect impacts leading to the issuance of an unauthorized activity notice from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers on August 24, 2016. A combination of excessive storm flow directed to the stream
and an impoundment located on the tributary created a system characterized by sediment burying
stream features, storm flows at discharges exceeding natural flow, restricted aquatic life mobility, and
lack of habitat. The stream restoration objectives focused on providing a natural system that was able
to efficiently transport sediment, provide for aquatic life mobility, and restore the channel morphology
(pattern, profile, and dimensions) to provide for stability.
Restoration and Construction Techniques
Stream restoration construction activities on site at the South Fork Business Park parcels owned by
South Fork — Mooresville, LLC began April 10, 2017 and were concluded on July 12, 2017. A total of 16
grade control and habitat forming structures were installed along the approximate 1621 linear feet of
stream from the toe of the slope to the approximate location of the removed dam. No grade control
structures were installed along the section of stream downstream from the sewer line due to channel
migration being restricted by bedrock. In -stream structures consisted primarily of log vanes and steps
with rock structures installed in locations where extra stability was required. There are a total of 9 log
structures (log vanes and steps), 7 large rock structures (j -hooks and cross vanes). Storm water control
devices, Aqua -Swirl units, were installed to treat storm water runoff by removal of TSS. The main unit
sends treated water to the stream via a level spreader through a single 24 inch pipe and the remainder
of the water, from large storm events, is sent to a dry detention basin through a 48 inch pipe.
Stormwater flowing through the 48 inch pipe moves through a forebay separated from the main area of
the pond by riprap and gravel to an outlet that directs the treated water to the stream at the
downstream end of the stream restoration project. The upper Aqua -Swirl system allows for a reduction
in the amount of storm water that is being directed to the stream by the addition of a plate on the inlet
of the 24 inch pipe. The level spreader system that discharges treated stormwater to the stream
consists of a level 24 inch pipe with approximately 100 two inch holes torched into the pipe at varying
elevations. The holes control the discharge stabilizing the stream system by creating a more natural
hydrograph. The water flows through a bio -engineered wetland for additional settling and slowing of
the flow before entering a widened section of the stream.
Morphological
Since completion of the restoration project there have been multiple rainfall events. None of the
storms have produced a measured bank full event but have helped solidify the stream bed and aid in
the development of pool -riffle sequences. Pools downstream of the installed structures are well
developed leading to a defined glide then to riffles. The riffles contain shallow water that has washed
away most of the fine particles remaining from construction. High water marks are visible with no
erosion occurring between any rocks or downstream of the stabilization. Geo -textiles and coir logs are
effectively securing bank material until more vegetation takes root. Along the water's edge and in wet
floodplain areas a wetland seed mix has been sewn along with a general contractor seed blend. During
the visual monitoring there had been substantial germination of the wetland and contractor seed mixes.

Biological
Visual monitoring showed multiple biological indicators of a healthy stream system. Various species of
frogs were observed along with species of snakes like Northern water snake (Nerodia sipedo). While
various families of macro invertebrates were observed along the entire restoration reach they were not as
densely populated as in similar streams. This is expected and insect populations should increase annually.
Tadpoles and crawfish were observed on September 1, 2017. Vegetation along the stream banks
consisted mostly of sedges, polygonum, and saplings native to North Carolina riparian zones and wetlands.
Two wetlands were delineated along floodplains which add to the ecological benefit of the restoration
providing for habitat and flood control.
Conclusion
The extent of the stream restoration project at South Fork Business Park appears to be in good/stable
condition. During the site visit no banks had become undercut and the stream had not become
entrenched anywhere. Shortly after the completion of construction there was a large rainfall event
which was near bank full that contributed to development of the pools, riffles, and streambed materials.
Biological considerations are also indicating restoration goals have been met. Macro invertebrates,
predominantly moderately pollution sensitive families, are establishing along with the presence of
hydrophytic vegetation. Channel morphology is stabilizing with meander evolution and floodplain
formation. The channel bed has become solid with the removal of residual fines and is now
characterized by gravel sediment in riffles.
4

Photographs
Structure 1: Installation
Ndi
�s
Az
i
hh r
Structure 2: Installation
Filling of historic sediment basin
5
• w v
Structure 1: After Installation
Structure 2: After Installation
Filling of historic sediment basin

Looking Upstream from structure 6
h
Aqua Swirl to drainage pipe
Wetland looking upstream
11
Structure 6: After installation
Drainage pipe to wetland
Structure 5: Below wetland

Structure 5: Looking downstream
Below Structure 6: Northern water snake
Grading stream to elevation
7
Structure 6: Looking downstream
'u, -r
Common snapping turtle
Grading stream to elevation

Stream Photographs - September 12017

10

11

--
c s
i
-.�
�y� Y
x.
� f
i..ca€; Structure installation
Filling historic sediment basin�
? ..
Filling bank erosion/failure
12

13

14

a

System Characteristics: 9/l/2017,
ALA
Ih
vegetation on floodplain point
and, Dragon Fly laiwa
Macroinvertebrate (moderately
tolerant) crayfish
Photographs:9/1/2017
ML
OoM habitlWvelc
Thick native vegetation
banks.

17

Pre Restoration Issues
Highly eroded vert ical banks between 3 and 6 ft high
Highly entrenched with no floodplain access
Variations from natural discharge
rn
Very I I inited native vegetation
No riffle/pool sequences for habitat
Stream bu ried by sediment in places
Summary
NC SAM functional uplift
Creation of stable stream
Creation of wetlands adjacent to stream in two
locations
Solid stream bed \� it h varying substrate
Substantial riparian zone
Live stakes are healthy
Some stream shading from shrubs and live stakes
NC SAM uplift] from low to medium
("Itrrent"rneitini
(itic, to sh't(fingand ,"'tern
Will be addressed this winter when live stakes are planted

NC SAM Evaluations
19

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the `Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment won).
PROJECTISITE INFORMATION:
1. Project nerve (if any): South Fork Business 2. Date of evaluation: 8/912016
3. Applicant/owner name: South Fork Mooresville LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental Inc
S. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: South Yadkin HUC 8 on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: South Fork Withrow Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.623400 -80.805720
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): -670
11. Charnel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ©A` ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) ❑Size 4 (2 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes ®No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (01 Oil ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publk:ly uwrmd prupsay ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waleis
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
1. Chan" Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water In pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction 2L fill to the
point of obstructing flow gr a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes g ponded water S[ impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver darns).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reacts metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
®B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current Instabli ty, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamslds area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching (including mosquito ditching))
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplainfintertidal zone access
[examples; causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining wails, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] g too much fkrodplainlintertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching)) gr floodplainiintertidal zone unnaturally absent g{ assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reachlintertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach Alld causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in 'NotesiSketch"
section.
OF Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
01 Other: (explain in'Notes/Sketch' section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions = no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses y OF 5% oysters or other natures hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) t ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple slicks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent F ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation 1.0C, [31 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) g m Eli 5% bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 02 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
BE Little or no habitat
*""REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS"
11. Bsdfonn and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes SNo Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Sedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(ss).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pod -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) => 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Silticlay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
lid. ®Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a• @Yes ❑No Was an In -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑0ther-
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
>1 Numbers over columns refer to `individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and `taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑Adult frogs
❑Aquatic reptiles
❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts.
®Beetles
❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑Dipterans
❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly. dobsonfly larvae)
❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑Other fish
❑ SalamandersAadpoles
®Snails
❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑Tipulid larvae
❑Worms/leeches
lichens, and algal mats)
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB
RB
❑A
❑A
Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B
❑B
Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C
®C
Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples; ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water a 6 inches deep
OB ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
ZE Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (�, 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
OF None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ❑A ©A
❑A 2 100 feet wide g extends to the edge of the watershed
©B OB QB
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
0C ❑C 0
EIC From 30 to < 50 feet wide
CJD ®D OD
®D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
®E ❑E [(E
❑E < 10 feet wide g no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
©A ©A
Mature forest
OB 08
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C []C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
©D ©D
Maintained shrubs
®E [3E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feel), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB R8 LB RB
❑A QA ❑A OA QA QA Row crops
❑B OB ©8 08 08 08 Maintained turf
®C ❑C ©C ®C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)tcommercial horticulture
®D pD OD ❑D CID ®D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
©A OA Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stern density
©C EIC No wooded riparian buffer 2E predominantly herbaceous species 2C bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
C )B QB The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
®C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — stroamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat,
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions, Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
QB ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with ran -native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata Q
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C OC Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent 2E communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non: -characteristic species Q communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
23. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
if No, select one of the following reasons. C3 No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 OB 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E 2 2330
Notes/Sketch:
Water in pools only, remainder of bed was wet but lacking flow

Stream Site Name South Fork Business
Stream Category Pb2
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 8/9/2016
Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental Inc
Notes of Field Assessment Form (YIN)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
(3) Stream Stability
USAGE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
ACCOMP041106 USW MMUal venawn T.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
assessment area and
COPY
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): South Fork Business 2. Date of evaluation: July 12 2017
3. Applicant/owner name: South Fork Mooresville LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Alas Environmental Inc
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: South Yadkin HUC 8 on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: South Fork Withrow Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at krwer end of assessment reach): 35.623400 -80.805720
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): 1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): - 1100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 6 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? []Yes []No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for
Tktal Marsh Stream):
17. Watershed size: (skip
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
❑B
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (a 5 mit)
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water []Classified Trout waters ❑Water Supply watershed (❑I [III ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owrxrd property ❑NCDWR Ripa►ian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Walms
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area,
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pods only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At kkW 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or rifle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction g fill to the
point of obstructing clow gr a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes g ponded water gr impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
®B Not A
S. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Conskler only current Instability, not post events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

Streamside Area Interaction - streamaide area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
ZA SA Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, dawn -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference Interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching (including mosquito ditchingl)
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no fioodplainfintertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] Z too much floodplainlintertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) pr tloodplainAnter0dal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach AW causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in 'Notes/Sketch"
section.
OF Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®l Ether: (explain in "NoteslSketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
Recent Weather - watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, 02 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions 1114 no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
❑Yes ENo Is stream is too targe or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types -assessment reach metric
10a.
❑Yes
®No regraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap), recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mossesN
OF 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) p
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B
Multiple slicks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent ='
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation C,
of Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
OD
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Lillie or no habitat
*"""'"*REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS `*'*'*""**"""""'*'� •""
11. Bedform and
Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.
❑Yes
®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b.
Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
MA
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
[DB
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
❑C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10°x'0, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
0
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
❑
❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Sift/day (< 0.062 mm)
❑
S ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
0
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
®Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. SYes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑ether
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (moo in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to `individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ MAdult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ®Beeties
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
• ❑Asian clam (Corbrcufa)
❑ ❑Crustacean(isopodiamphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
® ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
® ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishily, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicuta)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ®Salamanderstladpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
Z ❑WormsAeeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
nunoff.
LB RB
®A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14 Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Sire 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water;, 6 inches deep
❑B El Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to S inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions aloe to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
®B Ponds (include wet detention basins, do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
J@D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
SE Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment ream (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C urban stream (� 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
OF None of the above
16. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
SB Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated
Wooded
LB
RB
LB
RB
❑A
❑A
❑A
❑A a 100 feet wide Q_rr extends to the edge of the watershed
OB
❑B
OB
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
CC
®C
❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D
❑D
❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E
❑E
❑E
OE < 10 feet wide lu no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for
left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
SC
No wooded riparian buffer Q predominantly herbaceous species Q bare ground
❑A
❑A
Mature forest
OB
❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C
®C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D
❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E
❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet) or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30.50 feet).
�; ; fti%r� +kfiit�ar lnl� � i� afad taxi Ott
Abuts
< 30 feet 3050 feet
LB
RB
LB RB LB RB
❑A
❑A
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B
❑B
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C
❑C
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D
❑D
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem
Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for
left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
NA
❑A
Medium to high stem density
❑B
❑B
Low stem density
❑C
SC
No wooded riparian buffer Q predominantly herbaceous species Q bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
[0A EA The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
©A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
SIB ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is stili largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata ter
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C SC Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent 2E communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species pr communities inappropriately composed of a single species pr no vegetation.
25. Conductivity —assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes E]No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E z 230
Notes/Sketch;
Water in pools only, remainder of bed was wet but lacking flow

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name South Fork Business Date of Assessment
July 12 2017
Stream Category Pat Assessor Name/Organization
Atlas Environmental Inc
(3) Baseflow
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
MEDIUM
USACEI NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
(3) Strearnside Area Attenuation
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Strearnside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
MEDIUM

As -Built - Pattern and Structure Locations
30

657400.000
657200.000
657�,d00.000
656800.000
Legend
As -built
Pipe
Ripr
Strei
--- wed
1462200X00 1462400.000 14626MOC4 1462800.000 1463000.000 1463200.000 1463400.000
1462200.000 1462400.000 1462600.000 1462800.000 1463000.000 1463200.000 1463400.000
W-MOKKIIIII
687000.300
686600.700

687400.000,
687200.000
687W0.00C+
686800.000
686600.000
Legend
— Stream
+ stnou
14624N.0r.%O 1462600.000 146280�.Q09 1463000.000 1463200.000 1463400.000 1463600.000
14624M.&M 1462600.000 1462800.000 1463CJ0.000 1063200.0&• 14634C(I.r00 146300.000
10.000
10>000
►0.000
10.1310
)0.00
bft

As -Built - Profile
33

UT1
Distance along stream (ti)

RIVERMORPH PROFILE SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Profile Name: UT1
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
Survey Data
DIST
CH
WS
BKF Pi P2 P3 P4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10
860.51
860.63
27
859
859.1
28.8
858.02
858.12
50
856.62
856.77
856.75
63
856.52
856.6
65
855.46
855.58
105
854.23
.854.29
106
853.28
853.81
119
853.46
853.6
122
852.54
852.92
136
852.77
852.83
138
851.09
851.87
150
851.85
851.9
852.28
158
851.75
851.85
160
850.94
851.07
229
849.76
849.81
231
848.15
848.46
250
848.17
848.37
849.38
276
848.03
848.19
309
847.86
847.98
345
847.82
847.96
350
844.93
846.48
848.44
401
845.32
846.4
410
846.16
846.39
413
843.75
845.75
450
845.68
845.89
846.59
492
845.37
845.47
550
844.08
844.49
844.94
578
844.39
844.48
579
843.71
844.25
621
843.89
844.01
623
842.89
843.85
650
843.51
843.59
844.77
712
843.16
843.21
715
841.18
842
750
841.69
841.74
842.85
762
841.69
841.87
763
840.79
841.51
817
840.61
840.75
819
840.22
840.43
850
839.92
840.07
840.73
888
839.45
839.55
916
838.84
838.94
918
838.35
838.65
950
838.07
838.21
838.87
952
837.59
837.71
1014
836.83
836.94
1015
835.74
836
1019
836.02
836.18
1022
836.1
836.22
3�

1024
836.18
836.35
1050
835.97
836.1 836.71
1057
835.78
835.9
1105
835
835.19
1115
834.82
834.93 836.09
1127
834.63
834.72
Cross Section / Bank Profile Locations
Name
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Type
Profile Station
XS1
Run XS
SO
X52
Glide XS
150
XS3
Riffle XS
250
XS4
Pool XS
350
XS5
Riffle XS
450
XS6
Riffle XS
550
XS7
Run XS
650
x58
Riffle XS
750
XS9
Glide XS
850
XS1O
Run XS
950
XSll
Riffle XS
1050
XS12
Riffle XS
1115
Measurements from Graph
Bankfull slope: 0
variable
Min
Avg
Max
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S riffle
0
0
0
S pool
0
0
0
S run
0
0
0
S glide
0
0
0
S step
0
0
0
P- P
0
0
0
Pool length
0
0
0
Riffle length
0
0
0
Dmax riffle
0
0
0
Dmax pool
0
0
0
Dmax run
0
0
0
Dmax glide
0
0
0
Dmax step
0
0
0
Low bank ht
0
0
0
Length and depth measurements
in
feet, slopes in ft/ft.
RIVERMORPH
PROFILE SUMMARY
Notes
River Name: UT to South Fork withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Profile Name: UT1
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
DIST Note
10
Riffle
27
LOG
28.8
Pool
50
Riffle
63
LOG
65
Pool
3b

105
106
119
122
136
138
150
158
160
229
231
2 50
276
309
345
350
401
410
413
450
492
550
578
579
621
623
650
712
715
750
763
817
819
850
888
916
918
950
952
1014
1015
1019
1057
1105
1127
Rock vane
Pool
LOG
Pool
Rock vane
Pool
Ri ffl e
LOG
Riffle
Rock vane
Pool
Riffle
UPST end of wetland
DNST end of wetland
Rock J Hook
Pool
Pool
Rock vane
Pool
Glide
Riffle
Pool
LOG
Riffle
Rock J Hook
Pool
Ri ffl e
LOG
Pool
Glide
Riffle
LOG
Pool
Glide
Riffle
Rock J Hook
Pool
Riffle
Riffle
LOG
Pool
Glide
Riffle
Pond outflow
Sewer Line
3/

As -Built - Cross -Sections
38

xS1
♦ We Sf— Pan.
Horizontal Distance (ft)
39

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: XS1
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 857.17 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.1 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0
0
857.27
------------------
2
0.1667
857.1
856.75
4
0.3333
856.94
-----
6
0.5
856.77
6.22
8
0.4167
856.85
BKF
10
0.875
856.4
LEW
11
1.09
856.18
TW
12
0.9167
856.35
31.1
14
0.9167
856.35
1.25
16
0.9167
856.35
REW
18
0.625
856.65
BKF
20
0.6042
856.67
14.67
22
0.4167
856.85
20.89
22.5
0.25
857.02
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: shields Curve
Slope
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left Side Right Side
0.037 0 0
0.65
39.2
4u
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
857.32
857.32
857.32
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
856.75
856.75
856.75
Floodprone width (ft)
22.5
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
12.44
6.23
6.22
Entrenchment Ratio
1.81
_----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.28
0.37
0.2
Maximum De th (ft)
0.57
0.57
0.4
width/Depth Ratio
44.43
16.97
31.1
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
3.53
2.29
1.25
wetted Perimeter (ft)
12.55
6.7
6.64
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.28
0.34
0.19
Begin BKF Station
8.44
8.44
14.67
End BKF Station
20.89
14.67
20.89
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: shields Curve
Slope
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left Side Right Side
0.037 0 0
0.65
39.2
4u

XS2
0 C—d P.. ♦ 8..ka T W.. Sufaca Pawns
Horizontal Distance (ft)
41

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: XS2
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 852.85 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0
0
852.86
-
2
0.3333
852.53
852.28
4
0.375
852.49
-----
6
0.1667
852.69
2
8
0.4167
852.44
10
0.5833
852.28
BKF
12
0.9167
851.94
LWE
13
1
851.86
TW
14
0.5833
852.28
BKF
16
0.4167
852.44
2.43
18
0.375
852.49
0.24
20
0.2083
852.65
12
22
0
852.86
14
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: shields Curve
Slope
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left Side Right Side
0.037 0 0
0.53
31.1
4L
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
852.7
852.7
852.7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
852.28
852.28
852.28
Floodprone width (ft)
19.51
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
4
2
2
Entrenchment Ratio
4.88
Mean Depth (ft)
0.23
0.17
0.29
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.42
0.34
0.42
Width/Depth Ratio
17.39
11.76
6.9
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
0.93
0.34
0.59
wetted Perimeter (ft)
4.12
2.37
2.43
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.23
0.14
0.24
Begin BKF Station
10
10
12
End BKF Station
14
12
14
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: shields Curve
Slope
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left Side Right Side
0.037 0 0
0.53
31.1
4L

Et,
(u) WJUe191O MUOZMOH
--d —WV -RM anieaNW Mn. -S ♦ M d —M 0
ESX

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: XS3
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 851.37 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0.1
851.28
850.58
2
1.6
849.78
849.38
4
2
849.38
BKF
4.8
2.6
848.78
5.5
6
2.7
848.68
-----
8
2.7
848.68
0.87
10
2.8
848.58
REW
12
3.2
848.18
TW
14
2.8
848.58
LEW
15
2
849.38
BKF
16
0.9
850.48
0.72
17
0.5
850.88
9.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope 0.037 0 0
shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 1.66
Movable Particle (mm) 562.5
44
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
850.58
850.58
850.58
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
849.38
849.38
849.38
Floodprone width (ft)
15.32
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
11
5.5
5.5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.39
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.76
0.64
0.87
Maximum Depth (ft)
1.2
0.77
1.2
Width/Depth Ratio
14.47
8.58
6.32
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
8.32
3.53
4.79
wetted Perimeter (ft)
11.57
6.48
6.64
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.72
0.54
0.72
Begin BKF Station
4
4
9.5
End BKF Station
15
9.5
15
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields curve
channel Left side Right side
Slope 0.037 0 0
shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 1.66
Movable Particle (mm) 562.5
44

XS4
0 C,-. P -
Horizontal Distance (ft)
45

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross section Name: XS4
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 849.93 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0.2
849.74
851.94
2
0.95
848.99
848.44
4
0.9
849.04
-----
5.8
1.5
848.44
BKF
6.6
2.8
847.14
LEW
7
3.3
846.64
2.74
8
4.2
845.74
3.5
10
5
844.94
TW
12
4.5
845.44
11.25
13.8
3.2
846.74
REW
14
1.5
848.44
BKF
15
0.3
849.64
9.9
16
0.2
849.74
14
17
0
849.94
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: shields Curve
Slope
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left Side Right Side
0.018 0 0
1.98
818.4
40
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
851.94
851.94
851.94
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
848.44
848.44
848.44
Floodprone width (ft)
17
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
8.2
4.1
4.1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.07
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
2.5
2.25
2.74
Maximum Depth (ft)
3.5
3.46
3.5
width/Depth Ratio
3.28
1.82
1.5
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
20.49
9.24
11.25
wetted Perimeter (ft)
11.66
9.02
9.56
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
1.76
1.02
1.18
Begin BKF Station
5.8
5.8
9.9
End BKF Station
14
9.9
14
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: shields Curve
Slope
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left Side Right Side
0.018 0 0
1.98
818.4
40

XS5
0 G—� Pa . Im—..
Horizontal Distance (ft)
47

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: XS5
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 847.48 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0.6
846.89
847.49
2
0.7
846.79
846.59
4
1.1
846.39
-----
6
1.1
846.39
BKF
7.6
1.4
846.09
-----
9
1.6
845.89
REW
10.2
1.8
845.69
TW
12
1.6
845.89
10
13
1.5
845.99
LEW
14
1.5
845.99
7.19
15
1.2
846.29
0.55
16
0.7
846.79
BKF
17
0.4
847.09
15.6
18
0.3
847.19
19
0.3
847.19
20
0
847.49
-- --------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.018 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.54
Movable Particle (mm) 31.6
46
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
847.49
847.49
847.49
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
846.59
846.59
846.59
Floodprone width (ft)
20
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
12.6
6.3
6.3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.59
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.48
0.34
0.63
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.9
0.75
0.9
width/Depth Ratio
26.25
18.74
10
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
6.09
2.12
3.97
wetted Perimeter (ft)
12.81
7.12
7.19
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.48
0.3
0.55
Begin BKF Station
3
3
9.3
End BKF Station
15.6
9.3
15.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.018 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.54
Movable Particle (mm) 31.6
46

XS6
0 G-. P-
Honzontal Distance (ft)
49

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: XS6
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 845.88 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
845.89
845.79
2
0.03
845.86
844.94
4
0.5
845.39
-----
6
0.9
844.99
BKF
7.2
1.5
844.39
REW
7.8
1.8
844.09
TW
9
1.4
844.49
0.37
10
1.4
844.49
31.33
11
1.3
844.59
LEW
12
1.15
844.74
5.11
13
1
844.89
BKF
14
1.1
844.79
10.8
16
0.9
844.99
15.5
17
0.4
845.49
18
0
845.89
-
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified shields Curve
Channel Left side Right Side
Slope 0.018 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft) 0.35
Movable Particle (mm) 70.0
�u
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
845.79
845.79
845.79
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
844.94
844.94
844.94
Floodprone width (ft)
15.45
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
9.4
4.7
4.7
Entrenchment Ratio
1.64
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.32
0.49
0.15
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.85
0.85
0.37
width/Depth Ratio
29.38
9.69
31.33
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.97
2.28
0.68
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
9.71
5.34
5.11
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.31
0.43
0.13
Begin BKF Station
6.1
6.1
10.8
End BKF Station
15.5
10.8
15.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified shields Curve
Channel Left side Right Side
Slope 0.018 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft) 0.35
Movable Particle (mm) 70.0
�u

XS7
G -M P -
Horizontal Distance (ft)
51

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: XS7
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 845.11 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0
0.3
844.82
-----------------------
2
0.5
844.62
844.17
4
0.8
844.32
6
1
844.12
BKF
8
1.3
843.82
-----
10
1.5
843.62
REW
10.6
1.55
843.57
0.65
11.6
1.6
843.52
TW
12.7
1.55
843.57
2.23
13.6
1.4
843.72
LEW
14
1.1
844.02
0.42
15
0.9
844.22
BKF
16
0.6
844.52
14.75
18
0.2
844.92
18.5
0
845.12
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.02 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.47
Movable Particle (mm) 27.1
')L
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
844.82
844.82
844.82
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
844.17
844.17
844.17
Floodprone width (ft)
17.5
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
9.25
4.63
4.62
Entrenchment Ratio
1.89
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.39
0.3
0.48
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.65
0.56
0.65
width/Depth Ratio
23.72
15.48
9.63
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
3.62
1.38
2.23
wetted Perimeter (ft)
9.42
5.23
5.31
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.38
0.26
0.42
Begin BKF Station
5.5
5.5
10.13
End BKF Station
14.75
10.13
14.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.02 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.47
Movable Particle (mm) 27.1
')L

XS8
O G—d Po . ♦ ssmwe nam»ias ♦ W— re.. corms
Horizontal Distance (ft)
53

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: X58
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
--
Cross Section Data Entry - -
BM Elevation: 843.59 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0
0
--------------------------------------
843.6
844
2
0.3
843.3
842.85
4
0.5
843.1
-
5
0.7
842.9
BKF
6
1.1
842.5
-----
7.2
1.3
842.3
0.79
7.7
1.75
841.85
REW
8.8
1.9
841.7
TW
9.5
1.8
841.8
2.91
10.4
1.7
841.9
LEW
11.6
1.4
842.2
0.57
12.4
0.8
842.8
BKF
13
0.4
843.2
12.48
15
0.1
843.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.02 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.82
Movable Particle (mm) 54.0
�4
Channel
Left
Right
Fl oodp rune Elevation (ft)
844
844
844
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
842.85
842.85
842.85
Floodprone width (ft)
15
-
Bankfull width (ft)
7.35
3.68
3.68
Entrenchment Ratio
2.04
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.62
0.79
Maximum Depth (ft)
1.15
1.15
1.15
width/Depth Ratio
10.5
5.98
4.66
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
5.18
2.26
2.91
wetted Perimeter (ft)
7.88
5.09
5.09
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.66
0.44
0.57
Begin BKF Station
5.12
5.12
8.8
End BKF Station
12.48
8.8
12.48
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.02 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.82
Movable Particle (mm) 54.0
�4

SS
(U) -e)SIO iW-ZPOH
W-d—Y'S-WMA tblahWl/OWW♦ Mid W^ !)
6SX

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross section Name: XS9
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 841.47 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
841.48
841.53
2
0.4
841.08
840.73
4
0.55
840.93
-----
5
0.8
840.68
BKF
6
1.2
840.28
-----
6.8
1.35
840.13
RWE
7.07
1.5
839.98
0.65
8.6
1.55
839.93
TW
9.3
1.4
840.08
LWE
10.5
1.3
840.18
6.2
12
1.4
840.08
0.32
13
1
840.48
10.32
14
0.95
840.53
15.83
15
1
840.48
16
0.7
840.78
BKF
18
0.5
840.98
20
0
841.48
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0.02 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.57
Movable Particle (mm) 34.1
�b
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
841.53
841.53
841.53
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
840.73
840.73
840.73
Floodprone width (ft)
20
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
11.03
5.52
5.51
Entrenchment Ratio
1.81
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.47
0.57
0.36
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.65
width/Depth Ratio
23.47
9.61
15.31
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
5.17
3.17
2
wetted Perimeter (ft)
11.31
6.24
6.2
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.46
0.51
0.32
Begin BKF Station
4.8
4.8
10.32
End BKF Station
15.83
10.32
15.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0.02 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.57
Movable Particle (mm) 34.1
�b

xS10
Ocraw vanes Wes • W" Swf_ nes.
Horizontal Distance (ft)
57

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
cross Section Name: XS10
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 839.81 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0
0
839.82
---------------------------
2
0.55
839.27
838.87
4
1.1
838.72
BKF
5.4
1.4
838.42
3.47
6.5
1.6
838.22
REW
7.6
1.75
838.07
TW
9
1.7
838.12
LEW
9.9
1.45
838.37
5.26
10.5
0.85
838.97
2.28
11
0.8
839.02
BKF
12
0.25
839.57
0.51
13
0
839.82
6.93
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Slope
Shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left side Right Side
0.017 0 0
0.53
31.0
.36
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
839.671
839.67
83967
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
838.87
838.87
838.87
Floodprone width (ft)
11.85
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
6.95
3.48
3.47
Entrenchment Ratio
1.71
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.52
0.39
0.66
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.8
0.71
0.8
width/Depth Ratio
13.37
8.91
5.26
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
3.64
1.36
2.28
wetted Perimeter (ft)
7.27
4.26
4.43
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.5
0.32
0.51
Begin BKF Station
3.45
3.45
6.93
End BKF Station
10.4
6.93
10.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Slope
Shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left side Right Side
0.017 0 0
0.53
31.0
.36

xS1 1
B.w*A WAo ♦ VV" SIO— Pe
Horizontal Distance (111)
59

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: XS11
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 838.47 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.01 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
838.48
837.44
1
0.7
837.78
836.71
2
1.2
837.28
2.6
1.3
837.18
3.89
4
1.85
836.63
BKF
6
2
836.48
0.49
7
2.05
836.43
0.73
8.3
2.4
836.08
RWE
9.1
2.5
835.98
Tw
9.6
2.4
836.08
LWE
10.1
2.2
836.28
0.42
11
2.1
836.38
7.69
11.7
1.7
836.78
BKF
13
1.3
837.18
15
0.7
837.78
17
0
838.48
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
------------------------------------------------------------ ------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.017 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.36
Movable Particle (mm) 19.1
bu
channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
837.44
837.44
837.44
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
836.71
836.71
836.71
Floodprone width (ft)
12.19
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
7.78
3.89
3.89
Entrenchment Ratio
1.57
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.35
0.21
0.49
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.73
0.47
0.73
Width/Depth Ratio
22.23
18.24
7.94
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.75
0.83
1.92
wetted Perimeter (ft)
8
4.41
4.52
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.34
0.19
0.42
Begin BKF Station
3.8
3.8
7.69
End BKF Station
11.58
7.69
11.58
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0.017 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft) 0.36
Movable Particle (mm) 19.1
bu

XS12
"Au ft-W. ♦ W.. SO- P. -
Horizontal Distance (ft)
61

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: UT to South Fork Withrow Creek
Reach Name: Reach 1
Cross Section Name: XS12
Survey Date: 07/13/2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 838.07 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0.07 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
0
0
838.14
-----------------------
2
0.6
837.54
836.09
4
0.9
837.24
-----
5.8
1.9
836.24
BKF
7
2.4
835.74
-----
8.2
3
835.14
RWE
11
3
835.14
1.2
13
3.2
834.94
5.45
13.7
3.25
834.89
TW
14.5
3.1
835.04
LWE
16
2.2
835.94
BKF
17
1.3
836.84
11.16
19
0.6
837.54
16.17
20
0.4
837.74
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cross Sectional Geometry
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Slope
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left side Right Side
0.017 0 0
0.84
56.3
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
837.29
837.29
837.29
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
836.09
836.09
836.09
Floodprone width (ft)
14.62
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
10.01
5
5.01
Entrenchment Ratio
1.46
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.83
0.75
0.92
Maximum Depth (ft)
1.2
0.97
1.2
width/Depth Ratio
12.06
6.68
5.45
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
8.32
3.74
4.58
wetted Perimeter (ft)
10.55
6.18
6.3
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.79
0.61
0.73
Begin BKF Station
6.16
6.16
11.16
End BKF Station
16.17
11.16
16.17
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Shields Curve
Slope
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel Left side Right Side
0.017 0 0
0.84
56.3

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
IREDELL COUNTY
CONSERVATION DECLARATION
This DECLARATION of CONSERVATION COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, and
RESTRICTIONS ("Declaration") is made on this day of , 2017, by South
Fork -Mooresville, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, 20940 Bethelwood Lane,
Cornelius, North Carolina 28031 ("Declarant").
RECITALS & CONSERVATION PURPOSES
A. Declarant is the sole owner in fee simple of the certain Conservation Property
(Property) being approximately 1.80 acres, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and
B. The purpose of this Conservation Declaration is to maintain wetland and/or riparian
resources and other natural values of the Property, and prevent the use or development of the
Property for any purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of the Property
in its natural condition. The preservation of the Property in its natural condition is a condition of
Department of the Army permit Action ID No. SAW -2008-00363 issued by the Wilmington
District Corps of Engineers (Corps), required to mitigate for unavoidable impacts to waters of the
United States authorized by that permit, and this Conservation Declaration may therefore be
enforced by the United States of America.
NOW, THEREFORE the Declarant hereby unconditionally and irrevocably declares that the
Property shall be held and subject to the following restrictions, covenants and conditions as set out
herein, to run with the subject real property and be binding on all parties that have or shall have
any right, title, or interest in said property.
ARTICLE I. PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Property inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Declaration is prohibited. The Property shall be maintained in its natural, scenic, and open
condition and restricted from any development or use that would impair or interfere with the
conservation purposes of this Conservation Declaration set forth above.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly
prohibited or restricted, with the exception of actions necessary to implement and monitor the
effectiveness of work described in the Restoration Plan adopted under the Non -Judicial Settlement
Agreement between South Fork — Mooresville, LLC and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
("Restoration Plan") (available by request from the Corps, Wilmington District, [phone],
69 Darlington Ave, Wilmington NC 28403).
f0030401 v 4 }
301093577 v2

A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Property or any introduction of non-native plants and/or
animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile
home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility pole,
tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure or facility
on or above the Property, excluding construction related to the maintenance, repair, replacement,
or enhancement within the existing 25' sanitary sewer easement depicted in Exhibit A.
[Alternatively, the conservation property described in Exhibit A will exclude the property within
the sanitary sewer easement.]
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any right of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Property are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or
mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation on the Property.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on
the property.
G. Siege. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Property, except the posting
of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Property, signs giving
directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Property and/or signs identifying
the Grantor as owner of the property.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous waste,
or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the
Property is prohibited.
1. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals
or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Property,
except to restore natural topography or drainage patterns.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering
with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or
created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface
or underground water into, within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of
wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or
biocides is prohibited.
{00304011 v 4 } 2
301093577 v2

K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Declaration shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable
development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited.
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Property which is or may
become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Property substantially
in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE II. ENFORCEMENT & REMEDIES
A. This Declaration is intended to ensure continued compliance with the mitigation
condition of authorizations issued by the United States of America, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, and therefore may be enforced by the United States of America. This
covenant is to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under
the Declarant.
B. Corps, its employees and agents and its successors and assigns, have the right, with
reasonable notice, to enter the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the
Property to determine whether the Declarant, Declarant's representatives, or assigns are complying
with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Declaration.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Declaration shall be construed to entitle
Corps to bring any action against Declarant for any injury or change in the Conservation Property
caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Declarant's control, including, without
limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith
by the Declarant under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to
life, damage to Property or harm to the Property resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE III. PUBLIC ACCESS
A. This Conservation Declaration does not convey to the public the right to enter the
Property for any purpose whatsoever.
ARTICLE IV. DOCUMENTATION AND TITLE
A. Conservation Property Condition. The Declarant represents and acknowledges that
the Property is currently undeveloped land, with no improvements other than any existing utility
lines, Declarations rights of way, and improvements made pursuant to the Restoration Plan.
B. Title. The Declarant covenants and represents that the Declarant is the sole owner
and is seized of the Property in fee simple and has good right to make the herein Declaration; that
there is legal access to the Property, that the Property is free and clear of any and all encumbrances,
except Declarations, utility lines, and rights of way of record.
{00304011 v 4 }
301093577 v2

ARTICLE V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. Conservation Purpose.
(1) Declarant, for itself, its successors and assigns, agrees that this
Conservation Property shall be held exclusively for conservation purposes.
B. Entire Agreement. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties
with respect to the Conservation Declaration and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Declaration. If any provision is found
to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Conservation Declaration, and the application
of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid,
shall not be affected thereby.
C. Recording. Declarant shall record this instrument and any amendment hereto in
timely fashion in the official records of Iredell County, North Carolina, and may re-record it at any
time as may be required to preserve its rights.
D. Environmental Condition of Conservation Property. The Declarant warrants and
represents that to the best of its knowledge after appropriate inquiry and investigation: (a) the
Property described herein is and at all times hereafter will continue to be in full compliance with
all federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, and (b) as of the date hereof there
are no hazardous materials, substances, wastes, or environmentally regulated substances
(including, without limitation, any materials containing asbestos) located on, in or under the
Property or used in connection therewith, and that there is no environmental condition existing on
the Property that may prohibit or impede use of the Property for the purposes set forth in the
Recitals.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has hereunto set her hand and seal, the day and year first
above written.
DECLARANT:
South Fork -Mooresville, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
Kathryn B. Godley
Manager
{00304011 v 4 } 4
301093577 v2

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, the undersigned Notary Public of the afore -said State and County, do hereby certify that
Kathryn B. Godley personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged that she is the
Manager of South Fork -Mooresville, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, and that by
authority duly given and as the act of such entity, she signed the foregoing instrument in its name
on its behalf as its act and deed.
Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal, this day of 92017.
(Official Seal)
Notary Public
Print or type name
{00304011 v 4 }
301093577 v2

S.
DRAFT CO
C v °
RIK
=1 e
'Wy
� o�Riutwn. ioaae.c�Uswe Usr Wil
'IIF ftNft r cnRol rvcRncr m0
i Vqp
W
116,
INP
9 a vii
� a rssl,arrrvr V ��
C. .5. MCN UMENT
"PEACON"
uzu.II o
K_ 11611AQ
MK
N 585,005
L1453.914 Cm
OT to rvrv sorvE
FOOT Irwr) ea
Ust
sa
LOT 1�
SURVEYORS NOTES
ITI -Y Bt N1111OT TO
OR GODIF
r` Z/'ZD.
", , 111111-
v�v -1 s srIll
0
5) M."�m�'mn B"n q se,baa �o;au,r y o50yo.`, q oaeme�..
1) r r,
r
IR
Ir
LOT I I s _ rv,o.u» cx f
�O` •exs s ' ` c
IOI 12 1 O 10 - - - ..
wx ww
�_
I I LOT 9 �- - - - a _._waeur secs'
INUNCER ROA T
I G.>
r � LOT e I Lor 7 ss Rueuc R/w
a)T1.aaa ore
s)ocE r . 1264 -1 1218 AND 1121 Pc ,e", LOT s LCT a
ia) uca�° i_0r 5
NDTex
.1 N Q B
C
L3
w,rEa v Pao,[CTIN -P a iar°ccr courvn. Q e€ i
,p r,x,ox ansa-is-zass e -:ea
GRAPHIC SCALE: -•c
I
I
I
v
S.
DRAFT CO
C v °
RIK
=1 e
'Wy
� o�Riutwn. ioaae.c�Uswe Usr Wil
'IIF ftNft r cnRol rvcRncr m0
i Vqp
W
116,
INP
9 a vii
� a rssl,arrrvr V ��
C. .5. MCN UMENT
"PEACON"
uzu.II o
K_ 11611AQ
MK
N 585,005
L1453.914 Cm
OT to rvrv sorvE
FOOT Irwr) ea
Ust
sa
LOT 1�
SURVEYORS NOTES
ITI -Y Bt N1111OT TO
OR GODIF
r` Z/'ZD.
", , 111111-
v�v -1 s srIll
0
5) M."�m�'mn B"n q se,baa �o;au,r y o50yo.`, q oaeme�..
1) r r,
r
IR
Ir
LOT I I s _ rv,o.u» cx f
�O` •exs s ' ` c
IOI 12 1 O 10 - - - ..
wx ww
�_
I I LOT 9 �- - - - a _._waeur secs'
INUNCER ROA T
I G.>
r � LOT e I Lor 7 ss Rueuc R/w
a)T1.aaa ore
s)ocE r . 1264 -1 1218 AND 1121 Pc ,e", LOT s LCT a
ia) uca�° i_0r 5
NDTex
.1 N Q B
C
L3
w,rEa v Pao,[CTIN -P a iar°ccr courvn. Q e€ i
,p r,x,ox ansa-is-zass e -:ea
GRAPHIC SCALE: -•c